Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction

A proposed framework of strategies to overcome challenges to surgical quality assurance in oncology trials (SQA-Onc.)

INTRODUCTION

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with surgical interventions frequently lack a framework to ensure surgical quality. We aimed to investigate surgical quality assurance (SQA) in oesophagogastric oncology trials and to develop a translatable framework of strategies to overcome challenges in the design and implementation of SQA.

METHODS

Seventy-one peer-nominated, international, expert trial stakeholders included surgeons; oncologists; trial managers and trial methodologists. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with expert stakeholders examining challenges to SQA in oncology trials followed by a Delphi process to gain consensus on mitigating strategies. Relevant expert consensus strategies were selected for inclusion within a separate written survey and Delphi process in the active ADDICT RCT.

RESULTS

Expert consensus was reached for 59 strategies to overcome challenges to SQA in oncology trials. 19 of these strategies were selected for inclusion within the ADDICT survey and Delphi process, of which 14 (74 %) gained consensus amongst ADDICT trial stakeholders across two Delphi rounds, indicating their relevance within an active surgical oncology RCT. Prominent mitigating strategies included operative monitoring using photographs and/or videos with a structured objective assessment tool. Summarising the expert Delphi consensus allowed formulation of a framework of strategies to overcome challenges to SQA in oncology trials (SQA-Onc.) CONCLUSION: In this first international expert consensus within this area, agreement was reached for 59 strategies to overcome challenges to implementation of SQA. The proposed SQA-Onc. tool is intended to support SQA measures within future trials. Validating this framework within the next generation of RCTs should be the focus of future research.

Impact of histologically poorly cohesive phenotype as a prognostic factor in patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focussed on using histological phenotype to evaluate prognostic factors after adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer. We evaluated the impact of histological type based on the World Health Organization classification.

METHODS

Overall, 348 patients with pStage II/III advanced gastric cancer undergoing R0 gastrectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Of these, 143 underwent AC. Univariate and multivariate analyses for prognostic factors of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed in all patients and patients receiving AC. Moreover, long-term survivals were compared by histological phenotype between patients with and without AC.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis in all patients revealed that histologically poorly cohesive carcinoma with not otherwise specified and signet ring cell subtype (PCC-NOS/SRC) and pN 2/3 independently and adversely affected RFS. Alternatively, male sex, poor PS and pN 2/3 adversely affected OS. In multivariate analysis of patients receiving AC, longer tumour size (≥ 80 mm), histologically PCC-NOS/SRC phenotype and pN 3 independently influenced RFS. Multivariate analysis in this population for OS revealed that pN 3 and poor postoperative immune-nutritional status significantly induced worse OS. Comparison of RFS and OS by histological phenotype between patients with and without AC showed that AC had no efficacy for improving long-term survivals in histologically PCC phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologically PCC phenotype by WHO classification, particularly PCC-NOS/SRC phenotypes, showed poor long-term RFS even after AC in patients with pStage II and III gastric cancer. An effective chemotherapeutic regimen needs to be developed for this specific subtype of gastric cancer.

The current landscape of gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer diagnosis and treatment in China: a comprehensive nationwide cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer globally and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite its alarming prevalence, limited comparative evidence exists on its treatment efficacy and prognosis across diverse China populations.

METHODS

To address this, our study used a large-scale dataset from the National Cancer Information Database, including data from 220,304 patients from 53 leading hospitals across 27 provinces in China.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2023, early-stage (Stages I-II) gastric cancer diagnoses increased to 35.63% of all cancer cases. Our study evaluated the neoadjuvant treatment strategies, adjuvant post-operative therapy, first- and second-line management for progressive stages, alongside current gastric cancer treatment guidelines in China. Notably, immunotherapy accounted for 16.17% and 23.28% of first- and second-line treatments for late-stage gastric cancers, and 14.56% and 5.00% for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, respectively. Analysis of survival rates revealed that the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year survival rates were 74.07%, 54.89%, 44.21%, 37.97%, and 33.53%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates across stages I-IV were 85.07%, 49.34%, 35.56%, and 13.15%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings offer critical insights into the current state of gastric cancer treatment in China and can inform future initiatives to improve therapeutic outcomes for patients with gastric cancer.

Evolution of Therapeutics for Locally Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and gastric adenocarcinomas, remain a major global health concern, with poor overall survival and high recurrence rate despite aggressive treatment. Patients with very early tumors (cT1a) can benefit from endoscopic therapy. However, patients with locally advanced disease require multimodal therapies that may combine surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in the treatment of locally advanced upper GI adenocarcinomas. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment, with perioperative chemotherapy emerging as the standard of care. While preoperative chemoradiation has demonstrated some benefits in esophageal and GEJ cancers, recent data suggest a more limited role for radiation going forward. Immunotherapy has shown some promise in both the adjuvant and perioperative settings but has yet to establish definitive survival benefit. The integration of HER2-targeted therapies into treatment regimens for HER2-positive locally advanced gastroesophageal cancers has not yielded significant improvements, underscoring the need for more effective strategies. Ongoing research focuses on better predictive biomarkers, personalized treatment approaches, and potential organ preservation strategies for patients achieving a clinical complete response. Continued advancements in treatment modalities and precision medicine are critical to improving survival for patients with locally advanced upper GI adenocarcinomas.

Construction of a modified TNM staging system and prediction model based on examined lymph node counts for gastric cancer patients at pathological stage N3

Background

Examined lymph node (ELN) count is a critical factor affecting the number of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs). The impact of the ELN number on survival and staging remains unclear.

Methods

This study included 4,291 stage N3 GC patients from the SEER database (training cohort) and 567 stage N3 GC patients from the FAHZZU database (validation cohort). The optimal ELN count and stage migration were investigated, and a modified TNM (mTNM) staging system including the ELN count was proposed. LASSO regression and random forest analyses were used to screen and evaluate the variables associated with survival, and an mTNM-based nomogram was constructed. The performance of the mTNM staging system and mTNM-based nomogram were compared with that of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system.

Results

The optimal threshold of the ELN count was identified as 21. An insufficient number of ELNs (≤ 21) was associated with poorer survival outcomes and led to stage migration in all N3 patients. A new mTNM staging system was proposed, integrating the ELN count into the TNM staging system (8th edition). LASSO regression analysis revealed that age, tumor size, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the mTNM system were associated with overall survival (OS) outcomes, and random forest analysis revealed that the mTNM system was the most important variable for predicting survival. An mTNM-based nomogram was constructed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates. Compared with the TNM staging system (8th edition), the mTNM staging system and mTNM-based nomogram showed superior prognosis discriminative ability, better predictive accuracy, and greater net improvement in survival outcomes.

Conclusions

The optimal ELN count for N3 GC patients was 21. The mTNM staging system and mTNM-based nomogram showed superior discriminative ability, predictive accuracy, and greater net benefit for OS outcomes.

Long-Term Prognostic Analysis of Chemoradiation Therapy Versus Chemotherapy after D2 Resection for High-Risk Gastric Cancer: Results From a Prospective Randomized Control Study

PURPOSE

To explore the population of patients who could benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and investigated the value of postoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with gastric cancer after D2 resection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients between October 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Patients with gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy were randomized (1:1) to receive postoperative CRT or adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The adjuvant chemotherapy group received 8 cycles of SOX (S-1 + oxaliplatin) chemotherapy. RT was given after 4 to 6 cycles of SOX chemotherapy. RT comprised 45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy over 5 weeks by intensity modulated RT concurrently with S-1 chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients (median [IQR] age, 58 [50-64] years) were enrolled, including 157 patients randomized to the adjuvant chemotherapy group and 155 patients randomized to the adjuvant CRT group. The 3-year DFS was 66.7% for the control arm and 70.7% for the experimental arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54-1.25; P = .35). We defined patients with pN stage ≥ N2 and extraperigastric lymph node metastasis as the high-risk group and the remaining patients as the low-risk group. The 3-year DFS rates for the high-risk group and the low-risk group were 59.3% and 76.8%, respectively (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.39-3.22; P < .01). For high-risk patients, the 3-year DFS rates in the adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant CRT groups were 53.0% and 71.0%, respectively (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97; P < .05). More grade 3 and 4 acute toxic effects were observed in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the CRT group (41 patients [26.1%] vs 28 patients [18.5%]; P = .11), but the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Subgroup analysis of this randomized clinical trial revealed that high-risk patients can benefit from adjuvant CRT.

Updates in the Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Radiation Oncology in Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) plays a critical role in managing gastrointestinal (GI) cancers within radiation oncology. It enhances tumor detection, staging, and lymph node involvement assessment, leading to better-targeted radiation treatment. PET/CT also aids in delineating tumor volumes to minimize geographic misses, enabling precise dose escalation to metabolically active regions. Despite its benefits, PET/CT has limitations such as false positives and dependency on complementary imaging. Emerging technologies offer real-time adjustments and personalized treatments, advancing precision medicine in GI radiation oncology. Further research is needed to refine PET/CT integration for improved treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Chemo- and Radiotherapy of Gastrointestinal Tumors during Pregnancy

Background

Gastrointestinal cancers account for approximately one-fourth of all cancer cases and one-third of all tumor-related deaths worldwide. For the most frequent gastrointestinal tumor entities including colorectal, gastric, esophageal, and liver cancer, the incidence is expected to increase by more than 50% until 2040. While most gastrointestinal cancers are diagnosed beyond the age of fertility and predominantly in men, the increasing incidence of gastrointestinal malignancies in patients below the age of fifty suggests a growing importance in women of childbearing age. While localized cancers in pregnant women can either be monitored or treated surgically, more advanced stages might require radio- or chemotherapy to control tumor growth until delivery. Under these circumstances, critical decisions have to be made to preserve maternal health on the one side and minimize harm to the infant on the other side.

Summary

Here we summarize data from case reports, meta-analyses, and registries of women undergoing radio- or chemotherapy during pregnancy and provide guidance for therapeutic decision-making in pregnant women suffering from gastrointestinal cancers.

Key Message

After the first trimester, most chemotherapeutic regimens can be safely administered to pregnant patients with gastrointestinal cancers. With appropriate safety measures, both radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy can be applied to pregnant patients with rectal cancers.

Foundation Model for Predicting Prognosis and Adjuvant Therapy Benefit From Digital Pathology in GI Cancers

PURPOSE

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for improving cancer diagnosis and treatment. Here, we present a foundation AI model for prognosis prediction on the basis of standard hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathology slides.

METHODS

In this multinational cohort study, we developed AI models to predict prognosis from histopathology images of patients with GI cancers. First, we trained a foundation model using over 130 million patches from 104,876 whole-slide images on the basis of self-supervised learning. Second, we fine-tuned deep learning models for predicting survival outcomes and validated them across seven cohorts, including 1,619 patients with gastric and esophageal cancers and 2,594 patients with colorectal cancer. We further assessed the model for predicting survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The AI models predicted disease-free survival and disease-specific survival with a concordance index of 0.726-0.797 for gastric cancer and 0.714-0.757 for colorectal cancer in the validation cohorts. The models stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, with 5-year survival rates of 49%-52% versus 76%-92% in gastric cancer and 43%-72% versus 81%-98% in colorectal cancer. In multivariable analysis, the AI risk scores remained an independent prognostic factor after adjusting for clinicopathologic variables. Compared with stage alone, an integrated model consisting of stage and image information improved prognosis prediction across all validation cohorts. Finally, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival in the high-risk group but not in the low-risk group (treatment-model interaction P = .01 and .006) for stage II/III gastric and colorectal cancer, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The pathology foundation model can accurately predict survival outcomes and complement clinicopathologic factors in GI cancers. Pending prospective validation, it may be used to improve risk stratification and inform personalized adjuvant therapy.

Hounsfield units predict vertebral compression fractures in gastric cancer survivors after adjuvant irradiation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and predictive value of vertebral Hounsfield units (HUs) for vertebral compression fracture (VCF) development in gastric cancer (GC) patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 271 patients with non-metastatic GC who received adjuvant RT between 2010 and 2020. The vertebral bodies from 9th thoracic (T9) to 2nd lumbar (L2) were contoured in computed tomographies used for RT planning, and V30, V35, V40, mean doses, and HUs of vertebrae were documented. We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors for VCF development.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 35.7 months. VCF developed in 23 patients (8.5%) in a median of 30.6 months (range, 3.4 to 117.3) after the end of RT. In total, 37 vertebrae were fractured, with 14 located in T12, nine in L1, seven in T11, four in L2, and three in T10. Older age, female sex, non-smoking status, and lower median vertebrae HUs were significantly associated with VCF in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, lower median HUs of T12 vertebrae (odds ratio, 0.965; 95% confidence interval, 0.942 to 0.989; p = 0.004) remained significant. The optimal cut-off value for T12 HU was 205.1, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.765, sensitivity of 85.7%, and specificity of 65%.

CONCLUSION

The lower median HU value of T12 vertebrae is a significant and independent risk factor for VCF development in GC patients who received adjuvant RT. HUs values serve as a simple and reliable predictor of VCF development in this population.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for node-negative gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and gastrectomy: A propensity score matched analysis study

INTRODUCTION

The long term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer remains poor owing to high recurrence rates. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in node positive gastric cancer to prolong survival and prevent recurrence is widely accepted. However, the role for adjuvant chemotherapy in node negative gastric cancer is less clear, particularly in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of adjuvant chemotherapy with survival in patients undergoing pathologically node negative gastric cancer resection, following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We examined a national cancer database containing patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pathologically node negative curative gastrectomy. We divided these patients into those who had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who had not. Using a propensity score matched analysis, we analyzed the survival of these patients between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

5309 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy were identified from the database and 806 of these patients were given adjuvant chemotherapy. Following propensity score matched analysis, patients who had been given adjuvant chemotherapy had an increased median survival of 150 vs 125 months (5-year 68 % vs 62 %, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a small, but statistically significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node negative gastric cancer who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies are required to examine the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this subset of patients.

Characterizing Patients with ypT0N1 Gastric Adenocarcinoma Within the AJCC Staging System

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for gastric cancer in the United States involves perioperative chemotherapy. While most post-therapy pathologic staging results are concordant (i.e. ypT+N+ or ypT0N0), patients occasionally display discordant results, such as ypT0N1. Herein, we characterized the survival of patients with ypT0N1 staging to better determine their categorization within the American Joint committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we queried all patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2021 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by their ypTNM stage: (1) ypT0N0; (2) ypT+N0; (3) ypT+N1; and (4) ypT0N1. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess 5- and 10-year survival between ypTNM stages.

RESULTS

A total of 28,985 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 2378 (8.2%) had ypT0N0, 9402 (32.4%) had ypT+N0, 5339 (18.4%) had ypT+N1, and 318 (1.1%) had ypT0N1 staging. Overall, patients had a median age of 64 years, with the majority being male (74.9%) or White (82.2%). Additionally, 50.2% received care from an academic center, and 53.3% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. On multivariable analysis, patients with ypT0N1 had a 105% higher risk for mortality within 5 years (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69-2.50) and 86% increased risk within 10 years (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.54-2.23) when compared with ypT0N0.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stage ypT0N1 disease have worse 5- and 10-year outcomes than those with node-negative disease. Thus, their survival pattern most closely matches patients with ypstage IIB and III disease.

D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: Advancements and Technical Considerations

Lymphadenectomy (LND) is a crucial component of the curative surgical treatment of gastric cancer (GC). The LND serves to both accurately stage the disease and offer therapeutic benefits. At the time of "curative-intent" gastrectomy, D2 LND is the optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced GC due to its survival benefits and acceptable morbidity. Mastery of the technical aspects of LND, especially D2, requires significant training, adequate case volume, and expertise. This review discusses key aspects of D2 LND, including its status as the standard treatment for locally advanced GC, definition and anatomic borders, technical details, and controversial topics such as splenic hilar dissection and omentectomy. The application of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to elucidate the drainage patterns of GC and to facilitate lymph node (LN) identification is briefly reviewed. Finally, GC standardization and centralization, including surgical treatment, are discussed.

Clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study from Ain Shams Clinical Oncology Department

Background

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) has a different epidemiological profile in Egypt than in other countries. It ranks 11th in incidence, with 3,285 new cases and 10th in mortality, with 2,469 cases. This retrospective study aims to analyze gastric cancer epidemiology and clinical outcomes in Egyptian patients at Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology Department.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the complete medical records of patients with confirmed GAC at the Ain Shams University Clinical Oncology Department from January 2017 to December 2020.

Results

This study included 70 patients with GAC. The median age was 52.5 years, with nearly half of cases under 50 years and males representing 53% of the cohort. 70% of patients were from urban areas. Nearly one-third were smokers, with 57.1% having medical comorbidities, mainly diabetes mellitus, hypertension and viral hepatitis. Additionally, 25.7% had a positive family history of GAC. Most Common presenting symptoms were vomiting (42.9%) and abdominal pain (57.1%). 40% of tumours were in the gastric body, and 64.3% were diffuse-type GAC, with 64.3% classified as high grade (III). At presentation, the majority of cases were metastatic (55.7%), with 15.7% presenting with stage II disease and 28.6% with stage III. Most patients (72.8%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2. Only 18.6% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while 48.6% underwent surgical resection with adequate lymph node dissection in 55.9% of cases. Adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation was administered to 19 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months, 36 months for stage II, 17 months for stage III and 7 months for stage IV. Univariate analysis indicated that female gender, higher stage (Stage III-IV), higher grade (G IV), absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and intestinal type were significantly associated with increased mortality. However, multivariate analysis adjusting for these factors identified the advanced stage as a significant independent predictor of mortality.

Conclusion

This study identified the distinct GAC profile of Egyptian patients, younger age, aggressive tumours and frequent metastases. These factors contributed to lower OS. Further research and targeted interventions are needed to improve outcomes.

Prognostic performance of examined lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and positive lymph nodes in gastric cancer: a competing risk model study

Background

Previous research on the prognostic effectiveness of examined lymph nodes (ELN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and positive lymph nodes (pN) in postoperative gastric cancer (GC) has yielded inconsistent results despite their widespread use.

Methods

This study used a competing risk model (CRM) to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of these markers in patients with GC. Data from 337 patients with lymph node (LN)-positive stage II GC undergoing resection and chemotherapy between 2010 and 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Optimal cutoff values for ELN and LNR were determined using restricted cubic splines, and pN was divided into three groups based on the AJCC staging system. The survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional hazards analysis, cumulative incidence curves, and CRM. Subgroup analysis and interaction tests were performed to evaluate the correlation between LN status and survival within subgroups.

Results

The results indicated that the optimal cutoff values for ELN, LNR, and pN were 16, 0.1, and 2. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that ELN (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67), LNR (HR = 2.23), and pN (HR = 2.80) were independent predictors of overall survival, whereas only LNR (HR = 2.08) was independently associated with disease-specific survival. The CRM revealed that LNR (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.89) and pN (SHR = 2.80) were independently associated with disease-specific survival.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ELN, LNR, and pN are all significant predictors of overall survival for GC. However, LNR demonstrates stronger robustness in predicting DSS than ELN and pN. The LNR may supplement the TNM staging system in identifying prognostic discrepancies.

Association between adjuvant radiotherapy in adults with gastric cancer and risk of second primary malignancy: a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the association between adjuvant radiotherapy and the development of second primary malignancies (SPMs) and identify its determinants in patients who have undergone surgical treatment for gastric cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

SETTING

Cohorts (18 registries, 2000-2018, from SEER) were screened for any malignancy that developed after sufficient latency from diagnosis of surgically treated non-metastatic gastric cancer.

PARTICIPANTS

24 777 surgically treated gastric cancer cases were included in the cohort. Among them, 6128 patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The cumulative incidence of SPMs was estimated using Fine and Gray's competing risk model and the radiotherapy-correlated risks were calculated using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among patients with sufficient latency, there was no significant association between radiotherapy and the risk of developing second primary solid malignancies (relative risk=1.05, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.33) or haematological malignancies (relative risk=1.17, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.11). Interestingly, radiotherapy was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of second lung and bronchus cancer compared with no radiotherapy, with a 15-year incidence of 1.4%-3.17% (p<0.05). Radiotherapy was not associated with a significant increase in standardised incidence ratios of SPMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with an increased risk of developing SPMs in surgically treated patients with gastric cancer. Clinical trials are warranted to further verify the findings.

Multimodality Treatment for Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Gastric cancer is prevalent worldwide and is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Patients with GC often present at advanced stages at diagnosis. Patients with locally advanced diseases experience poor survival rates with surgery alone. Multimodality therapy, including peri-operative therapy and adjuvant therapy, has improved outcomes. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment approach. Molecular characteristics of GC may help guide treatment choices and studies are currently underway to evaluate other treatment modalities including immunotherapy and targeted therapy.

Evaluating survival outcomes and treatment recommendations in resectable gastric cancer

No consensus exists on the optimal therapy for resectable gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors, including the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy (PC). Our study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) outcomes associated with the recommended treatment modalities for GC and GEJ tumors and evaluate treatment trends from 2010 to 2020. A national registry cohort identified patients with ≥ cT2 nonmetastatic GC and GEJ cancer. Treatment modalities were classified as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCR), PC, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and adjuvant chemoradiation (ACR). Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated factors associated with OS. A cohort of 7665 patients were included. Patients who received PC had the highest OS (median 86.80 months, 95% CI 73.40-NE), while chemoradiotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings had worse OS than PC and NC (NCR median 47.15 months, 95% CI 44.58-52.27, and ACR median 52.67 months, 95%CI 42.78-63.93). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that NCR and NC had worse survival than PC (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.50-2.02, p < 0.001 and HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44, p = 0.0008, respectively). Additionally, the most utilized modality during 2020 was NC (35.8%), followed by PC (28.0%) and NCR (24.9%). The utilization of PC and NC had the most substantial rise between 2010 and 2020, increasing by 11.0%. The study demonstrates the association of PC with improved OS outcomes for nonmetastatic GC and GEJ tumors. Therapies combining radiation with chemotherapy and extended lymph node dissection correlated with a worse prognosis compared to PC and NC. Despite the association with improved outcomes, national data reveals low utilization rates for PC.

Is it time to retire preoperative radiation for localized esophageal and gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma?

Whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or perioperative chemotherapy is superior for localized esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancers has been a topic of long-standing debate. For years, standard of care in the United States for localized esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma (EAC) has been physician's choice between the 2 strategies. More recently, adjuvant immunotherapy has also been introduced into the treatment approach for those who received neoadjuvant CRT. While preoperative radiation remains an important option for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas, the ESOPEC trial presented in 2024 suggested that perioperative chemotherapy is superior to preoperative CRT in EAC. In addition, the results of the TOPGEAR trial presented in 2024 showed that adding CRT to perioperative chemotherapy did not lead to improved outcomes. This has led to a shift in practice among oncologists. However, there are various complexities and factors to consider when interpreting these studies. In this review, we outline both trials and what their findings may mean for the future of preoperative CRT in EAC. Ultimately, until more data are available that incorporate novel agents such as immunotherapy, these studies indicate that we should defer the routine inclusion of radiation in preoperative treatment for EAC.

Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Underwent Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to develop a predictive model.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 245 non-metastatic gastric cancer patients who received adjuvant CRT or radiotherapy from 2010 to 2020. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A nomogram was constructed based on significant predictive factors for OS, including lymph node ratio, T classification, tumor location, and local recurrence.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 41.5 months (range, 6-144.8 months). The 2- and 5-year OS and progression-free survival were 77% and 53% and 64% and 49%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, tumor location (distal vs. proximal), pT classification (pT1-2 vs. pT3-4), lymph node ratio (< 0.18 vs. ≥ 0.18), and presence of local recurrence were independent prognostic factors for OS. The optimal cut-off value for the total nomogram score predicting OS was 116 points. Patients with < 116 points had 2- and 5-year OS rates of 87% and 73%, respectively, compared to 67% and 30% for those with ≥ 116 points.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram was constructed incorporating lymph node ratio, T classification, tumor site, and local recurrence for gastric cancer patients receiving adjuvant CRT. Patients with a total score below 116 demonstrated higher survival rates. This nomogram may aid in defining optimal follow-up intervals.

Effect of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy offers survival benefit to patients with gastric cancer. Only 50-65% of patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and gastrectomy are able to receive adjuvant therapy. It is optimal to start adjuvant therapy within 8 weeks after gastrectomy. We compared the rate of return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) between minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) and open gastrectomy (OG).

METHOD

Retrospectively, we analyzed patients who underwent gastrectomy within a multi-hospital university-based health system (2019-2022). Data on patient demographics, comorbid conditions, operative approach, and postoperative outcomes were assessed with univariate analysis and multivariable analysis (MVA) to determine the association with RIOT.

RESULTS

Among 87 eligible patients, 33 underwent MIG and 54 underwent OG. There were no differences in demographics, performance status, comorbid conditions, or type of gastrectomy between the two groups. MIG patients were significantly more likely to RIOT compared with OG patients (87.9% vs. 63%, p = 0.003), with 73.1% of MIG patients starting adjuvant therapy within 8 weeks compared with 53.1% of OG patients. Factors associated with higher odds of RIOT included MIG and age <65 years, while major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) was associated with lower odds of RIOT. On MVA, MIG was independently associated with higher odds of RIOT compared with OG (odds ratio 6.05, 95% confidence interval 1.47-24.78, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The minimally invasive approach may benefit patients undergoing gastrectomy, irrespective of the extent of gastric resection for adenocarcinoma. MIG is associated with a higher likelihood of (1) RIOT and (2) starting adjuvant therapy within the optimal time period after gastrectomy.

Exploration of Constitutional Bias and Associated Factors in Patients with Recurrent and Metastatic Gastric Cancer, and the Therapeutic Effect of Yiqi Wenyang Jiedu Prescription: A one-arm study

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to elucidate the distribution characteristics of predominant unbalanced constitutions and TCM syndrome elements in patients with recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer. This study was also undertaken to analyze the potential relationship between the body constitutions of patients, syndrome elements, and biological indicators, as well as to investigate the effect of Yiqi Wenyang Jiedu prescription (YWJP) on symptoms and biological indicators before and after treatment.

RESULT

Yang-deficiency and Qi-deficiency were identified as prevalent imbalanced constitutions among patients with recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer. The primary syndrome factors associated with disease localization included the spleen-stomach and liver, with the main syndrome elements being Qi-deficiency, Yang-deficiency, and Qi-stagnation. Patients with Qi-deficiency and Yang-deficiency constitutions exhibited lower BMI and higher monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR). A notable positive correlation was observed between cold (Yang-deficiency) and BMI, as well as between Qi-deficiency constitution and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Furthermore, YWJP demonstrated efficacy in alleviating symptoms associated with Qi-deficiency and Yang-deficiency in patients with recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer, including dyspnea, fatigue, diaphoresis, cold intolerance, abdominal sounds, postural changes, and abdominal distension.

DISCUSSION

Yang-deficiency and Qi-deficiency emerged as prevalent constitutional patterns in patients with recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer. Notably, BMI, MLR, and NLR may serve as physiological indicators of these conditions. Furthermore, YWJP treatment demonstrated potential efficacy in alleviating symptoms associated with Qi-deficiency and Yang-deficiency in this patient population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200055826.

Reconsidering the Role of Radiotherapy for Inoperable Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review of Gastric Radiotherapy Given With Definitive and Palliative Intent

AIMS

The role of radiotherapy (RT) for inoperable gastric cancer (IGC) is commonly low-dose, given reactively for symptoms (e.g. bleeding), in contrast to the oesophagus, where high quality evidence exists for higher doses of RT. This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of, and evidence for, definitive and high-dose palliative RT for IGC and whether a change in practice is warranted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following registration with PROSPERO (CRD42022297080), MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched in accordance with PRISMA standards for studies evaluating definitive (non-metastatic disease, BED10 >45Gy) or high-dose palliative RT (for symptom/local control, minimum BED10 >30Gy). A manual search of meeting proceedings and clinical trial registries was also performed.

RESULTS

31 studies were selected for analysis. 10 definitive studies totalling n = 354 patients receiving RT with 45-50.4Gy/25-28#, showed median overall survival ranging between 11 and 26.4 months, clinical complete response range 12%-45%, G3 gastrointestinal toxicity 0-31% (range) and RT completion rates ranging from 81% to 100%. 21 high-dose palliative studies (n = 955) mostly evaluated haemostatic control and reported 38 different RT regimens (most commonly 30Gy/10#). Bleeding response rate (RR) was 59.6%-90%, pain RR 45.5-100%, obstruction RR 52.9%-100%, G3 gastrointestinal toxicity <5% and RT completion 68%-100%. An additional American National Cancer Database review >4700 non metastatic IGC patients which combined both definitive and palliative doses found significant benefit to RT in addition to chemotherapy. Evidence regarding a dose-response relationship is conflicting, limited by retrospective data. Two studies report high quality -of-life (QOL) scores following gastric RT.

CONCLUSION

There is a body of mainly non-randomised, observational evidence showing high-dose RT is efficacious, safe and may maintain QOL for patients with IGC. A change in practice will require a prospective randomised controlled trial, which should explore the role of prophylactic, high-BED RT combined with optimal systemic therapy using modern IMRT techniques and RT quality assurance.

Applying machine learning techniques to predict the risk of distant metastasis from gastric cancer: a real world retrospective study

Background

Distant metastasis of gastric cancer can seriously affect the treatment strategy of gastric cancer patients, so it is essential to identify patients at high risk of distant metastasis of gastric cancer earlier.

Method

In this study, we retrospectively collected research data from 18,472 gastric cancer patients from the SEER database. We applied six machine learning algorithms to construct a model that can predict distant metastasis of gastric cancer. We constructed the machine learning model using 10-fold cross-validation. We evaluated the model using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), decision curve analysis, and calibration curves. In addition, we used Shapley's addition interpretation (SHAP) to interpret the machine learning model. We used data from 1595 gastric cancer patients in the First Hospital of Jilin University for external validation. We plotted the correlation heat maps of the predictor variables. We selected an optimal model and constructed a web-based online calculator for predicting the risk of distant metastasis of gastric cancer.

Result

The study included 18,472 patients with gastric cancer from the SEER database, including 4,202 (22.75%) patients with distant metastases. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, race, grade of differentiation, tumor size, T stage, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for distant metastasis of gastric cancer. In the ten-fold cross-validation of the training set, the average AUC value of the random forest (RF) model was 0.80. The RF model performed best in the internal test set and external validation set. The RF model had an AUC of 0.80, an AUPRC of 0.555, an accuracy of 0.81, and a precision of 0.78 in the internal test set. The RF model had a metric AUC of 0.76 in the external validation set, an AUPRC of 0.496, an accuracy of 0.82, and a precision of 0.81. Finally, we constructed a network calculator for distant metastasis of gastric cancer using the RF model.

Conclusion

With the help of pathological and clinical indicators, we constructed a well-performing RF model for predicting the risk of distant metastasis in gastric cancer patients to help clinicians make clinical decisions.

Adjuvant Therapy after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?: Multi-institution Worldwide Observational Study

Objective

Based on current practice guidelines, we hypothesized that most patients with esophageal cancer, particularly those with locally advanced cancer, would benefit from adjuvant therapy after esophagectomy versus esophagectomy alone. We sought to obtain a granular estimate of patient-level risk-adjusted survival for each therapeutic option by cancer histopathology and stage.

Background

Although esophagectomy alone is now an uncommon therapy for treating locally advanced esophageal cancer, the value of adjuvant therapy after esophagectomy is unknown.

Methods

From 1970 to 2014, 22,123 consecutive patients from 33 centers on 6 continents (Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration) were diagnosed with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma (n = 7526) or squamous cell carcinoma (n = 5625), of whom 10,873 received esophagectomy alone and 2278 additional adjuvant therapy. Random forests for survival and virtual-twin analyses were performed for all-cause mortality.

Results

For adenocarcinoma, adjuvant therapy was beneficial only in pT4NanyM0 cancers (6-8 month survival benefit) and in pTanyN3M0 cancers (4-8 month benefit); a survival decrement was observed in pT1-3N0M0 cancers, with no effect on TanyN1-2M0 cancers. In squamous cell carcinoma, there was a 4 to 21 month survival benefit for pT3-4N0M0 cancers and a 4 to 15 month survival benefit for pT2-4N1-3M0 cancers.

Conclusions

Adjuvant therapy after esophagectomy appears to benefit most patients with node-positive squamous cell carcinoma, but for adenocarcinoma, its value is limited to deep cancers and to those with substantial nodal burden. Future studies of the role of adjuvant therapies should treat these 2 cancers differently, with guidelines reflecting the histopathologic-appropriate survival value of adjuvant therapy.

Current National Treatment Trends for Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the United States

PURPOSE

The treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) continues to evolve. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has demonstrated emerging benefit, the optimal treatment regimen, and sequence remain to be firmly established.

METHODS

Patients with nonmetastatic GA who underwent resection were identified within the 2020 National Cancer Database. Patients were compared between the mutually exclusive treatment groups of NAC, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and surgery only. The primary endpoint was receipt of NAC or NCRT. Patients were 1-to-1 propensity score matched for receiving any neoadjuvant therapy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of receipt of any neoadjuvant therapy and receipt of any adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-five thousand and seventy-three patients were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with NAC (25.0%), NCRT (31.4%), adjuvant chemotherapy (6.5%), adjuvant CRT (12.6%), and surgery only (24.5%). Compared to 2006-2011, patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2017 experienced the greatest increases in NAC (18.6% vs. 29.0%; p < 0.001) and NCRT (25.0% vs. 35.5%; p < 0.001). Median OS was 44.9 months. OS was longest for patients who received any neoadjuvant therapy compared to those receiving adjuvant or surgery only (51.0 vs. 42.4 vs. 38.0 months, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients who were Black, in the lowest income quartile or treated at lower volume facilities were less likely to receive NAT (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been significant acceleration in the use of neoadjuvant therapy for GA. Currently, NCRT followed by surgery are the most common treatment sequences in the United States. Additional trials are needed to further define the optimal treatment sequence.

Subtotal versus total gastrectomy for distal diffuse-type gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Diffuse-type gastric carcinoma in an aggressive form of gastric cancer. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment. It is controversial whether patients with diffuse-type gastric carcinoma should undergo total or subtotal gastrectomy when feasible. The aim of this study is to analyze the oncologic outcomes and overall survival of patients diagnosed with distal diffuse-type gastric cancer undergoing subtotal versus total gastrectomy with curative intent.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients with histologically confirmed diffuse-type distal gastric carcinoma and clinical staging cT1-4M0, who underwent surgery with curative intent between 2011 and 2020 in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Chile. Clinical and pathological staging was conducted using the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification. STG group was comprised by patients who underwent subtotal gastrectomy and TG group by patients who underwent total gastrectomy. Both groups were compared in relation to sociodemographic variables, pathology reports and perioperative data which were obtained from electronic medical records. Data analysis was obtained with Stata 16.1 Statistical Software.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients underwent curative intent surgery. Subtotal gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy was completed in 68 patients (52%). An R0 resection was achieved in all patients. Median number of resected lymph nodes, tumor size, proximal margin and depth of invasion were similar in both groups. Pathologic staging was similar between both groups, the most frequent being Stage 3(54%). After a median follow-up of 47 months [0.3-157], no difference was observed in overall survival between both groups (5-year-OS 63% in STG group versus 51% in TG group, p = 0.097).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologic and survival outcomes were similar in patients submitted to subtotal and total gastrectomy, suggesting that a subtotal gastrectomy with D2-lymphadenectomy for distal diffuse-type gastric carcinoma is not associated with a decrease in median overall survival and is an adequate surgical approach when technically feasible.

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

In Western countries, the current standard of care for resectable gastric cancer is perioperative chemotherapy. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has been considered, but data are limited regarding this treatment as compared with perioperative chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

We conducted an international, phase 3 trial in which patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus perioperative chemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy alone (control). In both groups, patients received either epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel both before and after surgery; the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group also received chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions of radiation, plus fluorouracil infusion). The primary end point was overall survival, and secondary end points included progression-free survival, pathological complete response, toxic effects, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 574 patients underwent randomization at 70 sites in Australasia, Canada, and Europe: 286 to the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group and 288 to the perioperative-chemotherapy group. A higher percentage of patients in the preoperative-chemoradiotherapy group than in the perioperative-chemotherapy group had a pathological complete response (17% vs. 8%) and greater tumor downstaging after resection. At a median follow-up of 67 months, no significant between-group differences in overall survival or progression-free survival were noted. The median overall survival was 46 months with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and 49 months with perioperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio for death, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.31), and the median progression-free survival was 31 months and 32 months, respectively. Treatment-related toxic effects were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of preoperative chemoradiotherapy to perioperative chemotherapy did not improve overall survival as compared with perioperative chemotherapy alone among patients with resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; TOPGEAR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01924819.).

Multicriteria optimization achieves superior normal tissue sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy for gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefits of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) based on multicriteria optimization (MCO) for gastric cancer patients, particularly the protection of serial organs at risk (OARs) that overlap with the target volume.

METHODS

MCO and single-criterion optimization (SCO) VMAT plans were conducted among 30 gastric cancer patients, with a prescription dose of 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions. All treatment plans underwent review, and a comparison was made between the active planning time and different dose-volume parameters.

RESULTS

Both the MCO and SCO VMAT plans achieved the target dose coverage, with no significant difference in the conformity index (CI) for the planning target volume (PTV), at median CI values of 0.887 and 0.891, respectively (P = 0.417). The MCO plans showed a slight but significant increase in the homogeneity index of the PTV, with a median increase of 0.029 (P < 0.001). Additionally, the MCO plans resulted in a lower D2% to the small intestine and duodenum, with reductions of 3.43 Gy and 0.3 Gy, respectively (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the Dmax to the small intestine correlated moderately with the overlapping volume between the small intestine and the target volume (ρ = 0.42, P = 0.023). Except for the mean dose to the liver, the MCO plans performed better in terms of dose indicators for other OARs. Moreover, compared to the SCO plans, the median active planning time in the MCO plans was significantly reduced by 53.2 min (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

MCO can effectively help the physicians to quickly select an optimal treatment plan for patients with gastric cancer. It has been shown that MCO VMAT plans can significantly reduce the dose to OARs and shorten the active planning time, with acceptable target coverage. In addition, these plans take less dosimetric time, thereby streamlining the treatment planning process.

Impact of early economic activity loss on all-cause mortality in gastric cancer survivors following curative treatment: a nationwide study in Korea

BACKGROUND

The impact of economic engagement on the health of cancer survivors is notable. Our study aims to explore the association between early loss of economic activity (EA) and the risk of all-cause mortality among gastric cancer survivors.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized data from Korea's National Health Insurance Service, focusing on 30-59-year-old gastric cancer patients who received either surgery or endoscopic procedures from January 2009 to December 2013. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Early loss of EA was identified when a patient's insurance status shifted to dependent within one year following treatment. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, conducting separate analyses for surgical and endoscopic groups.

RESULTS

Among 24,159 patients (median follow-up, 9.9 years), 2976 (12.3%) experienced all-cause mortality. Specifically, 2835 of these deaths occurred in patients who underwent surgery, while 141 were in the endoscopic procedure group. Early loss of EA was recorded in 14.4% of the surgery group and 7.7% of the endoscopic procedure group. Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality associated with early loss of EA were 1.39 (1.27-1.54) for the surgery group and 2.27 (1.46-3.52) for the endoscopic procedure group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights a significant association between the early loss of EA and an increased risk of all-cause mortality in those who have undergone curative treatments for gastric cancer. It underscores the crucial role of sustaining EA in enhancing the health outcomes of these survivors.

Real-World Outcomes for Localised Gastro-Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma Cancer Treated with Perioperative FLOT and Prophylactic GCSF Support in a Single Asian Centre

BACKGROUND

Perioperative FLOT (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) in Western guidelines, but its use is limited in Asian patients. We report outcomes from a single Asian centre of perioperative FLOT with concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) prophylaxis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all 56 stage II to III GEA patients treated with perioperative FLOT at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between June 2017 and February 2024 was performed. All patients were discussed at a multidisciplinary tumour board, underwent preoperative laparoscopic staging, and received prophylactic GCSF with perioperative FLOT. Surgery was performed across four partner institutions. The primary endpoints were the tolerability of FLOT and pathological complete response (pCR). A univariate analysis of factors associated with survival and adverse events was also performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 33 patients (58.9%) completed eight cycles of pre- and postoperative FLOT, and 92.9% underwent resection. The commonest grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (10.7%) and neutropenia (5.6%). The 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 0% and 1.9%, respectively. In resected tumours, the pCR was 15.4%. The median DFS was 27.5 months, but the median OS was not reached. The values for 1-, 2-, and 3-year DFS were 74.6%, 61.0%, and 46.5%, respectively. The values for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 85.0%, 67.4%, and 61.0%, respectively. In the univariate analysis of patients who underwent resection, an ECOG status of 0 was associated with better DFS, while ypN0, R0 resection, and pathological stages 0-II were associated with better DFS and OS. Patients ≥ 65 years benefited from FLOT similarly to those <65 years in terms of DFS (HR 1.03; p = 0.940) and OS (HR 1.08; p = 0.869), with similar rates of grade 3 to 4 AEs. Patients with a higher housing index (HI) were less likely to experience ≥grade 3 AEs compared to those with a lower HI (OR 0.16, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a unique real-world Asian experience of perioperative FLOT with prophylactic GCSF use, with low rates of G3 to 4 neutropenia. The tolerability of FLOT was similar to that reported in Western populations. Furthermore, similar survival and rates of grade 3 to 4 AEs were observed in elderly patients. Patients of lower socioeconomic status were more likely to experience severe AEs, highlighting the need to proactively support vulnerable groups during treatment.

Layer Analysis Based on RNA-Seq Reveals Molecular Complexity of Gastric Cancer

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is a significant global health issue with poor prognosis, despite advancements in treatment. Although molecular classifications, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), provide valuable insights, their clinical utility remains limited. We performed a multi-layered functional analysis using TCGA RNA sequencing data to better define molecular subtypes and explore therapeutic implications. We reanalyzed TCGA RNA-seq data from 142 GA patients with localized disease who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Our approach included probabilistic graphical models and recurrent sparse k-means/consensus cluster algorithms for layer-based analysis. Our findings revealed survival differences among TCGA groups, with the GS subtype showing the poorest prognosis. We identified twelve functional nodes and seven biological layers, each with distinct functions. The combined molecular layer (CML) classification identified three prognostic groups that align with TCGA subtypes. CML2 (GS-like) displayed gene expression related to lipid metabolism, correlating with worse survival. Transcriptomic heterogeneity within the CIN subtype revealed clusters tied to proteolysis and lipid metabolism. We identified a subset of CIN tumors with profiles similar to MSI, termed CIN-MSI-like. Claudin-18, a key gene in proteolysis, was overexpressed across TCGA subtypes, suggesting it is a potential therapeutic target. Our study advances GA biology, enabling refined stratification and personalized treatment. Further studies are needed to translate these findings into clinical practice.

Minimally Invasive Injectable Gel for Local Immunotherapy of Liver and Gastric Cancer

Local immunotherapy represents a promising solution for preventing tumor recurrence and metastasis post tumor surgical resection by eliminating residue tumor cells as well as eliciting tumor-specific immune responses. Minimally invasive surgery has become a mainstream surgical method worldwide due to its advantages of aesthetics and rapid postoperative recovery. Unfortunately, the currently reported local immunotherapy strategies are mostly designed to be used after open laparotomy, which go against the current surgical philosophy of minimally invasive therapy and is not suitable for clinical translation. Aiming at this problem, a minimally invasive injectable gel (MIGel) is herein reported loaded with immunotherapeutic agents for gastric and liver cancer postoperative treatment. The MIGel is formed by crosslinking between oxidized dextran (ODEX) and 4-arm polyethylene glycol hydroxylamine (4-arm PEG-ONH2) through oxime bonds, which can be injected through a clinic-used minimally invasive drainage tube and adhered tightly to the tissue. The loaded oxaliplatin (OxP) and resiquimod (R848) can be released constantly over two weeks and resulted in over 75% cure rate in orthotopic mouse gastric and liver cancer model. Collectively, a concept of minimally invasive local immunotherapy is proposed and MIGel is designed for local intraperitoneal cancer immunotherapy through minimally invasive surgery, with good clinical translation potential.

Comparison of treatment strategies based on clinical and pathological nodal status in resectable gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To determine the optimal multimodal treatment strategy between perioperative chemotherapy (PEC), postoperative chemoradiation therapy (POCR), and postoperative chemotherapy (POC) in resected gastric cancer (GC) patients based on nodal status.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, the National Cancer Database was used to identify resected non-metastatic GC (2006-2016). Patients were stratified by clinical nodal status-negative (cLN-) and positive (cLN+). In patients with cLN- disease who underwent upfront resection and were upstaged to pathological LN+, overall survival (OS) was compared between POC and POCR. In patients with cLN- and cLN+ disease, OS was compared between PEC, POCR, and POC. Kaplan-Meier survival estimate, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 7827 patients (cLN- 4828; cLN+ 2999). On multivariable analysis in patients with cLN- disease who underwent upfront resection (n = 4314) and were upstaged to pLN+ disease (70%), POCR (n = 2300, aHR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87, p < 0.001) was associated with improved OS compared to POC (n = 907). No significant difference was noted between POCR (n = 766, aHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.40, p = 0.39) and POC (n = 341) in patients with pLN- disease. On multivariable analysis in all patients with cLN- disease, POCR (n = 3066) was significantly associated with improved OS (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p < 0.01) compared to POC (n = 1248). No significant difference was noted between POCR (aHR 1.0, 95% CI 0.70-1.01, p = 0.958) and PEC (n = 514). These results remained consistent in patients with cLN+ disease (POCR = 1602, POC = 720, PEC = 677).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative chemoradiation is associated with improved survival in GC patients upstaged from clinically node-negative disease to pathologically node-positive disease. Negative clinical nodal disease status is not a reliable indicator of pathological nodal disease.

Gastric cancer-Epidemiology, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, challenges and opportunities: An updated review

Gastric cancer represents a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality and incidence rates, particularly in Eastern Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America. This comprehensive review synthesizes the latest epidemiological data and explores both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with gastric cancer, aiming to delineate the multifactorial etiology of this disease. Modifiable risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, obesity, dietary habits, smoking and alcohol consumption, whereas nonmodifiable factors comprise genetic predispositions, age, family history and male gender. The interplay of these factors significantly impacts the risk and progression of gastric cancer, suggesting potential preventive strategies. The challenges in treating gastric cancer are considerable, largely because of the late-stage diagnosis and the heterogeneity of the disease, which complicate effective treatment regimens. Current treatment strategies involve a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. The FLOT regimen (5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel) is now a standard for resectable cases in Europe and the US, showing superior survival and response rates over ECF and ECX regimens. For HER2-positive gastric cancer, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy improves overall survival, as demonstrated by the ToGA trial. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and nivolumab offer promising results. However, the five-year survival rate remains low, underscoring the urgency for improved therapeutic approaches. Recent advancements in molecular biology and cancer genomics have begun to pave the way for personalized medicine in gastric cancer care, focusing on molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This review also highlights the critical need for better screening methods that could facilitate early detection and treatment, potentially improving the prognosis. By integrating epidemiological insights with new therapeutic strategies, this article aims to thoroughly understand of gastric cancer's dynamics and outline a framework for future research and clinical management, advocating for a multidisciplinary approach to tackle this formidable disease.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery on Early and Late Outcomes of Patients With Gastric Cancer Treated Using Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common neoplasm and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for Stages II-III resectable tumors, but the comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open gastrectomy (OG) post-neoadjuvant therapy has not been adequately investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients with clinical Stage II and III gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by either MIS or OG between 2007 and 2020. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare the clinical and surgical outcomes, morbidity, and mortality, and the influence of MIS on 3-year survival rates was evaluated.

RESULTS

After matching, no statistical differences in clinical aspects were noted between the two groups. MIS was associated with increased D2 lymphadenectomy, curative intent, and complete neoadjuvant therapy. Furthermore, this therapeutic approach resulted in reduced transfusion rates and shorter hospital stays. Nonetheless, no significant differences were observed in global, clinical, or surgical complications or mortality between the two groups. Weight loss emerged as a significant risk factor for complications, but MIS did not independently affect survival rates. Extended resection and higher American Society of Anesthesiology scores were independent predictors of reduced survival.

CONCLUSION

MIS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer appears to be a viable option, with oncological outcomes comparable to those of OG, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays. Although MIS did not independently affect long-term survival, it offered potential benefits in terms of postoperative recovery and morbidity. Further studies are needed to validate these findings, especially across diverse populations.

High infiltration of immune cells with lower immune activity mediated the heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma and promoted metastasis

Background

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) is a heterogeneous malignancy with high invasion and metastasis. We aimed to explore the metastatic characteristics of GA using single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis.

Methods

The scRNA-seq dataset was downloaded from the GEO database and the "Seurat" package was used to perform the scRNA-seq analysis. The CellMarker2.0 database provided gene markers. Subsequently, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the FindMarkers function and subjected to enrichment analysis with the "ClusterProlifer". "GseaVis" package was used for visualizing the gene levels. Finally, the SCENIC analysis was performed for identifying key regulons. The expression level and functionality of the key genes were verified by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), wound healing and transwell assays.

Results

A total of 7697 cells were divided into 8 cell subsets, in which the Cytotoxic NK/T cells, Myeloid cells and Myofibroblasts had higher proportion in the metastatic tissues. Further screening of DEGs and enrichment analysis revealed that in the metastatic tissues, NK cells, monocytes and inflammatory fibroblasts with low immune levels contributed to GA metastasis. In addition, this study identified a series of key immune-related regulons that mediated the lower immune activity of immune cells. Further in vitro experiment verified that CXCL8 was a key factor mediating the proliferation and migration of GA cells.

Conclusion

The scRNA-seq analysis showed that high infiltration of immune cells with lower immune activity mediated heterogeneity to contribute to GA metastasis.

Gastric Cancer: An Up-to-Date Review with New Insights into Early-Onset Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer death in the world. Regarding the age at which the diagnosis was made, GC is divided into early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC-up to 45 years of age) and conventional GC (older than 45). EOGC constitutes approximately 10% of all GCs. Numerous reports indicate that EOGC is more aggressive than conventional GC and is often discovered at an advanced tumor stage, which has an impact on the five-year survival rate. The median survival rate for advanced-stage GC is very poor, amounting to less than 12 months. Risk factors for GC include family history, alcohol consumption, smoking, Helicobacter pylori, and Epstein-Barr virus infection. It has been shown that a proper diet and lifestyle can play a preventive role in GC. However, research indicates that risk factors for conventional GC are less correlated with EOGC. In addition, the unclear etiology of EOGC and the late diagnosis of this disease limit the possibilities of effective treatment. Genetic factors are considered a likely cause of EOGC, as young patients are less exposed to environmental carcinogens. Research characterizing GC in young patients is scarce. This comprehensive study presents all aspects: epidemiology, risk factors, new treatment strategies, and future directions.

Gastrectomies for the treatment of gastric cancer in a reference cancer center present better pathological results and survival compared to non-specialized hospitals

BACKGROUND

Some studies have shown that gastrectomy performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume specialized hospitals with the possibility of complete treatment has better results. This study aimed to compare the results of patients who underwent surgery at a reference center with non-specialized centers.

METHODS

Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma stage as pTNM II and III who underwent curative gastrectomy and were referred for adjuvant chemotherapy between 2009 and 2018 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: patients operated on in a reference center with complete oncological treatment (Reference Group); and those operated on in an external Hospital and referred for adjuvant treatment at the reference center (External Group).

RESULTS

A total of 643 patients were evaluated, 307 in the external group and 336 in the reference group. Patients in the external group were younger (58.9 vs. 62.6 years; p < 0.001) and with fewer comorbidities according to the Charlson-Deyo index (p < 0.001). The pathological result showed more dissected lymph nodes (41.4 vs. 23.5; p < 0.001) and a higher R0 resection rate (98.5% vs. 95.1%; p = 0.013) in the reference group. Patients of the external group underwent more adjuvant radiotherapy (49.5% vs. 33.9%; p < 0.001) with no difference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.066). Peritoneal recurrence was more common in the external group (63.2% vs 38.7%, p < 0.001). The disease-free survival rate was higher in the reference group (p < 0.001) as well as overall survival (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received full oncological treatment at a reference center had better survival outcomes compared to those operated in external services.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer is associated with better outcomes than neoadjuvant chemoradiation

INTRODUCTION

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) or chemoradiation (CRTx) for advanced resectable gastric cancer, irrespective of the tumor location. The aim of this study is to compare survival benefits between neoadjuvant CTx and CRTx using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

Using the NCDB, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent gastrectomy after neoadjuvant CRTx or CTx between 2004 and 2018.

RESULTS

The cohort included 14 266 patients, with 6458 (45.3%) receiving neoadjuvant CTx and 7808 (54.7%) receiving neoadjuvant CRTx. Both treatment groups exhibited significant differences in various demographic and clinical factors, including sex, age, race, tumor locations, stages, and adjuvant treatment (all p < 0.001). While the complete pathological response was more prevalent in the CRTx group (p < 0.001), overall survival (OS) was significantly extended in the CTx group (p < 0.001). Subgroup survival analyses, accounting for tumor location and clinical/pathological stage, consistently revealed longer OS in the CTx group (p < 0.001). The direct comparison showed an approximately 20%-30% improved 5-year OS in the CTx group across the majority of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T/N category tables. Multivariate analysis confirmed neoadjuvant CTx was an independent protective factor (hazard ratio = 0.811; p < 0.001). A nomogram for OS based on multivariate analysis was also proposed, revealing a significant improvement in the c-index compared to the current AJCC staging (0.654 vs. 0.596).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant CRTx demonstrated significantly shorter survival compared to patients undergoing CTx at the same stage. The current AJCC staging may lead to an overestimation of survival in patients with neoadjuvant CRTx.

Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 Plus Surgery and Adjuvant S-1 for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer: Updated Overall Survival Outcomes From Phase III PRODIGY

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The phase III PRODIGY study demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy (CSC) improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (SC) for patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) with clinical T2-3N+ or T4Nany disease. The primary end point was PFS. Overall survival (OS) was the secondary end point. We herein report the long-term follow-up outcomes, including OS, from this trial. A total of 238 and 246 patients were randomly assigned to the CSC and SC arms, respectively, and were treated (full analysis set). As of the data cutoff (September 2022), the median follow-up duration of the surviving patients was 99.5 months. Compared with SC, CSC significantly increased the OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; stratified log-rank P = .027) with an 8-year OS rate of 63.0% and 55.1% for the CSC and SC arms, respectively. CSC also significantly improved the PFS (HR, 0.70; stratified log-rank P = .016). In conclusion, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy, as part of perioperative chemotherapy, prolonged the OS of Asian patients with LAGC relative to patients treated with surgery and adjuvant S-1. It should be considered one of the standard treatment options for patients with LAGC in Asia.

Adjuvant chemotherapy versus preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer treated with curative-intent resection: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Multimodal therapy (MMT), comprising surgery alongside perioperative chemotherapy (PCMT) or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACMT), has demonstrated improve in survival compared with surgery alone for advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the moment of administering chemotherapy for GC is still a matter of debate. This study aimed to compare PCMT and ACMT in patients with locally advanced GC.

METHOD

We included all gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy and curative-intent resection. Using propensity score matching (PSM), patients who received PCMT were matched with patients undergoing ACMT for 10 pretreatment variables.

RESULTS

Among the 552 patients with indication for MMT, 377 (68.3%) received combining chemotherapy (CMT): 116 (30.8%) PCMT and 261 (69.2%) ACMT. After PSM, 109 patients were matched in each group. All variables assigned in the score were well matched and both groups became equivalent. Patients receiving PCMT had less angiolymphatic and perineural invasion, less advanced pT, pN and pTNM stage than ACMT group (p < 0.001 for all). There was no difference in the postoperative complication rate between both groups (p = 0.551). After the matching, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) became similar between PCMT and ACMT groups (DFS: 51.4% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.882, respectively; OS: 54.3% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.638, respectively).

CONCLUSION

After controlling for pretreatments characteristics, there was no significant difference in survival between GC patients who underwent perioperative and adjuvant CMT. PCMT did not result in an increase in survival, but it provides a decrease in the stage of the disease, with no difference in surgical outcomes.

Impact of chemotherapy delay on long-term prognosis of laparoscopic radical surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer: a pooled analysis of four randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy following curative surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) significantly improves long-term patient prognosis. However, delayed chemotherapy (DC), in which patients are unable to receive timely treatment, is a common phenomenon in clinical practice for various reasons. This study aimed to investigate the impact of DC on the prognosis of patients with stage II-III locally AGC and explore the associated risk factors.

METHODS

Data from four prospective studies were included in the pooled analysis. The planned chemotherapy (PC) group was defined as the time interval between surgery and the first chemotherapy ≤ 49 d, while the DC group was defined as the time interval between surgery and chemotherapy > 49 d. The prognosis, recurrence, and risk factors were compared, and a nomogram for predicting DC was established.

RESULTS

In total, 596 patients were included, of whom 531 (89.1%) had PC and 65 (10.9%) had DC. Survival analysis revealed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly lower in the DC group than those in the PC group (log-rank P < 0.001). Cox univariable and multivariable analyses showed that DC was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS in stage II-III patients (P < 0.05). Based on the significant factors for DC, a prediction model was established that had a good fit, high accuracy (AUC = 0.780), and clinical applicability in both the training and validation sets.

CONCLUSION

Delayed chemotherapy after gastrectomy is associated with poor long-term prognosis in patients with locally advanced stage II-III GC disease. But standardized, full-cycle adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery may play a remedial role, and can to a certain extent compensate the poor effects caused by delayed chemotherapy.

Feasibility and long-term survival of proximal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: A propensity-score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy enhances the possibility of achieving radical resection and improves the prognosis for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal extent of resection for locally advanced proximal GC after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

In this study, 330 patients underwent resection in Peking University Cancer Hospital, with curative intent after neoadjuvant therapy for histologically confirmed proximal GC from January 2009 to December 2022. Among them, 45 patients underwent proximal gastrectomy (PG), while 285 underwent total gastrectomy (TG).

RESULTS

In this study, 45 patients underwent proximal gastrectomy (PG), while 285 underwent total gastrectomy (TG). After propensity-score matching, 110 patients (71 TG and 39 PG) were included in the analysis. No significant differences between PG and TG regarding short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis were found. Specifically, PG demonstrated comparable overall survival to TG (P = 0.47). Subgroup analysis revealed that although not statistically significant, PG showed a potential advantage over TG in overall survival for patients with tumor-long diameters less than 4 cm (P = 0.31). However, for those with a long diameter larger than 4 cm, TG had a better survival probability (P = 0.81). No substantial differences were observed in baseline characteristics, surgical safety, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

For locally advanced proximal GC with objective response to neoadjuvant therapy (long diameter <4 cm), PG is an alternative surgical procedure. Further research and prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and guide clinical decision-making.

Who would be the winner? A prognostic nomogram for predicting the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy ± chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: TROD-02-01 study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop a basic, easily applicable nomogram to improve the survival prediction of the patients with stage II/III gastric cancer (GC) and to select the best candidate for postoperative radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

In this multicentric trial, we retrospectively evaluated the data of 1597 patients with stage II/III GC after curative gastrectomy followed by postoperative RT ± chemotherapy (CT). Patients were divided into a training set (n = 1307) and an external validation set (n = 290). Nomograms were created based on independent predictors identified by Cox regression analysis in the training set. The consistency index (C-index) and the calibration curve were used to evaluate the discriminative ability and accuracy of the nomogram. A nomogram was created based on the predictive model and the identified prognostic factors to predict 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The multivariate Cox model recognized lymph node (LN) involvement status, lymphatic dissection (LD) width, and metastatic LN ratio as covariates associated with CSS. Depth of invasion, LN involvement status, LD width, metastatic LN ratio, and lymphovascular invasion were the factors associated with PFS. Calibration of the nomogram predicted both CSS and PFS corresponding closely with the actual results. In our validation set, discrimination was good (C-index, 0.76), and the predicted survival was within a 10% margin of ideal nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

In our relatively large cohort, we created and validated both CSS and PFS nomograms that could be useful for underdeveloped or developing countries rather than Korea and Japan, where the D2 gastrectomy is routinely performed. This could serve as a true map for oncologists who must make decisions without an experienced surgeon and a multidisciplinary tumor board.

PERIOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND ADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER IN A HOSPITAL OF THE BRAZILIAN UNIFIED HEALTH SYSTEM

BACKGROUND

Despite the preference for multimodal treatment for gastric cancer, abandonment of chemotherapy treatment as well as the need for upfront surgery in obstructed patients brings negative impacts on the treatment. The difficulty of accessing treatment in specialized centers in the Brazilian Unified National Health System (SUS) scenario is an aggravating factor.

AIMS

To identify advantages, prognostic factors, complications, and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies survival in gastric cancer treatment in SUS setting.

METHODS

The retrospective study included 81 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment according to INT0116 trial (adjuvant chemoradiotherapy), CLASSIC trial (adjuvant chemotherapy), FLOT4-AIO trial (perioperative chemotherapy), and surgery with curative intention (R0 resection and D2 lymphadenectomy) in a single cancer center between 2015 and 2020. Individuals with other histological types, gastric stump, esophageal cancer, other treatment protocols, and stage Ia or IV were excluded.

RESULTS

Patients were grouped into FLOT4-AIO (26 patients), CLASSIC (25 patients), and INT0116 (30 patients). The average age was 61 years old. More than 60% of patients had pathological stage III. The treatment completion rate was 56%. The pathological complete response rate of the FLOT4-AIO group was 7.7%. Among the prognostic factors that impacted overall survival and disease-free survival were alcoholism, early postoperative complications, and anatomopathological status pN2 and pN3. The 3-year overall survival rate was 64.9%, with the CLASSIC subgroup having the best survival (79.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment strategy for gastric cancer varies according to the need for initial surgery. The CLASSIC subgroup had better overall survival and disease-free survival. The INT0116 regimen also protected against mortality, but not with statistical significance. Although FLOT4-AIO is the preferred treatment, the difficulty in carrying out neoadjuvant treatment in SUS scenario had a negative impact on the results due to the criticality of food intake and worse treatment tolerance.

Development of a reliable surgical quality assurance tool for gastrectomy in oncological trials

BACKGROUND

Despite its recognized importance, there is currently no reliable tool for surgical quality assurance (SQA) of gastrectomy in surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to develop an SQA tool for gastrectomy and to apply this tool within the ADDICT Trial in order to assess the extent and completeness of lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

The operative steps for D1+ and D2 gastrectomy have been previously described in the literature and ADDICT trial manual. Two researchers also performed fieldwork in the UK and Japan to document key operative steps through photographs and semi-structured interviews with expert surgeons. This provided the steps that were used as the framework for the SQA tool. Sixty-two photographic cases from the ADDICT Trial were rated by three independent surgeons. Generalizability (G) theory determined inter-rater reliability. D-studies examined the effect of varying the number of assessors and photographic series they rated. Chi-square assessed intra-rater reliability, comparing how the individual assessor's responses corresponded to their global rating for extent of lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

The tool comprised 20 items, including 19 anatomical landmarks and a global rating score. Overall reliability had G-coefficient of 0.557. Internal consistency was measured with a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.869 and Chi-square confirmed intra-rater reliability for each assessor as < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

A photographic surgical quality assurance tool is presented for gastrectomy. Using this tool, the assessor can reliably determine not only the quality but also the extent of the lymphadenectomy performed based on remaining anatomy rather than the excised specimen.

Epidemiology and prognostic nomogram for locally advanced gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) represents a specific subtype of gastric cancer renowned for its contentious epidemiological features, treatment principles, and prognostic factors.

AIM

To investigate the epidemiology of GSRC and establish an improved model for predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced GSRC (LAGSRC) after surgery.

METHODS

The annual rates of GSRC incidence and mortality, covering the years 1975 to 2019, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to explore the temporal trends in both disease incidence and mortality rates using Joinpoint software. The clinical data of 3793 postoperative LAGSRC patients were collected from the SEER database for the analysis of survival rates. The Cox regression model was used to explore the independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). The risk factors extracted were used to establish a prognostic nomogram.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of GSRC increased dramatically between 1975 and 1998, followed by a significant downward trend in incidence after 1998. In recent years, there has been a similarly optimistic trend in GSRC mortality rates. The trend in GSRC showed discrepancies based on age and sex. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS demonstrated the high discriminative ability and clinical utility of this nomogram. The area under the curve indicated that the performance of the new model outperformed that of the pathological staging system.

CONCLUSION

The model we established can aid clinicians in the early prognostication of LAGSRC patients, resulting in improved clinical outcomes by modifying management strategies and patient health care.

Epidemiology and prognostic nomogram for locally advanced gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) represents a specific subtype of gastric cancer renowned for its contentious epidemiological features, treatment principles, and prognostic factors.

AIM

To investigate the epidemiology of GSRC and establish an improved model for predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced GSRC (LAGSRC) after surgery.

METHODS

The annual rates of GSRC incidence and mortality, covering the years 1975 to 2019, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to explore the temporal trends in both disease incidence and mortality rates using Joinpoint software. The clinical data of 3793 postoperative LAGSRC patients were collected from the SEER database for the analysis of survival rates. The Cox regression model was used to explore the independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). The risk factors extracted were used to establish a prognostic nomogram.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of GSRC increased dramatically between 1975 and 1998, followed by a significant downward trend in incidence after 1998. In recent years, there has been a similarly optimistic trend in GSRC mortality rates. The trend in GSRC showed discrepancies based on age and sex. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS demonstrated the high discriminative ability and clinical utility of this nomogram. The area under the curve indicated that the performance of the new model outperformed that of the pathological staging system.

CONCLUSION

The model we established can aid clinicians in the early prognostication of LAGSRC patients, resulting in improved clinical outcomes by modifying management strategies and patient health care.