Frequent hypermethylation of RASSF1A in early flat-type colorectal tumors

Methylated circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction

Worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a deadly disease whose death rate ranks second among cancers though its incidence ranks third. Early CRC detection is key and is associated with improved survival outcomes. However, existing tests for CRC diagnosis have several weaknesses thus rendering them inefficient. Moreover, reliable prognostic tests that can predict the overall cancer outcome and recurrence of the disease as well as predictive markers that can assess effectiveness of therapy are still lacking. Thus, shifting to noninvasive liquid biopsy or blood-based biomarkers is vital to improving CRC diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction. Methylated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained increased attention as a type of liquid biopsy that is tumor-derived fragmented DNA with epigenetic alterations. Methylated ctDNA are more consistently present in blood of cancer patients as compared to mutated ctDNA. Hence, methylated ctDNA serves as a potential biomarker for CRC that is worth investigating. In this review, we explore what has been reported about methylated ctDNA as a biomarker for CRC diagnosis that can distinguish between CRC patients or those having adenoma and healthy controls as validated specifically through ROC curves. We also examine methylated ctDNA as a biomarker for CRC prognosis and prediction as confirmed through robust statistical analyses. Finally, we discuss the major technical challenges that limits the use of methylated ctDNA for clinical application and suggest possible recommendations to enhance its usage.

Signal transduction pathway mutations in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The present study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of the signaling pathways mutation rate in the Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers in a systematic review and meta-analysis study. The study was performed based on the PRISMA criteria. Random models by confidence interval (CI: 95%) were used to calculate the pooled estimate of prevalence via Metaprop command. The pooled prevalence indices of signal transduction pathway mutations in gastric cancer, liver cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer were 5% (95% CI: 3–8%), 12% (95% CI: 8–18%), 17% (95% CI: 14–20%), and 20% (95% CI: 5–41%), respectively. Also, the mutation rates for Wnt pathway and MAPK pathway were calculated to be 23% (95% CI, 14–33%) and 20% (95% CI, 17–24%), respectively. Moreover, the most popular genes were APC (in Wnt pathway), KRAS (in MAPK pathway) and PIK3CA (in PI3K pathway) in the colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and gastric cancer while they were beta-catenin and CTNNB1 in liver cancer. The most altered pathway was Wnt pathway followed by the MAPK pathway. In addition, pancreatic cancer was found to be higher under the pressure of mutation compared with others based on pooled prevalence analysis. Finally, APC mutations in colorectal cancer, KRAS in gastric cancer, and pancreatic cancer were mostly associated gene alterations.

Potential of RASSF1A promoter methylation as a biomarker for colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis and TCGA analysis

The RAS association domain family protein 1A (RASSF1A) is a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer (CRC), and is often inactived by hypermethylation. Therefore, we evaluated the association between RASSF1A hypermethylation and the risk and prognosis in CRC. We identified literature through searching PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, and then validated and supplemented the meta-analysis with TCGA analysis. Twenty-three studies involving 2886 subjects of CRC were examined. The meta-analysis showed that RASSF1A promoter methylation inferred high CRC risk (odds ratio, 6.53, 95% confidence interval 3.88-11.01, P < .001) and poor overall survival (hazard ratio 2.85, 95% CI 1.88-4.31, P < .001). The TCGA analysis suggested that effect of RASSF1A promotor methylation was affected by tumor localization (colon vs. rectum). RASSF1A promoter methylation was a predictor of high risk (OR 2.38, 95%CI 1.02-5.6, P = .046) and poor disease free survival(HR 2.25, 95%CI 1.27-3.99, P = .006)in colon adenocarcinoma, but the association was statistically insignificant in rectum adenocarcinoma(HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.69-3.59, P = .28). These results suggested RASSF1A hypermethylation is a risk and a potential prognostic biomarker in CRC.

RAS/RAF mutations and their associations with epigenetic alterations for distinct pathways in Vietnamese colorectal cancer

KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF are potential tumor-driven genes that are involved in the RAS/RAF/MAPK signaling pathway. RAS/RAF mutations importantly contribute to colorectal tumorigenesis since they remain the activated status of downstream pathways without regulation of the upstream EGFR signal. However, it has not been unclear how epigenetic alterations involved in colorectal tumorigenesis mediated by KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF mutations. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the frequency and distribution of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in Vietnamese colorectal cancer (CRC) and explored the relationship between genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in 156 tumors of CRC. Somatic mutations of KRAS (exon 2, codon 12/13; exon 3, codon 61), NRAS (exon 2, codon 12/13; exon 3, codon 61), and BRAF (exon 15, codon 600) was determined by Cobas® KRAS Mutation Test, Therascreen NRAS Pyro Kit and Cobas® 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test, respectively. Methylation status of BRCA1, MLH1, MGMT, p16, RASSF1A, and APC was detected by methylation-specific PCR. Distribution of each abnormality in clinicopathological features was also analyzed. Results showed the mutation rates of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were 41.0 %, 9.6 %, 8.3 % respectively, while the methylation rates of BRCA1, MLH1, MGMT, p16, RASSF1A, and APC were 16.7 %, 16.7 %, 32.7 %, 30.1 %, 30.1 %, and 37.2 % respectively. The distribution of KRAS mutation was mutually exclusive against that of NRAS (p <  0.001) and BRAF (p <  0.001) mutations in CRC. RAS/RAF mutations were more common in adenocarcinoma subtype (p =  0.020), whereas RASSF1A methylation was more frequent in mucinous adenocarcinoma subtype (p =  0.007). In addition, the frequency of having KRAS mutations was significantly higher in MGMT (p =  0.035) or RASSF1A (p =  0.043) methylated cases than in those without methylation. BRAF mutations were positively associated with MLH1 hypermethylation (p =  0.028) but were inversely associated with APC hypermethylation (p =  0.032). Overall, our results show specific interactions of genetic and epigenetic alterations and suggest the presence of independent oncogenic pathways in tumorigenesis of CRC.

Ras association domain family 1 isoform A suppresses colonic tumor cell growth through p21WAF1 activation in a p53-dependent manner

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Despite the frequent loss of Ras association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) expression in various cancers, the precise mechanism underlying its tumor-suppressive effect is not fully understood. To elucidate the growth-inhibitory role for RASSF1A in colorectal tumorigenesis, this study investigated the RASSF1A regulation of the p53-p21^WAF1 pathway.

METHODS

Ras association domain family 1 isoform A effect on cellular growth was tested in three human colon cancer cell lines by flow cytometry, cell counting, and [³ H]-thymidine incorporation assay. HCT116 p53^+/+ and p53^-/- isogenic sublines were utilized to determine the p53 dependence of RASSF1A effect on p21^WAF1 . Cycloheximide chase experiment and immunoprecipitation assay were carried out to define RASSF1A effect on p53 stability and mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) homolog ubiquitination.

RESULTS

Ras association domain family 1 isoform A expression inhibits colonic cell proliferation by preventing the G1 to S phase transition of the cell cycle. The RASSF1A-induced G1 cell cycle arrest is accompanied by the increase in the level of p21^WAF1 mRNA expression. The p21^WAF -inducing activity of RASSF1A was substantially higher in HCT116 p53^+/+ cell compared with isogenic p53^-/- cells. The cycloheximide chase assay revealed that RASSF1A expression leads to p53 stabilization and MDM2 homolog degradation. Using p53^-/- and p21^WAF1-/- subline cells, this study finally validated a crucial role of the p53-p21^WAF1 axis in RASSF1A-mediated growth inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

RASSF1A suppresses colonic tumor growth through the activation of the p53-p21^WAF1 pathway. This finding supports that RASSF1A could be a valuable marker for the assessment of colorectal cancer development and progression.

A novel DNA methylation panel accurately detects colorectal cancer independently of molecular pathway

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most incident cancers, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and usually classified into three main molecular pathways: chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). Currently, available screening methods are either costly or of limited specificity, impairing global implementation. More cost-effective strategies, including DNA methylation-based tests, might prove advantageous. Although some are already available, its performance is suboptimal, entailing the need for better candidate biomarkers. Herein, we tested whether combined use of APC, IGF2, MGMT, RASSF1A, and SEPT9 promoter methylation might accurately detect CRC irrespective of molecular subtype.

Methods

Selected genes were validated using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from 214 CRC and 50 non-malignant colorectal mucosae (CRN). Promoter methylation levels were assessed using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. MSI and CIMP status were determined. Molecular data were correlated with standard clinicopathological features. Diagnostic and prognostic performances were evaluated by receiver operator characteristics curve and survival analyses, respectively.

Results

Except for IGF2, promoter methylation levels were significantly higher in CRC compared to CRN. A three-gene panel (MGMT, RASSF1A, SEPT9) identified malignancy with 96.6% sensitivity, 74.0% specificity and 91.5 positive predictive value (area under the curve: 0.97), independently of tumor location, stage, and molecular pathway.

Conclusions

Combined promoter methylation analysis of MGMT/RASSF1A/SEPT9 displays a better performance than currently available epigenetic-based biomarkers for CRC, providing the basis for the development of a non-invasive assay to detect CRC irrespective of the molecular pathway.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-018-1415-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

β-catenin interaction with NHERF1 and RASSF1A methylation in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

There is an increasing need to identify new biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC) to further characterize this malignancy. β-catenin plays a central role in the Wnt signaling pathway. It also binds Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger regulating factor 1 (NHERF1) and interacts with the RAS-association domain family 1, isoform A (RASSF1A), but the mechanisms of this possible crosstalk are still not fully understood. In this study, we analyzed for the first time the different subcellular expression of β-catenin, NHERF1, and RASSF1A and their relationships with RASSF1A methylation in the progression of CRC. We assessed immunohistochemical expression and RASSF1A methylation in 51 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. Biomarker expression analysis was carried out considering the tumor-adjacent normal tissue, the primary tumor, and the paired liver metastases. Regarding the tumor compartment, it was found that cytoplasmic β-catenin expression was positively correlated to membranous (r = 0.3002, p = 0.0323) and nuclear NHERF1 (r = 0.293, p = 0.0368). In the liver metastases, instead, we found a positive correlation of cytoplasmic and nuclear β-catenin expression with RASSF1A methylation (r = 0.4019, p = 0.0068 and r = 0.3194, p = 0.0345, respectively).

In conclusion, our results showed that β-catenin was the crucial protagonist in metastatic CRC through different effector proteins involved in this developing process. In tumor tissues, β-catenin was predominantly associated with NHERF1 in a dynamic context, while interestingly in liver metastases, we noted an increase of its oncogenic function through RASSF1A inactivation.

Aberrant DNA Methylation in Colorectal Cancer: What Should We Target?

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) are characterized by global hypomethylation and promoter-specific DNA methylation. A subset of CRCs with extensive and co-ordinate patterns of promoter methylation has also been identified, termed the CpG-island methylator phenotype. Some genes methylated in CRC are established tumor suppressors; however, for the majority, direct roles in disease initiation or progression have not been established. Herein, we examine functional evidence of specific methylated genes contributing to CRC pathogenesis, focusing on components of commonly deregulated signaling pathways. We also review current knowledge of the mechanisms underpinning promoter methylation in CRC, including genetic events, altered transcription factor binding, and DNA damage. Finally, we summarize clinical trials of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in CRC, and propose strategies for enhancing their efficacy.

RASSF1A Site-Specific Methylation Hotspots in Cancer and Correlation with RASSF1C and MOAP-1

Epigenetic silencing of RASSF1A is frequently observed in numerous cancers and has been previously reported. The promoter region of RASSF1A is predicted to have 75 CpG sites, and very few studies demonstrate how the methylation of these sites affects expression. In addition, the expression relationship between RASSF1A and its downstream target, modulator of apoptosis 1 (MOAP-1), is poorly understood. In this study, we have explored the mRNA expression of RASSF1A, MOAP-1 and the well-characterized splice variant of RASSF1, RASSF1C, in cancer cell lines and primary tumors. We confirmed that the RASSF1A promoter is robustly methylated within a 32-CpG region in solid tumors and results in lower mRNA expression. The MOAP-1 promoter contains ~110 CpG sites, but was not found to be methylated in cancer cell lines when 19 predicted CpG sites were explored. Interestingly, MOAP-1 mRNA expression positively correlated with RASSF1A expression in numerous cancers, whereas RASSF1C expression remained the same or was increased in cell lines or tissues with epigenetic loss of RASSF1A. We speculate that MOAP-1 and RASSF1A may be more intimately connected than originally thought, and the expression of both are warranted in experimental designs exploring the biology of the RASSF1A/MOAP-1 molecular pathway.

Methylation status of the APC and RASSF1A promoter in cell-free circulating DNA and its prognostic role in patients with colorectal cancer

DNA methylation is the most frequent epigenetic alteration. Using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), the methylation status of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and Ras association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) genes was examined in cell-free circulating DNA from 155 plasma samples obtained from patients with early and advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). APC and RASSF1A hypermethylation was frequently observed in both early and advanced disease, and was significantly associated with a poorer disease outcome. The methylation status of the APC and RASSF1A promoters was investigated in cell-free DNA of patients with CRC. Using MSP, the promoter methylation status of APC and RASSF1A was examined in 155 blood samples obtained from patients with CRC, 88 of whom had operable CRC (oCRC) and 67 had metastatic CRC (mCRC). The frequency of APC methylation in patients with oCRC was 33%. Methylated APC promoter was significantly associated with older age (P=0.012), higher stage (P=0.014) and methylated RASSF1A status (P=0.050). The frequency of APC methylation in patients with mCRC was 53.7%. In these patients, APC methylation was significantly associated with methylated RASSF1A status (P=0.016). The frequency of RASSF1A methylation in patients with oCRC was 25%. Methylated RASSF1A in oCRC was significantly associated with higher stage (P=0.021). The frequency of RASSF1A methylation in mCRC was 44.8%. Methylated RASSF1A in mCRC was associated with moderate differentiation (P=0.012), high levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (P=0.023) and methylated APC status (P=0.016). Patients with an unmethylated APC gene had better survival in both early (81±5 vs. 27±4 months, P<0.001) and advanced disease (37±7 vs. 15±3 months, P<0.001), compared with patients with methylated APC. Patients with an unmethylated RASSF1A gene had better survival in both early (71±6 vs. 46±8 months, P<0.001) and advanced disease (28±4 vs. 16±3 months, P<0.001) than patients with methylated RASSF1A. The observed significant correlations between APC and RASSF1A promoter methylation status and survival may be indicative of a prognostic role for these genes in CRC, which requires additional testing in larger studies.

Re-expression of Lactotransferrin, a candidate tumor suppressor inactivated by promoter hypermethylation, impairs the malignance of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

Lactotransferrin (LTF) has been confirmed to act as a tumor suppressor in multiple cancers; however, its roles in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), one of malignant head and neck carcinomas, has not been explored.

METHODS

Here, the expression of LTF in OSCC tissues and TCA8113 cells was detected with RT-PCR, qPCR, and IHC. And the correlation between LTF expression and OSCC metastasis was assessed. MS-PCR was performed to reveal the methylation status in promoter regions of LTF both in OSCC tissue samples and cells. The influences of 5-Aza-Cdc treatment to the methylation status and expression levels of LTF were also analyzed. At last, the functions of LTF in OSCC progression were demonstrated by MTT analysis, clone formation assay, and cell cycle analysis in TCA8113 cells with forced ectopic expression of LTF.

RESULTS

LTF showed a low or null expression pattern in OSCC tissues and cells, at least partially, due to the hypermethylated status in promoter regions for 5-Aza-Cdc, a methyltransferase inhibitor, could restore the expression of LTF in TCA8113 cells. And the expression level of LTF exhibited a negative correlation with OSCC metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-expression of LTF inhibited the growth, proliferation, as well as cell cycle progression of TCA8113 cells. In conclusion, hypermethylation contributes much to LTF inactivation in OSCC. And LTF can partially reverse the malignant phenotypes of OSCC cells and may be served as a potential target for diagnosis and therapy of OSCC in future.

Promoter methylation of the RASSF1A gene may contribute to colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of cohort studies

This meta-analysis of published cohort studies was conducted to evaluate whether promoter methylation of the RASSF1A gene contributes to colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. A range of electronic databases were searched without language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. Crude risk differences (RD) with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. In this meta-analysis, 11 clinical cohort studies with a total of 630 CRC patients were included. The pooled results revealed that the frequency of RASSF1A gene methylation in cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in benign, adjacent, and normal tissues (cancer tissues vs. benign tissues: RD = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.13-0.38, P < 0.001; cancer tissues vs. adjacent tissues: RD = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.20-0.45, P < 0.001; cancer tissues vs. normal tissues: RD = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.26-0.50, P < 0.001; respectively). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity demonstrated that RASSF1A promoter methylation also exhibited a higher frequency in cancer tissues among both Asians and Caucasians (all P < 0.05). Our meta-analysis has shown positive correlations between RASSF1A promoter methylation and CRC susceptibility. Thus, detection of RASSF1A promoter methylation may be utilized as a valuable diagnostic marker for CRC.

Molecular profiling in colorectal cancer: current state of play and future directions

SUMMARY In the era of molecular scientific discovery, there is a continuing gap between our growing scientific knowledge and its utility at the bedside. This phenomenon probably occurs more frequently in colorectal cancer than in other cancer streams, with thousands of scientific studies having produced only a handful of molecular interventions. This review examines our current practices of molecular profiling in colorectal cancer and the scientific research that may impact on this area in the future.

Tracking the molecular features of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs) are proposed as a major contributor to the occurrence of interval cancers, but their underlying biology remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the major biological events in NP-CRNs.

METHODS

We systematically searched for studies examining molecular characteristics of NP-CRNs. We performed random effect meta-analyses. We measured the heterogeneity among studies using I(2) and possible publication bias using funnel plots.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies on KRAS, APC, or BRAF mutations, microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), or DNA promoter hypermethylation were included. We observed less KRAS mutations (summary odds ratio (OR) 0.30, confidence interval (CI)=0.19-0.46, I(2)=77.4%, CI=70.1-82.9) and APC mutations (summary OR 0.42, CI=0.24-0.72, I(2)=22.6%, CI=0.0-66.7) in NP-CRNs vs. protruded CRNs, whereas BRAF mutations were more frequent (summary OR 2.20, CI=1.01-4.81, I(2)=0%, CI=0-70.8), albeit all with large heterogeneity. Less KRAS mutations were especially found in NP-CRNs subtypes: depressed CRNs (summary OR 0.12, CI=0.05-0.29, I(2)=0%, CI=0-67.6), non-granular lateral spreading tumors (LSTs-NG) (summary OR 0.61, CI=0.37-1.0, I(2)=0%, CI=0-74.6), and early nonpolypoid carcinomas (summary OR 0.11, CI=0.06-0.19, I(2)=0%, CI=0-58.3). MSI frequency was similar in NP-CRNs and protruded CRNs (summary OR 0.99, CI=0.21-4.71, I(2)=70.3%, CI=38.4-85.7). Data for promoter hypermethylation and CIMP were inconsistent, precluding meaningful conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides indications that NP-CRNs are molecularly different from protruded CRNs. In particular, some subtypes of NP-CRNs, the depressed and LST-NG, are featured by less KRAS mutations than polypoid CRNs. Prospective, multicenter studies are needed to clarify the molecular pathways underlying nonpolypoid colorectal carcinogenesis and potential implications for surveillance intervals.

Kras gene mutation and RASSF1A, FHIT and MGMT gene promoter hypermethylation: indicators of tumor staging and metastasis in adenocarcinomatous sporadic colorectal cancer in Indian population

Objective

Colorectal cancer (CRC) development involves underlying modifications at genetic/epigenetic level. This study evaluated the role of Kras gene mutation and RASSF1A, FHIT and MGMT gene promoter hypermethylation together/independently in sporadic CRC in Indian population and correlation with clinicopathological variables of the disease.

Methods

One hundred and twenty four consecutive surgically resected tissues (62 tumor and equal number of normal adjacent controls) of primary sporadic CRC were included and patient details including demographic characteristics, lifestyle/food or drinking habits, clinical and histopathological profiles were recorded. Polymerase chain reaction - Restriction fragment length polymorphism and direct sequencing for Kras gene mutation and Methylation Specific-PCR for RASSF1A, FHIT and MGMT genes was performed.

Results

Kras gene mutation at codon 12 & 13 and methylated RASSF1A, FHIT and MGMT gene was observed in 47%, 19%, 47%, 37% and 47% cases, respectively. Alcohol intake and smoking were significantly associated with presence of Kras mutation (codon 12) and MGMT methylation (p-value <0.049). Tumor stage and metastasis correlated with presence of mutant Kras codon 12 (p-values 0.018, 0.044) and methylated RASSF1A (p-values 0.034, 0.044), FHIT (p-values 0.001, 0.047) and MGMT (p-values 0.018, 0.044) genes. Combinatorial effect of gene mutation/methylation was also observed (p-value <0.025). Overall, tumor stage 3, moderately differentiated tumors, presence of lymphatic invasion and absence of metastasis was more frequently observed in tumors with mutated Kras and/or methylated RASSF1A, FHIT and MGMT genes.

Conclusion

Synergistic interrelationship between these genes in sporadic CRC may be used as diagnostic/prognostic markers in assessing the overall pathological status of CRC.

Comprehensive mutation analysis in colorectal flat adenomas

BACKGROUND

Flat adenomas are a subgroup of colorectal adenomas that have been associated with a distinct biology and a more aggressive clinical behavior compared to their polypoid counterparts. In the present study, we aimed to compare the mutation spectrum of 14 cancer genes, between these two phenotypes.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 106 flat and 93 polypoid adenomas was analyzed retrospectively for frequently occurring mutations in "hot spot" regions of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and NRAS, as well as selected mutations in CTNNB1 (β-catenin), EGFR, FBXW7 (CDC4), PTEN, STK11, MAP2K4, SMAD4, PIK3R1 and PDGFRA using a high-throughput genotyping technique. Additionally, APC was analyzed using direct sequencing.

RESULTS

APC mutations were more frequent in polypoid adenomas compared to flat adenomas (48.5% versus 30.3%, respectively, p = 0.02). Mutations in KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, FBXW7 and CTNNB1 showed similar frequencies in both phenotypes. Between the different subtypes of flat adenomas (0-IIa, LST-F and LST-G) no differences were observed for any of the investigated genes.

CONCLUSION

The lower APC mutation rate in flat adenomas compared to polypoid adenomas suggests that disruption of the Wnt-pathway may occur via different mechanisms in these two phenotypes. Furthermore, in contrast to previous observations our results in this large well-defined sample set indicate that there is no significant association between the different morphological phenotypes and mutations in key genes of the RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway.

Colorectal cancer and RASSF family--a special emphasis on RASSF1A

The RAS-association domain family, commonly referred to as RASSF, is a family of 10 members (RASSF1-10) implicated in a variety of key biological processes, including cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and microtubule stability. Furthermore, RASSFs have been implicated in tumorigenesis and several family members are now thought to be tumor suppressors. As opposed to the KRAS oncogene, for which mutational activation is frequent in colorectal cancer (CRC), RASSFs are found to be silenced mainly by aberrant promoter methylation. In particular, RASSF1A, RASSF2 and RASSF5 methylation has been associated with CRC development, though the mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. This review focus on the current knowledge of RASSF inactivation in CRC, particularly RASSF1A, and on the implications RASSFs may have as potential biomarkers and for the development of new targeted therapies for CRC.

DNA methylation patterns in blood of patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous colorectal polyps

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are currently suboptimal. Blood-based screening could improve rates of earlier detection for CRC and adenomatous colorectal polyps. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of plasma-based detection of early CRC and adenomatous polyps using array-mediated analysis methylation profiling of 56 genes implicated in carcinogenesis. Methylation of 56 genes in patients with Stages I and II CRC (N=30) and those with adenomatous polyps (N=30) were compared with individuals who underwent colonoscopy and were found to have neither adenomatous changes nor CRC. Composite biomarkers were developed for adenomatous polyps and CRC, and their sensitivity and specificity was estimated using five-fold cross validation. Six promoters (CYCD2, HIC1, PAX 5, RASSF1A, RB1 and SRBC) were selected for the biomarker, which differentiated CRC patients and controls with 84% sensitivity and 68% specificity. Three promoters (HIC1, MDG1 and RASSF1A) were selected for the biomarker, which differentiated patients with adenomatous polyps and controls with sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 65%. Methylation profiling of plasma DNA can detect early CRC with significant accuracy and shows promise as a methodology to develop biomarkers for CRC screening.

Analysis of K-ras, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in laterally-spreading tumors of the colorectum

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Laterally-spreading tumors (LST) are a newly-recognized category of colorectal neoplasia, and are defined as lesions larger than 10 mm in diameter and extending circumferentially rather than vertically. However, genetic features of this new category of tumors are not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic alterations in LST.

METHODS

We examined K-ras, BRAF, and phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic-α polypeptide (PIK3CA) mutations in 101 LST, including 68 LST-granular type (LST-G) and 33 LST-non-granular type by direct sequencing. As controls, we examined these gene mutations in 66 protruded colon adenomas (10 mm or larger) and 44 advanced colon cancers.

RESULTS

K-ras, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations were observed in 59 (58%), zero (0%), and three (3%) LST, respectively. LST-G morphology in the right-sided colon was significantly correlated with the existence of K-ras mutations, whereas a size of 20 mm or larger was the only predictor of mutations in the left-sided colorectum. The frequency of K-ras mutations in LST was particularly marked in the left-sided colorectum compared to protruded adenomas or advanced cancers (LST vs protruded adenomas, P < 0.001; LST vs advanced cancers, P = 0.002), whereas in the right-sided colon, K-ras mutations were equally frequent. PIK3CA mutations were not familiar in either LST (3%) or advanced cancers (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

K-ras mutations were involved in colorectal LST in different manners according to tumor location.

Genetic aspects of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease arising through multiple possible pathways. Elucidating the genetic factors controlling molecular phenotype, morphology, histology, and prognosis of different tumor types continues to be a challenge. Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms provide opportunities for ongoing study of their underlying genetic abnormalities and molecular phenotypes. The varied data from different groups, however, highlight the need for further studies in different populations.

DNA methylation markers in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) arises as a consequence of the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in colonic epithelial cells during neoplastic transformation. Epigenetic modifications, particularly DNA methylation in selected gene promoters, are recognized as common molecular alterations in human tumors. Substantial efforts have been made to determine the cause and role of aberrant DNA methylation ("epigenomic instability") in colon carcinogenesis. In the colon, aberrant DNA methylation arises in tumor-adjacent, normal-appearing mucosa. Aberrant methylation also contributes to later stages of colon carcinogenesis through simultaneous methylation in key specific genes that alter specific oncogenic pathways. Hypermethylation of several gene clusters has been termed CpG island methylator phenotype and appears to define a subgroup of colon cancer distinctly characterized by pathological, clinical, and molecular features. DNA methylation of multiple promoters may serve as a biomarker for early detection in stool and blood DNA and as a tool for monitoring patients with CRC. DNA methylation patterns may also be predictors of metastatic or aggressive CRC. Therefore, the aim of this review is to understand DNA methylation as a driving force in colorectal neoplasia and its emerging value as a molecular marker in the clinic.

Aberrant gene promoter methylation associated with sporadic multiple colorectal cancer

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) multiplicity has been mainly related to polyposis and non-polyposis hereditary syndromes. In sporadic CRC, aberrant gene promoter methylation has been shown to play a key role in carcinogenesis, although little is known about its involvement in multiplicity. To assess the effect of methylation in tumor multiplicity in sporadic CRC, hypermethylation of key tumor suppressor genes was evaluated in patients with both multiple and solitary tumors, as a proof-of-concept of an underlying epigenetic defect.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We examined a total of 47 synchronous/metachronous primary CRC from 41 patients, and 41 gender, age (5-year intervals) and tumor location-paired patients with solitary tumors. Exclusion criteria were polyposis syndromes, Lynch syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease. DNA methylation at the promoter region of the MGMT, CDKN2A, SFRP1, TMEFF2, HS3ST2 (3OST2), RASSF1A and GATA4 genes was evaluated by quantitative methylation specific PCR in both tumor and corresponding normal appearing colorectal mucosa samples. Overall, patients with multiple lesions exhibited a higher degree of methylation in tumor samples than those with solitary tumors regarding all evaluated genes. After adjusting for age and gender, binomial logistic regression analysis identified methylation of MGMT2 (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.97; p = 0.008) and RASSF1A (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.13; p = 0.047) as variables independently associated with tumor multiplicity, being the risk related to methylation of any of these two genes 4.57 (95% CI, 1.53 to 13.61; p = 0.006). Moreover, in six patients in whom both tumors were available, we found a correlation in the methylation levels of MGMT2 (r = 0.64, p = 0.17), SFRP1 (r = 0.83, 0.06), HPP1 (r = 0.64, p = 0.17), 3OST2 (r = 0.83, p = 0.06) and GATA4 (r = 0.6, p = 0.24). Methylation in normal appearing colorectal mucosa from patients with multiple and solitary CRC showed no relevant difference in any evaluated gene.

Conclusions

These results provide a proof-of-concept that gene promoter methylation is associated with tumor multiplicity. This underlying epigenetic defect may have noteworthy implications in the prevention of patients with sporadic CRC.

Genetic and epigenetic alterations of Ras signalling pathway in colorectal neoplasia: analysis based on tumour clinicopathological features

Activation of RAS signalling induced by K-ras/BRAF mutations is a hallmark of colorectal tumours. In addition, Ras association domain families 1 and 2 (RASSF1 and RASSF2), the negative regulators of K-ras, are often inactivated by methylation of the promoter region in those tumours. However, reports showing differences in the occurrence of these alterations on the basis of tumour characteristics have been scarce. We analysed K-ras/BRAF mutations and the methylation status of RASSF1 and RASSF2 promoter regions in 120 colorectal adenomas with respect to their clinicopathological features. K-ras/BRAF mutations and RASSF2 methylation were observed in 49 (41%) and 30 (25%) of the samples, respectively, while RASSF1 methylation was observed in only 3 (2.5%). Adenomas with RASSF2 methylation often carried K-ras/BRAF mutations simultaneously (22 out of 30, P<0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the concomitance of these alterations was frequently observed in serrated adenomas (odds ratio (OR) 11.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.96–63.00), but rarely in adenomas located in the sigmoid or descending colon (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.03–0.58). A comparison between adenomas and cancers showed a significantly higher prevalence of these alterations in cancers than in adenomas in the proximal colon (58 vs 27%, P=0.02). Frequency and the time point of the occurrence of Ras signalling disorders differ according to colorectal neoplasia’s characteristics, particularly the location.

Involvement of Krüppel-like factor 6 (KLF6) mutation in the development of nonpolypoid colorectal carcinoma

AIM: To examine Krüppel-like factor 6 (KLF6) mutations in nonpolypoid-type tumors and alterations of K-ras, p53, and B-raf in relation between mutation and morphologic type, particularly nonpolypoid-type colorectal carcinomas.

METHODS: Fifty-five early nonpolypoid colorectal carcinomas were analyzed. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of KLF6 and p53 was determined by microsatellite assay. Mutations of KLF6, K-ras, and B-raf were examined by polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism followed by direct sequencing. In LOH-positive and/or mutation-positive tumors, multiple (4-7) samples in each tumor were microdissected and examined for genetic alterations. p53 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS: LOH of KLF6 and p53 was found in 14 of 29 (48.3%) and 14 of 31 (45.2%) tumors, respectively. In 10 of the 14 (71.4%) KLF6 LOH-positive tumors and 9 of the 14 (64.3%) p53 LOH-positive tumors, LOH was found in all of the microdissected samples. In 1 of the 10 (10.0%) KLF6 LOH-positive tumors, a single missense mutation was identified. K-ras and B-raf mutations were found in 5 of 55 (9.1%) and 6 of 55 (10.9%) tumors, respectively. However, these mutations were detected only in subsets of microdissected tumor samples.

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that KLF6 and p53 mutations are involved in the development of nonpolypoid colorectal carcinoma, whereas K-ras and B-raf mutations are not.

Chromosomal Alteration in Chinese Sporadic Colorectal Carcinomas Detected by Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Much information has been reported on the genetic and genomic alterations in colorectal cancer (CRC) in literature; however, nonrandom chromosomal alterations in Chinese CRC patients have only one report in Hong Kong. To further identify genomic alteration in primary sporadic colorectal carcinomas (SCRC) in Chinese patients and understand the molecular mechanisms in CRC development, progress, and metastasis, we used comparative genomic hybridization to screen for losses and/or gains of DNA copies along chromosomes in 24 SCRC tissues from 24 patients. Comparative genomic hybridization was applied to investigate the genomic imbalance in 24 cases of primary SCRC and compared the differences between tumors in different loci and between tumors with and without metastasis. The common chromosomal alterations in the SCRC included gains of chromosomes 1q, 2q, 4q, 7q, 8q, 11q, 13q, 20q and also losses of chromosomes 9p, 16q, 17p, 18q. Among them, gains of 1q, 7q, 20q and losses of 17p, 18q were related with lymph node metastasis of SCRC (P<0.05). The gains of 4q, 7q, 20q and losses of 9p, 18q were related with the sites (P<0.05), colon and rectum, respectively; gain of 20q and loss of 9p were commonly found in the colon cancer; gain of 4q, 7q and loss of 18q were easily seen in the rectal cancer. There are multiple regions of chromosomes with copy-number changes in SCRC. The tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes on these regions may be involved in the development and progress of SCRC. The chromosome 1q, 2q, 4q, 7q, 8q, 11q, 13q, 20q regions may have oncogenes such as epidermal growth factor, MET, platelet-derived growth factor receptor A, and 9p, 16q, 17p, 18q regions may have tumor suppressor genes such as p53,DCC, IGFR1 associated with occurrence of SCRC. The chromosome 1q, 7q, 20q, 17p, 18q regions may have genes related with metastasis of SCRC. The development mechanisms of colon cancer and rectal cancer may not be completely similar. Additionally, gain of chromosome 1q was verified by the second technique-Real-time reverse transcription PCR.

Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of small apparently "de novo" colorectal adenocarcinomas

Rarely, adenocarcinomas of the colorectum develop as small (< or =1.0 cm) rapidly invasive tumors without an obvious adenomatous or "in situ" component. These tumors have been termed "de novo" carcinomas. Although it is believed by some that these tumors are more aggressive than conventional large adenocarcinomas with an identifiable in situ component, little is known about the biologic characteristics and natural history of these lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pathologic features, biologic characteristics, and natural history of small apparently de novo invasive colorectal adenocarcinomas with conventional large (>1.0 cm) carcinomas. Routinely processed specimens from 20 patients (M/F ratio: 13/7; mean age: 65 y) with small apparently de novo invasive colorectal adenocarcinomas (all < or =1.0 cm in size) were evaluated for a variety of clinical and pathologic features. In addition, immunostains for p53, beta-catenin, DPC4, hMLH1, hMSH2, and MGMT were evaluated in all cases. The findings in this group of cases were compared with those from 20 control patients (M/F ratio: 8/12; mean age: 60 y) with stage-matched conventional "large" colorectal adenocarcinomas (all >1.0 cm in size). Patients were followed for a mean of 52.6 and 60.6 months, respectively, for the 2 groups. Small apparently de novo invasive adenocarcinomas were present in the left colon, transverse colon, and right colon in 85%, 10%, and 5% of cases, respectively. Their mean size was 7 mm (range: 3 to 10 mm). All cases were stage T1 and the majority were moderately differentiated (75%). Only 1 (5%) patient had lymph node metastases. Two (10%) cases were mucinous and only 1 (5%) showed prominent tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Upon complete sectioning of the tissue blocks of tumor, residual foci of adenomatous epithelium were present in 16/20 (80%) cases, of which 75% contained foci of high-grade dysplasia. P53 and nuclear beta-catenin staining was present in 70% and 85% of cases, respectively, but only 5 cases (25%) showed loss of DPC4. Loss of MGMT expression was seen in 5 cases (25%), loss of hMSH2 in only 1 case (5%), and none showed loss of hMLH1. Only 2 patients (10%) developed visceral metastases upon follow-up. Control patients had similar demographic features, clinical outcome, anatomic distribution of tumors, degree of differentiation, and prevalence of positivity for the immunostains noted above, to the study cases. In our patient population, true small de novo colorectal adenocarcinomas, tumors that lack an identifiable adenomatous component, are exceedingly rare, because complete tissue sectioning reveals residual adenomatous tissue in the majority of cases. The biologic characteristics and natural history of small carcinomas with a minimal dysplastic component, and those with no identifiable adenomatous component, are similar to conventional large (>1 cm) adenocarcinomas, and, thus, they should probably be treated similarly.

Flat-type colorectal advanced adenomas (laterally spreading tumors) have different genetic and epigenetic alterations from protruded-type advanced adenomas

Morphologically, colorectal adenomas can be divided into two groups, protruded-type and flat-type. However, the accurate frequencies of genetic and epigenetic alterations in flat-type colorectal advanced adenomas (laterally spreading tumors) have remained largely unknown. In the current study, we investigated genetic and epigenetic alterations in 101 flat-type colorectal advanced adenomas and 68 protruded-type colorectal advanced adenomas by using direct DNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR (MethyLight), respectively. KRAS mutation was detected in a significantly higher percentage of flat-type adenomas (35%) than in protruded-type adenomas (13%). When the samples were limited to the tumors in the distal colon, the difference of KRAS mutation was still significant. KRAS mutation in G-to-A transitions at codons 12 and 13 was detected in a significantly higher percentage of flat-type adenomas (26%) than in protruded-type adenomas (9%). BRAF and beta-catenin mutations were detected in 3 and 8% of the 101 flat-type adenomas, respectively. No significant difference was found between frequencies of those mutations in flat-type adenomas and protruded-type adenomas. Methylations of MGMT, CDKN2A (p16) and MLH1 were detected in 28, 33 and 9% of the 101 flat-type adenomas, respectively. CDKN2A methylation was detected in a significantly lower percentage of flat-type adenomas than in protruded-type adenomas (63%). Methylation of at least one gene was detected in a significantly lower percentage of flat-type adenomas (54%) than in protruded-type adenomas (78%). In conclusion, KRAS mutation was frequently detected in flat-type advanced adenomas and the mutational patterns in most of them with KRAS mutations were a transition from G-to-A. Therefore, these genetic alterations seem to play an important role in the development of flat-type advanced adenomas, especially in the distal colon. Epigenetic alterations infrequently occurred in flat-type advanced adenomas, suggesting that they have different genetic and epigenetic alterations from those of protruded-type advanced adenomas.

Frequent promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A and CASP8 in neuroblastoma

Background

Epigenetic alterations and loss of heterozygosity are mechanisms of tumor suppressor gene inactivation. A new carcinogenic pathway, targeting the RAS effectors has recently been documented. RASSF1A, on 3p21.3, and NORE1A, on 1q32.1, are among the most important, representative RAS effectors.

Methods

We screened the 3p21 locus for the loss of heterozygosity and the hypermethylation status of RASSF1A, NORE1A and BLU (the latter located at 3p21.3) in 41 neuroblastic tumors. The statistical relationship of these data was correlated with CASP8 hypermethylation. The expression levels of these genes, in cell lines, were analyzed by RT-PCR.

Results

Loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability at 3p21 were detected in 14% of the analyzed tumors. Methylation was different for tumors and cell lines (tumors: 83% in RASSF1A, 3% in NORE1A, 8% in BLU and 60% in CASP8; cell lines: 100% in RASSF1A, 50% in NORE1A, 66% in BLU and 92% in CASP8). In cell lines, a correlation with lack of expression was evident for RASSF1A, but less clear for NORE1A, BLU and CASP8. We could only demonstrate a statistically significant association between hypermethylation of RASSF1A and hypermethylation of CASP8, while no association with MYCN amplification, 1p deletion, and/or aggressive histological pattern of the tumor was demonstrated.

Conclusion

1) LOH at 3p21 appears in a small percentage of neuroblastomas, indicating that a candidate tumor suppressor gene of neuroblastic tumors is not located in this region.

2) Promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A and CASP8 occurs at a high frequency in neuroblastomas.

Laterally spreading type of colorectal adenoma exhibits a unique methylation phenotype and K-ras mutations

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Laterally spreading tumors (LST), characterized by superficial extension along the colonic lumen, have recently been detected by colonoscopy. However, genetic and epigenetic characteristics of these tumors were scarcely reported.

METHODS

A total of 205 sporadic colorectal adenoma tissues (157 protruded-type, 23 granular-type LST (G-LST), 12 flat-type LST (F-LST), and 13 flat-type smaller than 1 cm) were collected. CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) was determined by examination of methylation status at p16, methylated in tumor (MINT) 1, 2, 12, and 31 loci. K-ras codon 12 and 13 point mutations were also examined. The relationship between macroscopic appearance and CIMP status or K-ras mutations was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among adenomas larger than 1 cm, CpG island methylation involving 2 or more loci (CIMP-high) was more likely to be observed in G-LST (14/23, 61%) than in protruded-type adenomas (18/73, 25%) (P = .002). The prevalence of K-ras mutations in G-LST (18/23, 78%) was significantly higher than that in protruded-type adenomas (18/73, 25%) (P < .0001). Moreover, the prevalence of CIMP-high and K-ras mutations in G-LST located in the proximal colon was much higher (11/13, 85%; and 12/13, 92%, respectively). In contrast, F-LST exhibited low prevalence of CIMP-high (1/12, 8%) and K-ras mutations (2/12, 16%).

CONCLUSIONS

High prevalence of CIMP-high and K-ras mutations in G-LST, especially in the proximal colon, could strongly suggest that G-LST appearance is associated with a unique carcinogenic pathway.

Epigenetic alterations in RASSF1A in human aberrant crypt foci

CpG island methylation (CIM) is an epigenetic mechanism for transcriptional silencing that occurs at various stages of colon tumorigenesis. CIM has been found in serrated adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. There is also evidence for hypermethylation in aberrant crypt foci (ACF) that are found in resected colons from cancer patients. Our study addresses promoter methylation of a tumor suppressor gene, RASSF1A, within the colonic epithelium of subjects undergoing screening colonoscopies in the absence of synchronous tumors. Patients included in this study were at elevated risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) based on family history, but without a previously occurring or synchronous colon carcinoma. ACF were identified using close-focus magnifying chromendoscopy and collected by biopsy in situ. We isolated ACF and adjacent normal colonic epithelium by laser capture microdissection (LCM) and studied methylation of the RASSF1A promoter region in ACF and in adjacent normal mucosa. Expression of RASSF1A was verified using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR). We found that 8.6% (3 out of 35) of ACF had K-ras mutations and 24% (6 out of 25) had RASSF1A hypermethylation. Our results demonstrate that RASSF1A hypermethylation and K-ras mutations are not mutually exclusive and are present in patients at elevated risk of CRC. Importantly, CIM of RASSF1A is an early epigenetic aberration, occurring in the absence of synchronous colon tumors and is not accompanied by field effects into the surrounding epithelium.

Allelic loss analysis of early-stage flat-type colorectal tumors

BACKGROUND

Flat-type colorectal tumors are rare, but are known for their unusual flat morphology and aggressive clinical behavior despite their small size. To identify distinct genetic alterations, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis was performed on microdissected tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA was extracted from multiple microdissected foci in 43 cases of early-stage flat-type colorectal tumors and LOH analysis was performed on 2q, 4q, 5q, 12q, 14q, 15q, 17p, 18q, 18p and 22q.

RESULTS

LOH patterns were detected in one of two forms: (i) homogeneous LOH throughout the microdissected foci, which indicated the early acquisition of LOH; and (ii) heterogeneous LOH, which were detected in a part of analyzed foci. Homogeneous and heterogeneous LOH were most frequently detected on 17p (92%) followed by 18q (81%), 18p (81%), 5q (61%), 22q (51%), 14q (44%), 15q (41%), 2q (39%), 12q (36%) and 4q (32%). Homogeneous LOH was detected most frequently on 17p (68%) followed by 18p (53%), 18q (53%), 22q (34%) and 12q (27%). The average fractional allelic loss (FAL) for heterogeneous and homogeneous LOH was 0.57 and the average FAL for homogeneous LOH was 0.37.

CONCLUSIONS

Early flat-type colorectal tumors frequently shows the early occurrence of multiple LOH including 17p, 18p, 18q and 22q, which is coupled with additional LOH of other loci either simultaneously or in the early clonal progression phase. The extent and sequences of LOH may be the mechanisms responsible for the aggressive clinical behaviors of these tumors.

The RASSF1A isoform of RASSF1 promotes microtubule stability and suppresses tumorigenesis

The RASSF1A isoform of RASSF1 is frequently inactivated by epigenetic alterations in human cancers, but it remains unclear if and how it acts as a tumor suppressor. RASSF1A overexpression reduces in vitro colony formation and the tumorigenicity of cancer cell lines in vivo. Conversely, RASSF1A knockdown causes multiple mitotic defects that may promote genomic instability. Here, we have used a genetic approach to address the function of RASSF1A as a tumor suppressor in vivo by targeted deletion of Rassf1A in the mouse. Rassf1A null mice were viable and fertile and displayed no pathological abnormalities. Rassf1A null embryonic fibroblasts displayed an increased sensitivity to microtubule depolymerizing agents. No overtly altered cell cycle parameters or aberrations in centrosome number were detected in Rassf1A null fibroblasts. Rassf1A null fibroblasts did not show increased sensitivity to microtubule poisons or DNA-damaging agents and showed no evidence of gross genomic instability, suggesting that cellular responses to genotoxins were unaffected. Rassf1A null mice showed an increased incidence of spontaneous tumorigenesis and decreased survival rate compared with wild-type mice. Irradiated Rassf1A null mice also showed increased tumor susceptibility, particularly to tumors associated with the gastrointestinal tract, compared with wild-type mice. Thus, our results demonstrate that Rassf1A acts as a tumor suppressor gene.