1
|
Weeks-Pollenz SJ, Petrides MJ, Davis R, Harris KK, Bloom LB. Single-stranded DNA binding protein hitches a ride with the Escherichia coli YoaA-χ helicase. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.21.600097. [PMID: 38948847 PMCID: PMC11213134 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.21.600097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
The Escherichia coli XPD/Rad3-like helicase, YoaA, and DNA polymerase III subunit, χ, are involved in E. coli DNA damage tolerance and repair. YoaA and χ promote tolerance to the DNA chain-terminator, 3 -azidothymidine (AZT), and together form the functional helicase complex, YoaA-χ. How YoaA-χ contributes to DNA damage tolerance is not well understood. E. coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) accumulates at stalled replication forks, and the SSB-χ interaction is required to promote AZT tolerance via an unknown mechanism. YoaA-χ and SSB interactions were investigated in vitro to better understand this DNA damage tolerance mechanism, and we discovered YoaA-χ and SSB have a functional interaction. SSB confers a substrate-specific effect on the helicase activity of YoaA-χ, barely affecting YoaA-χ on an overhang DNA substrate but inhibiting YoaA-χ on forked DNA. A paralog helicase, DinG, unwinds SSB-bound DNA in a similar manner to YoaA-χ on the substrates tested. Through use of ensemble experiments, we believe SSB binds behind YoaA-χ relative to the DNA ds/ss junction and show via single-molecule assays that SSB translocates along ssDNA with YoaA-χ. This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of a mechanoenzyme pulling SSB along ssDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Linda B. Bloom
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0245, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Łazowski K, Woodgate R, Fijalkowska IJ. Escherichia coli DNA replication: the old model organism still holds many surprises. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2024; 48:fuae018. [PMID: 38982189 PMCID: PMC11253446 DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuae018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Research on Escherichia coli DNA replication paved the groundwork for many breakthrough discoveries with important implications for our understanding of human molecular biology, due to the high level of conservation of key molecular processes involved. To this day, it attracts a lot of attention, partially by virtue of being an important model organism, but also because the understanding of factors influencing replication fidelity might be important for studies on the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Importantly, the wide access to high-resolution single-molecule and live-cell imaging, whole genome sequencing, and cryo-electron microscopy techniques, which were greatly popularized in the last decade, allows us to revisit certain assumptions about the replisomes and offers very detailed insight into how they work. For many parts of the replisome, step-by-step mechanisms have been reconstituted, and some new players identified. This review summarizes the latest developments in the area, focusing on (a) the structure of the replisome and mechanisms of action of its components, (b) organization of replisome transactions and repair, (c) replisome dynamics, and (d) factors influencing the base and sugar fidelity of DNA synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystian Łazowski
- Laboratory of DNA Replication and Genome Stability, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5a, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Roger Woodgate
- Laboratory of Genomic Integrity, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-3371, United States
| | - Iwona J Fijalkowska
- Laboratory of DNA Replication and Genome Stability, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5a, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bonde NJ, Kozlov AG, Cox MM, Lohman TM, Keck JL. Molecular insights into the prototypical single-stranded DNA-binding protein from E. coli. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2024; 59:99-127. [PMID: 38770626 PMCID: PMC11209772 DOI: 10.1080/10409238.2024.2330372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
The SSB protein of Escherichia coli functions to bind single-stranded DNA wherever it occurs during DNA metabolism. Depending upon conditions, SSB occurs in several different binding modes. In the course of its function, SSB diffuses on ssDNA and transfers rapidly between different segments of ssDNA. SSB interacts with many other proteins involved in DNA metabolism, with 22 such SSB-interacting proteins, or SIPs, defined to date. These interactions chiefly involve the disordered and conserved C-terminal residues of SSB. When not bound to ssDNA, SSB can aggregate to form a phase-separated biomolecular condensate. Current understanding of the properties of SSB and the functional significance of its many intermolecular interactions are summarized in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina J. Bonde
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Alexander G. Kozlov
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Michael M. Cox
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Timothy M. Lohman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - James L. Keck
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wollman AJM, Syeda AH, Howard JAL, Payne-Dwyer A, Leech A, Warecka D, Guy C, McGlynn P, Hawkins M, Leake MC. Tetrameric UvrD Helicase Is Located at the E. Coli Replisome due to Frequent Replication Blocks. J Mol Biol 2024; 436:168369. [PMID: 37977299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
DNA replication in all organisms must overcome nucleoprotein blocks to complete genome duplication. Accessory replicative helicases in Escherichia coli, Rep and UvrD, help remove these blocks and aid the re-initiation of replication. Mechanistic details of Rep function have emerged from recent live cell studies; however, the division of UvrD functions between its activities in DNA repair and role as an accessory helicase remain unclear in live cells. By integrating super-resolved single-molecule fluorescence microscopy with biochemical analysis, we find that UvrD self-associates into tetrameric assemblies and, unlike Rep, is not recruited to a specific replisome protein despite being found at approximately 80% of replication forks. Instead, its colocation with forks is likely due to the very high frequency of replication blocks composed of DNA-bound proteins, including RNA polymerase and factors involved in repairing DNA damage. Deleting rep and DNA repair factor genes mutS and uvrA, and inhibiting transcription through RNA polymerase mutation and antibiotic inhibition, indicates that the level of UvrD at the fork is dependent on UvrD's function. Our findings show that UvrD is recruited to sites of nucleoprotein blocks via different mechanisms to Rep and plays a multi-faceted role in ensuring successful DNA replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J M Wollman
- School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Aisha H Syeda
- School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Jamieson A L Howard
- School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Payne-Dwyer
- School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Leech
- Bioscience Technology Facility, Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Dominika Warecka
- Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Guy
- Covance Laboratories Ltd., Otley Road, Harrogate HG3 1PY, United Kingdom
| | - Peter McGlynn
- Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Hawkins
- Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
| | - Mark C Leake
- School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom; Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chib S, Griffin WC, Gao J, Proffitt DR, Byrd AK, Raney KD. Pif1 Helicase Mediates Remodeling of Protein-Nucleic Acid Complexes by Promoting Dissociation of Sub1 from G-Quadruplex DNA and Cdc13 from G-Rich Single-Stranded DNA. Biochemistry 2023; 62:3360-3372. [PMID: 37948114 PMCID: PMC10841737 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Pif1 is a molecular motor enzyme that is conserved from yeast to mammals. It translocates on ssDNA with a directional bias (5' → 3') and unwinds duplexes using the energy obtained from ATP hydrolysis. Pif1 is involved in dsDNA break repair, resolution of G-quadruplex (G4) structures, negative regulation of telomeres, and Okazaki fragment maturation. An important property of this helicase is to exert force and disrupt protein-DNA complexes, which may otherwise serve as barriers to various cellular pathways. Previously, Pif1 was reported to displace streptavidin from biotinylated DNA, Rap1 from telomeric DNA, and telomerase from DNA ends. Here, we have investigated the ability of S. cerevisiae Pif1 helicase to disrupt protein barriers from G4 and telomeric sites. Yeast chromatin-associated transcription coactivator Sub1 was characterized as a G4 binding protein. We found evidence for a physical interaction between Pif1 helicase and Sub1 protein. Here, we demonstrate that Pif1 is capable of catalyzing the disruption of Sub1-bound G4 structures in an ATP-dependent manner. We also investigated Pif1-mediated removal of yeast telomere-capping protein Cdc13 from DNA ends. Cdc13 exhibits a high-affinity interaction with an 11-mer derived from the yeast telomere sequence. Our results show that Pif1 uses its translocase activity to enhance the dissociation of this telomere-specific protein from its binding site. The rate of dissociation increased with an increase in the helicase loading site length. Additionally, we examined the biochemical mechanism for Pif1-catalyzed protein displacement by mutating the sequence of the telomeric 11-mer on the 5'-end and the 3'-end. The results support a model whereby Pif1 disrupts Cdc13 from the ssDNA in steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shubeena Chib
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205
| | - Wezley C. Griffin
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205
| | - Jun Gao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205
| | - David R. Proffitt
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205
| | - Alicia K. Byrd
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205
| | - Kevin D. Raney
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ploetz E, Ambrose B, Barth A, Börner R, Erichson F, Kapanidis AN, Kim HD, Levitus M, Lohman TM, Mazumder A, Rueda DS, Steffen FD, Cordes T, Magennis SW, Lerner E. A new twist on PIFE: photoisomerisation-related fluorescence enhancement. Methods Appl Fluoresc 2023; 12:012001. [PMID: 37726007 PMCID: PMC10570931 DOI: 10.1088/2050-6120/acfb58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PIFE was first used as an acronym for protein-induced fluorescence enhancement, which refers to the increase in fluorescence observed upon the interaction of a fluorophore, such as a cyanine, with a protein. This fluorescence enhancement is due to changes in the rate ofcis/transphotoisomerisation. It is clear now that this mechanism is generally applicable to interactions with any biomolecule. In this review, we propose that PIFE is thereby renamed according to its fundamental working principle as photoisomerisation-related fluorescence enhancement, keeping the PIFE acronym intact. We discuss the photochemistry of cyanine fluorophores, the mechanism of PIFE, its advantages and limitations, and recent approaches to turning PIFE into a quantitative assay. We provide an overview of its current applications to different biomolecules and discuss potential future uses, including the study of protein-protein interactions, protein-ligand interactions and conformational changes in biomolecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Ploetz
- Department of Chemistry and Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstr. 5-13, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Benjamin Ambrose
- Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
- Single Molecule Imaging Group, MRC-London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Anders Barth
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629 HZ, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Börner
- Laserinstitut Hochschule Mittweida, Mittweida University of Applied Sciences, Mittweida, Germany
| | - Felix Erichson
- Laserinstitut Hochschule Mittweida, Mittweida University of Applied Sciences, Mittweida, Germany
| | - Achillefs N Kapanidis
- Biological Physics Research Group, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Harold D Kim
- School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, 837 State Street, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America
| | - Marcia Levitus
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, 551 E. University Drive, Tempe, AZ,85287, United States of America
| | - Timothy M Lohman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America
| | - Abhishek Mazumder
- CSIR-Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S.C. Mullick Road, Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032, West Bengal, India
| | - David S Rueda
- Department of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
- Single Molecule Imaging Group, MRC-London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| | - Fabio D Steffen
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Großhadernerstr. 2-4, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Steven W Magennis
- School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow, Joseph Black Building, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Eitan Lerner
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Faculty of Mathematics & Science, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Jerusalem 9190401, Israel
- Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Jerusalem 9190401, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Solomun T, Cordsmeier L, Hallier DC, Seitz H, Hahn MB. Interaction of a Dimeric Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein (G5P) with DNA Hairpins. A Molecular Beacon Study. J Phys Chem B 2023; 127:8131-8138. [PMID: 37704207 PMCID: PMC10544328 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c03669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
Gene-V protein (G5P/GVP) is a single-stranded (ss)DNA-binding protein (SBP) of bacteriophage f1 that is required for DNA synthesis and repair. In solution, it exists as a dimer that binds two antiparallel ssDNA strands with high affinity in a cooperative manner, forming a left-handed helical protein-DNA filament. Here, we report on fluorescence studies of the interaction of G5P with different DNA oligonucleotides having a hairpin structure (molecular beacon, MB) with a seven base-pair stem (dT24-stem7, dT18-stem7), as well as with DNA oligonucleotides (dT38, dT24) without a defined secondary structure. All oligonucleotides were end-labeled with a Cy3-fluorophore and a BHQ2-quencher. In the case of DNA oligonucleotides without a secondary structure, an almost complete quenching of their strong fluorescence (with about 5% residual intensity) was observed upon the binding of G5P. This implies an exact alignment of the ends of the DNA strand(s) in the saturated complex. The interaction of the DNA hairpins with G5P led to the unzipping of the base-paired stem, as revealed by fluorescence measurements, fluorescence microfluidic mixing experiments, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay data. Importantly, the disruption of ssDNA's secondary structure agrees with the behavior of other single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SBPs). In addition, substantial protein-induced fluorescence enhancement (PIFE) of the Cy3-fluorescence was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tihomir Solomun
- Bundesanstalt
für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin 12205, Germany
| | - Leo Cordsmeier
- Bundesanstalt
für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin 12205, Germany
- Institut
für Chemie, Freie Universität
Berlin, Berlin 14195, Germany
| | - Dorothea C. Hallier
- Bundesanstalt
für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin 12205, Germany
- Institut
für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität
Potsdam, Potsdam 14476, Germany
- Fraunhofer
Institut für Zelltherapie und Immunologie Institutsteil Bioanalytik
und Bioprozesse IZI-BB, Potsdam 14476, Germany
| | - Harald Seitz
- Institut
für Biochemie und Biologie, Universität
Potsdam, Potsdam 14476, Germany
- Fraunhofer
Institut für Zelltherapie und Immunologie Institutsteil Bioanalytik
und Bioprozesse IZI-BB, Potsdam 14476, Germany
| | - Marc Benjamin Hahn
- Bundesanstalt
für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Berlin 12205, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mustafi M, Kwon Y, Sung P, Greene EC. Single-molecule visualization of Pif1 helicase translocation on single-stranded DNA. J Biol Chem 2023; 299:104817. [PMID: 37178921 PMCID: PMC10279920 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Pif1 is a broadly conserved helicase that is essential for genome integrity and participates in numerous aspects of DNA metabolism, including telomere length regulation, Okazaki fragment maturation, replication fork progression through difficult-to-replicate sites, replication fork convergence, and break-induced replication. However, details of its translocation properties and the importance of amino acids residues implicated in DNA binding remain unclear. Here, we use total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy with single-molecule DNA curtain assays to directly observe the movement of fluorescently tagged Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) substrates. We find that Pif1 binds tightly to ssDNA and translocates very rapidly (∼350 nucleotides per second) in the 5'→3' direction over relatively long distances (∼29,500 nucleotides). Surprisingly, we show the ssDNA-binding protein replication protein A inhibits Pif1 activity in both bulk biochemical and single-molecule measurements. However, we demonstrate Pif1 can strip replication protein A from ssDNA, allowing subsequent molecules of Pif1 to translocate unimpeded. We also assess the functional attributes of several Pif1 mutations predicted to impair contact with the ssDNA substrate. Taken together, our findings highlight the functional importance of these amino acid residues in coordinating the movement of Pif1 along ssDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainak Mustafi
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Youngho Kwon
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Sung
- Department of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Eric C Greene
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mersch K, Sokoloski J, Nguyen B, Galletto R, Lohman T. "Helicase" Activity promoted through dynamic interactions between a ssDNA translocase and a diffusing SSB protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2216777120. [PMID: 37011199 PMCID: PMC10104510 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2216777120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Replication protein A (RPA) is a eukaryotic single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding (SSB) protein that is essential for all aspects of genome maintenance. RPA binds ssDNA with high affinity but can also diffuse along ssDNA. By itself, RPA is capable of transiently disrupting short regions of duplex DNA by diffusing from a ssDNA that flanks the duplex DNA. Using single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence and optical trapping combined with fluorescence approaches, we show that S. cerevisiae Pif1 can use its ATP-dependent 5' to 3' translocase activity to chemomechanically push a single human RPA (hRPA) heterotrimer directionally along ssDNA at rates comparable to those of Pif1 translocation alone. We further show that using its translocation activity, Pif1 can push hRPA from a ssDNA loading site into a duplex DNA causing stable disruption of at least 9 bp of duplex DNA. These results highlight the dynamic nature of hRPA enabling it to be readily reorganized even when bound tightly to ssDNA and demonstrate a mechanism by which directional DNA unwinding can be achieved through the combined action of a ssDNA translocase that pushes an SSB protein. These results highlight the two basic requirements for any processive DNA helicase: transient DNA base pair melting (supplied by hRPA) and ATP-dependent directional ssDNA translocation (supplied by Pif1) and that these functions can be unlinked by using two separate proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kacey N. Mersch
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110-1093
| | - Joshua E. Sokoloski
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110-1093
- Department of Chemistry, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD21801
| | - Binh Nguyen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110-1093
| | - Roberto Galletto
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110-1093
| | - Timothy M. Lohman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO63110-1093
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu L, Halma MTJ, Wuite GJL. Unravelling How Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein Coordinates DNA Metabolism Using Single-Molecule Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032806. [PMID: 36769124 PMCID: PMC9917605 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) play vital roles in DNA metabolism. Proteins of the SSB family exclusively and transiently bind to ssDNA, preventing the DNA double helix from re-annealing and maintaining genome integrity. In the meantime, they interact and coordinate with various proteins vital for DNA replication, recombination, and repair. Although SSB is essential for DNA metabolism, proteins of the SSB family have been long described as accessory players, primarily due to their unclear dynamics and mechanistic interaction with DNA and its partners. Recently-developed single-molecule tools, together with biochemical ensemble techniques and structural methods, have enhanced our understanding of the different coordination roles that SSB plays during DNA metabolism. In this review, we discuss how single-molecule assays, such as optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers, Förster resonance energy transfer, and their combinations, have advanced our understanding of the binding dynamics of SSBs to ssDNA and their interaction with other proteins partners. We highlight the central coordination role that the SSB protein plays by directly modulating other proteins' activities, rather than as an accessory player. Many possible modes of SSB interaction with protein partners are discussed, which together provide a bigger picture of the interaction network shaped by SSB.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ozaslan D, Byrd AK, Belachew B, Raney KD. Alignment of helicases on single-stranded DNA increases activity. Methods Enzymol 2022; 672:29-54. [PMID: 35934480 PMCID: PMC9421817 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2022.03.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Helicases function in most biological processes that utilize RNA or DNA nucleic acids including replication, recombination, repair, transcription, splicing, and translation. They are motor proteins that bind ATP and then catalyze hydrolysis to release energy which is transduced for conformational changes. Different conformations correspond to different steps in a process that results in movement of the enzyme along the nucleic acid track in a unidirectional manner. Some helicases such as DEAD-box helicases do not translocate, but these enzymes transduce chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis to unwind secondary structure in DNA or RNA. Some helicases function as monomers while others assemble into defined structures, either dimers or higher order oligomers. Dda helicase from bacteriophage T4 and NS3 helicase domain from the hepatitis C virus are examples of monomeric helicases. These helicases can bind to single-stranded DNA in a manner that appears like train engines on a track. When monomeric helicases align on DNA, the activity of the enzymes increases. Helicase activity can include the rate of duplex unwinding and the total number of base pairs melted during a single binding event or processivity. Dda and NS3h are considered as having low processivity, unwinding fewer than 50 base pairs per binding event. Here, we report fusing two molecules of NS3h molecules together through genetically linking the C-terminus of one molecule to the N-terminus of a second NS3h molecule. We observed increased processivity relative to NS3h possibly arising from the increased probability that at least one of the helicases will completely unwind the DNA prior to dissociation. The dimeric enzyme also binds DNA more like the full-length NS3 helicase. Finally, the dimer can displace streptavidin from biotin-labeled oligonucleotide, whereas monomeric NS3h cannot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Ozaslan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Alicia K Byrd
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
| | - Binyam Belachew
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Kevin D Raney
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hormeno S, Wilkinson OJ, Aicart-Ramos C, Kuppa S, Antony E, Dillingham MS, Moreno-Herrero F. Human HELB is a processive motor protein that catalyzes RPA clearance from single-stranded DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2112376119. [PMID: 35385349 PMCID: PMC9169624 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2112376119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Human DNA helicase B (HELB) is a poorly characterized helicase suggested to play both positive and negative regulatory roles in DNA replication and recombination. In this work, we used bulk and single-molecule approaches to characterize the biochemical activities of HELB protein with a particular focus on its interactions with Replication Protein A (RPA) and RPA–single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) filaments. HELB is a monomeric protein that binds tightly to ssDNA with a site size of ∼20 nucleotides. It couples ATP hydrolysis to translocation along ssDNA in the 5′ to 3′ direction accompanied by the formation of DNA loops. HELB also displays classical helicase activity, but this is very weak in the absence of an assisting force. HELB binds specifically to human RPA, which enhances its ATPase and ssDNA translocase activities but inhibits DNA unwinding. Direct observation of HELB on RPA nucleoprotein filaments shows that translocating HELB concomitantly clears RPA from ssDNA. This activity, which can allow other proteins access to ssDNA intermediates despite their shielding by RPA, may underpin the diverse roles of HELB in cellular DNA transactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Hormeno
- Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Oliver J. Wilkinson
- DNA:Protein Interactions Unit, School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom
| | - Clara Aicart-Ramos
- Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sahiti Kuppa
- Department of Biochemistry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104
| | - Edwin Antony
- Department of Biochemistry, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104
| | - Mark S. Dillingham
- DNA:Protein Interactions Unit, School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom
| | - Fernando Moreno-Herrero
- Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
How Glutamate Promotes Liquid-liquid Phase Separation and DNA Binding Cooperativity of E. coli SSB Protein. J Mol Biol 2022; 434:167562. [PMID: 35351518 PMCID: PMC9400470 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
E. coli single-stranded-DNA binding protein (EcSSB) displays nearest-neighbor (NN) and non-nearest-neighbor (NNN)) cooperativity in binding ssDNA during genome maintenance. NNN cooperativity requires the intrinsically-disordered linkers (IDL) of the C-terminal tails. Potassium glutamate (KGlu), the primary E. coli salt, promotes NNN-cooperativity, while KCl inhibits it. We find that KGlu promotes compaction of a single polymeric SSB-coated ssDNA beyond what occurs in KCl, indicating a link of compaction to NNN-cooperativity. EcSSB also undergoes liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), inhibited by ssDNA binding. We find that LLPS, like NNN-cooperativity, is promoted by increasing [KGlu] in the physiological range, while increasing [KCl] and/or deletion of the IDL eliminate LLPS, indicating similar interactions in both processes. From quantitative determinations of interactions of KGlu and KCl with protein model compounds, we deduce that the opposing effects of KGlu and KCl on SSB LLPS and cooperativity arise from their opposite interactions with amide groups. KGlu interacts unfavorably with the backbone (especially Gly) and side chain amide groups of the IDL, promoting amide-amide interactions in LLPS and NNN-cooperativity. By contrast, KCl interacts favorably with these amide groups and therefore inhibits LLPS and NNN-cooperativity. These results highlight the importance of salt interactions in regulating the propensity of proteins to undergo LLPS.
Collapse
|
14
|
Nguyen B, Shinn MK, Weiland E, Lohman TM. Regulation of E. coli Rep helicase activity by PriC. J Mol Biol 2021; 433:167072. [PMID: 34081984 PMCID: PMC8941637 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Stalled DNA replication forks can result in incompletely replicated genomes and cell death. DNA replication restart pathways have evolved to deal with repair of stalled forks and E. coli Rep helicase functions in this capacity. Rep and an accessory protein, PriC, assemble at a stalled replication fork to facilitate loading of other replication proteins. A Rep monomer is a rapid and processive single stranded (ss) DNA translocase but needs to be activated to function as a helicase. Activation of Rep in vitro requires self-assembly to form a dimer, removal of its auto-inhibitory 2B sub-domain, or interactions with an accessory protein. Rep helicase activity has been shown to be stimulated by PriC, although the mechanism of activation is not clear. Using stopped flow kinetics, analytical sedimentation and single molecule fluorescence methods, we show that a PriC dimer activates the Rep monomer helicase and can also stimulate the Rep dimer helicase. We show that PriC can self-assemble to form dimers and tetramers and that Rep and PriC interact in the absence of DNA. We further show that PriC serves as a Rep processivity factor, presumably co-translocating with Rep during DNA unwinding. Activation is specific for Rep since PriC does not activate the UvrD helicase. Interaction of PriC with the C-terminal acidic tip of the ssDNA binding protein, SSB, eliminates Rep activation by stabilizing the PriC monomer. This suggests a likely mechanism for Rep activation by PriC at a stalled replication fork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binh Nguyen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Box 8231, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States
| | - Min Kyung Shinn
- Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States
| | - Elizabeth Weiland
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Box 8231, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States
| | - Timothy M Lohman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Box 8231, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kozlov AG, Lohman TM. Probing E. coli SSB protein-DNA topology by reversing DNA backbone polarity. Biophys J 2021; 120:1522-1533. [PMID: 33636169 PMCID: PMC8105733 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli single-strand (ss) DNA binding protein (SSB) is an essential protein that binds ssDNA intermediates formed during genome maintenance. SSB homotetramers bind ssDNA in two major modes, differing in occluded site size and cooperativity. The (SSB)35 mode in which ssDNA wraps, on average, around two subunits is favored at low [NaCl] and high SSB/DNA ratios and displays high unlimited, nearest-neighbor cooperativity forming long protein clusters. The (SSB)65 mode, in which ssDNA wraps completely around four subunits of the tetramer, is favored at higher [NaCl] (>200 mM) and displays limited low cooperativity. Crystal structures of E. coli SSB and Plasmodium falciparum SSB show ssDNA bound to the SSB subunits (OB folds) with opposite polarities of the sugar phosphate backbones. To investigate whether SSB subunits show a polarity preference for binding ssDNA, we examined EcSSB and PfSSB binding to a series of (dT)70 constructs in which the backbone polarity was switched in the middle of the DNA by incorporating a reverse-polarity (RP) phosphodiester linkage, either 3'-3' or 5'-5'. We find only minor effects on the DNA binding properties for these RP constructs, although (dT)70 with a 3'-3' polarity switch shows decreased affinity for EcSSB in the (SSB)65 mode and lower cooperativity in the (SSB)35 mode. However, (dT)70 in which every phosphodiester linkage is reversed does not form a completely wrapped (SSB)65 mode but, rather, binds EcSSB in the (SSB)35 mode with little cooperativity. In contrast, PfSSB, which binds ssDNA only in an (SSB)65 mode and with opposite backbone polarity and different topology, shows little effect of backbone polarity on its DNA binding properties. We present structural models suggesting that strict backbone polarity can be maintained for ssDNA binding to the individual OB folds if there is a change in ssDNA wrapping topology of the RP ssDNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander G Kozlov
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Timothy M Lohman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Naufer MN, Morse M, Möller GB, McIsaac J, Rouzina I, Beuning PJ, Williams MC. Multiprotein E. coli SSB-ssDNA complex shows both stable binding and rapid dissociation due to interprotein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:1532-1549. [PMID: 33434279 PMCID: PMC7897507 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli SSB (EcSSB) is a model single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein critical in genome maintenance. EcSSB forms homotetramers that wrap ssDNA in multiple conformations to facilitate DNA replication and repair. Here we measure the binding and wrapping of many EcSSB proteins to a single long ssDNA substrate held at fixed tensions. We show EcSSB binds in a biphasic manner, where initial wrapping events are followed by unwrapping events as ssDNA-bound protein density passes critical saturation and high free protein concentration increases the fraction of EcSSBs in less-wrapped conformations. By destabilizing EcSSB wrapping through increased substrate tension, decreased substrate length, and protein mutation, we also directly observe an unstable bound but unwrapped state in which ∼8 nucleotides of ssDNA are bound by a single domain, which could act as a transition state through which rapid reorganization of the EcSSB-ssDNA complex occurs. When ssDNA is over-saturated, stimulated dissociation rapidly removes excess EcSSB, leaving an array of stably-wrapped complexes. These results provide a mechanism through which otherwise stably bound and wrapped EcSSB tetramers are rapidly removed from ssDNA to allow for DNA maintenance and replication functions, while still fully protecting ssDNA over a wide range of protein concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Nabuan Naufer
- Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Michael Morse
- Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - James McIsaac
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ioulia Rouzina
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Penny J Beuning
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mark C Williams
- Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dienerowitz M, Howard JAL, Quinn SD, Dienerowitz F, Leake MC. Single-molecule FRET dynamics of molecular motors in an ABEL trap. Methods 2021; 193:96-106. [PMID: 33571667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) of molecular motors provides transformative insights into their dynamics and conformational changes both at high temporal and spatial resolution simultaneously. However, a key challenge of such FRET investigations is to observe a molecule in action for long enough without restricting its natural function. The Anti-Brownian ELectrokinetic Trap (ABEL trap) sets out to combine smFRET with molecular confinement to enable observation times of up to several seconds while removing any requirement of tethered surface attachment of the molecule in question. In addition, the ABEL trap's inherent ability to selectively capture FRET active molecules accelerates the data acquisition process. In this work we exemplify the capabilities of the ABEL trap in performing extended timescale smFRET measurements on the molecular motor Rep, which is crucial for removing protein blocks ahead of the advancing DNA replication machinery and for restarting stalled DNA replication. We are able to monitor single Rep molecules up to 6 seconds with sub-millisecond time resolution capturing multiple conformational switching events during the observation time. Here we provide a step-by-step guide for the rational design, construction and implementation of the ABEL trap for smFRET detection of Rep in vitro. We include details of how to model the electric potential at the trap site and use Hidden Markov analysis of the smFRET trajectories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Dienerowitz
- Single-Molecule Microscopy Group, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Nonnenplan 2 - 4, 07743 Jena, Germany.
| | - Jamieson A L Howard
- Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK; Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Steven D Quinn
- Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK; York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Frank Dienerowitz
- Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, University of Applied Sciences, Carl-Zeiss-Promenade 2, 07745 Jena, Germany
| | - Mark C Leake
- Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK; Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK; York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lu C, Le S, Chen J, Byrd AK, Rhodes D, Raney KD, Yan J. Direct quantification of the translocation activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:7494-7501. [PMID: 31216020 PMCID: PMC6698741 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 (ScPif1) is known as an ATP-dependent DNA helicase that plays critical roles in a number of important biological processes such as DNA replication, telomere maintenance and genome stability maintenance. Besides its DNA helicase activity, ScPif1 is also known as a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) translocase, while how ScPif1 translocates on ssDNA is unclear. Here, by measuring the translocation activity of individual ScPif1 molecules on ssDNA extended by mechanical force, we identified two distinct types of ssDNA translocation. In one type, ScPif1 moves along the ssDNA track with a rate of ∼140 nt/s in 100 μM ATP, whereas in the other type, ScPif1 is immobilized to a fixed location of ssDNA and generates ssDNA loops against force. Between the two, the mobile translocation is the major form at nanomolar ScPif1 concentrations although patrolling becomes more frequent at micromolar concentrations. Together, our results suggest that ScPif1 translocates on extended ssDNA in two distinct modes, primarily in a ‘mobile’ manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Lu
- Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411.,Centre for Bioimaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117557
| | - Shimin Le
- Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117542
| | - Jin Chen
- Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411
| | - Alicia K Byrd
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Arkansas 72205, USA
| | - Daniela Rhodes
- School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore 637551
| | - Kevin D Raney
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Arkansas 72205, USA
| | - Jie Yan
- Mechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411.,Centre for Bioimaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117557.,Department of Physics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117542
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sparks MA, Singh SP, Burgers PM, Galletto R. Complementary roles of Pif1 helicase and single stranded DNA binding proteins in stimulating DNA replication through G-quadruplexes. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:8595-8605. [PMID: 31340040 PMCID: PMC7145523 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
G-quadruplexes (G4s) are stable secondary structures that can lead to the stalling of replication forks and cause genomic instability. Pif1 is a 5′ to 3′ helicase, localized to both the mitochondria and nucleus that can unwind G4s in vitro and prevent fork stalling at G4 forming sequences in vivo. Using in vitro primer extension assays, we show that both G4s and stable hairpins form barriers to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA polymerases δ and γ, respectively. However, while single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) readily promote replication through hairpins, SSBs are only effective in promoting replication through weak G4s. Using a series of G4s with increasing stabilities, we reveal a threshold above which G4 through-replication is inhibited even with SSBs present, and Pif1 helicase is required. Because Pif1 moves along the template strand with a 5′-3′-directionality, head-on collisions between Pif1 and polymerase δ or γ result in the stimulation of their 3′-exonuclease activity. Both nuclear RPA and mitochondrial SSB play a protective role during DNA replication by preventing excessive DNA degradation caused by the helicase-polymerase conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A Sparks
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Saurabh P Singh
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Peter M Burgers
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Roberto Galletto
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cerrón F, de Lorenzo S, Lemishko KM, Ciesielski GL, Kaguni LS, Cao FJ, Ibarra B. Replicative DNA polymerases promote active displacement of SSB proteins during lagging strand synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:5723-5734. [PMID: 30968132 PMCID: PMC6582349 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome replication induces the generation of large stretches of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates that are rapidly protected by single-stranded DNA-binding (SSB) proteins. To date, the mechanism by which tightly bound SSBs are removed from ssDNA by the lagging strand DNA polymerase without compromising the advance of the replication fork remains unresolved. Here, we aimed to address this question by measuring, with optical tweezers, the real-time replication kinetics of the human mitochondrial and bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerases on free-ssDNA, in comparison with ssDNA covered with homologous and non-homologous SSBs under mechanical tension. We find important differences between the force dependencies of the instantaneous replication rates of each polymerase on different substrates. Modeling of the data supports a mechanism in which strong, specific polymerase-SSB interactions, up to ∼12 kBT, are required for the polymerase to dislodge SSB from the template without compromising its instantaneous replication rate, even under stress conditions that may affect SSB–DNA organization and/or polymerase–SSB communication. Upon interaction, the elimination of template secondary structure by SSB binding facilitates the maximum replication rate of the lagging strand polymerase. In contrast, in the absence of polymerase–SSB interactions, SSB poses an effective barrier for the advance of the polymerase, slowing down DNA synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Cerrón
- Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia, IMDEA Nanociencia. 28049 Madrid, Spain.,Departamento Estructura de la Materia, Física Térmica y Electrónica. Universidad Complutense. 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara de Lorenzo
- Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia, IMDEA Nanociencia. 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Kateryna M Lemishko
- Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia, IMDEA Nanociencia. 28049 Madrid, Spain.,Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia (IMDEA Nanociencia) & CNB-CSIC-IMDEA Nanociencia Associated Unit "Unidad de Nanobiotecnología". 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Grzegorz L Ciesielski
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Center for Mitochondrial Science and Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
| | - Laurie S Kaguni
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Center for Mitochondrial Science and Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA
| | - Francisco J Cao
- Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia, IMDEA Nanociencia. 28049 Madrid, Spain.,Departamento Estructura de la Materia, Física Térmica y Electrónica. Universidad Complutense. 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja Ibarra
- Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia, IMDEA Nanociencia. 28049 Madrid, Spain.,Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados en Nanociencia (IMDEA Nanociencia) & CNB-CSIC-IMDEA Nanociencia Associated Unit "Unidad de Nanobiotecnología". 28049 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Spenkelink LM, Lewis JS, Jergic S, Xu ZQ, Robinson A, Dixon NE, van Oijen AM. Recycling of single-stranded DNA-binding protein by the bacterial replisome. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:4111-4123. [PMID: 30767010 PMCID: PMC6486552 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) support DNA replication by protecting single-stranded DNA from nucleolytic attack, preventing intra-strand pairing events and playing many other regulatory roles within the replisome. Recent developments in single-molecule approaches have led to a revised picture of the replisome that is much more complex in how it retains or recycles protein components. Here, we visualize how an in vitro reconstituted Escherichia coli replisome recruits SSB by relying on two different molecular mechanisms. Not only does it recruit new SSB molecules from solution to coat newly formed single-stranded DNA on the lagging strand, but it also internally recycles SSB from one Okazaki fragment to the next. We show that this internal transfer mechanism is balanced against recruitment from solution in a manner that is concentration dependent. By visualizing SSB dynamics in live cells, we show that both internal transfer and external exchange mechanisms are physiologically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne M Spenkelink
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9747 AG, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob S Lewis
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Slobodan Jergic
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Zhi-Qiang Xu
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Andrew Robinson
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Nicholas E Dixon
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Antoine M van Oijen
- Molecular Horizons and School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia.,Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Branched unwinding mechanism of the Pif1 family of DNA helicases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:24533-24541. [PMID: 31744872 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1915654116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Members of the Pif1 family of helicases function in multiple pathways that involve DNA synthesis: DNA replication across G-quadruplexes; break-induced replication; and processing of long flaps during Okazaki fragment maturation. Furthermore, Pif1 increases strand-displacement DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase δ and allows DNA replication across arrays of proteins tightly bound to DNA. This is a surprising feat since DNA rewinding or annealing activities limit the amount of single-stranded DNA product that Pif1 can generate, leading to an apparently poorly processive helicase. In this work, using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer approaches, we show that 2 members of the Pif1 family of helicases, Pif1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pfh1 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, unwind double-stranded DNA by a branched mechanism with 2 modes of activity. In the dominant mode, only short stretches of DNA can be processively and repetitively opened, with reclosure of the DNA occurring by mechanisms other than strand-switching. In the other less frequent mode, longer stretches of DNA are unwound via a path that is separate from the one leading to repetitive unwinding. Analysis of the kinetic partitioning between the 2 different modes suggests that the branching point in the mechanism is established by conformational selection, controlled by the interaction of the helicase with the 3' nontranslocating strand. The data suggest that the dominant and repetitive mode of DNA opening of the helicase can be used to allow efficient DNA replication, with DNA synthesis on the nontranslocating strand rectifying the DNA unwinding activity.
Collapse
|
23
|
Mohapatra S, Lin CT, Feng XA, Basu A, Ha T. Single-Molecule Analysis and Engineering of DNA Motors. Chem Rev 2019; 120:36-78. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Taekjip Ha
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Regulation of Nearest-Neighbor Cooperative Binding of E. coli SSB Protein to DNA. Biophys J 2019; 117:2120-2140. [PMID: 31708161 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli single-strand (ss) DNA-binding protein (SSB) is an essential protein that binds ssDNA intermediates formed during genome maintenance. SSB homotetramers bind ssDNA in several modes differing in occluded site size and cooperativity. The 35-site-size ((SSB)35) mode favored at low [NaCl] and high SSB/DNA ratios displays high "unlimited" nearest-neighbor cooperativity (ω35), forming long protein clusters, whereas the 65-site-size ((SSB)65) mode in which ssDNA wraps completely around the tetramer is favored at higher [NaCl] (>200 mM) and displays "limited" cooperativity (ω65), forming only dimers of tetramers. In addition, a non-nearest-neighbor high cooperativity can also occur in the (SSB)65 mode on long ssDNA even at physiological salt concentrations in the presence of glutamate and requires its intrinsically disordered C-terminal linker (IDL) region. However, whether cooperativity exists between the different modes and the role of the IDL in nearest-neighbor cooperativity has not been probed. Here, we combine sedimentation velocity and fluorescence titration studies to examine nearest-neighbor cooperativity in each binding mode and between binding modes using (dT)70 and (dT)140. We find that the (SSB)35 mode always shows extremely high "unlimited" cooperativity that requires the IDL. At high salt, wild-type SSB and a variant without the IDL, SSB-ΔL, bind in the (SSB)65 mode but show little cooperativity, although cooperativity increases at lower [NaCl] for wild-type SSB. We also find significant intermode nearest-neighbor cooperativity (ω65/35), with ω65 ≪ ω65/35 <ω35. The intrinsically disordered region of SSB is required for all cooperative interactions; however, in contrast to the non-nearest-neighbor cooperativity observed on longer ssDNA, glutamate does not enhance these nearest-neighbor cooperativities. Therefore, we show that SSB possesses four types of cooperative interactions, with clear differences in the forces stabilizing nearest-neighbor versus non-nearest-neighbor cooperativity.
Collapse
|
25
|
Perera HM, Behrmann MS, Hoang JM, Griffin WC, Trakselis MA. Contacts and context that regulate DNA helicase unwinding and replisome progression. Enzymes 2019; 45:183-223. [PMID: 31627877 DOI: 10.1016/bs.enz.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Hexameric DNA helicases involved in the separation of duplex DNA at the replication fork have a universal architecture but have evolved from two separate protein families. The consequences are that the regulation, translocation polarity, strand specificity, and architectural orientation varies between phage/bacteria to that of archaea/eukaryotes. Once assembled and activated for single strand DNA translocation and unwinding, the DNA polymerase couples tightly to the helicase forming a robust replisome complex. However, this helicase-polymerase interaction can be challenged by various forms of endogenous or exogenous agents that can stall the entire replisome or decouple DNA unwinding from synthesis. The consequences of decoupling can be severe, leading to a build-up of ssDNA requiring various pathways for replication fork restart. All told, the hexameric helicase sits prominently at the front of the replisome constantly responding to a variety of obstacles that require transient unwinding/reannealing, traversal of more stable blocks, and alternations in DNA unwinding speed that regulate replisome progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Himasha M Perera
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States
| | - Megan S Behrmann
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States
| | - Joy M Hoang
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States
| | - Wezley C Griffin
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States
| | - Michael A Trakselis
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, Waco, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Brüning JG, Howard JAL, Myka KK, Dillingham MS, McGlynn P. The 2B subdomain of Rep helicase links translocation along DNA with protein displacement. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 46:8917-8925. [PMID: 30060236 PMCID: PMC6158625 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Helicases catalyse DNA and RNA strand separation. Proteins bound to the nucleic acid must also be displaced in order to unwind DNA. This is exemplified by accessory helicases that clear protein barriers from DNA ahead of advancing replication forks. How helicases catalyse DNA unwinding is increasingly well understood but how protein displacement is achieved is unclear. Escherichia coli Rep accessory replicative helicase lacking one of its four subdomains, 2B, has been shown to be hyperactivated for DNA unwinding in vitro but we show here that RepΔ2B is, in contrast, deficient in displacing proteins from DNA. This defect correlates with an inability to promote replication of protein-bound DNA in vitro and lack of accessory helicase function in vivo. Defective protein displacement is manifested on double-stranded and single-stranded DNA. Thus binding and distortion of duplex DNA by the 2B subdomain ahead of the helicase is not the missing function responsible for this deficiency. These data demonstrate that protein displacement from DNA is not simply achieved by helicase translocation alone. They also imply that helicases may have evolved different specific features to optimise DNA unwinding and protein displacement, both of which are now recognised as key functions in all aspects of nucleic acid metabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kamila K Myka
- Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Mark S Dillingham
- DNA-Protein Interactions Unit, School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Biomedical Sciences Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK
| | - Peter McGlynn
- Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Protein Environment and DNA Orientation Affect Protein-Induced Cy3 Fluorescence Enhancement. Biophys J 2019; 117:66-73. [PMID: 31235181 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The cyanine dye Cy3 is a popular fluorophore used to probe the binding of proteins to nucleic acids as well as their conformational transitions. Nucleic acids labeled only with Cy3 can often be used to monitor interactions with unlabeled proteins because of an enhancement of Cy3 fluorescence intensity that results when the protein contacts Cy3, a property sometimes referred to as protein-induced fluorescence enhancement (PIFE). Although Cy3 fluorescence is enhanced upon contacting most proteins, we show here in studies of human replication protein A and Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein that the magnitude of the Cy3 enhancement is dependent on both the protein as well as the orientation of the protein with respect to the Cy3 label on the DNA. This difference in PIFE is due entirely to differences in the final protein-DNA complex. We also show that the origin of PIFE is the longer fluorescence lifetime induced by the local protein environment. These results indicate that PIFE is not a through space distance-dependent phenomenon but requires a direct interaction of Cy3 with the protein, and the magnitude of the effect is influenced by the region of the protein contacting Cy3. Hence, use of the Cy3 PIFE effect for quantitative studies may require careful calibration.
Collapse
|
28
|
Yeast Srs2 Helicase Promotes Redistribution of Single-Stranded DNA-Bound RPA and Rad52 in Homologous Recombination Regulation. Cell Rep 2018; 21:570-577. [PMID: 29045827 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Srs2 is a super-family 1 helicase that promotes genome stability by dismantling toxic DNA recombination intermediates. However, the mechanisms by which Srs2 remodels or resolves recombination intermediates remain poorly understood. Here, single-molecule imaging is used to visualize Srs2 in real time as it acts on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) bound by protein factors that function in recombination. We demonstrate that Srs2 is highly processive and translocates rapidly (∼170 nt per second) in the 3'→5' direction along ssDNA saturated with replication protein A (RPA). We show that RPA is evicted from DNA during the passage of Srs2. Remarkably, Srs2 also readily removes the recombination mediator Rad52 from RPA-ssDNA and, in doing so, promotes rapid redistribution of both Rad52 and RPA. These findings have important mechanistic implications for understanding how Srs2 and related nucleic acid motor proteins resolve potentially pathogenic nucleoprotein intermediates.
Collapse
|
29
|
Antony E, Lohman TM. Dynamics of E. coli single stranded DNA binding (SSB) protein-DNA complexes. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2018; 86:102-111. [PMID: 29588158 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Single stranded DNA binding proteins (SSB) are essential to the cell as they stabilize transiently open single stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates, recruit appropriate DNA metabolism proteins, and coordinate fundamental processes such as replication, repair and recombination. Escherichia coli single stranded DNA binding protein (EcSSB) has long served as the prototype for the study of SSB function. The structure, functions, and DNA binding properties of EcSSB are well established: The protein is a stable homotetramer with each subunit possessing an N-terminal DNA binding core, a C-terminal protein-protein interaction tail, and an intervening intrinsically disordered linker (IDL). EcSSB wraps ssDNA in multiple DNA binding modes and can diffuse along DNA to remove secondary structures and remodel other protein-DNA complexes. This review provides an update on these features based on recent findings, with special emphasis on the functional and mechanistic relevance of the IDL and DNA binding modes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin Antony
- Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
| | - Timothy M Lohman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Tullio L, Kaniecki K, Greene EC. Single-Stranded DNA Curtains for Studying the Srs2 Helicase Using Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy. Methods Enzymol 2018; 600:407-437. [PMID: 29458768 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Helicases are crucial participants in many types of DNA repair reactions, including homologous recombination. The properties of these enzymes can be assayed by traditional bulk biochemical analysis; however, these types of assays cannot directly access some types of information. In particular, bulk biochemical assays cannot readily access information that may be obscured in population averages. Single-molecule assays offer the potential advantage of being able to visualize the molecules in question in real time, thus providing direct access to questions relating to translocation velocity, processivity, and insights into how helicases may behave on different types of substrates. Here, we describe the use of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) curtains as an assay for directly viewing the behavior of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 helicase on single molecules of ssDNA. When used with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, these methods can be used to track the binding and movements of individual helicase complexes, and allow new insights into helicase behaviors at the single-molecule level.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Genetic recombination occurs in all organisms and is vital for genome stability. Indeed, in humans, aberrant recombination can lead to diseases such as cancer. Our understanding of homologous recombination is built upon more than a century of scientific inquiry, but achieving a more complete picture using ensemble biochemical and genetic approaches is hampered by population heterogeneity and transient recombination intermediates. Recent advances in single-molecule and super-resolution microscopy methods help to overcome these limitations and have led to new and refined insights into recombination mechanisms, including a detailed understanding of DNA helicase function and synaptonemal complex structure. The ability to view cellular processes at single-molecule resolution promises to transform our understanding of recombination and related processes.
Collapse
|
32
|
Tomko EJ, Lohman TM. Modulation of Escherichia coli UvrD Single-Stranded DNA Translocation by DNA Base Composition. Biophys J 2017; 113:1405-1415. [PMID: 28978435 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli UvrD is an SF1A DNA helicase/translocase that functions in chromosomal DNA repair and replication of some plasmids. UvrD can also displace proteins such as RecA from DNA in its capacity as an anti-recombinase. Central to all of these activities is its ATP-driven 3'-5' single-stranded (ss) DNA translocation activity. Previous ensemble transient kinetic studies have estimated the average translocation rate of a UvrD monomer on ssDNA composed solely of deoxythymidylates. Here we show that the rate of UvrD monomer translocation along ssDNA is influenced by DNA base composition, with UvrD having the fastest rate along polypyrimidines although decreasing nearly twofold on ssDNA containing equal amounts of the four bases. Experiments with DNA containing abasic sites and polyethylene glycol spacers show that the ssDNA base also influences translocation processivity. These results indicate that changes in base composition and backbone insertions influence the translocation rates, with increased ssDNA base stacking correlated with decreased translocation rates, supporting the proposal that base-stacking interactions are involved in the translocation mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Tomko
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Timothy M Lohman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Large domain movements upon UvrD dimerization and helicase activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:12178-12183. [PMID: 29087333 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712882114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Escherichia coli UvrD DNA helicase functions in several DNA repair processes. As a monomer, UvrD can translocate rapidly and processively along ssDNA; however, the monomer is a poor helicase. To unwind duplex DNA in vitro, UvrD needs to be activated either by self-assembly to form a dimer or by interaction with an accessory protein. However, the mechanism of activation is not understood. UvrD can exist in multiple conformations associated with the rotational conformational state of its 2B subdomain, and its helicase activity has been correlated with a closed 2B conformation. Using single-molecule total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we examined the rotational conformational states of the 2B subdomain of fluorescently labeled UvrD and their rates of interconversion. We find that the 2B subdomain of the UvrD monomer can rotate between an open and closed conformation as well as two highly populated intermediate states. The binding of a DNA substrate shifts the 2B conformation of a labeled UvrD monomer to a more open state that shows no helicase activity. The binding of a second unlabeled UvrD shifts the 2B conformation of the labeled UvrD to a more closed state resulting in activation of helicase activity. Binding of a monomer of the structurally similar Escherichia coli Rep helicase does not elicit this effect. This indicates that the helicase activity of a UvrD dimer is promoted via direct interactions between UvrD subunits that affect the rotational conformational state of its 2B subdomain.
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Uncovering the mechanisms by which single-stranded binding proteins both protect and expose single-stranded DNA has important implications for our understanding of DNA replication and repair. A new study serves up a master class in developing a full kinetic model for one such protein, mtSSB, showing how DNA can be reeled in and set free to control accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Eoff
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205.
| | - Kevin D Raney
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sequential eviction of crowded nucleoprotein complexes by the exonuclease RecBCD molecular motor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E6322-E6331. [PMID: 28716908 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1701368114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In physiological settings, all nucleic acids motor proteins must travel along substrates that are crowded with other proteins. However, the physical basis for how motor proteins behave in these highly crowded environments remains unknown. Here, we use real-time single-molecule imaging to determine how the ATP-dependent translocase RecBCD travels along DNA occupied by tandem arrays of high-affinity DNA binding proteins. We show that RecBCD forces each protein into its nearest adjacent neighbor, causing rapid disruption of the protein-nucleic acid interaction. This mechanism is not the same way that RecBCD disrupts isolated nucleoprotein complexes on otherwise naked DNA. Instead, molecular crowding itself completely alters the mechanism by which RecBCD removes tightly bound protein obstacles from DNA.
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Ubiquitous conserved processes that repair DNA damage are essential for the maintenance and propagation of genomes over generations. Then again, inaccuracies in DNA transactions and failures to remove mutagenic lesions cause heritable genome changes. Building on decades of research using genetics and biochemistry, unprecedented quantitative insight into DNA repair mechanisms has come from the new-found ability to measure single proteins in vitro and inside individual living cells. This has brought together biologists, chemists, engineers, physicists, and mathematicians to solve long-standing questions about the way in which repair enzymes search for DNA lesions and form protein complexes that act in DNA repair pathways. Furthermore, unexpected discoveries have resulted from capabilities to resolve molecular heterogeneity and cell subpopulations, provoking new questions about the role of stochastic processes in DNA repair and mutagenesis. These studies are leading to new technologies that will find widespread use in basic research, biotechnology, and medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Uphoff
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom; ,
| | - David J Sherratt
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom; ,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gidi Y, Götte M, Cosa G. Conformational Changes Spanning Angstroms to Nanometers via a Combined Protein-Induced Fluorescence Enhancement-Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Method. J Phys Chem B 2017; 121:2039-2048. [PMID: 28177636 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b11495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based single-molecule techniques have revolutionized our understanding of conformational dynamics in biomolecular systems. Recently, a new single-molecule technique based on protein-induced fluorescence enhancement (PIFE) has aided studies in which minimal (<3 nm) displacements occur. Concerns have been raised regarding whether donor fluorophore intensity (and correspondingly fluorescence quantum yield Φf) fluctuations, intrinsic to PIFE methods, may adversely affect FRET studies when retrieving the donor-acceptor dye distance. Here, we initially show through revisions of Förster's original equation that distances may be calculated in FRET experiments regardless of protein-induced intensity (and Φf) fluctuations occurring in the donor fluorophore. We additionally demonstrate by an analysis of the recorded emission intensity and competing decay pathways that PIFE and FRET methods may be conveniently combined, providing parallel complementary information in a single experiment. Single-molecule studies conducted with Cy3- and ATTO647N-labeled RNA structures and the HCV-NS5B polymerase protein undergoing binding dynamics along the RNA backbone provide a case study to validate the results. The analysis behind the proposed method enables for PIFE and FRET changes to be disentangled when both FRET and PIFE fluctuate over time following protein arrival and, for example, sliding. A new method, intensity-FRET, is thus proposed to monitor conformational changes spanning from angstroms to nanometers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser Gidi
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Self-Assembled Chemical Structures (CSACS-CRMAA), McGill University , 801 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0B8
| | - Matthias Götte
- Department of Biochemistry and Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta , 6020K Katz Group Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E1
| | - Gonzalo Cosa
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Self-Assembled Chemical Structures (CSACS-CRMAA), McGill University , 801 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0B8
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Förster resonance energy transfer and protein-induced fluorescence enhancement as synergetic multi-scale molecular rulers. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33257. [PMID: 27641327 PMCID: PMC5027553 DOI: 10.1038/srep33257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced microscopy methods allow obtaining information on (dynamic) conformational changes in biomolecules via measuring a single molecular distance in the structure. It is, however, extremely challenging to capture the full depth of a three-dimensional biochemical state, binding-related structural changes or conformational cross-talk in multi-protein complexes using one-dimensional assays. In this paper we address this fundamental problem by extending the standard molecular ruler based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) into a two-dimensional assay via its combination with protein-induced fluorescence enhancement (PIFE). We show that donor brightness (via PIFE) and energy transfer efficiency (via FRET) can simultaneously report on e.g., the conformational state of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) following its interaction with unlabelled proteins (BamHI, EcoRV, and T7 DNA polymerase gp5/trx). The PIFE-FRET assay uses established labelling protocols and single molecule fluorescence detection schemes (alternating-laser excitation, ALEX). Besides quantitative studies of PIFE and FRET ruler characteristics, we outline possible applications of ALEX-based PIFE-FRET for single-molecule studies with diffusing and immobilized molecules. Finally, we study transcription initiation and scrunching of E. coli RNA-polymerase with PIFE-FRET and provide direct evidence for the physical presence and vicinity of the polymerase that causes structural changes and scrunching of the transcriptional DNA bubble.
Collapse
|