Global Prevalence and Impact of Rumination Syndrome

Worldwide Prevalence and Description of Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome According to the Results of the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study

INTRODUCTION

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a disorder of gut-brain interaction of unknown origin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the global prevalence of this disorder and its associated factors.

METHODS

Data were collected from nationwide Internet surveys in 26 countries, with subjects evenly distributed by age, sex, and country. The survey included the Rome IV questionnaire and an extensive supplemental questionnaire to evaluate additional factors.

RESULTS

A total of 54,127 participants completed the questionnaire (51% male, mean age 44.3 years). The pooled prevalence of CVS was 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3%-0.4%; n = 187), highest in Brazil (1%, 95% CI 0.6-1.5), and lowest in Japan and Germany (with no subject who fulfilled the criteria for CVS). The mean age of participants with CVS was 36.7 years (SD 13.5), and it was more common in women (56.7% vs 43.5%). Factors independently associated with this syndrome were female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% CI 1.13-2.03), young age (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.34-4.94, for people between the ages of 18 and 39 years, compared with those older than 65 years), depression (OR 3.14, 95% CI 2.05-4.82, P < 0.001), and anxiety (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.15-2.78, P < 0.001). Individuals with CVS had impaired quality of life (QoL) (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System 10-item score: physical QoL mean, 12.9 vs 15.5, P < 0.001; mental QoL mean 12.3 vs 14.4, P < 0.001) compared with others.

DISCUSSION

CVS is a relatively common disorder that has a negative impact on QoL. It is important to raise awareness on this syndrome to avoid underdiagnosis and improve clinical practice.

European Guideline on Chronic Nausea and Vomiting-A UEG and ESNM Consensus for Clinical Management

INTRODUCTION

Chronic nausea and vomiting are symptoms of a wide range of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal conditions. Diagnosis can be challenging and requires a systematic and well-structured approach. If the initial investigation for structural, toxic and metabolic disorders is negative, digestive motility and gut-brain interaction disorders should be assessed. United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and the European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) identified the need for an updated, evidence-based clinical guideline for the management of chronic nausea and vomiting.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of experts in the field, including European specialists and national societies, participated in the development of the guideline. Relevant questions were addressed through a literature review and statements were developed and voted on according to a Delphi process.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight statements were identified and voted following the Delphi process. Overall agreement was high, although the grade of scientific evidence was low in many areas. Disagreement was more evident for some pharmacological treatment options. A diagnostic algorithm was developed, focussing on the differentiating features between gastrointestinal motility and gut-brain interaction disorders with predominant nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines provide an evidence-based framework for the evaluation and treatment of patients with chronic nausea and vomiting.

Rome Foundation Working Team Report on overlap in disorders of gut-brain interaction

In patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), overlapping non-gastrointestinal conditions such as fibromyalgia, headaches, gynaecological and urological conditions, sleep disturbances and fatigue are common, as is overlap among DGBI in different regions of the gastrointestinal tract. These overlaps strongly influence patient management and outcome. Shared pathophysiology could explain this scenario, but details are not fully understood. This overlap has been shown to be of great relevance for DGBI. In addition, symptoms considered to be caused by a DGBI could have a detectable organic cause, and in patients with a diagnosed organic gastrointestinal disease, symptoms not clearly explained by the pathology defining this organic disease are common. Thus, the aims of this Rome Foundation Working Team Report were to review the literature on overlapping conditions among patients with paediatric and adult DGBI and, based on the available epidemiological and clinical evidence, make recommendations for the current diagnostic and therapeutic approach, and for future research. Specifically, we focused on other DGBI in the same or different gastrointestinal anatomical region(s), DGBI overlap with organic bowel diseases in remission, and DGBI overlap with non-gastrointestinal, non-structural conditions.

Rumination Syndrome, Supragastric Belching, and Abdominophrenic Dyssynergia: How to Diagnose and Treat?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Supragastric belching (SGB), rumination syndrome (RS), and abdominophrenic dyssynergia are often misunderstood and underdiagnosed syndromes. Better understanding of these conditions is needed to increase recognition and guide treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnosis is typically made by history and physical examination though supplementary evaluations can be considered in difficult to diagnose cases. These diseases are unique in that their optimal therapies are behavioral and focused entirely on the basic physiology of breathing techniques. Once one of these syndromes is recognized, the change in life for these patients can be formidable. As a result, recognition and proper treatment of these syndromes is essential for the gastroenterologist.

Neurogastroenterology and motility disorders in patients with cirrhosis

Neurogastroenterology and motility disorders are complex gastrointestinal conditions that are prevalent worldwide, particularly affecting women and younger individuals. These conditions significantly impact the quality of life of people suffering from them. There is increasing evidence linking these disorders to cirrhosis, with a higher prevalence compared to the general population. However, the link between neurogastroenterology and motility disorders and cirrhosis remains unclear due to undefined mechanisms. In addition, managing these conditions in cirrhosis is often limited by the adverse effects of drugs commonly used for these disorders, presenting a significant clinical challenge in the routine management of patients with cirrhosis. This review delves into this connection, exploring potential pathophysiological links and clinical interventions between neurogastroenterology disorders and cirrhosis.

Multidisciplinary behavioral therapy reduces rumination

BACKGROUND

Behavioral therapy has proved effective as rumination therapy. Our objective was to treat rumination patients using multidisciplinary behavioral therapy aimed at reducing ≥2 of the rumination score.

METHODS

All patients fulfilled Rome IV criteria for rumination and were referred to speech therapy for psychoeducation, diaphragmatic breathing exercises and guided eating, physiotherapy for exercises to relax the thoracic and abdominal muscles, and consultation with the psychologist and the dietitian. Symptoms, depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and functional capacity were evaluated by questionnaires (Rome IV, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), 15D, and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0) at baseline and at 6-month control. Esophageal manometry was performed at 6-month control.

KEY RESULTS

The study enrolled 11 patients (19-64 years, 10 female). Rumination score: 6.5 (5-8) at baseline, 4.0 (3-5) at the 6-month control, p = 0.005. BDI/8 (6-13), BAI/15 (8-29) at baseline; BDI/7 (4-8), BAI/15 (7-27) at the 6-month control, NS. 15D score: 0.800 at baseline, 0.845 at the 6-month control, NS. WHODAS 2.0 score: 15 (7-33) at baseline, 11 (7-26) at the 6-month control, NS. Rumination could be evoked in manometry in six of nine (67%) patients at 6-month control.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Behavioral multidisciplinary therapy significantly reduces the self-assessed frequency of rumination. These patients have more depression, anxiety and a lower HRQoL compared to the normal population.

Current state of rumination syndrome

Rumination syndrome (RS) is an underdiagnosed behavioral disorder of recurrent regurgitation. Regurgitation occurs in RS due to increased gastric pressure achieved by subconscious contraction of the abdominal musculature wall, reversing the pressure gradient between the esophagus and the stomach. RS is mainly diagnosed clinically by the Rome Criteria with symptoms of regurgitation without retching of recently ingested food into the mouth and subsequent spitting or re-mastication. When the diagnosis is unable to be made clinically, supportive testing including fed impedance manometry can be considered. RS occurs worldwide, affecting patients of all ages, races, and genders with a prevalence of 3.1-5.8%. There is significant overlap with RS and disorders of a gut-brain interaction and upright gastroesophageal reflux driven by aerophagia and supragastric belching. There is also an association with mood disorder, fibromyalgia, and eating disorders. RS may be misdiagnosed as a variety of other syndromes including gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, achalasia, and bulimia nervosa. Once RS is diagnosed, the mainstay of treatment is diaphragmatic breathing to lower the intragastric pressure and increase the lower esophageal pressure. Diaphragmatic breathing can be supported with biofeedback and cognitive behavioral therapy as well as medication options for more refractory cases. Response to therapy overtime and changes in symptoms overtime can now be tracked with a validated questionnaire.

The prevalence of rumination syndrome and rumination disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rumination is characterized by the repeated regurgitation of food. Rumination syndrome is a disorder of gut-brain interaction diagnosed by Rome criteria, whereas rumination disorder is a feeding and eating disorder diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria. We aimed to determine the global prevalence of rumination according to these criteria across all age groups.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence of rumination syndrome according to Rome III and Rome IV and rumination disorder according to the following validated DSM-5 assessments: PARDI, EDA-5, EDY-Q, STEP, and STEP-CHILD. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO (from January 1, 2006, to June 1, 2023) to identify studies reporting the prevalence of rumination in community settings in participants of any age. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence and odds ratio (OR) of rumination according to diagnostic criteria, country, and characteristics such as age and sex.

KEY RESULTS

The search strategy generated 1243 studies, of which 147 studies appeared to be relevant. Thirty studies were included, with a total of 114,228 participants, of whom 61,534 of these were adults and 52,694 were children. The pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages according to Rome III criteria was 1.0% (95% CI 0.3-1.6; I2 91.1%), but no data were available for adults. According to Rome IV criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages was 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.6; I2 56.4%) and 3.7% in adults (95% CI 2.3-5.1; I2 91.4%). The pooled prevalence of rumination disorder in children of all ages according to EDY-Q was 2.1% (95% CI 0.9-3.4; I2 = 78.1%), but only one study utilizing EDY-Q in adults was included (0.7% [95% CI 0.4-1.0]). No data were available for children or adults using any other validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder. Irrespective of diagnostic criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination was higher in adults compared to children and adolescents (3.0% [95% CI 1.4-4.7; I2 = 98.1%] vs. 0.8% [95% CI 0.4-1.3; I2 = 90.8%]), but higher in adolescents than in children (1.1% [95% CI 0.3-2.0; I2 = 92.8%] vs. 0.1% [95% CI 0.0-0.2; I2 = 24.5%]). In adults, factors independently associated with rumination were female gender (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0-2.0]), anxiety (OR 2.3 [95% CI 2.1-2.6]), and depression (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.2-2.9]). No association between gender and rumination was seen in children.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The prevalence of rumination is more common in adults than in children. In adults, rumination is associated with female gender, anxiety, and depression. Future population studies should aim to better understand why this behavior is more common in adults and also compare validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder with Rome criteria for rumination syndrome as prevalence may differ.

Questionnaire for diagnosis and response to therapy in rumination syndrome

Rumination is a behavioral disorder characterized by regurgitation of food without retching. It is diagnosed clinically by the Rome Criteria and treated primarily by diaphragmatic breathing. Despite diagnosis and follow-up being based on symptomatic responses to therapies, there are no published or validated questionnaires. To address this care-gap, a rumination questionnaire was developed and reviewed by two expert esophagologists and five patients diagnosed with rumination. Ultimately, an eight-point questionnaire with scoring ranging from -1 to 10 was finalized. This newly developed questionnaire was implemented on five additional patients diagnosed clinically with rumination syndrome with improvement after interventions noted.

Rumination and Forgiveness in Emerging Adults: Mediating Role of Mindfulness and Humility

The objective of this study was to examine whether mindfulness and humility mediate the influence of rumination on forgiveness among emerging adults. The sample consisted of 392 individuals in the emerging adulthood stage, residing in Türkiye, with 69.10% females and 30.90% males, aged between 18 and 25 years (M = 20.19, SD = 1.77). Data were collected through a demographic information form and four self-report scales. In addition to descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient and bootstrap analysis were employed for data analysis. According to the study's findings, it can be inferred that ruminative thoughts among emerging adults hinder their ability to forgive. Furthermore, the study revealed that mindfulness and humility serve as mediators in the relationship between ruminative thoughts and forgiveness in emerging adults. In this context, it can be concluded that leveraging the positive effects of mindfulness and humility can mitigate the adverse impact of rumination on forgiveness among emerging adults, thus enhancing their inclination towards forgiveness.

The role of high-resolution impedance manometry to identify rumination syndrome in children with unexplained foregut symptoms

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of rumination syndrome (RS) relies on Rome IV criteria. Oesophageal high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) can objectively demonstrate the episodes of rumination, but its role in the diagnostic pathway is not yet established. We aimed to demonstrate the clinical contribution of this tool for the timely diagnosis of RS and diagnostic work-up of children with unexplained foregut symptoms deemed to be due to other conditions.

METHODS

HRIMs performed between 2012 and 2021 were searched to retrieve all diagnoses of RS. Medical records were reviewed for clinical data.

RESULTS

Out of 461 HRIMs performed, 76 children had manometric diagnosis of RS (35 male, median age: 13 years). Of them, 47% were not clinically suspected as the symptoms did not fulfil clinical criteria for RS. The indications for HRIM in these cases were investigation of unexplained foregut symptoms (37%), suspected refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (8%) and dysphagia (2%). Among all HRIMs performed for investigations of unexplained foregut symptoms (n = 80), 35% demonstrated rumination episodes.

CONCLUSION

Identification of characteristic patterns of rumination on HRIM in children with unexplained foregut symptoms enables the immediate diagnosis of RS. Thus, in situations of diagnostic uncertainty, the use of HRIM at early stages of the diagnostic pathway would reduce unnecessary investigations and treatments.

Dissecting the biology of feeding and eating disorders

Feeding and eating disorders (FEDs) are heterogenous and characterized by varying patterns of dysregulated eating and weight. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are clarifying their underlying biology and their genetic relationship to other psychiatric and metabolic/anthropometric traits. Genetic research on anorexia nervosa (AN) has identified eight significant loci and uncovered genetic correlations implicating both psychiatric and metabolic/anthropometric risk factors. Careful explication of these metabolic contributors may be key to developing effective and enduring treatments for devastating, life-altering, and frequently lethal illnesses. We discuss clinical phenomenology, genomics, phenomics, intestinal microbiota, and functional genomics and propose a path that translates variants to genes, genes to pathways, and pathways to metabolic outcomes to advance the science and eventually treatment of FEDs.

Emotion dysregulation and Internet gaming disorder in young people: Mediating effects of negative affect and metacognitions

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have found that emotion dysregulation, negative affect, and metacognitions about online gaming are risk factors for Internet gaming disorder (IGD). However, few studies investigated the mechanisms underlying these interactions. The present study aimed to explore the relationships between emotion dysregulation and IGD, and the mediating effects of negative affect and metacognitions about online gaming.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted with young people (aged 10-24 years) who played video games. 1768 participants were included in this study. Observed variables, including emotion dysregulation, IGD, depression, anxiety, and metacognitions, were measured with self-report scales. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the relationships among the variables.

RESULTS

The results showed that emotion dysregulation positively predicted IGD through a fully mediated model which included the independent mediating effects of negative affect and metacognitions about online gaming and their sequential mediating effect. The model explained 76.1 % of the variance in IGD.

LIMITATIONS

This was a cross-sectional study which could not infer causality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes that negative affect and metacognitions about online gaming mediate the effect of emotion dysregulation on IGD; moreover, metacognition may be a proximal factor of IGD. Thus, improving emotional regulation and modifying maladaptive metacognitions in young people may improve the prevention and treatment of IGD.

Belching Disorders and Rumination Syndrome: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Belching disorders and rumination syndrome (RS) are disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs) in Rome IV. Belching disorders are composed of excessive gastric belching (GB) and supragastric belching (SGB). Excessive GB is related to physiological phenomenon whereas excessive SGB and RS are behavioral disorders.

SUMMARY

A recent large internet survey found that prevalence of belching disorders and RS were 1% and 2.8%, respectively. It has been recognized that not a few patients with two behavioral disorders, excessive SGB and RS, could be misdiagnosed as proton pump inhibitors (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In patients with reflux symptoms, distinguishing these conditions is essential because they need psychological treatment (i.e., cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) rather than acid suppressants. Clinicians should take a medical history meticulously first to identify possible excessive SGB and/or RS. High-resolution impedance manometry and/or 24-h impedance-pH monitoring can offer an objective diagnosis of the disorders. Several therapeutic options are available for excessive SGB and RS. The first-line therapy should be CBT using diaphragmatic breathing that can stop the behaviors involving complex muscle contraction (e.g., abdominal straining) to generate SGB or rumination. Overlap with eating disorders and/or other DGBIs such as functional dyspepsia can make management of the behavioral disorders challenging since such coexisting conditions often require additional treatments.

KEY MESSAGES

Excessive SGB and RS are not unusual conditions. It is important to raise awareness of the behavioral disorders for appropriate management.

How to recognize and treat rumination syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rumination syndrome (RS) is a functional gastroduodenal disorder characterized by repeated effortless regurgitation or vomiting of recently ingested food without retching. RS generally has been considered a rare entity. However, it has been increasingly recognized that many RS patients are likely to be underdiagnosed. This review discusses how to recognize and manage RS patients in clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent epidemiological study that included over 50,000 individuals found that the prevalence of RS around the world is 3.1%. In patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory reflux symptoms, postprandial high-resolution manometry combined with impedance (HRM/Z) reveals that RS accounts for up to 20% of those cases. HRM/Z can be a gold standard for objective RS diagnosis. In addition, off-PPI 24-h impedance pH monitoring can suggest the possibility of RS when it reveals frequent postprandial, non-acid reflux with a high symptom index. Modulated cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) targeting secondary psychological maintaining mechanisms almost eliminates regurgitation.

SUMMARY

The prevalence of RS is higher than generally thought. For patients suspected of RS, HRM/Z is useful to distinguish RS from gastroesophageal reflux disease. CBT can be a highly effective therapeutic option.

Factor Analysis of the Rome IV Criteria for Major Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI) Globally and Across Geographical, Sex, and Age Groups

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Rome criteria are widely accepted for diagnosing disorders of gut-brain interaction, but their global applicability has been debated. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Rome IV criteria by factor analysis globally, across geographical regions, by sex, and by age groups.

METHODS

Data were collected in 26 countries using the Rome IV questionnaire. Forty-nine ordinal variables were used in exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify clusters of inter-correlated variables (factors) within the data set. Confirmatory factor analysis with predefined factors of the disorders of gut-brain interaction was compared with the factors in the EFA. Analyses were performed globally, for each geographical region (North and Latin America, Western and Eastern Europe, Middle East, Asia), sex, and age groups (18-34, 35-49, 50-64, ≥65).

RESULTS

A total of 54,127 people were included. The EFA identified 10 factors accounting for 57% of the variance: irritable bowel syndrome, constipation, diarrhea, upper gastrointestinal symptoms, globus, regurgitation/retching, chest pain, nausea/vomiting, and 2 right upper quadrant pain factors. Most factors had close correspondence to a Rome IV criteria diagnosis, but notably, functional dysphagia and heartburn symptoms were often included in the same factor and/or in upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Most factors were consistent across geographical regions, sex, and age groups, and compatible to the global results. All prespecified factors in the confirmatory analysis had a loading ≥0.4, indicating validity of the Rome IV criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, functional constipation, globus, and biliary pain are globally valid and represent universal diagnostic entities that are similar across sex and age groups.