1
|
Royston C, Bergford S, Calhoun P, Sibayan J, Ruan Y, Boughton C, Wilinska ME, Hovorka R. Safety of Options to "Boost" (Enhancing Insulin Infusion Rates) and "Ease-Off" (Reducing Insulin Infusion Rates) in CamAPS FX Hybrid Closed-Loop System: A Real-World Analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024. [PMID: 39146468 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2024.0298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
The usage and safety of the Boost and Ease-off features in the CamAPS FX hybrid closed-loop system were analyzed in a retrospective analysis of real-world data from 7,464 users over a 12-month period. Boost was used more frequently than Ease-off, but for a shorter duration per use. Mean starting glucose was above range for Boost (229 ± 51 mg/dL), and within range for Ease-off (114 ± 29 mg/dL). Time spent below 70 mg/dL was low during Boost periods [median (interquartile range; IQR) 0.0% (0.0, 0.5%)], and lower than during no Boost periods [2.1% (1.2, 3.4%)], while time spent above 180 mg/dL was lower during Ease-off periods (15 ± 14%) compared with no Ease-off periods (25 ± 12%). There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis attributed to Boost or Ease-off use. Boost and Ease-off allow users to engage safely with CamAPS FX to manage their glucose levels during periods of more-than-usual and less-than-usual insulin needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloë Royston
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Peter Calhoun
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Judy Sibayan
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Yue Ruan
- Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Charlotte Boughton
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Malgorzata E Wilinska
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bismuth É, Tubiana-Rufi N, Rynders CA, Dalla-Vale F, Bonnemaison E, Coutant R, Farret A, Poidvin A, Bouhours-Nouet N, Storey C, Donzeau A, DeBoer MD, Breton MD, Villard O, Renard É. Sustained 3-Year Improvement of Glucose Control With Hybrid Closed Loop in Children With Type 1 Diabetes While Going Through Puberty. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:1696-1703. [PMID: 38985499 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-0916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of prolonged hybrid closed loop (HCL) use in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on glucose control and BMI throughout pubertal progression. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We used a prospective multicenter extension study following the Free-Life Kid AP (FLKAP) HCL trial. The 9-month previously reported FLKAP trial included 119 prepubertal children (aged 6-12 years). During the extension study, participants could continue to use HCL for 30 months (M9 to M39). HbA1c values were collected every 3 months up to M39, while continuous glucose monitoring metrics, BMI z scores, and Tanner stages were collected up to M24. Noninferiority tests were performed to assess parameter sustainability over time. RESULTS One hundred seventeen children completed the extension study, with mean age 10.1 years (minimum to maximum, 6.8-14.0) at the beginning. Improvement of HbA1c obtained in the FLKAP trial was significantly sustained during extension (median [interquartile range], M9 7.0% [6.8-7.4], and M39 7.0% [6.6-7.4], P < 0.0001 for noninferiority test) and did not differ between children who entered puberty at M24 (Tanner stage ≥2; 54% of the patients) and patients who remained prepubertal. BMI z score also remained stable (M9 0.41 [-0.29 to 1.13] and M24 0.48 [-0.11 to 1.13], P < 0.0001, for noninferiority test). No severe hypoglycemia and one ketoacidosis episode not related to the HCL system occurred. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged use of HCL can safely and effectively mitigate impairment of glucose control usually associated with pubertal progression without impact on BMI in children with T1D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Élise Bismuth
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Nord, University of Paris, Paris, France
- Center of Clinical Investigations, INSERM CIC1426, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Nord, Paris, France
| | - Nadia Tubiana-Rufi
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Nord, University of Paris, Paris, France
- Center of Clinical Investigations, INSERM CIC1426, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Nord, Paris, France
| | - Corey A Rynders
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Fabienne Dalla-Vale
- Department of Pediatrics Endocrinology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Régis Coutant
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Anne Farret
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Amélie Poidvin
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Nord, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Natacha Bouhours-Nouet
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Caroline Storey
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Nord, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Donzeau
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Mark D DeBoer
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Marc D Breton
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Orianne Villard
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
- Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Éric Renard
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
- Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
- INSERM Clinical Investigation Centre 1411, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tanenbaum ML, Commissariat PV, Wilmot EG, Lange K. Navigating the Unique Challenges of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems to Facilitate Effective Uptake, Onboarding, and Continued Use. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024:19322968241275963. [PMID: 39212371 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241275963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Advances in diabetes technologies have enabled automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, which have demonstrated benefits to glycemia, psychosocial outcomes, and quality of life for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Despite the many demonstrated benefits, AID systems come with their own unique challenges: continued user attention and effort, barriers to equitable access, personal costs vs benefits, and integration of the system into daily life. The purpose of this narrative review is to identify challenges and opportunities for supporting uptake and onboarding of AID systems to ultimately support sustained AID use. Setting realistic expectations, providing comprehensive training, developing willingness to adopt new treatments and workflows, upskilling of diabetes team members, and increasing flexibility of care to tailor care to individual needs, preferences, lifestyle, and personal goals will be most effective in facilitating effective, widespread, person-centered implementation of AID systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly L Tanenbaum
- Division of Endocrinology, Gerontology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Persis V Commissariat
- Section on Clinical, Behavioral, and Outcomes Research, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emma G Wilmot
- Academic Unit of Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Karin Lange
- Department of Medical Psychology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
WANG YY, YING HM, TIAN F, QIAN XL, Zhou ZF. Three months use of Hybrid Closed Loop Systems improves glycated hemoglobin levels in adolescents and children with type 1 diabetes: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0308202. [PMID: 39133688 PMCID: PMC11318905 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Longer outpatient studies have demonstrated that hybrid closed loop (HCL) use has led to a concomitant reduction in glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c) by 0.3%-0.7%. However, reports have also indicated that HbA1c levels are not declined in the long-term use of HCL. Therefore, we wonder that 3 months use of HCL could improve glycated hemoglobin levels in adolescents and children with T1D. METHODS Relevant studies were searched electronically in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase utilizing the key words "Pediatrics or Child or Adolescent", "Insulin Infusion Systems" and "Diabetes Mellitus" from inception to 17th March 2024 to evaluate the performance of HCL on HbA1c in adolescents, and children with T1D. RESULTS Nine studies involving 927 patients were identified. Three months use of HCL show a beneficial effect on HbA1c management (p <0.001) as compared to standard of care in adolescents and children with T1D, without evidence of heterogeneity between articles (I2 = 40%, p = 0.10). HCL did significantly increase the overall average percentage of hypoglycemic time between 70 and 180 mg/dL (TIR) (p <0.001; I2 = 51%). HCL did not show a beneficial effect on hypoglycemic time <70 mg/dL and <54 mg/dL (p >0.05). The overall percentage of hyperglycemic time was significantly decreased in HCL group compared to the control group when it was defined as >180 mg/dL (p <0.001; I2 = 83%), >250 mg/dL (p = 0.007, I2 = 86%) and >300 mg/dL (p = 0.005; I2 = 76%). The mean glucose level was significantly decreased by HCL (p <0.001; I2 = 58%), however, no significant difference was found in coefficient of variation of sensor glucose (p = 0.82; I2 = 71%) and daily insulin dose (p = 0.94; I2 <0.001) between the HCL group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS HCL had a beneficial effect on HbA1c management and TIR without increased hypoglycemic time as compared to standard of care in adolescents and children with T1D when therapy duration of HCL was not less than three months. TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL CRD42022367493; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, Principal investigator: Zhen-feng Zhou, Date of registration: October 30, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-yuan WANG
- Department of Endocrinology, Xixi Hospital of Hangzhou (Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hui-min YING
- Department of Endocrinology, Xixi Hospital of Hangzhou (Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Fang TIAN
- Department of Endocrinology, Xixi Hospital of Hangzhou (Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-lu QIAN
- Department of Endocrinology, Xixi Hospital of Hangzhou (Affiliated Hangzhou Xixi Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhen-feng Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hangzhou Women’s Hospital (Hangzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Hangzhou First People’s Hospital Qianjiang New City Campus, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ware J, Boughton CK, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, Thankamony A, Randell T, Ghatak A, Besser RE, Elleri D, Trevelyan N, Campbell FM, Sibayan J, Bailey R, Calhoun P, Dunseath G, Hovorka R. Effect of 48 Months of Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery on Residual C-Peptide Secretion and Glycemic Control in Newly Diagnosed Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:1441-1448. [PMID: 38924772 PMCID: PMC11272979 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the effect of long-term intensive metabolic control with hybrid closed-loop (CL) on residual C-peptide secretion and glucose control compared with standard insulin therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes over 48 months. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Following the 24-month primary phase of a multicenter, randomized, parallel trial of 96 newly diagnosed youth aged 10 to 16.9 years, participants were invited to an extension phase using treatment allocated at randomization. They continued with hybrid CL using the Cambridge algorithm or standard insulin therapy (control) until 48 months after diagnosis. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS At 24 months after diagnosis, 81 participants (mean ± SD age 14 ± 2 years) continued in the extension phase (47 CL, 34 control). There was no difference in fasting C-peptide corrected for fasting glucose at 48 months between groups (CL: 5 ± 9 vs. control: 6 ± 14 pmol/L per mmol/L; mean adjusted difference -2 [95% CI -7, 4; P = 0.54]). Central laboratory HbA1c remained lower in the CL group by 0.9% (10 mmol/mol [95% CI 0.2, 1.5; 3, 17 mmol/mol); P = 0.009). Time in target range of 3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L was 12 percentage points (95% CI 3, 20; P = 0.008) higher in the CL group compared with control. There were 11 severe hypoglycemic events (6 CL, 5 control) and 7 diabetic ketoacidosis events (3 CL, 4 control) during the extension phase. CONCLUSIONS Improved glycemic control was sustained over 48 months after diagnosis with CL insulin delivery compared with standard therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes. This did not appear to confer a protective effect on residual C-peptide secretion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ware
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories and Medical Research Council Metabolic Diseases Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Charlotte K. Boughton
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories and Medical Research Council Metabolic Diseases Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Janet M. Allen
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories and Medical Research Council Metabolic Diseases Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Malgorzata E. Wilinska
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories and Medical Research Council Metabolic Diseases Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| | - Tabitha Randell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, U.K
| | - Atrayee Ghatak
- Department of Diabetes, Alder Hey Children's National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, U.K
| | - Rachel E.J. Besser
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, U.K
| | - Daniela Elleri
- Department of Diabetes, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, U.K
| | - Nicola Trevelyan
- Paediatric Diabetes, Southampton Children’s Hospital, Southampton, U.K
| | - Fiona M. Campbell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes, Leeds Children’s Hospital, Leeds, U.K
| | | | | | | | | | - Roman Hovorka
- Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories and Medical Research Council Metabolic Diseases Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schoelwer MJ, DeBoer MD, Breton MD. Use of diabetes technology in children. Diabetologia 2024:10.1007/s00125-024-06218-0. [PMID: 38995398 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06218-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Children with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers face numerous challenges navigating the unpredictability of this complex disease. Although the burden of managing diabetes remains significant, new technology has eased some of the load and allowed children with type 1 diabetes to achieve tighter glycaemic management without fear of excess hypoglycaemia. Continuous glucose monitor use alone improves outcomes and is considered standard of care for paediatric type 1 diabetes management. Similarly, automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven to be safe and effective for children as young as 2 years of age. AID use improves not only blood glucose levels but also quality of life for children with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers and should be strongly considered for all youth with type 1 diabetes if available and affordable. Here, we review key data on the use of diabetes technology in the paediatric population and discuss management issues unique to children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark D DeBoer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Marc D Breton
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McLean A, Maple-Brown L, Murphy HR. Technology advances in diabetes pregnancy: right technology, right person, right time. Diabetologia 2024:10.1007/s00125-024-06216-2. [PMID: 38967667 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06216-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
This review outlines some of the extraordinary recent advances in diabetes technology, which are transforming the management of type 1 diabetes before, during and after pregnancy. It highlights recent improvements associated with use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) but acknowledges that neither CGM nor insulin pump therapy are adequate for achieving the pregnancy glucose targets. Furthermore, even hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems that are clinically effective outside of pregnancy may not confer additional benefits throughout pregnancy. To date, there is only one HCL system, the CamAPS FX, with a strong evidence base for use during pregnancy, suggesting that the pregnancy benefits are HCL system specific. This is in stark contrast to HCL system use outside of pregnancy, where benefits are HCL category specific. The CamAPS FX HCL system has a rapidly adaptive algorithm and lower glucose targets with benefits across all maternal glucose categories, meaning that it is applicable for all women with type 1 diabetes, before and during pregnancy. For women of reproductive years living with type 2 diabetes, the relative merits of using non-insulin pharmacotherapies vs diabetes technology (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) are unknown. Despite the urgent unmet need and potential benefits, studies of pharmacotherapy and technology use are extremely limited in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna McLean
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Endocrinology Department, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Louise Maple-Brown
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Endocrinology Department, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Helen R Murphy
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
- Norfolk and Norwich NHS Foundation Trust, Diabetes and Antenatal Care, Norwich, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prahalad P, Scheinker D, Desai M, Ding VY, Bishop FK, Lee MY, Ferstad J, Zaharieva DP, Addala A, Johari R, Hood K, Maahs DM. Equitable implementation of a precision digital health program for glucose management in individuals with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Nat Med 2024; 30:2067-2075. [PMID: 38702523 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02975-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Few young people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) meet glucose targets. Continuous glucose monitoring improves glycemia, but access is not equitable. We prospectively assessed the impact of a systematic and equitable digital-health-team-based care program implementing tighter glucose targets (HbA1c < 7%), early technology use (continuous glucose monitoring starts <1 month after diagnosis) and remote patient monitoring on glycemia in young people with newly diagnosed T1D enrolled in the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T Study 1). Primary outcome was HbA1c change from 4 to 12 months after diagnosis; the secondary outcome was achieving the HbA1c targets. The 4T Study 1 cohort (36.8% Hispanic and 35.3% publicly insured) had a mean HbA1c of 6.58%, 64% with HbA1c < 7% and mean time in the range (70-180 mg dl-1) of 68% at 1 year after diagnosis. Clinical implementation of the 4T Study 1 met the prespecified primary outcome and improved glycemia without unexpected serious adverse events. The strategies in the 4T Study 1 can be used to implement systematic and equitable care for individuals with T1D and translate to care for other chronic diseases. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04336969 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Prahalad
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - David Scheinker
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Department of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Victoria Y Ding
- Department of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Franziska K Bishop
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ming Yeh Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Johannes Ferstad
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dessi P Zaharieva
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ananta Addala
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ramesh Johari
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Korey Hood
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David M Maahs
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Health Research and Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ware J, Wilinska ME, Ruan Y, Allen JM, Boughton CK, Hartnell S, Bally L, de Beaufort C, Besser REJ, Campbell FM, Draxlbauer K, Elleri D, Evans ML, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Ghatak A, Hofer SE, Kapellen TM, Leelarathna L, Mader JK, Mubita WM, Narendran P, Poettler T, Rami-Merhar B, Tauschmann M, Randell T, Thabit H, Thankamony A, Trevelyan N, Hovorka R. Safety of User-Initiated Intensification of Insulin Delivery Using Cambridge Hybrid Closed-Loop Algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:882-888. [PMID: 36475908 PMCID: PMC11307210 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221141924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems struggle to manage unusually high glucose levels as experienced with intercurrent illness or pre-menstrually. Manual correction boluses may be needed, increasing hypoglycemia risk with overcorrection. The Cambridge HCL system includes a user-initiated algorithm intensification mode ("Boost"), activation of which increases automated insulin delivery by approximately 35%, while remaining glucose-responsive. In this analysis, we assessed the safety of "Boost" mode. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from closed-loop studies involving young children (1-7 years, n = 24), children and adolescents (10-17 years, n = 19), adults (≥24 years, n = 13), and older adults (≥60 years, n = 20) with type 1 diabetes. Outcomes were calculated per participant for days with ≥30 minutes of "Boost" use versus days with no "Boost" use. Participants with <10 "Boost" days were excluded. The main outcome was time spent in hypoglycemia <70 and <54 mg/dL. RESULTS Eight weeks of data for 76 participants were analyzed. There was no difference in time spent <70 and <54 mg/dL between "Boost" days and "non-Boost" days; mean difference: -0.10% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.28 to 0.07; P = .249) time <70 mg/dL, and 0.03 (-0.04 to 0.09; P = .416) time < 54 mg/dL. Time in significant hyperglycemia >300 mg/dL was 1.39 percentage points (1.01 to 1.77; P < .001) higher on "Boost" days, with higher mean glucose and lower time in target range (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Use of an algorithm intensification mode in HCL therapy is safe across all age groups with type 1 diabetes. The higher time in hyperglycemia observed on "Boost" days suggests that users are more likely to use algorithm intensification on days with extreme hyperglycemic excursions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ware
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Malgorzata E. Wilinska
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yue Ruan
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Janet M. Allen
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte K. Boughton
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lia Bally
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carine de Beaufort
- Diabetes & Endocrine Care Clinique Pediatrique, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
- Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, UZ-VUB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rachel E. J. Besser
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Fiona M. Campbell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes, Leeds Children’s Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Daniela Elleri
- Department of Diabetes, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark L. Evans
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Atrayee Ghatak
- Department of Diabetes, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sabine E. Hofer
- Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas M. Kapellen
- Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Julia K. Mader
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Womba M. Mubita
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Parth Narendran
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tina Poettler
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Birgit Rami-Merhar
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Tauschmann
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tabitha Randell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham Children’s Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hood Thabit
- Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicola Trevelyan
- Department of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Southampton Children’s Hospital, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fureman AL, Bladh M, Carlsson A, Forsander G, Lilja M, Ludvigsson J, Samuelsson U, Särnblad S, Lind T. Partial Clinical Remission of Type 1 Diabetes in Swedish Children: A Longitudinal Study from the Swedish National Quality Register (SWEDIABKIDS) and the Better Diabetes Diagnosis (BDD) Study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024. [PMID: 38842902 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2024.0112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Aims/Hypotheses: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of partial remission in Swedish children with type 1 diabetes and whether the insulin delivery method, that is, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDIs), affects incidence and duration of this period, 2007-2011. Factors that increase the proportion of subjects who enter partial remission and extend this period can improve long-term metabolic control and reduce the risk of severe hypoglycemia, improve quality of life, and, in the long run, reduce late complications. Methods: Longitudinal data from 2007 to 2020 were extracted from the Swedish National Quality Register (SWEDIABKIDS) with all reported newly diagnosed children. Data on C-peptide from the participants in the Better Diabetes Diagnosis study from 2007 to 2010 were used. The definition of partial remission was insulin dose-adjusted HbA1c: HbA1c (%) + [4 × total daily insulin dose (U/kg/day)] ≤9. Results: Of the 3887 patients, 56% were boys. More boys than girls were in partial remission throughout the follow-up period until 24 months after diabetes onset. Fewer children 0-6 years old had partial remission at 3 and 12 months but not at 24 months compared with older age-groups. A larger proportion of patients using CSII at 12 and 24 months remained in partial remission compared with those with MDI (37% vs. 33%, P = 0.02 and 31% vs. 27%, P = 0.01, respectively). The level of C-peptide was higher in the group with partial remission and mean HbA1c was lower (both P < 0.001). Partial remission at 12 months after diabetes onset was associated with CSII (odds ratio [OR]: 1.39, confidence interval [CI]:1.13, 1.71), shorter diabetes duration (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.76, 0.84), and male sex (OR: 1.23, CI: 1.04, 1.46). Conclusions/Interpretation: Insulin through MDI, longer duration of diabetes, and female sex were associated with lower frequency of partial remission. Use of CSII seems to contribute to longer partial remission among Swedish children with type 1 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Lena Fureman
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Marie Bladh
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Children's and Women's Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Annelie Carlsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Skånes University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Gun Forsander
- Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mikael Lilja
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Research, Education and Development, Östersund, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden
| | - Johnny Ludvigsson
- Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital and Division of Pediatrics,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ulf Samuelsson
- Crown Princess Victoria Children's Hospital and Division of Pediatrics,Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Stefan Särnblad
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, and Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Örebro, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Lind
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kovatchev B, Castillo A, Pryor E, Kollar LL, Barnett CL, DeBoer MD, Brown SA. Neural-Net Artificial Pancreas: A Randomized Crossover Trial of a First-in-Class Automated Insulin Delivery Algorithm. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:375-382. [PMID: 38277161 PMCID: PMC11305265 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) is now integral to the clinical practice of type 1 diabetes (T1D). The objective of this pilot-feasibility study was to introduce a new regulatory and clinical paradigm-a Neural-Net Artificial Pancreas (NAP)-an encoding of an AID algorithm into a neural network that approximates its action and assess NAP versus the original AID algorithm. Methods: The University of Virginia Model-Predictive Control (UMPC) algorithm was encoded into a neural network, creating its NAP approximation. Seventeen AID users with T1D were recruited and 15 participated in two consecutive 20-h hotel sessions, receiving in random order either NAP or UMPC. Their demographic characteristics were ages 22-68 years old, duration of diabetes 7-58 years, gender 10/5 female/male, White Non-Hispanic/Black 13/2, and baseline glycated hemoglobin 5.4%-8.1%. Results: The time-in-range (TIR) difference between NAP and UMPC, adjusted for entry glucose level, was 1 percentage point, with absolute TIR values of 86% (NAP) and 87% (UMPC). The two algorithms achieved similar times <70 mg/dL of 2.0% versus 1.8% and coefficients of variation of 29.3% (NAP) versus 29.1 (UMPC)%. Under identical inputs, the average absolute insulin-recommendation difference was 0.031 U/h. There were no serious adverse events on either controller. NAP had sixfold lower computational demands than UMPC. Conclusion: In a randomized crossover study, a neural-network encoding of a complex model-predictive control algorithm demonstrated similar performance, at a fraction of the computational demands. Regulatory and clinical doors are therefore open for contemporary machine-learning methods to enter the AID field. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT05876273.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Kovatchev
- Address correspondence to: Boris Kovatchev, PhD, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, 560 Ray C Hunt Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fattah M, Boughton CK, Ware J, Allen JM, Hartnell S, Willinska ME, Thankamony A, de Beaufort C, Campbell FM, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Hofer SE, Kapellen TM, Rami-Merhar B, Ghatak A, Randell TL, Besser REJ, Elleri D, Trevelyan N, Denvir MD L, Davis N, Bally L, Thabit H, Leelarathna L, Evans ML, Mader JK, Hovorka R. Evaluating the Impact of Applying Personal Glucose Targets in a Closed-Loop System for People With Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:695-700. [PMID: 36540007 PMCID: PMC11089870 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221145184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CamAPS FX is a hybrid closed-loop smartphone app used to manage type one diabetes. The closed-loop algorithm has a default target glucose of 5.8 mmol/L (104.5 mg/dL), but users can select personal glucose targets (adjustable between 4.4 mmol/L and 11.0 mmol/L [79 mg/dL and 198 mg/dL, respectively]). METHOD In this post-hoc analysis, we evaluated the impact of personal glucose targets on glycemic control using data from participants in five randomized controlled trials. RESULTS Personal glucose targets were widely used, with 20.3% of all days in the data set having a target outside the default target bin (5.5-6.0 mmol/L [99-108 mg/dL]). Personal glucose targets >6.5 mmol/L (117 mg/dL) were associated with significantly less time in target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]; 6.5-7.0 mmol/L [117-126 mg/dL]: mean difference = -3.2 percentage points [95% CI: -5.3 to -1.2; P < .001]; 7.0-7.5 mmol/L [126-135 mg/dL]: -10.8 percentage points [95% CI: -14.1 to -7.6; P < .001]). Personal targets >6.5 mmol/L (117 mg/dL) were associated with significantly lower time (<3.9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL]; 6.5-7.0 mmol/L [117-126 mg/dL]: -1.85 percentage points [95% CI: -2.37 to -1.34; P < .001]; 7.0-7.5 mmol/L [126-135 mg/dL]: -2.68 percentage points [95% CI: -3.49 to -1.86; P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS Discrete study populations showed differences in glucose control when applying similar personal targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Fattah
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte K. Boughton
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia Ware
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Janet M. Allen
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Malgorzata E. Willinska
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carine de Beaufort
- Diabetes & Endocrine Care Clinique Pediatrique, Pediatric Clinic/Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Belval, Luxembourg
| | - Fiona M. Campbell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes, Leeds Children’s Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Sabine E. Hofer
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas M. Kapellen
- Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Birgit Rami-Merhar
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Atrayee Ghatak
- Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Rachel E. J. Besser
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniela Elleri
- Royal Hospital for Children & Young People, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Nikki Davis
- Southampton Children’s Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Lia Bally
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hood Thabit
- Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark L. Evans
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia K. Mader
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bourgeois S, Coenen S, Degroote L, Willems L, Van Mulders A, Pierreux J, Heremans Y, De Leu N, Staels W. Harnessing beta cell regeneration biology for diabetes therapy. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2024:S1043-2760(24)00082-1. [PMID: 38644094 DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
The pandemic scale of diabetes mellitus is alarming, its complications remain devastating, and current treatments still pose a major burden on those affected and on the healthcare system as a whole. As the disease emanates from the destruction or dysfunction of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells, a real cure requires their restoration and protection. An attractive strategy is to regenerate β-cells directly within the pancreas; however, while several approaches for β-cell regeneration have been proposed in the past, clinical translation has proven challenging. This review scrutinizes recent findings in β-cell regeneration and discusses their potential clinical implementation. Hereby, we aim to delineate a path for innovative, targeted therapies to help shift from 'caring for' to 'curing' diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Bourgeois
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sophie Coenen
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laure Degroote
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lien Willems
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Annelore Van Mulders
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Pierreux
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yves Heremans
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nico De Leu
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Endocrinology, Universiteit Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Endocrinology, ASZ Aalst, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
| | - Willem Staels
- Genetics, Reproduction, and Development (GRAD), Beta Cell Neogenesis (BENE) Research Unit, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090 Brussels, Belgium; Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, KidZ Health Castle, Universiteit Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lakshman R, Najami M, Allen JM, Ware J, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, Thankamony A, Randell T, Ghatak A, Besser RE, Elleri D, Trevelyan N, Campbell FM, Hovorka R, Boughton CK. Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Onset of Type 1 Diabetes and Glycemic Outcomes with Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:198-202. [PMID: 38444312 PMCID: PMC10877390 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
The presence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with higher glycated hemoglobin levels over time. We evaluated whether hybrid-closed loop (HCL) therapy from onset of T1D could prevent the adverse impact of DKA at diagnosis on long-term glycemic outcomes. This was a posthoc analysis from 51 adolescents using HCL from diagnosis of T1D as part of the CLOuD trial (NCT02871089). We compared glycemic and insulin metrics between adolescents with (n = 17) and without (n = 34) DKA at diagnosis. Participants with and without DKA at diagnosis had similar time in target glucose range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL), time below range (<3.9 mmol/L, <70 mg/dL) and HbA1c at 6, 12, and 24 months. While insulin requirements at 6 months were higher in those with DKA at diagnosis, this was not statistically significant after adjusting for bodyweight. Residual C-peptide secretion was similar between groups. We conclude that HCL therapy may mitigate against the negative glycemic effects of DKA at T1D diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rama Lakshman
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mazin Najami
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Janet M. Allen
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Ware
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Malgorzata E. Wilinska
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Tabitha Randell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Atrayee Ghatak
- Department of Diabetes, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel E.J. Besser
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Elleri
- Department of Diabetes, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Trevelyan
- Paediatric Diabetes, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona M. Campbell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte K. Boughton
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Murphy HR. A Diabetes Pregnancy Technology Roadmap: The 2023 Norbert Freinkel Award Lecture. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:324-330. [PMID: 38394634 DOI: 10.2337/dci23-0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Norbert Freinkel emphasized the need for "more aggressive therapy with exogenous insulin" during type 1 diabetes (T1D) pregnancy. Recent advances in diabetes technology, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems allow us to revisit Freinkel's observations from a contemporary perspective. The Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Women With Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT) led to international recommendations that CGM be offered to all pregnant women with T1D to help them meet their pregnancy glucose targets and improve neonatal outcomes. However, despite CGM use, only 35% of trial participants reached the pregnancy glucose targets by 35 weeks' gestation, which is too late for optimal obstetric and neonatal outcomes. The constant vigilance to CGM data and insulin dose adjustment, with perpetual worry about the impact of hyperglycemia on the developing fetal structures, leave many pregnant women feeling overwhelmed. HCL systems that can adapt to marked gestational changes in insulin sensitivity and pharmacokinetics may help to bridge the gap between the nonpregnant time in range glycemic targets (70-180 mg/dL) and the substantially more stringent pregnancy-specific targets (TIRp) (63-140 mg/dL) required for optimal obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Use of HCL (CamAPS FX system) was associated with a 10.5% higher TIRp, 10.2% less hyperglycemia, and 12.3% higher overnight TIRp. Clinical benefits were accompanied by 3.7 kg (8 lb) less gestational weight gain and consistently achieved across a representative patient population of insulin pump or injection users, across trial sites, and across maternal HbA1c categories. Working collaboratively, women, HCL technology, and health care teams achieved improved glycemia with less worry, less work, and more positive pregnancy experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen R Murphy
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nimri R, Phillip M, Clements MA, Kovatchev B. Closed-Loop Control, Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision-Support Systems, and Data Science. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:S68-S89. [PMID: 38441444 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2024.2505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Revital Nimri
- Diabetes Technology Center, Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Moshe Phillip
- Diabetes Technology Center, Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mark A Clements
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Boris Kovatchev
- Center for Diabetes Technology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zaharieva DP, Ding VY, Addala A, Prahalad P, Bishop F, Hood KK, Desai M, Wilson DM, Buckingham BA, Maahs DM. Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Diagnosis in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Is Associated with a Higher Hemoglobin A1c Even with Intensive Insulin Management. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:176-183. [PMID: 37955644 PMCID: PMC10877392 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at diagnosis is associated with short- and long-term complications. We assessed the relationship between DKA status and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) levels in the first year following type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosis. Research Design and Methods: The Pilot Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) study offered continuous glucose monitoring to youth with T1D within 1 month of diagnosis. A1c levels were compared between historical (n = 271) and Pilot 4T (n = 135) cohorts stratified by DKA status at diagnosis (DKA: historical = 94, 4T = 67 versus without DKA: historical = 177, 4T = 68). A1c was evaluated using locally estimated scatter plot smoothing. Change in A1c from 4 to 12 months postdiagnosis was evaluated using a linear mixed model. Results: Median age was 9.7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.6, 12.7) versus 9.7 (IQR: 6.8, 12.7) years, 49% versus 47% female, 44% versus 39% non-Hispanic White in historical versus Pilot 4T. In historical and 4T cohorts, DKA at diagnosis demonstrated higher A1c at 6 (0.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21-0.79; P < 0.01] and 0.38% [95% CI: 0.02-0.74; P = 0.04], respectively), and 12 months (0.62% [95% CI: -0.06 to 1.29; P = 0.07] and 0.39% [95% CI: -0.32 to 1.10; P = 0.29], respectively). The highest % time in range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL) was seen between weeks 15-20 (69%) versus 25-30 (75%) postdiagnosis for youth with versus without DKA in Pilot 4T, respectively. Conclusions: Pilot 4T improved A1c outcomes versus the historical cohort, but those with DKA at diagnosis had persistently elevated A1c throughout the study and intensive diabetes management did not mitigate this difference. DKA prevention at diagnosis may translate into better glycemic outcomes in the first-year postdiagnosis. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04336969.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dessi P. Zaharieva
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Victoria Y. Ding
- Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ananta Addala
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Priya Prahalad
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Franziska Bishop
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Korey K. Hood
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Division of Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Darrell M. Wilson
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David M. Maahs
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lingen K, Maahs D, Bellini N, Isaacs D. Removing Barriers, Bridging the Gap, and the Changing Role of the Health Care Professional with Automated Insulin Delivery Systems. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:45-52. [PMID: 38377318 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
As all people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and some with type 2 diabetes (T2D) require insulin, there is a need to develop management methods that not only achieve glycemic targets but also reduce the burden of living with diabetes. After insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors, the next step in the evolution of diabetes technology is automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, which have transformed intensive insulin management over the past decade, as these systems address the shortcomings of previous management options. However, AID use remains fairly limited, and access represents a major barrier to use for many people with diabetes, despite these systems being standard of care. Therefore, the future of AID will necessitate addressing barriers related to social determinants of health, finances, and an expansion of the number and type of health care professionals (HCPs) prescribing AID systems. These crucial steps will be essential to ensure that everyone with intensively managed diabetes can use AID systems. The impact of implementing these changes will create a shift in the future of diabetes care that will result in achievement of more targeted glycemia and psychosocial outcomes for all people with diabetes and an expansion of the role of all HCPs in AID-related diabetes care. Even more importantly, by addressing social determinants of health and clinical inertia related to AID, the field can address disparities in outcomes across countries, race, gender, socioeconomic status, and insurance status. Furthermore, the increased use of AID system will provide more time during appointments for a shift in the discussion away from fine tuning insulin dosing and toward a focus on more topics related to behavior and conversations about general health. This will include psychosocial outcomes, and quality of life. In addition, these changes can hopefully allow for time to discuss more general issues, such as cardiovascular health, obesity prevention, diabetes-related complications, and other health-related concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Maahs
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Natalie Bellini
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Diana Isaacs
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu W, Fang Y, Cai X, Zhu Y, Zhang M, Han X, Li J, Yin S, Cai D, Chen J, Wang L, Shi D, Ji L. Preserved C-peptide is common and associated with higher time in range in Chinese type 1 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1335913. [PMID: 38405156 PMCID: PMC10884320 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1335913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to determine the residual C-peptide level and to explore the clinical significance of preserved C-peptide secretion in glycemic control in Chinese individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Research design and methods A total of 534 participants with T1D were enrolled and divided into two groups, low-C-peptide group (fasting C-peptide ≤10 pmol/L) and preserved-C-peptide group (fasting C-peptide >10 pmol/L), and clinical factors were compared between the two groups. In 174 participants who were followed, factors associated with C-peptide loss were also identified by Cox regression. In addition, glucose metrics derived from intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring were compared between individuals with low C-peptide and those with preserved C-peptide in 178 participants. Results The lack of preserved C-peptide was associated with longer diabetes duration, glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody, and higher daily insulin doses, after adjustment {OR, 1.10 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.06-1.14]; OR, 0.46 (IQR, 0.27-0.77); OR, 1.04 (IQR, 1.02-1.06)}. In the longitudinal analysis, the percentages of individuals with preserved C-peptide were 71.4%, 56.8%, 71.7%, 62.5%, and 22.2% over 5 years of follow-up. Preserved C-peptide was also associated with higher time in range after adjustment of diabetes duration [62.4 (IQR, 47.3-76.6) vs. 50.3 (IQR, 36.2-63.0) %, adjusted P = 0.003]. Conclusions Our results indicate that a high proportion of Chinese patients with T1D had preserved C-peptide secretion. Meanwhile, residual C-peptide was associated with favorable glycemic control, suggesting the importance of research on adjunctive therapy to maintain β-cell function in T1D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Yayu Fang
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Xiaoling Cai
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Yu Zhu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Mingxia Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Xueyao Han
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Sai Yin
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| | - Deheng Cai
- School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, ;China
| | - Jing Chen
- School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, ;China
| | - Lei Wang
- School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, ;China
| | - Dawei Shi
- School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, ;China
| | - Linong Ji
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, ;China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kennedy EC, Hawkes CP. Approaches to Measuring Beta Cell Reserve and Defining Partial Clinical Remission in Paediatric Type 1 Diabetes. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:186. [PMID: 38397298 PMCID: PMC10887271 DOI: 10.3390/children11020186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the autoimmune T-cell mediated destruction of pancreatic beta cells leading to insufficient insulin secretion. At the time of diagnosis of T1D, there is residual beta cell function that declines over the subsequent months to years. Recent interventions have been approved to preserve beta cell function in evolving T1D. OBJECTIVE The aim of this review is to summarise the approaches used to assess residual beta cell function in evolving T1D, and to highlight potential future directions. METHODS Studies including subjects aged 0 to 18 years were included in this review. The following search terms were used; "(type 1 diabetes) and (partial remission)" and "(type 1 diabetes) and (honeymoon)". References of included studies were reviewed to determine if additional relevant studies were eligible. RESULTS There are numerous approaches to quantifying beta cell reserve in evolving T1D. These include c-peptide measurement after a mixed meal or glucagon stimuli, fasting c-peptide, the urinary c-peptide/creatinine ratio, insulin dose-adjusted haemoglobin A1c, and other clinical models to estimate beta cell function. Other biomarkers may have a role, including the proinsulin/c-peptide ratio, cytokines, and microRNA. Studies using thresholds to determine if residual beta cell function is present often differ in values used to define remission. CONCLUSIONS As interventions are approved to preserve beta cell function, it will become increasingly necessary to quantify residual beta cell function in research and clinical contexts. In this report, we have highlighted the strengths and limitations of the current approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine C Kennedy
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, T12 DC4A Cork, Ireland
- INFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, T12 DC4A Cork, Ireland
| | - Colin P Hawkes
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, T12 DC4A Cork, Ireland
- INFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, T12 DC4A Cork, Ireland
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Criego AB, Carlson AL, Brown SA, Forlenza GP, Bode BW, Levy CJ, Hansen DW, Hirsch IB, Bergenstal RM, Sherr JL, Mehta SN, Laffel LM, Shah VN, Bhargava A, Weinstock RS, MacLeish SA, DeSalvo DJ, Jones TC, Aleppo G, Buckingham BA, Ly TT. Two Years with a Tubeless Automated Insulin Delivery System: A Single-Arm Multicenter Trial in Children, Adolescents, and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024; 26:11-23. [PMID: 37850941 PMCID: PMC10794844 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Background: The Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System was shown to be safe and effective following 3 months of use in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, data on the durability of these results are limited. This study evaluated the long-term safety and effectiveness of Omnipod 5 use in people with T1D during up to 2 years of use. Materials and Methods: After a 3-month single-arm, multicenter, pivotal trial in children (6-13.9 years) and adolescents/adults (14-70 years), participants could continue system use in an extension phase. HbA1c was measured every 3 months for up to 15 months; continuous glucose monitor metrics were collected for up to 2 years. Results: Participants (N = 224) completed median (interquartile range) 22.3 (21.7, 22.7) months of AID. HbA1c was reduced in the pivotal trial from 7.7% ± 0.9% in children and 7.2% ± 0.9% in adolescents/adults to 7.0% ± 0.6% and 6.8% ± 0.7%, respectively, (P < 0.0001), and was maintained at 7.2% ± 0.7% and 6.9% ± 0.6% after 15 months (P < 0.0001 from baseline). Time in target range (70-180 mg/dL) increased from 52.4% ± 15.6% in children and 63.6% ± 16.5% in adolescents/adults at baseline to 67.9% ± 8.0% and 73.8% ± 10.8%, respectively, during the pivotal trial (P < 0.0001) and was maintained at 65.9% ± 8.9% and 72.9% ± 11.3% during the extension (P < 0.0001 from baseline). One episode of diabetic ketoacidosis and seven episodes of severe hypoglycemia occurred during the extension. Children and adolescents/adults spent median 96.1% and 96.3% of time in Automated Mode, respectively. Conclusion: Our study supports that long-term use of the Omnipod 5 AID System can safely maintain improvements in glycemic outcomes for up to 2 years of use in people with T1D. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT04196140.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy B. Criego
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anders L. Carlson
- International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet, HealthPartners, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sue A. Brown
- Division of Endocrinology, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Department of Pediatrics, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - David W. Hansen
- Department of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Irl B. Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Richard M. Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet, HealthPartners, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Sherr
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sanjeev N. Mehta
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Viral N. Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Ruth S. Weinstock
- Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Sarah A. MacLeish
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Daniel J. DeSalvo
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas C. Jones
- Department of Research, East Coast Institute for Research at The Jones Center, Macon, Georgia, USA
| | - Grazia Aleppo
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Trang T. Ly
- Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ramos EL, Dayan CM, Chatenoud L, Sumnik Z, Simmons KM, Szypowska A, Gitelman SE, Knecht LA, Niemoeller E, Tian W, Herold KC. Teplizumab and β-Cell Function in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:2151-2161. [PMID: 37861217 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2308743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teplizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to CD3 on T cells, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration to delay the onset of clinical type 1 diabetes (stage 3) in patients 8 years of age or older with preclinical (stage 2) disease. Whether treatment with intravenous teplizumab in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes can prevent disease progression is unknown. METHODS In this phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed β-cell preservation, clinical end points, and safety in children and adolescents who were assigned to receive teplizumab or placebo for two 12-day courses. The primary end point was the change from baseline in β-cell function, as measured by stimulated C-peptide levels at week 78. The key secondary end points were the insulin doses that were required to meet glycemic goals, glycated hemoglobin levels, time in the target glucose range, and clinically important hypoglycemic events. RESULTS Patients treated with teplizumab (217 patients) had significantly higher stimulated C-peptide levels than patients receiving placebo (111 patients) at week 78 (least-squares mean difference, 0.13 pmol per milliliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.17; P<0.001), and 94.9% (95% CI, 89.5 to 97.6) of patients treated with teplizumab maintained a clinically meaningful peak C-peptide level of 0.2 pmol per milliliter or greater, as compared with 79.2% (95% CI, 67.7 to 87.4) of those receiving placebo. The groups did not differ significantly with regard to the key secondary end points. Adverse events occurred primarily in association with administration of teplizumab or placebo and included headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, lymphopenia, and mild cytokine release syndrome. CONCLUSIONS Two 12-day courses of teplizumab in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes showed benefit with respect to the primary end point of preservation of β-cell function, but no significant differences between the groups were observed with respect to the secondary end points. (Funded by Provention Bio and Sanofi; PROTECT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03875729.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor L Ramos
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Colin M Dayan
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Lucienne Chatenoud
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Zdenek Sumnik
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Kimber M Simmons
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Agnieszka Szypowska
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Stephen E Gitelman
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Laura A Knecht
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Elisabeth Niemoeller
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Wei Tian
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| | - Kevan C Herold
- From Provention Bio, a Sanofi company, Red Bank, NJ (E.L.R., L.A.K., W.T.); Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom (C.M.D.); Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades-INEM, Paris (L.C.); the Department of Pediatrics, Motol University Hospital, Second Faculty of Medicine-Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic (Z.S.); the Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes/University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (K.M.S.); the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (A.S.); the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.E.G.); Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany (E.N.); and the Departments of Immunobiology and Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (K.C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zeng B, Gao L, Yang Q, Jia H, Sun F. Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outpatient Randomized Controlled Trials. Diabetes Care 2023; 46:2300-2307. [PMID: 38011519 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-0504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The glycemic control of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in outpatient children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) has not been systematically evaluated. PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AID systems in children and adolescents in outpatient settings. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 4 May 2023. This study was registered with PROSPERO (2023, CRD42023395252). STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials that compared AID systems with conventional insulin therapy in outpatient children and adolescents with T1D and reported continuous glucose monitoring outcomes were selected. DATA EXTRACTION Percent time in range (TIR) (3.9-10 mmol/L), time below range (TBR) (<3.9 mmol/L), and time above range (TAR) (>10 mmol/L) were extracted. Data were summarized as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. DATA SYNTHESIS Twenty-five trials (1,345 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. AID systems were associated with an increased percentage of TIR (MD, 11.38% [95% CI 9.01-13.76], P < 0.001; high certainty). The favorable effect was consistent whether AID was used over 3 months (10.46% [8.71-12.20]) or 6 months (10.87% [7.11-14.63]). AID systems had a favorable effect on the proportion of TBR (-0.59% [-1.02 to -0.15], P = 0.008; low certainty) or TAR (-12.19% [-14.65 to -9.73], P < 0.001; high certainty) compared with control treatment. LIMITATIONS Substantial heterogeneity was observed in most analyses. CONCLUSIONS AID systems are more effective than conventional insulin therapy for children and adolescents with T1D in outpatient settings. The favorable effect is consistent both in the short term and long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baoqi Zeng
- Central Laboratory, Peking University Binhai Hospital, Tianjin, China
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Le Gao
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Qingqing Yang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Jia
- Drug Clinical Trial Institution, Peking University Binhai Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases, Peking University, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Simmons KM, Sims EK. Screening and Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes: Where Are We? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 108:3067-3079. [PMID: 37290044 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
A diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and the subsequent requirement for exogenous insulin treatment is associated with considerable acute and chronic morbidity and a substantial effect on patient quality of life. Importantly, a large body of work suggests that early identification of presymptomatic T1D can accurately predict clinical disease, and when paired with education and monitoring, can yield improved health outcomes. Furthermore, a growing cadre of effective disease-modifying therapies provides the potential to alter the natural history of early stages of T1D. In this mini review, we highlight prior work that has led to the current landscape of T1D screening and prevention, as well as challenges and next steps moving into the future of these rapidly evolving areas of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimber M Simmons
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Division of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Emily K Sims
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research; Center for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Huang F, Ji X, Wang Z, Yin Y, Fan L, Li J, Zhou Z, Li X. Fat-to-muscle ratio is associated with insulin resistance and cardiometabolic disorders in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab 2023; 25:3181-3191. [PMID: 37455673 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to investigate the correlation of the fat-to-muscle ratio (FMR) with insulin resistance (IR) and cardiometabolic disorders (CMD) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively recruited 420 adults with T1DM [52.6% men, median age 32.4 (24.5, 43.0) years]. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and FMR was calculated. The characteristics of the overall participants were compared between tertiles of FMR. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of FMR tertiles with IR and cardiometabolic risk factors. RESULTS Median age and median haemoglobin A1c of all participants were 32.4 (24.5, 43.0) years and 7.4 (6.5, 8.7)%, respectively. The prevalence of IR and CMD was 18% and 38.6%. The FMR significantly differed between men and women [0.39 (0.31, 0.53) vs. 0.74 (0.63, 0.92), respectively, p < .001]. The proportion of IR and CMD gradually increased as the FMR increased. The multivariable-adjusted odd ratios for IR and CMD in FMR tertile 3 compared with tertile 1 were 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): (1.9, 12.1)] and 9.7 (95% CI: 4.2, 22.3), respectively, in men. For women, the corresponding odd ratios were 4.0 (95% CI: 1.2, 12.9) for IR and 5.8 (95% CI: 2.4, 13.6) for CMD. CONCLUSIONS FMR is associated with IR and CMD in adults with T1DM and could be used as a promising parameter for targeting treatment in T1DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fansu Huang
- Department of Nutrition, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaolin Ji
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yixuan Yin
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Li Fan
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Juan Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhiguang Zhou
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xia Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology (Central South University), Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee TTM, Collett C, Bergford S, Hartnell S, Scott EM, Lindsay RS, Hunt KF, McCance DR, Barnard-Kelly K, Rankin D, Lawton J, Reynolds RM, Flanagan E, Hammond M, Shepstone L, Wilinska ME, Sibayan J, Kollman C, Beck R, Hovorka R, Murphy HR. Automated Insulin Delivery in Women with Pregnancy Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1566-1578. [PMID: 37796241 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2303911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy has shown promise for management of type 1 diabetes during pregnancy; however, its efficacy is unclear. METHODS In this multicenter, controlled trial, we randomly assigned pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and a glycated hemoglobin level of at least 6.5% at nine sites in the United Kingdom to receive standard insulin therapy or hybrid closed-loop therapy, with both groups using continuous glucose monitoring. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in the pregnancy-specific target glucose range (63 to 140 mg per deciliter [3.5 to 7.8 mmol per liter]) as measured by continuous glucose monitoring from 16 weeks' gestation until delivery. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Key secondary outcomes were the percentage of time spent in a hyperglycemic state (glucose level >140 mg per deciliter), overnight time in the target range, the glycated hemoglobin level, and safety events. RESULTS A total of 124 participants with a mean (±SD) age of 31.1±5.3 years and a mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level of 7.7±1.2% underwent randomization. The mean percentage of time that the maternal glucose level was in the target range was 68.2±10.5% in the closed-loop group and 55.6±12.5% in the standard-care group (mean adjusted difference, 10.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0 to 14.0; P<0.001). Results for the secondary outcomes were consistent with those of the primary outcome; participants in the closed-loop group spent less time in a hyperglycemic state than those in the standard-care group (difference, -10.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -13.8 to -6.6); had more overnight time in the target range (difference, 12.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.3 to 16.2), and had lower glycated hemoglobin levels (difference, -0.31 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.50 to -0.12). Little time was spent in a hypoglycemic state. No unanticipated safety problems associated with the use of closed-loop therapy during pregnancy occurred (6 instances of severe hypoglycemia, vs. 5 in the standard-care group; 1 instance of diabetic ketoacidosis in each group; and 12 device-related adverse events in the closed-loop group, 7 related to closed-loop therapy). CONCLUSIONS Hybrid closed-loop therapy significantly improved maternal glycemic control during pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes. (Funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Program; AiDAPT ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN56898625.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara T M Lee
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Corinne Collett
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Simon Bergford
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Sara Hartnell
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Eleanor M Scott
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Robert S Lindsay
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Katharine F Hunt
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - David R McCance
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Katharine Barnard-Kelly
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - David Rankin
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Julia Lawton
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Rebecca M Reynolds
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Emma Flanagan
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Matthew Hammond
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Lee Shepstone
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Malgorzata E Wilinska
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Judy Sibayan
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Craig Kollman
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Roy Beck
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Roman Hovorka
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| | - Helen R Murphy
- From the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.) and the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (C.C., E.F., M.H., L.S.), Norwich Medical School (T.T.M.L., H.R.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (S.H.), and the Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge (M.E.W., R.H.), Cambridge, the Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds (E.M.S.), the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (R.S.L.), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London (K.F.H.), the Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast (D.R.M.), Barnard Health Research, Southampton (K.B.-K.), and the Usher Institute (D.R., J.L.) and the Centre for Cardiovascular Science (R.M.R.), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh - all in the United Kingdom; and the Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL (S.B., J.S., C.K., R.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Xie QY, Oh S, Wong A, Yau C, Herold KC, Danska JS. Immune responses to gut bacteria associated with time to diagnosis and clinical response to T cell-directed therapy for type 1 diabetes prevention. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15:eadh0353. [PMID: 37878676 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adh0353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Immune-targeted therapies have efficacy for treatment of autoinflammatory diseases. For example, treatment with the T cell-specific anti-CD3 antibody teplizumab delayed disease onset in participants at high risk for type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the TrialNet 10 (TN-10) trial. However, heterogeneity in therapeutic responses in TN-10 and other immunotherapy trials identifies gaps in understanding disease progression and treatment responses. The intestinal microbiome is a potential source of biomarkers associated with future T1D diagnosis and responses to immunotherapy. We previously reported that antibody responses to gut commensal bacteria were associated with T1D diagnosis, suggesting that certain antimicrobial immune responses may help predict disease onset. Here, we investigated anticommensal antibody (ACAb) responses against a panel of taxonomically diverse intestinal bacteria species in sera from TN-10 participants before and after teplizumab or placebo treatment. We identified IgG2 responses to three species that were associated with time to T1D diagnosis and with teplizumab treatment responses that delayed disease onset. These antibody responses link human intestinal bacteria with T1D progression, adding predictive value to known T1D risk factors. ACAb analysis provides a new approach to elucidate heterogeneity in responses to immunotherapy and identify individuals who may benefit from teplizumab, recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for delaying T1D onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quin Yuhui Xie
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T2S8, Canada
- Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
| | - Sean Oh
- Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
| | - Anthony Wong
- Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
| | - Christopher Yau
- Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
- Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T2S8, Canada
| | - Kevan C Herold
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Jayne S Danska
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T2S8, Canada
- Genetics and Genome Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
- Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jacobsen LM, Sherr JL, Considine E, Chen A, Peeling SM, Hulsmans M, Charleer S, Urazbayeva M, Tosur M, Alamarie S, Redondo MJ, Hood KK, Gottlieb PA, Gillard P, Wong JJ, Hirsch IB, Pratley RE, Laffel LM, Mathieu C. Utility and precision evidence of technology in the treatment of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2023; 3:132. [PMID: 37794113 PMCID: PMC10550996 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00358-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The greatest change in the treatment of people living with type 1 diabetes in the last decade has been the explosion of technology assisting in all aspects of diabetes therapy, from glucose monitoring to insulin delivery and decision making. As such, the aim of our systematic review was to assess the utility of these technologies as well as identify any precision medicine-directed findings to personalize care. METHODS Screening of 835 peer-reviewed articles was followed by systematic review of 70 of them (focusing on randomized trials and extension studies with ≥50 participants from the past 10 years). RESULTS We find that novel technologies, ranging from continuous glucose monitoring systems, insulin pumps and decision support tools to the most advanced hybrid closed loop systems, improve important measures like HbA1c, time in range, and glycemic variability, while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Several studies included person-reported outcomes, allowing assessment of the burden or benefit of the technology in the lives of those with type 1 diabetes, demonstrating positive results or, at a minimum, no increase in self-care burden compared with standard care. Important limitations of the trials to date are their small size, the scarcity of pre-planned or powered analyses in sub-populations such as children, racial/ethnic minorities, people with advanced complications, and variations in baseline glycemic levels. In addition, confounders including education with device initiation, concomitant behavioral modifications, and frequent contact with the healthcare team are rarely described in enough detail to assess their impact. CONCLUSIONS Our review highlights the potential of technology in the treatment of people living with type 1 diabetes and provides suggestions for optimization of outcomes and areas of further study for precision medicine-directed technology use in type 1 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mustafa Tosur
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Children's Nutrition Research Center, USDA/ARS, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Selma Alamarie
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Maria J Redondo
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Korey K Hood
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Peter A Gottlieb
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Jessie J Wong
- Children's Nutrition Research Center, USDA/ARS, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Irl B Hirsch
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Lori M Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Godoi A, Reis Marques I, Padrão EMH, Mahesh A, Hespanhol LC, Riceto Loyola Júnior JE, de Souza IAF, Moreira VCS, Silva CH, Miyawaki IA, Oommen C, Gomes C, Silva AC, Advani K, de Sa JR. Glucose control and psychosocial outcomes with use of automated insulin delivery for 12 to 96 weeks in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2023; 15:190. [PMID: 37759290 PMCID: PMC10537468 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-023-01144-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glycaemic control of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) remains a challenge due to hypoglycaemic episodes and the burden of insulin self-management. Advancements have been made with the development of automated insulin delivery (AID) devices, yet, previous reviews have only assessed the use of AID over days or weeks, and potential benefits with longer time of AID use in this population remain unclear. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing AID (hybrid and fully closed-loop systems) to usual care (sensor augmented pumps, multiple daily insulin injections, continuous glucose monitoring and predictive low-glucose suspend) for adults and children with T1DM with a minimum duration of 3 months. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies published up until April 4, 2023. Main outcomes included time in range 70-180 mg/dL as the primary outcome, and change in HbA1c (%, mmol/mol), glucose variability, and psychosocial impact (diabetes distress, treatment satisfaction and fear of hypoglycaemia) as secondary outcomes. Adverse events included diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and severe hypoglycaemia. Statistical analyses were conducted using mean differences and odds ratios. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to age, study duration and type of AID device. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022366710. RESULTS We identified 25 comparisons from 22 studies (six crossover and 16 parallel designs) including a total of 2376 participants (721 in adult studies, 621 in paediatric studies, and 1034 in combined studies) which were eligible for analysis. Use of AID devices ranged from 12 to 96 weeks. Patients using AID had 10.87% higher time in range [95% CI 9.38 to 12.37; p < 0.0001, I2 = 87%) and 0.37% (4.77 mmol/mol) lower HbA1c (95% CI - 0.49% (- 6.39 mmol/mol) to - 0.26 (- 3.14 mmol/mol); p < 0·0001, I2 = 77%]. AID systems decreased night hypoglycaemia, time in hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia and improved patient distress, with no increase in the risk of DKA or severe hypoglycaemia. No difference was found regarding treatment satisfaction or fear of hypoglycaemia. Among children, there was no difference in glucose variability or time spent in hypoglycaemia between the use of AID systems or usual care. In sensitivity analyses, results remained consistent with the overall analysis favouring AID. CONCLUSION The use of AID systems over 12 weeks, regardless of technical or clinical differences, improved glycaemic outcomes and diabetes distress without increasing the risk of adverse events in adults and children with T1DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Godoi
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, CF144YS, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cintia Gomes
- Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
| | - Ariadne C Silva
- UniEvangelica University Centre of Anapolis, Anapolis, Brazil
| | | | - Joao Roberto de Sa
- Endocrinology Division, ABC School of Medicine and Federal University of Sao Paulo, Paulista School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cardona-Hernandez R, Dôvc K, Biester T, Ekhlaspour L, Macedoni M, Tauschmann M, Mameli C. New therapies towards a better glycemic control in youths with type 1 diabetes. Pharmacol Res 2023; 195:106882. [PMID: 37543096 PMCID: PMC11073821 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is the most frequent form of diabetes in pediatric age, affecting more than 1.5 million people younger than age 20 years worldwide. Early and intensive control of diabetes provides continued protection against both microvascular and macrovascular complications, enhances growth, and ensures normal pubertal development. In the absence of definitive reversal therapy for this disease, achieving and maintaining the recommended glycemic targets is crucial. In the last 30 years, enormous progress has been made using technology to better treat T1D. In spite of this progress, the majority of children, adolescents and young adults do not reach the recommended targets for glycemic control and assume a considerable burden each day. The development of promising new therapeutic advances, such as more physiologic insulin analogues, pioneering diabetes technology including continuous glucose monitoring and closed loop systems as well as new adjuvant drugs, anticipate a new paradigm in T1D management over the next few years. This review presents insights into current management of T1D in youths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Klemen Dôvc
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Torben Biester
- AUF DER BULT, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology. University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Martin Tauschmann
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Chiara Mameli
- Department of Pediatrics, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ghatak A, Boughton CK, Allen JM, Ware J, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, Thankamony A, Randell T, Besser REJ, Elleri D, Trevelyan N, Campbell FM, Hovorka R. Closed-Loop from Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Young People. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:673-674. [PMID: 37384862 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Atrayee Ghatak
- Department of Diabetes, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte K Boughton
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Janet M Allen
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Ware
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Malgorzata E Wilinska
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Hartnell
- Wolfson Diabetes and Endocrine Clinic, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ajay Thankamony
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Tabitha Randell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel E J Besser
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela Elleri
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Trevelyan
- Department of Paediatrics, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona M Campbell
- Department of Paediatric Diabetes, Leeds Children's Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dovc K, Bergford S, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Zaharieva DP, Potocnik N, Müller A, Lenarcic Z, Calhoun P, Fritsch M, Sourij H, Bratina N, Kollman C, Battelino T. A Comparison of Faster Insulin Aspart with Standard Insulin Aspart Using Hybrid Automated Insulin Delivery System in Active Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Double-Blind Crossover Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:612-621. [PMID: 37404205 PMCID: PMC10460686 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of faster acting (FIA) and standard insulin aspart (SIA) with hybrid automated insulin delivery (AID) in active youth with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: In this double-blind multinational randomized crossover trial, 30 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (16 females; aged 15.0 ± 1.7 years; baseline HbA1c 7.5% ± 0.9% [58 ± 9.8 mmol/mol]) underwent two unrestricted 4-week periods using hybrid AID with either FIA or SIA in random order. During both interventions, participants were using the hybrid AID (investigational version of MiniMed™ 780G; Medtronic). Participants were encouraged to exercise as frequently as possible, capturing physical activity with an activity monitor. The primary outcome was the percentage of sensor glucose time above range (180 mg/dL [10.0 mmol/L]) measured by continuous glucose monitoring. Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, mean time above range was 31% ± 15% at baseline, 19% ± 6% during FIA use, and 20% ± 6% during SIA use with no difference between treatments: mean difference = -0.9%; 95% CI: -2.4% to 0.6%; P = 0.23. Similarly, there was no difference in mean time in range (TIR) (78% and 77%) or median time below range (2.5% and 2.8%). Glycemic outcomes during exercise or postprandial periods were comparable for the two treatment arms. No severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis events occurred. Conclusions: FIA was not superior to SIA with hybrid AID system use in physically active children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Nonetheless, both insulin formulations enabled high overall TIR and low time above and below ranges, even during and after documented exercise. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04853030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klemen Dovc
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Simon Bergford
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Dessi P. Zaharieva
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Nejka Potocnik
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Physiology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Alexander Müller
- Interdisciplinary Metabolic Medicine Trials Unit, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ziva Lenarcic
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Peter Calhoun
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Maria Fritsch
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Harald Sourij
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Natasa Bratina
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation, Inc., Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pinheiro MM, Pinheiro FMM, de Arruda MM, Beato GM, Verde GACL, Bianchini G, Casalenuovo PRM, Argolo AAA, de Souza LT, Pessoa FG, Hirose TS, Senra EF, Ricordi C, Fabbri A, Infante M, Diniz SN. Association between sitagliptin plus vitamin D3 (VIDPP-4i) use and clinical remission in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes: a retrospective case-control study. ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM 2023; 67:e000652. [PMID: 37249465 PMCID: PMC10665061 DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Objective The occurrence of partial remission (honeymoon phase) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been associated with a reduced risk of chronic microvascular complications of diabetes. We have published case reports showing that a combination therapy with the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin plus vitamin D3 (VIDPP-4i) can prolong the honeymoon phase in patients with new-onset T1D. In the present case-control study, we investigated the frequency of occurrence of clinical remission (CR) in patients with new-onset T1D after VIDPP-4i treatment. Subjects and methods In this case-control study, we collected data spanning 10 years from medical records of 46 patients (23 females) recently diagnosed with T1D. Overall, 27 participants with CR (insulin dose-adjusted glycated hemoglobin [IDAA1c] ≤ 9) at 12 or 24 months composed the case group, and 19 participants without CR served as the control group. Chi-square with Yates correction was used to analyze the association between VIDPP-4i use and CR, and odds ratio (OR) was used to determine the chance of CR due to VIDPP-4i treatment exposure. Results In all, 37 patients (80.4%) experienced CR at some time over 24 months. The mean CR duration was 13.15 ± 9.91 months. Treatment with VIDPP-4i was significantly associated with CR. At 24 months, the OR of CR after VIDPP-4i exposure was 9.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.21-30.18, p = 0.0036). Additionally, 9 (33.6%) and 4 (14.8%) patients in the VIDPP-4i group experienced insulin-free CR at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusion Therapy with VIDPP-4i was associated with a higher frequency and duration of the honeymoon phase. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Maia Pinheiro
- Univag Centro Universitário, Várzea Grande, MT, Brasil,
- Universidade Anhanguera, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Beta Cell Center Diabetes & Endocrinologia, Cuiabá, MT, Brasil
| | - Felipe Moura Maia Pinheiro
- Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Camillo Ricordi
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Cell Transplant Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Andrea Fabbri
- Diabetes Research Institute Federation (DRIF), Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Infante
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI) and Cell Transplant Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Diabetes Research Institute Federation (DRIF), Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Rome, Italy
- UniCamillus, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Coutant R, Bismuth E, Bonnemaison E, Dalla-Vale F, Morinais P, Perrard M, Trely J, Faure N, Bouhours-Nouet N, Levaillant L, Farret A, Storey C, Donzeau A, Poidvin A, Amsellem-Jager J, Place J, Quemener E, Hamel JF, Breton MD, Tubiana-Rufi N, Renard E. Hybrid Closed Loop Overcomes the Impact of Missed or Suboptimal Meal Boluses on Glucose Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Compared to Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023. [PMID: 36927054 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Background: It is unclear whether hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy attenuates the metabolic impact of missed or suboptimal meal insulin bolus compared with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy in children with type 1 diabetes in free-living conditions. Methods: This is an ancillary study from a multicenter randomized controlled trial that compared 24/7 HCL with evening and night (E/N) HCL for 36 weeks in children between 6 and 12 years old. In the present study, the 60 children from the E/N arm underwent a SAP phase, an E/N HCL for 18 weeks, then a 24/7 phase for 18 weeks, extended for 36 more weeks. The last 28-30 days of each of the four phases were analyzed according to meal bolus management (cumulated 6817 days). The primary endpoint was the percentage of time that the sensor glucose was in the target range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) according to the number of missed boluses per day. Findings: TIR was 54% ± 10% with SAP, 63% ± 7% with E/N HCL, and steadily 67% ± 7% with 24/7 HCL. From the SAP phase to 72 weeks of HCL, the percentage of days with at least one missed meal bolus increased from 12% to 22%. Estimated marginal (EM) mean TIR when no bolus was missed was 54% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 53-56) in SAP and it was 13% higher (95% CI 11-15) in the 24/7 HCL phase. EM mean TIR with 1 and ≥2 missed boluses/day was 49.5% (95% CI 46-52) and 45% (95% CI 39-51) in SAP, and it was 15% (95% CI 14-16) and 17% higher (95% CI 6-28), respectively, in the 24/7 HCL phase (P < 0.05 for all comparisons vs. SAP). Interpretation: HCL persistently improves glycemic control compared with SAP, even in case of meal bolus omission. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03739099).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Régis Coutant
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Elise Bismuth
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Fabienne Dalla-Vale
- Department of Pediatrics, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Paul Morinais
- School of Medicine, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Maelys Perrard
- School of Medicine, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Jeanne Trely
- School of Medicine, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Nathalie Faure
- Department of Pediatrics, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Natacha Bouhours-Nouet
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Lucie Levaillant
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Anne Farret
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
- Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Caroline Storey
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Donzeau
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Amélie Poidvin
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jessica Amsellem-Jager
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Jérôme Place
- Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Quemener
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Jean François Hamel
- Department of Biostatistics and Methodology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Marc D Breton
- Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Nadia Tubiana-Rufi
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Robert Debré University Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric Renard
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
- Institute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
- INSERM Clinical Investigation Centre 1411, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McVean J, Forlenza GP, Beck RW, Bauza C, Bailey R, Buckingham B, DiMeglio LA, Sherr JL, Clements M, Neyman A, Evans-Molina C, Sims EK, Messer LH, Ekhlaspour L, McDonough R, Van Name M, Rojas D, Beasley S, DuBose S, Kollman C, Moran A. Effect of Tight Glycemic Control on Pancreatic Beta Cell Function in Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 329:980-989. [PMID: 36826834 PMCID: PMC9960023 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.2063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Importance Near normalization of glucose levels instituted immediately after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes has been postulated to preserve pancreatic beta cell function by reducing glucotoxicity. Previous studies have been hampered by an inability to achieve tight glycemic goals. Objective To determine the effectiveness of intensive diabetes management to achieve near normalization of glucose levels on preservation of pancreatic beta cell function in youth with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted at 6 centers in the US (randomizations from July 20, 2020, to October 13, 2021; follow-up completed September 15, 2022) and included youths with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes aged 7 to 17 years. Interventions Random assignment to intensive diabetes management, which included use of an automated insulin delivery system (n = 61), or standard care, which included use of a continuous glucose monitor (n = 52), as part of a factorial design in which participants weighing 30 kg or more also were assigned to receive either oral verapamil or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was mixed-meal tolerance test-stimulated C-peptide area under the curve (a measure of pancreatic beta cell function) 52 weeks from diagnosis. Results Among 113 participants (mean [SD] age, 11.8 [2.8] years; 49 females [43%]; mean [SD] time from diagnosis to randomization, 24 [5] days), 108 (96%) completed the trial. The mean C-peptide area under the curve decreased from 0.57 pmol/mL at baseline to 0.45 pmol/mL at 52 weeks in the intensive management group, and from 0.60 to 0.50 pmol/mL in the standard care group (treatment group difference, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.10]; P = .89). The mean time in the target range of 70 to 180 mg/dL, measured with continuous glucose monitoring, at 52 weeks was 78% in the intensive management group vs 64% in the standard care group (adjusted difference, 16% [95% CI, 10% to 22%]). One severe hypoglycemia event and 1 diabetic ketoacidosis event occurred in each group. Conclusions and Relevance In youths with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes, intensive diabetes management, which included automated insulin delivery, achieved excellent glucose control but did not affect the decline in pancreatic C-peptide secretion at 52 weeks. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04233034.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer McVean
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
- now with Medtronic, Northridge, California
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Ryan Bailey
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | - Anna Neyman
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | | | - Emily K Sims
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Laurel H Messer
- Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver
- now with Tandem Diabetes Care, San Diego, California
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
- now with University of California, San Francisco
| | | | | | - Diana Rojas
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Stephanie DuBose
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
- now with Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tatovic D, Narendran P, Dayan CM. A perspective on treating type 1 diabetes mellitus before insulin is needed. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2023; 19:361-370. [PMID: 36914759 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-023-00816-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a progressive autoimmune disease that starts long before a clinical diagnosis is made. The American Diabetes Association recognizes three stages: stage 1 (normoglycaemic and positive for autoantibodies to β-cell antigens); stage 2 (asymptomatic with dysglycaemia); and stage 3, which is defined by glucose levels consistent with the definition of diabetes mellitus. This Perspective focuses on the management of the proportion of individuals with early stage 3 T1DM who do not immediately require insulin; a stage we propose should be termed stage 3a. To date, this period of non-insulin-dependent T1DM has been largely unrecognized. Importantly, it represents a window of opportunity for intervention, as remaining at this stage might delay the need for insulin by months or years. Extending the insulin-free period and/or avoiding unnecessary insulin therapy are important goals, as there is no risk of hypoglycaemia during this period and the adherence burden on patients of glycaemic monitoring and daily adjustments for diet and exercise is substantially reduced. Recognizing the pressing need for guidance on adequate management of children and adults with stage 3a T1DM, we present our perspective on the subject, which needs to be tested in formal and adequately powered clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danijela Tatovic
- Diabetes Research Group, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Parth Narendran
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Colin M Dayan
- Diabetes Research Group, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Couper J. Preserving Pancreatic Beta Cell Function in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes. JAMA 2023; 329:978-979. [PMID: 36826839 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.2140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Couper
- Women's and Children's Health Network, North Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|