Lack of relationship between eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in nasal lavage and urine and the severity of childhood asthma in a 6-month follow-up study

Clinical Potential of Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin in Asthma Management

The assessment and management of patients with asthma is challenging because of the complexity of the underlying inflammatory mechanisms and heterogeneity of their clinical presentation. Optimizing disease management requires therapy individualization that should rely on reliable biomarkers to unravel the phenotypes and endotypes of asthma. The secretory activity and turnover of eosinophils, as assessed by measuring eosinophil-derived proteins, may provide an accurate and complementary tool that mirrors the eosinophil activation status. Emerging evidence suggests that eosinophil-derived neurotoxin has considerable potential as a precision medicine biomarker. In this review, we explore the suitability of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin as a biomarker in asthma management, with particular emphasis on its clinical significance in the management of both pediatric and adult populations.

Serum Levels of Eosinophil-Derived Neurotoxin: A Biomarker for Asthma Severity in Adult Asthmatics

Purpose

Eosinophilic inflammation is a key component of severe asthma (SA). However, there has been no reliable serum biomarker for the eosinophilic inflammation of SA. We hypothesized that serum eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) could predict the eosinophilic inflammation of SA in adult asthmatics.

Methods

Severe asthmatics (n = 235), nonsevere asthmatics (n = 898), and healthy controls (n = 125) were enrolled from Ajou University Hospital, South Korea. The serum levels of EDN and periostin were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared between severe and nonsevere asthmatics. Their associations with total eosinophil count (TEC) and clinical parameters were evaluated; clinical validation of the K-EDN kit for the measurement of serum EDN was evaluated.

Results

Severe asthmatics were older and had longer disease duration with significantly lower levels of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and methacholine PC20 than nonsevere asthmatics. Significant differences were found in TEC or sputum eosinophil count (%) between the groups. The serum levels of EDN and periostin were significantly higher in severe asthmatics than in nonsevere asthmatics and in healthy controls (all P < 0.05). Although significant correlations were found between serum EDN levels measured by the 2 kits (ρ = 0.545, P < 0.0001), higher correlation coefficients between serum EDN levels measured by the K-EDN kit and TEC were higher (ρ = 0.358, P < 0.0001) than those between serum EDN levels measured by the MBL kit and TEC (ρ = 0.319, P < 0.0001) or serum periostin level (ρ = 0.222, P < 0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that serum EDN levels measured by the K-EDN kit predicted the phenotype of SA (P = 0.003), while 2 other biomarkers did not.

Conclusions

The serum EDN level may be a useful biomarker for assessing asthma severity in adult asthmatics.

Eosinophil protein X and childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: There are no reference guidelines for health care providers regarding appropriate use and interpretation of urine eosinophil protein X (u‐EPX) in clinical practice. Currently, there are no clear‐cut clinical or laboratory parameters to diagnose asthma in young children. Objective: In this study, we (1) systematically reviewed and qualitatively appraised the epidemiological evidence to determine diagnostic u‐EPX cut points for pediatric asthma, and (2) performed a meta‐analysis to provide u‐EPX estimates for diagnosing pediatric asthma. Methods: Research articles in literature were identified from PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases from 1966 to August 2015. Children <18 years of age were included. Both serum and urine EPX were included. Twenty‐seven studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and nine studies for the meta‐analysis. Details regarding EPX analyses, treatment efficacy, and outcomes were assessed. For meta‐analyses, effect estimates were abstracted using standardized means. Results: Over 70% of studies found a significant relationship between u‐EPX and childhood asthma. There was 1.94 times higher standardized means of u‐EPX among acute asthmatics compared to healthy controls (confidence interval [CI]: 1.67–2.22). Similarly, the difference in standardized means between asymptomatic asthmatics and healthy controls was 1.58 times higher (CI: 1.27–1.88). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Despite differences in sample sizes, EPX processing and measurement, and ages of children, a consistent trend of higher EPX levels with childhood asthma was revealed.

Salivary inflammatory mediator profiling and correlation to clinical disease markers in asthma

Rationale

There is a need for a readily available, non-invasive source of biomarkers that predict poor asthma control.

Objectives

We sought to determine if there is an association between the salivary inflammatory profile and disease control in children and adults with asthma.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we collected demographic and clinical information from two independent populations at different sites, resulting in convenience samples of 58 pediatric and 122 adult urban asthmatics. Control was assessed by symptom questionnaire (children) and by Asthma Control Questionnaire and current exacerbation (adults). Saliva was collected in all subjects. We applied principal component analysis to a 10-plex panel of relevant inflammatory markers to characterize marker profiles and determined if profiles were associated with asthma control.

Results

There were similar, strong correlations amongst biologically related markers in both populations: eosinophil-related: eotaxin-1/CCL11, RANTES/CCL5, and IL-5 (p<.001); myeloid/innate: IL-1β, IL-6, MCP-1/CCL2, and IL-8/CXCL8 (p<.001). The first three principal components captured ≥74% of variability across all ten analytes in both populations. In adults, the Principal Component 1 score, broadly reflective of all markers, but with greater weight given to myeloid/innate markers, was associated with Asthma Control Questionnaire score and exacerbation. The Principal Component 3 score, reflective of IP-10/CXCL10, was associated with current exacerbation. In children, the Principal Component 1, 2, and 3 scores were associated with recent asthma symptoms. The Principal Component 2 score, reflective of higher eosinophil markers, was inversely correlated with symptoms. The Principal Component 3 score was positively associated with all symptom outcomes.

Conclusion

The salivary inflammatory profile is associated with disease control in children and adults with asthma.

Targeted therapy of bronchitis in obstructive airway diseases

Guidelines for the management of obstructive airway diseases do not emphasize the measurement of bronchitis to indicate appropriate treatments or monitor response to treatment. Bronchitis is the central component of airway diseases and contributes to symptoms, physiological and structural abnormalities. It can be measured directly and reliably by quantitative assay of spontaneous or induced sputum. The measurement is reproducible, valid, and responsive to treatment and to changes in disease status. Bronchitis may be eosinophilic, neutrophilic, mixed, or paucigranulocytic (eosinophils and neutrophils not elevated). Eosinophilic bronchitis is usually a Th2 driven process and therefore a sputum eosinophilia of greater than 3% usually indicates a response to treatment with corticosteroids or novel therapies directed against Th2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13. Neutrophilic bronchitis which is a non-Th2 driven disease is generally a predictor of response to antibiotics and may be a predictor to therapies targeted at pathways that lead to neutrophil recruitment such as IL-8 (eg anti-CXCR2), IL-17 (eg anti-IL17) etc. Paucigranulocytic disease may not warrant anti-inflammatory therapy. Several novel monoclonals and small molecule antagonists have been evaluated in clinical trials with variable results and several more are likely to be discovered in the near future. The success of these agents will depend on appropriate patient selection by accurate phenotyping or characterization of bronchitis.

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels at 3 months post-respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis are a predictive biomarker of recurrent wheezing

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a predictive marker of recurrent wheezing episodes in post-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis.

METHODS

EDN levels and recurrent wheezing episodes were serially measured in 200 infants hospitalized with RSV bronchiolitis.

RESULTS

Serum EDN levels at 3 months correlated significantly with total wheezing episodes at 12 months in the RSV-PLC (n  = 71; r = 0.720, p < 0.0001) and RSV-MONT groups (n = 79; r = 0.531, p < 0.001). Positive predictive value of 3-mo EDN level for total wheezing episodes was 57%; negative predictive value, 76%; sensitivity, 72%; specificity, 62%.

CONCLUSION

EDN levels have predictive value for the development of recurrent wheezing post-RSV bronchiolitis.

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin: a novel biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of asthma

Asthma is associated with increased levels of eosinophils in tissues, body fluids, and bone marrow. Elevated levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) have been noted in asthma patients. Higher levels of EDN and ECP are also associated with exacerbated asthmatic conditions. Thus, EDN, along with ECP, may aid the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma. Several groups have suggested that EDN is more useful than ECP in evaluating disease severity. This may partially be because of the recoverability of EDN (not sticky, 100% recovery rate), as ECP is a sticky and more highly charged protein. In terms of clinical utility, EDN level is a more accurate biomarker than ECP when analyzing the underlying pathophysiology of asthma. As a monitoring tool, EDN has shown good results in children with asthma as well as other allergic diseases. In children too young to fully participate in lung function tests, EDN levels may be useful as an alter native measurement of eosinophilic inflammation. EDN can also be used in adult patients and in multiple specimen types (e.g., serum, sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and nasal lavage fluid). These results are repeatable and reproducible. In conclusion, EDN may be a novel biomarker for the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of asthma/allergic disease.

Urinary eosinophil protein X in childhood asthma: relation with changes in disease control and eosinophilic airway inflammation

The aim of this study was to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal correlations between uEPX and other markers of asthma control and eosinophilic airway inflammation. Methods. We measured uEPX at baseline, after 1 year and after 2 years in 205 atopic asthmatic children using inhaled fluticasone. At the same time points, we assessed symptom scores (2 weeks diary card), lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1))), airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), and percentage eosinophils in induced sputum (% eos). Results. We found negative correlations between uEPX and FEV(1) at baseline (r = -0.18, P = 0.01), after 1 year (r = -0.25, P < 0.01) and after 2 years (r = -0.21, P = 0.02). Within-patient changes of uEPX showed a negative association with FEV(1) changes (at 1 year: r = -0.24, P = 0.01; at 2 years: r = -0.21, P = 0.03). Within-patient changes from baseline of uEPX correlated with changes in % eos. No relations were found between uEPX and symptoms. Conclusion. In this population of children with atopic asthma, uEPX correlated with FEV(1) and % eos, and within-subjects changes in uEPX correlated with changes in FEV(1) and % eos. As the associations were weak and the scatter of uEPX wide, it seems unlikely that uEPX will be useful as a biomarker for monitoring asthma control in the individual child.

The metabolomics of asthma: novel diagnostic potential

Asthma is one of the most common chronic illnesses, especially in children. Reaching the diagnosis of asthma and its management are more difficult than for other chronic illnesses. For example, asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with many clinical classifications based on patient symptoms, lung function, and response to therapy. The symptoms and objective measurements of lung function, often used to guide therapy, are largely based on the inflammation of the airways. Because measuring airway dysfunction and inflammation in a typical clinical setting is difficult, it is often not done. Metabolomics is the study of small molecules generated from cellular metabolic activity. It is possible that the metabolic profile of a patient with a chronic illness such as asthma is different from that of a healthy patient or from a patient with another respiratory illness. Furthermore, if this metabolome could be measured, it might also vary with disease severity. The pattern of metabolites becomes the diagnostic representing the disease. This article outlines the more recent work that has been done to develop the metabolomic profile of asthma.

Metabolomic profiling of asthma: diagnostic utility of urine nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

BACKGROUND

The ability to diagnose and monitor asthma on the basis of noninvasive measurements of airway cellular dysfunction is difficult in the typical clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE

Metabolomics is the study of molecules created by cellular metabolic pathways. We hypothesized that the metabolic activity of children with asthma would differ from healthy children without asthma. Furthermore, children having an asthma exacerbation would be different compared with children with stable asthma in outpatient clinics. Finally, we hypothesized that (1)H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) would measure such differences using urine samples, one of the least invasive forms of biofluid sampling.

METHODS

Children (135 total, ages 4-16 years) were enrolled, having met the criteria of healthy controls (C), stable asthma in the outpatient clinic (AO), or unstable asthma in the emergency department (AED). Partial least squares discriminant analysis was performed on the NMR data to create models of separation (70 metabolites were measured/urine sample). Some NMR data were withheld from modeling to be run blindly to determine possible diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

On the basis of the model of AO versus C, 31 of 33 AO samples were correctly diagnosed with asthma (94% accuracy). Only 1 of 20 C samples was incorrectly labeled as asthma (5% misclassification). On the basis of the AO versus AED model, 31 of the 33 AO samples were correctly diagnosed as outpatient asthma (94% accurate).

CONCLUSION

This is the first report suggesting that (1)H-NMR analysis of human urine samples has the potential to be a useful clinical tool for physicians treating asthma.

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in childhood asthma: correlation with disease severity

BACKGROUND

Eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels have been proposed as markers of disease activity; however, the usefulness of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN)--another eosinophil granular protein--as a marker in pediatric asthma has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared the concentrations of blood eosinophil counts (TECs), serum ECP, and serum EDN to asthma symptom severity in young children.

METHODS

Forty-three young children with asthma (Asthma group: mean age, 2.9 years; range, 1.4-5.0 years) were evaluated during both the acute and stable phases of disease. Asthma severity was measured using a symptom-scoring technique, and serum eosinophil indices (EDN and ECP levels and TECs) were determined. Nineteen age-matched controls (Control group: mean age, 2.7 years; range, 1.0-5.0 years) were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Levels of serum EDN, serum ECP, and TECs were significantly higher in children with acute asthma compared with Controls (p < .0001). However, in stable asthma only EDN and ECP levels differed significantly when compared to Controls (p < .0001 and p < .001, respectively). When comparing acute and stable phases, EDN and TECs differed significantly (p < .0001), whereas ECP did not. Symptom scores correlated significantly with EDN (r = 0.850, p < 0.0001), ECP (r = 0.374, p < 0.01) and TECs (r = 0.457, p < 0.01) in acute asthma patients. When symptom scores were divided into three subgroups based on severity, only EDN levels showed significant differences amongst the three groups.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that serum EDN is a useful marker for identifying disease activity in children with asthma. EDN levels may better reflect disease severity than ECP levels or total eosinophil counts.

Relationships between cotinine, lower respiratory tract infection, and eosinophil cationic protein in children

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of passive smoking on urine eosinophil cationic protein (u-ECP) in children with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI).

METHOD

This was a case-control study. The study cohort consisted of 150 children with LRTI (case group) and 150 healthy children (control), all from a urban setting. The statistical parameters were: a minimum of 139 children for a 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 80% power, and a possible exposure prevalence of 50%. The u-cotinine and u-ECP levels were measured by radioimmunoassay and fluoroimmunoassay methods, respectively. Data were analyzed by the McNemar chi-square test, t-test, and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

When the generally accepted cut-off level of 30 ng/mg urinary cotinine/creatinine was applied, 87.3% of the children with LRTI and 84.7% of healthy children were passive smokers. Using a cut-off level of 60 ng/mg, passive smoking increased the prevalence of LRTI by 4.7-fold (p=0.000). The mean u-ECP values were significantly higher in the case group than in the healthy control group (p=0.018). A positive association was found between u-cotinine and u-ECP values in children with LRTI (p=0.034).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that passive smoking may play an important role in the development of respiratory infections and can cause airway inflammation in children with existing LRTI.

Eosinophil cationic protein: is it useful in asthma? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) has been widely investigated as a potential biomarker of airway inflammation.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed using Medline with key terms eosinophil cationic protein and asthma, limiting the search to titles or abstracts. Out of 688 potential papers found, abstracts were reviewed based on the following criteria: (1) ECP was used as a biological marker, (2) asthma was the index disease studied, (3) it was a controlled clinical study and (4) ECP was assessed as a diagnostic, assessment or management tool. One hundred and sixty-nine articles satisfied the selection criteria and their full-text versions were reviewed. Only 53 papers were found to provide clinically useful information.

RESULTS

ECP has been measured in serum, plasma, sputum, saliva and broncho-alveolar lavage fluids but serum and sputum are the most established. Levels of ECP in normal and asthmatic subjects in various body fluids were identified. ECP correlates well with airway inflammation but not airway hyper-responsiveness. It is raised in other atopic diseases and hence is not diagnostic for asthma. However, it has been shown to be useful in assessing asthma severity, compliance with anti-inflammatory asthma therapy and as a guide to tailing down inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Although there is some evidence that ECP levels are affected by age, smoking, circadian rhythm and seasonal variation, only smoking appears to be of clinical significance.

DISCUSSION

Despite its limitations, ECP remains potentially useful in asthma management. Future research on ECP should focus on using serial measurements and combining it with other markers of asthma which may increase its clinical usefulness.

Eosinophil granule proteins in the assessment of airway inflammation in pediatric bronchial asthma

Eosinophil granule proteins such as eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) in serum and urine are indirect measures of eosinophil activity. The measures have been evaluated for prediction, diagnosis and monitoring of anti-inflammatory treatment modalities in children with asthma. Assessments in serum and urine are highly dependent on sampling procedures and must be performed under strictly controlled conditions using standardized sampling and laboratory procedures. The measures are influenced by circadian and seasonal variations. Measurement of the eosinophil granule proteins does not improve the predictive value of a family history of atopy. Due to insufficient sensitivity and specificity, the measures are not useful in the diagnosis of asthma in children, and the clinical use of eosinophil proteins in the individual child for assessment of asthma severity has not been sufficiently validated. Serum and urine eosinophil granule proteins, however, may be useful in extending our knowledge of suppressive effects on eosinophil activity of various doses, devices and administration regimens of inhaled glucocorticoids in children. Such evaluations may be performed in randomized, double-blind trials of well-defined age groups and they should include measures of compliance. One important aspect to look at would be the distinction between suppressive effects on eosinophil activity and clinically important anti-inflammatory effects. Considering the complexity of airway inflammation and the heterogeneity of childhood asthma, however, it may be too simplistic to look for a single measure of the inflammatory processes. In the future, perhaps, a combination of products of inflammatory cells may give more clinically relevant information with respect to prediction, diagnosis, monitoring and outcome of childhood asthma.

Urinary leukotriene E(4), eosinophil protein X, and nasal eosinophil cationic protein are not associated with respiratory symptoms in 1-year-old children

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic airways inflammation forms the pathophysiologic basis for a proportion of children at risk of developing recurrent wheezing. Early preventive measures and/or anti-inflammatory treatment may be guided by the identification of such children. We aimed to study the relationship between respiratory symptoms and indirect markers of airway inflammation.

METHODS

We measured eosinophil protein X (EPX) and leukotriene E(4) (LTE(4)) in urine, as well as eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal lavages, in a random sample of 1-year-old children with a family history of atopy who participated in an international multicenter study on the prevention of allergy in Europe. For urine analyses, 10 children with upper respiratory illness and 19 healthy children without a family history of atopy were also enrolled. Endogenous urinary LTE(4) was separated by HPLC and determined by enzyme immunoassay with a specific antibody. The concentrations of nasal ECP and urinary EPX were determined by RIA analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten children (mean age: 1.05+/-0.1 years) were enrolled. Prolonged coughing during the first year of life was reported in 29 children, wheezy breathing in 17 children, and dry skin in 33 children. A doctor's diagnosis of wheezy bronchitis was given to 17 children. Sensitization to dust mites (specific IgE > or =1.43 ML/units) was detected in two children. Children with a doctor's diagnosis of atopic dermatitis within the first 12 months of life (n=6) had significantly higher urinary EPX than children without this (66.7 vs 30.1 microg/mmol creatinine, P=0.01). Urinary excretion of EPX and LTE4 showed a weak correlation (r=0.22, P=0.02). There were no significant differences in urinary excretion of EPX and LTE(4) or nasal ECP between children with and without respiratory symptoms (P>0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

At the age of 1 year, urinary EPX is increased in children with atopic dermatitis. With regard to respiratory symptoms, urinary and nasal inflammatory parameters are not helpful in characterizing the phenotype of a single patient.

Eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in the nasal lavage of children during the first 4 weeks of life. SPACE Collaborative Study Team

Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX) are well established as markers of eosinophil activation. We analyzed ECP and EPX concentrations in nasal lavage fluids (NALF) of 378 neonates during their first 4 weeks of life. Inclusion criteria were a positive history of parental allergy and a positive skin prick test or specific IgE (RAST class > or = 2) against at least one out of a panel of common aeroallergens in one or both parents. Twenty-four infants with no history of parental allergy were used as controls. A volume of 2 ml of 0.9% saline was instilled into each nostril and immediately recovered by a suction device. ECP and EPX were analyzed by radioimmunoassay. In 65 samples of three consecutive lavages, EPX was detected in nine samples (13.8%) in the control group, whereas it was detected in 197/360 samples (54.7%) in the study population. The corresponding figures for ECP were 17/65 (26.2%) in the control group and 173/365 (47.4%) in the study group. Both proteins showed a skewed distribution (median/5-95th percentiles for ECP: 0 microg/l [0-69.4] and EPX: 6.6 microg/l [0-73.2]). The differences between the control group and the study group were statistically significant, regardless of the allergic disease of the parents. In children of allergic parents, activation proteins of the eosinophil granulocyte are released on the nasal mucosal surface in about 50% of the studied population at the age of 4 weeks. This early onset of eosinophil activation in the nasal respiratory epithelium may reflect a genetic predisposition to allergy or early exposure to allergens.