1
|
Wang Z, Kumaran M, Batsel E, Testor-Cabrera S, Beine Z, Alvarez Ribelles A, Tsoulfas P, Venkatesh I, Blackmore MG. Single-Nuclei Sequencing Reveals a Robust Corticospinal Response to Nearby Axotomy But Overall Insensitivity to Spinal Injury. J Neurosci 2025; 45:e1508242024. [PMID: 39746824 PMCID: PMC11841758 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1508-24.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
The ability of neurons to sense and respond to damage is crucial for maintaining homeostasis and facilitating nervous system repair. For some cell types, notably dorsal root ganglia and retinal ganglion cells, extensive profiling has uncovered a significant transcriptional response to axon injury, which influences survival and regenerative outcomes. In contrast, the injury responses of most supraspinal cell types, which display limited regeneration after spinal damage, remain mostly unknown. In this study, we used single-nuclei sequencing in adult male and female mice to profile the transcriptional responses of diverse supraspinal cell types to spinal injury. Surprisingly, thoracic spinal injury induced only modest changes in gene expression across all populations, including corticospinal tract (CST) neurons. Additionally, CST neurons exhibited minimal response to cervical injury but showed a much stronger reaction to intracortical axotomy, with upregulation of numerous regeneration and apoptosis-related transcripts shared with injured DRG and RGC neurons. Thus, the muted response of CST neurons to spinal injury is linked to the injury's distal location, rather than intrinsic cellular characteristics. More broadly, these findings indicate that a central challenge for enhancing regeneration after a spinal injury is the limited detection of distant injuries and the subsequent modest baseline neuronal response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zimei Wang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233
| | - Manojkumar Kumaran
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad 500007, India
| | - Elizabeth Batsel
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233
| | - Sofia Testor-Cabrera
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233
| | - Zac Beine
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233
| | | | - Pantelis Tsoulfas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136
| | - Ishwariya Venkatesh
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad 500007, India
| | - Murray G Blackmore
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang X, Zhou B. Unleashing metabolic power for axonal regeneration. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2025; 36:161-175. [PMID: 39069446 DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2024.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Axon regeneration requires the mobilization of intracellular resources, including proteins, lipids, and nucleotides. After injury, neurons need to adapt their metabolism to meet the biosynthetic demands needed to achieve axonal regeneration. However, the exact contribution of cellular metabolism to this process remains elusive. Insights into the metabolic characteristics of proliferative cells may illuminate similar mechanisms operating in axon regeneration; therefore, unraveling previously unappreciated roles of metabolic adaptation is critical to achieving neuron regrowth, which is connected to the therapeutic strategies for neurological conditions necessitating nerve repairs, such as spinal cord injury and stroke. Here, we outline the metabolic role in axon regeneration and discuss factors enhancing nerve regrowth, highlighting potential novel metabolic treatments for restoring nerve function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyan Yang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Bing Zhou
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Z, Kumaran M, Batsel E, Testor-Cabrera S, Beine Z, Ribelles AA, Tsoulfas P, Venkatesh I, Blackmore MG. Injury distance limits the transcriptional response to spinal injury. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.27.596075. [PMID: 38854133 PMCID: PMC11160615 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.27.596075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
The ability of neurons to sense and respond to damage is fundamental to homeostasis and nervous system repair. For some cell types, notably dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), extensive profiling has revealed a large transcriptional response to axon injury that determines survival and regenerative outcomes. In contrast, the injury response of most supraspinal cell types, whose limited regeneration constrains recovery from spinal injury, is mostly unknown. Here we employed single-nuclei sequencing in mice to profile the transcriptional responses of diverse supraspinal cell types to spinal injury. Surprisingly, thoracic spinal injury triggered only modest changes in gene expression across all populations, including corticospinal tract (CST) neurons. Moreover, CST neurons also responded minimally to cervical injury but much more strongly to intracortical axotomy, including upregulation of numerous regeneration and apoptosis-related transcripts shared with injured DRG and RGC neurons. Thus, the muted response of CST neuron to spinal injury is linked to the injury's distal location, rather than intrinsic cellular characteristics. More broadly, these findings indicate that a central challenge for enhancing regeneration after a spinal injury is the limited sensing of distant injuries and the subsequent modest baseline neuronal response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zimei Wang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Manojkumar Kumaran
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) – Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Elizabeth Batsel
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | - Zac Beine
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | - Pantelis Tsoulfas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136
| | - Ishwariya Venkatesh
- Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) – Center for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tian T, Zhang S, Yang M. Recent progress and challenges in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Protein Cell 2023; 14:635-652. [PMID: 36856750 PMCID: PMC10501188 DOI: 10.1093/procel/pwad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts the structural and functional connectivity between the higher center and the spinal cord, resulting in severe motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction with a variety of complications. The pathophysiology of SCI is complicated and multifaceted, and thus individual treatments acting on a specific aspect or process are inadequate to elicit neuronal regeneration and functional recovery after SCI. Combinatory strategies targeting multiple aspects of SCI pathology have achieved greater beneficial effects than individual therapy alone. Although many problems and challenges remain, the encouraging outcomes that have been achieved in preclinical models offer a promising foothold for the development of novel clinical strategies to treat SCI. In this review, we characterize the mechanisms underlying axon regeneration of adult neurons and summarize recent advances in facilitating functional recovery following SCI at both the acute and chronic stages. In addition, we analyze the current status, remaining problems, and realistic challenges towards clinical translation. Finally, we consider the future of SCI treatment and provide insights into how to narrow the translational gap that currently exists between preclinical studies and clinical practice. Going forward, clinical trials should emphasize multidisciplinary conversation and cooperation to identify optimal combinatorial approaches to maximize therapeutic benefit in humans with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Tian
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Sensen Zhang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Maojun Yang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- Cryo-EM Facility Center, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhu Y, Luan C, Gong L, Gu Y, Wang X, Sun H, Chen Z, Zhou Q, Liu C, Shan Q, Gu X, Zhou S. SnRNA-seq reveals the heterogeneity of spinal ventral horn and mechanism of motor neuron axon regeneration. iScience 2023; 26:107264. [PMID: 37502257 PMCID: PMC10368823 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal motor neurons, the distinctive neurons of the central nervous system, extend into the peripheral nervous system and have outstanding ability of axon regeneration after injury. Here, we explored the heterogeneity of spinal ventral horn cells after rat sciatic nerve crush via single-nuclei RNA sequencing. Interestingly, regeneration mainly occurred in a Sncg+ and Anxa2+ motor neuron subtype (MN2) surrounded by a newly emerged microglia subtype (Mg6) after injury. Subsequently, microglia depletion slowed down the regeneration of sciatic nerve. OPCs were also involved into the regeneration process. Knockdown of Cacna2d2 in vitro and systemic blocking of Cacna2d2 in vivo improved the axon growth ability, hinting us the importance of Ca2+. Ultimately, we proposed three possible phases of motor neuron axon regeneration: preparation stage, early regeneration stage, and regeneration stage. Taken together, our study provided a resource for deciphering the underlying mechanism of motor neuron axon regeneration in a single cell dimension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Zhu
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Chengcheng Luan
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Leilei Gong
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Yun Gu
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Xinghui Wang
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Hualin Sun
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Zhifeng Chen
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Qiang Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Qi Shan
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Xiaosong Gu
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300000, China
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| | - Songlin Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226001, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandra O, Sharma M, Pandey N, Jha IP, Mishra S, Kong SL, Kumar V. Patterns of transcription factor binding and epigenome at promoters allow interpretable predictability of multiple functions of non-coding and coding genes. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:3590-3603. [PMID: 37520281 PMCID: PMC10371796 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the biological roles of all genes only through experimental methods is challenging. A computational approach with reliable interpretability is needed to infer the function of genes, particularly for non-coding RNAs. We have analyzed genomic features that are present across both coding and non-coding genes like transcription factor (TF) and cofactor ChIP-seq (823), histone modifications ChIP-seq (n = 621), cap analysis gene expression (CAGE) tags (n = 255), and DNase hypersensitivity profiles (n = 255) to predict ontology-based functions of genes. Our approach for gene function prediction was reliable (>90% balanced accuracy) for 486 gene-sets. PubMed abstract mining and CRISPR screens supported the inferred association of genes with biological functions, for which our method had high accuracy. Further analysis revealed that TF-binding patterns at promoters have high predictive strength for multiple functions. TF-binding patterns at the promoter add an unexplored dimension of explainable regulatory aspects of genes and their functions. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive analysis for the functional-specificity of TF-binding patterns at promoters and used them for clustering functions to reveal many latent groups of gene-sets involved in common major cellular processes. We also showed how our approach could be used to infer the functions of non-coding genes using the CRISPR screens of coding genes, which were validated using a long non-coding RNA CRISPR screen. Thus our results demonstrated the generality of our approach by using gene-sets from CRISPR screens. Overall, our approach opens an avenue for predicting the involvement of non-coding genes in various functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omkar Chandra
- Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Ph-III, New Delhi, India
| | - Madhu Sharma
- Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Ph-III, New Delhi, India
| | - Neetesh Pandey
- Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Ph-III, New Delhi, India
| | - Indra Prakash Jha
- Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Ph-III, New Delhi, India
| | - Shreya Mishra
- Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Ph-III, New Delhi, India
| | - Say Li Kong
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vibhor Kumar
- Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Okhla Ph-III, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Xu L, Li X, Chen Z, Chen J, Zhang T, Gu X, Yang J. Deciphering the dynamic niches and regeneration-associated transcriptional program of motoneurons following peripheral nerve injury. iScience 2022; 25:104917. [PMID: 36051182 PMCID: PMC9424597 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Robust axon regeneration of motoneurons (MNs) occurs in rodent models upon peripheral nerve injury (PNI). However, genome-wide dynamic molecules and permissive microenvironment following insult in MNs remain largely unknown. Here, we firstly tackled by high-coverage and massive sequencing of laser-dissected individual ChAT+ cells to uncover molecules and pro-regenerative programs of MNs from injury to the regenerating phase after PNI. "Injured" populations at 1d∼7d were well distinguished and three response phases were well defined by elucidating with several clues (Gap43, etc). We found remarkable changes of genes expressed by injured motoneurons to activate and enhance intrinsic axon regrowth or crosstalk with other cellular or non-cellular counterpart in the activated regenerative microenvironment, specifically microglia/macrophage. We also identified an injury and regeneration-associated module and critical regulators including core transcription factors (Atf3, Arid5a, Klf6, Klf7, Jun, Stat3, and Myc). This study provides a vital resource and critical molecules for studying neural repair of axotomized motoneurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Lian Xu
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
| | - Xiaodi Li
- School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Zhifeng Chen
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Xiaosong Gu
- School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210000, China.,Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Avraham O, Le J, Leahy K, Li T, Zhao G, Cavalli V. Analysis of neuronal injury transcriptional response identifies CTCF and YY1 as co-operating factors regulating axon regeneration. Front Mol Neurosci 2022; 15:967472. [PMID: 36081575 PMCID: PMC9446241 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.967472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Injured sensory neurons activate a transcriptional program necessary for robust axon regeneration and eventual target reinnervation. Understanding the transcriptional regulators that govern this axon regenerative response may guide therapeutic strategies to promote axon regeneration in the injured nervous system. Here, we used cultured dorsal root ganglia neurons to identify pro-regenerative transcription factors. Using RNA sequencing, we first characterized this neuronal culture and determined that embryonic day 13.5 DRG (eDRG) neurons cultured for 7 days are similar to e15.5 DRG neurons in vivo and that all neuronal subtypes are represented. This eDRG neuronal culture does not contain other non-neuronal cell types. Next, we performed RNA sequencing at different time points after in vitro axotomy. Analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed upregulation of known regeneration associated transcription factors, including Jun, Atf3 and Rest, paralleling the axon injury response in vivo. Analysis of transcription factor binding sites in differentially expressed genes revealed other known transcription factors promoting axon regeneration, such as Myc, Hif1α, Pparγ, Ascl1a, Srf, and Ctcf, as well as other transcription factors not yet characterized in axon regeneration. We next tested if overexpression of novel candidate transcription factors alone or in combination promotes axon regeneration in vitro. Our results demonstrate that expression of Ctcf with Yy1 or E2f2 enhances in vitro axon regeneration. Our analysis highlights that transcription factor interaction and chromatin architecture play important roles as a regulator of axon regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oshri Avraham
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jimmy Le
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Kathleen Leahy
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Tiandao Li
- Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Guoyan Zhao
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Valeria Cavalli
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Center of Regenerative Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- *Correspondence: Valeria Cavalli,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Burda JE, O'Shea TM, Ao Y, Suresh KB, Wang S, Bernstein AM, Chandra A, Deverasetty S, Kawaguchi R, Kim JH, McCallum S, Rogers A, Wahane S, Sofroniew MV. Divergent transcriptional regulation of astrocyte reactivity across disorders. Nature 2022; 606:557-564. [PMID: 35614216 PMCID: PMC10027402 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04739-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Astrocytes respond to injury and disease in the central nervous system with reactive changes that influence the outcome of the disorder1-4. These changes include differentially expressed genes (DEGs) whose contextual diversity and regulation are poorly understood. Here we combined biological and informatic analyses, including RNA sequencing, protein detection, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) and conditional gene deletion, to predict transcriptional regulators that differentially control more than 12,000 DEGs that are potentially associated with astrocyte reactivity across diverse central nervous system disorders in mice and humans. DEGs associated with astrocyte reactivity exhibited pronounced heterogeneity across disorders. Transcriptional regulators also exhibited disorder-specific differences, but a core group of 61 transcriptional regulators was identified as common across multiple disorders in both species. We show experimentally that DEG diversity is determined by combinatorial, context-specific interactions between transcriptional regulators. Notably, the same reactivity transcriptional regulators can regulate markedly different DEG cohorts in different disorders; changes in the access of transcriptional regulators to DNA-binding motifs differ markedly across disorders; and DEG changes can crucially require multiple reactivity transcriptional regulators. We show that, by modulating reactivity, transcriptional regulators can substantially alter disorder outcome, implicating them as therapeutic targets. We provide searchable resources of disorder-related reactive astrocyte DEGs and their predicted transcriptional regulators. Our findings show that transcriptional changes associated with astrocyte reactivity are highly heterogeneous and are customized from vast numbers of potential DEGs through context-specific combinatorial transcriptional-regulator interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua E Burda
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Center for Neural Science and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Timothy M O'Shea
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yan Ao
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Keshav B Suresh
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Neural Science and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shinong Wang
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexander M Bernstein
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ashu Chandra
- Department of Computer Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sandeep Deverasetty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Riki Kawaguchi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jae H Kim
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sarah McCallum
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Center for Neural Science and Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alexandra Rogers
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shalaka Wahane
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael V Sofroniew
- Department of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kauer SD, Fink KL, Li EHF, Evans BP, Golan N, Cafferty WBJ. Inositol Polyphosphate-5-Phosphatase K ( Inpp5k) Enhances Sprouting of Corticospinal Tract Axons after CNS Trauma. J Neurosci 2022; 42:2190-2204. [PMID: 35135857 PMCID: PMC8936595 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0897-21.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Failure of CNS neurons to mount a significant growth response after trauma contributes to chronic functional deficits after spinal cord injury. Activator and repressor screening of embryonic cortical neurons and retinal ganglion cells in vitro and transcriptional profiling of developing CNS neurons harvested in vivo have identified several candidates that stimulate robust axon growth in vitro and in vivo Building on these studies, we sought to identify novel axon growth activators induced in the complex adult CNS environment in vivo We transcriptionally profiled intact sprouting adult corticospinal neurons (CSNs) after contralateral pyramidotomy (PyX) in nogo receptor-1 knock-out mice and found that intact CSNs were enriched in genes in the 3-phosphoinositide degradation pathway, including six 5-phosphatases. We explored whether inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase K (Inpp5k) could enhance corticospinal tract (CST) axon growth in preclinical models of acute and chronic CNS trauma. Overexpression of Inpp5k in intact adult CSNs in male and female mice enhanced the sprouting of intact CST terminals after PyX and cortical stroke and sprouting of CST axons after acute and chronic severe thoracic spinal contusion. We show that Inpp5k stimulates axon growth in part by elevating the density of active cofilin in labile growth cones, thus stimulating actin polymerization and enhancing microtubule protrusion into distal filopodia. We identify Inpp5k as a novel CST growth activator capable of driving compensatory axon growth in multiple complex CNS injury environments and underscores the veracity of using in vivo transcriptional screening to identify the next generation of cell-autonomous factors capable of repairing the damaged CNS.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Neurologic recovery is limited after spinal cord injury as CNS neurons are incapable of self-repair post-trauma. In vitro screening strategies exploit the intrinsically high growth capacity of embryonic CNS neurons to identify novel axon growth activators. While promising candidates have been shown to stimulate axon growth in vivo, concomitant functional recovery remains incomplete. We identified Inpp5k as a novel axon growth activator using transcriptional profiling of intact adult corticospinal tract (CST) neurons that had initiated a growth response after pyramidotomy in plasticity sensitized nogo receptor-1-null mice. Here, we show that Inpp5k overexpression can stimulate CST axon growth after pyramidotomy, stroke, and acute and chronic contusion injuries. These data support in vivo screening approaches to identify novel axon growth activators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra D Kauer
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| | - Kathryn L Fink
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| | - Elizabeth H F Li
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| | - Brian P Evans
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York 10591
| | - Noa Golan
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| | - William B J Cafferty
- Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
| |
Collapse
|