RRN11 encodes the third subunit of the complex containing Rrn6p and Rrn7p that is essential for the initiation of rDNA transcription by yeast RNA polymerase I

Specific DNA features of the RNA polymerase I core promoter element targeted by core factor

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is essential for ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis, driving ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes. Transcription initiation by Pol I requires core factor (CF) binding to the core element (CE) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter. Despite structural conservation across species, significant sequence variability suggests CF recognizes DNA through structural features rather than specific sequences. We investigated CF's DNA binding preferences to elucidate the role of DNA structural properties in CE recognition. Analysis of CE sequences from 35 fungal species revealed conserved structural features, notably a rigid AT-rich patch at positions -22 to -20 and a conserved G base pair at position -24. Competition-based electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with single base-pair substitutions showed CF tolerates mutations at many positions but is sensitive to changes in the AT-rich patch. Loss of CF binding correlated with alterations in DNA structural properties such as increased bendability, decreased curvature, widened minor groove width, and altered helix twist. In vitro SELEX experiments identified novel CE sequences preferentially bound by CF, exhibiting increased GC content, higher bendability, and decreased curvature despite lacking sequence conservation. Classification based on bendability profiles revealed CF preferentially binds bendable sequences. In vivo selection assays confirmed these findings, demonstrating consistent CF binding preferences within a cellular context. Our results indicate that CF recognizes and binds to the CE primarily through specific DNA structural features rather than nucleotide sequences. Structural properties like bendability, curvature, and minor groove width are critical determinants of CF binding, facilitating effective Pol I transcription initiation.

Establishment of closed 35S ribosomal RNA gene chromatin in stationary Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells

As a first step in eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis RNA polymerase (Pol) I synthesizes a large ribosomal RNA (rRNA) precursor from multicopy rRNA gene loci. This process is essential for cellular growth and regulated in response to the cell's physiological state. rRNA gene transcription is downregulated upon growth to stationary phase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This reduction correlates with characteristic changes in rRNA gene chromatin structure from a transcriptionally active 'open' state to a non-transcribed 'closed' state. The conserved lysine deacetylase Rpd3 was shown to be required for this chromatin transition. We found that Rpd3 is needed for tight repression of Pol I transcription upon growth to stationary phase as a prerequisite for the establishment of the closed chromatin state. We provide evidence that Rpd3 regulates Pol I transcription by adjusting cellular levels of the Pol I preinitiation complex component core factor (CF). Importantly, our study identifies CF as the complex limiting the number of open rRNA genes in exponentially growing and stationary cells.

Transcriptional Reprogramming of Candida tropicalis in Response to Isoespintanol Treatment

Candida tropicalis, an opportunistic pathogen, ranks among the primary culprits of invasive candidiasis, a condition notorious for its resistance to conventional antifungal drugs. The urgency to combat these drug-resistant infections has spurred the quest for novel therapeutic compounds, with a particular focus on those of natural origin. In this study, we set out to evaluate the impact of isoespintanol (ISO), a monoterpene derived from Oxandra xylopioides, on the transcriptome of C. tropicalis. Leveraging transcriptomics, our research aimed to unravel the intricate transcriptional changes induced by ISO within this pathogen. Our differential gene expression analysis unveiled 186 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to ISO, with a striking 85% of these genes experiencing upregulation. These findings shed light on the multifaceted nature of ISO's influence on C. tropicalis, spanning a spectrum of physiological, structural, and metabolic adaptations. The upregulated DEGs predominantly pertained to crucial processes, including ergosterol biosynthesis, protein folding, response to DNA damage, cell wall integrity, mitochondrial activity modulation, and cellular responses to organic compounds. Simultaneously, 27 genes were observed to be repressed, affecting functions such as cytoplasmic translation, DNA damage checkpoints, membrane proteins, and metabolic pathways like trans-methylation, trans-sulfuration, and trans-propylamine. These results underscore the complexity of ISO's antifungal mechanism, suggesting that it targets multiple vital pathways within C. tropicalis. Such complexity potentially reduces the likelihood of the pathogen developing rapid resistance to ISO, making it an attractive candidate for further exploration as a therapeutic agent. In conclusion, our study provides a comprehensive overview of the transcriptional responses of C. tropicalis to ISO exposure. The identified molecular targets and pathways offer promising avenues for future research and the development of innovative antifungal therapies to combat infections caused by this pathogenic yeast.

Features of yeast RNA polymerase I with special consideration of the lobe binding subunits

Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are structural components of ribosomes and represent the most abundant cellular RNA fraction. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, they account for more than 60 % of the RNA content in a growing cell. The major amount of rRNA is synthesized by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). This enzyme transcribes exclusively the rRNA gene which is tandemly repeated in about 150 copies on chromosome XII. The high number of transcribed rRNA genes, the efficient recruitment of the transcription machinery and the dense packaging of elongating Pol I molecules on the gene ensure that enough rRNA is generated. Specific features of Pol I and of associated factors confer promoter selectivity and both elongation and termination competence. Many excellent reviews exist about the state of research about function and regulation of Pol I and how Pol I initiation complexes are assembled. In this report we focus on the Pol I specific lobe binding subunits which support efficient, error-free, and correctly terminated rRNA synthesis.

Promoting Nucleic Acid Synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through Enhanced Expression of Rrn7p, Rrn11p, IMPDH, and Pho84p

Saccharomyces cerevisiae has emerged as a preferred source for industrial production of ribonucleic acids (RNAs) and their derivatives, which find wide applications in the food and pharmaceutical sectors. In this study, we employed a modified RNA polymerase I-mediated green fluorescent protein expression system, previously developed by our team, to screen and identify an industrial S. cerevisiae strain with an impressive 18.2% increase in the RNA content. Transcriptome analysis revealed heightened activity of genes and pathways associated with rRNA transcription, purine metabolism, and phosphate transport in the high nucleic acid content mutant strains. Our findings highlighted the crucial role of the transcription factor Sfp1p in enhancing the expression of two key components of the transcription initiation factor complex, Rrn7p and Rrn11p, thereby promoting rRNA synthesis. Moreover, elevated expression of 5'-inosine monophosphate dehydrogenases, regardless of the specific isoform (IMD2, 3, or 4), resulted in increased rRNA synthesis through heightened GTP levels. Additionally, exogenous phosphate application, coupled with overexpression of the phosphate transporter PHO84, led to a 61.4% boost in the RNA yield, reaching 2050.4 mg/L. This comprehensive study provides valuable insights into the mechanism of RNA synthesis and serves as a reference for augmenting RNA production in the food industry.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae rDNA as super-hub: the region where replication, transcription and recombination meet

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal DNA, the repeated region where rRNAs are synthesized by about 150 encoding units, hosts all the protein machineries responsible for the main DNA transactions such as replication, transcription and recombination. This and its repetitive nature make rDNA a unique and complex genetic locus compared to any other. All the different molecular machineries acting in this locus need to be accurately and finely controlled and coordinated and for this reason rDNA is one of the most impressive examples of highly complex molecular regulated loci. The region in which the large molecular complexes involved in rDNA activity and/or regulation are recruited is extremely small: that is, the 2.5 kb long intergenic spacer, interrupting each 35S RNA coding unit from the next. All S. cerevisiae RNA polymerases (I, II and III) transcribing the different genetic rDNA elements are recruited here; a sequence responsible for each rDNA unit replication, which needs its molecular apparatus, also localizes here; moreover, it is noteworthy that the rDNA replication proceeds almost unidirectionally because each replication fork is stopped in the so-called replication fork barrier. These localized fork blocking events induce, with a given frequency, the homologous recombination process by which cells maintain a high identity among the rDNA repeated units. Here, we describe the different processes involving the rDNA locus, how they influence each other and how these mutual interferences are highly regulated and coordinated. We propose that an rDNA conformation as a super-hub could help in optimizing the micro-environment for all basic DNA transactions.

Molecular Topology of RNA Polymerase I Upstream Activation Factor

Upstream activation factor (UAF) is a multifunctional transcription factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that plays dual roles in activating RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription and repression of Pol II. For Pol I, UAF binds to a specific upstream element in the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter and interacts with two other Pol I initiation factors, the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and core factor (CF). We used an integrated combination of chemical cross-linking mass spectrometry (CXMS), molecular genetics, protein biochemistry, and structural modeling to understand the topological framework responsible for UAF complex formation. Here, we report the molecular topology of the UAF complex, describe new structural and functional domains that play roles in UAF complex integrity, assembly, and biological function, and provide roles for previously identified UAF domains that include the Rrn5 SANT and histone fold domains. We highlight the role of new domains in Uaf30 that include an N-terminal winged helix domain and a disordered tethering domain as well as a BORCS6-like domain found in Rrn9. Together, our results reveal a unique network of topological features that coalesce around a histone tetramer-like core to form the dual-function UAF complex.

DNA binding preferences of S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase I Core Factor reveal a preference for the GC-minor groove and a conserved binding mechanism

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Core Factor (CF) is a key evolutionarily conserved transcription initiation factor that helps recruit RNA polymerase I (Pol I) to the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoter. Upregulated Pol I transcription has been linked to many cancers, and targeting Pol I is an attractive and emerging anti-cancer strategy. Using yeast as a model system, we characterized how CF binds to the Pol I promoter by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). Synthetic DNA competitors along with anti-tumor drugs and nucleic acid stains that act as DNA groove blockers were used to discover the binding preference of yeast CF. Our results show that CF employs a unique binding mechanism where it prefers the GC-rich minor groove within the rDNA promoter. In addition, we show that yeast CF is able to bind to the human rDNA promoter sequence that is divergent in DNA sequence and demonstrate CF sensitivity to the human specific Pol I inhibitor, CX-5461. Finally, we show that the human Core Promoter Element (CPE) can functionally replace the yeast Core Element (CE) in vivo when aligned by conserved DNA structural features rather than DNA sequence. Together, these findings suggest that the yeast CF and the human ortholog Selectivity Factor 1 (SL1) use an evolutionarily conserved, structure-based mechanism to target DNA. Their shared mechanism may offer a new avenue in using yeast to explore current and future Pol I anti-cancer compounds.

The C-terminal region of Net1 is an activator of RNA polymerase I transcription with conserved features from yeast to human

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) synthesizes ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in all eukaryotes, accounting for the major part of transcriptional activity in proliferating cells. Although basal Pol I transcription factors have been characterized in diverse organisms, the molecular basis of the robust rRNA production in vivo remains largely unknown. In S. cerevisiae, the multifunctional Net1 protein was reported to stimulate Pol I transcription. We found that the Pol I-stimulating function can be attributed to the very C-terminal region (CTR) of Net1. The CTR was required for normal cell growth and Pol I recruitment to rRNA genes in vivo and sufficient to promote Pol I transcription in vitro. Similarity with the acidic tail region of mammalian Pol I transcription factor UBF, which could partly functionally substitute for the CTR, suggests conserved roles for CTR-like domains in Pol I transcription from yeast to human.

The production of ribosomes, cellular factories of protein synthesis, is an essential process driving proliferation and cell growth. Ribosome biogenesis is controlled at the level of synthesis of its components, ribosomal proteins and ribosomal RNA. In eukaryotes, RNA polymerase I is dedicated to transcribe the ribosomal RNA. RNA polymerase I has been identified as a potential target for cell proliferation inhibition. Here we describe the C-terminal region of Net1 as an activator of RNA polymerase I transcription in baker’s yeast. In the absence of this activator RNA polymerase I transcription is downregulated and cell proliferation is strongly impaired. Strikingly, this activator might be conserved in human cells, which points to a general mechanism. Our discovery will help to gain a better understanding of the molecular basis of ribosomal RNA synthesis and may have implications in developing strategies to control cellular growth.

The Structures of Eukaryotic Transcription Pre-initiation Complexes and Their Functional Implications

Transcription is a highly regulated process that supplies living cells with coding and non-coding RNA molecules. Failure to properly regulate transcription is associated with human pathologies, including cancers. RNA polymerase II is the enzyme complex that synthesizes messenger RNAs that are then translated into proteins. In spite of its complexity, RNA polymerase requires a plethora of general transcription factors to be recruited to the transcription start site as part of a large transcription pre-initiation complex, and to help it gain access to the transcribed strand of the DNA. This chapter reviews the structure and function of these eukaryotic transcription pre-initiation complexes, with a particular emphasis on two of its constituents, the multisubunit complexes TFIID and TFIIH. We also compare the overall architecture of the RNA polymerase II pre-initiation complex with those of RNA polymerases I and III, involved in transcription of ribosomal RNA and non-coding RNAs such as tRNAs and snRNAs, and discuss the general, conserved features that are applicable to all eukaryotic RNA polymerase systems.

Reconstitution of RNA Polymerase I Upstream Activating Factor and the Roles of Histones H3 and H4 in Complex Assembly

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires four separate factors that recruit Pol I to the promoter to form a pre-initiation complex. Upstream Activating Factor (UAF) is one of two multi-subunit complexes that regulate pre-initiation complex formation by binding to the ribosomal DNA promoter and by stimulating recruitment of downstream Pol I factors. UAF is composed of Rrn9, Rrn5, Rrn10, Uaf30, and histones H3 and H4. We developed a recombinant Escherichia coli-based system to coexpress and purify transcriptionally active UAF complex and to investigate the importance of each subunit in complex formation. We found that no single subunit is required for UAF assembly, including histones H3 and H4. We also demonstrate that histone H3 is able to interact with each UAF-specific subunit, and show that there are at least two copies of histone H3 and one copy of H4 present in the complex. Together, our results provide a new model suggesting that UAF contains a hybrid H3-H4 tetramer-like subcomplex.

Molecular breeding of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with high RNA content by harnessing essential ribosomal RNA transcription regulator

As yeast is commonly used for RNA production, it is industrially important to breed strains with high RNA contents. The upstream activating factor (UAF) plays an important role in transcription of ribosomal RNA (rRNA), a major constituent of intracellular RNA species. Here, we targeted the essential rRNA transcription regulator Rrn5 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a component of the UAF complex, and disrupted the genomic RRN5 gene using a helper plasmid carrying an RRN5 gene. Then we isolated nine suppressor mutants (Sup mutants) of RRN5 gene disruption, causing deficiency in rRNA transcription. The Sup mutants had RNA contents of approximately 40% of the wild type level and expansion of rDNA repeats to ca. 400–700 copies. Reintroduction of a functional RRN5 gene into Sup mutants caused a reduction in the number of rDNA repeats to close to the wild type level but did not change RNA content. However, we found that reintroduction of RRN5 into the Sup16 mutant (in which the FOB1 gene encoding the rDNA replication fork barrier site binding protein was disrupted) resulted in a significant increase (17%) in RNA content compared with wild type, although the rDNA repeat copy number was almost identical to the wild type strain. In this case, upregulated transcription of non-transcribed spacers (NTS) occurred, especially in the NTS2 region; this was likely mediated by RNA polymerase II and accounted for the increased RNA content. Thus, we propose a novel breeding strategy for developing high RNA content yeast by harnessing the essential rRNA transcription regulator.

Identification of Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that Are Haploinsufficient for Overcoming Amino Acid Starvation

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to amino acid deprivation by activating a pathway conserved in eukaryotes to overcome the starvation stress. We have screened the entire yeast heterozygous deletion collection to identify strains haploinsufficient for growth in the presence of sulfometuron methyl, which causes starvation for isoleucine and valine. We have discovered that cells devoid of MET15 are sensitive to sulfometuron methyl, and loss of heterozygosity at the MET15 locus can complicate screening the heterozygous deletion collection. We identified 138 cases of loss of heterozygosity in this screen. After eliminating the issues of the MET15 loss of heterozygosity, strains isolated from the collection were retested on sulfometuron methyl. To determine the general effect of the mutations for a starvation response, SMM-sensitive strains were tested for the ability to grow in the presence of canavanine, which induces arginine starvation, and strains that were MET15 were also tested for growth in the presence of ethionine, which causes methionine starvation. Many of the genes identified in our study were not previously identified as starvation-responsive genes, including a number of essential genes that are not easily screened in a systematic way. The genes identified span a broad range of biological functions, including many involved in some level of gene expression. Several unnamed proteins have also been identified, giving a clue as to possible functions of the encoded proteins.

Structural mechanism of ATP-independent transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I

Transcription initiation by RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) depends on the Core Factor (CF) complex to recognize the upstream promoter and assemble into a Pre-Initiation Complex (PIC). Here, we solve a structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol I-CF-DNA to 3.8 Å resolution using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. The structure reveals a bipartite architecture of Core Factor and its recognition of the promoter from -27 to -16. Core Factor's intrinsic mobility correlates well with different conformational states of the Pol I cleft, in addition to the stabilization of either Rrn7 N-terminal domain near Pol I wall or the tandem winged helix domain of A49 at a partially overlapping location. Comparison of the three states in this study with the Pol II system suggests that a ratchet motion of the Core Factor-DNA sub-complex at upstream facilitates promoter melting in an ATP-independent manner, distinct from a DNA translocase actively threading the downstream DNA in the Pol II PIC.

Structure of the initiation-competent RNA polymerase I and its implication for transcription

Eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is specialized in rRNA gene transcription synthesizing up to 60% of cellular RNA. High level rRNA production relies on efficient binding of initiation factors to the rRNA gene promoter and recruitment of Pol I complexes containing initiation factor Rrn3. Here, we determine the cryo-EM structure of the Pol I-Rrn3 complex at 7.5 Å resolution, and compare it with Rrn3-free monomeric and dimeric Pol I. We observe that Rrn3 contacts the Pol I A43/A14 stalk and subunits A190 and AC40, that association re-organizes the Rrn3 interaction interface, thereby preventing Pol I dimerization; and Rrn3-bound and monomeric Pol I differ from the dimeric enzyme in cleft opening, and localization of the A12.2 C-terminus in the active centre. Our findings thus support a dual role for Rrn3 in transcription initiation to stabilize a monomeric initiation competent Pol I and to drive pre-initiation complex formation.

Eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is responsible for the transcription of rRNA genes. Here the authors determine the cryo-EM structure of the Pol I-Rrn3 complex, providing insight into how Rrn3 stabilizes the monomeric initiation competent Pol I to drive pre-initiation complex formation.

Functional divergence of eukaryotic RNA polymerases: unique properties of RNA polymerase I suit its cellular role

Eukaryotic cells express at least three unique nuclear RNA polymerases. The selective advantage provided by this enhanced complexity is a topic of fundamental interest in cell biology. It has long been known that the gene targets and transcription initiation pathways for RNA polymerases (Pols) I, II and III are distinct; however, recent genetic, biochemical and structural data suggest that even the core enzymes have evolved unique properties. Among the three eukaryotic RNA polymerases, Pol I is considered the most divergent. Transcription of the ribosomal DNA by Pol I is unmatched in its high rate of initiation, complex organization within the nucleolus and functional connection to ribosome assembly. Furthermore, ribosome synthesis is intimately linked to cell growth and proliferation. Thus, there is intense selective pressure on Pol I. This review describes key features of Pol I transcription, discusses catalytic activities of the enzyme and focuses on recent advances in understanding its unique role among eukaryotic RNA polymerases.

Architecture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase I Core Factor complex

Core Factor (CF) is a conserved RNA polymerase (Pol) I general transcription factor and is comprised of Rrn6, Rrn11, and the TFIIB-related subunit Rrn7. CF binds TBP, Pol I, and the regulatory factors Rrn3 and UAF. We used chemical crosslinking-mass spectrometry (CXMS) to determine the molecular architecture of CF and its interactions with TBP. The CF subunits assemble through an interconnected network of interactions between five structural domains that are conserved in orthologous subunits of the human Pol I factor SL1. The crosslinking-derived model was validated through a series of genetic and biochemical assays. Our combined results show the architecture of CF and the functions of the CF subunits in assembly of the complex. We extend these findings to model how CF assembles into the Pol I preinitiation complex, providing new insight into the roles of CF, TBP and Rrn3.

Structural insights into transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II

Transcriptional regulation is one of the most important steps in control of cell identity, growth, differentiation, and development. Many signaling pathways controlling these processes ultimately target the core transcription machinery that, for protein coding genes, consists of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and the general transcription factors (GTFs). New studies on the structure and mechanism of the core assembly and how it interfaces with promoter DNA and coactivator complexes have given tremendous insight into early steps in the initiation process, genome-wide binding, and mechanisms conserved for all nuclear and archaeal Pols. Here, we review recent developments in dissecting the architecture of the Pol II core machinery with a focus on early and regulated steps in transcription initiation.

N-terminal acetylation by NatC is not a general determinant for substrate subcellular localization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

N-terminal acetylation has been suggested to play a role in the subcellular targeting of proteins, in particular those acetylated by the N-terminal acetyltransferase complex NatC. Based on previous positional proteomics data revealing N-terminal acetylation status and the predicted NAT substrate classes, we selected 13 suitable NatC substrates for subcellular localization studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fluorescence microscopy analysis of GFP-tagged candidates in the presence or absence of the NatC catalytic subunit Naa30 (Mak3) revealed unaltered localization patterns for all 13 candidates, thus arguing against a general role for the N-terminal acetyl group as a localization determinant. Furthermore, all organelle-localized substrates indicated undisrupted structures, thus suggesting that absence of NatC acetylation does not have a vast effect on organelle morphology in yeast.

TFIIB-related factors in RNA polymerase I transcription

Eukaryotic RNA polymerases (Pol) I, II, III and archaeal Pol use a related set of general transcription factors to recognize promoter sequences and recruit Pol to promoters and to function at key points in the transcription initiation mechanism. The TFIIB-like general transcription factors (GTFs) function during several important and conserved steps in the initiation pathway for Pols II, III, and archaeal Pol. Until recently, the mechanism of Pol I initiation seemed unique, since it appeared to lack a GTF paralogous to the TFIIB-like proteins. The surprising recent discovery of TFIIB-related Pol I general factors in yeast and humans highlights the evolutionary conservation of transcription initiation mechanisms for all eukaryotic and archaeal Pols. These findings reveal new roles for the function of the Pol I GTFs and insight into the function of TFIIB-related factors. Models for Pol I transcription initiation are reexamined in light of these recent findings. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Transcription by Odd Pols.

Conservation between the RNA polymerase I, II, and III transcription initiation machineries

Recent studies of the three eukaryotic transcription machineries revealed that all initiation complexes share a conserved core. This core consists of the RNA polymerase (I, II, or III), the TATA box-binding protein (TBP), and transcription factors TFIIB, TFIIE, and TFIIF (for Pol II) or proteins structurally and functionally related to parts of these factors (for Pol I and Pol III). The conserved core initiation complex stabilizes the open DNA promoter complex and directs initial RNA synthesis. The periphery of the core initiation complex is decorated by additional polymerase-specific factors that account for functional differences in promoter recognition and opening, and gene class-specific regulation. This review outlines the similarities and differences between these important molecular machines.

Nsi1 plays a significant role in the silencing of ribosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In eukaryotic cells, ribosomal DNA (rDNA) forms the basis of the nucleolus. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 100-200 copies of a 9.1-kb rDNA repeat exist as a tandem array on chromosome XII. The stability of this highly repetitive array is maintained through silencing. However, the precise mechanisms that regulate rDNA silencing are poorly understood. Here, we report that S. cerevisiae Ydr026c, which we name NTS1 silencing protein 1 (Nsi1), plays a significant role in rDNA silencing. By studying the subcellular localization of 159 nucleolar proteins, we identified 11 proteins whose localization pattern is similar to that of Net1, a well-established rDNA silencing factor. Among these proteins is Nsi1, which is associated with the NTS1 region of rDNA and is required for rDNA silencing at NTS1. In addition, Nsi1 physically interacts with the known rDNA silencing factors Net1, Sir2 and Fob1. The loss of Nsi1 decreases the association of Sir2 with NTS1 and increases histone acetylation at NTS1. Furthermore, Nsi1 contributes to the longevity of yeast cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that Nsi1 is a new rDNA silencing factor that contributes to rDNA stability and lifespan extension in S. cerevisiae.

Regulation of ribosomal RNA production by RNA polymerase I: does elongation come first?

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) production represents the most active transcription in the cell. Synthesis of the large rRNA precursors (35-47S) can be achieved by up to 150 RNA polymerase I (Pol I) enzymes simultaneously transcribing each rRNA gene. In this paper, we present recent advances made in understanding the regulatory mechanisms that control elongation. Built-in Pol I elongation factors, such as Rpa34/Rpa49 in budding yeast and PAF53/CAST in humans, are instrumental to the extremely high rate of rRNA production per gene. rRNA elongation mechanisms are intrinsically linked to chromatin structure and to the higher-order organization of the rRNA genes (rDNA). Factors such as Hmo1 in yeast and UBF1 in humans are key players in rDNA chromatin structure in vivo. Finally, elongation factors known to regulate messengers RNA production by RNA polymerase II are also involved in rRNA production and work cooperatively with Rpa49 in vivo.

Efficient transcription by RNA polymerase I using recombinant core factor

Transcription of ribosomal DNA by RNA polymerase I is a central feature of eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Since ribosome synthesis is closely linked to cell proliferation, there is a need to define the molecular mechanisms that control transcription by RNA polymerase I. To fully define the factors that control RNA polymerase I activity, biochemical analyses using purified transcription factors are essential. Although such assays exist, one limitation is the low abundance and difficult purification strategies required for some of the essential transcription factors for RNA polymerase I. Here, we describe a new method for expression and purification of the three subunit core factor complex from Escherichia coli. We demonstrate that the recombinant material is more active than yeast-derived core factor in assays for RNA polymerase I transcription in vitro. Finally, we use recombinant core factor to differentiate between two opposing models for the role of the TATA-binding protein in transcription by RNA polymerase I.

Molecular basis of Rrn3-regulated RNA polymerase I initiation and cell growth

Cell growth is regulated during RNA polymerase (Pol) I transcription initiation by the conserved factor Rrn3/TIF-IA in yeast/humans. Here we provide a structure-function analysis of Rrn3 based on a combination of structural biology with in vivo and in vitro functional assays. The Rrn3 crystal structure reveals a unique HEAT repeat fold and a surface serine patch. Phosphorylation of this patch represses human Pol I transcription, and a phospho-mimetic patch mutation prevents Rrn3 binding to Pol I in vitro and reduces cell growth and Pol I gene occupancy in vivo. Cross-linking indicates that Rrn3 binds Pol I between its subcomplexes, AC40/19 and A14/43, which faces the serine patch. The corresponding region of Pol II binds the Mediator head that cooperates with transcription factor (TF) IIB. Consistent with this, the Rrn3-binding factor Rrn7 is predicted to be a TFIIB homolog. This reveals the molecular basis of Rrn3-regulated Pol I initiation and cell growth, and indicates a general architecture of eukaryotic transcription initiation complexes.

Yeast Rrn7 and human TAF1B are TFIIB-related RNA polymerase I general transcription factors

Eukaryotic and archaeal multisubunit RNA polymerases (Pols) are structurally related and require several similar components for transcription initiation. However, none of the Pol I factors were known to share homology with transcription factor IIB (TFIIB) or TFIIB-related proteins, key factors in the initiation mechanisms of the other Pols. Here we show that Rrn7, a subunit of the yeast Pol I core factor, and its human ortholog TAF1B are TFIIB-like factors. Although distantly related, Rrn7 shares many activities associated with TFIIB-like factors. Domain swaps between TFIIB-related factors show that Rrn7 is most closely related to the Pol III general factor Brf1. Our results point to the conservation of initiation mechanisms among multisubunit Pols and reveal a key function of yeast core factor/human SL1 in Pol I transcription.

RNA polymerase I activity is regulated at multiple steps in the transcription cycle: recent insights into factors that influence transcription elongation

Synthesis of the translation apparatus is a central activity in growing and/or proliferating cells. Because of its fundamental importance and direct connection to cell proliferation, ribosome synthesis has been a focus of ongoing research for several decades. As a consequence, much is known about the essential factors involved in this process. Many studies have shown that transcription of the ribosomal DNA by RNA polymerase I is a major target for cellular regulation of ribosome synthesis rates. The initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase I has been implicated as a regulatory target, however, recent studies suggest that the elongation step in transcription is also influenced and regulated by trans-acting factors. This review describes the factors required for rRNA synthesis and focuses on recent works that have begun to identify and characterize factors that influence transcription elongation by RNA polymerase I and its regulation.

Journey of a Molecular Biologist

My journey into a research career began in fermentation biochemistry in an applied science department during the difficult post-World War II time in Japan. Subsequently, my desire to do research in basic science developed. I was fortunate to be a postdoctoral fellow in the United States during the early days of molecular biology. From 1957 to 1960, I worked with three pioneers of molecular biology, Sol Spiegelman, James Watson, and Seymour Benzer. These experiences helped me develop into a basic research scientist. My initial research projects at Osaka University, and subsequently at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, were on the mode of action of colicins as well as on mRNA and ribosomes. Following success in the reconstitution of ribosomal subunits, my efforts focused more on ribosomes, initially on the aspects of structure, function, and in vitro assembly, such as the construction of the 30S subunit assembly map. After this, my laboratory studied the regulation of the synthesis of ribosomes and ribosomal components in Escherichia coli. Our achievements included the discovery of translational feedback regulation of ribosomal protein synthesis and the identification of several repressor ribosomal proteins used in this regulation. In 1984, I moved to the University of California, Irvine, and initiated research on rRNA transcription by RNA polymerase I in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The use of yeast genetics combined with biochemistry allowed us to identify genes uniquely involved in rRNA synthesis and to elucidate the mechanism of initiation of transcription. This essay is a reflection on my life as a research scientist.

RNA polymerase I transcription silences noncoding RNAs at the ribosomal DNA locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the repeated units of the ribosomal locus, transcribed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I), are interrupted by nontranscribed spacers (NTSs). These NTS regions are transcribed by RNA polymerase III to synthesize 5S RNA and by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to synthesize, at low levels, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). While transcription of both RNA polymerase I and III is highly characterized, at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus only a few studies have been performed on Pol II, whose repression correlates with the SIR2-dependent silencing. The involvement of both chromatin organization and Pol I transcription has been proposed, and peculiar chromatin structures might justify "ribosomal" Pol II silencing. Reporter genes inserted within the rDNA units have been employed for these studies. We studied, in the natural context, yeast mutants differing in Pol I transcription in order to find whether correlations exist between Pol I transcription and Pol II ncRNA production. Here, we demonstrate that silencing at the rDNA locus represses ncRNAs with a strength inversely proportional to Pol I transcription. Moreover, localized regions of histone hyperacetylation appear in cryptic promoter elements when Pol II is active and in the coding region when Pol I is functional; in addition, DNA topoisomerase I site-specific activity follows RNA polymerase I transcription. The repression of ncRNAs at the rDNA locus, in response to RNA polymerase I transcription, could represent a physiological circuit control whose mechanism involves modification of histone acetylation.

Comparative analyses of time-course gene expression profiles of the long-lived sch9Delta mutant

In an attempt to elucidate the underlying longevity-promoting mechanisms of mutants lacking SCH9, which live three times as long as wild type chronologically, we measured their time-course gene expression profiles. We interpreted their expression time differences by statistical inferences based on prior biological knowledge, and identified the following significant changes: (i) between 12 and 24 h, stress response genes were up-regulated by larger fold changes and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) processing genes were down-regulated more dramatically; (ii) mitochondrial ribosomal protein genes were not up-regulated between 12 and 60 h as wild type were; (iii) electron transport, oxidative phosphorylation and TCA genes were down-regulated early; (iv) the up-regulation of TCA and electron transport was accompanied by deep down-regulation of rRNA processing over time; and (v) rRNA processing genes were more volatile over time, and three associated cis-regulatory elements [rRNA processing element (rRPE), polymerase A and C (PAC) and glucose response element (GRE)] were identified. Deletion of AZF1, which encodes the transcriptional factor that binds to the GRE element, reversed the lifespan extension of sch9Δ. The significant alterations in these time-dependent expression profiles imply that the lack of SCH9 turns on the longevity programme that extends the lifespan through changes in metabolic pathways and protection mechanisms, particularly, the regulation of aerobic respiration and rRNA processing.

Stress-dependent coordination of transcriptome and translatome in yeast

Cells rapidly alter gene expression in response to environmental stimuli such as nutrients, hormones, and drugs. During the imposed “remodeling” of gene expression, changes in the levels of particular mRNAs do not necessarily correlate with those of the encoded proteins, which could in part rely on the differential recruitment of mRNAs to translating ribosomes. To systematically address this issue, we have established an approach to rapidly access the translational status of each mRNA in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by affinity purification of endogenously formed ribosomes and the analysis of associated mRNAs with DNA microarrays. Using this method, we compared changes in total mRNA levels (transcriptome) with ribosome associations (translatome) after the application of different conditions of cellular stress. Severe stresses, induced by amino acid depletion or osmotic shock, stimulated highly correlated responses affecting about 15% of both total RNA levels and translatome. Many of the regulated messages code for functionally related proteins, thus reflecting logical responses to the particular stress. In contrast, mild stress provoked by addition of Calcofluor-white and menadione altered the translatome of approximately 1% of messages with only marginal effects on total mRNA, suggesting largely uncorrelated responses of transcriptome and translatome. Among these putative translationally regulated messages were most components of the mitochondrial ATPase. Increased polysome associations of corresponding messages and higher mitochondrial ATPase activities upon treatment confirmed the relevance for regulation of this macromolecular complex. Our results suggest the presence of highly sensitive translational regulatory networks that coordinate functionally related messages. These networks are preferentially activated for rapid adaptation of cells to minor environmental perturbations.

Organisms respond to environmental or physiological changes by altering the amounts and activities of specific proteins that are necessary for their adaptation and survival. Importantly, protein levels can be modulated by changing either the rate of synthesis or the stability of the messenger RNA (mRNA or transcript), or the synthesis or stability of the protein itself. Scientists often measure global mRNA levels upon changing conditions to identify transcripts that are differentially regulated, and often the assumption is made that changes in transcript levels lead to corresponding changes in protein levels. Here, we systematically compared global transcript levels (transcriptome) with global alterations in the levels of ribosome association of transcripts (translatome) when yeast cells are exposed to different stresses to determine how significant the discrepancy between transcript and protein levels can be. We found that changes in the transcriptome correlate well with those in the translatome after application of harsh stresses that arrest cell growth. However, this correlation is generally lost under more mild stresses that do not affect cell growth. In this case, remodeling of gene expression is mainly executed at the translational level by modulating mRNA association with ribosomes. As one example, we show that expression for many components of the mitochondrial ATPase, the major energy production machinery in cells, is translationally but not transcriptionally activated under a specific mild stress condition. Our results therefore show that alteration of protein synthesis can be the dominant mediator of changes of gene expression during adaptation to minor changes in cellular needs.

During cellular adaptation to changing growth conditions, the extent of correlation between changes in transcriptional and translational regulation varies with the severity of the stress.

Genetic identification of factors that modulate ribosomal DNA transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is transcribed from the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). Despite being responsible for the majority of transcription in growing cells, Pol I regulation is poorly understood compared to Pol II. To gain new insights into rDNA transcriptional regulation, we developed a genetic assay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that detects alterations in transcription from the centromere-proximal rDNA gene of the tandem array. Changes in Pol I transcription at this gene alter the expression of an adjacent, modified URA3 reporter cassette (mURA3) such that reductions in Pol I transcription induce growth on synthetic media lacking uracil. Increases in Pol I transcription induce growth on media containing 5-FOA. A transposon mutagenesis screen was performed with the reporter strain to identify genes that play a role in modulating rDNA transcription. Mutations in 68 different genes were identified, several of which were already known to function in chromatin modification and the regulation of Pol II transcription. Among the other classes of genes were those encoding proteasome subunits and multiple kinases and phosphatases that function in nutrient and stress signaling pathways. Fourteen genes were previously uncharacterized and have been named as regulators of rDNA transcription (RRT).

Transcription of multiple yeast ribosomal DNA genes requires targeting of UAF to the promoter by Uaf30

Upstream activating factor (UAF) is a multisubunit complex that functions in the activation of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). Cells lacking the Uaf30 subunit of UAF reduce the rRNA synthesis rate by approximately 70% compared to wild-type cells and produce rRNA using both Pol I and Pol II. Miller chromatin spreads demonstrated that even though there is an overall reduction in rRNA synthesis in uaf30 mutants, the active rDNA genes in such strains are overloaded with polymerases. This phenotype was specific to defects in Uaf30, as mutations in other UAF subunits resulted in a complete absence of rDNA genes with high or even modest Pol densities. The lack of Uaf30 prevented UAF from efficiently binding to the rDNA promoter in vivo, leading to an inability to activate a large number of rDNA genes. The relatively few genes that did become activated were highly transcribed, apparently to compensate for the reduced rRNA synthesis capacity. The results show that Uaf30p is a key targeting factor for the UAF complex that facilitates activation of a large proportion of rDNA genes in the tandem array.

RNA polymerase I remains intact without subunit exchange through multiple rounds of transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Previous experiments using mammalian cells suggested that after each round of transcription, RNA polymerase I (Pol I) dissociates into subunits that leave and reenter the nucleolus as individual subunits, before formation of a new initiation complex. In this study, we show that the size and subunit composition of Pol I did not change significantly when Pol I was not engaged in rRNA transcription, brought about by either the absence of Pol I-specific rDNA template or specific inhibition of the transcription initiation step that requires Rrn3p. In fact, Pol I purified from cells completely lacking rDNA repeats was more active than when purified from wild-type cells in an in vitro transcription system designed to assay active Pol I-Rrn3p complexes. Furthermore, measurements of the exchange of A135 and A190 subunits between preexistent Pol I and newly synthesized Pol I showed that these two largest subunits of Pol I do not disassociate through many rounds of transcription in vivo. Thus, Pol I is not a dynamic protein complex but rather a stable enzyme.

Dephosphorylation of RNA polymerase I by Fcp1p is required for efficient rRNA synthesis

Differently phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase (Pol) II are required to guide the enzyme through the transcription cycle. Here, we show that a phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycle is also important for RNA polymerase I-dependent synthesis of rRNA precursors. A key component of the Pol II transcription system is Fcp1p, a phosphatase that dephosphorylates the C-terminal domain of the largest Pol II subunit. Fcp1p stimulates transcription elongation and is required for Pol II recycling after transcription termination. We found that Fcp1p is also part of the RNA Pol I transcription apparatus. Fcp1p is required for efficient rDNA transcription in vivo, and also, recombinant Fcp1p stimulates rRNA synthesis both in promoter-dependent and in nonspecific transcription assays in vitro. We demonstrate that Fcp1 activity is not involved in the formation of the initiation-active form of Pol I (the Pol I-Rrn3p complex) and propose that dephosphorylation of Pol I by Fcp1p facilitates chain elongation during rRNA synthesis.

Tor pathway regulates Rrn3p-dependent recruitment of yeast RNA polymerase I to the promoter but does not participate in alteration of the number of active genes

Yeast cells entering into stationary phase decrease rRNA synthesis rate by decreasing both the number of active genes and the transcription rate of individual active genes. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we found that the association of RNA polymerase I with the promoter and the coding region of rDNA is decreased in stationary phase, but association of transcription factor UAF with the promoter is unchanged. Similar changes were also observed when growing cells were treated with rapamycin, which is known to inhibit the Tor signaling system. Rapamycin treatment also caused a decrease in the amount of Rrn3p-polymerase I complex, similar to stationary phase. Because recruitment of Pol I to the rDNA promoter is Rrn3p-dependent as shown in this work, these data suggest that the decrease in the transcription rate of individual active genes in stationary phase is achieved by the Tor signaling system acting at the Rrn3p-dependent polymerase recruitment step. Miller chromatin spreads of cells treated with rapamycin and cells in post-log phase confirm this conclusion and demonstrate that the Tor system does not participate in alteration of the number of active genes observed for cells entering into stationary phase.

Hmo1, an HMG-box protein, belongs to the yeast ribosomal DNA transcription system

Hmo1 is one of seven HMG-box proteins of Saccharo myces cerevisiae. Null mutants have a limited effect on growth. Hmo1 overexpression suppresses rpa49-Delta mutants lacking Rpa49, a non-essential but conserved subunit of RNA polymerase I corresponding to the animal RNA polymerase I factor PAF53. This overexpression strongly increases de novo rRNA synthesis. rpa49-Delta hmo1-Delta double mutants are lethal, and this lethality is bypassed when RNA polymerase II synthesizes rRNA. Hmo1 co-localizes with Fob1, a known rDNA-binding protein, defining a narrow territory adjacent to the nucleoplasm that could delineate the rDNA nucleolar domain. These data identify Hmo1 as a genuine RNA polymerase I factor acting synergistically with Rpa49. As an HMG-box protein, Hmo1 is remotely related to animal UBF factors. hmo1-Delta and rpa49-Delta are lethal with top3-Delta DNA topoisomerase (type I) mutants and are suppressed in mutants lacking the Sgs1 DNA helicase. They are not affected by top1-Delta defective in Top1, the other eukaryotic type I topoisomerase. Conversely, rpa34-Delta mutants lacking Rpa34, a non-essential subunit associated with Rpa49, are lethal in top1-Delta but not in top3-Delta.

RPD3 is required for the inactivation of yeast ribosomal DNA genes in stationary phase

rRNA transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is performed by RNA polymerase I and regulated by changes in growth conditions. During log phase, approximately 50% of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes in each cell are transcribed and maintained in an open, psoralen-accessible conformation. During stationary phase, the percentage of open rDNA genes is greatly reduced. In this study we found that the Rpd3 histone deacetylase was required to inactivate (close) individual rDNA genes as cells entered stationary phase. Even though approximately 50% of the rDNA genes remained open during stationary phase in rpd3Delta mutants, overall rRNA synthesis was still reduced. Using electron microscopy of Miller chromatin spreads, we found that the number of RNA polymerases transcribing each open gene in the rpd3Delta mutant was significantly reduced when cells grew past log phase. Bulk levels of histone H3 and H4 acetylation were reduced during stationary phase in an RPD3-dependent manner. However, histone H3 and H4 acetylation was not significantly altered at the rDNA locus in an rpd3Delta mutant. Rpd3 therefore regulates the number of open rDNA repeats.

Characterization of a fission yeast subunit of an RNA polymerase I essential transcription initiation factor, SpRrn7h/TAF(I)68, that bridges yeast and mammals: association with SpRrn11h and the core ribosomal RNA gene promoter

Production of eukaryotic ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) entails sequence-specific recognition of regulatory sequences in the rRNA gene promoter. A putative subunit of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe essential transcription initiation factor for rRNA synthesis has been identified that shares homology with both murine TAF(I)68 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrn7p, subunits of their species' transcription initiation factor. Affinity purified putative SpRrn7h and associated factors, including a putative Rrn11p homolog, SpRrn11h, bear RNA polymerase I transcription initiation factor activity, and recombinant SpRrn7h associates with S. pombe core rDNA promoter sequences. In the first widespread search for putative homologs of SpRrn7h/murine TAF(I)68, and SpRrn11h/murine TAF(I)48, multiple ones were identified across eukaryotes. Analysis of residues conserved between the fission yeast and murine essential initiation factor subunits aided in these identifications. Sequences in the core rRNA gene promoter contributing to transcriptional activation were investigated, including a perfect TATAAA element located at -35.

Differential roles of phosphorylation in the formation of transcriptional active RNA polymerase I

Regulation of rDNA transcription depends on the formation and dissociation of a functional complex between RNA polymerase I (pol I) and transcription initiation factor Rrn3p. We analyzed whether phosphorylation is involved in this molecular switch. Rrn3p is a phosphoprotein that is predominantly phosphorylated in vivo when it is not bound to pol I. In vitro, Rrn3p is able both to associate with pol I and to enter the transcription cycle in its nonphosphorylated form. By contrast, phosphorylation of pol I is required to form a stable pol I-Rrn3p complex for efficient transcription initiation. Furthermore, association of pol I with Rrn3p correlates with a change in the phosphorylation state of pol I in vivo. We suggest that phosphorylation at specific sites of pol I is a prerequisite for proper transcription initiation and that phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of pol I is one possibility to modulate cellular rDNA transcription activity.

New model for the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription cycle

Using an immobilized template assay, we observed two steps in assembly of the yeast RNA polymerase I (Pol I) preinitiation complex: stable binding of upstream activating factor (UAF) followed by recruitment of Pol I-Rrn3p and core factor (CF). Pol I is required for stable association of CF with the promoter and can be recruited in the absence of Rrn3p. Upon transcription initiation, Pol I-Rrn3p and CF dissociate from the promoter while UAF remains behind. These findings support a novel model in which the Pol I basal machinery cycles on and off the promoter with each round of transcription. This model accounts for previous observations that rRNA synthesis may be controlled by regulating both promoter accessibility and polymerase activity.

Role of TATA binding protein (TBP) in yeast ribosomal dna transcription by RNA polymerase I: defects in the dual functions of transcription factor UAF cannot be suppressed by TBP

Initiation of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves upstream activation factor (UAF), core factor, the TATA binding protein (TBP), and Rrn3p in addition to Pol I. We found previously that yeast strains carrying deletions in the UAF component RRN9 switch completely to the use of Pol II for rRNA transcription, with no residual Pol I transcription. These polymerase-switched strains initially grow very slowly, but subsequent expansion in the number of rDNA repeats on chromosome XII leads to better growth. Recently, it was reported that TBP overexpression could bypass the requirement of UAF for Pol I transcription in vivo, producing nearly wild-type levels of growth in UAF mutant strains (P. Aprikian, B. Moorefield, and R. H. Reeder, Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5269-5275, 2000). Here, we demonstrate that deletions in the UAF component RRN5, RRN9, or RRN10 lead to Pol II transcription of rDNA. TBP overexpression does not suppress UAF mutation, and these strains continue to use Pol II for rRNA transcription. We do not find evidence for even low levels of Pol I transcription in UAF mutant strains carrying overexpressed TBP. In diploid strains lacking both copies of the UAF component RRN9, Pol II transcription of rDNA is more strongly repressed than in haploid strains but TBP overexpression still fails to activate Pol I. These results emphasize that UAF plays an essential role in activation of Pol I transcription and silencing of Pol II transcription of rDNA and that TBP functions to recruit the Pol I machinery in a manner completely dependent on UAF.

In vivo binding and hierarchy of assembly of the yeast RNA polymerase I transcription factors

Transcription by RNA polymerase I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a series of transcription factors that have been genetically and biochemically identified. In particular, the core factor (CF) and the upstream activation factor (UAF) have been shown in vitro to bind the core element and the upstream promoter element, respectively. We have analyzed in vivo the DNAse I footprinting of the 35S promoter in wild-type and mutant strains lacking one specific transcription factor at the time. In this way we were able to unambiguously attribute the protections by the CF and the UAF to their respective putative binding sites. In addition, we have found that in vivo a binding hierarchy exists, the UAF being necessary for CF binding. Because the CF footprinting is lost in mutants lacking a functional RNA polymerase I, we also conclude that the final step of preinitiation-complex assembly affects binding of the CF, stabilizing its contact with DNA. Thus, in vivo, the CF is recruited to the core element by the UAF and stabilized on DNA by the presence of a functional RNA polymerase I.

In-vitro competition analysis of procyclin gene and variant surface glycoprotein gene expression site transcription in Trypanosoma brucei

In Trypanosoma brucei, alpha-amanitin-resistant transcription characteristic of RNA polymerase I is initiated at ribosomal RNA gene (RRNA), procyclin gene (GPEET or EP1), and variant surface glycoprotein gene expression site (VSG ES) promoters. The three promoter types do not share obvious sequence homologies, but contain a proximal domain I and a distal domain II within 80 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site. RRNA, GPEET and EP1, but not the VSG ES promoter, require additional upstream sequences for full activity. In the present study, we competed in-vitro transcription of circular template DNA with linear DNA fragments to identify promoter domains responsible for binding and sequestering essential trans-acting transcription factors. For the GPEET promoter, we found that domain III, located between positions -141 and -92, was most important for the DNA fragment to exert a transcription competition effect, whereas domain I, the only element absolutely required for transcription, was not. Moreover, insertions between promoter domains II and III reduced both transcription from the GPEET promoter and competition with the GPEET promoter fragment, suggesting that these two domains cooperate in the formation of a stable DNA-protein complex. Taken together, these results indicate a promoter structure very similar to that of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RRNA promoter. In contrast, VSG ES promoter analysis showed that domains I and II are both necessary and sufficient to compete transcription. Despite this structural difference, our analysis provide evidence that GPEET and VSG ES promoters interact with a common factor that is also important for RRNA promoter transcription.

TATA binding protein can stimulate core-directed transcription by yeast RNA polymerase I

The TATA binding protein (TBP) interacts with two transcription factor complexes, upstream activating factor (UAF) and core factor (CF), to direct transcription by RNA polymerase I (polI) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Previous work indicates that one function of TBP is to serve as a bridge, enabling UAF to recruit and stabilize the binding of CF (23, 24). In this work we show that, in addition to aiding recruitment, TBP also directly aids CF function. Overexpression of TBP in strains with UAF components deleted will stimulate CF-directed transcription nearly to wild-type levels in vivo. In vitro, increasing the concentration of TBP stimulates CF-directed transcription in the absence of either UAF or its DNA binding site. This dual function of TBP, serving as a critical member of a core promoter complex as well as a contact point for upstream activators, appears similar to the dual roles that TBP also plays in transcription by RNA polII.