Combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: do we need to maximize the dose of azathioprine?

Therapeutic drug monitoring and immunogenetic factors associated with the use of adalimumab in Crohn's disease patients

Crohn's disease (CD) involves immune system interactions with intestinal tissue, driven by pro-inflammatory cytokines like Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α). Adalimumab, targeting TNF-α, regulates associated inflammatory responses. Despite being humanized, it may induce immunogenic processes, affecting treatment effectiveness. Thus, monitoring serum adalimumab and anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels can optimize therapy. Understanding genetic factors influencing adalimumab response can enhance personalized treatment and improve patient quality of life. We aimed to quantify adalimumab serum levels, assess test interchangeability, detect ADA, examine immune complex formation, and investigate genetic phenotypes related to immunogenicity in CD patients. Seventy CD patients in the maintenance phase with adalimumab were classified into active (CDA) and remission (CDR) groups. Adalimumab concentration was determined via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA-Promonitor) and lateral flow assay (Quantum Blue), with assay interchangeability assessed statistically. ADA and immune complex formation were quantified using ELISA assays. DNA was genotyped for the genes ATG16L1, CD96, and CD155. No significant differences in adalimumab serum concentrations were observed between groups, regardless of the assay. However, a statistical difference between the tests indicated measurement disparity (P = 0.003), with moderate agreement (Lin's correlation of 0.247). ADA was detected in 4 of 27 of the patients with infratherapeutic levels, 3 in the CDA group and 1 in the CDR group. Analysis of immune complexes revealed significantly higher concentrations in the CDA group (P = 0.0125). The genotypic evaluation revealed significant associations for the CD96 CC (wild-type) genotype with higher CRP levels, colonic involvement, and infratherapeutic levels of adalimumab. ATG16L1 CC genotype was associated with higher CDEIS and fecal calprotectin values, while the variant (TT) genotype had lower platelet counts. The effectiveness of treatment with adalimumab was not directly related to higher medication levels in this cohort. The disparity between tests indicates the need to use only one test in patient follow-up to ensure accuracy in therapeutic monitoring. Genotypic differences highlight the correlation between the wild genotype for CD96 and ATG16L1 with unfavorable laboratory and endoscopic response to adalimumab. Finally, the more significant levels of immune complexes in the CDA group indicate an association with a worse response to adalimumab.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD).

OBJECTIVE

To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

METHODS

Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process.

RESULTS

Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator.

CONCLUSION

This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.

Iranian Consensus Guideline for Pharmacotherapy with Biologics and Small Molecules Drugs in Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Background: Pharmacotherapy with biologics and small molecules, as the more effective therapies for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is complex. Choosing the best methods for their utilization in order to induce and maintain remission are critical for practicing gastroenterologists. We aimed to develop an Iranian consensus on the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with biologics and small molecules. Methods: A Delphi consensus was undertaken by experts who performed a literature summary and voting process. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading and Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; and an additional risk of bias-protocol. Results: Following an extensive search of the literature, 219 studies were used to determine the quality of the evidence. After three rounds of voting, consensus (defined as≥80% agreement) was reached for 87 statements. Conclusion: We considered different aspects of pharmacotherapy in this consensus. This guideline, along with clinical judgment, can be used to optimize management of IBD patients.

Immunomodulator comedication promotes the reversal of anti-drug antibody-mediated loss of response to anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

Loss of therapeutic response (LOR) due to anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to investigate whether immunomodulator comedication can reverse the immunogenic LOR to TNF inhibitors in IBD.

METHODS

In this real-world retrospective cohort study, 123 IBD patients with neutralizing ADA to infliximab or adalimumab and concomitant subtherapeutic trough levels were screened for clinical LOR. Subsequent ADA and trough level measurements and clinical outcomes were analyzed for patients who received either immunomodulator comedication or dose intensification of infliximab or adalimumab to overcome LOR.

RESULTS

Following immunogenic LOR, the initial anti-TNF regimen was optimized in 33 patients. In univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, immunomodulator comedication was identified as the crucial factor for regaining clinical remission and ADA clearance. Detectable trough levels (≥ 0.98 or ≥ 1.00 mg/L, respectively) had optimal predictive performance for both endpoints in receiver operating characteristics curves [area under the curve 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.68-1.00) for regaining clinical remission, 0.87 (0.71-1.00) for ADA clearance]. Furthermore, 11/20 patients (55%) on a comedication with azathioprine or methotrexate and 2/13 patients (15%) receiving anti-TNF dose intensification exclusively (P = 0.032) exhibited ADA elimination, regain of therapeutic trough levels, and clinical remission. Regain of clinical remission alone was achieved in 17/20 (85%) patients receiving comedication and 2/13 (15%) patients receiving anti-TNF dose intensification (P = 1.6 × 10-4).

CONCLUSION

Immunogenic LOR to infliximab or adalimumab in IBD can be successfully reversed using immunomodulator comedication.

Combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and perspectives

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are chronic nonspecific intestinal inflammatory diseases with a relapsing-remitting course, including Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Combination therapy has been proposed as a strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD. The aim of this study is to summarize current evidence and perspectives on combination therapies in IBD.

METHODS

Electronic databases such as PubMed, Ovid Embase, Medline, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Current evidence supports that the combination of infliximab and thiopurines is more effective than monotherapy in inducing and maintaining remission in IBD. Data on the combination of other biological agents such as adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and immunosuppressors is lacking or showed conflicting results. Vedolizumab seems a potentially effective maintenance regimen after calcineurin inhibitors-based rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Dual Targeted Therapy, which is the combination of two biological agents and/or small molecules, might be a reasonable choice in patients with concomitant IBD and extraintestinal manifestations, or in patients with medical-refractory IBD who lack valid alternatives. Some safety concerns such as adverse events (serious and opportunistic infections) and malignancies (lymphoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer) were raised in combination therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapies seem to be effective in some IBD patients such as refractory IBD patients or patients with extraintestinal manifestations, but it might be associated with an increased risk of adverse events and malignancies.

The efficacy of immunomodulators in the prevention and suppression of anti-drug antibodies to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

The development of biological agents against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) has revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), frequently achieving induction and maintenance of remission in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, a loss of response due to the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is seen annually in approximately 20% of IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy. Current evidence suggests that the use of immunomodulators (IMM), such as thiopurines (azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine) or methotrexate, may prevent or suppress ADA formation. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the available literature regarding the efficacy of IMM in the prevention and suppression of ADA development to anti-TNF therapy in patients with IBD.

A Comprehensive Literature Review and Expert Consensus Statement on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biologics is a rapidly evolving field. We aimed to provide a consensus statement regarding the clinical utility of TDM for biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A modified Delphi method was applied to develop consensus statements. A comprehensive literature review was performed regarding TDM of biologic therapies in IBD, and 45 statements were subsequently formulated on the potential application of TDM in IBD. The statements, along with literature, were then presented to a panel of 10 gastroenterologists with expertise in IBD and TDM who anonymously rated them on a scale of 1-10 (1 = strongly disagree and 10 = strongly agree). An expert consensus development meeting was held virtually to review, discuss, refine, and reformulate statements that did not meet criteria for agreement or that were ambiguous. During the meeting, additional statements were proposed. Panelists then confidentially revoted, and statements rated ≥7 by 80% or more of the participants were accepted. During the virtual meeting, 8 statements were reworded, 7 new statements were proposed, and 19 statements were rerated. Consensus was finally reached in 48/49 statements. The panel agreed that reactive TDM should be used for all biologics for both primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response. It was recommended that treatment discontinuation should not be considered for infliximab or adalimumab until a drug concentration of at least 10-15 μg/mL was achieved. Consensus was also achieved regarding the utility of proactive TDM for anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. It was recommended to perform proactive TDM after induction and at least once during maintenance. Consensus was achieved in most cases regarding the utility of TDM of biologics in IBD, specifically for reactive and proactive TDM of anti-tumor necrosis factors.

Does Perianal Disease Influence the Efficacy of Combination Therapy in Crohn's Disease?

BACKGROUND

Perianal disease is associated with a disabling course of Crohn's disease (CD). We aim to study the impact of perianal disease on CD remission rates, after a 1-year course of infliximab in combination therapy with azathioprine.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study, including consecutive CD patients on combination therapy, followed for 1 year since induction. The outcome variable was split into clinical and endoscopic remissions. The correlation toward the outcome variable was assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis and a survival assessment, using SPSS software.

RESULTS

We assessed 74 CD patients, of whom 41 (55.4%) were female, with a mean age of 36 years. Thirty-nine percent of the patients presented perianal disease at diagnosis (n = 29). We documented 70.3% clinical and 47.2% endoscopic remissions. Several variables had statistical significance toward the outcomes (endoscopic and clinical remissions) in the univariate analysis. After adjusting for confoundment, patients with perianal disease presented an odds ratio (OR) of 0.201 for achieving endoscopic remission (CI: 0.054-0.75, p value 0.017) and an OR of 0.203 for achieving clinical remission (CI: 0.048-0.862, p value 0.031). Sixty-six patients (89.2%) presented an initial response to treatment, from whom, 20 (30.3%) exhibited at least 1 disease relapse (clinical and/or endoscopic). Patients with perianal disease presented higher probability of disease relapse, displaying statistically significant difference on Kaplan-Meier curves (Breslow p value 0.043).

CONCLUSION

In the first year of combination therapy, perianal disease is associated with an 80% decrease in endoscopic and clinical remission rates and higher ratio of disease relapse.