Weekly gemcitabine plus Epirubicin as effective chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II study

A squalamine derivative, NV669, as a novel PTP1B inhibitor: in vitro and in vivo effects on pancreatic and hepatic tumor growth

NV669 is an aminosterol derived from squalamine found to possess strong anticancer effects. The aim of this study was to investigate NV669’s beneficial effects on human pancreatic and hepatic cancer models and to decipher the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in tumor growth decrease upon treatment with NV669.

Pancreatic (BxPC3, MiaPaCa-2) and hepatic (HepG2, Huh7) cancer cells were treated with NV669, and the effects recorded on proliferation, cell cycle and death. Results showed that NV669 inhibited the viability of cancer cells, induced cell cycle arrest and subsequently promoted apoptosis. This was accompanied by a decrease in the expression of cyclin B1 and phosphorylated Cdk1 and by a cleavage of pro-apoptotic caspase-8 and PARP-1. Taken together, our studies showed that NV669 inhibits the proliferation of pancreatic and hepatic cancer cells through the regulation of G2/M phase transition via the cyclin B1-Cdk1 complex.

In vitro NV669 inhibits PTP1B activity and FAK expression. NV669 impacts on the expression of adhesion molecules CDH-1, -2 and -3 in BxPC3 and Huh7 lines that form cell monolayers. Consecutively NV669 induces cell detachment. This suggests that NV669 by inhibiting PTP1B induces cell detachment and apoptosis.

Subsequently, our in vivo results showed that NV669 inhibited the growth of pancreatic and hepatic tumor xenografts with a significant cell cycle arrest in pre-mitotic phase and an increase of tumor cell apoptosis. Therefore, NV669 may serve as an alternative anticancer agent, used alone or in association with other medications, for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chemotherapy for Late-Stage Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Complete Response Rates

Complete response (CR) rates reported for cytotoxic chemotherapy for late-stage cancer patients are generally low, with few exceptions, regardless of the solid cancer type or drug regimen. We investigated CR rates reported in the literature for clinical trials using chemotherapy alone, across a wide range of tumour types and chemotherapeutic regimens, to determine an overall CR rate for late-stage cancers. A total of 141 reports were located using the PubMed database. A meta-analysis was performed of reported CR from 68 chemotherapy trials (total 2732 patients) using standard agents across late-stage solid cancers—a binomial model with random effects was adopted. Mean CR rates were compared for different cancer types, and for chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action, using a logistic regression. Our results showed that the CR rates for chemotherapy treatment of late-stage cancer were generally low at 7.4%, regardless of the cancer type or drug regimen used. We found no evidence that CR rates differed between different chemotherapy drug types, but amongst different cancer types small CR differences were evident, although none exceeded a mean CR rate of 11%. This remarkable concordance of CR rates regardless of cancer or therapy type remains currently unexplained, and motivates further investigation.

Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Systemic treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma achieves only modest benefits, with evidence indicating a survival advantage with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) over best supportive care alone, and further advantage of single-agent gemcitabine over 5-FU. There are very few regimens better than single-agent gemcitabine despite multiple trials of cytotoxic and targeted agents. The addition of a platinum agent has improved response rate but not survival. The addition of erlotinib has improved survival but only by a small margin. The use of gemcitabine in multidrug regimens containing one or more of: a platinum agent; fluoropyrimidine; anthracycline; and taxane has demonstrated advantages in response rate, progression-free survival and, in one randomized study, overall survival. After gemcitabine failure, second-line therapy with oxaliplatin and 5-FU provides a further survival advantage. Further advances depend upon the current and future clinical trials investigating enhanced delivery of current agents, new agents and novel modalities, improved supportive care, and treatment more tailored to the individual patient and tumour.

ADH-1 suppresses N-cadherin-dependent pancreatic cancer progression

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignant diseases. We recently reported that N-cadherin plays a key role in tumor progression and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. For this study, we sought to determine if an N-cadherin-blocking peptide (ADH-1) could prevent N-cadherin-mediated tumor progression in a mouse model for pancreatic cancer. The effect of ADH-1 on N-cadherin-mediated cell scattering and migration on collagen I was examined using pancreatic cancer cells. We also examined the influence of ADH-1 on cell apoptosis. Furthermore, in vivo animal studies were performed using orthotopic injection of N-cadherin overexpressing BxPC-3 cells with or without ADH-1 treatment. BxPC-3 and Capan-1 cells exhibited increased expression of N-cadherin in response to collagen I. This increase in N-cadherin promoted cell scattering and migration in response to collagen I. ADH-1 prevented these changes, but did not inhibit upregulation of N-cadherin. TUNEL assays and immunoblots for caspase-3 showed that ADH-1 induced apoptosis in a concentration dependent and N-cadherin dependent manner in pancreatic cancer cells. ADH-1 treatment resulted in significant reductions in tumor growth and lung metastasis in a mouse model for pancreatic cancer. The N-cadherin antagonist, ADH-1 has significant antitumor activity against N-cadherin-expressing cells using in vitro assays and in an orthotopic mouse model for pancreatic cancer, raising the possibility that N-cadherin antagonists have therapeutic potential for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in humans.

Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and benefit of second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has never been demonstrated although it is regularly used.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been conducted. In this trial, a second-line treatment with the OXFU regimen (OXA 130 mg/m2 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), every 3 weeks) was offered to patients progressing after single agent treatment.

RESULTS

Eighteen out of 32 patients (12 males, median age 57 years) treated in the single agent arms received the OXFU combination in second-line treatment. WHO performance status was at least 2 in 61% of the patients. There was no objective response and 3 patients (17%) had a disease stabilisation. Median time to progression from the start of second-line treatment was 0.9 months. Median overall survival was 4.9 months from the start of front-line therapy and 1.3 months from the start of second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

The results of this trial bring arguments to support a modest value of second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

A phase I/II multicentric trial of gemcitabine and epirubicin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Potential synergistic interaction between gemcitabine (GEM) and epirubicin (EPI) in pancreatic cancer have been described previously. The maximum-tolerated dose in this trial was GEM 1000 mg m⁻² and EPI 45 mg m⁻². Median time to progression was 5.1 months and median survival time 7.4 months. This combination appears well tolerated and shows promising clinical activity.

Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Single-agent gemcitabine was established as standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after a superior clinical benefit response was demonstrated in a randomized study comparing it to 5-fluorouracil (FU). Until recently, many subsequent randomized trials of newer, often gemcitabine-based combinations have not been able to show improved survival over gemcitabine. Combination gemcitabine and capecitabine is likely to become the preferred standard treatment, at least in the UK, on the basis of the positive interim results of the UK National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) randomized study of chemotherapy with this combination. At present, there is no standard second-line treatment for patients who have become refractory to gemcitabine, although a recently reported study has suggested that oxaliplatin with FU and leucovorin is superior to best supportive care in these patients. This article will review and discuss the clinical trials of chemotherapy for this disease, including the more recent trials, which have included the novel targeted agents.

Adjuvant treatment of pancreatic carcinoma in a clinically adapted mouse resection model

BACKGROUND

The high rate of local recurrence after radical resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma fosters intensive efforts to develop new approaches for adjuvant treatment. The established animal models show significant limitations in simulating an adjuvant therapeutic setting. For optimal approximation to the clinical situation we therefore improved a murine orthotopic human xenotransplantation model.

METHODS

Subtotal pancreatectomy in mice was performed after orthotopic inoculation of human pancreatic cancer cells and manifestation of solid tumours. The natural course of disease, tumour growth and metastases were analysed. Gemcitabine as a cytotoxic drug was tested in vitro on the cell line used in this model and the effect of adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine in vivo was investigated.

RESULTS

All tumour-resected animals showed local recurrence. Organ metastases occurred in 67% in resected compared to 25% of non-resected animals. Gemcitabine in vitro was ineffective, but as adjuvant monotherapy resulted in a highly significant reduction of tumour weight and metastatic events.

CONCLUSION

Subtotal pancreatectomy for xenotransplanted pancreatic cancer in SCID beige mice is feasible. Due to high rates of local recurrence and increased organ metastases, this model offers a relevant option for preclinical adjuvant testing, especially as in vitro and in vivo effects of cytotoxic drugs differ enormously.

Cytotoxic Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for pancreatic cancer as most patients present with advanced disease, which precludes locoregional treatment. However, the efficacy of chemotherapy is limited. Gemcitabine is the only agent that improves symptoms and confers a modest survival advantage. Many combination therapy regimens have been studied in phase II settings. Eleven randomised phase III trials have been conducted to compare gemcitabine-containing regimens with gemcitabine monotherapy since gemcitabine became available clinically. The combination of gemcitabine plus capecitabine has demonstrated a survival advantage over gemcitabine, whereas gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus cisplatin have shown improved progression-free survival or time to tumour progression but failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over gemcitabine. The search for effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer continues. Gemcitabine in combination with cytotoxic agents or molecular targeted agents hold promise.

A Phase II Trial of Raltitrexed (Tomudex®) in Advanced Pancreatic and Biliary Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of raltitrexed (Tomudex) on the quality of life in a multicenter, phase II study in advanced pancreatic and biliary carcinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients with advanced, histologically proven pancreatic (n = 37, 80.4%) or biliary (n = 9, 19.6%) carcinoma received 3 mg/m2 raltitrexed intravenously once every 3 weeks. For the quality of life assessments, EORTC QLQ-C30 was used, and the evaluation of the clinical benefit was performed according to the 4 criteria of the clinical benefit response. All patients were assessed for safety, and 41 patients were evaluable for objective response.

RESULTS

Patients (63% male/37% female) had a mean age of 61.2 years, 71.7% had a PS of 0-1, 78.3% had metastatic disease, and 63% had at least 2 tumoral sites. A total of 176 cycles were administered with a mean of 4 cycles per patient (range 1-12). Three out of 43 patients evaluable for EORTC QLQ-C30 (7.0%; CI(95%) 1.4-19.0%) had a quality of life improvement. Thirty-two patients fulfilled the 4 criteria required to evaluate the clinical benefit response; 5 were responders (15.6%; CI(95%) 5.3-32.8%); 1 patient was a good responder based on both the EORTC questionnaire and the clinical benefit response. Forty-one patients were assessable for response, 3 responded to treatment (response rate: 6.5 %; CI(95%) 1.3-17.9%). Median survival was 4.6 months (CI(95%) 2.9-8.2 months), the 1-year survival rate was 21.8%. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (8%), leukopenia (8%), thrombopenia (6%), anemia (6%), liver enzyme elevations (11%), asthenia (9%), vomiting (9%), abdominal pain (7%), and phlebitis (6%). One treatment-related death occurred (neutropenic sepsis).

CONCLUSION

Raltitrexed appeared to be generally well tolerated and showed a clinical benefit response and/or quality of life improvement in a limited number of patients.

Chemotherapy in metastatic renal cell cancer

Currently, there is no standard treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who do not respond to or progress after transient remission to first-line immunotherapy. At the end of the 1990s, no single chemotherapeutic drug, alone or in combination with interleukin-2 (IL-2) or interferon-alfa (IFN), had shown activity beyond the one expected by immunotherapy alone. New drugs on the market such as the pyrimidine analog gemcitabine or taxane-based chemotherapeutics may show promising tumor activity in combination with targeted therapy, but this has to be substantiated in upcoming trials. There is a great need to develop effective systemic therapy for advanced MRCC and to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs in clinical trials.

Active chemotherapy for sarcomatoid and rapidly progressing renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is generally ineffective in patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and in patients with rapidly progressive metastatic or locally recurrent disease, with a median time to progression of approximately 2 months and a median survival of 4-7 months. Gemcitabine-based regimens have modest antitumor activity, whereas doxorubicin is often used to treat sarcomatoid RCC. Based on the antitumor activity of doxorubicin and gemcitabine in collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney, the authors used this combination to treat selected patients with sarcomatoid or rapidly progressing RCC.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (11 males and 7 females; median age, 53 years; range, 31-81 years) with RCC (56% sarcomatoid; 44% other) were treated at 2 institutions in a collaborative study that was not institutional review board reviewed. Seven patients received previous treatment with interferon or interleukin-2. Sites of metastases included the lung, soft tissue, bone, liver, and brain with 88% of patients having > or = 3 sites of disease. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1500 or 2000 mg/m2) every 2-3 weeks with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support.

RESULTS

A median of 5 courses was administered (range, 2-12 cycles). Therapy was well tolerated with no Grade 4 toxicities. Two patients had a complete response, five had a partial response, three had a mixed response, and one had stable disease. The median duration of response was 5 months (range, 2-21+ months).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggested that the combination of doxorubicin and gemcitabine has antitumor activity in patients with sarcomatoid RCC or with rapidly progressing RCC. A prospective investigation of this combination in RCC is warranted.

Schedule-dependent cytotoxic interaction between epidoxorubicin and gemcitabine in human bladder cancer cells in vitro

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity of epidoxorubicin (EPI) and gemcitabine (GEM) and to define the most effective schedule in human bladder cancer cells.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The study was performed on HT1376 and MCR cell lines. Cells were exposed for 1 and 24 h to drugs used in different schemes. Cytotoxic activity was evaluated by the sulforhodamine B assay, potential clinical activity was estimated by relative antitumor activity, and the type of drug interaction was assessed using the method of Chou and Talalay. Cell cycle perturbations and apoptosis were assessed by flow cytometry; BAX, BCL-2, and P53 expression was evaluated by Western blot; and DNA damage was assessed using the alkaline Comet assay.

RESULTS

EPI and GEM produced a cytotoxic effect in both cell lines, with 50% inhibitory concentration and relative antitumor activity values suggestive of a high clinical activity. Simultaneous treatment with EPI and GEM and the sequence GEM-->EPI caused an antagonistic interaction (combination index > 1) after both 1- and 24-h treatments. Conversely, the inverse sequence, EPI-->GEM, produced a synergistic interaction that was more pronounced in MCR cells than in HT1376 cells. The increase in DNA-damaged cells from 10% to 20% after single-drug exposure to 40-60% at the end of EPI-->GEM treatment may explain the synergistic interaction produced by the anthracycline-antimetabolite sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the efficacy of the EPI and GEM combination is highly schedule dependent and indicate that the most active scheme is EPI followed by GEM, which is currently being validated in an ongoing intravesical Phase I-II clinical protocol.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with mitomycin C, infusional 5-fluorouracil and sodium folinic acid. A phase-I-study in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer

Mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (FU) plus folinic acid (FA) is an effective treatment for metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Anthracyclines are commonly used in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of liposomal, pegylated doxorubicin (Caelyx) in combination with infusional 5-FU/sodium FA and MMC. Escalating doses of Caelyx (15 – 25 – 30 – 35 mg m⁻² corresponding to dose levels I–IV) were applied on days 1 and 29, given to fixed doses of 24-h 5-FU (2000 mg m⁻²) and sodium FA (500 mg m⁻², mixed with 5-FU in one pump) weekly for 6 weeks, and MMC 7 mg m⁻² on days 8 and 36. At least three patients were treated at each dose level. A total of 25 patients are evaluable. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed on level I (n=3). On level II, DLT occurred in three out of five patients (mucositis and leucopenia). Owing to the early DLTs at this dose, we added a 20 mg m⁻² Caelyx dose level (Ia). In total, 17 patients were treated at this dose level. Among these, only two patients experienced DLT in cycle one and 37 complete cycles have been administered in association with a low toxicity profile. The median dose intensity was 100% for each drug during the first course and no treatment delay exceeding 7 days was required. The recommended dose of 4-weekly Caelyx in combination with weekly 24-h 5-FU/sodium FA and 4-weekly MMC is 20 mg m⁻². Preliminary antitumour activity has been observed in patients with pretreated pancreatic cancer and in untreated gastric cancer.

p53 and DPC4 alterations in the bile of patients with pancreatic carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is still predominantly diagnosed in advanced stages, and 85%-90% of patients are not eligible for surgery at diagnosis. This is mainly due to the great difficulty in detecting the tumour at an early stage and presently no satisfactory results have been obtained to overcome this problem. Studies on molecular genetic profile of pancreatic cancer may represent an important approach. This study was focused on the mutations of p53 and DPC4 detectable in the bile of patients with histologically proven pancreatic cancers.

MATERIALS AND PATIENTS

We analysed specimens of bile collected through percutaneous transhepatic biliary catheters, placed to treat malignant biliary obstruction in 25 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A percentage of mutation was obtained of 43 % for the microsatellite D17S945 (p53), 54% and 50 % for D18S46 and D18S474 (DPC4), respectively. The percentage of amplification was 67%, 93,6%, and 80%.

CONCLUSION

We consider the results encouraging enough to decide to enlarge the number of patients examined. The aim is to determine if a test for DPC4 and p53 mutations is eligible for introduction in clinical routine use. More sets of samples are required to satisfactorily answer this question.

Red oil A5 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells

AIM: To study the effect of red oil A5 on pancreatic cancer cells and its possible mechanisms.

METHODS: Effect of different concentrations of red oil A5 on proliferation of three pancreatic cancer cell lines, AsPC-1, MiaPaCa-2 and S2013, was measured by ³H-methyl thymidine incorporation. Time-dependent effects of 1:32 000 red oil A5 on proliferation of three pancreatic cancer cell lines, were also measured by ³H-methyl thymidine incorporation, and Time-course effects of 1:32 000 red oil A5 on cell number. The cells were counted by Z1-Coulter Counter. Flow-cytometric analysis of cellular DNA content in the control and red oil A5 treated AsPC-1, MiaPaCa-2 and S2013 cells, were stained with propidium iodide. TUNEL assay of red oil A5-induced pancreatic cancer cell apoptosis was performed. Western blotting of the cytochrome c protein in AsPC-1, MiaPaCa-2 and S2013 cells treated 24 hours with 1:32 000 red oil A5 was performed. Proteins in cytosolic fraction and in mitochondria fraction were extracted. Proteins extracted from each sample were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE gels and then were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Cytochrome c was identified using a monoclonal cytochrome c antibody. Western blotting of the caspase-3 protein in AsPC-1, MiaPaCa-2 and S2013 cells treated with 1:32 000 red oil A5 for 24 hours was carried out. Proteins in whole cellular lysates were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Caspase-3 was identified using a specific antibody. Western blotting of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) protein in AsPC-1, MiaPaCa-2 and S2013 cells treated with 1:32 000 red oil A5 for 24 hours was performed. Proteins in whole cellular lysates were separated by electrophoresis on SDS-PAGE gels and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. PARP was identified by using a monoclonal antibody.

RESULTS: Red oil A5 caused dose- and time-dependent inhibition of pancreatic cancer cell proliferation. Propidium iodide DNA staining showed an increase of the sub-G0/G1 cell population. The DNA fragmentation induced by red oil A5 in these three cell lines was confirmed by the TUNEL assay. Furthermore, Western blotting analysis indicated that cytochrome c was released from mitochondria to cytosol during apoptosis, and caspase-3 was activated following red oil A5 treatment which was measured by procaspase-3 cleavage and PARP cleavage.

CONCLUSION: These findings show that red oil A5 has potent anti-proliferative effects on human pancreatic cancer cells with induction of apoptosis in vitro.

Should patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas be irradiated?

A small number of patients exist with carcinoma of the pancreas with an inoperable but not metastasized tumor. Prospective randomized studies defined the standard of combined radiochemotherapy during the early 1980s for these patients. Since then, new drugs have shown considerable activity and in parallel improvements in radiotherapy treatment planning and delivery have been achieved. Therefore, it is time to ask whether patients with locally advanced, inoperable pancreatic cancer without metastases should still be irradiated or not. This review summarizes the current literature on combined radiochemotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the pancreas. Median survival times of 10-11 months and 1-year survival rates of about 40% can be achieved with modern radiochemotherapy regimens.

A novel biweekly pancreatic cancer treatment schedule with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a common disease considered to be poorly responsive to antiblastic treatment. Recent clinical and preclinical results suggest that a combined treatment of gemcitabine (GEM), 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) offers a clinical benefit in patients with advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma. The aim of this phase II clinical trial was to evaluate the antitumour activity and toxicity of a novel biweekly schedule of this combination in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A total of 42 patients received a 30 min infusion of FA (100 mg m(-2)) and 5-FU (400 mg m(-2)) (FUFA) on days 1-3, and GEM 1000 mg m(-2) on day 1 every 15 days. We observed 13 objective responses (two complete, 11 partial) and 23 stable diseases. The median time to progression was 9.75 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 6.88-12.62) and the median overall survival was 13.10 months (95% CI 9.64-16.56). There were seven cases of each grade III gastroenteric and haematological toxicity. The GEM plus FUFA combination appears to be well tolerated and very active in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.