Faecal parameters in the assessment of activity in inflammatory bowel disease

Sniffing out causes of gastrointestinal disorders: a review of volatile metabolomic biomarkers

Distinct changes can be observed in the odor of human excretions during health and disease. Identifying underlying volatile metabolites responsible for these odorous changes can be correlated with the pathological process within the body. Advances in the technology have enabled us to interpret the volatile signature of these changes in the odor. This has opened a promising area to lay the foundations of a rapid, noninvasive and point of care diagnostic tool. This review explores the diagnostic potential of volatile organic metabolites as novel biomarkers and extends the discussion on the clinical applications of these biomarkers in gastrointestinal disorders.

Neutrophils and inflammatory metabolism in antimicrobial functions of the mucosa

In this mini-review, we will discuss recent findings that implicate neutrophil infiltration and function in establishing a metabolic environment to facilitate efficient pathogen clearance. For decades, neutrophils have been regarded as short lived, nonspecific granulocytes, equipped with toxic antimicrobial factors and a respiratory burst generating ROS. Recent findings demonstrate the importance of HIF signaling in leukocytes and surrounding tissues during inflammation. Here, we will review the potential mechanisms and outcomes of HIF stabilization within the intestinal mucosa.

Diagnostic utility of faecal biomarkers in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by unspecific symptoms. In clinical practice it is crucial to distinguish between non-inflammatory functional problems and inflammatory, malignant or infectious diseases of the GI tract. Differentiation between these involves the use of clinical, radiological, endoscopic, histological and serological techniques, which are invasive, expensive, time-consuming and/or hindered by inaccuracies arising from subjective components. A range of faecal markers now appears to have the potential to greatly assist in the differentiation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and IBS. Faecal markers of neutrophil influx into the mucosa are reliable indicators of intestinal inflammation and their role has been mainly studied in discriminating IBD from non-IBD conditions (including IBS) rather than organic from non-organic diseases. Phagocyte-specific proteins of the S100 family (S100A12, calprotectin) are amongst the most promising faecal biomarkers of inflammation. Faecal leukocyte degranulation markers (lactoferrin, polymorphonuclear elastase and myeloperoxidase) have also been suggested as diagnostic tools for the differentiation of IBD and IBS. More recently, additional proteins, including granins, defensins and matrix-metalloproteases, have been discussed as differential diagnostic markers in IBD and IBS. In this review, some of the most promising faecal markers, which have the potential to differentiate IBD and IBS and to advance diagnostic practices, will be discussed.

Fecal markers: calprotectin and lactoferrin

Overall, fecal markers have been found to be more accurate than serum markers. However, fecal markers are not specific for IBD and may be elevated in a range of organic conditions. Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin can still differentiate inflammatory disease from functional bowel disorders. Comparison studies have found an overall diagnostic accuracy in IBD of 80% to 100% for both calprotectin and lactoferrin. Elevated levels are found in both CD and UC making it difficult to distinguish between these 2 diagnoses from these biomarkers alone. Both markers correlated well to mucosal healing and histologic improvement. Hence, they may be useful in monitoring response to treatment and predicting endoscopic and clinical relapse. Overall, patients with elevated markers were at higher risk of postoperative recurrence than those with normal levels. Fecal markers are useful in predicting pouchitis as well. Fecal markers are helpful as an adjunctive tool in overall evaluation of patients with nonspecific symptoms and as a management tool in those with inflammatory disease to monitor disease activity and possibility of relapse. They are less invasive than colonoscopy and can help guide management in a more cost-effective manner.

Evaluation of fecal myeloperoxidase as a biomarker of disease activity and severity in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Subclinical inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC) can predispose to relapses and biomarkers can detect mucosal inflammation.

AIMS

To study the role of fecal myeloperoxidase (FMPO) in assessing disease activity and response to therapy in UC.

METHODS

Patients with UC attending our hospital from July 2005 to September 2006 were studied. All patients underwent clinical, endoscopic, and histological assessment for disease extent and severity. Estimation of FMPO levels at baseline and on follow-up was carried out. Age-matched healthy controls were studied for FMPO levels.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients of UC (30 males, 25 females, mean age 38.6 ± 12 years) and 54 age-matched controls (mean age 37.6 ± 13.6 years) were studied. Cases had higher median MPO levels than controls (0.42 [IQR 0.84] vs. 0.06 [IQR 0.12]); (p < 0.001). Cases with endoscopically more severe disease (Gr III & IV; n = 18) had higher median FMPO levels compared to those with milder disease (Gr II, n = 37), [0.075 (IQR 1.315) vs. 0.315 (IQR 0.813); p = 0.02]. The median MPO level in 27 patients was 0.58 [IQR 0.89] units/ml at presentation which on follow-up decreased significantly to 0.18 [IQR 0.42] units/ml (p value 0.002). However, there was no significant association between FMPO and endoscopic extent and histological scores of activity and chronicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal MPO is an effective biomarker for assessing disease activity and response to therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: current practices and recent advances

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis represent the two main forms of the idiopathic chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Currently available blood and stool based biomarkers provide reproducible, quantitative tools that can complement clinical assessment to aid clinicians in IBD diagnosis and management. C-reactive protein and fecal based leukocyte markers can help the clinician distinguish IBD from noninflammatory diarrhea and assess disease activity. The ability to differentiate between forms of IBD and predict risk for disease complications is specific to serologic tests including antibodies against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic proteins. Advances in genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic array based technologies are facilitating the development of new biomarkers for IBD. The discovery of novel biomarkers, which can correlate with mucosal healing or predict long-term disease course has the potential to significantly improve patient care. This article reviews the uses and limitations of currently available biomarkers and highlights recent advances in IBD biomarker discovery.

Biomarkers of regimen-related mucosal injury

Regimen-related mucosal toxicity is extremely common following cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The alimentary mucosa is particularly susceptible to injury and dysfunction, leading to a constellation of adverse side effects. Currently there is no "one fit" biomarker of such injury. A number of biomarkers have been investigated in the context of gastrointestinal diseases, which may prove useful in the oncology arena. Two of significant potential include citrulline and calprotectin, however more work is required to define the most appropriate settings for their use. Identification of a biomarker that is easily obtained, measured, and accurately indicates mucosal damage, would allow for improved patient diagnosis of toxicities and prompt appropriate intervention. In this review, we highlight the effectiveness of currently examined biomarkers and discuss future avenues for research in this exciting area.

Biomarkers in the management of ulcerative colitis: a brief review

Several attempts have been made in the last two decades to investigate ulcerative colitis (UC) patients during the natural course of the disease so as to identify appropriate surrogate markers of disease activity. Most patients with quiescent inflammatory bowel disease have low grade inflammation and it is possible that relapse occurs only once the inflammatory process crosses a critical intensity. Since inflammation is a continuous process, its direct assessment may provide us a quantitative pre-symptomatic measure of imminent relapse. If substantial, it may allow targeted treatment early, to avert relapse or formulate newer therapeutic strategies to maintain symptomatic remission. It is clinically very important to identify these patients at a subclinical stage, noninvasively, by various biomarkers. Biomarkers help to gain an objective measurement of disease activity as symptoms are often subjective. Biomarkers also help to avoid invasive procedures which are often a burden to the patient and the health care system. If an ideal biomarker existed for UC, it would greatly facilitate the work of the gastroenterologist treating these patients. Both “classical” and “emerging” biomarkers of relevance for UC have been studied, but the quest for an ideal biomarker still continues. In this brief review we describe various biomarkers of clinical importance.

High intestinal IgA associates with reduced risk of IgE-associated allergic diseases

Development of oral tolerance and its stimulation by probiotics are still incomprehensible. Microbial stimulation of the gut may induce a subtle inflammation and induce secretion of mucosal IgA, which participates in antigen elimination. In a cohort of allergy-prone infants receiving probiotics and prebiotics or placebo we studied intestinal IgA and inflammation in the development of eczema, food allergy, asthma, and rhinitis (allergic diseases). We performed a nested unmatched case-control study of 237 infants participating in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled allergy-prevention trial using a combination of four probiotic strains pre-natally and during 6 months form birth. We measured faecal IgA, alpha1-antitrypsin (alpha1-AT), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and calprotectin at the age of 3 and 6 months. By age 2 yr, 124 infants had developed allergic disease or IgE-sensitization (cases) and 113 had not (controls). In infants with high faecal IgA concentration at the age of 6 months, the risk of having any allergic disease before the age of 2 yr tended to reduce [odds ratio (OR: 0.52)] and the risk for any IgE-associated (atopic) disease reduced significantly (OR: 0.49). High faecal calprotectin at the age of 6 months associated also with lower risk for IgE-associated diseases up to age 2 yr (OR: 0.49). All faecal inflammation markers (alpha1-AT, TNF-alpha, and calprotectin) correlated positively with faecal IgA (p < 0.001). Probiotics tended to augment faecal IgA (p = 0.085) and significantly increased faecal alpha1-AT (p = 0.001). High intestinal IgA in early life associates with minimal intestinal inflammation and indicates reduced risk for IgE-associated allergic diseases.

Clinical significance of inflammatory markers

Inflammatory markers play a key role in the evaluation of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. For patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea, distinguishing inflammatory bowel disease from other disorders can be difficult, and invasive diagnostic procedures may be required. Inflammatory markers can be useful to differentiate patients who may require further workup from those who do not. Several serum, fecal, and other markers are reviewed for their use in clinical practice. Although no single ideal marker exists, a few show promise in diagnosing inflammatory disease, monitoring disease activity, and predicting relapse.

Questions and answers on the role of fecal lactoferrin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease

Among the available fecal biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), only calprotectin and lactoferrin have translated into useful clinical tools. Lactoferrin can be detected using simple and cheap techniques and it has excellent stability in feces over a long period of time. Fecal lactoferrin has a good diagnostic precision for separating organic and functional intestinal disease. However, a negative fecal lactoferrin test should be interpreted merely as the absence of significant neutrophilic intestinal inflammation. The mean sensitivity and specificity of the fecal lactoferrin determination for the diagnosis of IBD is 80% and 82%, respectively. Some studies have suggested a lower accuracy of lactoferrin when compared with calprotectin for the diagnosis of IBD, indicating that more studies on this topic are necessary. A parallel between fecal lactoferrin levels and IBD activity estimated with clinical, endoscopic, and histological parameters has been confirmed. However, this correlation seems to be lower in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis, mainly when Crohn's disease patients with purely ileal disease are considered. Fecal lactoferrin determination may be useful in predicting impending clinical relapse in IBD patients. Fecal lactoferrin may be a helpful noninvasive diagnostic tool for monitoring therapeutic efficacy, mainly on mucosal healing, as a decreasing concentration of lactoferrin can be interpreted as a marker of therapeutic response. Finally, in patients with Crohn's disease who have undergone ileocolonic resection, those with higher lactoferrin fecal levels might be more prone to postsurgical recurrence.

Fecal lactoferrin, myeloperoxidase and serum C-reactive are effective biomarkers in the assessment of disease activity and severity in patients with idiopathic ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Disease activity and severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) is assessed using colonoscopy, which is invasive, costly and has poor patient acceptability. The role of non-invasive biomarkers of intestinal inflammation in the evaluation of patients with UC is not known. The aim of the study was to examine the role of serum C-reactive protein (SCRP), fecal myeloperoxidase (FMPO) and fecal lactoferrin (FLF) in assessing disease severity, activity and response to therapy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with idiopathic UC (IUC) attending our hospital from July 2005 to September 2006 were studied. All underwent clinical, endoscopic and histological assessment for disease activity, extent, severity and estimation of SCRP, FMPO and FLF levels at baseline and follow up (FU). An equal number of healthy age-matched controls were studied for biomarker levels.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (mean age 37 +/- 12 years) were studied. All three biomarkers were elevated more often in the cases than in the controls (all P = 0.000). Cases with severe IUC had higher CRP, MPO and FLF titers than those without severe IUC. At FU, a significant fall in biomarker levels paralleled the reduction in Mayo's scores. All three biomarkers showed a high degree of correlation with each other. The areas under the curve for FLF, MPO and CRP were 1.00, 0.867 and 0.622, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of markers were: FLF (94%, 100%), FMPO (89%, 51%) and SCRP (24%, 100%).

CONCLUSION

Biomarkers are useful in assessing disease activity, severity and response to therapy in patients with UC. They showed a high degree of correlation with each other.

Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin for the prediction of inflammatory bowel disease relapse

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to determine the role of fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin in the prediction of inflammatory bowel disease relapses, both in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), in a large, long-term, follow-up study.

METHODS

The prospective multicenter study included CD and UC patients who had been in clinical remission for 6 months. At baseline, patients provided a single stool sample for calprotectin and lactoferrin determination. Follow-up was 12 months in patients showing no relapse and until activity flare in relapsing patients.

RESULTS

In all, 163 patients (89 CD, 74 UC) were included. Twenty-six patients (16%) relapsed during follow-up. Calprotectin concentrations in patients who suffered a relapse were higher than in nonrelapsing patients (239 +/- 150 versus 136 +/- 158 microg/g; P < 0.001). Relapse risk was higher in patients having high (>150 microg/g) calprotectin concentrations (30% versus 7.8%; P < 0.001) or positive lactoferrin (25% versus 10%; P < 0.05). Fecal calprotectin (>150 microg/g) sensitivity and specificity to predict relapse were 69% and 69%, respectively. Corresponding values for lactoferrin were 62% and 65%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict relapse using calprotectin determination was 0.73 (0.69 for UC and 0.77 for CD). Better results were obtained when only colonic CD disease or only relapses during the first 3 months were considered (100% sensitivity). High fecal calprotectin levels or lactoferrin positivity was associated with clinical relapse in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and both fecal tests were associated with relapse in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin determination may be useful in predicting impending clinical relapse-especially during the following 3 months-in both CD and UC patients.

Questions and answers on the role of faecal calprotectin as a biological marker in inflammatory bowel disease

Faecal calprotectin has been proposed as a non-invasive surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Close correlation between faecal calprotectin concentration and faecal leukocyte excretion quantified with (111)indium has been described. This faecal marker can be detected using simple and cheap techniques. Faecal calprotectin has a good diagnostic precision for separating organic and functional intestinal diseases. However, the specificity for the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease is lower than desirable, as several diseases other than inflammatory bowel disease -- specially colorectal neoplasia and gastrointestinal infection -- can also increase faecal calprotectin. High concentration of calprotectin in faeces is a strong argument to carry out a colonoscopy in order to rule out the presence of inflammatory bowel disease or other organic pathologies. Parallelism between faecal calprotectin levels and inflammatory bowel disease activity has been confirmed, although this faecal marker appears to better reflect the disease activity in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn's disease. Faecal calprotectin's capacity to predict inflammatory bowel diseases relapse is promising. It has been suggested that, in inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving treatment, a normalization or decrease in faecal calprotectin concentrations is an accurate indicator of endoscopic healing. Greater faecal calprotectin concentration has been shown in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, suggesting that there is a high prevalence of subclinical intestinal inflammation in them.

Review of fecal biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

We reviewed potential fecal biomarkers of inflammatory bowel disease and assessed their utility in a range of clinical applications.

METHODS

A literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase database was performed, locating all language articles on fecal biomarkers, including calprotectin and lactoferrin. The references of these papers were searched manually for further references.

RESULTS

A wide range of fecal biomarkers have been evaluated in the research setting. Only fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin have translated into useful clinical tools. These biomarkers have demonstrated high sensitivity for organic intestinal disease and good correlation with other measures of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin are useful triage tools to differentiate organic intestinal disorders from functional disorders. They also have a role in monitoring inflammatory bowel disease activity and predicting relapse.

[Role of biological markers in inflammatory bowel disease]

The role played by the distinct biological markers in chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains insufficiently characterized. C-reactive protein (CRP) has a short half-life and consequently it is elevated early after the onset of the inflammatory process and rapidly decreases after its resolution, making it an attractive marker of disease activity. Moreover, this test is inexpensive and easy to perform and is unaffected by medication. While Crohn's disease is associated with a marked CRP response, there is little or no elevation in the synthesis of this protein in ulcerative colitis. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate provides some advantages such as its ease of determination, availability, and reduced cost. Nevertheless, it also has several disadvantages, notably the fact that its concentration depends on age, the presence of anemia, smoking, and the use of certain drugs. Moreover, its utility is limited by its long half life and consequent prolonged latency period after changes in chronic IBD activity. In theory, fecal markers have the advantages of showing greater specificity in the diagnosis of chronic IBD. Several gastrointestinal diseases, including chronic IBD, show greater leukocyte elimination in feces and a close correlation has been described between fecal calprotectin concentration and leukocyte excretion quantified by 111indium. Advantages of this fecal marker are that it can be detected through a simple and inexpensive technique and also shows excellent stability in feces for prolonged periods. Like calprotectin, fecal lactoferrin is also quantified by a simple and inexpensive ELISA method, although there is considerably less experience with this latter marker.

Fecal lactoferrin is a sensitive and specific marker of disease activity in children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Fecal lactoferrin (FLA) is a neutrophil-derived surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation that is elevated in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, the correlation between FLA levels and serological markers of disease activity has not been previously reported, to our knowledge. In the present study we evaluated the ability of FLA levels to reflect disease activity in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We further assessed the relationship between FLA levels and customary laboratory and clinical measures of inflammation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fecal specimens were collected from 148 consecutive pediatric patients (79 with Crohn disease, 62 with ulcerative colitis, and 7 with irritable bowel syndrome) and 22 healthy control individuals. Lactoferrin was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IBD-SCAN, TECHLAB, Inc). Disease activity was assessed at the time of sample provision by laboratory measures (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] and albumin) and previously validated disease activity indices (Pediatric Crohn Disease Activity Index, Kozarek, Harvey Bradshaw Activity Index).

RESULTS

Lactoferrin levels were significantly higher in patients with ulcerative colitis (1880 +/- 565 microg/mL) (mean +/- SE) or Crohn disease (1701 +/- 382 microg/mL) than in healthy control individuals under 21 years of age (1.17 +/- 0.47 microg/mL, P < 0.001). Lactoferrin levels correlated significantly with ESR, hematocrit, albumin, and platelet count (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that FLA levels were comparable to ESR in detecting patients with clinically active disease (P < 0.001). Patients who experienced a clinical flare within 2 months of specimen collection displayed higher lactoferrin levels (845 +/- 452 microg/mL) than did those who remained in clinical remission (190 +/- 90 microg/mL, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Data presented here demonstrate that FLA is a sensitive and specific biochemical marker of inflammation for use in the diagnosis and interval assessment of pediatric patients with IBD, and its level correlates well with both clinical disease activity indices and ESR. Elevated levels of FLA may also identify patients at greater risk for the development of subsequent clinical flares.

Enzymes in feces: useful markers of chronic inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are characterized by a chronic intestinal inflammation. Since the precise etiology is still unknown, current therapies are aimed at reducing or eliminating inflammation.

METHODS

Endoscopy and histology on biopsy specimens remain the gold standard methods for detecting and quantifying bowel inflammation. These technique are expensive, invasive and not well tolerated by patients since the need of repeated examinations affects their quality of life. Although disease activity scores and laboratory inflammatory markers are widely used they showed unreliable relations with endoscopy and histology. Fecal markers have been investigated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by many authors for diagnostic purposes, to assess disease activity and of risk of complications, to predict relapse or recurrence, and to monitor the effect of therapy. Many inflammatory mediators have been detected in the feces such as leukocytes, cytokines and proteins from neutrophil activation. Some of these, particularly lactoferrin and calprotectin, have been demonstrated to be useful in detecting active inflammatory bowel disease, in predicting recurrence of disease after surgery or monitoring the effects of medical therapy. Calprotectin and lactoferrin are remarkably stable and easily detect in stool using ELISA so they appear to be equally recommendable as inflammation markers in the lower gastrointestinal tract especially in IBD patients.

CONCLUSION

Fecal markers are non-invasive, simple, cheap, sensitive and specific parameters and are useful to detect strointestinal inflammation.

Review article: biological activity markers in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, inflammatory bowel disease activity is assessed by clinical activity indices that measure clinical symptoms and endoscopic indices that measure endoscopic inflammation. Biological markers are a non-invasive way of objectively measuring inflammation and can play an adjunctive or primary role in the assessment of disease activity.

AIM

To review the data on biological markers for assessment of disease activity and prediction of relapse in inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

To collect relevant articles, a PubMed search was performed from 1980 to 2006 using following search terms in combination: inflammatory bowel disease, biomarkers, inflammation, disease activity, relapse, acute phase reactants cytokines, interleukins, adhesion molecules, integrins, calprotectin and lactoferrin.

RESULTS

Biological activity markers can be classified into serological, faecal and miscellaneous categories. Acute phase reactants levels correlate with disease activity and some can be used to help predict relapse. Cytokines and adhesion molecules are elevated in active disease inconsistently. Faecal markers are useful in assessment of disease activity and relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute phase reactants and faecal markers are useful to assess the disease activity in clinical practice. More data are required on cytokines and adhesion molecules. C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, interleukins and faecal markers may be useful in predicting a relapse.

Current therapy of inflammatory bowel disease in children

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) are chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases that can present as bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and malnutrition. Collectively, these disorders are referred to as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). All patients with IBD share a common pathophysiology. However, there are a number of developmental, psychosocial, and physiologic issues that are unique to the approximate, equals 20% of patients that present during childhood or adolescence. These include the possibility of disease-induced delays in linear growth or physical development, differences in drug dosing, and the changes in social and cognitive development that occur as children move from school-age years into adolescence and early adulthood. Gastroenterologists caring for these children must therefore develop an optimal regimen of pharmacologic therapies, nutritional management, psychologic support, and properly timed surgery (when necessary) that will maintain disease remission, minimize disease and drug-induced adverse effects, and optimize growth and development. This article reviews current approaches to the management of patients with UC and CD and highlights issues specific to the treatment of children with IBD. The principal medical therapies used to induce disease remission in patients with UC are aminosalicylates (for mild disease), corticosteroids (for moderate disease), and cyclosporine (ciclosporin) (for severe disease). If a patient responds to the induction regimen, maintenance therapies that are used to prevent disease relapse include aminosalicylates, mercaptopurine, and azathioprine. Colectomy with creation of an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (J pouch) has become the standard of care for patients with severe or refractory colitis and results in an improved quality of life in most patients. Therefore, the risks associated with using increasingly potent immunosuppressant agents must be balanced in each case against a patient's desire to retain their colon and avoid a temporary or potentially permanent ileostomy. Decisions about drug therapy in the management of patients with CD are more complex and depend on both the location (e.g. gastroduodenal vs small intestinal vs colonic), as well as the behavior of the disease (inflammatory/mucosal vs stricturing vs perforating) in a given patient. Induction therapies for CD typically include aminosalicylates and antibiotics (for mild mucosal disease), nutritional therapy (including elemental or polymeric formulas), corticosteroids (for moderate disease), and infliximab (for corticosteroid-resistant or fistulizing disease). Aminosalicylates, mercaptopurine, azathioprine, methotrexate, and infliximab can be used as maintenance therapies. Because surgical treatment of CD is not curative, it is typically reserved for those patients either with persistent symptoms and disease limited to a small section of the intestine (e.g. the terminal ileum and cecum) or for the management of complications of the disease including stricture or abdominal abscess. When surgery is necessary, maintenance medications administered postoperatively will postpone recurrence. Patients with UC and CD are at risk for the development of micronutrient deficiencies (including folate, iron, and vitamin D deficiencies) and require close nutritional monitoring. In addition, patients with UC and CD involving the colon are at increased risk of developing colon cancer, and should be enrolled into a colonoscopy surveillance program after 8-10 years of disease duration.

AAT as a diagnostic tool

Serum alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT) concentration can be affected by both inflammatory and non-inflammatory conditions. This paper characterizes the nature of AAT in physiology and pathologic deficiency and increasing states. The relationships between the AAT concentration in different clinical materials (serum, urine, faeces) and various diseases connected with different organs were analyzed.

Weaning to hypoallergenic formula improves gut barrier function in breast-fed infants with atopic eczema

OBJECTIVES

Infants may be sensitized to dietary antigens even during exclusive breast-feeding. Because food antigen traces in breast milk may have harmful effects on gut barrier function in infants with atopy, the authors sought to evaluate whether or not it is beneficial to shift such infants from breast milk to a hypoallergenic formula.

METHODS

Fifty-six infants (mean age, 5.0 months) manifesting atopic eczema during exclusive breast-feeding were studied at weaning to a tolerated hypoallergenic formula. The urinary recovery ratios of orally administered lactulose and mannitol, fecal alpha-1 antitrypsin and urinary methylhistamine, and eosinophil protein X concentrations were assessed during breast-feeding and after weaning.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range, IQR) concentration of fecal alpha-1 antitrypsin was 2.3 mg/g (range, 1.2-3.3 mg/g) during breast-feeding and 0 (0.0-1.9 mg/g) after weaning to a tolerated hypoallergenic formula, z = -4.23, P < 0.0001. The urinary recovery ratio of lactulose and mannitol decreased from 0.029 (range, 0.021-0.042) to 0.023 (range, 0.016-0.031), respectively, z = -3.45, P = 0.0006. Concomitantly, the atopic eczema improved, and the concentration of urinary eosinophil protein X decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In breast-fed infants with atopy, gut barrier function is improved after cessation of breast-feeding and starting of hypoallergenic formula feeding.

Clinical features of inflammatory bowel disease

The purpose of this review is to highlight new developments during the past year regarding diagnosis and clinical features of inflammatory bowel disease. Endoscopy remains the cornerstone for diagnosis and evaluation of ileocolonic inflammatory bowel disease. In ulcerative colitis, recent studies have challenged the concept of a continuous and homogeneous inflammatory process with constant rectal involvement: patchy inflammation and rectal sparing were reported in treated ulcerative colitis, and frequent cecum and appendiceal orifice skip lesions were confirmed. Cross-sectional imaging techniques usefully complement endoscopy by assessing whole-bowel thickness and detecting abscesses and fistulae. Furthermore, echo Doppler ultrasound is able to measure mesenteric blood flow, which is increased in active inflammatory bowel disease and seems to parallel inflammatory disease activity. Osteopenia, which affects approximately half of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, can be detected by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and prevented. Hyperhomocysteinemia, a predisposing factor for thrombosis, seems to be more frequent in inflammatory bowel disease, and can be corrected by folate supplementation. The concept of an aggressive, penetrating form of Crohn disease with early postoperative recurrence as opposed to a more indolent, nonpenetrating form of the disease, with later recurrence, was recently challenged. The most significant predictor of the risk of malignancy in inflammatory bowel disease remains the presence of dysplasia in colonic biopsy specimens. A dysplastic polypoid lesion or mass is a strong predictor of cancer but should be distinguished from the dysplasia inherent in a coincident sporadic adenoma.