Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19: an interim analysis

The effect of COVID-19 on placental functioning in South African pregnancies: investigation of kisspeptin expression and vascular and inflammatory alterations

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has passed; however, its long-term effects are yet to be determined. Pregnant women and their neonates faced a higher risk for complications during this pandemic as COVID-19 was reported to result in oxidative and inflammatory stress and the cytokine storm, which would impact pregnancy, namely the trophoblast invasion and placental development and functioning. Therefore, this study aims to determine the effect of COVID-19 on the placental functioning in South African pregnancies through the analysis of kisspeptin and placental morphology. Immunohistochemical analyses of placental samples were performed to detect the expression of kisspeptin. Histopathological analysis was conducted to identify vascular and inflammatory alterations. This study demonstrated that COVID-19 results in a significantly increased expression of placental kisspeptin in both the central (p = 0.001) and peripheral (p < 0.0001) regions as compared with the placentae from control pregnancies. Upon further analysis, the placentae from COVID-19 pregnancies also presented with severe inflammation and maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion compared with the control placentae. A significantly increased expression of placental kisspeptin was observed in COVID-19 positive pregnancies, implying impaired placental functioning. This was further supported by vascular and inflammatory alterations observed in COVID-19-positive placentae, which may suggest that trophoblast invasion was compromised. To date, there still exists small clusters of COVID-19 outbreaks, and our findings highlight the importance of the future surveillance of these mothers and neonates in COVID-19 pregnancies in South Africa, as neonates from other countries have presented with abnormalities.

Impact of maternal COVID-19 infection on offspring immunity and maternal-fetal outcomes at different pregnancy stages: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of COVID-19 infection on maternal and neonatal outcomes and immunity in pregnant women in China.

METHODS

283 pregnant women with COVID-19 were included in the prospective observational cohort study and divided into five groups based on infection stage. Antibody levels were measured in plasma, umbilical cord blood, and breast milk, and combined with clinical data and 6-month follow-up results. We measured SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels using a chemiluminescence immunoassay and analyzed the data with the Kruskal-Wallis test, χ2 test, or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in age, BMI, weight change during pregnancy, or the incidence of gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, gestational hypothyroidism, intrahepatic cholestasis, transaminitis, preterm birth, small for gestational age, neonatal NICU transfers, developmental delays, and hearing damage among the five groups. The incidence of COVID-19 in infants from mothers infected at different stages of pregnancy was significantly lower than in the uninfected group (P < 0.05). Maternal and umbilical cord blood showed significantly higher IgG levels in the infected group compared to the uninfected group at different stages of pregnancy (P < 0.05). The median transplacental antibody transfer ratio across all infection groups was 1.15 (0.98-1.30), with no significant differences between them. The reinfection group had significantly higher IgA levels during pregnancy compared to other groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

No adverse outcomes were observed in mothers or infants at any stage of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antibodies in umbilical cord blood and breast milk may offer passive immunity to newborns for 1-3 months. Reinfection during pregnancy may extend this immunity without raising the risk of adverse outcomes.

COVID-19 in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk and prevalence of pregnancy loss

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are more likely to experience preterm birth and their neonates are more likely to be stillborn or admitted to a neonatal unit. The World Health Organization declared in May 2023 an end to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a global health emergency. However, pregnant women are still becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 and there is limited information available regarding the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We conducted this systematic review to determine the prevalence of early pregnancy loss in women with SARS-Cov-2 infection and compare the risk to pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection.

SEARCH METHODS

Our systematic review is based on a prospectively registered protocol. The search of PregCov19 consortium was supplemented with an extra electronic search specifically on pregnancy loss in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 up to 10 March 2023 in PubMed, Google Scholar, and LitCovid. We included retrospective and prospective studies of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, provided that they contained information on pregnancy losses in the first and/or second trimester. Primary outcome was miscarriage defined as a pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of gestation, however, studies that reported loss up to 22 or 24 weeks were also included. Additionally, we report on studies that defined the pregnancy loss to occur at the first and/or second trimester of pregnancy without specifying gestational age, and for second trimester miscarriage only when the study presented stillbirths and/or foetal losses separately from miscarriages. Data were stratified into first and second trimester. Secondary outcomes were ectopic pregnancy (any extra-uterine pregnancy), and termination of pregnancy. At least three researchers independently extracted the data and assessed study quality. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and risk differences (RDs) with corresponding 95% CI and pooled the data using random effects meta-analysis. To estimate risk prevalence, we performed meta-analysis on proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2.

OUTCOMES

We included 120 studies comprising a total of 168 444 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection; of which 18 233 women were in their first or second trimester of pregnancy. Evidence level was considered to be of low to moderate certainty, mostly owing to selection bias. We did not find evidence of an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and miscarriage (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.81-1.48; I2 = 0.0%; RD 0.0012, 95% CI -0.0103 to 0.0127; I2 = 0%; 9 studies, 4439 women). Miscarriage occurred in 9.9% (95% CI 6.2-14.0%; I2 = 68%; 46 studies, 1797 women) of the women with SARS CoV-2 infection in their first trimester and in 1.2% (95% CI 0.3-2.4%; I2 = 34%; 33 studies; 3159 women) in the second trimester. The proportion of ectopic pregnancies in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.4% (95% CI 0.02-4.2%; I2 = 66%; 14 studies, 950 women). Termination of pregnancy occurred in 0.6% of the women (95% CI 0.01-1.6%; I2 = 79%; 39 studies; 1166 women).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Our study found no indication that SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first or second trimester increases the risk of miscarriages. To provide better risk estimates, well-designed studies are needed that include pregnant women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection at conception and early pregnancy and consider the association of clinical manifestation and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection with pregnancy loss, as well as potential confounding factors such as previous pregnancy loss. For clinical practice, pregnant women should still be advised to take precautions to avoid risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

The effects of COVID-19 on placental morphology

The impact of the COVID-19 infection, caused by Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), during the pandemic has been considerably more severe in pregnant women than non-pregnant women. Therefore, a review detailing the morphological alterations and physiological changes associated with COVID-19 during pregnancy and the effect that these changes have on the feto-placental unit is of high priority. This knowledge is crucial for these mothers, their babies and clinicians to ensure a healthy life post-pandemic. Hence, we review the placental morphological changes due to COVID-19 to enhance the general understanding of how pregnant mothers, their placentas and unborn children may have been affected by this pandemic. Based on current literature, we deduced that COVID-19 pregnancies were oxygen deficient, which could further result in other pregnancy-related complications like preeclampsia and IUGR. Therefore, we present an up-to-date review of the COVID-19 pathophysiological implications on the placenta, covering the function of the placenta in COVID-19, the effects of this virus on the placenta, its functions and its link to other gestational complications. Furthermore, we highlight the possible effects of COVID-19 therapeutic interventions on pregnant mothers and their unborn children. Based on the literature, we strongly suggest that consistent surveillance for the mothers and infants from COVID-19 pregnancies be prioritised in the future. Though the pandemic is now in the past, its effects are long-term, necessitating the monitoring of clinical manifestations in the near future.

Impact of COVID-19 on Infertility Treatments: Not Even a Global Pandemic Was Strong Enough to Hamper Successful Pregnancies

The COVID-19 global pandemic has meant a sanitary and social threat at every level and it was not any different for the assisted reproduction industry. This retrospective two-arm study aims to describe its impact on infertility treatments performed in our clinics (IVI Spain, Rome, and Lisbon) regarding: (1) assessment of COVID-19 impact in the amount, type, and success of infertility treatments performed during 2020 compared to 2019; and (2) description of the psychological status of women who got pregnant during the first months of the pandemic and its correlation with their final pregnancy outcome. On the one hand, this pandemic has led to a significant reduction in the total number of treatments performed, even though the proportion of the different types was almost unaltered. Additionally, its impact on pregnancy rates was not clinically relevant. On the other hand, the psychological status of pregnant women did not seem to affect their final pregnancy outcome. These results suggest that, even in the event of a negatively affected psychological status in our study population, it was not translated into an impaired pregnancy outcome. Hence, the COVID-19 global pandemic, although devastating, might not have exerted a clinically relevant negative impact on the overall pregnancy outcome in our clinics.