Cementless versus Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Usage, Costs, and Complications during the Inpatient Period

Enhanced improvement and comparable survivorship in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year analysis of patient reported outcomes and 5-year analysis of implant survivorship

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes, functional recovery, satisfaction, and implant survivorship for cementless and cemented TKA.

METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study was conducted on 453 patients. Cohort 1 (n = 373 knees) received a fully cementless construct with the Triathlon Tritanium Tibial Baseplate, Triathlon Tritanium Patella, Triathlon CR or PS Beaded Femur with Peri-Apatite, and the Triathlon Tibial Insert. Cohort 2 (n = 147 knees) received a fully cemented construct with identical implant design. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS), and Short Form 12 scores were recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Implant survivorship and adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

OKS (mean difference [MD] 1.5, p = 0.0123), KSS Symptoms for pain (with level walking [MD 0.62, p = 0.0007]; with stairs or incline [MD 0.85, p = 0.0037), KSS Patient satisfaction (MD 2.31, p = 0.0004), and KSS Functional Activities (MD 0.53, p = 0.0108) were significantly greater in Cohort 1 out to 2 years postoperatively. The Kaplan-Meier estimated all-cause survivorship was 98.2% (95% CI: 95.7-99.3%) for Cohort 1 and 97.5% (95% CI: 92.6-99.2%) for Cohort 2 (p = 0.4366).

CONCLUSION

Cementless TKA exhibited similar or greater patient outcomes, satisfaction, and function up to 2 years postoperative, while both cohorts showed comparable rates of adverse events and survivorship at 5-year follow-up. This evidence underscores the clinical value and safety of cementless TKA.

No difference in 5-year survivorship between cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty in a cohort of 5266 patients using a deep-dish mobile bearing implant

PURPOSE

The best fixation method for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of cemented and cementless fixation on prosthesis survivorship. Our primary hypothesis is that there is no difference in survivorship between cemented and cementless TKA. Our secondary hypothesis is that there is no difference in aseptic revisions and functional outcomes between cemented and cementless TKA at mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective study was done using data collected prospectively in a large cohort. The same deep-dish mobile bearing design was used for both cemented and cementless TKA. Patients were divided into two groups according to the fixation method. The survival rate between cemented and cementless TKA was compared. Functional outcomes were collected preoperatively and at the 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 5266 primary TKA included, 4549 were cementless, and 717 were cemented. At 5 years, there was no significant difference between the survivorship of the cementless (98.7% [95% confidence interval, CI: 98.2-99.1]) and cemented TKA (97.6%, [95% CI: 94.1-99.1]) (p = 0.468). There was no significant difference in the surgery-free survival at 5 years between cementless (95.8% [95% CI: 94.9-96.5]) and cemented TKA (95.5% [95% CI: 92.1-97.5]) (p = 0.508) as well as in aseptic revision: cementless (96.9% [95% CI: 96.2-97.5]) and cemented TKA (97.5 [95% CI: 95.5-98.6]) (p = 0.355). There was no significant difference in the functional outcomes at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

There was no observed difference in survivorship between cemented and cementless TKA at 5 years in this cohort of 5266 patients. Additionally, rates of reoperation and aseptic revision were similar across both fixation methods, and clinical outcomes did not differ significantly. Therefore, it may be suggested that cementless fixation is a safe option for primary TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Short-Term Outcomes of Noncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Morbid Obesity

INTRODUCTION

Noncemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compromises over 14% of all primary TKA procedures reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry. While studies have indicated similar outcomes for cemented and noncemented TKA in obese individuals, the efficacy and safety of noncemented TKA in morbidly obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m2) remain unexplored. This study compares short-term postoperative outcomes and complications between noncemented and cemented TKA in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 605 cases of patients with a BMI of at least 40 kg/m2 (22.5% of 2,691 total cases at a single tertiary center) who underwent TKA was conducted. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Data collected included age, BMI, sex, race, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Postoperative complications were tracked, including 90-day readmission, 1-year mortality, 1-year revision surgery, wound complications, fractures, and infections. Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests and continuous variables with t-tests.

RESULTS

Of the included patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2, 40 (6.6%) received noncemented TKA. The noncemented TKA group had a lower mean BMI (43.3 ± 3.1 vs. 45.0 ± 4.4; P = 0.012) and a higher proportion of male patients compared with the cemented group (n = 17 [42.5%] vs. n = 143 [25.3%]; P = 0.028). Surgical time was shorter for noncemented TKA (97 ± 27 minutes) than for cemented TKA (118.0 ± 39.4 minutes; P = 0.001). No significant differences were found in length of stay and postoperative complications, including 90-day readmission, 1-year mortality, revision surgery rates, wound complications, fractures, and infections.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the study suggest that noncemented TKA may be a feasible, safe alternative and not inferior to the standard cemented TKA in patients with morbid obesity with the benefit of decreasing surgical time.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Resurgence-Who, When, Where, and How?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common procedures in orthopaedics, but there is still debate over the optimal fixation method for long-term durability: cement versus cementless bone ingrowth. Recent improvements in implant materials and technology have offered the possibility of cementless TKA to change clinical practice with durable, stable biological fixation of the implants, improved operative efficiency, and optimal long-term results, particularly in younger and more active patients.

METHODS

This symposium evaluated the history of cementless TKA, the recent resurgence, and appropriate patient selection, as well as the historical and modern-generation outcomes of each implant (tibia, femur, and patella). Additionally, surgical technique pearls to assist in reliable, reproducible outcomes were detailed.

RESULTS

Historically, cemented fixation has been the gold standard for TKA. However, cementless fixation is increasing in prevalence in the United States and globally, with equivalent or improved results demonstrated in appropriately selected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless TKA provides durable biologic fixation and successful long-term results with improved operating room efficiency. Cementless TKA may be broadly utilized in appropriately selected patients, with intraoperative care taken to perform meticulous bone cuts to promote appropriate bony contact and biologic fixation.

Fixation options for total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive literature review

Total knee arthroplasty is a consistently successful, cost-efficient, and highly effective surgical procedure for treating severe knee osteoarthritis. The success and longevity of total knee arthroplasty depend significantly on the fixation method used to secure the prosthetic components. This comprehensive review examines the primary fixation methods (cemented, cementless, and hybrid fixation), analysing their biomechanics, clinical outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages, focusing on recent advances and trends in total knee arthroplasty fixation.

The Utilization of Press-Fit Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Evenly Distributed: A National Registry Review

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates trends of cemented versus press-fit total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that press-fit TKA is more common in younger and obese patients. There may also be racial, geographic, and institutional variation.

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to conduct a retrospective review of primary TKA procedures for osteoarthritis in the United States between January 2019 and March 2022. The objective was to identify differences in incidence, demographics, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and institutional teaching status (teaching vs. non-teaching) between press-fit and cemented TKAs.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-seven thousand four hundred two patients (61% female, average age 68 years, 88.3% White) underwent cemented TKA versus 50,880 patients (52% female, average age 65 years, 89% White) underwent press-fit TKA. Overall, 20.8% of press-fit versus 19.9% of cemented TKA had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 and 15.2% of press-fit versus 12.5% of cemented TKA had BMI >40 ( P < 0.001). Patients undergoing press-fit TKA were less likely Black (OR = 0.727; P < 0.0001), Asian (OR = 0.651, P < 0.0001), and Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR = 0.705, P < 0.02) with White as the reference group. Northeastern and Southern United States were more likely to use press-fit TKA than the Midwest (OR = 1.89 and OR = 1.87, P < 0.0001) and West (OR = 1.67; and OR = 1.65; P < 0.0001). Press-fit TKA incidence in 2019 was 9.9% versus 20.6% in 2022 ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Press-fit TKA is increasingly more common in Northeastern and Southern United States, and patients are older than expected. Patients with BMI >35 had a slightly higher rate of undergoing press-fit than cemented TKA. Notable racial differences also exist. Additional research addressing racial disparities and evaluating longevity of press-fit designs is needed.

Trend of using cementless total knee arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis from 2015 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Modern cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fixation has shown comparable long-term outcomes to cemented TKA, but the trend of using cementless TKA remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the trend of using cementless TKA based on a national database.

METHODS

The patients undergoing cementless TKA between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively extracted from the PearlDiver (Mariner dataset) Database. The annual percentage of cementless TKA was calculated using the following formula: annual number of cementless TKA/annual number of TKA. The trend of the number of patients undergoing cementless TKA was created according to a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) calculation of annual percentages. Patient age, comorbidity, region, insurance type, etc., were also investigated. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of the 574,848 patients who received TKA, 546,731 (95%) underwent cemented fixation and 28,117 (5%) underwent cementless fixation. From 2015 to 2021, the use of cementless TKA significantly increased by 242% from 3 to 9% (compounded annual growth rate (CAGR): + 20%; P < 0.05). From 2015 to 2021, we observed a CAGR greater than 15% for all age groups (< 50, 50-59, 60-69, 70-74, 75 +), insurance types (cash, commercial, government, Medicare, Medicaid), regions (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), sex (male and female), and certain comorbidities (osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, underweight (BMI < 18.5), rheumatoid arthritis) (P < 0.05 for all). Patients undergoing TKA with chronic kidney disease, prior fragility fractures, and dementia demonstrated a CAGR of + 9%-13% from 2015 to 2021 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

From 2015 to 2021, the use of cementless TKA saw a dramatic increase in all patient populations. However, there is still no consensus on when to cement and in whom. Clinical practice guidelines are needed to ensure safe and effective use of cementless fixation.

The economic and clinical impact of fast- versus slow-setting cement in primary total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

New bone cement products have been developed attempting to shorten their setting time and thus cut down time in the operating room. This study determines whether faster-setting bone cement shortens time in the operating room, and whether the quantity used compromises postoperative TKA outcomes. Additionally, this study looks at cost analyses of the quantity of bone cement used in TKA procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred and sixty patients at a single institution with primary TKA surgeries between January 2019 and December 2021, and a clinic follow-up of at least one year, were identified. Five cement products used in this time period were identified and categorized by fast- or slow-setting products if their set times were marketed below or above six minutes, respectively.

RESULTS

Estimated blood loss was higher in patients receiving fast-setting cements (160.0 vs 126.4 mL; p = 0.0009); however, operative time showed no difference between the cohorts (88.2 vs 89.2 min; p = 0.99). Fewer bags of cement were used for the fast cohort (1.3 vs 1.8 bags; p < 0.0001). The fast group was significantly cheaper on average per patient only when comparing between antibiotic bone cements (p = 0.007). No differences were found in postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences were found in operative times between the fast and slow cemented groups. Fewer bags of faster-setting cement only proved cost saving relative to other antibiotic bone cements studied. Nonetheless, decreased usage of fast cement did not result in any different postoperative outcomes compared to slow cements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

New Horizons of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Considering the increasing number of young and active patients needing TKA, orthopedic surgeons are looking for a long-lasting and physiological bond for the prosthetic implant. Multiple advantages have been associated with cementless fixation including higher preservation of the native bone stock, avoidance of cement debris with subsequent potential third-body wear, and the achievement of a natural bond and osseointegration between the implant and the bone that will provide a durable and stable fixation.

DISCUSSION

Innovations in technology and design have helped modern cementless TKA implants to improve dramatically. Better coefficient of friction and reduced Young's modulus mismatch between the implant and host bone have been related to the use of porous metal surfaces. Moreover, biologically active coatings have been used on modern implants such as periapatite and hydroxyapatite. These factors have increased the potential for ingrowth by reducing micromotion and increasing osteoconductive properties. New materials with better biocompatibility, porosity, and roughness have been introduced to increase implant stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovations in technology and design have helped modern cementless TKA implants improve primary stability in both the femur and tibia. This means that short-term follow-up are comparable to cemented. These positive prognostic factors may lead to a future in which cementless fixation may be considered the gold-standard technique in young and active patients.

Trends and risk factors for readmissions following press-fit total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee: a five-year analysis

INTRODUCTION

The development of new prostheses with improved osseointegration, bone preservation, and reduced cost has renewed interest in uncemented total knee arthroplasty (UCTKA). In the current study, we aimed to: (1) assess demographic data of patients who were and were not readmitted and (2) identify patient-specific risk factors associated with readmission.

METHODS

A retrospective query from the PearlDiver database was performed from January 1, 2015, to October 31, 2020. International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding was used to distinguish cohorts of patients who had osteoarthritis of the knee and underwent UCTKA. Patients readmitted within 90 days were classified as the study population, while those who were not readmitted were classified as control. A linear regression model was utilized to analyze readmission risk factors.

RESULTS

The query yielded 14,575 patients, with 986 (6.8%) being readmitted. Patient demographics such as age (P < 0.0001), sex (P < 0.009), and comorbidity (P < 0.0001) were associated with annual 90-day readmission. Patient-specific risk factors associated with 90-day readmission following press-fit total knee arthroplasty were: arrhythmia (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.11-1.49, P < 0.0005), coagulopathy (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.63, P < 0.0007), fluid and electrolyte abnormalities (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.38-1.84, P < 0.0001), iron deficiency anemia (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.27-1.73, P < 0.0001), and obesity (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.18-1.60, P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that patients with comorbidities, such as fluid and electrolyte problems, iron deficiency anemia, and obesity, were at an increased risk of readmission after having an uncemented total knee replacement. The risks of readmission following an uncemented total knee arthroplasty can be discussed with patients who have certain comorbidities by arthroplasty surgeons.

A TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP AFTER CEMENTLESS TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL

The aim of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the outcome of 109 cementless total knee arthroplasties performed in 101 patients at the General Hospital Bjelovar from January 2010 to October 2012. The survivorship of endoprosthesis and the clinical outcome were analyzed at the 10-year follow-up. The Oxford Knee Score was completed by 47% of patients with an average result of 31,2±9,4. There were two cases of aseptic loosening and one case of periprosthetic infection. Six patients suffered a periprosthetic fracture and were treated with osteosynthesis.

Comparison of the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin and fondaparinux sodium after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and fondaparinux sodium (FPX) are routinely used to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we compared the effects of these agents in preventing post-TKA DVT.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients who underwent unilateral TKA for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis at the Ningxia Medical University General Hospital between September 2021 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the anticoagulation agent used, the patients were divided into LMWH and FPX groups (34 and 37 patients, respectively). Changes in perioperative coagulation-related indicators, d-dimer and platelet count, perioperative complete blood count, amount of blood loss, lower-limb DVT, pulmonary embolism, and allogeneic blood transfusion were determined.

RESULTS

Intergroup differences in d-dimer or fibrinogen (FBG) levels before and 1 or 3 days after surgery were not significant (all p > 0.05); within-group pairwise comparisons indicated significant differences (all, p < 0.05). Intergroup differences in preoperative prothrombin time (PT), thrombin time, activated partial PT, and international normalized ratio were not significant (all p > 0.05), whereas significant differences were detected on postoperative days 1 and 3 (all p < 0.05). Intergroup differences in platelet counts before and 1 or 3 days after surgery were not significantly different (all p > 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of hemoglobin and hematocrit levels between patients in the same group before and 1 or 3 days after surgery revealed significant differences in both groups (all p < 0.05); however, intergroup differences were not significant (all p > 0.05). Although intergroup differences in visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and 1 or 3 days after surgery were not significant (p > 0.05), we detected significant intragroup differences in VAS scores before and 1 or 3 days after surgery (p < 0.05). The treatment cost ratio was significantly lower in the LMWH group than in the FPX group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both LMWH and FPX can effectively prevent DVT after TKA. There are some suggestive signals that FPX may have more beneficial pharmacological effects and clinical significance, while LMWH is cheaper and therefore more economical.

Analysis of different geometrical features to achieve close-to-bone stiffness material properties in medical device: A feasibility numerical study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In orthopedic medical devices, elasto-plastic behavior differences between bone and metallic materials could lead to mechanical issues at the bone-implant interface, as stress shielding. Those issue are mainly related to knee and hip arthroplasty, and they could be responsible for implant failure. To reduce mismatching-related adverse events between bone and prosthesis mechanical properties, modifying the implant's internal geometry varying the bulk stiffness and density could be the right approach. Therefore, this feasibility study aims to assess which in-body gap geometry improves, by reducing, the bulk stiffness.

METHODS

Using five finite element models, a uniaxial compression test in five cubes with a 20 mm thickness was simulated and analyzed. The displacements, strain and Young Modulus were calculated in four cubes, each containing internal prismatic gaps with different transversal sections (squared, hexagonal, octagonal, and circular). Those were compared with a fifth full-volume cube used as control.

RESULTS

The most significant difference have been achieved in displacement values, in cubes containing internal gaps with hexagonal and circular transversal sections (82 µm and 82.5 µm, respectively), when compared to the full-volume cube (69.3 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that hexagonal and circular shape of the gaps allows obtaining the lower rigidity in a size range of 4 mm, offering a starting approach to achieve a "close-to-bone" material, with a potential use in prosthetic devices with limited thickness.

Intra-articular administration of vancomycin and tobramycin during primary cementless total knee arthroplasty : determination of intra-articular and serum elution profiles

AIMS

Intra-articular administration of antibiotics during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may represent a safe, cost-effective strategy to reduce the risk of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Vancomycin with an aminoglycoside provides antimicrobial cover for most organisms isolated from acute PJI after TKA. However, the intra-articular doses required to achieve sustained therapeutic intra-articular levels while remaining below toxic serum levels is unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the intra-articular and serum levels of vancomycin and tobramycin over the first 24 hours postoperatively after intra-articular administration in primary cementless TKA.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed. Patients were excluded if they had poor renal function, known allergic reaction to vancomycin or tobramycin, received intravenous vancomycin, or were scheduled for same-day discharge. All patients received 600 mg tobramycin and 1 g of vancomycin powder suspended in 25 cc of normal saline and injected into the joint after closure of the arthrotomy. Serum from peripheral venous blood and drain fluid samples were collected at one, four, and 24 hours postoperatively. All concentrations are reported in µg per ml.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were included in final analysis. At one, four, and 24 hours postoperatively, mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) serum concentrations were 2.4 (0.7 to 4.1), 5.0 (3.1 to 6.9), and 4.8 (2.8 to 6.9) for vancomycin and 4.9 (3.4 to 6.3), 7.0 (5.8 to 8.2), and 1.3 (0.8 to 1.8) for tobramycin; intra-articular concentrations were 1,900.6 (1,492.5 to 2,308.8), 717.9 (485.5 to 950.3), and 162.2 (20.5 to 304.0) for vancomycin and 2,105.3 (1,389.9 to 2,820.6), 403.2 (266.6 to 539.7), and 98.8 (0 to 206.5) for tobramycin.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular administration of 1 g of vancomycin and 600 mg of tobramycin as a solution after closure of the arthrotomy in primary cementless TKA achieves therapeutic intra-articular concentrations over the first 24 hours postoperatively and does not reach sustained toxic levels in peripheral blood. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1702-1708.

Cementless knee arthroplasty: a review of recent performance

Cementless knee arthroplasty has seen a recent resurgence in popularity due to conceptual advantages, including improved osseointegration providing biological fixation, increased surgical efficiency, and reduced systemic complications associated with cement impaction and wear from cement debris. Increasingly younger and higher demand patients are requiring knee arthroplasty, and as such, there is optimism cementless fixation may improve implant survivorship and functional outcomes.

Compared to cemented implants, the National Joint Registry (NJR) currently reports higher revision rates in cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but lower in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, recent studies are beginning to show excellent outcomes with cementless implants, particularly with UKA which has shown superior performance to cemented varieties. Cementless TKA has yet to show long-term benefit, and currently performs equivalently to cemented in short- to medium-term cohort studies. However, with novel concepts including 3D-printed coatings, robotic-assisted surgery, radiostereometric analysis, and kinematic or functional knee alignment principles, it is hoped they may help improve the outcomes of cementless TKA in the long-term. In addition, though cementless implant costs remain higher due to novel implant coatings, it is speculated cost-effectiveness can be achieved through greater surgical efficiency and potential reduction in revision costs. There is paucity of level one data on long-term outcomes between fixation methods and the cost-effectiveness of modern cementless knee arthroplasty.

This review explores recent literature on cementless knee arthroplasty, with regards to clinical outcomes, implant survivorship, complications, and cost-effectiveness; providing a concise update to assist clinicians on implant choice.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(1):48–57.

No differences in cost-effectiveness and short-term functional outcomes between cemented and uncemented total knee arthroplasty

Background

There is an ongoing debate regarding optimal fixation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however cost has not been addressed as profoundly. Therefore, the current study primarily aimed to compare costs and cost-effectiveness 1 year after cemented or uncemented TKA. A secondary objective was to compare short-term functional outcomes between both groups.

Methods

A posthoc prospective observational multicenter cohort study of 60 cemented and 50 uncemented Low Contact Stress (LCS) knee systems. Outcome was evaluated using the EuroQol5D-3 L (EQ5D) index, in order to calculate quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Total costs were calculated considering direct costs within the hospital setting (inpatient cost) as well as direct and indirect costs outside the hospital. Cost-effectiveness (total costs per QALY), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were compared between cemented and uncemented cases at 1 year after surgery. HealthBASKET project, a micro-costing approach, represents the Dutch costs and situation and was used to calculate hospital stay. (In) direct costs outside the healthcare (medical cost and productivity cost) were determined using two validated questionnaires.

Results

Median costs per QALY were similar between cemented and uncemented TKA patients (€16,269 and €17,727 respectively; p = 0.50). Median OKS (44 and 42; p = 0.79), EQ5D (0.88 and 0.90; p = 0.82) and NRS for pain (1.0 and 1.0; p = 0.48) and satisfaction (9.0 and 9.0; p = 0.15) were also comparable between both groups.

Conclusion

For this type of knee implant (LCS), inpatient hospital costs and costs after hospitalization were comparable between groups.