Efficacy of sildenafil in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy

Regulation of PDE5 expression in normal prostate, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Type 5 phosphodiesterase (PDE5) expression in the normal and pathological prostate is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed at identifying the cell type/s, if any, expressing PDE5 in human healthy or pathological prostate sections in order to further validate the rationale of PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5i) treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and their safety in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following prostate cancer (PCa) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By immunohistochemical analysis, we studied PDE5 expression in tissue microarrays containing sections obtained from healthy, BPH, and PCa samples.

RESULTS

Our results showed that PDE5 is barely expressed in the epithelial or stromal compartment of normal human prostates, but it is highly expressed in the stromal compartment of BPH sections. We also found that a low but significant number of PCa samples (22%) expressed PDE5 in the epithelial cancer cells but not in stromal cells and that such expression was not correlated with the tumor aggressiveness, according to their Gleason score.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

PDE5 overexpression in the stromal compartment of BPH samples supports the rationale of PDE5 as a target in lower urinary tract symptoms of BPH. PDE5 expression in a significant percentage of PCa samples but the lack of correlation with the Gleason score suggests that this enzyme is not correlated with tumor aggressiveness; however, a role of PDE5 in the minimal residual disease of PCa cannot be excluded.

Erectile function status is highly associated with prostate-specific antigen bounce in localized prostate cancer patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between erectile function status and prostate-specific antigen bounce after prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

We identified 154 patients who were followed up for at least 24 months after brachytherapy. Erectile function status was assessed prospectively before brachytherapy (baseline), and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months postoperatively using the International Index of Erectile Function-15 questionnaire. Prostate-specific antigen bounce was defined as an increase of at least 0.4 ng/mL from a previous prostate-specific antigen level with a subsequent decline equal to, or less than, the initial nadir without treatment. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify a significant set of independent predictors of prostate-specific antigen bounce after brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Prostate-specific antigen bounce was observed in 38 (24.7%) men. The prostate-specific antigen bounce group had a higher erectile function domain score, higher orgasmic function domain score, and higher total International Index of Erectile Function-15 score before (at baseline) and after brachytherapy (3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months after brachytherapy) than their counterparts (P < 0.05). Of the 77 patients who completed the International Index of Erectile Function-15 questionnaire 18 months after brachytherapy (the median time of prostate-specific antigen bounce), sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction domain scores, and total International Index of Erectile Function scores 18 months after brachytherapy correlated with the occurrence of prostate-specific antigen bounce. A multivariate analysis identified the intercourse satisfaction domain score 18 months after brachytherapy as an independent indicator for the occurrence of prostate-specific antigen bounce (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

International Index of Erectile Function-15 score seems to be correlated with the prostate-specific antigen bounce in prostate cancer patients undergoing brachytherapy, and an occurrence of prostate-specific antigen bounce seems to be more likely in those who are more sexually active.

Comparative cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is increasingly used compared with a standard laparoscopic technique, but it remains uncertain whether potential benefits offset higher costs.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of robotic prostatectomy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a care pathway description and model-based cost-utility analysis. We studied men with localised prostate cancer able to undergo either robotic or laparoscopic prostatectomy for cure. We used data from a meta-analysis, other published literature, and costs from the UK National Health Service and commercial sources.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Care received by men for 10 yr following radical prostatectomy was modelled. Clinical events, their effect on quality of life, and associated costs were synthesised assuming 200 procedures were performed annually.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Over 10 yr, robotic prostatectomy was on average (95% confidence interval [CI]) £1412 (€1595) (£1304 [€1473] to £1516 [€1713]) more costly than laparoscopic prostatectomy but more effective with mean (95% CI) gain in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of 0.08 (0.01-0.15). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was £18 329 (€20 708) with an 80% probability that robotic prostatectomy was cost effective at a threshold of £30 000 (€33 894)/QALY. The ICER was sensitive to the throughput of cases and the relative positive margin rate favouring robotic prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher costs of robotic prostatectomy may be offset by modest health gain resulting from lower risk of early harms and positive margin, provided >150 cases are performed each year. Considerable uncertainty persists in the absence of directly comparative randomised data.

Optimizing postoperative sexual function after radical prostatectomy

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the complications associated with pelvic surgery. The significance of ED as a complication following pelvic surgery, especially radical prostatectomy (RP), lies in the negative impact that it has on patients' sexual and overall life. In the literature, rates of ED following RP range from 25% to 100%. Such variety is associated with pelvic dissection and conservation of neurovascular structures. Another important factor impacting on postoperative ED is the preoperative erectile function of the patient. Advances in the knowledge of pelvic anatomy and pathological mechanisms led to a refinement of pelvic surgical techniques, with attention to the main structures that if damaged compromise erectile function. These improvements resulted in lower postoperative ED rates and better erectile recovery, especially in patients undergoing RP. Furthermore, surgery alone is not sufficient to prevent this complication, and thus, several medical strategies have been tested with the aim of maximizing erectile function recovery. Indeed it seems that prevention of postoperative ED must be addressed by a multimodal approach. The aim of this review is to give a picture of recent knowledge, novel techniques and therapeutic approaches in order to reach the best combination of treatments to reduce the rate of ED after pelvic surgery.

A prospective longitudinal survey of erectile dysfunction in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Few studies have evaluated changes in erectile function with time before and after prostate brachytherapy using the International Index of Erectile Function-15, a sensitive, validated tool for assessing male sexual dysfunction. In this prospective study we evaluated the natural history of erectile function after prostate brachytherapy without supplemental therapy (external beam radiotherapy, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors or androgen deprivation therapy) using the International Index of Erectile Function-15.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 119 patients who were followed at least 12 months after prostate brachytherapy between 2004 and 2010. Sexual and erectile function status were assessed before brachytherapy (baseline), and 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months postoperatively using the International Index of Erectile Function-15.

RESULTS

Mean total International Index of Erectile Function-15 score, and scores on the erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire and intercourse satisfaction domains 3 months after brachytherapy were significantly lower than at baseline (p <0.05). They remained lower until 36 months after prostate brachytherapy. Erectile function was maintained 12 months after brachytherapy in 16 of the 48 men (33.3%) with a baseline erectile function domain score of 11 or greater. There was no significant difference in clinical features except the age of patients who maintained the erectile function domain score and their counterparts 12 months after brachytherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that age 70 years or greater was the only predictive factor for deteriorating erectile function after brachytherapy (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate a global decrease in all domains of the International Index of Erectile Function-15 score 12 months after prostate brachytherapy. Also, patient age may influence the preservation of brachytherapy related potency.

Effect of sildenafil administration on penile hypoxia induced by cavernous neurotomy in the rat

Hypoxia is a normal, physiological condition in penile tissue, which is interrupted by reoxygenation associated to sleep-related erections. We previously described in the rat that a penile fibrosis and overexpression of the pro-fibrotic endothelin-1 type B receptor (ETB) are associated to prolonged (3 months) hypoxia induced by the bilateral surgical resection of the cavernous nerves (bilateral cavernous neurotomy (BCN)). The aim of the present study was to define the time frame in which BCN induces hypoxia and ETB overexpression in the penile tissue. In addition, we studied the time-dependency of the rescuing effect of an acute administration of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil. We found that BCN induced penile hypo-oxygenation (immunohistochemistry for Hypoxyprobe), penile ETB mRNA overexpression (quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction) and hypersensitivity to the ETB agonist IRL-1620 (in vitro contractility study). Sildenafil treatment was able to counteract all these alterations (penile hypoxygenation, hyper-sensitivity to IRL-1620 and ETB overexpression), with its effect being more evident the earlier it was administered.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—BASIC SCIENCE: Effect of Chronic Tadalafil Administration on Penile Hypoxia Induced by Cavernous Neurotomy in the Rat

BACKGROUND

Numerous men develop postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction (PPED), due to surgery-related nervous damage. PPED is often refractory to phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors therapy.

AIM

To verify whether chronic tadalafil (CT) preserves bilateral cavernous neurotomy (BCN)-induced penile damage and hypo-oxygenation.

METHODS

In a rat model of BCN we evaluated in vitro and ex vivo effect of CT treatment (2 mg/kg, daily for 3 months).

RESULTS

Bilateral cavernous neurotomy induced massive hypoxia and decreased muscle/fiber ratio, completely restored by CT. Hypersensitivity of hypoxic tissues to the relaxant effect of the endothelin type B receptor (ETB) agonist IRL-1620 was observed, along with ETB mRNA and protein overexpression. CT restored sensitivity to IRL-1620, and normalized ETB expression. Hypoxic penis showed increased sensitivity to the relaxant effect of the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP), while acute tadalafil (100 nM) did not amplify the SNP effect. Accordingly, PDE5 mRNA and protein were reduced in BCN penile tissues. By restoring PDE5, CT decreased SNP-induced relaxation and rescued sensitivity to acute tadalafil. However, in hypoxic penis, CT normalizes neither acetylcholine hyporesponsiveness nor neuronal nitric oxide synthase-endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression.

CONCLUSION

Chronic tadalafil restores some of the investigated BCN-induced alterations, including PDE5 and tadalafil efficacy.

Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of clinical data

INTRODUCTION

Radical prostatectomy is a frequently used treatment option for prostate cancer; however, prostatectomy is often associated with significant morbidity, including erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

To analyze the efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treating ED after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE and CANCERLIT (1998 to January 2004) were searched for English language articles using the key words prostatectomy, sildenafil, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria: primary, discrete data sets of postprostatectomy patients with ED treated with sildenafil monotherapy.

RESULTS

Sample sizes ranged from 13 to 198 (mean age, 61 +/- 3 years). Treatment durations were 4 weeks (or more than four doses) to 1 year, and sildenafil dosing was in the recommended range (25-100 mg). Seven studies reported a response rate (range, 14%-53%) for an end point consistent with the primary analysis outcome (erection sufficient for vaginal intercourse); the combined estimate of probability of response was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-48%). There was strong evidence for a lower response rate after non-nerve-sparing (range, 0%-15%) versus nerve-sparing surgery (range, 35%-75%; combined odds ratio [OR] = 12.1; 95% CI, 5.5-26.6) but not after unilateral (range, 10%-80%) versus bilateral nerve-sparing surgery (range, 46%-72%; combined OR = 2.21; 95% CI, 0.75-6.54).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these studies demonstrate that with sildenafil, more than one third of patients with postprostatectomy ED achieved erection sufficient for intercourse. The odds of responding improved 12-fold with preservation of at least one neurovascular bundle. Early treatment failure does not necessarily imply lack of efficacy in the future, and patients should be encouraged to continue trying sildenafil, titrating up to 100 mg as needed.

Seminal monolateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in selected patients

INTRODUCTION

In recent years there has been a shift in prostate cancer stage with the majority of patients nowadays being operated with cT1c disease, prostate-specific antigen levels of <10 ng/ml, and a decreased rate of seminal vesicle invasion. Recent data suggest the role of preservation of the seminal vesicle in improving continence and/or potency. We describe our preliminary experience with seminal-sparing, unilateral nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

21 selected patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent seminal unilateral nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy (seminal-sparing group, SSG). We compared the postoperative continence, erectile function and quality of orgasm results to those obtained in a control group (CG) of 21 patients who underwent unilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Sexual function was evaluated preoperatively and 9 months postoperatively with the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire and with other self-administered questionnaires. The quality of orgasm was evaluated 9 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

1 month postoperatively, 95 and 28% of the patients in the SSG and CG were continent (p<0.001). The median postoperative drop in IIEF-5 score was 5 points in SSG and 14.5 points in CG (p<0.0001). Nine months postoperatively, 90 and 62% of the patients in SSG and CG, respectively (p=0.05), maintained the ability to achieve orgasm.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience seminal-sparing radical prostatectomy showed good feasibility and improved early postoperative urinary continence, erectile function and quality of orgasm, without compromised cancer control.

Efficacy, safety, and treatment satisfaction of tadalafil versus placebo in patients with erectile dysfunction evaluated at tertiary-care academic centers

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy, safety, and treatment satisfaction of tadalafil 20 mg for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients evaluated at tertiary-care academic centers.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients were randomly allocated to receive fixed-dose tadalafil 20 mg (n = 146) or placebo (n = 49) for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and Global Assessment Question (GAQ); patient and partner treatment satisfaction by the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) and SEP; and safety by adverse events, laboratory values, and vital signs.

RESULTS

Mean baseline IIEF erectile function (EF) domain was 12.98. Fifty-one percent of enrolled patients had severe baseline ED, and 82% had organic ED. Pre-existing, ED-associated comorbid conditions were common. When compared with patients treated with placebo, those receiving tadalafil reported significant improvement from baseline in the IIEF EF domain (P <0.001), successful penetration attempts (SEP question 2; P <0.001), successful intercourse (SEP question 3; P <0.001), and all secondary efficacy outcomes (P <0.001). Patients and their sexual partners were also significantly more satisfied with tadalafil treatment (P <0.001), including overall satisfaction (P <0.001) and length of time the treatment worked (P <0.001). Mild or moderate headache, dyspepsia, and myalgia were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Tadalafil significantly improved erectile function and patient and partner satisfaction and was well tolerated. These results were observed in a tertiary-care, academic center population with a high incidence of severe, organic ED, and comorbid medical conditions, factors known to compromise erectile function and treatment outcome.

Vardenafil improved patient satisfaction with erectile hardness, orgasmic function and sexual experience in men with erectile dysfunction following nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (NS-RRP) results in erectile dysfunction in a significant number of patients. Vardenafil, a potent and selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, is generally safe. It improves International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain scores, and penetration and erection maintenance success rates in patients who have undergone NS-RRP. We report additional parameters important to patient perceptions regarding erection quality and satisfaction with sexual experience following NS-RRP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 440 men at 58 centers throughout the United States and Canada participated in this randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind trial with 3 phases, namely baseline (4-week untreated period), treatment (12 weeks) and followup (7 days). Participants received placebo (145), 10 mg vardenafil (146) or 20 mg vardenafil (149) at home on demand but no more than once per calendar day. Efficacy and satisfaction with erection quality and sexual experience were determined during the trial.

RESULTS

The 10 and 20 mg vardenafil doses were significantly superior to placebo for the International Index of Erectile Function domains for intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function and overall satisfaction with sexual experience (vs placebo p <0.0009). Significant improvement in the satisfaction rate with erection hardness were demonstrated for each vardenafil dose compared with placebo (p <0.0001). Vardenafil was generally well tolerated. Common adverse events were headache, vasodilatation and rhinitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this difficult to treat population of men with erectile dysfunction subsequent to NS-RRP on demand treatment with vardenafil during a 3-month period significantly improved key aspects of the sexual experience important to patient quality of life.

Vardenafil: a novel type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Orally administered phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors have become the first-line treatment option for erectile dysfunction (ED). Vardenafil is a potent and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor developed as an oral therapy for ED. Two pivotal, randomised, double-blind, multi-centre studies have evaluated the use of vardenafil in men with ED. Vardenafil improved the rate of achieving and maintaining an erection during sexual intercourse. Improvement was also noted in other aspects of sexual function, including confidence, orgasmic function and overall satisfaction. Vardenafil produces clinically and statistically significant improvements in erectile function regardless of age, baseline severity and aetiology and is efficacious for the treatment of ED in diabetic and postradical prostatectomy patients. Vardenafil has a rapid onset of action, in which erections sufficiently rigid for eventual intercourse completion can be achieved as early as 16 min after ingestion. Vardenafil 20 mg has sustained long-term efficacy by providing up to 92% of patients with improved erections during > 2 years of treatment. Vardenafil is well-tolerated, with an adverse event profile typical of this class of PDE5 inhibitors. The most common adverse events were headache, flushing, rhinitis and dyspepsia, which were mild-to-moderate in severity and they generally attenuated with continued use. Vardenafil may be associated with transient reductions in blood pressure and commensurate increases in heart rate, with the overall incidence of cardiovascular-related adverse events similar to that of placebo. Although claims can be made about potential features of benefit for each of the currently marketed PDE5 inhibitors, there are at present, no non-pharmaceutical company sponsored, peer-reviewed, head-to-head trials that have been published.

Update on oral treatments for male erectile dysfunction

Impairment of erectile function compromises quality of life in millions of men and their partners, many of whom prefer to suffer in silence. It is important to maintain an elevated index of clinical suspicion in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) risk factors (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease). There remains a high rate of voluntary discontinuation of therapy associated with most treatment modalities. Since the introduction of sildenafil, a greater awareness and openness regarding the epidemiology and treatment of male erectile dysfunction has emerged. The development of newer and potentially more efficacious phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors will serve to treat an even greater number of patients, allowing once daily and more convenient dosing. An increased understanding of the physiological principles of penile erection has allowed the development of novel oral pharmacological therapies. The new agents offer a potential benefit in a broader range of patients and clinical situations. They may provide a more acceptable alternative than other more invasive options (intracavernosal/urethral injection, implant surgery). The dopamine agonist apomorphine acts on the central control of penile erection to allow a sublingual preparation to produce a prompt response. It is not contraindicated in patients on nitrate medication for coronary artery disease, or in patients with depression or on antidepressants. As with any other treatment, the clinician's responsibility in the care of ED patients does not end with the writing of a prescription. Adequate education and follow-up are needed to optimize the efficacy and safety of oral ED therapy. Furthermore, patients and their partners need to be advised that the agents are not effective in the absence of sexual stimulation. Communicating with both the patient and his partner in a discreet, non-judgmental manner that fosters the physician-patient alliance can facilitate the recognition and treatment of ED.

Current and Future Strategies for Preventing and Managing Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

As radical prostatectomy remains a commonly used procedure in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer, we critically analyzed current and future strategies for preventing and managing postoperative erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

Systematic literature review using Medline and CancerLit from January 1997 to June 2003. Abstracts published in the journals European Urology, The Journal of Urology and the International Journal of Impotence Research as official proceedings of internationally known scientific societies held in the same time period were also assessed.

RESULTS

Patient selection and surgical technique are the major determinants of postoperative erectile function. Apoptosis of corporeal smooth muscle cells plays a role in the development of cavernous veno-occlusive dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. Pharmacological prophylaxis and treatment of postoperative erectile dysfunction is effective and safe. The concepts of cavernous nerve reconstruction and neuroprotection have been associated to promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

In the hands of experienced surgeons, properly selected patients undergoing a nerve sparing radical prostatectomy should achieve unassisted or medically assisted erections postoperatively.

Vardenafil: A new approach to the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Vardenafil is a phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor developed as an oral therapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). Multiple phase 3 clinical trials have been completed and vardenafil is expected to launch worldwide in 2003. Two pivotal, randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies have evaluated the use of vardenafil in men with ED. Vardenafil improved the rate of achieving and maintaining an erection during sexual intercourse. Improvement also was noted in other aspects of sexual function, including confidence, orgasmic function, and overall satisfaction. Vardenafil produces clinically and statistically significant improvements in erectile function regardless of age, baseline severity, and etiology and is efficacious for the treatment of ED in diabetic and postprostatectomy patients. Vardenafil has a rapid onset of action and completion of successful sexual intercourse is possible for some patients 16 minutes after its administration. Twenty milligrams of vardenafil has sustained long-term efficacy by providing up to 92% of patients with improved erections during more than 2 years of treatment. Vardenafil is well tolerated, with an adverse event profile typical of the class of PDE-5 inhibitors. The most common adverse events were headache, flushing, rhinitis, and dyspepsia, which were mild or moderate and generally decreased with continued treatment. Vardenafil may be associated with transient reductions in blood pressure and commensurate increases in heart rate, with the overall incidence of cardiovascular-related adverse events similar to that of placebo.

Safety and Efficacy of Vardenafil for the Treatment of Men With Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

PURPOSE

More than one-third of men may experience erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. The efficacy and safety of vardenafil, a potent, selective, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, was assessed for the treatment of ED after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this double-blind study 440 men with ED after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were randomized to take placebo, or 10 or 20 mg vardenafil. Efficacy was measured after 12 weeks using the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, diary questions measuring vaginal penetration and intercourse success rates, and a global assessment question (GAQ) on erection.

RESULTS

Of the intent to treat population 70% had severe ED (erectile function less than 11) at baseline. After 12 weeks both vardenafil doses were significantly superior to placebo (p <0.0001) for all efficacy variables. Improved erections (based on GAQ) were reported by 65.2% and 59.4% of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil, respectively, and by only 12.5% of patients on placebo (p <0.0001). Among men with bilateral neurovascular bundle sparing, positive GAQ responses were reported by 71.1% and 59.7% of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil, respectively, versus 11.5% of those on placebo (p <0.0001). The average intercourse success rate per patient receiving 20 mg vardenafil was 74% in men with mild to moderate ED and 28% in men with severe ED, compared to 49% and 4% for placebo, respectively. Few adverse events were observed. They were generally mild to moderate headache, flushing and rhinitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In men with severe ED after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy, vardenafil significantly improved key indices of erectile function.

Oral agents for erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction is a common disease affecting the lives of millions of men worldwide. Sildenafil was the first oral treatment licensed for male erectile dysfunction. However, there are now a number of other options available. In this article the currently available oral treatments are reviewed.

Erectile function after radical prostatectomy: a review

OBJECTIVES

Although the high rate of erectile dysfunction (ED) following prostatectomy is well recognised, the aetiology and pathophysiology have not yet been fully elucidated. We examined the current literature as to aetiology, treatment and possible prevention of ED following prostatectomy.

METHOD

Review of the literature by a Medline search.

CONCLUSION

The most important predictors of erectile function are pre-operative erectile function and the nerve sparing nature of the procedure. The former is determined by age and vascular risk-factors whereas the latter is decided by the stage of the tumour and the skill of the surgeon. The value of intraoperative nerve mapping seems limited and the importance of nerve grafting is uncertain. Natural recovery of erection can take as long as 24 months. Patients complain about a lack of professional support. Symptomatic therapy may be applied according to the current general standards of treatment in men with ED.

Sildenafil in erectile dysfunction: a critical review

Sildenafil citrate (Viagra) is a potent orally active cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor that is effective as a peripheral conditioner in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction (ED) of organic, psychogenic or mixed aetiology. Sildenafil is the first effective oral agent in the management of ED that has had a revolutionary impact on management of ED. The present review has been subdivided into five major sections. Based on the most recent peer-reviewed publications, the first section is aimed at critically evaluating PDE5 selectivity as well as the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug, mainly to assess the best doses for each group of patients (i.e. adult and elderly men). Effectiveness in a broad spectrum ED population is the subject of the second section of the review, principally reporting post-marketing company-independent results. Safety and tolerability are the key concerns of the third section, with a broad consideration of the most commonly reported adverse events. Special attention has been paid to the cardiovascular safety of the drug, chiefly outlining the positive and potentially protective cardiac effects of sildenafil. Moreover, the impact of sildenafil in special patient populations is considered, namely in men complaining of diabetes mellitus, depression, neurological disorders, renal failure and those who have undergone a radical prostatectomy. Sildenafil and the ageing male has been especially underlined. Finally, the review covers a few new potential applications of sildenafil in ED patients with regard to high-dose treatment and combination therapy. The review ends with several considerations regarding the direct and/or indirect impact of sildenafil over quality of life and quality of partnership.

The use of treatments for erectile dysfunction among survivors of prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this survey were to describe the prevalence of using a treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) among men after therapy for localized prostate carcinoma and to construct models explaining the variance in trying a treatment, treatment success, and adherence to treatment.

METHODS

A postal survey was sent to 2636 men in The Cleveland Clinic Foundation's Prostate Cancer Registry who were treated initially with either definitive radiotherapy or prostatectomy for localized prostate carcinoma. The survey asked about demographic items, past and current sexual functioning, and the partner's sexual function. Men were asked about their current and intended use of medical treatments for ED. Standardized questionnaires included the Sexual Self-Schema Scale-Male Version, the International Index of Erectile Function, urinary and bowel symptom scales from the Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index), and the Short-Form Health Survey.

RESULTS

The return rate was 49%. Differences between men who returned the questionnaire and men who did not respond suggest that the sample was weighted toward men who were more interested in staying active sexually. ED was a problem for 85% of men, and 59% of this group used at least 1 treatment for ED. Only 38% of men found that a medical treatment was at least somewhat helpful in improving their sex lives, however, and 30% of respondents still were using at least 1 treatment at the time of the survey. Factors that were associated with the efficacy of treatments for ED and with their continued use included having a sexual partner, younger age, choosing a treatment for prostate carcinoma that was more likely to spare some sexual function, and not having had neoadjuvant or current antiandrogen therapy. Men who tried a greater number of treatments for ED were more likely to find one that worked. Men were more likely to continue using treatments for ED that produced greater improvements in sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

The success of medical treatments for men with ED among long-term survivors of prostate carcinoma is limited. Men prefer noninvasive treatments, although invasive treatments are more effective. Sexual counseling for men and their partners is recommended, because it may increase the use of medical therapies for ED. Creating more realistic expectations in both partners also may enhance treatment adherence.

Current oral treatments for erectile dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to achieve and maintain a penile erection adequate for satisfactory sexual intercourse. It is a significant male health problem of global dimensions affecting approximately 150 million men worldwide. A broad range of options are currently available for the management of ED. They include oral agents (phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, dopamine agonists and alpha-receptor blocking drugs), intracavernosal injection (papaverine, phentolamine, prostaglandin E1, vasoactive intestinal peptide), transurethral vasoactive agents (prostaglandin E1), vacuum erection devices, vascular surgery and penile prostheses. Here we review the physiology of penile erection and the currently available oral preparations. In addition, novel therapeutic strategies to improve erectile function are discussed.

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a widely used, multi-dimensional self-report instrument for the evaluation of male sexual function. It is has been recommended as a primary endpoint for clinical trials of erectile dysfunction (ED) and for diagnostic evaluation of ED severity. The IIEF was developed in conjunction with the clinical trial program for sildenafil, and has since been adopted as the 'gold standard' measure for efficacy assessment in clinical trials of ED. It has been linguistically validated in 32 languages and used as a primary endpoint in more than 50 clinical trials. This review summarizes early stages in the psychometric validation of the instrument, its subsequent adoption in randomized clinical trials with sildenafil and other ED therapies, and its use in classifying ED severity and prevalence. The IIEF meets psychometric criteria for test reliability and validity, has a high degree of sensitivity and specificity, and correlates well with other measures of treatment outcome. It has demonstrated consistent and robust treatment responsiveness in studies in USA, Europe and Asia, as well as in a wide range of etiological subgroups. Although only one direct comparator trial has been performed to date, the IIEF is also sensitive to therapeutic effects with treatment agents other than sildenafil. A severity classification for ED has recently been developed, in addition to a brief screening version of the instrument. This review includes the strengths as well as limitations of the IIEF, along with some potential areas for future research.

Outcome measures for erectile dysfunction 2: evaluation

This article, the second of two parts, discusses and evaluates the range of outcome measures for erectile dysfunction (ED) identified from the literature review in part one (Vol 11(1): 54-64). The literature review identified 14 subjective and 12 objective measures. These outcome measures are needed for the components: rigidity, vascular flow, nerve conductivity, intracavernosus muscle power, partner satisfaction and quality of life. Instruments selected should provide good validity, reliability and responsiveness. Quick, simple, inexpensive and efficient outcome measures can be used by nurses.

Outcome measures for erectile dysfunction. 1: Literature review

This article describes and evaluates critically the outcome measures available for the assessment of the conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The literature review identified 26 outcome measures. Of these, 14 were subjective and 12 were objective. Objective measures can provide more accurate information. However, owing to the sensitive nature of the problem, questionnaires which are reliable and sensitive to change can provide valuable data. Different outcome measures were needed for each of the separate components of ED. These components were found to be rigidity, vascular flow, nerve conductivity, intracavemosal pressure, ischiocavernosus muscle power, partner satisfaction and quality of life. An evaluation of outcome measures for each component of ED is provided in the second part of this article. Quick, simple, inexpensive and efficient outcome measures can be used by nurses to evaluate the impact of conservative treatment for ED.