Islet and pancreatic transplantation--autoimmunity and alloimmunity

Acceptance of Murine Islet Allografts Without Immunosuppression in Inguinal Subcutaneous White Adipose Tissue Pretreated With bFGF

Prevention of immune rejection without immunosuppression is the ultimate goal of transplant immunobiology. One way to achieve this in cellular transplantation, such as with islet transplantation, is to create a favorable local environment at the transplant site. In the current study, we found that C57BL/6 mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes remained normoglycemic for >1 year after transplantation of BALB/c islets without immunosuppression when the inguinal subcutaneous white adipose tissue (ISWAT) was the site of transplantation and when the site was pretreated with basic fibroblast growth factor. Mechanistically, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) expanded in the ISWAT after the treatment was found to produce transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and prevention of islet allograft rejection could be achieved by cotransplantation with syngeneic MSCs isolated from the ISWAT after the treatment, which was abolished by anti-TGF-β antibody treatment. Importantly, TGF-β-producing cells remained present at the site of cotransplantation up to the end of observation period at 240 days after transplantation. These findings indicate that prevention of islet allograft rejection without immunosuppression is feasible with the use of syngeneic TGF-β-producing MSCs expanded in the ISWAT after the treatment with bFGF, providing a novel strategy for prevention of islet allograft rejection without immunosuppression.

MHC-mismatched chimerism is required for induction of transplantation tolerance in autoimmune nonobese diabetic recipients

In nonautoimmune recipients, induction of mixed and complete chimerism with hematopoietic progenitor cells from MHC (HLA)-matched or -mismatched donors are effective approaches for induction of organ transplantation immune tolerance in both animal models and patients. But it is still unclear whether this is the case in autoimmune recipients. With the autoimmune diabetic NOD mouse model, we report that, although mixed and complete MHC-mismatched chimerism provide immune tolerance to donor-type islet and skin transplants, neither mixed nor complete MHC-matched chimerism does. The MHC-mismatched chimerism not only tolerizes the de novo developed, but also the residual pre-existing host-type T cells in a mismatched MHC class II-dependent manner. In the MHC-mismatched chimeras, the residual host-type peripheral T cells appear to be anergic with upregulation of PD-1 and downregulation of IL-7Rα. Conversely, in the MHC-matched chimeras, the residual host-type peripheral T cells manifest both alloreactivity and autoreactivity; they not only mediate insulitis and sialitis in the recipient, but also reject allogeneic donor-type islet and skin grafts. Interestingly, transgenic autoreactive BDC2.5 T cells from Rag1(+/+), but not from Rag1(-/-), NOD mice show alloreactivity and mediate both insulitis and rejection of allografts. Taken together, MHC-mismatched, but not MHC-matched, chimerism can effectively provide transplantation immune tolerance in autoimmune recipients.

Pancreatic autoantibodies after pancreas-kidney transplantation - do they matter?

Type 1 diabetes recurrence has been documented in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKT), but this diagnosis may be underestimated. Antibody monitoring is the most simple, noninvasive, screening test for pancreas autoimmune activity. However, the impact of the positive autoimmune markers on pancreas graft function remains controversial. In our cohort of 105 SPKT, we studied the cases with positive pancreatic autoantibodies. They were immunosuppressed with antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids. The persistence or reappearance of these autoantibodies after SPKT and factors associated with their evolution and with graft outcome were analyzed. Pancreatic autoantibodies were prospectively monitored. Serum samples were collected before transplantation and at least once per year thereafter. At the end of the follow-up (maximum 138 months), 43.8% of patients were positive (from pre-transplant or after recurrence) for at least one autoantibody - the positive group. Antiglutamic acid decarboxylase was the most prevalent (31.4%), followed by anti-insulin (8.6%) and anti-islet cell autoantibodies (3.8%). Bivariate analysis showed that the positive group had higher fasting glucose, higher glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lower C-peptide levels, and a higher number of HLA-matches. Analyzing the sample divided into four groups according to pre-/post-transplant autoantibodies profile, the negative/positive group tended to present the higher HbA1c values. Multivariate analysis confirmed the significant association between pancreas autoimmunity and HbA1c and C-peptide levels. Positivity for these autoantibodies pre-transplantation did not influence pancreas survival. The unfavorable glycemic profile observed in the autoantibody-positive SPKT is a matter of concern, which deserves further attention.

LMP-420, a small molecular inhibitor of TNF-α, prolongs islet allograft survival by induction of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1: synergistic effect with cyclosporin-A

Inflammatory insults following islet transplantation (ITx) hinders engraftment and long-term function of the transplanted (Tx) islets. Using a murine model of ITx, we determined the role of LMP-420, a novel TNF-α inhibitor, both individually and in combination with the immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CSA) in islet engraftment and survival. Diabetic C57BL/6 mice were Tx with 500 BALB/c islets under the kidney capsule. Four cohorts were used: LMP-420 only, CSA only, combination of LMP-420 and CSA (LMP+CSA), and control (n = 12 per cohort). Serial monitoring of blood glucose levels revealed that LMP+CSA (35 ± 5 days) prolonged stable blood insulin levels compared to control (6 ± 4 days). Immunohistology demonstrated that coadministration (LMP+CSA) results in a significant decrease in CD8(+) T-cell infiltration (LMP+CSA: 31 ± 18 vs. control: 224 ± 51 cells, p < 0.001). Serum cytokine analysis revealed that LMP-420 administration resulted in an increase in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (2.5-fold), and a decrease in TNF-α (threefold) with no change in IL-2. However, coadministration resulted in a marked decrease in both IL-2 and TNF-α (threefold) along with increase in IL-10 (threefold). Coadministration also demonstrated increase of antiapoptotic SOCS-1 and Mn-SOD expression and significant reduction of donor-specific antibodies (p < 0.005). In conclusion, LMP-420 administration with CSA results in the upregulation of anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic mechanisms which facilitate islet allograft engraftment and survival.

Islet transplantation: factors in short-term islet survival

Islet transplantation has the potential to cure type 1 diabetes. In recent years, the proportion of patients achieving initial insulin independence has improved, but longer term outcomes remain poor compared to those for whole pancreas transplants. This review article will discuss factors affecting islet yield and viability leading up to transplantation and in the immediate post-transplant period.

Induction of chimerism permits low-dose islet grafts in the liver or pancreas to reverse refractory autoimmune diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To test whether induction of chimerism lowers the amount of donor islets required for reversal of diabetes and renders the pancreas a suitable site for islet grafts in autoimmune diabetic mice.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The required donor islet dose for reversal of diabetes in late-stage diabetic NOD mice after transplantation into the liver or pancreas was compared under immunosuppression or after induction of chimerism. Recipient mice were monitored for blood glucose levels and measured for insulin-secretion capacity. Islet grafts were evaluated for beta-cell proliferation, beta-cell functional gene expression, and revascularization.

RESULTS

With immunosuppression, transplantation of 1,000, but not 600, donor islets was able to reverse diabetes when transplanted into the liver, but transplantation of 1,000 islets was not able to reverse diabetes when transplanted into the pancreas. In contrast, after induction of chimerism, transplantation of as few as 100 donor islets was able to reverse diabetes when transplanted into either the liver or pancreas. Interestingly, when lower doses (50 or 25) of islets were transplanted, donor islets in the pancreas were much more effective in reversal of diabetes than in the liver, which was associated with higher beta-cell replication rate, better beta-cell functional gene expression, and higher vascular density of graft islets in the pancreas.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction of chimerism not only provides immune tolerance to donor islets, but also markedly reduces the required amount of donor islets for reversal of diabetes. In addition, this process renders the pancreas a more superior site than the liver for donor islets in autoimmune mice.

The role of current product release criteria for identification of human islet preparations suitable for clinical transplantation

BACKGROUND

Alloimmunity, autoimmunity, and nonspecific inflammation are known to be potential determinants for long-term islet survival and insulin independence. Sufficient islet mass is a key determinant. But islet engraftment and posttransplant survival may also depend on functional characteristics of the graft. This study investigated the significance of current product release criteria for the transplantation outcome.

METHODS

Fourty five consecutive transplanted human islet preparations and their functional outcomes were analyzed. Islet mass was determined according to standard criteria: purity by light microscopy, viability by dye exclusion and Insulin secretory response to static glucose incubation. Islet graft function was monitored for > or = 1 year. Islet function was defined as full (FF), partial (PF), or nonfunction (NF) based on serum C-peptide levels and insulin independence.

RESULTS

All islet grafts displayed primary function. Islet mass [IEQ/kg BW]: 7331.3 +/- 679.7 (FF), 5821.3 +/- 546.7 (PF), 6468.6 +/- 658.5 (NF), (FF vs PF p = .032) Purity [%] 86.9 +/- 3.1 (FF), 76.0 +/- 2.87 (PF), 88.2 +/- 2.3 (NF) (FF vs PF P =.045, PF vs NF, P = 0.01). (4) Viability [%]:89.2 +/- 2 (FF), 86.2 +/- 1.7 (PF), 87.3 +/- 1.8 (NF) (ns). Stimulation index (SI): 20 +/- 6.3 (FF), 80.2 +/- 28.2 (PF), 21.6 +/- 3.5 (NF) (ns) No correlation was observed between SI and any other parameter nor between SI and C-peptide levels. Islet mass significantly correlated with C-peptide levels at 6 and 12 months after transplantation for functioning grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Stringent product release criteria allow identification of islet preparations suitable for clinical transplantation. However, currently used parameters are not predictive of long-term graft function, indicating that further refined quality assessments including apoptosis and resistance to early inflammation, are required to assess the primary engrafted islet mass.

Identification of an immune tolerance reaction in response to pretreatment with frozen pancreatic tissue in islet cell transplantation in rats

OBJECTIVES

Whereas transplantation of insulin-secreting pancreatic islets may provide long-term control of glucose metabolism in patients with diabetes mellitus, transplant rejection remains a problem. In this study, we tried pretreatment with frozen pancreatic tissue in a rat model of islet cell transplantation to determine whether induction of immune tolerance is feasible.

METHODS

Isolated islet cells from Wistar rats were transplanted into the spleen of recipient rats that were sensitized and rats that were not sensitized with frozen pancreatic tissue. Spleens were analyzed histologically and then examined immunohistochemically for expression of insulin, a pancreas-specific gene. With the use of cDNA primers for proinsulin, RT-PCR was performed to detect islet cells in the spleen.

RESULTS

Although islet cells were present in spleens at posttransplantation day (PTD) 1, islet cell clusters in recipients without pretreatment were markedly destroyed on PTD 14 on histologic examination. In contrast, islet cell clusters in recipients sensitized with frozen pancreatic tissue appeared similar to those at PTD 1 even at PTD 14. Proinsulin gene expression was found to be specific to pancreatic tissue. In recipients sensitized with frozen pancreatic tissue, proinsulin gene expression was identified in recipient spleens, even at PTD 14, whereas it was undetected in the absence of pretreatment. In recipients transplanted with islet cells and treated simultaneously with frozen pancreatic tissue, proinsulin gene expression was completely eliminated. The immunohistologic study also showed the presence of insulin-producing islet cells in the spleens of rats sensitized with frozen pancreatic tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of the immune reaction in transplant rejection may be mediated by pretreatment with frozen donor tissue.

The therapeutic potential of islet cell transplant in the treatment of diabetes

Diabetic patients requiring insulin treatment are at an increased risk of developing chronic complications affecting the eye, kidney and heart as well as other disabilities, such as neurological and vascular disease. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) showed that the development of these complications can be profoundly reduced or even prevented by strict glycaemic control through intensive insulin therapy. The DCCT study, which was concluded in 1993, administered intensive insulin treatment either by multiple (three or four per day) insulin injections or by an external insulin pump. However, it is both stressful and difficult to achieve effective glycaemic control by these methods. Furthermore, intensive insulin administration imposes a significant danger of hypoglycaemia to patients receiving this treatment. Biological replacement of the destroyed insulin-producing B-cells of pancreatic islets, with normal functioning islet transplants, remains the best option with which to achieve strict glycaemic control in diabetic patients requiring insulin treatment. The ultimate goal in transplantation is the unlimited availability of organs/tissues to be transplanted in a simple procedure that requires little or no immunosuppression. Other obstacles have also contributed to the delay in islet transplantation becoming a clinical reality. There are now good methods for isolating long-term functional islets, and it has been proposed that these islets can be immunoisolated by microencapsulation to prevent transplant rejection, an approach that could easily lead to the use of islet xenografts in human diabetic patients. Therefore, the development of microencapsulated islets promises to solve the two major obstacles to clinical islet transplantation, transplant rejection and shortage of human islets. This technique has enormous potential as a viable treatment for diabetic patients requiring insulin therapy to achieve glycaemic control.

Kinetics of diabetes-associated autoantibodies after sequential intraportal islet allograft associated with kidney transplantation in type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Presence or occurrence of pancreas auto-antibodies (aAb) has been shown to be of poor prognosis for islet cell transplantation. The aim of the study was to monitor the kinetics of these aAb after sequential intra-portal islet plus kidney transplantation with pre-Edmonton immunosuppressive regimen in order to determine whether the sequential protocol of transplantation was involved in the occurrence of the immune response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three patients with IDDM and a previous (IAK) or simultaneous (SIK) kidney transplantation received 3 or 4 ABO compatible islet preparations. Islets (> 8 000 IEQ/kg post culture) were sequentially transplanted within a 12 day period via a per-cutaneous catheter. Immunosuppressive treatment included cyclosporine, steroïds and mycophenolate. Plasma ICAs, GAD 65, IA2 and C peptide (C-p) levels were monitored. Type II HLA phenotype was determined in donors and recipients.

RESULTS

Patient #1 had high anti-GAD levels (26.5 UI/l) before the IAK, while anti-IA2 and ICA levels were low. After the transplantation, C-p levels increased to 4.9 ng/ml at one month before becoming undetectable at 2 months. GAD levels remained high, ICA and IA2 aAb were undetectable. Patients #2 and #3 did not have significant levels of aAb before the islet transplantation. A slight increase in GAD was observed with each islet transplantation, followed by an overt but transient increase in ICA. IA2 levels remained undetectable. Three months after the transplantation and 2 weeks after the increase of ICA, C-p levels, that were >3.4 ng/ml at one month, fell below 0.2 (N: 0.5-2).

CONCLUSION

The immunosuppressive regimen used in kidney transplantation is unable to control perfectly anti-pancreas aAb production. Moreover, these results seem to indicate that the benefits of sequential islet transplantation lie more in the increased islet mass they provide than in potential immune benefit.

Pancreatic Islet Cell Transplantation

Pancreatic islet cell transplantation as a treatment for diabetes has hitherto been confined to small patient cohorts with limited success. This article summarizes the results of islet cell transplantation before and after the advent of the new 'Edmonton protocol' of immunosuppression and management of the donor pancreas. Adopting this regimen has achieved unprecedented success and renewed interest in this potential cure for diabetes. Central to recent improvements in the technique has been the transplantation of an adequate islet mass. Improved methods to procure, isolate, and purify islets for clinical use are now being adopted as a new 'gold standard'. The use of new immunosuppressive drugs has further improved clinical results. Corticosteroid sparing-based regimens, and agents such as humanized monoclonal antibodies, are likely to form the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols with the aim of achieving donor-specific tolerance. Alternative sources of islet cells are also required to expand the technique in an era of reduced numbers of donor pancreata. Manipulation of stem cells and xenotransplantation may yet yield sufficient islets to overcome the problem of donor shortage. Islet cell transplantation now forms the basis of a prospective multicenter trial under the aegis of the Immune Tolerance Network. The results of this are awaited, but it appears that islet cell transplantation may yet emerge as an effective treatment option for some members of the diabetic population.

Human islet cell transplantation--future prospects

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation has the potential to cure diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless despite successful reversal of diabetes in many small animal models, the clinical situation has been far more challenging. The aim of this review is to discuss why insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation has been so difficult to achieve.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken using Medline from 1975 to July 2000. Results reported to the International Islet Transplant Registry (ITR) up to December 1998 were also analysed.

RESULTS

Up to December 1998, 405 islet allotransplants have been reported the ITR. Of those accurately documented between 1990 and 1998 (n = 267) only 12% have achieved insulin-independence (greater than 7 days). However with refined peri-transplant protocols insulin independence at 1 year can reach 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many factors which can explain the failure of achieving insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation. These include the use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive agents to abrogate both islet allo-immunity and auto-immunity, the critical islet mass to achieve insulin-independence and the detrimental effects of transplanting islets in an ectopic site. However recent evidence most notably from the Edmonton group demonstrates that islet allotransplantation still has great potential to become an established treatment option for diabetic patients.

Bovine islets are less susceptible than human islets to damage by human cytokines

BACKGROUND

The potential benefits of islet xenografting in type 1 diabetes include the intriguing, but still unanswered, possibility that the grafted xenoislets may be less subjected to human autoimmune attack. Cytokines may play a major role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diabetes by causing impairment of insulin release and pancreatic islet cell toxicity.

METHODS

We compared insulin secretion, islet cell death and survival, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA expression, nitrite production, and Bcl-2 and Bax mRNA expression in isolated human and large mammal (bovine) islets exposed to 50 U/ml recombinant human interleukin-1, 1,000 U/ml recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-alpha and 1,000 U/ml recombinant human interferon-gamma.

RESULTS

After 24-hr exposure, a marked decrease of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was observed with human, but not with bovine islets. After 48-hr exposure, human, but not bovine, pancreatic islets showed a significantly higher percentage of apoptotic cells compared to controls. Treatment of human islets with human cytokines induced up-regulation of iNOS mRNA, increased levels of nitrites, and down-regulation of Bcl-2 mRNA, with unchanged levels of Bax mRNA. These parameters were not affected by cytokines in bovine islets.

CONCLUSIONS

Bovine islets are less susceptible than human islets to the effects of human cytokines, which may be a potential advantage of xenotransplantation.

Chronically decreased oxygen tension in rat pancreatic islets transplanted under the kidney capsule

BACKGROUND

A factor of potential importance in the failure of islet grafts is poor or inadequate engraftment of the islets in the implantation organ. This study measured the oxygen tension and blood perfusion in 1-, 2-, and 9-month-old islet grafts.

METHODS

The partial pressure of oxygen was measured in pancreatic islets transplanted beneath the renal capsule of diabetic and nondiabetic recipient rats with a modified Clark electrode (outer tip diameter 2-6 microm). The size of the graft (250 islets) was by purpose not large enough to cure the diabetic recipients. The oxygen tension in islets within the pancreas was also recorded. Blood perfusion was measured with the laser-Doppler technique.

RESULTS

Within native pancreatic islets, the partial pressure of oxygen was approximately 40 mm Hg (n=8). In islets transplanted to nondiabetic animals, the oxygen tension was approximately 6-7 mm Hg 1, 2, and 9 months posttransplantation. No differences could be seen between the different time points after transplantation. In the diabetic recipients, an even more pronounced decrease in graft tissue oxygen tension was recorded. The mean oxygen tension in the superficial renal cortex surrounding the implanted islets was similar in all groups (approximately 15 mm Hg). Intravenous administration of glucose (0.1 gxkg(-1)x min(-1)) did not affect the oxygen tension in any of the investigated tissues. The islet graft blood flow was similar in all groups, measuring approximately 50% of the blood flow in the kidney cortex.

CONCLUSION

The oxygen tension in islets implanted beneath the kidney capsule is markedly lower than in native islets up to 9 months after transplantation. Moreover, persistent hyperglycemia in the recipient causes an even further decrease in graft oxygen tension, despite similar blood perfusion. To what extent this may contribute to islet graft failure remains to be determined.

[Use of islet cells in cell therapy]

Insulin dependent diabetes mellitus is a common disease affecting 1.5 million patients in Europe. It is currently treated by multiple injections of insulin associated with blood glucose self monitoring. The goal of the treatment is to obtain near normal glucose concentration, in order to prevent the later complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, macroangiopathy) of the disease--which may be severe--while avoiding severe hypoglycaemia. Although diabetes therapy has improved enormously in the last few decades, intensive research is currently aimed at replacing not only the missing hormone but also the cells which normally produce insulin in the pancreas. Transplantation of insulin secreting cells as a treatment of diabetes mellitus therefore has a special significance among other applications of cell therapy, since it deals with a disease which already has an efficient therapy. The aim of this article is the discussion of the objectives and the hopes in this field.