1
|
Conner AJ, Jacobs JME. Biased allele transmission for herbicide resistance: a conditional gene drive. PLANTA 2024; 261:18. [PMID: 39694976 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-024-04595-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024]
Abstract
MAIN CONCLUSION Herbicide application to plants heterozygous for herbicide resistance results in distorted segregation favoring resistant allele transmission resulting in a conditional gene drive. Brassica napus plants heterozygous for an allele conferring sulfonylurea resistance at a single locus exhibit normal Mendelian inheritance. However, following application of the herbicide, highly distorted segregation of herbicide resistance occurs among progeny. Screening progeny from controlled crosses demonstrated that the herbicide imposes in planta gametic selection against pollen and ovules with the recessive allele for herbicide susceptibility, as well as embryonic selection against embryos homozygous for the susceptible allele. Such inducible biased inheritance represents a conditional form of allele transmission following herbicide application and mimics a natural gene drive. We postulate that natural gene drives are common in plant populations and can operate in a conditional manner resulting in non-Mendelian inheritance in response to abiotic and biotic stresses.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wahl M, Levy T, Ventura T, Sagi A. Monosex Populations of the Giant Freshwater Prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii-From a Pre-Molecular Start to the Next Generation Era. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:17433. [PMID: 38139271 PMCID: PMC10743721 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Sexual manipulation in the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii has proven successful in generating monosex (both all-male and all-female) populations for aquaculture using a crustacean-specific endocrine gland, the androgenic gland (AG), which serves as a key masculinizing factor by producing and secreting an insulin-like AG hormone (IAG). Here, we provide a summary of the advancements from the discovery of the AG and IAG in decapods through to the development of monosex populations in M. rosenbergii. We discuss the broader sexual development pathway, which is highly divergent across decapods, and provide our future perspective on the utility of novel genetic and genomic tools in promoting refined approaches towards monosex biotechnology. Finally, the future potential benefits of deploying monosex prawn populations for environmental management are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melody Wahl
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel;
| | - Tom Levy
- Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
- Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA
| | - Tomer Ventura
- Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia;
- School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
| | - Amir Sagi
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel;
- National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bond DM, Ortega-Recalde O, Laird MK, Hayakawa T, Richardson KS, Reese FCB, Kyle B, McIsaac-Williams BE, Robertson BC, van Heezik Y, Adams AL, Chang WS, Haase B, Mountcastle J, Driller M, Collins J, Howe K, Go Y, Thibaud-Nissen F, Lister NC, Waters PD, Fedrigo O, Jarvis ED, Gemmell NJ, Alexander A, Hore TA. The admixed brushtail possum genome reveals invasion history in New Zealand and novel imprinted genes. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6364. [PMID: 37848431 PMCID: PMC10582058 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41784-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Combining genome assembly with population and functional genomics can provide valuable insights to development and evolution, as well as tools for species management. Here, we present a chromosome-level genome assembly of the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), a model marsupial threatened in parts of their native range in Australia, but also a major introduced pest in New Zealand. Functional genomics reveals post-natal activation of chemosensory and metabolic genes, reflecting unique adaptations to altricial birth and delayed weaning, a hallmark of marsupial development. Nuclear and mitochondrial analyses trace New Zealand possums to distinct Australian subspecies, which have subsequently hybridised. This admixture allowed phasing of parental alleles genome-wide, ultimately revealing at least four genes with imprinted, parent-specific expression not yet detected in other species (MLH1, EPM2AIP1, UBP1 and GPX7). We find that reprogramming of possum germline imprints, and the wider epigenome, is similar to eutherian mammals except onset occurs after birth. Together, this work is useful for genetic-based control and conservation of possums, and contributes to understanding of the evolution of novel mammalian epigenetic traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna M Bond
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Melanie K Laird
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Takashi Hayakawa
- Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0808, Japan
| | - Kyle S Richardson
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Biology Department, University of Montana Western, Dillon, MT, 59725, USA
| | - Finlay C B Reese
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Bruce Kyle
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Amy L Adams
- Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Wei-Shan Chang
- School of Life and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Bettina Haase
- Vertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Joanna Collins
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kerstin Howe
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yasuhiro Go
- Graduate School of Information Science, Hyogo University, Hyogo, Japan
- Cognitive Genomics Research Group, Exploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems (ExCELLS), National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Aichi, Japan
- Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Aichi, Japan
| | - Francoise Thibaud-Nissen
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas C Lister
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Paul D Waters
- School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Olivier Fedrigo
- Vertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erich D Jarvis
- Vertebrate Genome Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, 20815, USA
| | - Neil J Gemmell
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Alana Alexander
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Timothy A Hore
- Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lester PJ, O'Sullivan D, Perry GLW. Gene drives for invasive wasp control: Extinction is unlikely, with suppression dependent on dispersal and growth rates. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2023; 33:e2912. [PMID: 37615220 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Gene drives offer a potentially revolutionary method for pest control over large spatial extents. These genetic modifications spread deleterious variants through a population and have been proposed as methods for pest suppression or even eradication. We examined the influence of local dispersal, long-distance and/or human-mediated dispersal, and variation in population growth on the success of a gene drive for the control of invasive social wasps (Vespula vulgaris). Our simulations incorporated a spatially realistic environment containing variable habitat quality in New Zealand. Pest eradication was not observed, except in extreme and unrealistic scenarios of constant, widespread, and spatially intense releases of genetically modified individuals every year for decades. Instead, the regional persistence of genetically modified and wild-type wasps was predicted. Simulations using spatially homogeneous versus realistic landscapes (incorporating uninhabitable areas and dispersal barriers) showed little difference in overall population dynamics. Overall, little impact on wasp abundance was observed in the first 15 years after introduction. After 25 years, populations were suppressed to levels <95% of starting populations. Populations exhibited "chase dynamics" with population cycles in space, with local extinction occurring in some areas while wasps became abundant in others. Increasing the wasps' local dispersal distance increased the spatial and temporal variability of the occupied area and population suppression. Varying levels of human-associated long-distance dispersal had little effect on population dynamics. Increasing intrinsic population growth rates interacted with local dispersal to cause higher mean populations and substantially higher levels of variation in population suppression and the total amount of landscape occupied. Gene drives appear unlikely to cause a rapid and widespread extinction of this and probably other pests but could offer long-term and cost-effective methods of pest suppression. The predicted level of <95% pest suppression would substantially reduce the predation pressure and competitive interactions of this invasive wasp on native species. However, the predicted long-term persistence of genetically modified pests will influence the ethics and likelihood of using gene drives for pest control, especially given concerns that modified wasps would eventually be transported back to their home range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Lester
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - David O'Sullivan
- School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - George L W Perry
- School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Menchaca A. Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) and genome editing to support a sustainable livestock. Anim Reprod 2023; 20:e20230074. [PMID: 37720722 PMCID: PMC10503885 DOI: 10.1590/1984-3143-ar2023-0074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This article provides an overview of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and genome engineering to improve livestock production systems for the contribution of global sustainability. Most ruminant production systems are conducted on grassland conditions, as is the case of South American countries that are leaders in meat and milk production worldwide with a well-established grass-feed livestock. These systems have many strengths from an environmental perspective and consumer preferences but requires certain improvements to enhance resource efficiency. Reproductive performance is one of the main challenges particularly in cow-calf operations that usually are conducted under adverse conditions and thus ART can make a great contribution. Fixed-time artificial insemination is applied in South America in large scale programs as 20 to 30% of cows receive this technology every year in each country, with greater calving rate and significant herd genetic gain occurred in this region. Sexed semen has also been increasingly implemented, enhancing resource efficiency by a) obtaining desired female replacement and improving animal welfare by avoiding newborn male sacrifice in dairy industry, or b) alternatively producing male calves for beef industry. In vitro embryo production has been massively applied, with this region showing the greatest number of embryos produced worldwide leading to significant improvement in herd genetics and productivity. Although the contribution of these technologies is considerable, further improvements will be required for a significant livestock transformation and novel biotechnologies such as genome editing are already available. Through the CRISPR/Cas-based system it is possible to enhance food yield and quality, avoid animal welfare concerns, overcome animal health threats, and control pests and invasive species harming food production. In summary, a significant enhancement in livestock productivity and resource efficiency can be made through reproductive technologies and genome editing, improving at the same time profitability for farmers, and global food security and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejo Menchaca
- Plataforma de Salud Animal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Montevideo, Uruguay
- Fundación Instituto de Reproducción Animal Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim J, Harris KD, Kim IK, Shemesh S, Messer PW, Greenbaum G. Incorporating ecology into gene drive modelling. Ecol Lett 2023; 26 Suppl 1:S62-S80. [PMID: 37840022 DOI: 10.1111/ele.14194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Gene drive technology, in which fast-spreading engineered drive alleles are introduced into wild populations, represents a promising new tool in the fight against vector-borne diseases, agricultural pests and invasive species. Due to the risks involved, gene drives have so far only been tested in laboratory settings while their population-level behaviour is mainly studied using mathematical and computational models. The spread of a gene drive is a rapid evolutionary process that occurs over timescales similar to many ecological processes. This can potentially generate strong eco-evolutionary feedback that could profoundly affect the dynamics and outcome of a gene drive release. We, therefore, argue for the importance of incorporating ecological features into gene drive models. We describe the key ecological features that could affect gene drive behaviour, such as population structure, life-history, environmental variation and mode of selection. We review previous gene drive modelling efforts and identify areas where further research is needed. As gene drive technology approaches the level of field experimentation, it is crucial to evaluate gene drive dynamics, potential outcomes, and risks realistically by including ecological processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaehee Kim
- Department of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Keith D Harris
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Isabel K Kim
- Department of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Shahar Shemesh
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Philipp W Messer
- Department of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Gili Greenbaum
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frieß JL, Lalyer CR, Giese B, Simon S, Otto M. Review of gene drive modelling and implications for risk assessment of gene drive organisms. Ecol Modell 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
8
|
Liggins L, Arranz V, Braid HE, Carmelet-Rescan D, Elleouet J, Egorova E, Gemmell MR, Hills SFK, Holland LP, Koot EM, Lischka A, Maxwell KH, McCartney LJ, Nguyen HTT, Noble C, Olmedo Rojas P, Parvizi E, Pearman WS, Sweatman JAN, Kaihoro TR, Walton K, Aguirre JD, Stewart LC. The future of molecular ecology in Aotearoa New Zealand: an early career perspective. J R Soc N Z 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2097709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Libby Liggins
- School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Vanessa Arranz
- School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Heather E. Braid
- AUT Lab for Cephalopod Ecology and Systematics, School of Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Ekaterina Egorova
- Massey Geoinformatics Collaboratory, School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Michael R. Gemmell
- Plant Health and Environment Lab, Ministry for Primary Industries, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Simon F. K. Hills
- Ngāti Porou
- School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | | | - Emily M. Koot
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Alexandra Lischka
- AUT Lab for Cephalopod Ecology and Systematics, School of Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Kimberley H. Maxwell
- Ngāti Porou
- Te Whakatōhea, Te Whānau-a-Apanui, Ngāitai, Ngāti Tūwharetoa
- Te Kōtahi Research Institute, Faculty of Māori and Indigenous Studies, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Hang T. T. Nguyen
- Faculty of Fisheries, University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, Vietnam
| | - Cory Noble
- School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Elahe Parvizi
- School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Kerry Walton
- Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - J. David Aguirre
- School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Castle AR, Wohlgemuth S, Arce L, Westaway D. Investigating CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive for production of disease-preventing prion gene alleles. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269342. [PMID: 35671288 PMCID: PMC9173614 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Prion diseases are a group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders that includes chronic wasting disease, which affects cervids and is highly transmissible. Given that chronic wasting disease prevalence exceeds 30% in some endemic areas of North America, and that eventual transmission to other mammalian species, potentially including humans, cannot be ruled out, novel control strategies beyond population management via hunting and/or culling must be investigated. Prion diseases depend upon post-translational conversion of the cellular prion protein, encoded by the Prnp gene, into a disease-associated conformation; ablation of cellular prion protein expression, which is generally well-tolerated, eliminates prion disease susceptibility entirely. Inspired by demonstrations of gene drive in caged mosquito species, we aimed to test whether a CRISPR/Cas9-based gene drive mechanism could, in principle, promote the spread of a null Prnp allele among mammalian populations. First, we showed that transient co-expression of Cas9 and Prnp-directed guide RNAs in RK13 cells generates indels within the Prnp open-reading frame, indicating that repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining had taken place. Second, we integrated a ~1.2 kb donor DNA sequence into the Prnp open-reading frame in N2a cells by homology-directed repair following Cas9-induced cleavages and confirmed that integration occurred precisely in most cases. Third, we demonstrated that electroporation of Cas9/guide RNA ribonucleoprotein complexes into fertilised mouse oocytes resulted in pups with a variety of disruptions to the Prnp open reading frame, with a new coisogenic line of Prnp-null mice obtained as part of this work. However, a technical challenge in obtaining expression of Cas9 in the male germline prevented implementation of a complete gene drive mechanism in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R. Castle
- Centre for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Serene Wohlgemuth
- Centre for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Luis Arce
- Centre for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David Westaway
- Centre for Prions and Protein Folding Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goldsmith CL, Kang KE, Heitman E, Adelman ZN, Buchman LW, Kerns D, Liu X, Medina RF, Vedlitz A. Stakeholder Views on Engagement, Trust, Performance, and Risk Considerations About Use of Gene Drive Technology in Agricultural Pest Management. Health Secur 2021; 20:6-15. [PMID: 34981962 DOI: 10.1089/hs.2021.0101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene drive is an experimental technique that may make it possible to alter the genetic traits of whole populations of a species through the genetic modification of a relatively small number of individuals. This technology is sufficiently new that literature on the understanding and views of stakeholders and the public regarding the use of gene drive organisms in agricultural pest management is just beginning to emerge. Our team conducted a 2-pronged engagement process with Texas gene drive agricultural stakeholders to ascertain their values, beliefs, and preferences about the efficacy, safety, and risk management considerations of gene drive technology as a potential tool for agricultural pest management. We found that a majority of stakeholders support gene drive research and its potential use for managing agricultural pests. Our work with stakeholders confirms both their willingness to be engaged and the importance they place on stakeholder and public engagement regarding these issues, as well as the need to address these issues before use of gene drive as a pest management mechanism will be accepted and trusted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol L Goldsmith
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ki Eun Kang
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Elizabeth Heitman
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Zach N Adelman
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Leah W Buchman
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David Kerns
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Xinsheng Liu
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Raul F Medina
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Arnold Vedlitz
- Carol L. Goldsmith, MPA, is Assistant Director and Research Specialist II, Institute for Science, Technology, and Public Policy (ISTPP); Ki Eun Kang, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP; Zach N. Adelman, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Leah W. Buchman is a Predoctoral Research Associate, ISTPP, and a Doctoral Candidate, Department of Entomology; David Kerns, PhD, is a Professor, Extension Specialist and Statewide Integrated Pest Management Coordinator, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Xinsheng Liu, PhD, is a Senior Research Scholar and Research Scientist, ISTPP; Raul F. Medina, PhD, is a Professor, Department of Entomology, Texas A&M AgriLife Research; and Arnold Vedlitz, PhD, is Director and Distinguished Research Scholar, ISTPP, and a Professor, Department of Public Service and Administration; all at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Elizabeth Heitman, PhD, is a Professor, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weitzel AJ, Grunwald HA, Weber C, Levina R, Gantz VM, Hedrick SM, Bier E, Cooper KL. Meiotic Cas9 expression mediates gene conversion in the male and female mouse germline. PLoS Biol 2021; 19:e3001478. [PMID: 34941868 PMCID: PMC8699911 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Highly efficient gene conversion systems have the potential to facilitate the study of complex genetic traits using laboratory mice and, if implemented as a "gene drive," to limit loss of biodiversity and disease transmission caused by wild rodent populations. We previously showed that such a system of gene conversion from heterozygous to homozygous after a sequence targeted CRISPR/Cas9 double-strand DNA break (DSB) is feasible in the female mouse germline. In the male germline, however, all DSBs were instead repaired by end joining (EJ) mechanisms to form an "insertion/deletion" (indel) mutation. These observations suggested that timing Cas9 expression to coincide with meiosis I is critical to favor conditions when homologous chromosomes are aligned and interchromosomal homology-directed repair (HDR) mechanisms predominate. Here, using a Cas9 knock-in allele at the Spo11 locus, we show that meiotic expression of Cas9 does indeed mediate gene conversion in the male as well as in the female germline. However, the low frequency of both HDR and indel mutation in both male and female germlines suggests that Cas9 may be expressed from the Spo11 locus at levels too low for efficient DSB formation. We suggest that more robust Cas9 expression initiated during early meiosis I may improve the efficiency of gene conversion and further increase the rate of "super-mendelian" inheritance from both male and female mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J. Weitzel
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Hannah A. Grunwald
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Ceri Weber
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Rimma Levina
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Valentino M. Gantz
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Stephen M. Hedrick
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Molecular Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Ethan Bier
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
- Tata Institute for Genetics and Society, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Kimberly L. Cooper
- Division of Biological Sciences, Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
- Tata Institute for Genetics and Society, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kotze AC, James PJ. Control of sheep flystrike: what's been tried in the past and where to from here. Aust Vet J 2021; 100:1-19. [PMID: 34761372 PMCID: PMC9299489 DOI: 10.1111/avj.13131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Flystrike remains a serious financial and animal welfare issue for the sheep industry in Australia despite many years of research into control methods. The present paper provides an extensive review of past research on flystrike, and highlights areas that hold promise for providing long-term control options. We describe areas where the application of modern scientific advances may provide increased impetus to some novel, as well as some previously explored, control methods. We provide recommendations for research activities: insecticide resistance management, novel delivery methods for therapeutics, improved breeding indices for flystrike-related traits, mechanism of nematode-induced scouring in mature animals. We also identify areas where advances can be made in flystrike control through the greater adoption of well-recognised existing management approaches: optimal insecticide-use patterns, increased use of flystrike-related Australian Sheep Breeding Values, and management practices to prevent scouring in young sheep. We indicate that breeding efforts should be primarily focussed on the adoption and improvement of currently available breeding tools and towards the future integration of genomic selection methods. We describe factors that will impact on the ongoing availability of insecticides for flystrike control and on the feasibility of vaccination. We also describe areas where the blowfly genome may be useful in providing impetus to some flystrike control strategies, such as area-wide approaches that seek to directly suppress or eradicate sheep blowfly populations. However, we also highlight the fact that commercial and feasibility considerations will act to temper the potential for the genome to act as the basis for providing some control options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Kotze
- CSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067, Australia
| | - P J James
- QAAFI, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Palmer S, Dearden PK, Mercier OR, King-Hunt A, Lester PJ. Gene drive and RNAi technologies: a bio-cultural review of next-generation tools for pest wasp management in New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 2021; 52:508-525. [PMID: 39440191 PMCID: PMC11485957 DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2021.1985531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
There is a global need for novel, next-generation technologies and techniques to manage pest species. We review work on potential step-changing technologies for large landscape (>1000 hectares) pest management of social Vespula wasps. We also review Māori perspectives on these controls to gauge social and cultural acceptability to research, test and use of novel controls. Approaches discussed are the use of gene silencing (RNAi) and gene drives (CRISPR-Cas 9) involving genetic modification, which has potential for pest control but vary in feasibility, cost, benefits and off-target risks. RNAi may be better suited for wasp control in high-value cropping systems due to scaling inefficiencies. Gene drives offer potential for large-scale control but would require legislative and wide social deliberation due to their status as genetic modification. Both RNAi and gene drives will require consultation with tangata whenua. Māori interest groups agreed that exotic wasps must be controlled and expressed aversion to non-targeted traditional control methods. We present a diversity of opinions in parallel with scientific research underscoring the need for continued dialogue with Māori. Novel biotechnological controls must satisfy a broad range of social and cultural criteria, receive regulatory approval, along with being demonstrated as safe, selective, and cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Symon Palmer
- Te Kawa a Māui – School of Māori Studies, Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Peter K. Dearden
- Genomics Aotearoa, Bioprotection Research Centre, and Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Ocean R. Mercier
- Te Kawa a Māui – School of Māori Studies, Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Alan King-Hunt
- Te Kawa a Māui – School of Māori Studies, Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Phillip J. Lester
- School of Biology, Te Herenga Waka – Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Warburton B, Eason C, Fisher P, Hancox N, Hopkins B, Nugent G, Ogilvie S, Prowse TAA, Ross J, Cowan PE. Alternatives for mammal pest control in New Zealand in the context of concerns about 1080 toxicant (sodium fluoroacetate). NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/03014223.2021.1977345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles Eason
- Lincoln University, Department of Pest Management and Conservation, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Penny Fisher
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | | | - Brian Hopkins
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Graham Nugent
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Shaun Ogilvie
- Eco Research Associates Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - James Ross
- Lincoln University, Department of Pest Management and Conservation, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Phil E. Cowan
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sustainable Food Production: The Contribution of Genome Editing in Livestock. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13126788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The growing demand for animal source foods to feed people has been pushing the livestock industry to increase productivity, a tendency that will continue throughout this century. The challenge for the coming years is to increase the food supply to ensure equity in access to high quality food, while maintaining global sustainability including combating climate change, avoiding deforestation, and conserving biodiversity, as well as ensuring animal health and welfare. The question is, how do we produce more with less? Classical methods to enhance livestock productivity based on the improvement of animal health, nutrition, genetics, reproductive technologies and management have made important contributions; however, this is not going to be enough and thus disruptive approaches are required. Genome editing with CRISPR may be a powerful contributor to global livestock transformation. This article is focused on the scope and perspectives for the application of this technology, which includes improving production traits, enhancing animal welfare through adaptation and resilience, conferring resistance to infectious diseases, and suppressing pests and invasive species that threaten livestock. The main advantages and concerns that should be overcome by science, policy and people are discussed with the aim that this technology can make a real contribution to our collective future. This review is part of the special issue “Genome Editing in Animal Systems to Support Sustainable Farming and Pest Control”.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoffmann AA, Miller AD, Weeks AR. Genetic mixing for population management: From genetic rescue to provenancing. Evol Appl 2021; 14:634-652. [PMID: 33767740 PMCID: PMC7980264 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Animal and plant species around the world are being challenged by the deleterious effects of inbreeding, loss of genetic diversity, and maladaptation due to widespread habitat destruction and rapid climate change. In many cases, interventions will likely be needed to safeguard populations and species and to maintain functioning ecosystems. Strategies aimed at initiating, reinstating, or enhancing patterns of gene flow via the deliberate movement of genotypes around the environment are generating growing interest with broad applications in conservation and environmental management. These diverse strategies go by various names ranging from genetic or evolutionary rescue to provenancing and genetic resurrection. Our aim here is to provide some clarification around terminology and to how these strategies are connected and linked to underlying genetic processes. We draw on case studies from the literature and outline mechanisms that underlie how the various strategies aim to increase species fitness and impact the wider community. We argue that understanding mechanisms leading to species decline and community impact is a key to successful implementation of these strategies. We emphasize the need to consider the nature of source and recipient populations, as well as associated risks and trade-offs for the various strategies. This overview highlights where strategies are likely to have potential at population, species, and ecosystem scales, but also where they should probably not be attempted depending on the overall aims of the intervention. We advocate an approach where short- and long-term strategies are integrated into a decision framework that also considers nongenetic aspects of management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ary A. Hoffmann
- School of BioSciencesBio21 InstituteThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVic.Australia
| | - Adam D. Miller
- School of Life and Environmental SciencesCentre for Integrative EcologyDeakin UniversityWarrnamboolVic.Australia
- Deakin Genomics CentreDeakin UniversityGeelongVic.Australia
| | - Andrew R. Weeks
- School of BioSciencesBio21 InstituteThe University of MelbourneParkvilleVic.Australia
- cesar Pty LtdParkvilleVic.Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Greenbaum G, Feldman MW, Rosenberg NA, Kim J. Designing gene drives to limit spillover to non-target populations. PLoS Genet 2021; 17:e1009278. [PMID: 33630838 PMCID: PMC7943199 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The prospect of utilizing CRISPR-based gene-drive technology for controlling populations has generated much excitement. However, the potential for spillovers of gene-drive alleles from the target population to non-target populations has raised concerns. Here, using mathematical models, we investigate the possibility of limiting spillovers to non-target populations by designing differential-targeting gene drives, in which the expected equilibrium gene-drive allele frequencies are high in the target population but low in the non-target population. We find that achieving differential targeting is possible with certain configurations of gene-drive parameters, but, in most cases, only under relatively low migration rates between populations. Under high migration, differential targeting is possible only in a narrow region of the parameter space. Because fixation of the gene drive in the non-target population could severely disrupt ecosystems, we outline possible ways to avoid this outcome. We apply our model to two potential applications of gene drives—field trials for malaria-vector gene drives and control of invasive species on islands. We discuss theoretical predictions of key requirements for differential targeting and their practical implications. CRISPR-based gene drive is an emerging genetic engineering technology that enables engineered genetic variants, which are usually designed to be harmful to the organism carrying them, to be spread rapidly in populations. Although this technology is promising for controlling disease vectors and invasive species, there is a considerable risk that a gene drive could unintentionally spillover from the target population, where it was deployed, to non-target populations. We develop mathematical models of gene-drive dynamics that incorporate migration between target and non-target populations to investigate the possibility of effectively applying a gene drive in the target population while limiting its spillover to non-target populations (‘differential targeting’). We observe that the feasibility of differential targeting depends on the gene-drive design specification, as well as on the migration rates between the populations. Even when differential targeting is possible, as migration increases, the possibility for differential targeting disappears. We find that differential targeting can be effective for low migration rates, and that it is sensitive to the design of the gene drive under high migration rates. We suggest that differential targeting could be used, in combination with other mitigation measures, as an additional safeguard to limit gene drive spillovers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gili Greenbaum
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- * E-mail:
| | - Marcus W. Feldman
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Noah A. Rosenberg
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Jaehee Kim
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
MacDonald EA, Edwards ED, Balanovic J, Medvecky F. Scientifically framed gene drive communication perceived as credible but riskier. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Edith A. MacDonald
- Biodiversity Group Department of Conservation Conservation House Wellington New Zealand
| | - Eric D. Edwards
- Biodiversity Group Department of Conservation Conservation House Wellington New Zealand
| | - Jovana Balanovic
- Biodiversity Group Department of Conservation Conservation House Wellington New Zealand
| | - Fabien Medvecky
- Centre for Science Communication University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kelsey A, Stillinger D, Pham TB, Murphy J, Firth S, Carballar-Lejarazú R. Global Governing Bodies: A Pathway for Gene Drive Governance for Vector Mosquito Control. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:976-985. [PMID: 32748773 PMCID: PMC7470596 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Gene drive technologies represent powerful tools to develop vector control strategies that will complement the current approaches to mitigate arthropod-borne infectious diseases. The characteristics of gene drive technologies have raised additional concerns to those for standard genetically engineered organisms. This generates a need for adaptive governance that has not been met yet because of the rapid rate of progress in gene drive research. For the eventual release of gene drive insects into wild populations, an international governance network would be helpful in guiding scientists, stakeholders, public opinion, and affected communities in its use. We examined the current institutions and governing bodies among various continents that could have an impact on gene drive governance or the potential to adapt to its future use. Possible governance strategies also are proposed that seek to bridge gaps and promote an ethically sound policy framework. Ideally, governance strategies should be developed before or at the same pace as gene drive research to anticipate field releases and maximize their impact as a public health tool. However, this is not likely to happen as it takes years to develop global accords, and some countries may choose to move ahead independently on the new technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Kelsey
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Drusilla Stillinger
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Thai Binh Pham
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Jazmin Murphy
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Sean Firth
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Naegeli H, Bresson J, Dalmay T, Dewhurst IC, Epstein MM, Guerche P, Hejatko J, Moreno FJ, Mullins E, Nogué F, Rostoks N, Sánchez Serrano JJ, Savoini G, Veromann E, Veronesi F, Bonsall MB, Mumford J, Wimmer EA, Devos Y, Paraskevopoulos K, Firbank LG. Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives. EFSA J 2020; 18:e06297. [PMID: 33209154 PMCID: PMC7658669 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular and synthetic biology are enabling the engineering of gene drives in insects for disease vector/pest control. Engineered gene drives (that bias their own inheritance) can be designed either to suppress interbreeding target populations or modify them with a new genotype. Depending on the engineered gene drive system, theoretically, a genetic modification of interest could spread through target populations and persist indefinitely, or be restricted in its spread or persistence. While research on engineered gene drives and their applications in insects is advancing at a fast pace, it will take several years for technological developments to move to practical applications for deliberate release into the environment. Some gene drive modified insects (GDMIs) have been tested experimentally in the laboratory, but none has been assessed in small-scale confined field trials or in open release trials as yet. There is concern that the deliberate release of GDMIs in the environment may have possible irreversible and unintended consequences. As a proactive measure, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has been requested by the European Commission to review whether its previously published guidelines for the risk assessment of genetically modified animals (EFSA, 2012 and 2013), including insects (GMIs), are adequate and sufficient for GDMIs, primarily disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species, for deliberate release into the environment. Under this mandate, EFSA was not requested to develop risk assessment guidelines for GDMIs. In this Scientific Opinion, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) concludes that EFSA's guidelines are adequate, but insufficient for the molecular characterisation (MC), environmental risk assessment (ERA) and post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GDMIs. While the MC,ERA and PMEM of GDMIs can build on the existing risk assessment framework for GMIs that do not contain engineered gene drives, there are specific areas where further guidance is needed for GDMIs.
Collapse
|
21
|
High-Quality Assemblies for Three Invasive Social Wasps from the Vespula Genus. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS 2020; 10:3479-3488. [PMID: 32859687 PMCID: PMC7534447 DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Social wasps of the genus Vespula have spread to nearly all landmasses worldwide and have become significant pests in their introduced ranges, affecting economies and biodiversity. Comprehensive genome assemblies and annotations for these species are required to develop the next generation of control strategies and monitor existing chemical control. We sequenced and annotated the genomes of the common wasp (Vespula vulgaris), German wasp (Vespula germanica), and the western yellowjacket (Vespula pensylvanica). Our chromosome-level Vespula assemblies each contain 176–179 Mb of total sequence assembled into 25 scaffolds, with 10–200 unanchored scaffolds, and 16,566–18,948 genes. We annotated gene sets relevant to the applied management of invasive wasp populations, including genes associated with spermatogenesis and development, pesticide resistance, olfactory receptors, immunity and venom. These genomes provide evidence for active DNA methylation in Vespidae and tandem duplications of venom genes. Our genomic resources will contribute to the development of next-generation control strategies, and monitoring potential resistance to chemical control.
Collapse
|
22
|
Edgington MP, Harvey‐Samuel T, Alphey L. Population-level multiplexing: A promising strategy to manage the evolution of resistance against gene drives targeting a neutral locus. Evol Appl 2020; 13:1939-1948. [PMID: 32908596 PMCID: PMC7463328 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
CRISPR-based gene drives bias inheritance in their favour by inducing double-stranded breaks (DSBs) at wild-type homologous loci and using the drive transgene as a repair template-converting drive heterozygotes into homozygotes. Recent studies have shown that alternate end-joining repair mechanisms produce cut-resistant alleles that rapidly induce drive failure. Multiplexing-simultaneously targeting multiple sites at the wild-type locus-is commonly assumed to overcome this issue since resistance would need to develop at all target sites for the system to fail. This may work for some population suppression drives targeting essential (e.g. viability or fertility) genes if careful design can ensure cut-resistant alleles themselves have low fitness. However, here, models are used to demonstrate that this approach will be ineffective when targeting neutral loci. We then go on to compare the performance of four alternative population-level multiplexing approaches with standard individual-level multiplexing. Two of these approaches have mechanisms preventing them from becoming linked, thus avoiding multiple simultaneous DSBs and giving a large improvement. Releasing multiple unlinked drives gives a modest improvement, while releasing multiple drives that may become linked over time produces a decrease in performance under the conditions tested here. Based on performance and technical feasibility, we then take one approach forward for further investigation, demonstrating its robustness to different performance parameters and its potential for controlling very large target populations.
Collapse
|
23
|
Lester PJ, Bulgarella M, Baty JW, Dearden PK, Guhlin J, Kean JM. The potential for a CRISPR gene drive to eradicate or suppress globally invasive social wasps. Sci Rep 2020; 10:12398. [PMID: 32709966 PMCID: PMC7382497 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69259-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
CRISPR gene drives have potential for widespread and cost-efficient pest control, but are highly controversial. We examined a potential gene drive targeting spermatogenesis to control the invasive common wasp (Vespula vulgaris) in New Zealand. Vespula wasps are haplodiploid. Their life cycle makes gene drive production challenging, as nests are initiated by single fertilized queens in spring followed by several cohorts of sterile female workers and the production of reproductives in autumn. We show that different spermatogenesis genes have different levels of variation between introduced and native ranges, enabling a potential 'precision drive' that could target the reduced genetic diversity and genotypes within the invaded range. In vitro testing showed guide-RNA target specificity and efficacy that was dependent on the gene target within Vespula, but no cross-reactivity in other Hymenoptera. Mathematical modelling incorporating the genetic and life history traits of Vespula wasps identified characteristics for a male sterility drive to achieve population control. There was a trade-off between drive infiltration and impact: a drive causing complete male sterility would not spread, while partial sterility could be effective in limiting population size if the homing rate is high. Our results indicate that gene drives may offer viable suppression for wasps and other haplodiploid pests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Lester
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | - Mariana Bulgarella
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - James W Baty
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Peter K Dearden
- Genomics Aotearoa and Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Joseph Guhlin
- Genomics Aotearoa and Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - John M Kean
- AgResearch Limited, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Douglas C, Turner JMA. Advances and challenges in genetic technologies to produce single-sex litters. PLoS Genet 2020; 16:e1008898. [PMID: 32701961 PMCID: PMC7377362 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
There is currently a requirement for single-sex litters for many applications, including agriculture, pest control, and reducing animal culling in line with the 3Rs principles: Reduction, Replacement, and Refinement. The advent of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing presents a new opportunity with which to potentially generate all-female or all-male litters. We review some of the historical nongenetic strategies employed to generate single-sex litters and investigate how genetic and genome editing techniques are currently being used to produce all-male or all-female progeny. Lastly, we speculate on future technologies for generating single-sex litters and the possible associated challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Douglas
- Sex Chromosome Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - James M A Turner
- Sex Chromosome Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Emami-Khoyi A, Parbhu SP, Ross JG, Murphy EC, Bothwell J, Monsanto DM, Vuuren BJV, Teske PR, Paterson AM. De Novo Transcriptome Assembly and Annotation of Liver and Brain Tissues of Common Brushtail Possums ( Trichosurus vulpecula) in New Zealand: Transcriptome Diversity after Decades of Population Control. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11040436. [PMID: 32316496 PMCID: PMC7230921 DOI: 10.3390/genes11040436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), introduced from Australia in the mid-nineteenth century, is an invasive species in New Zealand where it is widespread and forms the largest self-sustained reservoir of bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) among wild populations. Conservation and agricultural authorities regularly apply a series of population control measures to suppress brushtail possum populations. The evolutionary consequence of more than half a century of intensive population control operations on the species’ genomic diversity and population structure is hindered by a paucity of available genomic resources. This study is the first to characterise the functional content and diversity of brushtail possum liver and brain cerebral cortex transcriptomes. Raw sequences from hepatic cells and cerebral cortex were assembled into 58,001 and 64,735 transcripts respectively. Functional annotation and polymorphism assignment of the assembled transcripts demonstrated a considerable level of variation in the core metabolic pathways that represent potential targets for selection pressure exerted by chemical toxicants. This study suggests that the brushtail possum population in New Zealand harbours considerable variation in metabolic pathways that could potentially promote the development of tolerance against chemical toxicants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arsalan Emami-Khoyi
- Center for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
- Department of Pest-management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
| | - Shilpa Pradeep Parbhu
- Center for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
| | - James G Ross
- Department of Pest-management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
| | - Elaine C Murphy
- Department of Pest-management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
| | - Jennifer Bothwell
- Department of Pest-management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
| | - Daniela M Monsanto
- Center for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
| | - Bettine Jansen van Vuuren
- Center for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
| | - Peter R Teske
- Center for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Conservation, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa
| | - Adrian M Paterson
- Department of Pest-management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Serr ME, Valdez RX, Barnhill-Dilling KS, Godwin J, Kuiken T, Booker M. Scenario analysis on the use of rodenticides and sex-biasing gene drives for the removal of invasive house mice on islands. Biol Invasions 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-019-02192-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
27
|
Sandler R. The ethics of genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:378-385. [PMID: 31397921 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The ethical issues associated with using genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation are typically described as consisting of risk assessment and management, public engagement and acceptance, opportunity costs, risk and benefit distributions, and oversight. These are important, but the ethical concerns extend beyond them because the use of genetic engineering has the potential to significantly alter the practices, concepts, and value commitments of conservation. I sought to elucidate the broader set of ethical issues connected with a potential genetic engineering turn in conservation and provide an approach to ethical analysis of novel conservation technologies. The primary rationales offered in support of using genetic engineering and gene drives in conservation are efficiency and necessity for achieving conservation goals. The instrumentalist ethical perspective associated with these rationales involves assessing novel technologies as a means to accomplish desired ends. For powerful emerging technologies the instrumentalist perspective needs to be complemented by a form-of-life perspective frequently applied in the philosophy of technology. The form-of-life perspective involves considering how novel technologies restructure the activities into which they are introduced. When the form-of-life perspective is applied to creative genetic engineering in conservation, it brings into focus a set of ethical issues, such as those associated with power, meaning, relationships, and values, that are not captured by the instrumentalist perspective. It also illuminates why the use of gene drives in conservation is so ethically and philosophically interesting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Sandler
- Department of Philosophy and Religion, Northeastern University, 371 Holmes Hall, Boston, MA, 02115-5000, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
I Am a Compassionate Conservation Welfare Scientist: Considering the Theoretical and Practical Differences Between Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10:ani10020257. [PMID: 32041150 PMCID: PMC7070475 DOI: 10.3390/ani10020257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare are two disciplines whose practitioners advocate consideration of individual wild animals within conservation practice and policy. However, they are not, as is sometimes suggested, the same. Compassionate Conservation and Conservation Welfare are based on different underpinning ethics, which sometimes leads to conflicting views about the kinds of conservation activities and decisions that are acceptable. Key differences between the disciplines appear to relate to their views about which wild animals can experience harms, the kinds of harms they can experience and how we can know about and confidently evidence those harms. Conservation Welfare scientists seek to engage with conservation scientists with the aim of facilitating ongoing incremental improvements in all aspects of conservation, i.e., minimizing harms to animals. In contrast, it is currently unclear how the tenets of Compassionate Conservation can be used to guide decision-making in complex or novel situations. Thus, Conservation Welfare may offer modern conservationists a more palatable approach to integrating evidence-based consideration of individual sentient animals into conservation practice and policy.
Collapse
|
29
|
Phelps MP, Seeb LW, Seeb JE. Transforming ecology and conservation biology through genome editing. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:54-65. [PMID: 30693970 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2018] [Revised: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
As the conservation challenges increase, new approaches are needed to help combat losses in biodiversity and slow or reverse the decline of threatened species. Genome-editing technology is changing the face of modern biology, facilitating applications that were unimaginable only a decade ago. The technology has the potential to make significant contributions to the fields of evolutionary biology, ecology, and conservation, yet the fear of unintended consequences from designer ecosystems containing engineered organisms has stifled innovation. To overcome this gap in the understanding of what genome editing is and what its capabilities are, more research is needed to translate genome-editing discoveries into tools for ecological research. Emerging and future genome-editing technologies include new clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) targeted sequencing and nucleic acid detection approaches as well as species genetic barcoding and somatic genome-editing technologies. These genome-editing tools have the potential to transform the environmental sciences by providing new noninvasive methods for monitoring threatened species or for enhancing critical adaptive traits. A pioneering effort by the conservation community is required to apply these technologies to real-world conservation problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Phelps
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Box 357705, Seattle, WA, 98195, U.S.A
| | - Lisa W Seeb
- School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, U.S.A
| | - James E Seeb
- School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Wedell N, Price TAR, Lindholm AK. Gene drive: progress and prospects. Proc Biol Sci 2019; 286:20192709. [PMID: 31847764 PMCID: PMC6939923 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene drive is a naturally occurring phenomenon in which selfish genetic elements manipulate gametogenesis and reproduction to increase their own transmission to the next generation. Currently, there is great excitement about the potential of harnessing such systems to control major pest and vector populations. If synthetic gene drive systems can be constructed and applied to key species, they may be able to rapidly spread either modifying or eliminating the targeted populations. This approach has been lauded as a revolutionary and efficient mechanism to control insect-borne diseases and crop pests. Driving endosymbionts have already been deployed to combat the transmission of dengue and Zika virus in mosquitoes. However, there are a variety of barriers to successfully implementing gene drive techniques in wild populations. There is a risk that targeted organisms will rapidly evolve an ability to suppress the synthetic drive system, rendering it ineffective. There are also potential risks of synthetic gene drivers invading non-target species or populations. This Special Feature covers the current state of affairs regarding both natural and synthetic gene drive systems with the aim to identify knowledge gaps. By understanding how natural drive systems spread through populations, we may be able to better predict the outcomes of synthetic drive release.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Wedell
- Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK
| | - T. A. R. Price
- Institution for Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK
| | - A. K. Lindholm
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
White DJ, Trought K, Hopkins B. The mixed liver and heart transcriptome dataset of the New Zealand brushtail possum , Trichosurus vulpecula. Data Brief 2019; 27:104577. [PMID: 31700950 PMCID: PMC6831712 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
New Zealand suffers greatly from invasive mammal predators including rats, stoats, feral cats and possums all of which not only damage or prey on New Zealand's unique terrestrial biodiversity, but also have huge impact on NZ's economy as many of these pests act as vectors of disease to farm and game animals. As such, the NZ government has invested nearly $90 m to support an ambitious plan to make the country predator free by 2050. Although there are adequate means to control invasive predator populations, it is widely agreed that current technologies are not sufficient for total eradication and that improved technologies are required. The Achilles Heel approach is one such developmental technology that attempts to exploit variation in the genes of target species that are vital to key physiological or cellular pathways within the body, such that interference with these genes will cause a species-specific death without the harmful effects on the environment and non-targets species that the current suite of control agents engender. Interference could either be through species-specific gene knock-down using such agents as siRNA and/or the use of species-selective chemical toxicants specifically developed against these targets. To assist with identifying species-specific gene targets in the New Zealand brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) we have assembled and annotated a possum mixed heart and liver transcriptome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J White
- Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand.,School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | | | - Brian Hopkins
- Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Godwin J, Serr M, Barnhill-Dilling SK, Blondel DV, Brown PR, Campbell K, Delborne J, Lloyd AL, Oh KP, Prowse TAA, Saah R, Thomas P. Rodent gene drives for conservation: opportunities and data needs. Proc Biol Sci 2019; 286:20191606. [PMID: 31690240 PMCID: PMC6842857 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive rodents impact biodiversity, human health and food security worldwide. The biodiversity impacts are particularly significant on islands, which are the primary sites of vertebrate extinctions and where we are reaching the limits of current control technologies. Gene drives may represent an effective approach to this challenge, but knowledge gaps remain in a number of areas. This paper is focused on what is currently known about natural and developing synthetic gene drive systems in mice, some key areas where key knowledge gaps exist, findings in a variety of disciplines relevant to those gaps and a brief consideration of how engagement at the regulatory, stakeholder and community levels can accompany and contribute to this effort. Our primary species focus is the house mouse, Mus musculus, as a genetic model system that is also an important invasive pest. Our primary application focus is the development of gene drive systems intended to reduce reproduction and potentially eliminate invasive rodents from islands. Gene drive technologies in rodents have the potential to produce significant benefits for biodiversity conservation, human health and food security. A broad-based, multidisciplinary approach is necessary to assess this potential in a transparent, effective and responsible manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Godwin
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Megan Serr
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | | | - Dimitri V. Blondel
- Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Peter R. Brown
- Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Karl Campbell
- Island Conservation, Charles Darwin Avenue, Puerto Ayora, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador
- School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jason Delborne
- Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Alun L. Lloyd
- Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Kevin P. Oh
- National Wildlife Research Center, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA
| | - Thomas A. A. Prowse
- School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Royden Saah
- Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Island Conservation, Charles Darwin Avenue, Puerto Ayora, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador
| | - Paul Thomas
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
McLaughlin GM, Dearden PK. Invasive Insects: Management Methods Explored. JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE (ONLINE) 2019; 19:5587051. [PMID: 31612947 PMCID: PMC6792099 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iez085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Invasive insect species can act as a plague across the globe, capable of vast expansion and rapid, proliferate reproduction. The spread of pathogens of serious diseases such as malaria and Zika virus and damages to agricultural crops number some of the afflictions invasive insects provide to humans alone. Additionally, an escape from predators can fail to keep invasive insects in check, providing potential threats such as extra resource competition to native species when insects invade. A variety of methods are employed to combat these invasive species, each with their own varying levels of success. Here, we explore the more traditional methods of invasive insect pest control, such as pesticides and biological control. In lieu of several unintended consequences resulting from such practices, we suggest some should be abandoned. We evaluate the potential of new techniques, in particular, those with a genetic component, regarding the costs, benefits and possible consequences of implementing them. And finally, we consider which techniques should be the focus of future research, if we truly wish to manage or even eradicate invasive insects in their introduced lands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma M McLaughlin
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Corresponding author, e-mail:
| | - Peter K Dearden
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Genomics Aotearoa, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Simberloff
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rode NO, Estoup A, Bourguet D, Courtier-Orgogozo V, Débarre F. Population management using gene drive: molecular design, models of spread dynamics and assessment of ecological risks. CONSERV GENET 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s10592-019-01165-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Graham P. Wallis
- Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lester PJ, Beggs JR. Invasion Success and Management Strategies for Social Vespula Wasps. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY 2019; 64:51-71. [PMID: 30256668 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Three species of Vespula have become invasive in Australia, Hawai'i, New Zealand, and North and South America and continue to spread. These social wasp species can achieve high nest densities, and their behavioral plasticity has led to substantial impacts on recipient communities. Ecologically, they affect all trophic levels, restructuring communities and altering resource flows. Economically, their main negative effect is associated with pollination and the apicultural industry. Climate change is likely to exacerbate their impacts in many regions. Introduced Vespula spp. likely experience some degree of enemy release from predators or parasites, although they are exposed to a wide range of microbial pathogens in both their native and introduced range. Toxic baits have been significantly improved over the last decade, enabling effective landscape-level control. Although investigated extensively, no effective biological control agents have yet been found. Emerging technologies such as gene drives are under consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J Lester
- School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New Zealand;
| | - Jacqueline R Beggs
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1072, New Zealand;
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
The origins of global invasions of the German wasp (Vespula germanica) and its infection with four honey bee viruses. Biol Invasions 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-018-1786-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
40
|
Fritsche S, Poovaiah C, MacRae E, Thorlby G. A New Zealand Perspective on the Application and Regulation of Gene Editing. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2018; 9:1323. [PMID: 30258454 PMCID: PMC6144285 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
New Zealand (NZ) is a small country with an export-led economy with above 90% of primary production exported. Plant-based primary commodities derived from the pastoral, horticultural and forestry sectors account for around half of the export earnings. Productivity is characterized by a history of innovation and the early adoption of advanced technologies. Gene editing has the potential to revolutionize breeding programmes, particularly in NZ. Here, perennials such as tree crops and forestry species are key components of the primary production value chain but are challenging for conventional breeding and only recently domesticated. Uncertainty over the global regulatory status of gene editing products is a barrier to invest in and apply editing techniques in plant breeding. NZs major trading partners including Europe, Asia and Australia are currently evaluating the regulatory status of these technologies and have not made definitive decisions. NZ is one of the few countries where the regulatory status of gene editing has been clarified. In 2014, the NZ Environmental Protection Authority ruled that plants produced via gene editing methods, where no foreign DNA remained in the edited plant, would not be regulated as GMOs. However, following a challenge in the High Court, this decision was overturned such that NZ currently controls all products of gene editing as GMOs. Here, we illustrate the potential benefits of integrating gene editing into plant breeding programmes using targets and traits with application in NZ. The regulatory process which led to gene editing's current GMO classification in NZ is described and the importance of globally harmonized regulations, particularly to small export-driven nations is discussed.
Collapse
|