Compliance with malaria chemoprophylaxis and preventative measures against mosquito bites among Dutch travellers

Questionnaire-Based Analysis of Adverse Events and Compliance with Malaria Chemoprophylaxis in Taiwan

Malaria was eradicated in Taiwan in 1952; however, imported malaria cases are reported every year. The subtropical climate in Taiwan permits mosquito propagation and possible outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate travelers' compliance and side effects of malaria prophylaxis to prevent a malaria outbreak in Taiwan. In this prospective study, we enrolled travelers who visited our travel clinic before going to malarious areas. A total of 161 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. Associations between the occurrence of side effects and compliance with antimalarial drugs were analyzed. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated after adjusting for potential risk factors in multiple logistic regression analysis. Of the 161 enrolled travelers, 58 (36.0%) reported side effects. Insomnia, somnolence, irritability, nausea, and anorexia were associated with poor compliance. Mefloquine was not associated with more neuropsychological side effects than doxycycline. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that chemoprophylaxis compliance was affected by a younger age, visiting friends and relatives, visiting the travel clinic more than 1 week before the trip, and preferring to use the same antimalarial regimen on the next trip. Our findings could provide information to travelers besides labeled side effects to improve compliance with malaria prophylaxis and consequently help to prevent malaria outbreaks in Taiwan.

Success of malaria chemoprophylaxis for outbound civil and military travellers in prevention of reintroduction of malaria in Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND

Sri Lanka was certified as malaria-free in September 2016. However, the continuous presence of the malaria vector poses serious risks of reintroduction of the disease. Chemoprophylaxis and advice on malaria preventive behaviour for international travellers is a key strategy adopted to reduce the risk of imported malaria.

METHODS

We conducted an efficiency study of malaria chemoprophylaxis for civilian and military travellers who requested travel advice from the Anti Malaria Campaign (AMC) prior to departure. The AMC is the only agency that can issue malaria chemoprophylaxis to travellers and hence this sample is representative of all such individuals seeking travel advice in Sri Lanka.

RESULTS

A total of 544 (400 civilians and 144 military) travellers were interviewed prior to departure and after return. The majority travelled to African destinations (516/544 [94.8%]) and were prescribed mefloquine (517/544 [95%]). Chemoprophylaxis was well tolerated and discontinuation due to adverse events was minimal. Regular chemoprophylaxis was reported by 505 (92.8%) participants while overseas. The protective efficacy of chemoprophylaxis was 100% among those who complied with the full course.

CONCLUSIONS

The compliance with chemoprophylaxis and its protective efficacy were satisfactory in this study. It is an effective tool in preventing imported malaria to post-elimination Sri Lanka.

A systematic review of factors affecting adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis amongst travellers from non-endemic countries

Background

The aim of this systematic review was to identify predictors of actual or intended adherence with malaria chemoprophylaxis amongst travellers from non-endemic countries visiting endemic countries.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health databases for studies published up to April 2019. Studies were included if they assessed reasons for adherence among people travelling from a country where malaria was not endemic to a country where it was.

Results

Thirty-two studies were included. Predictors of adherence were categorized as relating to either the nature of the travel or the traveller themselves. The three main predictors associated with nature of travel included: destination (e.g. country visited, urban vs rural areas), length of travel and type of travel (e.g. package vs backpacking holiday). The four main traveller-associated predictors were: age, reason for travel (e.g. business, leisure or visiting friends and relatives), perceived risk of catching malaria and experienced or expected medication effects.

Conclusions

In order to improve adherence, clinicians should focus on travellers who are least likely to exhibit adherent behaviour. This includes travellers visiting destinations known to have lower adherence figures (such as rural areas), backpackers, business travellers, younger travellers and those travelling for longer periods of time. They should also check to ensure travellers’ perceptions of the risks of malaria are realistic. Where appropriate, misperceptions (such as believing that curing malaria is easier than taking prophylaxis or that travellers visiting relatives have some level of innate immunity) should be corrected. All travellers should be informed of the potential side-effects of medication and given guidance on why it is nonetheless beneficial to continue to take prophylaxis. Further research is required to test interventions to improve adherence.

Non-adherence to malaria prophylaxis: The influence of travel-related and psychosocial factors

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis is limited by a lack of compliance in travellers. This study assesses the demographic, travel-related, and psychosocial determinants of non-compliance with chemoprophylaxis.

METHODS

715 adults, who received a pre-travel malaria prophylaxis prescription, were invited to complete a post-travel digital questionnaire on non-compliance, demographics, travel-related and psychosocial variables.

RESULTS

330 travellers (53% response) reported 32% non-compliance with malaria chemoprophylaxis. Logistic regression analyses revealed that 3/11 assessed psychosocial variables uniquely predicted non-compliance: 'negative attitude towards chemoprophylaxis' (β=0.694, OR 2.0, p<0.01), 'low perceived severity of malaria' (β=0.277, p=0.04) and 'fatigue during travel' (β=2.225, OR 9.3, p<0.01). Furthermore, the age and education of the traveller were uniquely predictive of non-compliance (β=-0.023 (p=0.02) and β=0.684 (p=0.04)). None of the travel-related variables predicted non-compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

About one-third of the travellers in our study were non-compliant with malaria prophylaxis, especially young travellers and highly educated travellers. Fatigue during travel seems to lead to non-compliance. Further research should focus on addressing the psychosocial factors in pre-travel consultation, since these appear to be better predictors for intention to comply than travel-related variables.

Malaria prevention in the older traveller: a systematic review

Older travellers are at higher risk of malaria-related morbidity and mortality compared with younger people. Yet, prevention of malaria in this specific group of travellers is a long-standing issue in travel medicine. The aim of this research was to synthetize the existing evidence about this important topic, highlighting older travellers' attitudes and practises toward malaria prevention. Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, EuropePMC, Web of Science, WHOLIS and LILACS databases for relevant studies reporting malaria prevention measures in older travellers. To measure malaria prevention in the older traveller population, the main information outcomes were obtained from the ABCD framework that included travellers' 'Awareness' towards pre-travel health advice, their utilisation of 'Bite-prevention measures' and adherence to 'Chemoprophylaxis'. Data on 'Diagnosis'-related outcomes were excluded for not being measures of malaria prevention. Three evaluators independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included articles. The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO (protocol number CRD42019124202). Out of the 899 titles and abstracts screened, 13 articles were included in this review synthesis. These studies included a wide range of interventions for malaria prevention: no relevant differences in pre-travel healthcare attendance were found depending on age; older travellers were found to be less likely to comply with bite-prevention measures; three high-quality studies reported that adherence to chemoprophylaxis significantly increased with age, while three studies did not find age-related differences in travellers' adherence. Overall, prevention of malaria in the older traveller has received limited attention from the scientific community. Older travellers seem to be less likely to comply with bite-prevention measures, but there was high heterogeneity across the reports. This population group demands particular attention and tailored health advice before travelling to malaria endemic areas. More research is required on how to improve malaria prevention in the older traveller.

Use of repellents by travellers: A randomised, quantitative analysis of applied dosage and an evaluation of knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP)

BACKGROUND

Prevention of arthropod-borne infections hinges on bite prevention. We aimed to investigate travellers' use of repellents.

METHODS

We measured the amount of applied repellent with a spray containing 30% DEET and 20% Icaridin versus a lotion with 20% Icaridin alone. We calculated the concentration of active ingredient reached on the skin and evaluated formulation acceptability. The travellers completed a questionnaire evaluating Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice (KAP) to anti-vectorial protective measures (AVPM).

RESULTS

Some 200 volunteers travelling to mosquito borne infection endemic areas were recruited. The mean concentration of active substance achieved on the skin of the left arm was 0.52 mg/cm² of DEET/Icaridin spray versus 0.21 mg/cm² of Icaridin lotion. These levels are below the recommended protective dose (1 mg/cm²) for each formulation. Women were significantly more likely to apply a higher, protective dose of repellent. Travellers to Africa, women and older participants showed higher projected adherence to AVPM.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 2.5% of recruited travellers applied the recommended protective dose of repellent. Women and older travellers are the most adherent users of repellents. The pre-travel health consultation should provide more information on the application quantity and correct use of repellents.

Factors associated with malaria chemoprophylaxis compliance among French service members deployed in Central African Republic

BACKGROUND

Malaria is a public health concern in the French armed forces, with 400-800 cases reported every year and three deaths in the past 2 years. However, lack of chemoprophylaxis (CP) compliance is often reported among service members. The aim of this study was to explore factors associated with CP compliance.

METHODS

A retrospective study (1296 service members) was carried out among troops deployed in Central African Republic. Determinants of CP were collected by self-questionnaire. Socio-demographic variables, behavioural characteristics, belief variables, operational determinants such as troops in contact (TIC) and number of nights worked per week and peer-to-peer reinforcement were studied. Relationships between covariates and compliance were explored using logistic regressions (outcome: compliance as a dummy variable).

RESULTS

Chemoprophylaxis compliance was associated with other individual preventive measures against mosquito bites (bed net use, OR (odds ratio) = 1.41 (95% CI [1.08-1.84]), and insecticide on clothing, OR = 1.90 ([1.43-2.51]) and malaria-related behaviours (taking chemoprophylaxis at the same time every day, OR = 2.37 ([1.17-4.78]) and taking chemoprophylaxis with food, OR = 1.45 ([1.11-1.89])). High perceived risk of contracting malaria, OR = 1.59 ([1.02-2.50]), positive perception of CP effectiveness, OR = 1.62 ([1.09-2.40]) and the practice of peer-to-peer reinforcement, OR = 1.38 ([1.05-1.82]) were also associated with better compliance. No association was found with TIC and number of nights worked.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, which shows a positive relationship between peer-to-peer reinforcement and CP compliance, also suggests the existence of two main personality profiles among service members: those who seek risks and those who are health-conscious. Health education should be expanded beyond knowledge, know-how and motivational factors by using a comprehensive approach based on identification of health determinants, development of psychosocial skills and peer-to-peer reinforcement.

Determinants of Adherence with Malaria Chemoprophylactic Drugs Used in a Traveler's Health Clinic

Background. The WHO recommends mefloquine, atovaquone/proguanil, and doxycycline for malaria chemoprophylaxis. Adherence to a drug is determined by many factors. Objective. To detect the determinants of travelers' adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis. Methods. A prospective comparative study was conducted from January 2012 to July 2013 that included travelers (928 travelers) to malaria endemic countries who visited the THC. They were classified into 3 groups: the 1st is the mefloquine group (396 travelers), the 2nd is the doxycycline group (370 travelers), and finally those who did not receive any drugs (162 travelers). The participants from the 1st and 2nd groups enrolled in the study. Results. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The predictors for adherence in the mefloquine group were travel to an African destination [OR = 51 (6.8–2385)], higher than a secondary school education [OR = 21 (4.1–144.2)], organized travel [OR = 4 (2.1–6.5)], traveling for leisure [OR = 2.1 (1.1–0.4)], and nationality [OR = 2 (1.11–4.00)]. In the doxycycline group, the predictors included higher than a secondary education [OR = 20.1 (4.5–125.1)], organized travel [OR = 11.4 (5.5–20.9)], travel for leisure [OR = 7 (2.3–22.9)], travel to an African destination [OR = 6.1 (0.41–417)], and nationality [OR = 4.5 (2.3–9.5)]. Conclusion. Adherence with malaria chemoprophylaxis could be affected by many factors such as nationality, education, and organized travel.

Mosquito bite-avoidance attitudes and behaviors in travelers at risk of malaria

INTRODUCTION

Mosquito bite prevention is an important strategy to reduce the risk of contracting malaria and advice on the methods available should be offered in pre-travel consultations. This study examines the attitudes of a cohort of UK travelers to the various bite-avoidance strategies and the extent to which they are practiced when visiting malaria-endemic areas.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study of UK travelers above 18 years of age returning from malaria-endemic areas. Those who agreed to participate were emailed a Web-based questionnaire on their return to the UK. The questionnaire consisted of items relating to attitudes to bite-avoidance measures and malaria and the use of bite-avoidance measures while away.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-two travelers completed the questionnaire representing a 51% response rate. Frequent use of repellents (69%) was higher than covering the arms (49%) and legs (56%), or using insecticide vaporizers (16%), sprays (24%), and bed nets (32%). Those under the age of 30 tended to use bite avoidance less frequently. Gender, purpose, and duration of travel were also found to influence the use of particular measures. A reliable 17-point attitude to the bite-avoidance questionnaire (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70) was constructed and a subscale score indicated that attitudes influenced the use of repellents.

CONCLUSION

The use of measures to avoid mosquito bites on retiring and covering arms and legs needs to be further emphasized to travelers. The attitude scales described could be a useful tool in practice and research into this area.

Severity of imported malaria: protective effect of taking malaria chemoprophylaxis

Background

Although chemoprophylaxis remains an important strategy for preventing malaria in travellers, its effectiveness may be compromised by lack of adherence. Inappropriate use of chemoprophylaxis is likely to increase the risk of acquiring malaria, but may probably also worsen the severity of imported cases. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of use of malaria chemoprophylaxis on clinical features and outcome of imported malaria.

Methods

Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of patients included in the Rotterdam Malaria Cohort between 1998 and 2011 were systematically collected and analysed. Patients were classified as self-reported compliant or non-compliant users or as non-users of chemoprophylaxis. Severe malaria was defined using the 2010 WHO criteria.

Results

Details on chemoprophylaxis were available for 559 of the 604 patients, of which 64.6% were non-users, 17.9% were inadequate users and 17.5% reported to be adequate users. The group of non-users was predominated by patients with African ethnicity, partial immunity and people visiting friends and relatives. The majority contracted Plasmodium falciparum malaria. In contrast, compliant users acquired non-falciparum malaria more frequently, had significant lower P. falciparum loads on admission, shorter duration of hospitalization and significant lower odds for severe malaria as compared with non-users. Patients with P. falciparum malaria were more likely to have taken their chemoprophylaxis less compliantly than those infected with non-P. falciparum species. Multivariate analysis showed that self-reported adequate prophylaxis and being a partially immune traveller visiting friends and relatives was associated with significantly lower odds ratio of severe malaria. In contrast, age, acquisition of malaria in West-Africa and being a non-immune tourist increased their risk significantly.

Conclusions

Compliant use of malaria chemoprophylaxis was associated with significantly lower odds ratios for severe malaria as compared with non-compliant users and non-users of chemoprophylaxis. After correction for age, gender and immunity, this protective effect of malaria chemoprophylaxis was present only in individuals who adhered compliantly to use of chemoprophylaxis. Patients with P. falciparum malaria were more likely to have used their chemoprophylaxis less compliantly than patients with non-P. falciparum malaria who were more likely to have contracted malaria in spite of compliant use of chemoprophylaxis.

Adherence to chemoprophylaxis and Plasmodium falciparum anti-circumsporozoite seroconversion in a prospective cohort study of Dutch short-term travelers

Background

We conducted a prospective study in a cohort of short-term travelers assessing the incidence rate of anti-circumsporozoite seroconversion, adherence to chemoprophylaxis, symptoms of malaria during travel, and malaria treatment abroad.

Methods

Adults were recruited from the travel clinic of the Public Health Service Amsterdam. They kept a structured daily travel diary and donated blood samples before and after travel. Blood samples were serologically tested for the presence of Plasmodium falciparum anti-circumsporozoite antibodies.

Results

Overall, the incidence rate (IR) of anti-circumsporozoite seroconversion was 0.8 per 100 person-months. Of 945 travelers, 620 (66%) visited high-endemic areas and were advised about both chemoprophylaxis and preventive measures against mosquito bites. Most subjects (520/620 = 84%) took at least 75% of recommended prophylaxis during travel. Travel to Africa, use of mefloquine, travel duration of 14–29 days in endemic areas, and concurrent use of DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide) were associated with good adherence practices. Four travelers without fever seroconverted, becoming anti-circumsporozoite antibody-positive. All four had been adherent to chemoprophylaxis; two visited Africa, one Suriname, one India. Ten subjects with fever were tested for malaria while abroad and of these, three received treatment. All three were adherent to chemoprophylaxis and tested negative for anti-circumsporozoite antibodies.

Conclusion

Travel to Africa, using mefloquine, travel duration of 14–29 days in endemic areas, and use of DEET were associated with good adherence to chemoprophylaxis. The combination of chemoprophylaxis and other preventive measures were sufficient to protect seroconverting travelers from clinical malaria. Travelers who were treated for malaria abroad did not seroconvert.

Rolling back malaria: how well is Europe doing?

Background. The Roll Back Malaria (RBM) initiative has committed itself to halving the worlds's malaria burden by 2010, having adopted five operationally focused 'critical concepts' to guide this task. The focus of RBM's efforts is in the developing world where external support is often required. Malaria was only recently eradicated from Europe, and the continent remains under continual threat of reintroduction. The extent of this threat is examined, and the European response benchmarked against RBM's critical concepts. Methods. The following sources were searched for references using the phrase "imported malaria": RBM, WHO, European Union including Eurosurveillance, and MedLine websites. Links to related articles were followed. Citations were independently assessed by the authors for relevance and inclusion. Results. Only in application of the critical concept "disease surveillance" does the European response seem adequate. Conclusions. Europe should be making greater efforts and considering additional strategies to combat imported malaria.

Target product profiles for protecting against outdoor malaria transmission

Background

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual sprays (IRS) have decimated malaria transmission by killing indoor-feeding mosquitoes. However, complete elimination of malaria transmission with these proven methods is confounded by vectors that evade pesticide contact by feeding outdoors.

Methods

For any assumed level of indoor coverage and personal protective efficacy with insecticidal products, process-explicit malaria transmission models suggest that insecticides that repel mosquitoes will achieve less impact upon transmission than those that kill them outright. Here such models are extended to explore how outdoor use of products containing either contact toxins or spatial repellents might augment or attenuate impact of high indoor coverage of LLINs relying primarily upon contact toxicity.

Results

LLIN impact could be dramatically enhanced by high coverage with spatial repellents conferring near-complete personal protection, but only if combined indoor use of both measures can be avoided where vectors persist that prefer feeding indoors upon humans. While very high levels of coverage and efficacy will be required for spatial repellents to substantially augment the impact of LLINs or IRS, these ambitious targets may well be at least as practically achievable as the lower requirements for equivalent impact using contact insecticides.

Conclusions

Vapour-phase repellents may be more acceptable, practical and effective than contact insecticides for preventing outdoor malaria transmission because they need not be applied to skin or clothing and may protect multiple occupants of spaces outside of treatable structures such as nets or houses.

Determinants of compliance with anti-vectorial protective measures among non-immune travellers during missions to tropical Africa

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of anti-vectorial malaria protective measures in travellers and expatriates is hampered by incorrect compliance. The objective of the present study was to identify the determinants of compliance with anti-vectorial protective measures (AVPMs) in this population that is particularly at risk because of their lack of immunity.

METHODS

Compliance with wearing long clothing, sleeping under insecticide-impregnated bed nets (IIBNs) and using insect repellent was estimated and analysed by questionnaires administered to 2,205 French military travellers from 20 groups before and after short-term missions (approximately four months) in six tropical African countries (Senegal, Ivory Coast, Chad, Central African Republic, Gabon and Djibouti). For each AVPM, the association of "correct compliance" with individual and collective variables was investigated using random-effect mixed logistic regression models to take into account the clustered design of the study.

RESULTS

The correct compliance rates were 48.6%, 50.6% and 18.5% for wearing long clothing, sleeping under bed nets and using repellents, respectively. Depending on the AVPM, correct compliance was significantly associated with the following factors: country, older than 24 years of age, management responsibilities, the perception of a personal malaria risk greater than that of other travellers, the occurrence of life events, early bedtime (i.e., before midnight), the type of stay (field operation compared to training), the absence of medical history of malaria, the absence of previous travel in malaria-endemic areas and the absence of tobacco consumption.There was no competition between compliance with the different AVPMs or between compliance with any AVPM and malaria chemoprophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Interventions aimed at improving compliance with AVPMs should target young people without management responsibilities who are scheduled for non-operational activities in countries with high risk of clinical malaria. Weak associations between compliance and history of clinical malaria or variables that pertain to threat perception suggest that cognition-based interventions referencing a "bad experience" with clinical malaria could have only a slight impact on the improvement of compliance. Further studies should focus on the cognitive and behavioural predictors of compliance with AVPMs.

Determinants of compliance with malaria chemoprophylaxis among French soldiers during missions in inter-tropical Africa

Background

The effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis is limited by the lack of compliance whose determinants are not well known.

Methods

The compliance with malaria chemoprophylaxis has been estimated and analysed by validated questionnaires administered before and after the short-term missions (about four months) in five tropical African countries of 2,093 French soldiers from 19 military companies involved in a prospective cohort study. "Correct compliance" was defined as "no missed doses" of daily drug intake during the entire mission and was analysed using multiple mixed-effect logistic regression model.

Results

The averaged prevalence rate of correct compliance was 46.2%, ranging from 9.6%to 76.6% according to the companies. Incorrect compliance was significantly associated with eveningness (p = 0.028), a medical history of clinical malaria (p < 0.001) and a perceived mosquito attractiveness inferior or superior to the others (p < 0.007). Correct compliance was significantly associated with the systematic use of protective measures against mosquito bites (p < 0.001), the type of military operations (combat vs. training activities, p < 0.001) and other individual factors (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The identification of circumstances and profiles of persons at higher risk of lack of compliance would pave the way to specifically targeted strategies aimed to improve compliance with malaria chemoprophylaxis and, therefore, its effectiveness.

Use of short message service (SMS) to improve malaria chemoprophylaxis compliance after returning from a malaria endemic area

Background

Malaria chemoprophylaxis compliance is suboptimal among French soldiers despite the availability of free malaria chemoprophylaxis and repeated health education before, during and after deployment to malaria endemic areas.

Methods

In 2007, a randomized controlled study was performed among a cohort of French soldiers returning from Côte d'Ivoire to assess the feasibility and acceptability of sending a daily short message service (SMS) reminder message via mobile device to remind soldiers to take their malaria chemoprophylaxis, and to assess the impact of the daily reminder SMS on chemoprophylaxis compliance. Malaria chemoprophylaxis consisted of a daily dose of 100 mg doxycycline monohydrate, which began upon arrival in Côte d'Ivoire and was to be continued for 28 days following return to France. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed by questionnaire. Cohort members were followed for a 28 day period, with compliance assessed by use of an electronic medication monitoring device, from which several indicators were developed: daily proportion of compliant individuals, average number of pills taken, and early discontinuation.

Results

Among 424 volunteers randomized to the study, 47.6% were assigned to the SMS group and 52.3% to the control group. Approximately 90% of subjects assigned to the SMS group received a daily SMS at midday during the study. Persons of the SMS group agreed more frequently that SMS reminders were very useful and that the device was not annoying. Compliance did not vary significantly between groups across the compliance indicators.

Conclusion

SMS did not increase malaria chemoprophylaxis compliance above baseline, likely because the persons did not benefit from holidays after the return and stayed together. So the reminder by SMS was noted by all subjects of the study. Another study should be done to confirm these results on soldiers going on holidays from employment after return or with individual travellers.

Chemoprophylaxis compliance in a French battalion after returning from malaria-endemic area

Incidence of malaria is increasing in travelers and soldiers. In 2006, a survey was performed in a French battalion returning from a malaria-endemic area. According to the chemoprophylaxis plasma concentration and the individuals' reports, the noncompliance rates were high, respectively, 63.4 and 54.7%.

Factors determining use of pre-travel preventive health services by West African immigrants in The Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To determine for what reasons West African immigrants, who contribute the largest single group of malaria cases in the Netherlands, visit pre-travel preventive health services and whether use of such services is likely to improve use of preventive measures.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with eligible participants recruited through West African churches and societies and at a large festival.

RESULTS

A total of 70% of the total non-random sample of 292 participants said that they always use pre-travel preventive health services before travelling. Being from Ghana (OR = 2.5), having legal residency status (OR = 2.5), visiting friends and relatives rather than going for business or funeral (OR = 6.7), and living in Amsterdam (OR = 5.1) were all independently associated with using pre-travel preventive health services, as were taking general preventive measures (OR = 3.0), and self-reported use of malaria prophylaxis. Higher use of pre-travel preventive health services was not associated with better knowledge of malaria as such.

CONCLUSIONS

West Africans, in particular non-Ghanaians, illegal immigrants and West African immigrants leaving at short notice should be encouraged to use pre-travel preventive health services. Adequate methods to reach these groups need to be developed, including health education on the importance of prevention in general.

Do travelers really take their mefloquine malaria chemoprophylaxis? Estimation of adherence by an electronic pillbox

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to chemoprophylaxis could explain why some travelers get malaria. Adherence is notoriously difficult to assess, and most studies have been conducted using questionnaires. This study aims at assessing continuous adherence more accurately with the help of an electronic pillbox.

METHODS

Adult travelers to sub-Saharan Africa had to fill a questionnaire on demographic and travel data, drug intake, and adverse events. They received oral and written information about malaria and mefloquine prophylaxis and a Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS, Aardex, Zug, Switzerland), ie, a bottle closed with a cap containing a microprocessor recording date and time of all openings, filled with the exact number of mefloquine 250 mg tablets (Lariam, Roche Reinach, Switzerland). The MEMS) was returned with the questionnaire after completion of chemoprophylaxis.

RESULTS

According to the MEMS, only 26 of 81 travelers (32.1%) took all the doses at the expected date, another 8 (9.9%) did so but starting late with the first dose, and 19 others (23.5%) took all the pills but with intervals of +/-1 day from the right date. Another eight (9.9%) took all the pills but in a random way. The remaining 20 travelers (24.7%) missed some doses, mainly after return. Strict adherence as assessed by electronic monitoring was therefore lower than adherence measured by questionnaire (32.1% vs 48% in taking all the tablets on the right day). There was no difference between the two methods when a broader definition of adherence was applied [taking all the tablets on the right day (+/-1 day); 53/81 (65.4%)], but the MEMS showed that some answers to the questionnaire were not reliable.

CONCLUSION

The use of electronic pillboxes confirms the low adherence of travelers to mefloquine chemoprophylaxis in spite of extensive information about the disease and its prevention. Electronic assessment of pill taking, for the first time applied to malaria chemoprophylaxis, gives new insights into the real adherence of travelers.

Efficacy of antimalarial chemoprophylaxis among French residents travelling to Africa

Controversy exists about which antimalarial chemoprophylaxis regimen should be used among travellers to Africa: the WHO and other experts recommend the use of mefloquine throughout sub-Saharan Africa, whereas French experts still support the combination of chloroquine and proguanil in most of West Africa (the so-called zone 2 countries). In this case-control study based at a travel clinic, we examined the compliance with antimalarial chemoprophylaxis and its efficacy among travellers to tropical areas. Cases were patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria (n = 131). Controls were patients who had a negative malaria film (n = 158). Of all controls, only 36 (22.8%) were adequately protected (i.e. compliant with an adapted regimen of chemoprophylaxis). In zone 2 countries, the efficacy of the combined chloroquine and proguanil was 58% (95% CI 22-78%) for all users, but increased to 100% (95% CI 89-100%) for compliant users. In zone 3 countries, the efficacy of mefloquine was 90% (95% CI 51-98%) and 100% (95% CI 58-100%) for all users and compliant users, respectively.

Antimosquito precautions and medical chemoprophylaxis in French children with malaria

BACKGROUND

France is the European country with the highest number of imported malaria cases (7,500 in 2000). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the nature and efficacy of prophylactic measures in children under 15 years of age referred for malaria.

METHODS

Post travel questionnaires were given to the parents of malarial children in the emergency room. The study took place in two university hospitals in Marseilles, southern France, from August to October 2001.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight children under 15 years of age were included in this 3-month period. Most of them had been infected in Comoro archipelago. Almost two-thirds used bed nets, but only 47% did so every night. Sprayed bed nets were used by 23%. Average compliances with cutaneous repellents, bedroom repellents and long-sleeved clothing were 32%, 24% and 26%, respectively. Air conditioners were uncommon. Only 22% of the children used chemoprophylaxis correctly, according to French recommendations. Five percent did not use any chemoprophylaxis, and 61% reported non recommended drug use. Although all the children traveled to chloroquine-resistant areas, chemoprophylaxis with mefloquine was less common than that with chloroquine + proguanil. No child fully complied with French recommendations concerning both anti mosquito measures and chemoprophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient use of antimalaria precautions by traveling families is associated with the high incidence of pediatric imported malaria in southern France. Travelers' education should be increased to allow the optimization of malaria prophylaxis.

Usefulness of quantitative nucleic Acid sequence-based amplification for diagnosis of malaria in an academic hospital setting

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of quantitative nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (QT-NASBA) to detect Plasmodium spp. in diagnostic specimens of patients suspected of having malaria in a clinical setting in a non-endemic country. During the 4-month recruitment period, 113 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 93 were diagnosed as non-malaria and 20 as malaria cases on the basis of clinical and microscopic criteria. All microscopically positive cases had QT-NASBA counts of >0.1 parasites/ micro l and there was a significant positive correlation between the parasite counts obtained with both diagnostic methods. Of the 93 microscopically negative cases, six had a positive QT-NASBA result. Three of these cases had a recent history of malaria for which specific treatment was taken. In the other three cases there was no history of malaria and QT-NASBA results in these cases were near the cut-off level (>0.1 parasites/ micro l) of the test. The results demonstrate that QT-NASBA is a useful technology for the diagnosis of malaria in a reference laboratory, and it is very helpful in cases of low parasitemia.

The prevention of malaria

Long before the advent of modern chemoprophylaxis drugs, many practitioners successfully prevented the debilitating and fatal outcomes associated with infection by the Plasmodium parasites that cause malaria. Today, with effective insect repellents and several excellent medications available for chemoprophylaxis, there has never been a better array of quality products to prevent mosquito bites and infection and to suppress parasites once in the blood stream; however, there are thousands of imported cases into nonendemic countries and scores of deaths and near-fatal outcomes every year in returning travelers, soldiers, immigrants, and refugees. In this article, the author focuses on practical uses of currently available prevention tools.

Randomized, parallel placebo-controlled trial of primaquine for malaria prophylaxis in Papua, Indonesia

Malaria causes illness or death in unprotected travelers. Primaquine prevents malaria by attacking liver-stage parasites, a property distinguishing it from most chemoprophylactics and obviating 4-week postexposure dosing. A daily adult regimen of 30 mg primaquine prevented malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax for 20 weeks in 95 of 97 glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD)-normal Javanese transmigrants in Papua, Indonesia. In comparison, 37 of 149 subjects taking placebo in a parallel trial became parasitemic. The protective efficacy of primaquine against malaria was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71%-98%); against P. falciparum it was 88% (95% CI 48%-97%), and >92% for P. vivax (95% CI >37%-99%). Primaquine was as well tolerated as placebo. Mild methemoglobinemia (mean of 3.4%) returned to normal within 2 weeks. Blood chemistry and hematological parameters revealed no evidence of toxicity. Good safety, tolerance, and efficacy, along with key advantages in dosing requirements, make primaquine an excellent drug for preventing malaria in nonpregnant, G6PD-normal travelers.

Use of medical chemoprophylaxis and antimosquito precautions in Danish malaria patients and their traveling companions

BACKGROUND

The number of malaria cases imported to Denmark has been increasing for some years. To analyze the background for this we assessed the use of protective measures in Danish travelers visiting malarious areas.

METHOD

Post-travel questionnaires were given during hospitalization to malaria patients, and sent by mail to their traveling companions.

RESULTS

In total, 142 persons participated. Only 32% of the travelers used chemoprophylaxis correctly, according to Danish recommendations. Twelve percent of the travelers did not use chemoprophylaxis. Average compliance was 52%. Insufficient drug dosage was reported by 13%, and use of nonrecommended drugs by 7% of the travelers. Thirty-seven percent used insufficient antimosquito precautions, a problem which often coincided with irregular use of chemoprophylaxis. Malaria patients, sole travelers, and travelers with other ethnical background than Danish, were subgroups using insufficient malaria prophylaxis more frequently than healthy traveling companions.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient use of the available antimalaria precautions by Danish travelers contributes greatly to maintaining a high incidence of imported malaria. Increased attention from physicians in educating travelers is important for optimizing malaria prophylaxis.

Sources of health advice given to travelers

One of the biggest problems for health professionals and the travel industry has been getting travelers to present for pretravel health advice from a qualified source. Behrens1 stated that one of the most important factors in whether travelers seek health advice at all was the perceived risk and severity of tropical diseases. Travelers may obtain this health advice from the travel industry itself, or from health professionals in travel clinics, hospitals, public health units, general practices or other centers. They may also obtain advice by telephone directly from these areas. It is likely however that travel agents and the travel industry, especially various publications, are an important source of preliminary information on health and safety for travelers.

Autonomic function in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Subtle signs of autonomic dysfunction and orthostatic intolerance have been reported in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). To assess cardiovascular autonomic function noninvasively in an unselected group of patients with CFS, we examined responsiveness to several cardiovascular reflex tests in 37 CFS patients and 38 healthy control subjects. Blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were recorded continuously by a Finapres device before and during forced breathing, standing up, Valsalva maneuver, and sustained handgrip exercise (HG). In addition, a mental arithmetic test was carried out and questionnaires to assess the severity of CFS symptoms were completed. At rest, there were no significant differences in blood pressure or in HR between the two groups. The in- and expiratory difference in HR tended to be lower in CFS patients (28.4 +/- 10.5 beats) than in healthy controls (32.2 +/- 9.5) (p = 0.11). The maximal increase in HR during standing up was not significantly different between the CFS group (37.6 +/-8.9 beats) and the control group (40.2 +/- 8.9 beats). There were no significant differences between both groups with regard to the Valsalva ratio, but the systolic and diastolic blood pressure responses were significantly larger in CFS patients, despite the fact that many CFS patients were not able to sustain the Valsalva maneuver. The HR response to MA was significantly less in the CFS group (22.6 +/- 9.9) than in the control group (29.5 +/- 16.7) (p < 0.05), suggesting impaired cardiac sympathetic responsiveness to mental stress. The lower HR responses could not be explained by the level of concentration in the CFS group. During HG exercise, the hemodynamic responses were lower in the CFS group than in the control group, but this might be attributed to the lower level of muscle exertion in CFS patients. There were no significant differences between CFS patients with and without symptoms of autonomic dysfunction regarding the hemodynamic responses to the cardiovascular reflex tests. The findings of the study suggest that there are no gross alterations in cardiovascular autonomic function in patients with CFS.

Compliance of malaria chemoprophylaxis among travelers to India

BACKGROUND

Compliance is an important issue in malaria chemoprophylaxis. The objective of the study was to determine reasons for noncompliance with chemoprophylaxis among international travelers to India.

METHODS

A group of 452 subjects traveling in the subcontinent were interviewed by directly administered questionnaire at two selected locations in Calcutta during October 1992. Full compliance was defined as the uninterrupted use of drugs, as per the World Health Organization (WHO) schedule, during travel up to the date of interview.

RESULTS

Overall, the sample had a male preponderance (61%), with 155 (34%) being business travelers and 56% traveling for more than 3 weeks. Of the 158 (35%) reporting illness during travel, 5 persons tested positive for malaria. Compliance with chemoprophylaxis noted among 320 (71%) respondents in comparison to 21 (5%) found taking inadequate dosage or incorrect medication and 111 (24%) travelers being without any drugs. Backpackers and ethnic travelers as a group reported lower usage. Female, first visit and long-term travelers were less compliant. Inadequacy in pretravel advice, discontinuation due to side effects and active decision despite pretravel advice were common reasons for noncompliance. Past travel experience, concern for side effects, perceived uselessness and confusion arising from alternative regimens were also found to have influenced the decision making.

CONCLUSION

We need to address the identified areas of conflict especially during pretravel counseling since improving compliance is our primary goal in malaria prevention among travelers today.