Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of ABT-627, an oral ETA selective endothelin antagonist, in humans

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in healthy Chinese volunteers treated with SC0062, a highly selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and food effects (FE) of SC0062, a highly active endothelin-A (ETA ) receptor antagonist, in healthy subjects. The primary objectives of this first-in-human phase I study, comprised of single-ascending-dose, multiple-ascending-dose, and FE parts, were to characterize the safety and tolerability of SC0062, and FE. The secondary objectives were to determine the PK behavior of SC0062 and its major active metabolite M18, whereas exploratory objectives focused on PD effects, principally effects on endothelin-1 (ET-1) and total bile acids (TBA). Single doses of 10 to 100 mg and multiple daily doses of 20 and 50 mg for 6 days were well tolerated. SC0062 was rapidly absorbed and plasma exposure of SC0062 and M18 increased disproportionately with dose, achieving steady state by day 3, with accumulation ratios of 1.22 and 1.89 on day 6 for SC0062 and M18, respectively. The geometric mean (geometric standard deviation) terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 ) values of SC0062 and M18 were 7.25 (1.70) h and 13.73 (1.32) h, respectively. Plasma ET-1 concentrations were dose-proportional, whereas plasma TBA concentrations behaved erratically. Following a single 50 mg dose of SC0062 after a high-fat meal, Cmax values for SC0062 and M18 increased by 41% and 32%, respectively, and median Tmax values for SC0062 were 3 h longer than fasting values; exposure was unaffected. These favorable safety, PK, and PD results provide a foundation for further studies of SC0062 in pulmonary arterial hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and other relevant indications.

Selective ETA vs. dual ETA/B receptor blockade for the prevention of sunitinib-induced hypertension and albuminuria in WKY rats

AIMS

Although effective in preventing tumour growth, angiogenesis inhibitors cause off-target effects including cardiovascular toxicity and renal injury, most likely via endothelin (ET)-1 up-regulation. ET-1 via stimulation of the ETA receptor has pro-hypertensive actions whereas stimulation of the ETB receptor can elicit both pro- or anti-hypertensive effects. In this study, our aim was to determine the efficacy of selective ETA vs. dual ETA/B receptor blockade for the prevention of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and albuminuria.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Male Wistar Kyoto (WKY) rats were treated with vehicle, sunitinib (angiogenesis inhibitor; 14 mg/kg/day) alone or in combination with macitentan (ETA/B receptor antagonist; 30 mg/kg/day) or sitaxentan (selective ETA receptor antagonist; 30 or 100 mg/kg/day) for 8 days. Compared with vehicle, sunitinib treatment caused a rapid and sustained increase in mean arterial pressure of ∼25 mmHg. Co-treatment with macitentan or sitaxentan abolished the pressor response to sunitinib. Sunitinib did not induce endothelial dysfunction. However, it was associated with increased aortic, mesenteric, and renal oxidative stress, an effect that was absent in mesenteric arteries of the macitentan and sitaxentan co-treated groups. Albuminuria was greater in the sunitinib- than vehicle-treated group. Co-treatment with sitaxentan, but not macitentan, prevented this increase in albuminuria. Sunitinib treatment increased circulating and urinary prostacyclin levels and had no effect on thromboxane levels. These increases in prostacyclin were blunted by co-treatment with sitaxentan.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that both selective ETA and dual ETA/B receptor antagonism prevents sunitinib-induced hypertension, whereas sunitinib-induced albuminuria was only prevented by selective ETA receptor antagonism. In addition, our results uncover a role for prostacyclin in the development of these effects. In conclusion, selective ETA receptor antagonism is sufficient for the prevention of sunitinib-induced hypertension and renal injury.

Vascular actions of peripheral CGRP in migraine-like photophobia in mice

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide is recognized as a key player in migraine, yet the mechanisms and sites of calcitonin gene-related peptide action remain unknown. The efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide-blocking antibodies as preventative migraine drugs supports a peripheral site of action, such as the trigeminovasculature. Given the apparent disconnect between the importance of vasodilatory peptides in migraine and the prevailing opinion that vasodilation is an epiphenomenon, the goal of this study was to test whether vasodilation plays a role in calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced light aversive behavior in mice.

METHODS

Systemic mean arterial pressure and light aversive behavior were measured after intraperitoneal administration of calcitonin gene-related peptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide in wild-type CD1 mice. The functional significance of vasodilation was tested by co-administration of a vasoconstrictor (phenylephrine, endothelin-1, or caffeine) with calcitonin gene-related peptide to normalize blood pressure during the light aversion assay.

RESULTS

Both calcitonin gene-related peptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide induced light aversion that was associated with their effect on mean arterial pressure. Notably, vasoactive intestinal peptide caused relatively transient vasodilation and light aversion. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced light aversion was still observed even with normalized blood pressure. However, two of the agents, endothelin-1 and caffeine, did reduce the magnitude of light aversion.

CONCLUSION

We propose that perivascular calcitonin gene-related peptide causes light-aversive behavior in mice by both vasomotor and non-vasomotor mechanisms.

Blockade of Endothelin-1 Receptor Type B Ameliorates Glucose Intolerance and Insulin Resistance in a Mouse Model of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with insulin resistance (IR) and glucose intolerance. Elevated endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels have been observed in OSA patients and in mice exposed to intermittent hypoxia (IH). We examined whether pharmacological blockade of type A and type B ET-1 receptors (ETA and ETB) would ameliorate glucose intolerance and IR in mice exposed to IH. Subcutaneously implanted pumps delivered BQ-123 (ETA antagonist; 200 nmol/kg/day), BQ-788 (ETB antagonist; 200 nmol/kg/day) or vehicle (saline or propyleneglycol [PG]) for 14 days in C57BL6/J mice (10/group). During treatment, mice were exposed to IH (decreasing the FiO2 from 20.9% to 6%, 60/h) or intermittent air (IA). After IH or IA exposure, insulin (0.5 IU/kg) or glucose (1 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally and plasma glucose determined after injection and area under glucose curve (AUC) was calculated. Fourteen-day IH increased fasting glucose levels (122 ± 7 vs. 157 ± 8 mg/dL, PG: 118 ± 6 vs. 139 ± 8; both p < 0.05) and impaired glucose tolerance (AUCglucose: 19,249 ± 1105 vs. 29,124 ± 1444, PG AUCglucose: 18,066 ± 947 vs. 25,135 ± 797; both p < 0.05) in vehicle-treated animals. IH-induced impairments in glucose tolerance were partially ameliorated with BQ-788 treatment (AUCglucose: 21,969 ± 662; p < 0.05). Fourteen-day IH also induced IR (AUCglucose: 7185 ± 401 vs. 8699 ± 401; p < 0.05). Treatment with BQ-788 decreased IR under IA (AUCglucose: 5281 ± 401, p < 0.05) and reduced worsening of IR with IH (AUCglucose: 7302 ± 401, p < 0.05). There was no effect of BQ-123 on IH-induced impairments in glucose tolerance or IR. Our results suggest that ET-1 plays a role in IH-induced impairments in glucose homeostasis.

Relationship Between Atrasentan Concentrations and Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio in Western and Japanese Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy

PURPOSE

The objective of the current analyses was to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of atrasentan and the exposure-response relationships for the efficacy end point, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), and the treatment-emergent adverse event, peripheral edema, during 8 or 12 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

Results from 3 Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (N = 257) were used for the population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response models. Concentration-time and response data for efficacy and tolerability were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects population analysis and logistic regression approaches.

FINDINGS

The pharmacokinetic data were adequately described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. After weight was accounted for, no clinically meaningful differences were found in CL/F or V_d/F of the central compartment between Western and Japanese patients. Exposure-response analyses confirmed the efficacy of atrasentan in reducing UACR, with an estimated decrease in UACR of ≥37% when the atrasentan dose was 0.75 mg or higher. No significant association between atrasentan exposure and the rate of edema was identified at atrasentan doses of 0.5, 0.75, and 1.25 mg. The rates of peripheral edema were comparable in patients receiving active treatment and placebo.

IMPLICATIONS

The exposure-response relationships for efficacy and tolerability were consistent between Western and Japanese patients. On the basis of these analyses, a dose of 0.75 mg/d was selected for the Phase III trial. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01356849, NCT01399580, and NCT01424319.

The Association of Endothelin-1 Signaling with Bone Alkaline Phosphatase Expression and Protumorigenic Activities in Canine Osteosarcoma

Background

Canine osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive sarcoma characterized by pathologic skeletal resorption and pulmonary metastases. A number of negative prognostic factors, including bone alkaline phosphatase, have been identified in dogs with OS, but the underlying biologic factors responsible for such observations have not been thoroughly investigated. Endothelin‐1‐mediated signaling is active during bone repair, and is responsible for osteoblast migration, survival, proliferation, and bone alkaline phosphatase expression.

Hypothesis

The endothelin‐1 signaling axis is active in canine OS cells, and this pathway is utilized by malignant osteoblasts for promoting cellular migration, survival, proliferation, and bone alkaline phosphatase activities.

Animals

45 dogs with appendicular OS.

Methods

The expressions of endothelin‐1 and endothelin A receptor were studied in OS cell lines and in samples from spontaneously occurring tumors. Activities mediated by endothelin‐1 signaling were investigated by characterizing responses in 3 OS cell lines. In 45 dogs with OS, bone alkaline phosphatase concentrations were correlated with primary tumor osteoproductivity.

Results

Canine OS cells express endothelin‐1 and endothelin A receptor, and this signaling axis mediates OS migration, survival, proliferation, and bone alkaline phosphatase activities. In OS‐bearing dogs, circulating bone alkaline phosphatase activities were positively correlated with primary tumor relative bone mineral densities.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Canine OS cells express endothelin‐1 and functional endothelin A receptors, with the potential for a protumorigenic signaling loop. Increases in bone alkaline phosphatase activity are associated with osteoblastic OS lesions, and might be an epiphenomenon of active endothelin‐1 signaling or excessive osteoproduction within the localized bone microenvironment.

Plasma pro-endothelin-1 peptide concentrations rise in chronic kidney disease and following selective endothelin A receptor antagonism

Background

Endothelin 1 (ET‐1) contributes to chronic kidney disease (CKD) development and progression, and endothelin receptor antagonists are being investigated as a novel therapy for CKD. The proET‐1 peptides, endothelin‐like domain peptide (ELDP) and C‐terminal pro‐ET‐1 (CT‐proET‐1), are both potential biomarkers of CKD and response to therapy with endothelin antagonists.

Methods and Results

We assessed plasma and urine ELDP and plasma CT‐proET‐1 in CKD patients with minimal comorbidity. Next, in a randomized double‐blind crossover study of 27 subjects with proteinuric CKD, we examined the effects of 6 weeks of treatment with placebo, sitaxentan (endothelin A antagonist), and nifedipine on these peptides alongside the primary end points of proteinuria, blood pressure, and arterial stiffness. Plasma ELDP and CT‐proET‐1 increased with CKD stage (both P<0.0001), correlating inversely with estimated glomerular filtration rate (both P<0.0001). Following intervention, placebo and nifedipine did not affect plasma and urine ELDP or plasma CT‐proET‐1. Sitaxentan increased both plasma ELDP and CT‐proET‐1 (baseline versus week 6±SEM: ELDP, 11.8±0.5 versus 13.4±0.6 fmol/mL; CT‐proET‐1, 20.5±1.2 versus 23.3±1.5 fmol/mL; both P<0.0001). Plasma ET‐1 was unaffected by any treatment. Following sitaxentan, plasma ELDP and CT‐proET‐1 correlated negatively with 24‐hour urinary sodium excretion.

Conclusions

ELDP and CT‐proET‐1 increase in CKD and thus are potentially useful biomarkers of renal injury. Increases in response to endothelin A antagonism may reflect EDN1 upregulation, which may partly explain fluid retention with these agents.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: www.clinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT00810732

Clinical pharmacology of an atrasentan and docetaxel regimen in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to evaluate potential pharmacokinetic interactions between docetaxel and atrasentan as part of a phase I/II clinical trial.

METHODS

Patients with prostate cancer were treated with intravenous docetaxel (60-75 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks and oral atrasentan (10 mg) daily starting on day 3 of cycle 1 and then given continuously. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs were evaluated individually (cycle 1, day 1 for docetaxel; day 21 for atrasentan) and in combination (cycle 2, day 1 for both drugs). Pharmacogenomics of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) were also explored.

RESULTS

Paired pharmacokinetic data sets for both drugs were evaluable in 21 patients. Atrasentan was rapidly absorbed and plasma concentrations varied over a fourfold range at steady state within a typical patient. The median apparent oral clearance of atrasentan was 17.4 L/h in cycle 1 and was not affected by docetaxel administration (p = 0.9). Median systemic clearance of docetaxel was 51.1 L/h on the first cycle and significantly slower (p = 0.01) compared with that obtained during co-administration of atrasentan, 61.6 L/h. Docetaxel systemic clearance in cycle 1 was 70.0 L/h in patients homozygous for a variant allele in AAG compared with 44.5 L/h in those with at least one wild-type allele (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Genetic polymorphism in AAG may explain some inter-patient variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics. The systemic clearance of docetaxel is increased by approximately 21 % when given concomitantly with atrasentan; however, atrasentan pharmacokinetics does not appear to be influenced by docetaxel administration.

The endothelin axis in urologic tumors: mechanisms of tumor biology and therapeutic implications

Endothelin (ET)-1 and its receptors ET-A and ET-B, referred to commonly as the endothelin axis, have been identified in various human cancers, especially gynecologic tumors, such as breast cancer or ovarian cancer, but also including urologic tumor entities. They play a key role in tumor growth and progression by influencing critical cancer pathways, such as apoptosis, angiogenesis and proliferation. In prostate cancer, overexpression of the ET-A receptor increases with tumor progression, and clinical trials with selective ET-A receptor antagonists, such as atrasentan (ABT-627), have shown promising early results. In preclinical models of bladder cancer, overexpression of the ET axis has been demonstrated and ET-targeting agents are under investigation. This paper reviews the role of the ET axis in human cancers and focuses on preclinical and clinical studies in urologic tumor entities to further define the role of ET-targeting agents as targeted molecular therapy.

Novel targeted agents on the horizon for castration-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation treatment in prostate cancer patients is well established; however, resistance to such treatment manifests itself by progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Despite significant advances in treatment options for patients with CRPC, their prognosis remains poor. Resistance results from multiple processes that facilitate cancer cell growth and survival. Mechanisms underlying the shift to castrate resistance have been attributed to a complex interplay of clonal selection, reactivation of the androgen receptor axis despite castrate levels of serum testosterone, stress-induced prosurvival genes and cytoprotective chaperone networks and alternative mitogenic growth factor pathways. This article discusses several pathways involved in the development of CRPC, with a particular focus on those mechanisms that have led to the development of new targeted therapies.

Atrasentan (ABT-627) enhances perfusion and reduces hypoxia in a human tumor xenograft model

The endothelin-1 antagonist, Atrasentan (ABT-627) was used to modify perfusion in the human tumor xenograft model, HT29, growing in nude mice. Atrasentan produced a significant increase in perfusion, as measured in vivo by Gd-DTPA DCE-MRI. Changes in tumor hypoxia were assessed by comparing the binding of two hypoxia tracers, pimonidazole and EF5 given before and after Atrasentan administration. In vehicle-treated controls, the distribution of EF5 and pimonidazole was very similar. However, Atrasentan treatment was associated with decreased uptake of the second hypoxia tracer (EF5), relative to the first (pimonidazole). Although Atrasentan had no independent effect on the growth of HT29 tumors, Atrasentan combined with 20 Gy radiation led to a modest but significant increase in tumor growth delay compared to radiation alone.

Endothelin antagonism in portal hypertensive mice: implications for endothelin receptor-specific signaling in liver disease

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoactive peptide, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of liver disease and portal hypertension. Two major endothelin receptors (ET-A and ET-B) mediate biological effects, largely on the basis of their known downstream signaling pathways. We hypothesized that the different receptors are likely to mediate divergent effects in portal hypertensive mice. Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis and portal hypertension were induced in 8-wk-old male BALB/c mice by gavage with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). Portal pressure was recorded acutely during intravenous infusion of endothelin receptor antagonists in normal or portal hypertensive mice. In vivo microscopy was used to monitor sinusoidal dynamics. Additionally, the effect of chronic exposure to endothelin antagonists was assessed in mice during induction of fibrosis and cirrhosis with CCl4 for 8 wk. Intravenous infusion of ET-A receptor antagonists into normal and cirrhotic mice reduced portal pressure whereas ET-B receptor antagonism increased portal pressure. A mixed endothelin receptor antagonist also significantly reduced portal pressure. Additionally, the ET-A receptor antagonist caused sinusoidal dilation, whereas the ET-B receptor antagonist caused sinusoidal constriction. Chronic administration of each the endothelin receptor antagonists during the induction of fibrosis and portal hypertension led to reduced fibrosis, a significant reduction in portal pressure, and altered sinusoidal dynamics relative to controls. Acute effects of endothelin receptor antagonists are likely directly on the hepatic and sinusoidal vasculature, whereas chronic endothelin receptor antagonism appears to be more complicated, likely affecting fibrogenesis and the hepatic microcirculation. The data imply a relationship between hepatic fibrogenesis or fibrosis and vasomotor responses.

The science of endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor antagonists in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: current understanding and future studies

Pathological vascular remodelling is a key contributor to the symptomatology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and reversing this process may offer the best hope for improving this debilitating condition. The vascular remodelling process is believed to be due to endothelial cell dysfunction and to involve altered production of endothelial cell-derived vasoactive mediators. The observation that circulating plasma levels of the vasoactive peptide endothelin (ET)-1 are raised in patients with PAH, and that ET-1 production is increased in the pulmonary tissue of affected individuals, makes it a particularly interesting target for a therapeutic intervention in PAH. Clinical trials with ET receptor antagonists (ETRAs) show that they provide symptomatic benefit in patients with PAH, thereby proving the clinical relevance of the ET system as a therapeutic target. In this paper, we review the role of ET-1 together with the available data on the roles of the specific ET receptors and ETRAs in PAH. In particular, we discuss the possible role of ET receptor selectivity in the vascular remodelling process in PAH and whether selective ET(A) or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) blockade offers the greatest potential to improve symptoms and alter the clinical course of the disease.

Efficacy and safety of atrasentan in patients with cardiovascular risk and early atherosclerosis

Endothelin plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and hemodynamic and metabolic responses to 6 months treatment with atrasentan, the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist. Seventy-two patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and nonobstructive coronary artery disease on coronary angiogram were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to atrasentan or placebo. Mean aortic blood pressure decreased from 92+/-10 to 80+/-10 mm Hg (P<0.001) in the atrasentan group and did not change in the placebo group (93+/-10 and 92+/-11 mm Hg; P=0.84). The difference between the groups was significant (P<0.001). No effect on heart rate was observed. In a subgroup of patients not treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, creatinine level decreased in the atrasentan versus the placebo group (P=0.011). Fasting glucose (P=0.026), glycosylated hemoglobin level (P=0.041), triglyceride l (P=0.013), lipoprotein-A (P=0.046), and uric acid levels (P=0.048) decreased significantly in the atrasentan group compared with the placebo group. No progression of angiographic coronary disease was observed. The most common adverse effects with atrasentan were nasal stuffiness, headache, and edema. In conclusion, 6 months of treatment with atrasentan results in a reduction of blood pressure and improvement in glucose and lipid metabolism. These findings suggest the beneficial role of atrasentan in the treatment of hypertension and metabolic syndrome.

Tumor-evoked sensitization of C nociceptors: a role for endothelin

Primary and metastatic cancers that effect bone are frequently associated with pain. Sensitization of primary afferent C nociceptors innervating tissue near the tumor likely contributes to the chronic pain and hyperalgesia accompanying this condition. This study focused on the role of the endogenous peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) as a potential peripheral algogen implicated in the process of cancer pain. Electrophysiological response properties, including ongoing activity and responses evoked by heat stimuli, of C nociceptors were recorded in vivo from the tibial nerve in anesthetized control mice and mice exhibiting mechanical hyperalgesia following implantation of fibrosarcoma cells into and around the calcaneus bone. ET-1 (100 microM) injected into the receptive fields of C nociceptors innervating the plantar surface of the hind paw evoked an increase in ongoing activity in both control and tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, the selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (3 mM), attenuated tumor-evoked ongoing activity in tumor-bearing mice. Whereas ET-1 produced sensitization of C nociceptors to heat stimuli in control mice, C nociceptors in tumor-bearing mice were sensitized to heat, and their responses were not further increased by ET-1. Importantly, administration of BQ-123 attenuated tumor-evoked sensitization of C nociceptors to heat. We conclude that ET-1 at the tumor site contributes to tumor-evoked excitation and sensitization of C nociceptors through an ETA receptor mediated mechanism.

ETA-receptor blockade impairs vasoconstriction after hemorrhage in xenon-anesthetized dogs treated with an AT1-receptor antagonist

The effects of endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) blockade on hemodynamics and hormonal adaptation during hemorrhage were studied in xenon/remifentanil-anesthetized dogs (n=6) pretreated with an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)-receptor blocker.

CONTROLS

after a baseline awake period, anesthesia was induced in the dogs with propofol and maintained with xenon/remifentanil (baseline anesthesia). Sixty minutes later, 20 mL x kg(-1) of blood was withdrawn within 5 min and the dogs observed for another hour (hemorrhage). AT1 group followed the same protocol as controls except the AT1-receptor blocker losartan (i.v. 100 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was started at the beginning of the experiment. AT1+ETA group was the same as AT1 group but with the addition of the ETA-receptor blocker atrasentan (i.v. 1 mg x kg(-1), then 0.01 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). In controls, mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained unchanged during baseline anesthesia, whereas systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased from 3282+/-281 to 7321+/-803 dyn.s.cm-5, heart rate (HR) decreased from 86+/-4 to 40+/-3 beats x min(-1), and cardiac output (CO) decreased from 2.3+/-0.2 to 0.9+/-0.1 L x min(-1) (p<0.05), with no further changes after hemorrhage. In AT1-inhibited dogs, MAP (71+/-6 mm Hg) and SVR (5939+/-611 dyn x s x cm(-5)) were lower during baseline anesthesia and after hemorrhage, but greater than those in AT1+ETA (66+/-7 mm Hg, 5034+/-658 dyn x s x cm(-5)) (p<0.05). HR and CO were not different between groups. Plasma concentration of vasopressin was highest with AT1+ETA inhibition after hemorrhage. Combined AT1+ETA-receptor blockade impaired vasoconstriction more than did AT1-receptor blockade alone, both during baseline xenon anesthesia and after hemorrhage. Even a large increase in vasoconstrictor hormones could not prevent the decrease in blood pressure and the smaller increase in SVR. Thus, endothelin is an important vasoconstrictor during hemorrhage, and both endothelin and angiotensin II are essential hormones for cardiovascular stabilization after hemorrhage.

Phase I safety study of escalating doses of atrasentan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma

Atrasentan is an oral selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist that may inhibit cell proliferation and interfere with angiogenesis during glioma growth. We conducted a dose-finding study to assess atrasentan's safety and toxicity and to gather preliminary evidence of efficacy. Patients with recurrent malignant glioma received oral atrasentan at >or=10 mg/day. We increased the dose among cohorts until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Patients were evaluated for response every 8 weeks and remained on the study until the tumor progressed or toxicities occurred. Twenty-five patients were enrolled, with a median age of 53 years (range, 25-70) and a median KPS of 90% (range, 60-100%). Twenty-two patients had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), 2 had anaplastic astrocytoma, and 1 had an anaplastic oliogodendroglioma; 24 patients had received one prior chemo therapy regimen before being enrolled in the study. The most common atrasentan-related toxicities were grade 1 or 2 rhinitis, fatigue, and edema. One patient developed grade 3 hypoxia and peripheral edema at a dose of 90 mg/day. We observed no dose-limiting toxicities in an expanded cohort of 10 patients at 70 mg/day, which was declared the MTD. Two partial responses (8%) were seen in patients with GBM at the 70- and 90-mg/day dose levels, and 4 patients had stable disease before progressing. Nineteen patients have died, and median survival was 6.0 months (95% confidence interval, 4.2-9.5 months). We conclude that the MTD of daily oral atrasentan in patients with recurrent malignant glioma is 70 mg/day. Further study of atrasentan with radiation therapy and temozolomide in newly diagnosed GBM is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this novel agent.

Nonclassic Endogenous Novel Regulators of Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, the process through which new blood vessels arise from preexisting ones, is regulated by several "classic" factors, among which the most studied are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). In recent years, investigations showed that, in addition to the classic factors, numerous endogenous peptides play a relevant regulatory role in angiogenesis. Such regulatory peptides, each of which exerts well-known specific biological activities, are present, along with their receptors, in the blood vessels and may take part in the control of the "angiogenic switch." An in vivo and in vitro proangiogenic effect has been demonstrated for erythropoietin, angiotensin II (ANG-II), endothelins (ETs), adrenomedullin (AM), proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP), urotensin-II, leptin, adiponectin, resistin, neuropeptide-Y, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), and substance P. There is evidence that the angiogenic action of some of these peptides is at least partly mediated by their stimulating effect on VEGF (ANG-II, ETs, PAMP, resistin, VIP and PACAP) and/or FGF-2 systems (PAMP and leptin). AM raises the expression of VEGF in endothelial cells, but VEGF blockade does not affect the proangiogenic action of AM. Other endogenous peptides have been reported to exert an in vivo and in vitro antiangiogenic action. These include somatostatin and natriuretic peptides, which suppress the VEGF system, and ghrelin, that antagonizes FGF-2 effects. Investigations on "nonclassic" regulators of angiogenesis could open new perspectives in the therapy of diseases coupled to dysregulation of angiogenesis.

In vitro and in vivo molecular evidence for better therapeutic efficacy of ABT-627 and taxotere combination in prostate cancer

Bone is the key metastatic site for prostate cancer. Endothelin 1 (ET-1) produced abundantly by prostate cancer cells binds to its receptor present on bone marrow stromal cells and favors osteoblastic response during bone metastases of prostate cancer. This suggests that interrupting ET-1 interaction with its endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor could be useful for inhibiting prostate cancer bone metastasis and, as such, may enhance the therapeutic activity of docetaxel (Taxotere), the most commonly used drug for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Therefore, the goal of our study was to obtain preclinical data supporting our hypothesis that the combined use of ET(A) receptor antagonist (ABT-627; Atrasentan) with Taxotere will be superior in inducing apoptosis in vitro and inhibiting tumor growth in vivo in a SCID-hu model of experimental bone metastasis induced by C4-2b prostate cancer cells. In vitro studies were done on a panel of prostate cancer cell lines to understand the molecular basis of combination therapy, and we found that the combination was more effective in the inhibition of cell viability and induction of apoptosis in LNCaP and C4-2b cells (androgen receptor positive) but not in PC-3 cells. These results were correlated with inactivation of Akt/nuclear factor-kappaB and its target genes. For in vivo studies, the therapeutic regimen was initiated when the tumor began showing signs of growth and treatment was continued for 5 weeks. Tumor volume and serum prostate-specific antigen were used as terminal index to evaluate the therapeutic advantage of combination therapy relative to a single regimen and untreated control. At termination, we found a 90% reduction in tumor volume by combination treatment relative to the untreated control group. Most importantly, the antitumor activity was associated with the down-regulation of molecular markers in tumor tissues that were similar to those observed in vitro.

Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease

First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.

Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease

First identified as a powerful vasoconstrictor, endothelin has an extremely diverse set of actions that influence homeostatic mechanisms throughout the body. Two receptor subtypes, ET(A) and ET(B), which usually have opposing actions, mediate the actions of endothelin. ET(A) receptors function to promote vasoconstriction, growth, and inflammation, whereas ET(B) receptors produce vasodilation, increases in sodium excretion, and inhibit growth and inflammation. Potent and selective receptor antagonists have been developed and have shown promising results in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, acute and chronic heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, and atherosclerosis. However, results are often contradictory and complicated because of the tissue-specific vasoconstrictor actions of ET(B) receptors and the fact that endothelin is an autocrine and paracrine factor whose activity is difficult to measure in vivo. Considerable questions remain regarding whether ET(A)-selective or nonselective ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists would be useful in a range of clinical settings.

Therapeutic targeting of the endothelin a receptor in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The endothelin A receptor (ET(A)R) autocrine pathway is overexpressed in many malignancies, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this tumor, ET(A)R expression is an independent determinant of survival and a robust independent predictor of distant metastasis. To evaluate whether ET(A)R represents a new target in NPC treatment, we tested the therapeutic role of ET(A)R in NPC. Cell proliferation was inhibited by the ET(A)R-selective antagonist ABT-627 in two ET(A)R-positive NPC cells in a dose-dependent manner. Proliferation of ET(A)R-negative NPC cells was not decreased. ET(A)R blockade also resulted in sensitization to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-induced apoptosis. In nude mice, ABT-627 inhibited the growth of NPC cell xenografts. Combined treatment of ABT-627 with the cytotoxic drug cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil produced additive antitumor effects. The antitumor activity of ABT-627 was demonstrated finally on an experimental lung metastasis by a reduction in the number of tumors. These results support the rationale of combining ABT-627 with current standard chemotherapy to further improve the therapeutic ratio in the treatment of NPC.

Endothelin receptor A blockade enhances taxane effects in prostate cancer

Endothelin (ET) 1 is important in the growth of prostate cancer cells through the activation of the endothelin A (ET(A)) receptor. ET receptor blockade is a new therapeutic target in treating advanced prostate cancer. This study investigates the impact of the combination of the ET(A) antagonist atrasentan (ABT-627) and taxane chemotherapy on prostate cancer cell survival in vitro and on the delay of prostate cancer in a xenograft mouse model. In vitro, PPC-1 cells transfected with an ET(A)-overexpressing vector were treated with ABT-627, paclitaxel/docetaxel, or both. Clonogenic viability and cell death assays were used to determine cell survival and apoptosis, respectively. ABT-627 and docetaxel combination treatment was used in vivo to treat mice with established ET(A)-overexpressing PPC-1 xenograft tumors, and tumor growth rates were assessed. Cell proliferation and vascularity were determined with Ki-67 and CD31 staining, respectively. Cells treated with combination therapy had significantly fewer viable cells and more programmed cell death than cells given monotherapy. Xenograft tumor growth rates were significantly lower in mice treated with combination therapy than in animals given a single agent. Ki-67 immunostaining demonstrated significantly fewer proliferative cells following combination therapy than following monotherapy. This study demonstrates ABT-627 to have additive antitumor effects when used in combination with taxane drugs both in vitro and in vivo.

Endothelin receptor antagonists

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed to block the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in a variety of cardiovascular conditions. ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor with mitogenic or co-mitogenic properties, which acts through the stimulation of 2 subtypes of receptors [endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) and endothelin receptor subtype B (ETB) receptors]. Endogenous ET-1 is involved in a variety of conditions including systemic and pulmonary hypertension (PH), congestive heart failure (CHF), vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, cancer, and cerebrovascular disease. The first dual ETA/ETB receptor blocker, bosentan, has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trials of endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure have been completed with mixed results so far. Studies are ongoing on the effects of selective ETA antagonists or dual ETA/ETB antagonists in lung fibrosis, cancer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. While non-peptidic ET-1 receptor antagonists suitable for oral intake with excellent bioavailability have become available, proven efficacy is limited to pulmonary hypertension, but it is possible that these agents might find a place in the treatment of several cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases in the coming future.

Reproducibility of forearm vasodilator response to intra-arterial infusion of calcitonin gene-related peptide assessed by venous occlusion plethysmography

AIMS

To assess the reproducibility of the forearm blood flow (FBF) response to intra-arterial infusion of calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP), measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. In addition, to compare different ways of expressing the FBF response and perform sample size calculations.

METHODS

On two separate visits, CGRP (10 ng min(-1) dl(-1) forearm) was infused for 45 min into the brachial artery of six healthy subjects. Reproducibility was assessed by calculating mean difference, repeatability coefficient, within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) and intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

CGRP increased FBF from 2.8 +/- 0.4 and 3.2 +/- 0.7 (at baseline) to 15.4 +/- 1.4 and 15.2 +/- 1.5 ml min(-1) dl(-1) forearm (at 45 min) on visits 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both visits). Mean difference in FBF at 45 min between both visits was 0.3 ml min(-1) dl(-1) forearm (repeatability coefficient: 4.1 ml min(-1) dl(-1) forearm). This FBF response appeared to be more reproducible when expressed as absolute FBF in the infused arm (WCV 11%) compared with absolute FBF-ratio between both arms (WCV 37%), percentage change from baseline in FBF in the infused arm (WCV 29%) and percentage change from baseline in FBF-ratio (WCV 40%). When expressed as absolute FBF, a sample size of five (95% confidence interval: 2-12) subjects gives 90% power at a type I error probability of 0.05 to detect a 25% shift in FBF response.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-arterial infusion of CGRP results in a forearm vasodilator response which is reproducible between days. This response is most reproducible when expressed as absolute FBF. The presented methodology provides a suitable pharmacodynamic model to assess the in vivo activity of CGRP-receptor antagonists in a small number of subjects.

Endothelin receptor antagonists

Hormone refractory prostate cancer remains true to its middle name: it is largely refractory to attempts to delay its progression. New targets and new therapies are demanded. Through a review of the available literature on endothelin and several preclinical observations, the endothelin axis has emerged as one such target. In phase II and III clinical trials of atrasentan, a potent and selective endothelin receptor A subtype (ET(A)) antagonist, disease progression was delayed in some men. This well tolerated, oral agent may help convert advanced prostate cancer to a more chronic disease. This review will discuss the endothelin axis, preclinical rationale and some of the available clinical trial data on this promising new approach.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the ETA-selective endothelin receptor antagonist SPP301 in healthy human subjects

SPP301 is a competitive antagonist of ET-1 with a high selectivity for the ETA receptor. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SPP301 after single oral doses in male healthy subjects; doses of 5, 20, 50, 100, and 200 mg were given to different groups of 4 or 8 subjects each. The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of SPP301 was assessed for the 50-mg dose according to a sequential design in the same subjects. At regular intervals, blood pressure and pulse rate, plasma levels of ET-1 and of SPP301 and its hydroxymethyl metabolite, and urinary excretion of the parent drug and its metabolite were determined. SPP301 was generally well tolerated. At doses >20 mg, adverse events that are typical for vasodilating agents-namely, headache, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, and postural hypotension-were observed. Maximum plasma levels of SPP301 were reached within 4.5 hours. Cmax and AUC values increased linearly with doses up to 100 mg. The apparent terminal half-life was quite constant over the whole dose range and ranged from 7.5 to 15.2 hours. Urinary excretion of SPP301 was below 0.1% of any dose. Cmax and AUC of the metabolite amounted only to about 5% of the values for SPP301. Concomitant food intake had no effect on the overall exposure but increased average peak plasma concentrations of SPP301 by around 50%. Plasma ET-1 increased nearly twofold at the 5-mg SPP301 dose, with no further relevant increase at higher doses. In conclusion, SPP301 is an active ET-1 antagonist and is well tolerated. The pharmacokinetics of the drug and its metabolite are linear up to 100 mg. Food does not affect overall exposure of SPP301 but increases Cmax. Urinary excretion of SPP301 is below 0.1% of the dose administered.

Effect of angiotensin II and endothelin-1 receptor blockade on the haemodynamic and hormonal changes after acute blood loss and after retransfusion in conscious dogs

AIM

This study investigates angiotensin II and endothelin-1 mediated mechanisms involved in the haemodynamic, hormonal, and renal response towards acute hypotensive haemorrhage.

METHODS

Conscious dogs were pre-treated with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) and/or endothelin-A (ETA) receptor blockers or not. Protocol 1: After a 60-min baseline period, 25% of the dog's blood was rapidly withdrawn. The blood was retransfused 60 min later and data recorded for another hour. Protocol 2: Likewise, but preceded by AT1 blockade with i.v. Losartan. Protocol 3: Likewise, but preceded by ETA blockade with i.v. ABT-627. Protocol 4: Likewise, but with combined AT1 plus ETA blockade.

RESULTS

In controls, haemorrhage decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP) by approximately 25%, cardiac output by approximately 40%, and urine volume by approximately 60%, increased angiotensin II (3.1-fold), endothelin-1 (1.13-fold), vasopressin (116-fold), and adrenaline concentrations (3.2-fold). Glomerular filtration rate and noradrenaline concentrations remained unchanged. During AT1 blockade, the MAP decrease was exaggerated (-40%) and glomerular filtration rate fell. During ETA blockade, noradrenaline increased after haemorrhage instead of adrenaline, and the MAP recovery after retransfusion was blunted. The decrease in cardiac output was similar in all protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin II is more important than endothelin-1 for the short-term regulation of MAP and glomerular filtration rate after haemorrhage, whereas endothelin-1 seems necessary for complete MAP recovery after retransfusion. After haemorrhage, endothelin-1 seems to facilitate adrenaline release and to blunt noradrenaline release. Haemorrhage-induced compensatory mechanisms maintain blood flow more effectively than blood pressure, as the decrease in cardiac output--but not MAP--was similar in all protocols.

Endothelin type A receptor antagonism restores myocardial perfusion response to adenosine in experimental hypercholesterolemia

Experimental hypercholesterolemia is characterized by increased endothelin-1 (ET-1) activity and is associated with an attenuated myocardial perfusion response and an inappropriate increase in coronary microvascular permeability during episodes of increased myocardial demand. This study was designed to determine the effect of chronic selective ET type A (ET(A)) receptor antagonism on coronary vascular response to simulated cardiac stress in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Twenty-one pigs were randomized to three groups: normal diet (N), high-cholesterol diet (HC), and HC diet plus ABT-627, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, (HC+ABT-627). After 12 weeks, cardiac electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) was performed before and during intravenous infusion of adenosine, and myocardial perfusion (ml/min per g) and coronary microvascular permeability index (arbitrary units) were calculated. Basal myocardial perfusion was similar in all groups (N: 0.91+/-0.10; HC: 0.95+/-0.08; HC+ABT-627: 1.03+/-0.09; P=0.64). Adenosine infusion led to a significant increase in myocardial perfusion in the N (1.32+/-0.15; P<0.001) but not in the HC (0.95+/-0.07) group. However, in the HC+ABT-627 group, adenosine also significantly increased myocardial perfusion (1.33+/-0.12; P=0.001). Basal permeability index did not differ between the groups (N: 1.56+/-0.13; HC: 1.34+/-0.19; HC+ABT-627: 1.62+/-0.10; P=0.38). Adenosine infusion significantly increased permeability index in HC pigs (2.29+/-0.22; P<0.001) but not in N (1.71+/-0.21) and HC+ABT-627 (1.82+/-0.08) pigs. We conclude that chronic selective ET(A) receptor antagonism preserves myocardial perfusion response and coronary microvascular integrity during episodes of increased myocardial demand in experimental hypercholesterolemia, indicating an important role for the endogenous endothelin system in this disorder.

Role of endothelin in human hypertension

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a pleiotropic hormone produced primarily by the endothelium. Synthesis of ET-1 is stimulated by the major signals of cardiovascular stress, such as vasoactive agents (angiotensin II, norepinephrine, vasopressin, and bradykinin), cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor alpha and transforming growth factor beta), and other factors, including thrombin and mechanical stress. ET-1 induces vasoconstriction, is proinflammatory, promotes fibrosis, and has mitogenic potential, important factors in the regulation of vascular tone, arterial remodeling, and vascular injury. These effects are mediated via two receptor types, ETA and ETB. The role ET-1 plays in normal cardiovascular homeostasis and in mild essential hypertension in humans is unclear. However, certain groups of essential hypertensive patients may have ET-1-dependent hypertension, including blacks (subjects of African descent), salt-sensitive hypertensives, patients with low renin hypertension, and those with obesity and insulin resistance. ET-1 has also been implicated in severe hypertension, heart failure, atherosclerosis, and pulmonary hypertension. In all of these conditions, plasma immunoreactive ET levels are elevated and tissue ET-1 expression is increased. Accordingly, it is becoming increasingly apparent that ET-1 plays an important role in cardiovascular disease and in some forms of hypertension in humans. Data from clinical trials using combined ETA-ETB receptor blockers have already demonstrated significant blood-pressure-lowering effects. Thus, targeting the endothelin system may have important therapeutic potential in the treatment of hypertension, particularly by contributing to the prevention of target organ damage and the management of cardiovascular disease.

Emerging role of endothelin-1 in tumor angiogenesis

Tumor vessels express distinct molecular markers that are functionally relevant in the angiogenic process. Although tyrosine kinase receptor agonists are the major mediators of angiogenesis, several G-protein-coupled receptor agonists have also been shown to have a role. Among these, endothelin-1 (ET-1), by acting directly on endothelial cells via the ET(B) receptor, modulates different stages of neovascularization, including proliferation, migration, invasion, protease production and morphogenesis, and also stimulates neovascularization in vivo. ET-1 can also modulate tumor angiogenesis indirectly through the induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Engagement of the ET(A) receptor by ET-1 induces VEGF production by increasing levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Moreover, tumor cells themselves, predominantly expressing the ET(A) receptor, might form vessel-like channels within the tumors. The role of ET-1 and its signaling network in tumor angiogenesis suggests that new therapeutic strategies using specific ET(A)-receptor antagonists could improve antitumor treatment by inhibiting both neovascularization and tumor cell growth.

Entry-into-humans study with tezosentan, an intravenous dual endothelin receptor antagonist

The purpose of this study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ascending doses of tezosentan, an IV dual endothelin receptor antagonist, during first administration in humans. Tezosentan infused at doses of 5, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 mg for 1 h was administered to sequential groups of six male subjects in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design. Recording of vital signs, electrocardiogram, adverse events, and clinical laboratory parameters monitored tolerability and safety. Blood samples were collected frequently for pharmacokinetic determinations and measurement of plasma endothelin-1 concentrations. Tezosentan was well tolerated at all dose levels. Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event and occurred at a higher incidence than with placebo at doses of > or = 100 mg. No clinically relevant changes in vital signs, electrocardiographic, or clinical laboratory parameters occurred. Plasma concentrations of tezosentan rapidly approached steady state and could be described by a two-compartment model. The volume of distribution at steady state (approximately 16 l) and the clearance (approximately 30 l/h) were considered independent of dose, in view of the wide dose range explored. A pronounced and rapid disposition phase (half-life 6 min), accounting for the major part of the elimination, was followed by a slower phase (half-life 3 h), probably caused by distribution from tissues. Endothelin-1 concentrations increased in a dose- and concentration-dependent fashion and returned slowly to baseline after termination of the infusion. Tezosentan warrants further clinical development in view of its tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile, which appears advantageous for application in emergency situations.

Atrasentan, an endothelin-receptor antagonist for refractory adenocarcinomas: safety and pharmacokinetics

PURPOSE

Endothelin receptors, particularly the ET(A) receptor, have been shown to participate in the pathophysiology of prostate and other cancers. Atrasentan, an endothelin antagonist, binds selectively to the ET(A) receptor. This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and maximum-tolerated dose of atrasentan in cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who were 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma refractory to therapy enrolled in this 28-day, open-label, phase I study. Enrollment was planned for cohorts of three patients at doses escalating from 10 to 140 mg/d. When any patient had dose-limiting toxicity, that cohort was expanded. The primary outcome variable was safety; secondary outcome variables were pharmacokinetics, tumor response, and pain relief.

RESULTS

Thirty-one cancer patients (14 prostate) were treated at daily atrasentan doses of 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 75 mg (n = 3 to 8 per cohort). The most common adverse events, such as rhinitis, headache, asthenia, and peripheral edema, were reversible on drug discontinuation and responded to symptom-specific treatment. Reversible hemodilution was apparent in laboratory findings and weight gain. Clinically significant headache was the dose-limiting adverse event; the maximum-tolerated dose was 60 mg/d. Pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional across the 10- to 75-mg dose range. Atrasentan was rapidly absorbed; the time to maximum observed concentration was approximately 1.5 hours. The terminal elimination half-life was approximately 24 hours, and steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved within 7 days. Decreases in prostate-specific antigen and pain relief were noted in a patient subset.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events were consistent with atrasentan's pharmacologic vasodilatory effect. Linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics suggest that atrasentan can be easily and consistently dosed.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tezosentan, an intravenous dual endothelin receptor antagonist, following chronic infusion in healthy subjects

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tezosentan, an intravenous dual endothelin receptor antagonist, during chronic infusions in healthy male subjects.

METHODS

Tezosentan was infused at a rate of 100 mg h(-1) for 6 h (study A, six subjects) and at a rate of 5 mg h(-1) for 72 h (study B, eight subjects). Both studies had a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design. Tolerability and safety were monitored by the recording of vital signs, ECG, adverse events and clinical laboratory parameters. Blood samples were collected frequently for pharmacokinetic determinations and measurement of plasma endothelin-1 concentrations.

RESULTS

In both studies tezosentan was well tolerated with headache the most frequently reported adverse event (incidence of 75-100% for tezosentan and 50% for placebo). Plasma concentrations of tezosentan rapidly approached steady state (3000 and 125 ng ml(-1) in study A and B, respectively) and did not change upon prolonged infusion. A two-compartment model could describe its pharmacokinetic profile. The half-lives of the two disposition phases were approximately 0.10 and 3.2 h. Endothelin-1 concentrations increased rapidly 11- and 2-fold compared with pre-dose values in study A and B, respectively, during infusion of tezosentan and did not change during the 72 h infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these results, dose finding studies with tezosentan in acute heart failure can be initiated in the dose range 5-100 mg h(-1).

Renal hemodynamic control by endothelin and nitric oxide under angiotensin II blockade in man

To investigate whether endothelin-A receptors and nitric oxide modulate renal hemodynamics in man under angiotensin II receptor-1 blockade, 6 healthy volunteers, on a 240 mmol Na diet, underwent 4 separate renal hemodynamic measurements, in 3 of which endothelin-A blocker BQ-123 0.2 nmol.kg.min(-1) was infused for 90 minutes after pretreatment with either placebo, telmisartan 1 mg.kg center dot day(-1) for 3 days, or telmisartan as well, but with co-infusion of both BQ-123 and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methylester 0.5 microg.kg center dot min(-1). A fourth infusion was made with N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methylester alone. No change followed infusion of either N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methylester alone or BQ-123 alone. With BQ-123 after telmisartan, renal blood flow rose from 916 +/- 56 mL center dot min(-1) center dot 1.73 m(2) to 1047 +/- 51.2 (P<0.001), and renal vascular resistances fell from 89 +/- 7 mm Hg center dot min center dot L(-1) to 74 +/-4 (P<0.001). These changes were fully abolished by the co-infused N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methylester. Infusion of BQ-123, devoid of renal hemodynamic effects at baseline, produces significant renal vasodilation when angiotensin II receptors are blocked, indicating an increasing renal hemodynamic role of endothelin-A--receptor activity. Because such a vasodilation is prevented by nonvasoconstricting microdoses of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methylester, nitric oxide--endothelin balance controls substantially renal hemodynamics under angiotensin II blockade. These findings are consistent with a rationale of the association of endothelin-A blockers with angiotensin II blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in treating nitric oxide--deficient conditions such as arterial hypertension, heart failure, and chronic renal diseases.

An update on the status of endothelin receptor antagonists for hypertension

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRA) are actively developed by the pharmaceutical industry for several cardiovascular indications. In the context of hypertension, preclinical studies are increasingly focused on prevention or regression of end-organ damage and drug combination than on control of arterial pressure in monotherapy, as most experimental models have already been studied. In general, the antihypertensive effect of ETRA is limited but the overwhelming efficacy of this class of drugs to prevent several end-organ damages warrants judicious combination. However, the few studies looking at regression of hypertension-induced cardiovascular alterations proved less successful, suggesting that ETRA should be used early in the treatment of hypertension to obtain full benefit. Judging from the progression of ongoing trials and the development of new trials patients suffering from pulmonary hypertension and heart failure may be the first to benefit from this new class of drugs. However, it is expected that once on the market, responsive subsets of hypertensive patients will be identified and will benefit from end-organ protection.

Systemic ETA receptor antagonism with BQ-123 blocks ET-1 induced forearm vasoconstriction and decreases peripheral vascular resistance in healthy men

1. The effect on systemic haemodynamics of BQ-123, a selective endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonist, was investigated in healthy men by giving, on separate occasions, ascending intravenous doses of 100, 300, 1000 and 3000 nmol min(-1) BQ-123, each for 15 min, in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. The response of forearm blood flow to brachial artery infusion of endothelin-1 (ET-1; 5 pmol min(-1) for 90 min) was also studied using bilateral forearm plethysmography, after systemic pre-treatment, on separate occasions, with one of two doses of BQ-123 (300 and 1000 nmol min(-1) for 15 min) or placebo. 2. Systemic BQ-123 dose-dependently decreased systemic vascular resistance (P<0.01 for all doses vs placebo) and mean arterial pressure (P<0.05 for 300 nmol min(-1) and P<0.01 for 1000 and 3000 nmol min(-1)) during the 60 min following infusion. There were concurrent increases in heart rate and cardiac index. BQ-123, when infused systemically for 15 min, appeared to reach a maximum effect at 1000 nmol min(-1). 3. Intra-brachial ET-1 infusion, after pre-treatment with placebo, caused a slow onset progressive forearm vasoconstriction without systemic effects. This vasoconstriction was attenuated by pre-treatment with BQ-123 at 300 nmol min(-1) and abolished by BQ-123 at 1000 nmol min(-1) (P<0.01 vs placebo). 4. These effects occurred at concentrations of BQ-123 in the plasma (510+/-64 nmol l(-1)) that were ETA receptor selective, and were not accompanied by an increase in plasma ET-1 that would have indicated ETB receptor blockade. 5. We conclude that ETA-mediated vascular tone contributes to the maintenance of basal systemic vascular resistance and blood pressure in healthy men.