Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

Desmoplastic tumor priming using clinical-stage corticosteroid liposomes

Inflammation is a hallmark of cancer. It contributes to a heterogeneous, hyperpermeable, and poorly perfused tumor vasculature, as well as to a dense and disorganized extracellular matrix, which together negatively affect drug delivery. Reasoning that glucocorticoids have pleiotropic effects, we use clinical-stage dexamethasone liposomes (LipoDex) to prime the tumor microenvironment for improved drug delivery and enhanced treatment efficacy. We show that LipoDex priming improves tumor vascular function and reduces extracellular matrix deposition. Single-cell sequencing corroborates LipoDex-mediated inhibition of pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, and pro-fibrogenic gene expression in mononuclear cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Multimodal optical imaging illustrates that LipoDex pre-treatment increases the tumor accumulation and intratumoral distribution of subsequently administered polymeric and liposomal drug delivery systems. Using Doxil as a prototypic nanodrug, we finally show that LipoDex priming promotes antitumor treatment efficacy. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that desmoplastic tumors can be primed for improved drug targeting and therapy using clinical-stage glucocorticoid liposomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Isatuximab, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone (IsaKd) in Multiple Myeloma Patients at the First Relapse After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Lenalidomide Maintenance: Results from the Multicenter, Real-Life AENEID Study

Background: In the randomized, phase-3 IKEMA trial, the triplet isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (IsaKd) demonstrated superior clinical benefit compared to those of carfilzomib and dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after 1-3 prior treatments. Methods: Our real-world, AENEID study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IsaKd in patients who relapsed after frontline lenalidomide treatment, poorly represented in the IKEMA trial. Specifically, in the present multicenter analysis, we enrolled eighty-two patients who received, between April 2022 and September 2024 and outside of clinical trials, at least one cycle of IsaKd as a second-line treatment at the first relapse after induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and lenalidomide maintenance. Results: After a median follow-up time of 12.9 months (range, 1-77), the overall response rate, at least a very good partial response rate, and median progression-free survival time were 79.3%, 56.1%, and 24.4 months, respectively. This slightly lower performance compared to that in the IKEMA study may be attributed to the well-known poor prognostic impact of lenalidomide refractoriness (len-R), developed by all our patients during maintenance therapy, and to a higher proportion of patients with extramedullary disease present in our series, which was identified as the only factor significantly affecting the PFS in multivariable analysis. The median overall survival was not reached, as in the pivotal trial, while the 1-year survival probability was 85.1%. Regarding the safety profile, our findings were consistent with those of the IKEMA trial, with no new safety signals reported. Conclusions: These real-world data support the use of IsaKd as a valuable option for len-R MM patients relapsing after the first-line therapy, including ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance.

Minimal Residual Disease-Based End Point for Accelerated Assessment of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Multiple Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

Newly approved drugs and combinations treating multiple myeloma (MM) have resulted in substantial improvements in patients' survival. To deliver rapid access to newer therapies, an earlier end point to expedite clinical trials is needed. Our objective was to evaluate the minimal residual disease-negative complete response (MRD-CR) as an intermediate end point for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed (ND) transplant-eligible (NDTE) patients, ND transplant-ineligible (NDTinE) patients, and patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual patient data from 20 randomized multicenter trials were collected. Eleven studies (4,773 patients) with sufficient data were analyzed to evaluate whether 9- or 12-month MRD-CR classified at a 10-5 threshold could be reasonably likely to predict the clinical benefit of new agents regarding PFS and OS. Global odds ratio (OR) was estimated using the bivariate Plackett Copula model. Supportive evaluation included correlations of the treatment effects on MRD-CR end points and PFS/OS, evaluated by both linear regression (R2weighted least squared) and Copula (R2Copula) models.

RESULTS

The analysis demonstrated that both 9- and 12-month MRD-CR strongly correlated with PFS at patient level in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM. Global ORs ranged from 3.06 to 16.24, all with 95% CIs excluding 1.0. Encouraging trial-level correlations (R2, 0.61-0.70) were observed by pooling three populations and were stronger (R2, 0.67-0.78) in the ND population. Similar results were observed for OS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provided the support for use of MRD-CR classified at a 10-5 threshold at either 9 or 12 months after starting of the treatment, as an intermediate end point to support accelerated approvals, in future trials in NDTE patients, NDTinE patients, and patients with RRMM.

Bortezomib, Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome, and Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multi-Center, Open-Label Phase I Trial

BACKGROUNDS

Mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (Lipo-MIT) has shown clinical benefits in various tumors. However, there is no prospective study evaluating its effectiveness and safety in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A phase I trial of bortezomib, Lipo-MIT, and dexamethasone (VMitD) with the primary endpoints being safety and efficacy was performed.

METHODS

Twenty subjects were enrolled this study, and the dose of Lipo-MIT was designed to be 12, 16, and 20 mg/m2 at Day 1 combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

RESULTS

The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse event was pneumonia (20%). The most frequently observed grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included thrombocytopenia (70%), neutropenia (55%), lymphopenia (30%), and anemia (10%). Fifteen subjects received at least one efficacy evaluation, including 60% (9/15) with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 86.7% (13/15).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report about the novel triplet regimen VMitD, including Lipo-MIT for RRMM, which was well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy. Further studies are required to assess the outcomes more accurately and to evaluate its effectiveness in comparison to other salvage regimens containing proteasome inhibitors and anthracyclines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05052970.

Forcing Ahead: Second-Line Treatment Options for Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The therapeutic landscape for multiple myeloma has gradually expanded in recent decades, leading to unprecedented deep and sustained responses as well as remarkable improvements in patient survival. Nonetheless, changes in treatment algorithms have raised new demands for patients with relapsed/refractory disease, as prior exposure and refractoriness to prior therapies impact the choice of subsequent treatments. In particular, refractoriness to lenalidomide-an established backbone of treatment in both front-line and maintenance settings and a key component of many approved regimens used in relapsed disease-is associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes. Therefore, identifying the most appropriate management in lenalidomide-refractory patients, and even more so in patients who are refractory to more than one agent, is critical. At present, treatment options for this growing subgroup of patients are still limited; however, recent data from clinical research are promising. Herein, we summarized the currently available treatment options and discuss future directions based on the latest results from ongoing clinical trials.

Quantification of serum daratumumab in multiple myeloma patients by LC-MS/MS, comparison with ELISA

Daratumumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody employed for treating relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and light-chain amyloidosis. Quantifying monoclonal antibodies in serum presents challenges due to interference from biological matrices. This research aimed to develop and verify an liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) approach for quantifying serum daratumumab, employing immunoglobulin G purification without alkylation, and to assess its applicability in patients with multiple myeloma receiving intravenous daratumumab. The chromatographic peaks of the daratumumab-derived peptides and internal standard were well-delineated from the serum digests, with an overall run time of 14 min. The calibration curves for serum daratumumab were linear across over 1-1000 μg/mL. The inter- and intra-day accuracy varied between 92.4 % and 108.4 %, with a coefficient-of-variation below 10 %. In patients receiving intravenous daratumumab, serum concentrations ranged from 181.8 to 975.3 µg/mL. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant bias, and Passing-Bablok regression demonstrated a good agreement between the LC-MS/MS method and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of combination therapies involving novel agents for first/second-relapse patients with multiple myeloma: a Markov model approach with calibration techniques

BACKGROUND

As the number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrating the survival benefits of combination therapies in previously treated multiple myeloma (MM) patients increases, it is essential to determine the most cost-effective treatment through robust economic evaluation. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of combination therapies for first/second-relapse MM patients from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to evaluate three combination therapy groups based on primary drugs (bortezomib, lenalidomide, and carfilzomib). The economic evaluation was conducted within each group individually, rather than across different groups. Clinical inputs for the model were derived from RCT reports, while healthcare costs were sourced from the Zhejiang Province bidding database and a retrospective analysis. Utility values were obtained through an on-site survey using the Chinese version of the EuroQoL Five-dimensional Five-level Questionnaire. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the base-case results.

RESULTS

In the bortezomib group, bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vd) yielded 2.42 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of ¥783,775. With a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of three times the 2023 per capita GDP in China (¥258,074), pomalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone was the most cost-effective therapy (¥86,129/QALY) in this group. In the lenalidomide group, lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) resulted in 3.06 QALYs at a cost of ¥840,509. Compared to Rd, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of elotuzumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (¥5,095,300/QALY), ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (¥1,605,712/QALY), carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (¥955,255/QALY), and daratumumab-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (¥851,933/QALY) all exceeded the WTP threshold. In the carfilzomib group, carfilzomib-dexamethasone (Kd) resulted in 3.19 QALYs at a cost of ¥1,961,624. Compared to Kd, the ICERs of daratumumab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone (¥2,250,821/QALY) and isatuximab-carfilzomib-dexamethasone (¥4,977,964/QALY) also exceeded the WTP. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study did not fully account for the heterogeneity of subsequent treatment regimens among first/second-relapse MM patients, it highlights that the substantial financial burden associated with combination therapies involving novel agents poses a significant challenge in justifying their economic value.

Predictive and Prognostic Significance of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Survival and Adverse Events in Daratumumab-Treated Multiple Myeloma

OBJECTIVES

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including physical function, have predictive potential for survival but remain underexplored in multiple myeloma (MM). This study evaluates the predictive and prognostic value of PROs for treatment outcomes in MM patients on daratumumab-based therapy and evaluates physical function versus ECOG Performance Status as a potential treatment-effect modifier.

METHODS

Data was pooled from randomized trials (MAIA, POLLUX, CASTOR) that collected pretreatment PROs using EORTC QLQ-C30. Cox models and logistic regression examined associations between PROs and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Physical function versus ECOG-PS was examined as a treatment effect modifier for daratumumab versus non-daratumumab therapies.

RESULTS

Among 1804 patients, 1535 (85%) had pretreatment PROs. Physical function, global health, and fatigue were most prognostic for survival and adverse events. Physical function provided independent prognostic value beyond ECOG-PS and was predictive of treatment effect. Low physical function patients experienced greater OS treatment benefit (adjusted HR (aHR) [95% CI] 0.53 [0.40-0.70], p interaction = 0.02) and PFS (aHR [95% CI] 0.30 [0.30-0.48], p interaction = 0.03) from daratumumab versus high-physical function (OS aHR 0.86 [0.62-1.19], PFS aHR 0.53 [0.42-0.67]).

CONCLUSION

Physical function is a predictive and prognostic marker that complements ECOG-PS, supporting its use in informing therapy decisions for daratumumab-based treatments.

Elotuzumab in combination with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Elotuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting signaling lymphocyte activation molecule F7 on plasma and natural killer cells, which enhances the activity of lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and bortezomib in multiple myeloma (MM). The OPTIMISMM study showed improved outcomes with the combination of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) in relapsed/refractory MM. Therefore, we studied adding elotuzumab to PVd (elo-PVd) in relapsed/refractory MM in a multicenter phase 2 trial. The primary objective was to determine the overall response rate (ORR). Patients with relapsed/refractory disease and ≥1 prior line of treatment (including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor) were eligible. For each 28-day cycle, elotuzumab was weekly for the first 2 cycles and then every other week; pomalidomide on days 1 to 21; bortezomib on days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone weekly. The trial enrolled 48 patients with a median 3 prior lines (range, 1-9). Prior therapies included pomalidomide (33%), daratumumab (25%), and isatuximab (4%). The ORR was 56.3%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months. In patients with 1 prior line of therapy, ORR was 73.7%; median PFS was 23.4 months. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (33%); infections, any (33%); lung infection (27%); hypophosphatemia (19%); and thrombocytopenia (15%). Elo-PVd is, to our knowledge, one of the first trials of a quadruplet regimen in relapsed/refractory MM incorporating a monoclonal antibody to show efficacy across diverse prior treatments, including triple-class exposed patients with prior anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02718833.

CD38 in the pathobiology of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and the potential for combination therapeutic intervention

Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) is a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma involving malignant skin-homing T-cells, characterized by variable severity and limited treatment options. Our study shows that patient samples and derived cell lines express CD38 on CTCL cells, and αCD38 antibodies effectively target CD38 in a mouse model. In vivo αCD38 antibody treatment led to the loss of CD38 expression in residual tumor cells, highlighting the need for innovative strategies to improve CTCL outcomes despite the CD38 loss in residual tumor cells. To investigate the role of CD38 in CTCL pathology, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to create CD38-deficient (CD38KO) CTCL cells. These CD38KO cells showed higher expression of oncogenes B-catenin, TCF7, and BCL6, along with reduced migration. Elevated NAD+ levels in CD38KO cells increased cellular respiration after CD38 inhibition in CD38WT cells. In vivo, CD38KO cell transplants led to more aggressive tumors, likely due to elevated β-catenin, Bcl6, and Tcf-1 signaling. Prior research in multiple myeloma showed αCD38 antibody efficacy relies on CD38 expression. We discovered that panobinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, increased surface CD38 expression in CTCL cells dose-dependently. Combining panobinostat with αCD38 antibody in a CTCL mouse model significantly improved survival compared to the antibody alone, underscoring CD38's therapeutic potential in CTCL. CD38 is expressed in CTCL cells and can be targeted with αCD38 antibody. αCD38 antibody treatment leads to a significant reduction in CTCL cells, while residual cells lose CD38 expression. Knocking out CD38 from CTCL cells leads to increases in intracellular NAD+ and increased cellular respiration. Additionally, CD38KO cells have increased protein levels of β-catenin, Tcf1 (encoded by TCF7), and Bcl6. CD38KO CTCL cells grow more aggressively in vivo than CD38WT CTCL cells. Treating CTCL cells with panobinostat increases CD38 expression. A dual combination treatment of panobinostat and αCD38 antibody in a mouse model of CTCL improved survival outcomes compared to αCD38 antibody treatment alone. (Figure made with Biorender.com).

Efficacy and safety of daratumumab for the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. A systematic review of meta-analyses

IntroductionSeveral meta-analyses (MAs) of the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) exist. They include different types of populations, Daratumumab regimens, and outcomes. Moreover, there is a wide variation in methodological quality and risk of bias.ObjectiveThis study aimed to conduct a systematic review of MAs to summarize the literature on the efficacy and safety profile of daratumumab use in RRMM, and also provide an assessment of the quality and risk of bias of the MAs if sufficient data is available.MethodsThe literature databases Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched since inception. The quality of methodology was assessed by the AMSTAR-2 tool, and the risk of bias was assessed by the ROBIS tool.ResultsEight MAs were included in the SR. Most studies reported ORR and CR improvement by adding daratumumab to the chemotherapy regimen. Five MAs reported improvement in PFS in daratumumab-based regimens compared to non- daratumumab-based regimens. Only two MAs reported molecular response, favoring daratumumab. Dara was associated with adverse drug events (ADEs), including pneumonia and diarrhea. Conflicting evidence regarding hematological ADEs association with daratumumab exists. The overall quality of the studies is poor, but the MAs had a low risk of bias overall.ConclusionDespite including low-quality MAs, this SR provides a summary that simplifies clinicians' access to efficacy and safety outcomes of daratumumab in RRMM patients. Future studies are required to reduce the uncertainty and produce higher-quality Mas, particularly regarding daratumumab's safety.

Is there still a place for autologous salvage transplantation in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies?

For patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after previous autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT), novel agents, cellular and immunotherapies are increasingly available. Options for second-line treatment mostly include triplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies and since recently also CAR T cells. The importance of autologous salvage transplantation (retransplantation, Re-AHCT) has significantly decreased in recent years due to the availability of many new treatment options. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of 171 pts cases with RRMM who received Re-AHCT between 2002 and 2021. With a median follow-up of 74.7 months, the 5-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18% (median 20.6 months) and 57% (median 65.0 months), respectively, the 100-day mortality rate was 4%. Multivariate analysis identified R-ISS stage and duration of previous response (DoR) as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. While the revealed high-risk population (R-ISS stage II/III, DoR ≤ 24 months) was associated with a significantly worse PFS (HR 2.728) and OS (HR 3.129), the low-risk group (R-ISS I, DoR > 24 months) achieved a median PFS and OS of 45.0 months and 80.2 months, respectively. Therefore, Re-AHCT could remain an option in such prognostically favorable pts with RRMM even in the era of novel therapies especially when more potent treatment modalities are not available.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Second-Line Therapy: A Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) Analysis

INTRODUCTION

First-line treatment in Canadian transplant-eligible MM patients is CyBorD/RVD followed by ASCT and maintenance lenalidomide. In transplant ineligible patients, bortezomib- or lenalidomide-based treatment is used. Relapse options include salvage ASCT or diverse doublet/triplets. Limited data support any one approach. The aim of this study was to assess treatment patterns/outcomes of real-world patients at first relapse.

METHODS

All patients initiating second-line therapy from January 1/10 to June 30/22 were included. We evaluated ORR, PFS and OS, calculated from the start of second-line.

RESULTS

A total of 3569 patients were included, 1638 (45.9%) with prior ASCT and 1931 (54.1%) without. The most used regimens were Rd, DRd, CyBorD, ASCT, RVd and DVd. The highest ORRs were seen with DRd (90%), ASCT (89%), Kd/KCd (79%), RVd (78.1%) and KRd (74%). For drug regimens, median PFS (27.6 months) and OS (75.5 months) were longest for DRd.

CONCLUSIONS

We evaluated impact of second-line treatment in MM patients. Triplets with an IMiD backbone and carfilzomib combinations had high ORR and durable PFS, with select patients undergoing second ASCT achieving durable responses. Given the expanding use of IMiD, PI and CD38 mAbs frontline, our results highlight the need for modern modalities at first relapse and provide a benchmark for implementation.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone versus bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone with daratumumab (D-VMP) versus bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS

A Markov model was established and three exclusive health states, progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) and death were included. The cycle length was set at 1.5 months and the time horizon was set at 20 years. The efficacy data were derived from the ALCYONE trial, and the utility values were obtained from previously published studies. The discount rate in the model was 3% per annum, and the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at $150 000.00/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in the USA. Moreover, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the parameter uncertainty.

RESULTS

D-VMP achieved an effectiveness of 6.91 QALYs at a cost of $858 695.42, while VMP achieved an effectiveness of 4.70 QALYs at a cost of $357 387.82. The incremental effectiveness and cost of D-VMP versus VMP were 2.21 QALYs and $501 307.6, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US $226 836.02/QALY. The cost of daratumumab, utility for PFS, cost of subsequent therapies in the VMP group and cost of subsequent therapies in the D-VMP group were the most influential factors, and the probabilities of D-VMP and VMP as the cost-effective option were 0% and 100% at the WTP threshold of $150 000.00/QALY, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with VMP, D-VMP is unlikely to be a cost-effective regimen for patients with NDMM who are ineligible for ASCT from the US payer's perspective.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone: An Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes From the Phase 3 CANDOR Trial

BACKGROUND

In the phase 3 CANDOR trial (NCT03158688), daratumumab added to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (KdD) significantly prolonged progression-free survival relative to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) alone in previously treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a post hoc analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-item module (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ Myeloma 20-item module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures from the CANDOR trial.

RESULTS

Median (range) duration of observation for PROs was 18.4 (0.9-50.0) months (KdD) and 10.3 (0.9-48.4) months (Kd). PRO compliance rates were high and similar between arms. Mean scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/quality-of-life (QOL) scale were numerically higher in the KdD than in the Kd arm and were generally sustained or trended toward improvement from baseline. Other EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) scores were generally similar between treatment arms and were stable over time, with some numerical trends favoring KdD. Risks of deterioration were similar for most scales; hazard ratios suggested improvement for KdD for EORTC QLQ-C30 social functioning, EORTC QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms, and EQ-5D VAS. Results were consistent for lenalidomide-exposed and lenalidomide-refractory subgroups. EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL scores trended toward improvement at some time points, and other scores remained generally stable when daratumumab was added to carfilzomib and dexamethasone.

CONCLUSION

These results support the benefits of KdD for the RRMM population, including lenalidomide-exposed and lenalidomide-refractory patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03158688.

Second-line anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody therapy mitigates the negative impact of functional high-risk status in myeloma patients

In multiple myeloma, functional high risk (FHR) is a predictor of poor outcomes. It is defined as M protein reduction to ≤ 50% of normal, suboptimal response (SR), or progressive disease (PD) within 12 months (i.e., early PD). The clinical significance of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) as second-line treatment for FHR myeloma remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy of anti-CD38 MoAb as second-line treatment for FHR myeloma. We included 332 patients who were newly diagnosed with myeloma and received proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory drugs as first-line therapy. Their median age was 70 years, and 29.4% were FHR. At a median follow-up of 48.5 months, the overall survival (OS) in the FHR group was significantly shorter (hazard ratio [HR], 2.086; P < 0.001). However, the OS in the SR without early-PD group was comparable to that in the non-FHR group (HR, 1.659; P = 0.330). The OS in patients with FHR who received anti-CD38 MoAb as second-line treatment was similar to that in the non-FHR group (HR, 1.157; P = 0.660). Anti-CD38 MoAb as second-line treatment improved the outcome in our patients with FHR although FHR predicted a poor prognosis.

The clinical journey of belantamab mafodotin in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: lessons in drug development

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a poor prognosis and a need remains for novel effective therapies. Belantamab mafodotin, an anti-B-cell maturation antigen antibody-drug conjugate, was granted accelerated/conditional approval for patients with RRMM who have received at least 4 prior lines of therapy, based on response rates observed in DREAMM-1/DREAMM-2. Despite the 41% response rate and durable responses observed with belantamab mafodotin in the Phase III confirmatory DREAMM-3 trial, the marketing license for belantamab mafodotin was later withdrawn from US and European markets when the trial did not meet its primary endpoint of superiority for progression-free survival compared with pomalidomide and dexamethasone. This review reflects on key lessons arising from the clinical journey of belantamab mafodotin in RRMM. It considers how incorporating longer follow-up in DREAMM-3 may have better captured the clinical benefits of belantamab mafodotin, particularly given its multimodal, immune-related mechanism of action with responses deepening over time. A non-inferiority hypothesis may have been more appropriate rather than superiority in the context of a monotherapy versus an active doublet therapy. Further, anticipation of, and planning for, non-proportional hazards arising from response heterogeneity may have mitigated loss of statistical power. With the aim of improving the efficacy of belantamab mafodotin, other Phase III trials in the RRMM development program (DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8) proceeded to evaluate the synergistic potential of combination regimens in earlier lines of treatment. The aim was to increase the proportion of patients responding to belantamab mafodotin (and thus the likelihood of seeing a clear separation of the progression-free survival curve versus comparator regimens). Protocol amendments reflecting DREAMM-3 learnings could also be implemented prospectively on the combinations trials to optimize the follow-up duration and mitigate risk. The wider implications of the lessons learned for clinical research in RRMM and in earlier treatment settings are discussed.

Autologous stem-cell transplantation and maintenance therapy for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ASCT and maintenance therapy strategies for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma from a Chinese healthcare perspective.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A short-run decision tree and a long-run Markov model were created to assess the mean costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of ASCT plus maintenance therapy over a lifetime horizon. Utility values were sourced from published literature, while healthcare costs were based on a single-center retrospective analysis and national drug bidding data.

RESULTS

The ASCT strategy with two-year daratumumab maintenance had the lowest discounted costs (1,394,183 CNY). Compared to no ASCT with continuous lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT had an ICER of 90,997 CNY/QALY. With one-year lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT provided more QALYs at lower costs. One-year lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT also resulted in higher QALYs and lower costs than no maintenance, while continuous lenalidomide had an ICER of 396,731 CNY/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the WTP threshold of CNY 268,074 per QALY, ASCT strategies were more cost-effective than non-ASCT approaches. One-year lenalidomide therapy after ASCT was more cost-effective than no maintenance or continuous therapy. Among all strategies, ASCT followed by two years of daratumumab maintenance was the most cost-effective option.

Evidence-based Korean guidelines for the clinical management of multiple myeloma: addressing 12 key clinical questions

Multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy, is characterized by malignant plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow. Recent treatment advances have significantly improved patient outcomes associated with MM. In this study, we aimed to develop comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of MM. We identified 12 key clinical questions essential for MM management, guiding the extensive literature review and meta-analysis of the study. Our guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations by integrating patient preferences with survey data. These recommendations include current and emerging diagnostic tools, therapeutic agents, and treatment strategies. By prioritizing a patient-centered approach and rigorous data analysis, these guidelines were developed to enhance MM management, both in Korea and globally.

Response to daratumumab-retreatment in patients with multiple myeloma

Daratumumab is an effective therapy in multiple myeloma (MM). We assessed whether daratumumab retreatment may re-induce significant responses and which patients do benefit the most. We hypothesized, that there is effective synergism between daratumumab and alternating antimyeloma drug combinations during retreatment and that retreatment is safe and effective. Here, we analyzed 293 consecutive MM patients receiving daratumumab at our institution from 2016 until 2023 retrospectively, and compared responses, side effects and survival of the first daratumumab treatment line and its retreatment. We identified 22/293 (8%) patients with daratumumab retreatment. These patients showed an advanced age and ISS/R-ISS stages, and ≥ 3 lines of prior antimyeloma therapy in 91%. Of note, the median durations of the first and subsequent daratumumab treatment were similarly long. We confirmed a therapy break between daratumumab lines as advantageous. Daratumumab retreatment was effective, with responses declining only gradually from its first use to subsequent first and second retreatment with 64%, 46% and 43%, respectively. Interestingly, comparable progression free survival rates were observed with 11.5, 12 months and not reached, respectively. Consistently, adverse events per daratumumab line did not increase. Our findings suggest that well-selected daratumumab-exposed MM patients may show rewarding responses to daratumumab retreatment, the more with alternating antimyeloma combinations, initial good response and CD38-antibody-treatment pauses, thereby proving CD38-antibody-retreatment as feasible, effective and non-toxic. Confirmatory studies are required to further validate our results.

Relative Dose Intensity of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma

Background: Daratumumab (DARA), lenalidomide (LEN), and dexamethasone (DEX, DRd) are one of standards of care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM); however, the clinical impact of relative dose intensity (RDI) remains unclear. In this retrospective study, the aim was to analyze the relationship between the RDI and clinical outcomes in patients with myeloma treated with DRd. Methods: The numbers of patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, and/or refractory MM were 40 and 71, respectively. Results: The median patient age was 74 years, and the median RDIs for DARA, LEN, and DEX were 84.0%, 39.4%, and 14.6%, respectively. At a median 26.8 months follow-up interval, the 2-year time to the next treatment (TTNT) of the high RDI of DARA (cutoff, 90%) was greater than that of the low RDI of DARA (77.3% vs. 51.6%, p < 0.001), and the 2-year overall survival (OS) of the low RDI of DEX (cutoff, 15%) was longer than that of the high RDI of DEX (87.7% vs. 61.0%, p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that a high RDI for DARA and low RDI for DEX were associated with longer TTNT and OS (hazard ratio, 0.503, p = 0.044; hazard ratio 0.426, p = 0.022, respectively). The high RDI of DARA and low RDI of DEX reduced the incidence of severe infections (p = 0.040 and 0.049). Conclusion: The high RDI of DARA and low RDI of DEX predicted good clinical outcomes in this study's cohort.

Minimal Residual Disease Significance in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies

Minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation is a recognized endpoint in clinical trials. Both next-generation flow and sequencing could be used as complementary techniques to detect myeloma cells after therapy to measure the depth of response and novel drug efficacy. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies combined with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs have increased the quality of response in myeloma patients, and MRD evaluation is also entering routine clinical practice in many hematological centers. This review analyzes updated results from recent clinical trials utilizing anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as isatuximab and daratumumab in terms of their responses and MRD data. MRD-driven therapy appears promising for the future of MM patients, and emerging minimally invasive techniques to assess MRD are under investigation as novel potential methods to replace or integrate traditional MRD evaluation.

Monoclonal Antibodies in Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a malignant hematological tumor characterized by the proliferation of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow causing organ damage. Despite improved survival rates due to the increasing availability of therapeutic options in recent decades, it remains an incurable disease, with most patients ultimately relapsing. Consequently, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma disease (RRMM) has become a treatment priority. Immunotherapy is the backbone of treatment in RRMM, starting with monoclonal antibodies such as elotuzumab, daratumumab, and isatuximab. The aim of this review is summarizing the results of RRMM trials with monoclonal antibodies and of the principal ongoing trials containing them. Additionally, we put a brief focus on novel drugs (such as bispecific antibodies) to provide a better overview. The advent of monoclonal antibodies has been nothing short of a game-changer for multi-refractory patients. It has opened up a whole new world of possibilities, offering myeloma patients a brighter and more hopeful future, even in the face of relapse.

Proteasome inhibition enhances oncolytic reovirus therapy in multiple myeloma independently of its direct cytotoxic effects

BACKGROUND

Reovirus (RV) is an oncolytic virus with natural tropism for cancer cells. We previously showed that RV administration in multiple myeloma (MM) patients was safe, but disease control associated with viral replication in the cancer cells was not observed. The combination with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) has shown to enhance RV therapeutic activity, but the mechanisms of action have not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

Electron microscopy, q-RT-PCR, single-cell mass cytometry (CyTOF), flow cytometry, plaque assays, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analysis were used to assess RV infection of both myeloma and immune cells. Immune fluorescence, flow cytometry, and luciferase reporter assays were used to assess NF-κB pathway activation upon RV treatments. Immune profiling changes, both ex vivo and in MM patients, were analyzed by flow cytometry and CyTOF analysis. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing was also conducted both in immune competent MM mice and in patients enrolled in a phase 1b trial per a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation schedule.

RESULTS

Here we show ex vivo and in vivo that proteasome inhibitors (PIs) potentiate reovirus replication in circulating classical monocytes, increasing viral delivery to myeloma cells. We found that the anti-viral signals in monocytes primarily rely on NF-κB activation and that this effect is impaired by the addition of PIs. Conversely, the addition of PIs to RV therapy supports immune activation and killing of MM, independently of direct PI sensitivity. To validate the importance of PIs in enhancing oncolytic viral therapy independently of their killing activity on cancer cells, we then conducted a phase 1b trial of the reovirus Pelareorep together with the PI carfilzomib in 13 heavily pretreated PI-resistant MM patients. Objective responses, which were associated with active reovirus replication in MM cells, T cell activation, and monocytic expansion, were noted in 70% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although characterized as immunosuppressive drugs, PIs improved RV delivery to MM cells but also enhanced anti-MM efficacy through immune-mediated killing of myeloma cells, independently of their PI sensitivity. These results highlight a more generalizable use of PIs as therapeutic companions to support oncolytic-based therapies in cancers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02101944.

Characteristics and outcomes in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma treated with 1-3 prior lines of therapy: Analysis of individual patient-level data from daratumumab clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The introduction of proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and lenalidomide as treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) has led to an increased population of lenalidomide-refractory patients. Limited data are available characterizing current treatments and outcomes in this difficult-to-treat population.

METHODS

Individual patient-level data were analyzed from the treatment arms of multiple daratumumab studies, including APOLLO, CASTOR, CANDOR, EQUULEUS, ALCYONE, MAIA, GRIFFIN, POLLUX, and CASSIOPEIA. Included patients were PI exposed and lenalidomide refractory, received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2. Treatments and outcomes were analyzed by number of prior LOT in the lenalidomide-refractory population. Time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

FINDINGS

Out of 4764 patients, 915 patients (prior LOT, one [n = 114]; two [n = 462]; three [n = 339]) met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 29·7 months (range 28·0-31·7). The overall response rate was 55·4 %. Estimated median TTNT was 9·7 months, median PFS was 10·0 months, and median OS was 27·5 months. Response rates and PFS decreased as number of prior LOT increased. Prognostic factors for response, TTNT, PFS, and OS included International Staging System stage, baseline plasmacytoma status, baseline hemoglobin, anti-CD38-refractory status, and cytogenetic risk status.

INTERPRETATION

Lenalidomide-refractory patients treated with 1-3 prior LOT have poor PFS and OS, which generally worsen with each additional LOT, highlighting the need for new and effective treatments for this population.

The Functional Transcriptomic Landscape Informs Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma

Several therapeutic agents have been approved for treating multiple myeloma, a cancer of bone marrow-resident plasma cells. Predictive biomarkers for drug response could help guide clinical strategies to optimize outcomes. In this study, we present an integrated functional genomic analysis of tumor samples from patients multiple myeloma that were assessed for their ex vivo drug sensitivity to 37 drugs, clinical variables, cytogenetics, mutational profiles, and transcriptomes. This analysis revealed a multiple myeloma transcriptomic topology that generates "footprints" in association with ex vivo drug sensitivity that have both predictive and mechanistic applications. Validation of the transcriptomic footprints for the anti-CD38 mAb daratumumab (DARA) and the nuclear export inhibitor selinexor (SELI) demonstrated that these footprints can accurately classify clinical responses. The analysis further revealed that DARA and SELI have anticorrelated mechanisms of resistance, and treatment with a SELI-based regimen immediately after a DARA-containing regimen was associated with improved survival in three independent clinical trials, supporting an evolutionary-based strategy involving sequential therapy. These findings suggest that this unique repository and computational framework can be leveraged to inform underlying biology and to identify therapeutic strategies to improve treatment of multiple myeloma. Significance: Functional genomic analysis of primary multiple myeloma samples elucidated predictive biomarkers for drugs and molecular pathways mediating therapeutic response, which revealed a rationale for sequential therapy to maximize patient outcomes.

Flow Cytometric MRD Detection in Selected Mature B-Cell Malignancies

The quantification of submicroscopic minimal residual disease (MRD) after therapy proved to have independent prognostic significance in many mature B-cell malignancies. With the advent of routine benchtop cytometers capable of simultaneously analyzing ≥8 colors and with improved standardization, flow cytometry has become the method of choice for MRD assessments in some lymphoma entities. Herein we describe general aspects of flow cytometric standardization. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM) are used as examples to explain the technical standardization of flow cytometry for MRD detection according to EuroFlow strategies. MRD data acquisition and detailed analysis in MM and CLL is a particular focus of this chapter.

CD46 and CD59 inhibitors enhance complement-dependent cytotoxicity of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab in multiple myeloma and other B-cell malignancy cells

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable malignancy of the B-cell lineage. Remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of MM with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab, which can kill MM cells by inducing complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). We showed that the CDC efficacy of daratumumab and isatuximab is limited by membrane complement inhibitors, including CD46 and CD59, which are upregulated in MM cells. We recently developed a small recombinant protein, Ad35K++, which is capable of transiently removing CD46 from the cell surface. We also produced a peptide inhibitor of CD59 (rILYd4). In this study, we tested Ad35K++ and rILYd4 in combination with daratumumab and isatuximab in MM cells as well as in cells from two other B-cell malignancies. We showed that Ad35K++ and rILYd4 increased CDC triggered by daratumumab and isatuximab. The combination of both inhibitors had an additive effect in vitro in primary MM cells as well as in vivo in a mouse xenograft model of MM. Daratumumab and isatuximab treatment of MM lines (without Ad35K++ or rILYd4) resulted in the upregulation of CD46/CD59 and/or survival of CD46high/CD59high MM cells that escaped the second round of daratumumab and isatuximab treatment. The escape in the second treatment cycle was prevented by the pretreatment of cells with Ad35K++. Overall, our data demonstrate that Ad35K++ and rILYd4 are efficient co-therapeutics of daratumumab and isatuximab, specifically in multi-cycle treatment regimens, and could be used to improve treatment of multiple myeloma.

Visualizing immunotherapy for multiple myeloma worldwide from 2013 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant, clonal proliferative disease of plasma cells that remains incurable. This paper aims to analyze the current research status and emerging trends in immunotherapy for MM through bibliometric methods, thereby providing valuable references and guidance for future research and clinical practice. This study presents a bibliometric analysis of 1,018 English-language publications related to MM immunotherapy, which were published in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database from 2013 to 2023. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were employed to visualize the research hotspots and trends within the field of MM immunotherapy. The United States had the highest number of publications (n = 432, 42.44%), followed by China (n = 177, 17.39%). Harvard University was the institution with the most publications (n = 85), while Anderson KC (n = 27) was the most prolific researcher in the field. The highly cited literature mainly focuses on the treatment regimen based on daratumumab, the application of BCMA CAR-T therapy and the management of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), which represent the current research hotspots in this field. Burst detection highlights that bispecific antibodies and preclinical activity as key areas of interest. The cooperation among countries, institutions, and authors in this field should be strengthened. The treatment regimen utilizing daratumumab, the implementation of BCMA CAR-T therapy, and the management of RRMM represent significant research focal points in this field. Additionally, the development and application of bispecific antibodies have emerged as a frontier in recent years.

The Antibody Drug Conjugate, Belantamab-Mafodotin, in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Review

Despite recent advancements in treatments, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, multiple myeloma (MM) remains mostly incurable with patients frequently experiencing disease relapses due to therapy resistance. Hence there is an urgent need for innovative treatments for patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM (RRMM). This review examines Belantamab mafodotin, the first antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which has shown efficacy in pre-clinical and clinical settings for RRMM. BCMA, a type III transmembrane glycoprotein critical for B cell functions, is predominantly expressed in malignant plasma cells making it a promising therapeutic target. ADCs, comprising a monoclonal antibody, a cytotoxic payload, and a linker, offer a targeted and potent therapeutic approach to cancer treatment. Belantamab mafodotin integrates an afucosylated monoclonal antibody and monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) as its cytotoxic agent. It induces apoptosis in MM cells by disrupting microtubule formation and interfering with important signaling pathways. The series of DREAMM (Driving Excellence in Approaches to MM) studies have extensively evaluated Belantamab mafodotin in various clinical settings. This review provides a comprehensive overview of pre-clinical and clinical data supporting Belantamab mafodotin as a future therapeutic option for RRMM.

A CD38/CD3xCD28 trispecific T-cell engager as a potentially active agent in multiple myeloma patients relapsed and/or refractory to anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies

There is accumulating evidence of BCMA and GPRC5D loss after treatment with T-cell redirecting therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). While complete CD38 loss is not observed upon relapses after treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb), there is downregulation of surface CD38 expression and decreased number and function of NK cells, which renders these patients resistant to retreatment with anti-CD38 mAb. Here, we provide preclinical evidence that RRMM patients previously exposed to anti-CD38 mAb could benefit from T-cell-based immunotherapy that depend less on CD38 antigen density and NK-cell activity, such as the novel CD38/CD3xCD28 trispecific T-cell engager, SAR442257.

Efficacy of daratumumab on multiple myeloma patients with renal insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Renal insufficiency (RI) is a key factor affecting the prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Because the benefit of daratumumab for treating MM patients with RI remains unclear, our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of daratumumab on MM patients with RI.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases as of October 24, 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the article titles, abstracts, and full text to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.4. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response or better (≥CR), and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, all calculated as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 10 RCTs with 5003 patients were included. Add-on daratumumab improved PFS and OS among newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with RI (HR 0.48 [95% CI: 0.36, 0.64, I2 = 65%] and HR 0.63 [95% CI: 0.48, 0.82, I2 = 0%]) as well as relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM)-RI patients, compared with the control group (HR 0.46 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.58, I2 = 0%] and HR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.92, I2 = 0%]). In terms of the renal status, the efficacy of add-on daratumumab for MMRI patients was similar to that for MM patients with normal renal function. A prolonged PFS benefit for add-on daratumumab treatment versus the control was evident across all RRMM-RI subgroups, and the benefits tended to increase with the follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that MM patients with RI could benefit from a daratumumab-added regimen regardless of MM status. Additional high-quality RCTs are still warranted to confirm our findings.

Daratumumab-based regimens for patients with multiple myeloma plus extramedullary plasmacytomas or paraskeletal plasmacytomas: initial follow-up of an Italian multicenter observational clinical experience

Myeloma with extramedullary plasmacytomas not adjacent to bone (EMP) is associated with an extremely poor outcome compared with paraosseous plasmacytomas (PP) as current therapeutic approaches are unsatisfactory. The role of new molecules and in particular of monoclonal antibodies is under investigation. To determine whether daratumumab-based regimens are effective for myeloma with EMP, we report herein an initial multicenter observational analysis of 102 myeloma patients with EMP (n = 10) and PP (n = 25) at diagnosis and EMP (n = 28) and PP (n = 39) at relapse, treated with daratumumab-based regimens at 11 Haematological Centers in Italy.EMP and PP at diagnosis were associated with higher biochemical (90% vs. 96%, respectively) and instrumental ORR (86% vs. 83.3%, respectively), while at relapse, biochemical (74% vs. 73%) and instrumental (53% vs. 59%) ORR were lower. Median OS was inferior in EMP patients compared with patients with PP both at diagnosis (21.0 months vs. NR) (p = 0.005) and at relapse (32.0 vs. 40.0 months) (p = 0.428), although, during relapse, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Surprisingly, at diagnosis, median TTP and median TTNT were not reached either in EMP patients or PP patients and during relapse there were no statistically significant differences in terms of median TTP (20 months for two groups), and median TTNT (24 months for PP patients vs. 22 months for EMP patients) between the two groups. Median TTR was 1 month in all populations.These promising results were documented even in the absence of local radiotherapy and in transplant-ineligible patients.

Efficacy of elotuzumab for multiple myeloma deteriorates after daratumumab: a multicenter retrospective study

Elotuzumab-based regimens are sometimes selected for multiple myeloma treatment after daratumumab-based regimens. However, there has been insufficient discussion on the efficacy of elotuzumab after daratumumab. We used Kansai Myeloma Forum registration data in a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of elotuzumab after daratumumab. Overall survival (OS) rate and time to next treatment (TTNT) were significantly worse in the cohort given elotuzumab after daratumumab (Dara cohort, n = 47) than in the cohort with no history of daratumumab administration before elotuzumab (No-Dara cohort, n = 80, OS: P = 0.03; TTNT: P = 0.02; best response: P < 0.01). In the Dara cohort, OS and TTNT rates were worse with sequential elotuzumab use after daratumumab than with non-sequential (OS: P = 0.02; TTNT: P = 0.03). In patients given elotuzumab < 180 days after daratumumab, OS (P = 0.08) and best response (P = 0.21) tended to be worse, and TTNT was significantly worse (P = 0.01), than in those given elotuzumab after ≥ 180 days. These findings were confirmed by subgroup analyses and multivariate analyses. Monoclonal-antibody-free treatment might be preferable after daratumumab-based regimens. If possible, elotuzumab-based regimens should be considered only ≥ 180 days after daratumumab use.

Development of BCMA-Targeted Bispecific Natural Killer Cell Engagers for Multiple Myeloma Treatment

BACKGROUND

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted T cell-redirecting immunotherapies, including Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and T-cell engagers have demonstrated remarkable success in treating relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM), a malignancy of plasma cells. However, a significant challenge is the severe side effects associated with T-cell overactivation, leading to cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity in MM patients undergoing such therapies. Bispecific NK cell engagers (NKCEs) may offer a promising alternative by redirecting NK cell cytotoxic activity towards tumor cells without triggering cytokine release syndrome.

METHODS

In this study, we designed a series of BCMA × CD16 NKCEs that simultaneously engage BCMA and CD16 on MM and NK cells, respectively. We evaluated the functionality of these NKCEs in vitro with respect to their molecular design.

RESULTS

Our results indicate that the format design of NKCEs influences their functionalities, underscoring the importance of format selection in optimizing NKCE-based therapies for MM. This study provides valuable insights for developing next-generation NKCEs and advancing therapeutic strategies for MM and potentially other malignancies.

PU.1 eviction at lymphocyte-specific chromatin domains mediates glucocorticoid response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The epigenetic landscape plays a critical role in cancer progression, yet its therapeutic potential remains underexplored. Glucocorticoids are essential components of treatments for lymphoid cancers, but resistance, driven in part by epigenetic changes at glucocorticoid-response elements, poses a major challenge to effective therapies. Here we show that glucocorticoid treatment induces distinct patterns of chromosomal organization in glucocorticoid-sensitive and resistant acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenograft models. These glucocorticoid-response elements are primed by the pioneer transcription factor PU.1, which interacts with the glucocorticoid receptor. Eviction of PU.1 promotes receptor binding, increasing the expression of genes involved in apoptosis and facilitating a stronger therapeutic response. Treatment with a PU.1 inhibitor enhances glucocorticoid sensitivity, demonstrating the clinical potential of targeting this pathway. This study uncovers a mechanism involving PU.1 and the glucocorticoid receptor, linking transcription factor activity with drug response, and suggesting potential therapeutic strategies for overcoming resistance.

Predictors and Profile of Severe Infectious Complications in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Daratumumab-Based Regimens: A Machine Learning Model for Pneumonia Risk

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab (Dara) is the first monoclonal antibody introduced into clinical practice to treat multiple myeloma (MM). It currently forms the backbone of therapy regimens in both newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (RR) patients. However, previous reports indicated an increased risk of infectious complications (ICs) during Dara-based treatment. In this study, we aimed to determine the profile of ICs in MM patients treated with Dara-based regimens and establish predictors of their occurrence.

METHODS

This retrospective, real-life study included MM patients treated with Dara-based regimens between July 2019 and March 2024 at our institution. Infectious events were evaluated using the Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of a total of 139 patients, including 49 NDMM and 90 RRMM. In the RR setting, the majority (60.0%) of patients received the Dara, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) regimen, whereas ND patients were predominantly (98%) treated with the Dara, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVTd) regimen. Overall, 55 patients (39.6%) experienced ICs. The most common IC was pneumonia (37.5%), followed by upper respiratory tract infections (26.8%). Finally, twenty-five patients had severe ICs (grade ≥ 3) and required hospitalization, and eight patients died due to ICs. In the final multivariable model adjusted for setting (ND/RR) and age, hemoglobin level (OR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.96, p = 0.0037), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) >1 (OR 4.46, 95% CI: 1.63-12.26, p = 0.0037) were significant factors influencing severe IC occurrence. Additionally, we developed predictive models using the J48 decision tree, gradient boosting, and random forest algorithms. After conducting 10-fold cross-validation, these models demonstrated strong performance in predicting the occurrence of pneumonia during treatment with daratumumab-based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple clinical and laboratory assessments, including hemoglobin level and ECOG scale, can be valuable in identifying patients vulnerable to infections during Dara-based regimens, facilitating personalized prophylactic strategies.

A review of recent clinical trials to evaluate disease-modifying therapies in the treatment of cardiac amyloidosis

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a serious condition that results in infiltrative cardiomyopathy and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) that is caused by the extracellular deposition of amyloid fibrils within heart tissue. While many important features of CA have been known for years, its prevalence in elderly patients with HF is increasingly being recognized. Plasma cells produce monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains which results in the formation and aggregation of amyloid fibrils that are responsible for AL amyloidosis. CA is classified as originating from either transthyretin (ATTR) or light chain (AL) amyloidosis. ATTR CA may result from a genetic mutation in the TTR gene, which is inherited (ATTRv), or from age-related deposition from wild-type ATTR (ATTRwt). Cardiac involvement in AL amyloidosis is attributed to either of two mechanisms: the extracellular deposition of amyloid fibril in the myocardium, or direct cardiotoxicity from the fibril aggregates. Typing of amyloid fibrils, a critical determinant of therapy, has also improved with wider availability of laser capture and mass spectrometry of histologic specimens. Specific and accurate evaluation of CA is now possible using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy tracers. Survival in CA has improved markedly as novel chemotherapy agents have become available, but challenges remain in advanced disease. Broadening the amyloid-specific therapeutic landscape to include RNA inhibitors, fibril formation stabilizers and inhibitors, and immunotherapeutic targeting of amyloid deposits holds promise and may improve outcomes in systemic and cardiac amyloidoses. Treatment strategies for CA has recently undergone transformative changes, leading to some progress in outcomes for certain patients. Here, we discuss the basic features of CA as well as the emergence of novel, disease-modifying strategies that have been recently evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of CA.

Challenges in the treatment of soft-tissue plasmacytoma: a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

Despite the development of novel drugs and the widespread use of hematopoietic cell transplantation, the prognosis of patients (pts) with multiple myeloma and extramedullary involvement (soft-tissue plasmacytoma, STP) is rather unfavorable.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 120 pts with STP treated between 2007 and 2022 was performed. The effects of demographic and clinical characteristics on treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The rate of serological response to first-line STP treatment (at least partial remission) was 67%, and the rate of imaging response was 59%. With a median follow-up of 84.2 months, the median PFS was 10.5 months (primary STP: 20.2 months; secondary STP: 5.8 months), and the median OS was 24.5 months (primary STP: 34.5 months; secondary STP: 12.4 months). Based on the multivariate regression analysis, secondary STP (HRPFS 2.75; HROS 2.63) and organ involvement (HRPFS 1.45; HROS 1.68) were found to be negative prognostic factors of both PFS and OS. In a prognostic model, pts with at least one of these factors had a significantly worse PFS (HRPFS 3.31) and OS (HROS 3.45) than those with none risk factor.

CONCLUSION

In pts with STP, risk-adapted treatment strategies including immunotherapies and cell therapies are urgently required.

Evaluating the HYDRASHIFT 2/4 Daratumumab assay: a powerful approach to assess treatment response in multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the HYDRASHIFT assay's effectiveness in mitigating daratumumab interference on serum protein tests during multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, aiming to ensure an accurate assessment of treatment response.

METHODS

We analyzed 113 serum samples from 68 MM patients undergoing daratumumab treatment, employing both standard IF and the HYDRASHIFT assay. The assay's precision was determined through intra-day and inter-day variability assessments, while its specificity was verified using serum samples devoid of daratumumab. Comparative analysis of IF results, before and after the application of the HYDRASHIFT assay, facilitated the categorization of treatment responses in alignment with the International Myeloma Working Group's response criteria.

RESULTS

The precision underscored the assay's consistent repeatability and reproducibility, successfully eliminating interference of daratumumab-induced Gκ bands. Specificity assessments demonstrated the assay's capability to distinguish daratumumab from both isatuximab and naturally occurring M-proteins. Of the analyzed cases, 91 exhibited successful migration of daratumumab-induced Gκ bands, thereby enhancing the accuracy of treatment response classification. The remaining 22 cases did not show a visible migration complex, likely due to the low concentration of daratumumab in the serum. These findings underscore the assay's critical role in distinguishing daratumumab from endogenous M-protein, particularly in samples with a single Gκ band on standard IF, where daratumumab and endogenous M-protein had co-migrated.

CONCLUSIONS

The HYDRASHIFT assay demonstrates high precision, specificity, and utility in the accurate monitoring of treatment responses in MM patients receiving daratumumab. This assay represents a significant advancement in overcoming the diagnostic challenges posed by daratumumab interference.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Different Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma Who Progress After the Frontline Use of Lenalidomide: A Narrative Review

Background/Objectives: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after exposure to lenalidomide in the context of their first-line therapy are becoming a growing and clinically relevant population. We performed a systematic review of available clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse after the frontline use of lenalidomide. Methods: Publications of interest were searched on the PubMed database. The following search terms were employed: relapsed multiple myeloma, refractory multiple myeloma, first relapse, second-line therapy, lenalidomide-refractory (Len-R) and lenalidomide-exposed (Len-Exp). Results: Overall, triplet regimens that included anti-CD38 antibodies, carfilzomib and dexamethasone achieved a more favorable PFS regardless of the number of prior therapies. Other trials also demonstrated a non-negligible benefit with combinations containing pomalidomide, particularly in early lines of therapy. However, the variable number of patients with Len-Exp/Len-R disease enrolled in these studies and the limited number of those analyzed after progression following frontline lenalidomide make it difficult to select an "optimal" choice for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse. Promising results have been more recently obtained by using combo therapies, including belantamab mafodotin and, above all, immunotherapies with CAR-T cells, and ongoing clinical trials are exploring the role of bispecific antibodies and CELMoDs in this population of patients. Conclusions: In the absence of clear-cut data regarding the specific effects of available regimens on patients with MM who are refractory or have relapsed after first-line therapies including lenalidomide, novel approaches based on different types of immune strategies are expected to further improve the clinical outcome of these patients.

Daratumumab-Based Therapeutic Approaches and Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma and other Plasma Cell Dyscrasias: Insights from a Nationwide Real-World Chart Review Study

Singapore leads Southeast Asia in the routine use of daratumumab for multiple myeloma and other plasma cell dyscrasias. This retrospective review analyzed 112 patients who received daratumumab between 2012 and 2020. Tolerability, and efficacy based on prior lines (PL) of therapy, cytogenetic risk group, and the presence of renal impairment were presented. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 26.8% of patients. Grades 1 and 2 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were observed in 14.3% and 33.9% of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, there was no significant difference in overall response rates (ORR) (86% versus 76.3%, p = 0.082) or depth of response (≥ complete response (CR), 35.1% versus 28.9%, p = 0.469) between myeloma patients with and without renal dysfunction. Newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients had an ORR of 92% and 76.3%, and a ≥ VGPR (very good partial response) rate of 80% and 55.3%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was better for patients with 0/1 PL compared to ≥ 2 PLs (19.8 versus 6.2 months, p < 0.001), with a deeper response (≥ CR, 38.5% versus 16.7%, p = 0.033). Forty-six and a half percentage of patients had high-risk FISH abnormalities, and those with 0/1 PL had a significantly better ORR than those with ≥ 2 PLs (83.3% vsersus 47.1%, p = 0.022), achieving an ORR similar to that of the general cohort (80.2%, p = 0.905). In conclusion, positioning daratumumab in earlier lines of therapy leads to better outcomes and may mitigate the impact of high-risk FISH abnormalities.

Improving Health Outcomes Through Treatment Sequencing Optimization in Multiple Myeloma: A Simulation Model in Transplant-Ineligible Patients

OBJECTIVES

Patients with multiple myeloma often require multiple treatment lines. The order in which treatments are sequenced has impact on clinical outcomes. This study aimed to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with common treatment sequences used in Portugal and the incremental benefit of an optimal sequence in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma.

METHODS

A state-transition sequential model with a five-health state conceptual structure was developed to simulate and compare survival outcomes between treatment sequences up to four lines of treatments. Data sources included randomized clinical trials and indirect treatment comparisons. A panel of Portuguese hematologists listed four most common treatment sequences and optimal sequence of choice in transplant-ineligible patients.

RESULTS

Our simulation estimated an OS between 6.1 and 7.8 years using the most common sequences, with VMP + DRd + Pd + Kd as the most effective (7.8 years). Optimal sequence of choice (DRd + PVd + Kd + Vd) achieved OS of 9.8 years and may extend OS in 2.0-3.7 years vs. most common sequences (26%-61% increase). This benefit was mostly explained by extended PFS in the first line of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Model results demonstrate that choosing the most effective treatment upfront is crucial in delaying disease progression thus yielding better survival outcomes in transplant-ineligible patients. There was a clear survival benefit in using daratumumab-based regimens in first line. This modelling exercise highlights the need to raise awareness around the impact of sequencing strategies to improve patient's outcomes.

Fast and furious: Changing gears on the road to cure with chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma

Based on the pivotal KarMMa-1 and CARTITUDE-1 studies, Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) and Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) have been approved to treat multiple myeloma patients, who have been exposed to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug and anti-CD38 antibody after 4 or 3 lines of therapy, respectively. The unprecedented rates of deep and long-lasting remissions have been meanwhile confirmed in multiple real-world analyses and more recently, the KarMMa-3 and CARTITUDE-4 studies lead to the approval in earlier lines of therapy. It is currently believed that ultimately all patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma experience relapse after anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapies. There is a plethora of CAR T-cell therapies targeting novel antigens, with the aim to overcome current CAR T-cell resistance. In this review, we will summarize current evidence of novel antigens and their clinical potential. Together with current CAR T-cell therapy and T-cell engagers, these approaches might lead us to the next frontier in multiple myeloma: total immunotherapy and the road to chemotherapy-free cure.

Anti-BCMA-engineered exosomes for bortezomib-targeted delivery in multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Exosomes have emerged as promising vehicles for delivering therapeutic cargoes to specific cells or tissues, owing to their superior biocompatibility, reduced immunogenicity, and enhanced targeting capabilities compared with conventional drug delivery systems. In this study, we developed a delivery platform using exosomes derived from monocytes, specifically designed for targeted delivery of bortezomib (Btz) to multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Our approach involved the genetic modification of monocytes to express antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (anti-BCMA), because BCMA selectively expresses on myeloma cells. This modified anti-BCMA was then efficiently incorporated into the monocyte-derived exosomes. These adapted exosomes effectively encapsulated Btz, leading to enhanced drug accessibility within MM cells and sustained intracellular accumulation over an extended period. Remarkably, our results demonstrated that anti-BCMA-modified exosome-loaded Btz (anti-BCMA-Exo-Btz) outperformed free Btz in vitro, exhibiting a more potent myeloma-suppressive effect. In orthotopic MM xenograft models, anti-BCMA-Exo-Btz exhibited a significant antitumor effect compared with free Btz. Furthermore, it demonstrated remarkable specificity in targeting Btz to myeloma cells in vivo. Importantly, we observed no significant histological damage in mice treated with anti-BCMA-Exo-Btz and a slight effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In addition, our study highlighted the multifunctional potential of monocyte exosomes, which induced cell apoptosis, mediated immune responses, and enhanced the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells. In conclusion, our study suggests that exosomes modified with targeting ligands hold therapeutic promise for delivering Btz to myelomas, offering substantial potential for clinical applications.

Antithrombotic utilization, adverse events, and associations with treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: pooled analysis of three clinical trials

Background

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), worsened by immunomodulatory drugs. Although antithrombotics are recommended for prophylaxis, existing guidelines are suboptimal and treatment outcomes remain unclear.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate adverse events, antithrombotic utilization, and their associations with survival outcomes in patients with MM initiating multi-drug immunomodulatory combinations.

Design

A posthoc analysis of individual-participant level data (IPD).

Methods

IPD from three daratumumab clinical trials (MAIA, POLLUX, and CASTOR) were pooled. Adverse events incidence and antithrombotic utilization were assessed. Logistic and Cox regression were utilized to examine associations between antithrombotics use with adverse events and survival outcomes at the baseline and 6-month landmark.

Results

Among 1804 patients, VTE occurred in 10%, bleeding in 14%, ischemic heart disease in 4%, and stroke in 2%. Patients with these adverse events demonstrated elevated rates of any grade ⩾3 events. Antiplatelet (primarily aspirin) and anticoagulant (primarily LMWH and direct oral anticoagulants) prescriptions have seen an increase from baseline (25% and 14%, respectively) to 6 months (35% and 31%). The primary indication for their use was prophylaxis. Anticoagulant use within 6 months was associated with reduced VTE (OR (95% CI) = 0.45 (0.26-0.77), p = 0.004), while antiplatelet use showed no associations with any evaluated adverse events. Antithrombotics and survival outcomes had no significant associations.

Conclusion

This study underscores the complexities of antithrombotic therapy and adverse events in MM and highlights the need for vigilant and proactive management due to increased grade ⩾3 adverse events. While anticoagulant use was associated with reduced VTE risk, further research is needed to optimize thromboprophylaxis guidelines and explore antithrombotic efficacy and safety in patients with MM.

Trial registration

MAIA (NCT02252172), POLLUX (NCT02076009), CASTOR (NCT02136134).

Efficacy of CARVYKTI in CARTITUDE-4 versus other conventional treatment regimens for lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma using inverse probability of treatment weighting

Aim: The phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) demonstrated superiority of CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel; cilta-cel) over daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) and pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have received one to three prior line(s) of therapy (LOT[s]) including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, and are refractory to lenalidomide. These analyses estimate the relative efficacy between cilta-cel and other common treatment regimens, for which no direct comparative evidence is available. Materials & methods: Patient data were available from the CARTITUDE-4, CASTOR, CANDOR and APOLLO RCTs. Imbalances between cohorts on key patient characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Relative efficacies were estimated with response rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better rate (≥VGPR) and complete response or better rate (≥CR), and with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS). Sensitivity analyses using different analytical methods and additional covariates were explored. Results: Key characteristics were well balanced across cohorts after IPTW. Cilta-cel showed statistically significant benefit in PFS (HRs: 0.11-0.51), ≥VGPR (RRs: 1.51-5.13) and ≥CR (RRs: 2.90-35.24) versus all comparators, and statistically significant improvements in ORR over most comparator regimens (RRs: 1.22-1.90). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Cilta-cel demonstrated benefit over other common treatment regimens, highlighting its potential to become a new standard of care option for lenalidomide-refractory RRMM patients with one to three prior LOT(s). These comparisons help to demonstrate the improved efficacy of cilta-cel in countries where the standard of care may differ from DPd/PVd.