Extensive molecular screening for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Distinct Molecular Profiles of Sporadic Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The observed increase in the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is being driven by sporadic cases, but the molecular characteristics of these tumors are not fully understood. Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of microsatellite instability (MSI) and selected mutations in sporadic EOCRC, and their association with survival.

METHODS

Firstly, we compared the prevalence of molecular characteristics and survival within a population-based cohort study of 652 stage II and III colon cancer patients in Northern Ireland, comparing sporadic early-onset (<50 years, n = 35) with older (60-69 years, n = 179) patients. Secondly, a systematic review for studies reporting the prevalence of MSI, mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), or BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53 mutations in sporadic EOCRC was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled estimates of the prevalence of molecular features in sporadic EOCRC.

RESULTS

Firstly, within the cohort study, EOCRC patients did not have a significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer-specific death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-2.39) compared with 60- to 69-year-olds. Second, 32 studies were included in the systematic review. The pooled analysis estimated a prevalence of 10% (95% CI 7%-14%) for MSI high/dMMR in sporadic EOCRC. BRAF and KRAS mutations had a prevalence of 1% (95% CI 0%-3%) and 32% (95% CI 23%-40%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The molecular characteristics of sporadic EOCRC differ from those of cancers in older adults, particularly regarding reduced prevalence of BRAF mutations. Ten percent of sporadic EOCRC display MSI high/dMMR. Further studies are needed to address survival in sporadic EOCRC cases and whether molecular profiles influence EOCRC outcomes in this patient group.

Unexpected expression of mismatch repair protein is more commonly seen with pathogenic missense than with other mutations in Lynch syndrome

It has been observed that some patients with colorectal cancer due to germline or double somatic pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes may have intact protein expression in their tumors as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). This has been speculated to occur more frequently in Lynch syndrome (LS) cases due to pathogenic missense mutations, leading to expression of a full-length but nonfunctional protein with retained antigenicity. Our goals were to study the frequency of unexpected MMR expression in colorectal cancers among LS cases with missense mutations, LS cases with truncating mutations, as well as cases with double somatic MMR mutations and evaluate if the unexpected MMR expression is more common in certain categories. IHC slides were available for 82 patients with MMR deficiency without methylation, which included 56 LS cases and 26 double somatic MMR mutation cases. Sixteen of 82 MMR-defective cases showed unexpected MMR expression, with 10 cases showing tumor staining weaker than the control and 6 cases (7%) showing intact staining. Unexpected MMR expression was most commonly seen with LS cases with missense mutations (4 of 9, 44%), followed by MMR double somatic mutation cases (7 of 26, 27%), and finally by LS cases with truncating mutations (5 of 47, 11%). Cautious interpretation of MMR IHC is advised when dealing with tumor staining that is weaker than the control regardless of the percentage of tumor staining as these cases may harbor pathogenic MMR gene mutations. Missense mutations may account for some LS cases that may be missed by IHC alone. Strict adherence to proper interpretation of IHC with attention to staining intensity and the status of heterodimer partner protein will prevent many potential misses.

Functional interrogation of Lynch syndrome-associated MSH2 missense variants via CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in human embryonic stem cells

Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes patients to cancer and is caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Identifying the deleterious mutation, such as a frameshift or nonsense mutation, is important for confirming an LS diagnosis. However, discovery of a missense variant is often inconclusive. The effects of these variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on disease pathogenesis are unclear, though understanding their impact on protein function can help determine their significance. Laboratory functional studies performed to date have been limited by their artificial nature. We report here an in-cellulo functional assay in which we engineered site-specific MSH2 VUS using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-Cas9 gene editing in human embryonic stem cells. This approach introduces the variant into the endogenous MSH2 loci, while simultaneously eliminating the wild-type gene. We characterized the impact of the variants on cellular MMR functions including DNA damage response signaling and the repair of DNA microsatellites. We classified the MMR functional capability of eight of 10 VUS providing valuable information for determining their likelihood of being bona fide pathogenic LS variants. This human cell-based assay system for functional testing of MMR gene VUS will facilitate the identification of high-risk LS patients.

Assessing colorectal cancer mismatch repair status in the modern era: a survey of current practices and re-evaluation of the role of microsatellite instability testing

Results of DNA mismatch repair testing are used to detect Lynch syndrome and have prognostic and therapeutic implications among patients with sporadic colorectal carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6) and PCR for microsatellite instability are two established methods for assessing mismatch repair function. Older literature suggested a discordance rate of approximately 5% between these assays, leading some institutions to perform dual testing on all cases. Although universal mismatch repair testing is now recommended by multiple professional organizations, none provide guidelines regarding preferred assays. We surveyed 96 academic and nonacademic institutions to assess Lynch syndrome screening practices and evaluated discordance rates between immunohistochemistry and PCR among 809 colorectal cancers tested in our own institution. Our survey demonstrated no significant differences between academic and nonacademic practices with respect to testing strategies. Eighty six percent performed universal screening, and usually (76%) employed immunohistochemistry on initial biopsy samples. Only 20% employed PCR; these were mostly academic practices that used both immunohistochemistry and PCR (p < 0.01 compared with the nonacademic groups). Loss of MLH1/PMS2 staining was often (90%) followed by either BRAF mutational analysis or MLH1 methylation assays. Only 24% adhered to WHO recommendations to assign histologic grade based on mismatch repair status. We found only 3 cases (0.4%) with discordant immunohistochemistry and PCR results in our own practice: 1 reflected decreased MSH-6 staining in a neoadjuvantly treated microsatellite stable tumor, 1 MLH1-deficient tumor showed diminished MLH1/PMS2 in the tumor compared with internal control, and 1 case reflected an error in the molecular laboratory. Overall, our results showed extremely low discordance between methods assessing mismatch repair status and would suggest immunohistochemistry as the preferred single screening test. PCR can be reserved for cases that show equivocal immunostaining patterns.

Performance of Lynch syndrome predictive models in quantifying the likelihood of germline mutations in patients with abnormal MLH1 immunoexpression

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for up to 4 % of all colorectal cancers (CRC). Detection of a pathogenic germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes is the definitive criterion for LS diagnosis, but it is time-consuming and expensive. Immunohistochemistry is the most sensitive prescreening test and its predictive value is very high for loss of expression of MSH2, MSH6, and (isolated) PMS2, but not for MLH1. We evaluated if LS predictive models have a role to improve the molecular testing algorithm in this specific setting by studying 38 individuals referred for molecular testing and who were subsequently shown to have loss of MLH1 immunoexpression in their tumors. For each proband we calculated a risk score, which represents the probability that the patient with CRC carries a pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation, using the PREMM_1,2,6 and MMRpro predictive models. Of the 38 individuals, 18.4 % had a pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation. MMRpro performed better for the purpose of this study, presenting a AUC of 0.83 (95 % CI 0.67-0.9; P < 0.001) compared with a AUC of 0.68 (95 % CI 0.51-0.82, P = 0.09) for PREMM_1,2,6. Considering a threshold of 5 %, MMRpro would eliminate unnecessary germline mutation analysis in a significant proportion of cases while keeping very high sensitivity. We conclude that MMRpro is useful to correctly predict who should be screened for a germline MLH1 gene mutation and propose an algorithm to improve the cost-effectiveness of LS diagnosis.

Investigation of correlation between mutational status in key EGFR signaling genes and prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer

Aim: To investigate the relationship between mutations of key genes in the EGFR signaling pathway and the prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer patients without chemotherapy. Materials & methods: The incidence of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations and deficient DNA mismatch repair were assessed in 160 stage II colorectal cancer patients who had been treated by radical operation without adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Mutations in KRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA were associated with poor prognosis, while the deficient DNA mismatch repair status was not associated with the prognosis. Combining these three markers, the sensitivity of the predicted value for poor progression-free survival and overall survival reached 0.645 (p = 0.002) and 0.709 (p = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Knowing the mutation status of KRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA in stage II colorectal cancer can significantly improve the accuracy of prognoses.

Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis screen to identify pathogenic Lynch syndrome-associated MSH2 DNA mismatch repair gene variants

Single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides can achieve targeted base-pair substitution with modest efficiency but high precision. We show that "oligo targeting" can be used effectively to study missense mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Inherited inactivating mutations in DNA MMR genes are causative for the cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome (LS). Although overtly deleterious mutations in MMR genes can clearly be ascribed as the cause of LS, the functional implications of missense mutations are often unclear. We developed a genetic screen to determine the pathogenicity of these variants of uncertain significance (VUS), focusing on mutator S homolog 2 (MSH2). VUS were introduced into the endogenous Msh2 gene of mouse embryonic stem cells by oligo targeting. Subsequent selection for MMR-deficient cells using the guanine analog 6-thioguanine allowed the detection of MMR-abrogating VUS. The screen was able to distinguish weak and strong pathogenic variants from polymorphisms and was used to investigate 59 Msh2 VUS. Nineteen of the 59 VUS were identified as pathogenic. Functional assays revealed that 14 of the 19 detected variants fully abrogated MMR activity and that five of the detected variants attenuated MMR activity. Implementation of the screen in clinical practice allows proper counseling of mutation carriers and treatment of their tumors.

Immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis in molecular subtyping of colorectal carcinoma based on mismatch repair competency

Mismatch repair defective (MMRd) colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a distinct molecular phenotype of colorectal cancer, including 12% of sporadic CRC and 3% of Lynch Syndrome. In order to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics of MMRd colorectal carcinoma, and to find the most effective method for preliminary screening, 296 CRC fulfilled revised Bethesda Guideline (RB) were selected from 1450 CRCs to perform both IHC staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and MSI analysis. Sixty-eight tumors were classified as MSI-H by MSI test. Colorectal carcinomas with MSI-H were prone to be proximal located, poorly differentiated, and relatively early staged, with infrequent metastasis to lymph node as well as to distant organs, compared with MSS ones. All of the 68 MMRd CRCs presented abnormal expression of at least one mismatch repair protein (MMRP), with 48 concurrent negative of MLH1 and PMS2, 14 concurrent negative of MSH2 and MSH6, 4 isolated negative of MSH6, 1 isolated negative of PMS2, and 1 concurrent negative of 4 MMRPs. All of the MLH1 negative tumors also showed abnormal expression of PMS2. All of the MSH2 negative cases also presented negative expression of MSH6. The sensitivity and specificity of the 2-antibody IHC test contained only PMS2 and MSH6 for screening for MMRd CRC were 100% and 98.2% respectively, exactly the same as that of the 4-antibody IHC test with all of the 4 MMRPs. The diagnostic accordance rate of the 2-antibody approach and MSI analysis was 98.6%. In conclusion, MMRd CRC has characteristic clinicopathological features different from MSS CRCs. The 2-antibody IHC approach containing MSH6 and PMS2 is the most easy and effective way to detecting MMR deficiency in CRC.

Human mutL homolog 1 expression characteristic and prognostic effect on patients with sporadic colorectal cancer

The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between aberrant human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) expression and clinicopathological parameters of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer, and to explore the prognostic effect of aberrant hMLH1 expression in these patients. The relationship was measured by chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model to measure 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates. Totally 17.13% of the patients with sporadic colorectal cancer showed aberrant nuclear staining for hMLH1 expression. Aberrant hMLH1 expression was related with tumor pathologic types, tumor location and TNM staging (P<0.05) in the patients with sporadic colorectal cancer. Cox regression analysis indicated important prognostic factors were age (RR: 1.021, 95% CI: 1.003-1.039, P=0.023), mucinous adenocarcinoma (RR: 2.603, 95% CI: 1.705-3.974, P<0.0001), TNM staging (RR: 2.071, 95% CI: 1.170-3.666, P=0.012), lymphangion invasion (RR: 2.013, 95% CI: 1.227-3.303, P=0.006) and aberrant hMLH1 expression (RR: 0.414, 95% CI: 0.216-0.791, P=0.008). Consequently, hMLH1 expression level is related with some clinicopathologic features. Aberrant hMLH1 expression plays a significant part in prognosis for patients with sporadic colorectal cancer and it will promisingly become an independent prognostic factor.

Efficacy and safety of a cisplatin and paclitaxel induction regimen followed by chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a non-5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Sixty patients with stage III to IV HNSCC were treated with induction paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP; paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) , 3 cycles) followed by CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) ; D1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (93.3%) completed 3 cycles of induction TP (no treatment-related deaths), 52 (86.7%) completed definitive CRT per protocol (adverse event [AE] grade ≥2 in 53.3%). The overall response rate after induction TP was 82.5% for patients with resectable disease and 55.5% for unresectable disease (p = .023), and complete response (CR) rate after CRT was 70.0% for patients with resectable disease and 30.0% for unresectable disease (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

Induction TP followed by cisplatin based-CRT was well-tolerated, safe, and had high overall response rate in selected patients with locally advanced HNSCC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E970-E980, 2016.

A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited autosomal dominant disorder characterised by an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers, and caused by mutations in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) mismatch repair genes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of strategies to identify LS in newly diagnosed early-onset CRC patients (aged < 50 years). Cascade testing of relatives is employed in all strategies for individuals in whom LS is identified.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

Systematic reviews were conducted of the test accuracy of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing or immunohistochemistry (IHC) in individuals with CRC at risk of LS, and of economic evidence relating to diagnostic strategies for LS. Reviews were carried out in April 2012 (test accuracy); and in February 2012, repeated in February 2013 (economic evaluations). Databases searched included MEDLINE (1946 to April week 3, 2012), EMBASE (1980 to week 17, 2012) and Web of Science (inception to 30 April 2012), and risk of bias for test accuracy was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) quality appraisal tool. A de novo economic model of diagnostic strategies for LS was developed.

RESULTS

Inconsistencies in study designs precluded pooling of diagnostic test accuracy results from a previous systematic review and nine subsequent primary studies. These were of mixed quality, with significant methodological concerns identified for most. IHC and MSI can both play a part in diagnosing LS but neither is gold standard. No UK studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of diagnosing and managing LS, although studies from other countries generally found some strategies to be cost-effective compared with no testing. The de novo model demonstrated that all strategies were cost-effective compared with no testing at a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), with the most cost-effective strategy utilising MSI and BRAF testing [incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) = £5491 per QALY]. The maximum health benefit to the population of interest would be obtained using universal germline testing, but this would not be a cost-effective use of NHS resources compared with the next best strategy. When the age limit was raised from 50 to 60 and 70 years, the ICERs compared with no testing increased but remained below £20,000 per QALY (except for universal germline testing with an age limit of 70 years). The total net health benefit increased with the age limit as more individuals with LS were identified. Uncertainty was evaluated through univariate sensitivity analyses, which suggested that the parameters substantially affecting cost-effectiveness: were the risk of CRC for individuals with LS; the average number of relatives identified per index patient; the effectiveness of colonoscopy in preventing metachronous CRC; the cost of colonoscopy; the duration of the psychological impact of genetic testing on health-related quality of life (HRQoL); and the impact of prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on HRQoL (this had the potential to make all testing strategies more expensive and less effective than no testing).

LIMITATIONS

The absence of high-quality data for the impact of prophylactic gynaecological surgery and the psychological impact of genetic testing on HRQoL is an acknowledged limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that reflex testing for LS in newly diagnosed CRC patients aged < 50 years is cost-effective. Such testing may also be cost-effective in newly diagnosed CRC patients aged < 60 or < 70 years. Results are subject to uncertainty due to a number of parameters, for some of which good estimates were not identified. We recommend future research to estimate the cost-effectiveness of testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed endometrial or ovarian cancer, and the inclusion of aspirin chemoprevention. Further research is required to accurately estimate the impact of interventions on HRQoL.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012002436.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Evidence for presence of mismatch repair gene expression positive Lynch syndrome cases in India

Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common form of familial CRC predisposition that causes tumor onset at a young age, is characterized by the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumors due to germline inactivation of mismatch repair (MMR) system. Two MMR genes namely MLH1 and MSH2 account for majority of LS cases while MSH6 and PMS2 may account for a minor proportion. In order to identify MMR genes causing LS in India, we analyzed MSI and determined expression status of the four MMR genes in forty eight suspected LS patient colorectal tumor samples. Though a majority exhibited MSI, only 58% exhibited loss of MMR expression, a significantly low proportion compared to reports from other populations. PCR-DNA sequencing and MLPA-based mutation and exonic deletion/duplication screening respectively, revealed genetic lesions in samples with and without MMR gene expression. Interestingly, tumor samples with and without MMR expression exhibited significant differences with respect to histological (mucin content) and molecular (instability exhibited by mononucleotide microsatellites) features. The study has revealed for the first time a significant proportion of LS tumors not exhibiting loss of MMR expression.

Mismatch repair protein expression in colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Alterations in at least six of the genes that encode proteins involved in the mismatch repair (MMR) system have been identified in either HNPCC or sporadic colon cancer. We aimed to analyse the proportion of patients with colorectal cancer with loss of immunostaining for MMR proteins in order to determine the feasibility of molecular screening for the loss of MMR proteins through the study of unselected patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A group of 33 patients with colorectal cancer was randomly selected from the department of surgery bio-bank to determine the expression of MMR proteins in their FFPE tumour tissues using immunohistochemistry techniques. Changes in protein expression following transfection of colorectal tissues were observed in stained cells using Olympus BX60 microscope and image analySIS software.

RESULTS

Of the tissue specimens in which acceptable immunostaining was achieved, three samples showed loss of one or more of the MMR proteins. Both hMLH1 and hPMS2 proteins were not expressed in a 36 years old woman with cancer of the caecum. The expression of hMSH6 protein was undetermined in tumour tissues retrieved from a 61 years old man with cancer of the proximal colon. The third case was a 77 years old man with no documented family history of cancer, who had carcinoma of the rectum. He showed loss of hMLH1 expression in the tumour tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings and the previous reports pointed out the importance of molecular screening of patients with colorectal cancer for MSI using immunohistochemistry. This strategy managed to identify mutations in patients otherwise would not have been detected.

Q48P mutation in the hMLH1 gene associated with Lynch syndrome in three Hungarian families

Lynch syndrome (Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, HNPCC) is an inherited disease with variable phenotype causing the development of colon cancer and other malignancies. The basis of the disease is believed to be the mismatch repair gene mutations. Genetic screening has been performed among the patients who have undergone surgery for colon cancer at the University of Debrecen, Department of Surgery. Tumor samples of the screened patients were submitted to immunohistochemistry on hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6 genes, microsatellite instability testing, followed by sequencing and multiple ligation dependent probe amplification. Three families were identified with the missense mutation c.143A>C (p.Q48P) of hMLH1 gene. In one of the families a segregation analysis of this particular variant was also accomplished. The segregation analysis revealed a clear correlation between the tumor cases and the occurrence of this mutation. However, none of the analyzed 100 healthy controls demonstrated the same aberration. There is only one published evidence in the literature about the presence of this rare variant in any population. The Gln to Pro switch in the ATPase domain, a conservative region of the hMLH1 gene, creates significant changes in the protein structure. These results indicate that this mutation is the abnormality responsible for the patients' phenotype and it is feasible that this particular aberration occurs more frequently among Hungarian Lynch syndrome patients.

Prevalence of pathological germline mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in colorectal cancer

The prevalence of pathological germline mutations in colorectal cancer has been widely studied, as germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 confer a high risk of colorectal cancer. However, because the sample size and population of previous studies are very different from each other, the conclusions still remain controversial. In this paper, Databases such as PubMed were applied to search for related papers. The data were imported into Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2, which was used to estimate the weighted prevalence of hMLH1 and hMSH2 pathological mutations and compare the differences of prevalence among different family histories, ethnicities and related factors. This study collected and utilized data from 102 papers. In the Amsterdam-criteria positive group, the prevalence of pathological germline mutations of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes was 28.55% (95%CI 26.04%–31.19%) and 19.41% (95%CI 15.88%–23.51%), respectively, and the prevalence of germline mutations in hMLH1/hMSH2 was 15.44%/10.02%, 20.43%/13.26% and 15.43%/11.70% in Asian, American multiethnic and European/Australian populations, respectively. Substitution mutations accounted for the largest proportion of germline mutations (hMLH1: 52.34%, hMSH2: 43.25%). The total prevalence of mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in Amsterdam-criteria positive, Amsterdam-criteria negative and sporadic colorectal cancers was around 45%, 25% and 15%, respectively, and there were no obvious differences in the prevalence of germline mutations among different ethnicities.

Human mismatch repair protein hMutLα is required to repair short slipped-DNAs of trinucleotide repeats

Mismatch repair (MMR) is required for proper maintenance of the genome by protecting against mutations. The mismatch repair system has also been implicated as a driver of certain mutations, including disease-associated trinucleotide repeat instability. We recently revealed a requirement of hMutSβ in the repair of short slip-outs containing a single CTG repeat unit (1). The involvement of other MMR proteins in short trinucleotide repeat slip-out repair is unknown. Here we show that hMutLα is required for the highly efficient in vitro repair of single CTG repeat slip-outs, to the same degree as hMutSβ. HEK293T cell extracts, deficient in hMLH1, are unable to process single-repeat slip-outs, but are functional when complemented with hMutLα. The MMR-deficient hMLH1 mutant, T117M, which has a point mutation proximal to the ATP-binding domain, is defective in slip-out repair, further supporting a requirement for hMLH1 in the processing of short slip-outs and possibly the involvement of hMHL1 ATPase activity. Extracts of hPMS2-deficient HEC-1-A cells, which express hMLH1, hMLH3, and hPMS1, are only functional when complemented with hMutLα, indicating that neither hMutLβ nor hMutLγ is sufficient to repair short slip-outs. The resolution of clustered short slip-outs, which are poorly repaired, was partially dependent upon a functional hMutLα. The joint involvement of hMutSβ and hMutLα suggests that repeat instability may be the result of aberrant outcomes of repair attempts.

An American founder mutation in MLH1

Mutations in the mismatch repair genes cause Lynch syndrome (LS), conferring high risk of colorectal, endometrial and some other cancers. After the same splice site mutation in the MLH1 gene (c.589-2A>G) had been observed in four ostensibly unrelated American families with typical LS cancers, its occurrence in comprehensive series of LS cases (Mayo Clinic, Germany and Italy) was determined. It occurred in 10 out of 995 LS mutation carriers (1.0%) diagnosed in the Mayo Clinic diagnostic laboratory. It did not occur among 1,803 cases tested for MLH1 mutations by the German HNPCC consortium, while it occurred in three probands and an additional five family members diagnosed in Italy. In the U.S., the splice site mutation occurs on a large (∼4.8 Mb) shared haplotype that also harbors the variant c.2146G>A, which predicts a missense change in codon 716 referred to here as V716M. In Italy, it occurs on a different, shorter shared haplotype (∼2.2 Mb) that does not carry V716M. The V716M variant was found to be present by itself in the U.S., German and Italian populations with individuals sharing a common haplotype of 280 kb, allowing us to calculate that the variant arose around 5,600 years ago (225 generations; 95% confidence interval 183-272). The splice site mutation in America arose or was introduced some 450 years ago (18 generations; 95% confidence interval 14-23); it accounts for 1.0% all LS in the Unites States and can be readily screened for.

Absence of hMLH1 or hMSH2 expression as a stage-dependent prognostic factor in sporadic colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

The predictive role of mismatch repair (MMR) status for survival after sporadic colorectal cancer remains a point of controversy. This study was designed to test the prognostic value of MMR status in sporadic colorectal cancers.

METHODS

The study included 318 patients with sporadic colorectal cancer who underwent primary tumor resection. MMR status was determined by the immunohistochemical analysis of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression.

RESULTS

Thirty-six carcinomas (11.3%) showed abnormal MMR protein expression (22 hMLH1 negative and 14 hMSH2 negative) and were classified as MMR-defective tumors. An MMR defect was strongly associated with a reduced likelihood of lymph node (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.13-0.75) or distant organ metastases at diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.62), independent of the clinicopathological features. Overall survival was significantly better in patients with MMR-defective tumors than in those with MMR-intact tumors (P = 0.013). In the subgroup analysis by stage, adjusted for other potential confounding variables, MMR status was not a statistically significant prognostic factor in stage I and II patients, while the MMR defect predicted a significantly better overall survival in stage III and IV patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.97; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

At initial diagnosis, metastases were found at lower rates in MMR-defective tumors. MMR status may be a stage-dependent prognostic factor in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer.

Expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins and MSH2 polymorphisms in nonmelanoma skin cancers of organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Organ transplant recipients (OTRs) have an increased risk of skin cancer. Treatment with azathioprine, commonly used in post-transplant immunosuppressive regimens, results in incorporation of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) into DNA. Mismatch repair (MMR)-defective cells are resistant to killing by 6-TG. Azathioprine exposure confers a survival advantage on MMR-defective cells, which are hypermutable and may therefore contribute to azathioprine-related nonmelanoma skin cancer, a phenomenon we have previously demonstrated in transplant-associated sebaceous carcinomas. The MSH2 protein is an important component of DNA MMR. The -6 exon 13 T>C MSH2 polymorphism is associated with impaired MMR, drug resistance and certain cancers.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate (i) whether loss of MMR protein expression and microsatellite instability are over-represented in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) from OTRs on azathioprine compared with SCCs from immunocompetent patients, and (ii) whether the MSH2 -6 exon 13 polymorphism is over-represented in OTRs with skin cancer on azathioprine.

METHODS

(i) Immunohistochemical staining was used to assess expression of the MMR proteins MSH2 and MLH1 in cutaneous SCCs from OTRs on azathioprine and from immunocompetent patients. (ii) Blood samples from OTRs on azathioprine with and without skin cancer were genotyped for the -6 exon 13 MSH2 polymorphism.

RESULTS

(i) MSH2 and MLH1 protein expression was not altered in SCCs from OTRs on azathioprine and there was no difference in expression between SCCs from OTRs and immunocompetent patients. (ii) There was no association between MSH2 polymorphism genotype frequency and OTR skin cancer status.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite previous findings in transplant-associated sebaceous carcinomas, defective MMR and the -6 exon 13 MSH2 polymorphism are unlikely to play a significant role in the development of SCC in OTRs on azathioprine.

Partial loss of heterozygosity events at the mutated gene in tumors from MLH1/MSH2 large genomic rearrangement carriers

Background

Depending on the population studied, large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes constitute various proportions of the germline mutations that predispose to hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). It has been reported that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the LGR region occurs through a gene conversion mechanism in tumors from MLH1/MSH2 deletion carriers; however, the converted tracts were delineated only by extragenic microsatellite markers. We sought to determine the frequency of LGRs in Slovak HNPCC patients and to study LOH in tumors from LGR carriers at the LGR region, as well as at other heterozygous markers within the gene to more precisely define conversion tracts.

Methods

The main MMR genes responsible for HNPCC, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, were analyzed by MLPA (multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification) in a total of 37 unrelated HNPCC-suspected patients whose MLH1/MSH2 genes gave negative results in previous sequencing experiments. An LOH study was performed on six tumors from LGR carriers by combining MLPA to assess LOH at LGR regions and sequencing to examine LOH at 28 SNP markers from the MLH1 and MSH2 genes.

Results

We found six rearrangements in the MSH2 gene (five deletions and dup5-6), and one aberration in the MLH1 gene (del5-6). The MSH2 deletions were of three types (del1, del1-3, del1-7). We detected LOH at the LGR region in the single MLH1 case, which was determined in a previous study to be LOH-negative in the intragenic D3S1611 marker. Three tumors displayed LOH of at least one SNP marker, including two cases that were LOH-negative at the LGR region.

Conclusion

LGRs accounted for 25% of germline MMR mutations identified in 28 Slovakian HNPCC families. A high frequency of LGRs among the MSH2 mutations provides a rationale for a MLPA screening of the Slovakian HNPCC families prior scanning by DNA sequencing. LOH at part of the informative loci confined to the MLH1 or MSH2 gene (heterozygous LGR region, SNP, or microsatellite) is a novel finding and can be regarded as a partial LOH. The conversion begins within the gene, and the details of conversion tracts are discussed for each case.

Assessing pathogenicity of MLH1 variants by co-expression of human MLH1 and PMS2 genes in yeast

Background

Loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) in humans, mainly due to mutations in the hMLH1 gene, is linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Because not all MLH1 alterations result in loss of MMR function, accurate characterization of variants and their classification in terms of their effect on MMR function is essential for reliable genetic testing and effective treatment. To date, in vivo assays for functional characterization of MLH1 mutations performed in various model systems have used episomal expression of the modified MMR genes. We describe here a novel approach to determine accurately the functional significance of hMLH1 mutations in vivo, based on co-expression of human MLH1 and PMS2 in yeast cells.

Methods

Yeast MLH1 and PMS1 genes, whose protein products form the MutLα complex, were replaced by human orthologs directly on yeast chromosomes by homologous recombination, and the resulting MMR activity was tested.

Results

The yeast strain co-expressing hMLH1 and hPMS2 exhibited the same mutation rate as the wild-type. Eight cancer-related MLH1 variants were introduced, using the same approach, into the prepared yeast model, and their effect on MMR function was determined. Five variants (A92P, S93G, I219V, K618R and K618T) were classified as non-pathogenic, whereas variants T117M, Y646C and R659Q were characterized as pathogenic.

Conclusion

Results of our in vivo yeast-based approach correlate well with clinical data in five out of seven hMLH1 variants and the described model was thus shown to be useful for functional characterization of MLH1 variants in cancer patients found throughout the entire coding region of the gene.

Molecular analysis: microsatellity instability and loss of heterozygosity of tumor suppressor gene in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCC)

HNPCC (Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers) development is caused by mutation of genes included in system of mismatch repair genes. The mutation exists at 60% of patients in hMSH2 gene, 30% in hMLH1 and 10% both in hPMS1and hPMS2 genes. RER+ exists in about 90% in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and about 15-28% in sporadic cancers. The purpose of the study was to determine highly sensitive microsatellite markers which can be fast and efficient way of microsatellite screening for detection of HNPCC patients. Moreover, we have analysed the loss of heterozygosity of tumour suppressor genes which could have the diagnostic value in detection of HPNCC patients.

[Our experience with the incidence of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is the most frequent genetic disease leading to colorectal malignancies. 3-5 percent of all colorectal cancer cases are related to Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer. Currently there is no reliable data on the incidence of the disease in Hungary.

METHODS

The family history of 809 patients with colorectal cancer was investigated between 1997 and 2006. Data collection was performed in a retrospective manner in the rst and in a prospective manner in the second phase of the study. Subsequent immunohistochemical and microsatellite instability analysis, and DNA sequencing was carried out to detect any underlying MMR gene mutation. Moreover, multiple ligation dependent probe amplication was applied for recognizing large deletions in MMR genes.

RESULTS

During the investigation 10 pathogenic mutations and several polymorphisms were found. Seven mutations were detected in families fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria, while the remaining three fulfilled the Bethesda Criteria. In the second phase of the study -- which better reflects the real population characteristics -- six percent of our patients fulfilled completely the Amsterdam Criteria and we managed to nd pathogenic MMR gene mutations in 1,7 percent of our patients.

CONCLUSION

8 out of 10 pathogenic mutations were novel and published rst time by ourselves. No repeatedly occurring mutations were found in our patients. It seems that these genetic alterations are located sporadically on different exons of the involved MMR genes. Our mutation detection rate was 77 percent in the Amsterdam positive patients who were completely examined, which appears to be better than the published data in the relevant literature. Importantly, 30 percent of the mutation carrier could be missed applying only this single criteria system. In order to detect the highest number of HNPCC patients, we suggest using both the Amsterdam as well as the Bethesda Criteria.

Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry

The utility of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein in screening colorectal tumors for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome has been the focus of much intensive research over the last 10 years. Particular attention has been given to the relative usefulness of immunohistochemistry (IHC) versus testing of tumor microsatellite instability (MSI). Earlier work that focused on mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) and mutS homolog 2 (MSH2) has created a false impression that IHC has a lower sensitivity than MSI testing in predicting germline mutation. More recent studies that included postmeiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2) and MSH6, on the other hand, have demonstrated an IHC predictive value that is virtually equivalent to that of MSI testing. Such added value of PMS2 and MSH6 can be explained by the biological and biochemical properties of the MMR proteins. On the premise that IHC with PMS2 and MSH6 is as sensitive as MSI testing, given that IHC is easily available and generally inexpensive and, importantly, identifies the affected gene, it is reasonable to regard IHC as a more optimal first-line screening tool than MSI testing for identifying HNPCC. MSI testing can provide a fallback position in equivocal situations, while remaining an important research tool. However, for IHC to be used as a first-line screening test requires that both pathologists and clinicians be aware that IHC results may be construed as "genetic information," and that appropriate procedures should be established to ensure patient understanding and consent.

Classification of ambiguous mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes identified in a population-based study of colorectal cancer

Identification of germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer probands without an extensive family history can be problematic when ascribing relevance to cancer causation. We undertook a structured assessment of the disease-causing potential of sequence variants identified in a prospective, population-based study of 932 colorectal cancer patients, diagnosed at <55 years of age. Patient samples were screened for germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. Of 110 carriers, 74 (67%) had one of 33 rare variants of uncertain pathogenicity (12 MLH1, 11 MSH2, and 10 MSH6). Pathogenicity was assessed by determining segregation in families, allele frequency in large numbers of unaffected controls, effect on mRNA for putative splice-site mutations, effect on protein function by bioinformatic analysis and tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) status and DNA mismatch repair protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Because of the ambiguous nature of these variants and lack of concordance between functional assays and control allele frequency, we devised a scoring system to rank the degree of support for a pathogenic role. MLH1 c.200G>A p.G67E, MLH1 c.2041G>A p.A681T, and MSH2 c.2634+5G>C were categorized as pathogenic through assimilation of all available data, while 14 variants were categorized as benign (seven MLH1, three MSH2, and four MSH6). Interestingly, there is tentative evidence suggesting a possible protective effect of three variants (MLH1 c.2066A>G pQ689R, c.2146G>A p.V716M, and MSH2 c.965G>A p.G322D). These findings support a causal link with colorectal cancer for several DNA mismatch repair gene variants. However, the majority of missense changes are likely to be inconsequential polymorphisms.

Functional analysis of human MLH1 variants using yeast and in vitro mismatch repair assays

The functional characterization of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in human mismatch repair (MMR) genes has been critical to evaluate their pathogenicity for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. We previously established an assay for detecting loss-of-function mutations in the MLH1 gene using a dominant mutator effect of human MLH1 expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The purpose of this study is to extend the functional analyses of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in the MLH1 gene both in quality and in quantity, and integrate the results to evaluate the variants for pathogenic significance. The 101 MLH1 variants, which covered most of the reported MLH1 nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms and consisted of one 3-bp deletion, 1 nonsense and 99 missense variants, were examined for the dominant mutator effect by three yeast assays and for the ability of the variant to repair a heteroduplex DNA with mismatch bases by in vitro MMR assay. There was diversity in the dominant mutator effects and the in vitro MMR activities among the variants. The majority of functionally inactive variants were located around the putative ATP-binding pocket of the NH(2)-terminal domain or the whole region of the COOH-terminal domain. Integrated functional evaluations contribute to a better prediction of the cancer risk in individuals or families carrying MLH1 variants and provide insights into the function-structure relationships in MLH1.

Identification of mismatch repair gene mutations in young patients with colorectal cancer and in patients with multiple tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) or those with multiple tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) raise suspicion of the presence of germline DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations.

AIM

To analyse the value of family history, microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis and MMR protein staining in the tumour to predict the presence of an MMR gene mutation in such patients.

METHODS

In 281 patients diagnosed with CRC before the age of 50 years or with CRC and at least one additional HNPCC-associated cancer, germline mutation analysis in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 was carried out with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. MSI analysis with five consensus markers and MMR protein staining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 were carried out in the tumours.

RESULTS

25 pathogenic mutations (8 in MLH1, 9 in MSH2 and 8 in MSH6) were found. MSI analysis missed three and immunohistochemistry (IHC) missed two mutation carriers. Sensitivities of family history, MSI analysis and IHC for the presence of a mutation were 76%, 82% and 88%, specificities were 64%, 70% and 84%, and positive predictive values were 19%, 23% and 38%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed the highest odds ratio for IHC (38.3, 95% confidence interval 9.0 to 184). Prevalence of pathogenic germline MMR gene mutations in patients with CRC before the age of 50 years was 6% and in those with > or =2 HNPCC-associated tumours was 22%. In the second group, no mutation carriers were found among the 29 patients who were diagnosed with their first tumour after the age of 60 years.

CONCLUSION

Family history, MSI analysis and IHC are indicative parameters to select patients with CRC for MMR gene mutation analysis. The data show that IHC is the best single selection criterion.

Immunohistochemical staining of hMLH1 and hMSH2 reflects microsatellite instability status in ovarian carcinoma

Microsatellite instability is due to defects in the family of DNA repair genes, primarily hMLH1 and hMSH2, which can be detected by immunohistochemical staining. However, it is unclear whether immunohistochemical staining can accurately predict microsatellite instability status. We sought here to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of immunostaining for the expression of the DNA mismatch-repair genes hMLH1 or hMSH2 in predicting microsatellite instability in ovarian carcinoma. Tissue microarrays with specimens from 322 women with primary ovarian carcinoma were stained with antibodies to hMLH1 and hMSH2; cases in which either hMLH1 or hMSH2 were negative were analyzed for microsatellite instability with the five-marker panel recommended by the National Cancer Institute (BAT26, BAT25, D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250). Microsatellite instability was also analyzed in another 19 cases selected at random in which both hMLH1 and hMSH2 were positive. Tumors with instability at two or more of the five NCI markers were considered to have a high level of microsatellite instability; tumors showing instability at only one marker were considered microsatellite instability-low; and tumors in which no markers exhibited microsatellite instability were considered microsatellite stable. We found that negative staining for hMLH1 protein (five cases) or hMSH2 protein (two cases) was associated with high level of microsatellite instability. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical staining for hMLH1 were 62 and 100% and those of hMSH2 alone were 25 and 100%. Combining loss of expression of both hMLH1 and hMSH2 led to sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 87, 100, 100, and 95%. These results suggest that use of a two-molecule panel (hMLH1 and hMSH2) can accurately determine the microsatellite instability status of patients with ovarian cancer.

Frequency of immunohistochemical loss of mismatch repair protein in double primary cancers of the colorectum and stomach in Japan

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer and gastric cancer are the two most commonly associated malignancies in Japan. We examined mismatch repair deficiency in the tumors of patients with primary colorectal and gastric cancers retrospectively.

METHODS

In 103 cases and 102 healthy control subjects, surgical specimens of colorectal and gastric cancer underwent immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair proteins (hMLH1 and hMSH2) and microsatellite instability testing.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical and microsatellite instability testing produced similar results. High microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer was found in 23 of 103 cases (23 percent) with colorectal and gastric cancers, and in 8 of 102 healthy control subjects (8 percent). Twelve (12 percent) had mismatch repair deficiency in both colorectal and gastric cancers, and both tumors had loss of the same mismatch repair protein (hMLH1, n = 5; hMSH2, n = 7). They had the first cancer at a younger age, with a higher frequency of familial colorectal cancer than the others. Seventeen had mismatch repair deficiency in either tumor, which showed loss of expression of hMLH1. Multiple cancers and right-sided colon cancers developed more frequently in patients with mismatch repair deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with both colorectal and gastric cancers are more likely to have phenotypic evidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer than patients with colorectal cancer only. Among patients with double tumors, 12 percent showed a common deficiency in the same mismatch repair protein in both tumors by immunohistochemistry, and they should undergo genetic counseling for germline mutational analysis. Immunohistochemistry was effective in detecting mismatch repair deficiency of colorectal and gastric cancer as well as microsatellite instability testing, and may be more practical to perform phenotypic analysis of tumors because of its cost-effectiveness.

Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome

CONTEXT

Identifying families at high risk for the Lynch syndrome (ie, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) is critical for both genetic counseling and cancer prevention. Current clinical guidelines are effective but limited by applicability and cost.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a genetic counseling and risk prediction tool that estimates the probability of carrying a deleterious mutation in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 and the probability of developing colorectal or endometrial cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

External validation of the MMRpro model was conducted on 279 individuals from 226 clinic-based families in the United States, Canada, and Australia (referred between 1993-2005) by comparing model predictions with results of highly sensitive germline mutation detection techniques. MMRpro models the autosomal dominant inheritance of mismatch repair mutations, with parameters based on meta-analyses of the penetrance and prevalence of mutations and of the predictive values of tumor characteristics. The model's prediction is tailored to each individual's detailed family history information on colorectal and endometrial cancer and to tumor characteristics including microsatellite instability.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Ability of MMRpro to correctly predict mutation carrier status, as measured by operating characteristics, calibration, and overall accuracy.

RESULTS

In the independent validation, MMRpro provided a concordance index of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.88) and a ratio of observed to predicted cases of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.05). This results in higher accuracy than existing alternatives and current clinical guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

MMRpro is a broadly applicable, accurate prediction model that can contribute to current screening and genetic counseling practices in a high-risk population. It is more sensitive and more specific than existing clinical guidelines for identifying individuals who may benefit from MMR germline testing. It is applicable to individuals for whom tumor samples are not available and to individuals in whom germline testing finds no mutation.

Mutations in the DNA mismatch repair gene MLH1 associated with early-onset colon cancer

Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the predisposition to develop a number of cancers, especially colorectal cancer (CRC). We present a HNPCC family with CRC at age 12 years. Our observations suggest that the germline mutation of the both copies of the MLH1 gene may play a role in the early onset of CRC.

Optimization of antibodies for detection of the mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 using a biotin-free visualization system

Testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) has become an important step in the planning of therapeutic and follow-up procedures for patients with colorectal cancer, both as a prognostic marker and as a screening tool for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Today the gold standard for MSI testing is based on the polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry may represent an alternative or complement to molecular MSI testing. Antibodies against the protein products of the most commonly affected mismatch repair genes (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and hPMS2) have been available for some time now. However, the quality of the primary antibody and optimization of the antigen retrieval methods are essential to get reproducible results. The aim of the present study was to test and optimize a panel of antibodies against the mismatch repair proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 using biotin-free, polymer-based visualization systems. The antibodies were tested on multitissue blocks containing normal tissue and tumor tissue from patients with known microsatellite-stable and microsatellite-instable tumors. For all four antibody groups, the chosen clones gave specific and reproducible staining. Furthermore, with the PowerVision+ detection system, the influence of endogenous biotin was eliminated, the incubation time with the primary antibody was significantly reduced, and the primary antibody could be further diluted. The authors found that immunohistochemistry may provide a cost-effective and time-saving complement to the molecular MSI analysis, and using the PowerVision+ detection system has greatly decreased the turnaround time as well as reduced the cost of immunohistochemistry in the authors' laboratory.

Use of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry testing for the identification of individuals at risk for Lynch syndrome

It is now generally recognized that a specific subset of those patients clinically defined as having hereditary non polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) have germline mutations in any one of several genes involved in DNA mismatch repair (MMR). This important subset of HNPCC families is now defined as having Lynch syndrome. A considerable amount of data has shown that tumors from patients with Lynch syndrome have characteristic features resulting from the underlying molecular involvement of defective MMR, that is, the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) and the absence of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). As a result, identifying patients with Lynch syndrome can now be accomplished by testing tumors for these tumor-related changes. Together, MSI and IHC are powerful tools that help identify individuals at risk for having Lynch syndrome and to distinguish these cases from HNPCC cases with other hereditary gene defects. Furthermore, IHC analysis provides valuable clues as to which MMR gene is mutated, allowing for comprehensive mutational analyses of that gene. Here, we discuss the current and historical perspectives regarding MSI and IHC analyses in tumors from sporadic colon cancer and from patients with Lynch syndrome. Given this background, we also provide a testing strategy for the identification of patients at risk for Lynch syndrome and subsequent gene testing.

Routine testing for mismatch repair deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer is justified

This study prospectively examines the accuracy of immunohistochemical staining in the identification of mismatch repair defective (MMRD) colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice. The potential impact of this information on decisions regarding adjuvant treatment and germline testing were quantified. A consecutive series of fresh tissue (836 cancers) was obtained from 786 individuals undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer at one institution. As part of normal practice, each tumour was screened for the expression of MLH1 and MSH2 by immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and relevant clinicopathological details were documented. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed using standard markers. Overall, 108 (13%) tumours showed loss of staining for either MLH1 (92 tumours) or MSH2 (16 tumours). The positive predictive value of mismatch repair IHC when used alone in the detection of MSI tumours was 88%, and the negative predictive value was 97%. Specificity and positive predictive value were improved by correlation with microsatellite status. Tumour stage (HR 3.5, 95% CI 2.0-6.0), vascular space invasion (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0) and mismatch repair deficiency (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.87) were independent prognostic factors in stages II and III disease. Screening by mismatch repair IHC could reasonably have been expected to prevent ineffective treatment in 3.6% of stage II and 7.6% of stage III patients. The frequency of germline mismatch repair mutations was 0.8%, representing six unsuspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) cases. Routine screening of colorectal cancers by mismatch repair IHC identifies individuals at low risk of relapse, and can prevent unnecessary adjuvant treatments in a significant number of individuals. Abnormal immunohistochemistry should be confirmed by microsatellite testing to ensure that false-positive results do not adversely impact on treatment decisions.

Immunohistochemistry identifies carriers of mismatch repair gene defects causing hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) may be caused by mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The aim of this study was to validate immunohistochemistry and family history as prescreening tools to predict germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pedigrees from 250 families were extended, cancer diagnoses were verified, and families were classified according to the Amsterdam and the Bethesda criteria. Tumor specimens were examined with immunohistochemistry for the presence of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins. Mutation analyses were performed in blood samples from the same patients.

RESULTS

Blood samples from affected index persons in 181 families and tumor specimens from 127 of the affected index persons were obtained. Thirty tumors lacked one or more gene products. Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry to detect mutation carriers was 100%, specificity was 82%, and positive predictive value was 85%. Sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values for the Amsterdam criteria were 82%, 8%, and 45%, respectively, and for the Bethesda criteria were 100%, 0%, and 48%, respectively. Distribution of mutations was MLH1 = 4, MSH2 = 11, and MSH6 = 4.

CONCLUSION

Wide clinical criteria to select HNPCC kindreds, followed by immunohistochemistry of tumor material from one affected person in each family, had high sensitivity and specificity to predict MMR mutations.

Value of microsatellite instability typing in detecting hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

AIM OF THE STUDY

To detect hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients with a strategy combining clinical selection (patient age at onset of cancer less than 50 years or family history of HNPCC tumors) and microsatellite instability typing plus immunohistochemistry, leading to mismatch repair (MMR) germline mutation analysis.

METHODS

Tumors were screened for microsatellite instability (MSI) and for hmlh1 and hmsh2 immunohistochemical expression. Germline mutation analysis was performed to search for MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in patients with MSI-High and MSI-Low tumors.

RESULTS

197 adenocarcinomas were studied: 164 patients were< or =50 years old, 33 were older than 50 years but had a family history of HNPCC tumors. Fifty tumors (25.4%) were MSI-High, 10 were MSI-Low (5.1%), and 130 were MS-Stable (66%). MSI typing was inconclusive in 7 (3.5%). Immunohistochemistry screening was performed on 165 tumors: sensitivity was 63.6%, specificity was 99%. Germline mutation analysis was performed in 33/60 MSI-High or Low tumors: 23 mutations were noted (70% of the tested patients).

CONCLUSION

This proposed strategy of determining microsatellite instability in young colorectal cancer patients or in patients with a family history of HNPCC tumors led to an increased frequency in the detection of MMR germline mutations.

HMLH1 gene mutation in gastric cancer patients and their kindred

AIM: To study the status of hMLH1 gene point mutations of gastric cancer kindreds and gastric cancer patients from northern China, and to find out gene mutation status in the population susceptible to gastric cancer.

METHODS: Blood samples of 120 members from five gastric cancer families, 56 sporadic gastric cancer patients and control individuals were collected. After DNA extraction, the mutations of exon 8 and exon 12 of hMLH1 gene were investigated by PCR-SSCP-CE, followed by DNA sequencing.

RESULTS: In the five kindreds, the mutation frequency was 25% (5/16) for the probands and 18% (19/104) for the non-cancerous members, which were significantly higher than the controls (P＜0.01 χ² = 7.71, P＜0.01 χ² = 8.65, respectively). In the sporadic gastric cancer, the mutation frequency was 7% (4/56), which was similar to that (5/100) in the healthy controls. The mutation point of exon 8 was at 219 codon of hMLH1 gene (A-G), resulting in a substitution of Ile-Val (ATC-GTC), whereas the mutation of exon 12 was at 384 codon of hMLH1 gene (T-A) resulting in a substitution of Asp-Val (GTT-GAT), which were the same as previously found in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION: The members of gastric cancer families from northern China may have similar genetic background of hMLH1 gene mutation as those of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma.

Defective DNA mismatch repair in long-term (> or =3 years) survivors with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) in pancreatic cancer, reported in up to 13% of sporadic pancreatic cancers, may predict a good prognosis. To determine if long-term survival in pancreatic cancer could be attributed to defective DNA MMR, we ascertained its prevalence in 35 pancreatic cancer patients who survived > or =3 years after surgery.

METHODS

We performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6 in all 35 tumors and microsatellite instability (MSI) studies in 34/35 tumors using 10 microsatellite markers in paired normal and tumor DNA. Defective DNA MMR was defined as absence of protein expression on IHC and/or MSI in > or =30% of markers studied.

RESULTS

On IHC, 3/35 (8.6%) tumors had defective DNA MMR. All 3 had absent expression of a DNA MMR protein (hMLH1 in 2 and hMSH2) and 2/3 also had MSI; the third could not be tested. Definitely 2, and probably all 3 patients had hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer as determined by clinical and genetic profiles.

CONCLUSION

Defective DNA MMR is uncommon in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer and does not account for the survival benefit in those with sporadic pancreatic cancer.

Accuracy of MSI testing in predicting germline mutations of MSH2 and MLH1: a case study in Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests without a gold standard

Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is a common screening procedure used to identify families that may harbor mutations of a mismatch repair (MMR) gene and therefore may be at high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer. A reliable estimate of sensitivity and specificity of MSI for detecting germline mutations of MMR genes is critical in genetic counseling and colorectal cancer prevention. Several studies published results of both MSI and mutation analysis on the same subjects. In this article we perform a meta-analysis of these studies and obtain estimates that can be directly used in counseling and screening. In particular, we estimate the sensitivity of MSI for detecting mutations of MSH2 and MLH1 to be 0.81 (0.73-0.89). Statistically, challenges arise from the following: (a) traditional mutation analysis methods used in these studies cannot be considered a gold standard for the identification of mutations; (b) studies are heterogeneous in both the design and the populations considered; and (c) studies may include different patterns of missing data resulting from partial testing of the populations sampled. We address these challenges in the context of a Bayesian meta-analytic implementation of the Hui-Walter design, tailored to account for various forms of incomplete data. Posterior inference is handled via a Gibbs sampler.

Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms

The utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening method for the identification of persons with mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) remains to be defined. In this study, we analyzed the value of IHC versus that of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in predicting mutation status of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in colorectal carcinomas and adenomas, and explored the frequency and significance of immunohistochemical staining variability. The study samples included 83 carcinomas and 29 adenomas derived from 110 patients who had strong family histories of colorectal cancer. Our results showed that IHC correctly predicted MSI status in 76% of the cases with a specificity of 100%. The overall sensitivity of IHC in predicting a germline mutation was 79% (30 of 38) with a specificity of 89% (48 of 54), whereas that of MSI testing was 97% (30 of 31) with a specificity of 83% (35 of 42). Six of 31 analyzable cases that had a disease-causing mutation and exhibited MSI showed normal IHC. The lower sensitivity of IHC was caused mainly by its low sensitivity in detecting MLH1 gene mutation (4 of 9). Coexisting adenomas and carcinomas observed in the same slide (n=12) showed a similar or identical staining pattern for all three proteins. No significant difference was detected in the sensitivity of IHC or MSI in detecting a germline mutation between isolated adenomas and carcinomas. In IHC-positive cases, heterogeneous staining was noted in 30% to 40% of the cases with the three different antibodies, and cytoplasmic staining in 5% to 13%. Weak IHC (defined as positive staining in <10% of the tumor with weak intensity) was noted in 14 tumors: 5 for the MLH1 antibody, 1 for MSH2, and 8 for MSH6. One of the 5 MLH1 cases exhibited MSI and had an MLH1 germline mutation. Five of the 8 MSH6 cases exhibited MSI and had MSH2 germline mutations. In conclusion, our study shows that 1) IHC identifies a significant portion of colorectal tumors derived from MMR gene germline mutation carriers and can be used as an adjunct measure in the identification of HNPCC families, but IHC cannot replace MSI testing; 2) adenomas have similar MMR protein expression patterns as carcinomas and may serve as an adequate sample for screening purposes in the identification of patients with MMR mutations; 3) not all IHC-positive cases show uniform positivity throughout the tumor; and 4) weak and focal staining of an MMR protein may be associated with MSI or gene mutation or both, suggesting the need to incorporate staining intensity in further IHC studies.

What is the best way to assess microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer? Study on a population base of 462 colorectal cancers

The assessment of the microsatellite instability (MSI) status in colorectal cancers is presently warranted for three reasons: 1) as a screening tool for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, 2) as a prognostic marker, and 3) as a potential predictive factor of chemotherapy response. The aim of this study was to evaluate, on a large scale with tissue samples coming from a number of different sources, the difficulties met with routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and to determine if it really does offer an accurate alternative to PCR genotyping. Colorectal carcinomas from 462 consecutive patients resected in public or private hospitals were assessed for MSI status by two methods: MSI testing (with BAT-26 microsatellite) and IHC detection of hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6 proteins. Of the 398 cancers tested, immunohistochemistry was noncontributory in 42 (10.5%), focal in 9 (2.3%), and discordant with the PCR results in 36 (9%). For these 87 cases, complementary analyses were performed to explain discrepancy. After additional IHC assay with modified processing protocols, 8 cases remained noncontributory, 2 focal, and 28 discordant: 18 microsatellite stability IHC/MSI PCR and 10 MSI IHC/microsatellite stability PCR. For these discordant cases, we performed a multiplex PCR assay on DNA extracted from the frozen sample and BAT-26 was amplified from DNA extracted from the paraffin blocks used for IHC. Four discordant cases were reclassified after PCR multiplex assay (3 as MSI and 1 as microsatellite stability). Five other cases displayed intratumoral heterogeneity and 19 remained discordant. The discrepancy could be partly explained by variable technical protocols of fixation in the different laboratories, leading to variations in staining quality and difficulties in IHC interpretation. This population-based study is the first one to show that IHC is not sensitive and specific enough to be used routinely. Immunohistochemistry analysis of MMR proteins must be performed in standardized conditions and interpreted by confirmed pathologists. It cannot replace PCR as long as protocols are not optimized and harmonized.

The utility of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair gene proteins

Since the development of monoclonal antibodies against the MSH2 protein by Leach et al. in 1996, a series of investigations has been undertaken to determine the utility of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene proteins in the identification of hereditary or sporadic colorectal tumors with microsatellite instability. These studies, however, have been performed with different aims and on different patient populations. Interpretation of these immunohistochemical data relies on a thorough understanding of the biological and technical factors that affect the detection of MMR proteins. In this review, we analyze the data from the published research studies, pointing out the various factors affecting immunohistochemical detection of MMR proteins and projecting the utility of immunohistochemistry in different clinical settings.

Microsatellite instability and loss of mismatch-repair protein expression in gastric carcinoma

AIM: To detect the microsatellite instability (MSI) and expression of mismatch repair (MMR) gene in gastric cancinoma, and to explore the molecular biological mechanism underlying the carcinogenesis of gastric cancinoma.

METHODS: A total of 56 cases of gastric cancinomas and surrounding non-cancerous tissues from surgical excision samples were collected, among which 22 cases were well and 34 cases were poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, 20 cases were in early stage and 36 cases were in advanced stage of the disease. The microsatellite locus of BAT-26, D17S261, D3S1283, D2S123 and D3S1611 were amplified by PCR after DNA abstraction. Then PCR products were mixed together with GeneScan 500 size standard followed by heat denaturation. Microsatellites were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis with 6% SLPA and 8 moL/L-1 urea as sieving medium. Carcinoma were characterized as high MSI (MSI-H) if they manifested instability at two or more markers, low MSI (MSI-L) if unstable at only one marker, and microsatellite stable (MSS) if they showed no instability at any marker. Expression of MMR gene hMLH1 and hMSH2 were detected by immunohistochimical staining using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method with 3, 3-diaminobenzidine as chromogen.

RESULTS: Of the 56 cases of gastric carcinomas, 14 cases (25%) showed MSI-H and 14 cases (25%) showed loss of MMR. In the 14 cases of the MSI, 11 cases (79%) were accompanied by loss of hMLH1/hMSH2 expression, whereas In the 42 cases of the MSI-L/MSS, only 3 cases (7%) were accompanied by loss of hMLH1/hMSH2 expression. MSI was significantly related with mismatch repair deficiency (P < 0.01). Of the 22 cases of well-differentiated carcinomas, 7 cases (32%) manifested MSI-H and 6 (27%) cases showed protein defection of MMR, Com-paratively, 7 cases (21%) manifested MSI-H and 8 cases (24%) showed protein defection of MMR in 34 cases poorly-differentiated carcinomas. Of the 20 cases early stage carcinomas, only 1 cases (5%) manifested MSI-H and 3 (15%) cases showed protein defection of MMR, whereas 13 cases (36%) manifested MSI-H and 11 cases (31%) showed protein defection of MMR in 36 cases advanced carcinomas. The MSI frequency was higher in advanced stage (36%) than that in early stage (5%) of gastric carcinoma and the difference was significant (P < 0.05), but no difference between well and poorly differentiated gastric carcinoma. The difference of loss frequency of hMLH1/hMSH2 expression was not significant in different stage and different differentiation of gastric carcinoma.

CONCLUSION: The defect of mismatch repair may be involved in the carcinogenesis of a subset of gastric cancer but not in the biologic behavior. MSI frequency increases with the progression of gastric carcinoma.

Gastrointestinal cancers and neurofibromatosis type 1 features in children with a germline homozygous MLH1 mutation

Heterozygous germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations are typically associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The molecular hallmark of this syndrome is high-frequency microsatellite instability in the tumors. Rare childhood cases with homozygous or compound heterozygous DNA mismatch repair gene mutations have a described predisposition to leukemia, lymphoma, and brain tumors but not to gastrointestinal cancer. We have now characterized a family in which 2 children with a homozygous germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutation developed early-onset gastrointestinal cancers. The 11-year-old proband had café-au-lait macules and developed metastatic duodenal adenocarcinoma that arose in a tubulovillous adenoma. His 9-year-old sister with café-au-lait macules and axillary freckling presented with malignant colon polyps. A 6-year-old sister with café-au-lait macules, hairy nevi, and a plexiform neurofibroma of the tongue has no malignancies to date. The family history did not fulfill the Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, but 2 relatives in their 60s had gastric cancer and colorectal cancer, whereas the parents, who are first cousins, remain cancer free. The proband's metastatic duodenal cancer and his sister's malignant colon polyps had high-frequency microsatellite instability but had detectable MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins by immunohistochemistry. Because some germline DNA mismatch repair gene deficiencies are associated with apparently intact immunohistochemical DNA mismatch repair gene expression in tumors, we proceeded to DNA sequencing, which showed that all 3 children had a germline homozygous MLH1 missense mutation (exon 18, codon 687, CGG-->TGG), whereas both parents were heterozygous for this mutation.

Clinical and molecular biologic characteristics of early-onset versus late-onset colorectal carcinoma in Filipinos

A case-control study of Filipino patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) during a 1-year period was undertaken. Thirty-five patients under age 40 years were identified. Paraffin blocks of these and 35 randomly selected patients over age 40 underwent histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation. Markers chosen for evaluation included the apoptosis-associated gene products (p53 and bcl-2), a tumor proliferation activity-related factor (Ki-67), and the markers (MLH1 and MSH2) of DNA microsatellite instability (MSI). Results were correlated with age and the stage and location of the tumor. The average age of the early-onset group was 30.7 years compared to the late-onset group at 67.0 years; and the male/female ratio was equivalent. The younger patients had a significantly higher Dukes' stage, the tumors were more poorly differentiated, and they were more frequently of the mucinous and signet ring cell histopathologic type. Expression of p53 was higher in the younger patients ( p < 0.001) and was independent of the degree of differentiation or the stage of the tumor. No differences of expression were noted for the other markers measured. The increased frequency of CRC in Filipino patients less than 40 years of age offers a unique opportunity to gain a better understanding of carcinogenesis, which might be exploited during diagnosis and management. The differences noted between the early- and late-onset CRC are provocative and provide an impetus for increased screening in Filipinos.

Microsatellite instability in colorectal carcinoma. The comparison of immunohistochemistry and molecular biology suggests a role for hMSH6 [correction of hMLH6] immunostaining

CONTEXT

Microsatellite instability (MSI) due to defective mismatch repair (MMR) genes has been reported in the majority of colorectal tumors from patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome and in 10% to 15% of sporadic colorectal cancers. The identification of cancers associated with MSI requires classical molecular testing as the gold standard.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of immunohistochemistry with antibodies directed against 4 MMR proteins as a screening tool for carcinomas with MSI.

METHODS

In this study, 204 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded colorectal carcinomas were examined for MMR protein expression (hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and hPMS2) and analyzed for MSI (MSI-H indicates at least 2 of 6 markers affected). These results were correlated with histopathologic parameters.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that loss of expression of at least 1 protein was present in 17% of cases. One hundred percent of carcinomas that showed high instability (MSI-H) showed loss of expression of hMLH1, hMSH2, or hMSH6. Loss of expression of 2 proteins was present in 59.4% of MSI-H cases, with only 2 combinations, namely, hMLH1/hPMS2 and hMSH2/hMSH6. Isolated loss of hMSH6 expression was present in 2 MSI-H cases.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm that examination of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry is a simple method to diagnose colorectal cancer with MSI. Our data suggest that the study of hMSH6 may be useful, in addition to hMLH1 and hMSH2. Moreover, immunohistochemistry could represent a screening method with which to direct research on the mutations of MMR genes observed in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

Genetic Testing for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

Approximately 80 per cent of patients with colorectal cancer have sporadic disease whereas the remaining 20 per cent seem to have a genetic component. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is the most common autosomal dominant hereditary syndrome predisposing to colorectal cancer. Various methods have been described to screen for HNPCC and to directly test for mismatch repair gene mutations. This study evaluates the initial results of 1) microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of tumors and 2) genetic sequencing for mismatch repair gene mutations in patients suspected to have HNPCC. Appropriate patients for HNPCC testing were identified through a high-risk colorectal cancer clinic. Of those patients screened only those who met Amsterdam criteria (AC) for HNPCC or were young age onset (YAO) (<40 years of age) were eligible for testing. The tumors underwent testing for MSI and had IHC performed in those patients with available tumor specimens. MSI was performed on the five markers approved by the NIH consensus conference. MSI-High (MSI-H) was defined as two or more markers being unstable. IHC was done with commercially available stains for MLH1 and MSH2. All patients had sequencing of the MLH1 and MSH2 genes performed to search for mutations by a commercial laboratory. Genetic counseling was provided and written informed consent was obtained. Fourteen patients were part of kindreds that met the AC. An additional 10 patients were <40 years of age at diagnosis of colorectal cancer but lacked any family history. Testing for MSI and IHC was performed on those available tissue blocks. Of the AC patients five had MSH2 mutations and two had MLH1 variants. Of the five with MSH2 mutations three of four had MSI-H tumors and all four had loss of expression of MSH2 on IHC. Of the MLH1 variants only one had MSI-H tumor and lacked expression of MLH-1 on IHC. Of those patients with no mutation identified three of six had MSI-H tumors. For those patients YAO no genetic mutations were identified. Two of the seven had MSI-H tumors. Genetic testing for HNPCC even in those patients fulfilling the rigid AC yielded mutations in only five of 14 patients with variants of unknown significance being found in an additional two patients. Only one MSH2 variant of unknown significance was identified in the 10 YAO patients, which would suggest that screening in this group of patients with MSI and/or IHC would be appropriate.

Clinical characteristics and diagnosis of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

AIM: To study the clinical characteristics of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in the Chinese population and discuss the identification and management of the patients with HNPCC.

METHODS: A series of 140 patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) and HNPCC associated tumors from 30 families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS: A total of 118 patients had CRC. Average age at diagnosis of the first CRC was 45.7 years, 56.8% and 23.4% of the first CRC were located proximal to the splenic flexure and in the rectum respectively. Twenty-three (19.5%) had synchronous and metachronous CRC. Twenty-seven patients were found to have extracolonic tumors. Gastric carcinoma was the most common tumor type in our series (44.4%).

CONCLUSION: The frequency of HNPCC was 2.6% in our series of patients. The main features are an excess of early onset with a propensity to involve the proximal colon, and high frequency of multiple foci. Management and surveillance for these patients should be different from sporadic CRC. Contrary to American and European reports, gastric cancer seems more frequent than endometrial cancer in Chinese. It is necessary to formulate a new HNPCC criterion for Chinese patients.