Identification of a nuclear localization sequence in β-arrestin-1 and its functional implications

Anti-lymphoma peptide is inspired by mapping a sequence of four amino acids of KRAI motif as nuclear localization signal of Crlz-1

Peptides of Crlz-1 nuclear localization signal as mapped to be a short KRAI sequence inhibited the proliferation of germinal center-derived Ramos cells from Burkitt's lymphoma patient. This anti-proliferative effect was mechanistically explained by a cascade of the block of Crlz-1 nuclear movement and consequential failure of CBFβ nuclear mobilization, resulting in the absence of bound Runx/CBFβ heterodimer on the enhancer-promoter of the Bcl-6 GC master gene. As a consequence of this heterodimer absence, the Bcl-6 expression was abolished, leading to the down-regulation of cyclins D1-D3 and the up-regulation of IRF-4, Blimp-1, and IgJ genes. Furthermore, this peptide decreased the production of rRNA in these cells, indicating that the nuclear Crlz-1 as a UTP-3 constituent of ribosomal small subunit processome might be necessary to regulate the biogenesis and/or processing of rRNA, and thereby produce ribosomes necessary for their rapid proliferation. Surprisingly, the KRAI motif peptides had an intrinsic cell-membrane permeability by themselves, and therefore their anti-proliferative and anti-tumor effects were also demonstrated in both the cultured cells and Ramos-xenografted mice just by adding them directly to the culture media or injecting them into tail veins. This definitely paved the prospective road to developing a novel anti-cancer peptide drug against the germinal center-derived B cell lymphoma.

Mast Cells and Mas-related G Protein-coupled Receptor X2: Itching for Novel Pathophysiological Insights to Clinical Relevance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clinical interest in non-IgE activation of mast cells has been growing since the description of the human MRGPRX2 receptor. Its participation in many allergic and inflammatory conditions such as non histaminergic itch, urticaria, asthma and drug hypersensitivity has been growing. We present here an updated review of its structure, expression and biology to help understand conditions and diseases attributed to its activation and/or overpexression and the search for agonists and antagonists of clinical utility.

RECENT FINDINGS

The description of patients presenting anaphylaxis when exposed to one or multiple MRGPRX2 agonists such as general anesthetics, antibiotics, opiods and other agents has provided evidence of potential heterogeneity in humans. This review provides the most recent developments into the receptor structure, tissue expression and signaling pathways including the potential enhancement of IgE-mediated mast cell activation. New insight into its agonists and antagonists is described and future developments to adress its modulations.

The Ubiquitination of Arrestin3 within the Nucleus Triggers the Nuclear Export of Mdm2, Which, in Turn, Mediates the Ubiquitination of GRK2 in the Cytosol

GRK2 and arrestin3, key players in the functional regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are ubiquitinated by Mdm2, a nuclear protein. The agonist-induced increase in arrestin3 ubiquitination occurs in the nucleus, underscoring the crucial role of its nuclear translocation in this process. The ubiquitination of arrestin3 occurs in the nucleus, highlighting the pivotal role of its nuclear translocation in this process. In contrast, GRK2 cannot translocate into the nucleus; thus, facilitation of the cytosolic translocation of nuclear Mdm2 is required to ubiquitinate GRK2 in the cytosol. Among the explored cellular components and processes, arrestin, Gβγ, clathrin, and receptor phosphorylation were found to be required for the nuclear import of arrestin3, the ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus, nuclear export of Mdm2, and the ubiquitination of GRK2 in the cytosol. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that agonist-induced ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus is interconnected with cytosolic GRK2 ubiquitination.

The multifaceted functions of β-arrestins and their therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative diseases

Arrestins are multifunctional proteins that regulate G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) desensitization, signaling, and internalization. The arrestin family consists of four subtypes: visual arrestin1, β-arrestin1, β-arrestin2, and visual arrestin-4. Recent studies have revealed the multifunctional roles of β-arrestins beyond GPCR signaling, including scaffolding and adapter functions, and physically interacting with non-GPCR receptors. Increasing evidence suggests that β-arrestins are involved in the pathogenesis of a variety of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). β-arrestins physically interact with γ-secretase, leading to increased production and accumulation of amyloid-beta in AD. Furthermore, β-arrestin oligomers inhibit the autophagy cargo receptor p62/SQSTM1, resulting in tau accumulation and aggregation in FTD. In PD, β-arrestins are upregulated in postmortem brain tissue and an MPTP model, and the β2AR regulates SNCA gene expression. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2, and describe their physiological functions and roles in neurodegenerative diseases. The multifaceted roles of β-arrestins and their involvement in neurodegenerative diseases suggest that they may serve as promising therapeutic targets.

Distinct activation mechanisms of β-arrestin-1 revealed by 19F NMR spectroscopy

β-Arrestins (βarrs) are functionally versatile proteins that play critical roles in the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways. While it is well established that the phosphorylated receptor tail plays a central role in βarr activation, emerging evidence highlights the contribution from membrane lipids. However, detailed molecular mechanisms of βarr activation by different binding partners remain elusive. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of the structural changes in critical regions of βarr1 during activation using 19F NMR spectroscopy. We show that phosphopeptides derived from different classes of GPCRs display different βarr1 activation abilities, whereas binding of the membrane phosphoinositide PIP2 stabilizes a distinct partially activated conformational state. Our results further unveil a sparsely-populated activation intermediate as well as complex cross-talks between different binding partners, implying a highly multifaceted conformational energy landscape of βarr1 that can be intricately modulated during signaling.

Role of ARRB1 in prognosis and immunotherapy: A Pan-Cancer analysis

Background: β-arrestin1 (ARRB1), was originally identified as a multifunctional adaptor protein. Although ARRB1 has recently been shown to also play an important role in tumor growth, metastasis, inflammation, and immunity, its relationship with distinct tumor types and the tumor immune microenvironment remains unclear.

Methods: We analyzed the ARRB1 expression profile and clinical characteristics in 33 cancer types using datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Clinical parameters such as patient survival, tumor stage, age, and gender were used to assess the prognostic value of ARRB1. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database was used to explore ARRB1 protein expression data. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms were performed to assess immune infiltration. Furthermore, putative correlations between ARRB1 and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, the signatures of T-cell subtypes, immunomodulators, the tumor mutation burden (TMB), Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and microsatellite instability (MSI) were also explored. Gene functional enrichment was determined using GSEA. GSE40435 and GSE13213 cohorts were used to validate the correlation of ARRB1 with KIRC and LUAD clinicopathological parameters. Finally, the relationship between ARRB1 and immunotherapeutic responses was assessed using three independent immunotherapy cohorts, namely, GSE67501, GSE168204, and IMvigor210.

Results: We found that ARRB1 expression levels were lower in 17 tumor tissues than in the corresponding normal tissues. We further found that ARRB1 expression was significantly correlated with tumor stage in BRCA, ESCA, KIRC, TGCT, and THCA, while in some tumors, particularly KIRC and LUAD, ARRB1 expression was associated with better prognosis. ARRB1 expression was also positively correlated with the stromal score or the immune score in some tumors. Regarding immune cell infiltration, ARRB1 expression in DLBC was positively correlated with M1 macrophage content and negatively correlated with B-cell infiltration. Additionally, there was a broad correlation between ARRB1 expression and three classes of immunomodulators. Furthermore, high ARRB1 expression levels were significantly correlated with some tumor immune-related pathways. Finally, ARRB1 expression was significantly associated with MSI, PD-L1, and TMB in some tumors and with the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in melanoma.

Conclusion: ARRB1 has prognostic value in malignant tumors, especially in KIRC and LUAD. At the same time, ARRB1 was closely correlated with the tumor immune microenvironment and indicators of immunotherapy efficacy, indicating its great potential as a reliable marker for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy.

β-arrestin interacts with TRAF6 to negatively regulate the NF-κB pathway in triangle sail mussel Hyriopsis cumingii

As members of arrestins family, β-arrestins are widely expressed in monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils and other immune cells. They can regulate the immune response of bodies through various ways. In the present study, a β-arrestin homolog named Hcβ-arrestin was cloned and identified from Hyriopsis cumingii. Predicted Hcβ-arrestin protein contained a conserved arrestin domain, which could be further divided into arrestin-N (39-192aa) and arrestin-C (211-365aa). Amino acid sequence alignment showed that it had the highest identity with Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mytilus edulis counterpart, which was 89.02% and 87.68%, respectively. Furthermore, real-time quantitative PCR analysis showed that the Hcβ-arrestin gene was widely expressed in the detected tissues and with the highest expression in hepatopancreas. The transcription of Hcβ-arrestin in hepatopancreas and gill of mussels was significantly up-regulated after stimulation with peptidoglycan, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and polyinosinic polycytidylic acid. Knockdown of Hcβ-arrestin gene significantly increased the expression of some antibacterial effector genes, such as lysozyme, LPS-binding protein/bactericidal permeability increasing protein and theromacin in hepatopancreas and gills of LPS stimulated mussels, but only had little effect on TLR pathway genes. In addition, GST pull-down assay confirmed that Hcβ-arrestin can bind to HcTRAF6 protein in vitro. Dual luciferase reporter assay showed that the co-expression of HcTRAF6 and Hcβ-arrestin inhibited the activation of NF-κB reporter by HcTRAF6. These findings indicated that Hcβ-arrestins could interact with HcTRAF6 to negatively regulate the NF-κB pathway in H. cumingii.

GPCR kinases generate an APH1A phosphorylation barcode to regulate amyloid-β generation

Emerging evidence suggests that G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) are associated with the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, GRKs have not been directly implicated in regulation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) pathogenic cascade in AD. Here, we determine that GRKs phosphorylate a non-canonical substrate, anterior pharynx-defective 1A (APH1A), an integral component of the γ-secretase complex. Significantly, we show that GRKs generate distinct phosphorylation barcodes in intracellular loop 2 (ICL2) and the C terminus of APH1A, which differentially regulate recruitment of the scaffolding protein β-arrestin 2 (βarr2) to APH1A and γ-secretase-mediated Aβ generation. Further molecular dynamics simulation studies reveal an interaction between the βarr2 finger loop domain and ICL2 and ICL3 of APH1A, similar to a GPCR-β-arrestin complex, which regulates γ-secretase activity. Collectively, these studies provide insight into the molecular and structural determinants of the APH1A-βarr2 interaction that critically regulate Aβ generation.

Double life: How GRK2 and β-arrestin signaling participate in diseases

G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins play key roles in GPCR and non-GPCR cellular responses. In fact, GRKs and arrestins are involved in a plethora of pathways vital for physiological maintenance of inter- and intracellular communication. Here we review decades of research literature spanning from the discovery, identification of key structural elements, and findings supporting the diverse roles of these proteins in GPCR-mediated pathways. We then describe how GRK2 and β-arrestins partake in non-GPCR signaling and briefly summarize their involvement in various pathologies. We conclude by presenting gaps in knowledge and our prospective on the promising pharmacological potential in targeting these proteins and/or downstream signaling. Future research is warranted and paramount for untangling these novel and promising roles for GRK2 and arrestins in metabolism and disease progression.

βArrestin1 regulates glucocorticoid receptor mitogenic signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in males. The disease is initially treated with methods that inhibit androgen receptor (AR) signal transduction. Laboratory-based and clinical studies have identified alternative pathways that cause the failure of AR signal inhibition and consequent development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) signaling is activated in certain PC patients and promotes the emergence of CRPC, although by as yet incompletely understood mechanisms. We have previously demonstrated that ubiquitous βarrestin1 (βArr1) expression levels are linked to PC progression. Here, we consider the possibility that βArr1 interacts with and activates GR in model CRPC cells.

METHODS

Bioinformatic analysis of tumor xenograft and human PC datasets was used to correlate the expression of βArr1 and GR. Western blot, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence microscopy, and subcellular fractionation were used to determine protein expression level and localization. Immunoprecipitation was applied to detect protein-protein interactions. RNA expression levels were determined using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Prostate sphere analysis was used to assess the rate of growth and invasion. The xenograft tumor implantation method was used to determine the tumor growth rate, local invasion, and metastasis.

RESULTS

Elevated expression of βArr1 positively correlated with increased GR expression and function in CRPC xenograft and in human PC patients. βArr1 is expressed in the cell cytosol and nucleus, and it formed a complex with GR in the nucleus and not cytosol. Depletion of βArr1 in AR-null CRPC cells inhibited GR function and CRPC growth and invasion in both in vitro and in vivo settings.

CONCLUSIONS

βArr1 binds GR that initiates mitogenic signaling cascades involved in the progression of PC to CRPC. The targeting of the βArr1-GR axis may provide a new opportunity to better manage the CRPC disease.

APLNR regulates IFN-γ signaling via β-arrestin 1 mediated JAK-STAT1 pathway in melanoma cells

The apelin receptor (APLNR) regulates many biological processes including metabolism, angiogenesis, circulating blood volume and cardiovascular function. Additionally, APLNR is overexpressed in various types of cancer and influences cancer progression. APLNR is reported to regulate tumor recognition during immune surveillance by modulating the IFN-γ response. However, the mechanism of APLNR crosstalk with intratumoral IFN-γ signaling remains unknown. Here, we show that activation of APLNR upregulates IFN-γ signaling in melanoma cells through APLNR mediated β-arrestin 1 but not β-arrestin 2 recruitment. Our data suggests that β-arrestin 1 directly interacts with STAT1 to inhibit STAT1 phosphorylation to attenuate IFN-γ signaling. The APLNR mutant receptor, I109A, which is deficient in β-arrestins recruitment, is unable to enhance intratumoral IFN-γ signaling. While APLNR N112G, a constitutively active mutant receptor, increases intratumoral sensitivity to IFN-γ signaling by enhancing STAT1 phosphorylation upon IFN-γ exposure. We also demonstrate in a co-culture system that APLNR regulates tumor survival rate. Taken together, our findings reveal that APLNR modulates IFN-γ signaling in melanoma cells and suggests that APLNR may be a potential target to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy.

An Insight into GPCR and G-Proteins as Cancer Drivers

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface signaling receptors known to play a crucial role in various physiological functions, including tumor growth and metastasis. Various molecules such as hormones, lipids, peptides, and neurotransmitters activate GPCRs that enable the coupling of these receptors to highly specialized transducer proteins, called G-proteins, and initiate multiple signaling pathways. Integration of these intricate networks of signaling cascades leads to numerous biochemical responses involved in diverse pathophysiological activities, including cancer development. While several studies indicate the role of GPCRs in controlling various aspects of cancer progression such as tumor growth, invasion, migration, survival, and metastasis through its aberrant overexpression, mutations, or increased release of agonists, the explicit mechanisms of the involvement of GPCRs in cancer progression is still puzzling. This review provides an insight into the various responses mediated by GPCRs in the development of cancers, the molecular mechanisms involved and the novel pharmacological approaches currently preferred for the treatment of cancer. Thus, these findings extend the knowledge of GPCRs in cancer cells and help in the identification of therapeutics for cancer patients.

β-Arrestins as Important Regulators of Glucose and Energy Homeostasis

β-Arrestin-1 and -2 (also known as arrestin-2 and -3, respectively) are ubiquitously expressed cytoplasmic proteins that dampen signaling through G protein-coupled receptors. However, β-arrestins can also act as signaling molecules in their own right. To investigate the potential metabolic roles of the two β-arrestins in modulating glucose and energy homeostasis, recent studies analyzed mutant mice that lacked or overexpressed β-arrestin-1 and/or -2 in distinct, metabolically important cell types. Metabolic analysis of these mutant mice clearly demonstrated that both β-arrestins play key roles in regulating the function of most of these cell types, resulting in striking changes in whole-body glucose and/or energy homeostasis. These studies also revealed that β-arrestin-1 and -2, though structurally closely related, clearly differ in their metabolic roles under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. These new findings should guide the development of novel drugs for the treatment of various metabolic disorders, including type 2 diabetes and obesity. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Physiology, Volume 84 is February 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Phosphorylation of NF-κBp65 drives inflammation-mediated hepatocellular carcinogenesis and is a novel therapeutic target

BACKGROUND

Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) plays a vital role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). β-arrestin1 (ARRB1) has been proved to enhance the activity of NF-κBp65, and our previous study indicated that ARRB1 promotes hepatocellular carcinogenesis and development of HCC. However, it remains unknown whether p65 is involved in hepatocellular carcinogenesis through the ARRB1-mediated pathway.

METHODS

The levels of NF-κBp65 and NF-κBp65 phosphorylation (p-p65) were assessed in including normal liver, primary HCC and paired paracancerous tissues. Liver-specific p65 knockout mice were used to examine the role of p65 and p-p65 in hepatocarcinogenesis. The mechanism of NF-κBp65 and p-p65 in hepatocarcinogenesis via ARRB1 was also studied both in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Phosphorylation of NF-κBp65 was markedly upregulated in inflammation-related HCC patients and was significantly increased in mouse hepatic inflammation models, which were induced by tetrachloromethane (CCl₄), diethylnitrosamine (DEN), TNF-α, as well as DEN-induced HCC. Hepatocyte-specific p65-deficient mice markedly decreased in the HCC incidence and size of tumours by the repressing of the proliferation of malignant cells in a DEN-induced HCC model. Furthermore, ARRB1 directly bounds p65 to promote the phosphorylation of NF-κBp65 at ser536, resulted in cell malignant proliferation through GSK3β/mTOR signalling.

CONCLUSION

The data demonstrated that phosphorylation of NF-κBp65 drives hepatocellular carcinogenesis in response to inflammation-mediated ARRB1, and that inhibition of the phosphorylation of NF-κBp65 restrains the hepatocellular carcinogenesis. The results indicate that phosphorylation of NF-κBp65 is a novel therapeutic target for HCC.

Chaiqin chengqi decoction ameliorates acute pancreatitis in mice via inhibition of neuron activation-mediated acinar cell SP/NK1R signaling pathways

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Chaiqin chengqi decoction (CQCQD) and its derivatives have been widely used in China for the early management of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). Numerous studies demonstrate the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects of CQCQD and derivatives, but whether these effects can be attributed to suppressing neurogenic inflammation, has never been studied.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate the effects of CQCQD on substance P (SP)-neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) based neurogenic inflammation in an experimental AP model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For AP patients on admission, pain score was accessed by visual analog scale (VAS); the levels of serum SP and expressions of pancreatic SP and NK1R were also determined. For in vivo study, mice received 7 intraperitoneal injections of cerulein (50 μg/kg) at hourly intervals to induce AP, whilst controls received normal saline injections. In the treatment groups, CQCQD (10 g/kg, 200 μl) was intragastrically given at the third, fifth, and seventh of the cerulein injection or the NK1R antagonist CP96345 (5 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally injected 30 min before the first cerulein administration. The von Frey test was performed to evaluate pain behavior. Animals were sacrificed at 12 h from the first cerulein/saline injection for severity assessment. Pharmacology network analysis was used to identify active ingredients of CQCQD for AP and pain. In vitro, freshly isolated pancreatic acinar cells were pre-treated with CQCQD (5 mg/ml), CP96345 (1 μM), or selected active compounds of CQCQD (12.5, 25, and 50 μM) for 30 min, followed by SP incubation for another 30 min.

RESULTS

The VAS score as well as the levels of serum SP and expressions of pancreatic SP-NK1R were up-regulated in moderately severe and severe patients compared with those with mild disease. CQCQD, but not CP96345, consistently and significantly ameliorated pain, pancreatic necrosis, and systemic inflammation in cerulein-induced AP as well as inhibited NK1R internalization of pancreatic acinar cells. These effects of CQCQD were associated with reduction of pancreatic SP-NK1R and neuron activity in pancreas, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal cord. Baicalin, emodin, and magnolol, the top 3 active components of CQCQD identified via pharmacology network analysis, suppressed NK1R internalization and NF-κB signal pathway activation in isolated pancreatic acinar cells.

CONCLUSIONS

CQCQD ameliorated cerulein-induced AP and its associated pain via inhibiting neuron activation-mediated pancreatic acinar cell SP-NK1R signaling pathways and its active compounds baicalin, emodin, and magnolol contributed to this effect.

β-Arrestin-1 is required for adaptive β-cell mass expansion during obesity

Obesity is the key driver of peripheral insulin resistance, one of the key features of type 2 diabetes (T2D). In insulin-resistant individuals, the expansion of beta-cell mass is able to delay or even prevent the onset of overt T2D. Here, we report that beta-arrestin-1 (barr1), an intracellular protein known to regulate signaling through G protein-coupled receptors, is essential for beta-cell replication and function in insulin-resistant mice maintained on an obesogenic diet. Specifically, insulin-resistant beta-cell-specific barr1 knockout mice display marked reductions in beta-cell mass and the rate of beta-cell proliferation, associated with pronounced impairments in glucose homeostasis. Mechanistic studies suggest that the observed metabolic deficits are due to reduced Pdx1 expression levels caused by beta-cell barr1 deficiency. These findings indicate that strategies aimed at enhancing barr1 activity and/or expression in beta-cells may prove useful to restore proper glucose homeostasis in T2D.

Key Metabolic Functions of β-Arrestins: Studies with Novel Mouse Models

β-Arrestin-1 and -2 are intracellular proteins that are able to inhibit signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, both proteins can also modulate cellular functions in a G protein-independent fashion. During the past few years, studies with mutant mice selectivity lacking β-arrestin-1 and/or -2 in metabolically important cell types have led to novel insights into the mechanisms through which β-arrestins regulate key metabolic processes in vivo, including whole-body glucose and energy homeostasis. The novel information gained from these studies should inform the development of novel drugs, including β-arrestin- or G protein-biased GPCR ligands, that could prove useful for the therapy of several important pathophysiological conditions, including type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Relevance of Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors in Multitarget Paradigm Associated with the Endocannabinoid System

Cannabinoids have shown to exert their therapeutic actions through a variety of targets. These include not only the canonical cannabinoid receptors CB1R and CB2R but also related orphan G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), ligand-gated ion channels, transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, metabolic enzymes, and nuclear receptors. In this review, we aim to summarize reported compounds exhibiting their therapeutic effects upon the modulation of CB1R and/or CB2R and the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Concomitant actions at CBRs and PPARα or PPARγ subtypes have shown to mediate antiobesity, analgesic, antitumoral, or neuroprotective properties of a variety of phytogenic, endogenous, and synthetic cannabinoids. The relevance of this multitargeting mechanism of action has been analyzed in the context of diverse pathologies. Synergistic effects triggered by combinatorial treatment with ligands that modulate the aforementioned targets have also been considered. This literature overview provides structural and pharmacological insights for the further development of dual cannabinoids for specific disorders.

Beta-Arrestins and Receptor Signaling in the Vascular Endothelium

The vascular endothelium is the innermost layer of blood vessels and is a key regulator of vascular tone. Endothelial function is controlled by receptor signaling through G protein-coupled receptors, receptor tyrosine kinases and receptor serine-threonine kinases. The β-arrestins, multifunctional adapter proteins, have the potential to regulate all of these receptor families, although it is unclear as to whether they serve to integrate signaling across all of these different axes. Notably, the β-arrestins have been shown to regulate signaling by a number of receptors important in endothelial function, such as chemokine receptors and receptors for vasoactive substances such as angiotensin II, endothelin-1 and prostaglandins. β-arrestin-mediated signaling pathways have been shown to play central roles in pathways that control vasodilation, cell proliferation, migration, and immune function. At this time, the physiological impact of this signaling has not been studied in detail, but a deeper understanding of it could lead to the development of novel therapies for the treatment of vascular disease.

β-arrestin-1 suppresses myogenic reprogramming of brown fat to maintain euglycemia

A better understanding of the signaling pathways regulating adipocyte function is required for the development of new classes of antidiabetic/obesity drugs. We here report that mice lacking β-arrestin-1 (barr1), a cytoplasmic and nuclear signaling protein, selectively in adipocytes showed greatly impaired glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity when consuming an obesogenic diet. In contrast, transgenic mice overexpressing barr1 in adipocytes were protected against the metabolic deficits caused by a high-calorie diet. Barr1 deficiency led to a myogenic reprogramming of brown adipose tissue (BAT), causing elevated plasma myostatin (Mstn) levels, which in turn led to impaired insulin signaling in multiple peripheral tissues. Additional in vivo studies indicated that barr1-mediated suppression of Mstn expression by BAT is required for maintaining euglycemia. These findings convincingly identify barr1 as a critical regulator of BAT function. Strategies aimed at enhancing barr1 activity in BAT may prove beneficial for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of β-arrestin2 in the nucleus occurs in a Gβγ- and clathrin-dependent manner

The fate and activity of β-arrestin2, a key player in the regulation of desensitization and endocytosis of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are regulated by mouse double minute 2 homolog (Mdm2)-mediated ubiquitination. However, details of the molecular mechanisms of β-arrestin2 ubiquitination remain unclear. Studies on β-arrestin2 and Mdm2 mutants with modified nucleocytoplasmic shuttling properties have revealed that β-arrestin2 ubiquitination occurs in the nucleus in a Gβγ- and clathrin-dependent manner. The nuclear entry of both β-arrestin2 and Mdm2 commonly relies on the presence of importin complex but can occur independently of each other. Gβγ and clathrin regulated the nuclear entry of β-arrestin2 by mediating the interaction between β-arrestin2 and importin β1. In contrast, Akt-mediated phosphorylation of two serine residues of Mdm2 partly regulated the nuclear entry of Mdm2. Ubiquitinated β-arrestin2 along with Mdm2 translocated to the cytoplasm where they play various functional roles including receptor endocytosis and ubiquitination of other cytoplasmic proteins. The nuclear export of Mdm2 required nuclear entry and interaction of β-arrestin2 with Mdm2. Ubiquitination was required for the translocation of β-arrestin2 toward activated receptors on the plasma membrane and for its endocytic activity. The current study revealed the cellular components and processes involved in the ubiquitination of β-arrestin2, and these findings could be quintessential for providing directions and detailed strategies for the manipulation of GPCR functions and development of GPCR-related therapeutics.

β-arrestin1/YAP/mutant p53 complexes orchestrate the endothelin A receptor signaling in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

The limited clinical response observed in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC) with high frequency of TP53 mutations (mutp53) might be related to mutp53-driven oncogenic pathway network. Here we show that β-arrestin1 (β-arr1), interacts with YAP, triggering its cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling. This interaction allows β-arr1 to recruit mutp53 to the YAP-TEAD transcriptional complex upon activation of endothelin-1 receptors (ET-1R) in patient-derived HG-SOC cells and in cell lines bearing mutp53. In parallel, β-arr1 mediates the ET-1R-induced Trio/RhoA-dependent YAP nuclear accumulation. In the nucleus, ET-1 through β-arr1 orchestrates the tethering of YAP and mutp53 to YAP/mutp53 target gene promoters, including EDN1 that ensures persistent signals. Treatment of patient-derived xenografts reveals synergistic antitumoral and antimetastatic effects of the dual ET-1R antagonist macitentan in combination with cisplatinum, shutting-down the β-arr1-mediated YAP/mutp53 transcriptional programme. Furthermore, ETAR/β-arr1/YAP gene signature correlates with a worst prognosis in HG-SOC. These findings support effective combinatorial treatment for repurposing the ET-1R antagonists in HG-SOC.

New Routes in GPCR/β-Arrestin-Driven Signaling in Cancer Progression and Metastasis

Tumor cells acquire invasive and metastatic behavior by sensing changes in the localization and activation of signaling pathways, which in turn determine changes in actin cytoskeleton. The core-scaffold machinery associated to β-arrestin (β-arr) is a key mechanism of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) to achieve spatiotemporal specificity of different signaling complexes driving cancer progression. Within different cellular contexts, the scaffold proteins β-arr1 or β-arr2 may now be considered organizers of protein interaction networks involved in tumor development and metastatic dissemination. Studies have uncovered the importance of the β-arr engagement with a growing number of receptors, signaling molecules, cytoskeleton regulators, epigenetic modifiers, and transcription factors in GPCR-driven tumor promoting pathways. In many of these molecular complexes, β-arrs might provide a physical link to active dynamic cytoskeleton, permitting cancer cells to adapt and modify the tumor microenvironment to promote the metastatic spread. Given the complexity and the multidirectional β-arr-driven signaling in cancer cells, therapeutic targeting of specific GPCR/β-arr molecular mechanisms is an important avenue to explore when considering future new therapeutic options. The focus of this review is to integrate the most recent developments and exciting findings of how highly connected components of β-arr-guided molecular connections to other pathways allow precise control over multiple signaling pathways in tumor progression, revealing ways of therapeutically targeting the convergent signals in patients.

Methods to Investigate the Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling Properties of β-Arrestins

β-Arrestins (β-arrs) were originally appreciated for the roles they play in the desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are also now known to act as molecular scaffolds, providing control in multiple signalling pathways. Through their scaffolding properties, β-arrs dynamically regulate the activity and/or subcellular distribution of protein partners giving rise to an appropriate cellular response. There are two β-arr isoforms, namely, β-arr1 and β-arr2, which share high sequence homology and structural conservation. While the β-arrs often display conserved overlapping roles, decisive differences between the isoforms also exist. A striking example of this is the subcellular distribution of the β-arr isoforms. While β-arr1 is distributed both in cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, β-arr2 displays an apparent cytoplasmic distribution. Both β-arrs are actively imported into the nucleus, but β-arr2 is constitutively exported by a leptomycin B-sensitive pathway due to a nuclear export signal in its C-terminus that is absent in β-arr1. β-arr2 therefore undergoes constitutive nucleocytoplasmic shuttling enabling the displacement of nuclear binding cargoes, such as Mdm2. Here, we describe methods to explore the differential nucleocytoplasmic shuttling capacities of the β-arrs.

CCR2 Signaling Selectively Regulates IFN-α: Role of β-Arrestin 2 in IFNAR1 Internalization

An integral component of the antiviral response, type I IFNs require regulation to modulate immune activation. We identify β-arrestin 2 as a key modulator of type I IFN in primary human macrophages, an essential component of the innate immune response. β-Arrestin 2 was selectively activated by CCL2/CCR2 signaling, which induced a decrease in IFN-α, but not IFN-β expression. Small interfering RNA knockdown of β-arrestin 2 demonstrated its role in IFNAR1 internalization, as well as STAT1 and IRF3 activation. As a result, cytokine responses were not propagated following HIV infection and TLR3 activation. However, remnants of IFN signaling remained intact, despite β-arrestin 2 activation, as IFN-β, IFN-γ, IFN-λ1, IRF7, TRAIL, and MxA expression were sustained. Similar effects of β-arrestin 2 on IFN signaling occurred in hepatocytes, suggesting that arrestins may broadly modulate IFN responses in multiple cell types. In summary, we identify a novel role of β-arrestin 2 as an integral regulator of type I IFN through its internalization of IFNAR1 and a subsequent selective loss of downstream IFN signaling.

β-Arrestins: Multitask Scaffolds Orchestrating the Where and When in Cell Signalling

The β-arrestins (β-arrs) were initially appreciated for the roles they play in the desensitization and endocytosis of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are now also known to act as multifunctional adaptor proteins binding many non-receptor protein partners to control multiple signalling pathways. β-arrs therefore act as key regulatory hubs at the crossroads of external cell inputs and functional outputs in cellular processes ranging from gene transcription to cell growth, survival, cytoskeletal regulation, polarity, and migration. An increasing number of studies have also highlighted the scaffolding roles β-arrs play in vivo in both physiological and pathological conditions, which opens up therapeutic avenues to explore. In this introductory review chapter, we discuss the functional roles that β-arrs exert to control GPCR function, their dynamic scaffolding roles and how this impacts signal transduction events, compartmentalization of β-arrs, how β-arrs are regulated themselves, and how the combination of these events culminates in cellular regulation.

Subcellular localization of β-arrestin1 and its prognostic value in lung adenocarcinoma

β-Arrestins play important roles in cancer progression, and the subcellular localization of β-arrestin1 has been receiving increasingly more attention. Intriguingly, several studies, including some of our previous work, showed that the effects of β-arrestin1 on outcomes of cancer patients were controversial.Specimens were obtained from 133 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of β-arrestin1 and p300 in the collected tissues. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to examine the relationship between β-arrestin1 and patient survival.We found no significant association between β-arrestin1 and clinicopathological variables. The Kaplan-Meier plot showed that patients with high expression of β-arrestin1 (especially in the nucleus) had a poorer overall survival (OS) and shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .026, P = .015). Additionally, high p300 expression also resulted in worse OS (P = .039). Following the univariate analysis, high expressions of nuclear β-arrestin1 and p300 were classed as poor prognostic factors for both OS (P = .016) and DFS (P = .025).The expression of β-arrestin1 in the nucleus is associated with increased malignant tendency of lung adenocarcinoma, and the predictive value of β-arrestin1 may be optimized by combining information about the expression of p300 acetyltransferase.

The Diverse Roles of Arrestin Scaffolds in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling

The visual/β-arrestins, a small family of proteins originally described for their role in the desensitization and intracellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), have emerged as key regulators of multiple signaling pathways. Evolutionarily related to a larger group of regulatory scaffolds that share a common arrestin fold, the visual/β-arrestins acquired the capacity to detect and bind activated GPCRs on the plasma membrane, which enables them to control GPCR desensitization, internalization, and intracellular trafficking. By acting as scaffolds that bind key pathway intermediates, visual/β-arrestins both influence the tonic level of pathway activity in cells and, in some cases, serve as ligand-regulated scaffolds for GPCR-mediated signaling. Growing evidence supports the physiologic and pathophysiologic roles of arrestins and underscores their potential as therapeutic targets. Circumventing arrestin-dependent GPCR desensitization may alleviate the problem of tachyphylaxis to drugs that target GPCRs, and find application in the management of chronic pain, asthma, and psychiatric illness. As signaling scaffolds, arrestins are also central regulators of pathways controlling cell growth, migration, and survival, suggesting that manipulating their scaffolding functions may be beneficial in inflammatory diseases, fibrosis, and cancer. In this review we examine the structure-function relationships that enable arrestins to perform their diverse roles, addressing arrestin structure at the molecular level, the relationship between arrestin conformation and function, and sites of interaction between arrestins, GPCRs, and nonreceptor-binding partners. We conclude with a discussion of arrestins as therapeutic targets and the settings in which manipulating arrestin function might be of clinical benefit.

β-arrestin1 at the cross-road of endothelin-1 signaling in cancer

The advent of targeted therapeutics in human cancer has begun to find novel druggable targets and, in this context, the endothelin-1 receptor (ET-1R), namely ET_A receptor (ET_AR) and ET_B receptor, among the GPCR family represents a class of highly druggable molecules in cancer. ET-1R are aberrantly expressed in human malignancies, potentially representing prognostic factors. Their activation by ligand stimulation initiate signaling cascades activating different downstream effectors, allowing precise control over multiple signaling pathways. ET-1R regulates cell proliferation, survival, motility, cytoskeletal changes, angiogenesis, metastasis as well as drug resistance. The molecular events underlying these responses are the activation of transcriptional factors and coactivators, and downstream genes, acting as key players in tumor growth and progression. ET-1R represent crucial cancer targets that have been exploited for ET-1R therapeutics. Importantly, efforts to explore new information of ET_AR in cancer have uncovered that their functions are crucially regulated by multifunctional scaffold protein β-arrestins (β-arrs) which orchestrate the multidimensionality of ET_AR signaling into highly regulated and distinct signaling complexes, a property that is highly advantageous for tumor signaling. Moreover, the role of β-arr1 in ET-1 signaling in cancer highlights why the pleiotropic effects of ET-1 and its dynamic signaling are more complex than previously recognized. In order to improve therapeutic strategies that interfere with the widespread effects of ET-1R, it is important to consider antagonists able to turn the receptors “off” selectively controlling β-arr1-dependent signaling, highlighting the possibility that targeting ET_AR/β-arr1 may display a large therapeutic window in cancer.

Emerging Functional Divergence of β-Arrestin Isoforms in GPCR Function

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are tightly regulated by multifunctional protein β-arrestins. Two isoforms of β-arrestin sharing more than 70% sequence identity and overall very similar 3D structures, β-arrestins 1 and 2, were originally expected to be functionally redundant. However, in recent years multiple lines of emerging evidence suggest they have distinct roles in various aspects of GPCR regulation and signaling. We summarize selected examples of GPCRs where β-arrestin isoforms are discovered to display non-overlapping and sometimes even antagonistic functions. We also discuss potential mechanistic basis for their functional divergence and highlight new frontiers that are likely to form the focal points of research in this area in coming years.

Astroglial β-Arrestin1-mediated Nuclear Signaling Regulates the Expansion of Neural Precursor Cells in Adult Hippocampus

Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is crucial for preserving normal brain function, but how it is regulated by niche cells is uncertain. Here we show that β-arrestin 1 (β-arr1) in dentate gyrus (DG) regulates neural precursor proliferation. β-arr1 knockout (KO) mice show reduced neural precursor proliferation in subgranular zone (SGZ) which could be rescued by selective viral expression of β-arr1 but not its nuclear-function-deficient mutants under control of hGFAP promotor in DG. Compared with wild type astrocytes, β-arr1 KO astrocytes nurture less neurospheres, and this may be attributed to changed activity of soluble, heat-sensitive excretive factors, such as BMP2. RNA-sequencing reveals that β-arr1 KO DG astrocytes exhibit an aberrant gene expression profile of niche factors, including elevated transcription of Bmp2. Taken together, our data suggest that β-arr1 mediated nuclear signaling regulates the production of excretive factors derived from niche astrocytes and expansion of neural precursors in DG, thus maintaining homeostasis of adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

Co-expression of β-arrestin1 and NF-кB is associated with cancer progression and poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma

β-arrestin1 and NF-κB have been demonstrated to be associated with tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis. Thus far, there is nevertheless little study about these two molecules in lung adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between β-arrestin1 and NF-κB expression and the clinicopathological characteristics in lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 115 surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma patients were recruited for the study. Expression of β-arrestin1 and p65 were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in lung adenocarcinoma tissue samples. Nuclear expression of β-arrestin1 and p65 were observed in 39.1 % (45/115) and 46.1 % (53/115) cases of lung adenocarcinoma, respectively. And high expression of β-arrestin1 had negative prognostic impact for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.034 and p = 0.033). In addition, overexpression of p65 indicated a significantly poor OS and DFS than those of lower-expression (p = 0.038 and p = 0.041). Furthermore, co-expression of nuclear β-arrestin1 and p65 correlated with poorer OS and DFS in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model confirmed that co-expression of nuclear β-arrestin1 and p65 was an independent prognostic factor for tumor progression (p = 0.008). In conclusion, these data indicated that co-expression of nuclear β-arrestin1 and p65 was a novel predictor for worse prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Endothelin A receptor/β-arrestin signaling to the Wnt pathway renders ovarian cancer cells resistant to chemotherapy

The high mortality of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is mainly caused by resistance to the available therapies. In EOC, the endothelin-1 (ET-1, EDN1)-endothelin A receptor (ETAR, EDNRA) signaling axis regulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and a chemoresistant phenotype. However, there is a paucity of knowledge about how ET-1 mediates drug resistance. Here, we define a novel bypass mechanism through which ETAR/β-arrestin-1 (β-arr1, ARRB1) links Wnt signaling to acquire chemoresistant and EMT phenotype. We found that ETAR/β-arr1 activity promoted nuclear complex with β-catenin and p300, resulting in histone acetylation, chromatin reorganization, and enhanced transcription of genes, such as ET-1, enhancing the network that sustains chemoresistance. Silencing of β-arr1 or pharmacologic treatment with the dual ETAR/ETBR antagonist macitentan prevented core complex formation and restored drug sensitivity, impairing the signaling pathways involved in cell survival, EMT, and invasion. In vivo macitentan treatment reduced tumor growth, vascularization, intravasation, and metastatic progression. The combination of macitentan and cisplatinum resulted in the potentiation of the cytotoxic effect, indicating that macitentan can enhance sensitivity to chemotherapy. Investigations in clinical specimens of chemoresistant EOC tissues confirmed increased recruitment of β-arr1 and β-catenin to ET-1 gene promoter. In these tissues, high expression of ETAR significantly associated with poor clinical outcome and chemoresistance. Collectively, our findings reveal the existence of a novel mechanism by which ETAR/β-arr1 signaling is integrated with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway to sustain chemoresistance in EOC, and they offer a solid rationale for clinical evaluation of macitentan in combination with chemotherapy to overcome chemoresistance in this setting.

Arrestin2 modulates androgen receptor activation

Androgen receptor (AR) has a pivotal role in the growth and survival of prostate cancer (PCa). Arrestin2 (Arr2) is a ubiquitous scaffolding/adaptor protein first characterized as a regulator of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. In this study, we report that Arr2 additionally functions as a positive regulator of AR expression and function in PCa cells. Expression level of Arr2 correlates with that of AR, and knockdown of Arr2 inhibits the expression of AR and its effectors prostate-specific antigen, transmembrane protease serine 2, FK506-binding protein 51 and fatty acid synthase. Mechanistically, the knockdown of Arr2 attenuates the binding of AR to androgen response elements and consequently decreases transcription of AR-regulated genes. The inhibition of AR by Arr2 knockdown occurs in both androgen-dependent and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) cells, although the effect is more prominent in CRPC. Arr2 knockdown inhibits the in vitro CRPC cell proliferation, prostasphere growth and invasion, as well as the in vivo prostate tumor formation, local invasion and distant metastasis. These results illustrate a new role for Arr2 in the expression and activation of AR and its potential relevance as a target for therapeutic intervention and monitoring of disease progression.

βArrestin1 regulates the guanine nucleotide exchange factor RasGRF2 expression and the small GTPase Rac-mediated formation of membrane protrusion and cell motility

βArrestin proteins shuttle between the cytosol and nucleus and have been shown to regulate G protein-coupled receptor signaling, actin remodeling, and gene expression. Here, we tested the hypothesis that βarrestin1 regulates actin remodeling and cell migration through the small GTPase Rac. Depletion of βarrestin1 promotes Rac activation, leading to the formation of multipolar protrusions and increased cell circularity, and overexpression of a dominant negative form of Rac reverses these morphological changes. Small interfering RNA library screen identifies RasGRF2 as a target of βarrestin1. RasGRF2 gene and protein expression levels are elevated following depletion of βarrestin1, and the consequent activation of Rac results in dephosphorylation of cofilin that can promote actin polymerization and formation of multipolar protrusions, thereby retarding cell migration and invasion. Together, these results suggest that βarrestin1 regulates rasgrf2 gene expression and Rac activation to affect membrane protrusion and cell migration and invasion.

Arrestins as regulatory hubs in cancer signalling pathways

Non-visual arrestins were initially appreciated for the roles they play in the negative regulation of G protein-coupled receptors through the processes of desensitisation and endocytosis. The arrestins are also now known as protein scaffolding platforms that act downstream of multiple types of receptors, ensuring relevant transmission of information for an appropriate cellular response. They function as regulatory hubs in several important signalling pathways that are often dysregulated in human cancers. Interestingly, several recent studies have documented changes in expression and localisation of arrestins that occur during cancer progression and that correlate with clinical outcome. Here, we discuss these advances and how changes in expression/localisation may affect functional outputs of arrestins in cancer biology.

Arrestins in apoptosis

Programmed cell death (apoptosis) is a coordinated set of events eventually leading to the massive activation of specialized proteases (caspases) that cleave numerous substrates, orchestrating fairly uniform biochemical changes than culminate in cellular suicide. Apoptosis can be triggered by a variety of stimuli, from external signals or growth factor withdrawal to intracellular conditions, such as DNA damage or ER stress. Arrestins regulate many signaling cascades involved in life-or-death decisions in the cell, so it is hardly surprising that numerous reports document the effects of ubiquitous nonvisual arrestins on apoptosis under various conditions. Although these findings hardly constitute a coherent picture, with the same arrestin subtypes, sometimes via the same signaling pathways, reported to promote or inhibit cell death, this might reflect real differences in pro- and antiapoptotic signaling in different cells under a variety of conditions. Recent finding suggests that one of the nonvisual subtypes, arrestin-2, is specifically cleaved by caspases. Generated fragment actively participates in the core mechanism of apoptosis: it assists another product of caspase activity, tBID, in releasing cytochrome C from mitochondria. This is the point of no return in committing vertebrate cells to death, and the aspartate where caspases cleave arrestin-2 is evolutionary conserved in vertebrate, but not in invertebrate arrestins. In contrast to wild-type arrestin-2, its caspase-resistant mutant does not facilitate cell death.

G protein coupled-receptor signaling and reversible lysine acetylation

Emerging data suggest that interaction with reversible protein acetylation is an important mediator of GPCR-initiated changes in transcription and other processes. Alteration of acetylation downstream of GPCR activation occurs through a variety of mechanisms, including kinase-dependent and -independent regulation of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and histone acetyltransferases (HATs). The prominence of both GPCR and acetylation in pathology and drug development efforts highlights the importance of understanding cross-talk between these two signaling mechanisms.

Angiotensin II activates NF-κB through AT1A receptor recruitment of β-arrestin in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells

Activation of the angiotensin type 1A receptor (AT1AR) in rat aorta vascular smooth muscle cells (RASMC) results in increased synthesis of the proinflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). We previously showed that nuclear localization of internalized AT1AR results in activation of transcription of the gene for COX-2, i.e., prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-2. Others have suggested that ANG II stimulation of COX-2 protein synthesis is mediated by NF-κB. The purpose of the present study was to examine the interrelationship between AT1AR activation, β-arrestin recruitment, and NF-κB activation in the ability of ANG II to increase COX-2 protein synthesis in RASMC. In the present study we utilized RASMC, inhibitors of the NF-κB pathway, β-arrestin knockdown, radioligand binding, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence to characterize the roles of AT1AR internalization, NF-κB activation, and β-arrestin in ANG II-induced COX-2 synthesis. Ro-106-9920 or parthenolide, agents that inhibit the initial steps of NF-κB activation, blocked ANG II-induced p65 NF-κB nuclear localization, COX-2 protein expression, β-arrestin recruitment, and AT1AR internalization without inhibiting ANG II-induced p42/44 ERK activation. Curcumin, an inhibitor of NF-κB-induced transcription, blocked ANG II-induced COX-2 protein expression without altering AT1AR internalization, ANG II-induced p65 NF-κB nuclear localization, or p42/44 ERK activation. Small interfering RNA-induced knockdown of β-arrestin-1 and -2 inhibited ANG II-induced p65 NF-κB nuclear localization. In vascular smooth muscle cells, internalization of the activated AT1AR mediated by β-arrestins activates the NF-κB pathway, producing nuclear localization of the transcription factor and initiation of COX-2 protein synthesis, thereby linking internalization of the receptor with the NF-κB pathway.

β-Arrestins: modulators of small GTPase activation and function

Most cellular events responsible for accurate G protein-coupled receptor trafficking involve small GTP-binding proteins. For example, trafficking of receptors via the endocytic and exocytic pathways requires activation of ADP-ribosylation factors and Rab proteins, while receptor-mediated complex responses such as migration are well characterized to be dependent upon Rho family members. Because β-arrestin proteins are recruited to activated receptors and now considered as key signaling molecules, whether they act to control small GTPase activity remains a subject of great interest. Over the years, considerable evidence has suggested that β-arrestins and GTPases might be effectors of the same signaling pathways. One example is the roles of both β-arrestin and Ras, the prototypical GTPase, in coordinating activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Recently developed tools effective in suppressing the expression of β-arrestins will help define whether they are essential for small G protein activation. Furthermore, novel approaches to identify protein complexes will greatly advance our understanding of the possible cross talk between β-arrestin and small GTPases.

Distinct cellular and subcellular distributions of G protein-coupled receptor kinase and arrestin isoforms in the striatum

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and arrestins mediate desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Arrestins also mediate G protein-independent signaling via GPCRs. Since GRK and arrestins demonstrate no strict receptor specificity, their functions in the brain may depend on their cellular complement, expression level, and subcellular targeting. However, cellular expression and subcellular distribution of GRKs and arrestins in the brain is largely unknown. We show that GRK isoforms GRK2 and GRK5 are similarly expressed in direct and indirect pathway neurons in the rat striatum. Arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 are also expressed in neurons of both pathways. Cholinergic interneurons are enriched in GRK2, arrestin-3, and GRK5. Parvalbumin-positive interneurons express more of GRK2 and less of arrestin-2 than medium spiny neurons. The GRK5 subcellular distribution in the human striatal neurons is altered by its phosphorylation: unphosphorylated enzyme preferentially localizes to synaptic membranes, whereas phosphorylated GRK5 is found in plasma membrane and cytosolic fractions. Both GRK isoforms are abundant in the nucleus of human striatal neurons, whereas the proportion of both arrestins in the nucleus was equally low. However, overall higher expression of arrestin-2 yields high enough concentration in the nucleus to mediate nuclear functions. These data suggest cell type- and subcellular compartment-dependent differences in GRK/arrestin-mediated desensitization and signaling.