1
|
Moore M, Zhu Y, Hirsch I, White T, Reiner RC, Barber RM, Pigott D, Collins JK, Santoni S, Sobieszczyk ME, Janes H. Estimating vaccine efficacy during open-label follow-up of COVID-19 vaccine trials based on population-level surveillance data. Epidemics 2024; 47:100768. [PMID: 38643547 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
While rapid development and roll out of COVID-19 vaccines is necessary in a pandemic, the process limits the ability of clinical trials to assess longer-term vaccine efficacy. We leveraged COVID-19 surveillance data in the U.S. to evaluate vaccine efficacy in U.S. Government-funded COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials with a three-step estimation process. First, we used a compartmental epidemiological model informed by county-level surveillance data, a "population model", to estimate SARS-CoV-2 incidence among the unvaccinated. Second, a "cohort model" was used to adjust the population SARS-CoV-2 incidence to the vaccine trial cohort, taking into account individual participant characteristics and the difference between SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease. Third, we fit a regression model estimating the offset between the cohort-model-based COVID-19 incidence in the unvaccinated with the placebo-group COVID-19 incidence in the trial during blinded follow-up. Counterfactual placebo COVID-19 incidence was estimated during open-label follow-up by adjusting the cohort-model-based incidence rate by the estimated offset. Vaccine efficacy during open-label follow-up was estimated by contrasting the vaccine group COVID-19 incidence with the counterfactual placebo COVID-19 incidence. We documented good performance of the methodology in a simulation study. We also applied the methodology to estimate vaccine efficacy for the two-dose AZD1222 COVID-19 vaccine using data from the phase 3 U.S. trial (ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT04516746). We estimated AZD1222 vaccine efficacy of 59.1% (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 40.4%-74.3%) in April, 2021 (mean 106 days post-second dose), which reduced to 35.7% (95% UI: 15.0%-51.7%) in July, 2021 (mean 198 days post-second-dose). We developed and evaluated a methodology for estimating longer-term vaccine efficacy. This methodology could be applied to estimating counterfactual placebo incidence for future placebo-controlled vaccine efficacy trials of emerging pathogens with early termination of blinded follow-up, to active-controlled or uncontrolled COVID-19 vaccine efficacy trials, and to other clinical endpoints influenced by vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Moore
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
| | | | - Ian Hirsch
- Biometrics, Vaccines, & Immune Therapies, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tom White
- Biometrics, Vaccines, & Immune Therapies, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robert C Reiner
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation within the Schools of Medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryan M Barber
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation within the Schools of Medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Pigott
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation within the Schools of Medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - James K Collins
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation within the Schools of Medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Serena Santoni
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation within the Schools of Medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Magdalena E Sobieszczyk
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Holly Janes
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosenstrom ET, Ivy JS, Mayorga ME, Swann JL. COVSIM: A stochastic agent-based COVID-19 SIMulation model for North Carolina. Epidemics 2024; 46:100752. [PMID: 38422675 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
We document the evolution and use of the stochastic agent-based COVID-19 simulation model (COVSIM) to study the impact of population behaviors and public health policy on disease spread within age, race/ethnicity, and urbanicity subpopulations in North Carolina. We detail the methodologies used to model the complexities of COVID-19, including multiple agent attributes (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, high-risk medical status), census tract-level interaction network, disease state network, agent behavior (i.e., masking, pharmaceutical intervention (PI) uptake, quarantine, mobility), and variants. We describe its uses outside of the COVID-19 Scenario Modeling Hub (CSMH), which has focused on the interplay of nonpharmaceutical and pharmaceutical interventions, equitability of vaccine distribution, and supporting local county decision-makers in North Carolina. This work has led to multiple publications and meetings with a variety of local stakeholders. When COVSIM joined the CSMH in January 2022, we found it was a sustainable way to support new COVID-19 challenges and allowed the group to focus on broader scientific questions. The CSMH has informed adaptions to our modeling approach, including redesigning our high-performance computing implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie S Ivy
- Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA; Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Maria E Mayorga
- Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA
| | - Julie L Swann
- Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Daniore P, Moser A, Höglinger M, Probst Hensch N, Imboden M, Vermes T, Keidel D, Bochud M, Ortega Herrero N, Baggio S, Chocano-Bedoya P, Rodondi N, Tancredi S, Wagner C, Cullati S, Stringhini S, Gonseth Nusslé S, Veys-Takeuchi C, Zuppinger C, Harju E, Michel G, Frank I, Kahlert CR, Albanese E, Crivelli L, Levati S, Amati R, Kaufmann M, Geigges M, Ballouz T, Frei A, Fehr J, von Wyl V. Interplay of Digital Proximity App Use and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Uptake in Switzerland: Analysis of Two Population-Based Cohort Studies. Int J Public Health 2023; 68:1605812. [PMID: 37799349 PMCID: PMC10549773 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Our study aims to evaluate developments in vaccine uptake and digital proximity tracing app use in a localized context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: We report findings from two population-based longitudinal cohorts in Switzerland from January to December 2021. Failure time analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression models were conducted to assess vaccine uptake and digital proximity tracing app (SwissCovid) uninstalling outcomes. Results: We observed a dichotomy of individuals who did not use the SwissCovid app and did not get vaccinated, and who used the SwissCovid app and got vaccinated during the study period. Increased vaccine uptake was observed with SwissCovid app use (aHR, 1.51; 95% CI: 1.40-1.62 [CI-DFU]; aHR, 1.79; 95% CI: 1.62-1.99 [CSM]) compared to SwissCovid app non-use. Decreased SwissCovid uninstallation risk was observed for participants who got vaccinated (aHR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38-0.81 [CI-DFU]; aHR, 0.45; 95% CI: 0.27-0.78 [CSM]) compared to participants who did not get vaccinated. Conclusion: In evolving epidemic contexts, these findings underscore the need for communication strategies as well as flexible digital proximity tracing app adjustments that accommodate different preventive measures and their anticipated interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Daniore
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Digital Society Initiative, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - André Moser
- Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marc Höglinger
- Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Probst Hensch
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Medea Imboden
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Vermes
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dirk Keidel
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Murielle Bochud
- Unisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Natalia Ortega Herrero
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Stéphanie Baggio
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Patricia Chocano-Bedoya
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Tancredi
- Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Wagner
- Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Stéphane Cullati
- Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Readaptation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Stringhini
- Department of Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Division of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Semira Gonseth Nusslé
- Unisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Claire Zuppinger
- Unisanté, University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Erika Harju
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Clinical Trial Unit, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
- School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Gisela Michel
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Irène Frank
- Clinical Trial Unit, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Christian R. Kahlert
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Emiliano Albanese
- Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Luca Crivelli
- Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- Department Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland
| | - Sara Levati
- Department Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Amati
- Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Marco Kaufmann
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marco Geigges
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tala Ballouz
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anja Frei
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Fehr
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Infectious Disease and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Viktor von Wyl
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Digital Society Initiative, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Infectious Disease and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aronoff-Spencer E, Mazrouee S, Graham R, Handcock MS, Nguyen K, Nebeker C, Malekinejad M, Longhurst CA. Exposure notification system activity as a leading indicator for SARS-COV-2 caseload forecasting. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287368. [PMID: 37594936 PMCID: PMC10437830 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Digital methods to augment traditional contact tracing approaches were developed and deployed globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. These "Exposure Notification (EN)" systems present new opportunities to support public health interventions. To date, there have been attempts to model the impact of such systems, yet no reports have explored the value of real-time system data for predictive epidemiological modeling. METHODS We investigated the potential to short-term forecast COVID-19 caseloads using data from California's implementation of the Google Apple Exposure Notification (GAEN) platform, branded as CA Notify. CA Notify is a digital public health intervention leveraging resident's smartphones for anonymous EN. We extended a published statistical model that uses prior case counts to investigate the possibility of predicting short-term future case counts and then added EN activity to test for improved forecast performance. Additional predictive value was assessed by comparing the pandemic forecasting models with and without EN activity to the actual reported caseloads from 1-7 days in the future. RESULTS Observation of time series presents noticeable evidence for temporal association of system activity and caseloads. Incorporating earlier ENs in our model improved prediction of the caseload counts. Using Bayesian inference, we found nonzero influence of EN terms with probability one. Furthermore, we found a reduction in both the mean absolute percentage error and the mean squared prediction error, the latter of at least 5% and up to 32% when using ENs over the model without. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary investigation suggests smartphone based ENs can significantly improve the accuracy of short-term forecasting. These predictive models can be readily deployed as local early warning systems to triage resources and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliah Aronoff-Spencer
- School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Sepideh Mazrouee
- School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Rishi Graham
- School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Mark S. Handcock
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Kevin Nguyen
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
- University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - Camille Nebeker
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Mohsen Malekinejad
- California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou X, Zhang X, Santi P, Ratti C. Phase-wise evaluation and optimization of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1198973. [PMID: 37601210 PMCID: PMC10434774 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1198973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Given that the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and other therapies is greatly limited by the continuously emerging variants, non-pharmaceutical interventions have been adopted as primary control strategies in the global fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. However, implementing strict interventions over extended periods of time is inevitably hurting the economy. Many countries are faced with the dilemma of how to take appropriate policy actions for socio-economic recovery while curbing the further spread of COVID-19. With an aim to solve this multi-objective decision-making problem, we investigate the underlying temporal dynamics and associations between policies, mobility patterns, and virus transmission through vector autoregressive models and the Toda-Yamamoto Granger causality test. Our findings reveal the presence of temporal lagged effects and Granger causality relationships among various transmission and human mobility variables. We further assess the effectiveness of existing COVID-19 control measures and explore potential optimal strategies that strike a balance between public health and socio-economic recovery for individual states in the U.S. by employing the Pareto optimality and genetic algorithms. The results highlight the joint power of the state of emergency declaration, wearing face masks, and the closure of bars, and emphasize the necessity of pursuing tailor-made strategies for different states and phases of epidemiological transmission. Our framework enables policymakers to create more refined designs of COVID-19 strategies and can be extended to other countries regarding best practices in pandemic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Zhou
- Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
- Senseable City Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Xiaohu Zhang
- Department of Urban Planning, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Paolo Santi
- Senseable City Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Istituto di Informatica e Telematica del CNR, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlo Ratti
- Senseable City Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Al-Bazi A, Madi F, Monshar AA, Eliya Y, Adediran T, Khudir KA. Modelling the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 exposure in closed-environments using agent-based modelling. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/20479700.2023.2189555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ammar Al-Bazi
- Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Faris Madi
- Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Yousif Eliya
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Tunde Adediran
- Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Khaled Al Khudir
- Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pozo-Martin F, Beltran Sanchez MA, Müller SA, Diaconu V, Weil K, El Bcheraoui C. Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Eur J Epidemiol 2023; 38:243-266. [PMID: 36795349 PMCID: PMC9932408 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Contact tracing is a non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) widely used in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Its effectiveness may depend on a number of factors including the proportion of contacts traced, delays in tracing, the mode of contact tracing (e.g. forward, backward or bidirectional contact training), the types of contacts who are traced (e.g. contacts of index cases or contacts of contacts of index cases), or the setting where contacts are traced (e.g. the household or the workplace). We performed a systematic review of the evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions. 78 studies were included in the review, 12 observational (ten ecological studies, one retrospective cohort study and one pre-post study with two patient cohorts) and 66 mathematical modelling studies. Based on the results from six of the 12 observational studies, contact tracing can be effective at controlling COVID-19. Two high quality ecological studies showed the incremental effectiveness of adding digital contact tracing to manual contact tracing. One ecological study of intermediate quality showed that increases in contact tracing were associated with a drop in COVID-19 mortality, and a pre-post study of acceptable quality showed that prompt contact tracing of contacts of COVID-19 case clusters / symptomatic individuals led to a reduction in the reproduction number R. Within the seven observational studies exploring the effectiveness of contact tracing in the context of the implementation of other non-pharmaceutical interventions, contact tracing was found to have an effect on COVID-19 epidemic control in two studies and not in the remaining five studies. However, a limitation in many of these studies is the lack of description of the extent of implementation of contact tracing interventions. Based on the results from the mathematical modelling studies, we identified the following highly effective policies: (1) manual contact tracing with high tracing coverage and either medium-term immunity, highly efficacious isolation/quarantine and/ or physical distancing (2) hybrid manual and digital contact tracing with high app adoption with highly effective isolation/ quarantine and social distancing, (3) secondary contact tracing, (4) eliminating contact tracing delays, (5) bidirectional contact tracing, (6) contact tracing with high coverage in reopening educational institutions. We also highlighted the role of social distancing to enhance the effectiveness of some of these interventions in the context of 2020 lockdown reopening. While limited, the evidence from observational studies shows a role for manual and digital contact tracing in controlling the COVID-19 epidemic. More empirical studies accounting for the extent of contact tracing implementation are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Pozo-Martin
- Evidence-based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Sophie Alice Müller
- Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Viorela Diaconu
- Evidence-based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kilian Weil
- Evidence-based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Charbel El Bcheraoui
- Evidence-based Public Health Unit, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Groves-Kirkby N, Wakeman E, Patel S, Hinch R, Poot T, Pearson J, Tang L, Kendall E, Tang M, Moore K, Stevenson S, Mathias B, Feige I, Nakach S, Stevenson L, O'Dwyer P, Probert W, Panovska-Griffiths J, Fraser C. Large-scale calibration and simulation of COVID-19 epidemiologic scenarios to support healthcare planning. Epidemics 2023; 42:100662. [PMID: 36563470 PMCID: PMC9758760 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has provided stiff challenges for planning and resourcing in health services in the UK and worldwide. Epidemiological models can provide simulations of how infectious disease might progress in a population given certain parameters. We adapted an agent-based model of COVID-19 to inform planning and decision-making within a healthcare setting, and created a software framework that automates processes for calibrating the model parameters to health data and allows the model to be run at national population scale on National Health Service (NHS) infrastructure. We developed a method for calibrating the model to three daily data streams (hospital admissions, intensive care occupancy, and deaths), and demonstrate that on cross-validation the model fits acceptably to unseen data streams including official estimates of COVID-19 incidence. Once calibrated, we use the model to simulate future scenarios of the spread of COVID-19 in England and show that the simulations provide useful projections of future COVID-19 clinical demand. These simulations were used to support operational planning in the NHS in England, and we present the example of the use of these simulations in projecting future clinical demand during the rollout of the national COVID-19 vaccination programme. Being able to investigate uncertainty and test sensitivities was particularly important to the operational planning team. This epidemiological model operates within an ecosystem of data technologies, drawing on a range of NHS, government and academic data sources, and provides results to strategists, planners and downstream data systems. We discuss the data resources that enabled this work and the data challenges that were faced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Seema Patel
- Economics and Strategic Analysis, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Robert Hinch
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tineke Poot
- Economics and Strategic Analysis, NHS England, London, UK
| | | | - Lily Tang
- Economics and Strategic Analysis, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Edward Kendall
- Economics and Strategic Analysis, NHS England, London, UK
| | - Ming Tang
- Directorate of the Chief Data & Analytics Officer, NHS England, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William Probert
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; The Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christophe Fraser
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gibson LA, Dixon EL, Sharif MA, Rodriguez AC, Cappella JN. Impact of Privacy Messaging on COVID-19 Exposure Notification App Downloads: Evidence From a Randomized Experiment. AJPM FOCUS 2023; 2:100059. [PMID: 36573173 PMCID: PMC9771837 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Digital contact-tracing smartphone apps have the potential to slow the spread of disease but are not widely used. We tested whether messages describing how a COVID-19 digital contact-tracing app protects users' privacy led to increased or decreased intentions to download the app by either calming privacy concerns or increasing their saliency. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting/participants We recruited adult smartphone owners in the U.S. (oversampled for younger adults aged 18-34 years) in November 2020 through an online panel. Intervention Survey software randomly assigned 860 participants to 1 of 2 parallel messaging conditions (n=430 privacy assured, n=430 no privacy described). Main outcome measures 4-point scale of intention to use the app "if public health officials released a COVID Exposure Notification app in their state" that averaged likelihood to (1) download and install the app on their phone; (2) keep the app active on their phone; and (3) keep Bluetooth active on their phone (needed for the app to work). Results After removing incompletes, those who failed the manipulation checks, or those who had already downloaded a COVID-19 digital contact-tracing app, we analyzed 671 participants (n=330 privacy, n=341 no privacy) in 2021. There was no relationship between privacy condition and download intention (meanprivacy=2.69, meannoprivacy=2.69, b=0.01, 95% CI= -0.13, 0.15, p=0.922) but also no evidence that describing the app's security increased context-dependent privacy concerns (measured 3 ways). Instead, we found increased endorsement of data security in the privacy condition using a scale of beliefs about the app keeping privacy secure (meanprivacy=2.74, meannoprivacy=2.58, b=0.16, 95% CI=0.04, 0.28, p=0.009, small effect ω2=0.009). Conclusions This study provides some evidence that people developing contact-tracing messaging campaigns do not need to worry that describing a digital contact-tracing app's privacy protections will backfire. Future mixed methods testing of messages about who has access to information-and for how long-may uncover new communication strategies to increase public trust in contact-tracing apps. Trial registration This study is registered with AsPredicted#51826.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Gibson
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Address correspondence to: Laura A. Gibson, PhD, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 1105B Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia PA 19104
| | - Erica L. Dixon
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Marissa A. Sharif
- Marketing Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anyara C. Rodriguez
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph N. Cappella
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bannister-Tyrrell M, Chen M, Choi V, Miglietta A, Galea G. Systematic scoping review of the implementation, adoption, use, and effectiveness of digital contact tracing interventions for COVID-19 in the Western Pacific Region. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH - WESTERN PACIFIC 2023; 34:100647. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
|
11
|
Van Yperen J, Campillo-Funollet E, Inkpen R, Memon A, Madzvamuse A. A hospital demand and capacity intervention approach for COVID-19. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283350. [PMID: 37134085 PMCID: PMC10156009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The mathematical interpretation of interventions for the mitigation of epidemics in the literature often involves finding the optimal time to initiate an intervention and/or the use of the number of infections to manage impact. Whilst these methods may work in theory, in order to implement effectively they may require information which is not likely to be available in the midst of an epidemic, or they may require impeccable data about infection levels in the community. In reality, testing and cases data can only be as good as the policy of implementation and the compliance of the individuals, which implies that accurately estimating the levels of infections becomes difficult or complicated from the data that is provided. In this paper, we demonstrate a different approach to the mathematical modelling of interventions, not based on optimality or cases, but based on demand and capacity of hospitals who have to deal with the epidemic on a day to day basis. In particular, we use data-driven modelling to calibrate a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered-died type model to infer parameters that depict the dynamics of the epidemic in several regions of the UK. We use the calibrated parameters for forecasting scenarios and understand, given a maximum capacity of hospital healthcare services, how the timing of interventions, severity of interventions, and conditions for the releasing of interventions affect the overall epidemic-picture. We provide an optimisation method to capture when, in terms of healthcare demand, an intervention should be put into place given a maximum capacity on the service. By using an equivalent agent-based approach, we demonstrate uncertainty quantification on the likelihood that capacity is not breached, by how much if it does, and the limit on demand that almost guarantees capacity is not breached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Van Yperen
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Eduard Campillo-Funollet
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical, Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Inkpen
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Anjum Memon
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Anotida Madzvamuse
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
- Department of Mathematics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Mathematics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Understanding the impact of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2022; 1:e0000149. [PMID: 36812611 PMCID: PMC9931320 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Digital contact tracing (DCT) applications have been introduced in many countries to aid the containment of COVID-19 outbreaks. Initially, enthusiasm was high regarding their implementation as a non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). However, no country was able to prevent larger outbreaks without falling back to harsher NPIs. Here, we discuss results of a stochastic infectious-disease model that provide insights in how the progression of an outbreak and key parameters such as detection probability, app participation and its distribution, as well as engagement of users impact DCT efficacy informed by results of empirical studies. We further show how contact heterogeneity and local contact clustering impact the intervention's efficacy. We conclude that DCT apps might have prevented cases on the order of single-digit percentages during single outbreaks for empirically plausible ranges of parameters, ignoring that a substantial part of these contacts would have been identified by manual contact tracing. This result is generally robust against changes in network topology with exceptions for homogeneous-degree, locally-clustered contact networks, on which the intervention prevents more infections. An improvement of efficacy is similarly observed when app participation is highly clustered. We find that DCT typically averts more cases during the super-critical phase of an epidemic when case counts are rising and the measured efficacy therefore depends on the time of evaluation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Shen J, Ghatti S, Levkov NR, Shen H, Sen T, Rheuban K, Enfield K, Facteau NR, Engel G, Dowdell K. A survey of COVID-19 detection and prediction approaches using mobile devices, AI, and telemedicine. Front Artif Intell 2022; 5:1034732. [PMID: 36530356 PMCID: PMC9755752 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.1034732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Since 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has had an extremely high impact on all facets of the society and will potentially have an everlasting impact for years to come. In response to this, over the past years, there have been a significant number of research efforts on exploring approaches to combat COVID-19. In this paper, we present a survey of the current research efforts on using mobile Internet of Thing (IoT) devices, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and telemedicine for COVID-19 detection and prediction. We first present the background and then present current research in this field. Specifically, we present the research on COVID-19 monitoring and detection, contact tracing, machine learning based approaches, telemedicine, and security. We finally discuss the challenges and the future work that lay ahead in this field before concluding this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Shen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Siddharth Ghatti
- Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Nate Ryan Levkov
- Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Haiying Shen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Tanmoy Sen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Karen Rheuban
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Kyle Enfield
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Nikki Reyer Facteau
- University of Virginia (UVA) Health System, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Gina Engel
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Kim Dowdell
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The Apple Mobility Trends Data in Human Mobility Patterns during Restrictions and Prediction of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122425. [PMID: 36553949 PMCID: PMC9778143 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review with PRISMA guidelines is to discover how population movement information has epidemiological implications for the spread of COVID-19. In November 2022, the Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for relevant reports for the review. The inclusion criteria are: (1) the study uses data from Apple Mobility Trends Reports, (2) the context of the study is about COVID-19 mobility patterns, and (3) the report is published in a peer-reviewed venue in the form of an article or conference paper in English. The review included 35 studies in the period of 2020-2022. The main strategy used for data extraction in this review is a matrix proposal to present each study from a perspective of research objective and outcome, study context, country, time span, and conducted research method. We conclude by pointing out that these data are not often used in studies and it is better to study a single country instead of doing multiple-country research. We propose topic classifications for the context of the studies as transmission rate, transport policy, air quality, re-increased activities, economic activities, and financial markets.
Collapse
|
15
|
Aronoff-Spencer E, Nebeker C, Wenzel AT, Nguyen K, Kunowski R, Zhu M, Adamos G, Goyal R, Mazrouee S, Reyes A, May N, Howard H, Longhurst CA, Malekinejad M. Defining Key Performance Indicators for the California COVID-19 Exposure Notification System (CA Notify). Public Health Rep 2022; 137:67S-75S. [PMID: 36314660 PMCID: PMC9678789 DOI: 10.1177/00333549221129354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Toward common methods for system monitoring and evaluation, we proposed a key performance indicator framework and discussed lessons learned while implementing a statewide exposure notification (EN) system in California during the COVID-19 epidemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS California deployed the Google Apple Exposure Notification framework, branded CA Notify, on December 10, 2020, to supplement traditional COVID-19 contact tracing programs. For system evaluation, we defined 6 key performance indicators: adoption, retention, sharing of unique codes, identification of potential contacts, behavior change, and impact. We aggregated and analyzed data from December 10, 2020, to July 1, 2021, in compliance with the CA Notify privacy policy. RESULTS We estimated CA Notify adoption at nearly 11 million smartphone activations during the study period. Among 1 654 201 CA Notify users who received a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, 446 634 (27%) shared their unique code, leading to ENs for other CA Notify users who were in close proximity to the SARS-CoV-2-positive individual. We identified at least 122 970 CA Notify users as contacts through this process. Contact identification occurred a median of 4 days after symptom onset or specimen collection date of the user who received a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Smartphone-based EN systems are promising new tools to supplement traditional contact tracing and public health interventions, particularly when efficient scaling is not feasible for other approaches. Methods to collect and interpret appropriate measures of system performance must be refined while maintaining trust and privacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliah Aronoff-Spencer
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- The Design Lab, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Camille Nebeker
- The Design Lab, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Alexander T. Wenzel
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Nguyen
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rachel Kunowski
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mingjia Zhu
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Gary Adamos
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ravi Goyal
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sepideh Mazrouee
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Reyes
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nicole May
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Holly Howard
- California Connected, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, USA
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher A. Longhurst
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Mohsen Malekinejad
- California Connected, Center for Infectious Diseases, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA, USA
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hinch R, Panovska-Griffiths J, Probert WJM, Ferretti L, Wymant C, Di Lauro F, Baya N, Ghafari M, Abeler-Dörner L, Fraser C. Estimating SARS-CoV-2 variant fitness and the impact of interventions in England using statistical and geo-spatial agent-based models. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2022. [PMID: 35965459 DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6067650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic has been extended by the evolution of more transmissible viral variants. In autumn 2020, the B.1.177 lineage became the dominant variant in England, before being replaced by the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) lineage in late 2020, with the sweep occurring at different times in each region. This period coincided with a large number of non-pharmaceutical interventions (e.g. lockdowns) to control the epidemic, making it difficult to estimate the relative transmissibility of variants. In this paper, we model the spatial spread of these variants in England using a meta-population agent-based model which correctly characterizes the regional variation in cases and distribution of variants. As a test of robustness, we additionally estimated the relative transmissibility of multiple variants using a statistical model based on the renewal equation, which simultaneously estimates the effective reproduction number R. Relative to earlier variants, the transmissibility of B.1.177 is estimated to have increased by 1.14 (1.12-1.16) and that of Alpha by 1.71 (1.65-1.77). The vaccination programme starting in December 2020 is also modelled. Counterfactual simulations demonstrate that the vaccination programme was essential for reopening in March 2021, and that if the January lockdown had started one month earlier, up to 30 k (24 k-38 k) deaths could have been prevented. This article is part of the theme issue 'Technical challenges of modelling real-life epidemics and examples of overcoming these'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hinch
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- The Queen's College, and, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - William J M Probert
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luca Ferretti
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Chris Wymant
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Francesco Di Lauro
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nikolas Baya
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mahan Ghafari
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lucie Abeler-Dörner
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christophe Fraser
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hinch R, Panovska-Griffiths J, Probert WJM, Ferretti L, Wymant C, Di Lauro F, Baya N, Ghafari M, Abeler-Dörner L, Fraser C. Estimating SARS-CoV-2 variant fitness and the impact of interventions in England using statistical and geo-spatial agent-based models. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2022; 380:20210304. [PMID: 35965459 PMCID: PMC9376717 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic has been extended by the evolution of more transmissible viral variants. In autumn 2020, the B.1.177 lineage became the dominant variant in England, before being replaced by the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) lineage in late 2020, with the sweep occurring at different times in each region. This period coincided with a large number of non-pharmaceutical interventions (e.g. lockdowns) to control the epidemic, making it difficult to estimate the relative transmissibility of variants. In this paper, we model the spatial spread of these variants in England using a meta-population agent-based model which correctly characterizes the regional variation in cases and distribution of variants. As a test of robustness, we additionally estimated the relative transmissibility of multiple variants using a statistical model based on the renewal equation, which simultaneously estimates the effective reproduction number R. Relative to earlier variants, the transmissibility of B.1.177 is estimated to have increased by 1.14 (1.12-1.16) and that of Alpha by 1.71 (1.65-1.77). The vaccination programme starting in December 2020 is also modelled. Counterfactual simulations demonstrate that the vaccination programme was essential for reopening in March 2021, and that if the January lockdown had started one month earlier, up to 30 k (24 k-38 k) deaths could have been prevented. This article is part of the theme issue 'Technical challenges of modelling real-life epidemics and examples of overcoming these'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hinch
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- The Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - William J. M. Probert
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luca Ferretti
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Chris Wymant
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Francesco Di Lauro
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nikolas Baya
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mahan Ghafari
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lucie Abeler-Dörner
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Christophe Fraser
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bonnell TJ, Revere D, Baseman J, Hills R, Karras BT. Equity and Accessibility of Washington State’s COVID-19 Digital Exposure Notification Tool (WA Notify): Survey and Listening Sessions Among Community Leaders. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e38193. [PMID: 35787520 PMCID: PMC9359117 DOI: 10.2196/38193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
In November 2020, WA Notify, Washington State’s COVID-19 digital exposure notification tool, was launched statewide to mitigate ongoing COVID-19 transmission. WA Notify uses the Bluetooth proximity–triggered, Google/Apple Exposure Notification Express framework to distribute notifications to users who have added or activated this tool on their smartphones. This smartphone-based tool relies on sufficient population-level activation to be effective; however, little is known about its adoption among communities disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic or what barriers might limit its adoption and use among diverse populations.
Objective
We sought to (1) conduct a formative exploration of equity-related issues that may influence the access, adoption, and use of WA Notify, as perceived by community leaders of populations disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) generate recommendations for promoting the equitable access to and impact of this novel intervention for these communities.
Methods
We used a 2-step data collection process to gather the perspectives of community leaders across Washington regarding the launch and implementation of WA Notify in their communities. A web-based, brief, and informational survey measured the perceptions of the community-level familiarity and effectiveness of WA Notify at slowing the spread of COVID-19 and identified potential barriers and concerns to accessing and adopting WA Notify (n=17). Semistructured listening sessions were conducted to expand upon survey findings and explore the community-level awareness, barriers, facilitators, and concerns related to activating WA Notify in greater depth (n=13).
Results
Our findings overlap considerably with those from previous mobile health equity studies. Digital literacy, trust, information accessibility, and misinformation were highlighted as key determinants of the adoption and use of WA Notify. Although WA Notify does not track users or share data, community leaders expressed concerns about security, data sharing, and personal privacy, which were cited as outweighing the potential benefits to adoption. Both the survey and informational sessions indicated low community-level awareness of WA Notify. Community leaders recommended the following approaches to improve engagement: tailoring informational materials for low-literacy levels, providing technology navigation, describing more clearly that WA Notify can help the community, and using trusted messengers who are already engaged with the communities to communicate about WA Notify.
Conclusions
As digital public health tools, such as WA Notify, emerge to address public health problems, understanding the key determinants of adoption and incorporating equity-focused recommendations into the development, implementation, and communication efforts around these tools will be instrumental to their adoption, use, and retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Jarvis Bonnell
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Debra Revere
- Department of Health Systems & Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Janet Baseman
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Rebecca Hills
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Bryant Thomas Karras
- Office of Innovation & Technology, State of Washington Department of Health, Tumwater, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baseman JG, Karras BT, Revere D. Engagement in Protective Behaviors by Digital Exposure Notification Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Washington State, January-June 2021. Public Health Rep 2022; 137:96S-100S. [PMID: 35915982 PMCID: PMC9679203 DOI: 10.1177/00333549221110301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Smartphone-based digital exposure notification (EN) tools were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic to supplement strained case investigation and contact tracing efforts. We examined the influence of an EN tool implemented in Washington State, WA Notify, on user engagement in behaviors that protect against COVID-19 transmission. METHODS From January 25 through June 30, 2021, we administered 2 surveys to WA Notify users who received notification of a possible COVID-19 exposure. The initial survey, sent when users received a notification, focused on intent to engage in protective behaviors. The follow-up survey captured data on self-reported actual engagement in protective behaviors and contact by a public health contact tracer. RESULTS Of 1507 WA Notify users who completed the initial survey, 40.1% (n = 604) reported intending to seek COVID-19 testing and 67.1% (n = 1011) intended to watch for COVID-19 symptoms. Of 407 respondents to the follow-up survey, 57.5% (n = 234) reported getting tested and 84.3% (n = 343) reported watching for COVID-19 symptoms. Approximately 84% (n = 1266) of respondents to the initial survey received a notification from WA Notify before being reached by public health contact tracers; on follow-up, 42.5% (n = 173) of respondents reported never being contacted by public health. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that WA Notify users may initiate protective behaviors earlier than nonusers who will not know of an exposure until notified by public health or by a known contact. Digital EN tools may be a valuable addition to existing public health outbreak investigation and response activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet G. Baseman
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Debra Revere
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hood JE, Kubiak RW, Avoundjian T, Kern E, Fagalde M, Collins HN, Meacham E, Baldwin M, Lechtenberg RJ, Bennett A, Thibault CS, Stewart S, Duchin JS, Golden MR. A Multifaceted Evaluation of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing Program in King County, Washington. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2022; 28:334-343. [PMID: 35616571 PMCID: PMC9119327 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite the massive scale of COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) programs operating worldwide, the evidence supporting the intervention's public health impact is limited. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the Public Health-Seattle & King County (PHSKC) CI/CT program, including its reach, timeliness, effect on isolation and quarantine (I&Q) adherence, and potential to mitigate pandemic-related hardships. DESIGN This program evaluation used descriptive statistics to analyze surveillance records, case and contact interviews, referral records, and survey data provided by a sample of cases who had recently ended isolation. SETTING The PHSKC is one of the largest governmental local health departments in the United States. It serves more than 2.2 million people who reside in Seattle and 38 other municipalities. PARTICIPANTS King County residents who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between July 2020 and June 2021. INTERVENTION The PHSKC integrated COVID-19 CI/CT with prevention education and service provision. RESULTS The PHSKC CI/CT team interviewed 42 900 cases (82% of cases eligible for CI/CT), a mean of 6.1 days after symptom onset and 3.4 days after SARS-CoV-2 testing. Cases disclosed the names and addresses of 10 817 unique worksites (mean = 0.8/interview) and 11 432 other recently visited locations (mean = 0.5/interview) and provided contact information for 62 987 household members (mean = 2.7/interview) and 14 398 nonhousehold contacts (mean = 0.3/interview). The CI/CT team helped arrange COVID-19 testing for 5650 contacts, facilitated grocery delivery for 7253 households, and referred 9127 households for financial assistance. End of I&Q Survey participants (n = 304, 54% of sampled) reported self-notifying an average of 4 nonhousehold contacts and 69% agreed that the information and referrals provided by the CI/CT team helped them stay in isolation. CONCLUSIONS In the 12-month evaluation period, CI/CT reached 42 611 households and identified thousands of exposure venues. The timing of CI/CT relative to infectiousness and difficulty eliciting nonhousehold contacts may have attenuated the intervention's effect. Through promotion of I&Q guidance and services, CI/CT can help mitigate pandemic-related hardships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E. Hood
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Rachel W. Kubiak
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Tigran Avoundjian
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Eli Kern
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Meaghan Fagalde
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Hannah N. Collins
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Elizabeth Meacham
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Megan Baldwin
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Richard J. Lechtenberg
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Amy Bennett
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Christina S. Thibault
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Sarah Stewart
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Jeffrey S. Duchin
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| | - Matthew R. Golden
- Public Health—Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Kubiak, Avoundjian, Duchin, and Golden, Messrs Kern and Lechtenberg, and Mss Fagalde, Collins, Meacham, Baldwin, Bennett, Thibault, and Stewart); University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington (Drs Hood, Duchin, and Golden); University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington (Drs Duchin and Golden); Seattle University, College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington (Dr Hood); and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Collins)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gunaratne C, Reyes R, Hemberg E, O'Reilly UM. Evaluating efficacy of indoor non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 outbreaks with a coupled spatial-SIR agent-based simulation framework. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6202. [PMID: 35418652 PMCID: PMC9007058 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09942-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Contagious respiratory diseases, such as COVID-19, depend on sufficiently prolonged exposures for the successful transmission of the underlying pathogen. It is important that organizations evaluate the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical interventions aimed at mitigating viral transmission among their personnel. We have developed a operational risk assessment simulation framework that couples a spatial agent-based model of movement with an agent-based SIR model to assess the relative risks of different intervention strategies. By applying our model on MIT's Stata center, we assess the impacts of three possible dimensions of intervention: one-way vs unrestricted movement, population size allowed onsite, and frequency of leaving designated work location for breaks. We find that there is no significant impact made by one-way movement restrictions over unrestricted movement. Instead, we find that reducing the frequency at which individuals leave their workstations combined with lowering the number of individuals admitted below the current recommendations lowers the likelihood of highly connected individuals within the contact networks that emerge, which in turn lowers the overall risk of infection. We discover three classes of possible interventions based on their epidemiological effects. By assuming a direct relationship between data on secondary attack rates and transmissibility in the agent-based SIR model, we compare relative infection risk of four respiratory illnesses, MERS, SARS, COVID-19, and Measles, within the simulated area, and recommend appropriate intervention guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chathika Gunaratne
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
| | - Rene Reyes
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Erik Hemberg
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Una-May O'Reilly
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rizi AK, Faqeeh A, Badie-Modiri A, Kivelä M. Epidemic spreading and digital contact tracing: Effects of heterogeneous mixing and quarantine failures. Phys Rev E 2022; 105:044313. [PMID: 35590624 DOI: 10.1103/physreve.105.044313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Contact tracing via digital tracking applications installed on mobile phones is an important tool for controlling epidemic spreading. Its effectivity can be quantified by modifying the standard methodology for analyzing percolation and connectivity of contact networks. We apply this framework to networks with varying degree distributions, numbers of application users, and probabilities of quarantine failures. Further, we study structured populations with homophily and heterophily and the possibility of degree-targeted application distribution. Our results are based on a combination of explicit simulations and mean-field analysis. They indicate that there can be major differences in the epidemic size and epidemic probabilities which are equivalent in the normal susceptible-infectious-recovered (SIR) processes. Further, degree heterogeneity is seen to be especially important for the epidemic threshold but not as much for the epidemic size. The probability that tracing leads to quarantines is not as important as the application adoption rate. Finally, both strong homophily and especially heterophily with regard to application adoption can be detrimental. Overall, epidemic dynamics are very sensitive to all of the parameter values we tested out, which makes the problem of estimating the effect of digital contact tracing an inherently multidimensional problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbas K Rizi
- Department of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, FI-00076, Finland
| | - Ali Faqeeh
- Department of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, FI-00076, Finland
- Mathematics Applications Consortium for Science & Industry, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland
- Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47408, USA
| | - Arash Badie-Modiri
- Department of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, FI-00076, Finland
| | - Mikko Kivelä
- Department of Computer Science, School of Science, Aalto University, FI-00076, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Baha Raja D, Abdul Taib NA, Teo AKJ, Jayaraj VJ, Ting CY. Vaccines alone are no silver bullets: a modeling study on the impact of efficient contact tracing on COVID-19 infection and transmission in Malaysia. Int Health 2022; 15:37-46. [PMID: 35265998 PMCID: PMC8992270 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The computer simulation presented in this study aimed to investigate the effect of contact tracing on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission and infection in the context of rising vaccination rates. METHODS This study proposed a deterministic, compartmental model with contact tracing and vaccination components. We defined contact tracing effectiveness as the proportion of contacts of a positive case that was successfully traced and the vaccination rate as the proportion of daily doses administered per population in Malaysia. Sensitivity analyses on the untraced and infectious populations were conducted. RESULTS At a vaccination rate of 1.4%, contact tracing with an effectiveness of 70% could delay the peak of untraced asymptomatic cases by 17 d and reduce it by 70% compared with 30% contact tracing effectiveness. A similar trend was observed for symptomatic cases when a similar experiment setting was used. We also performed sensitivity analyses by using different combinations of contact tracing effectiveness and vaccination rates. In all scenarios, the effect of contact tracing on COVID-19 incidence persisted for both asymptomatic and symptomatic cases. CONCLUSIONS While vaccines are progressively rolled out, efficient contact tracing must be rapidly implemented concurrently to reach, find, test, isolate and support the affected populations to bring COVID-19 under control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhesi Baha Raja
- Ainqa Health, Lot 7.01 B & C, Menara BRDB, 285 Jalan Maarof, Bukit Bandaraya, 59000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nur Asheila Abdul Taib
- Ainqa Health, Lot 7.01 B & C, Menara BRDB, 285 Jalan Maarof, Bukit Bandaraya, 59000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Alvin Kuo Jing Teo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549
| | - Vivek Jason Jayaraj
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Level 5, Block I, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Review on people's trust on home use medical devices during Covid-19 pandemic in India. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY 2022; 12:527-546. [PMID: 35223360 PMCID: PMC8863408 DOI: 10.1007/s12553-022-00645-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
With the rapid development of the medical device against COVID-19 is an excellent achievement. There are numerous obstacles effectively facing the worldwide population, from manufacture to distribution, deployment and, acceptance. Many manufacturers have entered the market rivalry as people's knowledge and demand for home-use medical equipment has increased. India represents a compelling market opportunity for global medical device manufacturers. Substantial growth for the Indian medical device industry is expected to be driven by the current low per-person spending rate for medical devices. The growth of the medical devices industry in India raises competition law issues (anti-trust) and therefore maintaining public trust in home-use medical devices during COVID-19 will be as essential. The review article aims to create awareness among people about commonly used medical devices during the COVID-19 pandemic and to survey people’s trust in home usable medical devices in India. In a worldwide pandemic, manufacturers of medical devices face insufficient storage and the impossibility of meeting the requirements of the health centre. The sale of some of the most significant medical devices has increased, making it more difficult for the medical device industry to satisfy demand with high-quality goods since the quality of COVID-19 items plays a vital part in the present scenario. Despite the difficulty in providing enough medical equipment during a pandemic, they are striving to adapt to the circumstance. After recognizing the need to promote awareness and grasp the selling, and production, handling of medical instruments during COVID-19 at home was conducted. In addition, medical equipment manufacturers and distributors look at this scenario as an opportunity to profit more. This review article would enable researchers during COVID-19 to build more knowledge and widespread trust in medical technologies respectively.
Collapse
|
25
|
Bsat R, Chemaitelly H, Coyle P, Tang P, Hasan MR, Al Kanaani Z, Al Kuwari E, Butt AA, Jeremijenko A, Kaleeckal AH, Latif AN, Shaik RM, Nasrallah GK, Benslimane FM, Al Khatib HA, Yassine HM, Al Kuwari MG, Al Romaihi HE, Al-Thani MH, Al Khal A, Bertollini R, Abu-Raddad LJ, Ayoub HH. Characterizing the effective reproduction number during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Qatar’s experience. J Glob Health 2022; 12:05004. [PMID: 35136602 PMCID: PMC8819337 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.05004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effective reproduction number, Rt, is a tool to track and understand pandemic dynamics. This investigation of Rt estimations was conducted to guide the national COVID-19 response in Qatar, from the onset of the pandemic until August 18, 2021. Methods Real-time “empirical” RtEmpirical was estimated using five methods, including the Robert Koch Institute, Cislaghi, Systrom-Bettencourt and Ribeiro, Wallinga and Teunis, and Cori et al. methods. Rt was also estimated using a transmission dynamics model (RtModel-based). Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Correlations between different Rt estimates were assessed by calculating correlation coefficients, and agreements between these estimates were assessed through Bland-Altman plots. Results RtEmpirical captured the evolution of the pandemic through three waves, public health response landmarks, effects of major social events, transient fluctuations coinciding with significant clusters of infection, and introduction and expansion of the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant. The various estimation methods produced consistent and overall comparable RtEmpirical estimates with generally large correlation coefficients. The Wallinga and Teunis method was the fastest at detecting changes in pandemic dynamics. RtEmpirical estimates were consistent whether using time series of symptomatic PCR-confirmed cases, all PCR-confirmed cases, acute-care hospital admissions, or ICU-care hospital admissions, to proxy trends in true infection incidence. RtModel-based correlated strongly with RtEmpirical and provided an average RtEmpirical. Conclusions Rt estimations were robust and generated consistent results regardless of the data source or the method of estimation. Findings affirmed an influential role for Rt estimations in guiding national responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, even in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghid Bsat
- Mathematics Program, Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hiam Chemaitelly
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Cornell University, Doha, Qatar
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Disease Epidemiology Analytics on HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections, and Viral Hepatitis, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Cornell University, Qatar Foundation – Education City, Doha, Qatar
| | - Peter Coyle
- Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Biomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queens University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Tang
- Department of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | | | | | | | - Adeel A Butt
- Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Gheyath K Nasrallah
- Biomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Fatiha M Benslimane
- Biomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hebah A Al Khatib
- Biomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hadi M Yassine
- Biomedical Research Center, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Health Sciences, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Laith J Abu-Raddad
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology Group, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Cornell University, Doha, Qatar
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Disease Epidemiology Analytics on HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections, and Viral Hepatitis, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Cornell University, Qatar Foundation – Education City, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Member of QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Houssein H Ayoub
- Mathematics Program, Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Walrave M, Waeterloos C, Ponnet K. Reasons for Nonuse, Discontinuation of Use, and Acceptance of Additional Functionalities of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022; 8:e22113. [PMID: 34794117 PMCID: PMC8763311 DOI: 10.2196/22113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In several countries, contact tracing apps (CTAs) have been introduced to warn users if they have had high-risk contacts that could expose them to SARS-CoV-2 and could, therefore, develop COVID-19 or further transmit the virus. For CTAs to be effective, a sufficient critical mass of users is needed. Until now, adoption of these apps in several countries has been limited, resulting in questions on which factors prevent app uptake or stimulate discontinuation of app use. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate individuals' reasons for not using, or stopping use of, a CTA, in particular, the Coronalert app. Users' and nonusers' attitudes toward the app's potential impact was assessed in Belgium. To further stimulate interest and potential use of a CTA, the study also investigated the population's interest in new functionalities. METHODS An online survey was administered in Belgium to a sample of 1850 respondents aged 18 to 64 years. Data were collected between October 30 and November 2, 2020. Sociodemographic differences were assessed between users and nonusers. We analyzed both groups' attitudes toward the potential impact of CTAs and their acceptance of new app functionalities. RESULTS Our data showed that 64.9% (1201/1850) of our respondents were nonusers of the CTA under study; this included individuals who did not install the app, those who downloaded but did not activate the app, and those who uninstalled the app. While we did not find any sociodemographic differences between users and nonusers, attitudes toward the app and its functionalities seemed to differ. The main reasons for not downloading and using the app were a perceived lack of advantages (308/991, 31.1%), worries about privacy (290/991, 29.3%), and, to a lesser extent, not having a smartphone (183/991, 18.5%). Users of the CTA agreed more with the potential of such apps to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic. Overall, nonusers found the possibility of extending the CTA with future functionalities to be less acceptable than users. However, among users, acceptability also tended to differ. Among users, functionalities relating to access and control, such as digital certificates or "green cards" for events, were less accepted (358/649, 55.2%) than functionalities focusing on informing citizens about the spread of the virus (453/649, 69.8%) or making an appointment to get tested (525/649, 80.9%). CONCLUSIONS Our results show that app users were more convinced of the CTA's utility and more inclined to accept new app features than nonusers. Moreover, nonusers had more CTA-related privacy concerns. Therefore, to further stimulate app adoption and use, its potential advantages and privacy-preserving mechanisms need to be stressed. Building further knowledge on the forms of resistance among nonusers is important for responding to these barriers through the app's further development and communication campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Walrave
- MIOS Research Group and GOVTRUST Centre of Excellence, Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cato Waeterloos
- IMEC-MICT Research Group, Department of Communication Sciences, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Ponnet
- IMEC-MICT Research Group, Department of Communication Sciences, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Adoni Valmiki EK, Yadlapalli R, Oroszi T. Global Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Health (London) 2022. [DOI: 10.4236/health.2022.147057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
28
|
Thompson J, Wattam S. Estimating the impact of interventions against COVID-19: From lockdown to vaccination. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0261330. [PMID: 34919576 PMCID: PMC8683038 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease of humans caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the first case was identified in China in December 2019 the disease has spread worldwide, leading to an ongoing pandemic. In this article, we present an agent-based model of COVID-19 in Luxembourg, and use it to estimate the impact, on cases and deaths, of interventions including testing, contact tracing, lockdown, curfew and vaccination. Our model is based on collation, with agents performing activities and moving between locations accordingly. The model is highly heterogeneous, featuring spatial clustering, over 2000 behavioural types and a 10 minute time resolution. The model is validated against COVID-19 clinical monitoring data collected in Luxembourg in 2020. Our model predicts far fewer cases and deaths than the equivalent equation-based SEIR model. In particular, with R0 = 2.45, the SEIR model infects 87% of the resident population while our agent-based model infects only around 23% of the resident population. Our simulations suggest that testing and contract tracing reduce cases substantially, but are less effective at reducing deaths. Lockdowns are very effective although costly, while the impact of an 11pm-6am curfew is relatively small. When vaccinating against a future outbreak, our results suggest that herd immunity can be achieved at relatively low coverage, with substantial levels of protection achieved with only 30% of the population fully immune. When vaccinating in the midst of an outbreak, the challenge is more difficult. In this context, we investigate the impact of vaccine efficacy, capacity, hesitancy and strategy. We conclude that, short of a permanent lockdown, vaccination is by far the most effective way to suppress and ultimately control the spread of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Thompson
- Dept. of Mathematics, University of Luxembourg, Esch sur Alzette, Luxembourg
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sharif MA, Dixon E, Bair EF, Garzon C, Gibson L, Linn K, Volpp K. Effect of Nudges on Downloads of COVID-19 Exposure Notification Apps: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2140839. [PMID: 34940870 PMCID: PMC8703239 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This randomized clinical trial examines the effect of digital contact tracing using smartphone app nudges to increase downloads of Pennsylvania’s COVID Alert PA app.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa A. Sharif
- Marketing Department, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Erica Dixon
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE) at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Elizabeth F. Bair
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Carolina Garzon
- Center for Health Care Innovation, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Laura Gibson
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Kristin Linn
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE) at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Kevin Volpp
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rusu AC, Emonet R, Farrahi K. Modelling digital and manual contact tracing for COVID-19. Are low uptakes and missed contacts deal-breakers? PLoS One 2021; 16:e0259969. [PMID: 34793526 PMCID: PMC8601513 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Comprehensive testing schemes, followed by adequate contact tracing and isolation, represent the best public health interventions we can employ to reduce the impact of an ongoing epidemic when no or limited vaccine supplies are available and the implications of a full lockdown are to be avoided. However, the process of tracing can prove feckless for highly-contagious viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. The interview-based approaches often miss contacts and involve significant delays, while digital solutions can suffer from insufficient adoption rates or inadequate usage patterns. Here we present a novel way of modelling different contact tracing strategies, using a generalized multi-site mean-field model, which can naturally assess the impact of manual and digital approaches alike. Our methodology can readily be applied to any compartmental formulation, thus enabling the study of more complex pathogen dynamics. We use this technique to simulate a newly-defined epidemiological model, SEIR-T, and show that, given the right conditions, tracing in a COVID-19 epidemic can be effective even when digital uptakes are sub-optimal or interviewers miss a fair proportion of the contacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei C. Rusu
- Vision, Learning and Control Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rémi Emonet
- Department of Machine Learning, Laboratoire Hubert Curien, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Katayoun Farrahi
- Vision, Learning and Control Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Frimpong JA, Helleringer S. Strategies to increase downloads of COVID-19 exposure notification apps: A discrete choice experiment. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258945. [PMID: 34723981 PMCID: PMC8559927 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Exposure notification apps have been developed to assist in notifying individuals of recent exposures to SARS-CoV-2. However, in several countries, such apps have had limited uptake. We assessed whether strategies to increase downloads of exposure notification apps should emphasize improving the accuracy of the apps in recording contacts and exposures, strengthening privacy protections and/or offering financial incentives to potential users. In a discrete choice experiment with potential app users in the US, financial incentives were more than twice as important in decision-making about app downloads, than privacy protections, and app accuracy. The probability that a potential user would download an exposure notification app increased by 40% when offered a $100 reward to download (relative to a reference scenario in which the app is free). Financial incentives might help exposure notification apps reach uptake levels that improve the effectiveness of contact tracing programs and ultimately enhance efforts to control SARS-CoV-2. Rapid, pragmatic trials of financial incentives for app downloads in real-life settings are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemima A. Frimpong
- Division of Social Science, Program in Social Research and Public Policy, New York University–Abu Dhabi (UAE), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
- Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Stéphane Helleringer
- Division of Social Science, Program in Social Research and Public Policy, New York University–Abu Dhabi (UAE), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lueks W, Benzler J, Bogdanov D, Kirchner G, Lucas R, Oliveira R, Preneel B, Salathé M, Troncoso C, von Wyl V. Toward a Common Performance and Effectiveness Terminology for Digital Proximity Tracing Applications. Front Digit Health 2021; 3:677929. [PMID: 34713149 PMCID: PMC8521913 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.677929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital proximity tracing (DPT) for Sars-CoV-2 pandemic mitigation is a complex intervention with the primary goal to notify app users about possible risk exposures to infected persons. DPT not only relies on the technical functioning of the proximity tracing application and its backend server, but also on seamless integration of health system processes such as laboratory testing, communication of results (and their validation), generation of notification codes, manual contact tracing, and management of app-notified users. Policymakers and DPT operators need to know whether their system works as expected in terms of speed or yield (performance) and whether DPT is making an effective contribution to pandemic mitigation (also in comparison to and beyond established mitigation measures, particularly manual contact tracing). Thereby, performance and effectiveness are not to be confused. Not only are there conceptual differences but also diverse data requirements. For example, comparative effectiveness measures may require information generated outside the DPT system, e.g., from manual contact tracing. This article describes differences between performance and effectiveness measures and attempts to develop a terminology and classification system for DPT evaluation. We discuss key aspects for critical assessments of whether the integration of additional data measurements into DPT apps may facilitate understanding of performance and effectiveness of planned and deployed DPT apps. Therefore, the terminology and a classification system may offer some guidance to DPT system operators regarding which measurements to prioritize. DPT developers and operators may also make conscious decisions to integrate measures for epidemic monitoring but should be aware that this introduces a secondary purpose to DPT. Ultimately, the integration of further information (e.g., regarding exact exposure time) into DPT involves a trade-off between data granularity and linkage on the one hand, and privacy on the other. More data may lead to better epidemiological information but may also increase the privacy risks associated with the system, and thus decrease public DPT acceptance. Decision-makers should be aware of the trade-off and take it into account when planning and developing DPT systems or intending to assess the added value of DPT relative to the existing contact tracing systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Lueks
- Security and Privacy Engineering Laboratory, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Raquel Lucas
- Medical School and Institute of Public Health (EPIUnit), Universidade Do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Oliveira
- Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science & University of Minho, Porto, Portugal
| | - Bart Preneel
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and IMEC, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marcel Salathé
- Digital Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Global Health Institute, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carmela Troncoso
- Security and Privacy Engineering Laboratory, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Viktor von Wyl
- Digital and Mobile Health Group, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Šušteršič T, Blagojević A, Cvetković D, Cvetković A, Lorencin I, Šegota SB, Milovanović D, Baskić D, Car Z, Filipović N. Epidemiological Predictive Modeling of COVID-19 Infection: Development, Testing, and Implementation on the Population of the Benelux Union. Front Public Health 2021; 9:727274. [PMID: 34778171 PMCID: PMC8580942 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.727274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the whole world has taken interest in the mechanisms of its spread and development. Mathematical models have been valuable instruments for the study of the spread and control of infectious diseases. For that purpose, we propose a two-way approach in modeling COVID-19 spread: a susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered, deceased (SEIRD) model based on differential equations and a long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning model. The SEIRD model is a compartmental epidemiological model with included components: susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered, deceased. In the case of the SEIRD model, official statistical data available online for countries of Belgium, Netherlands, and Luxembourg (Benelux) in the period of March 15 2020 to March 15 2021 were used. Based on them, we have calculated key parameters and forward them to the epidemiological model, which will predict the number of infected, deceased, and recovered people. Results show that the SEIRD model is able to accurately predict several peaks for all the three countries of interest, with very small root mean square error (RMSE), except for the mild cases (maximum RMSE was 240.79 ± 90.556), which can be explained by the fact that no official data were available for mild cases, but this number was derived from other statistics. On the other hand, LSTM represents a special kind of recurrent neural network structure that can comparatively learn long-term temporal dependencies. Results show that LSTM is capable of predicting several peaks based on the position of previous peaks with low values of RMSE. Higher values of RMSE are observed in the number of infected cases in Belgium (RMSE was 535.93) and Netherlands (RMSE was 434.28), and are expected because of thousands of people getting infected per day in those countries. In future studies, we will extend the models to include mobility information, variants of concern, as well as a medical intervention, etc. A prognostic model could help us predict epidemic peaks. In that way, we could react in a timely manner by introducing new or tightening existing measures before the health system is overloaded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijana Šušteršič
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- Bioengineering Research and Development Center (BioIRC), Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Andjela Blagojević
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- Bioengineering Research and Development Center (BioIRC), Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Danijela Cvetković
- Institute for Information Technologies, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Aleksandar Cvetković
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Ivan Lorencin
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | | | - Dragan Milovanović
- Clinical Centre Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Dejan Baskić
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- Institute of Public Health Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Zlatan Car
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Nenad Filipović
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- Bioengineering Research and Development Center (BioIRC), Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hong P, Herigon JC, Uptegraft C, Samuel B, Brown DL, Bickel J, Hron JD. Use of clinical data to augment healthcare worker contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 29:142-148. [PMID: 34623426 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This work examined the secondary use of clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) for screening our healthcare worker (HCW) population for potential exposures to patients with coronavirus disease 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study at a free-standing, quaternary care pediatric hospital comparing first-degree, patient-HCW pairs identified by the hospital's COVID-19 contact tracing team (CTT) to those identified using EHR clinical event data (EHR Report). The primary outcome was the number of patient-HCW pairs detected by each process. RESULTS Among 233 patients with COVID-19, our EHR Report identified 4,116 patient-HCW pairs, including 2,365 (30.0%) of the 7,890 pairs detected by the CTT. The EHR Report also revealed 1,751 pairs not identified by the CTT. The highest number of patient-HCW pairs per patient was detected in the inpatient care venue. Nurses comprised the most frequently identified HCW role overall. CONCLUSION Automated methods to screen HCWs for potential exposure to patients with COVID-19 using clinical event data from the EHR are likely to improve epidemiologic surveillance by contact tracing programs and represent a viable and readily available strategy which should be considered by other institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hong
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua C Herigon
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, USA, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Colby Uptegraft
- Health Informatics Branch, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Bassem Samuel
- Information Services Department, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - D Levin Brown
- Information Services Department, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan Bickel
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Information Services Department, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan D Hron
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Witteveen D, de Pedraza P. The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021; 7:e27892. [PMID: 34081602 PMCID: PMC8382155 DOI: 10.2196/27892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Contact tracing apps are considered useful means to monitor SARS-CoV-2 infections during the off-peak stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Their effectiveness is, however, dependent on the uptake of such COVID-19 apps. Objective We examined the role of individuals’ general health status in their willingness to use a COVID-19 tracing app as well as the roles of socioeconomic characteristics and COVID-19 proximity. Methods We drew data from the WageIndicator Foundation Living and Working in Coronavirus Times survey. The survey collected data on labor market status as well as the potential confounders of the relationship between general health and COVID-19 tracing app usage, such as sociodemographics and regular smartphone usage data. The survey also contained information that allowed us to examine the role of COVID-19 proximity, such as whether an individual has contracted SARS-CoV-2, whether an individual has family members and colleagues with COVID-19, and whether an individual exhibits COVID-19 pandemic–induced depressive and anxiety symptoms. We selected data that were collected in Spain, Italy, Germany, and the Netherlands from individuals aged between 18 and 70 years (N=4504). Logistic regressions were used to measure individuals’ willingness to use a COVID-19 tracing app. Results We found that the influence that socioeconomic factors have on COVID-19 tracing app usage varied dramatically between the four countries, although individuals experiencing forms of not being employed (ie, recent job loss and inactivity) consistently had a lower willingness to use a contact tracing app (effect size: 24.6%) compared to that of employees (effect size: 33.4%; P<.001). Among the selected COVID-19 proximity indicators, having a close family member with SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with higher contact tracing app usage (effect size: 36.3% vs 27.1%; P<.001). After accounting for these proximity factors and the country-based variations therein, we found that having a poorer general health status was significantly associated with a much higher likelihood of contact tracing app usage; compared to a self-reported “very good” health status (estimated probability of contact tracing app use: 29.6%), the “good” (estimated probability: +4.6%; 95% CI 1.2%-8.1%) and “fair or bad” (estimated probability: +6.3%; 95% CI 2.3%-10.3%) health statuses were associated with a markedly higher willingness to use a COVID-19 tracing app. Conclusions Current public health policies aim to promote the use of smartphone-based contact tracing apps during the off-peak periods of the COVID-19 pandemic. Campaigns that emphasize the health benefits of COVID-19 tracing apps may contribute the most to the uptake of such apps. Public health campaigns that rely on digital platforms would also benefit from seriously considering the country-specific distribution of privacy concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Witteveen
- Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Pablo de Pedraza
- European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Directorate I - Competences, Unit I.1 - Monitoring, Indicators and Impact Evaluation, Ispra (VA), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Grekousis G, Liu Y. Digital contact tracing, community uptake, and proximity awareness technology to fight COVID-19: a systematic review. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY 2021; 71:102995. [PMID: 34002124 PMCID: PMC8114870 DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Digital contact tracing provides an expeditious and comprehensive way to collect and analyze data on people's proximity, location, movement, and health status. However, this technique raises concerns about data privacy and its overall effectiveness. This paper contributes to this debate as it provides a systematic review of digital contact tracing studies between January 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Following the PRISMA protocol for systematic reviews and the CHEERS statement for quality assessment, 580 papers were initially screened, and 19 papers were included in a qualitative synthesis. We add to the current literature in three ways. First, we evaluate whether digital contact tracing can mitigate COVID-19 by either reducing the effective reproductive number or the infected cases. Second, we study whether digital is more effective than manual contact tracing. Third, we analyze how proximity/location awareness technologies affect data privacy and population participation. We also discuss proximity/location accuracy problems arising when these technologies are applied in different built environments (i.e., home, transport, mall, park). This review provides a strong rationale for using digital contact tracing under specific requirements. Outcomes may inform current digital contact tracing implementation efforts worldwide regarding the potential benefits, technical limitations, and trade-offs between effectiveness and privacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Grekousis
- School of Geography and Planning, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, No 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, Haizhu, 510275, China
- Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Sun Yat-sen University, No 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, Haizhu, 510275, China
| | - Ye Liu
- School of Geography and Planning, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, No 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, Haizhu, 510275, China
- Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Sun Yat-sen University, No 135, Xingang Xi Road, Guangzhou, Haizhu, 510275, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kerr CC, Stuart RM, Mistry D, Abeysuriya RG, Rosenfeld K, Hart GR, Núñez RC, Cohen JA, Selvaraj P, Hagedorn B, George L, Jastrzębski M, Izzo AS, Fowler G, Palmer A, Delport D, Scott N, Kelly SL, Bennette CS, Wagner BG, Chang ST, Oron AP, Wenger EA, Panovska-Griffiths J, Famulare M, Klein DJ. Covasim: An agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009149. [PMID: 34310589 DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.10.20097469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has created an urgent need for models that can project epidemic trends, explore intervention scenarios, and estimate resource needs. Here we describe the methodology of Covasim (COVID-19 Agent-based Simulator), an open-source model developed to help address these questions. Covasim includes country-specific demographic information on age structure and population size; realistic transmission networks in different social layers, including households, schools, workplaces, long-term care facilities, and communities; age-specific disease outcomes; and intrahost viral dynamics, including viral-load-based transmissibility. Covasim also supports an extensive set of interventions, including non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as physical distancing and protective equipment; pharmaceutical interventions, including vaccination; and testing interventions, such as symptomatic and asymptomatic testing, isolation, contact tracing, and quarantine. These interventions can incorporate the effects of delays, loss-to-follow-up, micro-targeting, and other factors. Implemented in pure Python, Covasim has been designed with equal emphasis on performance, ease of use, and flexibility: realistic and highly customized scenarios can be run on a standard laptop in under a minute. In collaboration with local health agencies and policymakers, Covasim has already been applied to examine epidemic dynamics and inform policy decisions in more than a dozen countries in Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cliff C Kerr
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Robyn M Stuart
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dina Mistry
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Katherine Rosenfeld
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Gregory R Hart
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Rafael C Núñez
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Jamie A Cohen
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Prashanth Selvaraj
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Brittany Hagedorn
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Lauren George
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Amanda S Izzo
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Greer Fowler
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Anna Palmer
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Nick Scott
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Caroline S Bennette
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Bradley G Wagner
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Stewart T Chang
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Assaf P Oron
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Edward A Wenger
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology and The Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Famulare
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Daniel J Klein
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hinch R, Probert WJM, Nurtay A, Kendall M, Wymant C, Hall M, Lythgoe K, Bulas Cruz A, Zhao L, Stewart A, Ferretti L, Montero D, Warren J, Mather N, Abueg M, Wu N, Legat O, Bentley K, Mead T, Van-Vuuren K, Feldner-Busztin D, Ristori T, Finkelstein A, Bonsall DG, Abeler-Dörner L, Fraser C. OpenABM-Covid19-An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009146. [PMID: 34252083 DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.16.20195925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has spread across the world, causing high mortality and unprecedented restrictions on social and economic activity. Policymakers are assessing how best to navigate through the ongoing epidemic, with computational models being used to predict the spread of infection and assess the impact of public health measures. Here, we present OpenABM-Covid19: an agent-based simulation of the epidemic including detailed age-stratification and realistic social networks. By default the model is parameterised to UK demographics and calibrated to the UK epidemic, however, it can easily be re-parameterised for other countries. OpenABM-Covid19 can evaluate non-pharmaceutical interventions, including both manual and digital contact tracing, and vaccination programmes. It can simulate a population of 1 million people in seconds per day, allowing parameter sweeps and formal statistical model-based inference. The code is open-source and has been developed by teams both inside and outside academia, with an emphasis on formal testing, documentation, modularity and transparency. A key feature of OpenABM-Covid19 are its Python and R interfaces, which has allowed scientists and policymakers to simulate dynamic packages of interventions and help compare options to suppress the COVID-19 epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hinch
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - William J M Probert
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Anel Nurtay
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Kendall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Wymant
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Hall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Lythgoe
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Bulas Cruz
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lele Zhao
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Stewart
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Luca Ferretti
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Matthew Abueg
- Google Research, Mountain View, California, United States of America
| | - Neo Wu
- Google Research, Mountain View, California, United States of America
| | - Olivier Legat
- Google Research, Mountain View, California, United States of America
| | - Katie Bentley
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Informatics, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Mead
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Informatics, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Tommaso Ristori
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Anthony Finkelstein
- Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - David G Bonsall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford University NHS Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lucie Abeler-Dörner
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Fraser
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kerr CC, Stuart RM, Mistry D, Abeysuriya RG, Rosenfeld K, Hart GR, Núñez RC, Cohen JA, Selvaraj P, Hagedorn B, George L, Jastrzębski M, Izzo AS, Fowler G, Palmer A, Delport D, Scott N, Kelly SL, Bennette CS, Wagner BG, Chang ST, Oron AP, Wenger EA, Panovska-Griffiths J, Famulare M, Klein DJ. Covasim: An agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009149. [PMID: 34310589 PMCID: PMC8341708 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has created an urgent need for models that can project epidemic trends, explore intervention scenarios, and estimate resource needs. Here we describe the methodology of Covasim (COVID-19 Agent-based Simulator), an open-source model developed to help address these questions. Covasim includes country-specific demographic information on age structure and population size; realistic transmission networks in different social layers, including households, schools, workplaces, long-term care facilities, and communities; age-specific disease outcomes; and intrahost viral dynamics, including viral-load-based transmissibility. Covasim also supports an extensive set of interventions, including non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as physical distancing and protective equipment; pharmaceutical interventions, including vaccination; and testing interventions, such as symptomatic and asymptomatic testing, isolation, contact tracing, and quarantine. These interventions can incorporate the effects of delays, loss-to-follow-up, micro-targeting, and other factors. Implemented in pure Python, Covasim has been designed with equal emphasis on performance, ease of use, and flexibility: realistic and highly customized scenarios can be run on a standard laptop in under a minute. In collaboration with local health agencies and policymakers, Covasim has already been applied to examine epidemic dynamics and inform policy decisions in more than a dozen countries in Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cliff C. Kerr
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Robyn M. Stuart
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dina Mistry
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Katherine Rosenfeld
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Gregory R. Hart
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Rafael C. Núñez
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Jamie A. Cohen
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Prashanth Selvaraj
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Brittany Hagedorn
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Lauren George
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Amanda S. Izzo
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Greer Fowler
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Anna Palmer
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Nick Scott
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Caroline S. Bennette
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Bradley G. Wagner
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Stewart T. Chang
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Assaf P. Oron
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Edward A. Wenger
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology and The Queen’s College, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Famulare
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Daniel J. Klein
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Global Health Division, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hinch R, Probert WJM, Nurtay A, Kendall M, Wymant C, Hall M, Lythgoe K, Bulas Cruz A, Zhao L, Stewart A, Ferretti L, Montero D, Warren J, Mather N, Abueg M, Wu N, Legat O, Bentley K, Mead T, Van-Vuuren K, Feldner-Busztin D, Ristori T, Finkelstein A, Bonsall DG, Abeler-Dörner L, Fraser C. OpenABM-Covid19-An agent-based model for non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 including contact tracing. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009146. [PMID: 34252083 PMCID: PMC8328312 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has spread across the world, causing high mortality and unprecedented restrictions on social and economic activity. Policymakers are assessing how best to navigate through the ongoing epidemic, with computational models being used to predict the spread of infection and assess the impact of public health measures. Here, we present OpenABM-Covid19: an agent-based simulation of the epidemic including detailed age-stratification and realistic social networks. By default the model is parameterised to UK demographics and calibrated to the UK epidemic, however, it can easily be re-parameterised for other countries. OpenABM-Covid19 can evaluate non-pharmaceutical interventions, including both manual and digital contact tracing, and vaccination programmes. It can simulate a population of 1 million people in seconds per day, allowing parameter sweeps and formal statistical model-based inference. The code is open-source and has been developed by teams both inside and outside academia, with an emphasis on formal testing, documentation, modularity and transparency. A key feature of OpenABM-Covid19 are its Python and R interfaces, which has allowed scientists and policymakers to simulate dynamic packages of interventions and help compare options to suppress the COVID-19 epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hinch
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - William J. M. Probert
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Anel Nurtay
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Kendall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Wymant
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Hall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Lythgoe
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Bulas Cruz
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lele Zhao
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Stewart
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Luca Ferretti
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Matthew Abueg
- Google Research, Mountain View, California, United States of America
| | - Neo Wu
- Google Research, Mountain View, California, United States of America
| | - Olivier Legat
- Google Research, Mountain View, California, United States of America
| | - Katie Bentley
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Informatics, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Mead
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Informatics, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Tommaso Ristori
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Anthony Finkelstein
- Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - David G. Bonsall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford University NHS Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lucie Abeler-Dörner
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Fraser
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
WA Notify: the planning and implementation of a Bluetooth exposure notification tool for COVID-19 pandemic response in Washington State. Online J Public Health Inform 2021; 13:e8. [PMID: 34178242 DOI: 10.5210/ojphi.v13i1.11694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Bluetooth exposure notification tools for mobile phones have emerged as one way to support public health contact tracing and mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Many states have launched their own versions of these tools. Washington State's exposure notification tool, WA Notify, became available on November 30, 2020, following a one-month Seattle campus pilot at the University of Washington. By the end of April 2021, 25% of the state's population had activated WA Notify, one of the highest adoption rates in the country. Washington State's formation of an Exposure Notification Advisory Committee, early pilot testing, and use of the EN Express system framework were all important factors in its adoption. Continuous monitoring and willingness to make early adjustments such as switching to automated texting of verification codes have also been important for improving the tool's value. Evaluation work is ongoing to determine and quantify WA Notify's effectiveness, timeliness, and accessibility.
Collapse
|
42
|
Wymant C, Ferretti L, Tsallis D, Charalambides M, Abeler-Dörner L, Bonsall D, Hinch R, Kendall M, Milsom L, Ayres M, Holmes C, Briers M, Fraser C. The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app. Nature 2021; 594:408-412. [PMID: 33979832 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the emergence of digital contact tracing to help to prevent the spread of the disease. A mobile phone app records proximity events between app users, and when a user tests positive for COVID-19, their recent contacts can be notified instantly. Theoretical evidence has supported this new public health intervention1-6, but its epidemiological impact has remained uncertain7. Here we investigate the impact of the National Health Service (NHS) COVID-19 app for England and Wales, from its launch on 24 September 2020 to the end of December 2020. It was used regularly by approximately 16.5 million users (28% of the total population), and sent approximately 1.7 million exposure notifications: 4.2 per index case consenting to contact tracing. We estimated that the fraction of individuals notified by the app who subsequently showed symptoms and tested positive (the secondary attack rate (SAR)) was 6%, similar to the SAR for manually traced close contacts. We estimated the number of cases averted by the app using two complementary approaches: modelling based on the notifications and SAR gave an estimate of 284,000 (central 95% range of sensitivity analyses 108,000-450,000), and statistical comparison of matched neighbouring local authorities gave an estimate of 594,000 (95% confidence interval 317,000-914,000). Approximately one case was averted for each case consenting to notification of their contacts. We estimated that for every percentage point increase in app uptake, the number of cases could be reduced by 0.8% (using modelling) or 2.3% (using statistical analysis). These findings support the continued development and deployment of such apps in populations that are awaiting full protection from vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Wymant
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luca Ferretti
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Lucie Abeler-Dörner
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Bonsall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Hinch
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michelle Kendall
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Luke Milsom
- Department of Economics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Chris Holmes
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK.,Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Christophe Fraser
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Romero-Brufau S, Chopra A, Ryu AJ, Gel E, Raskar R, Kremers W, Anderson KS, Subramanian J, Krishnamurthy B, Singh A, Pasupathy K, Dong Y, O'Horo JC, Wilson WR, Mitchell O, Kingsley TC. Public health impact of delaying second dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine: simulation agent based modeling study. BMJ 2021; 373:n1087. [PMID: 33980718 PMCID: PMC8114182 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate population health outcomes with delayed second dose versus standard schedule of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. DESIGN Simulation agent based modeling study. SETTING Simulated population based on real world US county. PARTICIPANTS The simulation included 100 000 agents, with a representative distribution of demographics and occupations. Networks of contacts were established to simulate potentially infectious interactions though occupation, household, and random interactions. INTERVENTIONS Simulation of standard covid-19 vaccination versus delayed second dose vaccination prioritizing the first dose. The simulation runs were replicated 10 times. Sensitivity analyses included first dose vaccine efficacy of 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% after day 12 post-vaccination; vaccination rate of 0.1%, 0.3%, and 1% of population per day; assuming the vaccine prevents only symptoms but not asymptomatic spread (that is, non-sterilizing vaccine); and an alternative vaccination strategy that implements delayed second dose for people under 65 years of age, but not until all those above this age have been vaccinated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cumulative covid-19 mortality, cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infections, and cumulative hospital admissions due to covid-19 over 180 days. RESULTS Over all simulation replications, the median cumulative mortality per 100 000 for standard dosing versus delayed second dose was 226 v 179, 233 v 207, and 235 v 236 for 90%, 80%, and 70% first dose efficacy, respectively. The delayed second dose strategy was optimal for vaccine efficacies at or above 80% and vaccination rates at or below 0.3% of the population per day, under both sterilizing and non-sterilizing vaccine assumptions, resulting in absolute cumulative mortality reductions between 26 and 47 per 100 000. The delayed second dose strategy for people under 65 performed consistently well under all vaccination rates tested. CONCLUSIONS A delayed second dose vaccination strategy, at least for people aged under 65, could result in reduced cumulative mortality under certain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Romero-Brufau
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ayush Chopra
- MIT Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Alex J Ryu
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Esma Gel
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ramesh Raskar
- MIT Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Walter Kremers
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karen S Anderson
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Abhishek Singh
- MIT Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kalyan Pasupathy
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Yue Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John C O'Horo
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Oscar Mitchell
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Crawford FW, Jones SA, Cartter M, Dean SG, Warren JL, Li ZR, Barbieri J, Campbell J, Kenney P, Valleau T, Morozova O. Impact of close interpersonal contact on COVID-19 incidence: evidence from one year of mobile device data. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2021:2021.03.10.21253282. [PMID: 33758869 PMCID: PMC7987027 DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Close contact between people is the primary route for transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We sought to quantify interpersonal contact at the population-level by using anonymized mobile device geolocation data. We computed the frequency of contact (within six feet) between people in Connecticut during February 2020 - January 2021. Then we aggregated counts of contact events by area of residence to obtain an estimate of the total intensity of interpersonal contact experienced by residents of each town for each day. When incorporated into a susceptible-exposed-infective-removed (SEIR) model of COVID-19 transmission, the contact rate accurately predicted COVID-19 cases in Connecticut towns during the timespan. The pattern of contact rate in Connecticut explains the large initial wave of infections during March-April, the subsequent drop in cases during June-August, local outbreaks during August-September, broad statewide resurgence during September-December, and decline in January 2021. Contact rate data can help guide public health messaging campaigns to encourage social distancing and in the allocation of testing resources to detect or prevent emerging local outbreaks more quickly than traditional case investigation. ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY Close interpersonal contact measured using mobile device location data explains dynamics of COVID-19 transmission in Connecticut during the first year of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forrest W Crawford
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Statistics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sydney A Jones
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Infectious Diseases Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew Cartter
- Infectious Diseases Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Samantha G Dean
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joshua L Warren
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zehang Richard Li
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Olga Morozova
- Program in Public Health and Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thompson J, Wattam S. Estimating the impact of interventions against COVID-19: From lockdown to vaccination. PLoS One 2021. [PMID: 34919576 DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.21.21254049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease of humans caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Since the first case was identified in China in December 2019 the disease has spread worldwide, leading to an ongoing pandemic. In this article, we present an agent-based model of COVID-19 in Luxembourg, and use it to estimate the impact, on cases and deaths, of interventions including testing, contact tracing, lockdown, curfew and vaccination. Our model is based on collation, with agents performing activities and moving between locations accordingly. The model is highly heterogeneous, featuring spatial clustering, over 2000 behavioural types and a 10 minute time resolution. The model is validated against COVID-19 clinical monitoring data collected in Luxembourg in 2020. Our model predicts far fewer cases and deaths than the equivalent equation-based SEIR model. In particular, with R0 = 2.45, the SEIR model infects 87% of the resident population while our agent-based model infects only around 23% of the resident population. Our simulations suggest that testing and contract tracing reduce cases substantially, but are less effective at reducing deaths. Lockdowns are very effective although costly, while the impact of an 11pm-6am curfew is relatively small. When vaccinating against a future outbreak, our results suggest that herd immunity can be achieved at relatively low coverage, with substantial levels of protection achieved with only 30% of the population fully immune. When vaccinating in the midst of an outbreak, the challenge is more difficult. In this context, we investigate the impact of vaccine efficacy, capacity, hesitancy and strategy. We conclude that, short of a permanent lockdown, vaccination is by far the most effective way to suppress and ultimately control the spread of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Thompson
- Dept. of Mathematics, University of Luxembourg, Esch sur Alzette, Luxembourg
| | | |
Collapse
|