Peripheral blood vs bone marrow as a source for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment option for many malignant and non-malignant haematological disorders. Peripheral blood stem cells represent the main stem cell source in malignant diseases due to faster engraftment and practicability issues compared with bone marrow stem cells. Since the early 2000s, there have been many developments in the clinical field. Allo-HSCT using haploidentical family donors (haplo-HSCT) has emerged as an alternative for people who do not have human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings or unrelated donors. In addition, the introduction of new methods and strategies in allo-HSCT, such as the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), better donor selection, the more frequent administration of anti-thymocyte globulins (ATGs), but also improved management of side effects such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and infection, have impacted outcomes after allo-HSCT. In addition, as transplant indications and strategies continue to adapt in line with novel research findings, the effect of the stem cell source on post-transplant outcomes is unclear. For our analysis, we considered peripheral blood stem cells as the standard graft source for adults with haematological malignancies. This is an update of a review first published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of bone marrow transplantation versus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in adults with haematological malignancies with regard to overall survival, disease-free survival, incidence of non-relapse or transplant-related mortality, incidence of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), incidence of acute GvHD grades III to IV, incidence of overall chronic GvHD, and quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registries on 2 November 2022 with no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with haematological malignancies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We evaluated risk of bias using the original Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 1), and we evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

The updated search identified no new studies for inclusion. We found two additional reports relating to a previously included study; they provided new data on quality of life and infection rates after transplantation. As these are clinically relevant outcomes, quality of life was added to the summary of findings table (replacing acute GvHD II to IV), and rate of infection was added to our list of secondary outcomes. We included nine RCTs with a total of 1521 participants. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was low. Median participant age across studies ranged from 21 to 45 years, and studies took place in Canada, the USA, New Zealand, Brazil, Australia, Egypt, and across Europe. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) compared with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) likely results in little to no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death 1.07, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.25; 6 studies, 1330 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between BMT and PBSCT in terms of disease-free survival (HR for disease recurrence or all-cause death 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; 6 studies, 1225 participants; low-certainty evidence) and non-relapse or transplant-related mortality (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.28; 3 studies, 758 participants; low-certainty evidence). BMT compared with PBSCT likely results in lower rates of extensive chronic GvHD (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90; 4 studies, 765 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and overall chronic GvHD (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; 4 studies, 1121 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). BMT compared with PBSCT may reduce the incidence of acute GvHD grades III to IV, although the 95% CI of the HR is also compatible with no effect (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.02; 3 studies, 925 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Evidence from two trials that used different quality of life assessment instruments suggests that BMT compared with PBSCT may be associated with higher quality of life five years after transplantation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-certainty evidence suggests little to no difference in overall survival following allo-HSCT using bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells (the current clinical standard stem cell source). Low-certainty evidence suggests little to no difference between the stem cell sources in terms of disease-free survival and non-relapse or transplant-related survival. BMT likely reduces the risk of extensive chronic GvHD and overall chronic GvHD compared with PBSCT. Evidence from two RCTs suggests that BMT compared with PBSCT may result in higher long-term quality of life, possibly due to the lower chronic GvHD incidence. With this update, we aimed to supply the most recent data on the choice of stem cell source for allo-HSCT in adults by including new evidence published up to November 2022. We identified no new ongoing studies and no new RCTs with published results. Further research in this field is warranted.

Anti-thymocyte globulin could potentially overcome an adverse effect of acute GVHD in matched-related PBSCT

BACKGROUND

Previous Japanese studies have shown that bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is associated with a better survival compared with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from matched related donors (MRDs). PBSCT recipients showed a higher incidence of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) than BMT recipients. In recent years, the efficacy and safety of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for PBSCT recipients has been reported from around the world.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare BMT and PBSCT to identify current improvements and unmet needs among PBSCT recipients from MRDs. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of ATG administration on the outcomes for PBSCT recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed patients aged 16 years or older with acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myeloid leukemia who received their first BMT or PBSCT from MRDs between 2009 and 2018 in Japan.

RESULTS

In total, 3599 transplantations were performed (BMT, 1218; PBSCT without ATG [PBSCT-ATG(-)], 2288; and PBSCT with ATG [PBSCT-ATG(+)], 93). The PBSCT-ATG(-) group had a higher NRM rate (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.57; p = 0.005) and lower overall survival (OS) rate (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30; p = 0.011) than the BMT group. Furthermore, the PBSCT-ATG(-) group had a higher incidence of grade III-IV, stage 2-4 gut, high-risk, and steroid-refractory acute GVHD than the BMT group. Acute GVHDs had a negative impact on NRM and OS rates. PBSCT-ATG(-) was also associated with a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.24-1.57; p < 0.001) and extensive chronic GVHD (HR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.23-1.68; p < 0.001). The incidence of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and NRM and chronic GVHD-free relapse-free survival rates were comparable between the PBSCT-ATG(+) and BMT groups. The OS rate of patients with acute GVHD in the three donor groups was similar. Patients treated with reduced-intensity conditioning in the PBSCT-ATG(+) group had a higher relapse rate and lower OS rate than those in the BMT group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Japanese cohort, standard calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis was not sufficient for PBSCT recipients from MRDs because of the high incidence of severe acute GVHD. Moreover, prophylactic ATG was found to be a promising strategy against GVHD.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Egypt: Challenges and Opportunities

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is now an established treatment modality with definitive indications for many hematological disorders. However, HSCT requires tremendous resources, and it is increasingly challenging for transplantation experts to practice in the developing world and to reach a compromise between requirements and available resources. Based on 30 years of experience and 4256 transplants (60% allogeneic and 40% autologous), this article focuses on the challenges our HSCT program encountered since it started in 1989 and what opportunities we see to solve them. Since 1997, HSCT procedures increased dramatically with the opening of 15 HSCT units distributed all over Egypt.

Network geometry of evidence from randomised controlled trials addressing donor selection and source of haematopoietic progenitor cells used in allogeneic transplantation: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

A scoping review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) addressing source of cells and choice of donor for allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was performed to create a network of best evidence that allows us to identify new potential indirect comparisons for the strategic development of future studies that connect to the existing evidence network.

RESULTS

A total of 19 eligible RCTs (2589 total patients) were identified. Nine studies (1566 patients) compared clinical outcomes following the use of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) with bone marrow (BM) from matched related donors (eight studies) or matched unrelated donors (one study). The remaining studies compared BM or PBPCs with various methods of BM stimulation or manipulation (six studies), compared different methods of surface molecule-based selection and/or depletion of grafts (two studies) or compared the optimal number of units for paediatric cord blood transplantation (two studies). No published RCTs compared different types of donors. The geometry of the evidence network was analysed to identify opportunities for potential novel indirect comparisons and to identify opportunities to expand the network. Few indirect comparisons are currently feasible due to small sample size and heterogeneity in patient diagnoses and demographics between treatment nodes in the network.

CONCLUSION

More RCTs that enrol greater numbers of similar patients are needed to leverage the current evidence network concerning donor choice and source of cells used in allogeneic HCT.

Comparable Outcomes of Allogeneic Peripheral Blood versus Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Major Thalassemia: A Multivariate Long-Term Cohort Analysis

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) currently is the only available curative option for transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Peripheral blood is a more convenient source for HSCT in comparison with bone marrow. Information about the relative success of transplantation with these 2 graft sources would help physicians and patients choose between them. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pros and cons of using peripheral blood instead of bone marrow as the graft source in thalassemia transplantation. We analyzed the transplant results of 567 transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients who received a transplant between 1998 and 2015 considering their stem cell source as a comparative variable. In multivariate Cox analysis the survival advantage for bone marrow compared with peripheral blood was not significant after adjusting for sex, age, and hepatic fibrosis presence. Rejection incidence was significantly lower in patients who used peripheral blood as their graft source. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were more frequent in peripheral blood transplants, but the difference was not statistically significant. This study shows that peripheral blood could be an alternative stem cell source in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for thalassemia.

G-CSF inhibits LFA-1-mediated CD4+ T cell functions by inhibiting Lck and ZAP-70

In this study, we showed that G-CSF mobilization increased the frequency of T cells, specifically CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells. G-CSF mobilization decreased the secretion of inflammatory cytokines of CD4⁺ T cells through the LFA-1/ICAM-1 signaling pathway, whereas it did not alter the TH1/TH2 ratio. We found that G-CSF mobilization inhibited LFA-1-mediated CD4⁺ T cell polarization and motility. In vitro, G-CSF stimulation also attenuated the polarization and adhesiveness of CD4⁺ T cells through the LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction. Further investigation revealed that G-CSF mobilization suppressed LFA-1 signaling by down-regulating Lck and ZAP-70 expression in CD4⁺ T cells, similar results was also confirmed by in-vitro studies. These findings suggested that G-CSF directly suppressed LFA-1-mediated CD4⁺ T cell functions through the down-regulation of Lck and ZAP-70. The immunosuppressive effect of G-CSF mobilization deepened our understanding about peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. LFA-1/ICMA-1 pathway may become a potential target for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.

Transplantations from HLA-identical siblings versus 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donors

The clinical outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor as well as an HLA-matched unrelated donor has clearly improved due in part to the progress made in the domains of HLA-typing techniques. Although HLA-matched sibling transplantation is still held as the "gold standard," transplantation from HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1-matched unrelated donors (so called 10/10) represent the first choice for patients without a suitable related donor. Several studies have shown that unmanipulated marrow transplantation from an HLA allele-matched unrelated donor resulted in similar outcomes to those observed following sibling transplantation. However, incorporating anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) within graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis should be considered for peripheral blood stem cell grafts in order to decrease the risk of developing chronic GVHD.

Bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological malignancies in adults

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment option for many malignant and non-malignant disorders. In the past two decades, peripheral blood stem cells replaced bone marrow as stem cell source due to faster engraftment and practicability. Previous meta-analyses analysed patients treated from 1990 to 2002 and demonstrated no impact of the stem cell source on overall survival, but a greater risk for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in peripheral blood transplants. As transplant indications and conditioning regimens continue to change, whether the choice of the stem cell source has an impact on transplant outcomes remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in adult patients with haematological malignancies with regard to overall survival, incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality, disease-free survival, transplant-related mortality, incidence of GvHD and time to engraftment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE (from 1948 to February 2014), trial registries and conference proceedings. The search was conducted in October 2011 and was last updated in February 2014. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bone marrow and peripheral blood allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with haematological malignancies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened abstracts and extracted and analysed data independently. We contacted study authors for additional information. We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs that met the pre-defined selection criteria, involving a total of 1521 participants. Quality of data reporting was heterogeneous among the studies. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was low.For the primary outcome overall survival, our analysis demonstrated comparable results between bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) (six studies, 1330 participants; hazard ratio (HR) 1.07; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.25; P value = 0.43; high-quality evidence).Disease-free survival (six studies, 1225 participants; HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; P value = 0.6; moderate-quality of evidence) and non-relapse or transplant-related mortality (three studies, 758 participants; HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.28; P = 0.91; high-quality evidence) were also comparable between transplantation arms.In the related-donor setting, data from two of eight studies with 211 participants (21%) indicated a higher relapse incidence in participants transplanted with bone marrow stem cells rather than peripheral blood stem cells (HR 2.73; 95% CI 1.47 to 5.08; P value = 0.001). There was no clear evidence of a difference in relapse incidence between transplantation groups in unrelated donors (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.47; P value = 0.66). The difference between the donor-related and -unrelated subgroups (P-value = 0.008) was considered to be statistically significant.BMT was associated with lower rates of overall and extensive chronic GvHD than PBSCT (overall chronic GvHD: four studies, 1121 participants; HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; P value = 0.0001, extensive chronic GvHD: four studies, 765 participants; HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.9; P value = 0.006; moderate-quality evidence for both outcomes). The incidence of acute GvHD grades II to IV was not lower (six studies, 1330 participants; HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; P value = 0.67; moderate-quality evidence), but there was a trend for a lower incidence of grades III and IV acute GvHD with BMT than with PBSCT (three studies, 925 participants; HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.02; P value = 0.07; moderate-quality evidence).Times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were longer with BMT than with PBSCT (neutrophil: five studies, 662 participants; HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.64 to 2.35; P value < 0.00001; platelet: four studies, 333 participants; HR 2.17; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.78; P value < 0.00001).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review  found high-quality evidence that overall survival following allo-HSCT using the current clinical standard stem cell source - peripheral blood stem cells - was similar to that following allo-HSCT using bone marrow stem cells in adults with haematological malignancies. We found moderate-quality evidence that PBSCT was associated with faster engraftment of neutrophils and platelets, but a higher risk of GvHD (in terms of more overall and extensive chronic GvHD). There was an imprecise effect on relapse and on severe (grades III to IV) acute GvHD. Quality of life, which is severely affected by GvHD, was not evaluated.Against the background of transplantation practices that have clearly changed over the past 10 to 15 years, our aim was to provide current data on the best stem cell source for allo-HSCT, by including the results of recently conducted trials. Our review includes participants recruited up to 2009, a proportion of whom were older, had received reduced-intensity conditioning regimens or had been transplanted with stem cells from unrelated donors. However, only one, large, study included relatively recently treated participants. Nevertheless, our findings are comparable to those of previous meta-analyses suggesting that our results hold true for today's practice.

Optimal stem cell source for allogeneic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a standard treatment for many hematological malignancies. Three different sources of stem cells, namely bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and cord blood (CB) can be used for HSCT, and each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that there is no significant survival advantage of PBSC over BM in Human Leukocyte Antigen-matched sibling transplant for adult patients with hematological malignancies. PBSC transplant probably results in lower risk of relapse and hence better disease-free survival, especially in patients with high risk disease at the expense of higher risks of both severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In the unrelated donor setting, the only RCT available suggests that PBSC and BM result in comparable overall and disease-free survivals in patients with hematological malignancies; and PBSC transplant results in lower risk of graft failure and higher risk of chronic GVHD. High level evidence is not available for CB in comparison to BM or PBSC. The risks and benefits of different sources of stem cells likely change with different conditioning regimen, strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD and manipulation of grafts. The recent success and rapid advance of double CB transplant and haploidentical BM and PBSC transplants further complicate the selection of stem cell source. Optimal selection requires careful weighing of the risks and benefits of different stem cell source for each individual recipient and donor. Detailed counseling of patient and donor regarding risks and benefits in the specific context of the patient and transplant method is essential for informed decision making.

Cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes can be efficiently expanded from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized hemopoietic progenitor cell products ex vivo and safely transferred to stem cell transplantation recipients to facilitate immune reconstitution

Uncontrolled cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation causes significant morbidity and mortality. Adoptive transfer of CMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) is a promising therapy to treat reactivation and prevent viral disease. In this article, we describe the generation of clinical-grade CMV-specific CTLs directly from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized hemopoietic progenitor cell (G-HPC) products collected for transplantation. This method requires less than 2.5% of a typical G-HPC product to reproducibly expand CMV-specific CTLs ex vivo. Comparison of 11 CMV CTL lines generated from G-HPC products with 52 CMV CTL lines generated from nonmobilized peripheral blood revealed similar expansion kinetics and phenotype. G-HPC-derived CTLs produced IFN-γ after reexposure to CMVpp65 antigen and exhibited CMV-directed cytotoxicity but no alloreactivity against transplantation recipient-derived cells. Seven patients received CMV-specific CTL lines expanded from G-HPC products in a prophylactic adoptive immunotherapy phase I/II clinical trial. Use of G-HPC products will facilitate integration of CTL generation into established quality systems of transplantation centers and more rapid inclusion of T cell therapies into routine clinical care.

What is the most appropriate source for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? Peripheral stem cell/bone marrow/cord blood

The introduction of peripheral stem cell (PSC) and cord blood (CB) as an alternative to bone marrow (BM) recently has caused important changes on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) practice. According to the CIBMTR data, there has been a significant decrease in the use of bone marrow and increase in the use of PSC and CB as the stem cell source for HSCT performed during 1997–2006 period for patients under the age of 20. On the other hand, the stem cell source in 70% of the HSCT procedures performed for patients over the age of 20 was PSC and the second most preferred stem cell source was bone marrow. CB usage is very limited for the adult population. Primary disease, stage, age, time and urgency of transplantation, HLA match between the patient and the donor, stem cell quantity, and the experience of the transplantation center are some of the associated factors for the selection of the appropriate stem cell source. Unfortunately, there is no prospective randomized study aimed to facilitate the selection of the correct source between CB, PSC, and BM. In this paper, we would like to emphasize the data on stem cell selection in light of the current knowledge for patient populations according to their age and primary disease.

Allogeneic transplantation: peripheral blood vs. bone marrow

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) have been widely adopted as a source of stem cells for allogeneic transplantation, although controversy remains regarding their role compared to the use of bone marrow.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ten-year follow-up has been reported from several large randomized trials and a recently completed trial using unrelated donor stem cells has been reported. In addition, two meta-analyses have been reported from the findings of a number of randomized studies. Several studies indicate that PBSCs confer survival advantages over bone marrow with matched sibling donors for most disease categories except where the risks of disease recurrence within the first year are low, but with the extra risk of more chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Using PBSCs from unrelated donors does not appear to be more beneficial than bone marrow, but with early follow-up. New strategies for rapid mobilization of PBSCs from normal donors using plerixafor have been reported. Early studies suggest that filgrastim-stimulated bone marrow may confer some of the advantages of PBSCs without the risks of chronic GVHD.

SUMMARY

PBSCs are a preferred source of stem cells for many types of allogeneic transplant, in which matched related donors are available. Whether the same benefits accrue from unrelated donors will require further follow-up.

Telomere biology in hematopoiesis and stem cell transplantation

Telomeres are long (TTAGGG)(n) nucleotide repeats and an associated protein complex located at the end of the chromosomes. They shorten with every cell division and, thus are markers for cellular aging, senescence, and replicative capacity. Telomere dysfunction is linked to several bone marrow disorders, including dyskeratosis congenita, aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and hematopoietic malignancies. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides an opportunity in which to study telomere dynamics in a high cell proliferative environment. Rapid telomere shortening of donor cells occurs in the recipient shortly after HSCT; the degree of telomere attrition does not appear to differ by graft source. As expected, telomeres are longer in recipients of grafts with longer telomeres (e.g., cord blood). Telomere attrition may play a role in, or be a marker of, long term outcome after HSCT, but these data are limited. In this review, we discuss telomere biology in normal and abnormal hematopoiesis, including HSCT.

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared to peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of hematologic malignancies: a meta-analysis based on time-to-event data from randomized controlled trials

Controversy remains regarding the transplant outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-identical related bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for the treatment of patients with hematological malignancies. To provide an estimate of the effect of BMT and PBSCT on clinical outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies, we conducted a meta-analysis based on time-to-event data from 17 randomized controlled trials. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), from 1972 through July 2010, and conference proceedings through July 2009 and reference lists, without any language restriction, of randomized trials that compared the transplant outcomes after BMT and PBSCT in patients with hematological malignancies were searched for details. Two independent reviewers extracted the data. The outcomes examined were engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM), leukemia-free-survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS). Compared to PBSCT, BMT had lower neutrophil (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.80 to 2.42; p < 0.00001) and platelet (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.78 to 4.30; p < 0.00001) engraftment. BMT was associated with a significant decrease in the development of grades II-IV (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.90; p = 0.002) and III-IV (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.84; p = 0.001) acute GVHD as well as overall (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.83; p < 0.0001) and extensive (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.91; p = 0.002) chronic GVHD. BMT was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.74; p = 0.0004). Comparable TRM (1.08; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.10; p = 0.81), LFS (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.30; p = 0.73), and OS (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.39; p = 0.65) were demonstrated for both treatments. An inverse linear relationship was observed between the acute GVHD difference (PBSCT minus BMT) and the outcome of OS (p = 0.016). Our meta-analysis suggest that BMT leads to slower hematological recovery, increasing rates of relapse, and a lower risk of GVHD, but no significant difference in LFS and OS. A lower incidence of acute GVHD is associated with a superior OS.

Children with acute leukemia: a comparison of outcomes from allogeneic blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

The relative merits of peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) versus bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for children with standard and high-risk hematologic malignancies remain unclear. In a retrospective study, we compared allogeneic PBSCT (n = 30) with BMT (n = 110) in children with acute leukemia between January 2001 and September 2006.

PROCEDURE

Median age for PBSCT was 9 years versus 8 years for BMT. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and medical variables. The unadjusted probabilities of disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The association of graft-source and time to each of the study endpoints was estimated by Cox's regression model and the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was included as a time-dependent covariate.

RESULTS

Time to neutrophil engraftment and platelet independence was faster after PBSCT than BMT (neutrophils 15.0 days vs. 17.0 days, P < 0.001; platelets, 21.0 days vs. 27.0 days, P = 0.034). The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GvHD at 100 days was 10.4% (SE 5.6%) after PBSCT and 15.1% (SE 3.5%) after BMT (P = NS). The cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 13.8% (SE 6.3%) after PBSCT and 11.3% (SE 3.1%) after BMT (P = NS). One-year disease-free survival was 37.9% (SE 9.0%) for PBSCT recipients versus 65.1% (SE 4.6%) after BMT (P = 0.005) but this difference was not sustained in multivariate analysis. Thus, only disease risk and pre-transplant CMV seropositivity were significant predictors of disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that PBSCT for children produces faster engraftment without increased risk of acute or chronic GvHD.

Fludarabine-based conditioning chemotherapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acquired severe aplastic anemia

Thirty-eight patients who met the diagnostic criteria for severe aplastic anemia underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The median patient age was 20 years (range, 14-36 years). Twenty-four patients were treatment-naïve, 11 had failed one or more previous courses of immunosuppressive therapy, and 3 had failed a previous HSCT. The conditioning regimen included fludarabine 30 mg/m(2)/day for 3 days (days -9, -8, and -7) and cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day for 4 days (days -5, -4, -3, and -2). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and short-course methotrexate. All patients underwent transplantation with unmanipulated bone marrow as the stem cell source. The median total nucleated cell (TNC) dose was 2.43 × 10(8)/kg (range, 0.60-6.7 × 10(8)/ kg). The conditioning regimen was well tolerated, with minimal treatment-related mortality. Engraftment was observed in all patients after transplantation; the median time to engraftment of neutrophils and platelets was 18 and 23 days, respectively. Twenty-five of the 27 patients with available chimeric studies at day 180 maintained donor chimerism. Acute GVHD grade ≥II was diagnosed in 4 patients (11%). Extensive chronic GVHD was observed in 8 patients (25%) who survived beyond day +100, at a median observation time of 43 months. Graft rejection with relapse of aplais was observed in one patient. The overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 79%. A trend toward improved OS was observed in the treatment-naïve patients (83% vs 71%), but this was statistically insignificant (P = .384). The fludarabine-based conditioning regimen used in this study with relatively young cohort of patients was well tolerated, with a low rate of rejection and treatment outcomes comparable to those seen in other, more intense and potentially more toxic conditioning regimens. Our results await validation in a larger study, optimally in a randomized controlled manner.

The effect of the composition of unrelated donor bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts on transplantation outcomes

To test the hypothesis that the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) grafts is at least partially determined by the cellular composition of the graft, the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) analyzed the correlation of cellular phenotypes of unrelated grafts with graft outcome. Samples from 94 bone marrow (BM) and 181 peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) grafts for transplantations at 40 U.S. transplant centers between 2003 and 2005 were analyzed at a single immunophenotyping reference laboratory. Samples were shipped from transplant centers upon receipt of graft. Graft cellular composition included analysis of leukocyte total cell numbers, and subsets of myeloid [CD34(+), CD34(+) CD38(-)], lymphoid [CD3(+), CD3(+) CD4(+), CD3(+) CD8(+)], and activated lymphoid cells [CD3(+) CD25(+), CD3(+) CD69(+), CD3(+) HLA-DR(+)] coexpressing CD3(+). There was substantial variability in the cellular composition of BM and PBPC grafts before and after graft processing by red blood cell (RBC) removal or plasma depletion in preparation for transplant. With BM grafts, cellular composition was not associated with hematopoietic recovery, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or survival. With PBPC grafts, survival rates were higher with CD34(+)>5 x 10(6)/kg, 59% compared to 34% with CD34(+)< or =5 x 10(6)/kg at 1 year. Platelet recovery was higher with PBPC containing CD3(+) CD8(+) >8 x 10(7)/kg. Neutrophil recovery or GVHD could not be predicted by any cellular subsets of PBPC grafts. Although survival was superior with PBPC grafts containing >5 x 10(6) CD34(+)/kg, an optimal graft mix of myeloid, lymphoid, and activated lymphoid subsets was not identified.

Decision analysis of peripheral blood versus bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) and bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic stem cells represent therapeutic alternatives in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Randomized controlled trials and an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) have demonstrated a decreased risk of disease relapse and an increased risk of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD, cGVHD) in patients receiving PBSCs compared with those receiving BM stem cells. Decision modeling provides quantitative integration of the risks and benefits associated with these alternative treatments, incorporates survival discounts for lower quality of life in patients with aGVHD or cGVHD and post-transplantation relapse, and allows sensitivity analyses for all model assumptions. We have constructed an externally validated Markov model to represent and analyze the decision to use PBSC or BM, estimating post-transplantation state transition probabilities (eg, GVHD and relapse) and quality-of-life discounts from the IPDMA and relevant literature; importantly, this IPDMA synthesized data from primarily adult patients treated with myeloablative (MA) conditioning regimens with T cell-replete matched sibling donors. In this setting, the model demonstrates the superiority of PBSC over BM in both overall and quality-adjusted life expectancy, with a 7-month advantage for PBSC. Sensitivity analyses support this conclusion through a range of values for each variable supported by the IPDMA and quality-of-life discounts, as supported by the literature. However, BM is the optimal strategy in conditions in which the 1-year relapse probability is < 5%. PBSC is the optimal stem cell source in terms of both overall and quality-adjusted life expectancy, except in conditions with a very low relapse probability, in which BM provides optimal outcomes.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell or bone marrow transplantation: controversy remains

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The paper compares bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantations in the allogeneic setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Peripheral blood progenitor cell use has emerged as an international standard of care for hematopoietic transplantation. These cells have a different cellular composition including higher numbers of CD34 cells and markedly higher numbers of T lymphocytes. Current data support the general safety of this approach for normal transplant donors. Results consistently indicate more rapid hematopoietic recovery compared with bone marrow transplantation. This may result in improved early survival in adults with high-risk leukemias, but longer follow-up has demonstrated an increased rate of chronic graft-versus-host disease morbidity and mortality which may obviate the long-term benefit.

SUMMARY

It is unclear whether peripheral blood progenitor cell or bone marrow transplantation will produce improved disease-free or overall survival. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to resolve these controversies.

Role of stem cells in cancer therapy and cancer stem cells: a review

For over 30 years, stem cells have been used in the replenishment of blood and immune systems damaged by the cancer cells or during treatment of cancer by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Apart from their use in the immuno-reconstitution, the stem cells have been reported to contribute in the tissue regeneration and as delivery vehicles in the cancer treatments. The recent concept of 'cancer stem cells' has directed scientific communities towards a different wide new area of research field and possible potential future treatment modalities for the cancer. Aim of this review is primarily focus on the recent developments in the use of the stem cells in the cancer treatments, then to discuss the cancer stem cells, now considered as backbone in the development of the cancer; and their role in carcinogenesis and their implications in the development of possible new cancer treatment options in future.

Individual patient data meta-analysis of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant vs bone marrow transplant in the management of hematological malignancies: indirect assessment of the effect of day 11 methotrexate administration

The effects of immunosuppressive regimens on the outcomes of patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation remain uncertain. We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis using data from nine randomized trials comparing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSCT) transplants to bone marrow (BMT) transplants, focusing on the administration of three vs four doses of methotrexate (MTX) as part of a regimen for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis which included cyclosporine. Six trials containing 573 patients prescribed four doses of MTX while three trials containing 534 patients prescribed three doses of MTX. Four doses of MTX conferred a statistically significant survival advantage, resulting in death odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (CI 0.52-0.88) (P=0.0036) for recipients of PBSC compared to BM; with three doses, there was no statistically significant difference. In the four-dose studies relapse rates were 36.6% among recipients of BM compared to 19.2% among recipients of PBSC (P=0.0015). The rates of relapse in the three dose studies were 26% for both PBSC and BM. We hypothesize that the fourth dose of MTX provides extra immunosuppression among BM recipients resulting in a reduced anti-leukemic effect. This hypothesis can only be proved or disproved by a prospective, randomized trial.

Poor mobilization is an independent prognostic factor in patients with malignant lymphomas treated by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Haemopoietic stem cell therapy is an increasingly adopted procedure in the treatment of patients with malignant lymphoma. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated 262 patients, 57 (22%) with Hodgkin's and 205 (78%) with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), and 665 harvesting procedures in order to assess the impact of poor mobilization on survival and to determine the factors that may be predictive of CD34(+) poor mobilization. The mobilization chemotherapy regimens consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 92 patients (35.1%) and a high-dose cytarabine-containing regimen (DHAP in 87 patients -(33.2%), MAD in 83 (31.7%)). The incidence of poor mobilizers (<2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg) was 17.9% overall, with a 10% of very poor mobilizers (< or = 1 x 10(6)/kg). Refractory disease status and chemotherapeutic load (>3 regimens) before mobilization played a negative role and were associated with poor mobilization. Survival analysis of all harvested patients showed an overall survival at 3 years of 71% in good mobilizers vs 33% in poor mobilizers (P=0.002). The event-free survival at 3 years was 23% in poor mobilizers and 58% in good mobilizers (P=0.04). We conclude that in NHL patients, poor mobilization status is predictive of survival.

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem-cell compared with bone marrow transplantation in the management of hematologic malignancies: an individual patient data meta-analysis of nine randomized trials

PURPOSE

Considerable uncertainty exists regarding relative effects of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (PBSCT) versus bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To provide the totality of research evidence related to the effects of PBSCT versus BMT, we conducted an individual-patient data meta-analysis using data from nine randomized trials enrolling 1,111 adult patients.

RESULTS

Compared with BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.38; P < .00001) and platelet engraftment (OR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.61; P < .00001). PBSCT was associated with a significant increase in the development of grade 3-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD; OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.88) and extensive (47% v 31% at 3 years; OR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.47 to 2.42; P < .000001) and overall chronic GVHD (68% v 52% at 3 years; OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.47 to 2.49; P < .000001), but not grade 2-4 acute GVHD (54% v 53%; P = .49). PBSCT was associated with a decrease in relapse (21% v 27% at 3 years; OR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.93; P = .01) in both late-stage-(33% v 51% at 3 years; OR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.93; P = .02) and early-stage-disease patients (16% v 20% at 3 years; OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.98; P = .04). Nonrelapse mortality was not different between groups. Overall and disease-free survival were only statistically significantly improved in patients with late-stage disease (overall survival: 46% v 31% at 3 years; OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.90; P = .01; disease-free survival: 41% v 27% at 3 years; OR = 0.63 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.87; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

PBSCT is associated with a decreased relapse rate in hematologic malignancies and improvement in overall and disease-free survival in patients with late-stage disease. PBSCT is also associated with a significant risk of extensive chronic GVHD.

Growth factors mobilize CXCR4 low/negative primitive hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from the bone marrow of nonhuman primates

Abstract The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is expressed by CD34 + hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSC/HPC). Several investigators have suggested that expression of CXCR4 may be an important characteristic of HSC/HPC. We studied the dynamic expression of CXCR4 during growth factor-induced mobilization of HSC in a clinically relevant nonhuman primate model, Papio anubis (baboons). We evaluated whether CXCR4 expression in HSC/HPC varies during steady-state hematopoiesis as well as during growth factor-induced mobilization. Peripheral blood stem cells from 5 baboons were mobilized with growth factors. During mobilization, there was a consistent stepwise increase in the proportion of peripheral blood CD34 + cells that were CXCR4 -. The highest number of CD34 + CXCR4 - cells appeared in the peripheral blood at the same time as the maximum number of assayable colony-forming cells. The cloning efficiency of the CD34 + CXCR4 - population was 3-fold greater than that of CD34 + CXCR4 + cells, and the frequency of cobblestone area-forming cells was 6 times higher in the CD34 + CXCR4 - population in comparison to CD34 + CXCR4 + cells. Furthermore, the most quiescent CD34 + cells isolated on the basis of low Hoechst 33342 (Ho) and rhodamine 123 (Rho) staining (Ho Low /Rho Low ) were highly enriched in the CXCR4 Low/- cell population. Ex vivo incubation of mobilized peripheral blood CD34 + cells with growth factors for 40 hours resulted in increasing numbers of cells expressing CXCR4. Peripheral blood stem cell grafts containing CD34 + cells that consisted of predominantly CXCR4 - cells were able to rapidly engraft lethally irradiated baboons. Because the overwhelming number of CD34 + cells within the mobilized peripheral blood grafts were CXCR4 - and were capable of rescuing lethally irradiated baboons, it seems unlikely that the expression of CXCR4 in vitro is an absolute requirement for HSC homing and engraftment. In summary, our data suggest the dynamic nature of CXCR4 expression on CD34 + cells during growth factor-induced HSC/HPC mobilization. In addition, our data indicate that the lack of CXCR4 expression is possibly a characteristic of relatively more primitive HSC/HPC characterized by a higher proliferative capacity.

Impact of CD34 subsets on engraftment kinetics in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Our objective was to evaluate, probably for the first time, the impact of CD34 subsets on engraftment kinetics in allogeneic PBSC transplantation (PBSCT). PBSC graft components were analyzed in 62 cases for the absolute count/kg of total CD34+ and the following subsets: DR- and +, CD71+/-, CD38+/-, CD33+/- and CD61+/-. Time to ANC >0.5 and >1 x 10(9)/l and platelets >20 and >50 x 10(9)/l was reported. The median value for each parameter was used to discriminate rapid from slow engraftment. Four parameters showed significant predictive power of early neutrophil engraftment, namely CD34+ /DR- (P = 0.002), CD34+/38- (P = 0.02), CD34+/CD61- (P = 0.04) and total CD34+ cell dose (P = 0.04). Four parameters showed significant predictive power of early platelet engraftment, namely CD34+/CD61+ (P = 0.02), CD34+ /CD38- and total CD34+ cell dose (P = 0.04) and CD34+ /CD71- (P = 0.05). Comparing patients who received > to those who received < the threshold dose(s), only CD34+ /CD38- lost its significance for neutrophil engraftment; and only CD34+ /CD61+ retained its significance for platelet engraftment (P = 0.03); furthermore, the former group required significantly fewer platelet transfusions (P = 0.018). We concluded that in allogeneic PBSCT, the best predictor of early neutrophil engraftment is the absolute CD34+ /DR- and for early platelet engraftment is the absolute CD34+ /CD61+ cell dose.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor modulates alpha-galactosylceramide-responsive human Valpha24+Vbeta11+NKT cells

Despite more than a 10-fold increase in T cell numbers in G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts, incidence and severity of acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) are comparable to bone marrow transplantation. As CD1d-restricted, Valpha24+Vbeta11+ NKT cells have pivotal immune regulatory functions and may influence GVHD, we aimed to determine whether G-CSF has any effects on human NKT cells. In this study, we examined the frequency and absolute numbers of peripheral blood NKT cells in healthy stem cell donors (n = 8) before and following G-CSF (filgrastim) treatment. Effects of in vivo and in vitro G-CSF on NKT cell cytokine expression profiles and on responsiveness of NKT cell subpopulations to specific stimulation by alpha-galactosylceramide (alpha-GalCer) were assessed. Contrary to the effects on conventional T cells, the absolute number of peripheral blood NKT cells was unaffected by G-CSF administration. Furthermore, responsiveness of NKT cells to alpha-GalCer stimulation was significantly decreased (p < 0.05) following exposure to G-CSF in vivo. This hyporesponsiveness was predominantly due to a direct effect on NKT cells, with a lesser contribution from G-CSF-mediated changes in APC. G-CSF administration resulted in polarization of NKT cells toward a Th2, IL-4-secreting phenotype following alpha-GalCer stimulation and preferential expansion of the CD4+ NKT cell subset. We conclude that G-CSF has previously unrecognized differential effects in vivo on NKT cells and conventional MHC-restricted T cells, and effects on NKT cells may contribute to the lower than expected incidence of GVHD following allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

The source of cells for allografting

Peripheral blood is used almost exclusively as the source of hematopoietic cells for autografting, but the best source of cells for allografting is the subject of considerable discussion and debate. Randomized studies comparing unstimulated bone marrow with G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood in the sibling allogeneic setting have indicated a trend to more chronic graft-versus-host disease in peripheral blood recipients. However, whether the use of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood cells leads to more acute graft-versus-host disease is uncertain. Adults undergoing sibling allografting appear to benefit in terms of improved disease-free survival or improved overall survival with the use of G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood. It is not clear, however, whether these benefits also extend to children or those undergoing matched unrelated transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease confined solely to intestine after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells transplantation in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia

We describe a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia who developing severe intestinal bleeding after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (allo-PBSCT). PBSC were obtained from an HLA one-locus mismatch sibling donor. On day 26 after PBSCT, although there was no sign of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in either the skin or the liver, diarrhea and severe intestinal bleeding occurred. The histopathological examination of the colon revealed complete denudation of the epithelial cells of the mucosa and no obvious apoptosis. Neither red cell fragments nor hemorrhagic diathesis was seen during this episode and the patient was diagnosed as having GVHD. Methylpredonisolone followed by FK506 may be effective in controlling intestinal bleeding and was used in our patient. Acute GVHD involving only the intestine has rarely been described but when using HLA-mismatched PBSCs, acute GVHD may occur severely and atypically.

Primed marrow for autologous and allogeneic transplantation: A review comparing primed marrow to mobilized blood and steady-state marrow

Mobilized peripheral blood collections, obtained following either chemotherapy (with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)) or G-CSF administration alone, are rapidly replacing traditional bone marrow harvests as the source of cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. According to the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant and the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registries, for the years 1998 through 2000, blood stem cell (BSC) transplants accounted for about 80% of autologous transplants in the pediatric age group and more than 90% of the autologous transplants among adults. In allogeneic transplantation, where the donor is a healthy family member or normal volunteer, G-CSF-mobilized BSC transplants are being used more and more frequently, accounting for about 20% of allogeneic transplants in the pediatric age range and more than 40% of allogeneic transplants among adults during the same time period. It is not, therefore, too great a stretch to imagine that BSC transplants will soon be, if not already, in the majority for allogeneic transplantation among adults. The principal reason why this is happening is the prevailing view that BSC engraft more rapidly than marrow stem cells (MSC). However, this view is based on comparisons between primed circulating blood cells (BSC) and unprimed resident marrow cells in the steady state (SS-MSC). If the reason why BSC engraft faster than SS-MSC were a consequence of G-CSF used for mobilization, then would priming of MSC by G-CSF (Prim-MSC) accelerate engraftment of marrow as well? We reviewed the literature of the last 10 years to see if there were enough data to answer this question.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: bone marrow vs. mobilized peripheral blood

Peripheral blood stem cells have largely replaced bone marrow as the source of cells in autologous transplantation because of more rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery and faster immune reconstitution. Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells similarly lead to faster hematologic recovery: however, their effects on graft-vs.-host disease, relapse, survival, and immune reconstitution have been less certain. Eight randomized trials have been published to date comparing the clinical outcomes of allogeneic-related donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT) vs. PBSCT and will be reviewed. In addition, comparisons between the two stem cell sources in unrelated donor transplantation and the increasingly utilized nonmyeloablative transplantation will be discussed.

Haemopoietic stem cell transplants: the impact of haemorrhagic complications

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the most important complication of allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), increasing susceptibility to haemorrhage and risk of early mortality. We evaluated 807 allogeneic HSCT patients to assess both the association between bleeding and GVHD, and the influence of haemorrhagic complications on clinical outcome. Up to 55% of patients with grade III-IV GVHD experienced bleeding, compared with 23% of patients with grades 0-l. Furthermore, 45% of patients receiving non-HLA-identical transplants suffered haemorrhage, whereas only 23% of patients receiving transplants from HLA-identical donors experienced bleeding. This can be explained by the higher incidence of severe GVHD among recipients of non-HLA-identical transplants. Our findings also demonstrated that haemorrhagic complications--particularly bleeding from the GI tract--markedly increase patient mortality. An ongoing, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind trial is currently investigating the efficacy and safety of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven) in the treatment of HSCT-associated bleeding. The trial will examine the ability of three dose levels of rFVIIa to reduce--or even eliminate entirely--the incidence and severity of haemorrhage following such procedures. A total enrollment of 100 patients is anticipated, and preliminary data are expected at the end of 2003.

Survival after HLA-identical allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The impact of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) on survival relative to bone marrow transplantation (BMT) remains poorly defined. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HLA-matched related PBSC- and BMT for patients with hematologic malignancies have been published, yielding differing results. We conducted a meta-analysis of published RCTs to more precisely estimate the effect of PBSCT on survival. Seven trials that assessed survival were identified and included in our analysis. Using a fixed effects model, and combining the results of all seven trials, the summary odds ratio for mortality after PBSCT was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.62-1.05) when compared to BMT. Subgroup analysis revealed no association between the median PBSCT 34+ cell dose and relative risk for morality after PBSCT. However, there was an association between the proportion of patients enrolled with advanced-stage disease and the summary odds ratio for mortality. The pooled estimate was 0.64 for studies where patients with intermediate/advanced disease comprised at least 25% of enrollment, and was 1.07 for the studies enrolling a smaller proportion. This finding substantiates results from previously published studies that have demonstrated a survival advantage with PBSCT limited to patients with advanced disease.

Fewer relapses and increased chronic GVHD in patients transplanted with blood stem cells: a 5-year follow-up in a single centre study

A total of 61 consecutive adult patients with haematological malignancies with an HLA-identical or one antigen-mismatched haploidentical family donor were randomised to allogeneic transplantation with blood stem cells (BSC) or bone marrow (BM). The median observation time was 5 years. Apart from engraftment parameters and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), transplant-related mortality (TRM), incidence and severity of chronic GVHD, relapse, leukaemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. In the BSC and BM group, respectively, TRM was 8/30 and 4/30 (P=0.405), the incidence of chronic GVHD was 15/26 and 11/30 (P=0.138), extensive chronic GVHD was 10/26 and 4/30 (P=0.034), and relapse one and 10 patients (P=0.007). In log-rank test restricted to the cases allografted from HLA-identical donors, the difference remained significant with regard to relapse incidence (P=0.039), but not extensive chronic GVHD (P=0.072). No difference in LFS and OS was observed. In conclusion, our study strongly indicates an enhanced graft-versus-leukaemia effect in BSC recipients, which is not expressed in increased survival. The increased chronic GVHD in these patients may contribute, but the relation is complex and not yet understood.

Homeostasis of telomere length rather than telomere shortening after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Hematopoietic reconstitution after stem cell transplantation requires excessive replicative activity because of the limited number of stem cells that are used for transplantation. Telomere shortening has been detected in hematopoietic cells after bone marrow transplantation. This has been thought to result from excessive replication of the stem cells, with putative concomitant reduction of their replicative potential. Hematopoietic stem cells from cytokine-mobilized peripheral blood are increasingly used for stem cell transplantation. These grafts contain higher numbers of hematopoietic stem cells, resulting in a faster hematopoietic reconstitution. We have performed a combined prospective and cross-sectional study of hematologic recovery and telomere length dynamics in the immediate reconstitution period after allogeneic T-cell-depleted blood stem cell transplantation. We analyzed hematologic recovery and telomere length of granulocytes, monocytes, B cells, and T-cell subsets in 30 donor/recipient combinations. We found fast recovery in combination with transient telomere shortening in the myeloid lineages. This initial reduction of telomere length was followed by an increase in telomere length to such an extent that 1 year after transplantation the telomere length in recipient cells was similar to the telomere length in donor-derived cells. Therefore, our data indicate telomere length homeostasis after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, implying no loss of replicative capacity of the stem cells. Our data indicate that fast expansion is accompanied by a reduction of telomere length and that telomere length homeostasis is achieved by de novo generation of hematopoietic cells from stem cells without transplantation-related telomere loss.

Non-myeloablative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe aplastic anaemia with various complications

We report a 20-year-old-male with severe aplastic anaemia who was treated with nonmyeloablative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (NSCT) from a sibling donor. As the patient presented with complications consisting of mental retardation, severe obesity, a bone fracture, and recurrent infections, we selected NSCT instead of a myeloablative regimen, to reduce regimen-related toxicity (RRT). Conditioning therapy consisting of busulfan, fludarabine, antithymocyte globulin and FK506 was used to obtain immune suppression. RRT was limited and he is now in complete remission 19 months after NSCT. On day 91, he developed chronic graft-vs.-host disease; it was resolved by the combination of FK506, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil. Our experience contributes to the growing interest in NSCT as a modality for treating not only malignant haematological disorders associated with complications, but also nonmalignant haematological diseases.

Hematopoietic and immune recovery after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and bone marrow transplantation in a pediatric population

To compare the hematopoietic and immune recoveries after allogeneic transplantation with different cell sources, we analyzed the recovery patterns of blood components after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in comparison with that after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in a pediatric population. Sixteen patients received PBSCT, and 24 received BMT between January, 1995 and March, 2000. The patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n = 22), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML; n = 8), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 3), or other diseases (n = 7). The median ages of patients in the PBSCT and BMT groups were 9 yr and 6 yr, respectively. Cyclosporin A (CsA) plus methotrexate or methylprednisolone was used as a graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis regimen in the PBSCT group, whereas CsA alone or methotrexate alone was used in the BMT group. Circulating lymphocyte numbers and subpopulations determined by flow cytometric analysis were used as markers of immune recovery. In the PBSCT group, the median number of harvested CD34+ cells was 7.25 (range: 1.3-27.6) x 106/kg of the recipient's body weight, while the median number of harvested nucleated cells was 4.7 (range: 3.7-10.5) x 108/kg. All of the patients were engrafted. Myeloid engraftment occurred sooner after PBSCT than after BMT (median number of days to achieve absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) > 0.5 x 109/L; 11 and 15, respectively; p < 0.0001) and similar results were found for platelet engraftment (median number of days to achieve a platelet count of > 20 x 109/L; 12 and 21, respectively; p = 0.004). On the other hand, after PBSCT the absolute numbers of total circulating lymphocytes and lymphocyte subpopulations were not significantly different from those after BMT. The incidence of acute GvHD after PBSCT was the same as that after BMT, while chronic GvHD developed more frequently after PBSCT than after BMT (p = 0.005). In a pediatric population, the indications for PBSCT and BMT should be based on these findings in addition to regard for the donor's safety.

Mobilization, collection, and processing of peripheral blood stem cells in individuals with sickle cell trait

Mobilized peripheral blood is increasingly used as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic transplantation, currently the only curative approach for sickle cell anemia. However, the safety and feasibility of stem cell mobilization in individuals with sickle cell trait (SCT) has not been documented. This study is a prospective controlled trial to evaluate the safety and feasibility of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in 8 SCT subjects and 8 control subjects matched for age and race. Mobilization with filgrastim 10 microg/kg subcutaneous daily for 5 days was followed by 12-L apheresis on the fifth day. Filgrastim administration was accompanied by similar symptoms in all subjects; no untoward adverse events occurred in either group, including sickle cell crises. CD34+ cell mobilization response was not significantly different between SCT and control subjects. Median CD34+ cell content was also similar in PBSCs collected from SCT versus control subjects, 6.8 versus 3.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/70 kg, P =.165. Red cell depletion from SCT products was not possible by using hydroxyethyl starch sedimentation but was achievable with ammonium chloride lysis. There was no evidence of gelling of SCT products after thaw, and no difference in cell recovery was seen among red cell-depleted versus nondepleted products. Cryopreservation in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide/6% pentastarch was associated with superior cell recovery (both SCT and control subjects) compared with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (P =.001). The study concluded that filgrastim mobilization, large volume apheresis, processing, and cryopreservation appears to be safe in donors with SCT, allowing PBSC use for transplantation in patients with sickle cell anemia.

Adverse events in peripheral progenitor cell collection: a 7-year experience

Collection of peripheral progenitor cells (PPC) by apheresis machines is generally regarded as a safe procedure. However, data about adverse events in PPC harvesting are scarce. In a monocentric retrospective study, the data of 540 PPC collections in a period of 7 years were reviewed. Adverse events were subdivided in collection-associated technical problems and patient/donor-related side effects. Patient/donor-related side effects occurred most often (19.8%); most of them were paresthesias due to citrate toxicity. Paresthesias were treated by oral (20.4%) or intravenous (1.1%) calcium supplementation. Problems with venous access were also seen frequently, resulting in blood flow alarms (11.3%) and blockades in the return line (4.3%). A total of 6.9% of these problems were catheter associated, requiring revision of the central venous line in 2.6%. Technical problems with the blood cell separators were observed in 11.7%. Ten PPC collections were discontinued due to adverse events. The data of this retrospective, monocentric analysis show that patient/donor-associated problems were observed in every fifth PPC harvest. Most of them were paresthesias, which could be easily treated by calcium supplementation. Problems with venous access and technical problems with the cell separators occurred in every tenth PPC collection.

Allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplants in Australia, 1996--a multi-centre retrospective comparison of the use of peripheral blood stem cells with bone marrow

A retrospective comparison was carried out on adult patients receiving HLA-identical allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplants from siblings in Australia in 1996, comparing bone marrow with G-CSF-mobilised peripheral blood stem cells. A total of 131 transplant recipients from nine centres were included in this study, of whom 79 received bone marrow, 44 blood stem cells and eight both. All but three of the 131 patients had cyclosporin and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. The minimum follow-up time for surviving patients is 27 months. Comparisons were carried out between the BM and PBSC groups. There were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, diagnosis, donor characteristics or pretransplant conditioning. Median time to neutrophil recovery of 0.5 x 10(9)/l was 14 days for PBSC recipients, compared to 19 days for marrow recipients (P < 0.0005). median time to platelet recovery of 20 x 10(9)/l was 17 days for PBSC recipients, compared to 28 days for marrow recipients (P < 0.0005). there were no significantly increased risks of either acute or chronic GVHD in the PBSC recipients. there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of major transplant-related complications, disease-free survival or overall survival.

Accelerated telomere shortening following allogeneic transplantation is independent of the cell source and occurs within the first year post transplant

Telomere shortening has been documented in the blood cells of recipients of allogeneic bone marrow transplants compared with their donors. Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have been increasingly used as an alternative to bone marrow. Their advantages include earlier engraftment and immune reconstitution following transplantation. We have measured telomere length of neutrophils and T cells in fully engrafted recipients of allogeneic bone marrow (n = 19) and allogeneic PBPC (n = 17) and also measured sequential telomere length in four patients after transplantation. Overall, significant telomere shortening occurred in recipients in neutrophils (0.3 kb, P < 0.001) and T cells (0.2 kb, P = 0.045). The data demonstrate that first, the degree of shortening was the same for BM and PBPC transplants and was not related to the time taken to engraft neutrophils and platelets and second, telomere shortening occurs in the first year post transplant without further shortening during the period of observation. These data suggest that the superiority of engraftment seen in PBPC transplants is independent of telomere shortening and other mechanisms such as homing or seeding may be more important.