Patients with pressure ulcers in Finnish hospitals

Consistent pressure ulcer prevention practice: The effect on PU prevalence and PU stages, and impact on PU prevention-A quasi-experimental intervention study

This study evaluates the effect of nursing staff's renewed consistent pressure ulcer (PU) prevention practice on PU prevalence and the PU prevention implemented for residents. A quasi-experimental intervention study was conducted. The data were collected from 232 residents (n = 115 in intervention and 117 in comparison group) in two public long-term older people care (LOPC) facilities in Finland using the Pressure Ulcer Patient instrument (PUP-Instrument). The facilities were chosen with convenience sampling, after which they were randomly allocated as either intervention or comparison facility. Based on international guidelines for PU prevention, the renewed, consistent PU prevention practice with six areas was developed and implemented using the operational model for evidence-based practices (OMEBP). After the intervention, a significant difference between the intervention and the comparison facility was seen in the prevalence of PUs and in the residents' highest stage of PUs in the sacrum, buttock and hip areas, and heels. Between the facilities, a significant difference was seen in the use of PU and nutrition risk assessment instruments and nutritional supplements, time used for repositioning in the daytime and at night-time, lifting belt use, and avoiding shearing or stretching residents' skin. The successful intervention improved skin integrity in LOPC facilities.

Pressure injury prevalence and incidence in acute inpatient care and related risk factors: A cross-sectional national study

The aim of this national cross‐sectional study was to explore the prevalence of pressure injuries and incidence of hospital‐acquired pressure injuries, and the relating factors in somatic‐specialised inpatient care in Finland. The study was conducted in 16 (out of 21) Finnish health care organisations offering specialised health care services. Data were collected in 2018 and 2019 from adult patients (N = 5902) in inpatient, emergency follow‐up, and rehabilitation units. Pressure injury prevalence (all stages/categories) was 12.7%, and the incidence of hospital‐acquired pressure injuries was 10%. Of the participants, 2.6% had at least one pressure injury at admission. The risk of hospital‐acquired pressure injuries was increased for medical patients with a higher age, the inability to move independently, mode of arrival, being underweight, and the absence of a skin assessment or pressure injury risk assessment at admission. For surgical patients, the risk was associated with the inability to move independently, mode of arrival, and lack of skin assessment at admission, while being overweight protected the patients. Overall, medical patients were in greater risk of hospital‐acquired pressure injuries than the surgical patients. An assessment of the pressure injury risk and skin status should be carried out more systematically in Finnish acute care hospitals.

Determination of nurses' level of knowledge on the prevention of pressure ulcers: The case of Turkey

AIM OF THE STUDY

Pressure ulcers (PUs) constitute a health issue that has a high prevalence and incidence rate in acute and long-term care, requiring long-term nursing care for treatment and prevention. Therefore, nurses should have adequate knowledge of the interventions and practices used to prevent PUs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study employed a descriptive and cross-sectional design to assess the level of nurses' knowledge concerning preventive interventions for PUs. Based on data found in the literature, researchers developed a 16-question Participant Information Form (including age, gender, level of education, employed ward, and training on PUs) and used this form, along with the Turkish version of the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge Assessment Instrument (PUPKAI-T), to collect data.

RESULTS

A group of 471 nurses working in two foundation hospitals in 2018 participated in the study by completing a questionnaire. Among the participants, 44.2% worked in surgery, 21.2% in internal medicine, and 34.6% in other wards (such as intensive care, pediatrics, and the operating theater). Most of the nurses(73.5%) held a bachelor's degree, and their average work experience was 7.27 ± 7.00 years. It was determined that 69.4% of the nurses had not received in-service training relating to PUs, 55.6% did not attend lectures/conferences or read articles on the prevention of PUs, and 59.7% rated themselves as "adequate" in interventions used to prevent PUs. Based on the use of PUPKAI-T, 17 individuals (3.6%) scored equal to or more than the 60% cut-off value, and 454 individuals (96.4%) scored less than 60%. The mean level of knowledge on PUs was calculated as 11.1 ± 2.659 (range: 1-18) out of 26 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the study showed that the general level of knowledge of nurses in preventing PUs are extremely insufficient. Therefore, various strategies should be developed to increase nurses' level of knowledge on the etiology and development, classification and observation, and risk assessment of PUs, as well as on nutrition plans and preventive interventions.

The prevalence of pressure ulcers in Europe, what does the European data tell us: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this systematic review was to establish the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PU) within published studies from Europe.

METHOD

Using systematic review methodology, quantitative design studies which explored prevalence data and/or the epidemiology of PUs in Europe were considered. The primary outcome was PU prevalence. The search, conducted in April 2019, using Cochrane, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, returned 3065 records, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool, and validity analysis was undertaken using the Evidence-Based Librarianship (EBL) Critical Appraisal Checklist.

RESULTS

We included 79 articles in this review. Across the studies, the median prevalence was 10.8% (standard deviation: 7%; range: 4.6-27.2%). The highest PU prevalence reported was from the Netherlands (27.2%; n=17,494 participants), and the lowest was reported from Finland (4.6%; n=629 participants). Almost 32.4% (n=151,195) of the PUs were category I and the most common site for PUs was the sacrum.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence data is consistently high. These data indicate the continued need for further resource allocation into PU prevention and management.

Local treatment of pressure ulcers in long-term care: a correlational cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the treatment of pressure ulcers (PU) in long-term care.

METHOD

In this correlational cross-sectional study, data was collected between November 2015 and January 2016 from older people with PUs in private and public long-term care facilities in Finland. Data collection was conducted by trained nurses using the Pressure Ulcer Patient Instrument (PUP-Ins). Outcomes measured were: prevalence and localisation of PU, local PU treatment, frequency (how often/week/day) and duration (minutes/week or day) of PU treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 112 patients with 158 PUs were identified (a prevalence rate of 5%). PUs were located most often on the heel (38%), hip (13%), buttocks (10%) and lateral malleolus (9.5%). The most frequently used PU treatment was skin protecting agents and local wound care products. The most typical treatment in category I, II and III PUs were foam dressings. In category III PUs, ribbon gauze dressings were also used. The most typical products for category IV PUs were complex dressings. Category I PUs received more treatment per day or week than other categories of PUs.

CONCLUSION

PU treatment is inconsistent and often conducted with varying methods and products. Holistic patient care must be the focus. Nurses in long-term care settings might benefit from in-depth in-service education focusing on the treatment of PUs. More research is needed about nurses' competence in PU treatment.

Prevalence of foot disease and risk factors in general inpatient populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review studies reporting the prevalence in general adult inpatient populations of foot disease disorders (foot wounds, foot infections, collective 'foot disease') and risk factors (peripheral arterial disease (PAD), peripheral neuropathy (PN), foot deformity).

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published between 1980 and 2013 was undertaken using electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL). Keywords and synonyms relating to prevalence, inpatients, foot disease disorders and risk factors were used. Studies reporting foot disease or risk factor prevalence data in general inpatient populations were included. Included study's reference lists and citations were searched and experts consulted to identify additional relevant studies. 2 authors, blinded to each other, assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Applicable data were extracted by 1 author and checked by a second author. Prevalence proportions and SEs were calculated for all included studies. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models where 3 eligible studies were available.

RESULTS

Of the 4972 studies initially identified, 78 studies reporting 84 different cohorts (total 60 231 517 participants) were included. Foot disease prevalence included: foot wounds 0.01-13.5% (70 cohorts), foot infections 0.05-6.4% (7 cohorts), collective foot disease 0.2-11.9% (12 cohorts). Risk factor prevalence included: PAD 0.01-36.0% (10 cohorts), PN 0.003-2.8% (6 cohorts), foot deformity was not reported. Pooled prevalence estimates were only able to be calculated for pressure ulcer-related foot wounds 4.6% (95% CI 3.7% to 5.4%)), diabetes-related foot wounds 2.4% (1.5% to 3.4%), diabetes-related foot infections 3.4% (0.2% to 6.5%), diabetes-related foot disease 4.7% (0.3% to 9.2%). Heterogeneity was high in all pooled estimates (I(2)=94.2-97.8%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This review found high heterogeneity, yet suggests foot disease was present in 1 in every 20 inpatients and a major risk factor in 1 in 3 inpatients. These findings are likely an underestimate and more robust studies are required to provide more precise estimates.

Quality of life and self-esteem in patients with paraplegia and pressure ulcers: a controlled cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self-esteem in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and pressure ulcers.

METHOD

This study was a controlled cross-sectional study. HRQoL was assessed using the generic Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem/UNIFESP-EPM Scale. A total of 120 patients with traumatic SCI were included in the sample, of which 60 had pressure ulcers and were assigned to the study group, and 60 had no pressure ulcers and were assigned to the control group. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients in the study group, 83.3% were men and the mean age was 38.17 years (SD = 9.08 years). When compared with controls, patients in the study group reported significantly lower scores (worse health status) on all SF-36 subscales (p less than or equal to 0.0013) except for general health (p=0.109). The RSE/UNIFESP-EMP scale total score indicated that patients with pressure ulcers had significantly lower self-esteem than controls (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pressure ulcers had an adverse impact on the HRQoL and self-esteem of patients with SCI.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

There were no external sources of funding for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Pressure ulcer prevalence in Turkey: a sample from a university hospital

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify pressure ulcer prevalence among hospitalized patients in a university hospital setting.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

The study setting was medical and surgical inpatient wards and critical care units in a university hospital in Adana, Turkey. The sample population comprised 404 patients who were aged 18 years or older and admitted to the intensive care units and internal and surgery units at least 24 hours before data collection.

METHODS

Each participating patient's skin was assessed and pressure ulcers were classified according to the National Pressure Ulcers Advisory Panel grading system. Pressure ulcer risk was assessed using the Braden Scale. Data were recorded on a patient observation form designed for this study.

INSTRUMENTS

The following tools were used to collect data: (a) data collection form in identifying sociodemographic and medical characteristics of the patients, (b) the classification developed by the National Pressure Ulcers Advisory Panel in identifying the phases and localization of pressure ulcers, and (c) Braden Risk Assessment Scale in assessing risks.

RESULTS

The average age of patients was 51.22 ± 0.84 years (mean ± SD); 51.7% were male. The mean hospital length of stay was 9.6 ± 0.5 days. Pressure ulcer risk assessment revealed that 34.2% of the patients were at increased risk. The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 10.4%. Pressure ulcers occurred most frequently in the sacral area (43.9%); 45.2% of them were stage (grade) II.

CONCLUSIONS

The pressure ulcer prevalence identified in this study is comparable with studies conducted in other countries.

L’escarre à l’hôpital en 2003 : enquête de prévalence un jour donné

BACKGROUND

To determine the prevalence of pressure sores in a university hospital and to assess the risk of developing a pressure sore.

METHODS

A one-day survey was performed in all hospitalized patients, day hospital excepted. The Garches scale was used to assess the severity of pressure sores and the Braden scale was used to measure the patient's risk for the development of pressure ulcers.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred and eleven patients were included, mean age was 62+/-23 years and 53.3% were over 65 years old. In hospitalized patients, 64% were in acute care, 29% in intermediate medicine and long-term care and 7% in intensive care units. We have found 675 pressure sores in 268 patients, mean age of 76 years; 263 decubitus ulcers were acquired during hospitalization. The most frequent sites were heels (46%) and sacrum (26%). Stage 1 pressure ulcers showed 33% of the total. The total prevalence was 16.6%, 95% CI (14.9-18.6), the hospital acquired pressure sores prevalence was 7.5%, all stages included. A Braden score less than or equal to 15 was found in 29.1% of hospitalized patients. Standard mattresses were used in 37% of patients with pressure sores. Multivariate analysis showed that age and a Braden score less than or equal to 15 were significantly associated with pressure sores.

CONCLUSION

Pressure sores are still an important problem in hospital; occurrence must be considered as an iatrogenic event and management requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Escarres dans un hôpital universitaire de court séjour

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of pressure sores, their risk factors, and the responsible microbial agents in an acute-care hospital and to evaluate their management.

METHOD

A prevalence survey was conducted from 5 July through 9 July 2004. Investigators completed a standardized questionnaire for each hospitalized patient, including demographic data (age, sex, previous hospitalizations, etc.) and Braden scale risk factors (sensory perception, humidity, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction and shear). Two experts in skin care detected pressure sores by physical examination of the patients. Each pressure sore was swabbed and inoculated on selective media. Management was evaluated by reviewing the clinical charts of each patient with a pressure sore.

RESULTS

The study included 535 adult patients (aged 59 +/- 19 years): 75 ulcer sores were observed in 37 patients (prevalence=6.9%). Stage I sores accounted for 24% of the total, stage II for 29%, stage III 31%, and stage IV 16%. The most frequent site was the heel (41%), followed by the sacrum (20%), elbow (11%), back (7%) and ischial tuberosities (7%). Sixty (80%) were acquired while hospitalized. Age-adjusted multivariate analyses found that the risk factors significantly associated with pressure sores were Braden score< or =15 (OR=5.9, 95% CI: 2.4-13.7, p<0.0001) and previous pressure sores (OR=5.0 95% CI: 2.2-11.6, p<0.0001). Eleven sores (24.5%), mostly stage III and IV, were colonized by multiple-drug-resistant bacteria (i.e., methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended spectrum beta-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae). Seven (9.3%) of the 75 ulcers were diagnosed only during the survey, by the experts; of the 68 diagnosed before the survey, 57 (83.8%) had been under treatment. Treatment was considered inappropriate according to French guidelines in 31.6% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

This prospective prevalence study resulted in better awareness of the patients at risk for pressure sores. It also made the recently created mobile geriatrics unit better known within the hospital.

Prevalence, incidence and predictors of pressure ulcers in a tertiary hospital in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

In 2002 the hospital under study implemented a pressure ulcer standard care plan. This follow-up study aimed to determine the prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers, whether demographic characteristics and medical diagnosis differed between those individuals who did and those who did not develop ulcers and the predictors of pressure-ulcer formation.

METHOD

The prevalence study used a cross-sectional design, while the incidence study was a prospective cohort study. Participants were scored using the Braden scale and were examined for the presence of pressure ulcers. Those who were ulcer free were monitored twice weekly until they were discharged or for 28 days.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 18.1% (95% CI: 15.5-20.9%), while the incidence was 8.1% (95% CI: 6.1-10.4%). Participants with ulcers were older, had a longer mean length of hospital stay, lower Braden scores and were diagnosed with or had a history of cardiovascular diseases or sepsis. Logistic regression found that the total Braden score was the only significant predictor of pressure ulcers. Compared with scores 16-23, the odds ratios were 7.7 (95% CI: 3.5-17.1, p < 0.001) and 12.5 (95% CI: 4.5-34.6, p < 0.001) for scores 12-15 and 6-11 respectively. Demographic characteristics, diagnosis and length of hospital stay were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

The study identified a modest decrease in incidence and improvements in nursing care following the implementation of the care plan. It suggests that Braden scores are predictive of those at-risk of developing pressure ulcers.

[Incidence of pressure ulcers at a university hospital]

This study aimed to identify the incidence of pressure ulcers (PU) at São Paulo University Hospital--Brazil, as well as to establish possible associations with patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Data were collected during three months, involving 211 risk patients, resulting in a 39.8% incidence level. A significant statistical correlation (p<0.05) was found between incidence level and age and PU area; and between age and humidity, time of hospitalization and nutrition, PU area and nutrition. Results indicate the urgent need to implant a PU prevention and treatment program at the institution and provide methodological contributions for other services to develop this kind of research.

Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Germany

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This article establishes the prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospitals and nursing homes for national and international comparison.

BACKGROUND

Although many European countries evaluate the prevalence of pressure ulcers, it has not recently been examined in German healthcare facilities.

DESIGN

Descriptive study design, point prevalence survey in 2001 and 2002. A total of 11 584 patients and residents in 66 institutions throughout Germany took part in the study.

METHODS

Prevalence rates were calculated for the different types of institutions, different years, different risk groups and different disciplines. All calculations were made by including as well as excluding pressure ulcer grade 1. The Braden scale (cut-off < or =20) was applied to define at risk and not at risk patients/residents.

RESULTS

The prevalence including (excluding) grade 1 pressure ulcers was 11.7% (5.2%) for the whole sample, while in the group at risk it was 24.5% (11.5%). The size of the group at risk in the nursing homes was 63.9% and less than 40% in the hospitals. Comparisons between disciplines showed a great range of prevalence rates. The use of special surface devices for persons at risk was more common in nursing homes than in hospitals.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of pressure ulcers bears resemblance to results produced by other studies, but it is uncertain if these similarities are more than coincidental. Due to the influence of sampling the use of a standardized samples method is essential. For comparisons of groups with differences regarding their risk assessment it would be more appropriate to use the prevalence of patients and residents at risk.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study provides accurate data about the extent of the problem of pressure ulcers in German healthcare facilities.

Pressure ulcer prevention: nurses' knowledge, attitudes and behaviour

Despite the increased expenditure on pressure ulcer prevention strategies, incidence and prevalence is increasing. Exploring nurses' attitudes about these programmes offers an insight into why, in some cases, they are not working.