Probing of breast cancer using a combination of plasma and urinary circulating cell-free DNA

Clinical Application of Different Liquid Biopsy Components in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer, usually occurring in the background of chronic liver disease. HCC lethality rate is in the third highest place in the world. Patients with HCC have concealed early symptoms and possess a high-level of heterogeneity. Once diagnosed, most of the tumors are in advanced stages and have a poor prognosis. The sensitivity and specificity of existing detection modalities and protocols are suboptimal. HCC calls for more sophisticated and individualized therapeutic regimens. Liquid biopsy is non-invasive, repeatable, unaffected by location, and can be monitored dynamically. It has emerged as a useable aid in achieving precision malignant tumor treatment. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating nucleic acids, exosomes and tumor-educated platelets are the commonest components of a liquid biopsy. It possesses the theoretical ability to conquer the high heterogeneity and the difficulty of early detection for HCC patients. In this review, we summarize the common enrichment techniques and the clinical applications in HCC for different liquid biopsy components. Tumor recurrence after HCC-related liver transplantation is more insidious and difficult to treat. The clinical use of liquid biopsy in HCC-related liver transplantation is also summarized in this review.

Liquid-based biomarkers in breast cancer: looking beyond the blood

In recent decades, using circulating tumor cell (CTC), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA), exosomes and etc. as liquid biomarkers has received enormous attention in various tumors, including breast cancer (BC). To date, efforts in the area of liquid biopsy predominantly focus on the analysis of blood-based markers. It is worth noting that the identifications of markers from non-blood sources provide unique advantages beyond the blood and these alternative sources may be of great significance in offering supplementary information in certain settings. Here, we outline the latest advances in the analysis of non-blood biomarkers, predominantly including urine, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, stool and etc. The unique advantages of such testings, their current limitations and the appropriate use of non-blood assays and blood assays in different settings are further discussed. Finally, we propose to highlight the challenges of these alternative assays from basic to clinical implementation and explore the areas where more investigations are warranted to elucidate its potential utility.

Network approach in liquidomics landscape

Tissue-based biopsy is the present main tool to explore the molecular landscape of cancer, but it also has many limits to be frequently executed, being too invasive with the risk of side effects. These limits and the ability of cancer to constantly evolve its genomic profile, have recently led to the need of a less invasive and more accurate alternative, such as liquid biopsy. By searching Circulating Tumor Cells and residues of their nucleic acids or other tumor products in body fluids, especially in blood, but also in urine, stools and saliva, liquid biopsy is becoming the future of clinical oncology. Despite the current lack of a standardization for its workflows, that makes it hard to be reproduced, liquid biopsy has already obtained promising results for cancer screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and risk of recurrence.Through a more accessible molecular profiling of tumors, it could become easier to identify biomarkers predictive of response to treatment, such as EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer, or Microsatellite Instability and Mismatch Repair as predictive markers of pembrolizumab response.By monitoring circulating tumor DNA in longitudinal repeated sampling of blood we could also predict Minimal Residual Disease and the risk of recurrence in already radically resected patients.In this review we will discuss about the current knowledge of limitations and strengths of the different forms of liquid biopsies for its inclusion in normal cancer management, with a brief nod to their newest biomarkers and its future implications.

Overview of the role of liquid biopsy in cancer management

With the emergence of novel targeted therapeutic options in early-stage and advanced-stage malignancies, researchers have shifted their focus on developing personalized treatment plans through molecular profiling. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a cell-free DNA (ctDNA) fragment, originating from tumor cells, and circulating in the bloodstream as well as biological fluids. Over the past decade, many techniques were developed for liquid biopsies through next-generation sequencing. This alternative non-invasive biopsy offers several advantages in various types of tumors over traditional tissue biopsy. The process of liquid biopsy is considered minimally invasive and therefore easily repeatable when needed, providing a more dynamic analysis of the tumor cells. Moreover, it has an advantage in patients with tumors that are not candidates for tissue sampling. Besides, it offers a deeper understanding of tumor burden as well as treatment response, thereby enhancing the detection of minimal residual disease and therapeutic guidance for personalized medicine. Despite its many advantages, ctDNA and liquid biopsy do have some limitations. This paper discusses the basis of ctDNA and the current data available on the subject, as well as its clinical utility. We also reflect on the limitations of using ctDNA in addition to its future perspectives in clinical oncology and precision medicine.

Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Liquid Biopsy and Cancer Management

BACKGROUND

The current methodology used to detect, diagnose, and monitor many types of cancers requires invasive tissue biopsy testing. Recently, liquid biopsy using blood, plasma, urine, saliva, and various other bodily fluids has shown utility to solve many issues associated with tissue biopsy. Blood/plasma has received most of the attention within the liquid biopsy field, however, obtaining blood samples from patients is still somewhat invasive and requires trained professionals. Using urine to detect cell-free DNA cancer biomarkers offers a truly non-invasive sampling method that can be easily and reproducibly conducted by patients.

CONTENT

Novel technologies and approaches have made the detection of small quantities of cell-free tumor DNA of varying lengths possible. Recent studies using urine circulating tumor DNA to detect cancer mutations and other biomarkers have shown sensitivity comparable to blood/plasma cell-free DNA liquid biopsy for many cancer types. Thus, urine cell-free DNA liquid biopsy may replace or provide supplementary information to tissue/blood biopsies. Further investigation with larger patient cohorts and standardization of pre-analytical factors is necessary to determine the utility of urine cell-free DNA liquid biopsy for cancer detection, diagnosis, and monitoring in a clinical setting.

SUMMARY

In this mini-review we discuss the biological aspects of cell-free DNA in urine, numerous studies using urine cell-free DNA to detect urological cancers, and recent studies using urine cell-free DNA to detect and monitor non-urological cancers including lung, breast, colorectal, and other cancers.

Circulating tumour DNA - looking beyond the blood

Over the past decade, various liquid biopsy techniques have emerged as viable alternatives to the analysis of traditional tissue biopsy samples. Such surrogate 'biopsies' offer numerous advantages, including the relative ease of obtaining serial samples and overcoming the issues of interpreting one or more small tissue samples that might not reflect the entire tumour burden. To date, the majority of research in the area of liquid biopsies has focused on blood-based biomarkers, predominantly using plasma-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). However, ctDNA can also be obtained from various non-blood sources and these might offer unique advantages over plasma ctDNA. In this Review, we discuss advances in the analysis of ctDNA from non-blood sources, focusing on urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and pleural or peritoneal fluid, but also consider other sources of ctDNA. We discuss how these alternative sources can have a distinct yet complementary role to that of blood ctDNA analysis and consider various technical aspects of non-blood ctDNA assay development. We also reflect on the settings in which non-blood ctDNA can offer distinct advantages over plasma ctDNA and explore some of the challenges associated with translating these alternative assays from academia into clinical use.

Targeted Sequencing of Plasma-Derived vs. Urinary cfDNA from Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

In breast cancer, the genetic profiling of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood plasma was shown to have good potential for clinical use. In contrast, only a few studies were performed investigating urinary cfDNA. In this pilot study, we analyzed plasma-derived and matching urinary cfDNA samples obtained from 15 presurgical triple-negative breast cancer patients. We used a targeted next-generation sequencing approach to identify and compare genetic alterations in both body fluids. The cfDNA concentration was higher in urine compared to plasma, but there was no significant correlation between matched samples. Bioinformatical analysis revealed a total of 3339 somatic breast-cancer-related variants (VAF ≥ 3%), whereof 1222 vs. 2117 variants were found in plasma-derived vs. urinary cfDNA, respectively. Further, 431 shared variants were found in both body fluids. Throughout the cohort, the recovery rate of plasma-derived mutations in matching urinary cfDNA was 47% and even 63% for pathogenic variants only. The most frequently occurring pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutated genes were NF1, CHEK2, KMT2C and PTEN in both body fluids. Notably, a pathogenic CHEK2 (T519M) variant was found in all 30 samples. Taken together, our results indicated that body fluids appear to be valuable sources bearing complementary information regarding the genetic tumor profile.

Trans-Renal Cell-Free Tumor DNA for Urine-Based Liquid Biopsy of Cancer

Cancer biomarkers are a promising tool for cancer detection, personalization of therapy, and monitoring of treatment response or recurrence. “Liquid biopsy” commonly refers to minimally invasive or non-invasive sampling of a bodily fluid (i.e., blood, urine, saliva) for detection of cancer biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells or cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA). These methods offer a means to collect frequent tumor assessments without needing surgical biopsies. Despite much progress with blood-based liquid biopsy approaches, there are limitations—including the limited amount of blood that can be drawn from a person and challenges with collecting blood samples at frequent intervals to capture ctDNA biomarker kinetics. These limitations are important because ctDNA is present at extremely low levels in plasma and there is evidence that measuring ctDNA biomarker kinetics over time can be useful for clinical prediction. Additionally, blood-based assays require access to trained phlebotomists and often a trip to a healthcare facility. In contrast, urine is a body fluid that can be self-collected from a patient’s home, at frequent intervals, and mailed to a laboratory for analysis. Multiple reports indicate that fragments of ctDNA pass from the bloodstream through the kidney’s glomerular filtration system into the urine, where they are known as trans-renal ctDNA (TR-ctDNA). Accumulating studies indicate that the limitations of blood based ctDNA approaches for cancer can be overcome by measuring TR-ctDNA. Here, we review current knowledge about TR-ctDNA in urine as a cancer biomarker approach, and discuss its clinical potential and open questions in this research field.

STAT3 Contributes to Intracranial Aneurysm Formation and Rupture by Modulating Inflammatory Response

Intracranial aneurysm (IA) is a common type of refractory cerebrovascular diseases. Inflammatory responses have been reported to be associated with the pathogenesis of IA. We aimed to study the role of STAT3 on IA formation and inflammatory response. STAT3 expression and clinicopathological factors were analyzed in IA and normal cerebral arteries. mRNA level of STAT3 was detected in normal, unruptured, and ruptured IA tissues by RT-PCR and Western blot. Inflammatory cytokines were examined by ELISA in unruptured, ruptured IA tissues, as well as cells with STAT3 overexpression or knockdown. mRNA of phenotypic modulation-related factors was tested by RT-PCR in STAT3 overexpressing or knockdown VSMCs. STAT3 expression was upregulated in ruptured IA tissues and highly associated with IA diameter and IA type. Inflammatory cytokine secretion was increased in ruptured IA samples and positively correlated with STAT3 expression. STAT3 overexpression led to enhanced expression of SM-α actin, SM-MHC, MMP2, and MMP9, and increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Our findings have demonstrated that STAT3 is a key regulator in IA formation by modulating inflammatory cytokine expression.