Aldosterone blockade in CKD: emphasis on pharmacology

Investigating the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for cardiovascular outcomes in different diseases

AIMS

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are crucial in managing cardiovascular diseases, with different MRAs demonstrating varying efficacy across diverse disease contexts. This research aims to compare the cardiovascular protective effects of different MRAs across various disease conditions.

METHODS

Evidence from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, or real-world registry studies that investigated hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following MRA treatment were searched in four literature databases. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve values were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 21 investigations involving 61 076 participants were included. The control groups comprised placebo arms in RCTs and non-MRA users in observational studies. In heart failure (HF) patients, finerenone showed highest efficacy with HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.95) versus control, followed by spironolactone (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) and eplerenone (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.10). For non-HF populations, spironolactone showed the most protective effect (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.15-1.10), followed by eplerenone (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.25-1.30) and finerenone (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.50-1.60). In diabetes mellitus population, spironolactone maintained advantage (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.13-2.43) in contrast to finerenone (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.25) and eplerenone (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.40-1.62). Sensitivity analyses which excluded observational studies and included only RCTs showed consistent results for these disease populations. But the chronic kidney disease/end-stage renal disease population exhibited different patterns: eplerenone showed optimal efficacy in primary analysis (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.32-1.20) followed by spironolactone (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.06) and finerenone (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.55-1.35). Sensitivity analysis revealed better result for spironolactone in this population (HR 0.40, 0.15-1.10) followed by eplerenone (HR 0.62, 0.27-1.40) and finerenone (HR 0.87, 0.49-1.50).

CONCLUSIONS

MRAs exhibit varying cardiovascular protective effects depending on the disease context. These findings support tailored treatment strategies based on specific disease conditions to optimize patient outcomes. Further research with larger and more diverse datasets is needed to validate these results and inform clinical decision-making.

Efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Objective: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: We systematically searched six databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about nonsteroidal MRAs for CKD, from inception to 22 August 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included RCTs using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We then conducted meta-analysis of the data using Stata 17.0 software. Results: 11 RCTs (n = 15,817) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, nonsteroidal MRAs significantly reduced the proportion of patients with ≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline [RR = 0.85, 95% CI (0.78, 0.92), p < 0.001], although the magnitude of eGFR reduction was greater [WMD = -2.83, 95% CI (-3.95, -1.72), p < 0.001]. The experimental group also had lower incidence of composite renal outcome [RR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.79, 0.93), p < 0.001] and greater reduction in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline [WMD = -0.41, 95% CI (-0.49, -0.32), p < 0.001], as well as reduced cardiovascular events [RR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.80, 0.95), p = 0.003]. MRAs did not increase any adverse events compared to placebo [RR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.99, 1.01), p = 0.909], but had higher incidence of hyperkalemia [RR = 2.05, 95% CI (1.85, 2.280), p < 0.001]. Compared with eplerenone, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with ≥40% decline in eGFR [RR = 0.57, 95% CI (0.18, 1.79), p = 0.335] or hyperkalemia [RR = 0.95, 95%CI (0.48, 1.88), p = 0.875]. Conclusion: Nonsteroidal MRAs can reduce the incidence of end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular adverse events in patients. Although there was still a risk of hyperkalemia compared to placebo, there was no significant difference in any adverse events compared to either placebo or eplerenone. It has become a new option for drug treatment of CKD patients, but more clinical trials are still needed to verify its efficacy and safety. Especially further direct comparison of the nonsteroidal MRAs to eplerenone in view of the relatively small number of patients reviewed are needed.

Mineralocorticoid receptor overactivation: targeting systemic impact with non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

The overactivation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) promotes pathophysiological processes related to multiple physiological systems, including the heart, vasculature, adipose tissue and kidneys. The inhibition of the MR with classical MR antagonists (MRA) has successfully improved outcomes most evidently in heart failure. However, real and perceived risk of side effects and limited tolerability associated with classical MRA have represented barriers to implementing MRA in settings where they have been already proven efficacious (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) and studying their potential role in settings where they might be beneficial but where risk of safety events is perceived to be higher (renal disease). Novel non-steroidal MRA have distinct properties that might translate into favourable clinical effects and better safety profiles as compared with MRA currently used in clinical practice. Randomised trials have shown benefits of non-steroidal MRA in a range of clinical contexts, including diabetic kidney disease, hypertension and heart failure. This review provides an overview of the literature on the systemic impact of MR overactivation across organ systems. Moreover, we summarise the evidence from preclinical studies and clinical trials that have set the stage for a potential new paradigm of MR antagonism.

Cardiorenal benefits of mineralocorticoid antagonists in CKD and type 2 diabetes : Lessons from the FIGARO-DKD trial

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) develops in almost half of all patients with diabetes and is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide. Despite the high risk of chronic renal failure in these patients, only few therapeutic strategies are available. The use of renin-angiotensin system blockers to reduce the incidence of kidney failure in patients with DKD was established years ago and remains the hallmark of therapy. The past 2 years have seen a dramatic change in our therapeutic arsenal for CKD. Sodium-glucose co-transporter‑2 inhibitors (SGLT2s) have been successfully introduced for the treatment of CKD. A further addition is a novel compound antagonizing the activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor: finerenone. Finerenone reduces albuminuria and surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease in patients who are already on optimal therapy. In the past, treatment with other mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was hampered by a significantly increased risk of hyperkalemia. Finerenone had a much smaller effect on hyperkalemia. Together with a reduced effect on blood pressure and no signs of gynecomastia, this therapeutic strategy had a more specific anti-inflammatory effect and a smaller effect on the volume/electrolyte axis. In the FIDELIO-DKD study comparing the actions of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone with placebo, finerenone reduced the progression of DKD and the incidence of cardiovascular events, with a relatively safe adverse event profile. In this article, we summarize the available evidence on the cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects of finerenone and analyze the molecular mechanisms involved. In addition, we discuss the potential future role of mineralocorticoid receptor inhibition in the treatment of patients with diabetic CKD.

Mineralocorticoid interaction with glycated albumin downregulates NRF - 2 signaling pathway in renal cells: Insights into diabetic nephropathy

In diabetic nephropathy, hyperglycemia elevates albumin glycation and also results in increased plasma aldosterone. Both glycation and aldosterone are reported to cause oxidative stress by downregulating the NRF-2 pathway and thereby resulting in reduced levels of antioxidants and glycation detoxifying enzymes. We hypothesize that an interaction between aldosterone and glycated albumin may be responsible for amplified oxidative stress and concomitant renal cell damage. Hence, human serum albumin was glycated by methylglyoxal (MGO) in presence of aldosterone. Different structural modifications of albumin, functional modifications and aldosterone binding were analyzed. HEK-293 T cells were treated with aldosterone+glycated albumin along with inhibitors of receptors for mineralocorticoid (MR) and advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE). Cellular MGO content, antioxidant markers (nitric oxide, glutathione, catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase), detoxification enzymes (aldose reductase, Glyoxalase I, II), their expression along with NRF-2 and Keap-1 were measured. Aldosterone binds to albumin with high affinity which is static and spontaneous. Cell treatment by aldosterone+glycated albumin increased intracellular MGO, MR and RAGE expression; hampered antioxidant, detoxification enzyme activities and reduced NRF-2, Keap-1 expression. Thus, the glycated albumin-aldosterone interaction and its adverse effect on renal cells were confirmed. The results will help in developing better pharmacotherapeutic strategies for diabetic nephropathy.

Increased glucocorticoid metabolism in diabetic kidney disease

Aims

Glomerular damage indicated by proteinuria is a main symptom in diabetic nephropathy. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs) are beneficial irrespective of aldosterone availability. Thus, we hypothesized an alternatively activated MR to promote glomerular damage in proteinuric diabetic nephropathy. Specifically, we aimed first to demonstrate the presence of steroid hormones serving as alternative MR targets in type II diabetic patients with proteinuric kidney disease, second whether MR selectivity was modified, third to characterize MR and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression and activity in glomerular cell types exposed to eu- and hyperglycemic conditions, fourth to characterize the pro-fibrotic potential of primary human renal mesangial cells (HRMC) upon stimulation with aldosterone and cortisol, and fifth to specify the involvement of the MR and/or GR in pro-fibrotic signaling.

Materials and methods

Urinary steroid hormone profiles of patients with diabetic kidney disease were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and compared to an age and gender matched healthy control group taken out of a population study. In both cohorts, the activity of the MR pre-receptor enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD11B2), which inactivates cortisol to prevent it from binding to the MR, was assessed to define a change in MR selectivity. Expression of HSD11B2, MR and GR was quantified in HRMC and primary human renal glomerular endothelial cells (HRGEC). Activity of MR and GR was explored in HRMC by measuring the MR/GR down-stream signal SGK1 and the pro-fibrotic genes TGFB1, FN1 and COL1A1 in normal and high glucose conditions with the MR/GR agonists aldosterone/cortisol and the MR/GR antagonists spironolactone/RU486.

Results

Patients with diabetic kidney disease excreted more tetrahydroaldosterone than the control group reaching significance in men. The excretion of MR-agonistic steroid hormones was only increased for 18-hydroxytetrahydrocorticosterone in diabetic women. The excretion of most glucocorticoids was higher in the diabetic cohort. Higher apparent systemic HSD11B2 activity suggested less activation of the MR by cortisol in diabetic patients. Both cell types, HRMC and HRGEC, lacked expression of HSD11B2. Hyperglycemic conditions did not change MR and GR expression and activity. Stimulation with both aldosterone and cortisol promoted upregulation of pro-fibrotic genes in HRMC. This effect of MR and/or GR activation was more pronounced in high glucose conditions and partially inhibited by MRAs and GR antagonists.

Conclusions

In patients with diabetic kidney disease alternative MR activation is conceivable as cortisol and cortisone metabolites are increased. Systemic availability of active metabolites is counteracted via an increased HSD11B2 activity. As this cortisol deactivation is absent in HRMC and HRGEC, cortisol binding to the MR is enabled. Both, cortisol and aldosterone stimulation led to an increased expression of pro-fibrotic genes in HRMC. This mechanism was related to the MR as well as the GR and more marked in high glucose conditions linking the benefit of MRAs in diabetic kidney disease to these findings.

Differentiation between emerging non-steroidal and established steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: head-to-head comparisons of pharmacological and clinical characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists (MRAs) provide cardiorenal protection. However steroidal MRAs might induce hyperkalemia and sex hormone-related adverse effects. Several novel non-steroidal MRAs are being developed that are highly selective for the MR and may have an improved safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes data from head-to-head comparisons of emerging non-steroidal MRAs with older steroidal MRAs, including pharmacological characteristics, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical outcomes, and safety, and highlights similarities and differences between emerging agents and established steroidal MRAs.

EXPERT OPINION

Head-to-head comparisons in phase 2 trials suggest that the new non-steroidal MRAs exhibit at least equivalent efficacy to steroidal MRAs but may have a better safety profile in patients with heart failure and/or kidney disease. When also taking into account data from recent phase 3 placebo-controlled trials, these novel non-steroidal MRAs have the potential to provide a cardiorenal benefit above that of current optimized standard-of-care treatment in a high-risk population with reduced renal function, and with a lower risk of hyperkalemia. To optimize therapy, further research is needed to clarify the molecular differences in the mode of action of non-steroidal MRAs versus steroidal MRAs, and biomarkers that are predictive of MRA response need to be identified and validated.

The paradoxical effect of aldosterone on cardiovascular outcome in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Background

Patients with end-stage kidney disease face increased risk of cardiovascular events, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) contributes to the high occurrence of cardiovascular mortality (CM). Although a high serum aldosterone (sALD) level is involved in the development of cardiovascular complications in the general population, this association is unclear in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We aimed to determine the impact of sALD on LVDD and CM among hemodialysis patients (HDPs).

Methods

We performed a prospective cohort study of maintenance HDPs without cardiovascular disease. The patients were divided into two groups according to the median level of sALD. All patients underwent baseline echocardiography to evaluate diastolic dysfunction (E/e´ ratio > 15). The LVDD and CM rates were compared between the high and low aldosterone groups.

Results

We enrolled a total of 60 adult patients (mean age, 57.9 ± 12.1 years; males, 30.0%). The low aldosterone group had an increased left ventricular diastolic dimension compared with the high aldosterone group (52.2 ± 8.4 mm vs. 50.3 ± 5.2 mm, respectively; p = 0.03). Low log-aldosterone (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.86) and large left atrial dimension (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.54) were independent risk factors for LVDD at baseline. In addition, Cox regression analysis demonstrated that low sALD was an independent predictor of CM in HDPs (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; p = 0.01) during follow-up.

Conclusion

Low sALD was not only associated with LVDD but was also an independent predictor of CM among HDPs regardless of their interdialytic weight gain.

Phase 1 Studies to Define the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of the Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Apararenone in Healthy Volunteers

Apararenone is a long-acting, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of single- and multiple-dose apararenone were assessed in 3 phase 1 randomized, double-blind studies in 223 healthy adults. Study 1 assessed the PK, safety/tolerability, and PD of single-dose apararenone (3.75-640 mg) and multiple-dose apararenone (10-40 mg/day on days 1-14, 320 mg loading dose on day 1 + 10 mg/day on days 2-14, or 40-320 mg loading dose on day 1 + 2.5-20 mg/day on days 2-14) in Caucasian and Black men and women. Study 2 assessed the PK and safety of single-dose apararenone (5-320 mg) in healthy Japanese men. Study 3 assessed the PK, PD, and safety/tolerability of single-dose apararenone (160 or 640 mg) or eplerenone (200 mg; only for 160 mg of apararenone), each after fludrocortisone challenge in Caucasian men. In studies 1 and 2, an approximately dose-proportional increase was observed in PK parameters over the apararenone dose range of 3.75-40 mg; at higher doses, a less than dose-proportional increase was observed. Food, sex, age, and race had no apparent effect on apararenone PK. A long half-life was seen for apararenone and its principal metabolite; in addition, the exposure of the metabolite was lower than that of apararenone. Apararenone suppressed the decrease in urinary sodium and potassium ion ratio that occurs after loading with fludrocortisone. These studies support the mechanism of action of apararenone as an MRA, and further clinical development is warranted.

The effect of aldosterone and aldosterone blockade on the progression of chronic kidney disease: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

The progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) cannot be completely inhibited. We first explored factors contributing to CKD progression in patients with CKD in a prospective observational study. In the next phase, we focused on the effects of aldosterone, conducting a single-blinded placebo-controlled study using the selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), eplerenone (25 mg/day). We recruited patients with CKD stage 2 and 3 whose plasma aldosterone concentration was above 15 ng/dL based on the prior data of a prospective observational study. In the CKD cohort study (n = 141), baseline plasma aldosterone concentration was identified as an independent contributory factor for the future rate of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). When the cut-off value for aldosterone was set at 14.5 ng/dL, the decline rate was significantly higher in patients with higher plasma aldosterone concentration (− 1.22 ± 0.39 ml/min/1.73 m²/year vs. 0.39 ± 0.40 ml/min/1.73 m²/year, p = 0.0047). In the final intervention study, in the eplerenone group, eGFR dropped at 6 months after the initiation of the study, and thereafter eGFR was maintained until the end of the study. At 24 months and 36 months, eGFR was significantly higher in the eplerenone group than in the placebo group. In conclusion, MRA can be an effective strategy in preventing CKD progression, especially in patients with high plasma aldosterone.

Results from Drug-Drug Interaction Studies In Vitro and In Vivo Investigating the Effect of Finerenone on the Pharmacokinetics of Comedications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In vivo studies were performed with the novel, selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone to assess the relevance of inductive and/or inhibitory effects on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes observed in vitro.

METHODS

CYP isoenzyme-specific substrates were incubated in vitro with finerenone or its metabolites to investigate reversible and irreversible inhibitory as well as inductive potential. Three crossover studies in healthy male volunteers investigated the effects of finerenone (20 mg orally) on the pharmacokinetics of the index substrates midazolam (CYP3A4, n = 30), repaglinide (CYP2C8, n = 28) and warfarin (CYP2C9, n = 24).

RESULTS

Finerenone caused direct inhibitory effects on CYP activities in vitro in the rank order CYP2C8, CYP1A1 > CYP3A4 > CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, but not on other major CYP isoforms. Moreover, irreversible inhibition of CYP3A4 was observed. The major metabolites of finerenone demonstrated minor reversible inhibition of CYP1A1, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 with no hint of time-dependent inhibition of any CYP isoform. Calculations from in vitro data according to regulatory guidelines suggested likely inhibition of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 in vivo, whereas this was not the case for CYP1A1, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Furthermore, finerenone and three of its metabolites were inducers of CYP3A4 in vitro with predicted weak-to-moderate in vivo relevance. Studies in healthy volunteers, prompted by these results, demonstrated no effect of finerenone on CYP isoenzymes for which in vitro data had indicated potential inhibition or induction.

CONCLUSION

Administration of finerenone 20 mg once daily confers no risk of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with substrates of cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Efficacy and Safety of Esaxerenone (CS-3150) for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes with Microalbuminuria: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The progression of kidney disease in some patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may not be adequately suppressed by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Esaxerenone (CS-3150) is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker that has shown kidney protective effects in preclinical studies, and it is a potential add-on therapy to treat diabetic kidney disease. This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of esaxerenone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 365 hypertensive or normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥45 to <300 mg/g creatinine) treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor who had eGFR≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m². Participants were randomized to receive 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, or 5 mg/d esaxerenone or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to week 12 (with last observation carried forward).

RESULTS

Esaxerenone treatment at 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/d significantly reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio by the end of treatment (38%, 50%, and 56%, respectively) compared with placebo (7%; all P<0.001). The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio remission rate (defined as urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio <30 mg/g creatinine at the end of treatment and ≥30% decrease from baseline) was 21% in the 2.5- and 5-mg/d groups versus 3% for placebo (both P<0.05). Adverse events occurred slightly more frequently with esaxerenone versus placebo, but the frequencies of drug-related adverse events and discontinuation rates were similar in the placebo and the 0.625-, 1.25-, and 2.5-mg/d groups. Drug-related adverse events and treatment discontinuations were marginally higher in the 5-mg/d group. The most common drug-related adverse event was hyperkalemia, which was dose proportional.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding esaxerenone at 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/d for 12 weeks to an ongoing renin-angiotensin system inhibitor significantly reduces urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.

Efficacy and safety of dosage-escalation of low-dosage esaxerenone added to a RAS inhibitor in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria: a single-arm, open-label study

The stimulation of mineralocorticoid receptors is linked to the development of hypertension and cardiovascular or renal damage in patients with diabetes, and the blockade of these receptors may be an effective treatment option. This open-label study with a 12-week treatment period assessed the antihypertensive (primary) and antialbuminuric (secondary) efficacy and safety of esaxerenone as an add-on therapy to a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria (urinary albumin-creatinine ratio 30 to <1000 mg/g•Cr). Esaxerenone was administered over 12 weeks at a starting dosage of 1.25 mg/day, which was gradually titrated to 2.5 mg/day and 5 mg/day at weeks 4, 6, or 8 according to the dosage-escalation criteria based on serum K⁺ levels, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the likelihood/occurrence of hypotension. Of the 51 patients enrolled, 44 (86.3%) reached an esaxerenone dosage of 2.5 or 5 mg/day. The changes from the baseline in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were −13.7 mmHg (p < 0.05) and −6.2 mmHg (p < 0.05), respectively. Significant decreases in blood pressure occurred regardless of age, baseline systolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The urinary albumin-creatinine ratio decreased by 32.4% from the baseline (p < 0.05). Two consecutive serum K⁺ measurements ≥ 5.5 mEq/L occurred in one patient but resolved after dosage reduction. Esaxerenone showed antihypertensive and antialbuminuric effects and a low risk of hyperkalemia with dosage titration from 1.25 mg in Japanese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria receiving a renin–angiotensin system inhibitor.

Obesidade e doença renal: aspectos fisiopatológicos

A epidemia de obesidade observada nas últimas décadas é acompanhada de aumento exponencial de doenças crônicas relacionadas, com destaque diabetes mellitus tipo 2, hipertensão arterial sistêmica, dislipidemia e doenças cardiovasculares. Do mesmo modo, a obesidade constitui fator de risco independente para o desenvolvimento de doença renal crônica, condição associada a elevados índices de morbidade e de mortalidade. A obesidade causa lesão renal de maneira indireta, por meio de sua estreita associação com hipertensão arterial sistêmica e com diabetes mellitus tipo 2 e de maneira direta, ao induzir adaptações glomerulares que culminam na glomerulopatia especí­fica da obesidade. Além disso, o excesso de peso contribui para o agravamento de glomerulopatias pré-existentes. Múltiplos fatores explicam o desenvolvimento e o agravamento das lesões renais associadas à obesidade, em especial alterações hemodinâmicas, inflamatórias e metabólicas. Nesse contexto, a redução do peso corporal com ênfase nas alterações metabólicas e inflamatórias bem como o tratamento da hipertensão arterial e do diabetes mellitus constituem o primeiro passo para a prevenção primária e secundária do desenvolvimento de doença renal crônica. Nesta revisão serão apresentados os principais mecanismos fisiopatológicos da lesão renal associada à obesidade.

Pharmacokinetics of the Novel, Selective, Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Finerenone in Healthy Volunteers: Results from an Absolute Bioavailability Study and Drug-Drug Interaction Studies In Vitro and In Vivo

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Finerenone is a selective, non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. In vivo and in vitro studies were performed to assess absolute bioavailability of finerenone, the effect of metabolic enzyme inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of finerenone and its metabolites, the quantitative contribution of the involved enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP2C8 and the relevance of gut wall versus liver metabolism.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of finerenone (1.25-10 mg orally or 0.25-1.0 mg intravenously) were evaluated in healthy male volunteers in four crossover studies. Absolute bioavailability was assessed in volunteers receiving finerenone orally and by intravenous infusion (n = 15) and the effects of erythromycin (n = 15), verapamil (n = 13) and gemfibrozil (n = 16) on finerenone pharmacokinetics were investigated. Finerenone was also incubated with cryopreserved human hepatocytes in vitro in the presence of erythromycin, verapamil or gemfibrozil.

RESULTS

Finerenone absolute bioavailability was 43.5% due to first-pass metabolism in the gut wall and liver. The geometric mean AUC_0-∞ ratios of finerenone (drug + inhibitor/drug alone) were 3.48, 2.70 and 1.10 with erythromycin, verapamil and gemfibrozil, respectively. The contribution ratio of CYP3A4 to the metabolic clearance of finerenone derived from these values was 0.88-0.89 and was consistent with estimations based on in vitro data, with the remaining metabolic clearance due to CYP2C8 involvement.

CONCLUSION

Finerenone is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 in the gut wall and liver. Increases in systemic exposure upon concomitant administration of inhibitors of this isoenzyme are predictable and consistent with in vitro data. Inhibition of CYP2C8, the second involved metabolic enzyme, has no relevant effect on finerenone in vivo.

Biotransformation of Finerenone, a Novel Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, in Dogs, Rats, and Humans, In Vivo and In Vitro

Mass balance and biotransformation of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, were investigated in four healthy male volunteers following a single oral administration of 10 mg (78 μCi) of [14C]finerenone and compared with data from studies in dogs and rats. The total recovery of the administered radioactivity was 101% in humans, 94.7% in dogs, and 95.2% in rats. In humans, radioactivity was mainly excreted renally (80%); in rats, it was primarily the biliary/fecal route (76%); and in dogs, excretion was more balanced. Finerenone was extensively metabolized in all species by oxidative biotransformation, with minor amounts of unchanged drug in excreta (humans: 1%; dogs, rats: <9%). In vitro studies suggested cytochrome P450 3A4 was the predominant enzyme involved in finerenone metabolism in humans. Primary metabolic transformation involved aromatization of the dihydronaphthyridine moiety of metabolite M1 as a major clearance pathway with a second oxidative pathway leading to M4. These were both prone to further oxidative biotransformation reactions. Naphthyridine metabolites (M1-M3) were the dominant metabolites identified in human plasma, with no on-target pharmacological activity. In dog plasma, finerenone and metabolite M2 constituted the major components; finerenone accounted almost exclusively for drug-related material in rat plasma. For metabolites M1-M3, axial chirality was observed, represented by two atropisomers (e.g., M1a and M1b). Analysis of plasma and excreta showed one atropisomer (a-series, >79%) of each metabolite predominated in all three species. In summary, the present study demonstrates that finerenone is cleared by oxidative biotransformation, mainly via naphthyridine derivatives.

Lipocalin-2 derived from adipose tissue mediates aldosterone-induced renal injury

Lipocalin-2 is not only a sensitive biomarker, but it also contributes to the pathogenesis of renal injuries. The present study demonstrates that adipose tissue-derived lipocalin-2 plays a critical role in causing both chronic and acute renal injuries. Four-week treatment with aldosterone and high salt after uninephrectomy (ANS) significantly increased both circulating and urinary lipocalin-2, and it induced glomerular and tubular injuries in kidneys of WT mice. Despite increased renal expression of lcn2 and urinary excretion of lipocalin-2, mice with selective deletion of lcn2 alleles in adipose tissue (Adipo-LKO) are protected from ANS- or aldosterone-induced renal injuries. By contrast, selective deletion of lcn2 alleles in kidney did not prevent aldosterone- or ANS-induced renal injuries. Transplantation of fat pads from WT donors increased the sensitivity of mice with complete deletion of Lcn2 alleles (LKO) to aldosterone-induced renal injuries. Aldosterone promoted the urinary excretion of a human lipocalin-2 variant, R81E, in turn causing renal injuries in LKO mice. Chronic treatment with R81E triggered significant renal injuries in LKO, resembling those observed in WT mice following ANS challenge. Taken in conjunction, the present results demonstrate that lipocalin-2 derived from adipose tissue causes acute and chronic renal injuries, largely independent of local lcn2 expression in kidney.

Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists in diabetic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current data highlight the pathological aspects of excess aldosterone in promoting glomerular hypertrophy, glomerulosclerosis, and proteinuria in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The role of nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in DKD is being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies demonstrate beneficial effects of adding MRAs to the treatment regimen of patients with type 2 diabetes with nephropathy. The MRAs spironolactone and eplerenone can protect against organ damage caused by elevated levels of serum aldosterone in patients with heart failure and DKD but are limited by their side effects, for example, hyperkalemia. Finerenone is more selective for the mineralocorticoid receptor than spironolactone and has greater affinity for the mineralocorticoid receptor than eplerenone. It reduces the concentration of aldosterone without causing significant elevation in serum potassium.

SUMMARY

MRAs have a clear role in reducing albuminuria when used with other renin-angiotensin system blockers in DKD; however, hyperkalemia limits their use. This article provides an overview of clinical studies with a novel MRA, finerenone, and several nonsteroidal MRAs being studied for treatment in DKD.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Signaling as a Therapeutic Target for Renal and Cardiac Fibrosis

Activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) plays important roles in both physiological and pathological events. Blockade of MR signaling with MR antagonists (MRAs) has been used clinically to treat kidney and cardiac disease associated with hypertension and other chronic diseases, resulting in suppression of fibrosis in these organs. However, the current use of steroidal MRAs has been limited by off target effects on other hormone receptors or adverse effects on kidney tubular function. In this review, we summarize recent insights into the profibrotic roles of MR signaling in kidney and cardiovascular disease. We review experimental in vitro data identifying the pathological mechanisms associated with MR signaling in cell types found in the kidney (mesangial cells, podocytes, tubular cells, macrophages, interstitial fibroblasts) and heart (cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, macrophages). In addition, we demonstrate the in vivo importance of MR signaling in specific kidney and cardiac cell types by reporting the outcomes of cell type selective MR gene deletion in animal models of kidney and cardiac disease and comparing these findings to those obtained with MRAs treatment. This review also includes a discussion of the potential benefits of novel non-steroidal MRAs for targeting kidney and cardiac fibrosis compared to existing steroidal MRAs, as well as the possibility of novel combination therapies and cell selective delivery of MRAs.

Steroidal and Novel Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure and Cardiorenal Diseases: Comparison at Bench and Bedside

Characterization of mice with cell-specific deletion or overexpression of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) shed a new light on its role in health and disease. Pathophysiological MR activation contributes to a plethora of deleterious molecular mechanisms in the development of cardiorenal diseases like chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF). Accordingly, the available steroidal MR antagonists (MRAs) spironolactone (first generation MRA) and eplerenone (second generation MRA) have been shown to be effective in reducing cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic HF and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, they remain underutilized, in large part owing to the risk inducing severe adverse events including hyperkalemia and worsening of kidney function, particularly when given on top of inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) to patients with concomitant kidney dysfunction. Novel, potent, and selective non-steroidal MRAs (third generation) were identified in drug discovery campaigns and a few entered clinical development recently. One of these is finerenone with different physicochemical, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacological properties in comparison with the steroidal MRAs. Available data from five clinical phase II trials with finerenone in more than 2,000 patients with HF and additional CKD and/or diabetes as well as in patients with diabetic kidney disease demonstrated that neither hyperkalemia nor reductions in kidney function were limiting factors to its use. Moreover, finerenone demonstrated a nominally improved outcome compared to eplerenone in a phase IIb trial with 1,066 patients with HFrEF and concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or CKD.

Nonsteroidal antagonists of the mineralocorticoid receptor

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The broad clinical use of steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) is limited by the potential risk of inducing hyperkalemia when given on top of renin-angiotensin system blockade. Drug discovery campaigns have been launched aiming for the identification of nonsteroidal MRAs with an improved safety profile. This review analyses the evidence for the potential of improved safety profiles of nonsteroidal MRAs and the current landscape of clinical trials with nonsteroidal MRAs.

RECENT FINDINGS

At least three novel nonsteroidal MRAs have reportedly demonstrated an improved therapeutic index (i.e. less risk for hyperkalemia) in comparison to steroidal antagonists in preclinical models. Five pharmaceutical companies have nonsteroidal MRAs in clinical development with a clear focus on the treatment of chronic kidney diseases. No clinical data have been published so far for MT-3995 (Mitsubishi), SC-3150 (Daiichi-Sankyo), LY2623091 (Eli Lilly) and PF-03882845 (Pfizer). In contrast, data from two clinical phase II trials are available for finerenone (Bayer) which demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with heart failure and additional chronic kidney diseases, and significantly reduced albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Neither hyperkalemia nor reductions in kidney function were limiting factors to its use.

SUMMARY

Novel, nonsteroidal MRAs are currently tested in clinical trials. Based on preclinical and first clinical data, these nonsteroidal MRAs might overcome the limitations of today's steroidal antagonists.

Emerging Roles of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor in Pathology: Toward New Paradigms in Clinical Pharmacology

The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and its ligand aldosterone are the principal modulators of hormone-regulated renal sodium reabsorption. In addition to the kidney, there are several other cells and organs expressing MR, in which its activation mediates pathologic changes, indicating potential therapeutic applications of pharmacological MR antagonism. Steroidal MR antagonists have been used for decades to fight hypertension and more recently heart failure. New therapeutic indications are now arising, and nonsteroidal MR antagonists are currently under development. This review is focused on nonclassic MR targets in cardiac, vascular, renal, metabolic, ocular, and cutaneous diseases. The MR, associated with other risk factors, is involved in organ fibrosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, and aging; for example, in the kidney and heart MR mediates hormonal tissue-specific ion channel regulation. Genetic and epigenetic modifications of MR expression/activity that have been documented in hypertension may also present significant risk factors in other diseases and be susceptible to MR antagonism. Excess mineralocorticoid signaling, mediated by aldosterone or glucocorticoids binding, now appears deleterious in the progression of pathologies that may lead to end-stage organ failure and could therefore benefit from the repositioning of pharmacological MR antagonists.