Transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment in yeast is influenced by promoter architecture and downstream sequences

Revisiting the model for coactivator recruitment: Med15 can select its target sites independent of promoter-bound transcription factors

Activation domains (ADs) within transcription factors (TFs) induce gene expression by recruiting coactivators such as the Mediator complex. Coactivators lack DNA binding domains (DBDs) and are assumed to passively follow their recruiting TFs. This is supported by direct AD-coactivator interactions seen in vitro but has not yet been tested in living cells. To examine that, we targeted two Med15-recruiting ADs to a range of budding yeast promoters through fusion with different DBDs. The DBD-AD fusions localized to hundreds of genomic sites but recruited Med15 and induced transcription in only a subset of bound promoters, characterized by a fuzzy-nucleosome architecture. Direct DBD-Med15 fusions shifted DBD localization towards fuzzy-nucleosome promoters, including promoters devoid of the endogenous Mediator. We propose that Med15, and perhaps other coactivators, possess inherent promoter preference and thus actively contribute to the selection of TF-induced genes.

Complementary strategies for directing in vivo transcription factor binding through DNA binding domains and intrinsically disordered regions

DNA binding domains (DBDs) of transcription factors (TFs) recognize DNA sequence motifs that are highly abundant in genomes. Within cells, TFs bind a subset of motif-containing sites as directed by either their DBDs or DBD-external (nonDBD) sequences. To define the relative roles of DBDs and nonDBDs in directing binding preferences, we compared the genome-wide binding of 48 (∼30%) budding yeast TFs with their DBD-only, nonDBD-truncated, and nonDBD-only mutants. With a few exceptions, binding locations differed between DBDs and TFs, resulting from the cumulative action of multiple determinants mapped mostly to disordered nonDBD regions. Furthermore, TFs' preferences for promoters of the fuzzy nucleosome architecture were lost in DBD-only mutants, whose binding spread across promoters, implicating nonDBDs' preferences in this hallmark of budding yeast regulatory design. We conclude that DBDs and nonDBDs employ complementary DNA-targeting strategies, whose balance defines TF binding specificity along genomes.

An overview and future prospects of recombinant protein production in Bacillus subtilis

Bacillus subtilis is a well-characterized Gram-positive bacterium and a valuable host for recombinant protein production because of its efficient secretion ability, high yield, and non-toxicity. Here, we comprehensively review the recent studies on recombinant protein production in B. subtilis to update and supplement other previous reviews. We have focused on several aspects, including optimization of B. subtilis strains, enhancement and regulation of expression, improvement of secretion level, surface display of proteins, and fermentation optimization. Among them, optimization of B. subtilis strains mainly involves undirected chemical/physical mutagenesis and selection and genetic manipulation; enhancement and regulation of expression comprises autonomous plasmid and integrated expression, promoter regulation and engineering, and fine-tuning gene expression based on proteases and molecular chaperones; improvement of secretion level predominantly involves secretion pathway and signal peptide screening and optimization; surface display of proteins includes surface display of proteins on spores or vegetative cells; and fermentation optimization incorporates medium optimization, process condition optimization, and feeding strategy optimization. Furthermore, we propose some novel methods and future challenges for recombinant protein production in B. subtilis.Key points• A comprehensive review on recombinant protein production in Bacillus subtilis.• Novel techniques facilitate recombinant protein expression and secretion.• Surface display of proteins has significant potential for different applications.

High-Throughput Discovery and Characterization of Human Transcriptional Effectors

Thousands of proteins localize to the nucleus; however, it remains unclear which contain transcriptional effectors. Here, we develop HT-recruit, a pooled assay where protein libraries are recruited to a reporter, and their transcriptional effects are measured by sequencing. Using this approach, we measure gene silencing and activation for thousands of domains. We find a relationship between repressor function and evolutionary age for the KRAB domains, discover that Homeodomain repressor strength is collinear with Hox genetic organization, and identify activities for several domains of unknown function. Deep mutational scanning of the CRISPRi KRAB maps the co-repressor binding surface and identifies substitutions that improve stability/silencing. By tiling 238 proteins, we find repressors as short as ten amino acids. Finally, we report new activator domains, including a divergent KRAB. These results provide a resource of 600 human proteins containing effectors and demonstrate a scalable strategy for assigning functions to protein domains.

Mediator Undergoes a Compositional Change during Transcriptional Activation

Mediator is a transcriptional co-activator recruited to enhancers by DNA-binding activators, and it also interacts with RNA polymerase (Pol) II as part of the preinitiation complex (PIC). We demonstrate that a single Mediator complex associates with the enhancer and core promoter in vivo, indicating that it can physically bridge these transcriptional elements. However, the Mediator kinase module associates strongly with the enhancer, but not with the core promoter, and it dissociates from the enhancer upon depletion of the TFIIH kinase. Severing the kinase module from Mediator by removing the connecting subunit Med13 does not affect Mediator association at the core promoter but increases occupancy at enhancers. Thus, Mediator undergoes a compositional change in which the kinase module, recruited via Mediator to the enhancer, dissociates from Mediator to permit association with Pol II and the PIC. As such, Mediator acts as a dynamic bridge between the enhancer and core promoter.

Using synthetic biology to make cells tomorrow's test tubes

The main tenet of physical biology is that biological phenomena can be subject to the same quantitative and predictive understanding that physics has afforded in the context of inanimate matter. However, the inherent complexity of many of these biological processes often leads to the derivation of complex theoretical descriptions containing a plethora of unknown parameters. Such complex descriptions pose a conceptual challenge to the establishment of a solid basis for predictive biology. In this article, we present various exciting examples of how synthetic biology can be used to simplify biological systems and distill these phenomena down to their essential features as a means to enable their theoretical description. Here, synthetic biology goes beyond previous efforts to engineer nature and becomes a tool to bend nature to understand it. We discuss various recent and classic experiments featuring applications of this synthetic approach to the elucidation of problems ranging from bacteriophage infection, to transcriptional regulation in bacteria and in developing embryos, to evolution. In all of these examples, synthetic biology provides the opportunity to turn cells into the equivalent of a test tube, where biological phenomena can be reconstituted and our theoretical understanding put to test with the same ease that these same phenomena can be studied in the in vitro setting.

Fungal mediator tail subunits contain classical transcriptional activation domains

Classical activation domains within DNA-bound eukaryotic transcription factors make weak interactions with coactivator complexes, such as Mediator, to stimulate transcription. How these interactions stimulate transcription, however, is unknown. The activation of reporter genes by artificial fusion of Mediator subunits to DNA binding domains that bind to their promoters has been cited as evidence that the primary role of activators is simply to recruit Mediator. We have identified potent classical transcriptional activation domains in the C termini of several tail module subunits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, and Candida dubliniensis Mediator, while their N-terminal domains are necessary and sufficient for their incorporation into Mediator but do not possess the ability to activate transcription when fused to a DNA binding domain. This suggests that Mediator fusion proteins actually are functioning in a manner similar to that of a classical DNA-bound activator rather than just recruiting Mediator. Our finding that deletion of the activation domains of S. cerevisiae Med2 and Med3, as well as C. dubliniensis Tlo1 (a Med2 ortholog), impairs the induction of certain genes shows these domains function at native promoters. Activation domains within coactivators are likely an important feature of these complexes and one that may have been uniquely leveraged by a common fungal pathogen.

Activation of silenced cytokine gene promoters by the synergistic effect of TBP-TALE and VP64-TALE activators

Recent work has shown that the combinatorial use of multiple TALE activators can selectively activate certain cellular genes in inaccessible chromatin regions. In this study, we aimed to interrogate the activation potential of TALEs upon transcriptionally silenced immune genes in the context of non-immune cells. We designed a unique strategy, in which a single TALE fused to the TATA-box binding protein (TBP-TALE) is coupled with multiple VP64-TALE activators. We found that our strategy is significantly more potent than multiple TALE activators alone in activating expression of IL-2 and GM-CSF in diverse cell origins in which both genes are otherwise completely silenced. Chromatin analysis revealed that the gene activation was due in part to displacement of a distinctly positioned nucleosome. These studies provide a novel epigenetic mechanism for artificial gene induction and have important implications for targeted cancer immunotherapy, DNA vaccine development, as well as rational design of TALE activators.

Cis-acting motifs in artificially synthesized expression cassette leads to enhanced transgene expression in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Efficacy of artificial synthetic expression modules was compared with native CaMV35S and DECaMV35S promoter in transgenic tomato developed by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The promoters under trial were CaMV35S-mec (PcamI), CaMV35S (PcamII), DECaMV35S (PcamIII), synthetic minimal expression cassette (Pmec), complete expression cassette (Pcec), double enhancer expression cassette (Pdec) and triple enhancer expression cassette (Ptec) for driving the uidA gene for β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity. The promoter efficiency based on average of GUS expression in T(0) and T(1) transgenic tomato was in the order Pcec > Pdec > PcamIII > PcamII > PcamI > Ptec > Pmec. The two promoters Pcec and PcamIII were deployed for development of insect-resistant transgenic tomato with optimal expression of modified cry1Ac insecticidal toxin gene from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The transgenic status and copy number of the cry1Ac in T(0) transgenic tomato was confirmed through PCR, Southern hybridization, RT-PCR and Western immunoassay, while toxin expression was monitored by DAS-ELISA. The expression level of Cry1Ac toxin driven by Pcec in T(0) population ranged from 0.08 to 0.8% of total soluble protein (TSP) that was significantly higher to PcamIII which ranged from 0.02 to 0.13% of TSP. The outcome of insect mortality bioassay with Helicoverpa armigera correlated well with the results of DAS-ELISA. The higher expression of cry1Ac gene driven by Pcec promoter in transgenic tomato did not show any yield penalty and reflected complete protection, while low recovery of promising transgenics expressing Cry1Ac toxin driven by PcamIII was a major limitation for complete protection against the fruit borer insect.

Transcriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: transcription factor regulation and function, mechanisms of initiation, and roles of activators and coactivators

Here we review recent advances in understanding the regulation of mRNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Many fundamental gene regulatory mechanisms have been conserved in all eukaryotes, and budding yeast has been at the forefront in the discovery and dissection of these conserved mechanisms. Topics covered include upstream activation sequence and promoter structure, transcription factor classification, and examples of regulated transcription factor activity. We also examine advances in understanding the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery, conserved coactivator complexes, transcription activation domains, and the cooperation of these factors in gene regulatory mechanisms.

YeTFaSCo: a database of evaluated yeast transcription factor sequence specificities

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a prevalent system for the analysis of transcriptional networks. As a result, multiple DNA-binding sequence specificities (motifs) have been derived for most yeast transcription factors (TFs). However, motifs from different studies are often inconsistent with each other, making subsequent analyses complicated and confusing. Here, we have created YeTFaSCo (The Yeast Transcription Factor Specificity Compendium, http://yetfasco.ccbr.utoronto.ca/), an extensive collection of S. cerevisiae TF specificities. YeTFaSCo differs from related databases by being more comprehensive (including 1709 motifs for 256 proteins or protein complexes), and by evaluating the motifs using multiple objective quality metrics. The metrics include correlation between motif matches and ChIP-chip data, gene expression patterns, and GO terms, as well as motif agreement between different studies. YeTFaSCo also features an index of ‘expert-curated’ motifs, each associated with a confidence assessment. In addition, the database website features tools for motif analysis, including a sequence scanning function and precomputed genome-browser tracks of motif occurrences across the entire yeast genome. Users can also search the database for motifs that are similar to a query motif.

Phosphorylation of the Gal4 DNA-binding domain is essential for activator mono-ubiquitylation and efficient promoter occupancy

Recent analysis of a Gal4 mutant (Gap71) carrying three point mutations (S22D, K23Q and K25F) in its DNA-binding domain (DBD), has demonstrated that it cannot occupy GAL promoters efficiently in cells and that it is not mono-ubiquitylated, suggesting a functional link between this modification and stable DNA binding in cells. The mechanistic underpinning of this phenotype is that this protein is hypersensitive to a newly discovered activity of the proteasomal ATPases--their ability to actively dissociate transcription factor-DNA complexes after direct interaction with the activation domain. In this paper, we examine the roles of each of the three point mutations contained in Gap71 individually. These experiments have revealed that serine 22 is a site of phosphorylation in the Gal4 DBD and that lysine 23 is essential for S22 phosphorylation, possibly acting as part of the kinase recognition site. Mutation of either residue blocks Gal4 DBD phosphorylation, its subsequent ubiquitylation and compromises the ability of the activator to bind promoter DNA in vivo. These data represent the first report of an essential phosphorylation event that is critical for the activity of this paradigmatic transcription factor.

Converting inactive peptides into potent transcriptional activators

Significant efforts have been devoted to the development of artificial transcriptional activators for use as mechanistic tools, as therapeutic agents, and for biomanufacturing applications. One of the primary challenges has been the development of artificial activators that exhibit potency in cells comparable to that of endogenous activators; the vast majority function only moderately in the cellular context. Here we demonstrate that the superimposition of two distinct binding modes, a masking interaction and an interaction with the transcriptional machinery, has a profoundly positive effect on the cellular activity of artificial activators, with up to 600-fold enhancement observed. Incorporation of this feature into future generations of small molecule transcriptional activators should increase their nuclear uptake and facilitate their accessibility to their target proteins, thus significantly augmenting both their activity and utility.

Functional specificity of artificial transcriptional activators

Misregulated transcription is linked to many human diseases, and thus artificial transcriptional activators are highly desirable as mechanistic tools and as replacements for their malfunctioning natural counterparts. We previously reported two artificial transcriptional activation domains obtained from synthetic peptide libraries screened for binding to the yeast transcription protein Med15(Gal11). Here we demonstrate that the transcriptional potency of the Med15 ligands is increased through straightforward structural alterations. These artificial activation domains upregulate transcription via specific Med15 binding interactions and do not function in mammalian cells, which lack Med15. This functional specificity stands in contrast to most natural or artificial activation domains that function across all eukaryotic cell types. The results indicate that the screening strategy holds excellent promise for identifying peptide and small molecule transcriptional activators that function by unique mechanisms with advantageous specificity properties.

Yeast mediator and its role in transcriptional regulation

Activated eukaryotic transcription requires the components of the Mediator complex, which can act as both a positive and negative regulator of transcription. This review of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mediator complex describes the role of Mediator and its effects on transcriptional regulation. One focal point of the review is to summarize new information regarding the negative effect of Mediator on transcription and suggest a possible mechanism that encompasses the latest results.

In vivo synthesis of Taf1p lacking the TAF N-terminal domain using alternative transcription or translation initiation sites

The TAF N-terminal domain (TAND) of TAF1 includes two subdomains, TAND1 and TAND2, which bind to the concave and convex surfaces of TBP, respectively. Previous studies showed that the substitution of yeast TAND1 or TAND2 with the equivalent domain from a Drosophila homologue leads to accumulation of truncated Taf1p in yeast. This study demonstrates that these truncated Taf1p derivatives lack TAND. However, full-length Taf1p and untruncated derivatives are produced in yeast when several Met-to-Ala mutations are introduced in the carboxy-terminus of TAND. In contrast, mutations that reduce expression of full-length TAF1 do not reduce the amount of truncated Taf1p derivatives that are produced. These data suggest that TAND-deficient TAF1 derivatives are produced by initiating translation at alternative initiation sites. In addition, the TAF1 mRNA structure suggests that the TAND-deficient TAF1 derivatives may also be formed in yeast by use of (cryptic) alternative transcription initiation sites. Importantly, TAND-deficient truncated Taf1p appears to be produced at a low level in wild-type yeast as well. Finally, this study also demonstrates that Drosophila TAND2 substitutes functionally for yeast TAND2, but Drosophila TAND1 does not substitute for yeast TAND1.

Targeting of Swi/Snf to the yeast GAL1 UAS G requires the Mediator, TAF IIs, and RNA polymerase II

The chromatin remodeling activity of the Swi/Snf complex is essential for the expression of several yeast genes. Previous studies have suggested that recruitment of Swi/Snf requires the action of transcriptional activators. However, reports in metazoans and in yeast have provided evidence of interactions between Swi/Snf and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme/Mediator complex. Here we show that recruitment of Swi/Snf to the galactose-inducible gene GAL1 cannot be fully achieved without the integrity of the Mediator complex, TAF IIs, and RNA polymerase II. Moreover, artificial recruitment of Mediator is sufficient to tether both Swi/Snf and SAGA to the GAL1 UAS G. We further demonstrate that Swi/Snf recruitment at GAL1 does not require acetylation of chromatin by Gcn5 nor the presence of SAGA. Based on these results, we conclude that interactions between the Gal4 activator and Swi/Snf are not sufficient to recruit the latter to the GAL1 UAS G, since interactions with the Mediator, TAF IIs, and RNA polymerase II are also important.

Activation of the Gal1 Gene of Yeast by Pairs of 'Non-Classical' Activators

Eukaryotic transcriptional activators work by recruiting to DNA the transcriptional machinery, including protein complexes required for chromatin modification, transcription initiation, and elongation. Which of these complexes must be directly recruited to trigger transcription? We test various "non-classical" transcription activators (comprising a component of the transcriptional machinery fused to a DNA binding domain) for their abilities to activate transcription of a chromosomally integrated reporter in yeast. Among these newly constructed fusion proteins, none efficiently activated transcription when working on its own. However, in several instances transcription was activated by a pair of such fusion proteins tethered to adjacent sites on DNA. In each of these cases, one fusion protein bore a component of the SAGA complex, and the other bore a component of the Mediator complex. Transcription was also activated by certain tripartite fusion proteins comprising a Mediator and a SAGA component fused to a DNA binding domain. The results are consistent with the finding that the classical activator Gal4, working at the GAL1 promoter, activates transcription by (at least in part) independently recruiting SAGA and Mediator.

hSrb7, an essential human Mediator component, acts as a coactivator for the thyroid hormone receptor

Nuclear hormone receptors interact with the basal-transcriptional complex and/or coactivators to regulate transcriptional activation. These activator-target interactions recruit the transcriptional machinery to the promoter and may also stimulate transcriptional events subsequent to the binding of the machinery to the promoter or enhancer element. We describe a novel functional interaction of the nuclear thyroid receptor (TR), with a human Mediator component (hSrb7), and a human TFIIH component (hMo15). In mammalian two-hybrid experiments as well as in GST-pull down assays, hSrb7 interacts with TR but not with other nuclear receptors such as the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) or the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Whereas hMo15 also interacts with VDR and RAR in mammalian two-hybrid assays, no association of hSrb7 with VDR or RAR is found. Accordingly, cotransfection of TR and hSrb7 increases thyroid hormone (T3)-dependent transcription in an AF-2-dependent manner, while hSrb7 causes no stimulation of vitamin D- or retinoic acid-mediated transactivation. These results reveal a novel co-activator role for hSrb7 and hMo15 on TR transcriptional responses, and demonstrate that different receptors can selectively target different co-activators or general transcription factors to stimulate transcription.

Getting into chromatin: how do transcription factors get past the histones?

Transcriptional activators and the general transcription machinery must gain access to DNA that in eukaryotes may be packaged into nucleosomes. In this review, I discuss this problem from the standpoint of the types of chromatin structures that these DNA-binding proteins may encounter, and the mechanisms by which they may contend with various chromatin structures. The discussion includes consideration of experiments in which chromatin structure is manipulated in vivo to confront activators with nucleosomal binding sites, and the roles of nucleosome dynamics and activation domains in facilitating access to such sites. Finally, the role of activators in facilitating access of the general transcriptional machinery to sites in chromatin is discussed.

Independent recruitment in vivo by Gal4 of two complexes required for transcription

We use a modified form of ChIP to analyze the recruitment of seven sets of proteins to the yeast GAL genes upon induction. We resolve three stages of recruitment: first SAGA, then Mediator, and finally Pol II along with four other proteins (including TBP) bind the promoter. In a strain lacking SAGA, Mediator is recruited with a time course indistinguishable from that observed in wild-type cells. Our results are consistent with the notion that a single species of activator, Gal4, separately contacts, and thereby directly recruits, SAGA and Mediator.

Protein-protein interaction map for yeast TFIID

A major rate-limiting step in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II is recognition and binding of the TATA element by the transcription factor TFIID. TFIID is composed of TATA binding protein (TBP) and approximately a dozen TBP-associated factors (TAFs). Emerging consensus regarding the role of TAFs is that TFIID assumes a gene specific activity that is regulated by interaction with other factors. In spite of many studies demonstrating the essential nature of TAFs in transcription, very little is known about the subunit contacts within TFIID. To understand fully the functional role of TAFs, it is imperative to define TAF-TAF interactions and their topological arrangement within TFIID. We performed a systematic two-hybrid analysis using the 13 essential TAFs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TFIID complex and TBP. Specific interactions were defined for each component, and the biological significance of these interactions is supported by numerous genetic and biochemical studies. By combining the interaction profiles presented here, and the available studies utilizing specific TAFs, we propose a working hypothesis for the arrangement of components in the TFIID complex. Thus, these results serve as a foundation for understanding the overall architecture of yeast TFIID.

Mutations in the histone fold domain of the TAF12 gene show synthetic lethality with the TAF1 gene lacking the TAF N-terminal domain (TAND) by different mechanisms from those in the SPT15 gene encoding the TATA box-binding protein (TBP)

The general transcription factor TFIID, composed of the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and 14 TBP-associated factors (TAFs), is important for both basal and regulated transcription by RNA polymerase II. Although it is well known that the TAF N-terminal domain (TAND) at the amino-terminus of the TAF1 protein binds to TBP and thereby inhibits TBP function in vitro, the physiological role of this domain remains obscure. In our previous study, we screened for mutations that cause lethality when co-expressed with the TAF1 gene lacking TAND (taf1-DeltaTAND) and identified two DeltaTAND synthetic lethal (nsl) mutations as those in the SPT15 gene encoding TBP. In this study we isolated another nsl mutation in the same screen and identified it to be a mutation in the histone fold domain (HFD) of the TAF12 gene. Several other HFD mutations of this gene also exhibit nsl phenotypes, and all of them are more or less impaired in transcriptional activation in vivo. Interestingly, a set of genes affected in the taf1-DeltaTAND mutant is similarly affected in the taf12 HFD mutants but not in the nsl mutants of TBP. Therefore, we discovered that the nsl mutations of these two genes cause lethality in the taf1-DeltaTAND mutant by different mechanisms.

Functional interactions within yeast mediator and evidence of differential subunit modifications

It is possible to recruit RNA polymerase II to a target promoter and, thus, activate transcription by fusing Mediator subunits to a DNA binding domain. To investigate functional interactions within Mediator, we have tested such fusions of the lexA DNA binding domain to Med1, Med2, Gal11, Srb7, and Srb10 in wild type, med1, med2, gal11, sin4, srb8, srb10, and srb11 strains. We found that lexA-Med2 and lexA-Gal11 are strong activators that are independent of all Mediator subunits tested. lexA-Srb10 is a weak activator that depends on Srb8 and Srb11. lexA-Med1 and lexA-Srb7 are both cryptic activators that become active in the absence of Srb8, Srb10, Srb11, or Sin4. An unexpected finding was that lexA-VP16 differs from Gal4-VP16 in that it is independent of the activator binding Mediator module. Both lexA-Med1 and lexA-Srb7 are stably associated with Med4 and Med8, which suggests that they are incorporated into Mediator. Med4 and Med8 exist in two mobility forms that differ in their association with lexA-Med1 and lexA-Srb7. Within purified Mediator, Med4 is present as a phosphorylated lower mobility form. Taken together, these results suggest that assembly of Mediator is a multistep process that involves conversion of both Med4 and Med8 to their low mobility forms.

Artificial recruitment of certain Mediator components affects requirement of basal transcription factor IIE

BACKGROUND

Basal transcription factors are essential for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-catalysed transcription of many but not all the mRNA-encoding genes in vivo as well as in vitro. For example, copper-inducible transcription of the copper metallothionein gene CUP1 occurs independently of basal factor TFIIE in budding yeast. To gain insight into the mechanism by which the requirement for TFIIE is bypassed, we artificially recruited certain constituents of Mediator, a large protein complex transmitting signals from various activators to the RNAPII machinery, to the CUP1 promoter by protein fusions with Ace1, the copper-inducible activator.

RESULTS

Fusions with Med2 or Pgd1 activated CUP1 independently of TFIIE. Surprisingly, fusions with neither Srb5 nor Med9 circumvented TFIIE requirement for the CUP1 activation. Components of TFIID were similarly recruited to the CUP1 promoter without activation. By using a chromatin immunoprecipitation technique, we found that TFIIE is necessary for stable binding of TFIIH and RNAPII to the ADH1 promoter, whose activation requires TFIIE. However, binding of TFIIH and RNAPII to CUP1 upon its activation did not require TFIIE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results strongly suggest that the TFIIE requirement of a gene is determined by a target(s) in Mediator through which the signal of the cognate activator is transmitted.

The role of TFIIB-RNA polymerase II interaction in start site selection in yeast cells

Previous studies have established a critical role of both TFIIB and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) in start site selection in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, it remains unclear how the TFIIB-RNAPII interaction impacts on this process since such an interaction can potentially influence both preinitiation complex (PIC) stability and conformation. In this study, we further investigate the role of TFIIB in start site selection by characterizing our newly generated TFIIB mutants, two of which exhibit a novel upstream shift of start sites in vivo. We took advantage of an artificial recruitment system in which an RNAPII holoenzyme component is covalently linked to a DNA-binding domain for more direct and stable recruitment. We show that TFIIB mutations can exert their effects on start site selection in such an artificial recruitment system even though it has a relaxed requirement for TFIIB. We further show that these TFIIB mutants have normal affinity for RNAPII and do not alter the promoter melting/scanning step. Finally, we show that overexpressing the genetically isolated TFIIB mutant E62K, which has a reduced affinity for RNAPII, can correct its start site selection defect. We discuss a model in which the TFIIB-RNAPII interaction controls the start site selection process by influencing the conformation of PIC prior to or during PIC assembly, as opposed to PIC stability.

A target essential for the activity of a nonacidic yeast transcriptional activator

P201 is a short (eight-residue) nonacidic peptide that comprises a strong transcriptional activating region when tethered to DNA in yeast. Here we identify the mediator protein Gal11 as an essential target of P201. Deletion of Gal11, which modestly decreases activation elicited by the typical acidic yeast activator, abolishes activation by DNA-tethered P201. A point mutation in Gal11, which has no effect on other Gal11 functions, also greatly diminishes activation by DNA-tethered P201. P201 binds to a fragment of Gal11 in vivo and in vitro, and the interaction is diminished by mutations in either component that decrease activation in vivo. P201, unlike the typical yeast acidic activating region, does not work in mammalian cells, which is consistent with the notion that the unique target of P201 (Gal11) is absent from mammalian cells.

The TBP-inhibitory domain of TAF145 limits the effects of nonclassical transcriptional activators

Many genes in bacteria and eukaryotes are activated by "regulated recruitment". According to that picture, a transcriptional activator binds cooperatively to DNA with the transcriptional machinery, and the constitutively active polymerase then spontaneously transcribes the gene. An important class of experiments that helped develop this model is called the "activator by-pass" experiment. In one version of such an experiment, the ordinary activator-transcriptional machinery interaction is replaced by a heterologous interaction. For example, fusing any of several DNA binding domains to Gal11, a component of the yeast mediator complex, creates a powerful activator of genes bearing the corresponding DNA binding sites. Here, we describe a simple modification of the yeast transcriptional machinery that extends the success of similar experiments involving other mediator components. The results reinforce parallels between regulation of enzymes involved in transcription and in other cellular processes.

Optimized regulation of gene expression using artificial transcription factors

A major focus in the basic science of gene therapy is the study of factors involved in target-specific regulation of gene expression. Optimization of artificial or "designer" transcription factors capable of specific regulation of target genes is a prerequisite to developing practical applications in human subjects. In this paper, we present a systematic and combinatorial approach to optimize engineered transcription factors using designed zinc-finger proteins fused to transcriptional effector domains derived from the naturally occurring activators (VP16 or P65) or repressor (KRAB) proteins. We also demonstrate effective targeting of artificial transcription factors to regulate gene expression from three different constitutive viral promoters (SV40, CMV, RSV). Achieving a desired level of gene expression from a targeted region depended on several variables, including target site affinities for various DNA-binding domains, the nature of the activator domain, the particular cell type used, and the position of the target site with respect to the core promoter. Hence, several aspects of the artificial transcription factors should be simultaneously evaluated to ensure the optimum level of gene expression from a given target site in a given cell type. Our observations and our optimization approach have substantial implications for designing safe and effective artificial transcription factors for cell-based and therapeutic uses.

The yeast protein Xtc1 functions as a direct transcriptional repressor

The yeast protein Xtc1 was identified as a protein that binds directly and specifically to the activation domains of acidic activators such as E2F-1, Gal4 and VP16. Additionally, it was shown to co-purify with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme complex and it was suggested that Xtc1 functions as a regulator of transcription that modulates the response of RNA polymerase II to transcriptional activators. We have further analyzed the transcription function of Xtc1 and show that its fusion to a heterologous DNA binding domain can repress transcription of a reporter gene in vivo in an Srb10/11-dependent manner. We suggest that the presence of Xtc1 in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme could help to recruit an Srb10-active form of the holoenzyme to target promoters. This same protein has also been implicated in mitochondrial DNA recombination, maintenance and repair. Determination of the subcellular localization using a GFP-Xtc1 fusion shows that it localizes to both the nucleus and the mitochondria in vivo, which is consistent with Xtc1 having a function in both cellular compartments.

H2A.Z is required for global chromatin integrity and for recruitment of RNA polymerase II under specific conditions

Evolutionarily conserved variant histone H2A.Z has been recently shown to regulate gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we show that loss of H2A.Z in this organism negatively affects the induction of GAL genes. Importantly, fusion of the H2A.Z C-terminal region to S phase H2A without its corresponding C-terminal region can mediate the variant histone's specialized function in GAL1-10 gene induction, and it restores the slow-growth phenotype of cells with a deletion of HTZ1. Furthermore, we show that the C-terminal region of H2A.Z can interact with some components of the transcriptional apparatus. In cells lacking H2A.Z, recruitment of RNA polymerase II and TATA-binding protein to the GAL1-10 promoters is significantly diminished under inducing conditions. Unexpectedly, we also find that H2A.Z is required to globally maintain chromatin integrity under GAL gene-inducing conditions. We hypothesize that H2A.Z can positively regulate gene transcription, at least in part, by modulating interactions with RNA polymerase II-associated factors at certain genes under specific cell growth conditions.

TBP-like protein (TLP/TLF/TRF2) artificially recruited to a promoter stimulates basal transcription in vivo

Metazoan genomes generally contain one TBP-related gene designated as TBP-like protein (TLP/TLF/TRF2). Although TLP is thought to work for transcriptional regulation, its natural function has not been clearly demonstrated. Here we describe the stimulation of transcription from TATA-containing and TATA-less class II promoters by artificially recruited mammalian TLP. TLP fused with Gal4 DNA-binding domain stimulated transcription when it was recruited at a proximal promoter. Compared to TBP, stimulation by TLP was less TATA-dependent. Slight truncation from each terminus of TLP destroyed this function drastically. Amino acid substitutions of TLP whose corresponding residues in TBP are crucial for its function resulted in the loss of function. Consequently, Gal4-fused TLP was demonstrated to exhibit ability of transcription activation irrespective of the type of promoter, the mechanism of which was thought to be similar to that of artificially recruited TBP. TLP is presumably able to behave as a transcriptional activator in cells.

Transcriptomes, transcription activators and microarrays

Gene-specific transcription activators are among the main factors which specifically shape the transcriptome profiles. It is tempting to take advantage of their properties to decipher the genome expression circuitry. The advent of microarray technology has offered fantastic opportunities to quickly analyze the expression profiles dictated by specific transcription factors. This review will first focus on the strategies which have been devised to control the activity of transcription factors and in the second part on the microarray experiments which addressed the role of these transcription factors in the genome-wide expression profile. This last part will mainly consider the case of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. All the collected data are available through the on-line database yTAFNET (http://transcriptome.ens.fr/ytafnet/). yTAFNET is designed to help the characterization of connections between the different yeast regulatory networks.

Transcriptional activity of the TFIIA four-helix bundle in vivo

TFIIA contributes to transcription initiation by stabilizing the TBP-TATA interaction and by mediating the response to transcriptional activators and inhibitors. TFIIA contains a six-stranded beta-sheet domain and a four-helix bundle. The beta-domain makes functional contacts with DNA and TBP. The role of the four-helix bundle was investigated using a structure-based model of this domain (called 4HB). 4HB adopts a highly stable, helical fold, consistent with its structure in the context of TFIIA. Like TBP and other intact transcription factors, 4HB is able to activate transcription in vivo when artificially recruited to a promoter via a heterologous DNA-binding domain. Thus, in addition to making important contacts with TBP and DNA via the beta-domain, TFIIA makes other specific, functional contacts with the transcriptional machinery via the four-helix bundle. Proteins 2001;43:227-232.

Transcriptional adaptor and histone acetyltransferase proteins in Arabidopsis and their interactions with CBF1, a transcriptional activator involved in cold-regulated gene expression

The ARABIDOPSIS CBF transcriptional activators bind to the CRT/DRE regulatory element present in the promoters of many cold-regulated genes and stimulate their transcription. Expression of the CBF1 proteins in yeast activates reporter genes carrying a minimal promoter with the CRT/DRE as an upstream regulatory element. Here we report that this ability of CBF1 is dependent upon the activities of three key components of the yeast Ada and SAGA complexes, namely the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) Gcn5 and the transcriptional adaptor proteins Ada2 and Ada3. This result suggested that CBF1 might function through the action of similar complexes in ARABIDOPSIS In support of this hypothesis we found that ARABIDOPSIS has a homolog of the GCN5 gene and two homologs of ADA2, the first report of multiple ADA2 genes in an organism. The ARABIDOPSIS GCN5 protein has intrinsic HAT activity and can physically interact in vitro with both the ARABIDOPSIS ADA2a and ADA2b proteins. In addition, the CBF1 transcriptional activator can interact with the ARABIDOPSIS GCN5 and ADA2 proteins. We conclude that ARABIDOPSIS encodes HAT-containing adaptor complexes that are related to the Ada and SAGA complexes of yeast and propose that the CBF1 transcriptional activator functions through the action of one or more of these complexes.

Mediator of transcriptional regulation

Three lines of evidence have converged on a multiprotein Mediator complex as a conserved interface between gene-specific regulatory proteins and the general transcription apparatus of eukaryotes. Mediator was discovered as an activity required for transcriptional activation in a reconstituted system from yeast. Upon resolution to homogeneity, the activity proved to reside in a 20-protein complex, which could exist in a free state or in a complex with RNA polymerase II, termed holoenzyme. A second line of evidence came from screens in yeast for mutations affecting transcription. Two-thirds of Mediator subunits are encoded by genes revealed by these screens. Five of the genetically defined subunits, termed Srbs, were characterized as interacting with the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II in vivo, and were shown to bind polymerase in vitro. A third line of evidence has come recently from studies in mammalian transcription systems. Mammalian counterparts of yeast Mediator were shown to interact with transcriptional activator proteins and to play an essential role in transcriptional regulation. Mediator evidently integrates and transduces positive and negative regulatory information from enhancers and operators to promoters. It functions directly through RNA polymerase II, modulating its activity in promoter-dependent transcription. Details of the Mediator mechanism remain obscure. Additional outstanding questions include the patterns of promoter-specificity of the various Mediator subunits, the possible cell-type-specificity of Mediator subunit composition, and the full structures of both free Mediator and RNA polymerase II holoenzyme.

TATA-binding protein and the Gal4 transactivator do not bind to promoters cooperatively

The yeast Gal4 protein, like many activators, binds TATA-binding protein (TBP) directly in vitro. It has been speculated that this protein-protein interaction is important for Gal4p-mediated activation of transcription, but little work has been done to test specific models involving this interaction. In this study, the effect of Gal4p on TBP-TATA binding is addressed. Specifically, it is asked if the Gal4p-TBP interaction can support cooperative binding of the two factors to promoters. It is easy to see how such an event could stimulate transcription, particularly from promoters with a non-consensus TATA box. In vitro, however, a derivative of Gal4p (Gal4-(1-93+768-881)) containing the DNA-binding, dimerization, and activation domains does not bind to promoter DNA cooperatively with either recombinant, purified TBP, or with protein from a yeast crude extract. In vivo, reporter gene experiments using promoters with differing TBP affinities reveal no major Gal4p-mediated stimulation of TBP function from weak TATA boxes, as would be predicted if the proteins bind cooperatively. Furthermore, native Gal4p and a potent Gal4p-based artificial activator lacking a TBP-binding activation domain support similar ratios of transcription from a series of promoters identical except for mutations in the TATA box. It is concluded that Gal4p and TBP do not bind cooperatively to promoters and that this mechanism does not contribute substantially to Gal4p-mediated transcriptional activation.

Artificially recruited TATA-binding protein fails to remodel chromatin and does not activate three promoters that require chromatin remodeling

Transcriptional activators are believed to work in part by recruiting general transcription factors, such as TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Activation domains also contribute to remodeling of chromatin in vivo. To determine whether these two activities represent distinct functions of activation domains, we have examined transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling accompanying artificial recruitment of TBP in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We measured transcription of reporter genes with defined chromatin structure by artificial recruitment of TBP and found that a reporter gene whose TATA element was relatively accessible could be activated by artificially recruited TBP, whereas two promoters, GAL10 and CHA1, that have accessible activator binding sites, but nucleosomal TATA elements, could not. A third reporter gene containing the HIS4 promoter could be activated by GAL4-TBP only when a RAP1 binding site was present, although RAP1 alone could not activate the reporter, suggesting that RAP1 was needed to open the chromatin structure to allow activation. Consistent with this interpretation, artificially recruited TBP was unable to perturb nucleosome positioning via a nucleosomal binding site, in contrast to a true activator such as GAL4, or to perturb the TATA-containing nucleosome at the CHA1 promoter. Finally, we show that activation of the GAL10 promoter by GAL4, which requires chromatin remodeling, can occur even in swi gcn5 yeast, implying that remodeling pathways independent of GCN5, the SWI-SNF complex, and TFIID can operate during transcriptional activation in vivo.

A role of transcriptional activators as antirepressors for the autoinhibitory activity of TATA box binding of transcription factor IID

The TATA box-binding activity of transcription factor IID (TFIID) is autoinhibited by the N-terminal domain of the Drosophila TATA box-binding protein- (TBP) associated factor 230/yeast TBP-associated factor 145 subunit, which binds to the TATA box-binding domain of TBP by mimicking the TATA box structure. Here, we propose a mechanism of transcriptional activation that involves antirepression of this autoinhibitory activity by transcriptional activators. Like the autoinhibitory domain of TFIID, various acidic activators interact with the TATA box-binding domain of TBP. Moreover, the autoinhibitory domain of TFIID, which is known to interact with only the TATA box-binding domain of TBP, acts as an activation domain when fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, indicating that interaction with the TATA-binding domain of TBP is crucial for activation of transcription. In a reciprocal fashion, the acidic activation domains can function as the autoinhibitory domain when the latter is replaced by the former within TFIID. These results indicate that activation domains and the autoinhibitory domain of TFIID are interchangeable, supporting a role for transcriptional activators as antirepressors of the autoinhibitory activity of the TATA box binding of TFIID.

A new method for the selection of protein interactions in mammalian cells

In the present study we present a new method that allows for the selection of protein interactions in mammalian cells. We have used this system to verify two interactions previously characterized in vitro. (1) The interaction between human TATA-binding protein 1 and nuclear factor kappaB and (2) the association of Homo sapiens nuclear autoantigen SP100B with human heterochromatin protein 1alpha, a protein implicated in chromatin remodelling. We observe for the first time that these interactions also occur in vivo. One protein was fused to the N-terminal half of ubiquitin, while the interacting partner was fused to the C-terminal half of ubiquitin, that was itself linked to guanine phosphoryltransferase 2 (gpt2) modified to begin with an arginine residue. Upon interaction of both proteins, ubiquitin is reconstituted, and its association with the Rgpt2 reporter is subsequently cleaved off by ubiquitin-processing enzymes. The presence of arginine in the Rgpt2 gene product leads to the degradation of the product by the N-end rule pathway. In the human fibroblast cell line HT1080HPRT(-) (that is deficient in the enzyme for hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase) cells in which interaction between both proteins of interest occurs can then be selected for by hypoxanthine/aminopterin/thymine medium and counterselected against by 6-thioguanine medium. This method provides a suitable alternative to the yeast two-hybrid system and is generally applicable.

Artificial recruitment of TFIID, but not RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, activates transcription in mammalian cells

In yeast cells, transcriptional activation occurs when the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) machinery is artificially recruited to a promoter by fusing individual components of this machinery to a DNA-binding domain. Here, we show that artificial recruitment of components of the TFIID complex can activate transcription in mammalian cells. Surprisingly, artificial recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP) activates transiently transfected and chromosomally integrated promoters with equal efficiency, whereas artificial recruitment of TBP-associated factors activates only chromosomal reporters. In contrast, artificial recruitment of various components of the mammalian Pol II holoenzyme does not confer transcriptional activation, nor does it result in synergistic activation in combination with natural activation domains. In the one case examined in more detail, the Srb7 fusion failed to activate despite being associated with the Pol II holoenzyme and being directly recruited to the promoter. Interestingly, some acidic activation domains are less effective when the promoter is chromosomally integrated rather than transiently transfected, whereas the Sp1 glutamine-rich activation domain is more effective on integrated reporters. Thus, yeast and mammalian cells differ with respect to transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment of the Pol II holoenzyme.

Peptides selected to bind the Gal80 repressor are potent transcriptional activation domains in yeast

The activation domain of the yeast Gal4 protein binds specifically to the Gal80 repressor and is also thought to associate with one or more coactivators in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and chromatin remodeling machines. This is a specific example of a common situation in biochemistry where a single protein domain can interact with multiple partners. Are these different interactions related chemically? To probe this point, phage display was employed to isolate peptides from a library based solely on their ability to bind Gal80 protein in vitro. Peptide-Gal80 protein association is shown to be highly specific and of moderate affinity. The Gal80 protein-binding peptides compete with the native activation domain for the repressor, suggesting that they bind to the same site. It was then asked if these peptides could function as activation domains in yeast when tethered to a DNA binding domain. Indeed, this is the case. Furthermore, one of the Gal80-binding peptides binds directly to a domain of the Gal11 protein, a known coactivator. The fact that Gal80-binding peptides are functional activation domains argues that repressor binding and activation/coactivator binding are intimately related properties. This peptide library-based approach should be generally useful for probing the chemical relationship of different binding interactions or functions of a given native domain.

TFIIA has activator-dependent and core promoter functions in vivo

The physiological role of TFIIA was investigated by analyzing transcription in a yeast strain that contains a TATA-binding protein (TBP) mutant (N2-1) defective for interacting with TFIIA. In cells containing N2-1, transcription from a set of artificial his3 promoters dependent on different activators is generally reduced by a similar extent, indicating that TFIIA function is largely nonselective for activators. In addition, TATA element utilization, a core promoter function, is altered at his3 promoters dependent on weak activators. Genomic expression analysis reveals that 3% of the genes are preferentially affected by a factor of 4 or more. Chimeras of affected promoters indicate that the sensitivity to the TFIIA-TBP interaction can map either to the upstream or core promoter region. Unlike wild-type TBP or TFIIA, the N2-1 derivative does not activate transcription when artificially recruited to the promoter via a heterologous DNA binding domain, indicating that TFIIA is important for transcription even in the absence of an activation domain. Taken together, these results suggest that TFIIA plays an important role in both activator-dependent and core promoter functions in vivo. Further, they suggest that TFIIA function may not be strictly related to the recruitment of TBP to promoters but may also involve a step after TBP recruitment.

An artificial transcriptional activating region with unusual properties

We describe a series of transcriptional activators generated by adding amino acids (eight in one case, six in another) to fragments of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae activator Gal4 that dimerize and bind DNA. One of the novel activating regions identified by this procedure is unusual, compared with previously characterized yeast activating regions, in the following ways: it works more strongly than does Gal4's natural activating region as assayed in yeast; it is devoid of acidic residues; and several lines of evidence suggest that it sees targets in the yeast transcriptional machinery at least partially distinct from those seen by Gal4's activating region.

Both p38alpha(MAPK) and JNK/SAPK pathways are important for induction of nitric-oxide synthase by interleukin-1beta in rat glomerular mesangial cells

Interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) induces expression of the inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) with concomitant release of nitric oxide (NO) from glomerular mesangial cells. These events are preceded by activation of the c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK) and p38(MAPK). Our current study demonstrates that overexpression of the dominant negative form of JNK1 or p54 SAPKbeta/JNK2 significantly reduces the iNOS protein expression and NO production induced by IL-1beta. Similarly, overexpression of the kinase-dead mutant form of p38alpha(MAPK) also inhibits IL-1beta-induced iNOS expression and NO production. In previous studies we demonstrated that IL-1beta can activate MKK4/SEK1, MKK3, and MKK6 in renal mesangial cells; therefore, we examined the role of these MAPK kinases in the modulation of iNOS induced by IL-1beta. Overexpression of the dominant negative form of MKK4/SEK1 decreases IL-1beta-induced iNOS expression and NO production with inhibition of both SAPK/JNK and p38(MAPK) phosphorylation. Overexpression of the kinase-dead mutant form of MKK3 or MKK6 demonstrated that either of these two mutant kinase inhibited IL-1beta-induced p38(MAPK) (but not JNK/SAPK) phosphorylation and iNOS expression. Interestingly overexpression of wild type MKK3/6 was associated with phosphorylation of p38(MAPK); however, in the absence of IL-1beta, iNOS expression was not enhanced. This study suggests that the activation of both SAPK/JNK and p38alpha(MAPK) signaling cascades are necessary for the IL-1beta-induced expression of iNOS and production of NO in renal mesangial cells.

Transcriptional activation by artificial recruitment in mammalian cells

We show that the typical "nonclassical" activator, which comprises a fusion protein bearing a component of the transcriptional machinery fused to a DNA-binding domain, activates transcription in mammalian cells only weakly when tested with an array of promoters. However, as found in analogous "artificial recruitment" experiments performed in yeast, these activators work synergistically with "classical" activators. The effect of the classical activator in such experiments requires that it be tethered to DNA, a requirement that cannot be overcome by expression of that classical activator at high levels. The effect of the one nonclassical activator that does elicit significant levels of transcription when working alone (i.e., that bearing TATA box-binding protein) is strongly influenced by promoter architecture. The results, consistent with those of analogous experiments in yeast [see the accompanying paper: Gaudreau, L., Keaveney, M., Nevado, J., Zaman, Z., Bryant, G. O., Struhl, K. & Ptashne, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2668-2673], suggest that classical activators, presumably by virtue of their abilities to interact with multiple targets, have a functional flexibility that nonclassical activators lack.