Pharmacological characterization of endothelin-induced contraction in the guinea-pig oesophageal muscularis mucosae

Physiology of the upper segment, body, and lower segment of the esophagus

The following discussion on the physiology of the esophagus includes commentaries on the function of the muscularis mucosa and submucosa as a mechanical antireflux barrier in the esophagus; the different mechanisms of neurological control in the esophageal striated and smooth muscle; new insights from animal models into the neurotransmitters mediating lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, peristalsis in the esophageal body (EB), and motility of esophageal smooth muscle; differentiation between in vitro properties of the lower esophageal circular muscle, clasp muscle, and sling fibers; alterations in the relationship between pharyngeal contraction and relaxation of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in patients with dysphagia; the mechanical relationships between anterior hyoid movement, the extent of upper esophageal opening, and aspiration; the application of fluoroscopy and manometry with biomechanics to define the stages of UES opening; and nonpharmacological approaches to alter the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

Endothelin A receptors mediate relaxation of guinea pig internal anal sphincter through cGMP pathway

BACKGROUND

Endothelin (ET) modulates motility of the internal anal sphincter through unclear receptor subtypes.

METHODS

We measured relaxation of guinea pig internal anal sphincter strips caused by ET-related peptides and binding of (125)I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the internal anal sphincter muscle. Visualization of (125)I-ET-1 binding sites in tissue was performed by autoradiography.

KEY RESULTS

In the guinea pig internal anal sphincter, ET-1 caused a marked relaxation insensitive to tetrodotoxin, atropine, or omega-conotoxin GVIA. ET-2 was as potent as ET-1. ET-3 caused a mild relaxation. The relative potencies for ETs to cause relaxation were ET-1 = ET-2 > ET-3. The ET-1-induced relaxation was inhibited by BQ-123, an ET(A) antagonist, but not by BQ-788, an ET(B) antagonist. These indicate that ET(A) receptors mediate the relaxation. The relaxant response of ET-1 was attenuated by LY 83583, KT 5823, Rp-8CPT-cGMPS, tetraethyl ammonium, 4-aminopyridine and N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine, but not significantly affected by N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, N(G)-methyl-L-arginine, charybdotoxin, apamin, KT 5720, and Rp-cAMPS. These suggest the involvement of cyclic guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP), and potassium channels. Autoradiography localized (125)I-ET-1 binding to the internal anal sphincter. Binding of (125)I-ET-1 to the cell membranes prepared from the internal anal sphincter revealed the presence of two subtypes of ET receptors, ET(A) and ET(B) receptors.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Taken together, these results demonstrate that ET(A) receptors mediate relaxation of guinea pig internal anal sphincter through the cGMP pathway.

Expression of endothelin receptor subtypes in the spiral ganglion neurons of the guinea pig

OBJECTIVE

Endothelin 1 has many biological activities including regulating the functions of auditory system. The present study aimed to investigate the expression of the endothelin receptors in spiral ganglion neurons and its significance in the auditory transmission.

METHODS

The cochleae of healthy guinea pigs were fixed, decalcified, embedded in paraffin and serially sectioned. The expression of endothelin receptor subunits, ET receptor A (ET-A) and ET receptor B (ET-B), was examined in the spiral ganglion neurons of guinea pig using immunohistochemical technique.

RESULTS

Different degrees of ET-A and ET-B positive reactivity appeared in all spiral ganglion neurons from the basal turn to the apical turn.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the suggestion that endothelin via the endothelin receptor may play a physiological role in the spiral ganglion neurons.

Reactive oxygen species mediate ET-1-induced activation of ERK1/2 signaling in cultured feline esophageal smooth muscle cells

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to play a critical role in propagating the signals of several growth factors, peptide hormones, and cytokines, such as epidermal growth factor, insulin, and interleukin-1. We investigated a possible role for ROS generation in mediating the action of ET-1 on activation of ERK1/2 in cultured feline esophageal smooth muscle cells (ESMC). Confluent layers of ESMC were stimulated by 10nM ET-1; activation of ERK was examined by western blot analysis with phospho-specific antibodies of ERKs. ET-1 induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in a dose- and time- dependent manner. ERK1/2 activation by ET-1 reached the maximal levels at 5min showing slight activation up to 20min, and then slowly declined. It was confirmed that the activation of ERK1/2 was reduced by MEK inhibitor PD98059. We observed the dose-dependent inhibitory effect of diphenyleneiodonium (DPI), an inhibitor of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase on the ET-1-enhanced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in ESMC. Pretreatment of ESMC with N-acetylcysteine, a ROS scavenger, also attenuated the ET-1-induced ERK1/2 activation. In addition, DPI significantly inhibited the ET-1- induced ROS production when ROS was measured as a function of DCF fluorescence. The results suggest that ROS might be critical mediators of the ET-1-induced ERK1/2 signaling events in ESMC.

Endothelin receptors in lower esophageal sphincter circular smooth muscle

To characterize endothelin (ET) receptors in the lower esophageal sphincter, we measured contraction of transverse strips from the guinea-pig lower esophageal sphincter induced by ET-related peptides and binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the lower esophageal sphincter circular muscle. Visualization of 125I-ET-1 binding sites in tissue was performed by autoradiography. ET-1 or ET-2 alone did not cause contraction or relaxation in resting strips. However, in carbachol precontracted lower esophageal sphincter strips, ET-1 and ET-2 caused marked, tetrodotoxin-insensitive relaxation. The ET-1-induced relaxation was abolished by BQ-123, an ETA receptor selective antagonist, but not inhibited by BQ-788, an ETB receptor selective antagonist. ET-3 and sarafotoxin S6c, a selective ETB receptor agonist, did not cause relaxation in the carbachol precontracted muscle strips. These clearly indicate that ETA receptors mediate relaxation. On the other hand, ET-3 and sarafotoxin S6c caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction in the resting strips. The sarafotoxin S6c-induced contraction was inhibited by BQ-788, but not by BQ-123. Furthermore, ET-1 and ET-2 caused contraction of the resting muscle strips after pretreatment with BQ-123. This ET-1-induced contraction was also inhibited by BQ-788. Taken together, these indicate that ETB receptors mediate contraction. Autoradiography localized 125I-ET-1 binding to the lower esophageal sphincter circular muscle as well as longitudinal muscle of the esophagus. Binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the circular smooth muscle was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves indicated the presence of two classes of receptors, ETA and ETB receptors. These results demonstrate that the guinea-pig lower esophageal sphincter possesses ETA receptors mediating relaxation and ETB receptors mediating contraction.

Endothelin causes contraction of human esophageal muscularis mucosae through interaction with both ETA and ETB receptors

Endothelin (ET) causes contraction of the muscularis mucosae in the guinea pig esophagus, but its role in the human esophagus remains unknown. To investigate effects of ET in the human esophagus, we measured contraction of isolated human esophageal muscularis mucosae strips caused by ET related peptides and binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the human esophageal muscularis mucosae. Autoradiography demonstrated specific binding of 125I-ET-1 to the muscularis mucosae and muscularis propria (muscularis externa) of the human esophagus. ET-1 caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction of muscularis mucosae strips. In terms of the maximal tension of contraction, ET-1 and ET-2 were equal in efficacy. The relative potencies for ET related peptides to cause contraction were ET-1=ET-2>ET-3>sarafotoxin S6c (SX6c), an ETB receptor agonist. ET-1 caused contraction was mildly inhibited by BQ-123, an ETA receptor antagonist, and not by BQ-788, an ETB receptor antagonist. It was moderately inhibited by the combination of both antagonists, indicating synergistic inhibition. Furthermore, desensitization to SX6c with SX6c pretreatment failed to abolish the contractile response to ET-1, which was completely inhibited by BQ-123. These indicate the involvement of both ETA and ETB receptors in the contraction. Binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes of the muscularis mucosae was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves demonstrated the presence of ETA and ETB receptors. This study demonstrates that, the muscularis mucosae of the human esophagus, similar to that of the guinea pig esophagus, possesses both ETA and ETB receptors mediating muscle contraction.

Endothelin ET(A) but not ET(B) receptors mediate contraction of common bile duct

Endothelin (ET) causes contraction of the gallbladder. To investigate effects of ET in the common bile duct, we measured contraction of longitudinal muscle strips from guinea pig common bile ducts induced by ET-related peptides and binding of 125I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the common bile duct. Visualization of 125I-ET-1 binding sites in tissue was performed by autoradiography. ET-1 caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction. In terms of maximal tension of contraction, ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3 were equal in efficacy. However, sarafotoxin S6c, a selective ET(B) receptor agonist, caused only a negligible contraction. The relative potencies for ET isopeptides to cause contraction were ET-1=ET-2>ET-3. The ET-1-induced contraction was inhibited by BQ-123, an ET(A)-receptor-selective antagonist, but not by BQ-788, an ET(B)-receptor-selective antagonist. In addition, the combination of both antagonists, BQ-123 and BQ-788, inhibited ET-1 induced contraction but did not potentiate the inhibition caused by BQ-123 alone. These indicate that ET(A) but not ET(B) receptors mediate the contraction. Autoradiography localized 125I-ET-1 binding to the smooth muscle layer. Binding of 125I-ET-1 to the smooth muscle cell membranes was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves indicated the presence of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. These results demonstrate that ET causes contraction of longitudinal muscle of the common bile duct. Different from the gallbladder, which possesses both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors cooperating to mediate muscle contraction, the common bile duct possesses two classes of ET receptors, but only the ET(A) receptor mediates the contraction.

The signal transduction of endothelin-1-induced circular smooth muscle cell contraction in cat esophagus

It has been known that endothelin-1 (ET-1) exerts important actions in gastrointestinal smooth muscle motility, but its precise mechanism remains unsolved. We investigated the intracellular mechanism of ET-1-induced circular smooth muscle cell contraction in cat esophagus. ET-1 produced contraction of smooth muscle cells isolated by enzymatic digestion. The contraction in response to ET-1 was concentration-dependent. Pertussis toxin (PTX) blocked contraction induced by ET-1 in intact cells. To identify the specific G protein involved in the contraction, muscle cells were permeabilized with saponin. The G(i3) or G(beta) protein antibody inhibited the contraction. Neomycin phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor inhibited the contraction, but 7,7-dimethyleicosadienoic acid (phospholipase A(2) inhibitor) and p-chloromercuribenzoic acid (phospholipase D inhibitor) had no effects. Incubation of permeabilized cells with PLC-beta(3) isozyme antibody inhibited the contraction. 1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine, chelerythrine [protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor], or genistein (protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor) inhibited the contraction, but not by diacylglycerol (DAG) kinase inhibitor, R59949. To test whether the contraction may be PKC isozyme-specific, we examined the effect of PKC isozymes antibodies on the contraction. PKC-epsilon antibody inhibited the contraction. To characterize further the specific PKC isozymes that mediate the contraction, we used, as an inhibitor, N-myristoylated peptides (myr-PKC) derived from the pseudosubstrate sequences of PKC-alphabetagamma, -alpha, -delta, or -epsilon. myr-PKC-epsilon inhibited the contraction, confirming that PKC-epsilon isozyme is involved in the contraction. To examine whether mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) mediate the contraction, specific MAPK inhibitors [MAPK kinase inhibitor, PD98059, (2'-amino-3'-methoxy-flavone), and p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB202190 (4-4-fluorophenyl) 2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)1H-imidazole)] were used. PD98059 or SB202190 blocked the contraction. ET-1 increased the intensity of the detection bands identified by immunological methods as MAPK monoclonal p44/p42 peptides. PD98059 decreased the intensity of the detection bands compared with ET-1. In conclusion, ET-1-induced contraction in cat esophageal circular muscle cells depends on PTX-sensitive G(i3) protein and PLC-beta(3) isozyme, resulting in the activation of PKC-epsilon- or protein-tyrosine kinase-dependent pathway, subsequently mediating the activation of p44/p42 MAPK or p38 MAPK pathway.

Two classes of endothelin receptors mediating contraction in esophageal muscularis mucosae

Endothelin (ET) causes contraction of the esophageal muscularis mucosae. To characterize the ET receptor subtypes involved in contraction, we measured contraction of isolated muscularis mucosae strips caused by ET-related peptides and binding of (125)I-ET-1 to cell membranes prepared from the guinea pig esophageal muscularis mucosae. Autoradiography demonstrated (125)I-ET-1 binding to the muscularis mucosae and muscularis propria. ET-1 caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction of esophageal muscularis mucosae strips. The relative potencies for ET isopeptides to cause contraction were ET-1=ET-2>ET-3. FR-139317, an ET(A) receptor antagonist, or BQ-788, an ET(B) receptor antagonist, alone did not alter responses to ET-1. However, the combination of both antagonists almost abolished the ET-1-induced contraction, indicating synergistic inhibition. Desensitization to sarafotoxin S6c, an ET(B) receptor agonist, failed to abolish the response to ET-1, which was completely inhibited by FR-139317. These indicate the involvement of both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in the contraction. Binding of (125)I-ET-1 to cell membranes of the muscularis mucosae was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves demonstrated the presence of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. This study demonstrates that the esophageal muscularis mucosae possesses both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors mediating muscle contraction. There is cooperation between these two subtypes of ET receptors in the esophagus mediating muscle contraction.

Endothelin receptors in human and guinea-pig gallbladder muscle

We measured contraction of muscle strips caused by endothelin (ET) isopeptides and binding of (125)I-ET-1 to muscle cell membranes prepared from human and guinea-pig gallbladders. Visualization of (125)I-ET-1 binding sites in tissue was performed by autoradiography. Results in human were similar to those in guinea-pig. ET-1 caused tetrodotoxin and atropine-insensitive contraction. The relative potencies for ET isopeptides to cause contraction were ET-1=ET-2>ET-3. ET-1 caused contraction was only slightly inhibited by BQ-123 (potent ET(A) receptor antagonist) and not by BQ-788 (potent ET(B) receptor antagonist). It was inhibited by the combination of both. Autoradiography localized (125)I-ET-1 binding to the smooth muscle layer. Binding of (125)I-ET-1 to muscle cell membranes was saturable and specific. Analysis of dose-inhibition curves demonstrated the presence of two classes of receptors. One class (ET(A) receptor) had a high affinity for ET-1 and ET-2 but a low affinity for ET-3, and the other (ET(B) receptor) a high affinity for ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3. These results demonstrate that similar to guinea-pig, human gallbladder possesses both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors cooperating to mediate muscle contraction.

Lack of involvement of endothelin-1 in angiotensin II-induced contraction of the isolated rat tail artery

1. The contribution of endothelin-1 (ET-1) to angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated contraction of the isolated rat tail artery was assessed with measurements of tension, and cytosolic calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)). The distribution of the AT(1) receptor was studied with RT - PCR and immunohistochemistry. 2. Ang II induced an endothelium-independent contraction (pEC(50) 7.95+/-0.06 and E(max): 0.46 g+/-0.05 with endothelium vs 7.81+/-0.02 and 0.41 g+/-0.07 without endothelium; P>0.05). Ang II (0.003 - 0.3 microM)-induced a non-sustained contraction of endothelium-intact preparations which was not antagonized by BQ-123 (1 microM), but was inhibited by losartan (10 nM). In addition, the maximal contraction induced by ET-1 (0.1 microM) could be further increased by the addition of 0.1 microM Ang II. 3. Ang II (0.001 - 0.3 microM) elevated [Ca(2+)](i) in single vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in a dose-dependent manner (pEC(50) 9.12+/-0.26) and the Ang II-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](i) were not affected by a Ca(2+)-free solution, but were abolished by pretreatment with caffeine (5 mM). Ang II did not increase [Ca(2+)](i) in endothelial cells. ET-1 (0.1 microM) increased [Ca(2+)](i) in single VSMCs in a normal Ca(2+) containing physiological saline solution (PSS), but not in a Ca(2+)-free solution. 4. Ang II-induced contraction was insensitive to inhibition by nifedipine (0.1 microM), an antagonist of L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels, and SK&F96365 (10 microM), which blocks non-selective cation channels, whereas that to ET-1 was inhibited by SK&F69365. 5. RT - PCR data indicate the expression of AT(1A) and AT(1B) on both VSMCs and endothelial cells, but immunohistochemical evidence illustrates that the AT(1) is located primarily on VSMCs. 6. These results indicate that endothelium-derived ET-1 is not involved in the Ang II-mediated vasoconstriction of the rat tail artery and that Ang II- and ET-1-mediated VSM contractions utilize distinct pathways.

Functional CCK-A and Y2 receptors in guinea pig esophagus

Effects of cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8), peptide YY (PPY), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and their analogs on muscle contractions of esophageal strips were investigated. CCK-8 induced a tetrodotoxin and atropine-sensitive contraction. The relative potencies for CCK related peptides to induce contractions were CCK-8 > desulfated CCK-8 > gastrin-17-I. The CCK-A receptor antagonist L-364,718 was 300-fold more potent than the CCK-B receptor antagonist L-365,260 at inhibiting CCK-8-induced contraction. These indicate that neural CCK-A receptors mediate this contraction. PYY or NPY did not cause muscle contraction or inhibit muscle contraction induced by carbachol, endothelin-1 or KCl. However, both PYY and NPY concentration-dependently inhibited contraction induced by CCK-8. This inhibition was not affected by nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitors L-NMMA or L-NAME. The relative potencies of PYY related peptides to inhibit CCK-8 induced contraction were PYY > NPY > NPY13-36 > [Leu(31), Pro(34)]NPY > pancreatic polypeptide (PP). We conclude that CCK interacts with neural CCK-A receptors to cause esophageal muscle contraction. PYY and NPY interact with Y2 receptors to inhibit this CCK-induced muscle contraction by an effect not related to NO.