Detection of hepatitis C core antigen in the antibody negative 'window' phase of hepatitis C infection

Development of a Lateral Flow Assay for the Detection of the Hepatitis C Virus Core Antigen

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a global health challenge, with millions of people affected annually. Current diagnostic methods, reliant on antibody screening and viral RNA detection, are complex, costly, and often inaccessible, particularly in resource-limited settings.

AIM

Development of a lateral flow immunochromatography-based assay for detecting the highly conserved hepatitis C core antigen (HCVcAg).

METHODS

The assay relies on the interaction of four highly specific and cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies with recombinant HCVcAg from five different genotypes in a double antibody sandwich format. Latex and colloidal gold were evaluated as detector nanoparticles.

RESULTS

Extensive evaluation of 32 antibody combinations led to identifying the most sensitive antibody pairs. The chosen assay, named LN17, demonstrated a target sensitivity of 10 ng/strip, with potential clinical implications for detecting HCV. Furthermore, the study examined matrix effects in serum samples, providing valuable insights for future clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed assay holds promise as a rapid, cost-effective, and user-friendly tool to enhance accessibility to hepatitis C screening, especially in high-risk populations and resource-limited environments.

One-step diagnosis strategy together with multidisciplinary telematics referral perform an effective approach for identifying and treating patients with active Hepatitis C infection

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Implementation of a one-step strategy for diagnosis of active Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection would encourage the early diagnosis and reduce the time to access antiviral treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a HCV one-step diagnosis compared to the traditional two-step protocol in terms of the time required for patients to be seen by specialists and the time taken to start antiviral treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comparative study was carried out to assess two diagnostic algorithms (one-step and two-step) for active HCV infection. Serological markers were quantified using the same serum sample to determine both anti-HCV antibodies (HCV-Ab) and HCV core antigen (HCV-cAg) by Architect i2000 SR kit. In this period, a multidisciplinary procedure was started for telematics referral of viremic patients.

RESULTS

One-step approach reduced the time required for patient HCV diagnosis, referral to a specialist, access to treatment, and eliminated the loss of patients to follow-up. Significant differences were observed between one-step and two-step diagnosis methods in the time required for patients to be seen by a specialist (18 days [Interquartile range (IQR) = 14-42] versus 107 days [IQR = 62-148]) and for the initiation of treatment (54 days [IQR = 43-75] versus 200 days [IQR = 116-388]), mainly for patients with advanced fibrosis (35 days [IQR = 116-388] versus 126 days [IQR = 152-366]).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of HCV-cAg has proven to be a useful tool for screening patients with active hepatitis C. The development of a multidisciplinary protocol for the communication of results improved the efficiency of the care process.

Current position of viral load versus hepatitis C core antigen testing

Quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (viral load) is the most widely used marker to diagnose and confirm active HCV infection. The HCV core antigen forms part of the internal structure of the virus and, like HCV RNA, its detection also indicates viral replication and presents certain advantages over viral load testing such as its lower cost, the greater stability of the target, the possibility of working with the same primary tube as that used for HCV serology, and the rapidity of obtaining results, since there is no need to work in batches, unlike the situation with most viral load platforms. Although the core antigen has lower analytical sensitivity than HCV RNA for the detection of low viremia levels, several studies and guidelines have already shown their utility in the identification of patients with active HCV infection. This article summarises current platforms for viral load determination, including point-of-care systems, and also reviews the indications attributed to this marker by the main HCV treatment guidelines. The article also reviews the characteristics of HCV core antigen, the available platforms for its determination, its correlation with viral load determination, and the indications for this marker in the distinct guidelines.

Design of a novel rapid immunoassay for simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibodies

HCV is a potential cause of viral hepatitis, which leads to blood-borne chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-HCV antibody detection assays detect HCV infection after approximately 70 days. HCV core antigen can be detected much earlier than anti-HCV antibodies. However, it disappears soon after the appearance of anti-HCV antibodies. Thus, there is a need for a rapid assay for simultaneous detection of HCV core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies for early diagnosis of HCV infection. A rapid diagnostic assay (HCV Ag-Ab Combo) for simultaneous detection of HCV core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies for early diagnosis of HCV infection was developed. HCV Ag-Ab Combo was evaluated in order to determine its potential for detection of HCV infection earlier than anti-HCV antibody detection assays. We compared the sensitivity of the newly developed assay with anti-HCV antibody detection assays (ELISA [HCV Ab ELISA] and rapid test [HCV Ab Rapid]) and HCV core antigen/anti-HCV antibody detection ELISA (HCV Ag-Ab ELISA). This study included 11 samples that were found positive in HCV RNA detection and HCV Ag-Ab ELISA but negative in HCV antibody detection assays (HCV Ab ELISA and rapid), 10 samples that were found positive in HCV Ag-Ab ELISA and HCV Ab ELISA but negative in HCV Ab Rapid, 69 samples that were found positive in HCV Ag-Ab ELISA, HCV Ab ELISA, and HCV Ab Rapid, and 509 samples that were found negative in HCV Ag-Ab ELISA, HCV Ab ELISA, and HCV Ab Rapid. Three seroconversion panels, PHV 913, PHV 911 (M) and PHV904-00-1.0, and a HCV RNA genotype qualification panel (2400-0182) acquired from Seracare Life Sciences (USA) were also tested. HCV Ag-Ab Combo showed a combined sensitivity and specificity of 100% when tested with 90 samples that were positive for HCV by HCV Ag-Ab ELISA and 509 HCV-negative samples. Its positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were found to be 100%. It detected HCV infection approximately 7 to 12 days earlier than the HCV Ab detection assays, and its performance was not affected when testing different genotypes of HCV. HCV Ag-Ab Combo did not detect HCV infection as early as HCV RNA or HCV Ag-Ab ELISA. HCV Ag-Ab Combo provided a significant improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the preseroconversion phase when compared with anti-HCV antibody detection assays. It could be a useful screening assay, and an alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV Ag-Ab ELISA when nucleic acid technologies cannot be implemented.

Nanosensors for water quality monitoring

Nanomaterial-enabled sensors are being designed for high-efficiency, multiplex-functionality and high-flexibility sensing applications. Many existing nanosensors have the inherent capacity to achieve such goals; however, they require further development into consumer- and operator-friendly tools with the ability to detect analytes in previously inaccessible locations, as well as at a greater scale than heretofore possible. Here, I discuss how nanotechnology-enabled sensors have great, as yet unmet, promise to provide widespread and potentially low-cost monitoring of chemicals, microbes and other analytes in drinking water.

Optimising diagnosis of viraemic hepatitis C infection: the development of a target product profile

Background

The current low access to virological testing to confirm chronic viraemic HCV infection in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is limiting the rollout of hepatitis C (HCV) care. Existing tests are complex, costly and require sophisticated laboratory infrastructure. Diagnostic manufacturers need guidance on the optimal characteristics a virological test needs to have to ensure the greatest impact on HCV diagnosis and treatment in LMIC. Our objective was to develop a target product profile (TPP) for diagnosis of HCV viraemia using a global stakeholder consensus-based approach.

Methods

Based on the standardised process established to develop consensus-based TPPs, we followed five key steps. (i) Identifying key potential global stakeholders for consultation and input into the TPP development process. (ii) Informal priority-setting exercise with key experts to identify the needs that should be the highest priority for the TPP development; (iii) Defining the key TPP domains (scope, performance and operational characteristics and price). (iv) Delphi-like process with larger group of key stakeholder to facilitate feedback on the key TPP criteria and consensus building based on pre-defined consensus criteria. (v) A final consensus-gathering meeting for discussions around disputed criteria. A complementary values and preferences survey helped to assess trade-offs between different key characteristics.

Results

The following key attributes for the TPP for a test to confirm HCV viraemic infection were identified: The scope defined is for both HCV detection as well as confirmation of cure. The timeline of development for tests envisioned in the TPP is 5 years. The test should be developed for use by health-care workers or laboratory technicians with limited training in countries with a medium to high prevalence of HCV (1.5–3.5% and >3.5%) and in high-risk populations in low prevalence settings (<1.5%). A clinical sensitivity at a minimum of 90% is considered sufficient (analytical sensitivity of the equivalent of 3000 IU/ml), particularly if the test increases access to testing through an affordable price, increase ease-of-use and feasibility on capillary blood. Polyvalency would be optimal (i.e. ability to test for HIV and others). The only characteristic that full agreement could not be achieved on was the price for a virological test. Discussants felt that to reach the optimal target price substantial trade-offs had to be made (e.g. in regards to sensitivity and integration).

Conclusion

The TPP and V&P survey results define the need for an easy-to-use, low cost test to increase access to diagnosis and linkage to care in LMIC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-017-2770-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

HCV Ag quantification as a one-step procedure in diagnosing chronic hepatitis C infection in Cameroon: the ANRS 12336 study

INTRODUCTION

The diagnostic procedure for chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC) usually combines anti-HCV antibody (HCV-Ab) and HCV-RNA measurement. Quantifying HCV core antigen (cAg) as a one-step procedure could shorten the diagnostic process. We aimed to assess the performance of cAg quantification in diagnosing CHC and how it is influenced by concomitant HIV or HBV infections.

METHODS

The cAg was quantified by an automated assay (Abbott Diagnostics) in 465 HCV-Ab negative serum samples and 544 HCV-RNA positive serum samples (n = 1009) collected in patients from the Pasteur Center in Cameroon, some of whom were infected by HBV or HIV. Its performance was evaluated in comparison to the gold standard (ELISA or PCR) by estimating its sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp), and by comparing the area under ROC (AUROC) curves in each patient population: HCV mono-infected, HCV-HBV and HIV-HCV co-infected.

RESULTS

Among the 465 HCV-Ab negative patients, 51 and 79 were HIV- and HBV-infected, respectively, whereas among the 544 patients with CHC, 27 and 28 were HIV- and HBV-infected, respectively. The Spearman ρ correlation coefficient between cAg and HCV-RNA was 0.75 (p < 0.00001). The assay had a sensitivity of 95.7% (95% CI: 93.2-97.5) and a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI: 98.1-10) in diagnosing CHC, corresponding to an AUROC of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.0). Being HIV- or HBV-infected did not impact the performance of cAg (Se = 96.4%, Sp = 96.2% and AUROC = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.0) in the HBV group, Se = 100%, Sp = 88.2% and AUROC = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.0) in the HIV group, p between AUROC = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

The cAg quantification displayed a high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of CHC in Cameroon, and its performance was not significantly modified by a concomitant HIV or HBV infection. In the context of CHC elimination on a global scale, using cAg quantification as a screening tool to directly identify CHC could be a reliable tool in a "test and treat" strategy.

Can Hepatitis C Virus Antigen Testing Replace Ribonucleic Acid Polymearse Chain Reaction Analysis for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus? A Systematic Review

The complexity and cost of current diagnostics for hepatitis C virus (HCV) may act as a prevention to the scale-up of treatment in the developing world. Currently, ribonucleic acid (RNA)-polymerase chain reaction tests are the gold standard. However, there is potential for the use of simpler and cheaper antigen tests to confirm HCV infection in different clinical settings. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of antigen assays. This was compared with the reference-standard RNA assays. A subanalysis also assessed Architect core antigen test, which is the only commercially available antigen test on the market. In 24 datasets, evaluating HCV-antigen assays in 8136 samples, the percentage of HCV-antigen positive, HCV-RNA negative was 0.57%. The percentage HCV-antigen negative, HCV-RNA positive was 3.52%. There is strong evidence that antigen detection performs as well as RNA-based assays for HCV management. The use of antigen tests could improve access to HCV care in underresourced healthcare settings.

Hepatitis C virus core antigen: A potential alternative to HCV RNA testing among persons with substance use disorders

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (HCVcAg) may be an alternative diagnostic method to HCV RNA especially in populations such as substance users, the homeless or in resource-limited settings.

AIMS

To evaluate performance of HCVcAg test in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) on methadone in order to document its performance characteristics in the target population and to ensure that its specificity remains consistent across different populations.

METHODS

HCVcAg levels from 109 methadone-maintained patients were compared to HCV RNA levels.

RESULTS

Mean age was 53.8±7.8years, 59.6% were male, 68.8% African American, and 44% HCV-infected. HCVcAg was detectable in 47 of 48 HCV-infected, and undetectable in all HCV RNA negative patients. The HCVcAg assay had sensitivity of 97.9% and specificity of 100%. Correlation with HCV RNA levels was excellent (r=0.88, 95% CI 0.76; 0.95, p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

HCVcAg has excellent performance for the diagnosis of HCV infection in patients with OUD on methadone.

Performance comparison of new generation HCV core antigen test versus HCV RNA test in management of hepatitis C virus infection

The study has evaluated the performance of HCV core antigen (Cag) test by comparing HCV RNA PCR assay which is considered the gold standard for management of HCV infection. Totally, 132 samples sent for HCV RNA (real-time PCR) test were included in the study. Anti-HCV antibody test and HCV Cag test were performed by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CMEI). Anti-HCV test was positive in all samples. HCV RNA was detected in 112/132 (84.8%) samples, and HCV Cag in 105/132 (79.5%). The most common HCV genotype was genotype 1 (86%). Considering the HCV RNA test as gold standard; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of Cag test were found to be 93.75%, 100%, 100%, 74.07% and 94.69%, respectively, and paired test results were detected as highly concordant. A high level of correlation was seen between HCV RNA and Cag tests, however, the concordance between the two tests appeared to be disrupted at viral loads lower than 10³IU/mL. On the contrary, the correlation reached significance for the values higher than 10³IU/mL. Viral loads were in the 17-2500IU/mL range for the negative results for Cag test. Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed a considerably high correlation. The concordance between HCV RNA and Cag tests was disrupted under a viral load lower than 10³IU/mL. Therefore, it would be appropriate to consider cost effectiveness, advantages and limitations of the HCV RNA and Cag tests during the decision on which method to use for patient management.

Current testing strategies for hepatitis C virus infection in blood donors and the way forward

Screening tests for blood donations are based upon sensitivity, cost-effectiveness and their suitability for high-throughput testing. Enzyme immunoassay (EIAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies were the initial screening tests introduced. The ”first generation“ antibody EIAs detected seroconversion after unduly long infectious window period. Improved HCV antibody assays still had an infectious window period around 66 d. HCV core antigen EIAs shortened the window period considerably, but high costs did not lead to widespread acceptance. A fourth-generation HCV antigen and antibody assay (combination EIA) is more convenient as two infectious markers of HCV are detected in the same assay. Molecular testing for HCV-RNA utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) is the most sensitive assay and shortens the window period to only 4 d. Implementation of NAT in many developed countries around the world has resulted in dramatic reductions in transfusion transmissible HCV and relative risk is now < 1 per million donations. However, HCV serology still continues to be retained as some donations are serology positive but NAT negative. In resource constrained countries HCV screening is highly variable, depending upon infrastructure, trained manpower and financial resource. Rapid tests which do not require instrumentation and are simple to perform are used in many small and remotely located blood centres. The sensitivity as compared to EIAs is less and wherever feasible HCV antibody EIAs are most frequently used screening assays. Efforts have been made to implement combined antigen-antibody assays and even NAT in some of these countries.

Characterization and application of monoclonal antibody against hepatitis C virus nonstructual protein three

Developing assays for detecting HCV antigens could be beneficial because viral proteins appear earlier than antibodies and are more stable than RNA in the serum. Monoclonal antibody was prepared by immunization and cell fusion. Subclass, specificity, and efficiency of monoclonal antibodies were determined by ELISA. Epitope specificity of monoclonal antibodies was analyzed by ELISA additivity test. HCV antigen in serum of hepatitis patients was examined by double monoclonal antibody sandwich ELISA. Five hybridoma cell lines were screened and named HCV(1), HCV(2), HCV(3), HCV(4), and HCV(5). These five monoclonal antibodies had high specificity and efficiency. The additivity test showed that HCV(2), HCV(4), and HCV(5) recognized different epitopes, which can be matched in ELISA. Of 173 anti-HCV positive patients, 37 (21.4%) were positive for HCV antigen. Of 1498 anti-HCV negative patients, 10 (0.67%) were positive for HCV antigen. Fifty normal controls were negative for HCV antigen. HCV antigen detection had moderate agreement and correlation with HCV RNA detection (kappa=0.577, p<0.01; r=0.59, p<0.01). This result indicates that the monoclonal antibody against HCV NS(3) may be a potential diagnostic reagent, which would provide a foundation for developing a sandwich ELISA of HCV antigen detection.

Comparison of a newly developed automated and quantitative hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen test with the HCV RNA assay for clinical usefulness in confirming anti-HCV results

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global health care problem. Diagnosis of HCV infection is mainly based on the detection of anti-HCV antibodies as a screening test with serum samples. Recombinant immunoblot assays are used as supplemental tests and for the final detection and quantification of HCV RNA in confirmatory tests. In this study, we aimed to compare the HCV core antigen test with the HCV RNA assay for confirming anti-HCV results to determine whether the HCV core antigen test may be used as an alternative confirmatory test to the HCV RNA test and to assess the diagnostic values of the total HCV core antigen test by determining the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity rates compared with the HCV RNA test. Sera from a total of 212 treatment-naive patients were analyzed for anti-HCV and HCV core antigen both with the Abbott Architect test and with the molecular HCV RNA assay consisting of a reverse transcription-PCR method as a confirmatory test. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the HCV core antigen assay compared to the HCV RNA test were 96.3%, 100%, 100%, and 89.7%, respectively. The levels of HCV core antigen showed a good correlation with those from the HCV RNA quantification (r = 0.907). In conclusion, the Architect HCV antigen assay is highly specific, sensitive, reliable, easy to perform, reproducible, cost-effective, and applicable as a screening, supplemental, and preconfirmatory test for anti-HCV assays used in laboratory procedures for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection.

Incidence of primary hepatitis C infection and risk factors for transmission in an Australian prisoner cohort

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in prisoner populations, particularly those with a history of injecting drug use (IDU). Previous studies of HCV incidence have been based on small case numbers and have not distinguished risk events in prison from those in the community.

METHODS

HCV incidence was examined in a longitudinal cohort of 488 Australian prisoners with a history of IDU and documented to be seronegative within 12 months prior to enrollment. Inmates were tested for anti-HCV antibodies and viremia, and interviewed about demographic and behavioral risk factors for transmission.

RESULTS

The cohort was predominantly male (65%) with high rates of prior imprisonment (72%) and tattooing (73%), as well as longstanding IDU (mean 8.5 years). Ninety-four incident HCV cases were identified (incidence 31.6 per 100 person years). Independent associations were observed between incident infection and prior imprisonment (p = 0.02) and tattooing (p = 0.03), and surprisingly also with methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High rates of new HCV infection were found in this prisoner cohort reflecting their substantive risk behavior profile, despite having remained uninfected for many years. The association with MMT is challenging and highlights the need for better understanding of prison-specific HCV transmission risks, as well as the uptake and effectiveness of prevention programs.

Frequency of gC1qR+CD4+ T cells increases during acute hepatitis C virus infection and remains elevated in patients with chronic infection

CD4+ T cell responses are impaired in chronic HCV infection. To determine factor(s) involved in CD4+ T cell dysregulation, we examined the effect of extracellular core on the alteration of CD4+ T cell responses and the cell surface level of core-binding protein, gC1qR on CD4+ T cells from acute HCV patients with resolved and chronic infection. During the acute phase of infection, the frequency of gC1qR+CD4+ T cells increased in both resolved and chronic HCV infection compared to healthy controls. Notably, 6 months later, the frequency of gC1qR+CD4+ T cells maintained elevated in chronic patients compared to that in resolved patients. In addition, TCR stimulation increased the frequency of gC1qR+CD4+ T cells, resulting in core-induced inhibition of T cell responses in both resolved and chronic patients. These results suggest that HCV infection expands gC1qR+CD4+ T cells, which increase the susceptibility to core-mediated immune dysregulation and facilitate the establishment of HCV persistency.

Electrochemical Biosensors - Sensor Principles and Architectures

Quantification of biological or biochemical processes are of utmost importance for medical, biological and biotechnological applications. However, converting the biological information to an easily processed electronic signal is challenging due to the complexity of connecting an electronic device directly to a biological environment. Electrochemical biosensors provide an attractive means to analyze the content of a biological sample due to the direct conversion of a biological event to an electronic signal. Over the past decades several sensing concepts and related devices have been developed. In this review, the most common traditional techniques, such as cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry, chronopotentiometry, impedance spectroscopy, and various field-effect transistor based methods are presented along with selected promising novel approaches, such as nanowire or magnetic nanoparticle-based biosensing. Additional measurement techniques, which have been shown useful in combination with electrochemical detection, are also summarized, such as the electrochemical versions of surface plasmon resonance, optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy, ellipsometry, quartz crystal microbalance, and scanning probe microscopy. The signal transduction and the general performance of electrochemical sensors are often determined by the surface architectures that connect the sensing element to the biological sample at the nanometer scale. The most common surface modification techniques, the various electrochemical transduction mechanisms, and the choice of the recognition receptor molecules all influence the ultimate sensitivity of the sensor. New nanotechnology-based approaches, such as the use of engineered ion-channels in lipid bilayers, the encapsulation of enzymes into vesicles, polymersomes, or polyelectrolyte capsules provide additional possibilities for signal amplification. In particular, this review highlights the importance of the precise control over the delicate interplay between surface nano-architectures, surface functionalization and the chosen sensor transducer principle, as well as the usefulness of complementary characterization tools to interpret and to optimize the sensor response.

Feasibility and cost-benefit of implementing pooled screening for HCVAg in small blood bank settings

To examine the accuracy, feasibility and benefits of screening for hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCVAg) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test in pools. Many countries cannot afford to test blood donations for hepatitis C using molecular methods. Screening individual units using the ELISA HCVAg test is an acceptable, yet still expensive, alternative, especially for small blood bank settings. This study evaluated the option of screening for HCVAg in pools. The sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of HCVAg in pools of three and six antibody-negative samples were estimated and compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The feasibility and cost-benefit of the assay was assessed on 960 routine samples collected at a hospital blood bank in Gaza. Based on results for 50 PCR-positive pools and 50 and 110 PCR-negative pools of three and six, the Se of testing in pools of three and six samples is 80-82% [95% confidence interval (CI): 66.3-91.4] and Sp >or=98% (95% CI: 89.4-100.0) compared with PCR. The incidence of antigen in donors in Gaza was 0.1% (95% CI: 0-0.56). Cost analyses suggested significant benefits from implementing screening blood donations for HCVAg when the incidence rate is >4.2/10,000, leading to reduction in the expenditures needed to treat patients infected with HCV. The risk of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis C in resource-deprived developing countries can be efficiently reduced by additional screening of antibody-negative blood donations for HCVAg in pools of six.

Detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen for early diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in plasma donor in China

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of a new hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen assay developed in China.

METHODS: After the determination of HCV infection, 49 serial samples were selected from 11 regular plasma donors in 5 different plasma stations. To compare the performance of HCV core antigen detection and HCV PCR, these samples were genotyped, and each specimen was analyzed by ELISA for the detection of HCV core antigen and by qualitative HCV PCR.

RESULTS: Among all of the sequential samples, the original 13 specimens were HCV RNA-negative, and 36 samples were HCV RNA-positive. Twenty-seven samples (75%) were HCV core antigen-positive from these HCV RNA-positive specimens. Conversely, 27 samples (93.1%) were found HCV RNA-positive in HCV core antigen-positive samples. Intervals between HCV RNA and HCV core antigen-positive, as well as between HCV core antigen-positive and HCV antibody-positive were 36.0 and 32.8 d, respectively.

CONCLUSION: This HCV core antigen assay, developed in China, is able to detect much of anti-HCV-negative, HCV RNA-positive preseroconversion window period (PWP) plasma donations.

Host and viral factors in the immunopathogenesis of primary hepatitis C virus infection

Individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) have two possible outcomes of infection, clearance or persistent infection. The focus of this review is the host mechanisms that facilitate clearance. The interaction between HCV viral components and the immune system ultimately determines the balance between the virus and host. Strong evidence points to the aspects of cellular immune response as the key determinants of outcome. The recent discovery of viral evasion strategies targeting innate immunity suggests that the interferon-alpha/beta induction pathways are also critical. A growing body of evidence has implicated polymorphisms in both innate and adaptive immune response genes as determinants of viral clearance in individuals infected with HCV.

Accuracy of hepatitis C virus core antigen testing in pools among seroconverters

BACKGROUND

Screening blood units for hepatitis C virus (HCV) with nucleic acid testing (NAT) reduces the risk associated with the long "window period" (8-9 weeks) after HCV infection. The feasibility of adding the HCV core antigen assay in pools to the existing anti-HCV individual screening was examined as an alternative of NAT, for early detection of HCV.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Eighteen HCV seroconversion panels were tested for HCV antibodies, HCV antigen, and HCV RNA. Each sample was tested for HCV antigen individually and in pools of 3, 6, and 12. Statistical analyses included estimation of time until detection of the first positive HCV antigen bleed in each pool size, with a locally weighted regression (LOWESS) model. Sensitivity was calculated compared to NAT.

RESULTS

Detection of HCV antigen in individual samples and in pools of 3 and 6 significantly preceded the detection of antibodies by 63, 53, and 46 days, respectively. Although the sensitivity of the HCV antigen test decreased with the increase in pool size, the estimated overall sensitivity of the "two-stage" antigen and antibody screening (where NAT of individual samples was the gold standard) was not significantly different between individual and the different pool sizes.

CONCLUSION

Screening for HCV antigen in pools of 6 can be considered an efficient and easier-to-implement alternative to the costly NAT for identifying blood donors in the seroconversion period. It may offer a cost-effective approach in resource utilization in poor countries, that, after the implementation of HCV antibody testing, want to further improve blood safety.

Performance of ORTHO HCV core antigen and trak-C assays for detection of viraemia in pre-seroconversion plasma and whole blood donors

OBJECTIVE

Logistics and cost of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) screening preclude its current use in many developing countries. Development of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen assays offer an alternative to NAT. We evaluated two specimen populations to assess the sensitivity, relative to NAT, of the HCV core antigen (HCVcAg) ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) test system and the trak-C assay: (1) plasma donor HCV NAT-conversion panels and (2) cross-sectional whole blood donor NAT yield specimens.

METHODS

Differential sensitivities among NAT (NGI; Chiron/Gen-Probe) and both HCVcAg assays (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY) were evaluated using: (1) 102 serial ramp-up phase specimens from 37 plasma donor NAT-conversion panels (Alpha Therapeutic/BioClinical Partners); and (2) 42 cross-sectional whole blood donor NAT yield specimens (confirmed RNA positive, antibody negative) plus 54 NAT false-positive specimens (American Red Cross).

RESULTS

Viral load among the plasma donor NAT-conversion panels at the cutoffs for HCVcAg and trak-C assays were 32 000 copies/ml (95% confidence interval [CI] 8000-120 000) and 8000 copies/ml (95% CI: 2200-28 000), respectively. The mean (95% CI) difference in window period reduction compared to routine mini-pool NAT screening (estimated sensitivity 100 copies/ml) was delayed 5.2 days (2.2-7.6 days) for HCVcAg assay and 3.8 days (2.1-5.5 days) for the trak-C assay. Among the 42 NAT yield specimens, the HCVcAg assay detected 31 (74%) as core antigen-positive while the trak-C assay detected 37 (88%) as core antigen-positive. Viral loads for the five specimens not detected by the trak-C HCVcAg assay ranged from 100 to 7770 copies/ml. All 54 NAT false-positive specimens were non-reactive on both HCV core antigen assays.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that the trak-C assay has sensitivity approaching routine mini-pool NAT screening for the detection of seronegative HCV infection. In the absence of routine NAT screening for early HCV infection, the use of an HCV core antigen assay should be considered.

Long-term evolution of serum and liver viral markers in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C and sustained response

Few studies have analysed the evolution of HCV markers in chronic hepatitis C (CHC)-treated patients. We have evaluated the presence or absence of serum and liver HCV-RNA, the core antigen (HCV-cAg) and the loss of specific antibodies (anti-HCV), in long-term sustained responders (SR). One hundred and seventy-six patients (132 SR and 44 nonresponders (NR) were included in the study. HCV-RNA was determined in serum and liver by a commercial PCR-kit. HCV-Ag was determined by ELISA and specific antibodies against HCV by means of a commercial line immunoblot assay (LIA) technique. Serum HCVcAg was found positive in three (4.2%) SR and in one (4%) NR (NS). Four SR (3.6%) and 44 NR (100%) were also HCV-RNA (+) in liver tissue. Two patients were HCV-cAg (+). A good correlation was found between the serum levels of HCV-cAg and HCV-RNA (r = 0.847, P < 0.001). Specific antibodies (anti-HCV) were determined by LIA in 45 patients. A decrease was found in the number of patients who presented reactivity to bands E2 and NS4 when we compared SR with a follow-up of more than 5 years with NR and SR with a follow-up <5 years (P < 0.01 and 0.005). A good correlation was found between the HCV-cAg and HCV-RNA serum levels in CHC-treated patients (P < 0.001). Few SR (3.6%) had HCV-RNA in the liver, and HCV-cAg (1.8%) in serum. In SR with more than 5 years of follow-up a clear tendency exists in the trend to clarify the bands E2 and NS4 of anti-HCV in serum.

Role of nucleic acid testing in cadaver organ donor screening: detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in seropositive and seronegative donors

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission by both seropositive and seronegative cadaver organ donors has been documented, yet nucleic acid testing is not routinely used to identify active infection in these donors prior to transplantation. Between November 2001 and February 2004, we screened 1445 cadaver organ donors for anti-HCV antibodies with either HCV EIA-2.0 (Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, IL, USA) and/or Ortho HCV Version 3.0 ELISA (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ, USA) and confirmed seropositive samples with Chiron RIBA3.0 SIA (Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, CA, USA). Samples with sufficient volume (n = 726) were tested by the VERSANT HCV [transcription-mediated amplification (TMA)] Qualitative assay (Bayer Healthcare LLC, Tarrytown, NY, USA) which can be performed in approximately 5 h. Those with detectable HCV RNA and sufficient volume were quantified by the VERSANT HCV 3.0 (bDNA) Assay (Bayer Healthcare LLC) and/or the HCV RNA TMA Quantitative Assay (n = 23) and genotyped (n = 57). Seventy-seven of 1445 (5.3%) donors were seropositive, reactive by either one or both anti-HCV assays. Fifty-two of 63 (82.5%) of the seropositive samples had detectable HCV RNA and were genotyped. Seventeen of these samples had quantifications ranging from 128,123 to >7,692,307 IU/mL. Six of 663 (0.9%) seronegative samples had detectable HCV RNA. Their quantifications ranged from <9.3 to 1,464,799 IU/mL, and five of these six were successfully genotyped. As HCV RNA was demonstrated in samples from both our seropositive and seronegative cadaver organ donors, we are now incorporating nucleic acid testing into our donor screening/diagnostic algorithm.

Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies improves the early detection of HCV infection

To evaluate whether a new enzyme immunoassay developed for the simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) and anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV Ab) (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad) could improve the early detection of HCV infection, we compared its sensitivity to that of anti-HCV, HCV core Ag, and HCV RNA assays. The populations studied included 12 blood donor samples positive for HCV RNA and HCV core Ag but negative for anti-HCV antibodies and 23 hemodialysis patients who developed anti-HCV Ab (seroconversion) during the follow-up. From these 23 individuals, 83 samples sequentially collected prior to seroconversion and 108 samples collected after seroconversion were tested. Six of 12 blood donations were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab assay. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 24 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative by the HCV Ag/Ab assay and 23 of the 59 HCV RNA-positive samples (39%) were positive. The HCV Ag/Ab assay detected HCV infection on average 21.6 days before the most sensitive antibody assay. The HCV Ag/Ab assay did not detect HCV infection as early as the HCV RNA assay (mean delay, 30.3 days) or HCV Ag assay (mean delays, 27.9, and 16.3 days by the HCV core Ag quantification assay and the HCV Ag blood screening assay, respectively). This new assay provides a notable improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the so-called window period compared with anti-HCV Ab assays and could be a useful alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV core Ag assays for diagnosis or blood screening when nucleic acid technologies or HCV core Ag detection are not implemented.

Usefulness of the hepatitis C virus core antigen assay for screening of a population undergoing routine medical checkup

We studied the usefulness of the recently designed Trak-C assay for the detection and quantification of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) for the screening of HCV infection in 4,201 subjects selected from 74,150 consecutive volunteers undergoing routine medical checkups. Subjects were selected for screening because they had risk factors (group II, n = 321) and/or elevated alanine transaminase activity (group I, n = 3847). Initially, the anti-HCV antibody assay and the Trak-C assay were performed on each patient. Subsequently, the Trak-C assay was performed only when the anti-HCV enzyme immune assay (EIA) was positive. Positive samples were further evaluated for anti-HCV antibodies by a third-generation strip immunoblot assay and for HCV RNA. Four samples (1.2%) from group II and 113 (2.9%) from group I were anti-HCV EIA positive. We also tested 33 subjects who previously tested positive for anti-HCV in our medical center. Among the 150 anti-HCV EIA-positive samples, the HCV core Ag result was in accord with the HCV RNA result in 146 cases (97.3%). When the EIA result was positive, the HCV core Ag concentration and the HCV RNA load were correlated (r(2) = 0.78; P < 0.001). Four samples with low viral loads were Trak-C negative but HCV RNA positive. Among the 2,395 anti-HCV EIA-negative serum samples collected during the first part of the study, 17 (0.7%) were found to contain very low levels of HCV core Ag (<8.5 pg/ml, the cutoff value being 1.5 pg/ml). All these samples were HCV RNA negative and considered to be false positives. This was confirmed by HCV core Ag neutralization analysis. The HCV core Ag assay is a useful method in the screening strategy of HCV infection and provides a reliable means of distinguishing between current and cleared HCV infections that is well correlated with HCV RNA testing.

De novo HCV infection among dialysis patients: a prospective study by HCV core antigen ELISA assay

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients remain a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus infection. The current diagnosis of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients includes serological measurement of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody; however, nucleic acid amplification technology for assessing hepatitis C virus viraemia is commonly used in other populations. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for detecting antibody to hepatitis C nucleocapsid core antigen (hepatitis C virus core antigen) in human serum has been recently developed (hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test). It is conceived for screening of donor blood products to significantly reduce the 'serologic window' occurring before seroconversion during acute hepatitis C virus.

AIM AND METHODS

A cohort (n = 72) of patients on maintenance haemodialysis in a single unit in the years 2000-2003 was included. Study patients were tested monthly by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in a prospective, clinical trial. Routine results obtained by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test were confirmed by assessing hepatitis C virus viraemia by branched-chain DNA (bDNA) signal amplification assay.

RESULTS

De novo hepatitis C virus infection was identified in three patients during the study period; the hepatitis C virus incidence was 1.38% (95% confidence intervals, 1.31-4.09) per year. In each patient, hepatitis C virus core antigen testing allowed the serological identification of acute hepatitis C virus before anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion. Hepatitis C virus RNA testing confirmed the results obtained by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in all cases. The time from initial hepatitis C virus detection by hepatitis C virus Core Antigen Assay and anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion was not greater than four weeks. Two (67%) of three patients with de novo hepatitis C virus acquisition were HBsAg negative; both these patients underwent an initial phase of hepatitis C virus viraemia that was associated with an increase in alanine aminotransferase activity and preceded the seroconversion to anti-hepatitis C virus antibody. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus between haemodialysis patients was implicated in at least two (67%) of these three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Serological testing for hepatitis C virus core antigen can identify acute hepatitis C virus infection before anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion. The time from initial hepatitis C virus detection by hepatitis C virus core antigen assay and anti-hepatitis C virus seroconversion was not >4 weeks. De novo acquisition of hepatitis C virus in haemodialysis was associated with a rise in alanine aminotransferase levels. Hepatitis C virus core antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test results can be obtained in routine laboratories without the need of special equipment or training. Hepatitis C virus core antigen testing among anti-hepatitis C virus negative patients on maintenance dialysis is suggested in order to early assess de novo hepatitis C virus within dialysis units.

The role of core antigen detection in management of hepatitis C: a critical review

Several assays in research format and two commercial assays for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein or HCV core antigen have been developed in recent years. In order to elucidate the role and significance of HCV core antigen detection in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C, we reviewed 56 studies published in peer-reviewed journals until September 2004. Evaluations in transfusion settings showed that the HCV core antigen assay detects HCV infection, similarly as nucleic acid techniques (NAT), between 40 and 50 days earlier than the current third generation HCV antibody screening assays. HCV core antigen levels closely track HCV RNA dynamics, and allow clinical monitoring of a patient's therapy, independently of HCV genotype, however, mainly in the samples with HCV RNA levels above 20,000 IU/ml. Considering the lower sensitivity of HCV core antigen detection in comparison to NAT, the HCV core antigen assay is not practical for the determination of the end of treatment response and sustained viral response, but could be useful for the determination of early viral response in the pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin treated patients infected with HCV genotype 1. The HCV core antigen detection is a viable tool for study of hepatitis C pathogenesis. The HCV core antigen can be used as a marker of HCV replication in anti-HCV positive individuals in the areas of the world that cannot afford NAT and/or in the settings that are not equipped or competent to perform HCV RNA testing. Because the manufacturer of HCV core antigen assays recently stopped an active marketing of these assays in several countries, it will, unfortunately and probably, never be possible to determine the actual potential and usefulness of HCV core antigen testing in the management of hepatitis C.

Novel assay using total hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen quantification for diagnosis of HCV infection in dialysis patients

Dialysis patients remain a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The current diagnosis of HCV infection among dialysis patients includes serological assays and nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) for assessing serum anti-HCV antibody and HCV viremia, respectively. However, current NAT techniques are expensive and labor-intensive and often lack standardization. An assay prototype designed to detect and quantify total HCV core antigen (total HCV core Ag) protein in serum and plasma in the presence or absence of anti-HCV antibodies has been recently developed. A comparison between a total anti-HCV core Ag enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a quantitative HCV RNA assay based on reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (Amplicor HCV Monitor test) was performed using a large (n = 305) cohort of ELISA HCV 3.0 HCV-negative and -positive patients on maintenance dialysis. The concentrations of HCV core Ag and HCV RNA levels (measured by RT-PCR) were significantly correlated (r = 0.471, P = 0.0001) over a wide range of HCV RNA levels and were maintained among different HCV genotypes (HCV genotype 1, r = 0.862, P = 0.0001; HCV genotype 2, r = 0.691, P = 0.0001). We estimated that 1 pg of total HCV core Ag per ml is equivalent to approximately 19.952 IU of HCV RNA per ml, even if the wide range in the ratio of core Ag to HCV RNA (95% confidence intervals, 2.8 x 10(3) to 1.6 x 10(5) IU/ml) precluded definitive conclusions. In summary, total HCV core Ag proved to be useful for performing HCV RNA measurement among dialysis patients in routine laboratories without the need for special equipment or training. The present study supports the use of the total anti-HCV core Ag ELISA for assessing viral load among dialysis patients with HCV infection.

Detection of free hepatitis C virus core antigen by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is not suitable for screening of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized hematopoietic progenitor donors

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients who are negative for the presence of anti-HCV and serum HCV RNA. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of HCV viremia in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donors by the use of a free HCV core antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 28 samples from consecutive PBPC donors that were mobilized with G-CSF, and 13 samples from patients presenting with leukocytosis of greater than 20 x 10(9) per L from other causes, were tested by a free HCV core antigen ELISA. Positive samples were confirmed by use of neutralization assays. The specificity of the assay was studied in 48,911 healthy blood donors negative for the presence of anti-HCV.

RESULTS

The free HCV core antigen assay showed a 46.4 percent positivity in PBPC donors mobilized with G-CSF and 61.5 percent in patients exhibiting leukocytosis in the absence of G-CSF treatment. All the samples were found to be false-positive samples, and those related with growth factor treatment did not react when G-CSF was discontinued. Overall specificity by the test in freshly collected blood donor specimens was 99.62 percent.

CONCLUSION

Data indicate that the free HCV core antigen ELISA is not a valid test in diagnosing HCV infection in G-CSF-treated PBPC donors. Moreover, false-positive results of this test on blood donors might be indicative of elevated white blood cell numbers. The low specificity of this assay in the PBPC mobilization setting suggests that molecular assays should be the test of choice in the screening of G-CSF-treated donors.

Total HCV core antigen assay

The present study assesses the clinical usefulness of the hepatitis C core antigen assay for monitoring of patients being treated for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Eighty-six serum samples were selected at random from 16 patients and levels of HCV RNA and HCV core antigen were determined simultaneously and in parallel to compare both techniques. The data obtained were compared by Pearson's correlation and the coefficients calculated by Fisher transformation and by calculating the difference and standard error. A good linear correlation was observed between both techniques. Maximum correlation, with significant difference, was found between patients infected with the 1a genotype and other genotypes. In conclusion, the HCV core antigen assay is useful for the diagnosis of early infection; however, its use for determining the exact timing of viral elimination during treatment is clearly unsuitable.

Hepatitis C core antigen in Polish blood donors

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of adopting the HCV core antigen ELISA (HCVcAg) for routine screening of Polish blood donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 133,279 donor samples were tested by ORTHO HCVcAg. All repeatedly reactive (RR) samples were tested by neutralization test for confirmation, RIBA HCV for anti-HCV, and by Cobas Amplicore for HCV RNA. All donations were tested for ALT level.

RESULTS

The HCVcAg test specificity was 99.94 percent. In total, 1499 donations (1.12%) were initially reactive and 124 (0.09%) were RR. Antibodies to HCV were found in 22 out of 124 donors and HCV RNA was detected in 19 out of 22. In 10 out of the 19 HCV-RNA-positive donors, the HCVcAg neutralization test was positive. Among the 102 HCVcAg RR/anti-HCV-negative donors, there were 6 neutralization-test-positive individuals, and all were HCV RNA positive. Elevated ALT level was observed in one of them. During the follow-up studies of three HCVcAg RR/HCV-RNA-positive donors, seroconvertion was observed 5 to 7 weeks after the initial HCVcAg-positive result. In all, HCVcAg results became negative once antibodies to HCV were detected.

CONCLUSION

The HCVcAg test proved to be feasible for routine screening in the Polish Blood Transfusion Service. Six HCVcAg RR/anti-HCV-negative donors were identified. The calculated residual risk in this study of donors in the preseroconversion window was 45 per million. Mandatory testing of every blood and plasma donation for HCVcAg or HCV RNA was recommended as of January 2, 2002.

Acute hepatitis C virus seroconversion in a Scottish blood donor: HCV antigen is not comparable with HCV nucleic acid amplification technology screening

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to analyse the usefulness of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen tests for the confirmation of HCV infection in a donor presenting as nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) positive but negative for antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood donations were screened, in parallel, for anti-HCV using the Abbott PRISM HCV Chemiluminescent immunoassay (ChLIA) and an 'in-house' HCV NAT (pools of up to 95 donations). An HCV NAT-positive antibody-negative donor was identified. Twelve follow-up samples were obtained and tested with various HCV antigen (including the recently marketed Trak-C second-generation assay) and HCV antibody assays.

RESULTS

The single HCV NAT-positive, antibody-negative donation was identified from 1 117 681 donations screened in the 4-year period, July 1999 to June 2003. The index donation was positive by Ortho HCV core antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Ortho Trak-C (second-generation HCV core antigen EIA). An archive sample, taken 127 days prior to the index donation, was negative for all HCV markers. Subsequent samples demonstrated a loss of reactivity in the Ortho HCV core antigen EIA and reduced activity in the Ortho Trak-C until day 69. Immunoblot (Ortho RIBA-3) and HCV PRISM became positive on day 62, whilst Ortho HCV ELISA was not positive until day 132 or Biorad HCV ELISA until day 160. An alternative immunoblot (Innogenetics Innolia III) was positive from day 55. RNA levels fluctuated considerably during the follow-up period, being completely undetectable by routine screening methods at the time-point around seroconversion; subsequently, antibody was detected using all assays investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

This HCV-converting blood donor provided a unique panel of samples for using to assess current (and future) HCV assay systems. The overall test results led to the conclusion that individual HCV antigen testing should not be considered as equivalent to HCV NAT minipool screening. Trak-C antigen testing may be considered as a suitable confirmatory assay for isolated HCV NAT reactivity.

HCV core/gC1qR interaction arrests T cell cycle progression through stabilization of the cell cycle inhibitor p27Kip1

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is efficient in the establishment of persistent infection. We have previously shown that HCV core protein inhibits T cell proliferation through its interaction with the complement receptor, gC1qR. Here we show that HCV core-induced inhibition of T cell proliferation involves a G(0)/G(1) cell cycle arrest, which is reversible upon addition of anti-gC1qR antibody. Correspondingly, the expression of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdk) 2/4 and cyclin E/D, as well as subsequent phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (pRb), is reduced in core-treated T cells in response to mitogenic stimulation. Remarkably, degradation of p27(Kip1), a negative regulator of both Cdk4/cyclin D and Cdk2/cyclin E complexes, is significantly diminished in T cells treated with HCV core upon mitogenic stimulation. These data indicate that the stability of p27(Kip1) by HCV core is associated with blocking activated T cells for the G(1) to S phase transition and inhibiting T cell proliferation.

Application of a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of total hepatitis C virus core antigen in blood donors

Recent studies have shown that total hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen, both free and antibody bound, is an accurate indirect marker of viral replication that can be used in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of a new total HCV core antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection and quantification of total core antigen in blood donors, testing positive for anti-HCV antibodies and for prospective low-risk population screening. A population comprising 257 samples, from blood donors detected reactive for anti-HCV antibodies [137 recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) positive and 120 RIBA indeterminate], were tested by using a new total HCV core antigen ELISA. HCV-RNA was quantified by using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays in all RIBA-positive samples and RIBA-indeterminate samples that were positive for the total core antigen. Specificity of the assay was studied in 1070 healthy blood donors negative for anti-HCV antibodies. Compared with quantitative PCR assays, the total HCV core antigen assay showed 97.37% sensitivity. The three HCV-RNA-positive samples, which tested negative for the total core antigen, had a low viral load (< 1.4 x 10(4) IU mL(-1)). All samples with more than 1.4 x 10(4) IU mL(-1) of viral RNA were positive for total core antigen, independent of the HCV genotype. Concentration of total core antigen correlated significantly with those of HCV-RNA (r = 0.614, P < 0.0001). Overall specificity in freshly collected blood donor specimens was 99.63%. Our data indicate that the total HCV core antigen ELISA has a sensitivity close to PCR assays in diagnosing HCV infection in blood donors with anti-HCV antibodies and shows an excellent specificity in volunteer donors. This assay, in combination with anti-HCV antibodies screening tests, could be an alternative to molecular assays for HCV infection screening in blood donors.

Combination HCV core antigen and antibody assay on a fully automated chemiluminescence analyzer

BACKGROUND

HCV exposure among blood donors is serologically determined by detection of antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV); however, the recent development of an assay for the detection of HCV core antigen identifies infection before anti-HCV development. Simultaneous detection of HCV core antigen and anti-HCV would shorten the window period before seroconversion over conventional HCV antibody screening assays.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prototype chemiluminescent immunoassay was developed for simultaneous detection of HCV core antigen and anti-HCV in human sera and plasma. The assay was performed on a single-channel instrument representing an automated serologic analyzer (PRISM, Abbott Laboratories) system. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated by testing 23 HCV seroconversion panels and plasma or sera from volunteer blood donors.

RESULTS

The prototype HCV core antigen and antibody combination assay detected 80 of 89 (89.9% ) HCV RNA-positive and antibody-negative specimens from 23 panels, thereby reducing the seroconversion window period by an average of 34.3 days compared to PRISM HCV antibody detection. All PRISM HCV antibody-positive specimens were detected by the combination assay for a relative sensitivity of 100 percent. The repeatedly reactive rate was 0.20 percent based on testing of 3017 screened anti-HCV-negative sera and plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

The prototype combination assay was shown to detect HCV core antigen and anti-HCV simultaneously and significantly closed the time gap between the initial detection of HCV RNA and the first appearance of detectable antibodies to HCV.

A new HCV core antigen assay based on disassociation of immune complexes: an alternative to molecular biology in the diagnosis of early HCV infection

BACKGROUND

An EIA based on immune complex disassociation of nucleocapsid proteins of HCV has been developed to detect and quantify HCV core antigen.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To evaluate whether this new assay (trak-C, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics) could be an alternative to NAT during the window period, its sensitivity in this context was assessed, and its performance was compared with that of a first-generation HCV core antigen assay dedicated to the blood screening (HCV core antigen ELISA). Studied populations included nine HCV RNA-positive, HCV antibody-negative blood donors and 23 hemodialysis patients who underwent an HCV seroconversion. From these individuals, 81 samples (23 HCV RNA-negative and 58 HCV RNA-positive) sequentially collected during the phase before seroconversion were tested.

RESULTS

The nine blood donor samples were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen by the trak-C, and 6 of 8 tested were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen by blood screening ELISA. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 23 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative with the two HCV core antigen assays. Among the 58 HCV RNA-positive samples, 46 of 57 (80.7%) tested were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen with the blood screening assay, and 57 of 58 (98.2%) were positive for the presence of HCV core antigen with the trak-C. The mean delays in detecting HCV infection between trak-C and the appearance of HCV antibodies, between HCV RNA testing and trak-C, and between trak-C and HCV core antigen ELISA were 58.2, 0.24, and 3.33 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Trak-C was more sensitive than the blood screening assay and had similar performance to HCV RNA assay in the window period. Trak-C could constitute an alternative to NAT for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period, especially when molecular biology procedures cannot be implemented.

Detection of a healthy carrier of HCV with no evidence of antibodies for over four years

BACKGROUND

Posttransfusion HCV has been notably reduced over recent years as a result of the systematic testing for antibodies to HCV in blood donors. However, the risk of transfusing blood-derived components from virus-carrying donors still remains. A diagnosis is reported here of HCV in a regular blood donor who had no antibodies during the entire time she was followed up.

CASE REPORT

The pharmaceutical company responsible for fractioning the plasma detected a donor who was a carrier of HCV, confirmed by PCR, but whose tests to detect anti-HCV were systematically negative. The donor had given blood on five previous occasions, from which 14 components were manufactured. Of the 11 components traced, six had been transfused, and in the two cases in which study of the anti-HCV was possible in the recipients, the result was positive. It was possible to check the blood samples from the donor from May 1997 to March 2002 (58 months). The tests to detect anti-HCV were all negative, while the PCR and core antigen tests were positive.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of RNA detection or HCV core antigen techniques in blood banks may reduce the residual risk of contracting posttransfusion HCV. Measures such as the correct traceability of the components, the existence of a specimen bank, or follow up of the recipients of blood-derived components would help to improve the quality of blood banking with percentage of survivability and case investigations.

Total HCV core antigen assay: a new marker of hepatitis C viremia for monitoring the progress of therapy

The ability of the total hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen assay was evaluated for monitoring the therapeutic responses of HCV-infected patients treated with interferon. The ability to detect and quantitate an independent structural protein component of HCV, in the presence of circulating antibodies, makes this assay a valuable new tool in diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Measurement of total core antigen showed a strong dynamic correlation with HCV RNA data and may serve as an alternative direct marker of viral infection. In addition, with the advent of additional treatment protocols, a rapid, reliable assay for changes in HCV load may permit more frequent patient assessment and tailoring of the therapeutic regimen.

A novel antigen detection immunoassay for field diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection

The limitations of dominant methods-based on the detection of anti-HCV antibodies or HCV viremia currently used for the diagnosis of HCV infection enhance efforts to have a rapid, simple, sensitive, and specific alternative diagnostic approach to detect viral antigens. A highly reactive IgG antibody was raised to HCV-NS4 recombinant antigen. The produced antibody showed no cross-reactivity with the other HCV structural and nonstructural recombinant antigens (C1 + 2, C3 + 4, E2/NS1, NS3, NS5). The well established ELISA technique was adapted to detect the new target HCV-NS4 antigen in serum samples. Extremely high agreement was found between the results of ELISA and qualitative detection of HCV-RNA, using a RT-PCR test as a gold standard for the diagnosis of HCV infection. Based on these encouraging results, a novel enzyme immunoassay; dot-ELISA was developed for rapid (approximately 5 min) and simple qualitative detection of the target HCV antigen in serum. The developed method detected the HCV target antigen in 95% of serum samples from HCV infected individuals, with a specificity of 97% using sera of noninfected individuals in comparison with PCR test. The antigen detection method showed high predictive values of positive (99%) and negative (90%). Moreover, the dot-ELISA could detect the HCV target antigen in sera negative for anti-HCV Abs, but positive for HCV-RNA, and in sera of HCV infected individuals with low viremia, as well as those with high viremia, using quantitative RT-PCR. Accordingly, the developed highly sensitive and specific HCV antigen detection method could be applied for mass screening of HCV infection.

Incorporation of an additional viral-clearance step into a human immunoglobulin manufacturing process

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Regulatory agencies have mandated that manufacturers of immunoglobulin products incorporate robust viral inactivation or removal steps into their purification processes. We evaluated the effectiveness of incorporating nanofiltration, a generic virus-clearance step, into an existing plasma-fractionation process for a human anti-D immunoglobulin product.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The nanofiltration process studied utilizes a 180 000-molecular weight composite membrane with well-defined pore distribution. To examine its viral-clearance capability, diluted anti-D immunoglobulin was spiked with high concentrations of human and animal model viruses and subjected to tangential-flow nanofiltration during scaled-down validation runs. Viral clearance by the membrane was determined by calculating log removal values in accordance with guidelines provided by US and European regulatory agencies.

RESULTS

Nanofiltration removed viruses of varying sizes and physical characteristics. For the three non-enveloped viruses tested (porcine parvovirus, encephalomyocarditis virus and hepatitis A virus, sizes 18-30 nm), clearance was 3.3, 4.1 and > 5.1 log, respectively. For the three enveloped viruses (human immunodeficiency virus-1, bovine viral diarrhoea virus and pseudorabies virus, 50-200 nm), a substantial 5-log reduction was demonstrated. Product potency, purity and stability were unaffected.

CONCLUSION

Tangential-flow nanofiltration provides substantial virus-removal capabilities for immunoglobulin preparations.

Quantification of HCV RNA levels and detection of core antigen in donations before seroconversion

BACKGROUND

Detection of HCV during the window phase of infection before seroconversion is important in blood screening. HCV RNA levels were measured before seroconversion and compared with HCV core antigen and anti-HCV detection.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 41 plasma samples from 17 US plasmapheresis donors and one English National Blood Service donor in the window phase before seroconversion of HCV infection were tested for the presence of anti-HCV, HCV RNA, and HCV core antigen.

RESULTS

HCV RNA levels between 5.4 x 10(2) and 3.4 x 10(7) IU per mL were measured. HCV core antigen was detected in 11 of 18 donors at the same time point as RNA was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of HCV RNA levels can be detected during the seronegative window phase of HCV infection. HCV core antigen can be used to detect HCV infection during the window phase of infection.

Residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HCV and HIV infections by antibody-screened blood in Italy

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to assess the risk of transmitting HCV and HIV by transfusion of antibody-screened blood and to estimate the additional reduction in risk that may be achieved through the implementation of direct viral detection assays in Italy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data of 2,411,800 blood donations collected from repeat volunteer donors from 1996 through 2000 were analyzed. The risk of transmitting HCV or HIV from screened blood donated during the window period was estimated using a mathematical model.

RESULTS

The residual risk of donating antibody-negative infectious blood was estimated at 1 in 127,000 donations for HCV and 1 in 435,000 for HIV. The use of NAT should further reduce such risk by 83 percent for HCV and 50 percent for HIV.

CONCLUSION

The residual risk of HCV or HIV transmission through screened blood is currently very small in Italy. The implementation of direct viral detection assays can further improve the safety of blood supply.

Sensitivity of HCV core antigen and HCV RNA detection in the early infection phase

BACKGROUND

Various countries have introduced HCV NAT to exclude infectious donations collected during the preseroconversion window phase (PWP). For the same purpose, an ELISA has also been developed to detect HCV core antigen (cAg).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Using sequential samples from regular plasma donors with very recent HCV infections, a total of 494 samples from 52 anti-HCV-negative donors were collected. These panels were used for direct comparison of the performance of PCR and ELISA in detecting viral markers (RNA and cAg) during the PWP of HCV infection. The panels were genotyped, and each sample was analyzed by qualitative and quantitative HCV PCR and by cAg ELISA. The HCV RNA doubling time was calculated from quantitation of viral RNA in consecutive samples during the earliest outbreak of viremia.

RESULTS

Concurrent detection of HCV RNA and cAg in 218 and nondetection in 185 samples yielded 81.6-percent concordance in the results of 494 samples. Unidirectional discrepancy of results (i.e., PCR positive and cAg negative) was seen in 91 of 494 (18.4%) samples, which was consistent with 65 specimens with RNA concentrations ranging between 300 and 100,000 IU per mL and 26 specimens with less than 300 IU per mL (limit of quantitative PCR). Individual genotyped panels had different kinetics and courses of viremia. The mean doubling time in the early PWP at the onset of viremia was derived to be 10.8 (range, 5.8-21.0) hours.

CONCLUSION

A majority of HCV RNA-positive samples were also cAg-positive during the PWP. The current cAg detection corresponds to 100,000 IU per mL of HCV RNA. Since low-titer samples would be identified only by single-donation NAT, which is often affordable only in developed countries, the cAg ELISA could offer a practical alternative for some countries. The doubling time for HCV RNA at the onset of viremia corresponds to a calculated mean delay of cAg detection during the virus burst phase of 2 or 5 days, when compared with minipool (5000 IU/mL) or single-donation NAT (50 IU/mL), respectively.