Role of transmembrane helix IV in G-protein specificity of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor

AI-driven GPCR analysis, engineering, and targeting

This article investigates the role of recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) to revolutionise the study of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). AI has been applied to many areas of GPCR research, including the application of machine learning (ML) in GPCR classification, prediction of GPCR activation levels, modelling GPCR 3D structures and interactions, understanding G-protein selectivity, aiding elucidation of GPCRs structures, and drug design. Despite progress, challenges in predicting GPCR structures and addressing the complex nature of GPCRs remain, providing avenues for future research and development.

Structural determinants for binding, activation, and functional selectivity of the angiotensin AT1 receptor

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disorders. Pharmacologic interventions targeting the RAS cascade have led to the discovery of renin inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and AT(1) receptor blockers (ARBs) to treat hypertension and some cardiovascular and renal disorders. Mutagenesis and modeling studies have revealed that differential functional outcomes are the results of multiple active states conformed by the AT(1) receptor upon interaction with angiotensin II (Ang II). The binding of agonist is dependent on both extracellular and intramembrane regions of the receptor molecule, and as a consequence occupies more extensive area of the receptor than a non-peptide antagonist. Both agonist and antagonist bind to the same intramembrane regions to interfere with each other's binding to exhibit competitive, surmountable interaction. The nature of interactions with the amino acids in the receptor is different for each of the ARBs given the small differences in the molecular structure between drugs. AT(1) receptors attain different conformation states after binding various Ang II analogues, resulting in variable responses through activation of multiple signaling pathways. These include both classical and non-classical pathways mediated through growth factor receptor transactivations, and provide cross-communication between downstream signaling molecules. The structural requirements for AT(1) receptors to activate extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 through G proteins, or G protein-independently through β-arrestin, are different. We review the structural and functional characteristics of Ang II and its analogs and antagonists, and their interaction with amino acid residues in the AT(1) receptor.

Analysis of transmembrane domains 1 and 4 of the human angiotensin II AT1 receptor by cysteine-scanning mutagenesis

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the AT(1) receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the AT(1) receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. Here, we investigated the role of the first and fourth transmembrane domains (TMDs) in the formation of the binding pocket of the human AT(1) receptor using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method. Each residue within the Phe-28((1.32))-Ile-53((1.57)) fragment of TMD1 and Leu-143((4.40))-Phe-170((4.67)) fragment of TMD4 was mutated, one at a time, to a cysteine. The resulting mutant receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells, which were subsequently treated with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA). This treatment led to a significant reduction in the binding affinity of TMD1 mutants M30C((1.34))-AT(1) and T33C((1.37))-AT(1) and TMD4 mutant V169C((4.66))-AT(1). Although this reduction in binding of the TMD1 mutants was maintained when examined in a constitutively active receptor (N111G-AT(1)) background, we found that V169C((4.66))-AT(1) remained unaffected when treated with MTSEA compared with untreated in this context. Moreover, the complete loss of binding observed for R167C((4.64))-AT(1) was restored upon treatment with MTSEA. Our results suggest that the extracellular portion of TMD1, particularly residues Met-30((1.34)) and Thr-33((1.37)), as well as residues Arg-167((4.64)) and Val-169((4.66)) at the junction of TMD4 and the second extracellular loop, are important binding determinants within the AT(1) receptor binding pocket but that these TMDs undergo very little movement, if at all, during the activation process.

The first extracellular loop of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G protein-coupled receptor Ste2p undergoes a conformational change upon ligand binding

In this study of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G protein-coupled receptor Ste2p, we present data indicating that the first extracellular loop (EL1) of the alpha-factor receptor has tertiary structure that limits solvent accessibility and that its conformation changes in a ligand-dependent manner. The substituted cysteine accessibility method was used to probe the solvent exposure of single cysteine residues engineered to replace residues Tyr(101) through Gln(135) of EL1 in the presence and absence of the tridecapeptide alpha-factor and a receptor antagonist. Surprisingly, many residues, especially those at the N-terminal region, were not solvent-accessible, including residues of the binding-competent yet signal transduction-deficient mutants L102C, N105C, S108C, Y111C, and T114C. In striking contrast, two N-terminal residues, Y101C and Y106C, were readily solvent-accessible, but upon incubation with alpha-factor labeling was reduced, suggesting a pheromone-dependent conformational change limiting solvent accessibility had occurred. Labeling in the presence of the antagonist, which binds Ste2p but does not initiate signal transduction, did not significantly alter reactivity with the Y101C and Y106C receptors, suggesting that the alpha-factor-dependent decrease in solvent accessibility was not because of steric hindrance that prevented the labeling reagent access to these residues. Based on these and previous observations, we propose a model in which the N terminus of EL1 is structured such that parts of the loop are buried in a solvent-inaccessible environment interacting with the extracellular part of the transmembrane domain bundle. This study highlights the essential role of an extracellular loop in activation of a G protein-coupled receptor upon ligand binding.

A role for transmembrane domains V and VI in ligand binding and maturation of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor

Several studies have proposed that angiotensin II (Ang II) binds to its receptor AT1 through interactions with residues in helices V and VI, suggesting that the distance between these helices is crucial for ligand binding. Based on a 3D model of AT1 in which the C-terminus of Ang II is docked, we identified the hydrophobic residues of TM V and VI pointing towards the external face of the helices, which may play a role in the structure of the binding pocket and in the structural integrity of the receptor. We performed a systematic mutagenesis study of these residues and examined the binding, localization, maturation, and dimerization of the mutated receptors. We found that mutations of hydrophobic residues to alanine in helix V do not alter binding, whereas mutations to glutamate lead to loss of binding without a loss in cell surface expression, suggesting that the external face of helix V may not directly participate in binding, but may rather contribute to the structure of the binding pocket. In contrast, mutations of hydrophobic residues to glutamate in helix VI lead to a loss in cell surface expression, suggesting that the external surface of helix VI plays a structural role and ensures correct folding of the receptor.

Protein kinase C-mediated inhibition of renal Ca2+ ATPase by physiological concentrations of angiotensin II is reversed by AT1- and AT2-receptor antagonists

Angiotensin II (Ang II) increases the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in different cell types. In this study, we investigate the effect of Ang II on the Ca2+ ATPase of purified basolateral membranes of kidney proximal tubules. This enzyme pumps Ca2+ out of the cytosol in a reaction coupled to ATP hydrolysis, and it is responsible for the fine-tuned regulation of cytosolic Ca2+ activity. Ca2+-ATPase activity is inhibited by picomolar concentrations of Ang II, with maximal inhibition being attained at approximately 50% of the control values. The presence of raising concentrations (10(-11) to 10(-7) M) of losartan (an AT1-receptor antagonist) or PD123319 (an AT2-receptor antagonist) gradually reverts inhibition by Ang II. Both the phospholipase C (PLC) inhibitor U-73122 (10(-6) M) and the inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC) staurosporine (10(-7) M) prevent inhibition of the Ca2+ pump by Ang II. Incubation of the previously isolated membranes with a PKC activator-the phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (10(-8) M)-mimics the inhibition found with Ang II, and the effects of the compounds are not additive. Taken as a whole, these results indicate the Ang II inhibits Ca2+-ATPase by activation of a PKC system present in primed state in these membranes after binding of the hormone to losartan- and PD123319-sensitive receptors coupled to a PLC. Therefore, inhibition of the basolateral membrane Ca2+-ATPase by kinase-mediated phosphorylation appears to be one of the pathways by which Ang II promotes an increase in the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration of proximal tubule cells.

Functional diversity of AT2 receptor orthologues in closely related species

BACKGROUND

The most striking feature of life is biodiversity. However, mechanisms of biodiversity remain poorly understood, as most protein orthologues of different species are highly homologous in sequence and identical in function. Interestingly, recent evidence has demonstrated heterogeneity for a G protein-coupled angiotensin II (Ang II) type 2 (AT(2)) receptor in both ligand binding and induction of arachidonic acid (AA) release. The present study investigated the properties of AT(2) receptors in closely related species.

METHODS

AT(2) receptors cloned from human, rabbit, rat, and mouse were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1), African green monkey kidney cells (COS-1), and human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells and characterized in ligand binding and signal transductions. Critical residues in rabbit AT(2) receptor attributable to heterogeneity were examined using both gain-of-function and loss-of-function approaches with mutagenesis.

RESULTS

The newly cloned rabbit AT(2) receptor exhibits distinct biochemical and biologic properties compared to its highly homologous orthologues (91% in overall amino acid sequence) of rat, mouse, and human. All these orthologues activate SH2 domain-containing phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) and show similar binding affinities for Ang II and AT(2)-specific ligands CGP42112A and PD123319. However, reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT) inactivates the rabbit orthologue but potentiates the others in ligand binding, a hallmark of AT(2) versus AT(1) receptor subtypes. Most interestingly, rabbit AT(2) receptor, but not the other orthologues, induces AA release in various cell systems when stimulated by both Ang II and CGP42112A, the peptide antagonist. Mutagenesis studies and sequence analyses further indicate that residues His(106), Asp(188), and Thr(293) are responsible for the DTT inactivation and residues Val(209) and Val(249) are partially responsible for AA release.

CONCLUSION

These results deny the coexistence of an additional AT(2) subtype in rabbit proximal tubule cells and demonstrate for the first time the presence of functional diversity for closely related Eutherian orthologues of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that are more than 90% homologous in the amino acid sequence.

Location and nature of the residues important for ligand recognition in G-protein coupled receptors

The overall structure of the biogenic amine subclass of the G-protein-coupled receptors, and of their ligand binding sites, is discussed with the aim of highlighting the major structural features of these receptors that are responsible for ligand recognition. A comparison is made between biogenic amine receptors, peptide receptors of the rhodopsin class, and the secretin receptors which all have peptide ligands. The question of where the peptide ligands bind, whether at extracellular sites or within the transmembrane helix bundle, is discussed. The suitability of the rhodopsin crystal structure as a template for construction of homology models is discussed and it is concluded that there are many reasons why a caution should be issued against using it uncritically.

Mutagenesis of the AT1 receptor reveals different binding modes of angiotensin II and [Sar1]-angiotensin II

Homology modeling of the structure of the AT1 receptor, based on the high resolution rhodopsin crystal structure, indicated that it is unlikely that the binding of AngII to AT1 involves simultaneously all the receptor's residues reported in the literature to participate in this process. Site-directed mutagenesis using Ala substitution of charged residues Lys20, Arg23, Glu91 and Arg93 was performed to evaluate the participation of their side-chains in ligand binding and in triggering the cell's response. A comparative analysis by competition binding and functional assays using angiotensin II and the analog [Sar1]-angiotensin II suggests an important role for Arg23 of AT1 receptor in binding of the natural agonist. It is discussed whether some receptor's residues participate directly in the binding with AngII or whether they are part of a regulatory site.

Probing receptor structure/function with chimeric G-protein-coupled receptors

Owing its name to an image borrowed from Greek mythology, a chimera is seen to represent a new entity created as a composite from existing creatures or, in this case, molecules. Making use of various combinations of three basic domains of the receptors (i.e., exofacial, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic segments) that couple agonist binding into activation of effectors through heterotrimeric G-proteins, molecular pharmacology has probed the basic organization, structure/function relationships of this superfamily of heptahelical receptors. Chimeric G-protein-coupled receptors obviate the need for a particular agonist ligand when the ligand is resistant to purification or, in the case of orphan receptors, is not known. Chimeric receptors created from distant members of the heptahelical receptors enable new strategies in understanding how these receptors transduce agonist binding into receptor activation and may be able to offer insights into the evolution of G-protein-coupled receptors from yeast to humans.

Losartan's molecular basis of interaction with membranes and AT1 receptor

Physicochemical methods were used to study the thermal and dynamic changes caused by losartan in the membrane bilayers. In addition, molecular modeling was implemented to explore its topography both in membranes and AT(1) receptor. Its incorporation resulted in the modification of thermal profile of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) bilayers in a concentration dependent way up to 20mol% as it is depicted from the combination of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and MAS data. In particular, the presence of losartan caused lowering of the phase transition temperature and abolishment of the pretransition. T(1) experiments revealed the location of the drug into the membrane bilayers. The use of a combination of biophysical methods along with docking experiments brought out a possible two-step mechanism which involves incorporation of losartan at the interface of membrane bilayers and diffusion in the upper parts of AT(1) receptor helices IV-VII.

Structural determinants of agonist-induced signaling and regulation of the angiotensin AT1 receptor

Angiotensin II (Ang II) regulates aldosterone secretion by stimulating inositol phosphate production and Ca(2+) signaling in adrenal glomerulosa cells via the G(q)-coupled AT(1) receptor, which is rapidly internalized upon agonist binding. Ang II also binds to the heptahelical AT(2) receptor, which neither activates inositol phosphate signaling nor undergoes receptor internalization. The differential behaviors of the AT(1) and AT(2) receptors were analyzed in chimeric angiotensin receptors created by swapping the second (IL2), the third (IL3) intracellular loops and/or the cytoplasmic tail (CT) between these receptors. When transiently expressed in COS-7 cells, the chimeric receptors showed only minor alterations in their ligand binding properties. Measurements of the internalization kinetics and inositol phosphate responses of chimeric AT(1A) receptors indicated that the CT is required for normal receptor internalization, and IL2 is a determinant of G protein activation. In addition, the amino-terminal portion of IL3 is required for both receptor functions. However, only substitution of IL2 impaired Ang II-induced ERK activation, suggesting that alternative mechanisms are responsible for ERK activation in signaling-deficient mutant AT(1) receptors. Substitution of IL2, IL3, or CT of the AT(1A) receptor into the AT(2) receptor sequence did not endow the latter with the ability to internalize or to mediate inositol phosphate signaling responses. These data suggest that the lack of receptor internalization and inositol phosphate signal generation by the AT(2) receptor is a consequence of its different activation mechanism, rather than the inability of its cytoplasmic domains to couple to intracellular effectors.

Constitutive activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor alters the spatial proximity of transmembrane 7 to the ligand-binding pocket

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TM) following binding of agonist. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which constitutes a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TM helices. Using the substituted cysteine accessibility method, we initially identified those residues within the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7) of wild type angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor that contribute to forming the binding site pocket. We have substituted successively TM7 residues ranging from Ile276 to Tyr302 to cysteine. Treatment of A277C, V280C, T282C, A283C, I286C, A291C, and F301C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent MTSEA significantly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was greatly reduced for TM7 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active mutant of the AT1 receptor. Our data suggest that upon activation, TM7 of the AT1 receptor goes through a pattern of helical movements that results in its distancing from the binding pocket per se. These studies support accumulating evidence whereby elements of TM7 of class A GPCRs promote activation of the receptor through structural rearrangements.

Molecular Analysis of the Structure and Function of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

The renin-angiotensin system hormone angiotensin II (Ang II) plays a central role in the pathophysiology of hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, congestive heart failure, and coronary heart disease. Two distinct subtypes of Ang II receptor, type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2), have been identified, and both have been shown to belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily (GPCRs). The recent Human Genome Project has revealed more than 1,000 transmembrane (TM) receptors that belong to this superfamily, and it has been estimated that 50% of all clinically used medicines modulate GPCRs activity. Recently, there have been many new insights regarding Ang II receptors and other GPCRs, such as on homo- and hetero-oligomerization, constitutive activation, movement of TM helices, internalization, desensitization and phosphorylation, trafficking, nuclear localization, intracellular protein-induced receptor activation, and receptor-associated proteins. Although AT1 receptor antagonists which prevent Ang II-induced signaling are already clinically available, we here summarize new findings regarding their structure and function, and the possibility of new therapeutic strategies for targeting Ang II receptors through molecular biological techniques.

Gbeta gamma -independent constitutive association of Galpha s with SHP-1 and angiotensin II receptor AT2 is essential in AT2-mediated ITIM-independent activation of SHP-1

Conventional mode of activation of SH2 domain-containing phosphatase 1 (SHP-1) by a single transmembrane (TM) inhibitory receptor such as killer cell inhibitory receptor, Fcgamma receptor type IIb1, and paired Ig-like receptors of inhibitory types requires tyrosine phosphorylation of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory (ITIM) motifs in the cytoplasmic domains of the inhibitory receptors. Contrary to this paradigm, AT(2), a G protein-coupled 7TM receptor that does not undergo tyrosine phosphorylation in response to angiotensin II (Ang II) stimulation, also activates SHP-1. Here we show that SHP-1 constitutively and physically associates with AT(2) receptor in transfected COS-7 cells. On stimulation by Ang II, SHP-1 becomes activated and dissociated from AT(2) receptor, independent of pertussis toxin. Cotransfection of transducin G(betagamma) inhibits SHP-1/AT(2) association and the SHP-1 activation, whereas cotransfection of C-terminal of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase, which abrogates G(betagamma) signaling, facilitates SHP-1 activation. Surprisingly, SHP-1/AT(2) association and the SHP-1 activation requires the presence of G(alphas) as shown by differential coimmunoprecipitation, dominant negative G(alphas), constitutively active G(alphas), and G(alpha) peptides. A mutant AT(2) receptor D141A-R142L that is inactive in G(alpha) protein activation constitutively associates with SHP-1 and activates it. Together, these results indicate that G(alphas) alone, rather than exclusively in the form of G(alphabetagamma) heterotrimer may facilitate signal transduction for G protein-coupled receptors, suggesting a novel mechanism distinct from the classic paradigm of heterotrimeric G proteins. The AT(2)-mediated ITIM-independent activation of SHP-1 that is distinct from the conventional mode of activation, may represent a general paradigm for activation of SHP-1/2-class tyrosine phosphatases by G protein-coupled receptors.

Impaired G protein coupling of the neurotensin receptor 1 by mutations in extracellular loop 3

The neurotensin receptor 1, NTS1, is a G protein-coupled receptor. We have shown previously that the NTS1 receptor-binding site of the peptide agonist involved residues in extracellular loop 3 and at the extracellular junction of transmembrane domains 4 and 6. Here, we investigated by site-directed mutagenesis residues in extracellular loop 3 that might be involved in agonist-induced activation of the rat NTS1 (rNTS1) receptor. Wild type and mutated receptors were expressed in COS (African green monkey kidney fibroblasts) cells. Labeled agonist and antagonist binding as well as inositol phosphate and cAMP productions were studied. Compared to the wild type NTS1 receptor, the W339A, F344A, H348A and Y349A mutant receptors exhibited (i) decreased proportion of high over low affinity agonist binding sites, (ii) increased sensitivity of high affinity agonist binding to GTP gamma S, and (iii) impaired G protein coupling of high affinity agonist-receptor complexes. The data are consistent with the C-terminal part of extracellular loop 3 being essential for allowing high affinity agonist-NTS1 receptor complexes to couple to G proteins.

Transmembrane domains 4 and 7 of the M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor are critical for ligand binding and the receptor activation switch

Activation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors requires agonist binding followed by a conformational change, but the ligand binding and conformation-switching residues have not been completely identified. Systematic alanine-scanning mutagenesis has been used to assess residues 142-164 in transmembrane helix 4 and 402-421 in transmembrane helix 7 of the M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Several inward-facing amino acid side chains in the exofacial parts of transmembrane helices 4 and 7 contribute to acetylcholine binding. Alanine substitution of the aromatic residues in this group reduced signaling efficacy, suggesting that they may form part of a charge-stabilized aromatic cage, which triggers rotation and movement of the transmembrane helices. The mutation of adjacent residues modulated receptor activation, either reducing signaling or causing constitutive activation. In the buried endofacial section of transmembrane helix 7, alanine substitution mutants of the conserved NSXXNPXXY motif displayed strongly reduced signaling efficacy, despite having increased or unchanged acetylcholine affinity. These residues may have dual functions, forming intramolecular contacts that stabilize the receptor in the inactive ground state, but that are broken, allowing them to form new intramolecular bonds in the activated state. This conformational rearrangement is critical to produce a G protein binding site and may represent a key mechanism of receptor activation.

Reversible inactivation of AT(2) angiotensin II receptor from cysteine-disulfide bond exchange

Dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment of angiotensin II (Ang II) type 2 (AT(2)) receptor potentiates ligand binding, but the underlying mechanism is not known. Two disulfide bonds proposed in the extracellular domain were examined in this report. Based on the analysis of ligand affinity of cysteine (Cys, C) to alanine (Ala, A) substitution mutants, we provide evidence that Cys(35)-Cys(290) and Cys(117)-Cys(195) disulfide bonds are formed in the wild-type AT(2) receptor. Disruption of the highly conserved Cys(117)-Cys(195) disulfide bond linking the second and third extracellular segments leads to inactivation of the receptor. The Cys(35)-Cys(290) bond is highly sensitive to DTT. Its breakage results in an increased binding affinity for both Ang II and the AT(2) receptor-specific antagonist PD123319. Surprisingly, in the single Cys mutants, C35A and C290A, a labile population of receptors is produced which can be re-folded to high-affinity state by DTT treatment. These results suggest that the free -SH group of Cys(35) or Cys(290) competes with the disulfide bond formation between Cys(117) and Cys(195). This Cys-disulfide bond exchange results in production of the inactive population of the mutant receptors through formation of a non-native disulfide bond.