Effects of intradialytic resistance training on physical activity in daily life, muscle strength, physical capacity and quality of life in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial

Comparison of the efficacy of intradialytic core stabilization and aerobic exercises for hemodialysis patients: randomized controlled single-blind study

PURPOSE

This study was performed to investigate and compare the effects of intradialytic core stabilization and aerobic exercises on physical performance, fatigue, quality of life and dialysis adequacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 39 individuals on hemodialysis randomized into two groups: aerobic exercise (AE, n = 20) and core stabilization (CSE, n = 19). Over 8 weeks, the AE group performed pedal ergometer exercises, while the CSE group performed 4-phase core stabilization exercises. Physical performance (five times sit to stand test, 2-min step test), quality of life (Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36; KDQOL-36), fatigue levels (Piper Fatigue Scale), and dialysis adequacy (Kt/V and URR) were assessed.

RESULTS

After training, a significant improvement was observed in the physical performance, fatigue levels, and some parameters of KDQOL-36 of the patients (p < 0.05). However, no significant changes were observed in dialysis adequacy indicators (Kt/V and URR) (p > 0.05). When the amount of development obtained in both treatment groups is compared, kidney disease burden only in the subparameter of KDQOL-36 was statistically significantly improved in the CSE group compared to the AE group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the study, intradialytic core stabilization exercises appear to have similar effects to aerobic exercises and can be performed by HD patients.

Factors Influencing Recruitment, Retention, and Adherence Rates in Exercise Interventions in ESKD: A Scoping Review

Rational & Objective

Majority of people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are sedentary, which increases risk for decreased quality and quantity of life. Development of exercise programs with characteristics that address individual preferences may increase interest in participating and completing exercise programs. We evaluated which exercise intervention characteristics affect exercise program recruitment, adherence, and completion in people with ESKD receiving dialysis.

Study Design

Scoping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with searching of Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases through May 12, 2023.

Setting & Study Populations

Adults with ESKD receiving dialysis.

Selection Criteria

RCTs with exercise interventions of ≥12 weeks that included more than 10 people with ESKD receiving dialysis in each study arm.

Data Extraction

One individual extracted data and the second author checked for accuracy.

Analytical Approach

Data were synthesized qualitatively. Associations between intervention characteristics and recruitment, retention and adherence rates were assessed through one-way analysis of variance tests. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1.0 tool.

Results

Of 7,396 studies identified, 55 studies with 3,269 trial participants were included. The majority of participants were male (63.2%) and treated with hemodialysis (89.1%). Mean age was 56 ± 11.5 years. Average recruitment, retention and adherence rates were 77.4%, 81.2%, and 76.0%, respectively. Only 27% of studies reported adherence rates. No significant associations were found between intervention characteristics (ie, exercise type, duration, frequency, setting, and supervision) and recruitment, adherence, and retention rates.

Limitations

Data were limited by small sample size, suboptimal risk of bias, selective recruiting methods, and variability in definitions of adherence rates.

Conclusion

Average recruitment, retention, and adherence rates in exercise interventions for patients receiving dialysis were high although less than 1 in 4 studies reported adherence rates. These results call for standardized reporting of recruitment, retention, and adherence rates in exercise interventions.

A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of exercise interventions on heart rate variability in hemodialysis patients

Patients with chronic kidney disease have a high incidence of cardiovascular diseases, and autonomic dysfunction has a determinant role in the relevant declines. Physical exercise influences heart rate variability and cardiac autonomic modulation. Thus, our objective was to systematically review, with a meta-analysis, the correlation between physical exercise interventions and alterations in cardiac autonomic modulation in hemodialysis patients. A customized research strategy was used across four databases. The search yielded 392 studies, with eight randomized clinical trials included (396 participants), indicating that the investigated indices favor the intervention group by increasing autonomic activity. The exercise training probably increases the standard deviation of all NN intervals (20.71 ms CI 95% [9.55, 31.87], p < 0.001, I²=95%) compared to the control group and showing an moderate certainty, was the most commonly used index (seven studies). Mean RR (35.57 ms CI 95% [14.56, 56.57], p = 0.91, I²=0%), the root mean square sum of squares of differences between NN intervals (10.55 ms CI 95% [6.75, 14.34], p = 0.37, I²=4%), and LF/HF (0.28 ms (n.u) [0.11, 0.44], p = 0.18, I²=39%) were also in favor of the training group. However, based on the GRADE analysis we are uncertain whether Mean RR can increase after an exercise intervention, as well RMSSD and LF/HF may increase slightly, we obtained low certainty of this evidence. The exact magnitude of the impact of physical training on the alteration of cardiac autonomic modulation in this patient population has yet to be conclusively defined.

Whole body resistance training on functional outcomes of patients with Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease: A systematic review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) causes skeletal muscle wasting, resulting in reduced function and inability to live independently. This systematic review critically appraised the scientific literature regarding the effects of full-body resistance training on clinically-relevant functional capacity measures in CKD. The study population included studies of people with Stage 4 or 5 CKD and a mean age of 40+ years old. Eight databases were searched for eligible studies: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and AGELINE. MeSH terms and keyword combinations were used for screening following the PRISMA conduct. Inclusion criteria were based on PICO principles and no date of publication filter was applied. The intervention was training 2 days/week of structured resistance exercises using major upper and lower muscle groups. Minimum intervention period was 7 weeks. Comparison groups maintained their habitual activity without structured exercise training. Outcome measures of interest were: 6-min walk test, grip strength, timed up-and-go test, and sit-to-stand. Eight randomized controlled trials and one nonequivalent comparison-group study fulfilled the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. All studies were of hemodialysis patients. The evidence indicates that full-body resistance exercise significantly improved grip strength, timed up and go and sit to stand tests; metrics associated with enhanced quality and quantity of life.

Psychometrically validated questionnaires to measure the effects and benefits/barriers to physical exercise in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To provide a critical assessment, summarize, and synthesize the evidence from studies using psychometrically validated questionnaires to assess the effects and benefits/barriers of physical exercise in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

The search was performed on six electronic databases. It was conducted following the PRISMA statement and the PICO framework. The methodological quality was assessed using the MMAT. Were used the quality criteria for psychometric properties developed by Terwee et al.

RESULTS

Overall, 70 studies were included, and 39 questionnaires identified, evaluating 13 outcomes. The quality of the psychometric properties of the questionnaires was not always described; only 13 presented positive ratings on > =6/9 properties. The most assessed measure was criterion validity, and the least assessed criteria was responsiveness. The most outcome measured by these questionnaires was quality of life using SF-36, followed by psychological health using the BDI. The DPEBBS was the only instrument identified that assessed the benefits and barriers of exercise.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life and depression were the most frequent outcomes. Other measures contemplating physical, mental, cognitive performance, and especially of the perceptions benefits and barriers to exercise should be further investigated. We have clearly identified the need for more studies evaluating psychometric measures that have not been tested satisfactorily or hardly been tested at all.

Resistance exercise interventions for sarcopenia and nutritional status of maintenance hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis

Background

A previous meta-analysis showed that exercise training improves patients' physical function and health status. However, the efficacy of resistance exercise (RE) in improving patients' physical function and nutritional status is uncertain.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of RE on sarcopenia and nutritional indicators in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.

Design

A meta-analysis.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials up to March 28, 2023 were searched from eight databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and CBM. The risk of bias of the literature eligible for inclusion was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. When a high heterogeneity was detected, a random-effects model was used. Egger's tests were used to assess publication bias. This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The reliability of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method, and a meta-analysis of the collected data was performed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software.

Results

Nine studies that met the criteria were identified, and 541 patients were included in these research.

Subjects

The results of this review showed that RE improved patients' grip strength levels (mean difference (MD) = 4.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) [3.14-5.64]; P < 0.00001), 6 min walking distance (MD = 40.71, 95% CI [8.92-72.49]; P = 0.01), muscle mass (MD = 4.50, 95% CI [2.01-6.99]; P = 0.0004), and serum albumin level (MD = 3.16, 95% CI [1.13-5.19]; P = 0.002) compared with the controls. However, the improvement caused by RE on hemoglobin (MD = 1.69, 95% CI [-1.49 to 4.87], P = 0.30) and cholesterol (MD = 2.33, 95% CI [-5.00 to 9.65], P = 0.53) levels was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

RE showed a significant effect on muscle function and strength of MHD patients. This meta-analysis provides new ideas on the efficacy of RE in muscle function and strength of MHD patients. The use of consistent RE patterns and nutritional interventions should be considered in future studies for further assessment of its effects. In the future, more high-quality studies will be required to verify these results.

Implications for practice

This meta-analysis identified the effect of RE on muscle strength, muscle function, and walking ability of HD patients, and provided a basis for clinical formulation of the optimal timing of intervention and the optimal frequency, intensity, modality, and content of intervention.

Patient or public contribution

No patient or public contribution because it does not apply to my work. This review has been registered at the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (INPLASY) (registration number: INPLASY202340078).

Objectively measured daily steps as an outcome in a clinical trial of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Physical inactivity is prevalent among individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is linked to unfavorable outcomes. In recent years, daily steps have emerged as a prominent target for interventions in clinical trials. The present study endeavors to scrutinize the effectiveness and/or efficacy of various interventions on daily steps in patients with full-spectrum CKD.

METHODS

In December 2022, a systematic search was conducted across three databases, namely PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, and subsequently updated in June 2023. The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled studies, quasi-experimental studies, and single-arm trials that assessed an intervention's impact on objectively measured daily steps in patients with chronic kidney disease. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in non-randomized controlled trials (RCT), while the Cochrane revised tool (ROB-2) was utilized for RCTs.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review, with a focus on examining the efficacy and/or effectiveness of exercise training-based interventions (n = 10), daily step goal-oriented interventions (n = 4), mobile health (mHealth) interventions (n = 1), different dialysis modalities (n = 1), and a "Sit Less, Interact, Move More" intervention (n = 1). The studies exhibit variability in their characteristics and assessment tools, reflecting the findings' heterogeneity. The results indicate that increasing physical activity levels remain challenging, as only a limited number of studies demonstrated significant improvements in participants' daily step counts from baseline to endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials with daily steps as an outcome are still lacking in the CKD population. Well-designed clinical trials that objectively assess the physical activity of CKD patients are needed.

Efficacy of six exercise-based interventions for individuals undergoing hemodialysis: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Evidence comparing different exercise modalities in individuals undergoing hemodialysis remains incipient. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare and synthesize the efficacy of five different intradialytic exercise modalities and home-based training in this population.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

Studies were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Cinahl, and Scopus from their inception to 19 September 2022. We used traditional random-effects models and Bayesian network meta-analysis models. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB v.2.0 tool, and the assessment of confidence in the results through the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) tool.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight studies involving 3326 participants were included. Our network meta-analysis showed that combined training was the intervention with the best performance to increase VO2 peak [mean difference (MD) = 3.94 ml/kg/min; 95% credible interval (CrI), 2.38 to 5.76] and to reduce diastolic blood pressure (MD = -5.19 mmHg; 95%CrI, -9.35 to -0.96) compared to the usual care group. Inspiratory muscle training was the intervention that most improved the 6-minute walk test distance (MD = 70.97 m; 95%CrI, 18.09 to 129.87). C-reactive protein decreased in resistance training (MD = -2.6 mg/l; 95%CrI, -4.97 to -0.33) and aerobic training (MD = -1.4 mg/l; 95%CrI, -3.15 to -0.06). Kt/V improved in aerobic training (MD = 0.11; 95%CrI, 0.02 to 0.18), and SF-36 physical functioning outcomes improved in resistance training (MD = 10.66 points; 95%Crl, 1.91 to 20.22). No intradialytic exercise modality was superior to others or comparable with home-based training in improving the evaluated outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed that exercise interventions >12 weeks improved functional capacity more than interventions ≤12 weeks, and that combined training reduces diastolic blood pressure only after 12 weeks of follow-up. Furthermore, our results suggest that moderate or moderate-to-vigorous intensity training leads to more pronounced improvements in functional capacity, whereas mild or mild-to-moderate intensity training does not have the same effect. In this review, most of the included studies were assessed as having some concern, which resulted in a low to very low level of confidence in the overall findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Both intradialytic training and home-based training can promote benefits for individuals undergoing hemodialysis, with no evidence of the superiority of either training modality over the other.

Interventions to increase physical activity level in patients with whole spectrum chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Little is known about effective interventions to increase physical activity levels in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of different interventions for physical activity levels in whole-spectrum CKD patients.Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to December 2022, with an update in March 2023. Studies of clinical interventions based on assessing physical activity outcomes (e.g., daily steps, time spent doing physical activity) in patients with whole-spectrum CKD were included. The pooled effect size was calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood method and reported as a standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).Results: The systematic review included 2,156 participants (59.9 ± 8.7 years) from 35 studies. Interventions aimed at modifying physical activity were associated with significantly higher physical activity levels in patients with CKD (SMD = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.36; I2 = 55%). Exercise-based interventions and real-time step feedback increased physical activity by 0.26 (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.45; I2 = 59%) and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.60; I2 = 0%) standard deviations, respectively. Effect sizes did not vary by disease stage or study duration; however, there was evidence of small study or publication bias for the primary analysis.Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, intervention strategies aimed at modifying physical activity were associated with significantly increased physical activity levels in patients with whole-spectrum CKD.

Does Intradialytic Group Exercise Programme Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes, Laboratory Parameters, and Anthropometric Parameters in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients? A Single-Group Repeated-Measures Trial

BACKGROUND

Maintenance hemodialysis(MHD) patients often suffer from fatigue and are recommended to undertake physical activities. The optimal format of exercise rehabilitation for MHD patients remains uncertain despite demonstrated health benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an intradialytic group exercise programme for MHD patients.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, single-group repeated-measures design study. The 12-week, three times per-week intradialytic group exercise programme was conducted for around 30 min during the first 2 hours of each dialysis session. Patient-reported outcomes including fatigue, anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life, laboratory parameters including haemoglobin, albumin, pre-albumin and hypersensitive C-reactive protein, and anthropometric parameters including triceps skinfold thickness, mid-upper arm circumference, mid-arm muscle circumference and handgrip strength, were measured at baseline, immediately post-intervention and 12-weeks post-intervention. The repeated-measures analysis of variance and Friedman test were used to compare the parametric and non-parametric data across time points, respectively.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled and 75 completed. Participants reported significant improvements across time points in fatigue (F = 10.19, p < 0.01), depression (F = 19.20, p < 0.001), health-related quality of life (F = 5.36, p = 0.006), haemoglobin (F = 3.43, p = 0.047), albumin (F = 4.42, p = 0.032), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (χ ² = 50.39, p < 0.001), pre-albumin (χ ² = 11.85, p = 0.003), triceps skinfold thickness (F = 25.03, p < 0.001), mid-upper arm circumference (F = 6.32, p = 0.005), mid-arm muscle circumference (F = 4.89, p = 0.02), and handgrip strength (F = 13.59, p < 0.001). Although the mean anxiety score tended to reduce, the difference across time points was nonsignificant (F = 1.33, p = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggested that the intradialytic group exercise programme could improve MHD patients' fatigue, depression, health-related quality of life, nutritional status, and inflammation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000034394 (04/07/2020).

Evaluating the effect of intradialytic cycling exercise on quality of life and recovery time in hemodialysis patients: A randomized clinical trial

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of intradialytic cycling exercise on quality of life (QOL) and recovery time in patients who underwent hemodialysis.

Materials and Methods

Hemodialysis patients were recruited from the referral dialysis centers affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Patients were randomly assigned into the intervention and the control groups. Patients in the intervention group exercised on a stationary bike for 12 weeks (3 times per week for 30 min); however, patients in the control group received usual hemodialysis. The kidney disease QOL (KDQOL)-short-form version 1.3 was used to assess QOL. Patients were asked to answer the question "How long does it take to recover from a dialysis session?" to assess recovery time.

Results

A total of 110 hemodialysis patients, including 60 in the intervention group and 50 in the control group were analyzed. A significant increase was observed in the generic (mean difference ± SE: 1.50 ± 0.44, P = 0.001), kidney disease (mean difference ± SE: 0.84 ± 0.28, P = 0.004), and overall QOL (mean difference ± SE: 1.18 ± 0.33, P = 0.001) scores after 12 weeks of intradialytic cycling exercise in the intervention group. Furthermore, a significant difference was noted between the intervention and the control group regarding the mean difference of all QOL scores after the intervention (P < 0.05). We also found a significant difference in the mean difference of recovery time between the intervention and the control group after the intervention (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

KDQOL and recovery time could improve in hemodialysis patients after 12-week intradialytic exercise.

The optimal exercise modality and intensity for hemodialysis patients incorporating Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review

Background: Physical inactivity is highly prevalent in patients with hemodialysis, and a large body of evidence reported the positive effect of different exercise modalities on their health outcomes. However, the effective dosage of exercise for hemodialysis patients still requires verification.

Objective: We aimed to determine the most effective exercise intensity and modality for improvements in physical function, blood pressure control, dialysis adequacy, and health-related quality of life for hemodialysis patients.

Design: Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Data sources: Five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus) were searched for randomized controlled trials. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two authors independently. Data were analyzed by the R (version.3.6.2) and the Stata (version.15.0).

Result: We included 1893 patients involving four exercise modalities and six exercise intensities. Combined training (aerobic exercise plus resistance exercise) has been the top-ranking exercise modality for improving the 6-min walk test (6MWT) (surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis (SUCRA) score, 90.63), systolic blood pressure control (SUCRA score, 77.35), and diastolic pressure control (SUCRA score, 90.56). Moreover, the top-ranking exercise intensity was moderate–vigorous for 6MWT (SUCRA score, 82.36), systolic blood pressure (SUCRA score, 77.43), and diastolic blood pressure (SUCRA score, 83.75). Regarding dialysis adequacy and health-related quality of life, we found no exercise modality or intensity superior to the placebo.

Conclusion: This network meta-analysis indicated that combined training and moderate–vigorous intensity might be the most effective interventions to improve 6MWT and blood pressure control. This finding helps further guide clinical exercise prescriptions for hemodialysis patients.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42021268535].

Bicycle ergometer exercise during hemodialysis and its impact on quality of life, aerobic fitness and dialysis adequacy: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis commonly have a worse quality of life (QoL) due to complications of the disease and dialysis procedure. Physical exercise has emerged as a strategy to improve this scenario. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intradialytic aerobic exercise program on QoL and aerobic fitness in hemodialysis patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

These are a secondary analysis of clinical trial data previously published in which hemodialysis patients were randomized into "bike group" (using an adapted exercise bicycle) or "control group" (usual care). The exercise sessions lasted 45 min (5 min of warm-up, 35 min of moderate-intensity and 5 min of cool-down) three times/week for three months. The QoL domains were assessed using the SF-36 QoL questionnaire. Aerobic fitness was evaluated using the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Circulating cytokines, biochemical parameters and Kt/V were also assessed.

RESULTS

Nine patients completed three months of exercise (5 men, 44 ± 11 years), and nine were in the control group (6 men, 44 ± 14 years). In the bike group, there was a trend to improve the physical role domain (p = 0.06) regarding QoL, an improvement in the 6MWT (p = 0.02), and in the Kt/V (p = 0.03) after three months. There was a positive correlation between the general health domain and Kt/V (r = 0.691; p = 0.003) and an inverse correlation between the physical functioning domain and plasma TNF-α levels (r = -0.514; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

12 weeks of intradialytic aerobic exercise was enough to benefit hemodialysis patients' quality of life, aerobic fitness, and quality of dialysis.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov id: NCT04375553.

Daily Step Counts in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Background

Physical inactivity is an essential factor in the prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Daily step count is a straightforward measure to assess physical activity levels. Understanding the step counts among different CKD stages is essential to change sedentary behavior.

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the daily step counts in patients with CKD at a different stage.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources

The literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to November 3rd, 2021.

Review Methods

Observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort studies) reported specific values of step counts in CKD patients by the wearable device were included. A random-effects model was used to pool the data. Subgroup analysis explored differences in outcomes by stage of CKD. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the χ2 test of Cochrane's Q statistic. A contour-enhanced funnel plot was conducted to investigate publication bias. Univariate and multivariate meta-regression was conducted to examine possible sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Twenty-eight articles were identified and used for quantitative analysis. The result showed that the daily step count in patients with CKD was 4642.47 (95% CI: 4274.18–5010.76), and significantly lower than the healthy population. Subgroup analysis revealed that the step counts decreased before dialysis, dropped to a freezing point at the hemodialysis phase, and increased after kidney transplantation. Meta-regression analysis showed that daily step counts were relatively higher in the Americas or younger than 60 or kidney transplant recipients.

Conclusion

The status of daily step counts in patients with CKD decreases with CKD severity and increases after kidney transplantation. Although studies have begun to focus on strategies to improve step counts in patients with CKD, future studies should focus more on step counts in pre-dialysis patients and changing their physically inactive lifestyle early to alleviate deteriorating renal function.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=291551, identifier: CRD42021291551.

The Role of Physical Activity and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: A Review

Available data indicated that physical activity was related to improved outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Multiple observational studies involving different cohorts have reported that increased physical activity level was associated with decreased mortality among hemodialysis patients. Therefore, promoting physical activity has become an increasingly critical and promising approach to improving cardiovascular health and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients. This review summarizes the published articles regarding physical activity and hemodialysis patients, focusing on mortality and strategy to promote physical activity.

Exercise training for adults undergoing maintenance dialysis

BACKGROUND

Dialysis treatments weigh heavily on patients' physical and psychosocial health. Multiple studies have assessed the potential for exercise training to improve outcomes in adults undergoing dialysis. However, uncertainties exist in its relevance and sustainable benefits for patient-important outcomes. This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and safety of regular structured exercise training in adults undergoing dialysis on patient-important outcomes including death, cardiovascular events, fatigue, functional capacity, pain, and depression. We also aimed to define the optimal prescription of exercise in adults undergoing dialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

In this update, we conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 23 December 2020. The Register includes studies identified from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov as well as kidney-related journals and the proceedings of major kidney conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of any structured exercise programs of eight weeks or more in adults undergoing maintenance dialysis compared to no exercise or sham exercise.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the search results for eligibility, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Whenever appropriate, we performed random-effects meta-analyses of the mean difference in outcomes. The primary outcomes were death (any cause), cardiovascular events and fatigue. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, pain, functional capacity, blood pressure, adherence to the exercise program, and intervention-related adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 89 studies involving 4291 randomised participants, of which 77 studies (3846 participants) contributed to the meta-analyses. Seven studies included adults undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Fifty-six studies reported aerobic exercise interventions, 21 resistance exercise interventions and 19 combined aerobic and resistance training within the same study arm. The interventions lasted from eight weeks to two years and most often took place thrice weekly during dialysis treatments. A single study reported death and no study reported long-term cardiovascular events. Five studies directly assessed fatigue, 46 reported HRQoL and 16 reported fatigue or pain through their assessment of HRQoL. Thirty-five studies assessed functional capacity, and 21 reported resting peripheral blood pressure. Twelve studies reported adherence to exercise sessions, and nine reported exercise-related adverse events. Overall, the quality of the included studies was low and blinding of the participants was generally not feasible due to the nature of the intervention. Exercise had uncertain effects on death, cardiovascular events, and the mental component of HRQoL due to the very low certainty of evidence. Compared with sham or no exercise, exercise training for two to 12 months may improve fatigue in adults undergoing dialysis, however, a meta-analysis could not be conducted. Any exercise training for two to 12 months may improve the physical component of HRQoL (17 studies, 656 participants: MD 4.12, 95% CI 1.88 to 6.37 points on 100 points-scale; I² = 49%; low certainty evidence). Any exercise training for two to 12 months probably improves depressive symptoms (10 studies, 441 participants: SMD -0.65, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.22; I² = 77%; moderate certainty evidence) and the magnitude of the effect may be greater when maintaining the exercise beyond four months (6 studies, 311 participants: SMD -0.30, 95% CI 0.14 to -0.74; I² = 71%). Any exercise training for three to 12 months may improve pain (15 studies, 872 participants: MD 5.28 95% CI -0.12 to 10.69 points on 100 points-scale; I² = 63%: low certainty evidence) however, the 95% CI indicates that exercise training may make little or no difference in the level of pain. Any exercise training for two to six months probably improves functional capacity as it increased the distance reached during six minutes of walking (19 studies, 827 participants: MD 49.91 metres, 95% CI 37.22 to 62.59; I² = 34%; moderate certainty evidence) and the number of sit-to-stand cycles performed in 30 seconds (MD 2.33 cycles, 95% CI 1.71 to 2.96; moderate certainty evidence). There was insufficient evidence to assess the safety of exercise training for adults undergoing maintenance dialysis. The results were similar for aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, and a combination of both aerobic and resistance exercise.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It is uncertain whether exercise training improves death, cardiovascular events, or the mental component of HRQoL in adults undergoing maintenance dialysis. Exercise training probably improves depressive symptoms, particularly when the intervention is maintained beyond four months. Exercise training is also likely to improve functional capacity. Low certainty evidence suggested that exercise training may improve fatigue, the physical component of quality of life, and pain. The safety of exercise training for adults undergoing dialysis remains uncertain.

Effects of intradialytic exercise on health-related quality of life in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To summarize the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of intradialytic exercise (IDE) on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis.

METHODS

Five English databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect) and four Chinese databases (VIP, WAN FANG, CNKI, CBM) were comprehensively searched from their inception to 18 March 2021. This study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Two independent reviewers selected the papers and extracted the details of each study therein. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The risk of bias tool version 2.0 was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool the effect size.

RESULTS

Thirty-three eligible studies with 1481 participants were included. For the generic HRQOL, assessed by the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form survey, IDE significantly improved most domains and the physical component summary compared with the control group. Furthermore, aerobic exercise alone significantly improved more domains compared to resistance exercise, combined aerobic and resistance exercise, and other types of exercise. Regarding the kidney-specific HRQOL, IDE improved three of eleven domains, including the symptom/problem list, the effect of kidney disease, and the quality of social interaction. No significant effect was found on other domains of kidney-specific HRQOL.

CONCLUSION

Intradialytic exercise could benefit patients undergoing haemodialysis in improving most domains of generic HRQOL, but the effect on most domains of kidney-specific HRQOL is insufficient.

Effects of intradialytic cycling exercise on daily physical activity, physical fitness, body composition, and clinical parameters in high-volume online hemodiafiltration patients: a pilot randomized-controlled trial

PURPOSE

The mortality of dialysis patients treated with high-volume online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is better than hemodialysis, but is still higher than healthy population. Low daily physical activity increases cardiovascular mortality. Addition of intradialytic exercise (IDX) program might improve physical activity and health status in OL-HDF patients. This pilot open-labeled randomized-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of IDX on physical activity and other clinical parameters in OL-HDF patients.

METHODS

Twelve OL-HDF patients were randomized into control (n = 6) or IDX (n = 6) groups. The subjects in IDX group were trained to exercise using a cycle ergometer for 60 min during each OL-HDF session. Physical activity measured as daily step count using a wrist-worn triaxial accelerometer, physical fitness, or cardiorespiratory fitness assessed by VO₂max and other physical performance tests, lean body mass determined by the Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quality of life (QOL), and various parameters were compared between baseline and 6 months.

RESULTS

The baseline physical activity status was comparable. Following 6-month IDX, the physical activity was significantly improved in IDX group [+ 1048.79 (+ 741.50, + 2792.54) vs. - 362.06 (- 1626.82, - 167.47) steps/day, p = 0.01], while physical fitness and QOL were unchanged. The lean body mass parameters were preserved in the IDX group while seemed to decrease in the control group. Serum albumin was significantly increased in the IDX group (p = 0.01). The hemoglobin changes were significantly better (p = 0.01) and the erythropoietin resistance index was significantly lower in the IDX group (p = 0.03). Phosphate reduction was significantly greater in the IDX group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

IDX could improve physical activity and other metabolic parameters in OL-HDF patients and these might contribute to further improvement in clinical and survival outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03353844.

The effects of an intradialytic resistance training on lower extremity muscle functions

Purpose: The loss of muscle functions is a significant health issue among dialysis patients. Poor muscle strength negatively affects a patient's mobility, independence and quality of life. The aim of the study was to assess the effects of an intradialytic resistance training (IRT) on lower extremity muscle functions among dialysed patients.Materials and methods: Ninety patients were allocated into an experimental group (n = 57) or control group (CNG) (n = 33) according to the location of the dialysis service center. Fifty-eight patients completed the study follow-up. The intervention regarded 12-week IRT, while the controls remained physically inactive during hemodialysis. In both groups of patients, we assessed lower extremity muscle functions by a diagnostics of maximal isometric force generated during hip flexion (HF), hip extension (HE), and knee extension (KE) contractions at baseline, after the 12-weeks intervention and after a further 12-weeks follow up.Results: We found that improvements in HE between baseline and post-intervention were significantly larger for the experimental than the CNG (difference 32.0, 95% CI = 12.3-51.8, p = 0.002). For the other primary outcomes, we found no differences between the groups, and neither for the two other indices of muscle strength (HF and KE). At 12-weeks follow-up, we found no statistically significant differences between the two groups.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that exercise during dialysis not just suppresses adverse effects in muscle strength and functioning, but effectively and safely increases lower extremities muscle function in a relatively short time.Implications for RehabilitationRegular, progressive, resistance training realized during dialysis is well tolerated and safe for exercise interventions in hemodialysis patients.A 12-weeks intradialytic resistance training is effective in the prevention and clinical management of muscle function loss among hemodialysis patients.The range of improvements in muscle functions, demonstrated by the assessment of maximal isometric force, varied severely during different lower extremity movements of hemodialysis patients.

Intradialytic training in patients with end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of five different training interventions

OBJECTIVE

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis may have reduced dialysis adequacy (Kt/V), low cardiorespiratory fitness, and worse prognosis. Different types of intradialytic training (IDT) may serve as an adjunct therapy for the management of the ESRD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of different types of IDT on clinical outcomes and functional parameters in ESRD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized clinical trials in adult patients with ESRD which compared IDT with usual care (UC), without language restrictions and published up to July 2019; a handsearch of references was also performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE, and risk of bias in primary studies with the RoB 1.0 tool.

RESULTS

Fifty studies were included (n = 1757). Compared to UC, aerobic IDT improved Kt/V (WMD = 0.08), VO₂peak (WMD = 2.07 mL/kg/min), 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance (64.98 m), reduced systolic blood pressure (- 10.07 mmHg) and C-reactive protein (- 3.28 mg/L). Resistance training increased 6MWT distance (68.50 m). Combined training increased VO₂peak (5.41 mL/kg/min) and reduced diastolic blood pressure (- 5.76 mmHg). Functional electrostimulation (FES) and inspiratory muscle training (IMT) improved 6MWT distance (54.14 m and 117.62 m, respectively). There was no impact on total cholesterol, interleukin-6, or hemoglobin levels. There was no difference in incidence of adverse events between the IDT and control groups. The certainty of evidence was variable according to the GRADE scale, with most outcomes rated very low certainty. The risk of bias assessment of primary studies showed unclear risk in most.

CONCLUSIONS

Aerobic, resistance, and combined training during hemodialysis, as well as FES and IMT, demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of the patient with ESRD. Our data should be interpreted in light of the unclear risk of bias of most evaluated articles and the low to very low certainty of evidence for evaluated outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION ID

CRD42017081338. DATA SHARING REPOSITORY: https://osf.io/fpj54/.