1
|
Cirigliano SM, Fine HA. Bridging the gap between tumor and disease: Innovating cancer and glioma models. J Exp Med 2025; 222:e20220808. [PMID: 39626263 PMCID: PMC11614461 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20220808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Revised: 11/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in cancer biology and therapeutics have underscored the importance of preclinical models in understanding and treating cancer. Nevertheless, current models often fail to capture the complexity and patient-specific nature of human tumors, particularly gliomas. This review examines the strengths and weaknesses of such models, highlighting the need for a new generation of models. Emphasizing the critical role of the tumor microenvironment, tumor, and patient heterogeneity, we propose integrating our advanced understanding of glioma biology with innovative bioengineering and AI technologies to create more clinically relevant, patient-specific models. These innovations are essential for improving therapeutic development and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Howard A. Fine
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kucinska M, Pospieszna J, Tang J, Lisiak N, Toton E, Rubis B, Murias M. The combination therapy using tyrosine kinase receptors inhibitors and repurposed drugs to target patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells. Biomed Pharmacother 2024; 176:116892. [PMID: 38876048 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The lesson from many studies investigating the efficacy of targeted therapy in glioblastoma (GBM) showed that a future perspective should be focused on combining multiple target treatments. Our research aimed to assess the efficacy of drug combinations against glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). Patient-derived cells U3042, U3009, and U3039 were obtained from the Human Glioblastoma Cell Culture resource. Additionally, the study was conducted on a GBM commercial U251 cell line. Gene expression analysis related to receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), stem cell markers and genes associated with significant molecular targets was performed, and selected proteins encoded by these genes were assessed using the immunofluorescence and flow cytometry methods. The cytotoxicity studies were preceded by analyzing the expression of specific proteins that serve as targets for selected drugs. The cytotoxicity study using the MTS assay was conducted to evaluate the effects of selected drugs/candidates in monotherapy and combinations. The most cytotoxic compounds for U3042 cells were Disulfiram combined with Copper gluconate (DSF/Cu), Dacomitinib, and Foretinib with IC50 values of 52.37 nM, 4.38 µM, and 4.54 µM after 24 h incubation, respectively. Interactions were assessed using SynergyFinder Plus software. The analysis enabled the identification of the most effective drug combinations against patient-derived GSCs. Our findings indicate that the most promising drug combinations are Dacomitinib and Foretinib, Dacomitinib and DSF/Cu, and Foretinib and AZD3759. Since most tested combinations have not been previously examined against glioblastoma stem-like cells, these results can shed new light on designing the therapeutic approach to target the GSC population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata Kucinska
- Department of Toxicology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences 3 Rokietnicka Street, Poznan 60-806, Poland.
| | - Julia Pospieszna
- Department of Toxicology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences 3 Rokietnicka Street, Poznan 60-806, Poland.
| | - Jing Tang
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00290, Finland.
| | - Natalia Lisiak
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 3 Rokietnicka Street, Poznan 60-806, Poland.
| | - Ewa Toton
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 3 Rokietnicka Street, Poznan 60-806, Poland.
| | - Blazej Rubis
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 3 Rokietnicka Street, Poznan 60-806, Poland.
| | - Marek Murias
- Department of Toxicology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences 3 Rokietnicka Street, Poznan 60-806, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen E, Ling AL, Reardon DA, Chiocca EA. Lessons learned from phase 3 trials of immunotherapy for glioblastoma: Time for longitudinal sampling? Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:211-225. [PMID: 37995317 PMCID: PMC10836778 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM)'s median overall survival is almost 21 months. Six phase 3 immunotherapy clinical trials have recently been published, yet 5/6 did not meet approval by regulatory bodies. For the sixth, approval is uncertain. Trial failures result from multiple factors, ranging from intrinsic tumor biology to clinical trial design. Understanding the clinical and basic science of these 6 trials is compelled by other immunotherapies reaching the point of advanced phase 3 clinical trial testing. We need to understand more of the science in human GBMs in early trials: the "window of opportunity" design may not be best to understand complex changes brought about by immunotherapeutic perturbations of the GBM microenvironment. The convergence of increased safety of image-guided biopsies with "multi-omics" of small cell numbers now permits longitudinal sampling of tumor and biofluids to dissect the complex temporal changes in the GBM microenvironment as a function of the immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander L Ling
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - E Antonio Chiocca
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kardani K, Sanchez Gil J, Rabkin SD. Oncolytic herpes simplex viruses for the treatment of glioma and targeting glioblastoma stem-like cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1206111. [PMID: 37325516 PMCID: PMC10264819 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1206111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most lethal cancers, having a poor prognosis and a median survival of only about 15 months with standard treatment (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy), which has not been significantly extended in decades. GBM demonstrates remarkable cellular heterogeneity, with glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs) at the apex. GSCs are a subpopulation of GBM cells that possess the ability to self-renew, differentiate, initiate tumor formation, and manipulate the tumor microenvironment (TME). GSCs are no longer considered a static population of cells with specific markers but are quite flexible phenotypically and in driving tumor heterogeneity and therapeutic resistance. In light of these features, they are a critical target for successful GBM therapy. Oncolytic viruses, in particular oncolytic herpes simplex viruses (oHSVs), have many attributes for therapy and are promising agents to target GSCs. oHSVs are genetically-engineered to selectively replicate in and kill cancer cells, including GSCs, but not normal cells. Moreover, oHSV can induce anti-tumor immune responses and synergize with other therapies, such as chemotherapy, DNA repair inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, to potentiate treatment effects and reduce GSC populations that are partly responsible for chemo- and radio-resistance. Herein, we present an overview of GSCs, activity of different oHSVs, clinical trial results, and combination strategies to enhance efficacy, including therapeutic arming of oHSV. Throughout, the therapeutic focus will be on GSCs and studies specifically targeting these cells. Recent clinical trials and approval of oHSV G47Δ in Japan for patients with recurrent glioma demonstrate the efficacy and promise of oHSV therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuel D. Rabkin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tang LW, Mallela AN, Deng H, Richardson TE, Hervey-Jumper SL, McBrayer SK, Abdullah KG. Preclinical modeling of lower-grade gliomas. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1139383. [PMID: 37051530 PMCID: PMC10083350 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1139383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Models for human gliomas prove critical not only to advancing our understanding of glioma biology but also to facilitate the development of therapeutic modalities. Specifically, creating lower-grade glioma (LGG) models has been challenging, contributing to few investigations and the minimal progress in standard treatment over the past decade. In order to reliably predict and validate the efficacies of novel treatments, however, LGG models need to adhere to specific standards that recapitulate tumor genetic aberrations and micro-environment. This underscores the need to revisit existing models of LGG and explore prospective models that may bridge the gap between preclinical insights and clinical translation. This review first outlines a set of criteria aimed to address the current challenges hindering model development. We then evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of existing preclinical models of LGG with respect to these established standards. To conclude, the review discusses potential future directions for integrating existing models to maximize the exploration of disease mechanisms and therapeutics development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilly W. Tang
- Physician Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Arka N. Mallela
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Hansen Deng
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Timothy E. Richardson
- Department of Pathology, Cell and Molecular Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Samuel K. McBrayer
- Children's Medical Center Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Kalil G. Abdullah
- Physician Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu X, Guo Q, Gao G, Cao Z, Guan Z, Jia B, Wang W, Zhang K, Zhang W, Wang S, Li W, Hao Q, Zhang Y, Li M, Zhang W, Gu J. Exosome-transmitted circCABIN1 promotes temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma via sustaining ErbB downstream signaling. J Nanobiotechnology 2023; 21:45. [PMID: 36755314 PMCID: PMC9906870 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-023-01801-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Although temozolomide (TMZ) provides significant clinical benefit for glioblastoma (GBM), responses are limited by the emergence of acquired resistance. Here, we demonstrate that exosomal circCABIN1 secreted from TMZ-resistant cells was packaged into exosomes and then disseminated TMZ resistance of receipt cells. CircCABIN1 could be cyclized by eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A3 (EIF4A3) and is highly expressed in GBM tissues and glioma stem cells (GSCs). CircCABIN1 is required for the self-renewal maintenance of GSCs to initiate acquired resistance. Mechanistically, circCABIN1 regulated the expression of olfactomedin-like 3 (OLFML3) by sponging miR-637. Moreover, upregulation of OLFML3 activating the ErbB signaling pathway and ultimately contributing to stemness reprogramming and TMZ resistance. Treatment of GBM orthotopic mice xenografts with engineered exosomes targeting circCABIN1 and OLFML3 provided prominent targetability and had significantly improved antitumor activity of TMZ. In summary, our work proposed a novel mechanism for drug resistance transmission in GBM and provided evidence that engineered exosomes are a promising clinical tool for cancer prevention and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
- Department of Hematology, Xijing Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Qingdong Guo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Guangxun Gao
- Department of Hematology, Xijing Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhengcong Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhihao Guan
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Bo Jia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Weizhong Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital, Xi’an, China
| | - Kuo Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Wangqian Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Shuning Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Weina Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Qiang Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Yingqi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Meng Li
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jintao Gu
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, School of Pharmacy, Biotechnology Center, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eyme KM, Sammarco A, Jha R, Mnatsakanyan H, Pechdimaljian C, Carvalho L, Neustadt R, Moses C, Alnasser A, Tardiff DF, Su B, Williams KJ, Bensinger SJ, Chung CY, Badr CE. Targeting de novo lipid synthesis induces lipotoxicity and impairs DNA damage repair in glioblastoma mouse models. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15:eabq6288. [PMID: 36652537 PMCID: PMC9942236 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abq6288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Deregulated de novo lipid synthesis (DNLS) is a potential druggable vulnerability in glioblastoma (GBM), a highly lethal and incurable cancer. Yet the molecular mechanisms that determine susceptibility to DNLS-targeted therapies remain unknown, and the lack of brain-penetrant inhibitors of DNLS has prevented their clinical evaluation as GBM therapeutics. Here, we report that YTX-7739, a clinical-stage inhibitor of stearoyl CoA desaturase (SCD), triggers lipotoxicity in patient-derived GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) and inhibits fatty acid desaturation in GSCs orthotopically implanted in mice. When administered as a single agent, or in combination with temozolomide (TMZ), YTX-7739 showed therapeutic efficacy in orthotopic GSC mouse models owing to its lipotoxicity and ability to impair DNA damage repair. Leveraging genetic, pharmacological, and physiological manipulation of key signaling nodes in gliomagenesis complemented with shotgun lipidomics, we show that aberrant MEK/ERK signaling and its repression of the energy sensor AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) primarily drive therapeutic vulnerability to SCD and other DNLS inhibitors. Conversely, AMPK activation mitigates lipotoxicity and renders GSCs resistant to the loss of DNLS, both in culture and in vivo, by decreasing the saturation state of phospholipids and diverting toxic lipids into lipid droplets. Together, our findings reveal mechanisms of metabolic plasticity in GSCs and provide a framework for the rational integration of DNLS-targeted GBM therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina M. Eyme
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129,Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alessandro Sammarco
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129,Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Padua, Italy,Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095
| | - Roshani Jha
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129
| | - Hayk Mnatsakanyan
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129
| | - Caline Pechdimaljian
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129
| | - Litia Carvalho
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129,Neuroscience Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02115
| | - Rudolph Neustadt
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129
| | - Charlotte Moses
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129
| | - Ahmad Alnasser
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129
| | | | - Baolong Su
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095,UCLA Lipidomics Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095
| | - Kevin J. Williams
- Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095,UCLA Lipidomics Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095
| | - Steven J. Bensinger
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095,UCLA Lipidomics Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 90095
| | | | - Christian E. Badr
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02129,Neuroscience Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 02115,Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu Y, He W, Guo Y, Qu S, Yao F, Liu J, Chai J, Yang Y, Xu T, Liu Y, Yang D, Jia Q, Li M. CSNK1D is associated with stemness and invasiveness in glioblastoma. Pathol Res Pract 2022; 240:154187. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.154187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
9
|
Paolillo M, Comincini S, Schinelli S. In Vitro Glioblastoma Models: A Journey into the Third Dimension. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102449. [PMID: 34070023 PMCID: PMC8157833 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this review, the thorny issue of glioblastoma models is addressed, with a focus on 3D in vitro models. In the first part of the manuscript, glioblastoma features and classification are recapitulated, in order to highlight the major critical aspects that should be taken into account when choosing a glioblastoma 3D model. In the second part of the review, the 3D models described in the literature are critically discussed, considering the advantages, disadvantages, and feasibility for each experimental model, in the light of the potential issues that researchers want to address. Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain tumor in adults, with an average survival time of about one year from initial diagnosis. In the attempt to overcome the complexity and drawbacks associated with in vivo GBM models, together with the need of developing systems dedicated to screen new potential drugs, considerable efforts have been devoted to the implementation of reliable and affordable in vitro GBM models. Recent findings on GBM molecular features, revealing a high heterogeneity between GBM cells and also between other non-tumor cells belonging to the tumoral niche, have stressed the limitations of the classical 2D cell culture systems. Recently, several novel and innovative 3D cell cultures models for GBM have been proposed and implemented. In this review, we first describe the different populations and their functional role of GBM and niche non-tumor cells that could be used in 3D models. An overview of the current available 3D in vitro systems for modeling GBM, together with their major weaknesses and strengths, is presented. Lastly, we discuss the impact of groundbreaking technologies, such as bioprinting and multi-omics single cell analysis, on the future implementation of 3D in vitro GBM models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayra Paolillo
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| | - Sergio Comincini
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Lazzaro Spallanzani”, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Sergio Schinelli
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hicks WH, Bird CE, Traylor JI, Shi DD, El Ahmadieh TY, Richardson TE, McBrayer SK, Abdullah KG. Contemporary Mouse Models in Glioma Research. Cells 2021; 10:cells10030712. [PMID: 33806933 PMCID: PMC8004772 DOI: 10.3390/cells10030712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of glioma, outcomes remain dismal. Developing successful treatments for glioma requires faithful in vivo disease modeling and rigorous preclinical testing. Murine models, including xenograft, syngeneic, and genetically engineered models, are used to study glioma-genesis, identify methods of tumor progression, and test novel treatment strategies. Since the discovery of highly recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in lower-grade gliomas, there is increasing emphasis on effective modeling of IDH mutant brain tumors. Improvements in preclinical models that capture the phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity of gliomas are critical for the development of effective new therapies. Herein, we explore the current status, advancements, and challenges with contemporary murine glioma models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H. Hicks
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA; (W.H.H.); (C.E.B.); (J.I.T.); (T.Y.E.A.)
| | - Cylaina E. Bird
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA; (W.H.H.); (C.E.B.); (J.I.T.); (T.Y.E.A.)
| | - Jeffrey I. Traylor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA; (W.H.H.); (C.E.B.); (J.I.T.); (T.Y.E.A.)
| | - Diana D. Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA;
| | - Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA; (W.H.H.); (C.E.B.); (J.I.T.); (T.Y.E.A.)
| | - Timothy E. Richardson
- Department of Pathology, Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer’s and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 75229, USA;
| | - Samuel K. McBrayer
- Children’s Medical Center Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Harrold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
- Correspondence: (S.K.M.); (K.G.A.)
| | - Kalil G. Abdullah
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA; (W.H.H.); (C.E.B.); (J.I.T.); (T.Y.E.A.)
- Harrold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
- Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
- Correspondence: (S.K.M.); (K.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|