A Clinical Severity Index for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Development, Consensus, and Future Directions

Outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis: current understanding and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder that demands lifelong management due to its potential to progress to fibrosis and esophageal strictures. This review synthesizes current strategies for evaluating EoE outcomes and highlights emerging approaches aimed at reconciling the often discordant relationship between clinical symptoms and histologic findings. An updated synthesis is crucial to guide evolving clinical practices.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature emphasizes the multifaceted nature of EoE, revealing limitations in traditional outcome measures. Advances in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), histologic scoring systems, and endoscopic assessments have enriched our understanding of disease activity. Furthermore, the integration of functional assessments through modalities such as high-resolution manometry and EndoFLIP, along with digital data integration, has refined disease monitoring and provided nuanced insights into treatment responses and long-term progression. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that integrating novel biomarkers may further refine disease stratification and outcomes.

SUMMARY

A multidimensional approach that combines clinical, histologic, endoscopic, and functional data is crucial for personalized management of EoE. These insights pave the way for improved therapeutic decision-making and highlight the need for standardized, comprehensive tools in both clinical practice and future research. These additional findings advocate for a shift towards precision medicine, emphasizing multidisciplinary and patient-centric approaches.

Future of therapy and monitoring for eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, including eosinophilic esophagitis, are chronic Th2 mediated diseases. Establishing a diagnosis and initiating treatment is crucial to limit disease progression that may lead to tissue remodeling and the development of strictures that significantly impact patient quality of life. Expert consensus guidelines provide a framework for treating eosinophilic esophagitis with diet elimination, proton pump inhibitors, swallowed topical steroids, or dupilumab and for monitoring with sedated endoscopy for gross and histologic evaluation. While this provides an established algorithm for treating and monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis, there is less established for the rarer eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (eosinophilic gastritis, enteritis, and colitis). Research advancements continue to emerge at a rapid pace, identifying potential biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and monitoring strategies. In this article, we review the current accepted methods for treating and monitoring eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders with a focus on eosinophilic esophagitis, assess what is currently under investigation, and provide an aspirational vision for future disease management with a streamlined algorithm of personalized medicine and less invasive monitoring.

Expert Opinion on the Management, Challenges, and Knowledge Gaps Pertaining to Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Adults in the Greater Gulf Region

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a type 2 inflammatory esophageal disease that presents in adults as dysphagia and food impaction. EoE is characterized by a predominance of T helper 2 cells among the T cell population. Environmental agents, including food antigens and aeroallergens, trigger EoE. EoE exhibits immunoglobulin E- (IgE-) and non-IgE-mediated allergic responses to these environmental allergens. Local antigen-specific IgE can also trigger mast cell degranulation, thereby worsening EoE. Individuals with atopic dermatitis, asthma, IgE-mediated food allergy, or allergic rhinitis are at a higher risk of developing EoE. EoE treatment aims to achieve clinical improvement, endoscopic mucosal healing, and reduction in or resolution of histological inflammation. However, attaining and maintaining "deep remission" with conventional treatments can be challenging, underscoring the need for targeted therapies. This expert opinion focuses on the latest global recommendations for using novel therapies to improve outcomes in patients with EoE. It also highlights current practices in the Greater Gulf region to manage EoE, identify challenges, and address future educational gaps.

The index of severity for eosinophilic esophagitis reflects treatment response in children and associates with outcome variables

We aimed to categorize the severity of eosinophilic esophagitis using the recently developed Index of Severity of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE), to assess the longitudinal response to treatment, and to correlate baseline severity with outcome variables. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort of children at two centers was performed. I-SEE was calculated at diagnosis, at the second endoscopy after initial treatment, and at the last endoscopy over a mean of 35 months. We analyzed clinical, endoscopic, and histologic characteristics at baseline by disease severity, examined the change in severity at the second and last endoscopy, and evaluated the association of baseline disease severity with treatment variables. Of 95 children meeting inclusion criteria, 35%, 63%, and 2% had mild, moderate, and severe I-SEE scores, respectively, at baseline. Between baseline and the second endoscopy, the median I-SEE decreased from 7 (7-8) to 2 (0-5) (p < 0.001), and to 0 (0-3) at last endoscopy, with 53% of patients having inactive and 47% having mild scores (p < 0.001). Patients with histologic response at the second and final endoscopy had lower I-SEE scores than non-responders (p < 0.001). A higher baseline I-SEE score was associated with increased odds of receiving 2 or more treatments or combined therapy (OR 95% CI 1.28 (1.03-1.59) and (1.18 (1.04-1.39), respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

 The I-SEE score reflects longitudinal treatment response in children with EoE. Patients with higher baseline I-SEE may be at higher risk of requiring more than one treatment, sequentially or in combination.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Eosinophilic esophagitis is a heterogenous disease with different degrees of severity. • The recently developed index of severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (I-SEE) incorporates frequency of symptoms, complications, and inflammatory and fibrostenotic findings and has shown to be a sensitive tool to change with treatment in a pediatric cohort.

WHAT IS NEW

• We confirmed the sensitivity of the index, with a significant decrease in the score with treatment, with the decrease being more pronounced in children with histologic response. • A higher initial severity score was associated with the need for more treatments, sequentially or in combination.

Inflammatory and homeostatic roles of eosinophil subpopulations in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp pathogenesis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) mainly expresses type-2 endotype, featuring eosinophils as a main player in the inflammatory process. Prolonged eosinophilia in the tissues of asthma and CRSwNP patients has been associated with structural changes, leading to fixed airflow obstruction in asthma and nasal polyposis in CRSwNP. This suggests that eosinophils may belong to different subgroups playing distinct roles in pathogenesis. Recent studies highlight the roles of inflammatory eosinophils (iEOS) in driving inflammation and tissue damage, whereas tissue-resident eosinophils (rEOS) maintain homeostasis and tissue repair in the airway. Therefore, understanding both roles of eosinophil subpopulations is crucial for better CRSwNP management, including enhancing the diagnosis accuracy, predicting recurrence, and optimizing treatment strategies.

Endoscopic diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic allergic inflammatory disease, and its incidence and prevalence have recently increased. Eosinophilic esophagitis has not become a rare disease; thus, knowledge for diagnosing it is needed in current clinical practice. The adequate management of endoscopic procedures is particularly important for the diagnosis and evaluation of inflammatory activity and therapeutic responses. The therapeutic options for eosinophilic esophagitis include anti-acid drugs such as proton pump inhibitors, potassium-competitive acid blockers, swallowed topical corticosteroids, biologics, and dietary elimination therapies. Moreover, endoscopic esophageal dilation is a therapeutic option for fibrotic strictures due to eosinophilic esophagitis to improve obstructive symptoms, such as dysphagia and food impaction. In this review, we describe the endoscopic characteristics of eosinophilic esophagitis, including an endoscopic reference score and an optimal biopsy protocol to diagnose and evaluate the therapeutic response. We also describe a current therapeutic management of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Insights into the natural history and disease course of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease marked by eosinophilic inflammation and esophageal dysfunction, with a significant impact on morbidity, quality of life, and health care utilization. Once considered rare, EoE has become increasingly prevalent, with global estimates exceeding 140 cases per 100,000 individuals. This rise highlights the need to better understand the natural history and disease course to inform diagnosis and management strategies. Evidence suggests that EoE is a progressive condition, such that untreated inflammation contributes to esophageal remodeling and fibrotic complications over years to decades. Patients can develop esophageal food impactions, leading to emergency department utilization and the need for emergent endoscopy. In addition, patients with fibrostenotic disease can require serial dilations. Long-term management, including dietary therapy, proton pump inhibitors, topical corticosteroids, and newer therapies such as dupilumab, demonstrate promise in altering the disease course. However, variability exists in the strength of evidence regarding each therapy's ability to halt or reverse fibrosis. Knowledge gaps persist, particularly in defining fibrosis, identifying phenotypes prone to progression, and tailoring therapies to individual patients. Addressing these gaps will require continued research into understanding fibrosis progression and how therapies alter this trajectory. These efforts are poised to significantly improve clinical care and enhance outcomes for patients with EoE.

Worsening Disease Severity as Measured by I-SEE Associates With Decreased Treatment Response to Topical Steroids in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) grades eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) severity across several domains. We assessed associations between EoE features and severity by I-SEE at diagnosis, and baseline I-SEE and outcomes following topical corticosteroids (tCS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed EoE patients. Data were extracted to complete the I-SEE at diagnosis. Disease activity was categorized as mild (I-SEE 1-6), moderate (I-SEE 7-14), or severe (I-SEE ≥15). We compared baseline characteristics by I-SEE category. We assessed if baseline I-SEE associated with treatment response in patients treated with tCS.

RESULTS

Of 1312 patients, there were 657 (50%), 461 (35%), and 194 (15%) with mild, moderate, and severe disease by I-SEE, respectively. Baseline scores were similar for children (8.5 ± 6.6) and adults (8.8 ± 6.5) (P = .37). Compared with mild or moderate disease, patients with severe disease were younger (23.8 ± 19.8 years for severe vs 28.0 ± 19.7 years for mild vs 30.3 ± 17.0 years for moderate; P < .001), had lower body mass index (21.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2 vs 24.4 ± 7.0 kg/m2 vs 25.7 ± 6.8 kg/m2; P < .001), and had longer symptom length preceding diagnosis (9.3 ± 10.5 years vs 5.9 ± 7.5 years vs 7.2 ± 7.9 years; P < .001). The baseline category associated with tCS response, with severe patients less likely to have histologic response (49% vs 55% vs 64%; P = .03 for <15 eosinophils per high-power field) and symptomatic responses, while also having the highest post-treatment eosinophilic esophagitis endoscopic reference scores.

CONCLUSIONS

I-SEE correlated with baseline features in a large EoE cohort, performed similarly in children and adults, and associated with post-treatment responses to tCS. These data support that I-SEE provides prognostic data and suggest that severe disease may benefit from intensive upfront management.

Factors associated with treatment response in eosinophilic esophagitis patients: Experience from a pediatric tertiary care center

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disease characterized by eosinophilic inflammation of the esophagus and associated esophageal dysfunction with increasing worldwide prevalence. Clinical presentation is nonspecific and varies with age, with limited studies in the pediatric population. Objective: Our study aimed to compile clinical phenotypes, esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings, and treatment response of EoE in a tertiary pediatric center, and to examine factors associated with the response of treatment. Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of 824 patients diagnosed with EoE at Children's Hospital of Michigan from 2011 to 2021. Data collected included a demographic profile, symptoms, esophagogastroduodenoscopic and histopathologic findings, treatment modalities, response, and compliance. We then performed a multivariable logistic regression to assess the associating factors that influenced the treatment response rate. Results: A high proportion of males and coexisting allergic conditions were observed in the patients with EoE, with the most common presentation of vomiting in children and of abdominal pain in adolescents. Among 656 of the 824 patients who had follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy, treatment response rates varied among modalities, with proton-pump inhibitor treatment exhibiting the highest response rate, at 60.8%, followed by diet modification (50%) and topical steroid treatment (43.5%). Significant predictors of normal endoscopic findings at follow-up included female gender, normal endoscopic appearance, good compliance to treatment, and absence of topical steroids in the treatment regimen. There were no significant differences in outcomes observed for targeted elimination led by a skin-prick test or specific immunoglobulin E test. Medication compliance did not significantly differ among the treatment options. Conclusion: Managing EoE in pediatric patients poses significant challenges, which emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary care to achieve treatment response effectively. The findings underscore the complexity of managing EoE and the need for individualized treatment approaches. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and optimize management strategies for pediatric patients with EoE.

Role of endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease involving inflammation of the esophagus. Endoscopy is essential in the diagnosis and treatment of EoE and shows typical findings, including esophageal edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stenosis. However, studies involving pediatric and adult patients with EoE suggest that even a normally appearing esophagus can be diagnosed as EoE by endoscopic biopsy. Therefore, in patients with suspected EoE, biopsy samples should be obtained from the esophagus regardless of endoscopic appearance. Moreover, follow-up endoscopies with biopsy after therapy initiation are usually recommended to assess response. Although previous reports of endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with EoE have shown diffuse thickening of the esophageal wall, including lamina propria, submucosa, and muscularis propria, its role in EoE remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Endoscopic dilation or bougienage is a safe and effective procedure that can be used in combination with medical and/or dietary elimination therapy in patients with esophageal stricture for the management of dysphagia and to prevent its recurrence.

Diagnosing eosinophilic esophagitis in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common disease that can present in children with the symptoms of feeding dysfunction, abdominal pain, vomiting, reflux-like symptoms, dysphagia, or food impaction. Diagnostically, children must have symptoms, dense esophageal eosinophilia, and other potential causes of these findings ruled out. Diagnostic recognition is critical to avoid food impactions and potential esophageal stricture development.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, a PubMed search using the search terms eosinophilic esophagitis, pediatric, and diagnosis were used to cover the last 10 years (2013-2023) of literature.

EXPERT OPINION

Early detection of EoE in children depends on increased recognition of diagnostic clues by many specialties. As increasing efforts to publicize the importance of EoE in children continues, our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of EoE is making rapid advances. Increasing growth of this knowledge base will provide more personalized diagnostic approaches, targeted interventions, and innovative treatments.

Assessment of Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Is It Clinically Relevant or Simply an Amusement for Experts?

Background

Since the first description of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as clinicopathologic syndrome three decades ago, considerable progress has been made to standardize and validate instruments to assess symptom severity, quality of life, endoscopic, and histologic activity for the purpose of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Standardized assessment of EoE activity is crucial to be able to compare the results of therapeutic interventions and bring much needed therapies to patients. This review focuses on outcome assessment of disease activity in adults with EoE.

Summary

The choice of endpoints/instruments to be used depends on the setting, which might be either an RCT, an observational study, or clinical practice. In RCTs, the choice of endpoints further depends on requirements from regional regulatory authorities. Primary endpoints chosen in RCTs typically focused on symptoms and esophageal peak eosinophil counts, although that likely will change, as therapies with new mechanism of action are explored. Validated symptom-based PRO instruments used in RCTs include the Daily Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ), the EoE activity index (EEsAI) PRO instrument, and numeric rating scales for dysphagia and pain. Histologic activity in RCT is assessed using the EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) that takes into account the severity and extent of eight distinct histologic features. Endoscopic activity is assessed using the EREFS (Exudates, Rings, Edema, Furrows, Stricture) grading system. For observational studies, activity assessment is based on EEsAI PRO, epithelial peak eosinophil counts, and EREFS. In daily clinical practice, EoE activity is based on assessment of symptoms using a visual analog scale (VAS, from 0-10), peak eosinophil count, and EREFS. Several other instruments including the I-SEE, dysphagia-free days over a defined period, the dysphagia stress test, and impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP), to assess EoE severity in clinical practice are currently under evaluation.

Key Messages

EoE activity assessment based on symptom-based PRO, histology, and endoscopy has become increasingly complex and varies depending on the setting. While more stringent endpoints and daily recall PRO instruments are being used in RCTs, new instruments aimed at broader disease activity assessment and weekly recall PRO instruments are being used in observational studies and daily clinical practice.

Treatment Preference Archetypes in Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Their Implications for Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about how patients make decisions about and prioritize therapies and disease management in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to systematically identify and characterize patient perspectives and attitudes that influence decision making for EoE management.

METHODS

To understand the diverse attitudes and values of patients with EoE, we designed a study using the Q-method. We iteratively developed 31 statements related to EoE disease management. Participants sorted statements by ranking from +4 (most agree) to -4 (most disagree). By-person factor analysis, using 2-factor and 3-factor rotation, revealed distinct preference archetypes.

RESULTS

Thirty-four adults with EoE (mean age 40.9 years, 51.4% male, 82.9% White) were recruited from gastroenterology and allergy clinics from a single center. We identified 2 treatment-centered archetypes: Medication preference, driven by symptoms and the desire to minimize risk of complications and Natural treatment preference , focusing on identifying trigger foods and diet adherence. Three-factor analysis revealed an additional archetype: Treatment ambivalent, a view of EoE as a mild and episodic (not chronic) disease with low priority to treat. Comparison by factor revealed 54% of those in the natural preference archetype were recategorized as treatment ambivalent , suggesting that they see natural treatment as a less complicated or milder strategy and may be at risk of nonadherence and reduced treatment uptake.

DISCUSSION

We identified 3 distinct treatment preference archetypes among individuals with EoE, underscoring the need for personalized treatment strategies, especially for those favoring natural approaches but masking ambivalence, and may be at risk of nonadherence or loss to follow-up.

Usability of a Mobile Point-of-Care App for the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Background and Aims

A new application (app) allows the Index of Severity for EoE (I-SEE) to be used at the point of care. We aimed to perform usability testing of the I-SEE mobile app and identify areas for improvement.

Methods

We recruited 60 practitioners (20 adult and 20 pediatric gastroenterologists; 20 allergists) to use I-SEE on ≥5 EoE patients seen in clinic and undergo interviews by trained qualitative researchers. The interview guide focused on overall user experience, user satisfaction, and desired improvements. It also explored potential perceived barriers to using the app and I-SEE.

Results

Though I-SEE was new to most providers, they found it took only a few minutes to calculate the score. All interviewees either "agreed" (5%) or "strongly agreed" (95%) with the statement, "The app was easy to navigate," and almost all (95%) either "agreed" (42%) or "strongly agreed" (53%) with "The app's features and functionalities were intuitive and easy to understand". The large majority (85%) reported satisfaction with the app. Responses were similar for allergists, and adult and pediatric gastroenterologists. Areas of suggested improvement included updating design features, incorporation into electronic medical records, addressing if scoring for children and adults should be different, and clarifying clinical implications of I-SEE for management.

Conclusion

The I-SEE app was user friendly and able to be completed rapidly in clinical practice. Interviewee feedback led to app updates to improve visualization and use. In the future, scoring for children should be confirmed and I-SEE should be validated by linking severity to treatment and monitoring recommendations.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases with overall gastrointestinal tract causing liver abscess in an older patient: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are the rare gastrointestinal disorders. To our knowledge, there have been no reports of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases with overall gastrointestinal tract involvement causing liver abscess in an older patient.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 68-year-old man with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease with overall gastrointestinal tract involvement. He was admitted with suspected acute gastroenteritis, and histological examination showed eosinophilic infiltration accompanied by liver abscess. The collected pus was tested for Metagenomics Next-Generation Sequencing and confirmed the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

CONCLUSIONS

We conducted a literature review on the complications of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases and discussed how eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases lead to liver abscess caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Long-term durability between parent and child patient-reported outcomes in eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Because young children cannot self-report symptoms, there is a need for parent surrogate reports. Although early work suggested parent-child alignment for eosinophil esophagitis (EoE) patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the longitudinal alignment is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the agreement and longitudinal stability of PROs between children with EoE and their parents.

METHODS

A total of 292 parent-child respondents completed 723 questionnaires over 5 years in an observational trial in the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers. The change in and agreement between parent and child Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score version 2 (PEESSv2.0) and Pediatric Quality of Life Eosinophilic Esophagitis Module (PedsQL-EoE) PROs over time were assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. Clinical factors influencing PROs and their agreement were evaluated using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

The cohort had a median disease duration equaling 3.7 years and was predominantly male (73.6%) and White (85.3%). Child and parent PEESSv2.0 response groups were identified and were stable over time. There was strong correlation between child and parent reports (PEESSv2.0, 0.83;PedsQL-EoE, 0.74), with minimal pairwise differences for symptoms. Longitudinally, parent-reported PedsQL-EoE scores were stable (P ≥ .32), whereas child-reported PedsQL-EoE scores improved (P = .026). A larger difference in parent and child PedsQL-EoE reports was associated with younger age (P < .001), and differences were driven by psychosocial PRO domains.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong longitudinal alignment between child and parent reports using EoE PROs. These data provide evidence that parent report is a stable proxy for objective EoE symptoms in their children.

Rationale for an Eosinophilic Esophagitis Treat-to-Target Concept

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic T helper 2-mediated inflammatory disorder of the esophagus defined clinically by the presence of symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by an eosinophil-predominant infiltration. Correspondingly, treatment has aimed at controlling both symptom severity and histologic activity. However, with emerging clinical and pathophysiologic understanding of the disease, it has become increasingly apparent that other disease aspects need to be targeted as well, such as endoscopic severity and quality of life. Moreover, with the role of eosinophils having been questioned lately, histologic changes beyond eosinophil infiltration have come to attention and are captured by newly validated scores. In addition, EoE is being increasingly considered a transmural disease that cannot be assessed by simple endoscopy but needs measurement of esophageal distensibility, a surrogate marker for fibrosis. Finally, novel tools such as measurement of esophageal impedance could make it possible to assess for complete restoration of the esophageal epithelium, potentially corresponding to disease clearance. This article reviews the various outcome parameters in adult EoE management and proposes an algorithm for a treat-to-target concept, in analogy to what has been practiced in inflammatory bowel disease treatment for the last 10 years.

Clinical and molecular correlates of the Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) is a new expert-defined clinical tool that classifies disease severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether I-SEE is associated with patient characteristics, molecular features of EoE, or both.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with EoE from the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR). Associations between I-SEE and clinical and molecular features (assessed by an EoE diagnostic panel [EDP]) were assessed.

RESULTS

In 318 patients with chronic EoE (209 adults, 109 children), median total I-SEE score was 7.0, with a higher symptoms and complications score in children than adults (4.0 vs 1.0; P < .001) and higher inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores in adults than children (3.0 vs 1.0 and 3.0 vs 0, respectively; both P < .001). Total I-SEE score had a bimodal distribution with the inactive to moderate categories and severe category. EDP score correlated with total I-SEE score (r = -0.352, P < .001) and both inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores (r = -0.665, P < .001; r = -0.446, P < .001, respectively), but not with symptoms and complications scores (r = 0.047, P = .408). Molecular severity increased from inactive to mild and moderate, but not severe, categories. Longitudinal changes of modified I-SEE scores and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores reflected histologic and molecular activity.

CONCLUSIONS

I-SEE score is associated with select clinical features across severity categories and with EoE molecular features for nonsevere categories, warranting further validation.

Optimal Assessment, Treatment, and Monitoring of Adults with Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Strategies to Improve Outcomes

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2 inflammation-mediated disease characterized by an eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophagus and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Relevant treatment outcomes in the setting of EoE include the improvement of histology, symptoms, and endoscopy findings, quality of life (QoL), and the psychological burden of the disease. Established validated tools for the assessment of EoE include questionnaires on dysphagia and QoL (ie, DSQ, EEsAI, and EoE-IQ). More recently, esophageal symptom-specific anxiety and hypervigilance, assessed using the esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS), have emerged as contributors to disease burden, confirming the importance of psychological aspects in EoE patients. The EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is the only validated endoscopy score in EoE and can quantify mucosal disease burden. However, esophageal panometry using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) have shown potential to optimize the assessment of fibrostenotic features of EoE, providing novel insights into the pathophysiology of symptoms. There is a growing number of licenced and off-label therapeutic options in EoE, with various randomized controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors, topical steroids, food elimination diets, biological drugs, and esophageal dilatation. However, standardized optimal management strategies of EoE are currently lacking. In this review, we provide an overview of established and novel assessment tools in EoE including patient reported outcomes, FLIP panometry, HRM, endoscopy, and histology outcome measures to improve the outcomes of EoE patients. In addition, we summarize available therapeutic options for EoE based on the most recent evidence.

Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current concepts in diagnosis and management

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an antigen-mediated chronic inflammatory disorder that has risen in incidence and prevalence over the past 2 decades. The clinical presentation is variable and consists of mainly esophageal symptoms such as dysphagia, heartburn, food impaction, and vomiting. Current management relies on dietary elimination, proton-pump inhibitors, and topical corticosteroids with different response rates and relapses after treatment discontinuation. With a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, many molecules emerged recently as targeted treatment including dupilumab (IL4/IL13 blocker), as the first FDA-approved biological treatment, which has changed the management paradigm.

Transnasal Endoscopy Acquires Esophageal Biopsies Adequate for Comprehensive Pathology Evaluation in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Transnasal endoscopy (TNE) does not require general anesthesia, an attractive characteristic for monitoring eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We evaluated the adequacy of TNE-obtained esophageal biopsies using the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoEHSS).

METHODS

The Cincinnati Center for Eosinophilic Disorders database was searched for esophageal biopsies obtained by the same endoscopist, using either TNE or conventional endoscopy (CE). Whole-slide biopsy images were evaluated. The Mann-Whitney test was used for median (interquartile range) values and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. P ≤ .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Median age (P = .82) or height (P = .83) did not differ between TNE (n = 17) and CE (n = 17) groups. Although median largest piece size (mm2) differed between the groups (TNE: 0.59 (0.45, 0.86), CE: 2.24 (1.09, 2.82), P < .001), all 8 EoEHSS features were evaluated in each group; only 1 feature (lamina propria fibrosis) was missing in both groups (TNE: 19/34, CE: 11/34, P = .09). The median peak eosinophil count/high-power field differed (TNE: 3 (0, 29), CE: 16 (1, 66), P = .03), but overall grade (TNE: 0.17 (0.10, 0.29), CE: 0.22 (0.14, 0.46), P = .12), stage (TNE: 0.14 (0.10, 0.24), CE: 0.20 (0.10, 0.43), P = .15), and non-eosinophil-related individual EoEHSS scores did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

TNE- and CE-obtained esophageal biopsies are similarly sufficient for evaluation of key pathological features in EoE.

Histopathology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Microscopic examination of esophageal biopsies is essential to diagnose eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Eosinophil inflammation is the basis for the diagnosis, but additional abnormalities may contribute to persistent symptoms and epithelial barrier dysfunction. Both peak eosinophil count and assessments of additional features should be included in pre-therapy and post-therapy pathology reports. Pathologic abnormalities identified in esophageal biopsies of EoE are reversible in contrast to esophageal strictures.

Clinical Evaluation of the Child with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is based on clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil predominant esophageal inflammation. Clinical symptoms in children with EoE vary based on age and may be nonspecific. EoE has a male predominance with the majority having comorbid atopic disorders. At present, treatment options include medications (proton pump inhibition, swallowed topical steroids), dietary therapy or biologic therapy (dupilumab, approved for those ≥12 years of age). Outside of EoE in the context of oral immunotherapy, EoE is typically chronic requiring lifelong therapy. Long-term complications including feeding difficulties, malnutrition, and fibrostenotic disease.

Endoscopic Features of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases

Endoscopic evaluation with biopsies is a mainstay of the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs). Increasing knowledge has resulted in the development of 2 standardized scoring systems: the Endoscopic REFerence Score (EREFS) for EoE and the EG-REFS for eosinophilic gastritis, although the latter has not been validated. In EGIDs, diagnosis and follow-up focus on eosinophil infiltration in biopsies. In this article, we will discuss the most commonly used endoscopic scores in EoE and non-EoE EGIDs, their validity for the diagnosis and follow-up of disease activity, as well as endoscopic interventions and areas of uncertainty.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on High-Quality Upper Endoscopy: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this Clinical Practice Update (CPU) Expert Review is to provide clinicians with guidance on best practices for performing a high-quality upper endoscopic exam.

METHODS

The best practice advice statements presented herein were developed from a combination of available evidence from published literature, guidelines, and consensus-based expert opinion. No formal rating of the strength or quality of the evidence was carried out, which aligns with standard processes for American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute CPUs. These statements are meant to provide practical, timely advice to clinicians practicing in the United States. This Expert Review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Updates (CPU) Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Endoscopists should ensure that upper endoscopy is being performed for an appropriate indication and that informed consent clearly explaining the risks, benefits, alternatives, sedation plan, and potential diagnostic and therapeutic interventions is obtained. These elements should be documented by the endoscopist before the procedure. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Endoscopists should ensure that adequate visualization of the upper gastrointestinal mucosa, using mucosal cleansing and insufflation as necessary, is achieved and documented. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: A high-definition white-light endoscopy system should be used for upper endoscopy instead of a standard-definition white-light endoscopy system whenever possible. The endoscope used for the procedure should be documented in the procedure note. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Image enhancement technologies should be used during the upper endoscopic examination to improve the diagnostic yield for preneoplasia and neoplasia. Suspicious areas should be clearly described, photodocumented, and biopsied separately. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Endoscopists should spend sufficient time carefully inspecting the foregut mucosa in an anterograde and retroflexed view to improve the detection and characterization of abnormalities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Endoscopists should document any abnormalities noted on upper endoscopy using established classifications and standard terminology whenever possible. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Endoscopists should perform biopsies for the evaluation and management of foregut conditions using standardized biopsy protocols. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Endoscopists should provide patients with management recommendations based on the specific endoscopic findings (eg, peptic ulcer disease, erosive esophagitis), and this should be documented in the medical record. If recommendations are contingent upon histopathology results (eg, H pylori infection, Barrett's esophagus), then endoscopists should document that appropriate guidance will be provided after results are available. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Endoscopists should document whether subsequent surveillance endoscopy is indicated and, if so, provide appropriate surveillance intervals. If the determination of surveillance is contingent on histopathology results, then endoscopists should document that surveillance intervals will be suggested after results are available.

Long-term course of untreated asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia and minimally symptomatic eosinophilic esophagitis

Background and study aims The long-term course of untreated asymptomatic esophageal eosinophilia (aEE) and minimally symptomatic eosinophilic esophagitis (mEoE) are not well understood. This study aimed to clarify this course. Patients and methods A total of 36 patients with EE who were endoscopically followed up for more than 5 years, and who underwent more than one endoscopy evaluation after the first diagnosis, were investigated. These patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of the continuous treatment: no treatment group (NT group, n=22) and proton pump inhibitor/potassium competitive acid blocker group (Tx group, n=14). Symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings were retrospectively reviewed according to endoscopic phenotypes. Endoscopic assessment was performed using the EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS). Results The median follow-up period was 84.5 months in the Tx group and 92 months in the NT group. During the follow-up period, about half of the patients in the Tx-diffuse group persisted EREFS >3, while the remaining half had EREFS ≤2. The total EREFS in the NT-diffuse group remained almost unchanged (median: 2-4) without apparent exacerbation. In contrast, EREFS in the NT-localized group exhibited an unchanged or gradually decreasing trend, with statistical significance from the first diagnosis to 72 to 83 months after. Conclusions Untreated aEE and mEoE are not likely to worsen even without treatment at least for a median follow-up of 7 years. Instead, the localized type may spontaneously improve, implying a different pathogenesis in the presence of the diffuse type. Further studies should clarify the long-term prognosis.

Composite score of physiomechanical esophageal function using functional lumen imaging probe panometry in eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The evaluation provided by functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry includes esophageal distensibility/compliance (mechanics) of the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and esophageal motility (secondary peristalsis). We developed a composite score using these parameters to characterize physiomechanical function in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

METHODS

Two hundred fifteen adult patients with EoE who completed FLIP panometry during sedated endoscopy with esophageal biopsy sampling were included. FLIP metrics of esophageal body Compliance, Contractile response, Distensibility plateau, and maximum EGJ Diameter (C2D2) were scored as 0 for normal versus 1 or 2 for increasing degree of abnormality. Scores were summed to calculate the composite C2D2 score.

RESULTS

The C2D2 score had a significant positive correlation with mucosal eosinophil count (ρ = .241) and total Endoscopic EoE Reference Score (ρ = .467). Among 46 patients off treatment at the baseline evaluation, future proton pump inhibitor (PPI) responders (ie, achieved mucosal eosinophil count <15 per high-powered field after PPI treatment) had lower C2D2 scores than PPI nonresponders (median, 2 [interquartile range, 1-3] vs 4 [interquartile range, 2-6], respectively; P = .003). A regression model (that controlled for age, sex, and baseline eosinophil count) showed a C2D2 score ≤3 had an odds ratio of 14.5 (95% confidence interval, 2.6-85) to predict future PPI response. However, total Endoscopic EoE Reference Scores (P = .142) and baseline eosinophil count (P = .480) did not differ between PPI responders and PPI nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

This composite score of FLIP panometry metrics, the C2D2 score, may facilitate characterizing physiomechanical function in EoE and serve as an objective outcome measure.

The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) Reflects Longitudinal Clinicopathologic Changes in Children

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) was recently developed. We aimed to understand I-SEE scores in a longitudinal pediatric cohort and to determine the relationship between I-SEE and clinical features in children.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on a prospectively enrolled cohort of children at a single center who were treated as part of routine clinical care. I-SEE was calculated at the diagnostic and follow-up endoscopies over a mean of 6.6 years. Scoring was 0 for inactive, 1-6 for mild, 7-14 for moderate, and ≥15 for severe eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We analyzed clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features at each instance. Symptoms were analyzed at the baseline, first follow-up, and last endoscopic instance.

RESULTS

Of 67 children who met study criteria of at least 3 endoscopies over at least 2 years of follow-up time, 43%, 36%, and 21% had mild, moderate, and severe I-SEE scores at baseline, respectively. Between the first and second endoscopic instances, there was a decrease in the group mean I-SEE from 9.7 ± 7.2 to 6.1 ± 5.9 (P < .001). By the last instance, the overall I-SEE score dropped to 3.9 (P < .001). Body mass index <5% and poor feeding were more common in the children with severe I-SEE scores at baseline, and both improved by the last instance. Fibrosis was improved by the last instance biopsy (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

I-SEE is a responsive severity metric in children treated long term during routine clinical care. Baseline low body mass index and poor feeding were more common in children with severe I-SEE scores.

ACCURACY OF THE EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS ENDOSCOPIC REFERENCE SCORE IN CHILDREN

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy of applying the endoscopic reference score for EoE (EREFS) in children with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction naïve to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing reports and photographs of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies (UGE) and esophageal biopsies of patients with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Patients who were treated with PPI or had other conditions that may cause esophageal eosinophilia were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 2,036 patients evaluated, endoscopic findings of EoE were identified in 248 (12.2%) and more than one abnormality was observed in 167 (8.2%). Among all patients, 154 (7.6%) presented esophageal eosinophilia (≥15 eosinophils per high power field) (P<0.01). In this group, 30 patients (19.5%) had normal endoscopy. In patients with EoE, edema (74% vs 6.5%, P<0.01) and furrows (66.2% vs 2.4%, P<0.01) were more prevalent than in the control group. Association of edema and furrows was more frequent in patients with EoE than in the control group (29.2% vs 1.6%, P<0.01, OR=24.7, CI=15.0-40.5). The presence of more than one endoscopic finding had sensitivity of 80.5%, specificity of 93.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 50%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.3%, and accuracy of 92.4%.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study showed that endoscopic features suggestive of EoE had high specificity and NPV for diagnosing EoE in children naïve to PPI therapy. These findings highlight the importance of the EREFS in contributing to early identification of inflammatory and fibrostenosing characteristics of EoE, making it possible to identify and to avoid progression of the disease.

Sleep, Anxiety, Somatization, Quality of Life, and Resilience in Pediatric Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

INTRODUCTION

Emerging evidence suggests a high burden of psychosocial comorbidities in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), although factors associated with this burden have not been explored. We aimed to increase understanding of the psychosocial burden of EoE and assess factors that are associated with disease burden.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with EoE (n = 87) recruited from a single-center, multidisciplinary pediatric eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders clinic (2019-2021). Participants (aged 8-18 years) completed validated assessments during routine clinic visit to assess EoE symptoms (Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score version 2.0), quality of life (Pediatric Quality of LIfe- Eosinophilic Esophagitis), anxiety state and trait (State-Trait Anxiety Score for Children), somatization (Child Somatic Symptoms Inventory 24), sleep disordered breathing (Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire) and, in a subset (n = 35), resilience (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale). Clinical and demographic data were collected.

RESULTS

Participants were at a mean (SD) age of 12.8 (3.1) years, and 26% (n = 23) were female. Shorter disease duration (6-12 months) was associated with higher symptom burden ( P = 0.03), somatization ( P < 0.01), and anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Score for Children Trait P < 0.01) scores. Participants with neurodevelopmental comorbidities had higher anxiety trait, somatization, sleep disordered breathing, and lower quality of life ( P < 0.01 for all). Symptom burden was significantly associated with increased somatic symptoms (adjusted β [aβ] = 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.45) and decreased quality of life (aβ = -0.42; 95% confidence interval -0.59 to -0.25) but not state anxiety, trait anxiety, or disordered sleep breathing.

DISCUSSION

Pediatric patients with a recent diagnosis of EoE can experience higher EoE symptoms, somatization, and anxiety when compared with those with a longer-standing diagnosis. Patients earlier in their diagnosis and with neurodevelopmental disorders may experience increased somatization and anxiety that may warrant additional support services.

Review article: Emerging insights into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis and other eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterised clinically by gastrointestinal symptoms and histologically by a pathologic increase in eosinophil-predominant inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, in the absence of secondary causes of eosinophilia.

AIMS

To highlight emerging insights and research efforts into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs, and discuss key remaining knowledge gaps.

METHODS

We selected and reviewed original research, retrospective studies, case series, randomised controlled trials, and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Standardised nomenclature classifies EGIDs as EoE, eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). Incidence and prevalence of EoE are rising, emphasising the need to better understand how environmental risk factors and genetic features interact. Advances in understanding EoE pathophysiology have led to clinical trials of targeted therapy and the approval (in the United States) of dupilumab for EoE. Several therapies that are under investigation hope to satisfy both histologic and clinical targets. For non-EoE EGIDs, efforts are focused on better defining clinical and histopathologic disease determinants and natural history, as well as establishing new therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Unmet needs for research are dramatically different for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs. In EoE, non-invasive diagnostic tests, clinicopathologic models that determine the risk of disease progression and therapeutic failure, and novel biologic therapies are emerging. In contrast, in non-EoE EGIDs, epidemiologic trends, diagnostic histopathologic thresholds, and natural history models are still developing for these more rare disorders.

The New Therapeutic Frontiers in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Biological Drugs

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a multifaceted disease characterized by a wide heterogeneity of clinical manifestations, endoscopic and histopathologic patterns, and responsiveness to therapy. From the perspective of an effective approach to the patient, the different inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of EoE and biologics, in particular monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), targeting these pathways are needed. Currently, the most relevant is dupilumab, which interferes with both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 pathways by binding IL-4 receptor α, and is the only mAb approved by the European Medicine Agency and US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of EoE. Other mAbs investigated include mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab (interfering with IL-5 axis), cendakimab and dectrekumab (anti-IL-13s), tezepelumab (anti-TSLP), lirentelimab (anti-SIGLEG-8), and many others. Despite the undeniable economic impact of biologic therapies, in the near future, there will be room for further reflection about the opportunity to prescribe biologic agents, not only as a last-line therapy in selected cases such as patients with comorbidities involving common pathways. Although recent findings are very encouraging, the road to permanent success in the treatment of EoE is still long, and further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of mAbs and to discover new potential targets.

Descriptive Analysis of Pre-existing Data on Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Associated Morbidities in Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

BACKGROUND

Data on eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are limited in the United Arab Emirates.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the distribution of eosinophilic gastritis/gastroenteritis (EoG/EGE) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) among patients whose data are recorded on the Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi (CCAD) systems.

METHODS

Anonymized aggregate data were obtained from the Clinerion Patient Network Explorer (PNEx®) network installed at the CCAD on patients diagnosed with EoG/EGE (n=17, of whom 11 (64.7%) were females) or with EoE (n=118, of whom 35 (29.7%) were females) between 2015 and 2022; 63 (53.4%) were diagnosed between 2020 and 2022.

RESULTS

The vast majority of EoE patients visited the gastroenterology clinic (111, 94.1%), followed by the primary care (70, 59.3%), the emergency medicine (60, 50.8%), and the immunology (59, 50%) units. A total of 84 patients with EoE also presented with another type-2 inflammatory condition including allergic rhinitis, food allergy, and atopic dermatitis. Proton pump inhibitors and corticosteroids were widely prescribed, and four patients with EoE have been commenced on biologics since 2020. However, heterogeneity of medication use was identified, warranting local clinical practice guidelines.

CONCLUSION

A referral network could be established with local and regional reach, which relies on a multidisciplinary approach for the management of EoE and associated type 2 co-morbidities. More studies are needed to better depict the clinical picture of patients with EGIDs in general and EoE, in particular, in terms of diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, non-medical interventions, disease course, and patient-reported outcomes.

Assessment of the Severity and the Remission Criteria in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disease that manifests with dysphagia and is characterized by the predominantly eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. Several instruments have been developed to assess the symptoms of EoE: the Daily Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ), EoE Activity Index (EEsAI), Pediatric EoE Symptom Severity (PEESSv2), etc. The use of the EREFS is a gold standard for endoscopic diagnosis. The EoE histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) was elaborated for the assessment of histological features in EoE. However, the remission criteria are not clearly defined and vary greatly in different studies. Gastroenterologists establish the severity of EoE mainly based on endoscopic findings. At the same time, EoE requires a multidisciplinary approach. The recently developed Index of Severity of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) that is built on symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histological features is promising.

Treatment of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Traditional and Novel Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review presents and summarizes the existing studies on the treatment goals and options for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis utilizing rigorous peer-reviewed literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to traditional treatments, emerging biologic therapies continue to evolve the approach to treating pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. Well defined treatment goals will aid the continued development of new therapies. Further, innovative assessment tools have changed how the clinician is able to assess the effectiveness of therapies with a trend toward less invasive options. The management of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis continues to evolve with the advent of both novel treatment options and assessment tools. Treatment choices, with benefits and risks involved, should be presented to families upon diagnosis and tailored towards the individual patient and likelihood of adherence and success. Biologic therapy for EoE presents an exciting option for both first line therapy and escalation for those with severe or unresponsive disease.

Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Model for Recognition and Quantitation of Histologic Features of Eosinophilic Esophagitis on Biopsy Samples

We have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital pathology model for the evaluation of histologic features related to eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). In this study, we evaluated the performance of our AI model in a cohort of pediatric and adult patients for histologic features included in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histologic Scoring System (EoEHSS). We collected a total of 203 esophageal biopsy samples from patients with mucosal eosinophilia of any degree (91 adult and 112 pediatric patients) and 10 normal controls from a prospectively maintained database. All cases were assessed by a specialized gastrointestinal (GI) pathologist for features in the EoEHSS at the time of original diagnosis and rescored by a central GI pathologist (R.K.M.). We subsequently analyzed whole-slide image digital slides using a supervised AI model operating in a cloud-based, deep learning AI platform (Aiforia Technologies) for peak eosinophil count (PEC) and several histopathologic features in the EoEHSS. The correlation and interobserver agreement between the AI model and pathologists (Pearson correlation coefficient [rs] = 0.89 and intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.87 vs original pathologist; rs = 0.91 and ICC = 0.83 vs central pathologist) were similar to the correlation and interobserver agreement between pathologists for PEC (rs = 0.88 and ICC = 0.91) and broadly similar to those for most other histologic features in the EoEHSS. The AI model also accurately identified PEC of >15 eosinophils/high-power field by the original pathologist (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.98) and central pathologist (AUC = 0.98) and had similar AUCs for the presence of EoE-related endoscopic features to pathologists' assessment. Average eosinophils per epithelial unit area had similar performance compared to AI high-power field-based analysis. Our newly developed AI model can accurately identify, quantify, and score several of the main histopathologic features in the EoE spectrum, with agreement regarding EoEHSS scoring which was similar to that seen among GI pathologists.

Mepolizumab for treatment of adolescents and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 antibody, was more effective than placebo for improving dysphagia symptoms and decreasing oesophageal eosinophil counts in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE).

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial. In the first part, patients aged 16-75 with EoE and dysphagia symptoms (per EoE Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI)) were randomised 1:1 to 3 months of mepolizumab 300 mg monthly or placebo. Primary outcome was change in EEsAI from baseline to month 3 (M3). Secondary outcomes included histological, endoscopic and safety metrics. In part 2, patients initially randomised to mepolizumab continued 300 mg monthly for 3 additional months (mepo/mepo), placebo patients started mepolizumab 100 mg monthly (pbo/mepo), and outcomes were reassessed at month 6 (M6).

RESULTS

Of 66 patients randomised, 64 completed M3, and 56 completed M6. At M3, EEsAI decreased 15.4±18.1 with mepolizumab and 8.3±18.0 with placebo (p=0.14). Peak eosinophil counts decreased more with mepolizumab (113±77 to 36±43) than placebo (146±94 to 160±133) (p<0.001). With mepolizumab, 42% and 34% achieved histological responses of <15 and ≤6 eos/hpf compared with 3% and 3% with placebo (p<0.001 and 0.02). The change in EoE Endoscopic Reference Score at M3 was also larger with mepolizumab. At M6, EEsAI decreased 18.3±18.1 points for mepo/mepo and 18.6±19.2 for pbo/mepo (p=0.85). The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab did not achieve the primary endpoint of improving dysphagia symptoms compared with placebo. While eosinophil counts and endoscopic severity improved with mepolizumab at 3 months, longer treatment did not yield additional improvement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03656380.

A Newly Proposed Severity Index for Eosinophilic Esophagitis is Associated With Baseline Clinical Features and Successful Treatment Response

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Index of Severity for EoE (I-SEE) was recently developed. We aimed to determine the relationship between features of eosinophilic esophagitis and disease severity, and assess change in disease severity with topical corticosteroid treatment, using I-SEE.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of an 8-week randomized trial comparing 2 topical corticosteroid formulations in newly diagnosed patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. I-SEE was calculated at baseline and posttreatment, and patients were classified as mild (1-6 points), moderate (7-14 points), severe (≥15 points), or inactive (0 points). We analyzed clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features at baseline by disease severity, and examined the change in severity before and after treatment, and by histologic response (<15 eosinophils per high-power field).

RESULTS

Of 111 subjects randomized, 20 (18%) were classified as mild, 75 (68%) as moderate, and 16 (14%) as severe at baseline. Increasing severity was associated with lower body mass index (30 for mild, 27 for moderate, 24 for severe; P = .01), longer duration of dysphagia symptoms before diagnosis (9 years for mild, 9 for moderate, and 20 for severe; P < .001), and decreasing esophageal diameter (15 mm for mild, 13 for moderate, and 10 for severe; P < .001). Mean severity score decreased after treatment (11 vs 4; P < .001), with lower scores in histologic responders compared with nonresponders (2 vs 9; P < .001). The severity score at baseline predicted need for dilation at follow-up (C statistic, 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly developed I-SEE correlates with many clinical features at diagnosis, and severity improves with successful topical corticosteroid treatment. Additional investigations in other populations can further confirm its utility.

Examining Disparities in Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding the impact of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on the health outcomes of children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

OBJECTIVE

To (1) identify demographic characteristics of children diagnosed with EoE in a large tertiary care center, and (2) determine associations between a patient's demographics and depth of evaluation or treatment choices.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included children 0 to 18 years old seen in Children's Hospital Colorado between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020. Demographics were extracted from the electronic medical record. Rural-Urban Commuting Area taxonomy codes were used to classify urbanization. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) scores were used to categorize neighborhood advantage/disadvantage. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 2,117 children with EoE. Children with higher state ADI scores (greater neighborhood disadvantage) had less radiographic evaluation of their disease (odds ratio [95% CI] per unit increase in state ADI = 0.93 [0.89-0.97]; P = .0002) and had esophageal dilations at younger ages (r = -0.24; P = .007). Black children compared with White children were younger at diagnosis (8.3 y vs 10.0 y; P = .002). Children from rural areas were seen less by feeding therapy (3.9% vs 9.9%; P = .02), but were younger at their visits (2.3 y vs 4.3 y; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of children with EoE cared for in a large tertiary care center, we found differences in presentation and care depending on race, urbanization, and socioeconomic status.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histologic Scoring System: Correlation with Histologic, Endoscopic, and Symptomatic Disease and Clinical Use

BACKGROUND

The eosinophilic esophagitis histologic scoring system (EoEHSS) was developed to enhance the diagnostic standard of peak eosinophil count (PEC) in evaluating disease activity in EoE.

AIMS

(1) Correlate the EoEHSS and PEC to measures of symptomatic and endoscopic disease activity, (2) Correlate EoEHSS grade and stage subcomponents to clinical, radiology, and endoscopic markers of fibrotic disease, (3) Evaluate EoEHSS remission in asymptomatic patients with PEC < 15 eosinophils per high powered field (eos/hpf).

METHODS

Secondary analysis of prospective cohort data of 22 patients with EoE that underwent dietary therapy and endoscopy at 3 time points. Active disease was defined by EoEHSS grade or stage > 0.125, symptomatic disease by EoE symptom activity index > 20, endoscopic disease by endoscopic reference score > 2, and histologic disease by PEC ≥ 15 eos/hpf. EoEHSS remission was defined by esophageal inflammation (EI) grade of 0-1, EI stage of 0, total grade ≤ 3, and total stage ≤ 3.

RESULTS

EoEHSS grade and stage did not correlate with symptomatic disease but did with endoscopic and histologic disease. PEC showed similar correlation pattern. Abnormal grade and stage had strong sensitivity (87-100%) but poor specificity (11-36%) to detect symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity. Lamina propria fibrosis was evaluated in 36% of biopsies and did not correlate with minimum esophageal diameter. Out of 14 patients who were in complete symptomatic, endoscopic, and histologic remission, 8 met criteria for EoEHSS remission.

CONCLUSION

The positive and negative correlations of EoEHSS to specific measures of symptomatic, histologic, and endoscopic activity suggest that it provides complementary information in EoE.

A New Tool to Assess Disease Severity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The presentation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is heterogeneous with varied clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features impacting the severity of the condition. Until recently, however, and in contrast with many other conditions, there has been no standardized way to measure disease severity in EoE. A clinically applicable method for assessing severity in routine practice has been recognized as necessary to standardize assessment and management of EoE. Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association has sponsored a consensus conference to determine elements of severity in EoE and develop the first tool to measure severity. This article presents details of this severity metric, which is known as the Index of Severity in EoE (I-SEE), and outlines the elements within I-SEE and how to categorize EoE as mild, moderate, severe, or inactive. The domains of I-SEE include symptoms and complications, inflammatory features (both endoscopic and histologic), and fibrostenotic features (both endoscopic and histologic). The article also provides an update on emerging data related to I-SEE and discusses the future studies necessary to implement I-SEE as part of a treatment framework in EoE.