Streptozocin alone compared with streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma

The efficacy of streptozotocin in managing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms - A systematic review

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pan-NETs) represent a highly heterogeneous and complex pathology, with therapeutic management and prognosis influenced by several biological and clinical characteristics. Chemotherapy, including regimens based on capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) or the combination of streptozotocin and 5-fluorouracil (STZ-5FU), is indicated for rapidly growing, symptomatic, or high-burden disease requiring swift cytoreduction. Historical studies provide scientific evidence for the STZ-5FU regimen, often retrospective and frequently analyzing small series. Despite these limitations, the efficacy of this treatment is well-established, and it is included in all guidelines as a therapeutic option. This systematic review aims to gather scientific evidence on using STZ-based chemotherapy to assess its real impact in managing well-differentiated metastatic or unresectable pan-NETs.

Biomarkers to Inform Prognosis and Treatment for Unresectable or Metastatic GEP-NENs

Importance

Evidence-based treatment decisions for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) require individualized patient-centered decision-making that accounts for patient and cancer characteristics.

Objective

To create an accessible guidance document to educate clinicians and patients on biomarkers informing prognosis and treatment in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs.

Methods

A multidisciplinary panel in-person workshop was convened to define methods. English language articles published from January 2016 to January 2023 in PubMed (MEDLINE) and relevant conference abstracts were reviewed to investigate prognostic and treatment-informing features in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs. Data from included studies were used to form evidence-based recommendations. Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Consensus was reached via electronic survey following a modified Delphi method.

Findings

A total of 131 publications were identified, including 8 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 randomized clinical trials, 29 prospective studies, and 88 retrospective cohort studies. After 2 rounds of surveys, 24 recommendations and 5 good clinical practice statements were developed, with full consensus among panelists. Recommendations focused on tumor and functional imaging characteristics, blood-based biomarkers, and carcinoid heart disease. A single strong recommendation was made for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome informing treatment in midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Conditional recommendations were made to use grade, morphology, primary site, and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic levels to inform treatment. The guidance document was endorsed by the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study results suggest that select factors have sufficient evidence to inform care in GEP-NENs, but the evidence for most biomarkers is weak. This article may help guide management and identify gaps for future research to advance personalized medicine and improve outcomes for patients with GEP-NENs.

Multicenter validation study of a treatment selection MAP for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogs, molecular-targeted agents and cytotoxic anticancer agents are available as therapeutic agents for the systemic treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and we have developed a first-line treatment selection MAP to enable selection of the optimal treatment strategy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The purpose of this study was to validate the usefulness of the treatment selection MAP.

METHODS

Patients who had received systemic therapy for a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor between January 2017 and December 2020 were compared according to whether they had been treated as recommended by the MAP (matched patients) or not (unmatched patients) to determine whether better outcomes were achieved by the matched patients. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the matched group and unmatched groups in the somatostatin analog, molecular-targeted agent and cytotoxic anticancer agents areas of the MAP.

RESULTS

There were 41 (55%) MAP-matched patients in all areas among the 74 patients registered at seven hospitals. The MAP-matched rates were 100, 77 and 38% in the somatostatin analog area, molecular-targeted agent area and cytotoxic anticancer agents area, respectively. All of the unmatched patients had been selected for less intensive treatment. The median progression-free survival in the matched group and unmatched group in the molecular-targeted agent area of the MAP were 46.6 and 15.4 months, respectively, and a multivariate analysis identified MAP-matched (hazard ratio 0.18 [95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.87], P = 0.032) as the only significant independent favorable predictive factor.

CONCLUSION

The usefulness of the MAP for treatment selection was validated in the molecular-targeted agent area of the MAP.

An Overview of Altered Pathways Associated with Sensitivity to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Strengths and Prospects

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a diverse group of malignancies with a shared phenotype but varying prognosis and response to current treatments. Based on their morphological features and rate of proliferation, NENs can be classified into two main groups with a distinct clinical behavior and response to treatment: (i) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) or carcinoids (with a low proliferation rate), and (ii) poorly differentiated small- or large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (with a high proliferation rate). For certain NENs (such as pancreatic tumors, higher-grade tumors, and those with DNA damage repair defects), chemotherapy is the main therapeutic approach. Among the different chemotherapic agents, cisplatin and carboplatin, in combination with etoposide, have shown the greatest efficacy in treating NECs compared to NETs. The cytotoxic effects of cisplatin and carboplatin are primarily due to their binding to DNA, which interferes with normal DNA transcription and/or replication. Consistent with this, NECs, which often have mutations in pathways involved in DNA repair (such as Rb, MDM2, BRCA, and PTEN), have a high response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Identifying mutations that affect molecular pathways involved in the initiation and progression of NENs can be crucial in predicting the response to platinum chemotherapy. This review aims to highlight targetable mutations that could serve as predictors of therapeutic response to platinum-based chemotherapy in NENs.

Systemic Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) account for approximately 2% of all pancreatic malignancies. Several systemic treatment options have been developed over the last four decades, ranging from cytotoxic chemotherapy and octreotide to newer targeted therapies like sunitinib, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib. Although surgery or liver-directed therapy remains cornerstone for management of metastatic PanNETs, however, they remain unfeasible in majority of cases. PanNETs behave differently than SI-NETs (small intestinal NET); the former is more aggressive and less responsive to somatostatin-based therapies. The optimal sequence of the systemic therapies for the advanced PanNETs depends mainly on the tumor burden, Ki-67 index, and the tempo of the disease. In the end, drawing from ENETS (European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society) and ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) guidelines, we propose a working algorithm for the management of advanced PanNETs, not amenable to surgery or liver-directed therapies.

Predictive Factors of Response to Streptozotocin in Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs) may exhibit a heterogeneous clinical course, ranging from indolent to progressive/metastatic behavior. In the latter scenario, streptozocin (STZ) is considered the cornerstone of systemic treatment; however, response to STZ-based chemotherapy may vary among individuals. In this narrative review, we aimed to identify the predictive factors of response to STZ in advanced Pan-NENs. We performed an extensive search in international online databases for published studies and ongoing clinical trials evaluating STZ in Pan-NENs. We found 11 pertinent studies evaluating 17 patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related factors. Age, CgA blood levels, tumor grade, Ki-67% index, anatomical location of the primary tumor, tumor stage, site of metastasis origin, liver tumor burden, extrahepatic spread, functional status, O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) status, line of therapy, and response to previous treatments were all statistically associated with radiological response and/or survival. The identified predictors may help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions, in this way improving clinical outcomes in patients with advanced Pan-NENs.

Systemic Therapy for Tumor Control in Metastatic Well-Differentiated Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211)

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective responses. Retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that capecitabine and temozolomide are associated with high response rates (RRs) and long progression-free survival (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide versus capecitabine/temozolomide in patients with advanced low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic NETs. Key eligibility criteria included progression within the preceding 12 months and no prior temozolomide, dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide or dacarbazine, capecitabine or fluorouracil. The primary end point was PFS; secondary endpoints were overall survival, RR, safety, and methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) by immunohistochemistry and promoter methylation.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine and temozolomide (n = 72); the primary analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, the median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide versus 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for the primary end point (stratified log-rank P = .022). In the final analysis (May 2021), the median overall survival was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.82, P = .42). MGMT deficiency was associated with response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared with temozolomide alone in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. The median PFS and RR observed with capecitabine/temozolomide are the highest reported in a randomized study for pancreatic NETs. MGMT deficiency was associated with response, and although routine MGMT testing is not recommended, it can be considered for select patients in need of objective response (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01824875).

Chemotherapy in Well Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) G1, G2, and G3: A Narrative Review

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms with a wide spectrum of clinical behavior, from the long survival of well-differentiated NETs to the dismal prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), being G3 NETs a recently recognized intermediate entity. While the role of chemotherapy is well established in NECs, data on NETs mostly derives from small studies, experts' opinions, and extrapolating results from small-cell lung cancer studies. This narrative review aims to summarize available evidence about the use of chemotherapy in the setting of G1-2 NETs and G3 NETs. We performed literature research in PubMed Library for all articles published up to September 2022 about the efficacy of chemotherapy in NETs. Treatment regimens with STZ-5FU, CAPTEM, and anti-metabolite-based treatment are the most active and tolerated in gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs) G1-G2, while platinum-based regimens (FOLFOX/XELOX) and TEM/CAPTEM showed the best activity in thoracic NETs. Solid evidence about chemotherapy efficacy in G3 NETs is still lacking. Literature data support the use of chemotherapy in low-intermediate grade NETs after the failure of other therapies or if tumor shrinkage is needed. Studies assessing G3 NETs independently from NECs are needed to better understand the role of chemotherapy in this setting.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung and gastrointestinal system: convergent biology and a path to better therapies

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) can develop in almost any organ and span a spectrum from well-differentiated and indolent neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) to poorly differentiated and highly aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), including small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). These neoplasms are thought to primarily derive from neuroendocrine precursor cells located throughout the body and can also arise through neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of organ-specific epithelial cell types. Hence, NENs constitute a group of tumour types that share key genomic and phenotypic characteristics irrespective of their site of origin, albeit with some organ-specific differences. The establishment of representative preclinical models for several of these disease entities together with analyses of human tumour specimens has provided important insights into crucial aspects of their biology with therapeutic implications. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of NENs of the gastrointestinal system and lung from clinical and biological perspectives. Research on NENs has typically been siloed by the tumour site of origin, and a cross-cutting view might enable advances in one area to accelerate research in others. Therefore, we aim to emphasize that a better understanding of the commonalities and differences of NENs arising in different organs might more effectively inform clinical research to define therapeutic targets and ultimately optimize patient care.

Capecitabine and Temozolomide (CAPTEM) in Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NENs): A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Background

Retrospective studies and single center experiences suggest a role of capecitabine combined with temozolomide (CAPTEM) in neuroendocrine tumors (NENs).

Methods

We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of CAPTEM in patients affected with NENs, with the aim to better clarify the role of this regimen in the therapeutic algorithm of NENs.

Results

A total of 42 articles and 1818 patients were included in our review. The overall disease control rate was 77% (range 43.5%-100%). The median progression free survival ranged from 4 to 38.5 months, while the median overall survival ranged from 8 to 103 months. Safety analysis showed an occurrence of G3-G4 toxicities in 16.4% of the entire population. The most common toxicities were hematological (27.2%), gastrointestinal (8.3%,) and cutaneous (3.2%).

Conclusion

This systematic review demonstrated that CAPTEM was an effective and relatively safe treatment for patients with advanced well-moderate differentiated NENs of gastroenteropancreatic, lung and unknown origin.

Treatment Sequencing Strategies in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Review

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) incidence has grown. The treatment landscape for advanced NETs is rapidly evolving, but there are limited head-to-head data to guide treatment sequencing decisions. We assessed the available clinical data to aid practicing clinicians in their routine clinical decision-making. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy benefits for new therapies in advanced NETs. Emerging long-term data from these trials have enabled clinicians to make more accurate risk-benefit assessments, particularly for patients receiving multiple lines of therapy. However, clinical data specifically regarding treatment sequencing are limited. In lieu of definitive data, treatment sequencing should be based on disease-related factors (e.g., site of tumor origin, volume of disease) and patient-related characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, patient preferences). Clinical decision-making in advanced NETs remains highly individualized and complex; important evidence gaps regarding treatment sequencing remain. Given this, advanced NET management should be a joint effort of multidisciplinary teams at referring and high-volume centers. Additional clinical trial and real-world evidence are needed to meet the challenge of understanding how to sequence available NET therapies. Until these trials are conducted, the best practices provided in this review may serve as a guide for clinicians making treatment sequencing decisions based on the available data.

Treatment options of metastatic and nonmetastatic VIPoma: a review

PURPOSE

VIPoma belongs to the group of neuroendocrine neoplasms. These tumours are located mostly in the pancreas and produce high levels of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). In most cases, a metastatic state has already been reached at the initial diagnosis, with high levels of VIP leading to a wide spectrum of presenting symptoms. These symptoms include intense diarrhoea and subsequent hypopotassaemia but also cardiac complications, with life-threatening consequences. Treatment options include symptomatic therapy, systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy, as well as radiation and surgery. Due to the low incidence of VIPoma, there are no prospective studies or evidence-based therapeutic standards to date.

METHODS

To evaluate the possible impact of different therapy strategies, we performed literature research using PubMed.

RESULTS

All possible treatment modalities for VIPoma have at least one of two therapy goals: antisecretory effects (symptom control) and antitumoural effects (tumour burden reduction). Symptomatic therapy is the most important in the emergency setting to rehydrate, balance electrolytes and stabilise the patient. Symptomatic therapy is also of great importance perioperatively. Somatostatin analogues play a major role in symptom control, although their efficiency is often limited. Chemotherapy may be effective in reaching stable disease for a certain time period, although its impact on symptom control is limited and often delayed. Among targeted therapy options, the usage of sunitinib appears to be the most effective in terms of symptom control and showing antitumoural effects at the same time. Experience with radiation is still limited; however, local ablative procedures seem to be promising options. Peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues (SSAs, 177Lu-DOTATATE) offers a targeted approach, especially in patients with high somatostatin receptor density. Surgery is the first-line therapy for nonmetastatic VIPoma. Additionally, if the resection of all visible tumour lesions is possible, the surgical approach seems preferable to other strategies in highly symptomatic patients. The role of surgery in very advanced stages where only tumour debulking is possible remains debatable. However, a high rate of immediate symptom control can be achieved by tumour debulking followed by somatostatin therapy, although the impact on survival remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Surgery is the only curative option for nonmetastatic VIPoma. Additionally, surgery should be a first-line therapy option for highly symptomatic patients, especially if the resection of all tumour lesions (primary tumour and metastasis) is achievable. In frail patients, other modalities can be used.

Phase I/II study of streptozocin monotherapy in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

This phase I/II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of streptozocin (STZ) in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients received up to 4 cycles of intravenous STZ at either 500 mg/m2 once daily for 5 consecutive days every 6 weeks (daily regimen) or at 1000-1500 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 weeks (weekly regimen). Tumor response was evaluated using the modified RECIST criteria ver. 1.1, and adverse events were assessed by grade according to the National Cancer Institute CTCAE (ver. 4.0).

RESULTS

Fourteen (63.6%) patients completed the study protocol. No patients had complete response; partial response in 2 (9.1%), stable disease in 17 (77.3%), non-complete response/non-progressive disease in 2 (9.1%) and only 1 (4.5%) had non-evaluable disease. Excluding the latter, the response rate in the daily and weekly regimens was 6.7% (1/15) and 16.7% (1/6), respectively, with an overall response rate of 9.5% (2/21). However, the best overall response in each patient showed that the disease control rate was 100%.Adverse events occurred in all 22 patients, including 17 grade 3 adverse events in 11 patients; however, no grade 4 or 5 adverse events were reported. Prophylactic hydration and antiemetic treatment reduced the severity and incidence of nephrotoxicity, nausea and vomiting. Plasma STZ concentrations decreased rapidly after termination of infusion, with a half-life of 32-40 min. Neither repeated administration nor dose increases affected pharmacokinetic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

STZ may be a useful option for Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Position Statement on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Response Evaluation to Systemic Therapies of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, With a Special Focus on Radioligand Therapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to provide a guidance for the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nominal group and Delphi techniques were used. A steering committee of 8 experts reviewed the current management of NETs, identified controversies and gaps, critically analyzed the available evidence, and formulated several guiding statements for clinicians. Subsequently, a panel of 26 experts, was selected to test agreement with the statements through 2 Delphi rounds. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = totally agree to 4 = totally disagree. The agreement was considered if ≥75% of answers pertained to Categories 1 and 2 (consensus with the agreement) or Categories 3 and 4 (consensus with the disagreement).

RESULTS

Overall, 132 statements were proposed, which incorporated the following areas: (1) overarching principles; (2) progression and treatment response criteria; (3) advanced gastro-enteric NETs; (4) advanced pancreatic NETs; (5) advanced NETs in other locations; (6) re-treatment with radioligand therapy (RLT); (7) neoadjuvant therapy. After 2 Delphi rounds, only 4 statements lacked a clear consensus. RLT was not only recommended in the sequencing of different NETs but also as neoadjuvant treatment, while several indications for retreatment with RLT were also established.

CONCLUSION

This document sought to pull together the experts' attitudes when dealing with different clinical scenarios of patients suffering from NETs, with RLT having a specific role where evidence-based data are limited.

Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors in Older Patients: Current Status and Potential Therapies

Neuroendocrine tumors are a rare and heterogenous group of neoplasms that arise from hormone-producing cells throughout the body, with the greatest increase in incidence occurring among older adults aged ≥ 65 years. Despite this, there is currently a lack of data regarding the safety and efficacy of systemic treatment for older adults with neuroendocrine tumors. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the current standard-of-care pharmacotherapeutic treatments for neuroendocrine tumors, with an emphasis on available data in older adults. The benefits of various systemic options such as somatostatin analogs, tryptophan hydroxylase inhibition, molecular targeted agents, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and chemotherapy were similar between older adults compared to younger patients. However, real-world data regarding tolerance in the older adult population with neuroendocrine tumors are needed. Future development of novel systemic therapies in the neuroendocrine tumor treatment landscape and their inclusion of and potential impact on older adults living with neuroendocrine tumors is warranted.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Relevant Clinical Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of neuroendocrine oncology has changed much since the time of Oberndorfer first described and coined the term carcinoid. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent findings and highlight clinically relevant updates in the management of NENs, particularly those that are practice changing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have replaced carcinoid tumor, for the most part. The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) improved, and the epidemiological understanding of this disease group also expanded with global collaborations and maturation of large tumor registries. Clarity in the utility of some NET biomarkers continues to be evolving. Knowledge of molecular drivers of tumorigenesis increases, and scientific/technological advancements lead the way to multiple drug approvals for the treatment of advanced NETs. The incidence and prevalence of NENs continue to increase, and patients are living longer. Better understanding of molecular drivers and further understanding of the role of immunotherapy in NENs will further elevate the level of care and transform care for all patients with NENs.

Pathogenic Mechanism of Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus in Humans: Potential Role of Streptozotocin-Induced Selective Autoimmunity against Human Islet β-Cells

Human type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the selective loss of insulin-producing β-cells in pancreatic islets of genetically susceptible individuals. In this communication, a new hypothesis is postulated which is based on the observations that streptozotocin (STZ), a chemically reactive and cytotoxic compound produced by certain gram-positive bacteria, can be preferentially taken up into islet β-cells and induce cytotoxicity and autoimmunity. It is hypothesized that humans might be occasionally exposed to STZ through opportunistic infections with the STZ-producing bacteria and/or through ingestion of certain food products that contain STZ. In addition, the potential presence of the STZ-producing bacteria in the gut microbiota of some individuals might be another source of long-term STZ exposure. Because of the high chemical reactivity of STZ and its breakdown products, these chemicals can covalently modify certain cellular macromolecules (e.g., DNA and proteins), and the covalently modified cellular components would serve as new antigens, potentially capable of inducing both humoral and cellular autoimmune responses in the islets of certain individuals. In addition to STZ exposure, the eventual development of autoimmunity against STZ-exposed islet β-cells also depends critically on the genetic predisposition of the susceptible individuals plus the opportunistic presence of a conducive, strong environmental trigger, which often is presented as severe febrile viral infections subsequently inducing strong aberrant reactions of the body’s immune system. The proposed pathogenic hypothesis is supported by a considerable body of direct and indirect evidence from laboratory animal studies and clinical observations. Certainly, more experimental and clinical studies are needed to carefully further examine each of the key components of the proposed pathogenic hypothesis.

Long-term treatment with streptozocin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Case series

RATIONALE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are rare entities representing 1% to 3% of all malignant pancreatic neoplasms. Current guidelines recommend a combination of streptozocin (STZ) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for patients with metastatic well-differentiated pNETs requiring systemic therapy. The highest median progression-free survival rate reported in previous studies for this combination was 23 months (95% confidence interval 14.5-31.5). However, it remains unclear for how long this regimen can be safely administered.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We report about 3 therapy-naïve patients with metastatic G2 (Ki67 10%-15%) pNETs treated with STZ/5-FU, that achieved sustained disease control for longer than 36 months.

DIAGNOSIS

Metastatic, well-differentiated G2 pNETs.

INTERVENTIONS

Systemic chemotherapy with STZ/5-FU was administered until the disease progressed. In 1 case showing a mixed response, selected metastases of increasing size were additionally treated with surgery and brachytherapy.

OUTCOMES

In our 3 patients with metastatic G2 pNETs, STZ/5-FU induced long-term disease control over 44, 42, and 95 months, respectively. No side effects that led to treatment discontinuation were observed.

LESSONS

In patients with metastatic G2 pNETs achieving disease control, STZ/5-FU can be safely administered.

Streptozotocin, 1982-2022: Forty Years from the FDA's Approval to Treat Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

In May 1982, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of streptozotocin to treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs). Thus, this year marks 40 years since that landmark date. This review of streptozotocin to treat panNETs is intended to commemorate this anniversary. A historical perspective of the chemical structure, pharmacokinetics, and mechanism of action of streptozotocin is followed by data from prospective and retrospective clinical studies. The last section of the review addresses the latest aspects and takes note of the prospects that lie ahead on the future horizon of the use of streptozotocin to treat panNETs, including ongoing clinical trials.

Streptozocin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in the era of targeted therapy

PURPOSE

The role of streptozocin-based chemotherapy (STZ CTx) in advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET) and the best sequence of treatments in advanced PanNET are unclear. We examined the outcomes after STZ CTx in patients who had been selected according to the current therapeutic guidelines.

METHODS

Data from 50 PanNET patients consecutively treated with STZ CTx between 2010 and 2018 were analysed. The endpoints of the study were the objective-response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

STZ CTx was the first-line treatment in 54% of patients. The PanNET grades were as follows: 6% G1, 88% G2, and 6% well-differentiated G3. The ORR was 38%. Stable disease was the best response in 38% of patients and 24% showed progressive disease. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in one patient. Median PFS and OS were 12 (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.5-15.5) and 38 months (95% CI, 20.4-55.6), respectively. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median OS was 89 months (95% CI, 34.9-143.1) for STZ CTx as first-line therapy compared with 22 months (95% CI, 19.3-24.7; p = 0.001, log-rank test) for subsequent lines. Bone metastases negatively impacted survival (HR, 2.71, p = 0.009, univariate analysis, HR, 2.64, p = 0.015, multivariate analysis, and Cox regression).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients selected according to current guidelines, PFS, and OS after STZ CTx were lower than previously reported, whereas ORR was unchanged. First-line treatment was positively associated with OS and the presence of bone metastases was negatively associated with OS. Pre-treatment with targeted or peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy did not alter ORR, PFS, or OS.

Localization Defines Streptozotocin/5-FU Response in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

INTRODUCTION

Incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) is on the rise. The only curative treatment is surgical resection in localized or oligo-metastatic disease. However, patients may present with locally advanced or unresectable primary tumours. So far, no conversion therapy to achieve resectability has been established, which is partly due to lack of data on primary tumour response to therapies. Here, we specifically evaluate the primary tumour response to streptozocin/5-FU in a large cohort of metastatic pNET patients.

METHODS

Five ENETS centres in Germany contributed 84 patients to the study cohort for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Overall response rate (ORR) in primary tumours was 34% and disease control rate (DCR) 88%. ORR was different in metastases at 44% and DCR at 70%. Partial remission in primary tumours was more frequent among those located in pancreatic tail than that in pancreatic head (49% vs. 14%, p = 0.03). Correspondingly, metastases from tumours originating from pancreatic tail responded more frequently than metastases originating from pancreatic head (88.5% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.005). The median PFS of the primary tumours was longer than that in metastases (31 months vs. 16 months; p = 0.04). Considerable downsizing of the primary tumour was rare and occurred primarily in tumours located in the pancreatic tail.

CONCLUSION

STZ/5-FU can achieve disease stabilization in a high proportion of metastatic pNET patients. In the majority of cases however it does not induce substantial downsizing of the primary tumour, thus possibly limiting its potential as conversion chemotherapy. Furthermore, the difference in response rate observed between different primary tumour locations warrants further exploration.

Treatment for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several available therapies for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) have demonstrated efficacy in randomised controlled trials. However, translation of these results into improved care faces several challenges, as a direct comparison of the most pertinent therapies is incomplete.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapies for NETs, to guide clinical decision-making, and to provide estimates of relative efficiency of the different treatment options (including placebo) and rank the treatments according to their efficiency based on a network meta-analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified studies through systematic searches of the following bibliographic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid); and Embase from January 1947 to December 2020. In addition, we checked trial registries for ongoing or unpublished eligible trials and manually searched for abstracts from scientific and clinical meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We evaluated randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more therapies in people with NETs (primarily gastrointestinal and pancreatic).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction form. Multi-arm studies were included in the network meta-analysis using the R-package netmeta. We separately analysed two different outcomes (disease control and progression-free survival) and two types of NET (gastrointestinal and pancreatic NET) in four network meta-analyses. A frequentist approach was used to compare the efficacy of therapies.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 55 studies in 90 records in the qualitative analysis, reporting 39 primary RCTs and 16 subgroup analyses. We included 22 RCTs, with 4299 participants, that reported disease control and/or progression-free survival in the network meta-analysis. Precision-of-treatment estimates and estimated heterogeneity were limited, although the risk of bias was predominantly low. The network meta-analysis of progression-free survival found nine therapies for pancreatic NETs: everolimus (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.46]), interferon plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.80]), everolimus plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.57]), bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.89]), interferon (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.94]), sunitinib (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.67]), everolimus plus bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.83]), surufatinib (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.76]), and somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.34 to 0.77]); and six therapies for gastrointestinal NETs: 177-Lu-DOTATATE plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.26]), everolimus plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.12 [95%CI, 0.03 to 0.54]), bevacizumab plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.94]), interferon plus somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.93]), surufatinib (HR, 0.33 [95%CI, 0.12 to 0.88]), and somatostatin analogue (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.76]), with higher efficacy than placebo. Besides everolimus for pancreatic NETs, the results suggested an overall superiority of combination therapies, including somatostatin analogues. The results indicate that NET therapies have a broad range of risk for adverse events and effects on quality of life, but these were reported inconsistently. Evidence from this network meta-analysis (and underlying RCTs) does not support any particular therapy (or combinations of therapies) with respect to patient-centred outcomes (e.g. overall survival and quality of life).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study suggest that a range of efficient therapies with different safety profiles is available for people with NETs.

Progress in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a heterogeneous and orphan group of neoplasms that vary in their histology, clinical features, prognosis, and management. The treatment of PNETs is highly dependent on the stage at presentation, tumor grade and differentiation, presence of symptoms from hormonal overproduction or from local growth, tumor burden, and rate of progression. The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved many novel treatments, which have altered decision making and positively impacted the care and prognosis of these patients. In this review, we focus on the significant progress made in the management of PNETs over the past decade, as well as the active areas of research. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors

The role for cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remains debated. Compared to patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) where chemotherapy is utilized ubiquitously, chemotherapy may play a more select role in patients with certain types of NETs (e.g., pancreatic tumors, higher grade tumors, and tumors possessing DNA damage repair defects). The primary types of chemotherapy that have been tested in patients with NETs include alkylating agent- and platinum agent-based combinations. Across regimens, chemotherapy appears to elicit greater antitumor activity in patients with pancreatic or grade 3 NETs. The role for chemotherapy in lower grade extra-pancreatic NETs remains undefined. Furthermore, while chemotherapy has demonstrated clinically meaningful benefit for patients in the systemic setting, its role in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting is as-of-yet undetermined. Finally, efforts to combine chemotherapy with targeted therapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy are ongoing, in hopes of improving the cytoreductive treatment options for patients with NETs.

Gastrinoma and Zollinger Ellison syndrome: A roadmap for the management between new and old therapies

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) associated with pancreatic or duodenal gastrinoma is characterized by gastric acid hypersecretion, which typically leads to gastroesophageal reflux disease, recurrent peptic ulcers, and chronic diarrhea. As symptoms of ZES are nonspecific and overlap with other gastrointestinal disorders, the diagnosis is often delayed with an average time between the onset of symptoms and final diagnosis longer than 5 years. The critical step for the diagnosis of ZES is represented by the initial clinical suspicion. Hypergastrinemia is the hallmark of ZES; however, hypergastrinemia might recognize several causes, which should be ruled out in order to make a final diagnosis. Gastrin levels > 1000 pg/mL and a gastric pH below 2 are considered to be diagnostic for gastrinoma; some specific tests, including esophageal pH-recording and secretin test, might be useful in selected cases, although they are not widely available. Endoscopic ultrasound is very useful for the diagnosis and the local staging of the primary tumor in patients with ZES, particularly in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Some controversies about the management of these tumors also exist. For the localized stage, the combination of proton pump inhibitory therapy, which usually resolves symptoms, and surgery, whenever feasible, with curative intent represents the hallmark of gastrinoma treatment. The high expression of somatostatin receptors in gastrinomas makes them highly responsive to somatostatin analogs, supporting their use as anti-proliferative agents in patients not amenable to surgical cure. Other medical options for advanced disease are super-imposable to other neuroendocrine neoplasms, and studies specifically focused on gastrinomas only are scant and often limited to case reports or small retrospective series. The multidisciplinary approach remains the cornerstone for the proper management of this composite disease. Herein, we reviewed available literature about gastrinoma-associated ZES with a specific focus on differential diagnosis, providing potential diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms.

Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a broad spectrum of tumors with widely variable biological and clinical behavior. Primary tumor site, extent of disease, tumor differentiation and expression of so matostatin receptors, proliferation and growth rates are the major prognostic factors that determine the therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for advanced disease have considerably expanded in recent years, particularly for well differentiated tumors (NETs). Novel drugs approved over the past decade in this context include somatostatin analogues and 177Lu-oxodotreotide for somatostatin-receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, sunitinib for pancreatic NETs (P-NETs), and everolimus for P-NETs and non-functioning lung or gastrointestinal NETs. Nevertheless, chemotherapy remains an essential component of the treatment armamentarium of patients with NENs, particularly of patients with P-NETs or those with bulky, symptomatic or rapidly progressive tumors (generally G3 or high-G2 NENs). In this manuscript we will comprehensively review available evidence related to the use of chemotherapy in lung and GEP NENs and will critically discuss its role in the treatment algorithm of this family of neoplasms.

Renal function in patients receiving streptozocin for locally advanced or metastatic digestive neuroendocrine tumours: results of the Streptotox-FFCD 0906 study

INTRODUCTION

Streptozocin can impair renal function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evolution of renal function in patients receiving this anti-mitotic for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic digestive well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

A prospective and a retrospective cohort of patients with normal baseline renal function were analysed. The primary endpoint was the incidence of a decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25% during treatment. Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of glomerular filtration rate changes, the impact of combined nephrotoxic treatments, other toxicities, compliance, and the objective response rate.

RESULTS

After screening 142 patients, 27 were included in the prospective and 84 in the retrospective cohort. A decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25% was observed in 32 patients (30%): respectively four (15.4%) and 28 patients (34.1%) among respectively 26 and 82 patients with numerous measures (P = 0.0097). Altogether, 39 patients (35%) experienced grade 1-2 renal toxicity, while no grade 3-4 occurred in the prospective and 1 occurred in the retrospective cohort. Renal toxicity was more frequent in the retrospective cohort with a less careful follow up. As best responses, objective response was achieved in 27% of patients with pancreatic primary tumours, disease control in 78.9% of patients with pancreatic primary tumours, in 87% of those with small bowel tumours and in 72.7% of patients with other primary locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Strongly recommended for pancreatic NET, streptozocin is associated with frequent mild renal toxicity but low occurrence of renal impairment in patients with baseline normal renal function and under adequate hydration.

Current status of medical treatment for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and future perspectives

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors. In this review, we summarize the results of various clinical trials that have been conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic options for NENs. Based on the encouraging results obtained from these trials, various therapeutic options have been established for the treatment of NENs, including somatostatin analogs (SSAs), molecularly targeted drugs and cytotoxic agents. In addition, peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy has recently been evaluated for the treatment of various NENs. We also discuss the approach for selecting the appropriate drugs and sequence of treatment with the various drug classes, as recommended by different treatment guidelines. Finally, we discuss the scope for future research in this field, especially into the merits of combination therapy with molecularly targeted drugs plus SSAs, along with ongoing studies.

Multicenter Analysis of Treatment Outcomes for Systemic Therapy in Well Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET G3)

Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) have been distinguished from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in the most current WHO classifications. Commonly applied first-line chemotherapy protocols with cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide (PE) are less effective in NET G3 than NEC. Suggested alternative treatment protocols have not been studied in first-line therapy of NET G3 so far. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with NET G3 in the databases of 3 German cancer centers. Out of 142 patients, 136 patients received palliative first-line therapy: overall response rate (ORR) was 35.1% for PE (n = 37), 56.4% for FOLFOX (n = 39), 27.3% for temozolomide/capecitabine (TEM/CAP) (n = 22), 45.0% for streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil (STZ/5-FU) (n = 20), and 16.7% for other (n = 18). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for PE was 6.9 months. Compared to PE, PFS in the other treatment groups was 6.9 months for FOLFOX (p = 0.333), 12.0 months for TEM/CAP (p = 0.093), 4.8 months for STZ/5-FU (p = 0.919), and 14.1 months for other (p = 0.014). In a univariate setting, all non-PE patients combined showed a significantly prolonged PFS vs. PE (9.0 months; p = 0.049) which could not be confirmed in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, NET G3 with FOLFOX showed the highest ORR, and with TEM/CAP showed the longest PFS. Further prospective evaluation of the optimal therapeutic strategy for this tumor entity is needed.

Multicenter Analysis of Treatment Outcomes for Systemic Therapy in Well Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET G3)

Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) have been distinguished from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in the most current WHO classifications. Commonly applied first-line chemotherapy protocols with cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide (PE) are less effective in NET G3 than NEC. Suggested alternative treatment protocols have not been studied in first-line therapy of NET G3 so far. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with NET G3 in the databases of 3 German cancer centers. Out of 142 patients, 136 patients received palliative first-line therapy: overall response rate (ORR) was 35.1% for PE (n = 37), 56.4% for FOLFOX (n = 39), 27.3% for temozolomide/capecitabine (TEM/CAP) (n = 22), 45.0% for streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil (STZ/5-FU) (n = 20), and 16.7% for other (n = 18). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for PE was 6.9 months. Compared to PE, PFS in the other treatment groups was 6.9 months for FOLFOX (p = 0.333), 12.0 months for TEM/CAP (p = 0.093), 4.8 months for STZ/5-FU (p = 0.919), and 14.1 months for other (p = 0.014). In a univariate setting, all non-PE patients combined showed a significantly prolonged PFS vs. PE (9.0 months; p = 0.049) which could not be confirmed in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, NET G3 with FOLFOX showed the highest ORR, and with TEM/CAP showed the longest PFS. Further prospective evaluation of the optimal therapeutic strategy for this tumor entity is needed.

Liver metastases

Liver metastases are commonly detected in a range of malignancies including colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic cancer, melanoma, lung cancer and breast cancer, although CRC is the most common primary cancer that metastasizes to the liver. Interactions between tumour cells and the tumour microenvironment play an important part in the engraftment, survival and progression of the metastases. Various cells including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, Kupffer cells, hepatic stellate cells, parenchymal hepatocytes, dendritic cells, resident natural killer cells as well as other immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils are implicated in promoting and sustaining metastases in the liver. Four key phases (microvascular, pre-angiogenic, angiogenic and growth phases) have been identified in the process of liver metastasis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasonography, CT, MRI and PET scans are typically used for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Surgical resection remains the main potentially curative treatment among patients with resectable liver metastases. The role of liver transplantation in the management of liver metastasis remains controversial. Systemic therapies, newer biologic agents (for example, bevacizumab and cetuximab) and immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized the treatment options for liver metastases. Moving forward, incorporation of genetic tests can provide more accurate information to guide clinical decision-making and predict prognosis among patients with liver metastases.

Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin with Streptozocin and Subsequent Therapies in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

We evaluated outcomes of treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and streptozocin (FAS) in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and its impact on subsequent therapy (everolimus or temozolomide). Advanced PanNET patients treated at our center from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients received bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2), streptozocin (400 mg/m2) (both IV, days 1-5), and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 IV, day 1) every 28 days. Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed using RECIST version 1.1. Of 243 eligible patients, 220 were evaluable for ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Most (≥90%) had metastatic, nonfunctional PanNETs; 14% had prior therapy. ORR to FAS was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-48%). Median follow-up was 61 months. Median PFS was 20 (95% CI: 15-23) months; median overall survival (OS) was 63 (95% CI: 60-71) months. Cox regression analyses suggested improvement with first-line versus subsequent lines of FAS therapy. Main adverse events ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (10%) and nausea/vomiting (5.5%). Dose reductions were required in 32% of patients. Post-FAS everolimus (n = 108; 68% second line) had a median PFS of 10 (95% CI: 8-14) months. Post-FAS temozolomide (n = 60; 53% ≥ fourth line) had an ORR of 13% and median PFS of 5.2 (95% CI: 4-12) months. In this largest reported cohort of PanNETs treated with chemotherapy, FAS demonstrated activity without significant safety concerns. FAS did not appear to affect subsequent PFS with everolimus; this sequence is being evaluated prospectively. Responses were noted with subsequent temozolomide-based regimens although PFS was possibly limited by line of therapy.

177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy of Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Heavily Pretreated with Chemotherapy: Analysis of Outcome, Safety, and Their Determinants

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and their determinants in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), previously pretreated with chemothe-r-apy, undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with advanced PanNETs, previously pretreated with one (67%) or several (33%) lines of chemotherapy, were included, of whom 90% had progressive disease and the majority (74.5%) had grade 2 tumors. 177Lu-DOTATATE, 7.4 GBq per cycle, was administered with 6- to 8-week intervals in 88% of patients utilizing a dosimetry-guided protocol until an absorbed dose of 23 Gy to the kidneys was reached.

RESULTS

A mean dose of 32 ± 10.9 GBq per patient was administered in 1-10 cycles starting a median of 36 months after PanNET diagnosis. The median follow-up was 34 months, the median PFS was 24 months, and the median OS was 42 months from start of PRRT. Independent risk factors for both progression and death were liver tumor burden >50%, more than one line of previous chemotherapy, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Resection of the primary tumor was linked to longer survival. Bone marrow toxicity grade 3-4 occurred in 10.8%. One patient (1.0%) developed acute myeloid leukemia. Bone marrow toxicity was unrelated to type and length of previous chemotherapy, amount of administered activity, and absorbed dose to the bone marrow.

CONCLUSION

177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was feasible, highly effective, and safe in patients with advanced PanNETs heavily pretreated with chemotherapy. More than one line of chemotherapy was a therapy-related independent risk factor for shorter PFS and OS.

Practical recommendations for the management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic (carcinoid) neuroendocrine neoplasms in the COVID-19 era

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous family of uncommon tumours with challenging diagnosis, clinical management and unique needs that almost always requires a multidisciplinary approach. In the absence of guidance from the scientific literature, along with the rapidly changing data available on the effect of COVID-19, we report how 12 high-volume NEN centres of expertise in 10 countries at different stages of the evolving COVID-19 global pandemic along with members of international neuroendocrine cancer patient societies have suggested to preserve high standards of care for patients with NENs. We review the multidisciplinary management of neuroendocrine neoplasms during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we suggest potential strategies to reduce risk and aid multidisciplinary treatment decision-making. By sharing our joint experiences, we aim to generate recommendations for proceeding to other institutions facing the same challenges.

Medical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours that arise mainly in the gastrointestinal or pulmonary system. Most NENs are well-differentiated and may obtain prolonged survival besides the presence of metastatic disease; however, a subset (poorly differentiated NENs) may display a truly aggressive behaviour exhibiting a poor prognosis. The recently developed classification systems along with advances in functional imaging have helped stratify patients to the administration of appropriate therapeutic options. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of NENs, but in recent decades there has been a considerable evolution of medical treatments that are used for locally advanced or metastatic disease not amenable to surgical resection. Long acting somatostatin analogues are the main therapeutic modality for patients with functioning and well-differentiated low grade NENs exhibiting symptomatic control and mainly stabilisation of tumour growth. Other systemic treatments include chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, interferon-α, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and immunotherapy. In addition, new agents such as telotristat may be used for the control of symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. The choice and/or sequence of therapeutic agents should be individualized according to tumour origin and differentiation, disease burden, presence of clinical symptoms and patients' performance status in the context of a multidisciplinary approach. Recent advances in the molecular pathogenesis of NENs set the field for a more personalised treatment approach.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: a contemporary review of treatment strategies

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are globally increasing in prevalence and the liver is the most common site of metastasis. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are heterogeneous in clinical presentation and prognosis. Fortunately, recent advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies have improved the multidisciplinary management of this challenging condition. When feasible, surgical resection of NELM offers the best long-term outcomes. General indications for hepatic resection include performance status acceptable for major liver surgery, grade 1 or 2 tumors, absence of extrahepatic disease, adequate size and function of future liver remnant, and feasibility of resecting >90% of metastases. Adjunct therapies including concomitant liver ablation are generally safe when used appropriately and may expand the number of patients eligible for surgery. Among patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. For patients who are not surgical candidates, liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization can provide locoregional control and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options also exist for patients with advanced or progressive disease. Ongoing research efforts are needed to identify novel biomarkers that will define the optimal indications for and sequencing of treatments to be delivered in a personalized fashion.

Optimal strategy of systemic treatment for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based upon opinion of Japanese experts

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

A number of therapeutic agents have been reported to be clinically useful for the management of the patients with unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) including somatostatin analogues, molecular-targeted agents and cytotoxic agents. However, the optimal strategy for selection among those treatment modalities above in these patients has remained unexplored.

METHODS

Japanese experts for PanNET discussed and determined the optimal treatment strategies according to the results of previously reported studies.

RESULTS

The tumor volume of liver metastases and the Ki-67 labeling index were unanimously accepted as indicators of the tumor burden and tumor aggressiveness, respectively, which are two most clinically pivotal factors for determining the strategy of systemic treatment for unresectable PanNETs. In addition, for those with a relatively small tumor burden and slow disease progression, somatostatin analogues were selected as the first-line treatment agents. For those with a relatively large tumor burden and rapid tumor progression, cytotoxic agents were selected, possibly aiming at tumor shrinkage. For those of intermediate tumor volume and/or growth rate, molecular-targeted agents were selected as the first choice. Based on this strategy discussed among the experts, we tentatively prepared a MAP for proposing optimal treatment strategy and examined its validity in some patients with unresectable PanNETs. Results validated the usefulness of this MAP proposed for patients harbouring unresectable PanNETs.

CONCLUSION

We herein propose a tentative MAP for optimal treatment selection for the patients harbouring unresectable PanNETs. Further large scale studies are, however, warranted to validate the usefulness of this MAP proposed in this study.

Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that vary in their clinical presentation, behavior and prognosis. The most common site of metastasis is the liver. Surgical resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is thought to afford the best long-term outcomes when feasible. Initial preoperative workup should include surveillance for carcinoid syndrome, screening for evidence of liver insufficiency, and performance of imaging specific to neuroendocrine tumors such as a somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography scan. Standard surgical principles apply to hepatic surgery for NELM, namely prioritizing low central venous pressure anesthesia, minimizing blood loss, knowledge of liver anatomy, generous use of intraoperative ultrasound, as well as safe parenchymal transection techniques and practices to avoid bile leakage. Knowledge of established prognostic factors may assist with patient selection, which is important for optimizing short- and long-term outcomes of hepatic resection. Adjunct therapies such as concomitant liver ablation are used frequently and are generally safe when used appropriately. For patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. Primary tumor resection in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is more controversial, however generally recommended if morbidity is acceptable. For patients who are not surgical candidates, due to either patient performance status or burden of liver disease, several liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are available to assist with locoregional control, extend progression-free survival (PFS), and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options exist for patients with metastatic PNET which are often prioritized for those patients with advanced or progressive disease. A systematic approach in a multi-disciplinary setting is likely to result in the best long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic NELM. Ongoing research is needed to determine the optimal patient selection for hepatic surgery as well as the ideal treatment sequencing for those patients with NELM.

Selective Modification of Streptozotocin at the C3 Position to Improve Its Bioactivity as Antibiotic and Reduce Its Cytotoxicity towards Insulin-Producing β Cells

With the increasing resistance of bacteria to current antibiotics, novel compounds are urgently needed to treat bacterial infections. Streptozotocin (STZ) is a natural product that has broad-spectrum antibiotic activity, albeit with limited use because of its toxicity to pancreatic β cells. In an attempt to derivatize STZ through structural modification at the C3 position, we performed the synthesis of three novel STZ analogues by making use of our recently developed regioselective oxidation protocol. Keto-STZ (2) shows the highest inhibition of bacterial growth (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and viability assays), but is also the most cytotoxic compound. Pre-sensitizing the bacteria with GlcNAc increased the antimicrobial effect, but did not result in complete killing. Interestingly, allo-STZ (3) revealed moderate concentration-dependent antimicrobial activity and no cytotoxicity towards β cells, and deoxy-STZ (4) showed no activity at all.

Gene Expression Signatures Identify Novel Therapeutics for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

PURPOSE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are uncommon malignancies noted for their propensity to metastasize and comparatively favorable prognosis. Although both the treatment options and clinical outcomes have improved in the past decades, most patients will die of metastatic disease. New systemic therapies are needed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tissues were obtained from 43 patients with well-differentiated pNETs undergoing surgery. Gene expression was compared between primary tumors versus liver and lymph node metastases using RNA-Seq. Genes that were selectively elevated at only one metastatic site were filtered out to reduce tissue-specific effects. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) and the Connectivity Map (CMap) identified drugs likely to antagonize metastasis-specific targets. The biological activity of top identified agents was tested in vitro using two pNET cell lines (BON-1 and QGP-1).

RESULTS

A total of 902 genes were differentially expressed in pNET metastases compared with primary tumors, 626 of which remained in the common metastatic profile after filtering. Analysis with IPA and CMap revealed altered activity of factors involved in survival and proliferation, and identified drugs targeting those pathways, including inhibitors of mTOR, PI3K, MEK, TOP2A, protein kinase C, NF-kB, cyclin-dependent kinase, and histone deacetylase. Inhibitors of MEK and TOP2A were consistently the most active compounds.

CONCLUSIONS

We employed a complementary bioinformatics approach to identify novel therapeutics for pNETs by analyzing gene expression in metastatic tumors. The potential utility of these drugs was confirmed by in vitro cytotoxicity assays, suggesting drugs targeting MEK and TOP2A may be highly efficacious against metastatic pNETs. This is a promising strategy for discovering more effective treatments for patients with pNETs.

Phase 1 dose escalation trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) and temozolomide in the treatment of advanced neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are understudied and have limited systemic treatment options. Prior studies for patients with advanced NETs have demonstrated promising results when antimetabolite agents, including fluoropyrimidines, were combined with temozolomide TMZ. TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) is an antineoplastic agent that is non-cross resistant with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine and that has a different toxicity profile. This study evaluated the safety of TAS-102 in combination with TMZ in patients in neuroendocrine tumors. Escalating doses of TMZ (100, 150 and 200 mg/m²) on days 8-12 were given in combination with TAS-102 (35 mg/m² twice a day) on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28 day cycle in subjects with advanced NETs. Primary endpoints were safety and determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Growth factor support was mandated starting with level 2 to avoid treatment delays. Fifteen evaluable subjects were enrolled in the phase 1 study. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed on level 1. One DLT was observed on level 2 (grade 3 fatigue and inability to resume treatment), and 1 on level 3 (grade 4 thrombocytopenia). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events included neutropenia (33%), lymphopenia (27%), and thrombocytopenia (27%). Disease control rate of 92% and partial response rate of 8% were observed in 13 evaluable subjects. This study established MTD of TAS-102 (35 mg/m² twice daily) and TMZ (200 mg/m² daily). This regimen was well tolerated. Early signs of clinically meaningful activity were observed. Further evaluation of the efficacy of this regimen is warranted.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms constitute a diverse group of tumors that derive from the sensory and secretory neuroendocrine cells and predominantly arise within the pulmonary and gastrointestinal tracts. The majority of these neoplasms have a well-differentiated grade and are termed neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This subgroup is characterized by limited proliferation and patients affected by these tumors carry a good to moderate prognosis. A substantial subset of patients presenting with a NET suffer from the consequences of endocrine syndromes as a result of the excessive secretion of amines or peptide hormones, which can impair their quality of life and prognosis. Over the past 15 years, critical developments in tumor grading, diagnostic biomarkers, radionuclide imaging, randomized controlled drug trials, evidence-based guidelines, and superior prognostic outcomes have substantially altered the field of NET care. Here, we review the relevant advances to clinical practice that have significantly upgraded our approach to NET patients, both in diagnostic and in therapeutic options.

Medical Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

The increased incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) over the past few decades has been accompanied by an improvement in overall survival. There are differences in the management of small bowel NETs versus pNETs. The management of all patients with NETs must be individualized based on patient characteristics as well tumor-related factors. This article reviews the role of somatostatin analogues, historical results with chemotherapy in gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEPNETs), and more recent evidence for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in GEPNETs. The article also discusses molecular targeted therapies approved for use in GEPNETs and some ongoing clinical trials.

Combination of weekly streptozocin and oral S-1 treatment for patients of unresectable or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Streptozocin (STZ) administration with or without other cytotoxic drugs remains a crucial chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs). However, the therapeutic effects of combination treatment with weekly STZ and oral S-1 therapy (STS1) remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and clinical feasibility of STS1.

METHODS

Twenty of 243 Pan-NEN patients were included in this retrospective study, all of whom had received STS1 for unresectable or distant metastatic diseases from November 2015 to January 2019. The maximum tumor shrinkage rate, time course of the tumor shrinkage rate, prognosis (progression-free survival and overall survival), and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 61.5 years and the median tumor size was 35 mm. The number of NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, and NEC-G3 patients was 3, 13, 3, and 1, respectively. The median Ki-67 index and mitoses were 10.2% and 2/10 high-power fields, respectively. The overall objective response rate and disease control rate were 30% and 90%, respectively. The median maximum tumor reduction rate was 19%. The Ki-67 index and tumor size did not influence the tumor shrinkage rate. Progression-free survival after STS1 treatment was 19 months with no significant difference between NET-G1/G2 and NET-G3/NEC-G3 patients (p = 0.4). There was one case each of grade 3/4 toxicity, including general fatigue, hyperglycemia, and renal dysfunction. No serious myelosuppressive events are manifested.

CONCLUSIONS

STS1 treatment is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with advanced Pan-NEN.

Endocrinological Toxicity Secondary to Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs)

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are increasingly recognized, characterized by prolonged survival even with metastatic disease. Their medical treatment is complex involving various specialties, necessitating awareness of treatment-related adverse effects (AEs). As GEP-NENs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) that are used for secretory syndrome and tumor control may lead to altered glucose metabolism. Everolimus and sunitinib are molecular targeted agents that affect glucose and lipid metabolism and may induce hypothyroidism or hypocalcemia, respectively. Chemotherapeutic drugs can affect the reproductive system and water homeostasis, whereas immunotherapeutic agents can cause hypophysitis and thyroiditis or other immune-mediated disorders. Treatment with radiopeptides may temporarily lead to radiation-induced hormone disturbances. As drugs targeting GEP-NENs are increasingly introduced, recognition and management of endocrine-related AEs may improve compliance and the quality of life of these patients.

The functioning side of the pancreas: a review on insulinomas

PURPOSE

Insulinomas are a rare type of neuroendocrine tumors, originating in the pancreas, difficult to diagnose and to treat. Due to its rarity, insulinomas are a not well-known pathological entity; thus, the diagnostic process is frequently a medical challenge with many possible differential diagnoses. The diagnostic process varies between non-invasive procedures, such as the fasting test or imaging techniques, and invasive ones. Insulinomas are rarely malignant, but the glycemic imbalance correlated with this tumor can frequently alter the quality of life of the patients and the consequent hypoglycemia can be extremely dangerous. Moreover, insulinomas can be associated with different genetic syndromes, such as Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 1, accompanied by other specific symptoms. There are many different treatment strategies, depending on the need to control symptoms or control diseases progression, the only curative one being surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the evidences present in the literature on insulinomas and reported its main clinical characteristics and management strategies.

CONCLUSION

The aim of this review of the literature is to present the current knowledge on insulinomas, exploring the main clinical characteristics, the diagnostic tools, and the therapeutic strategies.