Peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in multiple myeloma: predictors and management of inadequate collections

Efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome patients

Background

Due to the rarity of polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes (POEMS) syndrome, the best first-line treatment has not been established, although there are several options in guidelines. The preferred treatments vary according to the preference of the physician and anecdote.

Objectives

First, to analyze the efficacy of a new treatment mode in POEMS syndrome that uses the four-cycle treatment as the induction regimen, followed by sequential transplantation as the consolidation regimen for transplantation-eligible patients, or received another two-cycle treatment for transplantation-ineligible patients. Second, to compare the efficacy and safety of regimens with a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone, BCD) or without a proteasome inhibitor (cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone ± thalidomide, CD ± T).

Design

We conducted a retrospective study using real-world data from Capital Medical University, Xuanwu Hospital.

Methods

A total of 34 newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome patients met Dispenzieri's diagnostic criteria, and those who completed at least four cycles of treatment from July 2013 to March 2021 were included.

Results

The overall vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) response rate of this new treatment mode was 100%. The cumulative VEGF complete remission (CRV) rate was 67.9%, and the cumulative complete hematological response (CRH) rate was 55.6%. During the median 49-month follow-up, the 5-year-overall survival (OS) rate was 90.7%, the 3-year-progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 78.4%, and the 5-year-PFS rate was 73.8%. The BCD regimen achieved a 75% CRV rate (median time from diagnosis to CRV = 130 days) and 66.7% CRH rate (median time from diagnosis to CRH = 218 days). In addition, the VEGF response was less than the partial remission (PRV) after four-cycle induction treatment, which, together with a decrease on the Overall Neurological Limitation Scale of less than three points 1 year after consolidation treatment, was an independent poor prognostic factor.

Conclusion

Bortezomib was well-tolerated by patients with POEMS syndrome. Compared with CD ± T regimen, BCD as the induction regimen achieved better VEGF response and earlier hematological remission. Autologous stem cell transplantation used as consolidation therapy further improved the neurological and hematological remission rates, resulting in better OS and PFS.

Impact of Plerixafor Use at Different Peripheral Blood CD34+ Thresholds on Autologous Stem Cell Collection in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) scheduled for autologous stem cell transplantation must undergo autologous stem cell mobilization; unfortunately, however, many do not obtain an adequate collection yield. Despite the availability of plerixafor, its widespread and uniform use is limited by its cost, and consequently, many institutions have adopted various risk-adapted algorithms. We report our mobilization experience as we have modified our plerixafor algorithm to a more liberal one, with the expectation of greater collection efficiency and mobilization success with higher plerixafor use. A total of 344 mobilization attempts were analyzed over 3 time periods and using 3 different peripheral blood CD34⁺ cell counts to guide plerixafor use: <15/µL (n = 66), <20/µL (n = 130), and <40/µL (n = 148). The primary endpoints were evaluation of changes in mean plerixafor utilization and apheresis days and assessment of the impact on overall mobilization costs. Secondary endpoints were a description of the impact of lenalidomide use on mobilization and evaluation of the rate of mobilization failure. We found that mean plerixafor use increased from 1.32 to 1.65 to 1.74 doses per mobilization (P = .026) and the mean days of apheresis decreased from 2.15 to 2.17 to 1.89 days per mobilization for the <15/µL, <20/µL, and <40/µL cohorts, respectively (P = .011). The combined cost of plerixafor and apheresis procedures at a threshold of 40/µL is close to that at a threshold of 15/µL, while saving 26 apheresis days per 100 patients. In general, there were low rates of mobilization failure across all thresholds. Patients who received more than 6 cycles of lenalidomide demonstrated impaired mobilization and required more apheresis sessions (P < .013) and greater plerixafor use (P < .001) to achieve target stem cell yields. Overall, using plerixafor in patients with MM, with a day 4 pCD34 count of <40/µL is a reasonable and cost-effective strategy to optimize apheresis utilization.

Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Count does not Predict Neutrophil and Platelet Recovery following Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant: Value of the Colony-Forming Unit Granulocyte-Macrophage (CFU-GM) Assay

The common use of the marrow autograft mononuclear cell (MNC) count derives from positive correlative studies following allogeneic transplantation and from earlier conflicting data regarding the value of the bone marrow autograft colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assay for predicting hematologic recovery after ABMT. We conducted a retrospective analysis at our institution to determine whether autograft CFU-GM levels predict engraftment of neutrophils and platelets after ABMT in heavily pretreated patients with hematologic malignancies. Between 1 January 1993 and 1 March 1995, 58 heavily pretreated patients received only marrow cells as the autograft product. Patients with Hodgkin's disease (n = 25), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 19), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 14) underwent intensive therapy with etoposide and melphalan. Unpurged marrow containing a minimum of 1.5 × 108/kg (range: 1.5-4.8) was infused. Median time to an absolute neutrophil count ≥0.5 × 109/L was 21 days (range 10-270) and median time to a platelet count ≥20 × 109/L independent of transfusions was 44 days (range 13-317). There was no correlation between autograft MNC count and neutrophil or platelet engraftment. However, a correlation between autograft CFU-GM and both platelet and neutrophil recovery was demonstrated with a threshold CFU-GM of 3 × 104/kg; delayed neutrophil recovery was observed in 79% of patients below this threshold compared to only 9% in those with an autograft CFU-GM level of more than 3 × 104/kg (p = 0.0001). Similarly, platelet recovery was delayed in 76% of patients below, and 20% of those above this threshold (p = 0.003). We conclude that marrow autograft CFU-GM is predictive of engraftment of both platelets and neutrophils in heavily pretreated patients after ABMT for hematological malignancies.

Increased mobilization and yield of stem cells using plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma remain the most common indications for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue. While a CD34+ cell dose of 1 × 10⁶/kg is considered the minimum required for engraftment, higher CD34+ doses correlate with improved outcome. Numerous studies, however, support targeting a minimum CD34+ cell dose of 2.0 × 10⁶/kg, and an “optimal” dose of 4 to 6 × 10⁶/kg for a single transplant. Unfortunately, up to 40% of patients fail to mobilize an optimal CD34+ cell dose using myeloid growth factors alone. Plerixafor is a novel reversible inhibitor of CXCR4 that significantly increases the mobilization and collection of higher numbers of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Two randomized multi-center clinical trials in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma have demonstrated that the addition of plerixafor to granulocyte-colony stimulating factor increases the mobilization and yield of CD34+ cells in fewer apheresis days, which results in durable engraftment. This review summarizes the pharmacology and evidence for the clinical efficacy of plerixafor in mobilizing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, and discusses potential ways to utilize plerixafor in a cost-effective manner in patients with these diseases.

Predictors of high yield and purify of CD34(+) cell-selected PBPC, collected from patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Wide ranges i n cell recovery and purity may be observed following CD34(+) cell selection of mobilized HPC componetns. Characteristics of the mobilized HPC, associated with isolation of a high CD34(+) cell yield and purity following cell selection, have yet to be defined.

METHODS

Cell number and purities were determined before and after 56 CD34(+) cell-selection procedures, performed using the CellPro Ceprate SC system from April 1997 to February 1998. HPC were collected from 28 patients with multiple myeloma, following cyclophosphamide (60mg/kg) and G-CSF (10microg/kg) mobilization.

RESULTS

A medium of 47.9% (range 1.5-109.6%) CD34(+) cells were recovered in the enriched (ENR) fraction. A linear correlation existed between total CD34(+) cells in the ENR fraction and total CD34(+) cells in the START fraction (R2=0.93); there was a logarithmic correlation between CD34 ENR fraction purity and START fraction purity (R2=0.73). A START CD34(+) cell purity > 0.42% improved purity in the ENR fraction. A median of one (range one to nine) procedure was required to isolate 2 x 10 6 CD34(+) cells/kg. Three patients pretreated with alkylating agents failed to mobilized adequate numbers of HPC.

DISCUSSION

Isolation of highly purified CD34(+) cell-selected components using the Ceprate SC system in dependent on the CD34(+) purity of the lekapheresis component collected. Mobilization regimens should be used to maximize CD34(+) cell purity in stem cell authografts if CD34(+) cell selection is to be performed. Similar strategies should be used to evaluate other cell-selection devices as they become available.

Effects of induction with novel agents versus conventional chemotherapy on mobilization and autologous stem cell transplant outcomes in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the top indication for high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), a strategy which improves progression-free survival and potentially overall survival (OS). Novel induction regimens incorporating the immunomodulatory (IMID) agents, such as thalidomide and lenalidomide and the proteosome inhibitor bortezomib improve response rates and survival for newly diagnosed patients. Recent data temper enthusiasm for these treatments by illustrating difficulty in some circumstances with mobilizing CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells for subsequent HDC/SCT. We compare conventional induction regimens with novel agent-based induction strategies and the associated effects on stem cell mobilization and HDC/SCT outcome in 224 patients. Although patients exposed to novel agent inductions collected generally fewer CD34(+) cells than patients induced with chemotherapy, these differences did not translate into adverse consequences with subsequent HDC/SCT. We show that an improvement in OS after HDC/SCT may be related to induction therapy with novel agents as opposed to chemotherapy. Our data extrapolate on prior work and expand on ongoing controversies about optimal induction regimens for patients with MM planned for subsequent HDC/SCT and optimal sequencing of therapies.

How I treat multiple myeloma in younger patients

Therapeutic options for multiple myeloma (MM) patients have changed quickly in recent years and uncertainty has arisen about optimal approaches to therapy. A reasonable goal of MM treatment in younger “transplant eligible” patients is to initiate therapy with a target goal of durable complete remission, and the anticipated consequence of long-term disease control. To achieve this goal we recommend induction therapy with multi-agent combination chemotherapies (usually selected from bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and corticosteriods) which when employed together elicit frequent, rapid, and deep responses. We recommend consolidation with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation in the majority of patients willing and able to undergo this procedure and subsequent maintenance therapy, especially in those failing to achieve a complete response or at high risk for early relapse based on prognostic, genetically defined risk factors. Defining genetic risk for early relapse is therefore an important aspect of early diagnostic testing and attention to minimizing expected toxicities once therapy begins is critical in ensuring the efficacy of modern combination therapy approaches. When access to newer drugs is restricted participation in clinical trials should be pursued.

Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: high response rates in a phase II clinical trial

We have studied a three drug combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CyBorD) on a 28 day cycle in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients to assess response and toxicity. The primary endpoint of response was evaluated after four cycles. Thirty-three newly diagnosed, symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, 11, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² orally days 1, 8, 15, 22 and dexamethasone 40 mg orally days 1-4, 9-12, 17-20 on a 28 day cycle for four cycles. Responses were rapid with a mean 80% decline in the sentinel monoclonal protein at the end of two cycles. The overall intent to treat response rate (≥ partial response) was 88% with 61% ≥VGPR and 39% CR/nCR. For the 28 patients that completed all 4 cycles of therapy the CR/nCR rate was 46% and ≥VGPR rate 71%. All patients undergoing stem cell harvest had a successful collection. Twenty three patients underwent SCT and are evaluable through day 100 with CR/nCR documented in 70% and ≥VGPR in 74%. In conclusion, CyBorD produces a rapid and profound response in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with manageable toxicity.

The use of experimental murine models to assess novel agents of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization

The recent explosion in the understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization has facilitated development of novel therapeutic agents, targeted at improving mobilization kinetics as well as HSPC yield. With the development of new agents comes the challenge of choosing efficient and relevant preclinical studies for the testing of the HSPC mobilization efficacy of these agents. This article reviews the use of the mouse as a convenient small animal model of HSPC mobilization and transplantation, and outlines the range of murine assays that can be applied to assess novel HSPC mobilizing agents. Techniques to demonstrate murine HSPC mobilization are discussed, as well as the role of murine assays to confirm human HSPC mobilization, and techniques to investigate the biologic phenotype of HSPC mobilized by these novel agents. Technical aspects regarding mobilization regimens and control arms, and choice of experimental animals are also discussed.

Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Autologous PBSC transplantation is the standard care for patients with multiple myeloma. The most common regimen used to mobilize PBSC consists of CY and G-CSF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens of CY for PBSC mobilization: low-dose CY (1-2 g/m(2), LD-CY, n=61) plus G-CSF, and intermediate-dose CY (3-4 g/m(2), ID-CY, n=26) plus G-CSF.

RESULTS

In the LD-CY group, 5.17 (0.23-17.3)x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, and in the ID-CY group 7.71 (0.08-26.4)x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (P=0.018), were collected. Although >/=2x10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells were collected in 89% of the LD-CY group and 92% of the ID-CY group, this was achieved after a single leukapheresis in 54% of the LD-CY group and 92% of the ID-CY group (P=0.0001). Patients who are to have tandem autologous PBSC transplants require >/=4x10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. This was achieved in only 65% patients in the LD-CY group but 88% in the ID-CY group (P=0.05). Among patients who had not had prior melphalan and/or >12 months of prior treatment, 74% in the LD-CY group and 100% in ID-CY group mobilized >/=4x10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. Febrile neutropenia was more frequent in the ID-CY group (38% vs. 13%).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, compared with LD-CY, patients receiving ID-CY were more likely to collect a total CD34(+) cell number adequate for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation. The increased toxicity was manageable and considered acceptable.

The treatment of the elderly multiple myeloma patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignancy of the plasma cells. Most patients are diagnosed when they are older than 65 years. Therapeutic options include chemotherapy, using either established (e.g. melphalan) or newly available (e.g. thalidomide) drugs and high-dose treatment with stem-cell support (autologous as well as allogeneic). Recent research has focused on defining the target population for the different therapeutic approaches, taking into account pre-treatment characteristics of patients, particularly age, and aims to balance treatment benefit with potential adverse events. In this review we present the data available on the most recent trials dealing with the treatment of elderly MM patients.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and an RARalpha specific agonist, VTP195183, synergize to enhance the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells

BACKGROUND

Failure to mobilize adequate numbers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) is an important clinical problem. Since bone marrow (BM) neutrophils play a central role in HSPC mobilization, we hypothesized that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mediated mobilization would be enhanced by further expanding the size of the BM granulocyte pool.

METHODS

We tested the potential of the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARalpha) specific agonist VTP195183, and the pan-RAR agonist all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), to enhance G-CSF-mediated mobilization of HSPC, in two mouse strains.

RESULTS

Pretreatment of mice with VTP195183 significantly increased the number of leukocytes, colony-forming cells, and early engrafting hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) mobilized in the blood in response to G-CSF. In contrast, ATRA had only a marginal effect on G-CSF-induced mobilization. HSPC mobilization synergy between VTP195183 and G-CSF occurred only when mice were preconditioned with VTP195183 prior to G-CSF. This preconditioning was shown to increase the numbers of granulocyte/macrophage progenitors in the BM. Treatment with VTP195183 and G-CSF was accompanied by enhanced levels of active neutrophil proteases in the BM extracellular fluid compared to G-CSF treatment alone.

CONCLUSIONS

VTP195183 treatment increases the numbers of immature granulocyte progenitors in BM and subsequently synergizes to enhance G-CSF-mediated mobilization of HSPC. These data demonstrate a novel approach to improve G-CSF-induced mobilization by accelerating granulocyte maturation in the BM. These findings are currently being tested in a clinical trial of VTP195183 plus G-CSF for mobilization of HSPC in human patients.

Sepsis, low platelet nadir at mobilization and previous IFN use predict stem cell mobilization failure in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Successful stem cell mobilization is a prerequisite for autologous blood cell transplantation. We analyzed factors that may predict the success of stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

We analyzed 124 consecutive patients and compared those who failed to mobilize a sufficient amount of CD34(+) cells (peak blood CD34(+) cell count <20x10(6)/L) (n=20) with those with successful mobilization (n=104). The peak blood CD34(+) cell count after mobilization was used as the marker of mobilization success against which the various predictive factors were tested.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis the best predictive factors for mobilization failure were the number of different chemotherapy regimens (P<0.001), number of chemotherapy cycles (P<0.001), time from diagnosis to mobilization (P<0.001) and previous use of IFN (P<0.001). The distributions of treatment responses at mobilization were similar in the groups with successful and unsuccessful mobilization, and were CR or VGPR in 10% of all patients, PR in 54% and stable or progressive disease in 36%. Regarding the mobilization-related factors, lower leukocyte nadir (P<0.001), longer duration of leukocyte counts <1x10(9)/L (P<0.001), lower platelet nadir (P=0.001), longer duration of platelet counts <20x10(9)/L (P<0.001) and the occurrence of sepsis after the mobilization therapy (P=0.001) were significantly associated with mobilization failure. In multivariate analysis, the amount of earlier chemotherapy cycles (P=0.002), low platelet nadir (P=0.020), occurrence of sepsis at mobilization (P=0.040) and previous use of IFN (P=0.052) remained as significant predictive factors for mobilization failure.

DISCUSSION

Predicting the success of stem cell mobilization beforehand may have important practical consequences. By identifying those patients who will fail to mobilize stem cells, unnecessary mobilization and collection attempts can be avoided.

Treatment Strategies in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM), a plasma cell malignancy, is a disorder of the elderly with an increasing prevalence as the average life expectancy increases. Survival remains unacceptably low in elderly patients with MM, in whom the gold standard of treatment has been, until recently, oral melphalan and prednisolone, which induces a response rate of approximately 50% and overall survival of <3 years. In the last 15 years, traditional treatment paradigms for elderly patients with MM have been challenged not only as a result of the change in what we define as 'elderly' but also as a result of the reduced morbidity and treatment-related mortality associated with high-dose chemoradiotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and the emergence of novel therapies including thalidomide, its immunomodulator drug derivative lenalidomide and the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib. In this review, we examine currently available data regarding the treatment of MM in the elderly population. Recent years have seen a paradigm shift in the standard of care of elderly patients with MM from oral melphalan and prednisolone to approaches including HDT with ASCT using intermediate-dose melphalan in selected elderly patients, and the evaluation of and incorporation of drugs such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide. Importantly, we now have been able to change the traditional goal of palliation in the elderly group of patients to a more ambitious objective of achieving a complete response or a near complete response, in the hope that this will translate into improved progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life.

Local irradiation prior to stem cell harvest has no influence on CD34+ yield: a quantitative analysis

In patients with multiple myeloma, irradiation of bone marrow prior to mobilization of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) may lead to a reduced yield of CD34+ cells. Quantitative effects have not been sufficiently assessed. We retrospectively performed a multivariate analysis in 114 patients (67 men, 47 women) with multiple myeloma, of whom 53 (47%) patients had been irradiated prior to mobilization chemotherapy. High-dose cyclophosphamide followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used for mobilization in 84% of patients. In addition to previous chemotherapy, we quantitatively evaluated the dose and fractionation of prior irradiation, the volume of the irradiated bone marrow, and the time interval between radiation therapy and mobilization of PBPCs. The median volume of irradiated bone marrow was 9% (range 1-30%) of the estimated total hematopoietic bone marrow. The irradiated bone marrow volume and the number of CD34+ cells per kilogram of body weight in the first leukapheresis product showed no correlation. However, the time between irradiation and mobilization seemed to influence the yield of CD34+ cells. A comparison of irradiated patients with nonirradiated patients revealed no differences with respect to the CD34+ cell counts. We did not find a significant influence of the extent or the total dose of irradiation on the yield of CD34+ cells in the first leukapheresis product in patients with multiple myeloma. However, there may be an inverse correlation between the time elapsed since the last irradiation and the number of mobilized CD34+ cells.

Successful mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells using recombinant human stem cell factor in heavily pretreated patients who have failed a previous attempt with a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-based regimen

To assess the efficacy of recombinant human stem cell factor (rHuSCF), 48 patients who had failed to mobilize >2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (10 microg/kg twice daily) with, or without, concomitant chemotherapy (G-CSF-based regimen), were remobilized with the addition of rHuSCF (20 microg/kg/day). In all, 18/48 (38%) achieved a total of >2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with the second rHuSCF-based mobilisation alone and 29/48 (60%) achieved a cumulative total of >2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg following remobilization. Inclusion of chemotherapy in the mobilization regimen resulted in a higher yield of CD34+ cells/kg for both the initial G-CSF-based and subsequent rHuSCF-based regimens (0.90 vs 0.54, P < 0.01 and 2.36 vs 1.34, P < 0.01, respectively). The total peripheral blood stem cells PBSC collected from the G-CSF-based regimen, performance status, baseline platelet count and albumin were significantly associated with successful remobilization. Patients with multiple myeloma were also more likely to successfully remobilize. There was no threshold of total collected from the failed G-CSF-based regimen below which successful remobilization with the rHuSCF-based regimen was not possible. We therefore propose a predictive model [PBSC expected = 0.6+(G-CSF-based total collection)+2 (rHuSCF-based day 1 collection)] to calculate the cumulative total of PBSC expected following a maximum of five leukaphereses. This algorithm may permit the early identification of patients who are unlikely to achieve sufficient PBSC for transplantation and allow physicians to direct the resources involved in PBSC collection in a more appropriate and economical manner.

First-line thalidomide–dexamethasone therapy in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation in young patients (<61 years) with symptomatic multiple myeloma

Thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy was given in patients (<61 years) with previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination as first-line therapy, and to determine its effect on stem cell collection and engraftment. During first-line therapy, thalidomide and dexamethasone were administered for 75 days (200 mg/day) and 3 months, respectively. The monthly dose of dexamethasone was 20 mg/m2/day for 4 days, with cycles repeated on days 9 to 12 and 17 to 20 on the first and the third month of therapy. After first-line therapy, a collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) was performed. Between May 2003 and September 2004, 60 patients were included. On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response (> or =partial response) rate was 74%, including 24% of patients who obtained a complete remission. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of infections (12%), deep-vein thrombosis (3%), constipation (5%), and neuropathy (5%). A total of 58 patients (96%) proceeded to PBSC mobilisation and yielded a median number of 8 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. First-line thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy is effective and relatively well tolerated in young patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. This combination does not affect PBSC mobilisation.

High-dose cyclophosphamide with or without etoposide for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with multiple myeloma: efficacy and toxicity

The purpose of the study was to examine the yield of CD34(+) cells, response rates, and toxicity of high-dose cyclophosphamide with or without etoposide in patients with multiple myeloma. In total, 77 myeloma patients received either cyclophosphamide 4.5 g/m(2) (n=28) alone or with etoposide 2 g/m(2) (n=49) in a nonrandomized manner, followed by G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day for the purpose of stem cell mobilization. The effects of various factors on CD34(+) cell yield, response rate and engraftment were explored. A median of 22.39 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were collected on the first day of leukapheresis (range 0.59-114.71 x 10(6)/kg) in 71 (92%) of patients. Greater marrow plasma cell infiltration (P=0.02) or prior radiation therapy (P=0.02) adversely affected CD34(+) cell yield. In total, 45% of patients receiving cyclophosphamide and 56% of those receiving cyclophosphamide/etoposide had at least a minimum response by EBMT criteria. In all, 25% of patients who received cyclophosphamide alone vs 75.5% of patients who received combined chemotherapy required hospitalization mainly for treatment of neutropenic fever. Cyclophosphamide alone is associated with impressive CD34(+) cell yields and clear antimyeloma activity. The addition of etoposide resulted in increased toxicity without significant improvement in CD34(+) cell yield or response rates.

Analysis of remobilization success in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplants who fail an initial mobilization: risk factors, cytokine use and cost

Inadequate stem cell mobilization is seen in approximately 25% of patients undergoing autotransplantation for hematologic malignancies. Remobilization strategies include chemotherapy/cytokine combinations or high-dose cytokines alone or in combination. From 1/1997 to 7/2002, we remobilized 86 patients who failed an initial mobilization (median total CD34=0.72 x 10(6)/kg) in sequential cohorts using high-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) or G-CSF(10 microg/kg/day)+GM-CSF (5 microg/kg/day). No difference in CD34/kg yields were seen (G-CSF alone: 2.2 x 10(6) and G-CSF+GM-CSF 1.6 x 10(6)) in the median 3 aphereses performed (P=0.333). Of the 86, 23 (27%) failed the second mobilization; 14 were remobilized again (yield=1.5 x 10(6) CD34/kg; three aphereses). Of the 86, 93% went to transplant: three progressed, and three had inadequate stem cells. Significant risk factors for a failed remobilization were: number of stem-cell-damaging regimens (P=0.015), time between last chemotherapy and first mobilization (P=0.028), and higher WBC at initiation of first mobilization (P=0.04). High-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) was more costly @ USD $9,016, vs $5,907 for the G-CSF+GM-CSF combination (P<0.001). Most patients failing an initial mobilization benefit from a cytokine only remobilization. Lower cost G-CSF+GM-CSF is as effective as high-dose G-CSF.

Effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma. We performed a retrospective review of 67 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma at Mayo Clinic and treated with a single regimen prior to stem cell transplantation between January of 2000 and September of 2001. Stem cells were collected from 24 patients who received thalidomide, 200 mg/day, with dexamethasone as initial therapy before stem cell collection. These patients were compared with 43 control patients seen during the same period who had received only one previous regimen before stem cell collection and transplantation. The cumulative thalidomide dose before stem cell collection was 17 000 mg over a median of four cycles (range, 2-7 cycles). The thalidomide and control groups were not significantly different in their baseline characteristics, number of stem cells collected, time to collection, or time to engraftment of neutrophils or platelet count of 50 000/microl. Time to platelet count of 20 000/microl was delayed by a median of 4 days (P=0.008), but platelet transfusion requirements did not differ (P=0.95). We concluded that thalidomide does not substantially affect peripheral cell mobilization or engraftment.

Low-dose or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with multiple myeloma

Cyclophosphamide (CY) combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to mobilise blood progenitor cells to support high-dose therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The optimal dose of CY in this setting is unknown. We have retrospectively analysed mobilisation efficiency and need for supportive care in 57 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma previously treated with VAD+/-local radiotherapy. The patients were mobilised either with low-dose CY (LD-CY, 1.2-2 g/m(2)) (n=25) or intermediate-dose CY (ID-CY, 4 g/m(2)) (n=32) plus G-CSF. Both regimens proved to be effective in the progenitor cell mobilisation. At least 2 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells were collected from 88% and 84% of the patients with a single apheresis, respectively. Only one patient in the LD-CY group (4%) failed to mobilise vs none in the ID-CY group. Patients mobilised with LD-CY plus G-CSF had less toxicity: fewer hospital days during the mobilisation and apheresis procedures (5 vs 9 days, P<0.001), lower frequency of fever (20 vs 73%, P<0.001) and less need for supportive care including platelet transfusions (0 vs 24%, P=0.004) and days on parenteral antibiotics (0 vs 4 days, P<0.001). While these regimens seem to be equally effective in terms of progenitor cell mobilisation in newly diagnosed patients with MM, LD-CY+G-CSF is preferential because of more optimal resource utilisation and more favourable toxicity profile.

Optimising parameters for peripheral blood leukapheresis after r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) and r-metHuSCF (ancestim) in patients with multiple myeloma: a temporal analysis of CD34(+) absolute counts and subsets

Patients (n = 69) with multiple myeloma undergoing peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) were treated with cyclophosphamide and a combination of recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF, filgrastim) and recombinant methionyl human stem cell factor (r-metHuSCF, ancestim). The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) The proportion of patients reaching a target yield of >or=5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in one or two successive large-volume (20 liter) leukapheresis procedures; (2) the optimal collection time for leukapheresis; (3) mobilization kinetics of CD34(+) subsets in response to G-CSF/SCF. All patients were mobilized with cyclophosphamide (2.5 g/m(2)) on day 0 followed by filgrastim (10 microg/kg ) plus ancestim (20 microg/kg) commencing day 1 and continuing to day 11 or 12. Of the 65 evaluable patients, 57 were considered not heavily pretreated and 96.5% obtained a target of >or=5 x 10(6)/kg in one collection. The median CD34(+) cells/kg was 39.5 x 10(6) (range: 5.2-221.2 x 10(6)). Subset analysis demonstrated the number of CD38(-), CD33(-), and CD133(+) peaked at day 11; and CD34(+), CD90(+) cells peaked at day 10. The optimum day for leukapheresis was determined to be day 11. The median absolute peripheral blood CD34(+) cell numbers on day 11 was 665 x 10(6)/l (range: 76-1481 x 10(6)/l). Eight of the 10 heavily pretreated patients were evaluable: three achieved the target dose in one leukapheresis (37.5%) and three (37.5%) achieved the target dose with two leukaphereses. Use of this mobilization strategy allowed the collection of high numbers of CD34(+) cells and early progenitors and the ability to predictably schedule leukapheresis.

Predictive value of circulating immature cell counts in peripheral blood for timing of peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after G-CSF plus chemotherapy-induced mobilization

BACKGROUND

Enumeration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) before apheresis predicts the number of CD34+ cells collected, although flow cytometric techniques used are complex and expensive. In an attempt to determine the optimal timing for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, the usefulness of circulating immature cell (CIC) counts in PB was evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

CIC counts in PB and CD34+ cell counts in the apheresis product from 249 collections were assessed, and the relationship between these two parameters was evaluated by with the Pearson rank correlation analysis, the Fisher exact test, and the U-test.

RESULTS

CIC counts were correlated significantly with the number of CD34+ cells per kg of patient's body weight in the apheresis product (Pearson rank correlation analysis: r = 0.635, p < 0.0001). When a level of 1 x 10(9) CICs per L was selected as a cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity for collecting more than 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight were 75.7 and 85.5 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present study strongly suggests that the number of CICs in PB may estimate the number of CD34+ cells collected. The data indicate that CIC counts above 1 x 10(9) per L can be used as a good predictor for PBPC collections containing more than 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight in a single apheresis procedure.

Cryopreserved human haematopoietic stem cells retain engraftment potential after extended (5-14 years) cryostorage

Harvesting of stem cells during the early phases of treatment with no immediate intention to perform a stem cell transplant is becoming an increasingly common practice. Such "insurance" harvests are often stored for many years before being needed for transplant in a subsequent relapse. The effect of long-term cryostorage (5-14 years) on the viability and functional capacity of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) was investigated in 40 bone marrow and peripheral blood harvests using standard in vitro methods, the colony forming unit-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) assay and a single platform viable CD34(+) cell absolute count by flow cytometry. Forty percent of harvests had CD34(+) HSC counts of at least 0.7 x 10(6)/kg bodyweight and 85% had CFU-GM counts of at least 1.0 x 10(5)/kg bodyweight, these values representing our institutional minimum requirements for safe transplantation. Based on these results, it appears that HSC collections can remain adequate for safe transplantation after up to 14 years of cryostorage. However, as deterioration of HSC quality and viability may occur, some precautions may be warranted, namely harvesting higher than normal numbers of HSCs in collections intended for long-term storage and repeating in vitro assays on harvests after long-term storage prior to transplantation.

Efficacy of thalidomide therapy for extramedullary relapse of myeloma following allogeneic transplantation

Treatment options for patients with myeloma who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation are limited. Thalidomide, an antineoplastic agent, has been shown to be effective in multiple myeloma through proposed mechanisms that may include angiogenesis inhibition. Herein we report successful thalidomide treatment of four patients who relapsed following allogeneic transplantation, three of whom had predominantly extramedullary relapse. Thalidomide was well tolerated in all patients; in two patients interferon-alpha was subsequently added to thalidomide as maintenance therapy without worsening graft-versus-host disease. We suggest that extramedullary myeloma is particularly sensitive to thalidomide, speculating that growth biology may in part be dependent on angiogenesis.

Dexamethasone, paclitaxel, etoposide, cyclophosphamide (d-TEC) and G-CSF for stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma

Forty-one patients with multiple myeloma were treated with a novel stem cell mobilisation regimen. The primary end points were adequate stem cell mobilising ability (>1% circulating CD34-positive cells) and collection (> or = 4 x 10(6) CD34-positive cells/kg), and safety. The secondary end point was activity against myeloma. The regimen (d-TEC) consisted of dexamethasone, paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) i.v., etoposide 60 mg/kg i.v., cyclophosphamide 3 g/m(2) i.v., and G-CSF 5-10 microg/kg/day i.v. A total of 84 cycles were administered to these 41 individuals. Patient characteristics included a median age of 53 years, a median of five prior chemotherapy cycles, and a median interval of 10 months from diagnosis of myeloma to first cycle of d-TEC. Seventy-five percent of the patients had stage II or III disease, 50% had received carmustine and/or melphalan previously, and 25% had received prior radiation therapy. Eighty-eight percent of patients mobilised adequately after the first cycle of d-TEC and 91% mobilized adequately after the second cycle. An adequate number of stem cells were collected in 32 patients. Of the remaining nine patients, three mobilised, but stem cells were not collected, two mobilised but stem cell collection was < 4 x 10(6) CD34-positive cells/kg, three did not mobilise, and one died of disease progression. Major toxicities included pancytopenia, alopecia, fever and stomatitis. One patient died from multi-organ failure and progressive disease. Fifty percent of evaluable patients demonstrated a partial response and 28.6% of patients had a minor response. This novel dose-intense regimen was safe, capable of stem cell mobilisation and collection, even in heavily pre-treated patients, and active against the underlying myeloma.

Ifosamide, epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a regimen for successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with multiple myeloma

In general, the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is poor and is achieved in most cases by combined cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. This study was performed to examine the efficacy of combined ifosfamide/epirubicine and G-CSF for PBPC mobilization and purging. Sixteen patients suffering from multiple myeloma in stage II/A and III/A according to Durie and Salmon underwent chemotherapy consisting of a total of three cycles of ifosfamide (3 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2 and epirubicine 80 mg/m(2) on day 1) and G-CSF (10 or 20 microg/kg body weight (BW) daily until harvesting). PBPC harvesting was performed after the first and third cycle of chemotherapy. The median number of PBPC after the first cycle of chemotherapy was 7.79 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg BW (ranging from 0.94-26.36 x 10(6)) and 6.38 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg BW (ranging from 0.79-29.31 x 10(6)) after the third cycle of chemotherapy. Clinical re-evaluation after three cycles of chemotherapy showed 13 (81 per cent) patients in partial remission (PR), two (12 per cent) in complete remission (CR) and one (6.25 per cent) in stable disease (SD). No major side-effects were observed, six patients developed hematological toxicity stage IV WHO for a median of 3.9 days but no serious infection episodes occurred. Combined ifosfamide/epirubicin and standard G-CSF is able to mobilize sufficient PBPC without serious side-effects for patients with MM and for purging procedures resulting in a high proportion of complete remissions after tandem high-dose melphalan chemotherapy.

A comparison of toxicity following two different doses of cyclophosphamide for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 116 multiple myeloma patients

High-dose cyclophosphamide (HDC) has been shown to be an effective regimen for collecting PBPC in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but the optimal dose to be used remains controversial. Two historical cohorts of MM patients who received G- or GM-CSF and HDC at the dose of either 7 g/m(2) (HDC7, n = 74) or 4 g/m (HDC4, n = 42) were compared. As patients in the HDC4 group were more likely to have received G-CSF than GM-CSF (P < 10(-3)) and fewer previous alkylating agents (P = 0.004), multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. In the HDC4 group, patients had a shorter median duration of neutropenia (P < 10(-4)), fewer RBC (P < 10(-3)) and platelet transfusions (P < 10(-3)) with fewer patients with platelets <20 x 10(9)/l (P = 0.004). Moreover, fewer febrile episodes (P < 10(-3)) and less need of intravenous antibiotics (P < 10(-3)) were found in the HDC4 group. No statistical difference was observed with regard to CD34(+) cell collection efficiency. Thus, the use of HDC at the dose of 4 g/m(2) for the collection of PBPC in MM patients decreases hematological and extrahematological toxicity with an equivalent CD34(+) cell collection efficiency.

The effects of prior induction therapy with melphalan on subsequent peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for myeloma

High dose chemoradiotherapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) may improve outcome in myeloma. Melphalan is an effective drug in the treatment of myeloma, but is potentially toxic to progenitor cells. We studied 8 patients receiving intermittent intravenous melphalan (25 mg/m2) as induction therapy before PBPCT to assess engraftment characteristics post-transplantation. Comparison was made with an age-matched control group of patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma who had not received melphalan during induction therapy. There was correlation (P=0.037) between the dose of melphalan per kg body weight given, premobilization, and days to neutrophil engraftment, but no significant difference between the two groups in neutrophil recovery. The study group had delayed platelet recovery (P=0.01) and required more platelet support post-transplantation (P=0.05). 3-4 weekly melphalan (25 mg/m2) up to 6 courses was delivered to patients who went on to PBPCT without significantly influencing neutrophil recovery but with a negative impact on platelet recovery.

Efficient mobilization of haematopoietic progenitors after a single injection of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in mouse strains with distinct marrow-cell pool sizes

We have compared the efficacy of a single injection of SD/01, a newly engineered, pegylated form of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), with a single injection of glycosylated rhG-CSF (Filgrastim). SD/01 was administered to regular and recombinant inbred strains of mice (AKR, C57L/J, DBA/2, C57BL/6, AKXL) known to have widely distinct marrow-cell pool sizes and proliferation kinetics. A single injection of G-CSF was unable to mobilize granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM). In sharp contrast, a single dose of SD/01 resulted in massive mobilization of progenitors and stem cells. Although all mice strains showed qualitatively similar mobilization responses, large interstrain differences remained. C57L and C57BL/6 mice mobilized relatively poorly, whereas AKR and DBA/2 mice showed threefold to tenfold superior responses. In order to explain these different phenotypes, we studied the effects of SD/01 in nine AKXL recombinant inbred strains, derived from well-responding AKR and poorly responding C57L parental strains. The best predictor for SD/01 responsiveness in these strains was marrow cellularity prior to mobilization. Comparison of the AKXL strain distribution pattern for marrow cellularity with loci previously mapped in these strains showed complete concordance with Aat, a serine protease inhibitor mapping to chromosome 12.

Blood stem cell collections in multiple myeloma: definition of a scoring system

The purpose of the study was to identify factors that could predict good yields of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in multiple myeloma (MM). Fifty-one MM patients, nine with refractory disease and 42 in plateau phase, were mobilized with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) at 4 g/m2 followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg/day. Clinical and laboratory parameters at the time of mobilization were analyzed for correlations with the number of CD34+ cells collected, with the colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) count, and the mononuclear cell (MNC) count. In univariate analysis, low WBC count, low platelet count, prior exposure to melphalan, and an interval >6 months from the start of treatment correlated with poor yields of CD34+ cells. Low platelet count, prior exposure to melphalan or to radiotherapy, and an interval >6 months from the start of treatment were associated with a low CFU-GM count. On the basis of these data, we defined a scoring system able to predict the yield of the mobilizing procedure. According to this system, the presence of more than one risk factor (low WBC and platelet counts, prior exposure to melphalan, interval from first chemotherapy >6 months) was predictive of insufficient collections when a conventional combination of mobilizing measures are used.

Morphologic, immunophenotypic and in vitro growth characteristics of blood and bone marrow associated with stem cell mobilisation in patients with lymphoma

The proportion of CD34+ cells in the bone marrow (BM) is predictive of the size of progenitor cell mobilisation into the blood (PB). To investigate which other PB and BM parameters may be related to mobilisation, we analysed at steady state PB and BM of 23 patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma before administering high-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF Cell morphology, number of CD34+ cells, and growth in clonogenic assay and in long-term cultures (LTC) were determined and then correlated with mobilisation extent (CD34+ and GM-CFC) and quality (growth of harvested cells in LTC). We found that the good mobilising patients (CD34 > 50 x 10(3)/ml, n=10) had several baseline BM characteristics (number of CD34+ MNC, GM-CFC, BFU-E, production of CFCs in LTC) similar to a group of 12 healthy controls, while patients with reduced mobilisation (CD34 < 50 x 10(3)/ml, n=13) had clearly reduced BM progenitors and LTC growth (p< 0.05). In a multivariate analysis including baseline clinical, blood and bone marrow characteristics, the most significant PB and BM factors independently associated with a higher number and/or quality of mobilised cells were a higher number of CD34+ and GM-CFC in the BM and a higher baseline haemoglobin, platelet, and CD34+ blood count. The capacity to release progenitor cells into the circulation is therefore not predicted by the distribution of morphologically distinguishable cells, marginally predicted by the BM content of highly undifferentiated cells (growth in long term culture), while it is proportional to the number of BM progenitors (CD34+, GM-CFC and BFU-E).

Delayed stem cell transplantation for the management of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

The optimal timing of stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma is controversial. Late stem cell collection is undesirable because of the inability to mobilize stem cells. We report on 64 recipients of stem cells collected within 1 year after diagnosis, none of whom had transplantation in plateau phase of their disease. Patients seen within 12 months after diagnosis received four cycles of standard vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) chemotherapy and then had stem cells mobilized. Patients were then placed on maintenance vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone or melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy for 12 cycles. At the sign of first progression, transplantation occurred. Fourteen patients were refractory to VAD chemotherapy, 20 relapsed on maintenance chemotherapy, and 30 relapsed off chemotherapy. The time to platelet engraftment was not affected by the duration of stem cell cryopreservation or extent of chemotherapy exposure after mobilization. The complete response rate was 34%. The actuarial median survival from initial diagnosis, from transplant day 0, and post-transplant progression-free survival was 51, 20 and 11.4 months, respectively. The patient status at transplantation and percentage of plasma cells circulating in the blood at apheresis influenced post-transplant survival; circulating plasma cells, status at transplantation and plasma cell labeling index influenced progression-free survival. Response duration was shorter in patients relapsing on chemotherapy.

Mobilization of peripheral-blood stem cells by concurrent administration of daniplestim and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and hematopoietic activity of daniplestim administered concurrently with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) mobilization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the initial dose-escalation phase, 25 patients with adenocarcinoma of the breast (AB; 13 patients) or lymphoma (12 patients) were given daniplestim at doses ranging from 0.1 to 3.75 microgram/kg/d plus G-CSF 10 microgram/kg/d. In the randomized phase, 52 patients with AB (27 patients) or lymphoma (25 patients) were randomized within disease categories to the daniplestim dose chosen in the dose-escalation phase plus G-CSF 10 microgram/kg/d (D+G) or placebo plus G-CSF 10 microgram/kg/d (P+G) for up to 7 days.

RESULTS

A daniplestim dose of 2. 5 microg/kg/d was chosen for further study because it was hematopoietically active and had an acceptable side-effect profile. In the randomized phase, in patients with AB, D+G was associated with a higher probability (P =.0696) of collecting >/= 2.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg and significantly higher circulating CD34(+) cell counts (P =.0498) on days 6 through 9 after the initiation of dosing. The target level was more likely to be reached with additional leukaphereses in the patients given D+G. Patients given P+G did not benefit from additional leukaphereses beyond the first procedure. The type of mobilization did show a trend toward a shorter duration of neutropenia in the D+G group. The adverse events with D+G consisted largely of mild to moderate flu-like symptoms, including headache and fever, and occurred more frequently than with P+G.

CONCLUSION

Daniplestim administered at 2.5 microgram/kg/d is tolerable and active when combined with G-CSF, and the combination may prove more effective than G-CSF alone in promoting the collection of adequate numbers of CD34(+) cells for PBSC infusion in patients with AB.

Successful mobilization of peripheral blood HPCs with G-CSF alone in patients failing to achieve sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells and/or CFU-GM with chemotherapy and G-CSF

BACKGROUND

Mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF may result in poor peripheral blood HPC collection, yielding <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg or <10 x 10(4) CFU-GM per kg in leukapheresis procedures. The best mobilization strategy for oncology patients remains unclear.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In 27 patients who met either the CD34 (n = 3) or CFU-GM (n = 2) criteria or both (n = 22), the results obtained with two successive strategies-that is, chemotherapy and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg (Group 1, n = 7) and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone (Group 2, n = 20) used for a second mobilization course-were retrospectively analyzed. The patients had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (5), Hodgkin's disease (3), multiple myeloma (5), chronic myeloid leukemia (1), acute myeloid leukemia (1), breast cancer (6), or other solid tumors (6). Previous therapy consisted of 10 (1-31) cycles of chemotherapy with additional chlorambucil (n = 3), interferon (n = 3), and radiotherapy (n = 7).

RESULTS

The second collection was undertaken a median of 35 days after the first one. In Group 1, the results of the two mobilizations were identical. In Group 2, the number of CD34+ cells per kg per apheresis (0.17 [0.02-0.45] vs. 0.44 [0.11-0.45], p = 0. 00002), as well as the number of CFU-GM (0.88 [0.00-13.37] vs. 4.19 [0.96-21.61], p = 0.00003), BFU-E (0.83 [0.00-12.72] vs. 8.81 [1. 38-32.51], p = 0.00001), and CFU-MIX (0.10 [0.00-1.70] vs. 0.56 [0. 00-2.64], p = 0.001134) were significantly higher in the second peripheral blood HPC collection. However, yields per apheresis during the second collection did not significantly differ in the two groups. Six patients in Group 1 and 18 in Group 2 underwent transplantation, and all but one achieved engraftment, with a median of 15 versus 12 days to 1,000 neutrophils (NS), 22 versus 16 days to 1 percent reticulocytes (NS), and 26 versus 26 days to 20,000 platelets (NS), respectively. However, platelet engraftment was particularly delayed in many patients.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone may constitute a valid alternative to chemotherapy and G-CSF to obtain adequate numbers of peripheral blood HPCs in patients who previously failed to achieve mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF. This strategy should be tested in prospective randomized trials.

Reduced bone marrow stem cell pool and progenitor mobilisation in multiple myeloma after melphalan treatment

The content of stem cells was analysed in bone marrow samples from 75 multiple myeloma patients. In unstimulated bone marrow the percentage of CD34+ cells was significantly reduced in 11 patients previously treated with melphalan-prednisolone (MP)(median= 0.15%) compared to median 0.87% in 31 untreated patients (P=0.0001). The bone marrow cellularity in the two groups did not differ. There was no correlation between the number of courses or total dose of melphalan and content of CD34+ cells in the bone marrow. The clonogenicity as well as the ability to expand the marrow stem cell pool during growth factor treatment were also reduced in MP treated patients compared to untreated patients. Analysis of different subsets of CD34+ cells revealed no influence on the pre B cell compartment in the bone marrow by MP treatment, but the committed stem cells (CD34+CD38+) were reduced more than the uncommitted stem cells (CD34+CD38-) in the MP treated group compared to the untreated patients. Mobilisation to and harvest of total number of CD34+ cells from peripheral blood was also reduced in the MP treated group. There was, however, no difference in the distribution between CD34+CD38+ and CD34+CD38- populations in the leukapheresis products in the untreated and the melphalan-treated group, suggesting selective mobilisation of CD34+CD38+ cells and/or differentiation of CD34+CD38-cells during growth factor stimulation. We conclude that melphalan decreased the number of stem cells in the bone marrow, the ability to expand the stem cell pool and mobilise stem cells to the pheripheral blood.

The administration of 10 microg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone results in a successful peripheral blood stem cell collection when previous mobilization with chemotherapy and hematopoietic growth factor failed

Some heavily pretreated cancer patients fail to mobilize enough peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) after stimulation with chemotherapy and hematopoietic growth factors. For these patients the best way to obtain an adequate PBSC collection is unknown. Here we report 6 heavily pretreated cancer patients who failed to mobilize sufficient PBSC after stimulation with chemotherapy and G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day. In these cases, we used G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day alone for six days at least 3 weeks after the last chemotherapy. After three consecutive leukaphereses starting on day 5, five patients had adequate PBSC collections. With 6 days of G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day alone, 2.8 x 10(6) (+/- 1) CD34+ cells/kg were collected. This was significantly higher than the number of CD34+ cells/kg collected after chemotherapy and G-CSF 5 microg/kg 0.3 x 10(6) (+/- 0.1) [P = 0.05]. Four patients received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC support. Hematologic recovery observed in these patients was as expected. In conclusion, G-CSF 10 microg/kg alone can mobilize progenitor cells into peripheral blood when previous mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF 5 microg/kg fails.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) counts during steady-state haemopoiesis enable the estimation of the yield of mobilized PBPC after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supported cytotoxic chemotherapy: an update on 100 patients

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) can be mobilized using chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We and others previously reported a correlation of steady-state PBPC counts and the PBPC yield during mobilization in a small group of patients. Here we present data on 100 patients (patients: 25 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), five Hodgkin's disease, 35 multiple myeloma (MM), 35 solid tumour) which enabled a detailed analysis of determinants of steady-state PBPC levels and of mobilization efficiency in patient subgroups. Previous irradiation (P = 0.0034) or previous chemotherapy in patients with haematological malignancies (P = 0.0062) led to a depletion of steady-state PB CD34+ cells. A correlation analysis showed steady-state PB CD34+ cells (all patients: r = 0.52, P < 0.0001; NHL patients, r = 0.69, P = 0.0003; MM patients: r = 0.66, P = 0.0001) and PB colony-forming cells can reliably assess the CD34+ cell yield in mobilized PB. In patients with solid tumour a similar trend was observed in mobilization after the first chemotherapy cycle (r = 0.51, P = 0.05) but not if mobilization occurred after the second or further cycle of a sequential dose-intensified G-CSF-supported chemotherapy regimen, when premobilization CD34+ counts were 18-fold elevated (P = 0.004). When the patients with MM (r = 0.63, P = 0.0008) or with NHL (r = 0.65, P = 0.006) were analysed separately, a highly significant correlation of the steady-state PB CD34+ cell count to the mean leukapheresis CD34+ cell yield was found, whereas no correlation was observed for patients with a solid tumour. For patients with haematological malignancies estimates could be calculated which, at a specific steady-state PB CD34+ cell count, could predict with a 95% probability a defined minimum progenitor cell yield. These results enable recognition of patients who mobilize PBPC poorly and may assist selection of patients for novel mobilization regimens.

Factors associated with successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in 200 patients with lymphoid malignancies

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) were mobilized and harvested in 200 patients treated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 148), Hodgkin's disease (n = 22) and multiple myeloma (n = 30). The variables predicting the collection of a minimal (>2.5 x 10(6)/kg) or a high (>10 x 10(6)/kg) CD34+ cell count were analysed. Patients were mobilized with haemopoietic growth factors following either standard chemotherapy (n = 49) or high-dose cyclophosphamide, given alone (n = 55) or combined with high-dose VP16 (n = 86). 10 patients received haemopoietic growth factors only. The first mobilization resulted in a PBPC harvest with enough CD34+ cells in 179/200 patients (90%). High-dose cyclophosphamide, with or without VP16, did not mobilize a higher progenitor cell yield than standard chemotherapy. When performing multiple regression analysis in the 190 patients who received chemotherapy-containing mobilization, only the number of previous chemotherapy regimens and the exposure to fludarabine predicted for a failure to collect a minimal PBPC count (P=0.06 and 0.0008 respectively). The target to collect a high CD34+ cell count was negatively associated with the number of previous chemotherapy regimens (P=0.002). When only non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were considered for multivariate analysis, low-grade histology with fludarabine appeared to be associated with poor PBPC cell yield (P=0.08 and 0.005 respectively). This data confirms that PBPC harvest should be planned early in the disease course in transplant candidates, and can be obtained after a standard course of chemotherapy.

IL-3 in the clinic

Since the cloning of human interleukin 3 (IL-3) in 1986 [1] and the demonstration of its proliferative effects on multiple hematopoietic progenitor cells, IL-3 has been widely studied to treat different states of bone marrow failure or hematologic malignancies, to mobilize or expand hematopoietic progenitor cells for transplantation, and to support engraftment after bone marrow transplantation. However, no condition for the clinical use of IL-3 has been established so far despite its theoretical advantages as an early-acting cytokine and in contrast to erythropoietin (EPO), G-CSF, or GM-CSF all of which have already been approved for several clinical modalities. Here we shortly review our current knowledge about the effects of IL-3 on the molecular and cellular level, summarize recent clinical studies with IL-3, and discuss further perspectives for the use of this cytokine.