Six-Month Continuous Intraputamenal Infusion Toxicity Study of Recombinant Methionyl Human Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (r-metHuGDNF) in Rhesus Monkeys

Transplantation of human neural progenitor cells secreting GDNF into the spinal cord of patients with ALS: a phase 1/2a trial

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) involves progressive motor neuron loss, leading to paralysis and death typically within 3–5 years of diagnosis. Dysfunctional astrocytes may contribute to disease and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) can be protective. Here we show that human neural progenitor cells transduced with GDNF (CNS10-NPC-GDNF) differentiated to astrocytes protected spinal motor neurons and were safe in animal models. CNS10-NPC-GDNF were transplanted unilaterally into the lumbar spinal cord of 18 ALS participants in a phase 1/2a study (NCT02943850). The primary endpoint of safety at 1 year was met, with no negative effect of the transplant on motor function in the treated leg compared with the untreated leg. Tissue analysis of 13 participants who died of disease progression showed graft survival and GDNF production. Benign neuromas near delivery sites were common incidental findings at post-mortem. This study shows that one administration of engineered neural progenitors can provide new support cells and GDNF delivery to the ALS patient spinal cord for up to 42 months post-transplantation.

A phase 1/2a study shows that human neural progenitor cells modified to release the growth factor GDNF are safely transplanted into the spinal cord of patients with ALS, with cell survival and GDNF production for over 3 years.

Gene Therapy Approach with an Emphasis on Growth Factors: Theoretical and Clinical Outcomes in Neurodegenerative Diseases

The etiology of many neurological diseases affecting the central nervous system (CNS) is unknown and still needs more effective and specific therapeutic approaches. Gene therapy has a promising future in treating neurodegenerative disorders by correcting the genetic defects or by therapeutic protein delivery and is now an attraction for neurologists to treat brain disorders, like Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, spinocerebellar ataxia, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, stroke, and spinal cord injury. Gene therapy allows the transgene induction, with a unique expression in cells' substrate. This article mainly focuses on the delivering modes of genetic materials in the CNS, which includes viral and non-viral vectors and their application in gene therapy. Despite the many clinical trials conducted so far, data have shown disappointing outcomes. The efforts done to improve outcomes, efficacy, and safety in the identification of targets in various neurological disorders are also discussed here. Adapting gene therapy as a new therapeutic approach for treating neurological disorders seems to be promising, with early detection and delivery of therapy before the neuron is lost, helping a lot the development of new therapeutic options to translate to the clinic.

Safety Assessment of AAV2-hGDNF Administered Via Intracerebral Injection in Rats for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent neuroprotective biologic in Parkinson's disease models. Adeno-associated viral vector serotype 2 (AAV2)-human GDNF safety was assessed in rats treated with a single intracerebral dose of vehicle, 6.8 × 108, 6.8 × 109, or 5.2 × 1010 vector genomes (vg)/dose followed by interim sacrifices on day 7, 31, 90, and 376. There were no treatment-related effects observed on food consumption, body weight, hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation parameters, neurobehavioral parameters, organ weights, or serum GDNF and anti-GDNF antibody levels. Increased serum anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibody titers were observed in the 5.2 × 1010 vg/dose group. Histopathological lesions were observed at the injection site in the 6.8 × 109 vg/dose (day 7) and 5.2 × 1010 vg/dose groups (days 7 and 31) and consisted of gliosis, mononuclear perivascular cuffing, intranuclear inclusion bodies, and/or apoptosis on day 7 and mononuclear perivascular cuffing on day 31. GDNF immunostaining was observed in the injection site in all dose groups through day 376 indicating no detectable impacts of anti-AAV2 neutralizing antibody. There was no evidence of increased expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide or Swann cell hyperplasia in the cervical and lumbar spinal cord or medulla oblongata at the 5.2 × 1010 vg/dose level indicating lack of hyperplastic effects. In conclusion, no systemic toxicity was observed, and the local toxicity observed at the injection site appeared to be reversible demonstrating a promising safety profile of intracerebral AAV2-GDNF delivery. Furthermore, an intracerebral dose of 6.8 × 108 AAV2-GDNF vg/dose was considered to be a no observed adverse effect level in rats.

Extended Treatment with Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Parkinson's Disease

Background:

Intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), administered every 4 weeks to patients with moderately advanced Parkinson’s disease, did not show significant clinical improvements against placebo at 40 weeks, although it significantly increased [¹⁸F]DOPA uptake throughout the entire putamen.

Objective:

This open-label extension study explored the effects of continued (prior GDNF patients) or new (prior placebo patients) exposure to GDNF for another 40 weeks.

Methods:

Using the infusion protocol of the parent study, all patients received GDNF without disclosing prior treatment allocations (GDNF or placebo). The primary outcome was the percentage change from baseline to Week 80 in the OFF state Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score.

Results:

All 41 parent study participants were enrolled. The primary outcome decreased by 26.7±20.7% in patients on GDNF for 80 weeks (GDNF/GDNF; N = 21) and 27.6±23.6% in patients on placebo for 40 weeks followed by GDNF for 40 weeks (placebo/GDNF, N = 20; least squares mean difference: 0.4%, 95% CI: –13.9, 14.6, p = 0.96). Secondary endpoints did not show significant differences between the groups at Week 80 either. Prespecified comparisons between GDNF/GDNF at Week 80 and placebo/GDNF at Week 40 showed significant differences for mean OFF state UPDRS motor (–9.6±6.7 vs. –3.8±4.2 points, p = 0.0108) and activities of daily living score (–6.9±5.5 vs. –1.0±3.7 points, p = 0.0003). No treatment-emergent safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions:

The aggregate study results, from the parent and open-label extension suggest that future testing with GDNF will likely require an 80- rather than a 40-week randomized treatment period and/or a higher dose.

Randomized trial of intermittent intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in Parkinson's disease

We investigated the effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in Parkinson’s disease, using intermittent intraputamenal convection-enhanced delivery via a skull-mounted transcutaneous port as a novel administration paradigm to potentially afford putamen-wide therapeutic delivery. This was a single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were 35–75 years old, had motor symptoms for 5 or more years, and presented with moderate disease severity in the OFF state [Hoehn and Yahr stage 2–3 and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale motor score (part III) (UPDRS-III) between 25 and 45] and motor fluctuations. Drug delivery devices were implanted and putamenal volume coverage was required to exceed a predefined threshold at a test infusion prior to randomization. Six pilot stage patients (randomization 2:1) and 35 primary stage patients (randomization 1:1) received bilateral intraputamenal infusions of GDNF (120 µg per putamen) or placebo every 4 weeks for 40 weeks. Efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle and included all patients randomized. The primary outcome was the percentage change from baseline to Week 40 in the OFF state (UPDRS-III). The primary analysis was limited to primary stage patients, while further analyses included all patients from both study stages. The mean OFF state UPDRS motor score decreased by 17.3 ± 17.6% in the active group and 11.8 ± 15.8% in the placebo group (least squares mean difference: −4.9%, 95% CI: −16.9, 7.1, P = 0.41). Secondary endpoints did not show significant differences between the groups either. A post hoc analysis found nine (43%) patients in the active group but no placebo patients with a large clinically important motor improvement (≥10 points) in the OFF state (P = 0.0008). ¹⁸F-DOPA PET imaging demonstrated a significantly increased uptake throughout the putamen only in the active group, ranging from 25% (left anterior putamen; P = 0.0009) to 100% (both posterior putamina; P < 0.0001). GDNF appeared to be well tolerated and safe, and no drug-related serious adverse events were reported. The study did not meet its primary endpoint. ¹⁸F-DOPA imaging, however, suggested that intermittent convection-enhanced delivery of GDNF produced a putamen-wide tissue engagement effect, overcoming prior delivery limitations. Potential reasons for not proving clinical benefit at 40 weeks are discussed.

CDNF Protein Therapy in Parkinson's Disease

Neurotrophic factors (NTF) are a subgroup of growth factors that promote survival and differentiation of neurons. Due to their neuroprotective and neurorestorative properties, their therapeutic potential has been tested in various neurodegenerative diseases. Bioavailability of NTFs in the target tissue remains a major challenge for NTF-based therapies. Various intracerebral delivery approaches, both protein and gene transfer-based, have been tested with varying outcomes. Three growth factors, glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), neurturin (NRTN) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) have been tested in clinical trials in Parkinson’s disease (PD) during the past 20 years. A new protein can now be added to this list, as cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) has recently entered clinical trials. Despite their misleading names, CDNF, together with its closest relative mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor (MANF), form a novel family of unconventional NTF that are both structurally and mechanistically distinct from other growth factors. CDNF and MANF are localized mainly to the lumen of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and their primary function appears to be modulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway. Prolonged ER stress, via the UPR signaling pathways, contributes to the pathogenesis in a number of chronic degenerative diseases, and is an important target for therapeutic modulation. Intraputamenally administered recombinant human CDNF has shown robust neurorestorative effects in a number of small and large animal models of PD, and had a good safety profile in preclinical toxicology studies. Intermittent monthly bilateral intraputamenal infusions of CDNF are currently being tested in a randomized placebo-controlled phase I–II clinical study in moderately advanced PD patients. Here, we review the history of growth factor-based clinical trials in PD, and discuss how CDNF differs from the previously tested growth factors.

Cerebral Dopamine Neurotrophic Factor (CDNF) Has Neuroprotective Effects against Cerebral Ischemia That May Occur through the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Pathway

Cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF), previously known as the conserved dopamine neurotrophic factor, belongs to the evolutionarily conserved CDNF/mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor MANF family of neurotrophic factors that demonstrate neurotrophic activities in dopaminergic neurons. The function of CDNF during brain ischemia is still not known. MANF is identified as an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress protein; however, the role of CDNF in ER stress remains to be fully elucidated. Here, we test the neuroprotective effect of CDNF on middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rats and neurons and astrocytes treated with oxygen–glucose depletion (OGD). We also investigate the expression of CDNF in cerebral ischemia and in primary neurons treated with ER stress-inducing agents. Our results show that CDNF can significantly reduce infarct volume, reduce apoptotic cells and improve motor function in MCAO rats, while CDNF can increase the cell viability of neurons and astrocytes treated by OGD. The expression of CDNF was upregulated in the peri-infarct tissue at 2 h of ischemia/24 h reperfusion. ER stress inducer can induce CDNF expression in primary cultured neurons. Our data indicate that CDNF has neuroprotective effects on cerebral ischemia and the OGD cell model and the protective mechanism of CDNF may occur through ER stress pathways.

Intermittent convection-enhanced delivery of GDNF into rhesus monkey putamen: absence of local or cerebellar toxicity

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has demonstrated neurorestorative and neuroprotective effects in rodent and nonhuman primate models of Parkinson’s disease. However, continuous intraputamenal infusion of GDNF (100 µg/day) resulted in multifocal cerebellar Purkinje cell loss in a 6-month toxicity study in rhesus monkeys. It was hypothesized that continuous leakage of GDNF into the cerebrospinal fluid compartment during the infusions led to down-regulation of GDNF receptors on Purkinje cells, and that subsequent acute withdrawal of GDNF then mediated the observed cerebellar lesions. Here we present the results of a 9-month toxicity study in which rhesus monkeys received intermittent intraputamenal infusions via convection-enhanced delivery. Animals were treated with GDNF (87.1 µg; N = 14) or vehicle (N = 6) once every 4 weeks for a total of 40 weeks (11 treatments). Four of the GDNF-treated animals were utilized in a satellite study assessing the impact of concomitant catheter repositioning prior to treatment. In the main study, eight animals (5 GDNF, 3 control) were euthanized at the end of the treatment period, along with the four satellite study animals, while the remaining eight animals (5 GDNF, 3 control) were euthanized at the end of a 12-week recovery period. There were no GDNF-related adverse effects and in particular, no GDNF-related microscopic findings in the brain, spinal cord, dorsal root ganglia, or trigeminal ganglia. Therefore, 87.1 µg/4 weeks is considered the no observed adverse effect level for GDNF in rhesus monkeys receiving intermittent, convection-enhanced delivery of GDNF for 9 months.

Clinical tests of neurotrophic factors for human neurodegenerative diseases, part 1: Where have we been and what have we learned?

Over the past 25years, about 3 dozen clinical reports have been published regarding the safety and possible efficacy of neurotrophic factors in patients with various neurodegenerative diseases. This effort involved a half dozen different neurotrophic factors, using at least 5 different general delivery approaches for ALS (amyolateral sclerosis), peripheral neuropathies, PD (Parkinson's disease) and AD (Alzheimer's disease). While none of these efforts have yet produced efficacy data sufficiently robust or reliable to establish neurotrophic factors as treatments for any human disease, the obstacles encountered and novel information reported, when viewed collectively, provide important insight to help future efforts. Three consistent themes emerge from these publications: (1) unexpected and undesirable side effects, at times serious, have plagued many efforts to deliver neurotrophic factors to humans; (2) the magnitude and consistency of clinical benefit has been disappointing; (3) by far that most consistently proposed reason for the side effects and poor efficacy has been inadequate dosing and delivery. This paper reviews and attempts to synthesize the available data derived from clinical tests of neurotrophic factors for neurodegenerative diseases. The obstacles encountered, the solutions attempted, and the lessons learned are discussed. The vast majority of solutions have involved changes in dosing paradigms and dose levels, which has primarily led to improved safety outcomes. However, lack of adequate efficacy remains a significant issue. While current efforts continue to focus exclusively on still-further changes in dosing parameters, a review of available data argues that it may now be the time to ask whether other, non-dose-related variables should be given more serious consideration as being responsible for the great divide that exists between the robust effects seen in animal models and the relatively weak effects seen in human neurodegenerative patients. Foremost among these appears to be the severe degeneration seen in the majority of patients enrolled in past and current trials testing neurotrophic factors in humans. A companion paper (Bartus and Johnson, 2016), reviews the contemporary data and concludes that compelling empirical evidence already exists for enrolling earlier-stage subjects as likely essential to achieving more robust and reliable benefit.

A regulatable AAV vector mediating GDNF biological effects at clinically-approved sub-antimicrobial doxycycline doses

Preclinical and clinical data stress the importance of pharmacologically-controlling glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) intracerebral administration to treat PD. The main challenge is finding a combination of a genetic switch and a drug which, when administered at a clinically-approved dose, reaches the brain in sufficient amounts to induce a therapeutic effect. We describe a highly-sensitive doxycycline-inducible adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector. This vector allowed for the first time a longitudinal analysis of inducible transgene expression in the brain using bioluminescence imaging. To evaluate the dose range of GDNF biological activity, the inducible AAV vector (8.0 × 10(9) viral genomes) was injected in the rat striatum at four delivery sites and increasing doxycycline doses administered orally. ERK/Akt signaling activation as well as tyrosine hydroxylase downregulation, a consequence of long-term GDNF treatment, were induced at plasmatic doxycycline concentrations of 140 and 320 ng/ml respectively, which are known not to increase antibiotic-resistant microorganisms in patients. In these conditions, GDNF covered the majority of the striatum. No behavioral abnormalities or weight loss were observed. Motor asymmetry resulting from unilateral GDNF treatment only appeared with a 2.5-fold higher vector and a 13-fold higher inducer doses. Our data suggest that using the herein-described inducible AAV vector, biological effects of GDNF can be obtained in response to sub-antimicrobial doxycycline doses.

Gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases

Gene therapy is, potentially, a powerful tool for treating neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinal muscular atrophy, Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). To date, clinical trials have failed to show any improvement in outcome beyond the placebo effect. Efforts to improve outcomes are focusing on three main areas: vector design and the identification of new vector serotypes, mode of delivery of gene therapies, and identification of new therapeutic targets. These advances are being tested both individually and together to improve efficacy. These improvements may finally make gene therapy successful for these disorders.

Can Parkinson's disease be cured by stimulating neurogenesis?

There have been many attempts at slowing down or even reversing the neurodegenerative process of Parkinson's disease (PD). To date, there are no treatments of proven value in this regard. One underexplored route to slow the neurodegenerative process is the use of agents that may stimulate neurogenesis in the subventricular zone. In animal models of PD, PDGF-BB has been shown to restore/protect against dopaminergic deficits caused by neurotoxins via increased neurogenesis in the subventricular zone. Previous work suggests that these new cells are not themselves dopaminergic but have trophic effects on residual dopaminergic cells in the substantia nigra. In this issue of the JCI, Paul et al. evaluate this agent in individuals with PD and show that i.c.v. administration of PDGF-BB is safe and well tolerated. This study lays the foundation for formal dose-finding studies and clinical trials to assess the efficacy of this agent as a potential neuroprotective treatment for PD.

Modulation of neurotrophin signaling by monoclonal antibodies

The neurotrophin family is comprised of the structurally related secreted proteins nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and neurotrophine-4 (NT-4). They bind and activate the tyrosine kinase receptors Trk A, B, and C in a ligand-specific manner and additionally bind a shared p75NTR receptor. The neurotrophins were originally defined by their ability to support the survival and maturation of embryonic neurons. However, they also control important physiological functions of the adult nervous system including learning and memory, sensation, and energy homeostasis. For example, NGF/trkA signaling is critical for normal and pathological sensation of pain. Likewise, the BDNF/trkB pathway controls feeding and metabolism, and its dysfunction leads to severe obesity. Antibodies can modulate neurotrophin signaling. Thus, NGF blocking agents can attenuate pain in several animal models, and a recombinant humanized NGF blocking antibody (Tanezumab) has shown promising results in human clinical trials for osteoarthritic pain. On the other hand trkB agonist antibodies can modulate food intake and body weight in rodents and nonhuman primates. The power of monoclonal antibodies to modulate neurotrophin signaling promises to turn the rich biological insights into novel human medicines.

A next step in adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapy for neurological diseases: regulation and targeting

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors mediating long term transgene expression are excellent gene therapy tools for chronic neurological diseases. While rAAV2 was the first serotype tested in the clinics, more efficient vectors derived from the rh10 serotype are currently being evaluated and other serotypes are likely to be tested in the near future. In addition, aside from the currently used stereotaxy-guided intraparenchymal delivery, new techniques for global brain transduction (by intravenous or intra-cerebrospinal injections) are very promising. Various strategies for therapeutic gene delivery to the central nervous system have been explored in human clinical trials in the past decade. Canavan disease, a genetic disease caused by an enzymatic deficiency, was the first to be approved. Three gene transfer paradigms for Parkinson's disease have been explored: converting L-dopa into dopamine through AADC gene delivery in the putamen; synthesizing GABA through GAD gene delivery in the overactive subthalamic nucleus and providing neurotrophic support through neurturin gene delivery in the nigro-striatal pathway. These pioneer clinical trials demonstrated the safety and tolerability of rAAV delivery in the human brain at moderate doses. Therapeutic effects however, were modest, emphasizing the need for higher doses of the therapeutic transgene product which could be achieved using more efficient vectors or expression cassettes. This will require re-addressing pharmacological aspects, with attention to which cases require either localized and cell-type specific expression or efficient brain-wide transgene expression, and when it is necessary to modulate or terminate the administration of transgene product. The ongoing development of targeted and regulated rAAV vectors is described.

Gene therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: the nature of the biologics expands the future indications

The pharmaceutical industry's development of therapeutic medications for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) endures, as a result of the continuing need for better agents, and the increased clinical demand due to the aging population. Each new drug offers advantages and disadvantages to patients when compared to other medical offerings or surgical options. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a standard surgical remedy for the effective treatment of select patients with PD, for whom most drug regimens have failed or become refractory. Similar to DBS as a surgical option, gene therapy for the treatment of PD is evolving as a future option. In the four different PD gene therapy approaches that have reached clinical trials investigators have documented an excellent safety profile associated with the stereotactic delivery, viral vectors and doses utilized, and transgenes expressed. In this article, we review the clinically relevant gene therapy strategies for the treatment of PD, concentrating on the published preclinical and clinical results, and the likely mechanisms involved. Based on these presentations, we advance an analysis of how the nature of the gene therapy used may eventually expand the scope and utility for the management of PD.

Translating the therapeutic potential of neurotrophic factors to clinical 'proof of concept': a personal saga achieving a career-long quest

While the therapeutic potential of neurotrophic factors has been well-recognized for over two decades, attempts to translate that potential to the clinic have been disappointing, largely due to significant delivery obstacles. Similarly, gene therapy (or gene transfer) emerged as a potentially powerful, new therapeutic approach nearly two decades ago and despite its promise, also suffered serious setbacks when applied to the human clinic. As advances continue to be made in both fields, ironically, they may now be poised to complement each other to produce a translational breakthrough. The accumulated data argue that gene transfer provides the 'enabling technology' that can solve the age-old delivery problems that have plagued the translation of neurotrophic factors as treatments for chronic central nervous system diseases. A leading translational program applying gene transfer to deliver a neurotrophic factor to rejuvenate and protect degenerating human neurons is CERE-120 (AAV2-NRTN). To date, over two dozen nonclinical studies and three clinical trials have been completed. A fourth (pivotal) clinical trial has completed all dosing and is currently evaluating safety and efficacy. In total, eighty Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects have thus far been dosed with CERE-120 (some 7 years ago), representing over 250 cumulative patient-years of exposure, with no serious safety issues identified. In a completed sham-surgery, double-blinded controlled trial, though the primary endpoint (the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UDPRS) motor off score measured at 12 months) did not show benefit from CERE-120, several important motor and quality of life measurements did, including the same UPDRS-motor-off score, pre-specified to also be measured at a longer, 18-month post-dosing time point. Importantly, not a single measurement favored the sham control group. This study therefore, provided important, well-controlled evidence establishing 'clinical proof of concept' for gene transfer to the CNS and the first controlled evidence for clinical benefit of a neurotrophic factor in a human neurodegenerative disease. This paper reviews the development of CERE-120, starting historically with the long-standing interest in the therapeutic potential of neurotrophic factors and continuing with selective accounts of past efforts to translate their potential to the clinic, eventually leading to the application of gene transfer and its role as the 'enabling technology'. Because of growing interest in translational R&D, including its practice in industry, the paper is uniquely oriented from the author's personal, quasi-autobiographic perspective and career-long experiences conducting translational research and development, with a focus on various translational neurotrophic factor programs spanning 30+ years in Big Pharma and development-stage biotech companies. It is hoped that by sharing these perspectives, practical insight and information might be provided to others also interested in translational R&D as well as neurotrophic factors and gene therapy, offering readers the opportunity to benefit from some of our successes, while possibly avoiding some of our missteps.

Neurotrophic factors and neurodegenerative diseases: a delivery issue

Neurotrophic factors (NTFs) represent one of the most stimulating challenge in neurodegenerative diseases, due to their potential in neurorestoring and neuroprotection. Despite the large number of proofs-of-concept and evidences of their activity, most of the clinical trials, mainly regarding Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease, demonstrated several failures of the therapeutic intervention. A large number of researches were conducted on this hot topic of neuroscience, clearly evidencing the advantages of NTF approach, but evidencing the major limitations in its application. The inability in crossing the blood-brain barrier and the lack of selectivity actually represent some of the most highlighted limits of NTFs-based therapy. In this review, beside an overview of NTF activity versus the main neuropathological disorders, a summary of the most relevant approaches, from invasive to noninvasive strategies, applied for improving NTF delivery to the central nervous systems is critically considered and evaluated.

Glial-derived neurotrophic factor gene transfer for Parkinson's disease: anterograde distribution of AAV2 vectors in the primate brain

Delivery of neurotrophic factors to treat neurodegenerative diseases has not been efficacious in clinical trials despite their known potency for promoting neuronal growth and survival. Direct gene delivery to the brain offers an approach for establishing sustained expression of neurotrophic factors but is dependent on accurate surgical procedures to target specific anatomical regions of the brain. Serotype-2 adeno-associated viral (AAV2) vectors have been investigated in multiple clinical studies for neurological diseases without adverse effects; however the absence of significant clinical efficacy after neurotrophic factor gene transfer has been largely attributed to insufficient coverage of the target region. Our pre-clinical development of AAV2-glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) for Parkinson's disease involved real-time image guided delivery and optimization of delivery techniques to maximize gene transfer in the putamen. We have demonstrated that AAV2 vectors are anterogradely transported in the primate brain with GDNF expression observed in the substantia nigra after putaminal delivery in both intact and nigrostriatal lesioned primates. Direct midbrain delivery of AAV2-GDNF resulted in extensive anterograde transport to multiple brain regions and significant weight loss.

Chronic dosing of mice with a transferrin receptor monoclonal antibody-glial-derived neurotrophic factor fusion protein

Glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potential neurotrophic factor treatment of brain disorders, including Parkinson's disease. However, GDNF does not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). A brain-penetrating form of GDNF, which is a fusion protein of human GDNF and a chimeric monoclonal antibody (MAb) against the mouse transferrin receptor (TfR), has been engineered for the mouse and is designated the cTfRMAb-GDNF fusion protein. The present study examined the potential toxic side effects and immune response after treatment of mice with twice-weekly cTfRMAb-GDNF fusion protein at a dose of 2 mg/kg i.v. for 12 consecutive weeks. Chronic treatment with the fusion protein caused no change in body weight, no change in 23 serum chemistry measurements, and no histologic changes in brain and cerebellum, kidney, liver, spleen, heart, or pancreas. Chronic treatment caused a low-titer immune response against the fusion protein, which was directed against the variable region of the antibody part of the fusion protein, with no immune response directed against either the constant region of the antibody or against GDNF. A pharmacokinetics and brain uptake study was performed at the end of the 12 weeks of treatment. There was no change in clearance of the fusion protein mediated by the TfR in peripheral organs, and there was no change in BBB permeability to the fusion protein mediated by the TfR at the BBB. The study shows no toxic side effects from chronic cTfRMAb-GDNF systemic treatment and the absence of neutralizing antibodies in vivo.

Clinical neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease - still waiting for the breakthrough

Recent research in the pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been able to provide numerous agents for the symptomatic control of motor impairments, but has failed to identify substances capable to slow down or even halt the progression of the disease. In the absence of disease-modifying therapies, affected patients develop marked disability within some years after the onset of motor symptoms, which can be alleviated but eventually not prevented with currently available medical and surgical therapies. Despite promising results from preclinical studies, outcomes of clinical neuroprotection trials have been repeatedly disappointing, which calls for a review of our approach to this topic. This article attempts to explain the need for neuroprotective therapies in PD, discusses results and limitations of previous clinical trials and provides some food for thought for the future research of neuroprotection in PD. Previous experiences from neuroprotection studies may have been discouraging, but also teach us some important lessons for the next generation of preclinical and clinical trials. Firstly, our currently used animal models for PD need to be refined in order to more reliably predict the efficacy of putative neuroprotective agents in subsequent clinical studies. Furthermore, changes in the methodology and design of future neuroprotection trials are required in order to exclude an impact of confounding symptomatic effects on observations. Finally, coordination and concentration of future research on the most promising agents will be necessary in order to accelerate the search for neuroprotective therapies in PD. Just as the pathogenesis of the disease is manifold, it may be this multilateral approach that eventually leads us to a breakthrough in finding neuroprotective agents for PD, if they exist.

Embryonic substantia nigra grafts in the mesencephalon send neurites to the host striatum in non-human primate after overexpression of GDNF

In spite of partial success in treating Parkinson's disease by using ectopically placed grafts of dopamine-producing cells, restoration of the original neuroanatomical circuits, if possible, might work better. Previous evidence of normal anatomic projections from ventral mesencephalic (VM) grafts placed in the substantia nigra (SN) has been limited to neonatal rodents and double grafting or bridging procedures. This study attempted to determine whether injection of a potent growth-promoting factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), into the target regions or placement of fetal striatal co-grafts in the nigrostriatal pathway might elicit neuritic outgrowth to the caudate nucleus. Four adult St. Kitts green monkeys received embryonic VM grafts into the rostral mesencephalon near the host SN, and injections of adeno-associated virus 2 (AAV2)/GDNF or equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV)/GDNF into the caudate. Three adult monkeys were co-grafted with fetal VM tissue near the SN and fetal striatal grafts (STR) 2.5 mm rostral in the nigrostriatal pathway. Before sacrifice, the striatal target regions were injected with the retrograde tracer Fluoro-Gold (FG). FG label was found in tyrosine hydroxylase-labeled neurons in VM grafts in the SN of only those monkeys that received AAV2/GDNF vector injections into the ipsilateral striatum. All monkeys showed FG labeling in the host SN when FG labeling was injected on the same side. These data show that grafted dopaminergic neurons can extend neurites to a distant target releasing an elevated concentration of GDNF, and suggest that grafted neurons can be placed into appropriate loci for potential tract reconstruction.

Challenges and opportunities in CNS delivery of therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases

With an increase in lifespan and changing population demographics, the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) diseases is expected to increase significantly in the 21st century. The most challenging of the CNS diseases are neurodegenerative diseases, characterized by age-related gradual decline in neurological function, often accompanied by neuronal death. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease are some examples of neurodegenerative diseases and have been well described in terms of disease mechanisms and pathology. However, successful treatment strategies for neurodegenerative diseases have so far been limited. Delivery of drugs into the CNS is one of the most challenging problems faced in the treatment of neurodegeneration. In this review, we describe the difficulties with CNS therapy, especially with the use of biological macromolecules, such as proteins and nucleic acid constructs. CNS therapeutics also represents a huge opportunity and examples of strategies that can enhance therapeutic delivery for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are emphasized. It is anticipated that with an increase in biological understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, there will be even more therapeutic opportunities. As such, these delivery strategies have a very important role to play in the future in the translation of CNS therapeutics from bench to bedside.