Molecular studies in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in remission 5 years after allogeneic stem cell transplant define the risk of subsequent relapse

Extramedullary Relapse in a CML Patient after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Myeloid or granulocytic sarcoma (GS) is a tumoral lesion consisting of immature granulocytic cells. It is a rare entity during the course of CML patients especially after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Relapse without bone marrow involvement is much rarer. We report a case of CML patient who relapsed with isolated granulocytic sarcoma after allogeneic SCT during cytogenetic and molecular remission. 28-year-old male was diagnosed as CML and allogeneic SCT was performed because of refractory disease to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Complete cytogenetic and molecular response was achieved after allogeneic SCT followed by dasatinib treatment. Approximately 5 years after the transplantation, very rapidly progressive lesion was documented and diagnosed as GS although he was at molecular and cytogenetic remission. The patient died during chemotherapy due to sepsis. GS relapse after allogeneic SCT is a very rare type of relapse in CML patients with molecular and cytogenetic remission. Since it is a very aggressive disease with a poor prognosis, combined chemoradiotherapies with other possible options like DLI or second allogeneic SCT should be considered as soon as the diagnosis is confirmed.

Chronic myeloid leukemia: reminiscences and dreams

With the deaths of Janet Rowley and John Goldman in December 2013, the world lost two pioneers in the field of chronic myeloid leukemia. In 1973, Janet Rowley, unraveled the cytogenetic anatomy of the Philadelphia chromosome, which subsequently led to the identification of the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene and its principal pathogenetic role in the development of chronic myeloid leukemia. This work was also of major importance to support the idea that cytogenetic changes were drivers of leukemogenesis. John Goldman originally made seminal contributions to the use of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation from the late 1970s onwards. Then, in collaboration with Brian Druker, he led efforts to develop ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the late 1990s. He also led the global efforts to develop and harmonize methodology for molecular monitoring, and was an indefatigable organizer of international conferences. These conferences brought together clinicians and scientists, and accelerated the adoption of new therapies. The abundance of praise, tributes and testimonies expressed by many serve to illustrate the indelible impressions these two passionate and affable scholars made on so many people's lives. This tribute provides an outline of the remarkable story of chronic myeloid leukemia, and in writing it, it is clear that the historical triumph of biomedical science over this leukemia cannot be considered without appreciating the work of both Janet Rowley and John Goldman.

Evaluation of a novel multiplex RT-qPCR assay for the quantification of leukemia-associated BCR-ABL1 translocation

Although monitoring of BCR-ABL1 translocation has become an established practice in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the detection limit of the BCR-ABL1 transcripts needs more standardization. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical performances of a novel assay for the quantification of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts (e13a2 and e14a2) and ABL1 in a single reaction. This assay is based on the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in multiplex format. In a retrospective comparative clinical study performed in a reference laboratory, RNA was extracted from 48 CML patient blood samples with various BCR-ABL1/ABL1 ratios and RT-qPCR was performed using either MAScIR assay or the RT-qPCR simplex reference assay used in routine clinical testing. The comparative clinical results showed high qualitative and quantitative concordance (correlation coefficient >0.95) between MAScIR and the reference assays. The present study illustrates the utility of MAScIR assay as a sensitive, rapid, and cost-effective quantitative device to monitor the BCR-ABL1 ratios by RT-qPCR on whole blood of diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia patients. This test could be used as an aid in the assessment of molecular response to available treatments.

Relapse assessment following allogeneic SCT in patients with MDS and AML

Options to pre-emptively treat impending relapse of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) continuously increase. In recent years, the spectrum of diagnostic methods and parameters to perform post-transplant monitoring in patients with AML and MDS has grown. Cytomorphology, histomorphology, and chimaerism analysis are the mainstay in any panel of post-transplant monitoring. This may be individually combined with multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) for the detection of residual cells with a leukaemia phenotype and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) to assess gene expression, e.g., of WT1 or the residual mutation load (e.g., in case of an NPM1 mutation). Data evaluating the aforementioned methods alone or in combination are discussed in this review with particular emphasis on data pointing towards their suitability to steer pre-emptive post-transplant interventions such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy or therapy with demethylating agents.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate in the treatment of intractable chronic myeloid leukemia

In a significant proportion of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, resistance to BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors develops due to acquisition of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations and insensitivity of leukemia stem cells to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (formerly called homoharringtonine) is a natural alkaloid that inhibits protein synthesis and induces cell death. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who failed to respond to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or acquired the BCR-ABL-T315I mutation. In this review, we discuss the use and effectiveness of omacetaxine mepesuccinate in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, with coverage of its pharmacology, mode of action, and pharmacokinetics. We believe that omacetaxine mepesuccinate will be beneficial to many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who do not respond well to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Minimal residual disease and discontinuation of therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: can we aim at a cure?

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who have achieved a complete molecular response (CMR) defined by no detectable BCR-ABL mRNA on imatinib (IM) treatment often ask whether it is necessary for treatment to continue. We now know that approximately 40% of patients with a stable CMR for at least 2 years are able to stop IM treatment and remain in molecular remission for at least 2 years. This exciting observation has raised hopes that many patients can be cured of CML without the need for transplantation and its attendant risks. One might argue that for many patients maintenance therapy with IM or an alternative kinase inhibitor is so well tolerated that there is no imperative to stop treatment; however, chronic medical therapy may be associated with impaired quality of life and reduced compliance. Inferences about the biology of CML in patients responding to kinase inhibitors can be drawn from clinical experience, molecular monitoring data, and experimental observations. We summarize this information herein, and propose 3 possible pathways to "cure" of CML by kinase inhibitors: stem-cell depletion, stem-cell exhaustion, and immunological control.

Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS)

This study examines the prognostic significance of early molecular response using an expanded dataset in chronic myeloid leukemia patients enrolled in the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Serial molecular studies demonstrate decreases in BCR-ABL transcripts over time. Analyses of event-free survival (EFS) and time to progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC) at 7 years were based on molecular responses using the international scale (IS) at 6-, 12-, and 18-month landmarks. Patients with BCR-ABL transcripts > 10% at 6 months and > 1% at 12 months had inferior EFS and higher rate of progression to AP/BC compared with all other molecular response groups. Conversely, patients who achieved major molecular response [MMR: BCR-ABL (IS) ≤ 0.1%] by 18 months enjoyed remarkably durable responses, with no progression to AP/BC and 95% EFS at 7 years. The probability of loss of complete cytogenetic response by 7 years was only 3% for patients in MMR at 18 months versus 26% for patients with complete cytogenetic response but not MMR (P < .001). This study shows a strong association between the degree to which BCR-ABL transcript numbers are reduced by therapy and long-term clinical outcome, supporting the use of time-dependent molecular measures to determine optimal response to therapy. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00006343.

NCI first international workshop on the biology, prevention, and treatment of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: report from the committee on disease-specific methods and strategies for monitoring relapse following allogeneic stem cell transplantation. part II: chronic leukemias, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and lymphoid malignancies

Relapse has become the major cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Outcome of patients with clinical relapse after transplantation generally remains poor, but intervention prior to florid relapse improves outcome for certain hematologic malignancies. To detect early relapse or minimal residual disease, sensitive methods such as molecular genetics, tumor-specific molecular primers, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) are commonly used after allogeneic stem cell transplantation to monitor patients, but not all of them are included in the commonly employed disease-specific response criteria. The highest sensitivity and specificity can be achieved by molecular monitoring of tumor- or patient-specific markers measured by polymerase chain reaction-based techniques, but not all diseases have such targets for monitoring. Similar high sensitivity can be achieved by determination of recipient-donor chimerism, but its specificity regarding detection of relapse is low and differs substantially among diseases. Here, we summarize the current knowledge about the utilization of such sensitive monitoring techniques in chronic leukemias, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and lymphoid malignancies based on tumor-specific markers and cell chimerism and how these methods might augment the standard definitions of posttransplant remission, persistence, progression, relapse, and the prediction of relapse. Critically important is the need for standardization of the different residual disease techniques and to assess the clinical relevance of minimal residual disease and chimerism surveillance in individual diseases, which in turn must be followed by studies to assess the potential impact of specific interventional strategies.

Critical molecular pathways in cancer stem cells of chronic myeloid leukemia

Inhibition of BCR-ABL with kinase inhibitors in the treatment of Philadelphia-positive (Ph(+)) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is highly effective in controlling but not curing the disease. This is largely due to the inability of these kinase inhibitors to kill leukemia stem cells (LSCs) responsible for disease relapse. This stem cell resistance is not associated with the BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations resistant to kinase inhibitors. Development of curative therapies for CML requires the identification of crucial molecular pathways responsible for the survival and self-renewal of LSCs. In this review, we will discuss our current understanding of these crucial molecular pathways in LSCs and the available therapeutic strategies for targeting these stem cells in CML.

In search of the original leukemic clone in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in complete molecular remission after stem cell transplantation or imatinib

It is not clear if absence of BCR-ABL transcripts--complete molecular response (CMR)--is synonymous with, or required for, cure of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Some patients achieve CMR with imatinib (IM), but most relapse shortly after treatment discontinuation. Furthermore, most patients in long-term remission (LTR) post-stem cell transplantation (SCT) are considered functionally cured, although some remain occasionally positive for low-level BCR-ABL mRNA. Interpretation of the latter is complicated because it has been observed in healthy subjects. We designed a patient-specific, highly sensitive, DNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction to test follow-up samples for the original leukemic clone, identified by its unique genomic BCR-ABL fusion (gBCR-ABL). In 5 IM-treated patients in CMR, gBCR-ABL was detected in transcript-negative samples; 4 patients became gBCR-ABL-negative with continuing IM therapy. In contrast, of 9 patients in LTR (13-27 years) post-SCT, gBCR-ABL was detected in only 1, despite occasional transcript-positive samples in 8 of them. In conclusion, in IM-treated patients, absence of transcripts should not be interpreted as absence of the leukemic clone, although continuing IM after achievement of CMR may lead to further reduction of residual disease. Post-SCT, we found little evidence that the transcripts occasionally detected originate from the leukemic clone.

Targeted agents for chronic myelogenous leukemia: will that be the end of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for that disease?

Although the drug imatinib has been accepted as the treatment of choice for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) throughout the Western world, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) continues to remain a widely practiced first-line treatment in countries with limited health care budgets. The rationale is not scientific, but largely economically based. We analyzed a cohort of 46 CML patients who participated in a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis clinical trial and underwent related HLA-matched allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The median time of follow-up in surviving patients was 43 months (range: 4-89 months). Risk stratification of the population was done by European Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) criteria. The estimated probabilities of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 3 years in low EBMT risk score (0-2) patients were both 91%, respectively. We conclude that in countries with restricted access to imatinib, allo-SCT should be considered early on as front-line therapy. Continued research support for bone marrow transplantation will be needed to make a global impact on this disease.

Chronic myeloid leukemia 2010: where are we now and where can we go?

Chronic myeloid leukemia is a model of how the molecular understanding of a disease can provide the platform for therapy and diagnostics. Clinicians are now empowered with first- and second-generation tyrosine kinases, as well as molecular tools to monitor disease and characterize resistance. However, there are still unanswered questions regarding optimization of therapy, the utility of molecular monitoring, and the search (or need) of "cure" that bears thought. In this review, we will discuss these issues, as they provide a roadmap for what may lie ahead in the therapy of other hematologic malignancies, particular the other myeloproliferative syndromes, where specific genetic lesions, and targeted therapy, are now being realized.

Molecular monitoring of residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia by genomic DNA compared with conventional mRNA analysis

Translocation t(9;22), which produces the BCR-ABL gene, is pathognomonic of chronic myeloid leukemia. For clinical purposes, the amount of chimeric transcript is considered proportional to the leukemic clone; thus, mRNA is commonly used for molecular monitoring of patients. However, there is no consensus regarding the degree of increase in mRNA that should cause concern or whether the absence of transcript indicates a "cure." In this study, we analyzed 57 samples from 10 chronic myeloid leukemia patients undergoing imatinib treatment. For each sample, we compared BCR-ABL mRNA levels with the actual proportion of leukemic cells, which were measured through a novel genomic approach based on the quantitative amplification of DNA breakpoints. The two approaches gave similar patterns of residual disease, and the majority of patients were still positive after an average treatment period of 2 years. Nevertheless, in one of two patients with confirmed undetectable levels of chimeric transcript, DNA still revealed the persistence of leukemic cells at 42 months. These findings appear to justify the clinical practice of maintaining imatinib treatment indefinitely. However, the absence of leukemic DNA (observed in 1 of 10 patients) could be used to identify possible candidates for drug discontinuation. In conclusion, DNA analysis proved to be a reliable index of residual disease with potential applications in the field of clinical diagnostics and research.

Late mortality and relapse following BuCy2 and HLA-identical sibling marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only known curative therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Failure, because of relapse or nonrelapse mortality (NRM), generally occurs within 3 years of transplantation, but large studies with long-term follow-up are limited. We present mature results in 335 patients with CML who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from HLA-identical siblings following busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BU/Cy2). Two hundred twenty-nine were in chronic phase (CP) and 106 in accelerated or blastic phase at transplantation. Median follow-up exceeded 14 years. The estimated probability of 18-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) for CP patients was 55.6% and for those beyond CP, 10.5%. Of 182 patients who survived leukemia-free at 3 years, the estimated probability of LFS at 18 years was 61.9%. Late relapse (P = .039) and late NRM (P = .008) occurred at higher rates in patients beyond CP at transplantation. There was no plateau in LFS.

Relative survival of long-term hematopoietic cell transplant recipients approaches general population rates

Whether the annual mortality rates of long-term hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivors ever return to that of the general population is unclear. This study sought to determine the annual long-term mortality rates of allogeneic and autologous HCT recipients who had survived 5 years or more disease-free posttransplant and calculate their relative survival rates. Patients were included if they had a first allogeneic or syngeneic HCT for acute leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), or autologous HCT for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or lymphoma in Australia or New Zealand between 1992 and 2001, recorded on the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) database, and were known to have survived, disease free, 5 years or more posttransplant. The annual mortality rates of 5-year transplant survivors were compared to standard Australian and New Zealand populations using relative survival. A total of 1461 HCT survivors (688 postallograft, 773 postautograft) were included in this study. The 10-year survival probability for 5-year allograft survivors was slightly higher than that of 5-year autologous survivors (93.4% versus 89.6%, P=.06). The relative survival of both allogeneic and autologous 5-year survivors was never <97% of that of the general population. However, it was statistically significantly lower than expected in the sixth to ninth years posttransplant, with no obvious pattern of either improvement or deterioration from 6 to 10 years posttransplant. This study indicates that annual relative survival rates of long-term survivors of allogeneic HCT performed in Australia and New Zealand for acute lymophoblastic leukemkia (ALL), AML, CML, and MDS are slightly, but significantly lower than population rates in the 6th to 10th years posttransplant. Annual relative survival rates of long-term survivors of autologous HCT performed in Australia and New Zealand for AML and lymphomas are also slightly lower than population rates up to the 10th year posttransplant. Late deaths from transplant and disease-related causes are unusual, but continue to occur for many years post-HCT.

How and why minimal residual disease studies are necessary in leukemia: a review from WP10 and WP12 of the European LeukaemiaNet

Resistance to therapeutic agents is a major factor in the failure of cancer treatments. In leukemia, the resistant cells remaining in the bone marrow and/or peripheral blood constitute minimal residual disease and are detectable by highly sensitive assays when the patient appears to be in complete remission. Early detection of the expansion of residual cells permits clinical intervention with the aim of reversing the proliferation of resistant leukemic cells. Therefore, accurate and precise measurement of minimal residual disease can greatly enhance optimization of oncology patients' clinical management. This notion is supported by a large body of data among chronic myeloid leukemia patients, but minimal residual disease detection and monitoring is increasingly applied to other types of leukemia, and is starting to be a factor in decision-making for some therapeutic trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Here, from the solid ground of minimal residual disease detection in chronic myeloid leukemia, the current state of the art and development of molecular techniques in other leukemias and the growing field of multiparameter flow cytometry are reviewed in two separate parts reporting on the respective advances, advantages and pitfalls of these emerging methods.

How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era

Although it is now generally accepted that imatinib is the best initial treatment for patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, a number of questions remain unanswered. For example, (1) Is imatinib the best initial treatment for every chronic-phase patient? (2) At what dose should imatinib be started? (3) How should response to treatment be monitored? (4) For how long should the drug be continued in patients who have achieved and maintain a complete molecular response? (5) How does one handle a patient who achieves a 2-log but not a 3-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts? (6) How should response or failure be defined? (7) For the patient deemed to have failed imatinib, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib? (8) For the patient who has failed imatinib but has a possible allogeneic transplant donor, should one offer dasatinib or nilotinib before recommending a transplantation? (9) Should the transplantation be myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning? (10) How should one treat the patient who relapses after allografting? This paper will address these issues, many of which cannot yet be answered definitively.

Optimal management of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia in 2007

Chronic myeloid leukemia cells contain a Bcr-Abl oncoprotein with an enhanced tyrosine kinase activity, which is considered to be the principal cause of the leukemia. The use of the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib to inhibit the dysregulated kinase activity has proved remarkably successful, and imatinib as a single-agent is now considered to be the best initial treatment for the majority of adult patients in chronic phase. For patients who develop resistance to imatinib, the Bcr-Abl signaling pathway is often re-activated, second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as dasatinib or nilotinib, might restore the kinase inhibition. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is now generally offered to older patients in whom imatinib therapy, and perhaps dasatinib or nilotinib also, have failed; efforts to establish firm criteria for the selection of second-line therapies after imatinib failure continue. At this time, children and younger adults should probably be considered for transplantation as first-line treatment.

Evaluation of the Cepheid GeneXpert BCR-ABL assay

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia harbor the chromosomal translocation t(9;22), which corresponds to fusion of the BCR and ABL genes at the DNA level. The translated fusion product is an oncogenic protein with increased ABL tyrosine kinase activity causing cell transformation. To date, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction is considered the most sensitive method available for detecting low copy numbers of the BCR-ABL gene fusion. Recently, Cepheid introduced its GeneXpert-based assay for the identification of the BCR-ABL gene fusion in cells from blood samples. This system comprises a walk-away self-contained instrument that combines cartridge-based microfluidic sample preparation with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-based fluorescent signal detection and BCR-ABL and ABL Ct (threshold cycle) determination. The difference between the BCR-ABL Ct and ABL Ct (DeltaCt) is expected to represent the ratio of the two populations of mRNAs and ultimately the percentage of neoplastic cells present. We tested whether this BCR-ABL fusion detection system could be used as a clinical diagnostic tool for monitoring patients with minimal residual disease of chronic myelogenous leukemia. We report similar performance characteristics, including limit of detection, specificity, sensitivity, and precision, of this automated BCR-ABL fusion detection system to those of a manual TaqMan reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction-based test.

The detection and significance of minimal residual disease in acute and chronic leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) can be detected in many patients with leukemia who have achieved complete remission as defined by conventional pathology examination. The detection of MRD, be it by flow cytometry or by polymerase chain reaction assays, has now been found to be associated with subsequent relapses in most leukemia subtypes, either following chemotherapy or following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These assays are now increasingly used in clinical trial design to optimize therapy and provide a novel way to assess treatment efficacy.

Serial measurement of BCR-ABL transcripts in the peripheral blood after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an attempt to define patients who may not require further therapy

We identified 243 patients with Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who had BCR-ABL transcripts monitored by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for a median of 84.3 months. Individual patients were regarded as having achieved molecular relapse (MR) if the BCR-ABL/ABL ratio exceeded 0.02% on 3 occasions or reached 0.05% on 2 occasions. Patients were allocated to 1 of 4 categories: (1) 36 patients were "persistently negative" or had a single low-level positive result; (2) 51 patients, "fluctuating positive, low level," had more than 1 positive result but never more than 2 consecutive positive results; (3) 27 patients, "persistently positive, low level," had persisting low levels of BCR-ABL transcripts but never more than 3 consecutive positive results; and (4) 129 patients relapsed. In 107 of these, relapse was based initially only on molecular criteria; in 72 (67.3%) patients the leukemia progressed to cytogenetic or hematologic relapse either prior to or during treatment with donor lymphocyte infusions. We conclude that the pattern of BCR-ABL transcript levels after allograft is variable; only a minority of patients with fluctuating or persistent low levels of BCR-ABL transcripts satisfied our definitions of MR, whereas the majority of patients who did so were likely to progress further.

Managing the Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Through and After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Although the only curative therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia remains allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), early to mid-term results of imatinib in newly diagnosed patients are sufficiently impressive to have displaced allo-SCT to second- or third-line treatment. Patients now arrive at a decision for transplantation in a variety of disease situations: failing to achieve certain hematological, cytogenetic and molecular milestones by some pre-determined timepoint, having lost a previous best response or by progression to advanced phase. The decision, therefore, is not simply whether to transplant or not, but also how to transplant. Evolving transplant technology requires that the individual circumstances of each patient should be considered when recommending the procedure. Attempts to improve the safety of transplant are generally associated with a reduction in long-term disease control and patient monitoring, and management is life-long. The treatment of recurrent disease is no longer straightforward, with the choices being donor lymphocytes or tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone or in combination. This section will review the evidence supporting some of these decisions and highlight current controversies.

Detection and monitoring of minimal residual disease by quantitative real-time PCR

BACKGROUND

The detection of malignant cells by quantitative real-time PCR has become state of the art for diagnosis, monitoring response to treatment and detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with leukemia or lymphoma. In order to be used in high-throughput analyses technical details have to be standardized to improve reproducibility and comparability of quantitative results obtained in different laboratories.

METHODS

Molecular monitoring of disease activity during and after treatment based on the detection of malignant cells in circulation or bone marrow by quantitative real-time PCR will be helpful to develop individualized treatment strategies for every patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of any kind of innovative treatment with specific antibodies, cellular immunotherapy or molecules designed for specific targets of tumor cells can be controlled at a very high level of sensitivity and accuracy. Based on quantitative results indicative for success or treatment failure, therapeutic changes upon the detection of progressive disease at the molecular level can be made even before symptoms or signs of clinical relapse occur. Hopefully, this will lead to higher cure rates and improved long-term survival.

Monitoring minimal residual disease in BCR-ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The total number of leukemia cells in the body is reduced very substantially in patients with BCR-ABL-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) responding to imatinib. This reduction is seen first as restoration of Ph negativity in blood and marrow and thereafter as decreasing BCR-ABL transcript levels assayed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Most patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML who receive imatinib achieve complete cytogenetic remission (CCYR) and low levels of BCR-ABL transcripts, a status that seems to predict for relatively long survival compared with previous treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients treated with 400 mg daily who achieved a reduction in BCR-ABL transcript numbers equal or greater than 3 logs compared with a baseline value have a significantly better progression-free survival than those who achieved lesser degrees of response. The presence of Ph-positive subclones with point mutations in the ABL kinase domain correlates with "acquired" resistance to imatinib and some mutations are associated with greater resistance than others. Preliminary evidence suggests that P-loop mutations are especially likely to be associated with progression to advanced-phase disease.

SUMMARY

Patients with CML should be monitored routinely by serial cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow until Ph negativity is achieved. Thereafter serial quantitative-PCR studies should be undertaken at approximately 3-month intervals and probably also bone marrow cytogenetic studies at longer intervals. Routine studies for ABL kinase domain mutations may also be advisable. The observation of increasing quantities of residual leukemia or expansion of a mutated clone suggests the need to modify therapy.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia

There never has been a more difficult time to advise patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Until recently,the options comprised noncurative but relatively nontoxic chemotherapy or potentially curative allogeneic stem cell transplantation,with its attendant morbidity and mortality. There now is the additional option of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate that has been in clinical practice for almost 5 years. Although data are emerging regarding the efficacy of imatinib, solid evidence of any prolongation in survival will be delayed for several years. Future management of CML will continue to depend on a combination of approaches that use allografting and targeted drug therapy. The next decade undoubtedly will witness the introduction of a number of agents capable of inhibiting signal transduction pathways,perhaps controlling CML in cases of primary or acquired imatinib resistance. In the absence of long-term outcome data for imatinib,it remains reasonable to propose that young patients with newly diagnosed CML who have HLA-identical or well-matched unrelated donors should undergo allogeneic transplantation using a standard or nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen. Similarly,patients who fail to respond to imatinib should be rescued with a transplant strategy. The role of molecular monitoring in these two strategies cannot be underestimated.

Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

In a randomized trial, 1106 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase were assigned to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine as initial therapy. We measured levels of BCR-ABL transcripts in the blood of all patients in this trial who had a complete cytogenetic remission.

METHODS

Levels of BCR-ABL transcripts were measured by a quantitative real-time polymerase-chain-reaction assay. Results were expressed relative to the median level of BCR-ABL transcripts in the blood of 30 patients with untreated CML in chronic phase.

RESULTS

In patients who had a complete cytogenetic remission, levels of BCR-ABL transcripts after 12 months of treatment had fallen by at least 3 log in 57 percent of those in the imatinib group and 24 percent of those in the group given interferon plus cytarabine (P=0.003). On the basis of the rates of complete cytogenetic remission of 68 percent in the imatinib group and 7 percent in the group given interferon plus cytarabine at 12 months, an estimated 39 percent of all patients treated with imatinib but only 2 percent of all those given interferon plus cytarabine had a reduction in BCR-ABL transcript levels of at least 3 log (P<0.001). For patients who had a complete cytogenetic remission and a reduction in transcript levels of at least 3 log at 12 months, the probability of remaining progression-free was 100 percent at 24 months, as compared with 95 percent for such patients with a reduction of less than 3 log and 85 percent for patients who were not in complete cytogenetic remission at 12 months (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients with CML who had a reduction in BCR-ABL transcript levels of at least 3 log by 12 months of therapy was far greater with imatinib treatment than with treatment with interferon plus cytarabine. Patients in the imatinib group with this degree of molecular response had a negligible risk of disease progression during the subsequent 12 months.

Monitoring bcr-abl by polymerase chain reaction in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia

The elucidation of the molecular biology of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has provided a paradigm for understanding leukemogenesis, targeted drug development, and disease monitoring at the molecular level. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has become an important tool in predicting relapse after allogeneic transplant, allowing for early intervention strategies such as donor lymphocyte infusion. MRD monitoring is important for assessment of disease status in patients who obtain a complete cytogenetic remission, and this approach is likely to play an important role in following patients to determine who will relapse on imatinib mesylate therapy. This review focuses primarily on MRD monitoring by PCR.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia

The treatment options for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) continue to evolve rapidly. Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, Glivec, formerly STI571) has continued to show remarkable clinical benefits and the updated results with this agent are reviewed. As relapses using single agent imatinib have occurred, particularly in advanced phase patients, the issue of whether combinations of other antileukemic agents with imatinib may yield improved results is addressed. In addition, data on new agents that have potential in the treatment of CML are reviewed. These agents are presented in the context of their molecular mechanism of action. The most recent data for stem cell transplantation, along with advances in nonmyeloablative transplants, are also reviewed. In Section I, Drs. Stephen O'Brien and Brian Druker update the current status of clinical trials with imatinib and review ongoing investigations into mechanisms of resistance and combinations of imatinib with other agents. They also present their views on integration of imatinib with other therapies. In Section II, Dr. Jorge Cortes describes the most recent data on novel therapies for CML, including farnesyl transferase inhibitors, arsenic trioxide, decitabine, and troxatyl, among others. These agents are discussed in the context of their molecular mechanism of action and rationale for use. In Section III, Dr. Jerald Radich updates the results of stem cell transplants for CML, including emerging data on nonmyeloablative transplants. He also presents data on using microarrays to stratify patients into molecularly defined risk groups.

The occurrence of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) negative leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for Ph positive chronic myeloid leukemia: implications for disease monitoring and treatment

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal neoplastic disorder, characterized by t(9;22)(q34;q11) that results in the formation of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) and the BCR/ABL fusion gene. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative treatment for CML. Much of its therapeutic efficacy is attributed to a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect exerted by donor-derived lymphoid cells against the Ph positive (Ph+) clone. Post-HSCT monitoring by cytogenetic and molecular detection of the Ph+ clone is necessary, so that pre-emptive immunologic or pharmacologic treatment may be administered at an early stage of relapse. However, under rare circumstances a second Ph negative (Ph-) leukemia may evolve post-HSCT. The pathogenetic possibilities included leukemia arising from donor-derived hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), or transformation of residual recipient-derived Ph- HSCs that have survived the conditioning chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recipient-derived Ph- leukemia may be related to genetic alterations that precede the onset of CML, or myelotoxic effects of the HSCT conditioning regimen. The diagnosis of Ph- relapses requires detailed investigations by conventional karyotyping, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and molecular analysis; as well as chimerism studies that help to document the donor or recipient origin of the leukemia. Although uncommonly reported in the past, Ph- relapses may in fact be more frequent if leukemic relapses post-HSCT are more thoroughly evaluated with these investigations. The recognition of Ph- relapses are important in several ways. Ph- relapses cannot be identified by monitoring investigations targeting the Ph+ clone, so that the early detection of Ph- leukemia is usually not possible. Furthermore, Ph- relapses will not respond to therapeutic strategies effective against the Ph+ CML clone.

Clinical applications of BCR-ABL molecular testing in acute leukemia

Recent advances in molecular genetics impact the health care and outcome of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). BCR-ABL, a common molecular defect in adult ALL, is a valuable tumor marker whose detection influences prognosis and clinical management decisions. Molecular methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR), and real-time quantitative rtPCR can be used to detect the chimeric BCR-ABL gene or its transcripts. These molecular assays improve our ability to measure residual disease and to estimate risk of relapse. On the horizon are gene expression profiles that will likely provide additional information beyond what is obtainable with current clinical and laboratory approaches.

Chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was the first human malignancy to be associated with a specific genetic lesion, the Philadelphia chromosome, harboring the BCR-ABL oncogene. Since then, it has become a paradigm for the discovery of molecular mechanisms and targeted therapeutic approaches in the field of hematologic neoplasias. The past 5 years or so have been particularly fruitful in the dissection of the signal transduction pathways abnormally activated in CML and in the translation of this knowledge to clinical practice. In this report, we discuss the biological basis for such translation and highlight the current and potential tools for the effective treatment of CML patients. The first part presents a review of the basic concepts on the biology of CML and their application to the design of targeted therapy. The mechanisms of action of the molecular-specific drugs currently used in clinical trials are discussed, with emphasis on the description of the most promising new compounds that are enhancing the potential for effective alternative or combination chemotherapy in CML. In the following section, we explain how molecular monitoring of response to imatinib mesylate in patients with CML can be used as a guide to clinical management. In particular, we discuss the relative value of regular quantitative RT/PCR and cytogenetic analyses, how responding patients should be monitored and managed, and how to investigate patients who are refractory or become resistant to imatinib treatment. In the last part of this report, a discussion on the possibility of managing CML with patient-specific strategies is presented. We review the current treatment options, highlight the factors impacting on decision making, discuss the range of possibilities for future therapeutic strategies and propose a systematic approach for individualizing treatment for patients in different disease categories.