Normal cellular prion protein is a ligand of selectins: binding requires Le(X) but is inhibited by sLe(X)

Prion protein is required for tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)-triggered nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling and cytokine production

The expression of normal cellular prion protein (PrP) is required for the pathogenesis of prion diseases. However, the physiological functions of PrP remain ambiguous. Here, we identified PrP as being critical for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α-triggered signaling in a human melanoma cell line, M2, and a pancreatic ductal cell adenocarcinoma cell line, BxPC-3. In M2 cells, TNFα up-regulates the expression of p-IκB-kinase α/β (p-IKKα/β), p-p65, and p-JNK, but down-regulates the IκBα protein, all of which are downstream signaling intermediates in the TNF receptor signaling cascade. When PRNP is deleted in M2 cells, the effects of TNFα are no longer detectable. More importantly, p-p65 and p-JNK responses are restored when PRNP is reintroduced into the PRNP null cells. TNFα also activates NF-κB and increases TNFα production in wild-type M2 cells, but not in PrP-null M2 cells. Similar results are obtained in the BxPC-3 cells. Moreover, TNFα activation of NF-κB requires ubiquitination of receptor-interacting serine/threonine kinase 1 (RIP1) and TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2). TNFα treatment increases the binding between PrP and the deubiquitinase tumor suppressor cylindromatosis (CYLD), in these treated cells, binding of CYLD to RIP1 and TRAF2 is reduced. We conclude that PrP traps CYLD, preventing it from binding and deubiquitinating RIP1 and TRAF2. Our findings reveal that PrP enhances the responses to TNFα, promoting proinflammatory cytokine production, which may contribute to inflammation and tumorigenesis.

Cell Biology of Prion Protein

Cellular prion protein (PrP^C) is a mammalian glycoprotein which is usually found anchored to the plasma membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor. The precise function of PrP^C remains elusive but may depend upon its cellular localization. PrP^C misfolds to a pathogenic isoform PrP^Sc, the causative agent of neurodegenerative prion diseases. Nonetheless some forms of prion disease develop in the apparent absence of infectious PrP^Sc, suggesting that molecular species of PrP distinct from PrP^Sc may represent the primary neurotoxic culprits. Indeed, in some inherited cases of human prion disease, the predominant form of PrP detectable in the brain is not PrP^Sc but rather ^CtmPrP, a transmembrane form of the protein. The relationship between the neurodegeneration occurring in prion diseases involving PrP^Sc and that associated with ^CtmPrP remains unclear. However, the different membrane topology of the PrP mutants, as well as the presence of the GPI anchor, could influence both the function and the intracellular localization and trafficking of the protein, all being potentially very important in the pathophysiological mechanism that ultimately causes the disease. Here, we review the latest findings on the fundamental aspects of prions biology, from the PrP^C biosynthesis, function, and structure up to its intracellular traffic and analyze the possible roles of the different topological isoforms of the protein, as well as the GPI anchor, in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Multifaceted Role of Sialylation in Prion Diseases

Mammalian prion or PrP(Sc) is a proteinaceous infectious agent that consists of a misfolded, self-replicating state of a sialoglycoprotein called the prion protein, or PrP(C). Sialylation of the prion protein N-linked glycans was discovered more than 30 years ago, yet the role of sialylation in prion pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Recent years have witnessed extraordinary growth in interest in sialylation and established a critical role for sialic acids in host invasion and host-pathogen interactions. This review article summarizes current knowledge on the role of sialylation of the prion protein in prion diseases. First, we discuss the correlation between sialylation of PrP(Sc) glycans and prion infectivity and describe the factors that control sialylation of PrP(Sc). Second, we explain how glycan sialylation contributes to the prion replication barrier, defines strain-specific glycoform ratios, and imposes constraints for PrP(Sc) structure. Third, several topics, including a possible role for sialylation in animal-to-human prion transmission, prion lymphotropism, toxicity, strain interference, and normal function of PrP(C), are critically reviewed. Finally, a metabolic hypothesis on the role of sialylation in the etiology of sporadic prion diseases is proposed.

PrP(c) deficiency and dasatinib protect mouse intestines against radiation injury by inhibiting of c-Src

BACKGROUND & AIM

Despite extensive study of the contribution of cell death and apoptosis to radiation-induced acute intestinal injury, our knowledge of the signaling mechanisms involved in epithelial barrier dysfunction remains inadequate. Because PrP(c) plays a key role in intestinal homeostasis by renewing epithelia, we sought to study its role in epithelial barrier function after irradiation.

DESIGN

Histology, morphometry and plasma FD-4 levels were used to examine ileal architecture, wound healing, and intestinal leakage in PrP(c)-deficient (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice after total-body irradiation. Impairment of the PrP(c) Src pathway after irradiation was explored by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy, with Caco-2/Tc7 cells. Lastly, dasatinib treatment was used to switch off the Src pathway in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

The decrease in radiation-induced lethality, improved intestinal wound healing, and reduced intestinal leakage promoted by PrP(c) deficiency demonstrate its involvement in acute intestinal damage. Irradiation of Cacao2/Tc7 cells induced PrP(c) to target the nuclei associated with Src activation. Finally, the protective effect triggered by dasatinib confirmed Src involvement in radiation-induced acute intestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our data are the first to show a role for the PrP(c)-Src pathway in acute intestinal response to radiation injury and offer a novel therapeutic opportunity.

Sialylation of prion protein controls the rate of prion amplification, the cross-species barrier, the ratio of PrPSc glycoform and prion infectivity

The central event underlying prion diseases involves conformational change of the cellular form of the prion protein (PrP^C) into the disease-associated, transmissible form (PrP^Sc). PrP^C is a sialoglycoprotein that contains two conserved N-glycosylation sites. Among the key parameters that control prion replication identified over the years are amino acid sequence of host PrP^C and the strain-specific structure of PrP^Sc. The current work highlights the previously unappreciated role of sialylation of PrP^C glycans in prion pathogenesis, including its role in controlling prion replication rate, infectivity, cross-species barrier and PrP^Sc glycoform ratio. The current study demonstrates that undersialylated PrP^C is selected during prion amplification in Protein Misfolding Cyclic Amplification (PMCAb) at the expense of oversialylated PrP^C. As a result, PMCAb-derived PrP^Sc was less sialylated than brain-derived PrP^Sc. A decrease in PrP^Sc sialylation correlated with a drop in infectivity of PMCAb-derived material. Nevertheless, enzymatic de-sialylation of PrP^C using sialidase was found to increase the rate of PrP^Sc amplification in PMCAb from 10- to 10,000-fold in a strain-dependent manner. Moreover, de-sialylation of PrP^C reduced or eliminated a species barrier of for prion amplification in PMCAb. These results suggest that the negative charge of sialic acid controls the energy barrier of homologous and heterologous prion replication. Surprisingly, the sialylation status of PrP^C was also found to control PrP^Sc glycoform ratio. A decrease in PrP^C sialylation levels resulted in a higher percentage of the diglycosylated glycoform in PrP^Sc. 2D analysis of charge distribution revealed that the sialylation status of brain-derived PrP^C differed from that of spleen-derived PrP^C. Knocking out lysosomal sialidase Neu1 did not change the sialylation status of brain-derived PrP^C, suggesting that Neu1 is not responsible for desialylation of PrP^C. The current work highlights previously unappreciated role of PrP^C sialylation in prion diseases and opens multiple new research directions, including development of new therapeutic approaches.

The central event underlying prion diseases involves conformational change of the cellular form of the prion protein (PrP^C) into disease-associated, transmissible form (PrP^Sc). The amino acid sequence of PrP^C and strain-specific structure of PrP^Sc are among the key parameters that control prion replication and transmission. The current study showed that PrP^C posttranslational modification, specifically sialylation of N-linked glycans, plays a key role in regulating prion replication rate, infectivity, cross-species barrier and PrP^Sc glycoform ratio. A decrease in PrP^C sialylation level increased the rate of prion replication in a strain-specific manner and reduced or eliminated a species barrier when prion replication was seeded by heterologous seeds. At the same time, a decrease in sialylation correlated with a drop in infectivity of PrP^Sc material produced in vitro. The current study also demonstrated that the PrP^Sc glycoform ratio, which is an important feature used for strain typing, is not only controlled by prion strain or host but also the sialylation status of PrP^C. This study opens multiple new directions in prion research, including development of new therapeutic approaches.

Prion protein and cancers

The normal cellular prion protein, PrP(C) is a highly conserved and widely expressed cell surface glycoprotein in all mammals. The expression of PrP is pivotal in the pathogenesis of prion diseases; however, the normal physiological functions of PrP(C) remain incompletely understood. Based on the studies in cell models, a plethora of functions have been attributed to PrP(C). In this paper, we reviewed the potential roles that PrP(C) plays in cell physiology and focused on its contribution to tumorigenesis.

Binding of pro-prion to filamin A: by design or an unfortunate blunder

Over the last decades, cancer research has focused on tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Genes in other cellular pathways has received less attention. Between 0.5% to 1% of the mammalian genome encodes for proteins that are tethered on the cell membrane via a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor. The GPI modification pathway is complex and not completely understood. Prion (PrP), a GPI-anchored protein, is infamous for being the only normal protein that when misfolded can cause and transmit a deadly disease. Though widely expressed and highly conserved, little is known about the functions of PrP. Pancreatic cancer and melanoma cell lines express PrP. However, in these cell lines the PrP exists as a pro-PrP as defined by retaining its GPI anchor peptide signal sequence (GPI-PSS). Unexpectedly, the GPI-PSS of PrP has a filamin A (FLNA) binding motif and binds FLNA. FLNA is a cytolinker protein, and an integrator of cell mechanics and signaling. Binding of pro-PrP to FLNA disrupts the normal FLNA functions. Although normal pancreatic ductal cells lack PrP, about 40% of patients with pancreatic ductal cell adenocarcinoma express PrP in their cancers. These patients have significantly shorter survival time compared with patients whose cancers lack PrP. Pro-PrP is also detected in melanoma in situ but is undetectable in normal melanocyte, and invasive melanoma expresses more pro-PrP. In this review, we will discuss the underlying mechanisms by which binding of pro-PrP to FLNA disrupts normal cellular physiology and contributes to tumorigenesis, and the potential mechanisms that cause the accumulation of pro-PrP in cancer cells.

The fatal attraction between pro-prion and filamin A: prion as a marker in human cancers

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cancer causing deaths in the USA, with more than 30,000 deaths per year. The overall median survival for all pancreatic cancer is 6 months and the 5-year survival rate is less than 10%. This dismal outcome reflects the inefficacy of the chemotherapeutic agents, as well as the lack of an early diagnostic marker. A protein known as prion (PrP) is expressed in human pancreatic cancer cell lines. However, in these cell lines, the PrP is incompletely processed and exists as pro-PrP. The pro-PrP binds to a molecule inside the cell, filamin A (FLNa), which is an integrator of cell signaling and mechanics. The binding of pro-PrP to FLNa disrupts the normal functions of FLNa, altering the cell's cytoskeleton and signal transduction machineries. As a result, the tumor cells grow more aggressively. Approximately 40% of patients with pancreatic cancer express PrP in their cancer. These patients have significantly shorter survival compared with patients whose pancreatic cancers lack PrP. Therefore, expression of pro-PrP and its binding to FLNa provide a growth advantage to pancreatic cancers. In this article, we discuss the following points: the biology of PrP, the consequences of binding of pro-PrP to FLNa in pancreatic cancer, the detection of pro-PrP in other cancers, the potential of using pro-PrP as a diagnostic marker, and prevention of the binding between pro-PrP and FLNa as a target for therapeutic intervention in cancers.

The fatal attraction between pro-prion and filamin A: prion as a marker in human cancers

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cancer causing deaths in the USA, with more than 30,000 deaths per year. The overall median survival for all pancreatic cancer is 6 months and the 5-year survival rate is less than 10%. This dismal outcome reflects the inefficacy of the chemotherapeutic agents, as well as the lack of an early diagnostic marker. A protein known as prion (PrP) is expressed in human pancreatic cancer cell lines. However, in these cell lines, the PrP is incompletely processed and exists as pro-PrP. The pro-PrP binds to a molecule inside the cell, filamin A (FLNa), which is an integrator of cell signaling and mechanics. The binding of pro-PrP to FLNa disrupts the normal functions of FLNa, altering the cell's cytoskeleton and signal transduction machineries. As a result, the tumor cells grow more aggressively. Approximately 40% of patients with pancreatic cancer express PrP in their cancer. These patients have significantly shorter survival compared with patients whose pancreatic cancers lack PrP. Therefore, expression of pro-PrP and its binding to FLNa provide a growth advantage to pancreatic cancers. In this article, we discuss the following points: the biology of PrP, the consequences of binding of pro-PrP to FLNa in pancreatic cancer, the detection of pro-PrP in other cancers, the potential of using pro-PrP as a diagnostic marker, and prevention of the binding between pro-PrP and FLNa as a target for therapeutic intervention in cancers.

Sialic acids as regulators of molecular and cellular interactions

The wide occurrence of sialic acids (Sia) in various chemical forms linked as monomers or polymers in an outstanding position in a multitude of complex carbohydrates of animals and microorganisms renders them as most versatile function modulators in cell biology and pathology. A survey is presented of recent advances in the study of the influences that Sias have as bulky hydrophilic and electronegatively charged monosaccharides on animal cells and on their interaction with microorganisms. Some highlights are: sialylation leads to increased anti-inflammatory activity of IgG antibodies, facilitates the escape of microorganisms from the host's immune system, and in polymeric form is involved in the regulation of embryogenesis and neuronal growth and function. The role of siglecs in immunoregulation, the dynamics of lymphocyte binding to selectins and the interactions of toxins, viruses, and other microorganisms with the host's Sia are now better understood. N-Glycolylneuraminic acid from food is antigenic in man and seems to have pathogenic potential. Sia O-acetylation mediated by various eukaryotic and prokaryotic O-acetyltransferases modulates the affinity of these monosaccharides to mammalian and microbial receptors and hinders apoptosis. The functionally versatile O-acetylated ganglioside GD3 is an onco-fetal antigen.

Binding of pro-prion to filamin A disrupts cytoskeleton and correlates with poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer

The cellular prion protein (PrP) is a highly conserved, widely expressed, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored (GPI-anchored) cell surface glycoprotein. Since its discovery, most studies on PrP have focused on its role in neurodegenerative prion diseases, whereas its function outside the nervous system remains unclear. Here, we report that human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell lines expressed PrP. However, the PrP was neither glycosylated nor GPI-anchored, existing as pro-PrP and retaining its GPI anchor peptide signal sequence (GPI-PSS). We also showed that the PrP GPI-PSS has a filamin A-binding (FLNa-binding) motif and interacted with FLNa, an actin-associated protein that integrates cell mechanics and signaling. Binding of pro-PrP to FLNa disrupted cytoskeletal organization. Inhibition of PrP expression by shRNA in the PDAC cell lines altered the cytoskeleton and expression of multiple signaling proteins; it also reduced cellular proliferation and invasiveness in vitro as well as tumor growth in vivo. A subgroup of human patients with pancreatic cancer was found to have tumors that expressed pro-PrP. Most importantly, PrP expression in tumors correlated with a marked decrease in patient survival. We propose that binding of pro-PrP to FLNa perturbs FLNa function, thus contributing to the aggressiveness of PDAC. Prevention of this interaction could provide an attractive target for therapeutic intervention in human PDAC.

Glycosylation-related genes are variably expressed depending on the differentiation state of a bioaminergic neuronal cell line: implication for the cellular prion protein

A striking feature of the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) is the heterogeneity of its glycoforms, whose contribution to PrP(C) function has yet to be defined. Using the 1C11 neuronal bioaminergic differentiation model and a glycomics approach, we show here a correlation between differential PrP(C) N-glycosylations in 1C11(5-HT) serotonergic and 1C11(NE) noradrenergic cells compared to their 1C11 precursor cells and a variation of the glycogenome expression status in these cells. In particular, expression of genes involved in N-glycan synthesis or in the modeling of chondroitin and heparan sulfate proteoglycans appeared to be modulated. Our results highlight that, the expression of glycosylation-related genes is regulated during bioaminergic neuronal differentiation, consistent with a participation of glycoconjugates in neuronal development and plasticity. A neuronal regulation of glycosylation processes may have direct implications on some neurospecific functions of PrP(C) and may participate in specific brain targeting of prion strains.

Binding of recombinant but not endogenous prion protein to DNA causes DNA internalization and expression in mammalian cells

Recombinant prion protein, rPrP, binds DNA. Both the KKRPK motif and the octapeptide repeat region of rPrP are essential for maximal binding. rPrP with pathogenic insertional mutations binds more DNA than wild-type rPrP. DNA promotes the aggregation of rPrP and protects its N terminus from proteinase K digestion. When rPrP is mixed with an expression plasmid and Ca(2+), the rPrP.DNA complex is taken up by mammalian cells leading to gene expression. In the presence of Ca(2+), rPrP by itself is also taken up by cells in a temperature- and pinocytosis-dependent manner. Cells do not take up rPrP(DeltaKKRPK), which lacks the KKRPK motif. Thus, rPrP is the carrier for DNA and the KKRPK motif is essential for its uptake. When mixed with DNA, a pentapeptide KKRPK, but not KKKKK, is sufficient for DNA internalization and expression. In contrast, whereas the normal cellular prion protein, PrP(C), on the cell surface can also internalize DNA, the imported DNA is not expressed. These findings may have relevance to the normal functions of PrP(C) and the pathogenic mechanisms of human prion disease.

Is there a role for cellular prion protein in intrathymic T cell differentiation and migration?

The cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) is expressed in the nervous and immune systems. Functionally, PrP(C) has been suggested to participate in neuron survival, neuritogenesis and T lymphocyte activation. Moreover, PrP(C) interaction with laminin influences neuronal adhesion and neurite extension. Nevertheless, so far the physiological role of PrP(C) has not been completely elucidated, particularly in the immune system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the possible participation of PrP(C) in intrathymic T cell development. We evaluated T cell differentiation markers in thymocytes and peripheral lymphocytes, as well as thymocyte death in PrP(C)-null or PrP(C)-overexpressing (Tga20) mice, compared to wild-type controls. In these same animals, we ascertained laminin-driven thymocyte migration. Compared to controls, only marginal differences were found in PrP(C)-null animals. However, Tga20 mice exhibited a severe thymic hypoplasia, with 10-20% lymphocytes compared to wild-type counterparts. In particular, the frequency of CD4+CD8+ cells was largely reduced, and this was accompanied by a dramatic increase in the frequency of CD4-CD8- thymocytes, which could be as high as 60-65% of the whole-cell suspensions. Moreover, Tga20 mice exhibited an increase in thymocyte death, comprising the CD4+CD8+, as well as CD4+ and CD8+ single-positive cells. Additionally, laminin-driven migration was largely impaired in Tga20 mice, in which we also found a significant decrease in total T lymphocytes in the spleen and lymph nodes. Our results show that PrP(C) overexpression alters intrathymic T cell development, a defect that likely has a negative impact in the formation of the T cell peripheral pool.