The Eurocleft project 1996-2000: overview

Between unity and disparity: current treatment protocols for common orofacial clefts in European expert centres

There is considerable variability in the management of common orofacial clefts across Europe, reflecting differing opinions on optimal treatments. An updated overview of treatment protocols for orofacial clefts across 26 expert centres in the European Reference Network CRANIO is presented here. A structured questionnaire was distributed to map the surgical protocol and additional standard procedures for cleft palate (CP), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). A surgical protocol was defined as the unique combination of a sequence of standard surgeries, their timing, and the surgical techniques employed. Overall, 33 unique surgical protocols for CP, 54 for UCLP, and 51 for BCLP were identified. Notable findings included the trend towards early hard palate closure, uniform timing of lip closure, and the popularity of primary cleft rhinoplasty. Nevertheless, practice variations were most pronounced in the timing of alveolar closure, the number of standard surgeries, and the application of additional standard procedures. This study highlights the diversity of treatment protocols across Europe, despite considerable convergence of treatment practices over time. To allow for further convergence, establishing objective criteria for protocol selection, adequate documentation of customizations, and consensus on the terminology of surgical techniques, are necessary.

Postoperative Physical Therapy Following Primary Cheiloplasty in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

ABSTRACT

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) are common congenital anomalies with significant functional and aesthetic implications. In Chile, the incidence of cleft lip is 14 per 10,000 live births. Primary cheiloplasty is the initial surgical intervention, typically followed by physical therapy for scar management. Despite inclusion in national guidelines, data on postoperative physical therapy after cheiloplasty are limited.This study aims to describe postoperative physical therapy management in CLP patients following primary cheiloplasty, focusing on initiation timing and number of sessions. A retrospective analysis of records from the Gantz Foundation included 91 patients who underwent primary cheiloplasty between 2022 and 2023. Data collected encompassed age at surgery, dates of surgery and therapy initiation, number of sessions, and the interval between surgery and therapy start.Seventy-one patients (78%) began postoperative physical therapy at the Gantz Foundation. Ages at surgery ranged from 2 to 24 months (mean: 4.8 mo), with 90.1% between 3.5 and 5 months old. Physical therapy commenced 8 to 136 days postsurgery (mean: 38 d); 47.8% started within the first month, while 10% began after 2 months. The number of sessions ranged from 1 to 11 (mean: 4.67, median: 4).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability exists in the timing and frequency of postoperative physical therapy following primary cheiloplasty in CLP patients. Delays and inconsistencies may result from geographical barriers and access issues. Enhancing referral protocols, improving communication with caregivers, and exploring strategies like telerehabilitation could improve access and adherence, potentially leading to better functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Retrospective evaluation of velopharyngeal insufficiency treated with Orticochea pharyngoplasty in cleft palate patients

This study evaluated the outcomes of perceptual speech, breathing, snoring, and nasal regurgitation following Orticochea pharyngoplasty, and investigated patient characteristics associated with the resolution or improvement of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in cleft patients. The study involved a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent Orticochea pharyngoplasty for VPI management between 2016 and 2024 in the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Woman-Mother-Child Hospital, Lyon, France. Demographic data, speech and breathing characteristics, and the presence of snoring and nasal regurgitation were recorded using a standardized protocol. Preoperative and postoperative VPI severity was assessed using the Borel-Maisonny scale. All 89 patients included in the study had at least minimal VPI preoperatively (stage IIB), with 83% graded as having moderate or severe VPI. Improvement was observed in 88.76% of the patients after one surgery, and in 98.9% following a second surgery. Orticochea pharyngoplasty improved physiological breathing rates by 22% and reduced nasal regurgitation in 75% of the cases. This indicated that Orticochea pharyngoplasty is a reliable, safe, and reproducible surgical technique.

Hearing Loss in 5-Year-Old and 12-Year-Old Patients With a Cleft Palate and Evaluating Standardized Assessment Methods

This study describes the results of hearing assessment in patients with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) enrolled in the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measures set for cleft lip and palate (ICHOM set). Other cleft initiatives were examined to provide an overview of the hearing assessment used. Data were analyzed from 390 patients with CP±L, aged 5 or 12 years, who were followed up according to the ICHOM set between 2016 and 2023. Statistical analysis evaluated pure-tone average (PTA) differences by age, cleft phenotype, sex, ventilation tube (VT) insertion, isolated CP±L, syndromes associated with hearing loss (HL), and syndromes with unknown associations with HL. Other cleft initiatives were reviewed to compare hearing assessments. The median PTA was higher in 5-year-olds (15.31 dB HL; IQR 10.0-27.5) than in 12-year-olds (10.0 dB HL; IQR 6.9-16.7; P<0.001). Patients with VT insertions had worse thresholds (median 12.50 dB HL; IQR 8.1-24.0) compared with those without (median 9.4 dB HL; IQR 5.8-13.8; P<0.001). Patients with syndromes associated with HL showed worse hearing thresholds (median 17.81 dB HL) than isolated CP±L (median 11.25 dB HL). Conductive hearing loss (CHL) was found in 35% of 5-year-olds and 15% of 12-year-olds. To improve the ICHOM set and align with other initiatives, assessments at additional frequencies (0.25-8 kHz), air and bone conduction, tympanometry, and evaluations around age 3 are recommended.

Impact of Unilateral Alveolar Bone Grafting on Nasal Volume and Nasolabial Surface: A 3D Analysis

ObjectiveTo determine possible effects of unilateral alveolar cleft closure on internal nasal volume and external nasolabial surface.DesignRetrospective, single-arm, cohort study.SettingInstitutional, tertiary care.PatientsPatients with complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (CUCLAP), who underwent closure of the alveolar cleft with autologous bone graft (ABG) at the age of 9-11 years, with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and/or three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry images taken before and one year after the ABG procedure.InterventionsABG-pocedure in patients with CUCLAP.Main Outcome MeasuresThe influence of ABG on the internal and external nasal morphology.ResultsA total of 28 patients (21M/7F, 14R/14L) were divided into internal (CBCT) and external (3D-stereophotogrammetry) measurement subgroups. The external nasolabial surface showed a significant decrease of the angle alar curvature right-subnasale-alar curvature left (-1.99°; P = .02; 95% CI -2.61, -0.36) and an increase of the linear measurement between these points (+1.01 mm; P = .03; 95% CI: 0.11, 1.91). No significant differences were found when comparing the distance maps of the affected side with the non-affected side (P = .50, 95% CI: -0.20, 0.29).ConclusionsClosure of the alveolar cleft in CUCLAP patients with ABG did not affect the internal nasal volume, but significantly affected the external nasal surface. The procedure resulted in the nose becoming wider because both alar curvatures moved caudally and laterally relative to the subnasale.

Morphological Changes in Maxillary Arch Post-Cheiloplasty in Cleft Lip and Palate Infants: A Case Series

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the effectiveness of cleft lip repair in modifying maxillary arch morphology in infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (cUCLP) over a 6-month period.DesignProspective case series.SettingMy Thien Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ParticipantsFifteen infants with cUCLP, average age 5.07 months.InterventionAll infants underwent unilateral cleft lip repair using Fisher's technique. Maxillary arch impressions were taken before surgery and 6 months postoperatively and converted into 3D models.Main Outcome MeasuresAnalysis focused on maxillary arch dimensions in anteroposterior and transverse directions, changes in cleft width, curvature of the larger segment, and position of the proximal edge.ResultsAlveolar cleft width (GL) and anterior curvature angle (∠GIC) showed significant reductions (P < .05). Additionally, posterior arch width (TT'), maxillary arch depth (I-TT'), and anterior arch depth (I-CC') showed significant increases (P < .05), while anterior arch width (CC') remained unchanged (P = .87). Measurements demonstrated high reliability with ICC > 0.75 for all parameters.ConclusionUnilateral cleft lip repair in cUCLP infants significantly narrowed the alveolar cleft width and reduced the anterior curvature angle. Increases in posterior arch width and maxillary arch depth were also observed. These morphological changes are crucial for planning future surgical interventions to optimize outcomes.

A survey on nasoalveolar moulding treatment practices at cleft centres across India

Background

The purpose of this study is to assess the current protocols followed in the practice of NAM treatment for patients with cleft lip and palate across different comprehensive centres in India.

Design

Cross sectional questionnaire based study.

Method

Comprehensive cleft teams across India were invited to participate in this survey. The questionnaire was developed over four stages, with a panel of eight members. The developed questionnaire consisted of 29 questions that included demographic details, decision-making process, treatment protocols, experiences with treating patients, difficulties and complications encountered during treatment. The results were reported descriptively in percentages.

Results

Of the 46 teams, 39 teams (85%) reported offering NAM before lip surgery, while 15% (n = 7) teams did not offer NAM. Of these 39 teams, almost half (49%, n = 19) of the teams were providing NAM to less than 20% of their patients, 28% (n = 11) of the teams were providing treatment to more than 50%, and the remaining respondents reported (23%, n = 9) providing NAM to 21%-50% of their patients. There is a consensus that NAM is beneficial for both unilateral and bilateral clefts, with the Grayson's method as the most commonly used technique. While there is general agreement on their effectiveness, 15% of participants were unsure. The most frequently reported side effects were cheek and mucosal irritation. Despite these issues, all respondents would recommend NAM treatment.

Conclusion

The survey demonstrated a strong consensus among centers regarding most aspects of NAM treatment. Notably, all respondents expressed their willingness to recommend NAM to their friends and family.

Development of software for collecting cleft-specific data in Malaysia

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the development of a cleft-specific database for collecting and analyzing data on patients with cleft from birth to adulthood. However, such a database currently does not exist in Malaysia. The objective of this study was to develop a cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) database software for Malaysia to streamline data collection and support comprehensive research to enhance outcomes of care.

METHODS

The development of the database software involves several key stages, including determining the requirements, designing the software interface, implementing the system, conducting thorough testing, and completing comprehensive documentation. The database software was mainly developed internally within the research institution. The team involved in developing the clinical database includes cleft clinicians, software developers, software designers, members of the Cleft Lip and Palate Association Malaysia (CLAPAM), and experts in database development.

RESULTS

An online and offline database software has been developed to store information on patients with CL/P in Malaysia. It is designed to be user-friendly, accommodating multiple specialties and capable of storing photographs, radiology, and three-dimensional files. Various methods have been implemented to ensure data security. Additionally, documentation including video tutorials, consent forms, and hard copy versions has been developed to complement the database.

CONCLUSION

A specialized cleft-specific database software has been successfully developed for use in Malaysia to improve data management and support CL/P patient care.

Evolution of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery and the Pursuit for Consensus on Standardized Algorithms of Care

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) surgery has evolved over centuries in an attempt to achieve anatomical closure while optimizing speech and limiting fistulas and midface hypoplasia. Masters of cleft surgery and early pioneers inspired generations of surgical innovators to refine techniques and timing to improve surgical outcomes. Constant modification has resulted in significant diversity of cleft surgical protocols across institutions. Unlike many other surgical conditions, there is no gold-standard algorithm of care for CLP. Several international consortiums, including Eurocleft, Americleft, and Scandcleft, aimed to investigate the ideal cleft care protocol. Despite the inclusion of multiple institutions and attempts at long-term follow-up, these studies were limited by small sample sizes, lack of diversity in patient population, poor long-term follow-up, lack of standardized measurement tools, and inability to control for confounders such as severity. This article aimed to present the findings of these early pioneer consortiums in their pursuit for the optimal CLP surgical protocol and recommend a direction for future research with a global consortium of experts in cleft care.

Using "Real-World Data" to Study Cleft Lip/Palate Care: An Exploration of Speech Outcomes from a Multi-Center US Learning Health Network

ObjectiveTo assess the ability of a cleft-specific multi-site learning health network registry to describe variations in cleft outcomes by cleft phenotypes, ages, and treatment centers. Observed variations were assessed for coherence with prior study findings.DesignCross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data from 2019-2022.SettingSix cleft treatment centers collected data systematically during routine clinic appointments according to a standardized protocol.Participants714 English-speaking children and adolescents with non-syndromic cleft lip/palate.InterventionRoutine multidisciplinary care and systematic outcomes measurement by cleft teams.Outcome MeasuresSpeech outcomes included articulatory accuracy measured by Percent Consonants Correct (PCC), velopharyngeal function measured by Velopharyngeal Competence (VPC) Rating Scale (VPC-R), intelligibility measured by caregiver-reported Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS), and two CLEFT-Q™ surveys, in which patients rate their own speech function and level of speech distress.Results12year-olds exhibited high median PCC scores (91-100%), high frequency of velopharyngeal competency (62.50-100%), and high median Speech Function (80-91) relative to younger peers parsed by phenotype. Patients with bilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate reported low PCC scores (51-91%) relative to peers at some ages and low frequency of velopharyngeal competency (26.67%) at 5 years. ICS scores ranged from 3.93-5.0 for all ages and phenotypes. Speech Function and Speech Distress were similar across phenotypes.ConclusionsThis exploration of speech outcomes demonstrates the current ability of the cleft-specific registry to support cleft research efforts as a source of "real-world" data. Further work is focused on developing robust methodology for hypothesis-driven research and causal inference.

Development of a Core Outcome Set for the Audit of Cleft Care in Malaysia

OBJECTIVE

To develop a core outcome set for the audit of cleft care in Malaysia.

DESIGN

To generate a core outcome set for patients dealing with cleft lip and/or palate within Malaysia, a combination of scholarly research reviews and consensus-driven methodologies, such as questionnaires and collaborative discussions, were utilized to guide the development process.

SETTING

Multicenter study. Feedback obtains via face-to-face and online interaction.

PARTICIPANTS

Cleft Clinicians, Cleft Lip and Palate Association of Malaysia members, hospitals, and government bodies personal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Participants provide their feedback and suggestions of each outcome measure.

RESULTS

Through a deliberative process, agreement was established on a uniform set of outcome measures selected from an initial list of 108 potential outcomes. These agreed-upon measures were classified into 12 primary domains: demographic, cleft detail, pregnancy, general pediatric, otolaryngology/audiology, speech, surgical, orthodontics, pediatric dentistry, radiology, photographs, and study models.

CONCLUSION

A specialized core outcome set has been successfully developed for patients with cleft lip and/or palate, aiming to facilitate its implementation within the Malaysian healthcare system.

White matter tract integrity in isolated oral clefts: relationship to cognition and reading skills

Children with isolated cleft of the lip and/or palate (iCL/P) have been shown to be at risk for impaired reading ability. Structural and functional neuroimaging studies have revealed subtle morphological and functional abnormalities correlated to cognition and reading ability. However, the integrity of white matter tracts and their potential relationship to reading performance in iCL/P is under-studied. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate white matter integrity related to cognition and reading skills among participants with and without iCL/P. Data from two cross-sectional, case/control studies with similar neuropsychological batteries and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) protocols were combined. The final sample included 210 participants (ages 7 to 27 years). Group and sex differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) values were examined between participants with (n = 105) and without (n = 105) iCL/P. Potential associations between FA values and age, cognition, and reading skills were also evaluated separately by group and sex. Sex effects were prominent in association and projection fibers, and effects of cleft status were found in association fibers and cerebellar regions, with isolated associations to reading skills. Findings provide preliminary understanding of microstructural associations to cognitive and reading performance among children, adolescents, and young adults with iCL/P.

Patient Factors Influencing Speech Outcomes in Velopharyngeal Function Following Initial Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Identification of patient factors influencing velopharyngeal function for speech following initial cleft palate repair.

DESIGN

A literature search of relevant databases from inception until 2018 was performed using medical subject headings and keywords related to cleft palate, palatoplasty and speech assessment. Following three stage screening data extraction was performed.

SETTING

Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant literature.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred and eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data on 47 658 participants.

INTERVENTIONS

Individuals undergoing initial palatoplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Studies including participants undergoing initial cleft palate repair where the frequency of secondary speech surgery and/or velopharyngeal function for speech was recorded.

RESULTS

Patient factors reported included cleft phenotype (95% studies), biological sex (64%), syndrome diagnosis (44%), hearing loss (28%), developmental delay (16%), Robin Sequence (16%) and 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (11%). Meta-analysis provided strong evidence that rates of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal dysfunction varied according to cleft phenotype (Veau I best outcomes, Veau IV worst outcomes), Robin Sequence and syndrome diagnosis. There was no evidence that biological sex was associated with worse outcomes. Many studies were poor quality with minimal follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis demonstrated the association of certain patient factors with speech outcome, however the quality of the evidence was low. Uniform, prospective, multi-centre documentation of preoperative characteristics and speech outcomes is required to characterise risk factors for post-palatoplasty velopharyngeal insufficiency for speech.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Registered with PROSPERO CRD42017051624.

Occlusal and Cephalometric Outcomes of Cleft Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Aberrant facial growth in individuals affected by orofacial clefts can result in maxillary retrusion and class III malocclusion, with a proportion requiring surgical correction at cessation of growth. This study aimed to evaluate occlusal and cephalometric outcomes of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study in a United Kingdom cleft center. Participants included twenty-seven patients (20 males, 7 females) with cleft (n = 16 UCLP :7 BCLP :4 ICP) who consecutively underwent combined surgical treatment for Class III malocclusion between January 2013 and December 2017. Records were collected pre-treatment (T0), pre-surgery (T1) and at debond (T2). Models were scored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and cephalometric radiographs were traced and analyzed. Outcomes were assessed by an independent rater.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 21.4 years (SD 4.9). Le Fort 1 advancement (mean 6.1 mm, SD 4.0) was performed in all cases. Additional procedures included mandibular setback (n = 2), cortico-cancellous bone grafting (n = 6) and genioplasty (n = 1). Mean T0 PAR score was 44.8 (SD 11.7), reducing to 3.6 (SD 2.0) at T2, indicating a mean % PAR score reduction of 91.6% (SD 4.7). Class III skeletal profiles improved from a mean T0 ANB of -2.1º (SD 2.2), to 2.8º (SD 1.6) at T2. Mean T0 overjet was -3.3 mm (SD 2.3), increasing to 2.6 mm (SD 1.3) at T2.

CONCLUSION

Cleft orthognathic surgery differs in complexity and approach to routine orthognathics, however, these results demonstrate that occlusal outcomes can still be comparable with non-cleft populations. Outcome data can be used for comparison with other centers providing cleft orthognathic treatment.

Where is the Care? Identifying the Impact of Rurality on SLP Caseloads and Treatment Decisions for Children with Cleft Palate

Challenges providing cleft/craniofacial care in rural communities are often reported, leading to disparities in resources available to clinicians. The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of rurality on caseloads and practice patterns of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) regarding speech and velopharyngeal function for children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).

A national, survey of US-based SLPs (N = 359 respondents) investigated resources, comfort level, caseloads, and practice patterns for children with CL/P. Sub-county classifications that delineated levels of rurality were utilized. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were conducted to determine the impact of population density on assessment and referral decisions.

Nearly 83% of SLPs reported providing care for a child with CL/P and 41.4% of these SLPs reported five or more children with CL/P on caseload throughout their career. There were no significant differences in rurality of practice setting and the likelihood of treating a child with CL/P. Significant differences were present between rural, town, suburban, and metropolitan-based SLPs regarding available resources (p = 0.035). SLPs in rural settings reported feeling uncomfortable treating children with CL/P compared to those in metropolitan settings (p = 0.02). Distance to the cleft/craniofacial team and comfort levels impacted referral decisions.

Most SLPs report having children with CL/P on caseload regardless of practice location. Rurality impacted assessment and referral decisions, especially surrounding access to resources and comfort levels engaging in team care. Findings have implications for developing support systems and reducing barriers for rural SLPs working with children born with CL/P.

How differences in anatomy and physiology and other aetiology affect the way we label and describe speech in individuals with cleft lip and palate

BACKGROUND

Speech in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is a complex myriad of presenting symptoms. It is uniquely associated with the structural difference of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), together with a wide and heterogeneous range of other aetiologies which often co-occur. The nature of the speech sound disorder (SSD) including VPI may also change over the course of an individual's care pathway. Differences in terminology and approaches to analysis are currently used, resulting in confusion internationally. Additionally, current diagnostic labels and classification systems in SSD do not capture the complexity and full nature of speech characteristics in CLP.

AIMS

This paper aims to explore the different aetiologies of cleft palate/VPI speech and to relate aetiology with speech characteristic(s). In so doing, it attempts to unravel the different terminology used in the field, describing commonalities and differences, and identifying overlaps with the speech summary patterns used in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. The paper also aims to explore the applicability of current diagnostic labels and classification systems in the non-cleft SSD literature and illustrate certain implications for speech intervention in CLP.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The different aetiologies were identified from the literature and mapped onto cleft palate/VPI speech characteristics. Different terminology and approaches to analysis are defined and overlaps described. The applicability of current classification systems in SSD is discussed including additional diagnostic labels proposed in the field.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Aetiologies of cleft palate/VPI speech identified include developmental (cognitive-linguistic), middle ear disease and fluctuating hearing loss, altered oral structure, abnormal facial growth, VPI-structural (abnormal palate muscle) and VPI-iatrogenic (maxillary advancement surgery). There are four main terminologies used to describe cleft palate/VPI speech: active/passive and compensatory/obligatory, which overlap with the four categories used in the UK speech summary patterns: anterior oral cleft speech characteristics (CSCs), posterior oral CSCs, non-oral CSCs and passive CSCs, although not directly comparable. Current classification systems in non-cleft SSD do not sufficiently capture the full nature and complexity of cleft palate/VPI speech.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our attempt at identifying the heterogeneous range of aetiologies provides clinicians with a better understanding of cleft palate/VPI speech to inform the management pathway and the nature and type of speech intervention required. We hope that the unravelling of the different terminology in relation to the UK speech summary patterns, and those used elsewhere, reduces confusion and provides more clarity for clinicians in the field. Diagnostic labels and classification require international agreement.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Speech associated with cleft palate/velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a complex myriad of speech characteristics with a wide and heterogeneous range of aetiologies. Different terminology and speech summary patterns are used to describe the speech characteristics. The traditional classification of cleft palate/VPI speech is Articulation Disorder, although evidence is building for Phonological Disorder and contrastive approaches in cleft speech intervention. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper explores the range of aetiologies of cleft palate/VPI speech (e.g., altered oral structure, abnormal facial growth, abnormal palate muscle and iatrogenic aetiologies) and attempts to relate aetiology with speech characteristic(s). An attempt is made at unravelling the different terminology used in relation to a well-known and validated approach to analysis, used in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. Complexities of current diagnostic labels and classifications in Speech Sound Disorder to describe cleft palate/VPI speech are discussed. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? There needs to be a common language for describing and summarising cleft palate/VPI speech. Speech summary patterns based on narrow phonetic transcription and correct identification of aetiology are essential for the accurate classification of the speech disorder and identification of speech intervention approaches. There is an urgent need for research to identify the most appropriate type of contrastive (phonological) approach in cleft lip and/or palate.

Impact of early cleft lip and palate surgery on maxillary growth in 5- and 10-Year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated maxillary growth and dental arch relationships at 5 and 10 years of age in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who underwent early cleft lip and palate surgery.

METHODS

28 patients with UCLP who underwent cleft lip surgery in neonatal age and cleft palate surgery at average age of 7 months without orthodontic treatment (intervention group) were measured for intercanine and intermolar distances and for dental arch length. These measurements were compared with those of 30 healthy participants in a control group. Dental arch relationships in the intervention group were evaluated by 5-YO index at 5 years and the GOSLON Yardstick score at 10 years of patients' age.

RESULTS

Patients in the intervention group had significantly shorter mean intercanine distance and arch length than control patients at both 5 and 10 years of age (p<.001 for all). There were no significant differences in intermolar distance at both 5 (p = .945) and 10 years (p = .105) of patients' age. The average 5YO index increased from 2.46 to an average GOSLON 10-year score of 2.89 in intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Intercanine distance and dental arch length of patients with UCLP are significantly reduced at 5 and 10 years after early cleft lip and palate surgeries compared to the healthy population. Dental arch relationships at 5 and 10 years of patients with UCLP show comparable outcomes to those reported by other cleft centers.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study evaluates maxillary growth in UCLP patients 5 and 10 years of age who underwent early primary lip and palate surgery.

Complete Digital Workflow for Manufacturing Presurgical Orthodontic Palatal Plates in Newborns and Infants with Cleft Lip and/or Palate

Deciding on the implementation or modification of steps in daily clinical care is a nuanced process that demands careful evaluation. This is crucial not only for selecting the most appropriate solution but also for achieving the best treatment outcome. Thus, implementing a workflow for treating cleft lip and/or palate patients with a presurgical orthodontic cleft-covering plate needs to consider objective factors, prioritized from most to least important: safety and quality level, user-friendliness, feasibility, and, finally, efficiency and cost. The goal of this workflow is to integrate CAD/CAM technologies into daily clinical routine to enhance technical and clinical efficiency, reduce the burden of cleft care, and simplify the implementation of these technologies in other facilities. To achieve this, a methodology based on intraoral scanning and additive manufacturing is employed to produce patient-specific passive palatal plates. The approach describes possible pitfalls and their resolution within the routine of a cleft centre, along with an exemplary case scenario. Comparative analysis between the digital workflow and the conventional process demonstrated the digital approach to be safer, higher in quality, more user-friendly, feasible, and cost- and time-effective than the conventional process.

A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Speech and Surgical Outcomes: Study Overview

AIMS

To provide an overview of the Cleft Outcomes Research NETwork (CORNET) and the CORNET Speech and Surgery study. The study is (1) comparing speech outcomes and fistula rate between two common palate repair techniques, straight-line closure with intra-velar veloplasty (IVVP) and Furlow Double-Opposing Z-palatoplasty (Furlow Z-plasty); (2) summarizing practice variation in the utilization of early intervention speech-language (EI-SL) services; and (3) exploring the association between EI-SL services and speech outcomes.

DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal, observational, comparative effectiveness, multi-center.

SITES

Twenty sites across the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand two hundred forty-seven children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L). Children with submucous cleft palate or bilateral sensorineural severe to profound hearing loss were excluded from participation.

INTERVENTIONS

Straight-line closure with IVVP or Furlow Z-plasty based on each surgeon's standard clinical protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary study outcome is perceptual ratings of hypernasality judged from speech samples collected at 3 years of age. Secondary outcomes are fistula rate, measures of speech production, and quality of life. The statistical analyses will include generalized estimating equations with propensity score weighting to address potential confounders.

CURRENT PROGRESS

Recruitment was completed in February 2023; 80% of children have been retained to date. Five hundred sixty two children have completed their final 3-year speech assessment. Final study activities will end in early 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

This study addresses long-standing questions related to the effectiveness of the two most common palatoplasty approaches and describes CORNET which provides an infrastructure that will streamline future studies in all areas of cleft care.

Single-Stage Posterior Vomerine Ostectomy and Primary Cheiloplasty in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip & Palate and Protuberant Premaxilla

OBJECTIVE

A protruded premaxilla has always been challenging to care for by cleft care professionals. This study aims to fortify the use of a single-stage premaxillary setback, with posterior vomerine ostectomy and primary cheiloplasty to achieve proper care for patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and protruded premaxilla.

DESIGN

Longitudinal retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Twenty-three outreach programs to four countries (Ecuador, Lebanon, Peru, and El-Salvador) between 2016-2022.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-five patients between the ages of 3 months and 6 years and 5 months, with BCLP and severely protruded premaxilla underwent premaxillary setback via posterior vomerine ostectomy and primary cheiloplasty. Patients with diagnosed syndromes and inaccessible vomer bone due to fused palates were excluded from the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Premaxillary setback with posterior vomerine ostectomy, bilateral gingivoperiosteoplasties (GPP), and primary cheiloplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 13.17 ± 14.1 months, with an average follow-up time of 26 ± 17 months. Patients underwent their procedures in Ecuador (72%), Peru (9%), Lebanon (8%) and El-Salvador (1%). The majority of patients were aged 1 year or less (66.7%) and were males (58.5%). All patients were operated on successfully and had good aesthetic outcomes. Only one patient developed partial necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with BCLP and severe premaxillary protrusion have always carried immense social, psychological, and financial burdens, especially in outreach settings. Our described single-stage technique has proven to be safe and effective with good aesthetic results. Further follow-up after primary repair should be done to document and ensure proper facial growth and normal nasolabial maturation.

Comparison of two surgical protocols for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate: a multidisciplinary systematic review and meta-analysis

There is still no unanimous agreement on the optimal surgical protocol(s) for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and a huge variety of protocols are employed by cleft centres across the world. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare reported patient outcomes of the Oslo protocol (and modifications) (OP) and delayed hard palate closure protocols (DHPCP) from a multidisciplinary perspective. A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted until September 2023. Studies reporting any patient outcomes of these protocols were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for evidence synthesis, including comparisons of results between the types of protocol. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. In total, 62 articles (42 studies) reporting patients with UCLP were reviewed, involving 1281 patients following the OP and 655 following DHPCP. Equally poor long-term sagittal maxillofacial growth was found, and similar results for velopharyngeal insufficiency and nasolabial appearance. In contrast, OP was associated with a lower rate of oronasal fistulas. Disregarding the scarcity of comparable evidence for some domains, the results of this review, overall, favour OP over DHPCP. However, caution should be taken when interpreting the results on velopharyngeal insufficiency and oronasal fistulas, since the possibility of confounding and other biases remains.

Long-term Results and Efficacy of Intermediate Rhinoplasty in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip: A Single Surgeon's Experience

Intermediate rhinoplasty, the correction of cleft lip nose deformities, is performed between the time of primary and secondary rhinoplasties, which is at ~6 years of age. Although intermediate rhinoplasty reduces psychological stress in school-aged children through improvements in appearance, studies on intermediate rhinoplasty are scarce. Hence, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of intermediate rhinoplasty in patients with unilateral cleft lip. Twenty-three patients with unilateral cleft lip who underwent intermediate rhinoplasty without primary rhinoplasty from 1997 to 2004 were enrolled in this retrospective study. They were categorized into total, male, and female groups. Photogrammetric analysis of 9 proportional, 5 angular, and 6 nostril-related parameters was performed using photographs that were taken after skeletal maturity had been reached; these parameters were compared with those of normal controls. The cleft group had significantly lower dome-to-columellar ratio, nasal sill ratio, labial-columellar angle, nostril width ratio, nostril height (base) ratio, nostril one-fourth medial part ratio, and nostril area ratio measurement and significantly higher alar width/mouth width ratio, columella height/alar width ratio, nasal tip protrusion/alar base width ratio, nasal dorsum angle, and nostril dimension in the cleft side values than the control group. After intermediate rhinoplasty, significant nasal improvement was achieved, including sufficient nasal tip projection, nasal height, nasal protrusion, and a relatively symmetric nasal tip without tip deviation. Intermediate rhinoplasty may contribute to reducing the psychosocial stress of school-aged children with unilateral cleft lip.

The influence of three different primary treatment protocols on 5-year-old maxillary growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

The study evaluated the effects of three different primary treatment protocols on maxillary growth in patients aged 5 years with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). The secondary objective was to assess the influence of initial cleft severity, family history of class III, and status of permanent lateral incisor on maxillary growth. In total, 54 patients with non-syndromic complete UCLP were included and grouped as follows: group An underwent lip adhesion, cheilorhinoplasty associated with tibial periosteal graft for hard palate repair, and finally veloplasty; group B underwent lip adhesion, then cheilorhinoplasty with intravelar veloplasty, and finally a hard-palate repair; group C underwent cheilorhinoplasty with intravelar veloplasty and then a hard-palate repair. Five-year maxillary growth was assessed on dental models, both clinically and digitally. No difference was found with GOSLON-Yardstick scoring. Five-year measurements showed that group C tended to have the best maxillary arch morphology (p = 0.012). Initial cleft severity did not impact maxillary growth, but status of permanent lateral incisor and family history of class III did (p = 0.019 and p = 0.004, respectively). In patients aged 5 years, the two-stage approach appeared to be the least detrimental to growth development. Predictive factors for growth retardation included the absence of lateral incisor and a family history of class III.

"Long term speech outcomes after using the Sommerlad technique for primary palatoplasty: a retrospective study in the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht."

OBJECTIVES

After cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) repair, children may develop velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) leading to speech imperfections, necessitating additional speech correcting surgery. This study examines the incidence of VPI and speech correcting surgery after Sommerlad's palatoplasty for CL/P, and its association with various clinical features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in the Wilhelmina Children's Hospital in Utrecht and child records from 380 individuals with CL/P registered from 2008 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria comprised the diagnosis of CL/P, primary palatoplasty according to Sommerlad's technique, and speech assessment at five years or older. Association between cleft type and width, presence of additional genetic disorders and postoperative complications (palatal dehiscence, fistula) were assessed using odds ratios and chi squared tests.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were included. The VPI rate was 52.7% (n = 126) and in 119 patients (49.8%) a speech correcting surgery was performed. Severe cleft type, as indicated by a higher Veau classification, was associated with a significant higher rate of speech correcting surgeries (p = 0.033). Significantly more speech correcting surgeries were performed in patients with a cleft width >10 mm, compared to patients with a cleft width ≤10 mm (p < 0.001). Patients with oronasal fistula underwent significantly more speech correcting surgeries than those without fistula (p = 0.004). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of speech correcting surgery between patients with and without genetic disorders (p = 0.890).

CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Variations in cleft morphology, cleft width and complications like oronasal fistula are associated with different speech outcomes. Future research should focus on creating a multivariable prediction model for speech correcting surgery in CL/P patients.

A multi-centric, single-blinded, randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the effectiveness of nasoalveolar moulding treatment in non-syndromic patients with complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate (NAMUC study): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) are among the most common congenital anomaly that affects up to 33,000 newborns in India every year. Nasoalveolar moulding (NAM) is a non-surgical treatment performed between 0 and 6 months of age to reduce the cleft and improve nasal aesthetics prior to lip surgery. The NAM treatment has been a controversial treatment option with 51% of the cleft teams in Europe, 37% of teams in the USA and 25 of cleft teams in India adopting this methodology. This treatment adds to the already existing high burden of care for these patients. Furthermore, the supporting evidence for this technique is limited with no high-quality long-term clinical trials available on the effectiveness of this treatment.

METHOD

The NAMUC study is an investigator-initiated, multi-centre, single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design. The study will compare the effectiveness of NAM treatment provided prior to lip surgery against the no-treatment control group in 274 patients with non-syndromic unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. The primary endpoint of the trial is the nasolabial aesthetics measured using the Asher McDade index at 5 years of age. The secondary outcomes include dentofacial development, speech, hearing, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, patient perception, feeding and intangible benefits. Randomization will be carried out via central online system and stratified based on cleft width, birth weight and clinical trial site.

DISCUSSION

We expect the results from this study on the effectiveness of treatment with NAM appliance in the long term along with the cost-effectiveness evaluation can eliminate the dilemma and differences in clinical care across the globe.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov CTRI/2022/11/047426 (Clinical Trials Registry India). Registered on 18 November 2022. The first patient was recruited on 11 December 2022. CTR India does not pick up on Google search with just the trial number. The following steps have to be carried out to pick up. How to search: ( https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/advsearch.php -use the search boxes by entering the following details: Interventional trial > November 2022 > NAMUC).

Speech Outcomes after Delayed Hard Palate Closure and Synchronous Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus and Palate

Background  The best timing of closure of the hard palate in individuals with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (CLAP) to reach the optimal speech outcomes and maxillary growth is still a subject of debate. This study evaluates changes in compensatory articulatory patterns and resonance in patients with unilateral and bilateral CLAP who underwent simultaneous closure of the hard palate and secondary alveolar bone grafting (ABG). Methods  A retrospective study of patients with nonsyndromic unilateral and bilateral CLAP who underwent delayed hard palate closure (DHPC) simultaneously with ABG at 9 to 12 years of age from 2013 to 2018. The articulatory patterns, nasality, degree of hypernasality, facial grimacing, and speech intelligibility were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Results  Forty-eight patients were included. DHPC and ABG were performed at the mean age of 10.5 years. Postoperatively hypernasal speech was still present in 54% of patients; however, the degree of hypernasality decreased in 67% ( p  < 0.001). Grimacing decreased in 27% ( p  = 0.015). Articulation disorders remained present in 85% ( p  = 0.375). Intelligible speech (grade 1 or 2) was observed in 71 compared with 35% of patients preoperatively ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion  This study showed an improved resonance and intelligibility following DHPC at the mean age of 10.5 years, however compensatory articulation errors persisted. Sequential treatments such as speech therapy play a key role in improvement of speech and may reduce remaining compensatory mechanisms following DHPC.

The Development of a European Multidisciplinary Cleft Lip and Palate Registry by the European Reference Network CRANIO: Experiences, Barriers, And Facilitators

The European Reference Network for Rare Craniofacial Aanomalies and Ear-Nose-Throat disorders aims to improve care for patients with such afflictions, including cleft lip and palate (CL/P) across Europe. Cleft treatment remains varied throughout European centers, inhibiting meaningful comparison of treatment outcomes. To overcome these issues, a European-wide common CL/P dataset and registry was developed, facilitating standardized treatment endpoints and outcome measures for international comparison and benchmarking of CL/P centers. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to determine the set-up of the registry. Previous CL/P initiatives were analyzed to create an initial dataset, refined through consensus meetings. In total, 87 cleft specialists working in specialized CL/P centers from 16 European nations participated. Consensus on a common dataset was reached. A "Level 1" dataset, with mandatory clinical and patient-reported outcome measures, and "Level 2" dataset with additional outcome measures. Finally, 2 dashboards were developed for data dissemination. The development of the European CL/P common dataset and registry tackled challenges with resource disparities, variations in specialists within CL/P teams, regulatory differences in patient data usage, patient-reported outcome measures availability in European languages, and use of assessment tools. This study described the successful development of the European Reference Network for Rare Craniofacial Aanomalies and Ear-Nose-Throat disorders CL/P common dataset and registry. This achievement will help improve patient care and outcomes for patients with CL/P in Europe. Furthermore, this study provides useful information for initiatives with similar aims.

Comparative study on cleft palate morphology after passive presurgical plate therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate

BACKGROUND

Presurgical plate therapy has been widely accepted as a treatment prior to palatal cleft closure. The effects of passive presurgical plate therapy on cleft morphology prior to single-stage unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) repair were quantified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared the dimensions of cleft width and cleft area (true cleft and palatal cleft) measured preoperatively at 2 European cleft centers. Center A performed single-stage UCLP repair in 8-month-old infants without any presurgical orthopedic treatment. Center B initiated passive presurgical plate therapy immediately after the birth of the neonates, followed by single-stage UCLP repair at 8 months of age.

RESULTS

We included 28 patients with complete UCLP from Center A and 12 patients from Center B. The average anterior width of the true cleft before surgery was significantly smaller in infants at Center B than that in Center A (p = 0.001) with 95% confidence interval of (1.8, 5.7) mm, but the average posterior width was similar in the 2 groups. The mean presurgical true cleft area amounted to 106.8 mm2 (SD = 42.4 mm2) at Center A and 71.9 mm2 (SD = 32.2 mm2) at Center B, with a confidence interval for the difference being (9.8, 60.1) mm2. This corresponded to a 32.7% reduction of the true cleft area when passive presurgical plate therapy was used for the first 8 months of the infants' life.

CONCLUSION

Passive presurgical plate therapy in UCLP significantly reduced the cleft area. Implications for the subsequent surgical outcome might depend on the surgical technique used.

Regional anesthesia in neonates with cleft lip and palate: Retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Orofacial clefts are the most common congenital abnormalities. Cleft lip reconstruction is performed mostly in 3 months of life including the neonatal period. The consumption of opioids during anesthesia is one of the monitored parameters of anesthesia safety. We investigated the effect of using an infraorbital nerve block for reducing opioid consumption during cleft lip surgery in neonates.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Overall, 100 patients who underwent primary cleft lip surgery in neonatal age between 2018 and 2021 were included in the study. The primary outcome was to compare opioid requirements during cleft lip surgery with and without using regional anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included a first oral intake from surgery between neonates with and without regional anesthesia and complications rate of infraorbital nerve block.

RESULTS

Data from 100 patients (46 patients with and 64 without regional anesthesia) were retrospectively analyzed and classified into two groups according to whether regional anesthesia during neonatal cleft lip surgery had been performed or not. The use of infraorbital block was found to be positively correlated with lower doses of opioids used during the general anesthesia for the surgery (mean 0.48 μg/kg vs 0.29 μg/kg, p < 0.05). The postoperative course was evaluated based on the interval from surgery to first oral intake which was statistically insignificant shorter (p = 0.16) in the group of patients using regional anesthesia. No complications were recorded in the group of patients with regional anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional anesthesia is associated with reduced opioid consumption during anesthesia thereby increasing the safety of anesthesia in neonates.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT06067854https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06067854?cond=NCT06067854&rank=1.

Healthcare use and direct medical costs in a cleft lip and palate population: an analysis of observed and protocolized care and costs

This study was performed to describe observed healthcare utilization and medical costs for patients with a cleft, compare these costs to the expected costs based on the treatment protocol, and explore the additional costs of implementing the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Standard Set for Cleft Lip and Palate (CL/P). Forty patients with unilateral CL/P between 0 and 24 years of age, treated between 2012 and 2019 at Erasmus University Medical Center, were included. Healthcare services (consultations, diagnostic and surgical procedures) were counted and costs were calculated. Expected costs based on the treatment protocol were calculated by multiplying healthcare products by the product prices. Correspondingly, the additional expected costs after implementing the ICHOM Standard Set (protocol + ICHOM) were calculated. Observed costs were compared with protocol costs, and the additional expected protocol + ICHOM costs were described. The total mean costs were highest in the first year after birth (€5596), mainly due to surgeries. The mean observed total costs (€40,859) for the complete treatment (0-24 years) were 1.6 times the expected protocol costs (€25,198) due to optional, non-protocolized procedures. Hospital admissions including surgery were the main cost drivers, accounting for 42% of observed costs and 70% of expected protocol costs. Implementing the ICHOM Standard Set increased protocol-based costs by 7%.

The Burden of Care of Nasoalveolar Molding: An Institutional Experience

Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) is an early presurgical intervention to facilitate primary cleft lip repair by reducing cleft severity and improving labial and nasal form. However, it continues to be associated with the burden of care that influences access and completion of therapy. The authors, therefore, aim to determine the burden of care of NAM therapy for families seeking treatment at a high-volume urban cleft center. A retrospective study of all patients undergoing primary cleft repair between 2012 and 2020 was performed. Patients were grouped based on whether or not NAM therapy was offered. Variables including physical, psychosocial, and financial factors were assessed. Two hundred and thirty patients underwent primary cleft repair between 2012 and 2020. Of these, 176 patients were indicated for NAM, with 4% discontinuing, and 54 patients did not undergo NAM. The 169 patients who completed NAM had a mean duration of treatment of 13.6±8.8 wks consisting of 15±6 scheduled NAM adjustment visits and 1±1 unscheduled visit made urgently to assess caregiver concerns. The mean travel distance was 28.6±37.1 miles. Eighty-four percent of caregivers were married, and 16% did not have English as a primary language. Though 57% had private insurance, 43% of patients received charity support for their treatment. NAM is a finite presurgical intervention that requires caregivers to participate in patient care for approximately three months of their early life. The decision to pursue NAM should be considered alongside the burden of care for caregivers to complete treatment.

Presurgical management trends and nasoalveolar molding usage for infants with cleft lip and palate in the capital of a developing country

BACKGROUNDS

Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) application is among presurgical management (PSM) techniques used for infants with cleft lip and palate (CLP). It helps to approximate the palatal cleft and to reshape the nasoalveolar complex prior to primary lip repair. This study aimed to explore types of PSM and the dental speciality provision for infants with CLP in Baghdad. The status of NAM usage and surgeons' perceptions toward NAM usage were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional paper-based questionnaire study that collected responses of surgeons perform primary lip and nose repair regarding PSM. The questionnaire was distributed amongst public and private hospitals in Baghdad. Twenty surgeons were enrolled (only those surgeons who perform primary repair for infants with CLP); two females and eighteen males.

RESULTS

The majority of participants' responses suggested that the majority of infants with CLP were provided with baby feeding plates and lip straps. Six surgeons reported that a percentage of their patients who have been provided with NAM. PSM in Baghdad was mostly supplied by orthodontists and plastic surgeons, and the next most likely providers were prosthodontists. 82.35% of the surgeons found that primary surgical repair procedures were easier with NAM than for the other infants. The rest have not perceived any differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthodontists, surgeons and prosthodontists were involved in providing PSM. Baby feeding plates and lip straps were the most common PSM in Baghdad, although NAM is not uncommon. Most surgeons believe that using NAM made surgical procedures easier and permitted the prediction of surgical outcomes.

Screening for Academic Risk Among Students With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Patterns of Risk and Qualities of Effective Tools

This study evaluated the effectiveness of academic screening measures in relation to parent-reported diagnoses.

Multicenter, retrospective cohort study including structured interviews, questionnaires, and chart reviews.

Six North American cleft centers.

Children (n = 391) with cleft lip and/or palate, ages 8 to 10 years of age (192 male) and their guardians were recruited during regular clinic visits.

Parent and child ratings on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) School Scale, child report on CleftQ School Scale, parent report on the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-Third Edition Functional Academics (ABAS-FA) Scale and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) School Competency Scale, parent interview, and medical chart review.

Risk for concerns ranged from 12% to 41%, with higher risk reflected on the CBCL-SC compared to other measures. Males with cleft palate were consistently at the highest risk. Only 9% of the sample had a parent-reported diagnosis of a learning or language disability. Ratings from the ABAS-FA and CBCL-SC had the highest utility in identifying those with language and/or learning concerns.

As cleft teams work to develop standardized batteries for screening and monitoring of patients, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of measures in identifying those at highest risk. When screening for language and learning disorders, questions related to potential academic struggles, such as increased school effort or increased school distress, are most useful. Referrals for follow-up evaluation are recommended for those identified at high risk.

Most Efficient and Meaningful Patient-Reported Appearance Assessment in Different Cleft Types and Age Groups with CLEFT-Q

BACKGROUND

The CLEFT-Q, a questionnaire developed and validated specifically for cleft patients, contains seven appearance scales. The International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) has incorporated only some CLEFT-Q appearance scales in the Standard Set to minimize burden. This study evaluates which appearance scales provide the most meaningful information in the different cleft types at specific ages, for the most efficient cleft appearance outcome assessment.

METHODS

Within this international multicenter study, outcomes of the seven appearance scales were collected, either as part of the ICHOM Standard Set, or as part of the field test study performed to validate the CLEFT-Q. Analyses were performed in separate age groups and cleft types, and involved univariate regression analyses, trend analyses, t tests, correlations, and floor and ceiling effects.

RESULTS

A total of 3116 patients were included. Scores for most appearance scales showed a downward trend by age group, with the exception of the Teeth and Jaw scales. In all cleft types, several scales correlated strongly with each other. No floor effects were observed, but ceiling effects were found in several scales in different age groups, most often in the CLEFT-Q Jaw scale.

CONCLUSIONS

A proposition for the most meaningful and efficient appearance outcome assessment in cleft patients is made. It was composed so that recommendations are of value for different cleft protocols and initiatives. Suggestions for the use of scales in the ICHOM Standard Set at different ages are given, and also from a clinical perspective. Use of the CLEFT-Q Scar, Lips, and Nose scales will provide additional relevant information.

[Surgical treatment of patients with upper micrognatia caused by cleft lip and palate]

Hypoplasia of the upper jaw to one degree or another inevitably occurs in patients with cleft lip and palate. The most difficult task is to fix skeletal deformity of the upper jaw, especially the discrepancy between its transversal dimensions due to the high risks of recurrence after treatment. One of the key stages of rehabilitation of this group of patients is orthodontics and surgical treatment aimed at eliminating functional and aesthetic problems of the dental system. The variety of treatment protocols illustrates the special approach in the treatment of patients with clefts, however, the development of recommendations to eliminate the imbalance of the upper jaw in these patients should include an interdisciplinary approach when choosing treatment tactics. The search for an effective rehabilitation algorithm continues, and the development of a digital protocol is especially useful in planning and interpreting patient treatment results. The purpose of this literature review was to analyze existing methods of conservative and surgical correction of transversal maxillary discrepancy in adult patients with cleft lip and palate.

Speech correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In cleft palate patients, the soft palate is commonly closed using straight-line palatoplasty, Z-palatoplasty, or palatoplasty with buccal flaps. Currently, it is unknown which surgical technique is superior regarding speech outcomes. The aim of this review is to study the incidence of speech correcting surgery (SCS) per soft palatoplasty technique and to identify variables which are associated with this outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to focus on the incidence of SCS after soft palatoplasty. Additional variables like surgical modification, cleft morphology, syndrome, age at palatoplasty, fistula and assessment of velopharyngeal function were reported. A modified New-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality appraisal. Pooled estimates from the meta-analysis were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

One thousand twenty-nine studies were found of which 54 were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate proportion of SCS after straight-line palatoplasty was 19% (95% CI 15-24), after Z-palatoplasty 6% (95% CI 4-9), and after palatoplasty with buccal flaps 7% (95% CI 4-11).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower SCS rate was found in patients receiving Z-palatoplasty when compared to straight-line palatoplasty. We propose a minimum set of outcome parameters which ideally should be included in future studies regarding speech outcomes after cleft palate repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Current literature reports highly heterogenous data regarding cleft palate repair. Our recommended set of parameters may address this inconsistency and could make intercenter comparison possible and of better quality.

What is the optimal assessment of speech? A multicentre, international evaluation of speech assessment in 2500 patients with a cleft

OBJECTIVES

Speech problems in patients with a cleft palate are often complex and multifactorial. Finding the optimal way of monitoring these problems is challenging. The International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) has developed a set of standardised outcome measures at specific ages for patients with a cleft lip and/or palate, including measures of speech assessment. This study evaluates the type and timing of speech outcome measures currently included in this ICHOM Standard Set. Additionally, speech assessments in other cleft protocols and initiatives are discussed.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

An international, multicentre study was set up including centres from the USA and the Netherlands. Outcomes of clinical measures and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were collected retrospectively according to the ICHOM set. PROM data from a field test of the CLEFT-Q, a questionnaire developed and validated for patients with a cleft, were collected, including participants from countries with all sorts of income statuses, to examine the value of additional moments of measurement that are used in other cleft initiatives.Data from 2500 patients were included. Measured outcomes contained univariate regression analyses, trend analyses, t-tests, correlations and floor and ceiling effects.

RESULTS

PROMs correlated low to moderate with clinical outcome measures. Clinical outcome measures correlated low to moderate with each other too. In contrast, two CLEFT-Q Scales correlated strongly with each other. All PROMs and the Percent Consonants Correct (PCC) showed an effect of age. In patients with an isolated cleft palate, a ceiling effect was found in the Intelligibility in Context Scale.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for an optimal speech outcome assessment in cleft patients are made. Measurement moments of different cleft protocols and initiatives are considered in this proposition. Concerning the type of measures, adjustment of the current PCC score outcome seems appropriate. For centres with adequate resources and specific interest in research, translation and validation of an upcoming tool, the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech Augmented, is recommended.

Presurgical Cleft Management of Infants: A Survey of ACPA Approved and International Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Teams

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO) and gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) protocols across the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved and international cleft palate (CP) and craniofacial teams.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

ACPA approved and international CP and craniofacial teams.

RESULTS

Respondents from 115 out of 215 ACPA approved and international CP and craniofacial teams permitted to contact (out of a total of 259 total teams) completed the survey (response rate  =  53.5%). There were 89 (77.4%) ACPA approved teams and the remaining international teams were mainly located in Europe (13.0%). Seventy-eight CP and craniofacial teams (67.8%) provided PSIO and 65 (83.3%) of these teams used alveolar molding (AM). Twenty-two CP and craniofacial teams (19.1%) provided GPP. A mean of 9.5  ±  2.6 different specialists were on the cleft team with the most common being orthodontists (97.4%), speech therapists (96.5%), and plastic/craniofacial surgeons (90.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most ACPA approved and ACPA registered international CP and craniofacial teams provided PSIO techniques by orthodontists using lip taping (LT) and AM, while few provide GPP.

Longitudinal Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetric Growth Analysis in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate from 3 to 12 Months of Age

This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate facial growth and soft tissue changes in infants with complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate (CUCLAP) at ages 3, 9, and 12 months. Using 3D images of 22 CUCLAP infants, average faces and distance maps for the entire face and specific regions were created. Color-coded maps highlighted more significant soft tissue changes from 3 to 9 months than from 9 to 12 months. The first interval showed substantial growth in the entire face, particularly in the forehead, eyes, lower lip, chin, and cheeks (p < 0.001), while the second interval exhibited no significant growth. This study provides insights into facial soft tissue growth in CUCLAP infants during critical developmental stages, emphasizing substantial improvements between 3 and 9 months, mainly in the chin, lower lip, and forehead. However, uneven growth occurred in the upper lip, philtrum, and nostrils throughout both intervals, with an overall decline in growth from 9 to 12 months. These findings underscore the dynamic nature of soft tissue growth in CUCLAP patients, highlighting the need to consider these patterns in treatment planning. Future research should explore the underlying factors and develop customized treatment interventions for enhanced facial aesthetics and function in this population.

Guidance to develop a multidisciplinary, international, pediatric registry: a systematic review

AIM

The European Reference Network for craniofacial anomalies and ear, nose and throat disorders (ERN-CRANIO) aims to improve craniofacial care on a European scale. Within ERN-CRANIO, the cleft lip and palate (CL/P) work stream seeks to ameliorate health outcomes for patients with CL/P. This work stream acknowledged the need for a European wide registry for comparable outcome measures and therapy endpoints to achieve this goal. This review aimed to provide a scientific basis for the conceptualization of this registry by studying previous registry initiatives.

METHODS

This review performed thematic analysis on twenty-four articles through narrative synthesis. An iterative process was used to identify key-themes required for prolonged registry success.

RESULTS

Analysis of the literature resulted in twenty-one distinct headings including quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data including registry characteristics were visualized in a table. The analysis of qualitative data resulted in the identification of fourteen key-themes, which have been summarized and visualized in a guidance.

CONCLUSION

This review has successfully identified key-themes required for the development of an international, multidisciplinary, pediatric registry for pan-European cleft care. The guidance provided by this review applies to the goals of ERN-CRANIO, but can be used by any initiative developing a registry.

Evaluation of a Granular Bone Substitute for Bone Regeneration Using an Optimized In Vivo Alveolar Cleft Model

Alveolar cleft is a common congenital deformity that requires surgical intervention, notably using autologous bone grafts in young children. Bone substitutes, in combination with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have shown promise in the repair of these defects. This study aimed to evaluate the regenerative capabilities of a granular bone substitute using an optimized alveolar cleft model. Thirty-six rats underwent a surgical procedure for the creation of a defect filled with a fragment of silicone. After 5 weeks, the silicone was removed and the biomaterial, with or without Wharton's jelly MSCs, was put into the defect, except for the control group. The rats underwent μCT scans immediately and after 4 and 8 weeks. Analyses showed a statistically significant improvement in bone regeneration in the two treatment groups compared with control at weeks 4 and 8, both for bone volume (94.64% ± 10.71% and 91.33% ± 13.30%, vs. 76.09% ± 7.99%) and mineral density (96.13% ± 24.19% and 93.01% ± 27.04%, vs. 51.64% ± 16.51%), but without having fully healed. This study validates our optimized alveolar cleft model in rats, but further work is needed to allow for the use of this granular bone substitute in the treatment of bone defects.

Long-term Outcome for Two-Stage Palatal Closure With Different Timings for Hard Palate Surgery: Craniofacial Growth and Dental Arch Relation

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate dental arch relation and craniofacial growth for individuals born with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), who had two-stage palatal surgery, with hard palate closure (HPC) at the ages of 3 or 8 years.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Ceft lip and palate team in Gothenburg, Sweden.

PATIENTS

The inclusion criteria were nonsyndromic individuals born with complete UCLP who were consecutively operated according to two different surgical protocols; soft palate closure at 6 months followed by hard palate closure at the age of 3 years (HPC3) or at the age of 8 years (HPC8). In this evaluation, 28 individuals had HPC3 and 59 individuals had HPC8.

INTERNVENTIONS

The main outcome, longitudinal series of dental casts and lateral radiographs from the ages of 5, 10, 16, and 19 years, were evaluated using GOSLON Yardstick and cephalometric analysis.

RESULTS

At the age of 10 years, 78% of the individuals with HPC3 demonstrated GOSLON scores of 1 and 2 and 86% in HPC8. At the age of 19 years, 54% of the individuals exhibited GOSLON scores of 1or 2 when compared with 74% in HPC8. A statistical significant difference for SNA was observed at the age of 5 years (P  =  .004), with a lower SNA in HPC3, but not at the ages of 10, 16 and 19 years. At the final age, SNA was 75.2° for HPC3 and 76.8° for HPC8.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in age for HPC did not have an adverse effect on long-term dental arch relationship or craniofacial growth.

Systematic Review of Postoperative Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Incidence and Association With Palatoplasty Timing and Technique

Cleft palate is among the most common congenital disorders worldwide and is correctable through surgical intervention. Sub-optimal surgical results may cause velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). When symptomatic, VPI can cause hypernasal or unintelligible speech. The postoperative risk of VPI varies significantly in the literature but may be attributed to differences in study size, cleft type, surgical technique, and operative age. To identify the potential impact of these factors, a systematic review was conducted to examine the risk of VPI after primary palatoplasty, accounting for operative age and surgical technique. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was completed for original studies that examined speech outcomes after primary palatoplasty. The search identified 4740 original articles and included 35 studies that reported mean age at palatoplasty and VPI-related outcomes. The studies included 10,795 patients with a weighted mean operative age of 15.7 months (range: 3.1-182.9 mo), and 20% (n=2186) had signs of postoperative VPI. Because of the heterogeneity in reporting of surgical technique across studies, small sample sizes, and a lack of statistical power, an analysis of the VPI risk per procedure type and timing was not possible. A lack of data and variable consensus limits our understanding of optimal timing and techniques to reduce VPI occurrence. This paper presents a call-to-action to generate: (1) high-quality research from thoughtfully designed studies; (2) greater global representation; and (3) global consensus informed by high-quality data, to make recommendations on optimal technique and timing for primary palatoplasty to reduce VPI.

Epidemiological and clinical evaluation of patients with a cleft in lower saxony Germany: a mono-center analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to provide epidemiological and clinical data on patients with orofacial clefts in Lower Saxony in Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 404 patients with orofacial clefts treated surgically at the University Medical Center Goettingen from 2001 to 2019 were analyzed in this retrospective study. Prevalence of orofacial clefts in general, orofacial clefts as manifestation of a syndrome, sex distribution, and prevalence of different cleft types was evaluated and associated with the need for corrective surgery, family history, pregnancy complications, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The prevalence of orofacial clefts for Goettingen in Lower Saxony was 1:890. 231 patients were male and 173 were female. CLP was most common (39.1%) followed by CP (34.7%), CL (14.4%), CLA (9.9%), and facial clefts (2%). The left side was more frequently affected and unilateral cleft forms occurred more often than bilateral ones. Almost 10% of the population displayed syndromic CL/P. 10.9% of all patients had a positive family history regarding CL/P, predominantly from the maternal side. Pregnancy abnormalities were found in 11.4%, most often in the form of preterm birth. Comorbidities, especially of the cardiovascular system, were found in 30.2% of the sample. 2.2% of patients treated according to the University Medical Center Goettingen protocol corrective surgery was performed in form of a velopharyngoplasty or residual hole closure.

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemiological and clinical profile of the study population resembled the expected distributions in Western populations. The large number of syndromic CL/P and associated comorbidities supports the need for specialized cleft centers and interdisciplinary cleft care.

The orthodontic management of patients with cleft lip and palate: from birth to the late mixed dentition

This is the first of two papers outlining the orthodontic management of patients with cleft lip and palate. This paper will review orthodontic input into children with cleft lip and palate from birth to the late mixed dentition before definitive orthodontics. It will emphasise the importance of timing in alveolar bone grafting, the role of the general dental practitioner and the impact of timing on definitive orthodontic outcome.

Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Speech proficiency at 10 years of age

BACKGROUND & AIM

To assess consonant proficiency and velopharyngeal function in 10-year-old children born with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) within the Scandcleft project.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

Three parallel group, randomized, clinical trials were undertaken as an international multicentre study by nine cleft teams in five countries. Three different surgical protocols for primary palate repair (Arm B-Lip and soft palate closure at 3-4 months, hard palate closure at 36 months, Arm C-Lip closure at 3-4 months, hard and soft palate closure at 12 months, and Arm D-Lip closure at 3-4 months combined with a single-layer closure of the hard palate using a vomer flap, soft palate closure at 12 months) were tested against a common procedure (Arm A-Lip and soft palate closure at 3-4 months followed by hard palate closure at 12 months) in the total cohort of 431 children born with a non-syndromic UCLP. Speech audio and video recordings of 399 children were available and perceptually analysed. Percentage of consonants correct (PCC) from a naming test, an overall rating of velopharyngeal competence (VPC) (VPC-Rate), and a composite measure (VPC-Sum) were reported.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

The mean levels of consonant proficiency (PCC score) in the trial arms were 86-92% and between 58% and 83% of the children had VPC (VPC-Sum). Only 50-73% of the participants had a consonant proficiency level with their peers. Girls performed better throughout. Long delay of the hard palate repair (Arm B) indicated lower PCC and simultaneous hard and soft palate closure higher (Arm C). However, the proportion of participants with primary VPC (not including velopharyngeal surgeries) was highest in Arm B (68%) and lowest in Arm C (47%).

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

The speech outcome in terms of PCC and VPC was low across the trials. The different protocols had their pros and cons and there is no obvious evidence to recommend any of the protocols as superior. Aspects other than primary surgical method, such as time after velopharyngeal surgery, surgical experience, hearing level, language difficulties and speech therapy, need to be thoroughly reviewed for a better understanding of what has affected speech outcome at 10 years.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject Speech outcomes at 10 years of age in children treated for UCLP are sparse and contradictory. Previous studies have examined speech outcomes and the relationship with surgical intervention in 5-year-olds. What this study adds to the existing knowledge Speech outcomes based on standardized assessment in a large group of 10-year-old children born with UCLP and surgically treated according to different protocols are presented. While speech therapy had been provided, a large proportion of the children across treatment protocols still needed further speech therapy. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Aspects other than surgery and speech function might add to the understanding of what affects speech outcome. Effective speech therapy should be available for children in addition to primary surgical repair of the cleft and secondary surgeries if needed.

Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Survey on Clinical Experience in the European Cleft Centers

Cleft lip and palate patients require complex interdisciplinary treatment, including maxillary expansion and secondary alveolar bone grafting. However, the evidence on these treatment procedures and outcomes is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to survey the subjective observations of European maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists on the maxillary expansion and bone grafting treatment protocols and the associated complications. An online questionnaire was sent to 131 centers. The questions assessed the participants' demographic data, maxillary expansion and alveolar bone grafting protocols, and the associated complications. Descriptive statistics and a t-test were used to analyze the data. The response rate was 40.5%. The average age for maxillary expansion was 9-10 years. The secondary alveolar bone grafting was planned 5-10 months after the expansion. The most common complications were asymmetric expansion, relapse, and fistula formation. The protocols and materials used vary widely among centers. Anatomical alterations and developmental processes, like tooth eruption adjacent to the cleft, should be seriously considered for treatment planning. This survey showed that there is still a lack of consensus on these treatment procedures. Further clinical trials should focus on long-term outcome evaluation to identify treatment components for optimal alveolar bone substitution and transversal maxillary expansion treatment in patients with clefts.