Differences between the abilities of tegaserod and motilin receptor agonists to stimulate gastric motility in vitro

Structural basis for motilin and erythromycin recognition by motilin receptor

Motilin is an endogenous peptide hormone almost exclusively expressed in the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract. It activates the motilin receptor (MTLR), a class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), and stimulates GI motility. To our knowledge, MTLR is the first GPCR reported to be activated by macrolide antibiotics, such as erythromycin. It has attracted extensive attention as a potential drug target for GI disorders. We report two structures of G_q-coupled human MTLR bound to motilin and erythromycin. Our structures reveal the recognition mechanism of both ligands and explain the specificity of motilin and ghrelin, a related gut peptide hormone, for their respective receptors. These structures also provide the basis for understanding the different recognition modes of erythromycin by MTLR and ribosome. These findings provide a framework for understanding the physiological regulation of MTLR and guiding drug design targeting MTLR for the treatment of GI motility disorders.

Tegaserod: What's Old Is New Again

Irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) are common gastrointestinal disorders imposing considerable impact on the quality of life and well-being of affected individuals. A paucity of evidence-based treatment options exist for CIC and IBS-C sufferers. Tegaserod, a 5-HT₄ agonist, has a substantial body of preclinical and clinical study evidence to support its beneficial role in modulating sensorimotor function of the luminal gastrointestinal tract. Tegaserod was first approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the management of IBS-C and CIC in 2002 and 2004, respectively. Tegaserod enjoyed a successful uptake in the management of these disorders during its first several years of availability in the United States, but was later withdrawn from the market in 2007 over concerns related to adverse cardiovascular events. Since then, additional safety data has been generated, and following a resubmission and review by the Food and Drug Administration, in April 2019, tegaserod was once again approved for use in IBS-C under a more restricted labeling, confining use to women under 65 years of age without heart disease or additional cardiovascular risk factors. This review summarizes the regulatory journey of tegaserod and details the existing pharmacokinetic, physiologic, clinical, and safety data of tegaserod generated over the last 2 decades. The discussion also examines the future of tegaserod in the treatment of these constipation disorders, as well as its potential role in other related disorders of brain-gut interaction.

Effects of Motilin Receptor Agonists and Ghrelin in Human motilin receptor Transgenic Mice

Gastrointestinal motility is regulated by neural factors and humoral factors. Both motilin and ghrelin improve gastrointestinal motility, but many issues remain unclear. We prepared human motilin receptor transgenic (Tg) mice and performed experiments evaluating the effects of motilin, erythromycin (EM), and ghrelin. EM and ghrelin promoted gastric emptying (GE) when administered either peripherally or centrally to Tg mice. Atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist) counteracted GE induced by centrally administered EM, but not that induced by peripherally administered EM. The administration of EM in this model promoted the effect of mosapride (a selective serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 (5-HT4) receptor agonist), and improved loperamide (a μ-opioid receptor agonist)-induced gastroparesis. The level of acyl-ghrelin was significantly attenuated by EM administration. Thus, we have established an animal model appropriate for the evaluation of motilin receptor agonists. These data and the model are expected to facilitate the identification of novel compounds with clinical potential for relieving symptoms of dyspepsia and gastroparesis.

Characterization of the gastric motility response to human motilin and erythromycin in human motilin receptor-expressing transgenic mice

Motilin is a gastrointestinal peptide hormone that stimulates gastrointestinal motility. Motilin is produced primarily in the duodenum and jejunum. Motilin receptors (MTLRs) are G protein-coupled receptors that may represent a clinically useful pharmacological target as they can be activated by erythromycin. The functions of motilin are highly species-dependent and remain poorly understood. As a functional motilin system is absent in rodents such as rats and mice, these species are not commonly used for basic studies. In this study, we examine the usefulness of human MTLR-overexpressing transgenic (hMTLR-Tg) mice by identifying the mechanisms of the gastric motor response to human motilin and erythromycin. The distribution of hMTLR was examined immunohistochemically in male wild-type (WT) and hMTLR-Tg mice. The contractile response of gastric strips was measured isometrically in an organ bath, while gastric emptying was determined using phenol red. hMTLR expression was abundant in the gastric smooth muscle layer. Interestingly, higher levels of hMTLR expression were observed in the myenteric plexus of hMTLR-Tg mice but not WT mice. hMTLR was not co-localized with vesicular acetylcholine transporter, a marker of cholinergic neurons in the myenteric plexus. Treatment with human motilin and erythromycin caused concentration-dependent contraction of gastric strips obtained from hMTLR-Tg mice but not from WT mice. The contractile response to human motilin and erythromycin in hMTLR-Tg mice was affected by neither atropine nor tetrodotoxin and was totally absent in Ca2+-free conditions. Furthermore, intraperitoneal injection of erythromycin significantly promoted gastric emptying in hMTLR-Tg mice but not in WT mice. Human motilin and erythromycin stimulate gastric smooth muscle contraction in hMTLR-Tg mice. This action is mediated by direct contraction of smooth muscle via the influx of extracellular Ca2+. Thus, hMTLR-Tg mice may be useful for the evaluation of MTLR agonists as gastric prokinetic agents.

Ghrelin and Motilin Control Systems in GI Physiology and Therapeutics

Ghrelin and motilin are released from gastrointestinal endocrine cells during hunger, to act through G protein-coupled receptors that have closely related amino acid sequences. The actions of ghrelin are more complex than motilin because ghrelin also exists outside the GI tract, it is processed to des-acyl ghrelin which has activity, ghrelin can exist in truncated forms and retain activity, the ghrelin receptor can have constitutive activity and is subject to biased agonism and finally additional ghrelin-like and des-acyl ghrelin receptors are proposed. Both ghrelin and motilin can stimulate gastric emptying, acting via different pathways, perhaps influenced by biased agonism at the receptors, but research is revealing additional pathways of activity. For example, it is becoming apparent that reduction of nausea may be a key therapeutic target for ghrelin receptor agonists and perhaps for compounds that modulate the constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor. Reduction of nausea may be the mechanism through which gastroparesis symptoms are reduced. Intriguingly, a potential ability of motilin to influence nausea is also becoming apparent. Ghrelin interacts with digestive function through its effects on appetite, and ghrelin antagonists may have a place in treating Prader-Willi syndrome. Unlike motilin, ghrelin receptor agonists also have the potential to treat constipation by acting at the lumbosacral defecation centres. In conclusion, agonists of both ghrelin and motilin receptors hold potential as treatments for specific subsets of digestive system disorders.

Molecular cloning of motilin and mechanism of motilin-induced gastrointestinal motility in Japanese quail

Motilin, a peptide hormone produced in the upper intestinal mucosa, plays an important role in the regulation of gastrointestinal (GI) motility. In the present study, we first determined the cDNA and amino acid sequences of motilin in the Japanese quail and studied the distribution of motilin-producing cells in the gastrointestinal tract. We also examined the motilin-induced contractile properties of quail GI tracts using an in vitro organ bath, and then elucidated the mechanisms of motilin-induced contraction in the proventriculus and duodenum of the quail. Mature quail motilin was composed of 22 amino acid residues, which showed high homology with chicken (95.4%), human (72.7%), and dog (72.7%) motilin. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that motilin-immunopositive cells were present in the mucosal layer of the duodenum (23.4±4.6cells/mm(2)), jejunum (15.2±0.8cells/mm(2)), and ileum (2.5±0.7cells/mm(2)), but were not observed in the crop, proventriculus, and colon. In the organ bath study, chicken motilin induced dose-dependent contraction in the proventriculus and small intestine. On the other hand, chicken ghrelin had no effect on contraction in the GI tract. Motilin-induced contraction in the duodenum was not inhibited by atropine, hexamethonium, ritanserin, ondansetron, or tetrodotoxin. However, motilin-induced contractions in the proventriculus were significantly inhibited by atropine and tetrodotoxin. These results suggest that motilin is the major stimulant of GI contraction in quail, as it is in mammals and the site of action of motilin is different between small intestine and proventriculus.

Ghrelin and motilin receptors as drug targets for gastrointestinal disorders

The gastrointestinal tract is the major source of the related hormones ghrelin and motilin, which act on structurally similar G protein-coupled receptors. Nevertheless, selective receptor agonists are available. The primary roles of endogenous ghrelin and motilin in the digestive system are to increase appetite or hedonic eating (ghrelin) and initiate phase III of gastric migrating myoelectric complexes (motilin). Ghrelin and motilin also both inhibit nausea. In clinical trials, the motilin receptor agonist camicinal increased gastric emptying, but at lower doses reduced gastroparesis symptoms and improved appetite. Ghrelin receptor agonists have been trialled for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis because of their ability to increase gastric emptying, but with mixed results; however, relamorelin, a ghrelin agonist, reduced nausea and vomiting in patients with this disorder. Treatment of postoperative ileus with a ghrelin receptor agonist proved unsuccessful. Centrally penetrant ghrelin receptor agonists stimulate defecation in animals and humans, although ghrelin itself does not seem to control colorectal function. Thus, the most promising uses of motilin receptor agonists are the treatment of gastroparesis or conditions with slow gastric emptying, and ghrelin receptor agonists hold potential for the reduction of nausea and vomiting, and the treatment of constipation. Therapeutic, gastrointestinal roles for receptor antagonists or inverse agonists have not been identified.

The antibiotic azithromycin is a motilin receptor agonist in human stomach: comparison with erythromycin

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The antibiotic azithromycin is a suggested alternative to erythromycin for treating patients with delayed gastric emptying. However, although hypothesized to activate motilin receptors, supportive evidence is unavailable. This was investigated using recombinant and naturally expressed motilin receptors in human stomach, comparing azithromycin with erythromycin.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

[(125)I]-motilin binding and calcium flux experiments were conducted using human recombinant motilin receptors in CHO cells. Neuromuscular activities were studied using circular muscle of human gastric antrum, after electrical field stimulation (EFS) of intrinsic nerves.

KEY RESULTS

Azithromycin (1-100 μM) and erythromycin (3-30 μM) concentration-dependently displaced [(125)I]-motilin binding to the motilin receptor (52 ± 7 and 58 ± 18% displacement at 100 and 30 μM respectively). Azithromycin, erythromycin and motilin concentration-dependently caused short-lived increases in intracellular [Ca(2+)] in cells expressing the motilin receptor. EC50 values were, respectively, 2.9, 0.92 and 0.036 μM (n = 3 each); and maximal activities were similar. In human stomach, EFS evoked cholinergically mediated contractions, attenuated by simultaneous nitrergic activation. Azithromycin and erythromycin lactobionate (30-300 μM each) facilitated these contractions (apparent E(max) values of 2007 ± 396 and 1924 ± 1375%, n = 3-4 each concentration, respectively). These actions were slow in onset and faded slowly. The higher concentrations also evoked short-lived muscle contraction. Contractions to a submaximally effective concentration of carbachol were unaffected by either drug.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Azithromcyin activates human recombinant motilin receptors in therapeutically relevant concentrations, similar to erythromycin. In humans, gastric antrum azithromycin caused long-lasting facilitation of cholinergic activity. These actions explain the gastric prokinetic activity of azithromycin.

Drugs acting at 5-HT4 , D2 , motilin, and ghrelin receptors differ markedly in how they affect neuromuscular functions in human isolated stomach

BACKGROUND

Progress in identifying safer, effective drugs to increase gastric emptying is impeded by failed clinical trials. One potential reason for failure is lack of translation from animal models to the human condition. To make progress, the actions of existing drugs and new therapeutic candidates need to be understood in human isolated stomach.

METHODS

Neuromuscular activities were evoked in human gastric antrum circular muscle by electrical field stimulation (EFS), defined phenotypically using pharmacological tools.

KEY RESULTS

EFS evoked cholinergically mediated contractions, attenuated by simultaneous nitrergic activation. The 5-HT4 receptor agonist/D2 antagonist metoclopramide and the selective 5-HT4 agonist prucalopride, facilitated contractions in the absence (respectively, Emax 95 ± 29% and 42 ± 9%, n = 3-6 each concentration) and presence (139 ± 38%, 55 ± 13%, n = 3-5) of the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME, without affecting submaximal contractions to carbachol; the 5-HT4 antagonist SB204070 prevented facilitation by metoclopramide 100 μM (respectively, -5 (range -26 to 34) and 167 (12-1327)% in presence and absence; n = 5-6). The selective motilin receptor agonist camicinal provided considerably greater facilitation (478 (12-2080)% at 30 μM, n = 8). Domperidone (0.001-100 μM; n = 3-6) and acylated or des-acylated ghrelin (1-300 nM; n = 2-4) had no consistent activity, even with protease inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

5-HT4 receptor agonists show different efficacies. Motilin receptor activation has greater potential to increase gastric emptying, whereas ghrelin and D2 receptor antagonism have no direct activity. Drugs stimulating human gastric motility directly can act regardless of disease mechanisms, whereas drugs without direct activity but an ability to block nausea/vomiting may be effective only if these symptoms exist.

Translational neuropharmacology: the use of human isolated gastrointestinal tissues

Translational sciences increasingly emphasize the measurement of functions in native human tissues. However, such studies must confront variations in patient age, gender, genetic background and disease. Here, these are discussed with reference to neuromuscular and neurosecretory functions of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Tissues are obtained after informed consent, in collaboration with surgeons (surgical techniques help minimize variables) and pathologists. Given the difficulties of directly recording from human myenteric neurones (embedded between muscle layers), enteric motor nerve functions are studied by measuring muscle contractions/relaxations evoked by electrical stimulation of intrinsic nerves; responses are regionally dependent, often involving cholinergic and nitrergic phenotypes. Enteric sensory functions can be studied by evoking the peristaltic reflex, involving enteric sensory and motor nerves, but this has rarely been achieved. As submucosal neurones are more accessible (after removing the mucosa), direct neuronal recordings are possible. Neurosecretory functions are studied by measuring changes in short-circuit current across the mucosa. For all experiments, basic questions must be addressed. Because tissues are from patients, what are the controls and the influence of disease? How long does it take before function fully recovers? What is the impact of age- and gender-related differences? What is the optimal sample size? Addressing these and other questions minimizes variability and raises the scientific credibility of human tissue research. Such studies also reduce animal use. Further, the many differences between animal and human GI functions also means that human tissue research must question the ethical validity of using strains of animals with unproved translational significance.

Ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists: time to introduce bias into drug design

Ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists increase gastric motility and are attractive drug targets. However, 14 years after the receptors were described (18-24 years since ligands became available) the inactivity of the ghrelin agonist TZP-102 in patients with gastroparesis joins the list of unsuccessful motilin agonists. Fundamental questions must be asked. Pustovit et al., have now shown that the ghrelin agonist ulimorelin evokes prolonged increases in rat colorectal propulsion yet responses to other ghrelin agonists fade. Similarly, different motilin agonists induce short- or long-lasting effects in a cell-dependent manner. Together, these and other data create the hypothesis that the receptors can be induced to preferentially signal ('biased agonism') via particular pathways to evoke different responses with therapeutic advantages/disadvantages. Biased agonism has been demonstrated for ghrelin. Are motilin agonists which cause long-lasting facilitation of human stomach cholinergic function (compared with motilin) biased agonists (e.g., camicinal, under development for patients with gastric hypo-motility)? For ghrelin, additional complications exist because the therapeutic aims/mechanisms of action are uncertain, making it difficult to select the best (biased) agonist. Will ghrelin agonists be useful treatments of nausea and/or as suggested by Pustovit et al., chronic constipation? How does ghrelin increase gastric motility? As gastroparesis symptoms poorly correlate with delayed gastric emptying (yet gastro-prokinetic drugs can provide relief: e.g., low-dose erythromycin), would low doses of ghrelin and motilin agonists relieve symptoms simply by restoring neuromuscular rhythm? These questions on design and functions need addressing if ghrelin and motilin agonists are to reach patients as drugs.

Motilin: towards a new understanding of the gastrointestinal neuropharmacology and therapeutic use of motilin receptor agonists

The gastrointestinal hormone motilin has been known about for >40 years, but after identification of its receptor and subsequent development of new tools and methods, a reappraisal of its actions is required. Firstly, it is important to note that motilin and ghrelin receptors are members of the same family (similar genomic organization, gastrointestinal distribution and abilities to stimulate gastrointestinal motility), yet each fails to recognize the ligand of the other; and whereas ghrelin and ghrelin receptors are widespread outside the gastrointestinal tract, motilin and its receptors are largely restricted to the gastrointestinal tract. Secondly, although some studies suggest motilin has activity in rodents, most do not, and receptor pseudogenes exist in rodents. Thirdly, motilin preferentially operates by facilitating enteric cholinergic activity rather than directly contracting the muscle, despite the relatively high expression of receptor immunoreactivity in muscle. This activity is ligand-dependent, with short-lasting actions of motilin contrasting with longer-lasting actions of the non-selective and selective motilin receptor agonists erythromycin and GSK962040. Finally, the use of erythromycin (also an antibiotic drug) to treat patients requiring acceleration of gastric emptying has led to concerns over safety and potential exacerbation of antibiotic resistance. Replacement motilin receptor agonists derived from erythromycin (motilides) have been unsuccessful. New, non-motilide, small molecule receptor agonists, designed to minimize self-desensitization, are now entering clinical trials for treating patients undergoing enteral feeding or with diabetic gastroparesis. Thus, for the translational pharmacologist, the study of motilin illustrates the need to avoid overreliance on artificial systems, on structural information and on animal studies.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Neuropeptides. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2013.170.issue-7.

Regional- and agonist-dependent facilitation of human neurogastrointestinal functions by motilin receptor agonists

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Delayed gastric emptying is poorly managed. Motilin agonists are potential treatments but inadequate understanding into how enteric nerve functions are stimulated compromises drug/dose selection. Resolution is hampered by extreme species dependency so methods were developed to study human gastrointestinal neuromuscular activities and the neurobiology of motilin.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Protocols to study neuromuscular activities were developed for different regions of human stomach and intestine (71 patients) using circular muscle preparations and electrical field stimulation (EFS) of intrinsic nerves. Other tissues were fixed for immunohistochemistry.

KEY RESULTS

EFS evoked contractions and/or relaxations via cholinergic and nitrergic neurons, with additional tachykinergic activity in colon; these were consistent after 154 min (longer if stored overnight). Motilin 1-300 nM and the selective motilin agonist GSK962040 0.1-30 µM acted pre-junctionally to strongly facilitate cholinergic contractions of the antrum (E(max) ≈ 1000% for motilin), with smaller increases in fundus, duodenum and ileum; high concentrations increased baseline muscle tension in fundus and small intestine. There were minimal effects in the colon. In the antrum, cholinergic facilitation by motilin faded irregularly, even with peptidase inhibitors, whereas facilitation by GSK962040 was long lasting. Motilin receptor immunoreactivity was identified in muscle and myenteric plexus predominantly in the upper gut, co-expressed with choline acetyltransferase in neurons.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Motilin and GSK962040 strongly facilitated cholinergic activity in the antrum, with lower activity in fundus and small intestine only. Facilitation by motilin was short lived, consistent with participation in migrating motor complexes. Long-lasting facilitation by GSK962040 suggests different receptor interactions and potential for clinical evaluation.

Anti-emetic and emetic effects of erythromycin in Suncus murinus: role of vagal nerve activation, gastric motility stimulation and motilin receptors

Paradoxically, erythromycin is associated with nausea when used as an antibiotic but at lower doses erythromycin activates motilin receptors and is used to treat delayed gastric emptying and nausea. The aim of this study was to characterise pro- and anti-emetic activity of erythromycin and investigate mechanisms of action. Japanese House musk shrews (Suncus murinus) were used. Erythromycin was administered alone or prior to induction of emesis with abnormal motion or subcutaneous nicotine (10mg/kg). The effects of erythromycin and motilin on vagal nerve activity and on cholinergically mediated contractions of the stomach (evoked by electrical field stimulation) were studied in vitro. The results showed that erythromycin (1 and 5mg/kg) reduced vomiting caused by abnormal motion (e.g., from 10.3 ± 1.8 to 4.0 ± 1.1 emetic episodes at 5mg/kg) or by nicotine (from 9.5 ± 2.0 to 3.1 ± 2.0 at 5mg/kg), increasing latency of onset to emesis; lower or higher doses had no effects. When administered alone, erythromycin 100mg/kg induced vomiting in two of four animals, whereas lower doses did not. In vitro, motilin (1, 100 nM) increased gastric vagal afferent activity without affecting jejunal afferent mesenteric nerve activity. Cholinergically mediated contractions of the stomach (prevented by tetrodotoxin 1 μM or atropine 1 μM, facilitated by l-NAME 300 μM) were facilitated by motilin (1-100 nM) and erythromycin (10-30 μM). In conclusion, low doses of erythromycin have anti-emetic activity. Potential mechanisms of action include increased gastric motility (overcoming gastric stasis) and/ or modulation of vagal nerve pathways involved in emesis, demonstrated by first-time direct recording of vagal activation by motilin.

Motilin receptor neuropharmacology: revised understanding

Although motilin was identified >40 years ago as a gastrointestinal hormone capable of stimulating gastric emptying, the relatively recent availability of molecular tools and focus on its neuronal activities are now clarifying mechanisms of action. In rodents, only motilin receptor pseudogenes are identified. In human stomach, facilitation of enteric cholinergic activity is identified as the main mechanism by which gastric emptying is increased; some motilin agonists act in a prolonged manner, contrasting with motilin itself and with studies using recombinant receptors. As such, assays using recombinant receptors seem poor predictors of in vivo activity. High-throughput screening enabled selective motilin agonists to be identified, which together with enhanced understanding into neuromuscular actions of motilin, promises to deliver rational treatments of disorders with delayed gastric emptying.

The hungry stomach: physiology, disease, and drug development opportunities

During hunger, a series of high-amplitude contractions of the stomach and small intestine (phase III), which form part of a cycle of quiescence and contractions (known as the migrating motor complex, MMC), play a "housekeeping" role prior to the next meal, and may contribute toward the development of hunger. Several gastrointestinal (GI) hormones are associated with phase III MMC activity, but currently the most prominent is motilin, thought to at least partly mediate phase III contractions of the gastric MMC. Additional GI endocrine and neuronal systems play even more powerful roles in the development of hunger. In particular, the ghrelin-precursor gene is proving to have a complex physiology, giving rise to three different products: ghrelin itself, which is formed from a post-translational modification of des-acyl-ghrelin, and obestatin. The receptors acted on by des-acyl-ghrelin and by obestatin are currently unknown but both these peptides seem able to exert actions which oppose that of ghrelin, either indirectly or directly. An increased understanding of the actions of these peptides is helping to unravel a number of different eating disorders and providing opportunities for the discovery of new drugs to regulate dysfunctional gastric behaviors and appetite. To date, ghrelin and motilin receptor agonists and antagonists have been described. The most advanced are compounds which activate the ghrelin and motilin receptors which are being progressed for disorders associated with gastric hypomotility.

Colitis affects the smooth muscle and neural response to motilin in the rabbit antrum

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The underlying mechanisms of gastric dysfunction during or after an episode of intestinal inflammation are poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of colitis on the contractile effects of motilin, an important endocrine regulator of gastric motility, in the antrum.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, NF-kappaB activity and motilin receptor density were determined in the antrum of rabbits 5 days after the induction of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid colitis. Smooth muscle and neural responses to motilin were studied in antral smooth muscle strips in vitro.

KEY RESULTS

Colitis did not affect MPO activity, but increased NF-kappaB activity in the antrum. Motilin receptor density in the antrum was not affected. Under control conditions, motilin induced a slowly developing tonic smooth muscle contraction. Five days post-inflammation, tonic contractions to motilin were reduced and preceded by a rapid initial contraction. Other kinases were recruited for the phosphorylation of myosin light chain (MLC) (a multi-functional MLC kinase), and for the inhibition of MLC phosphatase (Rho kinase in addition to protein kinase C) to mediate the motilin-induced contractions during inflammation. Colitis potentiated the cholinergic neural on-contractions in the antrum. This was associated with a hyper-reactivity to motilin and an increased muscle response to ACh.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Colitis altered the course of the motilin-induced smooth muscle contraction in the antrum. This involved changes in the kinases phosphorylating MLC. Increased cholinergic excitability to motilin in the antrum may play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammation-associated gastric motility disorders.

Identification of small molecule agonists of the motilin receptor

High-throughput screening resulted in the identification of a series of novel motilin receptor agonists with relatively low molecular weights. The series originated from an array of biphenyl derivatives designed to target 7-transmembrane (7-TM) receptors. Further investigation of the structure-activity relationship within the series resulted in the identification of compound (22) as a potent and selective agonist at the motilin receptor.

Synergy between 5-HT4 receptor activation and acetylcholinesterase inhibition in human colon and rat forestomach

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT4) receptor agonists increase gastrointestinal (GI) motility by enhancing enteric acetylcholine release which is then metabolized by acetylcholinesterase (AChE) to inactive metabolites. As both AChE inhibitors and, more usually, 5-HT4 receptor agonists are used to increase GI motility, an understanding of how these two different types of drugs might interact becomes of great importance. Our aim was to investigate the hypothesis that the effect of AChE inhibition will synergise with the ability of 5-HT4 receptor agonism to increase cholinergic activity, leading to an effect greater than that evoked by each action alone. We tested the activity of the 5-HT4 receptor agonist, prucalopride (10 nmol L(-1)-30 micromol L(-1)) and an AChE inhibitor, neostigmine (1 nmol L(-1)-10 micromol L(-1)) on cholinergically mediated contractions elicited by electrical field stimulation of human isolated colon circular muscle and rat isolated forestomach longitudinal strips. The experiments with human colon were performed in the presence of an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (N(omega)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester, 300 micromol L(-1)). Prucalopride and neostigmine both enhanced cholinergic contractions in both tissues. The effect of prucalopride was inhibited in both tissues by SB-204070, a 5-HT4 receptor antagonist. In the presence of a minimum effective concentration of neostigmine (30 nmol L(-1)) and a submaximum concentration of prucalopride (3 micromol L(-1)) the enhancement of contractions was greater than either compound alone in both tissues. These data demonstrate that the combination of prucalopride and neostigmine potentiate cholinergic contractions more than their arithmetic sum of their individual values. The results suggest that a synergy between 5-HT4 receptor agonism and AChE inhibition could be established pharmacologically which could be utilized as a novel prokinetic approach to functional GI disorders.

Hormones of the gut-brain axis as targets for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders

The concept of the gut forming the centre of an integrated gut-brain-energy axis - modulating appetite, metabolism and digestion - opens up new paradigms for drugs that can tackle multiple symptoms in complex upper gastrointestinal disorders. These include eating disorders, nausea and vomiting, gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. The hormones that modulate gastric motility represent targets for gastric prokinetic drugs, and peptides that modify eating behaviours may be targeted to develop drugs that reduce nausea, a currently poorly treated condition. The gut-brain axis may therefore provide a range of therapeutic opportunities that deliver a more holistic treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders.

Development of drugs for gastrointestinal motor disorders: translating science to clinical need

Only a small number of new drugs have recently become available for gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. This is partly because we await outcomes of research into functional bowel disorder aetiology (e.g., role of microbiota) and of trials to control stress- related or painful GI symptoms (e.g., via CRF(1) receptors or beta(3) adrenoceptors). Nevertheless, only the ClC-2 channel activator lubiprostone has recently reached the clinic, joining the 5-HT(3) antagonist alosetron and the long-established 5-HT(4) agonist and D(2) antagonist metoclopramide; tegaserod, a non-selective ligand, was withdrawn. Interestingly, each has shortcomings, providing opportunities for molecules with 5-HT(4) or motilin receptor selectivity, and for new biology via guanylate cyclase C or ghrelin receptor activation. For translation into new drugs, the molecule must have appropriate efficacy, selectivity and pharmacodynamic properties. It is argued that the compound must then be evaluated in conditions where changes in motility are known to exist, before considering more difficult symptomatic conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or functional dyspepsia (FD), where relationships with disordered motility are unclear. Thus, it may be better to begin studying a gastric prokinetic in diabetics requiring improved glucose control, rather than in FD. Notably, new 5-HT(4) receptor agonists are being evaluated firstly as treatments of constipation, not IBS. New antidiarrhoeal agents should be developed similarly. Thus, progression of new drugs may require initial studies in smaller patient populations where clinical outcome is better defined. Only then can disease-related ideas be properly tested and drugs brought forward for these disorders (with high clinical need) and then, if successful for IBS and FD.

Motilin, ghrelin and related neuropeptides as targets for the treatment of GI diseases

Motilin and ghrelin are released from the upper gut during fasting, to stimulate gastric motility. Additional actions of ghrelin (e.g. changes in appetite, nausea or endocrine functions) improve the possibility of using ghrelin receptor agonists to treat complex disorders such as functional dyspepsia. However, changes in endocrine functions increase the risk of unacceptable side effects. By comparison, the more restricted prokinetic activity of motilin limits the therapeutic possibilities but improves the risk:benefit ratio. Compounds targeting both receptors are in development. Recently, additional peptides have been identified from preproghrelin (obestatin) and prepromotilin. These exert biological activity but their pathophysiological significance is unknown.

Identification of genes for the ghrelin and motilin receptors and a novel related gene in fish, and stimulation of intestinal motility in zebrafish (Danio rerio) by ghrelin and motilin

In mammals ghrelin has a diverse range of effects including stimulation of gut motility but although present in teleost fish its effects on motility have not been investigated. The present study used bioinformatics to search for fish paralogues of the ghrelin receptor and the closely related motilin receptor, and investigated the effects of ghrelin and motilin on gut motility in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Fish paralogues of the human ghrelin and motilin receptor genes were identified, including those from the zebrafish. In addition, a third gene was identified in three species of pufferfish (the only fish genome completely sequenced), which is distinct from the ghrelin and motilin receptors but more closely aligned to these receptors relative to other G-protein coupled receptors. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated strong ghrelin receptor-like reactivity in the muscle of the zebrafish intestine. In isolated intestinal bulb and mid/distal intestine preparations, ghrelin, motilin, and the motilin receptor agonist erythromycin all evoked contraction; these responses ranged between 9% and 51% of the contractions evoked by carbachol (10(-6) M). There were some variations in the concentrations found to be active in the different tissues, e.g., whereas motilin and rat ghrelin caused contraction of the intestinal bulb circular muscle at concentrations as low as 10(-8) M, human ghrelin (10(-8) to 10(-6) M) was without activity. Neither ghrelin (10(-7) M) nor erythromycin (10(-5) M) affected the contractions evoked by electrical field stimulation. The results suggest that both ghrelin and motilin can regulate intestinal motility in zebrafish and most likely other teleosts, and are discussed in relation to the evolution of these regulatory peptides.