Analysis of 158 frontal sinus fractures: current surgical management and complications

Contemporary Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures

Frontal sinus fractures are the result of high-energy trauma and require accurate evaluation and management to prevent long-term complications such as contour deformity, sinus dysfunction, cerebrospinal fluid leak, chronic sinusitis, and mucocele formation. This article provides a comprehensive review of frontal sinus anatomy, diagnostic protocols, and evolving treatment strategies. An anatomically based treatment algorithm is presented that focuses on sinus preservation and conservative management strategies. Advanced surgical techniques, including endoscopic sinus surgery and cranialization, are reviewed for the treatment of severe injuries.

New Surgical Devices for Closed Reduction of Frontal Sinus Bone Fracture

Traditional surgical interventions for frontal sinus fractures necessitate a cut on the forehead skin, and extant closed reduction techniques aimed at enhancing accessibility continue to grapple with secure tool fixation, stable bone elevation, and screw breakage risk. To address these challenges and augment surgical efficiency, this study introduces novel surgical devices. Design parameters for models with spiral or L-shaped tips are established, considering practical medical requirements and constraints, and subsequently validated through finite element method numerical simulations using commercial software, Ansys. Four spiral-type prototypes are constructed, and three scenarios for each prototype, varying in projection distance from the device handle to the bone-device contact point, are examined via nonlinear simulation analyses. For the L-shaped type, three prototypes are developed, and static analyses are conducted for four scenarios per prototype, differing in traction force locations, based on another simulation result concerning moments of inertia calculation with a force boundary condition unlike pressure. Maximum stress results under a specific force are analyzed, and the maximum permissible force is determined under the most unfavorable force application condition. Simulation outcomes indicate that the spiral type offers greater applicability with less force to lift multiple bones, while the L-shaped type is more suitable under bone hardening conditions.

A trans-eyebrow zig-zag approach for frontal bone fractures✰

Frontal bone fractures are amongst the most common facial fractures and surgical management, which has traditionally involved access via a coronal flap, can result in unsightly scarring, alopecia, paraesthesia, facial nerve weakness and temporal hollowing. Alternative approaches include use of endoscopically-assisted surgery, often through the eyebrow, which minimises the risk of unsightly scarring but may also sacrifice access in the process. In this technical note, we discuss a surgical technique for open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the bone overlying the frontal sinus and supra-orbital rim, which the authors have not found in the literature, which involves the making of a "zig-zag" incision through the eyebrow in a trichophytic manner which reduces the risk of unsightly scarring whilst simultaneously allowing for sufficient surgical access to the fracture site.

Comparison of closed percutaneous screw reduction versus open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of frontal sinus fractures: A retrospective study

The aim of this study was to compare closed percutaneous screw reduction to traditional open reduction-internal fixation (OR-IF) for the treatment of anterior table fractures. Both groups were evaluated in terms of operative variables, complications, and treatment success. Of 32 patients included, 19 patients underwent OR-IF, while 13 underwent percutaneous screw reduction. The median operative time, length of hospital stays, and treatment cost of the OR-IF group were 100 min (range 60-130), 4 days (range 3-9), and $727 (range $642-$1291), respectively. The same variables for the closed reduction group were 30 min (range 20-40), 2 days (range 1-2), and $303 (range $252-$349), respectively. The closed reduction group exhibited a shorter operative time (p< 0.001), reduced length of hospital stays (p< 0.001), lower treatment cost (p< 0.001), and a lower complication rate (p = 0.025) compared to the OR-IF group. Late-term outcomes in both groups showed no visible contour changes or step deformities. In conclusion, the percutaneous screw reduction technique is a safe and effective option with minimal morbidity in the treatment of frontal sinus anterior table fractures. Therefore, traditional OR-IF should be reserved for fractures that are not suitable for reduction using minimally invasive techniques.

Epidemiological Study of Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evaluation of 16 Years of Care at the Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto/Brazil

Purpose

Aiming to evaluate and study the epidemiological profile of frontal sinus fractures treated in the region of Ribeirão Preto-Brazil.

Methods

Sixteen years of activity in the Oral and Maxillofacial service of the Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto/SP (FORP/USP), totaling 9,736 consultations, 4,524 with facial fractures, those diagnosed with frontal sinus fracture (113) were evaluated and selected for the study.

Results

Frontal sinus fractures accounted for 2.5% of facial fractures, the majority occurring in men (89.4%), concentrated in the age group 21-30 years old, with 52.2% of cases being caused by road traffic accidents (RTA). Associations with other facial fractures are common and appeared in 75.2% of cases. Treatment was followed either surgically, by open reduction internal fixation (52.2%) or conservatively (35.4%). Analyzing only the 28 isolated frontal sinus fractures, the most common treatment was conservative (46.4%). surgical treatment dropped to 25%. The most common postoperative complications were temporal branch paralysis and supraorbital nerve paresthesia, both occurring in 30.5% of surgical cases.

Conclusion

The frequency of frontal sinus fractures may be decreasing, but the pattern of occurrence in young men due to road traffic accidents does not seem to change, fortunately the appearance of serious complications is not common and it is usually associated with more severe trauma.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: An Evaluation of Patient Demographics, Mechanisms of Injury, Classification, and Management Strategies in Patients Referred to a Trauma Center, From 2014 to 2019

This retrospective study aimed to present demographic data, mechanisms of injury, anatomical locations, and management strategies in patients with frontal sinus fractures. The study included 91 patients with frontal sinus fractures attending the Rajaee Hospital of Shiraz between 2014 and 2019. The data recorded for each patient included age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture classification, associated craniofacial fractures, nasofrontal duct injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and treatment approach. The mean age of patients was 31.0±14.0 years, with male predominance (95.6%). Car crashes represented the most frequent mechanism of frontal sinus fracture, involving 31 subjects (34%). Isolated anterior and posterior table fractures were seen in 32 (35.2%) and 5 (5.5%) patients. Fifty-four patients (59.3%) presented both tables' involvement. Frontal sinus injuries occurred frequently (74.7%) with other facial fractures. Nasofrontal duct injury was found in 7 patients (7.7%), and 13 (14.3%) exhibited cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Fifty patients (55%) were treated with observation alone; 16 (17.5%) underwent sinus preservation, 12 (13.2%) experienced sinus obliteration, and 13 (14.3%) endured cranialization. Fisher's exact test revealed no significant association between the classification of fracture and the mechanism of injury ( P =0.591). However, a significant association was observed between the fracture classification and the treatment applied ( P =0.023). Frontal sinus fractures were most often caused by car crashes in young adults. Combined anterior and posterior table fractures were more commonly found than isolated anterior or posterior table involvement. Most frontal sinus fractures were treated conservatively without DDS surgical operation.

Management of frontal sinus trauma: a retrospective study of surgical interventions and complications

BACKGROUND

Frontal sinus injuries are relatively rare among facial bone traumas. Without proper treatment, they can lead to fatal intracranial complications, including meningitis or brain abscesses, as well as aesthetic and functional sequelae. The management of frontal sinus injuries remains controversial, with various treatment methods and outcomes being reported. This article describes the clinical characteristics, surgical methods, and outcomes among 17 patients who underwent surgery for frontal sinus injury and related complications.

CASE PRESENTATION

We retrospectively included 17 patients who underwent surgery for frontal sinus injury and its related complications at the Kangwon National University Hospital between July 2010 and September 2021. Among them, six underwent simple open reduction and fixation of the anterior wall, eight underwent sinus obliteration, and three underwent cranialization. Two patients who underwent sinus obliteration died due to infection-related complications. The patient who underwent cranialization reported experiencing chronic headache and expressed dissatisfaction regarding the esthetic outcomes of the forehead. Except for these three patients, the other patients achieved satisfactory esthetic and functional recovery.

CONCLUSION

Active surgical management of frontal sinus injuries is often required owing to the various complications caused by these injuries; however, several factors, including the fracture type, clinical presentation, related craniomaxillofacial injury, and medical history, should be considered while formulating the treatment plan. Surgical treatment through the opening of the frontal sinus should be actively considered in patients with severely damaged posterior wall fractures and those at risk of developing infection.

Craniofacial Growth and Development: A Primer for the Facial Trauma Surgeon

Understanding craniofacial growth and development is important in the management of facial trauma in the growing pediatric patient. This manuscript is a review of craniofacial growth and development and clinical implications of pediatric facial fractures.

Balloon Sinuplasty and Stenting in the Management of Complex Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Classical management of complex fractures involving the frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT) favors obliteration or cranialization to avoid delayed complications. We aim to exhibit success with a novel application of balloon sinuplasty and frontal stenting in the management of complex injuries disrupting the FSOT, which might have otherwise required more invasive interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Single institution, level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center with fractures involving the FSOT. Outcomes include patency of the FSOT on imaging and endoscopy, rate of complications, degree of residual tabular displacement, and need for revision surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria, with complete FSOT obstruction seen in all cases on computed tomography. All patients underwent balloon sinuplasty with frontal sinus stenting; 48% underwent concurrent anterior table repair, and 36% open repair of nasoorbitoethmoid complex fractures. The mean follow-up length was 13.9 months, at which time 91.3% of patients demonstrated radiographic and endoscopic FSOT patency. No residual sinus opacification or pneumocephalus was observed.

CONCLUSION

Balloon sinuplasty with frontal sinus stenting is a straightforward and minimally invasive technique that can create a safe sinus in complex fractures disrupting the FSOT while avoiding the need for more invasive procedures.

The C-S Approach for The Management of Median or Paramedian Frontal Sinus Lesion

The frontal sinus is one the most complex of the paranasal sinuses, its proximity to the cranial vault and the orbit cause that frontal sinus pathologies can progress to involve these structures and lead to significant morbidity, or even death. Surgical management of the frontal sinus is technically challenging, the most commonly used surgical approaches are coronal, butterfly, gullwing and suprabrow. The purpose of this article is to propose the C-S approach, an interesting alternative to the gullwing approach for the managing of median and paramedian frontal sinus lesions or isolated displaced fractures of the anterior wall. The main advantage of this technique is represented by the fact that it follows the new tension lines described in the literature, a curved vertical line that follows the glabellar frown.

Reduction of comminuted fractures of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus using threaded Kirschner wires and a small eyebrow incision

Background: Frontal sinus fractures are relatively rare. Their surgical management significantly differs depending on whether the posterior wall is invaded and the clinical features vary. A bicoronal incision or endoscopic approach can be used. However, the minimally invasive approach has been attracting attention, leading us to introduce a simple and effective surgical method using multiple-threaded Kirschner wires.Methods: All patients had isolated anterior wall fractures without nasofrontal duct impairment. The depth from the skin to the posterior wall was measured using computed tomography to prevent injury. The edge of the bone segment on the skin was marked, a threaded Kirschner wire was inserted into the center of the bone segment, and multiple Kirschner wires were gently reduced simultaneously.Results: Surgery was performed on 11 patients. Among them, seven patients required additional support for appropriate fracture reduction. Therefore, a periosteal elevator was used as an adjunct through a small sub-brow incision because the reduction was incomplete with the Kirschner wire alone. The reduction results were confirmed using facial bone computed tomography 1 to 3 days postoperatively. The follow-up period was 3 to 12 months.Conclusion: The patients had no complications and were satisfied with the surgical results. Here we demonstrated an easy and successful procedure to reduce a pure anterior wall frontal sinus fracture via non-invasive threaded Kirschner wire reduction.

Algorithms for the management of frontal sinus fractures: A retrospective study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results and to evaluate the validity of the treatment algorithm that can be safely applied in dfrontal sinus fractures. All patients were evaluated in terms of late-term contour deformity and further craniometric analysis for measurement of maximum amount of displacement, fracture surface area (mm2) and the maximum angulation of the fracture (degree) were done. 125 patients (101 male, 24 female) with frontal sinus fractures with an average age of 22.4 years (range,17-66 years) were reviewed. All patients with isolated anterior table fractures without displacement were followed up on conservative basis. 33 patients with anterior table fractures with displacement and 39 patients with anterior and posterior table fractures were also followed on conservative basis without surgical intervention. The cut-off value of the maximum amount of displacement was confirmed to be 4.5 mm in prediction of late-term contour deformities (p < 0.001). The maximum amount of displacement was decreased by an average of 1.8 mm at late-term. Apart from the standard protocols, within the limitations of the study it seems that isolated anterior table fractures with a maximum amount of displacement of less than 4.5 mm can be treated conservatively without leading to contour deformities. CSF leakage in the acute setting might not always require cranialization and this may spontaneously resolve within 10 days. Cranialization should be considered whenever CSF leakage lasts longer than 10 days.

Mathematical analysis of fracture configuration in predicting outcome in complex anterior skull base trauma

Craniofacial trauma involving the anterior skull base produces a heterogenous injury with variance in fracture pattern, complexity and outcome. Variance is influenced by the biomechanical properties of the craniofacial construct and by the magnitude and vector of the impacting energy. Fractal dimension and other metrics applied to individual fracture patterns allows quantification of fracture complexity and severity, which can be used to correlate with neurological outcome. Frontobasal fractures from 81 patients admitted to two UK major trauma centres were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: those with anteriorly-based vectors of impact and those with laterally-based vectors. Osseous disruption was quantified by: fractal dimension, fracture length, number of termini, and number of nodes, and then compared with neurological outcome using first recorded Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and requirement for intubation. As fracture length increased, fractures from anterior impacts became more complex and reticulated compared with lateral impacts; fractal dimension also increased more rapidly for anterior impacts. Longer fracture length in both groups was associated with a significantly lower GCS, and increased requirement for intubation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). Fracture propagation and severity of head injury was different in anterior-directed trauma compared to lateral-directed trauma. Consequently, we suggest that the central region of the anterior skull base acts to primarily absorb impact force thereby behaving as a protective ' crumple zone ' . In severe mechanisms the protective mechanism is exceeded and the fracture length tended to that of the lateral group worsening prognosis.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evidence and Clinical Reflections

Background:

Despite significant advances in the management of frontal sinus fractures, there is still a paucity of large-cohort data, and a comprehensive synthesis of the current literature is warranted. The purpose of this study was to present an evidence-based overview of frontal sinus fracture management and outcomes.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for studies published between 1992 and 2020 investigating frontal sinus fractures. Data on fracture type, intervention, and outcome measurements were reported.

Results:

In total, 456 articles were identified, of which 53 met our criteria and were included in our analysis. No statistically significant difference in mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, form of management, or total complication rate was identified. We found a statistically significant increase in complication rates in patients with nasofrontal outflow tract injury compared with those without.

Conclusions:

Frontal sinus fracture management is a challenging clinical situation, with no widely accepted algorithm to guide appropriate management. Thorough clinical assessment of the fracture pattern and associated injuries can facilitate clinical decision-making.

A Review of Frontal Orbital and Frontal Sinus Fractures and Associated Ocular Injuries - Level I Trauma Center - University Hospital Experience

BACKGROUND

Traumatic frontal fractures result from high force injuries and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate our Montreal General Hospital (MGH) experience with frontal bone fractures.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of our trauma database was performed. All adult patients (>18 years) presenting with a diagnosis of frontal sinus fracture were identified. A thorough retrospective electronic medical records search was performed and relevant data extracted. Specifically, all cases of ocular injury or sequelae were identified and an in-depth review was performed.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2014, 10,189 trauma patients presented to the MUHC Level 1 trauma center. A total of 1277 patients presented with a facial fracture and 140 had a frontal sinus fracture. The mean age was 43.5 years, 90% were male and the mean hospitalization time was 16.2 days. A significant proportion of patients suffered concomitant craniomaxillofacial fractures including orbital (79%), maxillary (66%), nasal (64%), zygomaticomaxillary complex (34%), nasoorbitoethmoid (31%), Lefort types I-III (18%), and mandibular (8%). Associated cervical spine injuries were documented in 16% of patients. Ocular injuries were present in 30% of subjects. 26% of patients had some form of permanent sequelae from their trauma, mainly neurological.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the intimate association of the frontal bones with the brain and the orbits, frontal sinus fractures demand a sophisticated multidisciplinary craniofacial surgical approach. Given the high rate of ocular injury of 30% as well as severe systemic injuries, the authors propose a modified treatment algorithm for these complex cases.

Surgical Management of Frontal Bone Fractures

INTRODUCTION

Frontal bone fractures show a low frequency of occurrence of about 5% to 15% of all maxillofacial fractures occurring due to high-velocity injuries such as in the case of road traffic accidents, sporting events, assaults. Successful surgical management revolves around the concept of minimizing cosmetic deformity, maintaining normal sinus function, avoidance of short and long-term complications. In this article, the authors report a case series of 24 cases of frontal bone fracture treated with various treatment modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 24 cases of frontal bone fracture admitted to our facility were treated accordingly and the subsequent follow up data were collected and compiled to be included in this study.

RESULTS

In our study, 83.33% cases showed isolated anterior table fractures, 8.3% cases with combined anterior and posterior table fractures. 40% cases managed conservatively, 41.6% with titanium mini plates, 12.5% cases with titanium mesh and 4% with cranialisation with fat obliteration.

CONCLUSION

Our treatment decisions were based upon the extent and severity of the injuries which aided in tailoring the treatment modality. Thereby, curbing the long-term complications which could be foreseen and hence, a better functional outcome was achieved.

Minimally Invasive Treatment With a Patient Specific Implant in Reconstruction of Isolated Anterior Wall Fracture of the Frontal Sinus

ABSTRACT

Isolated fractures of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus are most often treated through a coronal approach. Although the coronal approach is a relatively easy procedure, the size of the incision is causing more problems related to patient morbidity and recovery time than smaller approaches. A novel, minimal invasive procedure for reconstruction of the anterior wall fracture of the frontal sinus is presented in this article. An endoscopic assisted approach to camouflage the defect of the anterior wall and restore the contour of the frontal bone with a titanium patient specific implant is described in 2 patients. The aim of this procedure is to evaluate the effect on the operating time, recovery time, length of hospital stay and facial scarring compared to the conventional coronal approach. Postoperative evaluation was performed by superimposing pre and postoperative 3D stereophotographs and computed tomography scans. A distance map demonstrated an accurate reconstruction of the preoperatively planned contour. Postoperative recovery of both patients was quick and uneventful with no complications. The use of endoscopically inserted patient specific implant for contour reconstruction in anterior wall fractures of the frontal sinus seems to offer a predictable and minimal invasive alternative to the conventional approach.

Frontal Sinus Fracture Management Meta-analysis: Endoscopic Versus Open Repair

INTRODUCTION

Frontal sinus fracture management continues to be a point of controversy. Many systematic reviews have been done, but meta-analyses comparing various approaches to frontal sinus fractures are scarce. Our study focuses on open surgical repair versus endoscopic repair of frontal sinus fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed to identify prospective RCTs, non-RCTs, guidelines, case-control, and observational studies published in English before April 2019. Search terms included (1) frontal sinus, (2) skull fractures, (3) frontal bone, alone or in combination. An in-depth review was conducted to identify publications relevant to this analysis. Studies that included pediatric patients, case reports, and review articles without original data were excluded. Postoperative outcomes included were cosmesis, sinus function, mucocele, sinusitis, cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, and brain abscess. Meta-analysis of proportions, Fisher exact test, and relative risks were calculated.

RESULTS

Seven studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The assessment of heterogeneity indicated that the studies are comparable. The weighted outcome proportions of patients with postoperative cosmetic deformity and mucocele are found to be significantly higher in patients who underwent open repair compared to patients who received endoscopic treatment. No significant difference between the 2 intervention groups in regards to the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Based on this meta-analysis, no definitive conclusions regarding superiority of one approach over the other can be made. There are currently no universally accepted algorithms that aid in the decision to proceed with either approach. It is likely that these 2 techniques will come to serve different roles in treatment, as they can each be utilized to achieve different goals. At this time, the only recommendation is to proceed with whichever technique can be safely performed based upon surgeon experience and fracture pattern.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Review on Etiology and Management Emphasizing Minimally Invasive and Endoscopic Techniques

ABSTRACT

In spite of a long and tortuous history of the acute management of frontal sinus fractures, current optimal management remains steeped in controversy. These fractures are frequently produced by excessive forces and are often accompanied with other injuries. However, disruption of the nasofrontal duct persists as essential to maintain proper sinus function and should guide current management. Although there has never been any distinct procedure defining optimal outcomes, proper treatment is contingent on precise diagnosis culled from a complete history, physical examination, and imaging studies. This is further augmented by the surgeon's intraoperative findings. Reconstruction will ultimately rest on the degree of disruption of the anterior and posterior sinus walls, as well as the status and function of the nasofrontal ducts. For these reasons, current management continues to be challenging and evolving. Thus, this review will discuss the etiology and clinical presentation of frontal sinus fractures, the current complications arising in the subject, and the evolution of treatment options towards a more conservative and endoscopic approach to care.

Treatment of Frontal Sinus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is still no consensus about the best treatment for frontal sinus fractures (FSFs). Thus, the aims of this study were to answer the following questions: 1) what treatment of FSFs has the lowest rate of postoperative complications? 2) does sinus preservation using observation produce a lower complication rate? 3) are FSFs with nasofrontal outflow tract (NFOT) injury associated with greater complication rates following different treatment options when compared to those patients without NFOT involvement?

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed based on PRISMA that included several databases with specific keywords, a reference search, and a manual search for suitable articles. Randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical studies, retrospective studies and case series that estimated complications rate after different treatments options for FSFs were included. The predictor variable was treatment groups, including observation, ORIF, cranialization and obliteration. The outcome variable was complication rate and correlation between complication rate and presence/absence of NFOT. A weighted complication rate/proportion using a random effect model, or risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), was performed to construct forest plots. Data analysis was done using a comprehensive meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2,911 patients with FSFs enrolled in 23 studies were included in this study. The weighted complication rate for different treatment was as follows: observation (7%), ORIF (9.4%), obliteration (10.6%), and cranialization (11%). Nonsurgical treatment decreased the complication rate by 2.1 times (low quality evidence, RR = 2.1, CI: 1.13 to 3.9, P = .000) when compared to surgical treatments for FSFs. CR for fractures with NFOT was 8 % (55/619) compared to a complication rate of 5% (18/353) for fractures without NFOT with insignificant difference (very low quality evidence, RR = 1.7, CI: 0.75 to 4.1, P = .158).

CONCLUSIONS

FSFs vary in their severity and treatments. The more severe fractures, the higher the complication rate, no matter how they were treated.

Compartmentalization: An Open Technique for Frontal Sinus Repair and Preservation-Description of Technique and Early Case Series

Background  Cranialization or obliteration is widely accepted intervention for traumatic or intentional breach of the frontal sinus. These techniques, however, result in the loss of frontal sinus function and have a persistent risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and mucocele. Compartmentalization is an open technique for repair of the frontal sinus using allograft onlay and a vascularized periosteal flap that allows for preservation of frontal sinus function. Objective  The main objective of this article is to describe the technique for compartmentalization of the frontal sinus and demonstrate its efficacy and complication rate with an early patient series. Methods  Our technique includes the following key components: harvesting of a pedicled periosteal flap, frontal sinus repair through a bifrontal craniotomy with minimal mucosa removal, ensuring the patency of the nasal frontal outflow tract, and separation of the brain from the frontal sinus with a dual layer of periosteum and allograft. All cases of frontal sinus repair using the compartmentalization technique at our institution were reviewed. Charts were reviewed for CSF leak, mucocele, and other complications. Results  Twenty-three patients underwent the described frontal sinus repair technique 17 for tumor and 6 for trauma. There were no CSF leaks and no mucoceles. One patient experienced postoperative anemia and a "parameningeal reaction" that were managed with a short course of antibiotics. Conclusions  Compartmentalization, due to its sinus preservation and low complication rate, represents a meaningful step forward in neurosurgical technique for open frontal sinus repair. However, long-term outcomes are necessary to fully evaluate risk of mucocele.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: 10-Year Contemporary Experience at a Level 1 Urban Trauma Center

Frontal sinus fractures account for 5% to 15% of all facial fractures, and have traditionally been associated with high kinetic energy blunt injury. Surgical management is largely focused on minimizing potentially serious sequelae including frontal sinus dysfunction, CSF leak, and significant cosmetic deformity. An institutional database of 1944 patients presenting with maxillofacial fractures over a 10-year period was queried. Demographics, mechanism of injury, yearly trends, surgical approaches, and follow-up data were examined. A total of 160 (8.3%) patients presented with at least 1 fracture of the frontal sinus anterior table, posterior table, or frontal sinus outflow tract during the study period. The average annual number of cases was 15.9 ± 5.7 per year with a peak of 21.5 ± 4.0 cases during the 2014 to 2015 period and a decline to 8.5 ± 1.5 cases/year from 2016 to 2017. Among those patients with falls, 61.5% (n = 40) were a result of tripping or fainting at a height of <6 ft. 55.6% of fracture types were isolated to the anterior table, but fracture location was not significantly associated with operative intervention. Cases of operative fracture type had a higher rate of both displacement and comminution compared to nonoperative fractures (P < 0.00001). Of all patients presenting with frontal sinus fractures, 75% of cases were managed nonoperatively. However, many patients presented with falls and other seemingly low energy injuries which are not traditionally associated with frontal sinus trauma. These results highlight the need for continued follow-up even in otherwise low-risk urban populations in order to avoid long term sinus dysfunction.

Frontal and Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Complex Fractures

Naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) injuries constitute about 5% of facial fractures and most of them are as a result of road traffic accidents. Deformities in the region tend to be more cosmetically apparent. Considering the proximity of the area to critical structures like brain and eye, such injuries need to be thoroughly evaluated both clinically and radiologically to understand the extent of the injury as well as initiate emergency management if required prior to constituting a definitive treatment plan. CT scans are the most useful investigation modality. Identification and maintaining the attachment of Medial canthal ligament in appropriate position along with reducing / stabilizing the bony fracture is the key to getting good results in these fractures. Primary management of the deformity produces better results compared to secondary correction.

The association of Le Fort midfacial fractures with frontobasal injuries: a 17-year review of 125 cases, reflections on biomechanics, classifications and treatment

The frequency of midface and frontobasal fractures has increased over the past 40 years despite the improvement and stringent regulation implemented on modern safety equipment (belts, helmets…). This observation might be correlated with the progress of radiodiagnosis tools. Literature was reviewed according to Prisma guidelines. We searched for reviewed articles, published between January 2000 and December 2017, through Medline (Pubmed) online databases and ScienceDirect, using the following MeSH Keywords: "Le Fort classification", "Le Fort fracture", "Frontobasal fracture", "skull base fracture", "Midface Fractures". Among 652 patients with frontobasal fractures, 125 (19.1%) were associated with a Le Fort fracture. 59 (9%) were associated with Le Fort III fracture, 51 (7.8%) with Le Fort II fracture and 15 (2.3%) with Le Fort I fracture. When frontobasal fractures were associated with midfacial fractures, we found 18 cerebrospinal fluid leaks (11.8 %) and 19 cases of meningitis (12.5 %). When only the frontobasal area was involved, there were 6 cerebrospinal fluid leaks (4.3 %) and 6 meningitis (4.3 %). Our results highlight a regular association between Le Fort fractures and frontobasal fractures for stages II and stage III of Le Fort fractures and also found a higher rate of neuro-septic complication. Further research shall investigate treatment and monitoring recommendations fitting modern epidemiology of craniofacial traumatology.

Frontal sinus fracture management: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review of the frontal sinus fracture management literature was undertaken to document measurable outcomes, with emphasis on complications associated with the various treatment strategies. A comprehensive electronic search was undertaken in October 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled clinical trials, retrospective and prospective studies describing the management of frontal sinus fractures and complications were included. Twenty-four publications were included: one reporting a prospective RCT and 23 reporting consecutive case series studies (four prospective, 19 retrospective). These included 2388 patients (84.1% male, average age 23-43 years); 50.7% of cases were due to motor vehicle accidents and 61.8% had a concomitant intracranial injury. There were six categories for anterior table reconstruction, three endoscopic surgery categories, 11 for obliteration, and six for cranialization. Forest plots demonstrating complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification of 1 ('low') and >3 ('high') were determined for total, early, and late complications, with heterogeneous effect sizes. Fractures with a nasofrontal outflow tract (NFOT) injury without obstruction can be treated with reconstruction if displaced, or managed conservatively if undisplaced. Obliteration and cranialization should be considered when there is obstruction of the NFOT. A computed tomography scan should be performed at 6 months to evaluate re-ventilation of the sinus. Endoscopic sinus surgery is a reasonable salvage re-ventilation procedure.

Retrospective radiological evaluation to study the prevalence and pattern of maxillofacial fracture among Military personal at Prince Sultan Military Medical City [PSMMC], Riyadh: An institutional study

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to analyze the prevalence, causes, and patterns of maxillofacial fractures retrospectively in patients who were treated at Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Patients′ medical records were reviewed from 2005 to 2014. Patient′s age, gender, cause, and the pattern of maxillofacial fractures were studied. Associated body injuries were also recorded.

Results

Out of 263 patients, 207 (78.7%) were male and 56 (21.3%) were female. The age range was from 3 to 67 yr with a mean age of 26.21 yr. Road traffic accidents 236 (89.8%) were the most commonly reported cause of maxillofacial fractures, followed by falls 14 (5.3%), assaults 4 (1.5%), gunshot 3 (1.1%), and sport accidents 2 (0.8%). Most of the cases of maxillary fracture were Le Fort II 27 (36.5%), followed by LeFort I 23 (31.1%), LeFort III 20 (27.0%) and palatal fractures 4 (5.4%). Of the mandibular fractures, parasymphysis fractures constituted 61 (27.4%), body 50 (22.4%), condyle 45 (20.2%), angle 40 (17.9%), symphysis 16 (7.2%), ramus 7 (3.1%) and coronoid 4 (1.8%). Zygomatic complex fractures 110 (94.8%) were the most commonly reported fractures in the mid and upper facial region. Other facial fractures included orbital floor 61 (97.0%), naso-orbito-ethmoidal 18 (19.8%), and frontal 12 (13.2%).

Conclusion

Road traffic accidents were the most common cause of maxillofacial fractures. Spreading awareness among young drivers regarding road safety regulations is highly recommended.

Pediatric Frontal Bone and Sinus Fractures: Cause, Characteristics, and a Treatment Algorithm

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, cause, characteristics, presentation, and management of pediatric frontal bone fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was performed on all patients younger than 15 years with frontal fractures that presented to a single institution from 1998 to 2010. Charts and computed tomographic images were reviewed, and frontal bone fractures were classified into three types based on anatomical fracture characteristics. Fracture cause, patient demographics, management, concomitant injuries, and complications were recorded. Primary outcomes were defined by fracture type and predictors of operative management and length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients with frontal bone fractures met the authors' inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patient sample was 7.19 ± 4.27 years. Among these patients, 52, 47, and 75 patients were classified as having type I, II, and III fractures, respectively. A total of 14, 9, and 24 patients with type I, II, and III fractures underwent operative management, respectively. All children with evidence of nasofrontal outflow tract involvement and obstruction underwent cranialization (n = 11).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors recommend that type I fractures be managed according to the usual neurosurgical guidelines. Type II fractures can be managed operatively according to the usual pediatric orbital roof and frontal sinus fracture indications (e.g., significantly displaced posterior table fractures with associated neurologic indications). Lastly, type III fractures can be managed operatively as for type I and II indications and for evidence of nasofrontal outflow tract involvement. The authors recommend cranialization in children with nasofrontal outflow tract involvement.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Frontal sinus fractures and cerebrospinal fluid leaks: a change in surgical paradigm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traditionally, frontal sinus trauma has been treated using open incisions to access the anterior and/or posterior table. Mounting evidence indicates frontal sinus trauma can be managed using an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) with less morbidity. Such an approach permits preservation of a functional sinus and less reliance on computed tomography for postoperative follow up. The goal of this article is to highlight a shift in paradigm away from open approaches using external incisions towards an EEA to repair cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and fractures of the frontal sinus.

RECENT FINDINGS

In a prospective case series of 46 patients undergoing EEA to frontal sinus fractures, 41 patients had active CSF leaks arising from the posterior table of the frontal sinus. A successful endoscopic repair was achieved in 97.6% with only one patient requiring revision Draf IIB surgery. Anterior table fractures were also successfully reduced with excellent cosmesis.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic repair of frontal sinus fractures and CSF leaks is effective and well tolerated. In select patients, it is the preferred treatment as it maintains normal sinus structure and function, minimizing both early and late complications.

[Modern aspects of surgical treatment of nasal liquorrhea with localization of defect in frontal sinus]

Defects localized in the frontal sinus are difficult for surgical treatment, since there is a large number of anatomical variations in the structure of the naso-frontal canal and the sinus itself. With the development of endoscopic technology and paying attention to the modern tendency of minimal invasive surgery, new invasive approaches to reach frontal sinus, such as endoscopic approach according to Draf I-III and combined approaches were developed and put into practice.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and to analyze the results of treatment of nasal liquorrhea with localization of the defect in the frontal sinus using endoscopic endonasal and combined intra-extranasal approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a series of 43 cases of nasal liquorrhea with a frontal sinus defect being treated at the NMRCN Burdenko during the period from 2001 to 2017. To select access, a classification of frontal sinus defects according to their localization was developed. The analysis of demographic and clinical data of patients, as well as intraoperative and postoperative data analysis were done.

RESULTS

In the series of 43 patients, endoscopic endonasal approach was performed in 28 (65%) cases. Combined approach was performed at 15 (35%) patients. The success rate of plastic surgery with endoscopic endonasal approach was 86% (24 of 28), with combined approach - 93% (14 of 15).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic endonasal and combined approaches are the methods of choice for plastic surgery of defects of the skull base in the frontal sinus as they are effective and safe. The choice of approach depends on anatomical features of the frontal sinus and on the localization of defect.

Prevalence and pattern of basal skull fracture in head injury patients in an academic hospital

Background

Basal skull fractures (BSFs) have been reported to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the literature, particularly in young male patients. However, there are limited data available on the aetiology, prevalence and patterns of such observed in South Africa.

Objectives

To evaluate the prevalence and pattern of BSF in head injury patients referred to Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Gauteng, South Africa.

Methods

Patients of all ages with head injuries were considered for the study, and those who met the inclusion criteria were scanned using a 128-slice multidetector helical computed tomography (CT) machine after obtaining consent. Data were prospectively obtained over a 6-month period, interpreted on an advanced workstation by two readers and statistically analysed.

Results

The prevalence of BSF in this study was found to be 15.2%. The majority of patients (80.5%) were under 40 years old, with a male to female ratio of 3:1. The most common aetiology of BSF was assault, which accounted for 46% of cases. The middle cranial fossa was the most frequently fractured compartment, while the petrous bone was the most commonly fractured bone. There was a statistically significant association between head injury severity and BSF, and between the number of fracture lines and associated signs of BSF (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of clinical signs in predicting BSF was 31%, while specificity was 89.3% (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

The prevalence and pattern of BSF found were consistent with data from previously published studies, although, dissimilarly, assault was found to be the most common aetiology in this study.

Reconstructing the Face of War

Introduction

Ongoing combat operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other theaters have led to an increase in high energy craniomaxillofacial (CMF) wounds. These challenging injuries are typically associated with complex tissue deficiencies, evolving areas of necrosis, and bony comminution with bone and ballistic fragment sequestrum. Restoring form and function in these combat-sustained CMF injuries is challenging, and frequently requires local and distant tissue transfers. War injuries are different than the isolated trauma seen in the civilian sector. Donor sites are limited on patients with blast injuries and they may have preferences or functional reasons for the decisions to choose flaps from the available donor sites.

Methods

A case series of patients who sustained severe combat-related CMF injury and were treated at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) is presented. Our study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review, and appropriate written consent was obtained from all patients included in the study for the use of representative clinical images.

Results

Four patients treated by the CMF team at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center are presented. In this study, we highlight their surgical management by the CMF team at WRNMMC, detail their postoperative course, and illustrate the outcomes achieved using representative patient clinical images. We also supplement this case series demonstrating military approaches to complex CMF injuries with CMF reconstructive algorithms utilized by the senior author (EDR) in the management of civilian complex avulsive injuries of the upper, mid, and lower face are thoroughly reviewed.

Conclusion

While the epidemiology and characteristics of military CMF injuries have been well described, their management remains poorly defined and creates an opportunity for reconstructive principles proven in the civilian sector to be applied in the care of severely wounded service members. The War on Terror marks the first time that microsurgery has been used extensively to reconstruct combat sustained wounds of the CMF region. Our manuscript reviews various options to reconstruct these devastating CMF injuries and emphasizes the need for steady communication between the civilian and military surgical communities to establish the best care for these complex patients.

Pediatric Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Frontal Sinus: A Case Report

An 11-year-old male presented with right proptosis, bulbar conjunctivitis, and diplopia. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an enhancing mass involving the superio-medial orbit, ethmoids, frontal sinus, and anterior cranial fossa with skull base destruction. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was diagnosed via CT-guided biopsy. As a component of multidisciplinary care, the patient underwent frontal sinus cranialization, with orbital and skull base reconstruction. Trauma reconstructive principles guided recreation of orbital, frontal sinus, and anterior skull base anatomy. This rare primary location is undescribed in the pediatric literature.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: Management and Complications

Frontal sinus fractures are relatively rare maxillofacial injuries (only 5-15% of all facial fractures). The appropriate management of frontal sinus fracture and associated pathology is controversial. Diagnosis and treatment of frontal sinus fractures has improved with the advances of high-resolution computed tomography technology. Treatment of frontal sinus fractures depends on several factors, including contour deformity of anterior table; the presence of CSF leak or air-fluid level in the sinus, likelihood of nasofrontal duct obstruction, and degree of displacement of posterior table. Nasofrontal duct patency should be checked if fracture pattern is highly suspicious of ductal injury. Cranialization is performed in cases of severely comminuted posterior wall fracture. Long-term complication of frontal sinus fracture can occur up to 10 years after initial injury or intervention; so, judicious long-term follow-up is warranted. This article presents the management and complications of frontal sinus fractures.

Frontal Sinus Fractures: Evolving Clinical Considerations and Surgical Approaches

Frontal sinus fractures are an uncommon injury of the maxillofacial skeleton, and account for 5-15% of all maxillofacial fractures. As the force of impact increases, fractures may extend beyond the anterior table to involve adjacent skull, posterior table and frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT). Fractures at these subsites should be evaluated independently to assess the need for and type of operative intervention. Historically, these fractures were managed aggressively with open techniques resulting in obliteration or cranialization. With significant injuries, these approaches are still indispensable. However, the treatment of frontal sinus fractures has changed dramatically over the past half-century, and recent case series have demonstrated favorable outcomes with conservative management. Concurrently, there has been an increasing role of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, both for primary and expectant management, with a focus on sinus preservation. Here, we review the diagnosis and management of frontal sinus fractures, with an emphasis on subsite evaluation. Following a detailed assessment, an appropriate treatment strategy is selected from a variety of open and minimally invasive approaches available in the surgeon's armamentarium.

Risk of frontal sinus anterior table fractures after craniofacial trauma and the role of anatomic variations in frontal sinus size: A retrospective case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Purpose of this study was to evaluate a probable risk of frontal sinus size for traumatic depressed anterior table fractures in patients with similar forehead trauma.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study with a case group of consecutive treated patients with displaced frontal sinus anterior table fractures. The control group was randomly sampled from patients who presented with a blunt forehead trauma in our institution's emergency unit. In computed tomography data sets, all patients' frontal sinus size was categorized by Guerram's classification that is defined as aplasia, hypoplasia, medium-size and hyperplasia. Odds for prevalence of the sinus types as well as sinus total width and height were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

In total, 47 cases and 93 controls were identified. Hyperplasia in the case group had an odds ratio of 46:1 (p < 0.001) compared to the controls. Mean sinus width (73 mm vs. 46 mm; p < 0.001) and sinus height (30 mm vs. 15 mm; p < 0.001) were larger in the case group.

CONCLUSION

Depressed traumatic fractures of the anterior table are an injury with a high risk specific for enlarged frontal sinus sizes. Anatomy is the predictive factor for this mode of craniofacial trauma.

Surgical approach of isolated fracture of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus: The upper eyelid incision

Fractures of the frontal sinus are classified according to the topography (anterior wall, posterior wall or both), the displacement, and the presence of associated lesions (wound, nasofrontal duct injury, rhinorrhea). Isolated fractures of the anterior wall require surgical management, if the displacement is over 4 mm, to restore the forehead symmetry, to maintain the sinus ventilation and to avoid long-term complications (sinusitis, mucocele, meningitis…). Coronal incision is commonly performed but less invasive techniques are more and more used. We describe a technique of reduction and fixation of isolated anterior wall fractures by upper eyelid incision, allowing a good exposure of the lower portion of the frontal sinus, with a limited scar.

Pattern of maxillofacial injuries in patients with craniocerebral injuries: a prospective study

Introduction: This prospective study highlights the pattern of oral and maxillofacial injuries in patients with associated craniocerebral injuries. Material and Methods: This was a prospective descriptive study conducted over a 22-month period. Information was collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Office Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Test of statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results: Three hundred and three consecutive patients were studied and this consisted of 254 males and 49 females. The difference in the gender distribution was statistically significant (p = 0.008). Road traffic crashes (n = 262; 86.5%) was the most common cause of injury and soft tissues orofacial injuries accounted for 61.7% of injuries. Le Fort II fractures were the major skeletal injuries. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 13–15 had the highest frequency (n = 157; 53.4%). Intracerebral haemorrhage was the most common cerebral injury recorded and the commonest complication noted was dysocclusion. Discussion: Although middle third facial fractures were the most common skeletal injury, fractures of the upper third facial skeleton appear to be associated with lower GCS. Conclusion: Fractures of the facial skeleton are fairly common in craniocerebral injuries.

Frontal Sinus Obliteration Utilizing Autogenous Abdominal Fat Graft

BACKGROUND:

Frontal sinus fractures have always been unique because of the controversy surrounding their ideal treatment protocol and the fatal complications that could follow if the wrong treatment opts.

AIM:

The purpose of this study was to assess clinically and radiographically frontal sinus obliteration technique utilising autogenous abdominal fat graft.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

This study was carried out on 20 patients having anterior table fracture of their frontal sinuses indicated for sinus obliteration. All sinuses were obliterated using autogenous abdominal fat graft. Post-operatively, patients were clinically evaluated for any signs or symptoms of intracranial infections, wound dehiscence, sinus affections, or aesthetic deformity. Computerized tomography (CT) radiographic evaluations were carried out immediately and 12 months postoperatively to evaluate any uneventful healing of the graft.

RESULTS:

Clinical follow-up showed no cerebrospinal fluid leak, no postoperative infection or wound dehiscence in 18 cases. There were two cases however that showed infection. Radiographic follow-up revealed uneventful healing of the abdominal fat grafts with no abnormality detected in the sinus cavity throughout the whole postoperative period.

CONCLUSION:

Autogenous abdominal fat graft appears to be a successful obliteration material in the frontal sinus cavity and is beneficial in fractures of the anterior table.

Frontal Sinus Morphology: A Reliable Factor for Classification of Frontal Bone Fractures?

PURPOSE

The frontal sinus shows a wide range of morphologic variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of frontal sinus size on fracture characteristics in frontal bone trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, data from patients with traumatic fractures of the frontal bone were retrospectively collected from the institution's database. Radiometric analysis of computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography datasets was performed. Frontal sinus size was measured as variables of height, width, and depth. The secondary predictor was morphologic sinus type according to Guerram's classification: hyperplasia, medium size, hypoplasia, or aplasia of the frontal sinus. To determine outcomes, we classified fractures into the following categories: fracture isolated to the anterior table, combined fractures of the anterior and posterior tables, fracture isolated to the posterior table, and frontal bone fracture without sinus involvement. Further study variables were patients' demographic characteristics, combined midfacial fractures, orbital rim involvement, fracture displacement, and surgical approach. For statistical analysis, fracture types were assessed for frontal sinus metric size and morphologic type using bivariate tests with P < .05 defined as significant.

RESULTS

We enrolled 53 consecutive patients with a mean age of 35 years; male patients comprised 91%. Fracture types differed significantly in sinus width and height (both P < .001), as well as depth (P = .002). Frontal sinus morphology was hyperplastic in 66%, medium in 30.2%, and hypoplastic in 3.8%. Patients with a hyperplastic frontal sinus had an increased likelihood of isolated anterior table fractures (odds ratio, 6.0; P = .007) compared with medium-sized types. Fractures without sinus involvement were more likely in hypoplastic and medium types (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The morphology of the frontal sinus determines the probability of fracture types from craniofacial trauma. Thus the frontal sinus size appears to be a major factor for frontal bone resistance to traumatic force impingement.

Treatment of frontal bone fracture sequelae through inversion of the bone fragment

Treatment of frontal sinus fractures depends on the structures involved: the anterior wall, the posterior wall and the nasofrontal duct. It may vary from the correction of the defect in the anterior wall to the cranialization with obliteration of the nasofrontal duct. The inversion of the frontal sinus's anterior wall to correct the defect in the fractured region is a good treatment option for sequelae, since this technique eliminates or reduces the use of biomaterial in the area, and allows direct assessment of the permeability of the nasofrontal duct. This work describes the technique of fractured segment inversion for the treatment of frontal sinus fracture sequelae in a motorcycle accident victim.

Epidemiology and patterns of facial fractures due to road traffic accidents in Taiwan: A 15-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The facial region is a commonly fractured site, but the etiology varies widely by country and geographic region. To date, there are no population-based studies of facial fractures in Taiwan.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with facial fracture and registered in the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan between 1997 and 2011. The epidemiological characteristics of this cohort were analyzed, including the etiology, fracture site, associated injuries, and sex and age distributions.

RESULTS

A total of 6,013 cases were identified that involved facial fractures. Most patients were male (69.8%), aged 18-29 years (35.8%), and had fractures caused by road traffic accidents (RTAs; 55.2%), particularly motorcycle accidents (31.5%). Falls increased in frequency with advancing age, reaching 23.9% among the elderly (age > 65 years). The most common sites of involvement were the malar and maxillary bones (54.0%), but nasal bone fractures were more common among those younger than 18 years.

CONCLUSION

Most facial injuries in Taiwan occur in young males and typically result from RTAs, particularly involving motorcycles. However, with increasing age, there is an increase in the proportion of facial injuries due to falls.

Mucormycosis of the Frontal Sinus: A Rare Case Report and Review

Mucormycosis of the frontal sinus are rarely seen in day to day clinical practice. Although this fungus is commonly found in the environment, the disease is usually prevented by the immune system and is hence rare. Well-recognized risk factors for the disease include diabetes mellitus, leukemia, aplastic anemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, blood dyscrasias, and immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplantation, renal disease, sepsis, and severe burns. The disease is primarily found in those who are immunocompromised, but it may also manifest in immuno competent persons. Current therapy for the invasive disease includes early surgical debridement, antifungal therapy management of underlying predisposing factors. Early recognition of the disease and treating the underlying cause of mucormycosis, such as diabetes, are key to improving outcomes. The antifungal treatment of choice for mucormycosis is amphotericin B, although very high doses are required because of the relative resistance of the fungus to the drug. Here, we present a case of rhinocerebral mucormycosis of frontal sinus in a diabetic patient, who was managed by systemic antifungals, surgical debridement, and obliteration procedures.

Frontal Sinus Fractures

The frontal bone serves a protective role, representing the transition between the facial skeleton and the cranium. Within its enclosure, the frontal sinus lies adjacent to many important intracranial structures, and injury to this region has severe complications if not properly managed. Historically, the goals of frontal sinus fracture management have been to best prevent intracranial complications with invasive procedures, but a recent shift favoring conservative management now aims to preserve the form and function of the frontal sinus and its outflow tract. With the advancement of endoscopic techniques and the development of new technologies, many alternatives to aggressive surgical management are available.

Management of Frontal Sinus Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks and Encephaloceles

Encephaloceles and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks of the frontal sinus may result from congenital, traumatic, spontaneous, or neoplastic causes. Paramount to success is adequate preoperative planning with accurate history, physical exam, endoscopy, imaging, and testing to confirm location of the leak and origin of the disease. Generally, frontal sinus CSF leaks may be addressed endoscopically with favorable anatomy, proper surgical technique, and appropriate equipment. Open surgical approaches (eg, osteoplastic flap) are often required for superior/lateral defects or if the surgeon is not experienced with endoscopic frontal sinus techniques.

Changing the surgical dogma in frontal sinus trauma: transnasal endoscopic repair

BACKGROUND

Management of frontal sinus trauma includes coronal or direct open approaches through skin incisions to either ablate or obliterate the frontal sinus for posterior table fractures and openly reduce/internally fixate fractured anterior tables. The objective of this prospective case-series study was to evaluate outcomes of frontal sinus anterior and posterior table trauma using endoscopic techniques.

METHODS

Prospective evaluation of patients undergoing surgery for frontal sinus fractures was performed. Data were collected regarding demographics, etiology, technique, operative site, length involving the posterior table, size of skull base defects, complications, and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (average age, 42 years) with frontal sinus fractures were treated using endoscopic techniques from 2008 to 2016. Mean follow-up was 26 (range, 0.5 to 79) months. Patients were treated primarily with a Draf IIb frontal sinusotomies. Draf III was used in 8 patients. Average fracture defect (length vs width) was 17.1 × 9.1 mm, and the average length involving the posterior table was 13.1 mm. Skull base defects were covered with either nasoseptal flaps or free tissue grafts. One individual required Draf IIb revision, but all sinuses were patent on final examination and all closed reductions of anterior table defects resulted in cosmetically acceptable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Frontal sinus trauma has traditionally been treated using open approaches. Our findings show that endoscopic management should become part of the management algorithm for frontal sinus trauma, which challenges current surgical dogma regarding mandatory open approaches.