International collaborative study to evaluate methods for quantification of anti-D in immunoglobulin preparations

The third international standard for anti-D immunoglobulin: international collaborative study to evaluate candidate preparations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate a lyophilized anti-D immunoglobulin preparation to serve as a replacement WHO International Standard for the calibration of potency assays of anti-D immunoglobulin products. Such products are used to prevent haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn due to maternal alloanti-D.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The candidate 3rd International Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin (16/332) was evaluated and calibrated against the 2nd International Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin (01/572), along with a coded duplicate, a second candidate preparation (16/278) and a comparability sample (16/272) in an international collaborative study. Twenty of 21 laboratories in 15 countries performed one or more of the three European Pharmacopoeia reference methods.

RESULTS

The overall geometric mean potency (from all methods) of the candidate 3rd International Standard, 16/332, was 296·6 IU/ampoule, with inter-laboratory variability, expressed as % GCV, of 4·7%. SE-HPLC of the immunoglobulin preparations demonstrated combined monomeric and dimeric IgG peak areas of >95% for all samples. Accelerated stability studies have shown both 16/332 and 16/278 to be very stable for long-term storage at -20°C.

CONCLUSIONS

Preparation 16/332 was established by the World Health Organisation Expert Committee on Biological Standardization as the 3rd International Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin with an assigned potency of 297 IU/ampoule.

Anti-D quantification in relation to anti-D titre, middle cerebral artery Doppler measurement and clinical outcome in RhD-immunized pregnancies

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy to monitor RhD-immunized pregnancies is not evident. Whether a quantitative analysis of anti-D antibodies adds valuable information to anti-D titre is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of anti-D quantification in routine monitoring of RhD-immunized pregnancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, 64 consecutive pregnancies in 61 immunized women with anti-D titre ≥128 at any time during pregnancy were included. According to routine, at titre ≥128, anti-D quantification was performed by flow cytometry and the peak systolic velocity in the middle cerebral artery was measured by ultrasound. Decisions for treatment with intrauterine blood transfusion were based on increased peak systolic velocity in the middle cerebral artery.

RESULTS

Increasing anti-D concentrations correlated well to increasing anti-D titres, but at each titre value, there was a large interindividual variation, in the determined anti-D concentration. Intrauterine transfusions were initiated in 35 pregnancies according to algorithms based on ultrasound measurements, at anti-D concentrations of 2·4-619 IU/ml and titre 128-16 000. Sixty pregnancies resulted in a live-born child, three in miscarriage and one in termination of pregnancy. During the perinatal care in the neonatal intensive care unit, thirty-one of the neonates were treated with blood exchange transfusions and/or red cell transfusions and 47 were treated with phototherapy.

CONCLUSION

Anti-D quantification does not add further information compared to anti-D titre, in defining a critical level to start monitoring RhD-immunized pregnancies with Doppler ultrasound.

Collaborative study to establish the first international standard for quantitation of anti-HPA-1a

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This report describes the production of a freeze-dried preparation of pooled human plasma, containing immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a). The material, coded 03/152, is proposed as an International Standard containing 100 arbitrary units of anti-HPA-1a for use in quantitative assays to determine the anti-HPA-1a activity in clinical samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma samples containing potent anti-HPA-1a were pooled and freeze dried in 1-ml ampoules. In addition, three individual plasma samples were selected which had varying levels of anti-HPA-1a activity. The anti-HPA-1a activity of these three samples was determined by using a variety of quantitative assays with the proposed standard as a reference.

RESULTS

An international collaborative study, which was part of the 2004 ISBT Platelet Immunology Workshop, involved 39 laboratories in 24 countries and showed that the anti-HPA-1a activity in three test samples could be reliably determined by using the proposed standard.

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratories can use this standard to measure the anti-HPA-1a activity in patient's samples. Further studies are required to determine the relationship between anti-HPA-1a activity and clinical outcome in patients with neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT).

A single recombinant anti-RhD IgG prevents RhD immunization: association of RhD-positive red blood cell clearance rate with polymorphisms in the FcγRIIA and FcγIIIA genes

A single recombinant immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) anti-RhD antibody (MonoRho) was compared with a currently used polyclonal anti-RhD product (Rhophylac) in a phase 1 study for safety, efficacy of Rhesus D (RhD)–positive red blood cell (RBC) clearance, and prevention of RhD immunization in RhD-negative men challenged with 15 mL RhD-positive RBCs. Both the polyclonal product and recombinant anti-RhD effectively cleared RhD-positive RBCs after intravenous and intramuscular injection. The recombinant anti-RhD demonstrated a slower clearance rate compared with the polyclonal anti-RhD. There was no dose response, and there was considerable variation among subjects who received the same dose of recombinant anti-RhD. Interestingly, RhD-positive RBC clearance rates were strongly associated with Fcγ receptor IIA (FcγRIIA) and FcγIIIA but not with FcγIIIB polymorphisms. Subjects homozygous for FcγRIIA-131H or FcγRIIIA-158V allotypes showed a faster clearance rate compared with both the heterozygote and the corresponding alternative homozygote allotypes. A similar but less marked trend was seen for the polyclonal anti-RhD. Despite the variation in clearance rates there was no evidence of anti-RhD alloantibodies in any of the subjects at +6 months after the RBC challenge.

A global standard for anti-D immunoglobulin: international collaborative study to evaluate a candidate preparation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate a lyophilized anti-D immunoglobulin preparation to serve as a global standard for potency assays of anti-D immunoglobulin products.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The candidate global standard, 01/572, was calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) International Reference Preparation (IRP) for anti-D immunoglobulin, human (68/419), along with two reserve candidate reference preparations, in an international collaborative study involving 25 laboratories in 15 countries. The United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin, Lot 3, was included for comparison. Most laboratories (20/25) performed AutoAnalyser methodology, competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) and/or flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The overall mean potency of the candidate global standard, 01/572, was 284.5 international units (IU)/ampoule, with an interlaboratory variability, expressed as a percentage geometric coefficient of variation (% gcv), of 9.7. The mean potency of the US Standard was 859.4 IU/ml with an interlaboratory variability of 9.5% gcv, excluding an outlier. The mean potencies of the reserve preparations per ampoule/vial were 110.6 IU and 106.7 IU when calibrated against the IRP, and 112.2 IU and 106.6 IU when calibrated against 01/572, respectively, with interlaboratory % gcv values of 9.6-18.3 (excluding outliers).

CONCLUSIONS

Preparation 01/572 proved more suitable for use as a global standard than the reserve candidate preparations and was established, with an assigned potency of 285 IU/ampoule, by the WHO as the 2nd International Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin; by FDA-CBER as the Standard for anti-D immunoglobulin, Lot 4; and by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM) as the 1st Biological Reference Preparation for anti-D immunoglobulin.

Indications of neutralising anti-idiotypic antibodies and selective proteolytic fragmentation in polyclonal anti-D IgG preparations

Proteolytic fragmentation is the only suggested cause of potency losses during storage of liquid human polyclonal anti-D Ig. Besides the effect of fragmentation, we have investigated the potential contribution of neutralising anti-idiotypic antibodies (anti-Ids). Potency changes during storage and/or upon pH reduction in anti-D IgG batches with or without addition of plasminogen and urokinase were quantitatively analysed by the autoanalyser (AA) method or by a special procedure of flow cytometry (FC). Moreover, simultaneous changes of the molecular size distribution pattern have been determined by size exclusion chromatography. In contrast to the AA procedure, the particular FC methodology was found to be almost insensitive to proteolysis comprising up to 30% of total IgG. Data interpretation was based on the assumption that both assays cannot detect Ids with neutralised paratopes. In the absence of detectable neutralisation (functional absence of anti-Ids), it could be demonstrated that the anti-D IgG subpopulation is more sensitive to fragmentation by endogenous protease as compared to the unrelated bulk. However, both methods detected batch- and assay-dependently variable potency losses during storage. Moreover, the increase of potency induced by pH reduction correlated with the increase of monomeric IgG, essentially on the expense of dimers. This finding was interpreted to indirectly indicate the neutralising action of anti-Ids known to be the major driving force of dimer formation in polyclonal IgG. A more or less pronounced pH-dependent potency increase was also detectable in three arbitrarily selected batches of two other manufacturers. The data allows to assume that anti-Id-mediated neutralisation can significantly contribute to losses of anti-D potency. In addition, it turned out that anti-D plasma itself can be the source of anti-Ids.

Competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay of monoclonal immunoglobulin G anti-D preparations

The development of monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-D for prophylaxis necessitates estimation of their potency in terms of their red cell-binding ability, but it is unclear which quantification methodology is most suitable for this. The aim of this study was to assess 50 monoclonal anti-D from the 4th International Workshop for quantitative and qualitative binding to red cells in a competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) in which varying amounts of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) and a constant amount of biotinylated monoclonal anti-D (BRAD-5) compete for red cell binding. The potencies of the MoAb were estimated against the International Reference Preparation (IRP) for anti-D Ig. Two MoAbs as supplied were insufficiently inhibitory of biotinylated BRAD-5 binding to be quantified; the potencies of the remainder ranged from 4 to 343 IU mL-1 and included 11 MoAbs showing dose-responses that were nonparallel to those of other MoAb and the IRP. Estimation of the concentration of antibody in the supernatants by radial immunodiffusion ranged from 0.5 to 61 micro g mL-1, giving specific activities of <1-24 IU micro g-1. The results show that competitive EIA is suitable for quantitating most monoclonal anti-D for development and quality control purposes, regardless of their D epitope reactivity.

Validation of flow cytometry to quantify the potency of anti-D immunoglobulin preparations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Flow cytometry has been recommended as an alternative to that of autoanalyser methodology for estimation of anti-D potency. This investigation was performed to validate the flow cytometry method based on a quality assurance system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A flow cytometry method based on indirect labelling of Rh(D)-positive red blood cells was validated using the parameters precision and accuracy and was compared to the autoanalyser data of manufacturers of anti-D immunoglobulin preparations.

RESULTS

The experiment first investigated the possible differences between assays from single donors compared with a pooled assay. Red blood cells of four individual donors and their pooled red blood cells were interchangeable. There was no significant difference between donors, on one hand, and between the use of a single donation and the pooled red blood cells, on the other hand (P = 0.695). The two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the difference between single donors and the pool ranged from -4.6% to 4.7%. The intermediate variability was determined by standard deviation (SD) = 48.4 IU/ml [coefficient of variation (CV) = 3.8%]; the repeatability was SD = 34.3 IU/ml (CV = 2.7%). Using a spiking experiment, the second part of the experiment investigated recovery of a known anti-D potency. The recovery of samples spiked with defined amounts of reference preparation was 97.7-101%, with a mean bias of -1.3 (95% CI: -4.1 to 1.6). The results of the flow cytometry assay, as compared to those of the autoanalyser performed by the manufacturers of anti-D immunoglobulin preparations for those manufacturers who have their method validated in-house, ranged from 87 to 129%, indicating good correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow cytometry is a suitable quality control method for polyclonal anti-D immunoglobulins, which can be standardized in a quality control laboratory using a quality assurance system.