1
|
Amouzegar A, Haig S, Kahn AM, Tawbi HA, Jones JA, Goldberg SB. Navigating the Complexities of Brain Metastases Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e433694. [PMID: 38781565 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_433694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
The management of brain metastases, a potentially devastating complication of advanced cancers, has become increasingly complex with advancements in local and systemic therapies. Improved outcomes and extended survival for patients with metastatic solid tumors have led to a surge in the prevalence and possibly incidence of brain metastases, affecting up to 40% of individuals with solid tumors. Enhanced imaging technologies contribute to more accurate and early detection, shaping the understanding of the intricate landscape of this condition. Traditionally, surgery and radiation stood as the mainstays of treatment because of the limited efficacy of systemic therapies within the brain. However, emerging clinical data, particularly in melanoma, lung, and breast cancers, reveal promising results with novel systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Despite the historical exclusion of patients with active brain metastases from clinical trials, a shift is occurring toward a more inclusive approach. This chapter delves into the multifaceted challenges associated with managing brain metastases, with a focus on the evolving landscape of systemic approaches as well as the intricacies of shared decision making, providing a comprehensive overview of the current state and future directions in navigating the complexities of brain metastases management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsaneh Amouzegar
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shannon Haig
- Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Greensburg, PA
| | - Adriana M Kahn
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joshua A Jones
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology and Division of Palliative Medicine, Rochester Regional Health System, Rochester, NY
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goh E, Labelle S, Chan A. Implementation and evaluation of a shared care model between oncologists and pharmacists for breast cancer patients at a Canadian regional ambulatory cancer centre. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2024; 30:622-627. [PMID: 37259570 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231179190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of CDK 4/6 inhibitors for breast cancer patients has contributed to increased ambulatory patient visits for oncologists. The Medication Assessment by Pharmacist program aims to evaluate the impact of oncology pharmacists performing medication assessment follow-up visits. METHODS Breast cancer patients on a CDK 4/6 inhibitor deemed suitable by their oncologist for pharmacist assessment could be booked for a pharmacist medication assessment appointment at alternate treatment cycles. RESULTS Between February 2019 to November 2021, 29 of 128 patients (22.7%) were selected for 46 total Medication Assessment by Pharmacist visits resulting in 920 min of clinic time savings for physicians. There were similar rates of adhering to provincial protocols for scheduling visits (99% vs. 96%, p = 0.12) and monitoring investigations (98% vs. 98%, p = 0.96) between those enrolled in Medication Assessment by Pharmacist or not. Surveys completed by medical oncologists and pharmacists demonstrated that nine of nine oncologists felt Medication Assessment by Pharmacist reduced workload and wanted Medication Assessment by Pharmacist expanded to additional oncology drugs. Pharmacist-completed surveys revealed that nine of nine pharmacists felt Medication Assessment by Pharmacist increased job satisfaction, and allowed further application of clinical skills. All agreed that patients were receptive to meeting with pharmacists. According to survey results, 33% of oncologists versus 100% of pharmacists routinely asked about medication adherence, new medications or supplements. CONCLUSION Integrating pharmacists into a shared care model reduces ambulatory patient visits for oncologists without deviating from provincial protocol guidelines for monitoring and visits for patients on CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Leveraging the medication expertise of pharmacists also increases the frequency of addressing medication adherence and concurrent therapies. Medication Assessment by Pharmacist may be an effective strategy in alleviating projected shortages of oncology providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Goh
- British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deiana C, Agostini M, Brandi G, Giovannetti E. The trend toward more target therapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024:1-41. [PMID: 38768098 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2357802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the considerable progress made in cancer treatment through the development of target therapies, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to exhibit resistance to this category of drugs. As a result, chemotherapy combination regimens remain the primary treatment approach for this aggressive cancer. AREAS COVERED In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of past and ongoing trials on both well-known and novel targets that are being explored in PDAC, including PARP, EGFR, HER2, KRAS, and its downstream and upstream pathways (such as RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR), JAK/STAT pathway, angiogenesis, metabolisms, epigenetic targets, claudin, and novel targets (such as P53 and plectin). We also provide a comprehensive overview of the significant trials for each target, allowing a thorough glimpse into the past and future of target therapy. EXPERT OPINION The path toward implementing a target therapy capable of improving the overall survival of PDAC is still long, and it is unlikely that a monotherapy target drug will fulfill a meaningful role in addressing the complexity of this cancer. Thus, we discuss the future direction of target therapies in PDAC, trying to identify the more promising target and combination treatments, with a special focus on the more eagerly awaited ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Deiana
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Margherita Agostini
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elisa Giovannetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Pharmacology Lab, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) Start-Up Unit, Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, Pisa, San Giuliano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Azim HA, Saleh MA, Essam Eldin P, Abdelhafeez AAM, Hassan M, Kassem L. Combination of metronomic capecitabine and letrozole in metastatic hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial. J Chemother 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38764430 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2024.2342741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
First line endocrine therapy is the gold standard for advanced estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer. Adding CDK4/6 inhibitors has improved progression free survival. Metronomic Capecitabine has proven to be safe to combine with endocrine therapy with promising efficacy. We conducted a phase II randomized, open label, single centre clinical trial on patients with metastatic ER positive and HER 2 negative breast cancer. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to arm A: metronomic dose of capecitabine (500 mg/m2 BID) combined with letrozole (2.5 mg OD) or arm B: letrozole single agent. The primary endpoint was progression free survival. The study was terminated early due to poor accrual and 60 eligible patients out of the planned 204 were randomized. This clinical trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (MD-127-2019, NCT04571437). Between February 2019 and April 2022, 60 patients were randomized. This is the first report of the study, after a median follow-up of 18.6 months. The median age at diagnosis was 47 years with only 41.7% of patients post-menopausal. Half of our patients had bone-only disease, 45% had visceral metastasis (liver and lung) and 63% presented with endocrine sensitive disease. The estimated median PFS for the whole population was 16.2 months. Median PFS for capecitabine arm was 17.7 months versus 14.6 months for letrozole alone (p = 0.078). Overall response rate was 70% for capecitabine/letrozole arm and 56.6% for letrozole only. Clinical benefit rate was 90% in the capecitabine/letrozole arm versus 73.3% in the letrozole arm. Overall survival data is still immature after this short follow up duration. Adverse event assessment showed acceptable all grade and high grade toxicity profile consistent with the established adverse events of both capecitabine and letrozole. Anaemia (28.3%) and hand & foot syndrome (43.8%) were significantly more common in the capecitabine/letrozole arm. Capecitabine combined with letrozole have showed a trend towards improvement in progression free survival with potential more benefit to certain sub-groups and the combination showed acceptable safety profile consistent with the established known safety profile of both letrozole and capecitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamdy A Azim
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mariam A Saleh
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Passant Essam Eldin
- Anatomic Pathology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed A M Abdelhafeez
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Hassan
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Loay Kassem
- Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ding H, Xu W, Dai M, Li S, Xin W, Tong Y, He C, Mi X, Zhan Z, Fang L. Hematological toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis and pharmacovigilance study. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38753541 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2348566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate and compare the risk of hematological adverse events (AEs) associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Food and Drug Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs related to abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the risks of hematological AEs, and a disproportionality analysis was performed to detect signals of hematological AEs. RESULTS 16 RCTs comprising 16,350 breast cancer patients were included. Palbociclib and ribociclib had similar risks for hematological AEs, except a higher risk of grade 3-4 leukopenia observed with palbociclib (risk ratio [RR]: 7.84, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.33-41.28). Abemaciclib had a higher risk of anemia than both ribociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.25 - 3.96; grade 3-4: RR: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.59 - 8.11) and palbociclib (grade 1-4: RR: 1.65, 95%CI: 1.03 - 2.59), but a lower risk of grade 3-4 of both leukopenia (RR: 0.12, 95%CI: 0.02 - 0.49) and neutropenia (RR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.04 - 0.52) compared with palbociclib. Signals indicating occurrence of leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were identified for three CDK4/6 inhibitors. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib showed significant but inconsistent hematological toxicity risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiying Ding
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiben Xu
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mengfei Dai
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shujing Li
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenxiu Xin
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yinghui Tong
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chaoneng He
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiufang Mi
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhajun Zhan
- College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Luo Fang
- Department of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Andrade MDO, Bonadio RRDCC, Diz MDPE, Testa L. Visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer: an old concept with new perspectives. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2024; 79:100362. [PMID: 38754225 PMCID: PMC11112279 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Visceral Crisis (VC) in breast cancer is a critical scenario when the burden of metastatic disease results in rapid deterioration of organ functions. There are no widely accepted objective clinical criteria for the definition of VC, and different studies have reported diverse clinical conditions such as visceral crises. Diagnosis of VC is associated with a dismal prognosis and the management of this condition is currently based on limited retrospective evidence and expert opinions. International guidelines have recommended cytotoxic polychemotherapy in the management of VC, to achieve rapid symptomatic control and preserve organ function. Nevertheless, in the case of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the role of chemotherapy as the treatment of choice for VC has been recently questioned, since endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitors yielded similar response rates, with better quality of life. For HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, combined chemotherapy (plus HER2-directed therapy for HER2-positive) remains a standard option for VC, but novel effective drugs such as antibody-drug conjugates are emerging and their role in the VC context shall soon be elucidated. This review aims to critically discuss the definition, prognosis, management, and future directions regarding the visceral crisis in metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheus de Oliveira Andrade
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - Maria Del Pilar Estevez Diz
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Laura Testa
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ottenbourgs T, Van Nieuwenhuysen E. Novel Endocrine Therapeutic Opportunities for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Ovarian Cancer-What Can We Learn from Breast Cancer? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1862. [PMID: 38791941 PMCID: PMC11119209 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare ovarian malignancy primarily affecting younger women and is characterized by an indolent growth pattern. It exhibits indolent growth and high estrogen/progesterone receptor expression, suggesting potential responsiveness to endocrine therapy. However, treatment efficacy remains limited due to the development of endocrine resistance. The mechanisms of resistance, whether primary or acquired, are still largely unknown and present a significant hurdle in achieving favorable treatment outcomes with endocrine therapy in these patients. In estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, mechanisms of endocrine resistance have been largely explored and novel treatment strategies to overcome resistance have emerged. Considering the shared estrogen receptor positivity in LGSOC and breast cancer, we wanted to explore whether there are any parallel mechanisms of resistance and whether we can extend endocrine breast cancer treatments to LGSOC. This review aims to highlight the underlying molecular mechanisms possibly driving endocrine resistance in ovarian cancer, while also exploring the available therapeutic opportunities to overcome this resistance. By unraveling the potential pathways involved and examining emerging strategies, this review explores valuable insights for advancing treatment options and improving patient outcomes in LGSOC, which has limited therapeutic options available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine Ottenbourgs
- Gynaecological Oncology Laboratory, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, BGOG and Leuven Cancer Institute, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coles CE, Earl H, Anderson BO, Barrios CH, Bienz M, Bliss JM, Cameron DA, Cardoso F, Cui W, Francis PA, Jagsi R, Knaul FM, McIntosh SA, Phillips KA, Radbruch L, Thompson MK, André F, Abraham JE, Bhattacharya IS, Franzoi MA, Drewett L, Fulton A, Kazmi F, Inbah Rajah D, Mutebi M, Ng D, Ng S, Olopade OI, Rosa WE, Rubasingham J, Spence D, Stobart H, Vargas Enciso V, Vaz-Luis I, Villarreal-Garza C. The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission. Lancet 2024; 403:1895-1950. [PMID: 38636533 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00747-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helena Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Global Breast Cancer Initiative, World Health Organisation and Departments of Surgery and Global Health Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Carlos H Barrios
- Oncology Research Center, Hospital São Lucas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Maya Bienz
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David A Cameron
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer and Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Wanda Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felicia Marie Knaul
- Institute for Advanced Study of the Americas, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Tómatelo a Pecho, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Stuart A McIntosh
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lukas Radbruch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Jean E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Lynsey Drewett
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Farasat Kazmi
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Dianna Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Szeyi Ng
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - William E Rosa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Giraudo A, Sabatier R, Rousseau F, De Nonneville A, Gonçalves A, Cecile M, Braticevic C, Viret F, Seguin L, Kfoury M, Naudet D, Hamon M, Tassy L. The Use of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: What Do We Know? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1838. [PMID: 38791919 PMCID: PMC11119337 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) incidence increases with age, particularly in HR-positive/HER2-negative subtypes. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6is) alongside endocrine therapy (ET) have emerged as promising treatments for HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced and early BC. However, their efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) in older and frail patients remain underexplored. METHODS This position paper assesses the existing literature from 2015 to 2024, focusing on CDK4/6is use in patients aged 65 years and older with HR-positive/HER2-negative BC. RESULTS Our analysis methodically addresses critical questions regarding the utilization of CDK4/6is in the elderly BC patient population, organizing findings from the metastatic and adjuvant settings. In the metastatic setting, CDK4/6is significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS), paralleling benefits observed in younger patients, and suggest potential overall survival (OS) benefits, warranting further investigation. Despite an increased incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), such as neutropenia and asthenia, CDK4/6is present a markedly lower toxicity profile compared to traditional chemotherapy, with manageable side effects. QoL analysis indicates that integrating CDK4/6is into treatment regimens does not significantly impact elderly BC patients' daily life and symptom management. Special attention is given to frail subgroups, and personalized approaches are recommended to balance efficacy and adverse effects, such as starting with ET alone and introducing CDK4/6is upon progression in patients with a low disease burden. Transitioning to the adjuvant setting, early results, particularly with abemaciclib, indicate positive effects on disease-free survival (DFS), emphasizing the need for continued analysis to validate these findings and assess long-term implications. However, data on older patients are insufficient to conclude whether they truly benefit from this treatment. CONCLUSION Overall, CDK4/6is present a favorable benefit-risk profile in older BC patients, at least in advanced BC; however, further research is warranted to optimize treatment strategies and improve outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Giraudo
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Frederique Rousseau
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Alexandre De Nonneville
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Maud Cecile
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Cecile Braticevic
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Frederic Viret
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Lorene Seguin
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Maria Kfoury
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Dorothée Naudet
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| | - Marie Hamon
- Medical School Department, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France;
| | - Louis Tassy
- Institute Paoli-Calmette, 13009 Marseille, France; (R.S.); (F.R.); (A.D.N.); (A.G.); (M.C.); (C.B.); (F.V.); (L.S.); (M.K.); (D.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goetz MP, Toi M, Huober J, Sohn J, Trédan O, Park IH, Campone M, Chen SC, Manso LM, Paluch-Shimon S, Freedman OC, O'Shaughnessy J, Pivot X, Tolaney SM, Hurvitz S, Llombart-Cussac A, André V, Saha A, van Hal G, Shahir A, Iwata H, Johnston SRD. Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: Final overall survival results of MONARCH 3. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00139-X. [PMID: 38729566 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy (ET). In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS A total of 493 women were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease (sVD), there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and CFS numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (ITT: 13.1 months; sVD: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2- ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - M Toi
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - J Huober
- Breast Center Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Switzerland and University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - J Sohn
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - O Trédan
- Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - I H Park
- National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - M Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - S-C Chen
- Chang Gung University Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - L M Manso
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - X Pivot
- Centre Paul Strauss, INSERM 110, Strasbourg, France
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S Hurvitz
- Department of Medicine, UW Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - V André
- Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - A Saha
- Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - A Shahir
- Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - H Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - S R D Johnston
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grammoustianou M, Dimitrakopoulos FI, Koutras A. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1801. [PMID: 38791880 PMCID: PMC11120191 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women. The vast majority of breast cancer patients have hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors. In advanced HR+ breast cancer, the combination of endocrine therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors is considered the standard of care in the front-line setting. Nevertheless, resistance to hormonal therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors eventually occurs, leading to progression of the disease. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) comprise a promising therapeutic choice with significant efficacy in patients with HR+ breast cancer, which is resistant to endocrine treatment. ADCs typically consist of a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker to a monoclonal antibody that targets a specific tumor-associated antigen, offering the advantage of a more selective delivery of chemotherapy to cancer cells. In this review, we focus on the ADC mechanisms of action, their toxicity profile and therapeutic uses as well as on related biomarkers and future perspectives in advanced HR+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grammoustianou
- Oncology Department, Sotiria General Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece;
- Breast Cancer Survivorship Research Group, Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | | | - Angelos Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Medical School, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Magge T, Rajendran S, Brufsky AM, Foldi J. CDK4/6 inhibitors: The Devil is in the Detail. Curr Oncol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11912-024-01540-7. [PMID: 38713311 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01540-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Update on the most recent clinical evidence on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Over the past decade, CDK4/6i have become part of the standard of care treatment of patients with both metastatic and high-risk early HR + /HER2- breast cancers. The three available CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) have been extensively studied in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with consistent prolongation of progression free survival; however, ribociclib has emerged as the preferred first line agent in mBC given overall survival benefit over endocrine monotherapy. In early BC, abemaciclib is the only currently approved agent while ribociclib has early positive clinical trial data. Toxicities and financial burden limit the use of CDK4/6i in all patients and resource-poor settings, and optimal timing of their use in mBC remains unclear. There is considerable evidence for the use of CDK4/6i in metastatic and early HR + /HER2- breast cancer, but knowledge gaps remain, and further research is necessary to better define their optimal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Magge
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Sneha Rajendran
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Julia Foldi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Breast Medical Oncology, Magee Women's Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 300 Halket Street, Suite 3524, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lashen A, Alqahtani S, Shoqafi A, Algethami M, Jeyapalan JN, Mongan NP, Rakha EA, Madhusudan S. Clinicopathological Significance of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 (CDK2) in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:5053. [PMID: 38732271 PMCID: PMC11084890 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25095053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) is a key cell cycle regulator, with essential roles during G1/S transition. The clinicopathological significance of CDK2 in ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) and early-stage invasive breast cancers (BCs) remains largely unknown. Here, we evaluated CDK2's protein expression in 479 BC samples and 216 DCIS specimens. Analysis of CDK2 transcripts was completed in the METABRIC cohort (n = 1980) and TCGA cohort (n = 1090), respectively. A high nuclear CDK2 protein expression was significantly associated with aggressive phenotypes, including a high tumour grade, lymph vascular invasion, a poor Nottingham prognostic index (all p-values < 0.0001), and shorter survival (p = 0.006), especially in luminal BC (p = 0.009). In p53-mutant BC, high nuclear CDK2 remained linked with worse survival (p = 0.01). In DCIS, high nuclear/low cytoplasmic co-expression showed significant association with a high tumour grade (p = 0.043), triple-negative and HER2-enriched molecular subtypes (p = 0.01), Comedo necrosis (p = 0.024), negative ER status (p = 0.004), negative PR status (p < 0.0001), and a high proliferation index (p < 0.0001). Tumours with high CDK2 transcripts were more likely to have higher expressions of genes involved in the cell cycle, homologous recombination, and p53 signaling. We provide compelling evidence that high CDK2 is a feature of aggressive breast cancers. The clinical evaluation of CDK2 inhibitors in early-stage BC patients will have a clinical impact.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2/metabolism
- Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/metabolism
- Prognosis
- Middle Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Neoplasm Staging
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality
- Aged
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/metabolism
- Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayat Lashen
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Department of Pathology, Nottingham University Hospital, City Campus, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Shatha Alqahtani
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Ahmed Shoqafi
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Mashael Algethami
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Jennie N. Jeyapalan
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Nigel P. Mongan
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK
- Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Emad A. Rakha
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Department of Pathology, Nottingham University Hospital, City Campus, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Srinivasan Madhusudan
- Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (M.A.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Department of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hussain S, Mursal M, Verma G, Hasan SM, Khan MF. Targeting oncogenic kinases: Insights on FDA approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol 2024; 970:176484. [PMID: 38467235 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
Protein kinases play pivotal roles in various biological functions, influencing cell differentiation, promoting survival, and regulating the cell cycle. The disruption of protein kinase activity is intricately linked to pathways in tumor development. This manuscript explores the transformative impact of protein kinase inhibitors on cancer therapy, particularly their efficacy in cases driven by targeted mutations. Focusing on key tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like Bcr-Abl, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR), it targets critical kinase families in cancer progression. Clinical trial details of these TKIs offer insights into their therapeutic potentials. Learning from FDA-approved kinase inhibitors, the review dissects trends in kinase drug development since imatinib's paradigm-shifting approval in 2001. TKIs have evolved into pivotal drugs, extending beyond oncology. Ongoing clinical trials explore novel kinase targets, revealing the vast potential within the human kinome. The manuscript provides a detailed analysis of advancements until 2022, discussing the roles of specific oncogenic protein kinases in cancer development and carcinogenesis. Our exploration on PubMed for relevant and significant TKIs undergoing pre-FDA approval phase III clinical trials enriches the discussion with valuable findings. While kinase inhibitors exhibit lower toxicity than traditional chemotherapy in cancer treatment, challenges like resistance and side effects emphasize the necessity of understanding resistance mechanisms, prompting the development of novel inhibitors like osimertinib targeting specific mutant proteins. The review advocates thorough research on effective combination therapies, highlighting the future development of more selective RTKIs to optimize patient-specific cancer treatment and reduce adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Hussain
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Kursi Road, Lucknow, 226026, India
| | - Mohd Mursal
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Kursi Road, Lucknow, 226026, India
| | - Garima Verma
- RWE Specialist, HealthPlix Technologies, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560103, India
| | - Syed Misbahul Hasan
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Kursi Road, Lucknow, 226026, India
| | - Mohemmed Faraz Khan
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Integral University, Kursi Road, Lucknow, 226026, India.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sánchez-Bayona R, Lopez de Sa A, Jerez Gilarranz Y, Sanchez de Torre A, Alva M, Echavarria I, Moreno F, Tolosa P, Herrero Lopez B, de Luna A, Lema L, Gamez Casado S, Madariaga A, López-Tarruella S, Manso L, Bueno-Muiño C, Garcia-Saenz JA, Ciruelos E, Martin M. Everolimus plus endocrine therapy beyond CDK4/6 inhibitors progression for HR+ /HER2- advanced breast cancer: a real-world evidence cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07324-8. [PMID: 38703285 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07324-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) was formerly approved as 2nd-line therapy in HR(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients (pts) progressing during or after a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). Since this approval, the treatment landscape of aBC has changed dramatically, particularly with the arrival of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. Endocrine monotherapy after progression to CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown a limited progression-free survival (PFS), below 3 months. Evidence of the efficacy of everolimus plus ET after CDK4/6 inhibitors is scarce. METHODS A retrospective observational study of patients with aBC treated with everolimus and ET beyond CDK4/6-i progression compiled from February 2015 to December 2022 in 4 Spanish hospitals was performed. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. The main objective was to estimate the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Everolimus adverse events (AE) were registered. Quantitative variables were summarized with medians; qualitative variables with proportions and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival estimates. RESULTS One hundred sixty-one patients received everolimus plus ET (exemestane: 96, fulvestrant: 54, tamoxifen: 10, unknown: 1) after progressing on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The median follow-up time was 15 months (interquartile range: 1-56 months). The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range: 35-90 years). The estimated mPFS was 6.0 months (95%CI 5.3-7.8 months). PFS was longer in patients with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy lasting for > 18 months (8.7 months, 95%CI 6.6-11.3 months), in patients w/o visceral metastases (8.0 months, 95%CI 5.8-10.5 months), and chemotherapy-naïve in the metastatic setting (7.2 months, 95%CI 5.9-8.4 months). CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis cohort of everolimus plus ET in mBC patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor suggests a longer estimated mPFS when compared with the mPFS with ET monotherapy obtained from current randomized clinical data. Everolimus plus ET may be considered as a valid control arm in novel clinical trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yolanda Jerez Gilarranz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Manuel Alva
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Echavarria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Moreno
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Tolosa
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Blanca Herrero Lopez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia de Luna
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Lema
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Salvador Gamez Casado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ainhoa Madariaga
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara López-Tarruella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Manso
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Eva Ciruelos
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Martin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jiang H, Zhong J, Wang J, Song G, Di L, Shao B, Zhang R, Liu Y, Zhu A, Wang N, Li H. Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy after progression on prior palbociclib in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: A single center real-world study in China. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7249. [PMID: 38770648 PMCID: PMC11106689 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) become standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal therapeutic paradigm after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib with switching ET versus chemotherapy after progression on prior palbociclib-based ET in Chinese patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. METHODS From 414 consecutive patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who had been treated with palbociclib plus ET from September 2018 to May 2022 in Peking University Cancer Hospital, we identified 80 patients who received abemaciclib plus switching ET or chemotherapy after progression on palbociclib, matched for age, original stage at diagnosis, disease-free interval, and tumor burden at 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify clinical factors associated with PFS in the abemaciclib group. RESULTS The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.94-8.06) in abemaciclib group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.52-5.49) in chemotherapy group (p = 0.667). And, there was no difference in median PFS between the sequential and nonsequential arm (6.0 vs. 6.0 months) in the abemaciclib group though fewer lines of prior systemic therapy and longer PFS from prior palbociclib in the sequential arm. However, patients with prior palbociclib as the first-line therapy had a significantly longer median PFS versus prior palbociclib as ≥2nd-line therapy (11.0 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.043). Based on multivariable analysis, ER+/PR+ was an independent factor associated with longer PFS. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the abemaciclib and chemotherapy groups (p = 0.069). CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that abemaciclib plus switching ET might be one of feasible treatment options for Chinese patients with HR+/HER2- MBC after progression on prior palbociclib-based therapy in addition to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanfang Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Jianxin Zhong
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Jing Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Guohong Song
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Lijun Di
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Bin Shao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Ruyan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Yaxin Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Anjie Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Nan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Huiping Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Breast OncologyPeking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Önder T, Ateş Ö, Öner I, Karaçin C. Relationship between HER2-low status and efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer: a real-world study. Int J Clin Oncol 2024:10.1007/s10147-024-02528-w. [PMID: 38687407 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02528-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC) is a new entity considered a biologically distinct subtype from HER2-zero BC. However, the importance of HER2 low expression on the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) remains unclear. METHODS/MATERIALS We conducted a single-center retrospective study including hormone receptor-positive (HR +) /HER2- metastatic BC (mBC) patients treated with CDK4/6i plus endocrine treatment (ET) as first-line therapy. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to HER2 expression. RESULTS 258 women were analyzed with a median follow-up of 25.4 months; 39.9% had HER2 low, and 60.1% had HER2 zero BC. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) in the HER2-low group was 27.6 months compared with 44.3 months in the HER2-zero group (p = 0.341). In patients receiving ribociclib, the mPFS in the HER2-low group was 24.2 months compared with 53.1 months in the HER2-zero group (multivariate-adjusted HR: 1.981, 95 Cl 1.094-3.586; p = 0.024). The survival probabilities at 24, 36 and 48 months for the HER2 low and HER2 zero groups were 82%, 69%, 69% and 83%, 75% and 69%, respectively (p = 0.336). Objective response rate (p = 0.179) and disease control rate (p = 0.338) did not significantly differ between HER-2-low and HER-2-zero groups. CONCLUSIONS The mPFS in the Her2-zero group was almost twice that of the Her2-low group, but the difference was not statistically significant. mPFS was significantly longer in the HER2-zero group compared to the HER2-low group in patients receiving ribociclib. More prospective studies are needed to understand the actual consequences of this biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Önder
- Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Ö Ateş
- Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Öner
- Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - C Karaçin
- Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
O’Connor TN, Schultz E, Wang J, O’Connor T, Levine E, Knudsen ES, Witkiewicz AK. Real-World Experience among Elderly Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Based Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1749. [PMID: 38730702 PMCID: PMC11083425 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The largest portion of breast cancer patients diagnosed after 70 years of age present with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer subtypes. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor treatment, in conjunction with endocrine therapy, has become standard-of-care for metastatic HR+ breast cancer. In total, 320 patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor were enrolled in an ongoing observational study or were included in an IRB-approved retrospective study. All patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based therapy that were ≥70 years of age (n = 111) displayed prolonged progression-free survival (27.6 months) as compared to patients <70 years of age (n = 209, 21.1 months, HR = 1.38, p < 0.05). Specifically, patients receiving a CDK4/6 inhibitor with an aromatase inhibitor who were ≥70 years of age (n = 79) displayed exceptionally prolonged progression-free survival (46.0 months) as compared to patients receiving the same treatment who were <70 years of age (n = 161, 21.8 months, HR = 1.71, p < 0.01). However, patients ≥70 years of age also experienced more frequent adverse responses to CDK4/6 inhibitor-based treatment leading to dose reduction, hold, or discontinuation than the younger cohort (69% and 53%, respectively). Treatment strategies that may decrease toxicity without affecting efficacy (such as dose titration) are worth further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas N. O’Connor
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA (E.S.); (J.W.)
| | - Emily Schultz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA (E.S.); (J.W.)
| | - Jianxin Wang
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA (E.S.); (J.W.)
| | - Tracey O’Connor
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (T.O.); (E.L.)
| | - Ellis Levine
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA; (T.O.); (E.L.)
| | - Erik S. Knudsen
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA (E.S.); (J.W.)
| | - Agnieszka K. Witkiewicz
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA (E.S.); (J.W.)
- Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abdel-Razeq H, Mansour A. Challenges and Opportunities in Breast Cancer Care in Low-Resourced Countries, Jordan as An Example. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1751. [PMID: 38730701 PMCID: PMC11083275 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Jordan is a relatively small country with a rapidly growing population and a challenged economy. Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide and also in Jordan. Though the age-standardized rate (ASR) of breast cancer incidence is still lower than that in Western societies, the number of newly diagnosed cases continues to increase, involving younger women, and new cases are usually detected at more advanced stages. Improvements in breast cancer care across the health care continuum, including early detection, prevention, treatment, and survivorship and palliative care, have become very visible, but may not match the magnitude of the problem. More organized, goal-oriented work is urgently needed to downstage the disease and improve awareness of, access to, and participation in early detection programs. The cost of recently introduced anti-cancer therapies poses a great challenge, but the impact of these therapies on treatment outcomes, including overall survival, is becoming very noticeable. Though the concept of a multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer treatment is often used at most health care facilities, its implementation in real practice varies significantly. The availability of breast reconstruction procedures, survivorship programs, germline genetic testing, counselling, and palliative care is improving, but these are not widely practiced. In this manuscript, we review the status of breast cancer in Jordan and highlight some of the existing challenges and opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan
- School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
| | - Asem Mansour
- Department of Radiology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman 11941, Jordan;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Moraes FCA, de Oliveira Almeida G, Alves VFC, Priantti JN, Gomes GDC, Carnevalli SVB, Madeira T, Vilbert M, Stecca C, Figueroa Magalhães MC, Fernandes MR, dos Santos NPC. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone for HR-Positive, HER-2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials. J Pers Med 2024; 14:464. [PMID: 38793046 PMCID: PMC11121774 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are approved for advanced breast cancer combined with endocrine therapy (ET). The efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET in hormone estrogen-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (esBC) is still to be confirmed. METHODS We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of CDK4/6i plus ET in esBC. Main outcomes included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). We included only phase III randomized controlled trials. We used RStudio version 4.2.3, and we considered p < 0.05 to be statistically significant. RESULTS Four studies were selected, including 14,168 patients, of which 7089 were treated with CDK4/6i plus ET and 7079 received ET monotherapy. Regarding patient characteristics, 6828 (48.2%) were premenopausal. Compared with ET alone, iDFS rates (HR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.98; p = 0.034) were significantly in favor of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET. However, there were no significant differences in DRFS (HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.58, 1.07; p = 0.132) nor OS (HR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.35; p = 0.829). CONCLUSIONS Our results show that the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors is associated with a significant benefit for HR+/HER2- esBC patients in iDFS. More studies and longer follow-up are needed to assess overall survival benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thiago Madeira
- School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Maysa Vilbert
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Carlos Stecca
- Mackenzie Evangelical University Hospital, Curitiba 80730-150, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lashen A, Algethami M, Alqahtani S, Shoqafi A, Sheha A, Jeyapalan JN, Mongan NP, Rakha EA, Madhusudan S. The Clinicopathological Significance of the Cyclin D1/E1-Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK2/4/6)-Retinoblastoma (RB1/pRB1) Pathway in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4060. [PMID: 38612869 PMCID: PMC11012085 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25074060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK2, CDK4, CDK6), cyclin D1, cyclin E1 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma (pRB1) are key regulators of the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint and may influence platinum response in ovarian cancers. CDK2/4/6 inhibitors are emerging targets in ovarian cancer therapeutics. In the current study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive significance of the CDK2/4/6-cyclin D1/E1-pRB1 axis in clinical ovarian cancers (OC). The CDK2/4/6, cyclin D1/E1 and RB1/pRB1 protein expression were investigated in 300 ovarian cancers and correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes. CDK2/4/6, cyclin D1/E1 and RB1 mRNA expression were evaluated in the publicly available ovarian TCGA dataset. We observed nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for CDK2/4/6, cyclins D1/E1 and RB1/pRB1 in OCs with varying percentages. Increased nuclear CDK2 and nuclear cyclin E1 expression was linked with poor progression-free survival (PFS) and a shorter overall survival (OS). Nuclear CDK6 was associated with poor OS. The cytoplasmic expression of CDK4, cyclin D1 and cyclin E1 also has predictive and/or prognostic significance in OCs. In the multivariate analysis, nuclear cyclin E1 was an independent predictor of poor PFS. Tumours with high nuclear cyclin E1/high nuclear CDK2 have a worse PFS and OS. Detailed bioinformatics in the TCGA cohort showed a positive correlation between cyclin E1 and CDK2. We also showed that cyclin-E1-overexpressing tumours are enriched for genes involved in insulin signalling and release. Our data not only identified the prognostic/predictive significance of these key cell cycle regulators but also demonstrate the importance of sub-cellular localisation. CDK2 targeting in cyclin-E1-amplified OCs could be a rational approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayat Lashen
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Department of Pathology, Nottingham University Hospital, City Campus, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Mashael Algethami
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Shatha Alqahtani
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Ahmed Shoqafi
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Amera Sheha
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Jennie N. Jeyapalan
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Cancer Sciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK
| | - Nigel P. Mongan
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Cancer Sciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK
- Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Emad A. Rakha
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
| | - Srinivasan Madhusudan
- Naaz Coker Ovarian Cancer Research Centre, Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 3RD, UK; (A.L.); (M.A.); (S.A.); (A.S.); (A.S.); (J.N.J.); (N.P.M.); (E.A.R.)
- Department of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang J, Li B, Luo M, Huang J, Zhang K, Zheng S, Zhang S, Zhou J. Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024; 9:83. [PMID: 38570490 PMCID: PMC10991592 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01779-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents pre-invasive breast carcinoma. In untreated cases, 25-60% DCIS progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The challenge lies in distinguishing between non-progressive and progressive DCIS, often resulting in over- or under-treatment in many cases. With increasing screen-detected DCIS in these years, the nature of DCIS has aroused worldwide attention. A deeper understanding of the biological nature of DCIS and the molecular journey of the DCIS-IDC transition is crucial for more effective clinical management. Here, we reviewed the key signaling pathways in breast cancer that may contribute to DCIS initiation and progression. We also explored the molecular features of DCIS and IDC, shedding light on the progression of DCIS through both inherent changes within tumor cells and alterations in the tumor microenvironment. In addition, valuable research tools utilized in studying DCIS including preclinical models and newer advanced technologies such as single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and artificial intelligence, have been systematically summarized. Further, we thoroughly discussed the clinical advancements in DCIS and IDC, including prognostic biomarkers and clinical managements, with the aim of facilitating more personalized treatment strategies in the future. Research on DCIS has already yielded significant insights into breast carcinogenesis and will continue to pave the way for practical clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Baizhou Li
- Department of Pathology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China
| | - Meng Luo
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Huang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kun Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shu Zheng
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Suzhan Zhang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Jiaojiao Zhou
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China.
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Browne IM, André F, Chandarlapaty S, Carey LA, Turner NC. Optimal targeting of PI3K-AKT and mTOR in advanced oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e139-e151. [PMID: 38547898 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00676-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
The growing availability of targeted therapies for patients with advanced oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer has improved survival, but there remains much to learn about the optimal management of these patients. The PI3K-AKT and mTOR pathways are among the most commonly activated pathways in breast cancer, whose crucial role in the pathogenesis of this tumour type has spurred major efforts to target this pathway at specific kinase hubs. Approvals for oestrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer include the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated tumours, the AKT inhibitor capivasertib for tumours with alterations in PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN, and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, which is used irrespective of mutation status. The availability of different inhibitors leaves physicians with a potentially challenging decision over which of these therapies should be used for individual patients and when. In this Review, we present a comprehensive summary of our current understanding of the pathways and the three inhibitors and discuss strategies for the optimal sequencing of therapies in the clinic, particularly after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iseult M Browne
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research and Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medical Oncology, INSERM U981, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Lisa A Carey
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research and Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Micha JP, Rettenmaier MA, Bohart RD, Goldstein BH. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2024; 30:547-551. [PMID: 38404005 DOI: 10.1177/10781552241232701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the relatively high cure rates in early-stage breast cancer, advanced and metastatic breast cancer cases are associated with more inauspicious patient outcomes. Fortunately, with the advent of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors (e.g. palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) with endocrine therapy, survival in advanced and metastatic breast cancer has appreciably improved. In the current review, we discuss these distinctions and the concomitant implications associated with the individual CDK4/6 inhibitors. DATA SOURCES We conducted an extensive PubMed search comprising several review articles on the topic of advanced or metastatic breast cancer treatment, with specific terms that included CDK4/6 inhibitors, treatment, and breast cancer. DATA SUMMARY Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib have exhibited superior progression-free survival differences compared to endocrine therapy alone. However, there are differences among the various CDK4/6 inhibitors with regard to overall survival, tolerability and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Ribociclib may be indicated for pre/perimenopausal patients, whereas abemaciclib is potentially recommended to address endocrine-resistant or visceral disease. Alternatively, palbociclib is associated with lower discontinuation rates than abemaciclib and unlike ribociclib, QTc prolongation is not observed with palbociclib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Micha
- Women's Cancer Research Foundation, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Suzuki DA, Morelle AM, de Brito ML, Paes FR, Mattar A, Leal JHS, Simon SD, Lima EMA, Werutsky G, Piotto GHM, Bines J, Damiani LP, Macedo A, Campos L, Buehler AM. Real-World Evidence of Ribociclib Plus Aromatase Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer: The BrasiLEEira Study. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300484. [PMID: 38603658 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cyclin inhibitors plus endocrine therapy represent the reference standard for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). Efficacy results on hard end points such as overall survival come from well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, a limitation of RCTs is the low external results validity, and their extrapolation to a broader population may not be appropriate. Real-world studies can overcome these limitations, also increasing the reliability of RCTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS The BrasiLEEira was an observational, longitudinal, retrospective, multicenter study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors in Brazilian women age 18 years or older with HR+/HER2- ABC. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of all 11 hospitals. Data were collected anonymously from medical records using an electronic case report form designed by an independent academic research organization, which conducted the study considering all recommendations of international guidelines. The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included mortality, dose reduction, and safety. RESULTS The mean age of 76 patients was 57 years, and 28.9% were Black/Brown. The most prevalent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (34.7%). About 26.0% had endocrine-resistant disease, and 54.1% had more than three metastatic sites. The PFS rate was 77.6%. Three patients died (3.9%). Dose reductions occurred in 37.7% of patients. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (68.4%). CONCLUSION The high-quality evidence from the BrasiLEEira study corroborates the RCTs' findings, expanding its validity to a broader spectrum and underrepresented population who may benefit from ribociclib treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Flavia Rocha Paes
- Oncoclínicas do Brasil Serviços Médicos S.A., Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - André Mattar
- Clínica de Pesquisa e Centro de Estudos em Oncologia Ginecológica e Mamária LTDA, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jorge H Santos Leal
- IPD-CAM Instituto de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Carlos Aristides Maltez, Salvador, Brazil
| | | | | | - Gustavo Werutsky
- União Brasileira de Educação e Assistência-Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - José Bines
- Oncologia Rede D'OR S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Ariane Macedo
- Brazilian Clinical Research Institute, Alameda Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lígia Campos
- Local Medical Affairs-Oncology, Novartis Biociências S.A., São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Anna Maria Buehler
- Local Medical Affairs-Oncology, Novartis Biociências S.A., São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Ligt KM, Koppert LB, de Rooij BH, van de Poll-Franse LV, Velikova G, Cardoso F. Seizing the moment: The time for harnessing electronic patient-reported outcome measures for enhanced and sustainable metastatic breast cancer care is now. Breast 2024; 74:103676. [PMID: 38359564 PMCID: PMC10877629 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
The sustainability of healthcare systems is under pressure. Unlike care for many other chronic diseases, cancer care has yet to empower patients in effectively self-managing both the medical and emotional consequences of their condition, including adapting to changes in lifestyle and work, which is essential to achieve optimal health and recovery. Although proposed as a potential solution for sustainable healthcare and support for optimal health and recovery already decades ago, practical implementation of digital care lags behind. We believe electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) could play an important role in creating sustainable healthcare, both to guide complex treatment pathways and to empower survivors to self-manage consequences of diagnosis and treatment. That is, ePROMs can be used for screening and monitoring of symptoms, but also for treatment decision-making and to facilitate communication about quality of life. We therefore see opportunities for improvements in quality of care, quality of life, and survival of cancer patients, as well as research opportunities, as ePROMs collection can lead to better understanding of care needs. The '10 Actions for Change report' of the Advanced Breast Cancer Global Alliance stresses a critical need for improvement of care for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. We therefore in this paper focus on MBC care and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M de Ligt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - B H de Rooij
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - L V van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - G Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Woodhouse Lane, LS2 9JT, Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Beckett St, Harehills, LS9 7LP, Leeds, United Kingdom.
| | - F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida Brasília s/n, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schlam I, Chavez-MacGregor M. Best of the year: Advanced breast cancer in 2023. Breast 2024; 74:103677. [PMID: 38401422 PMCID: PMC10901908 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
•This article reviews some of the most clinically relevant data related to metastatic breast cancer presented during 2023. •Elacestrant (oral SERD) was approved in 2023 for the treatment of patients with pretreated ESR1 mutant HR-positive mBC. •Capivasertib (AKT inhibitor) was approved in 2023 for patients with pretreated mBC with PIK3CA , PTEN , or AKT1 alterations. •Sacituzumab govitecan was approved in 2023 for patients with HR-positive tumors previously tereated with chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilana Schlam
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Health Services Research Department, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Breast Medical Oncology Department, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vasseur A, Cabel L, Hego C, Takka W, Trabelsi Grati O, Renouf B, Lerebours F, Loirat D, Brain E, Cottu P, Sablin MP, Pierga JY, Callens C, Renault S, Bidard FC. Fulvestrant and everolimus efficacy after CDK4/6 inhibitor: a prospective study with circulating tumor DNA analysis. Oncogene 2024; 43:1214-1222. [PMID: 38413796 PMCID: PMC11014798 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-024-02986-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
In a prospective study (NCT02866149), we assessed the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i pre-treated mBC patients and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes throughout therapy. Patients treated with fulvestrant and everolimus had their ctDNA assessed at baseline, after 3-5 weeks and at disease progression. Somatic mutations were identified in archived tumor tissues by targeted NGS and tracked in cell-free DNA by droplet digital PCR. ctDNA detection was then associated with clinicopathological characteristics and patients' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and best overall response (BOR). In the 57 included patients, median PFS and OS were 6.8 (95%CI [5.03-11.5]) and 38.2 (95%CI [30.0-not reached]) months, respectively. In 47 response-evaluable patients, BOR was a partial response or stable disease in 15 (31.9%) and 11 (23.4%) patients, respectively. Among patients with trackable somatic mutation and available plasma sample, N = 33/47 (70.2%) and N = 19/36 (52.8%) had ctDNA detected at baseline and at 3 weeks, respectively. ctDNA detection at baseline and PIK3CA mutation had an adverse prognostic impact on PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. This prospective cohort study documents the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i-pretreated ER + /HER2- mBC and highlights the clinical validity of early ctDNA changes as pharmacodynamic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Vasseur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers Laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Caroline Hego
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers Laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Wissam Takka
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers Laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Olfa Trabelsi Grati
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences & Lettres University, Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Lerebours
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Delphine Loirat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Marie-Paule Sablin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Céline Callens
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences & Lettres University, Paris, France
| | - Shufang Renault
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers Laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
| | - François-Clément Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France.
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers Laboratory, INSERM CIC BT-1428, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
- UVSQ, Paris-Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Martínez-Jañez N, Ezquerra MB, Manso Sanchez LM, Carrasco FH, Torres AA, Morales S, Ortega PT, Gil VLO, Sampedro T, Conejero RA, Calvo-Martinez L, Galve-Calvo E, López R, de la Pena FA, Lopez-Tarruella S, de Araguiz BAHF, Ruiz LB, Cardenas TM, Chacon JI, Antón FM. First-line therapy with palbociclib in patients with advanced HR +/HER2 - breast cancer: The real-life study PALBOSPAIN. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07287-w. [PMID: 38561577 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07287-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line therapy with palbociclib in a Spanish cohort treated after palbociclib approval. METHODS PALBOSPAIN is an observational, retrospective, multicenter study evaluating real-world patterns and outcomes with 1 L palbociclib in men and women (any menopausal status) with advanced HR+/HER2- BC diagnosed between November 2017 and November 2019. The primary endpoint was real-world progression-free survival (rw-PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), the real-world response rate (rw-RR), the clinical benefit rate, palbociclib dose reduction, and safety. RESULTS A total of 762 patients were included. The median rw-PFS and OS were 24 months (95% CI 21-27) and 42 months (40-not estimable [NE]) in the whole population, respectively. By cohort, the median rw-PFS and OS were as follows: 28 (95% CI 23-39) and 44 (95% CI 38-NE) months in patients with de novo metastatic disease, 13 (95% CI 11-17) and 36 months (95% CI 31-41) in patients who experienced relapse < 12 months after the end of ET, and 31 months (95% CI 26-37) and not reached (NR) in patients who experienced relapse > 12 months after the end of ET. rw-PFS and OS were longer in patients with oligometastasis and only one metastatic site and those with non-visceral disease. The most frequent hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (72%; grade ≥ 3: 52.5%), and the most common non-hematologic adverse event was asthenia (38%). CONCLUSION These findings, consistent with those from clinical trials, support use of palbociclib plus ET as 1 L for advanced BC in the real-world setting, including pre-menopausal women and men. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04874025 (PALBOSPAIN). Date of registration: 04/30/2021 retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Martínez-Jañez
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo km. 9,100, Madrid, 28034, Spain
| | - M Bellet Ezquerra
- Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO)-Cellex Center, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L M Manso Sanchez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Henao Carrasco
- Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | - A Anton Torres
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - S Morales
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova - Lleida, Alpicat, Spain
| | - P Tolosa Ortega
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - V L Obadia Gil
- Breast Cancer Unit, ICO - Institut Català d'Oncologia l'Hospitalet (Hospital Duran i Reynals) L'Hospitalet De, Llobregat, Spain
| | - T Sampedro
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Cabuenes, Gijón, Spain
| | - R Andrés Conejero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - L Calvo-Martinez
- Medical Oncology Department, CHUAC - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - E Galve-Calvo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - R López
- Servicio de Oncología Médica y Grupo de Oncología Médica Traslacional, Hospital Clínico Universitario e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-CIBERONC, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - F Ayala de la Pena
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - S Lopez-Tarruella
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), CIBERONC, Geicam, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - L Boronat Ruiz
- Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Martos Cardenas
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar - Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J I Chacon
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain
| | - F Moreno Antón
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kulkarni A, Singh J. Predicting drug-drug interactions in breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors and forward planning. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2024; 20:225-233. [PMID: 38600865 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2341810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are cornerstones in the treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR) positive and Human Epidermal Growth factor (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer. Given their widespread use in the metastatic setting and emerging use in the adjuvant setting, studying drug-drug interactions (DDI) of these medications is of utmost importance. AREAS COVERED This review provides key background information on the CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. We discuss drug-drug interactions including those with proton pump inhibitors as well as CYP3A substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. We describe the effect of these drugs on membrane transporters and their substrates as well as those drugs that increase risk of CDK4/6 toxicities. Finally, we explore future directions for strategies to minimize drug-drug interactions. EXPERT OPINION It is crucial to be mindful of medications that may interfere with drug absorption, such as proton pump inhibitors, as well as those that interfere with drug metabolism, such as CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers. Additionally, special consideration should be given to populations at higher risk for polypharmacy, such as older patients with greater comorbidities. These interactions and patient characteristics should be considered when developing individual treatment plans with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abha Kulkarni
- Department of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, NY USA
| | - Jasmeet Singh
- Department of Breast Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, West Harrison, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Weide R, Feiten S, Waßmann C, Rendenbach B, Braun U, Burkhard O, Ehscheidt P, Schmidt M. Metastatic Breast Cancer: Prolonging Life in Routine Oncology Care. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1255. [PMID: 38610931 PMCID: PMC11011127 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has improved within controlled clinical trials. Whether these advances translate into improved OS in routine care is controversial. We therefore analyzed retrospectively unselected female patients from five oncology group practices and one university outpatient clinic, whose initial diagnosis of MBC was between 1995 and 2022. A total of 1610 patients with a median age of 63 years (23-100) were evaluated. In all, 82.9% had hormone-receptor-positive disease, and 23.8% were HER2-positive. Evaluation in time cohorts by initial MBC diagnosis date showed a continuous prolongation of median OS from 31.6 months (0.5-237.3+) (1995-2000) to 48.4 months (0.4-61.1+) (2018-2022) (p = 0.003). Univariable analyses showed a significant dependence on the time cohort of diagnosis, metastatic status at initial diagnosis, age at metastasis, hormone and HER2 status, general condition, metastasis localization, and the number of affected organs. A multivariable analysis revealed a significant dependence of survival probability on receptor status, general condition, and number of metastatic sites, as well as the time between initial breast cancer diagnosis and the diagnosis date of MBC in months. In sum, OS of patients with MBC has improved continuously and significantly in routine care over the last 27 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf Weide
- Praxis für Haematologie und Onkologie Koblenz, 56068 Koblenz, Germany
- Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Onkologie, 56068 Koblenz, Germany;
| | - Stefan Feiten
- Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Onkologie, 56068 Koblenz, Germany;
| | - Christina Waßmann
- Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz, Universitaetsmedizin Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Ute Braun
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Braun und Hünermund, 67061 Ludwigshafen, Germany;
| | | | | | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit, Universitaetsmedizin Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pla H, Felip E, Obadia V, Pernas S, Viñas G, Margelí M, Fort-Culillas R, Del Barco S, Sabaté N, Fort E, Lezcano C, Cirauqui B, Quiroga V, Stradella A, Gil Gil M, Esteve A, Recalde S. Elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in a multicentre cohort. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03399-3. [PMID: 38519708 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03399-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy have become the gold standard in hormone receptor-positive (HR +) HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is a significant lack of data regarding the efficacy and safety of these treatments in elderly patients. We present the results of a real-world data (RWD) cohort stratified by age at treatment initiation (≥ 70 years compared to patients < 70 years). METHODS Clinico-pathological data of HR + HER2- MBC patients who were candidates for CDK4/6i therapy between January 2017 and December 2020 at the Institut Català d'Oncologia (Spain) were retrospectively collected. The primary goal was to assess Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and safety outcomes within this patient population. RESULTS A total of 274 patients with MBC who received CDK4/6i treatment were included in the study. Among them, 84 patients (30.8%) were aged ≥ 70 years, with a mean age of 75, while 190 patients (69.2%) were under the age of 70, with a mean age of 55.7 years. The most frequently observed grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, with similar rates in both the < 70 group (43.9%) and the ≥ 70 group (47.9%) (p = 0.728). The median Progression-Free Survival (mPFS) for the first-line CDK4/6i treatment was 22 months (95% CI, 15.4-39.8) in the < 70 group and 20.8 months (95% CI 11.2-NR) in the ≥ 70 group (p = 0.67). Similarly, the median PFS for the second-line CDK4/6i treatment was 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.4-15.1) and 7.1 months (95% CI 4.4-21.3) (p = 0.79), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached either for the first- and second-line treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our RWD suggests that elderly patients, when compared to those under 70, experience similar survival outcomes and exhibit comparable tolerance for CDK4/6i therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Pla
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
- Precision Oncology Group (OncoGIR-Pro), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Eudald Felip
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain
| | - Verónica Obadia
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Bellvitge. Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Pernas
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Bellvitge. Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Viñas
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
- Precision Oncology Group (OncoGIR-Pro), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Mireia Margelí
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain
| | - Roser Fort-Culillas
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
- Precision Oncology Group (OncoGIR-Pro), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Sonia Del Barco
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
- Unitat d'Epidemiologia i Registre de càncer de Girona (UERCG), Institut d'Investigació Institut d'InvestigacióBiomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Nuria Sabaté
- Department of Pharmacy, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Doctor Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Eduard Fort
- Department of Pharmacy, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Clara Lezcano
- Department of Pharmacy, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Cirauqui
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain
| | - Vanesa Quiroga
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain
| | - Agostina Stradella
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Bellvitge. Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Gil Gil
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Bellvitge. Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Esteve
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H. U. Germans Trias i Pujol (HUGTiP), Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain.
| | - Sabela Recalde
- Department of Medical Oncology-Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-H.U.Bellvitge. Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Slamon D, Lipatov O, Nowecki Z, McAndrew N, Kukielka-Budny B, Stroyakovskiy D, Yardley DA, Huang CS, Fasching PA, Crown J, Bardia A, Chia S, Im SA, Ruiz-Borrego M, Loi S, Xu B, Hurvitz S, Barrios C, Untch M, Moroose R, Visco F, Afenjar K, Fresco R, Severin I, Ji Y, Ghaznawi F, Li Z, Zarate JP, Chakravartty A, Taran T, Hortobagyi G. Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Early Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2024; 390:1080-1091. [PMID: 38507751 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2305488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ribociclib has been shown to have a significant overall survival benefit in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Whether this benefit in advanced breast cancer extends to early breast cancer is unclear. METHODS In this international, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer in a 1:1 ratio to receive ribociclib (at a dose of 400 mg per day for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, for 3 years) plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI; letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg per day or anastrozole at a dose of 1 mg per day for ≥5 years) or an NSAI alone. Premenopausal women and men also received goserelin every 28 days. Eligible patients had anatomical stage II or III breast cancer. Here we report the results of a prespecified interim analysis of invasive disease-free survival, the primary end point; other efficacy and safety results are also reported. Invasive disease-free survival was evaluated with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method. The statistical comparison was made with the use of a stratified log-rank test, with a protocol-specified stopping boundary of a one-sided P-value threshold of 0.0128 for superior efficacy. RESULTS As of the data-cutoff date for this prespecified interim analysis (January 11, 2023), a total of 426 patients had had invasive disease, recurrence, or death. A significant invasive disease-free survival benefit was seen with ribociclib plus an NSAI as compared with an NSAI alone. At 3 years, invasive disease-free survival was 90.4% with ribociclib plus an NSAI and 87.1% with an NSAI alone (hazard ratio for invasive disease, recurrence, or death, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.91; P = 0.003). Secondary end points - distant disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival - also favored ribociclib plus an NSAI. The 3-year regimen of ribociclib at a 400-mg starting dose plus an NSAI was not associated with any new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS Ribociclib plus an NSAI significantly improved invasive disease-free survival among patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative stage II or III early breast cancer. (Funded by Novartis; NATALEE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03701334.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Slamon
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Oleg Lipatov
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Zbigniew Nowecki
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Nicholas McAndrew
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Bozena Kukielka-Budny
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Daniil Stroyakovskiy
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Denise A Yardley
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Peter A Fasching
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - John Crown
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Aditya Bardia
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Stephen Chia
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Manuel Ruiz-Borrego
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Sherene Loi
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Binghe Xu
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Sara Hurvitz
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Carlos Barrios
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Michael Untch
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Rebecca Moroose
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Frances Visco
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Karen Afenjar
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Rodrigo Fresco
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Irene Severin
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Yan Ji
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Farhat Ghaznawi
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Zheng Li
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Juan P Zarate
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Arunava Chakravartty
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Tetiana Taran
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| | - Gabriel Hortobagyi
- From the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (D. Slamon, N.M.); Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ufa (O.L.), and Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow (D. Stroyakovskiy) - both in Russia; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw (Z.N.), and Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli, Lublin (B.K.-B.) - both in Poland; the Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.A.Y.); the National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City (C.-S.H.); University Hospital Erlangen, the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region of Nuremberg, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen (P.A.F.), and the Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin (M.U.) - both in Germany; St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin (J.C.); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston (A.B.); the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (S.C.), and Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Edmonton, AB (I.S.) - both in Canada; the Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (S.-A.I.); Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, and Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama, Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Madrid - both in Spain (M.R.-B.); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (S.L.); the Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing (B.X.); the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle (S.H.); the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil (C.B.); the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL (R.M.); the National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, DC (F.V.); TRIO, Paris (K.A.); TRIO, Montevideo, Uruguay (R.F.); Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (Y.J., F.G., Z.L., J.P.Z., A.C.); Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland (T.T.); and the Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (G.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Slamon DJ, Diéras V, Rugo HS, Harbeck N, Im SA, Gelmon KA, Lipatov ON, Walshe JM, Martin M, Chavez-MacGregor M, Bananis E, Gauthier E, Lu DR, Kim S, Finn RS. Overall Survival With Palbociclib Plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:994-1000. [PMID: 38252901 PMCID: PMC10950136 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.PALOMA-2 demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival with palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Here, we report results for the secondary end point overall survival (OS). Postmenopausal women (N = 666) with ER+/HER2- ABC without previous systemic therapy for ABC were randomly assigned 2:1 to palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. After a median follow-up of 90.1 months, 405 deaths were observed and 155 patients were known to be alive. The median OS was 53.9 months (95% CI, 49.8 to 60.8) with palbociclib plus letrozole versus 51.2 months (95% CI, 43.7 to 58.9) with placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.18]; stratified one-sided P = .34). An imbalance in the number of patients with unknown survival outcome between the treatment arms (13.3% v 21.2%, respectively) limited interpretation of OS results. With recovered survival data, the median OS was 53.8 (95% CI, 49.8 to 59.2) versus 49.8 months (95% CI, 42.3 to 56.4), respectively (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.12]; one-sided P = .21). OS was not significantly improved with palbociclib plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis J. Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA
| | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Oleg N. Lipatov
- SAHI Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary under the MoH of Russia, Ufa, Russia
| | - Janice M. Walshe
- Cancer Trials Ireland, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Miguel Martin
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Richard S. Finn
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yildirim HC, Kapar C, Koksal B, Seyyar M, Sanci PC, Guliyev M, Perkin P, Buyukkor M, Yaslikaya S, Majidova N, Keskinkilic M, Ozaskin D, Avci T, Gunes TK, Arcagok M, Topal A, Keskin GSY, Kavgaci G, Yildirim N, Celayir OM, Avci N, Aslan F, Alkan A, Erciyestepe M, Cengiz M, Pehlivan M, Gulmez A, Beypinar I, Basoglu Tuylu T, Kayikcioglu E, Chalabiyev E, Turhal S, Guzel HG, Ayas E, Sahbazlar M, Dulgar O, Demir H, Yavuzsen T, Bayoglu V, Kivrak Salim D, Ozturk B, Ozdemir F, Kara O, Oksuzoglu B, Bal O, Demirci NS, Yilmaz M, Cabuk D, Aksoy S. Efficacy of first-line CDK 4-6 inhibitors in premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to treatment-related neutropenia on efficacy: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study. J Chemother 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38497444 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2024.2330835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
The only phase 3 study on the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in first-line treatment in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer is the MONALEESA-7 study, and data on the effectiveness of palbociclib is limited. Data are also limited regarding the effectiveness of CDK 4-6 inhibitors in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia, the most common side effect of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in first-line treatment in patients with premenopausal metastatic breast cancer and the effect of dose reduction due to neutropenia on progression-free survival. Our study is a multicenter, retrospective study, and factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) were examined in patients diagnosed with metastatic premenopausal breast cancer from 29 different centers and receiving combination therapy containing palbociclib or ribociclib in the metastatic stage. 319 patients were included in the study. The mPFS for patients treated with palbociclib was 26.83 months, and for those receiving ribociclib, the mPFS was 29.86 months (p = 0.924). mPFS was 32.00 months in patients who received a reduced dose, and mPFS was 25.96 months in patients who could take the initial dose, and there was no statistical difference (p = 0.238). Liver metastasis, using a fulvestrant together with a CDK 4-6 inhibitor, ECOG PS 1 was found to be a negative prognostic factor. No new adverse events were observed. In our study, we found PFS over 27 months in patients diagnosed with premenopausal breast cancer with CDK 4-6 inhibitors used in first-line treatment, similar to post-menopausal patients. We did not detect any difference between the effectiveness of the two CDK 4-6 inhibitors, and we showed that there was no decrease in the effectiveness of the CDK 4-6 inhibitor in patients whose dose was reduced due to neutropenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Cagri Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nigde Research and Education Hospital, Nigde, Turkey
| | - Caner Kapar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Baris Koksal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Seyyar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Pervin Can Sanci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Murad Guliyev
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Cerrahpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Perihan Perkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yildirim Beyazit University, Bilkent State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Buyukkor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Research and Education Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sendag Yaslikaya
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | - Nargiz Majidova
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Merve Keskinkilic
- Department of Medical Oncology, 9 Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Duygu Ozaskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Afyon Health Sciences University School of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Tugay Avci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Tugce Kubra Gunes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Umraniye Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Arcagok
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Alper Topal
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gul Sema Yildiran Keskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gulhane School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Kavgaci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nilgun Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Firat University Faculty of Medicine, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Ozde Melisa Celayir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nilufer Avci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medicana Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Ferit Aslan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Park Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Alkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Faculty of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Mert Erciyestepe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Cengiz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Metin Pehlivan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zonguldak Ataturk State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Gulmez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adana City Education and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ismail Beypinar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alaaddin Keykubat University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Tugba Basoglu Tuylu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nigde Research and Education Hospital, Nigde, Turkey
| | - Erkan Kayikcioglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isparta Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey
| | - Elvin Chalabiyev
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serdal Turhal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Anadolu Health Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Halil Goksel Guzel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Eyyup Ayas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Sahbazlar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Ozgecan Dulgar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Umraniye Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hacer Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Afyon Health Sciences University School of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Tugba Yavuzsen
- Department of Medical Oncology, 9 Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Vedat Bayoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Derya Kivrak Salim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Banu Ozturk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Feyyaz Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Oguz Kara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | - Berna Oksuzoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. A. Y. Ankara Oncology Research and Education Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Oznur Bal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yildirim Beyazit University, Bilkent State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nebi Serkan Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Cerrahpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mesut Yilmaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Devrim Cabuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Sercan Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nathan SD, Johri S, Joly JM, King CS, Raina A, McEvoy CA, Lee D, Shen E, Smith P, Deng C, Waxman AB. Survival analysis from the INCREASE study in PH-ILD: evaluating the impact of treatment crossover on overall mortality. Thorax 2024; 79:301-306. [PMID: 37979971 PMCID: PMC10958253 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A post-hoc analysis of the INCREASE trial and its open-label extension (OLE) was performed to evaluate whether inhaled treprostinil has a long-term survival benefit in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). METHODS Two different models of survival were employed; the inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) and the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) models both allow construction of a pseudo-placebo group, thereby allowing for long-term survival evaluation of patients with PH-ILD receiving inhaled treprostinil. Time-varying stabilised weights were calculated by fitting Cox proportional hazards models based on the baseline and time-varying prognostic factors to generate weighted Cox regression models with associated adjusted HRs. RESULTS In the INCREASE trial, there were 10 and 12 deaths in the inhaled treprostinil and placebo arms, respectively, during the 16-week randomised trial. During the OLE, all patients received inhaled treprostinil and there were 29 and 33 deaths in the prior inhaled treprostinil arm and prior placebo arm, respectively. With a conventional analysis, the HR for death was 0.71 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.10; p=0.1227). Both models demonstrated significant reductions in death associated with inhaled treprostinil treatment with HRs of 0.62 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.99; p=0.0483) and 0.26 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.98; p=0.0473) for the IPCW and RPSFT methods, respectively. CONCLUSION Two independent modelling techniques that have been employed in the oncology literature both suggest a long-term survival benefit associated with inhaled treprostinil treatment in patients with PH-ILD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven D Nathan
- Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Shilpa Johri
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Pulmonary Associates of Richmond Inc, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Joanna M Joly
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Christopher S King
- Advanced Lung Disease and Lung Transplant Program, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Amresh Raina
- Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Colleen A McEvoy
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Dasom Lee
- United Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric Shen
- United Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Peter Smith
- United Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chunqin Deng
- United Therapeutics, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Aaron B Waxman
- Pulmonary Vascular Disease Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pascual T, Fernandez-Martinez A, Agrawal Y, Pfefferle AD, Chic N, Brasó-Maristany F, Gonzàlez-Farré B, Paré L, Villacampa G, Saura C, Hernando C, Muñoz M, Galván P, Gonzàlez-Farré X, Oliveira M, Gil-Gil M, Ciruelos E, Villagrasa P, Gavilá J, Prat A, Perou CM. Cell-cycle inhibition and immune microenvironment in breast cancer treated with ribociclib and letrozole or chemotherapy. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:20. [PMID: 38448600 PMCID: PMC10918094 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00625-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
In this study, we performed genomic analyses of cell cycle and tumor microenvironment changes during and after ribociclib and letrozole or chemotherapy in the CORALLEEN trial. 106 women with untreated PAM50-defined Luminal B early breast cancers were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant ribociclib and letrozole or standard-of-care chemotherapy. Ki67 immunohistochemistry, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes quantification, and RNA sequencing were obtained from tissue biopsies pre-treatment, on day 14 of treatment, and tumor specimens from surgical resection. Results showed that at surgery, Ki67 and the PAM50 proliferation scores were lower after ribociclib compared to chemotherapy. However, consistent reactivation of tumor cell proliferation from day 14 to surgery was only observed in the ribociclib arm. In tumors with complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA) at surgery, PAM50 proliferation scores were lower in the ribociclib arm compared to chemotherapy (p < 0.001), whereas the opposite was observed with tumor cellularity (p = 0.002). Gene expression signatures (GES) associated with antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and innate immune system activity showed increased expression post-chemotherapy but decreased expression post-ribociclib. Interferon-associated GES had decreased expression with CCCA and increased expression with non-CCCA. Our findings suggest that while both treatment strategies decreased proliferation, the depth and the patterns over time differed by treatment arm. Immunologically, ribociclib was associated with downregulated GES associated with APCs and the innate immune system in Luminal B tumors, contrary to existing preclinical data. Further studies are needed to understand the effect of CDK4/6 inhibition on the tumor cells and microenvironment, an effect which may vary according to tumor subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomás Pascual
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yash Agrawal
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Adam D Pfefferle
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nuria Chic
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fara Brasó-Maristany
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Blanca Gonzàlez-Farré
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Pathology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Paré
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Saura
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Breast Cancer Program, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Hernando
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Breast Cancer Biology Research Group, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Montserrat Muñoz
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Galván
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Gonzàlez-Farré
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Breast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mafalda Oliveira
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Breast Cancer Program, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Gil-Gil
- IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Ciruelos
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, HM Hospitales Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Joaquín Gavilá
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Aleix Prat
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain.
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
- Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Breast Cancer Unit, IOB-Quirón Salud, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Charles M Perou
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Agostinetto E, Arecco L, de Azambuja E. Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Early Breast Cancer: How to Choose Wisely? Oncol Ther 2024; 12:19-29. [PMID: 37989811 PMCID: PMC10881905 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-023-00250-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Agostinetto
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90 (Rez Haut Nord), Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luca Arecco
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90 (Rez Haut Nord), Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Rue Meylemeersch, 90 (Rez Haut Nord), Anderlecht, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Guo X, Zhou Y, Zhang K, Lu W, Zhong X, Wu S, Shen L, Chen H, Chen Y. First-line CDK4/6 inhibitor-based combinations for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 2024; 17:106-118. [PMID: 38102891 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines recommend cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i)-based first-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, direct drug comparisons are lacking. We aimed to identify the most effective and safe therapy through network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OpenGrey up to September 30, 2023. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing endocrine therapy alone or in combination with CDK4/6i as first-line endocrine treatment for HR+/HER2- ABC patients. The hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and relative risks for objective response rate and adverse events (AEs) were available in selected trials. We performed a Bayesian NMA following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Thirteen RCTs, involving 10 treatments, were included. Most studies were at low risk of bias. Regarding PFS, ribociclib+fulvestrant ranked first with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 85.0%, followed by dalpiciclib+nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) (SUCRA = 78.9%). Considering OS, the top three ranked treatments were ribociclib+fulvestrant (SUCRA = 94.1%), abemaciclib+NSAI (SUCRA = 69.9%), and ribociclib+NSAI (SUCRA = 68.5%). Out of four CDK4/6is, ribociclib minimized the grade 3/4 AEs, while dalpiciclib demonstrated the worst safety. Publication bias could not be ignored in our analyses, and the certainty of evidence was downgraded primarily due to imprecision. CONCLUSIONS Ribociclib+fulvestrant probably represents the best option in a first-line setting. When combined with NSAI, dalpiciclib likely showed the best efficacy but the worst safety. Abemaciclib+NSAI and ribociclib+NSAI could also be promising treatments, while palbociclib presented inferiority. (PROSPERO Registration No. CRD42022370271).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianan Guo
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yunxiang Zhou
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kun Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei Lu
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xi Zhong
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shijie Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lu Shen
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Huihui Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yiding Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chen N, Nanda R. Androgen receptor agonism in advanced oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:269-270. [PMID: 38342112 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00080-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Chen
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Rita Nanda
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Julson JR, Horton SC, Quinn CH, Beierle AM, Bownes LV, Stewart JE, Aye J, Yoon KJ, Beierle EA. CDK4/6 Inhibition With Lerociclib is a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for the Treatment of Pediatric Sarcomas. J Pediatr Surg 2024; 59:473-482. [PMID: 37919169 PMCID: PMC10922146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sarcomas are a heterogenous collection of bone and soft tissue tumors. The heterogeneity of these tumors makes it difficult to standardize treatment. CDK 4/6 inhibitors are a family of targeted agents which limit cell cycle progression and have been shown to be upregulated in sarcomas. In the current preclinical study, we evaluated the effects of lerociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, on pediatric sarcomas in vitro and in 3D bioprinted tumors. METHODS The effects of lerociclib on viability, proliferation, cell cycle, motility, and stemness were assessed in established sarcoma cell lines, U-2 OS and MG-63, as well as sarcoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). 3D printed biotumors of each of the U-2 OS, MG-63, and COA79 cells were utilized to study the effects of lerociclib on tumor growth ex vivo. RESULTS CDK 4/6, as well as the intermediaries retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and phosphorylated Rb were identified as targets in the four sarcoma cell lines. Lerociclib treatment induced cell cycle arrest, decreased proliferation, motility, and stemness of sarcoma cells. Treatment with lerociclib decreased sarcoma cell viability in both traditional 2D culture as well as 3D bioprinted microtumors. CONCLUSIONS Inhibition of CDK 4/6 activity with lerociclib was efficacious in traditional 2D sarcoma cell culture as well as in 3D bioprints. Lerociclib holds promise and warrants further investigation as a novel therapeutic strategy for management of these heterogenous groups of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet R Julson
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Sara C Horton
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Colin H Quinn
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Andee M Beierle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Laura V Bownes
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Jerry E Stewart
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Jamie Aye
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Karina J Yoon
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Beierle
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Palmieri C, Linden H, Birrell SN, Wheelwright S, Lim E, Schwartzberg LS, Dwyer AR, Hickey TE, Rugo HS, Cobb P, O'Shaughnessy JA, Johnston S, Brufsky A, Tilley WD, Overmoyer B. Activity and safety of enobosarm, a novel, oral, selective androgen receptor modulator, in androgen receptor-positive, oestrogen receptor-positive, and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (Study G200802): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, multinational, parallel design, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:317-325. [PMID: 38342115 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00004-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The androgen receptor is a tumour suppressor in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. The activity and safety of enobosarm, an oral selective androgen receptor modulator, was evaluated in women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative, and androgen receptor (AR)-positive disease. METHODS Women who were postmenopausal (aged ≥18 years) with previously treated ER-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were enrolled in a randomised, open-label, multicentre, multinational, parallel design, phase 2 trial done at 35 cancer treatment centres in nine countries. Participants were stratified on the setting of immediately preceding endocrine therapy and the presence of bone-only metastasis and randomly assigned (1:1) to 9 mg or 18 mg oral enobosarm daily using an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks in those with centrally confirmed AR-positive disease (ie, the evaluable population). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02463032). FINDINGS Between Sept 10, 2015, and Nov 28, 2017, 136 (79%) of 172 patients deemed eligible were randomly assigned to 9 mg (n=72) or 18 mg (n=64) oral enobosarm daily. Of these 136 patients, 102 (75%) patients formed the evaluable population (9 mg, n=50; 18 mg, n=52). The median age was 60·5 years (IQR 52·3-69·3) in the 9 mg group and 62·5 years (54·0-69·3) in the 18 mg group. The median follow-up was 7·5 months (IQR 2·9-14·1). At 24 weeks, 16 (32%, 95% CI 20-47) of 50 in the 9 mg group and 15 (29%, 17-43) of 52 in the 18 mg group had clinical benefit. Six (8%) of 75 patients who received 9 mg and ten (16%) of 61 patients who received 18 mg had grade 3 or grade 4 drug-related adverse events, most frequently increased hepatic transaminases (three [4%] of 75 in the 9 mg group and two [3%] of 61 in the 18 mg group), hypercalcaemia (two [3%] and two [3%]), and fatigue (one [1%] and two [3%]). Four deaths (one in the 9 mg group and three in the 18 mg group) were deemed unrelated to the study drug. INTERPRETATION Enobosarm has anti-tumour activity in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, showing that AR activation can result in clinical benefit, supporting further clinical investigation of selective AR activation strategies for the treatment of AR-positive, ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. FUNDING GTx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Palmieri
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular, and Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Hannah Linden
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center/University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stephen N Birrell
- Wellend Health/Burnside War Memorial Hospital, Toorak Gardens, SA, Australia; Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sally Wheelwright
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE-C), University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK
| | - Elgene Lim
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Research Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Amy R Dwyer
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Theresa E Hickey
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Stephen Johnston
- The Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Adam Brufsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Wayne D Tilley
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Beth Overmoyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yıldırım HÇ, Kutlu Y, Mutlu E, Aykan MB, Korkmaz M, Yalçın S, Şakalar T, Celayir ÖM, Kayıkçıoğlu E, Aslan F, Hafızoğlu E, Altıntaş YE, Keskinkılıç M, Chalabiyev E, Çelebi A, Dursun B, Kapar C, Özen M, Acar Ö, Dülgar Ö, Kut E, Biter S, Kus F, Almuradova E, Erdoğan AP, Saray S, Güven DC, Şimşek ET, Üskent N, Kemal Y, Çakar B, Açıkgöz Ö, Kılıçkap S, Aksoy S. The efficacy of palbociclib and ribociclib in the first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer in male patients: a Turkish oncology group (TOG) study. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:258-265. [PMID: 38310597 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02460-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Male breast cancer, comprising approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases, often leads to the exclusion of male patients as a criterion in clinical trials. While the efficacy of Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors has been established in metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR +) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2 -) breast cancer in women, limited data exist on their effectiveness in male patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of palbociclib or ribociclib in male patients with breast cancer. METHODS This study is a multicenter, retrospective study. We included male patients with HR + and HER2-metastatic breast cancer who received palbociclib or ribociclib as first-line treatment. Our primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR), and drug-related adverse effects. RESULTS A total of 46 male patients from 27 institutions were enrolled. The median age at initiation of CDK 4/6 inhibitors was 63.64 ± 13.69 years, with a median follow-up of 21.33 (95% CI 14.92-27.74) months. The ORR were 84% for palbociclib and 76.2% for ribociclib. The mPFS for the entire cohort was 28.06 months (95% CI 18.70-37.42). No significant difference in PFS was observed between palbociclib and ribociclib (mPFS: 24.46 months (95% CI 11.51-37.42) vs 28.33 months (95% CI 14.77-41.88), respectively, p = 0.211). No new adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates that palbociclib and ribociclib are effective and safe options for first-line treatment in male patients with HR + /HER2 - metastatic breast cancer. However, further prospective studies are warranted to establish their efficacy in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hasan Çağrı Yıldırım
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Yasin Kutlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emel Mutlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Musa Barış Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Korkmaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tokat State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey
| | - Selim Yalçın
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kırıkkale University Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale, Turkey
| | - Teoman Şakalar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kahramanmaras Necip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | | | - Erkan Kayıkçıoğlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
| | - Ferit Aslan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medicalpark Ankara Batıkent Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Emre Hafızoğlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yunus Emre Altıntaş
- Department of Medical Oncology, Koc University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Merve Keskinkılıç
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Elvin Chalabiyev
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Abdussamet Çelebi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bengü Dursun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Caner Kapar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Educatıon and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Miraç Özen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Ömer Acar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Özgecan Dülgar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Engin Kut
- Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa State Hospital, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Sedat Biter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey
| | - Fatih Kus
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elvina Almuradova
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tınaztepe Galen Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Atike Pınar Erdoğan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Seray Saray
- Department of Medical Oncology, Balıkesir State Hospital, Balıkesir, Turkey
| | - Deniz Can Güven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Necdet Üskent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Kemal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Samsun Medical Park Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Burcu Çakar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Özgür Açıkgöz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Medipol University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kılıçkap
- Department of Medical Oncology, İstinye University Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sercan Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Prat A, Solovieff N, André F, O'Shaughnessy J, Cameron DA, Janni W, Sonke GS, Yap YS, Yardley DA, Partridge AH, Thuerigen A, Zarate JP, Lteif A, Su F, Carey LA. Intrinsic Subtype and Overall Survival of Patients with Advanced HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Treated with Ribociclib and ET: Correlative Analysis of MONALEESA-2, -3, -7. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:793-802. [PMID: 37939142 PMCID: PMC10870119 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The MONALEESA-2, -3, -7 trials demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) benefits with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Understanding the association of intrinsic subtypes with survival outcomes could potentially guide treatment decisions. Here, we evaluated the association of intrinsic subtypes with OS in MONALEESA-2, -3, -7. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Tumor samples from MONALEESA-2, -3, -7 underwent PAM50-based subtyping. The relationship between subtypes and OS was assessed using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Multivariable models were adjusted for clinical prognostic factors. RESULTS Overall, 990 tumors (among 2,066 patients) from ribociclib (n = 580) and placebo (n = 410) arms were profiled. Subtype distribution was luminal A, 54.5%; luminal B, 28.0%; HER2-enriched (HER2E) 14.6%; and basal-like, 2.8%; and was consistent across treatment arms. The luminal A subtype had the best OS outcomes in both arms, while basal-like had the worst. Patients with HER2E (HR, 0.60; P = 0.018), luminal B (HR, 0.69; P = 0.023), and luminal A (HR, 0.75; P = 0.021) subtypes derived OS benefit with ribociclib. Patients with basal-like subtype did not derive benefit from ribociclib (HR, 1.92; P = 0.137); however, patient numbers were small (n = 28). CONCLUSIONS The prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes for OS was confirmed in this pooled analysis of the MONALEESA trials (largest dataset in HR+/HER2- ABC). While basal-like subtype did not benefit, a consistent OS benefit was observed with ribociclib added to ET across luminal and HER2E subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- IOB-Quironsalud, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Solovieff
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Texas Oncology-Baylor University Medical Center and The US Oncology Research Network, Dallas, Texas
| | - David A. Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Gabe S. Sonke
- Netherlands Cancer Institute/Borstkanker Onderzoek Groep Study Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Denise A. Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | - Agnes Lteif
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | - Fei Su
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | - Lisa A. Carey
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zikry TM, Wolff SC, Ranek JS, Davis HM, Naugle A, Luthra N, Whitman AA, Kedziora KM, Stallaert W, Kosorok MR, Spanheimer PM, Purvis JE. Cell cycle plasticity underlies fractional resistance to palbociclib in ER+/HER2- breast tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2309261121. [PMID: 38324568 PMCID: PMC10873600 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309261121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib blocks cell cycle progression in Estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast tumor cells. Despite the drug's success in improving patient outcomes, a small percentage of tumor cells continues to divide in the presence of palbociclib-a phenomenon we refer to as fractional resistance. It is critical to understand the cellular mechanisms underlying fractional resistance because the precise percentage of resistant cells in patient tissue is a strong predictor of clinical outcomes. Here, we hypothesize that fractional resistance arises from cell-to-cell differences in core cell cycle regulators that allow a subset of cells to escape CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. We used multiplex, single-cell imaging to identify fractionally resistant cells in both cultured and primary breast tumor samples resected from patients. Resistant cells showed premature accumulation of multiple G1 regulators including E2F1, retinoblastoma protein, and CDK2, as well as enhanced sensitivity to pharmacological inhibition of CDK2 activity. Using trajectory inference approaches, we show how plasticity among cell cycle regulators gives rise to alternate cell cycle "paths" that allow individual tumor cells to escape palbociclib treatment. Understanding drivers of cell cycle plasticity, and how to eliminate resistant cell cycle paths, could lead to improved cancer therapies targeting fractionally resistant cells to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek M. Zikry
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Samuel C. Wolff
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Jolene S. Ranek
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Harris M. Davis
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Ander Naugle
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Namit Luthra
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Austin A. Whitman
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Katarzyna M. Kedziora
- Center for Biologic Imaging, Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburgh, PA15620
| | - Wayne Stallaert
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburgh, PA15620
| | - Michael R. Kosorok
- Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Philip M. Spanheimer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| | - Jeremy E. Purvis
- Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC27599
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kappel C, Elliott MJ, Kumar V, Nadler MB, Desnoyers A, Amir E. Comparative overall survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3129. [PMID: 38326452 PMCID: PMC10850180 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53151-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Individual trials of abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib show a similar impact on progression-free survival yet differing statistical significance for overall survival (OS). A robust comparative evaluation of OS, safety, and tolerability of the three drugs is warranted. A systematic literature search identified phase 3 randomized clinical trials reporting OS of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Trial-level data on OS and common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each drug. In the absence of direct comparisons, a network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pairwise comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of each of the CDK4/6i. Seven studies comprising of 4415 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 73.3 months (range: 48.7-97.2 months). There were no statistically significant differences in OS between any of the CDK4/6i. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib both showed significantly higher GI toxicity (grade 1-2 vomiting OR 1.87 [95% CI 1.37-2.56] and OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.59-3.23] respectively). Compared to palbociclib, abemaciclib was associated with more grade 3-4 diarrhea OR 118.06 [95% CI 7.28-1915.32]. In contrast, palbociclib was associated with significantly more neutropenia than ribociclib and abemaciclib but significantly lower risk of grade 3-4 infections. Abemaciclib had significantly less grade 3-4 transaminitis and grade 3-4 neutropenia than ribociclib. Treatment discontinuation and death due to AE were significantly higher with abemaciclib than palbociclib and ribociclib. There is no statistically significant difference in OS between CDK4/6i despite differing statistical significance levels of individual trials. Real-world data analyses may help to identify if there is a meaningful inter-drug difference in efficacy. Significant differences between CDK4/6i are observed for safety and tolerability outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coralea Kappel
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mitchell J Elliott
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vikaash Kumar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle B Nadler
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Eitan Amir
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Ave, 700U, 7-721, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Magri V, Marino L, De Renzi G, De Meo M, Salvatori F, Buccilli D, Bianco V, Santini D, Nicolazzo C, Gazzaniga P. Early Detection of Disease Progression in Metastatic Cancers: Could CTCs Improve RECIST Criteria? Biomedicines 2024; 12:388. [PMID: 38397990 PMCID: PMC10887063 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12020388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Early detection of disease progression is a crucial issue in the management of cancer patients, especially in metastatic settings. Currently, treatment selection mostly relies on criteria based on radiologic evaluations (RECIST). The aim of the present retrospective study is to evaluate the potential inclusion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in hybrid criteria. CTC counts from a total of 160 patients with different metastatic tumors were analyzed for this purpose. In our cohort, 73 patients were affected by breast cancer, 69 by colorectal cancer and 18 by prostate cancer. PFS and OS were evaluated according to the corresponding prediction of disease progression by CTCs and RECIST criteria. In breast cancer, CTC-I has an important impact on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values. When CTC-I predicted earlier than RECIST-I, the disease progression, the PFS and OS were shorter with respect to the opposite case. In particular, PFS was 11 (5-16) vs. 34 (23-45)-with p < 0.001-and OS was 80 (22-138) vs. 116 (43-189), p = 0.33. The results suggest a promising role of CTCs as complementary information which could significantly improve the clinical outcomes, and they encourage consideration of future trials to evaluate new hybrid criteria, particularly for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Magri
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Luca Marino
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy;
| | - Gianluigi De Renzi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| | - Michela De Meo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| | - Francesca Salvatori
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Dorelsa Buccilli
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Vincenzo Bianco
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Pathology, Oncology and Radiology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.S.); (D.B.); (V.B.); (D.S.)
| | - Chiara Nicolazzo
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| | - Paola Gazzaniga
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.D.R.); (M.D.M.); (C.N.); (P.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Morrison L, Loibl S, Turner NC. The CDK4/6 inhibitor revolution - a game-changing era for breast cancer treatment. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:89-105. [PMID: 38082107 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00840-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2 non-amplified (HR+HER2-) breast cancer. These agents can also be administered as adjuvant therapy to patients with higher-risk early stage disease. Nonetheless, the clinical success of these agents has created several challenges, such as how to address acquired resistance, identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from therapy prior to treatment, and understanding the optimal timing of administration and sequencing of these agents. In this Review, we describe the rationale for targeting CDK4/6 in patients with breast cancer, including a summary of updated clinical evidence and how this should inform clinical practice. We also discuss ongoing research efforts that are attempting to address the various challenges created by the widespread implementation of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Morrison
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ghose A, Stanway S, Sirohi B, Mutebi M, Adomah S. Advanced Breast Cancer Care: The Current Situation and Global Disparities. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151551. [PMID: 38065813 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Advanced breast cancer (ABC) is an incurable disease. The number of people living with ABC has increased globally. Disparities in ABC care exist at both individual and system levels. ABC cases in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are underreported due to a lack of national cancer registries. Harmonized guidelines for resource stratification and capacity building in LMICs are under way. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were used. CONCLUSION To improve ABC outcomes and resolve disparities, more robust health systems or pathways need to be developed across the cancer continuum in addition to social education. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE So far, the ABC specialist nurse role has been variable globally, and to conquer such variability, an international online nurse education and training program is in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruni Ghose
- United Kingdom and Ireland Global Cancer Network; Barts Cancer Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London, UK; Immuno-Oncology Clinical Network, UK; European Cancer Organisation.
| | - Susannah Stanway
- United Kingdom and Ireland Global Cancer Network; and Breast Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bhawna Sirohi
- United Kingdom and Ireland Global Cancer Network; and Medical Oncology, BALCO Medical Centre, Vedanta Medical Research Foundation, Chattisgarh, India
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sarah Adomah
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jhaveri K, Marmé F. Current and emerging treatment approaches for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 123:102670. [PMID: 38211404 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
In the past decade, significant progress was made in treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), but many clinical questions remain. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors are now widely used in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as standard of care, having demonstrated significant progression-free survival versus ET, and also significant overall survival benefits in the metastatic setting. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR intracellular signaling pathway coupled with ET typically follows first-line therapies. Novel endocrine options including oral selective estrogen receptor down-regulators (SERDs) are in late phases of development, with elacestrant being the first oral SERD to be approved for ESR1-mutant mBC. However, endocrine-refractory disease is inevitable in most patients and represents an area of unmet need, with current recommended options offering poor efficacy, undesirable toxicity, and reduced quality of life. Breakthrough advances in the metastatic setting came via the development of antibody-drug conjugates, which have the advantage of delivering cytotoxic payloads to tumor cells with higher tumor selectivity. Trastuzumab deruxtecan offers a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC and sacituzumab govitecan is a novel therapeutic option for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC, including those with unmet treatment need in the later-line endocrine-refractory setting. Data gaps still exist regarding optimal sequencing of these novel agents; additional studies into mechanisms of resistance in the metastatic setting would provide further insights. Herein, we describe the current treatment options for HR+/HER2- mBC, including the latest practice-impacting data, and provide commentary on future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Komal Jhaveri
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Gynecological Oncology Section, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|