1
|
Huang H, Kuang H, Thomas TR, Wei D, Zhang H. How to minimize the dropout and crossover in an infertility trial? Fertil Steril 2024; 121:905-908. [PMID: 38316206 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials and intent-to-treat analyses are important for infertility clinical studies. Dropouts or crossovers during the study process will disrupt the randomization design and affect the intent-to-treat analysis. In this review, we have briefly introduced the occurrence of dropout and crossover from our previous Reproductive Medicine Network and other related studies and provided some experience obtained from these studies on how to minimize and reduce the occurrence of dropout and crossover for infertility randomized clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hongying Kuang
- The Second Department of Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, People's Republic of China
| | - Tracey R Thomas
- Women's Health Clinical Research Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Daimin Wei
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Heping Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sun N, Fang X, Jiao Y, Wang Y, Wan Y, Wu Z, Jin H, Shi H, Song W. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing with trophectoderm biopsy: a retrospective cohort study of 3373 intracytoplasmic sperm injection single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:2427-2437. [PMID: 37389643 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07120-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. METHODS This respective cohort study enrolled 3373 ICSI single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles with and without trophectoderm biopsy. Statistical methods including univariate logistic regression analysis, multivariate logistic regression analysis, and stratified analyses were performed to explore the impact of trophectoderm biopsy on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS The rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that the live birth rate (45.15% vs. 40.75%; P = 0.010) in the biopsied group was statistically higher than that in the unbiopsied group, and the rates of miscarriage (15.40% vs. 20.00%; P = 0.011) and birth defects (0.58% vs. 2.16%; P = 0.007) were statistically lower in the biopsied group. After adjusting for confounding factors, the rates of miscarriage (aOR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.57-0.96; P = 0.022) and birth defects (aOR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.08-0.70, P = 0.009) in the biopsied group were significantly lower than those in the unbiopsied group. Stratified analyses showed that the birth defects rate after biopsy was significantly reduced in the subgroups of age < 35 years old, BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2, artificial cycle with downregulation, poor-quality blastocysts, and Day 5 poor-quality blastocysts. CONCLUSION Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with trophectoderm biopsy does not increase the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in ICSI single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles, and PGT can effectively reduce the rates of miscarriage and birth defects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Sun
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingyu Fang
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunyun Jiao
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Wang
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Wan
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoting Wu
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Haixia Jin
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Shi
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenyan Song
- Reproductive Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao J, Li S, Ban M, Gao S, Cui L, Yan J, Yang X, Li J, Zhang Y, Guan S, Zhou W, Gao X, Chen ZJ. Metabolic Profiles of Offspring Born From Biopsied Embryos from Toddlerhood to Preschool Age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024:dgae315. [PMID: 38805186 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Embryo biopsy, which is necessary for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), has not been fully investigated regarding its potential influences and safety. Previous studies of children born from biopsied embryos (PGT children) have primarily centered around their growth and neuropsychological development, while there remains limited knowledge concerning their endocrine and metabolic parameters. OBJECTIVE This study aims to examine the effect of trophectoderm (TE) biopsy on metabolic outcomes for PGT children. METHODS A total of 1267 children from the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, who were conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with and without PGT, were analyzed in this study. Three sets of measurements pertaining to growth and metabolism were taken at each predetermined follow-up time point. The linear regression models within a generalized estimating equation were employed to examine the associations between the PGT and each outcome measure and the approach of false discovery rate was used to correct for multiple comparisons. RESULTS After controlling for confounding factors and correcting for multiple comparisons, no statistically significant difference was identified in any of the measured variables between the PGT children and children conceived by IVF alone (IVF children) and children conceived through IVF using ICSI (ICSI children). The same is true also for age- or sex-based subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION Between the ages of 1 and 5 years, there are no clinically adverse metabolic outcomes observed in PGT children, and their metabolic profiles are essentially identical to those of IVF children and ICSI children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialin Zhao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Shuo Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Miaomiao Ban
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Shuzhe Gao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Linlin Cui
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Xiaohe Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Jincheng Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Yiyuan Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Shengnan Guan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Xuan Gao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Research Unit of Gametogenesis and Health of ART-Offspring, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No.2021RU001), Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200135, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200135, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang S, Pei Z, Xiao M, Zhou J, Hu B, Zhu S, Sun X, Wu J, Lei C, Xu C. Comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing for balanced insertional translocation carriers. J Med Genet 2024:jmg-2024-109851. [PMID: 38802138 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2024-109851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Balanced insertional translocations (BITs) can increase the risk of infertility, recurrent miscarriages or neonatal birth defects due to chromosomal imbalances in gametes. However, studies on preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for patients carrying BITs are inadequate. METHODS A preimplantation genetic genotyping and haplotype analysis approach was developed and implemented in this study. Genome-wide SNP genotyping was performed, followed by core family-based haplotype analysis. The balanced insertion segments in euploid embryos were inferred from the haplotypes inherited from the carrier parent. RESULTS A total of 10 BIT carrier couples were enrolled in our study. 15 in vitro fertilisation cycles were conducted, resulting in 73 blastocysts biopsied and subjected to PGT analysis. Among these, 20 blastocysts displayed rearrangement-related imbalances, 13 exhibited de novo aneuploidies, 15 presented a complex anomaly involving both imbalances and additional aneuploidies, while 25 were euploid. Within the euploid embryos, 12 were balanced carrier embryos and 13 were non-carrier embryos. To date, eight non-carrier and one carrier embryos have been transferred, resulting in seven clinical pregnancies. All pregnancies were recommended to perform prenatal diagnosis, our date revealed complete concordance between fetal genetic testing results and PGT results. Presently, five infants have been born from these pregnancies, and two pregnancies are still ongoing. CONCLUSION The proposed method facilitates comprehensive chromosome screening and the concurrent identification of balanced insertions or normal karyotypes in embryos. This study offers an effective and universally applicable strategy for BIT carriers to achieve a healthy pregnancy and prevent the transmission of BITs to their offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Zhang
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenle Pei
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Xiao
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Zhou
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin Hu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Saijuan Zhu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoxi Sun
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Junping Wu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Caixia Lei
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Congjian Xu
- Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics & IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2024:S0015-0282(24)00241-3. [PMID: 38762806 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in the United States has been increasing steadily. Moreover, the underlying technology used for 24-chromosome analysis continues to evolve rapidly. The value of PGT-A as a routine screening test for all patients undergoing in vitro fertilization has not been demonstrated. Although some earlier single-center studies reported higher live-birth rates after PGT-A in favorable-prognosis patients, recent multicenter, randomized control trials in women with available blastocysts concluded that the overall pregnancy outcomes via frozen embryo transfer were similar between PGT-A and conventional in vitro fertilization. The value of PGT-A to lower the risk of clinical miscarriage is also unclear, although these studies have important limitations. This document replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2018.
Collapse
|
6
|
He H, Wu L, Chen Y, Li T, Ren X, Hu J, Liu J, Chen W, Ma B, Zou Y, Liu Z, Lu S, Huang B, Jin L. A novel non-invasive embryo evaluation method (NICS-Timelapse) with enhanced predictive precision and clinical impact. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30189. [PMID: 38726199 PMCID: PMC11078863 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The selection of the finest possible embryo in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was crucial and revolutionary, particularly when just one embryo is transplanted to lessen the possibility of multiple pregnancies. However, practical usefulness of currently used methodologies may be constrained. Here, we established a novel non-invasive embryo evaluation method that combines non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS) and Timelapse system along with artificial intelligence algorithms. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 and an accuracy of 0.88, the NICS-Timelapse model was able to predict blastocyst euploidy. The performance of the model was further evaluated using 75 patients in various clinical settings. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of embryos predicted by the NICS-Timelapse model, showing that embryos with higher euploid probabilities were associated with higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. These results demonstrated the NICS-Timelapse model's significantly wider application in clinical IVF due to its excellent accuracy and noninvasiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui He
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Li Wu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yulin Chen
- Yikon Genomics Company, Ltd., Shanghai, 201499, China
| | - Tuan Li
- Yikon Genomics Company, Ltd., Shanghai, 201499, China
| | - Xinling Ren
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Juan Hu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jinming Liu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wen Chen
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bingxin Ma
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yangyun Zou
- Yikon Genomics Company, Ltd., Shanghai, 201499, China
| | - Zhen Liu
- Yikon Genomics Company, Ltd., Shanghai, 201499, China
| | - Sijia Lu
- Yikon Genomics Company, Ltd., Shanghai, 201499, China
| | - Bo Huang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Jin
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medicine College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Olive E, Bull C, Gordon A, Davies-Tuck M, Wang R, Callander E. Economic evaluations of assisted reproductive technologies in high-income countries: a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:981-991. [PMID: 38438132 PMCID: PMC11063548 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Which assited reproductive technology (ART) interventions in high-income countries are cost-effective and which are not? SUMMARY ANSWER Among all ART interventions assessed in economic evaluations, most high-cost interventions, including preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) for a general population and ICSI for unexplained infertility, are unlikely to be cost-effective owing to minimal or no increase in effectiveness. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Approaches to reduce costs in order to increase access have been identified as a research priority for future infertility research. There has been an increasing number of ART interventions implemented in routine clinical practice globally, before robust assessments of evidence on economic evaluations. The extent of clinical effectiveness of some studied comparisons has been evaluated in high-quality research, allowing more informative decision making around cost-effectiveness. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We performed a systematic review and searched seven databases (MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, ECONLIT, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) for studies examining ART interventions for infertility together with an economic evaluation component (cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, cost-utility, or cost-minimization assessment), in high-income countries, published since January 2011. The last search was 22 June 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Two independent reviewers assessed publications and included those fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Studies were examined to assess the cost-effectiveness of the studied intervention, as well as the reporting quality of the study. The chosen outcome measure and payer perspective were also noted. Completeness of reporting was assessed against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard. Results are presented and summarized based on the intervention studied. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The review included 40 studies which were conducted in 11 high-income countries. Most studies (n = 34) included a cost-effectiveness analysis. ART interventions included medication or strategies for controlled ovarian stimulation (n = 15), IVF (n = 9), PGT-A (n = 7), single embryo transfer (n = 5), ICSI (n = 3), and freeze-all embryo transfer (n = 1). Live birth was the mostly commonly reported primary outcome (n = 27), and quality-adjusted life years was reported in three studies. The health funder perspective was used in 85% (n = 34) of studies. None of the included studies measured patient preference for treatment. It remains uncertain whether PGT-A improves pregnancy rates compared to IVF cycles managed without PGT-A, and therefore cost-effectiveness could not be demonstrated for this intervention. Similarly, ICSI in non-male factor infertility appears not to be clinically effective compared to standard fertilization in an IVF cycle and is therefore not cost-effective. Interventions such as use of biosimilars or HMG for ovarian stimulation are cheaper but compromise clinical effectiveness. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Lack of both preference-based and standardized outcomes limits the comparability of results across studies. The selection of efficacy evidence offered for some interventions for economic evaluations is not always based on high-quality randomized trials and systematic reviews. In addition, there is insufficient knowledge of the willingness to pay thresholds of individuals and state funders for treatment of infertility. There is variable quality of reporting scores, which might increase uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Investment in strategies to help infertile people who utilize ART is justifiable at both personal and population levels. This systematic review may assist ART funders decide how to best invest to maximize the likelihood of delivery of a healthy child. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) There was no funding for this study. E.C. and R.W. receive salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through their fellowship scheme (EC GNT1159536, RW 2021/GNT2009767). M.D.-T. reports consulting fees from King Fahad Medical School. All other authors have no competing interests to declare. REGISTRATION NUMBER Prospero CRD42021261537.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Olive
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Claudia Bull
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Adrienne Gordon
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Miranda Davies-Tuck
- The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Emily Callander
- School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zou H, Wang R, Morbeck DE. Diagnostic or prognostic? Decoding the role of embryo selection on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes. Fertil Steril 2024; 121:730-736. [PMID: 38185198 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
In this review, we take a fresh look at embryo assessment and selection methods from the perspective of diagnosis and prognosis. On the basis of a systematic search in the literature, we examined the evidence on the prognostic value of different embryo assessment methods, including morphological assessment, blastocyst culture, time-lapse imaging, artificial intelligence, and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haowen Zou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dean E Morbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Principle, Morbeck Consulting Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Davis OS, Favetta LA, Deniz S, Faghih M, Amin S, Karnis M, Neal MS. Potential Costs and Benefits of Incorporating PGT-A Across Age Groups: A Canadian Clinic Perspective. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2024; 46:102361. [PMID: 38272217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the potential costs and benefits of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) across age groups, considering financial costs, total euploidy rates and the potential for morphology grading to predict a euploid embryo. METHODS This study is a blinded retrospective chart review of patients who incorporated PGT-A as part of their in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle at a university-affiliated fertility clinic. Patients between 25-44 years of age undergoing IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection and PGT-A with autologous oocytes (n = 220) were included in this study. Number of blastocysts achieved, euploidy rates and PGT-A costs were compared between 3 age groups: <35 years, 35-37, and ≥38. Additionally, agreement on the top-quality embryo based on morphology assessment alone versus PGT-A selection was analyzed and further compared based on the number of blastocysts achieved. RESULTS A significant negative correlation between patient age and number of embryos produced, PGT-A costs, and euploidy rates (P < 0.001) was observed. Additionally, morphology alone ratings were able to predict the top-quality euploid embryo 78% of the time in the <35 age group, but only 32% of the time in the ≥38 age group (P < 0.05), with a trend toward even lower agreement when 3 or fewer blastocysts were produced. CONCLUSION Based on our cost analysis, it may be advantageous to incorporate PGT-A when maternal age is ≥38, given the lower financial costs associated with each cycle and the low likelihood of transferring a euploid embryo on the first attempt for this age group. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that PGT-A remains a complex decision influenced by a multitude of factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola S Davis
- Reproductive Health and Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Laura A Favetta
- Reproductive Health and Biotechnology Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Stacy Deniz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; ONE Fertility, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Mehrnoosh Faghih
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; ONE Fertility, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Shilpa Amin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; ONE Fertility, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Megan Karnis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; ONE Fertility, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Michael S Neal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; ONE Fertility, Burlington, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liang Z, Lv J, Liang T, Que W, Ji X, Zhang Q, Chen H, Wei L, Li Y. Association Between Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Early Spontaneous Abortion in Assisted Reproduction Treatment: A Case-Control Study Integrated with Biological Evidence. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:1373-1384. [PMID: 38228975 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01442-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Early spontaneous abortion (ESA) is a common adverse pregnancy outcome mainly attributed to embryo chromosomal abnormalities. However, as a quantitative marker, whether the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) can reflect oocyte quality is still controversial. By integrating biological evidence and adjusting many cofounders, this study aimed to clarify the controversies about the association between AMH and ESA caused by embryo aneuploidy during assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. We strictly preselected 988 patients receiving first ART treatment for analyzing clinical data, while 55 of them acquired chorionic villi karyotype results. In addition, 373 biopsied embryos from 126 patients receiving preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGT) were tracked to compare embryo karyotypes. Univariate and multiple factor regressions were applied to analyze the risk factors leading to ESA. As covariates unadjusted, AMH (odds ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93) was the significant variable contributing to ESA. However, AMH played no significant role in the following regression models after age was adjusted. Also, AMH had no significant association with ESA in most age-adjusted subgroups, except in the male factors engaged subgroup. Additionally, compared to the patients with euploid chorionic villi karyotypes, those with aneuploid karyotypes were older and acquired fewer oocytes, yet their AMH levels were not significantly different. Furthermore, the embryo aneuploidy was independent of AMH while associated with maternal age, retrieved oocyte number, and embryo quality. This study suggested that AMH was unassociated with the ESA caused by embryo aneuploidy in ART therapy. As a critical cofounder, age remains the variable closely related to ESA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Liang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiezhong Lv
- Laboratory of Prenatal Diagnosis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Senen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ting Liang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wenqing Que
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaohui Ji
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qingxue Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hui Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lina Wei
- Division of Histology and Embryology, International Joint Laboratory for Embryonic, Development and Prenatal Medicine, Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Yi Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhao S, Lyu C, Liu Y, Wang X, Zhang Z, Lv H, Ni T, Yan J. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy could not improve cumulative live birth rate among 1003 couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Chin Med J (Engl) 2024:00029330-990000000-01043. [PMID: 38630915 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000003041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shaotong Zhao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Chunzi Lyu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Yingbo Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Xiyao Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Zhaowen Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Hong Lv
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Tianxiang Ni
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lersten IL, Grau L, Jahandideh S, Devine K, Zalles L, Plosker SM, Imudia AN, Hoyos LR, Uhler ML, Homer M, Roeca C, Sammel MD, Polotsky AJ. High estradiol levels in fresh embryo transfer cycles are not associated with detrimental impact on birth outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:893-902. [PMID: 38600428 PMCID: PMC11052734 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03062-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is an unclear relationship between estradiol levels and fresh embryo transfer (ET) outcomes. We determined the relationship between estradiol on the day of trigger, in fresh ET cycles without premature progesterone elevation, and good birth outcomes (GBO). METHODS We identified autologous fresh ET cycles from 2015 to 2021 at multiple clinics in the USA. Patients with recurrent pregnancy loss, uterine factor, and elevated progesterone on the day of trigger (progesterone > 2 ng/mL or 3-day area under the curve > 4.5 ng/mL) were excluded. The primary outcome was GBO (singleton, term, live birth with appropriate weight). Log-binomial generalized estimating equations determined the likelihood of outcomes. RESULTS Of 17,608 fresh ET cycles, 5025 (29%) yielded GBO. Cycles with estradiol ≥ 4000 pg/mL had a greater likelihood of GBO compared to cycles < 1000 pg/mL (aRR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.13-1.54). Pairwise comparisons of estradiol between < 1000 pg/mL versus 1000-1999 pg/mL and 1000-1999 pg/mL versus 2000-2999 pg/mL revealed a higher likelihood of GBO with higher estradiol (aRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95; aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97, respectively). Comparisons amongst more elevated estradiol levels revealed that the likelihood of GBO remained similar between groups (2000-2999 pg/mL versus 3000-3999 pg/mL, aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.11; 3000-3999 pg/mL versus ≥ 4000 pg/mL, aRR 0.96, 95% CI 0.9-1.04). CONCLUSION In fresh ET cycles, higher estradiol levels were associated with an increased prevalence of GBO until estradiol 2000-2999 pg/mL, thereafter plateauing. In fresh ET candidates, elevated estradiol levels should not preclude eligibility though premature progesterone rise, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome must still be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivy L Lersten
- University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, 12631 E 17Th Ave, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Shady Grove Fertility, Greenwood Village, CO, USA.
| | - Laura Grau
- University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | - Shayne M Plosker
- Shady Grove Fertility, Tampa, FL, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anthony N Imudia
- Shady Grove Fertility, Tampa, FL, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Luis R Hoyos
- IVF Florida Reproductive Associates, Margate, FL, USA
| | | | - Michael Homer
- Reproductive Science Center of the Bay Area, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cassandra Roeca
- University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, 12631 E 17Th Ave, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, USA
- Shady Grove Fertility, Greenwood Village, CO, USA
| | - Mary D Sammel
- University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, 12631 E 17Th Ave, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alex J Polotsky
- University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, 12631 E 17Th Ave, Mail Stop B-198, Aurora, CO, USA
- Shady Grove Fertility, Greenwood Village, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grebe TA, Khushf G, Greally JM, Turley P, Foyouzi N, Rabin-Havt S, Berkman BE, Pope K, Vatta M, Kaur S. Clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for embryo selection: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2024; 26:101052. [PMID: 38393332 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.101052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa A Grebe
- Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Child Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
| | - George Khushf
- Department of Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - John M Greally
- Departments of Genetics and Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Patrick Turley
- Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Sara Rabin-Havt
- Department of OB/GYN, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Benjamin E Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health; National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Kathleen Pope
- Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, FL; University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Shagun Kaur
- Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Child Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ni T, Zhou W, Liu Y, Cui W, Liu Y, Lu J, Zhang Q, Chen ZJ, Li Y, Yan J. Excessive Exogenous Gonadotropins and Genetic and Pregnancy Outcomes After Euploidy Embryo Transfer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e244438. [PMID: 38564220 PMCID: PMC10988349 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The safety of exogenous gonadotropin treatment, based on its effect on embryos and pregnancy outcomes, remains inconclusive. Objective To evaluate the associations of different doses and durations of gonadotropins with embryonic genetic status and pregnancy outcomes after euploid embryo transfer in couples with infertility. Design, Setting, and Participants This study was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) conducted at 14 reproductive centers throughout China from July 2017 to June 2018 that evaluated the cumulative live birth rate with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) among couples with infertility and good prognosis. The PGT-A group from the original RCT was selected for secondary analysis. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the total dosage of exogenous gonadotropins and treatment duration: group 1 (≤1500 IU and <10 days), group 2 (≤1500 IU and ≥10 days), group 3 (>1500 IU and <10 days), and group 4 (>1 500 IU and ≥10 days). Group 1 served as the control group. Data were analyzed from June through August 2023. Interventions Blastocyst biopsy and PGT-A. Main outcomes and measures The primary outcomes were embryonic aneuploidy, embryonic mosaicism, and cumulative live birth rates after euploid embryo transfer. Results A total of 603 couples (mean [SD] age of prospective mothers, 29.13 [3.61] years) who underwent PGT-A were included, and 1809 embryos were screened using next-generation sequencing. The embryo mosaicism rate was significantly higher in groups 2 (44 of 339 embryos [13.0%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.09-2.64]), 3 (27 of 186 embryos [14.5%]; aOR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.15-3.40]), and 4 (82 of 651 embryos [12.6%]; aOR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.07-2.38]) than in group 1 (56 of 633 embryos [8.8%]). There were no associations between gonadotropin dosage or duration and the embryo aneuploidy rate. The cumulative live birth rate was significantly lower in groups 2 (83 of 113 couples [73.5%]; aOR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.27-0.88]), 3 (42 of 62 couples [67.7%]; aOR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.21-0.82]), and 4 (161 of 217 couples [74.2%]; aOR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.31-0.89]) than in group 1 (180 of 211 couples [85.3%]). Conclusions and relevance In this study, excessive exogenous gonadotropin administration was associated with increased embryonic mosaicism and decreased cumulative live birth rate after euploid embryo transfer in couples with a good prognosis. These findings suggest that consideration should be given to minimizing exogenous gonadotropin dosage and limiting treatment duration to improve embryo outcomes and increase the live birth rate. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03118141.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianxiang Ni
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yingbo Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Weiran Cui
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Juanjuan Lu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Robertson SA, Richards RI. Single-cell sequencing shows mosaic aneuploidy in most human embryos. J Clin Invest 2024; 134:e179134. [PMID: 38488008 PMCID: PMC10940079 DOI: 10.1172/jci179134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Mammalian preimplantation embryos often contain chromosomal defects that arose in the first divisions after fertilization and affect a subpopulation of cells - an event known as mosaic aneuploidy. In this issue of the JCI, Chavli et al. report single-cell genomic sequencing data for rigorous evaluation of the incidence and degree of mosaic aneuploidy in healthy human in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos. Remarkably, mosaic aneuploidy occurred in at least 80% of human blastocyst-stage embryos, with often less than 20% of cells showing defects. These findings confirm that mosaic aneuploidy is prevalent in human embryos, indicating that the process is a widespread event that rarely has clinical consequences. There are major implications for preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy (PGT-A), a test commonly used to screen and select IVF embryos for transfer. The application and benefit of this technology is controversial, and the findings provide more cause for caution on its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert I. Richards
- School of Molecular Bioscience, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Makieva S, Giacomini E, Scotti GM, Lazarevic D, Pavone V, Ottolina J, Bartiromo L, Schimberni M, Morelli M, Alteri A, Minetto S, Tonon G, Candiani M, Papaleo E, Viganò P. Extracellular vesicles secreted by human aneuploid embryos present a distinct transcriptomic profile and upregulate MUC1 transcription in decidualised endometrial stromal cells. Hum Reprod Open 2024; 2024:hoae014. [PMID: 38559895 PMCID: PMC10980593 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by aneuploid human embryos possess a unique transcriptomic profile that elicits a relevant transcriptomic response in decidualized primary endometrial stromal cells (dESCs)? SUMMARY ANSWER Aneuploid embryo-derived EVs contain transcripts of PPM1J, LINC00561, ANKRD34C, and TMED10 with differential abundance from euploid embryo-derived EVs and induce upregulation of MUC1 transcript in dESCs. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY We have previously reported that IVF embryos secrete EVs that can be internalized by ESCs, conceptualizing that successful implantation to the endometrium is facilitated by EVs. Whether these EVs may additionally serve as biomarkers of ploidy status is unknown. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION Embryos destined for biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were grown under standard conditions. Spent media (30 μl) were collected from euploid (n = 175) and aneuploid (n = 140) embryos at cleavage (Days 1-3) stage and from euploid (n = 187) and aneuploid (n = 142) embryos at blastocyst (Days 3-5) stage. Media samples from n = 35 cleavage-stage embryos were pooled in order to obtain five euploid and four aneuploid pools. Similarly, media samples from blastocysts were pooled to create one euploid and one aneuploid pool. ESCs were obtained from five women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS EVs were isolated from pools of media by differential centrifugation and EV-RNA sequencing was performed following a single-cell approach that circumvents RNA extraction. ESCs were decidualized (estradiol: 10 nM, progesterone: 1 µM, cAMP: 0.5 mM twice every 48 h) and incubated for 24 h with EVs (50 ng/ml). RNA sequencing was performed on ESCs. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Aneuploid cleavage stage embryos secreted EVs that were less abundant in RNA fragments originating from the genes PPM1J (log2fc = -5.13, P = 0.011), LINC00561 (log2fc = -7.87, P = 0.010), and ANKRD34C (log2fc = -7.30, P = 0.017) and more abundant in TMED10 (log2fc = 1.63, P = 0.025) compared to EVs of euploid embryos. Decidualization per se induced downregulation of MUC1 (log2fc = -0.54, P = 0.0028) in ESCs as a prerequisite for the establishment of receptive endometrium. The expression of MUC1 transcript in decidualized ESCs was significantly increased following treatment with aneuploid compared to euploid embryo-secreted EVs (log2fc = 0.85, P = 0.0201). LARGE SCALE DATA Raw data have been uploaded to GEO (accession number GSE234338). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The findings of the study will require validation utilizing a second cohort of EV samples. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The discovery that the transcriptomic profile of EVs secreted from aneuploid cleavage stage embryos differs from that of euploid embryos supports the possibility to develop a non-invasive methodology for PGT-A. The upregulation of MUC1 in dESCs following aneuploid embryo EV treatment proposes a new mechanism underlying implantation failure. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS The study was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions fellowship awarded to SM by the European Commission (CERVINO grant agreement ID: 79620) and by a BIRTH research grant from Theramex HQ UK Ltd. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Makieva
- Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Giacomini
- Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Maria Scotti
- Centre for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Dejan Lazarevic
- Centre for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Pavone
- Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Jessica Ottolina
- Centro Scienze della Natalità, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ludovica Bartiromo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Schimberni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Morelli
- Centre for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Alteri
- Centro Scienze della Natalità, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabrina Minetto
- Centro Scienze della Natalità, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tonon
- Centre for Omics Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Papaleo
- Centro Scienze della Natalità, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Viganò
- Reproductive Sciences Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gudapati S, Chaudhari K, Shrivastava D, Yelne S. Advancements and Applications of Preimplantation Genetic Testing in In Vitro Fertilization: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e57357. [PMID: 38694414 PMCID: PMC11061269 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become an integral component of assisted reproductive technology (ART), offering couples the opportunity to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation during in vitro fertilization (IVF). This comprehensive review explores the advancements and applications of PGT in IVF, covering its various types, technological developments, clinical applications, efficacy, challenges, regulatory aspects, and future directions. The evolution of PGT techniques, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), has significantly enhanced the accuracy and reliability of genetic testing in embryos. PGT holds profound implications for the future of ART by improving IVF success rates, reducing the incidence of genetic disorders, and mitigating the emotional and financial burdens associated with failed pregnancies and genetic diseases. Recommendations for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers include staying updated on the latest PGT techniques and guidelines, exploring innovative technologies, establishing clear regulatory frameworks, and fostering collaboration to maximize the potential benefits of PGT in assisted reproduction. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the current state of PGT and its implications for the field of reproductive medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravya Gudapati
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Kamlesh Chaudhari
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Deepti Shrivastava
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Seema Yelne
- Nursing, Shalinitai Meghe College of Nursing, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scheffer JB, de Carvalho RF, Scheffer BB, Aguiar APDS, Pessoa LP, Lozano DM, Fanchin R. Correlations between clinical parameters, blastocyst morphological classification and embryo euploidy. JBRA Assist Reprod 2024; 28:54-58. [PMID: 37962968 PMCID: PMC10936908 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and embryo parameters to predict embryo ploidy. METHODS In this retrospective analysis, we studied 838 biopsied day-5 blastocysts from 219 patients in the period from May 2021 to July 2022. All embryos were morphologically classified before biopsy and were divided into two groups according to genetic test results. Euploid embryos (299) were compared with aneuploid embryos (539) based on maternal age, anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle count, and embryo morphology. RESULTS Maternal age (36.2±3.0) of euploid embryos was lower than maternal age (37.1±2.5) of aneuploid embryos (p<0.0001). AMH levels were higher (3.9±1.2) in the group of euploid embryos than in the group of aneuploid embryos (3.6±1.3, p<0.0001). However, the AFC was not different in the group of euploid embryos (15.3±6.0) compared to the group of aneuploid embryos (14.5±5.9, p=0.07). The presence of aneuploidy was negatively correlated with top embryo quality (embryos 4AA and 4AB). All euploid embryos (299) were top quality versus 331 of 539 (61.49%) aneuploid embryos (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS We found that euploid embryos were associated with lower maternal age, higher AMH levels, and higher quality embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bruno Brum Scheffer
- IBRRA - Brazilian Institute of Assisted Reproduction, Belo
Horizonte, Brazil
| | | | | | - Daniel Mendez Lozano
- School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey and Center for
Reproductive Medicine CREASIS, San Pedro Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Renato Fanchin
- Professeur des Universites- Praticien Hospitalier en Medecine de la
Reproduction, France, Hopital Foch, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Peero EK, Banjar S, Khoudja R, Ton-Leclerc S, Beauchamp C, Benoit J, Beltempo M, Dahan MH, Gold P, Kadoch IJ, Jamal W, Laskin C, Mahutte N, Phillips S, Sylvestre C, Reinblatt S, Mazer BD, Buckett W, Genest G. Intravenous immunoglobulin for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure: a 6-year single center retrospective review of clinical outcomes. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3876. [PMID: 38365988 PMCID: PMC10873418 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54423-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The effectiveness of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) remains debated. We retrospectively analysed outcomes of uRIF patients treated with IVIg compared to a separate control uRIF cohort within our center (01/2014-12/2021). Primary outcomes included live birth, miscarriage, or transfer failure. We documented IVIg side effects and maternal/fetal outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess for association of IVIg exposure with outcomes and adjust for confounders. The study included 143 patients, with a 2:1 ratio of controls to patients receiving IVIg treatment. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. There was higher live birth rate (LBR) in patients receiving IVIg (32/49; 65.3%) compared to controls (32/94; 34%); p < 0.001). When stratifying patients into moderate and severe uRIF (respectively 3-4 and [Formula: see text] 5 previous good quality blastocyst transfer failures), only patients with severe uRIF benefited from IVIg (LBR (20/29 (69%) versus 5/25 (20%) for controls, p = 0.0004). In the logistic regression analysis, IVIg was associated with higher odds of live birth (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.78-7.67; p = 0.0004). There were no serious adverse events with IVIg. IVIg can be considered in well selected patients with [Formula: see text] 5 previous unexplained, high quality blastocyst transfer failures. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Einav Kadour Peero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Shorooq Banjar
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rabea Khoudja
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Coralie Beauchamp
- Ovo Clinic, 8000 Boulevard Decarie, Montréal, QC, H4P 2S4, Canada
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Joanne Benoit
- Ovo Clinic, 8000 Boulevard Decarie, Montréal, QC, H4P 2S4, Canada
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Marc Beltempo
- Division of Neonatology, Montreal Children's Hospital - McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Michael H Dahan
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Phil Gold
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave. A6-123, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - Isaac Jacques Kadoch
- Ovo Clinic, 8000 Boulevard Decarie, Montréal, QC, H4P 2S4, Canada
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Wael Jamal
- Clinique OVO, 8000 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4P 2S4, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carl Laskin
- TRIO Fertility, 655 Bay St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2K4, Canada
- Deptartments of Medicine and Obstetrics & Gynecology University of Toronto, 27 King's College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S, Canada
| | - Neal Mahutte
- The Montreal Fertility Centre, 5252 de Maisonneuve Blvd West, Suite 220, Montreal, QC, H4A 3S5, Canada
| | - Simon Phillips
- Clinique OVO, 8000 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC, H4P 2S4, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - Camille Sylvestre
- Ovo Clinic, 8000 Boulevard Decarie, Montréal, QC, H4P 2S4, Canada
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T1J4, Canada
| | - Shauna Reinblatt
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- McGill University Health Care Reproductive Center, 888 Boul. De Maisonneuve E# 200, Montreal, QC, H2L 4S8, Canada
| | - Bruce D Mazer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy Immunology and Clinical Dermatology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Program in Translational Research in Respiratory Diseases, Research Institute of the McGill, University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - William Buckett
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- McGill University Health Care Reproductive Center, 888 Boul. De Maisonneuve E# 200, Montreal, QC, H2L 4S8, Canada
| | - Genevieve Genest
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Katz-Jaffe M, Gassen C, Makloski R, Reed L, Schoolcraft WB. Impact of aneuploidy on reproductive success in young infertile women: prospective analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 49:103858. [PMID: 38648711 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What is the clinical outcome of the first attempt at conception between two embryo selection methods, blastocyst morphology and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), chosen at the initial physician IVF consultation? DESIGN In this prospective analysis, a clinical decision regarding embryo selection, blastocyst morphology (group A) or PGT-A (group B) was made during initial physician IVF consultation. Female infertility patients were matched based on maternal age (mean 32.6 ± 3.6 years; range 25-43 years) and a similar time frame of oocyte retrieval. The primary outcome was live birth rate from the initial consultation to the first conception attempt for all female patients and for a subset analysis of patients aged <35 years. RESULTS The inclusion of PGT-A (group B) for embryo selection during the initial physician IVF consultation resulted in 23 additional women out of the total 100 achieving a healthy live birth following the first conception attempt in this maternally age-matched infertile population (group B = 72.0% versus group A = 49.0%; P = 0.0014). This same benefit was observed for age-matched, younger infertility patients (<35 years), with live birth rates from the initial consultation being significantly higher when the upfront clinical decision included PGT-A for embryo selection (group B = 76.7% versus group A = 53.4%; P = 0.0052). Interestingly, 17 women from group B would have received an aneuploid embryo transfer if selection had been determined by blastocyst morphology alone, as their best-grade embryo was aneuploid. CONCLUSIONS This prospective analysis from the initial physician IVF consultation revealed that euploid embryo selection significantly improved live birth potential with the first conception attempt, even for younger women with infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Laura Reed
- CCRM Fertility, Lone Tree, Colorado, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chow JFC, Lam KKW, Cheng HHY, Lai SF, Yeung WSB, Ng EHY. Optimizing non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing: investigating culture conditions, sample collection, and IVF treatment for improved non-invasive PGT-A results. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:465-472. [PMID: 38183536 PMCID: PMC10894776 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-03015-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to optimize the non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) in the laboratory by comparing two collection timing of the spent culture medium (SCM), two embryo rinsing protocols, and the use of conventional insemination instead of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). METHODS Results of two embryo rinsing methods (one-step vs sequential) and SCM collected on day 5 vs day 6 after retrieval were compared against trophectoderm (TE) biopsies as reference. Results from day 6 SCM in cycles fertilized by conventional insemination were compared with PGT-A using ICSI. RESULTS The rate of concordance was higher in day 6 samples than in day 5 samples when the sequential method was used, in terms of total concordance (TC; day 6 vs day 5: 85.0% vs 60.0%, p = 0.0228), total concordance with same sex (TCS, 82.5% vs 28,0%, p < 0.0001), and full concordance with same sex (FCS, 62.5% vs 24.0%, p = 0.0025). The sequential method significantly out-performed the one-step method when SCM were collected on day 6 (sequential vs one-step, TC: 85.0% vs 64.5%, p = 0.0449; TCS: 82.5% vs 54.8%, p = 0.0113; FCS: 62.5% vs 25.8%, p = 0.0021). There was no significant difference in niPGT-A results between cycles fertilized by the conventional insemination and ICSI. CONCLUSION We have shown a higher concordance rate when SCM was collected on day 6 and the embryos were rinsed in a sequential manner. Comparable results of niPGT-A when oocytes were fertilized by conventional insemination or ICSI. These optimization steps are important prior to commencement of a randomized trial in niPGT-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy F C Chow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kevin K W Lam
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Heidi H Y Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shui Fan Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - William S B Yeung
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Ernest H Y Ng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mao D, Xu J, Sun L. Impact of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:199-212.e5. [PMID: 37595823 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing is associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. DATA SOURCES Entries between January 1990 and August 2022 were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Publications comparing the outcomes of pregnancies after preimplantation genetic testing using trophectoderm biopsy and in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were included. Only human studies with a cohort or case-control design or randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. METHODS The study selection process was performed independently by 2 investigators. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 was used to grade the level of bias in randomized controlled trials. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model when substantial heterogeneity occurred (indicated by I2 of >50% and P<.1). Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. RESULTS This meta-analysis included 13 studies involving 11,469 live births after preimplantation genetic testing treatment with trophectoderm biopsy before embryo transfer and 20,438 live births after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection only. The odds ratio of preterm delivery was higher in the trophectoderm-biopsied group than in the routine in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection group (pooled odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21); however, the difference did not exist after sensitivity analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.11). The risk of low birthweight did not increase among the biopsied pregnancies (pooled odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.20). No marked difference was observed in the risk of other obstetrical or neonatal outcomes between the biopsy and control groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted in the perinatal outcomes between trophectoderm-biopsied and nonbiopsied groups in the subgroup analyses by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, frozen-thawed transfer, or single embryo transfer. CONCLUSION Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing treatment did not alter the risk of obstetrical or neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. However, this study was limited by the large observational evidence base, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Mao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Xu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Sun
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu Y, Lan X, Lu J, Zhang Q, Zhou T, Ni T, Yan J. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Could Not Improve Cumulative Live Birth Rate Among 705 Couples with Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure. Appl Clin Genet 2024; 17:1-13. [PMID: 38322806 PMCID: PMC10840415 DOI: 10.2147/tacg.s441784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective We evaluate whether next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the cumulative pregnancy outcomes of patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) as compared to conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Patients and Methods This was a retrospective cohort study (2015-2022). A total of 705 couples diagnosed with uRIF were included in the study. 229 women transferred blastocysts based on morphological grading (IVF/ICSI) and 476 couples opted for PGT-A to screen blastocysts by NGS. Women were further stratified according to age at retrieval (<38 years and ≥38 years). The primary outcome was the cumulative live-birth rate after all the embryos were transferred in a single oocyte retrieval or until achieving a live birth. Confounders were adjusted using binary logistic regression models. Results Cumulative live-birth rate was similar between the IVF/ICSI group and the PGT-A group after stratified by age: IVF/ICSI vs PGT-A in the <38 years subgroup (49.7% vs 57.7%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (0.84-1.84), P = 0.270) and in the ≥38 years subgroup (14.0% vs 19.5%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.09 (0.41-2.92), P = 0.866), respectively. Nonetheless, the PGT group had a lower first-time biochemical pregnancy loss rate (17.0% vs 8.7%, P = 0.034) and a higher cumulative good birth outcome rate (35.2% vs 46.4%, P = 0.014) than the IVF/ICSI group in the <38 years subgroup. Other pregnancy outcomes after the initial embryo transfer and multiple transfers following a single oocyte retrieval were all similar between groups. Conclusion Our results showed no evidence of favorable effects of PGT-A treatment on improving the cumulative live birth rate in uRIF couples regardless of maternal age. Use of PGT-A in the <38 years uRIF patients would help to decrease the first-time biochemical pregnancy loss and increase the cumulative good birth outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiangxin Lan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Juanjuan Lu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tingting Zhou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Tianxiang Ni
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Popovic M, Borot L, Lorenzon AR, Lopes ALRDC, Sakkas D, Lledó B, Morales R, Ortiz JA, Polyzos NP, Parriego M, Azpiroz F, Galain M, Pujol A, Menten B, Dhaenens L, Vanden Meerschaut F, Stoop D, Rodriguez M, de la Blanca EP, Rodríguez A, Vassena R. Implicit bias in diagnosing mosaicism amongst preimplantation genetic testing providers: results from a multicenter study of 36 395 blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:258-274. [PMID: 37873575 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does the diagnosis of mosaicism affect ploidy rates across different providers offering preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A)? SUMMARY ANSWER Our analysis of 36 395 blastocyst biopsies across eight genetic testing laboratories revealed that euploidy rates were significantly higher in providers reporting low rates of mosaicism. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Diagnoses consistent with chromosomal mosaicism have emerged as a third category of possible embryo ploidy outcomes following PGT-A. However, in the era of mosaicism, embryo selection has become increasingly complex. Biological, technical, analytical, and clinical complexities in interpreting such results have led to substantial variability in mosaicism rates across PGT-A providers and clinics. Critically, it remains unknown whether these differences impact the number of euploid embryos available for transfer. Ultimately, this may significantly affect clinical outcomes, with important implications for PGT-A patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In this international, multicenter cohort study, we reviewed 36 395 consecutive PGT-A results, obtained from 10 035 patients across 11 867 treatment cycles, conducted between October 2015 and October 2021. A total of 17 IVF centers, across eight PGT-A providers, five countries and three continents participated in the study. All blastocysts were tested using trophectoderm biopsy and next-generation sequencing. Both autologous and donation cycles were assessed. Cycles using preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements were excluded from the analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The PGT-A providers were randomly categorized (A to H). Providers B, C, D, E, F, G, and H all reported mosaicism, whereas Provider A reported embryos as either euploid or aneuploid. Ploidy rates were analyzed using multilevel mixed linear regression. Analyses were adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, oocyte source, number of embryos biopsied, day of biopsy, and PGT-A provider, as appropriate. We compared associations between genetic testing providers and PGT-A outcomes, including the number of chromosomally normal (euploid) embryos determined to be suitable for transfer. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The mean maternal age (±SD) across all providers was 36.2 (±5.2). Our findings reveal a strong association between PGT-A provider and the diagnosis of euploidy and mosaicism. Amongst the seven providers that reported mosaicism, the rates varied from 3.1% to 25.0%. After adjusting for confounders, we observed a significant difference in the likelihood of diagnosing mosaicism across providers (P < 0.001), ranging from 6.5% (95% CI: 5.2-7.4%) for Provider B to 35.6% (95% CI: 32.6-38.7%) for Provider E. Notably, adjusted euploidy rates were highest for providers that reported the lowest rates of mosaicism (Provider B: euploidy, 55.7% (95% CI: 54.1-57.4%), mosaicism, 6.5% (95% CI: 5.2-7.4%); Provider H: euploidy, 44.5% (95% CI: 43.6-45.4%), mosaicism, 9.9% (95% CI: 9.2-10.6%)); and Provider D: euploidy, 43.8% (95% CI: 39.2-48.4%), mosaicism, 11.0% (95% CI: 7.5-14.5%)). Moreover, the overall chance of having at least one euploid blastocyst available for transfer was significantly higher when mosaicism was not reported, when we compared Provider A to all other providers (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.13-1.50). Differences in diagnosing and interpreting mosaic results across PGT-A laboratories raise further concerns regarding the accuracy and relevance of mosaicism predictions. While we confirmed equivalent clinical outcomes following the transfer of mosaic and euploid blastocysts, we found that a significant proportion of mosaic embryos are not used for IVF treatment. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Due to the retrospective nature of the study, associations can be ascertained, however, causality cannot be established. Certain parameters such as blastocyst grade were not available in the dataset. Furthermore, certain platform-related and clinic-specific factors may not be readily quantifiable or explicitly captured in our dataset. As such, a full elucidation of all potential confounders accounting for variability may not be possible. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our findings highlight the strong need for standardization and quality assurance in the industry. The decision not to transfer mosaic embryos may ultimately reduce the chance of success of a PGT-A cycle by limiting the pool of available embryos. Until we can be certain that mosaic diagnoses accurately reflect biological variability, reporting mosaicism warrants utmost caution. A prudent approach is imperative, as it may determine the difference between success or failure for some patients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by the Torres Quevedo Grant, awarded to M.P. (PTQ2019-010494) by the Spanish State Research Agency, Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain. M.P., L.B., A.R.L., A.L.R.d.C.L., N.P.P., M.P., D.S., F.A., A.P., B.M., L.D., F.V.M., D.S., M.R., E.P.d.l.B., A.R., and R.V. have no competing interests to declare. B.L., R.M., and J.A.O. are full time employees of IB Biotech, the genetics company of the Instituto Bernabeu group, which performs preimplantation genetic testing. M.G. is a full time employee of Novagen, the genetics company of Cegyr, which performs preimplantation genetic testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Popovic
- Research and Development, Eugin Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorena Borot
- Research and Development, Eugin Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nikolaos P Polyzos
- Clínica Dexeus Mujer, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mónica Parriego
- Clínica Dexeus Mujer, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Felicitas Azpiroz
- Research and Development, Eugin Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Cegyr-Medicina y Genética Reproductiva-Eugin Group, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Micaela Galain
- Cegyr-Medicina y Genética Reproductiva-Eugin Group, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Aïda Pujol
- Center for Infertility and Human Reproduction, CIRH-Eugin Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Björn Menten
- Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lien Dhaenens
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Dominic Stoop
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Rita Vassena
- Research and Development, Eugin Group, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rhon-Calderon EA, Hemphill CN, Vrooman LA, Rosier CL, Lan Y, Ord T, Coutifaris C, Mainigi M, Schultz RM, Bartolomei MS. Trophectoderm biopsy of blastocysts following IVF and embryo culture increases epigenetic dysregulation in a mouse model. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:154-176. [PMID: 37994669 PMCID: PMC11032714 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does trophectoderm biopsy (TEBx) of blastocysts for preimplantation genetic testing in the clinic affect normal placental and embryo development and offspring metabolic outcomes in a mouse model? SUMMARY ANSWER TEBx impacts placental and embryonic health during early development, with some alterations resolving and others worsening later in development and triggering metabolic changes in adult offspring. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Previous studies have not assessed the epigenetic and morphological impacts of TEBx either in human populations or in animal models. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We employed a mouse model to identify the effects of TEBx during IVF. Three groups were assessed: naturally conceived (Naturals), IVF, and IVF + TEBx, at two developmental timepoints: embryonic day (E)12.5 (n = 40/Naturals, n = 36/IVF, and n = 36/IVF + TEBx) and E18.5 (n = 42/Naturals, n = 30/IVF, and n = 35/IVF + TEBx). Additionally, to mimic clinical practice, we assessed a fourth group: IVF + TEBx + Vitrification (Vit) at E12.5 (n = 29) that combines TEBx and vitrification. To assess the effect of TEBx in offspring health, we characterized a 12-week-old cohort (n = 24/Naturals, n = 25/IVF and n = 25/IVF + TEBx). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Our mouse model used CF-1 females as egg donors and SJL/B6 males as sperm donors. IVF, TEBx, and vitrification were performed using standardized methods. Placenta morphology was evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin staining, in situ hybridization using Tpbpa as a junctional zone marker and immunohistochemistry using CD34 fetal endothelial cell markers. For molecular analysis of placentas and embryos, DNA methylation was analyzed using pyrosequencing, luminometric methylation assay, and chip array technology. Expression patterns were ascertained by RNA sequencing. Triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-, low-, and very low-density lipoprotein, insulin, and glucose were determined in the 12-week-old cohort using commercially available kits. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We observed that at E12.5, IVF + TEBx had a worse outcome in terms of changes in DNA methylation and differential gene expression in placentas and whole embryos compared with IVF alone and compared with Naturals. These changes were reflected in alterations in placental morphology and blood vessel density. At E18.5, early molecular changes in fetuses were maintained or exacerbated. With respect to placentas, the molecular and morphological changes, although different compared to Naturals, were equivalent to the IVF group, except for changes in blood vessel density, which persisted. Of note is that most differences were sex specific. We conclude that TEBx has more detrimental effects in mid-gestation placental and embryonic tissues, with alterations in embryonic tissues persisting or worsening in later developmental stages compared to IVF alone, and the addition of vitrification after TEBx results in more pronounced and potentially detrimental epigenetic effects: these changes are significantly different compared to Naturals. Finally, we observed that 12-week IVF + TEBx offspring, regardless of sex, showed higher glucose, insulin, triglycerides, lower total cholesterol, and lower high-density lipoprotein compared to IVF and Naturals, with only males having higher body weight compared to IVF and Naturals. Our findings in a mouse model additionally support the need for more studies to assess the impact of new procedures in ART to ensure healthy pregnancies and offspring outcomes. LARGE SCALE DATA Data reported in this work have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE225318. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study was performed using a mouse model that mimics many clinical IVF procedures and outcomes observed in humans, where studies on early embryos are not possible. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study highlights the importance of assaying new procedures used in ART to assess their impact on placenta and embryo development, and offspring metabolic outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was funded by a National Centers for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility grant P50 HD068157-06A1 (M.S.B., C.C., M.M.), Ruth L. Kirschstein National Service Award Individual Postdoctoral Fellowship F32 HD107914 (E.A.R.-C.) and F32 HD089623 (L.A.V.), and National Institutes of Health Training program in Cell and Molecular Biology T32 GM007229 (C.N.H.). No conflict of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Rhon-Calderon
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cassidy N Hemphill
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lisa A Vrooman
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Casey L Rosier
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yemin Lan
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Teri Ord
- Center for Research on Reproduction and Women’s Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christos Coutifaris
- Center for Research on Reproduction and Women’s Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Monica Mainigi
- Center for Research on Reproduction and Women’s Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Richard M Schultz
- Department of Biology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Marisa S Bartolomei
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Research on Reproduction and Women’s Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bamford T, Smith R, Young S, Evans A, Lockwood M, Easter C, Montgomery S, Barrie A, Dhillon-Smith R, Coomarasamy A, Campbell A. A comparison of morphokinetic models and morphological selection for prioritizing euploid embryos: a multicentre cohort study. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:53-61. [PMID: 37963011 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are morphokinetic models better at prioritizing a euploid embryo for transfer over morphological selection by an embryologist? SUMMARY ANSWER Morphokinetic algorithms lead to an improved prioritization of euploid embryos when compared to embryologist selection. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PREFER (predicting euploidy for embryos in reproductive medicine) is a previously published morphokinetic model associated with live birth and miscarriage. The second model uses live birth as the target outcome (LB model). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Data for this cohort study were obtained from 1958 biopsied blastocysts at nine IVF clinics across the UK from January 2021 to December 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The ability of the PREFER and LB models to prioritize a euploid embryo was compared against arbitrary selection and the prediction of four embryologists using the timelapse video, blinded to the morphokinetic time stamp. The comparisons were made using calculated percentages and normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG), whereby an NDCG score of 1 would equate to all euploid embryos being ranked first. In arbitrary selection, the ploidy status was randomly assigned within each cycle and the NDGC calculated, and this was then repeated 100 times and the mean obtained. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Arbitrary embryo selection would rank a euploid embryo first 37% of the time, embryologist selection 39%, and the LB and PREFER ploidy morphokinetic models 46% and 47% of the time, respectively. The AUC for LB and PREFER model was 0.62 and 0.63, respectively. Morphological selection did not significantly improve the performance of both morphokinetic models when used in combination. There was a significant difference between the NDGC metric of the PREFER model versus embryologist selection at 0.96 and 0.87, respectively (t = 14.1, P < 0.001). Similarly, there was a significant difference between the LB model and embryologist selection with an NDGC metric of 0.95 and 0.87, respectively (t = 12.0, P < 0.001). All four embryologists ranked embryos similarly, with an intraclass coefficient of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.95, P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Aside from the retrospective study design, limitations include allowing the embryologist to watch the time lapse video, potentially providing more information than a truly static morphological assessment. Furthermore, the embryologists at the participating centres were familiar with the significant variables in time lapse, which could bias the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The present study shows that the use of morphokinetic models, namely PREFER and LB, translates into improved euploid embryo selection. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study received no specific grant funding from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Dr Alison Campbell is minor share holder of Care Fertility. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Time lapse is a technology for which patients are charged extra at participating centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bamford
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Rachel Smith
- Care Fertility, John Webster House, Nottingham, UK
| | - Selina Young
- Care Fertility, John Webster House, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amy Evans
- Care Fertility, John Webster House, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | - Amy Barrie
- Care Fertility, John Webster House, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rima Dhillon-Smith
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li S, Li H, Gao Y, Zou Y, Yin X, Chen ZJ, Choy KW, Dong Z, Yan J. Identification of cryptic balanced translocations in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss based upon embryonic PGT-A results. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:171-184. [PMID: 38102500 PMCID: PMC10789697 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02999-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study is to determine whether any balanced translocation (BT) had been missed by previous karyotyping in patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (uRPL). METHODS This case series included 48 uRPL-affected couples with normal karyotypes. The embryos from these couples have all undergone preimplantation testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Based on the PGT-A's results, 48 couples could be categorized into two groups: 17 couples whose multiple embryos were detected with similar structural variations (SVs, segmental/complete) and 31 couples without such findings but who did not develop any euploid embryo despite at least three high-quality blastocysts being tested. The peripheral blood sample of each partner was then collected for mate-pair sequencing (MPseq) to determine whether any of them were BT carriers. RESULTS MPseq analyses identified 13 BTs in the 17 couples whose multiple embryos had similar SVs detected (13/17, 76.47%) and three BTs in the 31 couples without euploid embryo obtained (3/31, 9.7%). Among the 16 MPseq-identified BTs, six were missed due to the limited resolution of G-banding karyotyping analysis, and the rest were mostly owing to the similar banding patterns and/or comparable sizes shared by the two segments exchanged. CONCLUSION A normal karyotype does not eliminate the possibility of carrying BT for couples with uRPL. The use of PGT-A allows us to perceive the "carrier couples" missed by karyotyping analysis, providing an increased risk of finding cryptic BTs if similar SVs are always detected on two chromosomes among multiple embryos. Nonetheless, certain carriers with translocated segments of sub-resolution may still go unnoticed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hongchang Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yang Zou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xunqiang Yin
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kwong Wai Choy
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
- Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong-Baylor College of Medicine Joint Center For Medical Genetics, Hong Kong, China.
- Hong Kong Branches of Chinese National Engineering Research Centers-Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Zirui Dong
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
- Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wirleitner B, Hrubá M, Schuff M, Hradecký L, Stecher A, Damko A, Stadler J, Spitzer D, Obkircher M, Murtinger M. Embryo drop-out rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a retrospective data analysis from the DoLoRes study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:193-203. [PMID: 37878220 PMCID: PMC10789689 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02976-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the decline in transferable embryos in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles due to (a) non-biopsable blastocyst quality, (b) failure of genetic analysis, (c) diagnosis of uniform numerical or structural chromosomal aberrations, and/or (d) chromosomal aberrations in mosaic constitution. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study comprised outcomes of 1562 blastocysts originating from 363 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, respectively, 226 IVF couples in the period between January 2016 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were PGT-A cycles with trophectoderm biopsy (TB) and next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS Out of 1562 blastocysts, 25.8% were lost due to non-biopsable and/or non-freezable embryo quality. In 10.3% of all biopsied blastocysts, genetic analysis failed. After exclusion of embryos with uniform or chromosomal aberrations in mosaic, only 18.1% of those originally yielded remained as diagnosed euploid embryos suitable for transfer. This translates into 50.4% of patients and 57.6% of stimulated cycles with no euploid embryo left for transfer. The risk that no transfer can take place rose significantly with a lower number of oocytes and with increasing maternal age. The chance for at least one euploid blastocyst/cycle in advanced maternal age (AMA)-patients was 33.3% compared to 52.1% in recurrent miscarriage (RM), 59.8% in recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and 60.0% in severe male factor (SMF). CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates that PGT-A is accompanied by high embryo drop-out rates. IVF-practitioners should be aware that their patients run a high risk of ending up without any embryo suitable for transfer after (several) stimulation cycles, especially in AMA patients. Patients should be informed in detail about the frequency of inconclusive or mosaic results, with the associated risk of not having an euploid embryo available for transfer after PGT-A, as well as the high cost involved in this type of testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martina Hrubá
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Next Lab Genetika, Parková 11a, 32600, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Maximilian Schuff
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Libor Hradecký
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Smetany 2, 30100, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Astrid Stecher
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Adriane Damko
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Jürgen Stadler
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Innsbrucker Bundesstrasse 35, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Dietmar Spitzer
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Innsbrucker Bundesstrasse 35, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Maximilian Murtinger
- Next Fertility IVF Prof. Zech, Roemerstrasse 2, 6900, Bregenz, Austria
- Next Fertility St. Gallen, Kürsteinerstrasse 2, 9015, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Morales C. Current Applications and Controversies in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) in In Vitro Fertilization. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:66-80. [PMID: 37515717 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01301-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has evolved over recent years, including improvements in embryo culture, biopsy, transfer, and genetic testing. The application of new comprehensive chromosome screening analysis has improved the accuracy in determining the chromosomal status of the analyzed sample, but it has brought new challenges such as the management of partial aneuploidies and mosaicisms. For the past two decades, PGT-A has been involved in a controversy regarding its efficiency in improving IVF outcomes, despite its widespread worldwide implementation. Understanding the impact of embryo aneuploidy in IVF (in vitro fertilization) should theoretically allow improving reproductive outcomes. This review of the literature aims to describe the impact of aneuploidy in human reproduction and how PGT-A was introduced to overcome this obstacle in IVF (in vitro fertilization). The article will try to analyze and summarize the evolution of the PGT-A in the recent years, and its current applications and limitations, as well as the controversy it generates. Conflicting published data could indicate the lacking value of a single biopsied sample to determine embryo chromosomal status and/or the lack of standardized methods for embryo culture and management and genetic analysis among other factors. It has to be considered that PGT-A may not be a universal test to improve the reproductive potential in IVF patients, rather each clinic should evaluate the efficacy of PGT-A in their IVF program based on their population, skills, and limitations.
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhan J, Chen C, Zhang N, Zhong S, Wang J, Hu J, Liu J. An artificial intelligence model for embryo selection in preimplantation DNA methylation screening in assisted reproductive technology. BIOPHYSICS REPORTS 2023; 9:352-361. [PMID: 38524697 PMCID: PMC10960573 DOI: 10.52601/bpr.2023.230035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Embryo quality is a critical determinant of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). A recent clinical trial investigating preimplantation DNA methylation screening (PIMS) revealed that whole genome DNA methylation level is a novel biomarker for assessing ART embryo quality. Here, we reinforced and estimated the clinical efficacy of PIMS. We introduce PIMS-AI, an innovative artificial intelligence (AI) based model, to predict the probability of an embryo producing live birth and subsequently assist ART embryo selection. Our model demonstrated robust performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.90 in cross-validation and 0.80 in independent testing. In simulated embryo selection, PIMS-AI attained an accuracy of 81% in identifying viable embryos for patients. Notably, PIMS-AI offers significant advantages over conventional preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), including enhanced embryo discriminability and the potential to benefit a broader patient population. In conclusion, our approach holds substantial promise for clinical application and has the potential to significantly improve the ART success rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhong Zhan
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Chuangqi Chen
- Guangdong Women's and Children's Hospital, Guangzhou 511400, China
| | - Na Zhang
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China
| | | | - Jiaming Wang
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
- University of the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 101408, China
- School of Future Technology, University of the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Jinzhou Hu
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
- University of the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 101408, China
| | - Jiang Liu
- Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100101, China
- University of the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 101408, China
- School of Future Technology, University of the Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Polyakov A, Rozen G, Gyngell C, Savulescu J. Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 5:1287621. [PMID: 38162011 PMCID: PMC10757847 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1287621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of novel technologies in the selection of embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has the potential to improve the chances of pregnancy and birth of a healthy child. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and unintended consequences that may arise from the premature implementation of these technologies. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the use of novel embryo selection technologies in IVF, including the growing uptake of genetic testing and others, and argues that prioritising embryos for transfer using these technologies is acceptable, but discarding embryos based on unproven advances is not. Several historical examples are provided, which demonstrate possible harms, where the overall chance of pregnancy may have been reduced, and some patients may have missed out on biological parenthood altogether. We emphasise the need for caution and a balanced approach to ensure that the benefits of these technologies outweigh any potential harm. We also highlight the primacy of patients' autonomy in reproductive decision-making, especially when information gained by utilising novel technologies is imprecise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Polyakov
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Reproductive Biology Unit, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne IVF, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Genia Rozen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Reproductive Biology Unit, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne IVF, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chris Gyngell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sabbagh R, Mulligan S, Shah J, Korkidakis A, Penzias A, Vaughan D, Patrizio P, Sakkas D. From oocytes to a live birth: Are we improving the biological efficiency? Fertil Steril 2023; 120:1210-1219. [PMID: 37678730 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) The objectives of our study were to investigate the live birth rate (LBR) per oocyte retrieved during in vitro fertilization, in patients who had used all their embryos and to extrapolate the LBR in patients with remaining frozen embryos by calculating the expected LBR from these embryos. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. SETTING A single academically affiliated fertility clinic. PATIENT(S) Autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from January 2014 to December 2020. Data on the number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos obtained and transferred (at cleavage or blastocyst-stage), use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and number of live births were obtained. The expected LBR was estimated in patients with remaining frozen embryos according to nationally reported Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology LBR data. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Live birth rate per oocyte retrieved. RESULT(S) A total of 12,717 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent a total of 20,677 oocyte retrievals which yielded a total of 248,004 oocytes and 57,268 embryos (fresh and frozen). In patients who had fully utilized all their embryos the LBR per oocyte was 2.82% (ranging from 11.3% aged <35 years to 1.2% aged >42 years). Stratification of the population based on PGT-A utilization yielded similar results (with PGT-A: 2.88% and without PGT-A: 2.79%). When stratified by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology age groups, the addition of PGT-A in patients aged 35-37 and 38-40 years yielded higher LBR per oocyte compared with patients who did not add PGT-A (P<.05). In patients with remaining frozen embryos who had added PGT-A, the projected LBR per oocyte was 8.34%. Use of PGT-A in patients aged <35 and 35-37 years decreased LBR per oocyte (P<.001 and P=.03, respectively) but improved LBR per oocyte in patients aged 38-40 and 41-42 years (P=.006 and P=.005, respectively). Poisson regression analysis demonstrated an age threshold of 38.5, below which PGT-A lowers LBR per oocyte compared with no PGT-A. CONCLUSION(S) Despite clinical and scientific advances in Assisted Reproductive Technology, with the current protocols of ovarian stimulation, the LBR per oocyte remains low reflecting a biological barrier that has yet to be overcome. Overall, the addition of PGT-A did not demonstrate improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riwa Sabbagh
- Boston IVF-Eugin Group, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | - Jaimin Shah
- Boston IVF-Eugin Group, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ann Korkidakis
- Boston IVF-Eugin Group, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan Penzias
- Boston IVF-Eugin Group, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Denis Vaughan
- Boston IVF-Eugin Group, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pasquale Patrizio
- UHealth Center for Reproductive Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hu Z, Li Y, Chen K, Li M, Tian M, Xiang L, Wu X, Zeng P, Li M, Shao J, Li L, Lin N, Tang L, Deng L, Gao M, Li Y, Zhong L, Wang M, Yan J, Wu Z. The Comparison of Two Whole-Genome Amplification Approaches for Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (ni-PGT) and the Application Scenario of ni-PGT during the Fresh Cycle. J Mol Diagn 2023; 25:945-956. [PMID: 37806432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing (ni-PGT) using degenerate oligonucleotide primer PCR (DOP-PCR) and multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle (MALBAC)-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) methods has demonstrated predictable results in embryo testing. However, a considerable heterogeneity of results has been reported in numerous studies on these two WGA methods. Our aim was to evaluate the current WGA method for ni-PGT while further clarifying the applicable scenarios of ni-PGT in the fresh cycle. A total of 173 embryos were tested with trophectoderm biopsy and ni-PGT. In the whole preimplantation genetic testing, the clinical concordance rates of the detection results of DOP-PCR and MALBAC with the corresponding trophectoderm biopsy results were 64.12% (84/131) and 68.99% (89/129), respectively (P = 0.405). However, in the detection of abnormal embryos, the detection efficiency of ni-PGT is significantly improved [MALBAC: 96.55% versus 68.99% (P < 0.001); and DOP-PCR: 89.09% versus 64.12% (P < 0.001)]. In addition, the diagnostic efficiency of ni-PGT in low-quality blastocysts was significantly higher than that in high-quality blastocysts [MALBAC: 95.24% versus 51.85% (P = 0.001); and DOP-PCR: 91.30% versus 48.15% (P = 0.001)]. These results contribute to further understanding ni-PGT and to clarifying its application scenario in the fresh cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixin Hu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Yonggang Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Kexin Chen
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mingying Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mei Tian
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lifeng Xiang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Xiaorong Wu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Peng Zeng
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Minyao Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Jingyi Shao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Na Lin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lu Tang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Lian Deng
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mengying Gao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Yunxiu Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Li Zhong
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Mei Wang
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China
| | - Jiacong Yan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China.
| | - Ze Wu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China; The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China; National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Preconception Health Birth in Western China, Kunming, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kutteh WH, Papas RS, Maisenbacher MK, Dahdouh EM. Role of genetic analysis of products of conception and PGT in managing early pregnancy loss. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 49:103738. [PMID: 38701633 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
This article considers the addition of comprehensive 24-chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of products of conception (POC) to a standard evaluation for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) to help direct treatment towards expectant management versus IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). The review included retrospective data from 65,333 miscarriages, a prospective evaluation of 378 couples with RPL who had CMA testing of POC and the standard workup, and data from an additional 1020 couples who were evaluated for RPL but did not undergo CMA testing of POC. Aneuploidy in POC explained the pregnancy loss in 57.7% (218/378) of cases. In contrast, the full RPL evaluation recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine identified a potential cause in only 42.9% (600/1398). Combining the data from the RPL evaluation and the results of genetic testing of POC provides a probable explanation for the loss in over 90% (347/378) of women. Couples with an unexplained loss after the standard evaluation with POC aneuploidy accounted for 41% of cases; PGT-A may be considered after expectant management. Conversely, PGT-A would have a limited role in those with a euploid loss and a possible explanation after the standard workup. Categorizing a pregnancy loss as an explained versus unexplained loss after the standard evaluation combined with the results of CMA testing of POC may help identify patients who would benefit from expectant management versus PGT-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Kutteh
- Natera, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, USA..
| | - Ralph S Papas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Elias M Dahdouh
- ART Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Martirosyan YO, Silachev DN, Nazarenko TA, Birukova AM, Vishnyakova PA, Sukhikh GT. Stem-Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Unlocking New Possibilities for Treating Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:2247. [PMID: 38137848 PMCID: PMC10744991 DOI: 10.3390/life13122247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite advancements in assisted reproductive technology (ART), achieving successful pregnancy rates remains challenging. Diminished ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency hinder IVF success-about 20% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients face a poor prognosis due to a low response, leading to higher cancellations and reduced birth rates. In an attempt to address the issue of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), we conducted systematic PubMed and Web of Science research, using keywords "stem cells", "extracellular vesicles", "premature ovarian insufficiency", "diminished ovarian reserve" and "exosomes". Amid the complex ovarian dynamics and challenges like POI, stem cell therapy and particularly the use of extracellular vesicles (EVs), a great potential is shown. EVs trigger paracrine mechanisms via microRNAs and bioactive molecules, suppressing apoptosis, stimulating angiogenesis and activating latent regenerative potential. Key microRNAs influence estrogen secretion, proliferation and apoptosis resistance. Extracellular vesicles present a lot of possibilities for treating infertility, and understanding their molecular mechanisms is crucial for maximizing EVs' therapeutic potential in addressing ovarian disorders and promoting reproductive health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yana O. Martirosyan
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (T.A.N.); (A.M.B.); (P.A.V.); (G.T.S.)
| | - Denis N. Silachev
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (T.A.N.); (A.M.B.); (P.A.V.); (G.T.S.)
- Department of Functional Biochemistry of Biopolymers, A.N. Belozersky Research Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatiana A. Nazarenko
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (T.A.N.); (A.M.B.); (P.A.V.); (G.T.S.)
| | - Almina M. Birukova
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (T.A.N.); (A.M.B.); (P.A.V.); (G.T.S.)
| | - Polina A. Vishnyakova
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (T.A.N.); (A.M.B.); (P.A.V.); (G.T.S.)
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Gennadiy T. Sukhikh
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia; (T.A.N.); (A.M.B.); (P.A.V.); (G.T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liu Y, Ni T, Zhao Q, Cui W, Lan X, Zhou T, Zhang Q, Yan J. Maternal hypercholesterolemia would increase the incidence of embryo aneuploidy in couples with recurrent implantation failure. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:534. [PMID: 37990245 PMCID: PMC10662148 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01492-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of dyslipidemia with embryo development and pregnancy outcomes is largely unknown, especially in unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) patients. Here, this study aimed to explore the impact of abnormal blood lipid levels on embryo genetic status and pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) from a clinical perspective. METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed 502 patients diagnosed as uRIF. They were divided into four groups according to the levels of cholesterol and triglyceride: nonhyperlipidemia group (NonH group), simple hypercholesterolemia group (SHC group), simple hypertriglyceridemia group (SHC group) and mixed hyperlipidemia group (MixH group). At the same time, patients were divided into non-low HDL-C group and low HDL-C group according to their HDL-C level. The outcomes of embryos genetic testing and pregnancy outcomes after PGT-A was analyzed between groups. Binary logistic regression and/or generalized estimating equation (GEE) model were conducted to investigate the association of different types of dyslipidemia with embryonic aneuploidy rate and cumulative live-birth rate. RESULTS 474 women who met the inclusion criteria were divided into four groups: NonH group (N = 349), SHC group (N = 55), SHT group (N = 52) and MixH group (N = 18). Compared with the NonH group, SHC group had a significantly increased rate of embryo aneuploidy [48.3% vs. 36.7%, P = 0.006; adjusted OR (95% confidence interval) = 1.52(1.04-2.22), P = 0.029], as well as a reduced number of good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6 [3.00 ± 2.29 vs. 3.74 ± 2.77, P = 0.033]. The SHC group showed a tendency of a lower cumulative live birth rate (47.0% vs. 40.0%), a lower incidence of good birth outcome (37.2% vs. 34.5%) and a higher risk of clinical pregnancy loss (11.1% vs. 17.9%), but did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). The incidences of obstetric or neonatal complications and other adverse events were similar in the four groups. Whether patients have low HDL-C did not differ in pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We found that uRIF women with hypercholesterolemia had an increased proportion of aneuploid embryos and a reduced proportion of high-quality embryos, while different types of hyperlipidemia had no correlation with cumulative live birth rate as well as pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Tianxiang Ni
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Qing Zhao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Weiran Cui
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Xiangxin Lan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Tingting Zhou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lundin K, Bentzen JG, Bozdag G, Ebner T, Harper J, Le Clef N, Moffett A, Norcross S, Polyzos NP, Rautakallio-Hokkanen S, Sfontouris I, Sermon K, Vermeulen N, Pinborg A. Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:2062-2104. [PMID: 37747409 PMCID: PMC10628516 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Which add-ons are safe and effective to be used in ART treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER Forty-two recommendations were formulated on the use of add-ons in the diagnosis of fertility problems, the IVF laboratory and clinical management of IVF treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The innovative nature of ART combined with the extremely high motivation of the patients has opened the door to the wide application of what has become known as 'add-ons' in reproductive medicine. These supplementary options are available to patients in addition to standard fertility procedures, typically incurring an additional cost. A diverse array of supplementary options is made available, encompassing tests, drugs, equipment, complementary or alternative therapies, laboratory procedures, and surgical interventions. These options share the common aim of stating to enhance pregnancy or live birth rates, mitigate the risk of miscarriage, or expedite the time to achieving pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION ESHRE aimed to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations focusing on the safety and efficacy of add-ons currently used in fertility procedures in order to improve the quality of care for patients with infertility. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS ESHRE appointed a European multidisciplinary working group consisting of practising clinicians, embryologists, and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of infertility. Patient representatives were included in the working group. To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, recommendations were based on the professional experience and consensus of the working group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 46 independent international reviewers. A total of 272 comments were received and incorporated where relevant. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The multidisciplinary working group formulated 42 recommendations in three sections; diagnosis and diagnostic tests, laboratory tests and interventions, and clinical management. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Of the 42 recommendations, none could be based on high-quality evidence and only four could be based on moderate-quality evidence, implicating that 95% of the recommendations are supported only by low-quality randomized controlled trials, observational data, professional experience, or consensus of the development group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These guidelines offer valuable direction for healthcare professionals who are responsible for the care of patients undergoing ART treatment for infertility. Their purpose is to promote safe and effective ART treatment, enabling patients to make informed decisions based on realistic expectations. The guidelines aim to ensure that patients are fully informed about the various treatment options available to them and the likelihood of any additional treatment or test to improve the chance of achieving a live birth. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESHRE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. K.L. reports speakers fees from Merck and was part of a research study by Vitrolife (unpaid). T.E. reports consulting fees from Gynemed, speakers fees from Gynemed and is part of the scientific advisory board of Hamilton Thorne. N.P.P. reports grants from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare, speakers fees from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare. S.R.H. declares being managing director of Fertility Europe, a not-for-profit organization receiving financial support from ESHRE. I.S. is a scientific advisor for and has stock options from Alife Health, is co-founder of IVFvision LTD (unpaid) and received speakers' fee from the 2023 ART Young Leader Prestige workshop in China. A.P. reports grants from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck A/S, consulting fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon Richter, Cryos and Merck A/S, speakers fees from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, Theramex and Organon, travel fees from Gedeon Richter. The other authors disclosed no conflicts of interest. DISCLAIMER This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or bedeemedinclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results.Theydo not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - K Lundin
- Department Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - J G Bentzen
- The Fertility Department, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - G Bozdag
- Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - T Ebner
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Gynecological Endocrinology, Kepler University, MedCampus IV, Linz, Austria
| | - J Harper
- Institute for Women’s Health, London, UK
| | - N Le Clef
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Moffett
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - N P Polyzos
- Department Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - K Sermon
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - N Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Pinborg
- The Fertility Department, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhong W, Shen K, Xue X, Wang W, Wang W, Zuo H, Guo Y, Yao S, Sun M, Song C, Wang Q, Ruan Z, Yao X, Shang W. Single-cell multi-omics sequencing reveals chromosome copy number inconsistency between trophectoderm and inner cell mass in human reconstituted embryos after spindle transfer. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:2137-2153. [PMID: 37766497 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is the chromosome copy number of the trophectoderm (TE) of a human reconstituted embryos after spindle transfer (ST) representative of the inner cell mass (ICM)? SUMMARY ANSWER Single-cell multi-omics sequencing revealed that ST blastocysts have a higher proportion of cell lineages exhibiting intermediate mosaicism than conventional ICSI blastocysts, and that the TE of ST blastocysts does not represent the chromosome copy number of ICM. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) assumes that TE biopsies are representative of the ICM, but the TE and ICM originate from different cell lineages, and concordance between TE and ICM is not well-studied, especially in ST embryos. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We recruited 30 infertile women who received treatment at our clinic and obtained 45 usable blastocysts (22 from conventional ICSI and 23 reconstituted embryos after ST). We performed single-cell multi-omics sequencing on all blastocysts to predict and verify copy number variations (CNVs) in each cell. We determined the chromosome copy number of each embryo by analysing the proportion of abnormal cells in each blastocyst. We used the Bland-Altman concordance and the Kappa test to evaluate the concordance between TE and ICM in the both groups. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study was conducted at a public tertiary hospital in China, where all the embryo operations, including oocytes retrieval, ST, and ICSI, were performed in the embryo laboratory. We utilized single-cell multi-omics sequencing technology at the Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, to analyse the blastocysts. Transcriptome sequencing was used to predict the CNV of each cell through bioinformatics analysis, and the results were validated using the DNA methylation library of each cell to confirm chromosomal normalcy. We conducted statistical analysis and graphical plotting using R 4.2.1, SPSS 27, and GraphPad Prism 9.3. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Mean age of the volunteers, the blastocyst morphology, and the developmental ratewere similar in ST and ICSI groups. The blastocysts in the ST group had some additional chromosomal types that were prone to variations beyond those enriched in the blastocysts of the ICSI group. Finally, both Bland-Altman concordance test and kappa concordancetest showed good chromosomal concordance between TE and ICM in the ICSI blastocysts (kappa = 0.659, P < 0.05), but not in ST blastocysts (P = 1.000), suggesting that the TE in reconstituted embryos is not representative of ICM. Gene functional annotation (GO and KEGG analyses) suggests that there may be new or additional pathways for CNV generation in ST embryos compared to ICSI embryos. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study was mainly limited by the small sample size and the limitations of single-cell multi-omics sequencing technology. To select eligible single cells, some cells of the embryos were eliminated or not labelled, resulting in a loss of information about them. The findings of this study are innovative and exploratory. A larger sample size of human embryos (especially ST embryos) and more accurate molecular genetics techniques for detecting CNV in single cells are needed to validate our results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study justifies the routine clinical use of PGT-A in ICSI blastocysts, as we found that the TE is a good substitute for ICM in predicting chromosomal abnormalities. While PGT-A is not entirely accurate, our data demonstrate good clinical feasibility. This trial was able to provide correct genetic counselling to patients regarding the reliability of PGT-A. Regarding ST blastocysts, the increased mosaicism rate and the inability of the TE to represent the chromosomal copy number of the ICM are both biological characteristics that differentiate them from ICSI blastocysts. Currently, ST is not used clinically on a large scale to produce blastocysts. However, if ST becomes more widely used in the future, our study will be the first to demonstrate that the use of PGT-A in ST blastocysts may not be as accurate as PGT-A for ICSI blastocysts. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0107601) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1003003). The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhong
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Kexin Shen
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui Xue
- Peking University-Tsinghua University-National Institute of Biological Sciences Joint Graduate Program, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weizhou Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Haiyang Zuo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Yiming Guo
- Department of Biological Science, Dietrich School Of Art and Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shun Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
- Navy Clinical Medical School, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Mingyue Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Chunlan Song
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qihang Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuolin Ruan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xinyi Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Shang
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ma S, Liao J, Zhang S, Yang X, Hocher B, Tan J, Tan Y, Hu L, Gong F, Xie P, Lin G. Exploring the efficacy and beneficial population of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy start from the oocyte retrieval cycle: a real-world study. J Transl Med 2023; 21:779. [PMID: 37919732 PMCID: PMC10623718 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04641-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used as an embryo selection technique in in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its effectiveness and potential beneficiary populations are unclear. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent their first oocyte retrieval cycles at CITIC-Xiangya between January 2016 and November 2019, and the associated fresh and thawed embryo transfer cycles up to November 30, 2020. PGT-A (PGT-A group) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/IVF (non-PGT-A group) cycles were included. The numbers of oocytes and embryos obtained were unrestricted. In total, 60,580 patients were enrolled, and baseline data were matched between groups using 1:3 propensity score matching. Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score stratification and traditional multivariate logistic regression, were performed on the original unmatched cohort to check the robustness of the overall results. Analyses were stratified by age, body mass index, ovarian reserve/responsiveness, and potential indications to explore benefits in subgroups. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The other outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), pregnancy loss rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, low birth weight rate, and neonatal malformation rate. RESULTS In total, 4195 PGT-A users were matched with 10,140 non-PGT-A users. A significant reduction in CLBR was observed in women using PGT-A (27.5% vs. 31.1%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.91; P < 0.001). However, women using PGT-A had higher first-transfer pregnancy (63.9% vs. 46.9%; OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.81-2.23; P < 0.001) and LBR (52.6% vs. 34.2%, OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.92-2.36; P < 0.001) rates and lower rates of early miscarriage (12.8% vs. 20.2%; OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70; P < 0.001), preterm birth (8.6% vs 17.3%; P < 0.001), and low birth weight (4.9% vs. 19.3%; P < 0.001). Moreover, subgroup analyses revealed that women aged ≥ 38 years, diagnosed with recurrent pregnancy loss or intrauterine adhesions benefited from PGT-A, with a significant increase in first-transfer LBR without a decrease in CLBR. CONCLUSION PGT-A does not increase and decrease CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle; nonetheless, it is effective in infertile populations with specific indications. PGT-A reduces complications associated with multiple gestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shujuan Ma
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Jingnan Liao
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shuoping Zhang
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Xiaoyi Yang
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Berthold Hocher
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
- Fifth Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jing Tan
- Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yueqiu Tan
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liang Hu
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Fei Gong
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Pingyuan Xie
- Hunan Normal University School of Medicine, Changsha, China.
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China.
| | - Ge Lin
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China.
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zang Z, Hu M, Yan Y, Su Y, Yan J, Chen ZJ, Li Y. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in infertile patients with positive tuberculin skin test results. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 47:103307. [PMID: 37666021 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Do infertile women with positive tuberculin skin test (TST) results have a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes after IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) and does preventive anti-tuberculosis treatment applied to infertile women with positive TST results before IVF/ICSI-ET affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes? DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 6283 infertile women who underwent IVF/ICSI-ET treatment for the first time at the Reproductive Hospital affiliated to Shandong University from November 2016 to September 2022. None of the participants had prior tuberculosis or active tuberculosis. According to their TST results, 5947 patients who had never received preventive anti-tuberculosis treatment were divided into a TST-positive group (1704 cases) and a TST-negative group (4243 cases). A total of 504 patients with TST (+++) results (using the 20 mm sclerosis threshold) were divided into a treated TST (+++) group (336 cases) and an untreated TST (+++) group (168 cases) according to whether they received preventive anti-tuberculosis treatment before IVF/ICSI-ET. The outcome measures were pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS There were no significant differences in pregnancy or neonatal outcomes between the TST-positive group and the TST-negative group (P > 0.05). In the TST (+++) group, there were no significant differences in pregnancy or neonatal outcomes between the treated TST (+++) group and the untreated TST (+++) group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS For infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET without prior tuberculosis or active tuberculosis, positive TST results and preventive anti-tuberculosis treatments prior to IVF/ICSI-ET do not affect pregnancy or neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaowen Zang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Min Hu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yueyue Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yaxin Su
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Yan Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.; Medical Integration and Practice Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China..
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy of blastocysts: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2023; 120:973-982. [PMID: 37678731 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
This revised document incorporates a growing number of published studies about mosaic embryo transfer and provides current evidence-based considerations for the clinical management of embryos with mosaic results on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. This document replaces the document titled "Clinical management of mosaic results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of blastocysts: a committee opinion," published in 2020 (Fertil Steril 2020;114:246-54).
Collapse
|
42
|
Wang Y, Chen D, Cai B, Huang D, Xu Y, Ding C. Effects of different oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo development and euploidy: a sibling oocyte control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:1593-1603. [PMID: 37608229 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07176-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the relationship between cytoplasmic granulation patterns and the developmental potential of mature sibling oocytes. METHODS Data from 54 cycles of preimplantation genetic tests for structural rearrangement from July 2019 to June 2022 were analyzed. In total, 564 embryos were cultured using a time-lapse system. Sibling oocytes were divided into four groups based on cytoplasmic granulation patterns: fine granulation (FG) group (n = 177), central granulation (CG) group (n = 183), dispersed granulation (DG) group (n = 161), and uneven granulation (UG) group (n = 43). The CG group was further divided into three groups (grades I, II, and III) based on the tertile of the ratio of central granular distribution area to oocyte area. Fertilization rate, embryo morphokinetics, chromosomal ploidy, and clinical outcomes of the groups were compared. RESULTS No significant differences were observed in morphokinetic parameters, fertilization rate, embryo production, blastocyst formation, and aneuploidy rates among the different cytoplasmic-granulation pattern groups. However, embryos derived from CG oocytes showed significantly higher aneuploidy rates in grade III compared to grade I (86.21% vs 61.54%, P = 0.036) or grade II (86.21% vs 56.00%, P = 0.013). Thirty embryos were transferred to the uteri of female patients and the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not significantly differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS Cytoplasmic granulation patterns may not affect embryo fertilization, development speed, and aneuploidy rates. However, a higher grade of CG may be associated with increased aneuploidy rates. Larger sample sizes are required to explore the impact of oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo implantation potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yali Wang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Dongjia Chen
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Bing Cai
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Huang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanwen Xu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Chenhui Ding
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liang Z, Wen Q, Li J, Zeng D, Huang P. A systematic review and meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of recurrent pregnancy failure resulting from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1178294. [PMID: 37850092 PMCID: PMC10577404 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1178294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is an emerging technology that aims to identify euploid embryos for transfer, reducing the risk of embryonic chromosomal abnormalities. However, the clinical benefits of PGT-A in recurrent pregnancy failure (RPF) patients, particularly in young RPF patients, remains uncertain. Objective and rationale This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether RPF patients undergoing PGT-A had better clinical outcomes compared to those not undergoing PGT-A, thus assessing the value of PGT-A in clinical practice. Search methods We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP) from 2002 to 2022. Thirteen published studies involving 930 RPF patients screened using PGT-A and over 1,434 RPF patients screened without PGT-A were included in this meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on embryo transfers after PGT-A (n=1,015) and without PGT-A (n=1,799). Clinical outcomes The PGT-A group demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to the in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) group. The PGT-A group had a significantly higher implantation rate (IR) (RR=2.01, 95% CI: [1.73; 2.34]), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (RR=1.53, 95% CI: [1.36; 1.71]), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) (RR=1.76, 95% CI: [1.35; 2.29]), live birth rate (LBR) (RR=1.75, 95% CI: [1.51; 2.03]), and significantly lower clinical miscarriage rate (CMR) (RR=0.74, 95% CI: [0.54; 0.99]). Subgroup analysis based on patient age (under 35 years and 35 years or older) showed that both PGT-A subgroups had significantly better CPR (P<0.01) and LBR (P<0.05) values compared to the IVF/ICSI groups. Summary This meta-analysis demonstrates that PGT-A in RPF patients, is associated with improved clinical outcomes, including higher IR, CPR, OPR, and LBR values, and lower CMR compared to the IVF/ICSI group. These findings support the positive clinical application of PGT-A in RPF patients. Systematic Review Registration http://INPLASY.com, identifier INPLASY 202320118.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Liang
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center-Liuzhou Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Institute of Reproduction and Genetics, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Affiliated Maternity Hospital and Affiliated Children’s Hospital of Guangxi, University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Graduate School, Guilin Medical College, Guilin, Guangxi, China
| | - Qiuyue Wen
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center-Liuzhou Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Institute of Reproduction and Genetics, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Affiliated Maternity Hospital and Affiliated Children’s Hospital of Guangxi, University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
| | - Jingjing Li
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center-Liuzhou Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Institute of Reproduction and Genetics, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Affiliated Maternity Hospital and Affiliated Children’s Hospital of Guangxi, University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
| | - Dingyuan Zeng
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center-Liuzhou Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Institute of Reproduction and Genetics, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Affiliated Maternity Hospital and Affiliated Children’s Hospital of Guangxi, University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
| | - Pinxiu Huang
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center-Liuzhou Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Liuzhou Institute of Reproduction and Genetics, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Affiliated Maternity Hospital and Affiliated Children’s Hospital of Guangxi, University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
- Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Geng L, Lu S, Li S, Chen ZJ, Wei D, Liu P. An appraisal of current embryo transfer strategies. HUM FERTIL 2023; 26:815-823. [PMID: 37811841 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2023.2265152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Embryo transfer, one of the most essential procedures in assisted reproductive technology, plays a vital role in the success of in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. During the last decades, the strategies for embryo transfer have changed dramatically. In this review, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of several current embryo transfer strategies including fresh versus frozen embryo transfer, cleavage- versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, and single- versus double-embryo transfer. Available evidence indicates that the freeze-only strategy improves the live birth rate after the first embryo transfer in high responders while making no difference in normal responders. The risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is significantly reduced in the freeze-only strategy. Fresh blastocyst-stage embryo transfer increased live birth rate compared to cleavage-stage embryo transfer. The best embryo transfer strategy is one which tailors to individual circumstances and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Geng
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
| | - Shiya Lu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
| | - Siyuan Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, P.R. China
| | - Daimin Wei
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
| | - Peihao Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- Shandong Technology Innovation Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yu W, Jin C, Zhang Q, Ni T, Yan J. Does reciprocal translocation affect the meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes? HUM FERTIL 2023; 26:702-711. [PMID: 37961879 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2023.2262810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the effect of chromosomal reciprocal translocation on meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. A total of 744 reciprocal translocation carriers and 875 non-carriers were included in this study. A total of 6,832 blastocysts were biopsied and tested by next-generation sequencing. Blastocysts from the carrier group were classified into five subgroups according to the theoretical segregation pattern of quadrivalent structure. For carrier patients, normal meiotic segregation products of the non-translocation chromosome were classified after excluding the segregation modes of the quadrivalent structure. The proportion of normal non-translocation chromosome meiotic segregation products was similar between the carrier and noncarrier groups (p = 0.69). The generalized Estimation Equation revealed that there was no correlation between reciprocal translocation and meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that the segregation modes of quadrivalent structure (p = 0.00) and carrier's gender (p = 0.00) may affect the meiotic segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. In conclusion, reciprocal translocation does not directly reduce the proportion of normal segregation products of non-translocation chromosomes. The difference among subgroups of different quadrivalent segregation patterns implied that interchromosomal effect may exist but the high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities for reciprocal translocation carriers should not be attributed to interchromosomal effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhao Yu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Chenxi Jin
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Tianxiang Ni
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Junhao Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Health, Jinan, Shandong, China
- National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Telfer EE, Grosbois J, Odey YL, Rosario R, Anderson RA. Making a good egg: human oocyte health, aging, and in vitro development. Physiol Rev 2023; 103:2623-2677. [PMID: 37171807 PMCID: PMC10625843 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Mammalian eggs (oocytes) are formed during fetal life and establish associations with somatic cells to form primordial follicles that create a store of germ cells (the primordial pool). The size of this pool is influenced by key events during the formation of germ cells and by factors that influence the subsequent activation of follicle growth. These regulatory pathways must ensure that the reserve of oocytes within primordial follicles in humans lasts for up to 50 years, yet only approximately 0.1% will ever be ovulated with the rest undergoing degeneration. This review outlines the mechanisms and regulatory pathways that govern the processes of oocyte and follicle formation and later growth, within the ovarian stroma, through to ovulation with particular reference to human oocytes/follicles. In addition, the effects of aging on female reproductive capacity through changes in oocyte number and quality are emphasized, with both the cellular mechanisms and clinical implications discussed. Finally, the details of current developments in culture systems that support all stages of follicle growth to generate mature oocytes in vitro and emerging prospects for making new oocytes from stem cells are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn E Telfer
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Johanne Grosbois
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Yvonne L Odey
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Roseanne Rosario
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Casper RF. PGT-A: Houston, we have a problem. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:2325-2332. [PMID: 37589859 PMCID: PMC10504172 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02913-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a common add-on to IVF cycles. As it is presently performed, PGT-A relies on whole genome amplification of small amounts of DNA from cells removed from the trophectoderm (TE) of a blastocyst for determination of gain or loss of chromosomal material by next-generation sequencing. Whole genome amplification may introduce artifacts such as allele dropout and loss of heterozygosity in up to 25% of cases. In addition, the high prevalence of mosaicism in human embryos is a complicating factor in interpreting the results of PGT-A screening. In the presence of mosaicism, biopsy of TE cells cannot provide accurate results regarding the chromosomal make-up of the inner cell mass. The available clinical data suggest that PGT-A is probably harmful when IVF outcomes are analyzed by intention to treat or by live birth rate per cycle started rather than per embryo transfer, especially in women with three or fewer blastocysts. In addition, hypothesized advantages of reduced spontaneous abortion rate and reduced time to conception may be modest at best.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F Casper
- TRIO Fertility, The University of Toronto and the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dahdouh EM, Mourad AM, Balayla J, Sylvestre C, Brezina PR, Kutteh WH, Picchetta L, Capalbo A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Update on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and outcomes of embryos with mosaic results. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2023; 75:468-481. [PMID: 36255164 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.22.05166-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is used as a frequent add-on for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to improve clinical outcomes. The purpose is to select a euploid embryo following chromosomal testing on embryo biopsies. The current practice includes comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technology applied on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. Despite its widespread use, PGT-A remains a controversial topic mainly because all of the RCTs comprised only good prognosis patients with 2 or more blastocysts available; hence the results are not generalizable to all groups of patients. Furthermore, with the introduction of the highly-sensitive platforms into clinical practice (i.e. next-generation sequencing [NGS]), a result consistent with intermediate copy number surfaced and is termed "Mosaic," consistent with a mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells within the biopsy sample. The optimal disposition and management of embryos with mosaic results is still an open question, as many 'mosaics' generated healthy live births with no identifiable congenital anomalies. The present article provides a complete and comprehensive up-to-date review on PGT-A. It discusses in detail the findings of all the published RCTs on PGT-A with CCS, comments on the subject of "mosaicism" and its current management, and describes the latest technique of non-invasive PGT-A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias M Dahdouh
- Assisted Reproduction Technology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada -
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada -
| | - Ali M Mourad
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jacques Balayla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Camille Sylvestre
- Assisted Reproduction Technology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Clinique OVO, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul R Brezina
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Fertility Associates of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - William H Kutteh
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Fertility Associates of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Juan A Garcia-Velasco
- IVI-RMA, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shi X, Tang Y, Liu C, Li W, Lin H, Mao W, Huang M, Chu Q, Wang L, Quan S, Xu C, Ma Q, Duan J. Effects of NGS-based PGT-a for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failure: a retrospective cohort study. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2023; 69:354-365. [PMID: 37460217 DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2023.2225679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
To clarify the effect of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) combined with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy on the pregnancy outcomes of idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (iRPL) and idiopathic recurrent implantation failure (iRIF), we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 212 iRPL couples and 66 iRIF couples who underwent PGT-A or conventional in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment. The implantation rate (IR) per transfer (64.2%), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per transfer (57.5%), and live birth rate (LBR) per transfer (45%) of iRPL couples of the PGT-A treatment group were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of the conventional IVF/ICSI group (IR per transfer,38.2%; CPR per transfer,33.3%; LBR per transfer, 28.4%), whereas the pregnancy loss rate (PLR) per transfer was similar between the two groups. These effects were also significant (p < 0.05) in iRPL couples with advanced maternal age (AMA, ≥35 years), whereas no significant differences were found in clinical outcomes between the PGT-A and conventional IVF/ICSI groups in younger iRPL couples (<35 years). The cumulative clinical outcomes of iRPL couples were comparable between the PGT-A and conventional IVF/ICSI groups. No significant differences were found in any clinical outcomes between the PGT-A and conventional IVF/ICSI groups for young or AMA couples with iRIF. In conclusion, NGS-based PGT-A involving TE biopsy may be useful for iRPL women to shorten the time to pregnancy and reduce their physical and psychological burden, especially for iRPL women with AMA; however, couples with iRIF may not benefit from PGT-A treatment. Considering the small sample size of the iRIF group, further investigations with a larger sample size are needed to verify our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Shi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NanFang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Youyong Tang
- Department of Biopharmaceutics, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Chenxin Liu
- Department of Biopharmaceutics, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Weiyu Li
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, 924 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Guilin, P.R. China
| | - Hui Lin
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, 924 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Guilin, P.R. China
| | - Wenqi Mao
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, 924 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Guilin, P.R. China
| | - Min Huang
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, 924 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Guilin, P.R. China
| | - Qingjun Chu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NanFang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Liantong Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NanFang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Song Quan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NanFang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Chengming Xu
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, 924 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Guilin, P.R. China
| | - Qiang Ma
- Department of Biopharmaceutics, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P.R. China
| | - Jinliang Duan
- Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, 924 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Guilin, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tian T, Qiao J. The role of clinical trials in advancing reproductive medicine: a comprehensive overview. MEDICAL REVIEW (2021) 2023; 3:363-365. [PMID: 38283257 PMCID: PMC10811349 DOI: 10.1515/mr-2023-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Tian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Qiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- State Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Beijing, China
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Research Units of Comprehensive Diagnosis and Treatment of Oocyte Maturation Arrest, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|