Epigenetic phenotypes distinguish microsatellite-stable and -unstable colorectal cancers

MLH1 Promotor Hypermethylation in Colorectal and Endometrial Carcinomas from Patients with Lynch Syndrome

Screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer patients generally involves immunohistochemical staining of the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. In case of MLH1 protein loss, MLH1 promotor hypermethylation (MLH1-PM) testing is performed to indirectly distinguish the constitutional MLH1 variants from somatic epimutations. Recently, multiple studies have reported that MLH1-PM and pathogenic constitutional MMR variants are not mutually exclusive. This study describes 6 new and 86 previously reported MLH1-PM CRCs or endometrial cancers in LS patients. Of these, methylation of the MLH1 gene promotor C region was reported in 30 MLH1, 6 MSH2, 6 MSH6, and 3 PMS2 variant carriers at a median age at diagnosis of 48.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 39-56.75 years], 39 years (IQR, 29-51 years), 58 years (IQR, 53.5-67 years), and 68 years (IQR, 65.6-68.5 years), respectively. For 31 MLH1-PM CRCs in LS patients from the literature, only the B region of the MLH1 gene promotor was tested, whereas for 13 cases in the literature the tested region was not specified. Collectively, these data indicate that a diagnosis of LS should not be excluded when MLH1-PM is detected. Clinicians should carefully consider whether follow-up genetic MMR gene testing should be offered, with age <60 to 70 years and/or a positive family history among other factors being suggestive for a potential constitutional MMR gene defect.

Heterogeneity of Colorectal Cancer Progression: Molecular Gas and Brakes

The review begins with molecular genetics, which hit the field unveiling the involvement of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) and uncovering genetic predispositions. Then the notion of molecular phenotypes with different clinical behaviors was introduced and translated in the clinical arena, paving the way to next-generation sequencing that captured previously unrecognized heterogeneity. Among other molecular regulators of CRC progression, the extent of host immune response within the tumor micro-environment has a critical position. Translational sciences deeply investigated the field, accelerating the pace toward clinical transition, due to its strong association with outcomes. While the perturbation of gut homeostasis occurring in inflammatory bowel diseases can fuel carcinogenesis, micronutrients like vitamin D and calcium can act as brakes, and we discuss underlying molecular mechanisms. Among the components of gut microbiota, Fusobacterium nucleatum is over-represented in CRC, and may worsen patient outcome. However, any translational knowledge tracing the multifaceted evolution of CRC should be interpreted according to the prognostic and predictive frame of the TNM-staging system in a perspective of clinical actionability. Eventually, we examine challenges and promises of pharmacological interventions aimed to restrain disease progression at different disease stages.

Clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with a second primary cancer

PURPOSE

The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing due to a westernized dietary lifestyle, and improvements in treatment and diagnostic tools have resulted in more patients being confirmed of having multiple primary cancers. However, studies regarding multiple primary cancers are insufficient. In this study, the clinical aspects of patients with primary multiple cancers, including colorectal cancers, were investigated, and the results were compared to those of patients with primary colorectal cancer only.

METHODS

Seven hundred eighteen patients who received surgery for colorectal cancer between March 2003 and September 2012 in CHA Medical Center were enrolled. A retrograde cohort was done for comparison of the two groups: those with and those without multiple primary cancer. The analysis was done according to sex, age, tumor location, tumor size, metastatic regional lymph-node number, vascular/lymphatic microinvasion, staging, tumor markers, microsatellite instability, and C/T subgroup of polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.

RESULTS

Of the 718 subjects, 33 (4.6%) had multiple primary cancers: 12 (36.4%) synchronous and 21 (63.6%) metachronous. The malignancy most frequently accompanying colorectal cancer was gastric cancer, followed by thyroid, prostate, and esophageal malignancies in that order. In the comparison between groups, mean age, tumor location, and microsatellite instability showed statistically significant differences; others parameters did not.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of multiple primary cancers, including colorectal cancer, is increasing. Therefore, defining the characteristics of patients with multiple primary cancers is crucial, and those characteristics need to be acknowledged in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients.

Microsatellite instability and promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer in India

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important factor in tumor development and is a hypermutable phenotype caused by the loss of DNA mismatch repair activity. It is important to identify tumors with microsatellite instability as the patients have a better prognosis and differ with response to chemotherapy. Limited data are available on the incidence of MSI in Indian colorectal cancers (CRCs). The objectives of this study were to identify the extent of MSI in Indian CRC patients below 50 years and to determine promoter methylation status of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in relation to MSI. A total of 450 patients were diagnosed with CRC, out of which 91 individuals were recruited as per Bethesda guidelines and were tested for instability by the NCI-recommended Bethesda panel (BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346, and D17S2720) using labeled primers. The fragments were separated and analyzed on a Beckman GeXP sequencer. Promoter methylation status was determined by restriction enzyme digestion and PCR. MSI (high and low) was seen in 48.4% (44/91) of CRC patients, out of which microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) was detected in 13.2% (12/91) and microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) in 35.2% (32/91) and the rest were microsatellite stable (MSS), 51.6% (47/91). Majority of the MSI-H tumors were adenocarcinomas (10/12), in the rectum (8/12), and moderately or poorly differentiated (12/12). Promoter hypermethylation was seen in 75% of the MSI-H, 56.24% of MSI-L, and only 23.4% of MSS individuals. MSI (high and low) was associated with 48.4% of CRC patients, and a significantly higher proportion of promoter hypermethylation of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes was associated with instable tumors.

Relationship between MLH1 promoter methylation and colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To investigate the relationship between mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) promoter hy-permethylation and colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS: Relevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WANGFANG and VIP database updated to July 2013. The English search terms included MLH1, mutL homolog 1, promoter methylation, colon cancer and CRC, and the Chinese search terms included MLH1 gene promoter methylation and colorectal cancer. Stata11.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 11 articles involving 1496 CRC cases and 382 controls were analyzed in the study. Statistically significant odds ratios (OR) of MLH1 promoter methylation were obtained between total cases and controls (OR = 7.863, 95%CI: 4.537-13.627, P < 0.05), between tumor tissues of CRC patients and those of healthy persons (OR = 8.246, 95%CI: 3.522-19.307, P < 0.05), and between tumor tissues and non-tumorous tissues of CRC patients (OR = 7.549, 95%CI: 3.685-15.464, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: MLH1 promoter hypermethylation may contribute to the development of colon cancer and has appreciated value in the diagnosis of this malignancy.

Genomic instability in pre-neoplastic colonic lesions

Genomic instability is a characteristic of most cancers and it is argued that genomic instability is a driving force for tumorigenesis. Data herein demonstrate that genomic instability, as evidenced by microsatellite instability (MSI) and promoter methylation of DNA mismatch repair genes, is common in individual glands of pre-malignant colorectal lesions and raises interesting questions about the role of MSI in the development of colorectal carcinoma.

CHFR silencing or microsatellite instability is associated with increased antitumor activity of docetaxel or gemcitabine in colorectal cancer

Phenotypic differences among cancers with the same origin may be associated with chemotherapy response. CHFR silencing associated with DNA methylation has been suggested to be predictive of taxane sensitivity in diverse tumor types. However, the use of microsatellite instability (MSI:unstable-MSS:stable) as a predictive marker for therapeutic effect has had conflicting results. We examined these molecular alterations as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in colorectal cancer (CRC). Differential sensitivity to docetaxel and gemcitabine was compared to potential predictive biomarkers CHFR methylation and MSI status. Cell lines that were MSI-H/CHFR-methylated, MSS/CHFR-methylated and MSS/CHFR-unmethylated were assessed for in vivo sensitivity of CRC cell line xenografts to docetaxel and/or gemcitabine. We observed increased sensitivity in vitro to gemcitabine in cell lines with MSI and docetaxel in cell lines with CHFR inactivation via DNA methylation. In vivo treatment of human xenografts confirmed differential sensitivity, with the MSI-H/CHFR-methylated line RKO having tumor growth inhibition to each agent, and at least additive tumor growth inhibition with combination therapy. The MSS-CHFR-unmethylated line, CACO2 , was resistant to single and combination therapy, while COLO205, the MSS/CHFR-methylated line, showed tumor growth inhibition with docetaxel, but not gemcitabine, therapy. CHFR methylation in CRC cell lines predicted for sensitivity in vitro and in vivo to docetaxel, while MSI-H cell lines were more sensitive to gemcitabine. These data suggest that a subset of CRC patients would be selectively sensitive to a novel combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel, and are the basis for an ongoing clinical trial of this combination in a biomarker-selected patient population.

MLH1 promoter methylation frequency in colorectal cancer patients and related clinicopathological and molecular features

Purpose

To describe the frequency of MLH1 promoter methylation in colorectal cancer (CRC); to explore the associations between MLH1 promoter methylation and clinicopathological and molecular factors using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A literature search of the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify relevant articles published up to September 7, 2012 that described the frequency of MLH1 promoter methylation or its associations with clinicopathological and molecular factors in CRC. The pooled frequency, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

Results

The pooled frequency of MLH1 promoter methylation in unselected CRC was 20.3% (95% CI: 16.8–24.1%). They were 18.7% (95% CI: 14.7–23.6%) and 16.4% (95% CI: 11.9–22.0%) in sporadic and Lynch syndrome (LS) CRC, respectively. Significant associations were observed between MLH1 promoter methylation and gender (pooled OR = 1.641, 95% CI: 1.215–2.215; P = 0.001), tumor location (pooled OR = 3.804, 95% CI: 2.715–5.329; P<0.001), tumor differentiation (pooled OR = 2.131, 95% CI: 1.464–3.102; P<0.001), MSI (OR: 27.096, 95% CI: 13.717–53.526; P<0.001). Significant associations were also observed between MLH1 promoter methylation and MLH1 protein expression, BRAF mutation (OR = 14.919 (95% CI: 6.427–34.631; P<0.001) and 9.419 (95% CI: 2.613–33.953; P = 0.001), respectively).

Conclusion

The frequency of MLH1 promoter methylation in unselected CRC was 20.3%. They were 18.7% in sporadic CRC and 16.4% in LS CRC, respectively. MLH1 promoter methylation may be significantly associated with gender, tumor location, tumor differentiation, MSI, MLH1 protein expression, and BRAF mutation.

Deficient mismatch repair phenotype is a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

About 15% of colorectal adenocarcinomas have a deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype. The frequency of deficient DNA mismatch repair tumours increases with age due to the hypermethylation of hMLH1 promoter. The study aimed to determine the prognostic value of deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype in elderly patients.

DESIGN

Mismatch repair phenotype was retrospectively determined by molecular analysis in consecutive resected colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens from patients over 75 years of age from 4 Oncology centres.

RESULTS

231 patients (median age: 81, range: 75-100) were enrolled from 2005 to 2008. Mean prevalence of deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype was 22.5%, and 36% for patients over 85 years. Deficient DNA mismatch repair status was significantly associated with older age, female sex, proximal colon primary and high grade tumour. For stage II tumours no deficient DNA mismatch repair tumours had a recurrence at end of follow-up compared to 17% for tumours with proficient phenotype. The proficient phenotype status was significantly associated with worse age-adjusted overall survival [HR 2.60; 95% CI 1.05-6.44; p=0.039]. For stage III tumours a trend for less recurrence was observed for deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype (16%) compared to proficient phenotype (36%).

CONCLUSION

deficient DNA mismatch repair phenotype is a prognostic factor in stage II colorectal tumour in elderly patients. Our results suggest that mismatch repair phenotype should be taken in consideration for adjuvant chemotherapy decision in elderly patients.

Aneuploidy-associated gene expression signatures characterize malignant transformation in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Malignant transformation in ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with pronounced chromosomal instability, reflected by aneuploidy. Although aneuploidy can precede primary cancer diagnosis in UC for more than a decade, little is known of its cellular consequences.

METHODS

Whole-genome gene expression analysis was applied to noninflamed colon mucosa, mucosal biopsies of patients with UC, and UC-associated carcinomas (UCCs). DNA image cytometry was used to stratify samples into ploidy types. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and validated by real-time quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

Gene expression changes were more pronounced between normal mucosa and UC (2587 DEGs) than between UC and UCC (827 DEGs). Cytometry identified colitis patients with euploid or aneuploid mucosa biopsies, whereas all UCCs were aneuploid. However, 1749 DEGs distinguished euploid UC and UCCs, whereas only 15 DEGs differentiated aneuploid UC and UCCs. A total of 16 genes were differentially expressed throughout the whole sequence from normal controls to UCCs. Particularly, genes pivotal for chromosome segregation (e.g., SMC3 and NUF2) were differentially regulated along aneuploidy development.

CONCLUSIONS

The high number of DEGs between normal mucosa and colitis is dominated by inflammatory-associated genes. Subsequent acquisition of aneuploidy leads to subtle but distinct transcriptional alterations, revealing novel target genes that drive genomic instability and thus carcinogenesis. The gene expression signature of malignant phenotypes in aneuploid UC suggests that these lesions might need to be considered as severe as high-grade dysplasia.

DNA methyltransferases, DNA damage repair, and cancer

The maintenance DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) 1 and the de novo methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B are all essential for mammalian development. DNA methylation, catalyzed by the DNMTs, plays an important role in maintaining genome stability. Aberrant expression of DNMTs and disruption of DNA methylation patterns are closely associated with many forms of cancer, although the exact mechanisms underlying this link remain elusive. DNA damage repair systems have evolved to act as a genome-wide surveillance mechanism to maintain chromosome integrity by recognizing and repairing both exogenous and endogenous DNA insults. Impairment of these systems gives rise to mutations and directly contributes to tumorigenesis. Evidence is mounting for a direct link between DNMTs, DNA methylation, and DNA damage repair systems, which provide new insight into the development of cancer. Like tumor suppressor genes, an array of DNA repair genes frequently sustain promoter hypermethylation in a variety of tumors. In addition, DNMT1, but not the DNMT3s, appear to function coordinately with DNA damage repair pathways to protect cells from sustaining mutagenic events, which is very likely through a DNA methylation-independent mechanism. This chapter is focused on reviewing the links between DNA methylation and the DNA damage response.

Methylation variable position profiles of hMLH1 promoter CpG islands in human sporadic colorectal carcinoma

Aberrant hypermethylation of CpG islands (CGIs) in hMLH1 promoter regions has been well known to play an important role in the tumorigenesis of human sporadic colorectal carcinoma (SCRC). In this study, bisulfite sequencing was performed to analyze the methylation variable positions (MVPs) profiles of hMLH1 promoter CGIs in 30 clinical SCRC patients, and further analysis was carried out to evaluate the associations between the CGI methylation and the clinicopathological features in SCRC. Among the 2 CGIs in the hMLH1 promoter, that is, CGI-I and CGI-II, 20% (6/30) and 13% (4/30) of the patients had methylated CGI-I and CGI-II, respectively. Suppressed expression of hMLH1was significantly correlated with methylation of CGI-I but not CGI-II. Further analysis of the MVP profiles of CGI-I showed that most of the MVPs were hypermethylated and others were poorly methylated or unmethylated. The profiles could be classified into at least 4 groups based on the methylation status of 3 MVPs at positions 21 to 23 in CGI-I. All 6 patients with methylated CGI-I belonged to group I. This result suggests that the above 3 MVPs in CGI-I should be a targeted region to further analyze the epigenetic features of hMLH1 in human SCRC. Our results further suggest that MVP profiling is useful for identifying the aberrantly methylated CGIs associated with suppressed gene expression.

MSH3 protein expression and nodal status in MLH1-deficient colorectal cancers

PURPOSE

Patients with colorectal cancers (CRC) and high microsatellite instability (MSI) have a better outcome than their chromosome-unstable counterpart. Given the heterogeneity of microsatellite-unstable CRCs, we wanted to see whether any MSI-associated molecular features are specifically associated with prognosis.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

One hundred and nine MSI-high CRCs were typed for primary mismatch repair (MMR) defect and for secondary loss of MMR proteins. Frameshifts at seven target genes, mutations in the RAS pathway, and methylation at MLH1/CDKN2A promoters were also searched. The interplay of molecular findings with clinicopathologic features and patient survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 84 MLH1-deficient CRCs, 31 (36.9%) had MSH3 and 11 (13.1%) had MSH6 loss (P < 0.001), biallelic frameshift mutations at mononucleotide repeats accounting for most (78%) MSH3 losses. As compared with MSH3-retaining cancers, MLH1-deficient tumors with MSH3 loss showed a higher number of mutated target genes (3.94 ± 1.56 vs. 2.79 ± 1.75; P = 0.001), absence of nodal involvement at pathology [N0; OR, 0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.43, P < 0.001], and better disease-free survival (P = 0.06). No prognostic value was observed for KRAS status and for MLH1/CDKN2A promoter methylation. The association between MSH3 loss and N0 was confirmed in an independent cohort of 71 MLH1-deficient CRCs (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

MLH1-deficient CRCs not expressing MSH3 have a more severe MSI, a lower rate of nodal involvement, and a better postsurgical outcome.

LINE-1 hypomethylation in familial and sporadic cancer

Increased and decreased methylation at specific sequences (hypermethylation and hypomethylation, respectively) is characteristic of tumor DNA compared to normal DNA and promotes carcinogenesis in multiple ways including genomic instability. Long interspersed element (LINE), an abundant class of retrotransposons, provides a surrogate marker for global hypomethylation. We developed methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assays to study LINE-1 methylation in cases of colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancer (N = 276), stratified by patient category [sporadic; Lynch syndrome (LS); familial colorectal cancer type X (FCCX)] and microsatellite instability status. Within each patient group, LINE-1 showed lower methylation in tumor DNA relative to paired normal DNA and hypomethylation was statistically significant in most cases. Interestingly, normal colorectal mucosa samples from different patient groups displayed differences in LINE-1 methylation that mirrored differences between the respective tumor tissues, with a decreasing trend for LINE-1 methylation from patients with sporadic colorectal cancer to LS to FCCX. Despite the fact that the degree of LINE-1 methylation is generally tissue specific, normal colorectal mucosa, gastric mucosa, and endometrium from LS patients showed similar levels of LINE-1 methylation. Our results suggest that the degree of LINE-1 methylation may constitute a “field defect” that may predispose normal tissues for cancer development.

Mutations and epimutations in the origin of cancer

Cancer is traditionally viewed as a disease of abnormal cell proliferation controlled by a series of mutations. Mutations typically affect oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes thereby conferring growth advantage. Genomic instability facilitates mutation accumulation. Recent findings demonstrate that activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, as well as genomic instability, can be achieved by epigenetic mechanisms as well. Unlike genetic mutations, epimutations do not change the base sequence of DNA and are potentially reversible. Similar to genetic mutations, epimutations are associated with specific patterns of gene expression that are heritable through cell divisions. Knudson's hypothesis postulates that inactivation of tumor suppressor genes requires two hits, with the first hit occurring either in somatic cells (sporadic cancer) or in the germline (hereditary cancer) and the second one always being somatic. Studies on hereditary and sporadic forms of colorectal carcinoma have made it evident that, apart from genetic mutations, epimutations may serve as either hit or both. Furthermore, recent next-generation sequencing studies show that epigenetic genes, such as those encoding histone modifying enzymes and subunits for chromatin remodeling systems, are themselves frequent targets of somatic mutations in cancer and can act like tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes. This review discusses genetic vs. epigenetic origin of cancer, including cancer susceptibility, in light of recent discoveries. Situations in which mutations and epimutations occur to serve analogous purposes are highlighted.

Somatic deletions of genes regulating MSH2 protein stability cause DNA mismatch repair deficiency and drug resistance in human leukemia cells

DNA mismatch repair enzymes (e.g., MSH2) maintain genomic integrity, and their deficiency predisposes to several human cancers and to drug resistance. We found that leukemia cells from a substantial proportion of patients (~11%) with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have low or undetectable MSH2 protein levels (MSH2-L), despite abundant wild-type MSH2 mRNA. MSH2-L leukemia cells contained partial or complete somatic deletions of 1–4 genes that regulate MSH2 degradation (FRAP1, HERC1, PRKCZ, PIK3C2B); these deletions were also found in adult ALL (16%) and sporadic colorectal cancer (13.5%). Knockdown of these genes in human leukemia cells recapitulated the MSH2 protein deficiency by enhancing MSH2-degradation, leading to significant reduction in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and increased resistance to thiopurines. These findings reveal a previously unrecognized mechanism whereby somatic deletions of genes regulating MSH2 degradation result in undetectable levels of MSH2 protein in leukemia cells, MMR deficiency and drug resistance.

Genomic instability and carcinogenesis: an update

Cancers arise as a result of stepwise accumulation of mutations which may occur at the nucleotide level and/or the gross chromosomal level. Many cancers particularly those of the colon display a form of genomic instability which may facilitate and speed up tumor initiation and development. In few instances, a "mutator mutation" has been clearly implicated in driving the accumulation of other carcinogenic mutations. For example, the post-replicative DNA mismatch repair deficiency results in dramatic increase in insertion/deletion mutations giving rise to the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype and may predispose to a spectrum of tumours when it occurs in the germline. Although many sporadic cancers show multiple mutations suggesting unstable genome, the role of this instability in carcinogenesis, as opposed to the power of natural selection, has been a matter of controversy. This review gives an update of the latest data on these issues particularly recent data from genome-wide, high throughput techniques as well as mathematical modelling. Throughout this review, reference will be made to the relevance of genomic instability to the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinoma particularly its hereditary and familial subsets.

Insights into the role of DNA methylation in disease through the use of mouse models

Epigenetics was originally defined as the interaction of genes with their environment that brings the phenotype into being. It now refers to the study of heritable changes in gene expression that occur without a change in DNA sequence. To date, the best understood epigenetic mechanisms are CpG DNA methylation and histone modifications. DNA methylation in particular has been the subject of intense interest because of its recently recognized role in disease, as well as in the development and normal function of organisms. Much of the focus of disease-related research has been on cancer because of the recognition that epigenetic alterations are common in cancer and probably cooperate with genetic alterations to drive cancer formation. Our understanding of epigenetic mechanisms in controlling gene expression has resulted from the study of cell line systems and simple model systems, such as Arabidopsis thaliana. We are now moving into an era of more complex model systems, such as transgenic and knockout mouse models, which will lead to further insight into epigenetics in development and human disease. The current models have revealed complex, tissue-specific effects of epigenetic mechanisms and have further informed our understanding of the role of DNA methylation and histone modifications on disease and development. The current state of these models is the subject of this Commentary.

Serrated adenoma: a distinct form of non-polypoid colorectal neoplasia?

Until recently, 2 major forms of colorectal polyp were recognized: the adenoma and the hyperplastic polyp. Adenomas were known to represent a precursor to colorectal cancer, whereas hyperplastic polyps were viewed as nonneoplastic, having no potential for progression to malignancy. We now recognize, however, that the lesions diagnosed as hyperplastic polyps in the past represent a heterogeneous group of polyps, some of which truly are hyperplastic, and others that truly have a significant risk for transformation to colorectal cancer. These polyps have a characteristic serrated architecture, and include not only hyperplastic polyps but also the recently recognized serrated adenomas. Serrated adenomas occur in 2 forms: the traditional serrated adenoma, which is usually a polypoid lesion endoscopically, and the sessile serrated adenoma, a flat or slightly raised, usually right-sided lesion. Serrated adenomas of both types show characteristic molecular alterations not commonly seen in traditional colorectal adenomas, and probably progress to colorectal cancer by means of a different pathway, the so-called serrated neoplasia pathway. The morphologic features of serrated colorectal lesions, the molecular alterations that characterize them, and their role in colorectal cancer development are discussed.

[Correlation between microsatellite instability and morphology in colorectal cancer]

Microsatellite instability (MSI) influences the development and clinical course of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and induce specific morphological alterations of such neoplasms, therefore hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) based histology allows to predict the microsatellite status of a given tumor. The aim of this article is to demonstrate clinicopathological features that are useful in recognition of microsatellite-stable and -unstable CRCs on routine histological examination. In the Center of Surgical and Molecular Pathology of National Institute of Oncology, from 384 CRC cases 26 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCC), 22 sporadic high-level microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) cancers and 76 microsatellite-stable (MSS) or low-level MSI (MSI-L) CRCs were selected on the basis of the localization, clinical stage, microsatellite status, and patient age at the time of the diagnosis. Our results showed that we can recognize MSS/MSI-L carcinomas, HNPCCs and sporadic MSI-H tumors with high probability on the base of clinicopathological features like patient's age, tumor localization, clinical stage and histological characteristics of CRCs, even if the genetic MSI test is not available. The main morphological characteristics related to microsatellite instability are intratumoral or stromal infiltrating lymphocytes/leukocytes, large, vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli, and expansive infiltrative edge of the tumors. Careful and detailed morphological analysis of colorectal cancers helps to select the appropriate molecular method to determine the molecular features that influence the clinical care of patients and allow to consider the most appropriate anti-tumor therapy.

Aberrant DNA methylation occurs in colon neoplasms arising in the azoxymethane colon cancer model

Mouse models of intestinal tumors have advanced our understanding of the role of gene mutations in colorectal malignancy. However, the utility of these systems for studying the role of epigenetic alterations in intestinal neoplasms remains to be defined. Consequently, we assessed the role of aberrant DNA methylation in the azoxymethane (AOM) rodent model of colon cancer. AOM induced tumors display global DNA hypomethylation, which is similar to human colorectal cancer. We next assessed the methylation status of a panel of candidate genes previously shown to be aberrantly methylated in human cancer or in mouse models of malignant neoplasms. This analysis revealed different patterns of DNA methylation that were gene specific. Zik1 and Gja9 demonstrated cancer-specific aberrant DNA methylation, whereas, Cdkn2a/p16, Igfbp3, Mgmt, Id4, and Cxcr4 were methylated in both the AOM tumors and normal colon mucosa. No aberrant methylation of Dapk1 or Mlt1 was detected in the neoplasms, but normal colon mucosa samples displayed methylation of these genes. Finally, p19(Arf), Tslc1, Hltf, and Mlh1 were unmethylated in both the AOM tumors and normal colon mucosa. Thus, aberrant DNA methylation does occur in AOM tumors, although the frequency of aberrantly methylated genes appears to be less common than in human colorectal cancer. Additional studies are necessary to further characterize the patterns of aberrantly methylated genes in AOM tumors.

A review on the molecular diagnostics of Lynch syndrome: a central role for the pathology laboratory

Lynch syndrome (LS) is caused by mutations in mismatch repair genes and is characterized by a high cumulative risk for the development of mainly colorectal carcinoma and endometrial carcinoma. Early detection of LS is important since surveillance can reduce morbidity and mortality. However, the diagnosis of LS is complicated by the absence of a pre-morbid phenotype and germline mutation analysis is expensive and time consuming. Therefore it is standard practice to precede germline mutation analysis by a molecular diagnostic work-up of tumours, guided by clinical and pathological criteria, to select patients for germline mutation analysis. In this review we address these molecular analyses, the central role for the pathologist in the selection of patients for germline diagnostics of LS, as well as the molecular basis of LS.

Serrated polyps and colorectal cancer: new pathway to malignancy

Until recently, two major forms of colorectal epithelial polyp were recognized: the adenoma and the hyperplastic polyp. Adenomas were perceived to represent the precursor to colorectal cancer, whereas hyperplastic polyps were viewed as innocuous lesions with no potential for progression to malignancy. We now recognize, however, that the lesions formerly classified as hyperplastic actually represent a heterogeneous group of polyps, some of which have a significant risk for neoplastic transformation. These serrated polyps include not only hyperplastic polyps but also traditional serrated adenomas and sessile serrated adenomas. These polyps demonstrate characteristic molecular alterations not commonly seen in colorectal adenomas, and they probably progress to colorectal cancer by means of a new pathway: the serrated neoplasia pathway. The morphologic features of serrated colorectal lesions, the molecular alterations that characterize them, and their role in colorectal cancer development are discussed herein.

Diet and epigenetics in colon cancer

Over the past few years, evidence has accumulated indicating that apart from genetic alterations, epigenetic alterations, through e.g. aberrant promoter methylation, play a major role in the initiation and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). Even in the hereditary colon cancer syndromes, in which the susceptibility is inherited dominantly, cancer develops only as the result of the progressive accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations. Diet can both prevent and induce colon carcinogenesis, for instance, through epigenetic changes, which regulate the homeostasis of the intestinal mucosa. Food-derived compounds are constantly present in the intestine and may shift cellular balance toward harmful outcomes, such as increased susceptibility to mutations. There is strong evidence that a major component of cancer risk may involve epigenetic changes in normal cells that increase the probability of cancer after genetic mutation. The recognition of epigenetic changes as a driving force in colorectal neoplasia would open new areas of research in disease epidemiology, risk assessment, and treatment, especially in mutation carriers who already have an inherited predisposition to cancer.

Epigenetic events in normal colonic mucosa surrounding colorectal cancer lesions

Gene inactivation by promoter hypermethylation has been demonstrated in the colonic mucosa of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, current data do not prove direct involvement of this epigenetic modification in the early stages of CRC. Promoter methylation profiles of E-cadherin, hMLH1, MGMT, p16(INK4a), p15(INK4b) and p14(ARF); mutations of K-ras, B-raf and TP53 and microsatellite instability (MSI) were examined in normal and cancerous colonic mucosal tissue in 82 CRC patients using methylation-specific PCR assays. Methylation of hMLH1 and MGMT in normal mucosa correlated significantly with MSI and K-ras activation in neighbouring cancerous mucosal tissues. Similarly, poorly differentiated tumours were associated with methylated p16(INK4a) and E-cadherin in neighbouring normal colonic tissues (NCTs). Our results indicate that epigenetic changes in mucosa surrounding colorectal neoplastic lesions may describe a 'field cancerisation' phenomenon that may occur previous to genetic alterations in early stages of carcinogenesis.

Management of colorectal cancer: a role for genetics in prevention and treatment?

Colorectal cancer remains one of the most common cancers in the Western world and amongst the top three causes of cancer morbidity and death. Cancer is caused by genetic mutations, but currently there is little use of genetic information in the clinic with the exception of establishing germline mutations for the uncommon predisposing syndromes. Rapid advances in technologies allowing high throughput analysis of germline and somatic mutations raises the possibility that genetics will find a major role in the clinic distinguishing individuals at low to high risk of cancer, allowing early intervention and stratification of cancers based on mutational pathways for therapeutic interventions. In the future, this will lead to treatment regimes tailored to the individuals and their tumor. Here, we summarize the genetics underlying colorectal cancer and the future role of genetics in prevention, diagnosis, classification and treatment.

Poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas show higher rates of microsatellite instability and promoter methylation of p16 and hMLH1: a study matched for T classification and tumor location

BACKGROUND

Extensive genetic and epigenetic analysis of poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas (Por) has been difficult, as the number of cases is too small.

METHODS

We investigated genetic and epigenetic alterations of 53 cases of Por and 53 cases of well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas (WD) to clarify their differences. The cases of WD were matched with the cases of Por for T classification and tumor location, which influence genetic and epigenetic alterations. We evaluated microsatellite instability (MSI) status and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of four loci (2p, 5q, 17p, 18q), and defined "MSI tumors" as those that showed MSI-H, and "chromosomal instability (CIN) tumors" as those that showed LOH but not MSI-H. Further, we evaluated the methylation status of the hMLH1 and p16 promoter region.

RESULTS

MSI tumors were significantly more frequent in Por (22.6%) than in WD (3.8%; P = 0.0041). CIN tumors were significantly less frequent in Por (64.2%) than in WD (83.0%; P = 0.046). Further, methylation of the p16 and hMLH1 promoter region was significantly more frequent in Por than in WD (P = 0.037, P = 0.047, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that Por tumorigenesis strongly correlates with MSI and methylation of the p16 and hMLH1 promoter region.

Colorectal serrated adenocarcinoma

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the three most common cancers in terms of both cancer incidence and cancer-related deaths in most Western countries. Serrated adenocarcinoma is a recently described, distinct variant of CRC, accounting for about 7.5% of all CRCs and up to 17.5% of most proximal CRCs. It has been postulated that about 10-15% of sporadic CRCs would have their origin in serrated polyps that harbour a significant malignant potential. These lesions include hyperplastic-type aberrant crypt foci, hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas, admixed polyps and serrated adenomas, and constitute the so-called 'serrated pathway', which is distinct from both the conventional adenoma-carcinoma pathway and the mutator pathway of hereditary non-polyposis CRC and is characterized by early involvement of oncogenic BRAF mutations, excess CpG island methylation (CIM) and subsequent low- or high-level DNA microsatellite instability (MSI). Methylation of hMLH1 is likely to explain the increased frequency of high-level MSI (16%) and methylation of MGMT is postulated to explain the low-level MSI (29%) in serrated adenocarcinomas. Reproducible histopathological criteria for serrated adenocarcinoma have recently been established and they have been qualified by DNA expression analysis for 7928 genes, showing clustering of serrated adenocarcinomas into a molecular entity apart from conventional adenocarcinoma, and representing with distinct down-regulation of EPHB2, PTCH and up-regulation of HIF1alpha.

APC gene methylation is inversely correlated with features of the CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer

The notion of a CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) was proposed to describe a subset of colorectal cancers (CRC) displaying frequent and concordant methylation of CpG islands located within gene promoter regions. Some workers have failed to observe associations between CIMP and specific clinicopathological features of CRC, possibly because of the choice of genes used to define this phenotype. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the aberrant methylation of 6 genes implicated in CRC development was associated with the same phenotypic features of this tumour type. The MethyLight assay was used to provide quantitative estimates of MLH1, P16, TIMP3, P14, DAPK and APC methylation levels in 199 unselected colorectal tumours. The methylation of MLH1, P16, TIMP3 and P14 was highly concordant (p < 0.0001 for each pair) but that of DAPK and APC was not. An inverse association was observed between the methylation of APC and TIMP3 (p = 0.004). Methylation of the MLH1, P16, TIMP3 and P14 genes was associated with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (p < 0.05), microsatellite instability (p < 0.001), BRAF mutation (p < 0.0001) and elevated concentrations of the methyl group carriers tetrahydrofolate (THF) and 5,10-methylene THF (p < 0.05). In contrast, APC methylation was associated with wildtype BRAF (p = 0.003) and with lower concentrations of methyl group carriers (p < 0.05). These findings highlight the importance of gene selection in studies that aim to characterize the biological features and clinical behaviour of CIMP+ tumours.

Prognostic impact of microsatellite instability and DNA ploidy in human colon carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Genomic instability in colon cancers is a consequence of chromosomal instability characterized by aneuploidy or defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) indicated by microsatellite instability (MSI). Given that high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) and diploidy are correlated, we determined whether they are independent prognostic variables.

METHODS

Astler-Coller stage B2 and C colon cancers (N = 528) from patients treated in 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy trials were analyzed for MSI using 11 microsatellite markers. Immunostaining for hMLH1, hMSH2, and p53 proteins was performed. DNA ploidy was analyzed by flow cytometry. Associations with disease-free and overall survival were determined.

RESULTS

MSI-H was detected in 95 tumors (18%), and 70 (74%) of these were diploid. Tumors showing MSI-H (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.96; P = .023) or loss of MMR proteins (P = .024) were associated with better overall survival. Improved disease-free and overall survival were found for diploid versus aneuploid/tetraploid tumors (overall survival: hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.79; P = .0003). In the subgroups of MSI-H and microsatellite stable (MSS)/low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) tumors, diploidy was associated with better survival. The prognostic impact of ploidy was similar in stage B2 and C tumors. Ploidy did not predict the benefit of 5-fluorouracil-based treatment. When ploidy, MSI, and MMR proteins were analyzed in the same multivariate model, only ploidy remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS

DNA ploidy and MSI-H status were independent prognostic variables, yet ploidy was the strongest marker. Diploidy was associated with better survival in MSI-H and in MSS/MSI-L patient subgroups.

[Promoter hypermethylation status of the mismatch repair gene hMLH1 in patients with sporadic renal cell carcinoma]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Epigenetic inactivation is a gene function abnormality that produces no changes in the DNA sequence, with the most frequent epigenetic alteration being hypermethylation of CpG islands in the promoter regions of the genes. Based on recent indications of a potential relationship between mismatch repair genes and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), we were interested in investigating the existence of promoter hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene in tumor DNA samples from patients with sporadic RCC.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Sixty-five tumor tissue specimens were collected consecutively. The DNA was first obtained and purified, then digested with the restriction enzymes Hpa II and Msp I, followed by polimerase chain reaction amplification of 3 promoter regions of the hMLH1 gene, agarose gel electrophoresis, and densitometric analysis of the images of the amplified bands.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 63.7 years. The most frequent cell type was clear cell carcinoma (67.7%). 73.9% of tumors were diagnosed in stages below pT2, 9.3% had gland involvement and 20%, distant metastasis. No somatic hypermethylation was detected in the promoter region of the hMLH1 gene in any of the patients studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that promoter hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene is not implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic RCC, and therefore the existence of another type of mutation, microsatellite instability and/or loss of heterozygosity should be examined to determine the possible role of this gene in sporadic RCC.

The genetics of HNPCC: application to diagnosis and screening

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC; Lynch Syndrome) is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancers. Predisposed individuals have increased lifetime risk of developing colorectal, endometrial and other cancers. The syndrome is primarily due to heterozygous germline mutations in one of the mismatch repair genes; mainly MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. The resulting mismatch repair deficiency leads to microsatellite instability which is the hallmark of tumors arising within this syndrome, as well as a variable proportion of sporadic tumors. Diagnostic guidelines and criteria for molecular testing of suspected families have been proposed and are continuously updated. However, not all families fulfilling these criteria show mutations in mismatch repair genes and/or microsatellite instability implicating other, as yet unknown, carcinogenic mechanisms and predisposition genes. This subset of tumors is the focus of current clinical and molecular research. This review addresses recent advances in the field of HNPCC research and their applications in the management of affected individuals and families.

Expression of angiogenic VEGF-A (soluble isoforms 121, 165) and lymphangiogenic VEGF-C in colorectal cancers with micro-satellite instability

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Colorectal cancers (CRC) with high-level micro-satellite instability (MSI-H) show reduced metastatic potential and better prognosis compared to stage-matched stable (MSS) cancers. Angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis, central to tumour growth and spread, is mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) cytokines, but little is known of their relationship to MSI.

METHODS

In this study, 67 sporadic CRC with identified MSI status, and 8 samples of normal colon were analysed for VEGF-A soluble isoforms (VEGF-121/VEGF-165) and VEGF-C gene transcription (by RT-PCR and scanning densitometry), and blood vessel density (BVD; measuring angiogenesis) and VEGF-C protein expression (measuring lymphangiogenesis).

RESULTS

Compared to normal colon, VEGF-165 transcription was reduced (P < 0.05), but VEGF-121 transcription was higher in MSS (P < 0.06) and MSI-L (P < 0.01) cancers (but similar in MSI-H). VEGF-165 transcription was unrelated to MSI, but VEGF-121 transcription was elevated in MSI-L (P < 0.06). There was a weak inverse correlation with VEGF-121 transcription and Dukes stage (P < 0.09), and with BVD and MSI (P < 0.09). With a singular di-nucleotide loci mutation (MSI-L), VEGF-121 (P < 0.03) and VEGF-C (P < 0.04) transcription was elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-H cancers have reduced angiogenic/lymphangiogenic potential, and transcription of VEGF-121 may be important in early growth and spread of CRC. Elevated VEGF-121 and VEGF-C transcription with singular di-nucleotide mutations may aid in the identification of distinct MSI-L cancers.

Microsatellite instability caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided sporadic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

A subset of sporadic colorectal cancers (SCRCs) exhibits microsatellite instability (MSI). Most MSI in SCRCs is caused by hMLH1 inactivation due to promoter methylation. However, the role of MSI in the progression of SCRCs remains unclear.

METHODS

Thirty-two intramucosal cancers and 63 cancers with submucosal invasion were assigned to group 1 (early-stage cancer), and 30 Dukes' B and 26 Dukes' C cancers to group 2 (advanced-stage cancer). hMLH1 promoter methylation status was determined by methylation-specific PCR. MSI was determined using five markers. hMLH1 expression was determined immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

MSI was found in 1 of 95 (1.1%) tumors in group 1, compared with 4 of 56 (7.1%) tumors in group 2. In right-sided tumors, the overall frequency of hMLH1-methylation-positive tumors in group 1 was not significantly different from that in group 2 (17 of 43, 39.5%, vs. 9 of 23, 39.1%). In right-sided tumors with hMLH1 promoter methylation, the frequency of MSI-positive tumors in group 1 was significantly lower than that in group 2 (1 of 17, 5.9%, vs. 4 of 9, 44.4%, p=0.0081).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of MSI caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided SCRCs.

Mucinous carcinomas of the colon and rectum show higher rates of microsatellite instability and lower rates of chromosomal instability: a study matched for T classification and tumor location

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathologic significance of mucinous carcinomas (Muc) of the colon and rectum has been widely discussed, but there have been few studies on Muc regarding genetic and epigenetic alterations. The current study analyzed genetic and epigenetic alterations of Muc to clarify their differences from well differentiated adenocarcinomas (WD).

METHODS

Thirty-nine cases of Muc and 39 cases of WD were investigated. Cases of WD were matched with cases of Muc for T classification and tumor location. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of four loci (2p, 5q, 17p, 18q) were evaluated. The methylation status of the hMLH1 promoter region in Muc was also examined.

RESULTS

"MSI tumors" were defined as those that showed MSI-high, and "chromosomal instability (CIN) tumors" were defined as those that showed LOH but not MSI-high. MSI tumors were significantly more frequent in Muc (30.8%) than in WD (5.1%). CIN tumors were significantly less frequent in Muc (53.8%) than in WD (87.2%). In Muc, MSI tumors were significantly more frequent in the proximal colon (55.6%) than in the distal colon (9.5%). Also, methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region in Muc was significantly more frequent in MSI tumors (83.3%) than in CIN tumors (27.8%) (P = 0.0077).

CONCLUSIONS

When matched for T classification and tumor location, Muc shows higher rates of MSI and lower rates of CIN than WD.. Muc shows different characteristics according to tumor location, and methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region strongly correlates with Muc tumors showing MSI.

Molecular analysis of familial endometrial carcinoma: a manifestation of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer or a separate syndrome?

PURPOSE

Familial clustering of endometrial carcinoma (EC) may occur as part of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), a multiorgan cancer syndrome with mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency. Clustering of EC alone, termed as familial site-specific EC, may constitute a separate entity. Because its genetic basis is unknown, our purpose was to characterize such families molecularly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three families with site-specific EC were identified among 519 consecutive patients diagnosed with EC during 1986 to 1997. Tumor tissues were examined for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, and MMR genes pinpointed by IHC changes were screened for germline mutations by exon-by-exon sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and direct tests for mutations common in the population.

RESULTS

Among 33 ECs from 23 families, MLH1 protein was lost in seven tumors (21%), MSH2 together with MSH6 was lost in four tumors (12%), and MSH6 alone was lost in five tumors (15%). A truncating germline mutation in MSH6 (3261insC) was identified in one family and a likely pathogenic missense mutation in MSH2 (D603N) was identified in another family. Among the original 519 patients, nine (all with colon cancer in the family) were diagnosed with HNPCC at the outset-six with MLH1 and three with MSH2 mutations.

CONCLUSION

Our study gives a minimum overall frequency of 2.1% (11 of 519) for germline MMR defects ascertained through EC in the index patients. The fact that only two of 23 families with site-specific EC (8.7%) had germline mutations in MMR genes suggests another as yet unknown etiology in most families with site-specific EC.

Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in transitional cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is a pan-urothelial disease characterized by multiplicity. Although little is known about the molecular events in upper-tract TCC, similar carcinogenic mechanisms are thought to occur throughout the urinary tract. However, we have previously shown that distinct patterns of microsatellite instability occur in upper and lower urinary tract TCC, suggesting biologic differences between these tumors. Here we investigate the extent of promoter hypermethylation in TCC throughout the urinary tract.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tissue was obtained from 280 patients (median follow-up, 56 months) whose tumors comprised 116 bladder and 164 upper-tract tumors (UTT). Analysis for hypermethylation at 11 CpG islands, using methylation-sensitive polymerase chain reaction and bisulfite sequencing, was performed for each sample and compared with the tumor's clinicopathologic details, microsatellite instability status, and subsequent behavior.

RESULTS

Promoter methylation was present in 86% of TCC and occurred both more frequently and more extensively in UTT (94%) than in bladder tumors (76%; P < .0001). Methylation was associated with advanced tumor stage (P = .0001) and higher tumor progression (P = .03) and mortality rates (P = .04), when compared with tumors without methylation. Multivariate analysis revealed that methylation at the RASSF1A and DAPK loci, in addition to tumor stage and grade, were associated with disease progression (P < .04).

CONCLUSION

Despite morphologic similarities, there are genetic and epigenetic differences between TCC in the upper and lower urinary tracts. Methylation occurs commonly in urinary tract tumors, may affect carcinogenic mechanisms, and is a prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic target.

Prognosis in DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer: are all MSI tumours equivalent?

Microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal tumours is the hallmark of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and high level MSI can be detected in up to 15% of incident colorectal cancers. MSI in sporadic colorectal tumours is primarily due to epigenetic silencing of MLH1 while MSI is almost universal in tumours from HNPCC family members due to germline MMR gene mutation with loss or mutational inactivation of the second copy as a somatic event. There is evidence that tumour MSI is associated with a better outcome than the generality of large bowel malignancy. However, although MSI occurs in both sporadic colorectal cancer and in tumours arising in patients with germline MMR gene mutations, cancer survival should not be considered to be equivalent for these two groups with MSI tumours simply because both exhibit similarities in molecular phenotype. Here, we review the evidence on prognosis in patients with sporadic MSI tumours compared to those who have inherited a germline DNA MMR repair gene defect. In addition, we explore whether there are variables that afford opportunity to distinguish three groups on the basis of MSI status, namely: sporadic MSI tumours; MSI tumours in carriers of germline MMR gene defects; microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours. Differences in prognosis between these three groups is important because it underpins the rationale for surveillance and early identification of tumours in MMR gene carriers, as well as refining understanding of the influence of MSI on cancer progression. Furthermore, we discuss the effect of MSI on the effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens.

Promoter hypermethylation frequency and BRAF mutations distinguish hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer from sporadic MSI-H colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancers resulting from defective DNA mismatch repair can occur in both hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) and in the sporadic setting. They are characterised by a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and superficially resemble each other in that they are frequently located in the proximal colon and share features such as circumscribed tumour margins and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. However, significant differences can be demonstrated at the molecular level including widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF -activating mutations which occur significantly less often in HNPCC.

AIMS

In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence of widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF mutations would exclude HNPCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the methylation status of four methylated in tumour markers (MINTs 1,2,12 and 31), and the promoter regions of 5 genes hMLH1, HPP1, MGMT, p16INK4A and p14ARF, in 21 sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancers and compared these with 18 cancers from HNPCC patients. The methylation status of CpG islands were determined by either methylation specific PCR (MSP) or combined bisulfite restricton analysis (COBRA). In addition we considered the BRAF mutation status of 18 HNPCC tumours and 19 sporadic MSI-H cancers which had been previously determined by RFLP analysis and confirmatory sequencing.

RESULTS

Methylation of the promoter regions in target genes occurred less frequently within the HNPCC tumours (27% of analyses), compared with the sporadic MSI-H tumours (59% of analyses) (P < 0.001). Methylation of MINTs 1, 2, 12 and 31 occurred in 4% of analyses for HNPCC tumours contrasted with 73% for sporadic MSI-H tumours (P < 0.001). BRAF mutations were detected in 74% of sporadic tumours but none of the HNPCC cancers tested.

CONCLUSIONS

The total number of genes and MINTs methylated in HNPCC was lower than in MSI-H colorectal tumours. No HNPCC tumour showed evidence of widespread promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation suggesting this feature could be used as a discriminator between familial and sporadic cases.

Microsatellite instability in esophageal adenocarcinoma

The frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI), a result of defective mismatch repair during DNA replication, has been reported inconsistently in primary esophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC). Using a panel of 15 markers, the primary aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of MSI in a well-characterized series of 27 primary EADCs, defined according to strict clinicopathologic criteria. Polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify the following microsatellite repeat loci: D2S123, D10S197, D2S119, D11S904, D2S147, D3S1764, D7S1830, D7S1805, D2S434, D9S299, BAT25, BAT26, D5S346, D17S250, and TGF-beta-RII. Tumors were classified as microsatellite-stable (MSS) when no alterations were seen in tumor DNA compared to matched normal tissues, low-level MSI (MSI-L) when 1-5 of 15 markers were altered, and high-level MSI (MSI-H) when more than five markers were altered. Using these stringent criteria, 9/27 (33%) tumors were MSS, 18/27 (67%) tumors were MSI-L, and no tumor was MSI-H. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated cell nuclear expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins (both hMLH1 and hMSH2) in 78% (21/27) of tumors. No associations were seen between MSI and immunohistochemical expression of hMLH1, hMSH2, alterations in p53 or MBD4, tumor grade, pathologic stage, or patient survival. In conclusion, the finding of low levels of MSI in most tumors suggests an inherent baseline genomic instability, and potentially increased susceptibility to mutations during the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Activity (transcription) of the genes for MLH1, MSH2 and p53 in sporadic colorectal tumours with micro-satellite instability

Micro-satellite instability (MSI) is relevant in the management of colorectal cancers (CRC) and relies on analysis of gene mutations, or production of the proteins involved in DNA mismatch repair (e.g. MLH1, MSH2). p53 mutation is also relevant in MSI, but high-level CRC (MSI-H) demonstrate fewer mutations than low-level (MSI-L) or stable (MSS) cancers. Recently, the importance of gene activity (transcription) in MSI has been identified, where rather than being mutated genes have been downregulated. In this study, 67 sporadic CRC and eight samples of normal bowel were analysed for MSI status (by SSCP) and levels of MLH1, MSH2 and p53 gene transcription (by RT–PCR and scanning densitometry). Micro-satellite instability correlated with gender and site, with more MSI-H CRC in females (P<0.02) and in the right colon (P<0.04). In MSI-H, p53 transcription was markedly reduced (P<0.003). Compared to normal bowel, MLH1 transcription was elevated in all cancers (P<0.01), while MSH2 transcription was elevated only in MSI-H (P<0.04). There was a direct correlation between MLH1 and MSH2 transcription (P<0.001). Although fewer mutations are reported in MSI-H than MSI-L/MSS, these results suggest that reduced p53 transcription might account for decreased tumour suppression in MSI-H. The direct correlation between MLH1 and MSH2 transcription suggests that control of these genes might be coordinated.

Germline epimutation of MLH1 in individuals with multiple cancers

Epigenetic silencing can mimic genetic mutation by abolishing expression of a gene. We hypothesized that an epimutation could occur in any gene as a germline event that predisposes to disease and looked for examples in tumor suppressor genes in individuals with cancer. Here we report two individuals with soma-wide, allele-specific and mosaic hypermethylation of the DNA mismatch repair gene MLH1. Both individuals lack evidence of genetic mutation in any mismatch repair gene but have had multiple primary tumors that show mismatch repair deficiency, and both meet clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The epimutation was also present in spermatozoa of one of the individuals, indicating a germline defect and the potential for transmission to offspring. Germline epimutation provides a mechanism for phenocopying of genetic disease. The mosaicism and nonmendelian inheritance that are characteristic of epigenetic states could produce patterns of disease risk that resemble those of polygenic or complex traits.

Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis among southern Italian patients with colorectal carcinoma: detection of different alterations accounting for MLH1 and MSH2 inactivation in familial cases

BACKGROUND

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is due to defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and has been detected at various rates in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The role of MSI in colorectal tumorigenesis was assessed further in this study by both microsatellite analysis of two CRC subsets [unselected patients (n = 215) and patients <50 years of age (n = 95)], and mutation screening of the two major MMR genes MLH1 and MSH2 among familial CRC cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PCR-based microsatellite analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues. In CRC families, MLH1/MSH2 mutation analysis and MLH1/MSH2 immunostaining were performed on germline DNA and MSI+ tumour tissues, respectively.

RESULTS

The MSI+ phenotype was detected in 75 (24%) patients, with higher incidence in early-onset or proximally located tumours. Among 220 patients investigated for family cancer history, MSI frequency was markedly higher in familial [18/27 (67%)] than in sporadic [32/193 (17%)] cases. Three MLH1 and six MSH2 germline mutations were identified in 14 out of 36 (39%) CRC families. Prevalence of MLH1/MSH2 mutations in CRC families was significantly increased by the presence of: (i) fulfilled Amsterdam criteria; (ii) four or more CRCs; or (iii) one or more endometrial cancer. While MSH2 was found mostly mutated, almost all [8/9 (89%)] familial MSI+ cases with loss of the MLH1 protein were negative for MLH1 germline mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Both genetic (for MSH2) and gene-silencing (for MLH1) alterations seem to be involved in CRC pathogenesis.

Mutations of BRAF are associated with extensive hMLH1 promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal carcinomas

Activating mutations of BRAF have been frequently observed in microsatellite unstable (MSI+) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs), in which mutations of BRAF and KRAS are mutually exclusive. Previously, we reported that hypermethylation of hMLH1 might play an important role in the tumorigenesis of right-sided sporadic CRCs with MSI showing less frequency of KRAS/TP53 alteration. Therefore, we have assumed that BRAF mutations might be highly associated with hMLH1 methylation status rather than MSI status. In this study, mutations of BRAF and KRAS and their relationship with MSI and hMLH1 methylation status were examined in 140 resected specimens of CRC. The methylation status was classified into 3 types: full methylation (FM), partial methylation (PM) and nonmethylation (NM). Only FM closely linked to reduced expression of hMLH1 protein. BRAF mutations were found in 16 cases (11%), all leading to the production of BRAF(V599E). As for MSI status, BRAF mutations were found in 43% of MSI+ and 4% of MSI- cases (p < 0.0001). Among the MSI+ individuals, BRAF mutations were more frequent in cases with hMLH1 deficiency (58%) than those with hMSH2 deficiency (0%; p=0.02). Moreover, they were found in 69% of FM, 4% of PM and 4% of NM, revealing a striking difference between FM and the other 2 groups (FM vs. PM or NM; p < 0.0001). These findings suggest that BRAF activation may participate in the carcinogenesis of sporadic CRCs with hMLH1 hypermethylation in the proximal colon, independently of KRAS activation.

Distinct patterns of microsatellite instability are seen in tumours of the urinary tract

To date, two forms of microsatellite instability (MSI) have been described in human cancer. MSI typical of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), is due to deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and is defined with mono- and dinucleotide repeat microsatellites. A second variety of instability is best seen at selective tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST; elevated microsatellite alterations at select tetranucleotides). While MSI occurs infrequently in bladder cancers, EMAST is common. Sporadic tumours with the largest proportion showing MSI are those found most frequently in HNPCC kindreds. While bladder cancer is not frequently seen in HNPCC, upper urinary tract tumours (UTTs) are. Having previously found a low frequency of MSI in bladder cancer, we sought to determine the relative levels of MSI and EMAST in transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the upper and lower urinary tracts. Microsatellite analysis was performed at 10 mono- and dinucleotide and eight tetranucleotide loci, in 89 bladder and 71 UTT TCC. Contrasting patterns of instability were seen in urinary tumours. In bladder cancer, MSI was rare and EMAST was common. The presence of EMAST was not related to tumour grade, stage, subsequent outcome or immunohistochemical expression of the MMR proteins. In UTT, while MSI occurred frequently, EMAST was seen less frequently than in bladder cancer. When TCC of the upper and lower urinary tracts are compared, MSI-H is more frequent in UTT and EMAST more frequent in bladder cancer. Our findings show that, as for colorectal cancer, the pattern of MSI varies with location in the urinary tract. In addition, we have confirmed that MSI and EMAST are discrete forms of MSI, and that the presence of EMAST does not affect tumour phenotype.

Inactivation of p16INK4a by CpG hypermethylation is not a frequent event in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gene promoter hypermethylation is common in colorectal cancer and is associated with transcriptional silencing. However, the clinicopathological significance of p16(INK4a) gene silencing with hypermethylation is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze loss of p16 expression and its relationship to hypermethylation in sporadic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Tissue from 426 colorectal cancers underwent histological analysis. Immunohistochemistry was performed for p16 expression. Fresh tumor DNA was analyzed for microsatellite instability (MSI) and the presence of K-ras mutations. In addition, DNA was bisulphite-modified and analyzed for p16(INK4a) promoter methylation by methylation-specific PCR.

RESULTS

There were 25% of tumors with p16(INK4a) promoter hypermethylation. These tumors were associated with older patients, right-sidedness, MSI and were poorly differentiated, mucinous, and had intraepithelial and peritumoral lymphocytes and a Crohn's-type lymphocytic reaction (P < 0.05). However, only right-sidedness was significant on multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). Only 8.1% of tumors did not express p16, and this was associated with hypermethylation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

p16(INK4a) promoter methylation, although common in colorectal cancer, does not result in a clinicopathologically distinct subgroup of tumors and infrequently results in transcriptional silencing. This suggests that p16(INK4a) gene inactivation does not have an important role in the pathogenesis of sporadic colorectal cancer.

Altered expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in predisposition to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

A considerable fraction (30% to 70%) of families with verified or putative hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer fails to show mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Our purpose was to address the genetic etiology of such families.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We scrutinized a population-based cohort of 26 families from Finland that had screened mutation-negative by previous techniques. Blood was tested for allelic messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by single nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE), and tumor tissue for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as for microsatellite instability (MSI). Full-length cDNAs of genes implicated by SNuPE or IHC were cloned and sequenced.

RESULTS

Unbalanced mRNA expression of MLH1 alleles was evident in two families. An inherited nonsense mutation was subsequently identified in one family, and complete silencing of the mutated allele was identified in the other family. Extinct protein expression by IHC implicated MLH1 in these two and in four other families, MSH2 in four families, and MSH6 in one family. Although no unequivocal genomic mutations were detected in the latter families, haplotype and other findings provided support for heritable defects. With one exception, all tumors with IHC alterations showed MSI, in contrast to the remaining families, which showed neither IHC changes nor MSI.

CONCLUSION

Our expression-based strategy stratified the present "mutation-negative" cohort into two discrete categories: families linked to the major MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 (11 [42%] of 26) and those likely to be associated with other, as yet unknown susceptibility genes (15 [58%] of 26).

Genetics supersedes epigenetics in colon cancer phenotype

A CpG island DNA methylator phenotype has been postulated to explain silencing of the hMLH1 DNA mismatch repair gene in cancer of the microsatellite mutator phenotype. To evaluate this model, we analyzed methylation in CpG islands from six mutator and suppressor genes, and thirty random genomic sites, in a panel of colorectal cancers. Tumor-specific somatic hypermethylation was a widespread age-dependent process that followed a normal Gaussian distribution. Because there was no discontinuity in methylation rate, our results challenge the methylator phenotype hypothesis and its hypothetical pathological underlying defect. We also show that the mutator phenotype dominates over the gradual accumulation of DNA hypermethylation in determining the genotypic features that govern the phenotypic peculiarities of colon cancer of the mutator pathway.

Evidence of a preferred molecular pathway in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

A small proportion of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) have synchronous tumors at the time of diagnosis. A subset of sporadic CRCs display microsatellite instability (MSI) that is associated with MLH1 silencing due to promoter methylation. In the current study, the authors investigated the proportion of tumors with MSI in patients with synchronous colorectal carcinoma (SCRC) and the concordance in MSI status among tumors in a given individual. In addition, the authors examined MLH1 and MSH2 expression and MLH1 promoter methylation in SCRCs.

METHODS

The current study included 77 patients, with a combined total of 170 invasive SCRCs, who were identified from a database of 2884 patients with CRC. Instability was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using a set of five markers. Tumors that were unstable at two or more markers were considered unstable (MSI); otherwise, they were considered microsatellite stable (MSS). Expression of MLH1 and MSH2 was determined by immunohistochemistry. Methylation of the MLH1 gene promoter was determined by a methylation-specific PCR assay. Statistical comparisons were made using the chi-square test or the Student t test.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients in the study, 21 (27%) had a family history of hereditary nonpolyposis colon carcinoma-related malignancy, but none fulfilled the Amsterdam II criteria. Fifty-four of 170 tumors (32%) were found to be MSI. Patients with MSI tumors were older and more frequently female. All but 1 MSI tumor lacked expression of MLH1 (n = 44) or MSH2 (n = 8), or both (n = 1). All MLH1-negative tumors, compared with only 3 MLH1-positive tumors, were methylated at the MLH1 promoter. Most patients (n = 67; 87%) had either all MSS tumors (n = 48; 62%) or all MSI tumors (n = 19; 25%); 10 patients (13%) had both MSS and MSI tumors. The observed MSI/MSS distribution was significantly different from the distribution expected based on an assumption of independence (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong concordance in MSI/MSS status among tumors in the same individual. This finding suggests that the tumors in patients with SCRC develop along a preferred molecular pathway.