Apheresis registry in France: indications, techniques, and complications. French Registry Study Group

A nationwide population-based study on therapeutic plasma exchange for 10 years in Korea using Health Insurance Review and Assessment database

INTRODUCTION

Indications for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) have expanded over the years, and the number of procedures is expected to have been increased. Apheresis registries can be difficult to sustain due to workload and privacy issues. This study aimed to analyze national claims data to characterize the use of TPE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent TPE were retrospectively identified between January 2008 and December 2017 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. Data of patients' characteristics, primary diagnosis, hospitalization, treatment, and procedures were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 9944 patients underwent 62 606 TPE procedures. The median number of TPE procedures performed per patient was 5 (interquartile range, 3-7). Fresh frozen plasma (71.4%) was most commonly used as the replacement fluid. The most common indication was renal diseases (36.8%), followed by hepato-biliary (17.6%) and hematological (15.2%) diseases. Increased frequency of renal diseases was the most remarkable change, which increased from 529 (21.2%) procedures in 2008 to 4107 (44.5%) procedures in 2017, reflecting the widespread implementation of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. The top five hospitals conducted 59.6% of the procedures, which showed a centralized distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common indication was renal diseases. The number of TPE procedures performed annually increased by approximately 3.7 times from 2008 to 2017. This study shows that other than a registry, claims data can be successfully used to analyze various aspects of TPE procedures on a nationwide scale. This approach could be used by other countries, especially those that have national health insurance.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in neurological diseases: Eleven years experience at a tertiary care center in Turkey

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an apheresis procedure in which plasma is separated from the blood cellular components ex vivo, allocated, and replaced with another plasma or a plasma-replacing fluid. This study aimed to define the rate of complications and determine TPE distribution in various neurological diseases. Our study is a retrospective analysis of neurologic diseases requiring TPE between 2008 and 2019 that were selected using the medical records of neurology departments and apheresis units database. We performed 1459 TPE procedures on 207 patients between 2008 and 2019. TPE Procedure is most frequently applied in patients with Myasthenia-Gravis syndrome (34.7%). The complication ratio was 1.6% from a total of 1459 TPE procedures. The most commonly specified adverse event was allergic reactions 11 (5.3%), followed by hypotension 6 (2.9%). TPE was safe and tolerable, with manageable complications in experienced hands.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Tehran Between 2011 and 2014

The goal of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is to remove autoantibodies, pathogenic molecules, immune complexes, toxins, high concentration lipoproteins, and pathological proteins. We aimed to present the most common indication of TPE and rate of admission to the intensive care unit. From 2011 to 2014, our retrospective study was conducted including 1069 inpatients from the Tehran Blood Transfusion Center, which was responsible for performing therapeutic apheresis in all 122 hospitals of Tehran. The patients, based on their TPE indication, were classified into five groups: hematological and oncological, neurological, renal, rheumatological diseases, and all the remaining diseases. We performed 6329 procedures of TPE on 1069 inpatients. Of the patients, 479 (44.8%) were male and 590 (55.2%) female. Their age varied from a minimum of 2 years to the maximum of 93 years. Overall, the mean of TPE sessions for each patient was 5.92 ± 3.9; 415 (38.8%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). ASFA categories I/II indications were considered an appropriate request for TPE, and 82.97% (887) of all TPE were suitable. The most frequent categories of TPE indications are as follows: neurological, hematological, and renal diseases. Class I/II indications in the neurological diseases, myasthenia gravis (21.7%), Guillain-Barré disease (21%), and multiple sclerosis (13.3%), were the most prevalent. In the hematological category, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) (14.1%) was observed to be greater than the other indications. We observed that the most prevalent illnesses are neurological (myasthenia gravis), hematological (TTP), and renal.

Overview of therapeutic plasma exchange in pediatric neurology: a single-center experience

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used in the treatment of neurological, hematological, renal and autoimmune diseases with known or suspected immune pathogenesis. In comparison with neurological diseases of adults, knowledge about the use of TPE in children is incomplete. We report our experience on TPE in children with neurological diseases in a single institution and describe the underlying etiology, clinical course, treatment and outcome. We retrospectively evaluated 22 consecutive children (12 girls, 10 boys, aged 2-16 years) who underwent TPE in the pediatric intensive care unit between January 2010 and January 2017. There were 135 TPE procedures with median 6 TPE sessions per patient. Fresh frozen plasma was used as a replacement fluid in all cases. Most common indications were inflammatory polyneuropathy followed by acquired demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Other indications were autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis. No mortality was recorded during TPE. The complication rate was 2.2% and consisted of transient events like hypotension and allergic reactions. Therapetic plasma exchange is one of the safe methods of treatment for neuroimmunological disorders in children, with Guillain-Barré syndrome as the most common indication.

Therapeutic plasma exchange: Experience in a third level hospital, 2013-2016, Lima (Peru)

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal procedure which consists of removing the patient's plasma and replacing it with an appropriate replacement fluid. Plasma and blood cells are separated by a centrifugation process. Our department has used TPE for several years, and in 2013 we introduced an institutional apheresis protocol. The main objective of this report is to describe the TPE procedures performed between 2013 and 2016 in the Peruvian population.

METHODS

We analyzed the technical and clinical aspects of 864 centrifugal TPE procedures as well as the associated complications. We evaluated 230 patients treated in our institution.

RESULTS

The therapeutic indications included 16 different diseases: 89.5% (N = 206/230) neurological, 7.3% (N = 17/230) hematological, 1.7% (N = 4/230) rheumatologic, 0.8% (N = 2/230) dermatological and 0.4% (N = 1/230) nephrological. 70.4% (N = 142/230) of patients were diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome. Albumin 5% solution was the most frequent replacement solution, used in 65.8% (N = 569/864) of the procedures. The mean plasma volume (PV) replaced was 2451.73 ml, corresponding to 1.0 PV in all procedures. Complications occurred in 10.9% (N = 95/864) of the sessions. Allergic reactions were the most common events and cardiopulmonary arrests were recorded in two patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of TPE performed in the Peruvian population. The use of an institutional apheresis protocol was beneficial to improve registries in our service and our professional health attention. This study reports a low rate of complications, suggesting that TPE is safe. There is a need to create a multicenter Peruvian apheresis registry to assess the benefits and risks of TPE in Peru.

The Italian Sidem Registry for Apheresis: An Overview of the 2005 Statistics

Data collection on apheresis activities in Italy throughout 2005 including techniques, types of blood cell separators, clinical indications and adverse effects was performed by means of a standardized questionnaire. These data provided by 83 Apheresis Units from 16 Italian regions, albeit rough, are sufficiently informative, mainly in comparison with previous surveys on these statistics (1997 and 2000). In 2005 a total number of 204,746 apheresis procedures were carried out, with a clear-cut prevalence of apheresis production (87.7%), performed by 66 out of 83 Apheresis Units (79.5). Lombardy, Veneto and Tuscany were the most active regions for therapeutic apheresis (51.1% of the total national procedures). An increasing number in extracorporeal photochemotherapy as compared to the 2000 national survey (3,386 vs. 704 procedures) is the most striking observation to emerge from the 2005 data collection on therapeutic apheresis in Italy. Adverse effects, predominantly mild ones (i.e., paresthesia due to citrate-induced hypocalcemia), occurred in 0.12% of apheresis production and 6.04 of therapeutic sessions, particularly in the course of peripheral blood stem cell collection (20.79%), as already reported in the 2000 national survey.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Patients with Neurologic Disorders: Review of 63 Cases

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure that reduces circulating autoantibodies of the patients. TPE is commonly used in neurological disorders where autoimmunity plays a major role. We report our experience with regard to the indications, adverse events and outcomes of plasma exchange in neurological disorders. Sixty-three patients were included to this retrospective study. Median age was 48 years (range 1-85), there was a predominance of males. Neurological indications included Guillain-Barrè syndrome (n = 22), myasthenia gravis (n = 21), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (n = 7), polymyositis (n = 3), multifocal motor neuropathy (n = 2), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 2), neuromyelitis optica (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 2), limbic encephalitis (n = 1) and transverse myelitis (n = 1). TPE was frontline therapy in 57 % of the patients (n = 36). Total number of TPE sessions was 517; median number of sessions per patient was 8 (range 1-66). TPE was done through a central venous access in 97 % and through a peripheral venous access in 3 % of the patients. Human albumin was used as replacement fluid in 49 %, hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in 49 % and fresh frozen plasma in 2 % of the cases. Adverse reactions were recorded in 60 % of the patients. Total ratio of complications in 517 TPE procedures was 10.8 % and these were mild and manageable such as allergic reactions and hypotension. Overall response rate was 81 %. Interestingly, complication and response rates were similar in both HES and human albumin groups. We conclude that TPE is an effective treatment in neurologic diseases in which autoimmunity plays an important role in the pathogenesis and HES can be used instead of albumin as replacement fluid in these disorders, since it is cost-effective, has similar efficacy and complication rates.

Therapeutic plasmapheresis in geriatric patients: favorable results

Therapeutic plasma exchange is generally a tolerable procedure, although several complications should be considered. Since geriatric population has been growing worldwide, the aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze 4709 TPE data from 981 geriatric procedures (20.8%) and to compare them with 3728 non-geriatric procedures (79.2%). The most common indications for TPE in both groups were sepsis/adult respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction. In geriatric patient group, contrary to expectations of aggravation, complication rate was statistically similar with non-geriatric group (P > 0.05). Therefore, TPE appeared to be a safe procedure in geriatric patients when performed by experienced practitioners.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with neurological diseases: multicenter retrospective analysis

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), is a procedure, changing pathologic substances in the plasma of patients with replacement fluid. TPE has an increasing list of indications in recent years such as neurological, connective tissue, hematological, nephrological, endocrinological and metabolic disorders. We report our multicenter data about therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with neurological diseases. Six University Hospitals' aphaeresis units medical records about neurologic diseases were reviewed retrospectively. Hundred and fifteen patients and 771 TPE sessions from six aphaeresis units' were included to this study. Of the 115 patients, 53 (46%) were men and 62 (54%) were women. The median age was 50 (range: 5-85) years. Of these patients 58.3% were Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), 17.4% were acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), 10.4% were chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), 7% were multiple sclerosis, 6.1% were myasthenia gravis (MG) and 0.9% were Wilson disease (WD). The median number of TPE sessions per patient was 5 (range 1-72). Human albumin was used as a replacement fluid in 66% and fresh frozen plasma was used in 34% of cases. TPE was done through central venous catheters in 66%, and peripheral venous access in 34% of patients. Some complications were seen in patients (18.3%) during TPE sessions. These complications were, complications related to catheter placement procedure (8.7%), hypotension (3.5%), hypocalcaemia (3.5%) and allergic reactions (1.7%). The complication ratios were 2.7% in total 771 TPE procedures. TPE procedure was terminated in 6% of sessions depending on these complications. Overall responses to TPE were noted in 89.5% of patients. In conclusion; Therapeutic plasma exchange is an effective treatment option in several neurologic diseases.

Italian multicenter study on low-density lipoprotein apheresis Working Group 2009 survey

We present results of the second survey of the Italian Multicenter Study on Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis (IMSLDLa-WG/2). The study involved 18 centers in 2009, treating 66 males and 35 females, mean age 47 ± 18 years. Mean age for initiation of drug treatment before low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDLa) was 31 ± 18 years, mean age to the first LDLa was 37 ± 20 years and average duration of treatment was 9 ± 6 years. The techniques used included direct adsorption of lipids, dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption, heparin-mediated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) precipitation, cascade filtration, and plasma exchange. The mean treated plasma/blood volumes/session were 3127 ± 518 mL and 8666 ± 1384 mL, respectively. The average plasma volume substituted was 3500 ± 300 mL. Lipid therapy before LDLa included ezetimibe, statins, ω-3 fatty acids and fenofibrate. Baseline mean LDL cholesterol (LDLC) levels were 386 ± 223 mg/dL. The mean before/after apheresis LDLC level decreased by 67% from 250 ± 108 mg/dL (P = 0.05 vs. baseline) to 83 ± 37 mg/dL (P = 0.001 vs. before). Baseline mean Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level was 179 ± 136 mg/dL. Mean before/after apheresis Lp(a) level decreased by 71% from 133 ± 120 mg/dL (P = 0.05 vs. baseline) to 39 ± 44 mg/dL (P = 0.001 vs. before). Major and minor side effects occurred in 27 and 62 patients, respectively. Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), 62.3% had coronary angiography and 50.4% coronary revascularization before LDLa. Single vessel, double vessel and triple vessel CAD occurred in 19 (30.1%), 15 (23.8%) and 29 (46%) patients, respectively. Both CAD and extra-CAD occurred in 41.5%, 39% had hypertension, 9.9% were smokers, 9.9% consumed alcohol and 42% were physically active. Ischemic cardiovascular events were not observed in any patient over 9 ± 6 years of treatment. Two centers have also treated 34 patients (females: 17/males 17; no. sessions: 36; average plasma volume treated: 3000 mL) for sudden hearing loss (SHL). Relief of symptoms was obtained, independently of the system used (HELP; cascade-filtration).

Current view: indications for extracorporeal lipid apheresis treatment

Background

One of the first investigations concerning extracorporeal treatment of hypercholesterolemia was performed in 1967 by plasma exchange in patients with homozygous or severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). In the following decades, several specific lipid apheresis systems were developed to efficiently eliminate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and Lp(a) cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients. In the early 1980s, the main clinical indication has been homozygous FH including mainly children and pregnant women. In consideration of the current development of lipid-lowering regimens and scientific knowledge of preventing progression of cardiovascular diseases, the spectrum of indications to initiate lipid apheresis was extended due to still insufficient lipid-lowering therapy in some clinical cases. However, a generally accepted indication for lipid apheresis treatment is still under discussion. In Germany, the target-oriented distribution of increasingly limited healthcare resources demand data which support the benefit of established treatment procedures such as lipid apheresis. In recent years, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), a paramount decision-making body of the German Healthcare System, issued to reassess the approval of chronic lipid apheresis therapy for regular reimbursement. Therefore, in 2005, an interdisciplinary German Apheresis Working Group has been established by members of both the German societies of nephrology. One of the first goals of this working group was a revision of the indications for lipid apheresis corresponding to current guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of lipid disorders. In addition, recently new pathophysiological perceptions of the impact of lipoproteins on atherogenesis and thrombosis were also considered.

Methods and Results

Since 2005, the working group met on a regular basis to substantiate the first defined goals. The indications for lipid apheresis were critically revised with respect to actual results from clinical investigations, cardiovascular guidelines, and scientific knowledge and were accepted by the members of the apheresis working group.

Conclusions

There is consensus between the medical societies and health insurance funds regarding the need for general accepted guidelines for lipid apheresis. Recommendations for the indications of lipid apheresis were developed, but additionally these results should be confirmed by medical societies to transform them to guidelines. However, due to limited data showing that lipid apheresis has effects on the progression of cardiovascular diseases all members of the apheresis working group support a project for creating a lipid apheresis registry. This apheresis registry has been developed and recently started. The primary goal is to substantiate prospective long-term data on clinical outcome of chronic lipid apheresis treatment and to support additional clinical research activities in this field. In addition, this registry should comply with the actual requests of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA).

The German Lipid Apheresis Registry - remaining to be established

BACKGROUND

The target-oriented distribution of increasingly limited health care resources demand data, which support the benefit of established treatment procedures such as lipid apheresis. In recent years, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), a paramount decision-making body of the German Health Care System, warrants reassessment of the approval of chronic lipid apheresis therapy for regular reimbursement. Therefore, in 2005, an interdisciplinary German apheresis working group has been established by members of both German Societies of Nephrology. The goal of this working group has been to revise 1.) the indication for lipid apheresis according to current guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of lipid disorders and 2.) to transfer recent advances of our understanding of the impact of lipoproteins for atherogenesis and thrombosis into these recommendations. In addition, the working group developed standardized report forms, which could be implemented in a software solution to establish a German Lipid Apheresis Registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 2005 to 2009 the working group met on a regular basis to substantiate the first defined goals. The indication for lipid apheresis was critically revised with respect to cardiovascular guidelines and actual scientific evidence and was accepted by the members of the apheresis working group. The first draft of report forms for the German Lipid Apheresis Registry was validated. Various software solutions were discussed, but proved not feasible because of the lack of financial sponsoring.

CONCLUSIONS

There is consensus between the medical societies and health care authorities that there is a need for a German Lipid Apheresis Registry. The advantage of such a registry is to substantiate prospective long-term data on clinical outcome of chronic lipid apheresis treatment and to support additional clinical research activities in that field. In addition, this registry should comply with requests of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). The necessary terms for this registry are well defined, but financial support is an issue.

World apheresis registry 2003-2007 data

OBJECTIVES

Seventy-five centers from many countries have applied for a login code to the WAA apheresis registry. Fifteen centers from 7 countries have been actively entering data at the internet site from 2003 until 2007. We report on data from the registry so far.

METHODS

This is a web-based registry. A link is available from the WAA homepage (www.worldapheresis.org). So far data from 2013 patients (12,448 procedures) have been included. A median of 6 treatments have been performed (range 1-140). Mean age 51 years (range 1-94 years; 45% women). Seven percent of the patients were < or = 21 years and 4% were < or = 16 years.

RESULTS

The purpose of the apheresis procedure was therapeutic in 67% and retrieval of blood components in 33%. Main indications: neurological and hematological diseases, lipid apheresis and stemcell collection (autologous, and some allogeneic). Blood access: peripheral vessels (71%), central dialysis catheter through jugular (6.5%) or subclavian veins (6.7%), femoral vein (8%) and AV fistula (4%). ACD was used for anticoagulation in 73% of the procedures. Albumin was mainly used as replacement fluid. Adverse events (AE) were registered in 5.7% of the procedures. AE was graded as mild (2.5%), moderate (2.7%) or severe (0.5%). No death occurred due to treatment. The procedures were interrupted in 2.6%. Most frequent AEs were blood access problems (29%), tingling around the mouth (20%), hypotension (18%), and urticaria (9%). There were significant differences between the centers regarding mild and moderate AEs. Data indicate that centers using continuous infusion of calcium had fewer AEs.

CONCLUSION

There was a limited number of severe AEs. Centers use various standard procedures for apheresis. By learning from the experience of others the treatment quality will improve further. In the near future, an update of the registry will enable more extensive evaluation of the data.

Apheresis information management system (AMIS)

Data collection in the field of medicine is extremely important for patient safety. It is viewed as a quality issue in several countries around the world. In order to achieve this goal, nationwide apheresis registries were planned. In 2003, World Apheresis Association (WAA) decided to establish a world-wide apheresis registry. Although some of the apheresis centers in our country sent data to this registry, we believe that we need our own Turkish Registry. For this purpose, we launched new web based apheresis software for donor and therapeutic apheresis procedures. This paper summarizes the characteristics of this new software.

Therapeutic apheresis: use of human serum albumin, fresh frozen plasma and cryosupernatant plasma in therapeutic plasma exchange

In therapeutic plasma exchange, patient plasma is removed and a colloid replacement solution is infused in its stead. A solution of 4-5% human serum albumin in saline is the recommended replacement solution in most instances, even though it leads to transient mild deficiencies of most plasma proteins. Albumin solutions are pasteurized to inactivate viruses, carry a very low risk of febrile and allergic reactions, and are convenient to store and administer. Fresh frozen plasma, which must be type specific and needs to be ordered in advance and thawed before use, carries a higher risk of reactions; however, it replaces all plasma constituents and is appropriate for patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or a pre-existing coagulopathy. Neither cryosupernatant plasma, which is relatively depleted of the proteins in cryoprecipitate, nor pooled plasma that has been virally inactivated with organic solvents and detergents has been shown to be superior to fresh frozen plasma for any indication.

Haemapheresis activities in Germany

Preparative and therapeutic haemaphereses are well established in Germany. Plasma and platelets are the most often collected products by apheresis. 1,090,329l of apheresed plasma were collected for fractionation in 2002. For therapeutic purposes 410,507 transfusion units (TUs) of plasma and 227,096 TUs of platelets were harvested by apheresis. The number of allogeneic and autologous peripheral blood stem cell collections is steadily increasing and supplants more and more the harvesting of bone marrow. There is only a small market for the collection of red blood cells (RBCs) by apheresis (4982 TUs in 2002) and multicomponent donation. Unfortunately, there is no central register for the data acquisition of therapeutic aphereses which makes it impossible to gain exact data about the number of performed procedures as well as their side effects. Preparative haemapheresis are usually carried out by specialists in Transfusion Medicine, whereas therapeutic aphereses are performed by experts in Transfusion Medicine and by clinicians of different specialties. Besides the well established plasmaphereses and cell depletions, new interesting therapeutic apheresis techniques, e.g. for the treatment of sudden hearing loss and cardiomyopathy, are promising.

World apheresis association—world apheresis registry

In 2002 WAA decided to start a world-wide apheresis registry to gain insight into the extent of treatment, adverse events, and to facilitate contacts among centers when treatment indications are rare and experience limited. Stem cell and other blood products collections intended for therapeutic application can also be entered. The WAA planned to use the French Registry. Its translation into English has not been accomplished and the fiscal obligations for that registry has not, as yet, been determined or considered and approved by the WAA Board. From Dec 2002 the proposed registry (a merged version of the French, Canadian and Swedish registries) can be immediately implemented. We now cordially invite all centers to join that registry. Please, also inform colleagues at other centers in your country to join. E-mail and address lists of colleagues in your country who have not registered will be welcomed. The site is at: Go to World Apheresis Registry; Login code to test the Registry is: al61tms. Then apply for a specific login code for your center. We welcome you to this registry for your input of data. You will not be charged any registration fee. The registry includes a randomization system that can be used for local or multi center studies (randomization by in-center basis allows you to make your own studies). It includes a formula that increases the chance to get a more even distribution between groups also for smaller sample sizes.

Autoimmune-associated Congenital Heart Block: Treatment of the Mother With Immunoadsorption

Autoimmune-associated congenital heart block (CHB) is a rare complication of pregnancy in mothers with Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies (SSA-abs), resulting in fetal myocarditis, atrioventricular block, hydrops fetalis and/or intrauterine fetal death. As these antibodies are supposed to be directly involved in the pathogenesis of CHB, their removal should be associated with an improved clinical course. Extracorporeal immunoadsorption (IA) is the most efficient method to remove IgG-immunoglobulins like SSA-abs selectively. Two women with high titers of those auto-antibodies [mothers serum 615 and 612, respectively (normal range <3.0 IU/mL)] were treated with IA two to three times per gestation week in the outpatient department of the University of Rostock. In both patients, the mean removal of IgG (65 +/- 6%) to a target near 2.0 g/L after IA was successful. The SSA-abs were reduced from mean 328 +/- 138 and 247 +/- 105 pre IA to 88 +/- 124 and 98 +/- 42 post IA, respectively. One child received a pacemaker due to the persisting atrioventricular block grade III after birth. The second was unaffected. The removal of highly elevated SSA-antibodies by immunoadsorption is a possible treatment option in pregnant woman with high titers of those antibodies and/or a positive history of clinical complications. Further clinical studies are necessary.

Therapeutic plasma exchange as a nephrological procedure: A single-center experience

In the United States, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is both performed and requested by a wide range of services, often on an empiric basis (before a diagnosis is established). Whether empiric therapy is beneficial has not been established. Patients were identified from an electronic procedure log that included those patients who received plasmapheresis at Walter Reed Army Medical Center from 1996 to 2003. The clinical indications, referring service, and outcomes (including deaths) that occurred were tabulated. Between March 1997 and August 2003, 568 TPE treatments were performed in 54 patients. The majority of the diagnoses were either neurologic (48%) or hematologic (37%). Thirty-three patients (61%) received TPE for a Category I indication. Twelve cases were performed empirically (without an established diagnosis) at the request of the referring service, most (7) performed for presumed thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Almost 80% of patients required central venous catheters for treatment. Twelve patients (22%) experienced a major complication including death, and six patients (11%) died. Of the patients who died, 5 (83%) were treated empirically versus one death (17%) among patients not treated empirically, P < 0.001 by Chi Square. Only one of the seven patients treated empirically for TTP died, however. In logistic regression analysis, empiric treatment was the only factor independently associated with death, adjusted odds ratio, 34.2, 95% CI, 3.4, 334.8, P = 0.003. The most common indication for TPE was neurological disease, which also accounted for the highest proportion of complications. With the exception of presumed TTP, performing TPE in the absence of a confirmed diagnosis was not beneficial.

The Italian Registry for Therapeutic Apheresis. A report from the Apheresis Study Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology

Many clinical indications and different technical issues have been reported on therapeutic apheresis: much criticism has also been recorded in several instances, mainly due to the lack of large clinical trials to validate collected data. A Registry where all the available data can be organized and analyzed therefore becomes a priority for all the professionals involved in apheresis. The purpose of this report is to describe the data submitted from 1994 to 2004 from 15,285 treatments on 1,477 patients from 44 Centers, including mainly, but not exclusively, Nephrological Units, collected by the Apheresis Study Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology in 15 Italian regions. Plasma exchange accounted for 56.2% of the procedures, and of these 50.4% were performed by filtration. Plasma treatment was used in 40.1% of procedures, namely with Protein A immunoadsorption (14.6%), LDL-Cholesterol dextran sulfate adsorption (9.7%), and semiselective cascade or double filtration (12.6%). Cell apheresis, limited to photopheresis, was used in 0.85% of cases, and whole blood treatment (direct adsorption lipoprotein, and molecular adsorption recirculating system) in 2.7%. The procedures analyzed here account for less than 20% of estimated therapeutic apheresis performed in Italy, according to the national survey of activity performed for year 2000 by the Italian Apheresis Society. Notwithstanding that the data are largely incomplete, they are sufficiently informative for a definite trend: plasma treatment with filtration on fractionation filters and adsorption must be used as often as possible, instead of plasma exchange, thus obtaining the most selective removals.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in a single center: Ibni Sina experience

BACKGROUND

The number of therapeutic procedures is increasing steadily year by year with growing collaboration of departments other than Hematology. In the aim to demonstrate our single center activity we analyzed our data since four years.

METHODS

Between years 1998 and 2001, 658 therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) procedures were performed on 158 patients. Median age and male/female ratio were 37 (range, 15-87) and 80/78, respectively. Main indications were myastenia gravis (n=55, 34%), TTP (n=13, 8.5%), post ABO mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation aregeneratoric anemia (n=6, 7.5%), progressive systemic sclerosis (n=10, 6.5%), multiple myeloma (n=10, 6.5%), Gullian Barre Syndrome (n=9, 5.9%), multiple sclerosis (n=7, 4.6%), Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (n=5, 3.4%), polymyositis (n=4, 2.7%), sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (n=4, 2.7%). Departments who referred the majority of the patients for TPE were neurology (n=199), hematology (n=153), immunology (n=78), intensive care unit (n=78) and thorax surgery (n=51).

RESULTS

The median TPE procedure per patient was 4 (range, 1-50). All the procedures were performed on continuous flow cell separators and median plasma volume processed per cycle was 2471 ml (range 436-5000). The replacement fluids used were 3% hydroxyethylstarch (HES) (24%), 5% albumin (35%), fresh frozen plasma (25%), and HES and albumin (16%). HES was tolerated well even as a sole replacement fluid with acceptable minor side effects. In three patients with progressing hypoalbuminemia HES was replaced or combined with 5% albumin. Close monitoring of serum albumin and fibrinogen levels after repeated procedures is mandatory.

CONCLUSION

In our four years of TPE experience we have increased our collaboration with other departments. 3% HES+/-5% Albumin is a feasible, well tolerated and cost effective replacement fluid combination especially for short-term plasma exchange therapy.

National survey of apheresis activity in Italy (2000)

Data collection on apheresis in Italy throughout 2000, including techniques, machines, clinical indications and adverse effects, has been performed by means of a standardized questionnaire. These data provided from 102 Apheresis Units from 19 Italian regions, albeit rough, are sufficiently informative. In 2000 a total number of 164,943 apheresis procedures has been carried out, with a clear-cut prevalence of productive apheresis (90.8%), that has been performed by all Apheresis Units. Lombardy, Venetia and Liguria have been the most active regions for therapeutic apheresis (54.0% of the total activity). Adverse events, predominantly mild ones (i.e., paresthesia due to citrate-induced hypocalcemia) have occurred in 0.59% of productive and in 6.75% of therapeutic apheresis sessions, particularly in the course of peripheral blood stem cell collection (13.0%).

Is there a need for a national or a global apheresis registry?

Indications for apheresis may vary and more than 45 different diagnoses have been reported from various countries. New devices are being developed and, in the beginning their clinical implications and use are limited to detect rare but important side effects. However, to achieve more reliable information on the effects and side effects we need more extensive sampling of data. Collection of such data is considered a safety and quality issue in several countries. However, data is still limited and little is known about therapeutic apheresis practised around the world including the incidence and pattern of adverse events. The establishment of national registries and analyses of data on a global level therefore seems important. Thus the World Apheresis Association (WAA) has initiated a global apheresis registry for therapeutic procedures and collection of e.g., stem cells. The WAA registry is Internet based and the site is at www.iml.umu.se/medicin. A login code to test the registry is needed (AL61TMS). This report deals with the aim of a global registry as well as some comparative data regarding findings of the Canadian, French and Swedish registries.

Therapeutic apheresis in Sweden: update of epidemiology and adverse events

The indications of apheresis have changed over time due to results from various studies as well as the innovation of new techniques and ideas. To get an overview of the indications used for apheresis by colleagues elsewhere, data from registries are valuable. In addition, registries can be used for detection of severe adverse events as well as extent of adverse events in various types of treatment. To have a basis for statistical calculations, apheresis units need to be very large or centralisation of data needs to be performed. Data from more than 20000 procedures show that in about 4.3% of occasions adverse events and other problems will develop. Interruption of the procedure was done in 1%, most frequently a plasma exchange. Technical problems can be expected more frequent when performing LDL apheresis and immunoadsorption. Severe adverse events needing medication or interruption of the treatment, such as hypotension and arrhythmia, will develop in about 1% of the procedures. Such an episode occurs more often in patients with TTP/HUS and Guillain-Barré syndrome than in hypercholesterolemia, hyperviscosity syndrome or septic shock/MODS. The non-severe adverse events have increased over time. The results will provide focus in analyses for the reduction of such adverse events.

A survey of therapeutic hemapheresis in Norway year 2000

In a survey of therapeutic hemapheresis in Norway, we sent a questionnaire to all regional and central hospitals, asking about hemapheresis activities, patients, indications, and adverse events. All units responded to the questionnaire: 17 dialysis units, 7 blood units, and 2 specialized units for stem cell apheresis. In total, they performed 2141 procedures that is 5.0 stem cell collections and 42.5 therapeutic apheresis procedures per 100,000 inhabitants. The most frequent indications were Guillain-Barré syndrome, hypercholesterolemia, and myasthenia gravis. Adverse effects were frequent, but mild. Dialysis units performed a majority of the procedures, leading to an extensive use of filtration techniques.

Dilatation and declotting of arteriovenous accesses

The autogenous arteriovenous fistula has long been proven to be the most durable access for hemodialysis and therefore for any therapy based on plasma exchange. Forearm autogenous fistulas are, however, frequently challenging to create, leading less experienced surgeons to create elbow fistulas or even worse, to place prosthetic grafts. Once the arteriovenous access is constructed, stenoses largely located on the venous side frequently occur, leading to thrombosis if they are not detected and preventively treated. Interventional radiology is now the first line and preferred treatment in the majority of cases of vascular access dysfunction. The overall advantages compared with conventional surgery are its minimal invasiveness, better preservation of the patient's venous reserve, and better outcomes for selected indications such as thrombosed autogenous fistulas. Prophylactic dilation of stenoses greater than 50% associated with clinical abnormalities such as flow-rate reduction is warranted to prolong access patency. Stents are placed only in selected cases with clearly insufficient results of dilation but they must never overlap major side veins and obviate future access creation. Thrombosed fistulas and grafts can be declotted by purely mechanical methods or in combination with a lytic drug. The success rates are over 90% for dilation, in central veins radiologists frequently resort to the use of stents. Long-term results after dilation in the largest series are better in forearm native fistulas compared with grafts. The initial success rates for declotting are better in grafts compared with forearm fistulas but early rethrombosis is frequent in grafts so that primary patency rates can be better for native fistulas from the first month's follow-up.

14 years of therapeutic plasma exchange in France

The French Registry for plasma exchange (PE) was set up in 1985. For 14 years it has allowed analysis of the techniques used along with the indications and complications. Recent analysis shows a slight fall in activity as some studies have ended, while the neurological disorders remain the most frequent indications for PE. The important changes observed over the years are the increased use of the centrifugation technique, the development of plasma and whole blood treatment and plasma substitution using a mixture of albumin and pentastarch. The French Registry for PE is the largest such database which, along with the Canadian Registry for therapeutic hemapheresis, allows both retrospective and prospective studies.

Adverse events and problems in therapeutic hemapheresis. A report from the Swedish registry

BACKGROUND

Since 1996 adverse events (AE) in therapeutic apheresis (TA) have been more extensively registered in Sweden. This report analyzes the extent and relation of AEs to procedures and diagnoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reporting of TA performed in Sweden was centralized. A separate system for the registration of AE in TA was established and the data received were entered into a central database for registration and analyses. Fifteen of all 35 apheresis units reported both TA and AE during 1996-1999. These centers performed 75% of all TA procedures. Adverse events included medical symptoms, vascular access problems, technical and other problems.

RESULTS

More than 14,000 procedures were registered during the observation period. No fatalities occurred. AEs occurred in 3.7% (1996), 4.6% (1997), 4.2% (1998) and 4.4% (1999) of procedures. Interventions during the adverse event were performed in about 65% of the events. Apheresis procedures were interrupted due to an adverse event in about 1%. Adverse events occurred in 5.6% of plasma exchanges, 1.9% of plasma modulations and 6.8% of cytapheresis procedures. Paresthesia was registered in 22% and hypotensive events in 20.5%. Other more frequent symptoms were urticaria (14.4%), shivering (7.4%) and nausea (7.4%). AEs were most frequent in patients with Goodpasture's syndrome (12.5%), TTP/HUS (10.5%) and GuillainBarré syndrome (11.0%).

CONCLUSION

AEs are few, often mild and less common in plasma modulation than plasma exchange. AEs are more frequent during TA of patients with certain diagnoses such as TTP/HUS.

Plasmapheresis in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia

Over the past 3 decades, plasmapheresis has been used more extensively for a variety of neurological and hematological disorders. We undertook a retrospective review to ascertain its safety, efficacy, and factor(s) that predispose to poor outcome. We reviewed 117 plasma exchanges in 24 patients with a mean age of 43 +/- 15 years; half were male. A total of 79% of the patients had neurological diseases, and the most common were chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and myasthenic crisis. Plasmapheresis was effective in 79% of the patients, especially for neurological indications. Complications occurred in 23% of the exchanges affecting 58% of the patients. Most complications were mild; sepsis was the most common (9.4% of exchanges), especially catheter related sepsis (6%), rash (4.3%), and hypotension (4.3%). Only 2 (8%) patients had severe complications that required mechanical ventilation. There were 5 mortalities (21%), 3 due to sepsis and 2 due to myocardial ischemia and arrhythmia, none of which occurred within 48 h of the last exchange. Patients with poor renal function had higher mortality. Overall, our figures agree with those from other institutions and indicate that plasma exchange is an effective and safe procedure, especially for a variety of neuroimmunological conditions.

Apheresis registry in Sweden: scope, techniques and indications for treatment. A report from the Swedish apheresis study group

Registries of therapeutic apheresis can be used to evaluate changes in technology, clinical indications and applications over the years. This study reports data collected prospectively and voluntarily in Sweden during 1993-1999. A total number of 40 apheresis units have been performing therapeutic apheresis procedures: 16 blood centers, 20 dialysis units, two intensive care units, one hematology ward and one hemotherapy unit. The registry includes a median of 92%) of the centers for therapeutic apheresis in Sweden during the years and in 1999 there were 31 active units in 26 hospitals. The total numbers of procedures per year have remained fairly stable corresponding to a median of 46 treatments/ 100,000 inhabitants, and in 1999 4084 procedures were performed. The number of plasma exchanges has decreased, but LDL-apheresis and immunoadsorption procedures have increased over the years. 70% of the patients have been referred for 12 indications. A significant decline was found for patients with SLE and Guillain Barres syndrome. The use of extracorporeal photo-chemotherapy has increased over the years, and 3 indications include >75$ of the patients. There has been an adaptation to the experience learned by different studies. The number of collections of hematopoietic progenitor cells is about 9/100,000 inhabitants, and in 1999 821 collections were performed. The use of allogeneic donors is increasing. The extent of therapeutic apheresis in Sweden was compared to other countries on the basis of published data. In Sweden, the extent of therapy is two- to three-fold to that for Canada and France.