Barriers to women's breast cancer screening behaviors in several countries: A meta-synthesis study

Evaluation of women's breast cancer prevention behaviors: example of Türkiye

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the factors affecting women's behaviors toward breast cancer prevention.

METHODS

This research, designed as a descriptive cross-sectional study, was conducted with 400 women. Research data were collected using a descriptive personal information form and the scale to measure factors influencing women's breast cancer prevention behaviors (ASSISTS). The forms were transferred to the online platform via Google and published as an online survey. The statistical significance was identified if the P-value was below 0.05.

RESULTS

The highest score on the ASSISTS is 165, and the lowest is 33. As women got older, it was determined that their scores in the scale's attitude (P = 0.013), motivation (P = 0.011), self-efficacy (P = 0.042), and self-care (P = 0.017) subdimensions were higher. Women with a high-income level exhibited higher levels of positive behavior than women with medium and low-income levels in the subscales of attitude (P = 0.026), motivation (P = 0.004), support systems (P = 0.041), and stress management (P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

In the attitude and motivation subscales, women with pregnancy and childbirth experience showed higher levels of positive behavior in breast cancer prevention. Married women had higher ASSISTS scores than single women. Participants' breast cancer prevention behaviors were evaluated as positive. Advanced age, pregnancy, and childbirth experience are factors that affect positive behaviors in breast cancer prevention.

Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The online nature of decision aids (DAs) and related e-tools supporting women's decision-making regarding breast cancer screening (BCS) through mammography may facilitate broader access, making them a valuable addition to BCS programs.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impacts of these e-tools and to provide a comprehensive assessment of the factors associated with their increased utility and efficacy.

METHODS

We followed the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and conducted a search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from August 2010 to April 2023. We included studies reporting on populations at average risk of breast cancer, which utilized DAs or related e-tools, and assessed women's participation in BCS by mammography or other key cognitive determinants of decision-making as primary or secondary outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses on the identified randomized controlled trials, which were assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. We further explored intermediate and high heterogeneity between studies to enhance the validity of our results.

RESULTS

In total, 22 different e-tools were identified across 31 papers. The degree of tailoring in the e-tools, specifically whether the tool was fully tailored or featured with tailoring, was the most influential factor in women's decision-making regarding BCS. Compared with control groups, tailored e-tools significantly increased women's long-term participation in BCS (risk ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.23, P<.001, I2=0%). Tailored-to-breast-cancer-risk e-tools increased women's level of worry (mean difference 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.48, P<.001, I2=0%). E-tools also improved women's adequate knowledge of BCS, with features-with-tailoring e-tools designed and tested with the general population being more effective than tailored e-tools designed for or tested with non-BCS participants (χ21=5.1, P=.02). Features-with-tailoring e-tools increased both the rate of women who intended not to undergo BCS (risk ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.43-2.48, P<.001, I2=0%) and the rate of women who had made an informed choice regarding their intention to undergo BCS (risk ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.09-2.33, P=.02, I2=91%). Additionally, these tools decreased the proportion of women with decision conflict (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.91, P=.002, I2=0%). Shared decision-making was not formally evaluated. This review is limited by small sample sizes, including only a few studies in the meta-analysis, some with a high risk of bias, and high heterogeneity between the studies and e-tools.

CONCLUSIONS

Features-with-tailoring e-tools could potentially negatively impact BCS programs by fostering negative intentions and attitudes toward BCS participation. Conversely, tailored e-tools may increase women's participation in BCS but, when tailored to risk, they may elevate their levels of worry. To maximize the effectiveness of e-tools while minimizing potential negative impacts, we advocate for an "on-demand" layered approach to their design.

Automated Breast Ultrasound With Remote Reading for Primary Breast Cancer Screening: A Prospective Study Involving 46 Community Health Centers in China

BACKGROUND. China has faced barriers to implementation of a population-based mammographic screening program. Breast ultrasound provides an alternative screening modality to mammography in low-resource settings. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with remote reading as the primary screening modality for breast cancer. METHODS. This prospective study enrolled asymptomatic women 35-69 years old from 46 community health centers across 18 provinces representing all six regions of China from January 2021 to December 2021. Participants underwent screening ABUS as the sole breast cancer screening modality, with images acquired by a technologist at a community health center. The 3D volumetric data were transferred via cloud-based software to a single remote reading center, where examinations were interpreted independently in batches by two subspecialized breast radiologists using BI-RADS; a third radiologist at the remote reading center resolved discrepancies. Diagnostic reports were returned to the community centers, and patients sought follow-up care at local hospitals. The reference standard incorporated a combination of histopathology and 24-month follow-up. Outcome measures included cancer detection rate, abnormal interpretation rate (AIR), sensitivity, specificity, biopsy rate, and PPV. RESULTS. The final analysis included 5978 enrolled participants (median age, 46 years [IQR, 40-52 years]) who underwent screening ABUS at the community health centers with subsequent remote reading. A total of 24 ABUS-detected cancers and two interval cancers were diagnosed. The cancer detection rate was 4.0 per 1000 women (95% CI: 2.7-5.9), and the AIR was 11.9% (95% CI: 11.1-12.7%). A total of 95.8% (23/24) of ABUS-detected cancers were invasive. The 23 invasive cancers had a median diameter of 10.0 mm, and 73.9% (17/23) were node-negative. Sensitivity was 92.3% (95% CI: 75.9-97.9%), and specificity was 88.4% (95% CI: 87.6-89.2%). The biopsy rate was 1.7% (95% CI: 1.4-2.0%), and the PPV of biopsy was 24.0% (95% CI: 16.7-33.2%). CONCLUSION. ABUS screening with remote reading met benchmark performance for cancer detection in comparison with mammography, with infrequent interval cancers. CLINICAL IMPACT. ABUS with remote reading holds promise in enhancing access to breast cancer screening and early detection in low-resource settings or underserved regions where mammographic screening is not established. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04527510.

Informed choices for some, but not for others: An exploration of Australian midlife women's participation in mammography screening by social class

BACKGROUND

Population-level mammography screening for early detection of breast cancer is a secondary prevention measure well-embedded in developed countries, and the implications for women's health are widely researched. From a public health perspective, efforts have focused on why mammography screening rates remain below the 70% screening rate required for effective population-level screening. From a sociological perspective, debates centre on whether 'informed choice' regarding screening exists for all women and the overemphasis on screening benefits, at the cost of not highlighting the potential harms. We dovetail these disciplinary agendas to contextualise the factors that impact mammography screening choices, interpreting screening status through a social class lens.

OBJECTIVE

To understand how social class impacts informed choice-making among midlife women (45-64 years), regarding (non) participation in mammography screening.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

METHODS

We interviewed 36 Australian midlife women from differing social class groups who were 'screeners' or 'non-screeners'. We conducted a theory-informed thematic analysis and used Bourdieu's relational social class theory to consider how women's access to social, cultural and economic capital influenced their screening identities. We conducted matrix and crosstab queries across themes to identify patterns by social class. We extend the findings from Friedman's study of women's screening perspectives as 'attentional' types utilising the 'sociology of attention'.

RESULTS

Our results map to Friedman's four 'attentional' types (default or conscious interventionists, conflicted or conscious sceptics), and we show how social class impacts women's attention to screening and participation. We show for middle-class women screening is a 'given', they align closely with normative screening expectations. Working-class women who screen, do so out of a sense of compliance. Affluent non-screeners make informed choices, while working-class women are more passive in their non-screening choices, being a group that sits outside of Friedman's four attentional types.

CONCLUSION

Current approaches to screening communication and programme delivery can be improved by tailoring approaches to reflect the impacts of social class in shaping women's 'choices'. Subsequently, equitable breast cancer prevention may be afforded, which impacts positively on population-level screening rates.

Barriers and facilitators to breast cancer screening among high-risk women: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Women with greater than 20-25% lifetime breast cancer risk are recommended to have breast cancer screening with annual mammogram and supplemental breast MRI. However, few women follow these screening recommendations. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators of screening among women at high risk for breast cancer, guided by the Health Services Utilization Model (HSUM).

METHODS

Unaffected high-risk women (N=63) completed semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring their experiences with breast cancer screening. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a combined deductive and inductive approach.

RESULTS

Most participants (84%) had received a screening mammogram; fewer (33%) had received a screening breast MRI. Only 14% had received neither screening. In line with the HSUM, qualitative analysis identified predisposing factors, enabling factors, and need factors associated with receipt of breast cancer screening. Enabling factors - including financial burden, logistic barriers, social support, and care coordination - were most frequently discussed. Predisposing factors included knowledge, health beliefs, and self-advocacy. Need factors included healthcare provider recommendation, family history of breast cancer, and personal medical history. Although HSUM themes were consistent for both mammography and breast MRI, participants did highlight several important differences in barriers and facilitators between the two screening modalities.

CONCLUSION

Barriers and enabling factors associated with supplemental screening for high-risk women represent possible intervention targets. Future research is needed to develop and test multilevel interventions targeting these factors, with the ultimate goal of increasing access to supplemental screening for high-risk women.

Clinical breast examination: A screening tool for lower- and middle-income countries

Breast cancer (BC) remains a global health challenge, devastatingly impacting women's lives. Low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC), such as India, experience a concerning upward trend in BC incidence, necessitating the implementation of cost-effective screening methods. While mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging are preferred screening modalities in resource-rich settings, limited resources in LMICs make clinical breast examination (CBE) the method of choice. This review explores the merits of CBE, its coverage, barriers, and facilitators in the Indian context for developing strategies in resource-constrained settings. CBE has shown significant down-staging and cost-effectiveness. Performed by trained health workers in minutes, CBE offers an opportunity for education about BC. Various individual and health system barriers, such as stigma, financial constraints, and the absence of opportunistic screening hinder CBE coverage. Promising facilitators include awareness programs, capacity building, and integrating CBE through universal health care. No healthcare provider must miss any screening opportunity through CBE.

Breast cancer screening motivation among women: an application of self-determination theory

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is a major health concern worldwide, especially in Vietnam. This study aimed to explore women's motivation for and factors related to breast cancer screening.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study was conducted in Danang, Vietnam, using a convergent parallel approach. This study utilized both quantitative and qualitative methods to gather the data. The quantitative approach involved surveys to assess motivation levels and related factors, including demographic information and experience with breast cancer screening. In-depth qualitative interviews were used to gain deeper insights into participants' perspectives and experiences related to breast cancer screening.

RESULTS

The average motivation score for breast cancer screening was moderate (3.55 ± 0.55). Ethnicity, regular health check-ups, family history of breast cancer, receiving information about breast cancer, and women's health issues have direct relationships with breast cancer screening motivation. According to the qualitative data, three categories emerged: intrinsic motivation, external motivation/internalization, and amotivation. The individual, and sociocultural environmental factors impacted screening motivation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the motivations behind breast cancer screening among women. Healthcare providers could use these findings to improve screening policies and guidelines and encourage more women to undergo regular screening, ultimately reducing the incidence of breast cancer in the community.

Do immigrants know less than natives about cancer screening tests? - the case of Netherlands

Introduction

The Netherlands was one of the first countries in Europe to offer breast, colorectal and cervical cancer screening tests free of charge. Yet, a significant share of migrants in the Netherlands forgo the use of these preventive screenings. Qualitative research suggests, that lack of system knowledge on how the healthcare system operates (e.g. age eligibility of cancer screenings), is one factor contributing to this underuse among migrants. However, little is known about the extent to which migrants differ from natives in their system knowledge and about potential causes of this ethnic gap. The contribution of this study is therefore twofold: First, we examine whether migrants in the Netherlands have lower system knowledge regarding cancer screenings than the natives. Second, we examine which factors explain potential ethnic differences in system knowledge between migrants and non-migrants.

Method

Using the Longitudinal Internet Study for Social Sciences (LISS), we matched newly collected data on system knowledge about healthcare with Health module (wave 14). To assess the difference in system knowledge among migrants and non-migrants, while taking into account potential selection bias, we applied propensity score matching, one-to-one matching procedure with no replacement. We compared first generation non - Western migrants (FNWM) and second-generation non-western migrants (SNWM) with their most similar non-migrants group regarding their knowledge about breast, colorectal, and cervical screening. A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition with non-matched samples was used to examine which factors can explain the differences in system knowledge among migrants and non-migrants.

Results

Our results show that first generation migrants have lower system knowledge about all three screening tests, while second generation migrants differ from non-migrants only with regard to knowledge about breast and colorectal cancer screenings. The ethnic differences found are not caused by personal or social factors such as education or income.

Conclusion

We recommend Dutch healthcare policy makes to focus in the strengthen of cancer screening system knowledge among migrant populations in order to increase their participation in these screening programs.

Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds

BACKGROUND

To inform the development of an online tool to be potentially used in shared decision-making about breast cancer screening, French women were questioned about participation in breast cancer screening, the health professional's role, and their perceptions of the proposed tool.

METHODS

We organised focus group discussions with 55 French women. Two different strategies were used to recruit women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds. We applied both inductive and deductive approaches to conduct a thematic analysis of the discussions. We analysed the responses by using the main determinants from different health behaviour models and compared the two groups.

RESULTS

Independently of socioeconomic status, the most important determinant for a woman's participation in breast cancer screening was the perceived severity of breast cancer and the perceived benefits of its early detection by screening. Cues to action reported by both groups were invitation letters; recommendations by health professionals, or group/community activities and public events were reported by women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds, respectively. Among other positive determinants, women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported making informed decisions and receiving peer support whereas women from low socioeconomic backgrounds reported community empowerment through group/community events. Fear of cancer was reported as a barrier in both groups. Among other barriers, language issues were reported only by women from low socioeconomic backgrounds; women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported breast cancer screening-related risks other than overdiagnosis and/or overtreatment. Barriers to accessing the online tool to be developed were mainly reported by women from high socioeconomic backgrounds.

CONCLUSION

Limitations in implementing shared decision-making for women from low socioeconomic backgrounds were highlighted. An online tool that is suitable for all women, regardless of socioeconomic status, would provide "on-demand" reliable and tailored information about breast cancer screening and improve access to health professionals and social exchanges.

Cancer Health Literacy and Its Correlated Factors in the United Arab Emirates-A Cross Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Cancer Health literacy (CHL) is the health literacy related to cancer knowledge, prevention, treatment, screening, and access to services. It is an important indicator of people's adherence to screening and preventive measures, which helps to reduce the incidence and prevalence of cancer. The study assessed the CHL level and its association with relevant socio-demographic characteristics and sources of information among primary health care patients and visitors in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study recruited survey participants who consented to respond to an interviewer-administered questionnaire. The assessment of CHL was done by using 15 questions. CHL level was measured as a median score and also categorized as poor/inadequate, moderate, good/excellent. Nominal logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between CHL categories and participants' sociodemographic characteristics and CHL sources of information.

RESULTS

Of the total 492 participants, 45.5% were young adults (30-39 years old), 32.9% were males, and 70.8% were UAE nationals. The overall median CHL score was 8.0 (IQR = 5.0-10). 33.7% of the participants had a poor/inadequate level of CHL, 49.6% had a moderate level and 16.7% had a good to excellent level of CHL. 76.9% of the participants knew the importance of early cancer screening tests, 72.7% acknowledged the metastatic capacity of cancer, and the protective factors of cancer, especially, in colon cancer (71.7%). A high proportion of participants received health information about cancer via the internet (50.7%), television (45.3%), social media (40.2%), and doctors (43.6%). Nationality other than UAE (aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03-2.56, P = .038), having university education (aOR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.21-3.99, P = .010) compared to those with lower than high school, and having a family history of cancer (aOR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.33-4.41, P = .004) were positively associated with CHL. Older age (aOR = .36, 95% CI = .17-.75, P = .007 for 50-59 years, and aOR = .29, 95% CI = .11-.82, P = .019) for 60-69 years, higher-income (aOR = .57, 95% CI = .33-.99, P = .047 for 10,000-19,999 AED; aOR = .53, 95% CI = .33-.88, P = .013 for ≥20,000) compared with those earning <10,000 AED were negatively associated with CHL.

CONCLUSIONS

CHL among the resident UAE population was moderately adequate, therefore implementation of awareness campaigns seems to be warranted. Moreover, evaluation research targeting the CHL impact on cancer prevention practices and screening is also advocated.

Predicting Mammogram Screening Follow Through with Electronic Health Record and Geographically Linked Data

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, and breast cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death, with 42,275 women dying of breast cancer in the United States in 2020. Screening is a key strategy for reducing mortality from breast cancer and is recommended by various national guidelines. This study applies machine learning classification methods to the task of predicting which patients will fail to complete a mammogram screening after having one ordered, as well as understanding the underlying features that influence predictions. The results show that a small group of patients can be identified that are very unlikely to complete mammogram screening, enabling care managers to focus resources.

SIGNIFICANCE

The motivation behind this study is to create an automated system that can identify a small group of individuals that are at elevated risk for not following through completing a mammogram screening. This will enable interventions to boost screening to be focused on patients least likely to complete screening.

Decomposing socioeconomic disparity in the utilization of screening mammography: A cross-sectional analysis from the RaNCD cohort study

We aimed to examine the degree of socioeconomic inequality in screening mammography among Kurdish women of Iran. Data from the Ravansar Non-Communicable Diseases (RaNCD) Cohort Study were used. A total of 3,219 women aged 35-65 years were studied. The concentration index (CIn) was used to measure the magnitude of socioeconomic-related inequalities in screening mammography. Decomposition analysis was employed to calculate the contribution of each explanatory variable to the observed inequality. The participation rate for screening mammography was 19.7%. The CIn of screening mammography was 0.142 (95% CI: 0.0197, 0.0656), indicating that screening mammography is more concentrated among high-SES women. Socioeconomic status, education level and area of residence were the main contributors to the observed inequality, respectively. We found a pro-rich inequality in screening mammography among Iranian Kurdish women. For mitigating socioeconomic inequality in screening mammography policymakers should focus more on the poor and rural communities.

“It's cancer screening after all”. Barriers to cervical and colorectal cancer screening and attitudes to promotion of self-sampling kits upon attendance for breast cancer screening

Objectives

To explore barriers to cervical and colorectal cancer screening and attitudes to promotion of self-sampling kits upon attendance for breast cancer screening.

Methods

Interview study with women who had not responded to one or more invitations to cervical or colorectal cancer screening. A semi-structured interview guide was used and interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Concepts from Temporal Motivation Theory were used to structure and analyse the data.

Results

Twenty-two women were interviewed. Screening was highly valued but the women perceived screening for cervical cancer and colorectal cancer as more troublesome to participate in, compared with participation in breast cancer screening. The lack of a pre-booked appointment or a suggested deadline attenuated the perceived value of cervical and colorectal cancer screening and this further increased procrastination. Promotion of self-sampling kits for cervical and colorectal cancer screening upon attendance for breast cancer screening was considered a feasible way to increase salience of both types of screening.

Conclusion

A high number of micro steps and absence of a deadline in cervical and colorectal cancer screening diverted attention away from screening participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening. The main facilitator could be reduction of micro actions, proposing a suggested deadline, and promotion of self-sampling kits when attending breast cancer screening to increase salience and a renewed attention to all three screening programmes.

Socioeconomic status index is an independent determinant of breast cancer screening practices: Evidence from Eastern China

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy affecting Chinese women, and early routine screening is incredibly important for its prevention and control. This study aimed to investigate the role of socioeconomic status (SES) in female breast cancer screening practices using the composite SES index.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved 1816 women in Eastern China. Data were collected using an online self-administered questionnaire from January 2020 to May 2021. We used principal component analysis to construct the composite SES index using educational level, annual household income, and occupation. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the SES index and breast cancer screening utilization.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 19.27% reported having performed breast self-examination, 12.89% reported having undergone clinical breast examination, and 3.52% reported having received mammography. The SES has a significant influence on the patronage of female breast cancer screening in Eastern China. The composite SES index was found to have a positive and significant association with breast cancer screening practices. An interaction was found between the SES index and patient characteristics, such as health awareness, marital status, and location of residence. In addition, the SES index had a positive effect on breast cancer-related knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic inequalities existed in Eastern China and were related to breast cancer screening patronage. The composite SES index was identified as a significant determinant of breast cancer screening practices. Our results highlighted the negative impacts of socioeconomic inequities on female breast cancer screening utilization. This suggests that reducing socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening requires more focused interventions and concerted outreach activities for groups with lower education levels, lower income, or lower occupational classes.

Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Health Screening: an Umbrella Review Across Conditions

Screening is an essential prevention practice for a number of health conditions. However, screening coverage remains generally low. Studies that investigate determinants of screening participation are becoming more common, but oftentimes investigate screening for health conditions in an individualized rather than integrated fashion. In routine clinical practice, however, healthcare professionals are often confronted with situations in which several screening procedures are recommended for the same patient. The consideration of their common determinants may support a more integrated screening approach. The objectives of this umbrella review were therefore to examine: 1) the determinants (barriers and facilitators) that have been identified in relation to recommended health screening procedures; and 2) the modifiable determinants (in primary care) common across health conditions or specific to individual procedures. Results were presented through a narrative synthesis. PubMed, PsycInfo and Cochrane were searched up to January 2022. Systematic reviews reporting determinants of participation in health screening procedures with grade A or B recommendation according to the US Preventive Services Task Force were included. A total of 85 systematic reviews were included, most which contained both qualitative and quantitative studies on determinants that describe individual factors (961 occurrences), social factors (113 occurrences, healthcare professional factors (149 occurrences), health system factors (105 occurrences) and screening procedure factors (99 occurrences). The most studied screening procedures concerned cervical cancer/human papillomavirus (n = 33), breast cancer (n = 28), colorectal cancer (n = 25) and the human immunodeficiency virus (n = 12). Other conditions have been under-studied (e.g. cardiovascular problems, lung cancer, syphilis). The individual domain, including determinants such as knowledge, beliefs and emotions, was the most covered across health conditions. Healthcare professional's recommendations and the quality of patient-provider communication were identified to have a strong influence on screening participation in most conditions. The other three domains included determinants which were more specific to a condition or a population. Various determinants modifiable in primary care were found in the individual domain and in the health system, healthcare professional and screening procedure domains. Quality was assessed as low for most systematic reviews included. The identification of various modifiable determinants common across conditions highlights the potential of an integrated screening participation approach. Interventions may address common determinants in a broader person-centred framework within which tailoring to specific procedures or populations can be considered. This approach needs to be explored in intervention studies. The systematic review registration is PROSPERO CRD42019126709.

Barriers to breast cancer screening in Singapore: A literature review

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer death among women, and its age-standardised incidence rate is one of the highest in Asia. We aimed to review studies on barriers to breast cancer screening to inform future policies in Singapore.

METHOD

This was a literature review of both quantitative and qualitative studies published between 2012 and 2020 using PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases, which analysed the perceptions and behaviours of women towards breast cancer screening in Singapore.

RESULTS

Through a thematic analysis based on the Health Belief Model, significant themes associated with low breast cancer screening uptake in Singapore were identified. The themes are: (1) high perceived barriers versus benefits, including fear of the breast cancer screening procedure and its possible outcomes, (2) personal challenges that impede screening attendance and paying for screening and treatment, and (3) low perceived susceptibility to breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Perceived costs/barriers vs benefits of screening appear to be the most common barriers to breast cancer screening in Singapore. Based on the barriers identified, increasing convenience to get screened, reducing mammogram and treatment costs, and improving engagement with support groups are recommended to improve the screening uptake rate in Singapore.

Qualitative factors influencing breast and cervical cancer screening in women: A scoping review

Breast and cervical are top cancers for women globally, but few studies have summarised how gender norms influence screening uptake, given sexual connotations and physical exposure. These beliefs may play a central role in decision-making, and understanding them is crucial to improving screening rates and services. This review scopes international literature for gender-based qualitative factors influencing women's screening uptake. A systematic search of peer-reviewed English articles in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL was conducted from inception until December 2019. Articles were included if they were about breast or cervical cancer screening, had mixed or qualitative methodology, and sampled women from the general population. 72 studies spanning 34 countries were analysed. Eight studies also included healthcare providers' views. Our narrative thematic analysis summarised primary themes extracted from each study into first-level subthemes, then synthesising second-level and third-level themes: (I) gender socialisation of women, (II) gender inequality in society, and (III) lack of empowerment to women in making screening decisions. Women tended to face sociocultural/role-based constraints, were expected to prioritise family, and keep bodily exposure to their husbands. Women showed low awareness and had fewer opportunities for health education compared to men. Male relations were often gatekeepers to financial resources needed to pay for screening tests. Screening risked community norms about women's or husbands' perceived embarrassing sexual behaviours. These findings suggest that interventions targeting unhelpful stigmatising beliefs about women's cancer screening must concurrently address community general norms, familial role-based beliefs, as well as at male relations who hold the purse-strings.

Identification of women's breast cancer prevention behaviors and the associated factors: The case of the Southeastern Anatolia Region

In this study, the researchers investigated the factors that affect women's breast cancer prevention behaviors. The sample of this cross-sectional and descriptive study consisted of 406 participants aged 20 and older. The study was conducted in February-March 2021 within the administrative borders of a province located in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. The data were collected via an online platform using Personal Information Form and the Scale of Factors Affecting Women's Breast Cancer Prevention Behaviors. The mean Scale of Factors Affecting Women's Breast Cancer Prevention Behaviors score of the participants was moderate as 107.20 ± 17.86. The frequency of breast cancer prevention behaviors was found to be lower in the participants with low literacy, those who were unemployed, those with low income, those living in villages and those who did not perform breast self-examination (p < 0.05). It is recommended to plan educational studies on breast cancer screening behaviors by considering regional differences.

Muslim Women and Disparities in Cancer Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study

Muslim women often find their religious customs at odds with their healthcare needs, such as regular gynecological check-ups and cervical cancer screenings, especially before marriage. Religious beliefs may also affect beliefs about gender roles, illness, and death, affecting seeking healthcare services. This retrospective study explored the differences in care-seeking related to cancer between Muslim women and the general female population at the Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States between 2010 and 2019. There were major differences in insurance status between the two cohorts. Muslim women were less likely to have government-sponsored health insurance and were much more likely to be uninsured than non-Muslim women. We also found that preventable female cancers were more prevalent among Muslim women than among non-Muslim women and was also diagnosed at more advanced stages.

The relative importance of factors influencing the surgeons' choice between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery for women with breast cancer

The authors' aim is to provide breast surgeons' perspectives on the relative importance of the criteria for choosing an appropriate surgery method between mastectomy (total removal of a breast) and breast-conserving surgery (removal of a breast cancer tumor and some of the normal tissue that surrounds it) for women with breast cancer by using the multicriteria decision-making method (MCDM). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) methods are utilized. A decision hierarchy is set with a goal, criteria, and alternatives. We developed our model based on three main criteria, tumor-related, patient-related, and post-operative process-related factors and nineteen sub-criteria, as well as two alternatives, mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS). An online questionnaire was sent to the breast surgeons; we showed that the most important criteria are post-operative process-related factors, especially the demand for esthetic appearance based on 39 breast surgeons. Conversely, the least significant criteria are tumor-related factors. Furthermore, breast-conserving surgery is selected as the most appropriate surgery method for breast cancer patients using the AHP, TOPSIS, and VIKOR.

The relationship between the fear of breast cancer, risk factors, and early diagnosis behaviors of women by age groups

PURPOSE

This study investigates the relationship between fear of breast cancer, risk factors, and early diagnosis behavior of women aged 20 or above.

METHOD

It is a descriptive cross-sectional study.

FINDINGS

It was found that 17.3% of the women conducted breast self-examination, 14.0% underwent clinical breast examination, and that 9.3% of them underwent mammography. The predictors regularly affecting early diagnosis behaviors were identified through logistic regression. Different predictors for breast cancer diagnostic behaviors were found in each age group.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This study is important in terms of taking into account the age factor in the practices aiming to increase the diagnostic behavior of healthcare personnel, especially nurses.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that there were different predictors of breast cancer diagnostic behaviors in both age groups of the women in the study.