Stigmatization of medications for opioid use disorder in 12-step support groups and participant responses

Layperson knowledge on naloxone and medications for opioid use disorder in an urban population: a cross sectional survey study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There has been little research in an urban population regarding knowledge of harm reduction measures and treatment options. The objective of our study was to evaluate knowledge and perceptions of harm reduction measures and types of treatment available for opioid use disorder among patients and family in an urban emergency department (ED) waiting room.

METHODS

We conducted a single center, cross-sectional survey study that occurred between September 2021 and August 2022. A convenience sample of patients and family members that were above 18 and English speaking were recruited by research assistants. Participants were assessed on knowledge and preferences around drug treatment options and harm reduction. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Freeman-Halton/Kruskall-Wallis/Mann-Whitney U tests. p-Values were reported at the 0.05 significance level.

RESULTS

We collected 200 responses. Of these, 104 people had a connection to someone with a substance use disorder (SUD) and 50 had an SUD. Of those who had a connection to someone with SUD, 63 had heard of naloxone (60.6%, CI: [50.5, 69.9]). Fewer than 60% of respondents in each group had heard of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) (p = 0.46) and fewer than 50% thought that among people who use drugs that they knew would be interested in receiving treatment (p = 0.10).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that among people who came to an urban emergency department, there was a lack of awareness of harm reduction and MOUD. Interventions should be put into place to educate on the importance of MOUD and harm reduction.

Perceived Importance of Counseling Among Patients Receiving Methadone Treatment

We examined the perceived importance of counseling and its correlates among patients receiving methadone treatment (MT). Participants were 345 patients attending MT who completed 7-point Likert-type scales from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 7 ("Strongly Agree") to rate agreement with perceived importance of counseling, opioid use disorder (OUD) illness models, and OUD treatment beliefs. We examined predictors of perceived importance of counseling using hierarchical linear regression; steps 1, 2, and 3 were demographics, OUD illness models, and OUD treatment beliefs, respectively. Most (76%) agreed counseling was important (Mean = 5.6, SD = 1.7). Demographics did not contribute significantly to the regression model, F(4, 340) = 0.88, p > .05). R2 was significant for Step 2 (F = 2.89, p < .05) but individual OUD illness model variables did not make a significant contribution (F(3, 337) = 1.76, p > .05). The addition of OUD treatment beliefs on Step 3 (positive overall treatment expectation, importance of daily methadone, life-saving benefit of methadone medication, and importance of mutual aid) explained an additional 51% of the variation in perceived importance of counseling and this change in R2 was significant, F(4, 333) = 31.17, p < .001. We conclude that most participants perceived counseling to be important and OUD treatment beliefs independently predicted perceived importance of counseling.

Exploring the potential of Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART Recovery) mutual-help groups for supporting people who use methamphetamine: A qualitative study examining participant experience of initiation and engagement

INTRODUCTION

Improving support options for people who use methamphetamine is of critical national and global importance. The role of mutual-help groups within the treatment-seeking journey of people who use methamphetamine is unclear. Self-Management and Recovery Training ('SMART Recovery') mutual-help groups are led by a trained facilitator and support participants to work on individual goals, including, but not limited to abstinence. This study examined how people who use methamphetamine came to be involved in SMART Recovery mutual-help groups and factors associated with engagement.

METHODS

A sample of Australian SMART Recovery participants who self-reported using methamphetamine in the preceding 12-months (n = 18) discussed their history of substance use and experience of service provision in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using iterative categorization.

RESULTS

Participant initiation of SMART Recovery groups was described across two themes: i) delayed attendance and ii) use as an adjunct to other services. Factors associated with engagement were discussed in terms of: i) the 'fit' of SMART Recovery mutual-help groups; ii) coping and tolerance of discomfort; iii) the power of shared lived experience; iv) choice and autonomy; and v) short-term goal setting supports self-efficacy and the possibility of change.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

SMART Recovery mutual-help groups show promise for engaging people who use methamphetamine. There is a clear need to improve awareness of mutual-help group options amongst service users, providers and the general community. Offering choice over mutual-help groups may help to engage people earlier and support improved linkage between services.

Receipt of Medications for Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorders: The Importance of Service Utilization Patterns

Medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUD) and opioid use disorder (MOUD) are underutilized evidence-based treatments. While patients often receive treatment in multiple medical treatment settings, it is unknown whether certain treatment settings or combinations of settings are associated with increased receipt of MAUD or MOUD. Data from the cross-sectional 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health were used to identify treatment settings where adult respondents received any past year alcohol treatment (n = 476, 33% female) or, separately, opioid treatment (n = 337, 38% female). Three-stage latent class analysis assessed the patterns of treatment settings utilization and their associations with receipt of MAUD or MOUD, adjusting for potential confounders. Only 10.9% of those in alcohol treatment received MAUD while 40.9% of those in opioid treatment received MOUD. Analyzing different treatment settings visited by respondents, a four-class model best fit the MAUD sample while a three-class model best fit the MOUD sample. There were significant differences in receipt of MAUD by treatment setting classes in unadjusted models (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in receipt of MOUD across treatment utilization classes, but MOUD receipt was associated with severity of opioid use in all treatment setting classes. People in treatment for alcohol or opioid use were more likely to receive medication if their use was more severe, and were more likely to receive MAUD if they accessed care in many settings. As MOUD and especially MAUD are underutilized, these findings highlight opportunities to increase access to evidence-based care for alcohol and opioid use disorders.

Relationship of hub and treatment characteristics with client outcomes in the initial Washington State hub and spoke cohort

INTRODUCTION

Washington State's Hub and Spoke (HS) approach aims to improve availability of opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. Washington initially funded six hubs with expertise in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) that built care networks with referral and treatment partners (spokes). We assessed outcomes for the initial HS cohort, considering the role of HS and treatment characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort-based observational study using 2017-2019 Medicaid claims data for 2841 HS participants aged 18-64, excluding those with past-month MOUD, in an intent-to-treat analysis. We describe treatment characteristics (MOUD type, treatment setting, and hub type at the initial HS visit, number of outpatient services in their first HS month), and six-month outcomes (MOUD continuity, emergency department (ED) utilization, hospitalization, and intensive SUD treatment). We used multivariable regressions to assess associations with six-month outcomes, adjusting for client characteristics.

RESULTS

Two-thirds (68 %) of participants received buprenorphine, 22 % methadone, 5 % naltrexone, and 5 % outpatient without MOUD for their initial visit. Within six months, 45 % had an ED visit, 14 % any hospitalization, and 18 % entered intensive SUD treatment. Only 24 % remained on MOUD for six months. Compared to buprenorphine, the methadone sample had higher odds of MOUD continuity (aOR = 2.81, 95%CI 2.21-3.55), and the naltrexone sample had lower odds (aOR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.19-0.66). FQHC/public health treatment settings had higher odds of MOUD continuity (aOR = 1.70, 95%CI 1.17-2.47) but hub type was not significant. MOUD continuity increased with 2+ outpatient services for the buprenorphine sample (aOR range 2.55-4.73). Odds of intensive SUD treatment were lower for the methadone sample, compared to buprenorphine (aOR = 0.16, 95%CI 0.11-0.23), all settings compared to SUD settings (aOR range 0.32-0.58), and SUD + MH and medical/hospital hubs compared to SUD only hubs (aOR range 0.28-0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Most participants did not attain six-month MOUD continuity, despite the HS approach, with variations by MOUD type and treatment setting. The number of outpatient services in the first month for buprenorphine clients was associated with greater odds of MOUD continuity and reduced odds of intensive SUD treatment. More work is needed to improve MOUD continuity for people with OUD within the HS model.

Rates of buprenorphine prescribing and racial disparities among patients with opioid overdose

Background

Awareness of the relationship between real-world buprenorphine prescribing and overdose frequency is limited, especially in the Southeastern United States. We described buprenorphine prescribing rates for patients experiencing nonfatal opioid overdoses in the context of overdose frequency.

Methods

Electronic medical records review was conducted at an urban, academic hospital in Alabama from January 1 through December 31, 2021. Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and nonfatal opioid overdoses, dispositioned from either the emergency department (ED), inpatient, or outpatient affiliated clinics, were identified by International Classification of Diseases-10 codes.

Results

The study included 358 unique patients. Many patients were white (71.5 %), male (59.2 %), and uninsured (54.2 %), with a mean age of 42.0±12.8 years. The majority (85.5 %) experienced one to three overdoses, and 14.5 % of patients had more than three overdoses. The buprenorphine prescription rate increased to 55.8 % when patients had more than three overdoses, compared to one overdose (34.5 %) and two to three overdoses (37.4 %) (p=0.025). Compared to females, more males overdosed more than once (p=0.004). Black patients were less likely to receive buprenorphine prescriptions than white patients (27.3 % vs. 44.5 %, p=0.004). Compared to patients with multiple overdoses, more patients with one overdose had public insurance (p=0.028) and were less likely to present to the ED (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Under-prescribing of buprenorphine is high among patients with OUD and opioid overdoses, even in patients with multiple overdoses, and there appear to be racial disparities in prescribing. Our findings indicate clinical opportunities for improving buprenorphine prescribing and reducing the current disparities.

Beyond the 5-year recovery mark: Perspectives of researchers with lived and living experience on public engagement and discourse

There has been growing attention toward including people with lived and living experience (PWLLE) with substance use, substance use disorders, and recovery in public-facing activities. The goals of including PWLLE in sharing their perspectives often include demonstrating that recovery is possible, destigmatizing and humanizing people who have substance use experiences, and leveraging their lived experience to illuminate a particular topic or issue. Recently, the National Council for Mental Wellbeing issued a set of guidelines entitled, "Protecting Individuals with Lived Experience in Public Disclosure," which included a "Lived Experience Safeguard Scale." We offer the present commentary to bolster some of the ideas presented by the Council and to articulate suggested changes to this guidance, with the goal of reducing unintentional gatekeeping and stigma. Specifically, we offer that there are numerous problems with the recommendation to only invite people who have "five or more years of sustained recovery" to contribute to public discourse. The idea of perceived stability after five years of abstinence is not new to us or the field. We suggest that this idea excludes people who have experienced the present rapidly changing substance use landscape, people who have briefly returned to use, some young people, and people with living experience who also can valuably contribute to public discourse. We offer alternative guidelines to the National Council for Mental Wellbeing and others seeking to promote practices that are inclusive to the diversity of PWLLE.

"We're Not Gonna Aid You in Shooting Up": Stigma's Relationship to Harm Reduction in People Who Inject Drugs

BACKGROUND

Harm reduction, when applied to drug use, prioritizes improving patient-centered health outcomes and reducing drug-related harm. In order for harm reduction strategies to be adopted by people who inject drugs (PWID), they need to be promoted, accessible, and accepted in that population and the community-at-large. While PWID face stigma at multiple levels, less is known about how stigma influences uptake and acceptance of harm reduction services and strategies among PWID.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to characterize the stigmatizing experiences PWID have had related to harm reduction and the role of stigma in influencing their acceptance and adoption of harm reduction services and strategies.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using in-person, semi-structured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

We recruited hospitalized participants, age 18 and over, with a history of injection drug use.

APPROACH

We developed an interview guide asking about various aspects of stigma and participants' experiences with naloxone, syringe service programs, fentanyl test strips, HIV and hepatitis C testing, and any other harm reduction strategies. Key themes were generated using a thematic analysis. We reached thematic saturation at 16 participants.

KEY RESULTS

PWID reported multi-level stigma related to harm reduction from themselves, the public, the healthcare system, and the legal and carceral systems. Themes were grouped into four main categories: internalized, interpersonal, intervention, and structural stigma. Stigma across all of these domains negatively impacted the ability of PWID to access harm reduction resources. Positive, non-stigmatizing experiences from others, such as syringe service programs and peer navigators, countered historically negative experiences and promoted greater education and comfort about using harm reduction resources among PWID.

CONCLUSIONS

To expand the reach of harm reduction services, it is critical to develop interventions that can reduce the stigma against PWID and harm reduction.

Supporting medication-assisted recovery in recovery residences: staff support, managing built environment threats, and building a supportive network

Background: While medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are effective in reducing overdoses, widespread adoption and implementation of MOUD remains inadequate. Innovative approaches to promote MOUD use and to support people in their medication-assisted recovery (MAR) are needed. Recovery residences that serve people taking MOUD are steadily growing in number, yet little is known about how MOUD and the MAR pathway is promoted within the recovery residence setting.Objectives: The purpose of this qualitative analysis was to describe how recovery residences facilitate MOUD initiation and support residents' MAR pathway.Methods: We conducted interviews with 93 residents (59.1% male; 38.7% female) living in recovery residences located in five Texas cities that served people taking medication for opioid use disorder.Results: We found that recovery residence staff addressed linkage to care gaps in their communities by connecting people who might benefit from MOUD to appropriate providers. Recovery residence staff also strengthened participants' community of MAR-supportive peers by hosting or connecting residents to Medication-Assisted Recovery Anonymous meetings. Additionally, recovery residences helped some residents overcome common logistical barriers (e.g. transportation issues, housing instability, distance to providers) that hinder MOUD access.Conclusion: Recovery residences that serve people taking MOUD are a well-positioned recovery support service to promote MOUD initiation and the MAR pathway.

Quality of participants' relationships to peer recovery support specialists as a function of perceived similarities: An exploratory analysis

Background

A growing evidence base supports the value of peer recovery support specialists (PRSS), particularly due to shared lived experience with participants (recipients of PRSS services). However, little research has examined whether congruence on certain aspects of "peerness" (e.g., demographics, experiences) matters for PRSS-participant relationships.

Methods

Through a pilot study under the NIDA-funded Initiative for Justice and Emerging Adult Populations (JEAP), adults who had recently received PRSS services (N=100) were interviewed. Participants completed a modified version of the Scales for Participant Alliance with Recovery Coach (SPARC), a measure of PRSS-participant relationship quality, and rated themselves as different/similar to their PRSS in several domains using a six-point scale.

Results

Participants had met with their PRSS for a median of 10 sessions over two months. SPARC scores were unrelated to participant demographics or lived experiences. However, better-quality relationships were reported by participants who believed their PRSS was similar to them in relationships with family (p=.004), spirituality/religion (p=.001), age (p<.001), and overall recovery pathway (p<.001). Total SPARC scores were not significantly correlated with perceived PRSS-participant similarities on gender, race/ethnicity, substances of choice, and history of incarceration or substance use treatment.

Discussion

Results from this pilot study suggest that PRSS-participant alignment on past experiences (e.g., prior incarceration, choice of drugs) may not be needed to establish good-quality working relationships. However, similarities on factors related to current life stage (e.g., age, family relationships) and/or recovery process (e.g., overall pathway, spirituality) may be more important. Future research should employ mixed-methods approaches to elucidate these unique findings.

Attitudes toward medications for opioid use disorder among peer recovery specialists

Background: Peer recovery specialists (PRSs) are substance use service providers with lived experience in recovery. Although a large body of research demonstrates the efficacy of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), emerging research suggests PRSs' attitudes toward MOUD are ambivalent or mixed. Few studies have quantitatively assessed factors influencing PRSs' attitudes.Objectives: This study identifies personal and professional characteristics associated with attitudes toward MOUD among PRSs.Methods: PRSs working at publicly funded agencies in Michigan completed a self-administered web-based survey (N = 266, 60.5% women). Surveys assessed socio-demographics, treatment and recovery history, attitudes toward clients, and attitudes toward MOUD. Multiple linear regression was used to identify factors associated with attitudes toward MOUD.Results: A minority of PRSs (21.4%) reported a history of treatment with MOUD, while nearly two-thirds reported current 12-step involvement (62.5%). Compared to PRSs without a history of MOUD treatment, PRSs who had positive (b = 4.71, p < .001) and mixed (b = 3.36, p = .010) experiences with MOUD had more positive attitudes; PRSs with negative experiences with MOUD had less positive attitudes (b = -3.16, p = .003). Current 12-step involvement (b = -1.63, p = .007) and more stigmatizing attitudes toward clients (b = -.294, p < .001) were associated with less positive attitudes toward MOUD. Black PRSs had less positive attitudes than White PRSs (b = -2.50, p = .001), and women had more positive attitudes than men (b = 1.19, p = .038).Conclusion: PRSs' attitudes toward MOUD varied based on the nature of their lived experience. Findings highlight considerations for training and supervising PRSs who serve individuals with opioid use disorder.

Effects of strength of relationship ties in recovery homes: A conundrum

Recovery homes are a widespread source of support for those attempting to maintain abstinence. For those who are able to remain in these settings for at least 6 months, outcomes tend to be favorable; however, many leave prematurely. There is a need to better understand the social integration processes that play a major role in giving recovery home residents access to available recovery-related social capital that is associated with better outcomes. The current study involved Oxford House recovery homes in 3 states and examined the strength of relationship ties among house members. We found that those who associated with peers who have higher recovery scores tend to improve their own recovery scores over time. However, we also found that those with higher recovery scores tended to create "strong" ties with similarly high-scoring alters; likewise lower-scoring individuals preferentially formed strong ties with each other. These findings suggest a conundrum: recovery home residents most in need of relational support from more recovered housemates are the least likely to obtain it. We discuss possible pathways to creating more ties between high and low-recovered residents.

The peer to career pipeline: An observational study of peer worker trainee characteristics and training completion likelihood

INTRODUCTION

Peer recovery support services (PRSS) for substance use disorder (SUD) are a flexible and evidence-based intervention employed across multiple settings and for a variety of populations. These services have expanded over the past two decades, but there is little research on recruitment and training of prospective peer workers - the peer to career pipeline. This study observed training outcomes for applicants to a peer worker scholarship program in Texas.

METHODS

A total of 448 participants provided baseline personal history information, and a subset of participants (n = 239) completed optional psychosocial surveys. Logistic regression analysis tested associations of personal history and psychosocial variables with three training stage completion outcomes: classroom training completion, placement at an internship site, and full certification.

RESULTS

The greatest decline in advancement between stages occurred in the transition between classroom training (78.1 % of participants completed) and internship placement (43.3 % of participants completed). Participants were diverse in terms of race/ethnicity and life experiences salient to the peer worker role, but Hispanic/Latinx peer workers were under-represented. Past work with a SUD peer worker, age, and having a bachelor's degree were each positively associated with training stage completion across multiple models, while having basic technological access, being a woman, and veteran status were each positively associated with training stage completion in only one model. Years since recovery initiation date, non-monosexual orientation, White race, and quality of life were each negatively associated with training stage completion in only one model.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing peer workforce may be a key source of recruitment for new peer workers; thus retention of existing workers is key to ensuring continued expansion of these services. Additional support may be required to recruit and retain younger peer worker trainees, men trainees, Hispanic/Latinx trainees, trainees who lack basic technological access, or trainees without bachelor's degrees. Unanswered questions about the peer workforce remain and must be addressed to ensure that an appropriately diverse workforce is recruited, that disparities in training outcomes are minimized or prevented, and that existing peer workers are well-supported.

Barriers to opioid use disorder treatment among people who use drugs in the rural United States: A qualitative, multi-site study

BACKGROUND

In 2020, 2.8 million people required substance use disorder (SUD) treatment in nonmetropolitan or 'rural' areas in the U.S. Among this population, only 10% received SUD treatment from a specialty facility, and 1 in 500 received medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We explored the context surrounding barriers to SUD treatment in the rural United States.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews from 2018 to 2019 to assess barriers to SUD treatment among people who use drugs (PWUD) across seven rural U.S. study sites. Using the social-ecological model (SEM), we examined individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy factors contributing to perceived barriers to SUD treatment. We employed deductive and inductive coding and analytical approaches to identify themes. We also calculated descriptive statistics for participant characteristics and salient themes.

RESULTS

Among 304 participants (55% male, mean age 36 years), we identified barriers to SUD treatment in rural areas across SEM levels. At the individual/interpersonal level, relevant themes included: fear of withdrawal, the need to "get things in order" before entering treatment, close-knit communities and limited confidentiality, networks and settings that perpetuated drug use, and stigma. Organizational-level barriers included: strict facility rules, treatment programs managed like corrections facilities, lack of gender-specific treatment programs, and concerns about jeopardizing employment. Community-level barriers included: limited availability of treatment in local rural communities, long distances and limited transportation, waitlists, and a lack of information about treatment options. Policy-level themes included insurance challenges and system-imposed barriers such as arrest and incarceration.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight multi-level barriers to SUD treatment in rural U.S. communities. Salient barriers included the need to travel long distances to treatment, challenges to confidentiality due to small, close-knit communities where people are highly familiar with one another, and high-threshold treatment program practices. Our findings point to the need to facilitate the elimination of treatment barriers at each level of the SEM in rural America.

Interventions to reduce self-stigma in people who use drugs: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Substance use stigma is a key barrier to treatment and harm reduction engagement among people who use drugs (PWUD). Previous systematic reviews have focused on interventions to reduce stigma in healthcare providers and the public; less is known about interventions to address self-stigma among PWUD. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence for substance use self-stigma reduction interventions.

METHODS

We reviewed English-language studies published between 2011 and 2023 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO #CRD42022321305). We searched seven bibliographic databases (PubMed; SCOPUS; APA PsycInfo; CINAHL; Social Work Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses). This review included studies if 1) they evaluated the effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention, 2) participants were PWUD, 3) authors reported self-stigma as a primary outcome, 4) the study design was experimental or quasi-experimental. We reviewed, interpreted and reported intervention characteristics and effectiveness using narrative synthesis. We assessed study quality with the Downs & Black checklist.

RESULTS

Among 1195 screened studies, 15 met the inclusion criteria (N = 2280 PWUD). We categorized the interventions according to three approaches: psychotherapeutic (n = 8), psychoeducational (n = 5), and multimodal (n = 2). Most interventions were delivered in clinical settings (n = 11) and in a group format (n = 13). Study quality was fair-to-good and included nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six quasi-experiments. Measurement heterogeneity was high, with 11 different stigma-related scales used across the 15 studies. Eleven studies showed significant favorable effects in at least one stigma measure. Six of these demonstrated positive effects in all stigma measures. Evidence was mixed for all three intervention categories; however, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, a form of group psychotherapy, demonstrated effectiveness in four of five RCTs incorporating this approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there is promising evidence for the effectiveness of substance use self-stigma interventions, although more studies are needed to determine which approaches are most effective. Consistent conceptualization and measurement of self-stigma across studies will improve comparability in future intervention trials. Current offerings are largely limited to clinical settings and group-based formats; self-help interventions, available for other stigmatized conditions, could be developed to serve the majority of PWUD not engaged in treatment.

Trauma-related shame predicts daily non-medical prescription opioid use among individuals with PTSD symptoms

Non-medical prescription opioid use (NMPOU) is the use of opioids without a prescription or in a way different from how they were prescribed and is the fourth most common type of drug use in the United States. Separate research has shown that trauma-related shame is linked to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and, respectively, opioid use. However, no study to date has empirically examined the association between trauma-related shame and NMPOU among individuals with PTSD symptoms. Forty adults with clinical or subclinical PTSD who reported engaging in NMPOU at least one day in the prior month before the study completed 28 days of daily surveys. Trauma-related shame was measured at baseline. NMPOU and underlying motives to engage in NMPOU were assessed once daily via a smartphone app. Twenty-four participants (60 %) reported NMPOU over the 28-day period. After controlling for PTSD symptoms and covariates, mixed models showed that higher trauma-related shame significantly predicted higher risk of daily NMPOU (B = 0.06, SE = 0.03, t = 2.14, p=.03). After controlling for false discovery rates, trauma-related shame also significantly predicted NMPOU due to the following motives (p's < 0.031): to manage depression/sadness, to manage anxiety, to manage other stress/worry, and to get high. Among individuals with PTSD, higher baseline trauma-related shame prospectively and positively predicted greater NMPOU over a four-week daily monitoring period. Findings suggest a need to attend to trauma-related shame and its impact on subsequent motivations to engage in NMPOU. Future research should examine how treatments may effectively target trauma-related shame to reduce NMPOU and more severe PTSD symptoms.

"Being here is saving my life": Resident experiences of living in recovery residences for people taking medication for an opioid use disorder

INTRODUCTION

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are an effective treatment for addressing opioid use disorder. Despite MOUD's demonstrated effectiveness, MOUD-related stigma is prevalent throughout many recovery communities and subsequently limits persons taking MOUD access to recovery supports, including recovery housing. While recovery residences that serve people taking MOUD could be a critical recovery support, they are limited in number and understudied.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with 47 residents in medication-assisted recovery (MAR) living in 11 Texas-based recovery residences serving people taking MOUD to characterize residents' experiences and understand the impact that these homes had on their recovery.

RESULTS

We found that many participants could not previously access recovery housing and other recovery supports due to MOUD-related stigma, thus recovery homes that supported people in MAR were considered a groundbreaking opportunity. Recovery residences provided participants with a space in which they did not feel judged for taking MOUD, which facilitated participants' connections with their fellow housemates. Subsequently, participants no longer had to hide their MAR pathway and could be transparent about taking MOUD among their recovery residence community. Last, recovery homes provided a supportive environment in which participants' internalized MOUD-related stigma could evolve into acceptance of their MAR pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery residences that serve people in MAR provide a supportive, safe, nonjudgmental recovery environment in which residents develop relationships with other peers taking MOUD, share openly about their MAR, and are empowered to embrace their recovery pathway. These findings highlight the need for more recovery residences that are supportive of people taking MOUD as part of their recovery.

Efficacy of 12-step mutual-help groups other than Alcoholics Anonymous: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This paper offers a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies on the main twelve-step mutual-help (TSMH) groups (excluding Alcoholics Anonymous) and four meta-analyses exploring the correlation between (i) duration or involvement in TSMH groups and; (ii) severity of symptoms or quality of life. Systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches of databases (MEDLINE, PsychInfo), a register (ClinicalTrials) and citations were conducted, from inception through November 01 2022. Fifty five articles were included (24 quantitative, 27 qualitative, 4 mixed-methods), corresponding to 47 distinctive studies. 68% of these studies were conducted in North America, 17% in Middle East, 11% in the European Union and 4% in Australia. The most studied TSMH group were Gamblers Anonymous (28% of the 47 studies), Narcotics Anonymous (26%), Double Trouble in Recovery (15%), Overeaters Anonymous (19%) and TSMH groups for compulsive sexual behaviors (11%). The four meta-analyses pooled data from 9 studies. Pooled mean age ranged from 36.5 to 40.5. 80-81% of participants were male. TSMH attendance and involvement were negatively correlated with severity of symptoms (high and medium levels of evidence) and positively correlated with quality of life (low levels of evidence). Twenty-one qualitative papers reported factors influencing recovery: Social (n = 15), emotional (n = 9), spiritual (n = 8), self-identification or psychological (n = 6) factors. Review provides characteristics of TSMH groups others than Alcoholics Anonymous, with implications for both research and healthcare practice. The perspective to implement TSMH groups targeting ontological addiction, at the root of all addiction, is discussed.Protocol registration: Prospero registration number: CRD42022342605.

Linkage facilitation services for opioid use disorder: Taxonomy of facilitation practitioners, goals, and activities

INTRODUCTION

This article proposes a taxonomy of linkage facilitation services used to help persons with opioid use disorder access treatment and recovery resources. Linkage facilitation may be especially valuable for persons receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) given the considerable barriers to treatment access and initiation that have been identified. The science of linkage facilitation currently lacks both consistent communication about linkage facilitation practices and a conceptual framework for guiding research.

METHODS

To address this gap, this article presents a taxonomy derived from expert consensus that organizes the array of practitioners, goals, and activities associated with linkage services for OUD and related needs. Expert panelists first independently reviewed research reports and policy guidelines summarizing the science and practice of linkage facilitation for substance use disorders generally and OUD specifically, then met several times to vet the conceptual scheme and content of the taxonomy until they reached a final consensus.

RESULTS

The derived taxonomy contains eight domains: facilitator identity, facilitator lived experience, linkage client, facilitator-client relationship, linkage activity, linkage method, linkage connectivity, and linkage goal. For each domain, the article defines basic domain categories, highlights research and practice themes in substance use and OUD care, and introduces innovations in linkage facilitation being tested in one of two NIDA-funded research networks: Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) or Consortium on Addiction Recovery Science (CoARS).

CONCLUSIONS

To accelerate consistent application of this taxonomy to diverse research and practice settings, the article concludes by naming several considerations for linkage facilitation workforce training and implementation.

Ambivalence and contingencies: A qualitative examination of peer recovery coaches' attitudes toward medications for opioid use disorder

INTRODUCTION

Peer recovery coaches (PRCs) are an important provider group affecting medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) uptake and retention. However, some PRCs may have experiences and beliefs that do not align with the use of MOUD. This study examines PRCs' perceptions of MOUD and how PRCs' attitudes affect their interactions with clients. The article also explores factors influencing PRCs' attitudes.

METHODS

The study team conducted semi-structured interviews by phone with PRCs in Michigan (N = 34, July through September 2021). The study asked participants about their opinion of MOUD, how they help clients to make decisions about MOUD, and whether they have encountered negative attitudes toward MOUD in their work. Data analysis was guided by Tracy's (2020) iterative phronetic approach.

RESULTS

Nearly all PRCs acknowledged the social stigma surrounding MOUD. PRCs described the stigma toward MOUD as affecting treatment access, utilization, and recovery support. While most PRCs expressed support for many recovery pathways, support for MOUD was contingent on the type of medication and the conditions under which it is used. PRCs often described MOUD as acceptable only in the short-term when paired with psychosocial interventions, after nonpharmacological treatment attempts had failed. PRCs with concerns about MOUD reported sometimes avoiding discussions about MOUD with clients, spreading misinformation about MOUD, and encouraging clients to discontinue treatment. However, many PRCs expressed a desire to support clients' self-determination despite their own biases.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight a need for education and stigma reduction among PRCs and point to specific areas for intervention. PRCs described deeply engrained beliefs about MOUD rooted in their own treatment histories and recovery practices. Provision of high-quality training and supervision to shift attitudes among PRCs will be key to increasing the use of MOUD.

Detoxification, 12-step meeting attendance, and non-fatal opioid overdoses among a suburban/exurban population with opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Drug overdoses are the leading cause of injury death in the United States with an estimated 105,752 individuals dying from an overdose in the United States in a 12-month period ending October 2021. Given that people who have opioid use disorder (OUD) are at an increased risk of death, it is crucial to assess risk factors associated with opioid overdose to improve interventions.

OBJECTIVES

We examine factors associated with non-fatal overdose among a suburban/exurban population with OUD in Southern California.

METHODS

Participants were recruited by convenience sampling (n = 355) and were interviewed between November 2017 to August 2018. Participants were eligible for the study if they had a history of pharmaceutical opioid use.

RESULTS

A total of 198 (55.8%) participants reported at least one overdose in their lifetime. A total of 229 participants identified as male, 124 identified as female, and 2 identified as non-binary. When controlling for demographic factors, non-oral opioid administration at first opioid use (AOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.52-5.22), having a history of methadone detoxification, (AOR 2.23, 95% CI 1.27-3.91), history of buprenorphine detoxification (AOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.02-3.07), and history of 12 step attendance (AOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.12-3.20) were found to be independently and positively associated with lifetime opioid overdose.

CONCLUSIONS

Detoxification with buprenorphine and methadone was found to be associated with having a non-fatal opioid overdose. Buprenorphine and methadone should not be prescribed as a detoxification medication as long-term use of medication for OUD results in better outcomes than medication that is used short-term.

Perspectives of researchers with lived experience in implementation science research: Opportunities to close the research-to-practice gap in substance use systems of care

Background

The field of implementation science acknowledges the importance of diversity within research teams including members from diverse disciplines and with lived expertise in practical implementation (e.g., administrators, front-line workers, patients/clients). Gaps remain in the successful implementation of proven substance use treatment interventions.

Methods

This paper will outline the rationale for the purposeful inclusion of researchers with lived experience (RLE) related to substance use disorder (SUD) within implementation science research studies focused on improving SUD services.

Results

We posit that researchers with such experience can help address research-to-practice gaps by (1) building strong community partnerships, (2) engaging in conversations around effective interventions through knowledge translation, (3) providing community-congruent approaches to evaluation, and (4) aiding in dissemination and sustainability efforts.

Conclusions

We end by offering recommendations for researchers without lived experience as they intentionally collaborate with RLE.

Medication Assisted Treatment Program Policies: Opinions of People in Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Medication assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid use disorder (OUD) saves lives and enhances quality of life for people in recovery. However, only a small percentage of people eligible for MAT in the United States receive treatment, and among those who do seek treatment, retention is a challenge. This study aims to understand factors that help individuals enter and stay in MAT from the perspective of those in recovery. The patient perspective is vital in efforts to improve care delivery and best support individuals in treatment.

METHODS

Survey development was driven by a review of current peer-reviewed literature plus information gained through 3 semi-structured interviews and follow-up discussions with 5 individuals who have lived experience in MAT, termed Participant Advisors. Survey questions focused in part on MAT participants' opinions relating to program policies such as drug testing, relapse protocols, duration of treatment, participant use of anti-anxiety medications and marijuana, and requirements for attendance in peer recovery groups such as Narcotics Anonymous and Alcoholics Anonymous. Responses were collected from West Virginia-based MAT programs from February through August 2021, with 1700 surveys distributed to 21 MAT programs.

RESULTS

At the close of data collection, 225 survey responses, including over 500 free-text comments, were received (13.2% response rate). Most (n = 207, 95%) were currently in a MAT program and most (n = 187, 88.6%) reported using buprenorphine/naloxone for MAT, though participants reported having used other medications for treatment of OUD as well. Questions about how long a person should have MAT prescribed, how long they should be able to stay in treatment, whether they can use marijuana or anti-anxiety drugs while in treatment, and whether they should use a 12-step program generated mixed opinions. Findings strongly support consideration of individual situations and shared decision-making with providers.

"You're Not Supposed to be on it Forever": Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) Related Stigma Among Drug Treatment Providers and People who Use Opioids

Opioid use disorder (OUD) through prescription opioid misuse, heroin, and illicitly manufactured fentanyl use has increased dramatically in the past 20 years. Medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) is considered the gold standard for treating opioid use disorders but uptake remains low. Recently, Madden has argued that in addition to the stigma assigned to substance use and people with SUD, MOUDs also are stigmatized, a process she labels intervention stigma to distinguish it from condition stigma (ie, stigma of SUD) . In this paper, we examine MOUD related stigma from the perspective of people who use opioids (PWUO) and key informants who play some role in providing or referring people to drug treatment. Providers and PWOU often viewed MOUD as one drug replacing another which discouraged providers from recommending and PWUO from accepting MOUD. MOUD stigma was also expressed by providers' exaggerated fear of MOUD diversion. The extent to which MOUD was accepted as a legitimate treatment varied and influenced treatment providers' perceptions of the goals of drug treatment and the length of time that MOUD should be used with many feeling that MOUD should only be used as a temporary tool while PWOU work on other treatment goals. This led to tapering off of MOUD after some time in treatment. Some providers also expressed mistrust of MOUD stemming from their previous experiences with the over-prescription of opioids for pain which led to the current crisis. Results from this study suggest that the proportion of PWUO on MOUD is unlikely to increase without addressing MOUD stigma among drug treatment providers and PWUO seeking treatment.

Providing peer navigation services to women with a history of opioid misuse pre- and post-release from jail: A program description

Background:

Justice system-involved women with opioid use disorder (OUD) experience layered health risks and stigma, yet peer navigation services during reentry may support positive outcomes. This manuscript offers a program description of a women’s peer navigation intervention delivered pre- and post-release from jail to remove barriers to women’s access to OUD treatment, including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).

Methods:

All data were collected as part of a NIH/NIDA-funded national cooperative, the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) project. Through the larger study’s intervention, women in jail with OUD are connected via videoconference to a peer navigator, who provides an initial reentry recovery assessment and 12+ weeks of recovery support sessions post-release. Qualitative analyses examined peers’ notes from initial sessions with women (N = 50) and in-depth interviews with peers (N = 3).

Results:

Peers’ notes from initial sessions suggest that women anticipate challenges to successful recovery and community reentry. More than half of women (51.9%) chose OUD treatment as their primary goal, while others selected more basic needs (e.g. housing, transportation). In qualitative interviews, peers described women’s transitions to the community as unpredictable, creating difficulties for reentry planning, particularly for rural women. Peers also described challenges with stigma against MOUD and establishing relationships via telehealth, but ultimately believed their role was valuable in providing resource referrals, support, and hope for recovery.

Conclusions:

For women with OUD, peer navigation can offer critical linkages to services at release from jail, in addition to hope, encouragement, and solidarity. Findings provide important insights for future peer-based interventions.

Exploring the question of financial incentives for training amongst non-adopters of MOUD in rural primary care

BACKGROUND

Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) includes administering medications such as buprenorphine or methadone, often with mental health services. MOUD has been shown to significantly improve outcomes and success of recovery from opioid use disorder. In WV, only 18% of providers including physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners are waivered, and 44% of non-waivered providers were not interested in free training even if compensated. This exploratory research seeks to understand intervention-related stigma in community-based primary care providers in rural West Virginia, determine whether financial incentives for training may be linked to levels of stigma, and what level of financial incentives would be required for non-adopters of MOUD services provision to obtain training.

METHOD

Survey questions were included in the West Virginia Practice-Based Research Network (WVPBRN) annual Collective Outreach & Research Engagement (CORE) Survey and delivered electronically to each practice site in WV. General demographic, staff attitudes and views on compensation for immersion training for delivering MOUD therapy in primary care offices were returned. Statistical analysis included logistic and multinomial logistic regression and an independent samples t-test.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 102 participants. Perceived stigma did significantly predict having a waiver with every 1-unit increase in stigma being associated with a 65% decreased odds of possessing a waiver for buprenorphine/MOUD (OR = 0.35; 95% CI  0.16-0.78, p = 0.01). Further, t-test analyses suggested there was a statistically significant mean difference in perceived stigma (t(100) = 2.78, p = 0.006) with those possessing a waiver (M = 1.56; SD = 0.51) having a significantly lower perceived stigma than those without a waiver (M = 1.92; SD = 0.57). There was no statistically significant association of stigma on whether someone with a waiver actually prescribed MOUD or not (OR = 0.28; 95% CI  0.04-2.27, p = 0.234).

CONCLUSION

This survey of rural primary care providers demonstrates that stigmatizing beliefs related to MOUD impact the desired financial incentive to complete a one-day immersion, and that currently unwaivered providers endorse more stigmatizing beliefs about MOUD when compared to currently waivered providers. Furthermore, providers who endorse stigmatizing beliefs with respect to MOUD require higher levels of compensation to consider such training.