Psychological factors are more strongly associated with pain than radiographic severity in non-invasively treated first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

Quantitative Bone SPECT/CT Parameters Could Predict the Success of the Conservative Treatment for Symptomatic Basal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of quantitatively assessed bone SPECT/CT parameters for predicting the success of conservative treatment for symptomatic basal joint arthritis of the thumb.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients (128 hands) with symptomatic basal joint arthritis of the thumb who underwent bone SPECT/CT scans within 4 weeks after their initial visit and completed conservative treatment for more than 6 months between April 2019 and April 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. PRWHE (patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation) was evaluated in all patients before and after the treatment. The SUV max from bone SPECT/CT was measured in the 4 peritrapezial joints, and the highest uptake was used for analysis.

RESULTS

On the basis of the minimal clinically important difference in PRWHE scores, 64 hands (50.0% of 128 hands) were classified as the treatment success group and 64 hands (50.0% of 128 hands) were failure group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only high SUV max (odds ratio, 1.097; 95% confidence interval, 1.027-1.172; P = 0.006) was a factor significantly associated with the success of conservative treatment. In receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the area under the curve of SUV max was 0.649 (95% confidence interval, 0.554-0.744; P = 0.002). As a prognostic parameter for the success of conservative treatment, SUV max showed a sensitivity of 56.3% and specificity of 70.3% with a cutoff of 9.52.

CONCLUSIONS

High initial SUV max on bone SPECT/CT was significantly associated with the success of conservative treatment for symptomatic basal joint arthritis of the thumb.

A multi-modal evaluation of experimental pain and psychological function in women with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

Objective

Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC1 OA) is a prevalent and debilitating condition that lacks effective treatments. Understanding the multidimensional pain experience across CMC1 OA disease stages is crucial to improving treatment outcomes. This study examined how radiographic CMC1 OA severity is associated with physical, psychological, and somatosensory function.

Method

Thirty-one women with early-stage (Eaton-Littler 1-2) or end-stage (Eaton-Littler 3-4) radiographic CMC1 OA completed validated questionnaires to assess pain, disability, and psychological function. Additionally, experimental pain was measured in each participant using quantitative sensory testing (QST) (mechanical, pressure, vibratory, thermal) at seven body sites (thenar, hypothenar, brachioradialis bi-laterally; quadriceps on affected side). Cohort differences (early-vs. end-stage) across all variables were analyzed using a multivariable modeling approach that included fixed effects and interactions; notably, age was controlled as a confounder.

Results

End-stage CMC1 OA participants had higher scores in the pain (p ​= ​0.01) and function (p ​= ​0.02) portions of the AUSCAN assessment, self-reported disability of the DASH questionnaire (p ​= ​0.04), and painDETECT scores (p ​= ​0.03), indicating greater pain and disability compared to early-stage participants. Additionally, end-stage CMC1 OA participants demonstrated reduced vibratory detection and heat pain thresholds at multiple body sites (p's ​< ​0.05), with significant interactions observed across the mechanical and cold stimuli.

Conclusion

Findings revealed women with end-stage CMC1 OA exhibited increased neuropathic pain characteristics and somatosensory loss compared to those with early-stage CMC1 OA. These results underscore the importance of addressing both peripheral and centralized pain mechanisms and the need for multimodal approaches in the treatment of CMC1 OA.

Multidimensional characteristics are associated with pain severity in osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Aims

Pain is the most frequent complaint associated with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), but the factors contributing to such pain are poorly understood. This study explored diverse demographic, clinical, radiological, psychological, and neurophysiological factors for their potential contribution to pain in patients with ONFH.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out according to the "STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology" statement. Data on 19 variables were collected at a single timepoint from 250 patients with ONFH who were treated at our medical centre between July and December 2023 using validated instruments or, in the case of hip pain, a numerical rating scale. Factors associated with pain severity were identified using hierarchical multifactor linear regression.

Results

Regression identified the following characteristics as independently associated with higher pain score, after adjustment for potential confounders: Association Research Circulation Osseous classification stage IIIa or IIIb, bone marrow oedema, grade 3 joint effusion, as well as higher scores on pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and central sensitization. The final model explained 69.7% of observed variance in pain scores, of which clinical and radiological factors explained 37%, while psychological and neurophysiological factors explained 24% and demographic factors explained 8.7%.

Conclusion

Multidimensional characteristics jointly contribute to the severity of pain associated with ONFH. These findings highlight the need to comprehensively identify potential contributors to pain, and to personalize management and treatment accordingly.

Revisions after Trapeziometacarpal Joint Resection Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic literature review was to describe current indications and interventions for revisions after trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) resection arthroplasty.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted by an experienced librarian in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The authors included all articles that investigated any TMJ arthroplasty procedure in which the trapezium was completely resected and if any subsequent revision procedure including joint-related and soft-tissue operations was mentioned. Two independent reviewers selected the articles and were involved in data extraction.

RESULTS

Sixty-two articles reporting on 5284 operated thumbs and 434 revision operations were included. Twenty-four indications for revision and 31 revision techniques were extracted. Most revisions were performed because of subsidence/impingement of the first metacarpal bone ( n = 194 thumbs) followed by unspecified pain ( n = 53), metacarpophalangeal joint problems ( n = 28), and scaphotrapezoidal osteoarthritis ( n = 17). Eleven treatment strategies were found for subsidence/impingement of the first metacarpal, the most frequent being revision of the existing interposition using autologous tendon ( n = 46) and soft-tissue interposition with distraction pinning ( n = 28).

CONCLUSIONS

There are a wide variety of indications and even more surgical techniques described in the literature to treat persisting or recurrent pain after TMJ resection arthroplasty. Currently, there is no uniform treatment guideline available on how to diagnose and treat such cases. Therefore, the results of this literature review will form the basis for a Delphi study aiming to develop recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of persistent/recurrent pain after TMJ resection arthroplasty.

Changes in illness perception, pain catastrophizing, and psychological distress following hand surgeon consultation: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Baseline mindset factors are important factors that influence treatment decisions and outcomes. Theoretically, improving the mindset prior to treatment may improve treatment decisions and outcomes. This prospective cohort study evaluated changes in patients' mindset following hand surgeon consultation. Additionally, we assessed if the change in illness perception differed between surgical and nonsurgical patients.

METHODS

The primary outcome was illness perception, measured using the total score of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ, range 0-80). Secondary outcomes were the B-IPQ subscales, pain catastrophizing (measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)), and psychological distress (measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4).

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients with various hand and wrist conditions completed the mindset questionnaires before and after hand surgeon consultation (median time interval: 15 days). The B-IPQ total score improved from 39.7 (±10.6) before to 35.8 (±11.3) after consultation (p < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.36); scores also improved for the B-IPQ subscales Coherence, Concern, Emotional Response, Timeline, Treatment Control, and Identity and the PCS. There were no changes in the other outcomes. Surgical patients improved on the B-IPQ subscales Treatment Control and Timeline, while nonsurgical patients did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Illness perception and pain catastrophizing improved following hand surgeon consultation, suggesting that clinicians may actively influence the patients' mindset during consultations, and that they may try to enhance this effect to improve outcomes. Furthermore, surgical patients improved more in illness perceptions, indicating that nonsurgical patients may benefit from a more targeted strategy for changing mindset.

Pain catastrophizing in rheumatic diseases: prevalence, origin, and implications

Pain is a crucial factor in rheumatic disorders, and reducing it is a primary goal of successful treatment. Adaptive pain-coping strategies can enhance this improvement, but maladaptive approaches such as pain catastrophizing may worsen overall patient well-being. This narrative review aims to provide a concise overview of the existing knowledge on pain catastrophizing in the most prevalent specific rheumatic disorders. The objective of this study was to improve understanding of this phenomenon and its implications, as well as to pinpoint potential directions for future research. We conducted searches in the MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, and DOAJ bibliography databases to identify articles related to pain catastrophizing in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondylarthritis, systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and osteoarthritis (non-surgical treatment). Data extraction was performed on November 1, 2023. The investigators screened the identified articles to determine their relevance and whether they met the inclusion criteria. Following a bibliography search, which was further expanded by screening of citations and references, we included 156 records in the current review. The full-text analysis centred on pain catastrophizing, encompassing its prevalence, pathogenesis, and impact. The review established the role of catastrophizing in amplifying pain and diminishing various aspects of general well-being. Also, potential treatment approaches were discussed and summarised across the examined disorders. Pain catastrophizing is as a significant factor in rheumatic disorders. Its impact warrants further exploration through prospective controlled trials to enhance global patient outcomes.

The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making

BACKGROUND

Mental health influences symptoms, outcomes, and decision-making in musculoskeletal healthcare. Implementing measures of mental health in clinical practice can be challenging. An ultrashort screening tool for mental health with a low burden is currently unavailable but could be used as a conversation starter, expectation management tool, or decision support tool.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Which items of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4), and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) are the most discriminative and yield a high correlation with the total scores of these questionnaires? (2) What is the construct validity and added clinical value (explained variance for pain and hand function) of an ultrashort four-item mental health screening tool? (3) What is the test-retest reliability of the screening tool? (4) What is the response time for the ultrashort screening tool?

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. Data collection was part of usual care at Xpert Clinics, the Netherlands, but prospective measurements were added to this study. Between September 2017 and January 2022, we included 19,156 patients with hand and wrist conditions. We subdivided these into four samples: a test set to select the screener items (n = 18,034), a validation set to determine whether the selected items were solid (n = 1017), a sample to determine the added clinical value (explained variance for pain and hand function, n = 13,061), and a sample to assess the test-retest reliability (n = 105). Patients were eligible for either sample if they completed all relevant measurements of interest for that particular sample. To create an ultrashort screening tool that is valid, reliable, and has added value, we began by picking the most discriminatory items (that is, the items that were most influential for determining the total score) from the PCS, PHQ-4, and B-IPQ using chi-square automated interaction detection (a machine-learning algorithm). To assess construct validity (how well our screening tool assesses the constructs of interest), we correlated these items with the associated sum score of the full questionnaire in the test and validation sets. We compared the explained variance of linear models for pain and function using the screening tool items or the original sum scores of the PCS, PHQ-4, and B-IPQ to further assess the screening tool's construct validity and added value. We evaluated test-retest reliability by calculating weighted kappas, ICCs, and the standard error of measurement.

RESULTS

We identified four items and used these in the screening tool. The screening tool items were highly correlated with the PCS (Pearson coefficient = 0.82; p < 0.001), PHQ-4 (0.87; p < 0.001), and B-IPQ (0.85; p < 0.001) sum scores, indicating high construct validity. The full questionnaires explained only slightly more variance in pain and function (10% to 22%) than the screening tool did (9% to 17%), again indicating high construct validity and much added clinical value of the screening tool. Test-retest reliability was high for the PCS (ICC 0.75, weighted kappa 0.75) and B-IPQ (ICC 0.70 to 0.75, standard error of measurement 1.3 to 1.4) items and moderate for the PHQ-4 item (ICC 0.54, weighted kappa 0.54). The median response time was 43 seconds, against more than 4 minutes for the full questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

Our ultrashort, valid, and reliable screening tool for pain catastrophizing, psychologic distress, and illness perception can be used before clinician consultation and may serve as a conversation starter, an expectation management tool, or a decision support tool. The clinical utility of the screening tool is that it can indicate that further testing is warranted, guide a clinician when considering a consultation with a mental health specialist, or support a clinician in choosing between more invasive and less invasive treatments. Future studies could investigate how the tool can be used optimally and whether using the screening tool affects daily clinic decisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

A Secondary Analysis: Comparison of Experimental Pain and Psychological Impact in Individuals with Carpometacarpal and Knee Osteoarthritis

Purpose

Evaluate sensory and psychological differences in individuals with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) and/or knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain. This secondary analysis focuses on comparing the effects of OA at large and small joints in community-dwelling adults.

Patients and Methods

A total of 434 individuals were recruited from communities in Gainesville, FL and Birmingham, AL. Each participant completed health and clinical history questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing, and physical functional tests. Participants were divided into four groups based on their pain ("CMC pain" (n = 33), "knee pain" (n = 71), "CMC + knee pain" (n = 81), and "pain-free" controls (n = 60)). ANCOVAs were performed to identify significant differences in experimental pain and psychological variables across groups.

Results

The "CMC + knee pain" group had lower pressure pain thresholds (lateral knee site, p < 0.01) and higher temporal summation of mechanical pain (knee, p < 0.01) when compared to "CMC pain" and "pain-free" groups. The "knee pain" group had lower heat pain tolerance at the forearm site (p = 0.02) and higher mechanical pain (p < 0.01) at both tested sites in comparison to the "CMC pain" group. Lastly, the "CMC + knee pain" group had the highest self-reported pain (p < 0.01) and disability (p < 0.01) compared to all other groups.

Conclusion

Results suggest knee OA compounded with CMC OA increases disease impact and decreases emotional health compared to OA at either the CMC or knee joint alone. Results also support a relationship between the number of painful joints and enhanced widespread pain sensitivity. Measuring pain at sites other than the primary OA location is important and could contribute to more holistic treatment and prevention of OA progression.

Frequency of multisite non-hand joint involvement in patients with thumb-base osteoarthritis, and associations with functional and patient-reported outcomes

Purpose

In OA studies, the focus often is on an index-joint; other affected joint sites are often overlooked. In this thumb-base OA study, we documented the frequency of symptomatic non-hand joint sites and investigated whether their count was associated with thumb-specific functional and patient-reported outcome measures.

Design

Patients seeking care for thumb-base OA (conservative or surgical) were included. A patient-completed questionnaire captured sociodemographic and health characteristics, symptomatic hand and non-hand joint sites, and outcome measures (thumb-base pain intensity, symptoms and disability (TASD) and upper-extremity disability/symptoms (quickDASH)). Grip and pinch strength were measured. Linear regressions examined the association between each outcome and symptomatic joint site count, adjusted for several covariates.

Results

The mean age of the 145 patients was 62 years, 72% were female. Mean symptomatic non-hand joint site count was 3.6. Ten percent reported only their hands as symptomatic; 30% reported 2-3 other symptomatic sites, and 49% reported 4+. From cross-sectional multivariable analyses, a higher symptomatic non-hand joint site count was associated with worse scores for all patient-reported outcomes and grip strength. Every unit increase in joint site count (49% had a 4+ count) was associated with a 2.1-3.3 unit increase (worse) in patient-reported outcome scores (all p ​< ​0.02).

Conclusions

In this sample, nearly 80% of patients had 2+ symptomatic non-hand joint sites. These symptoms were associated with worse thumb- and hand-specific outcomes, suggesting a need for awareness of whole body OA burden, with implications for outcome score interpretations, study designs, and provision of care in thumb-base OA.

Changes in illness perception, pain catastrophizing, and psychological distress following hand surgeon consultation: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Baseline mindset factors are important factors that influence treatment decisions and outcomes. Theoretically, improving the mindset prior to treatment may improve treatment decisions and outcomes. This prospective cohort study evaluated changes in patients' mindset following hand surgeon consultation. Additionally, we assessed if the change in illness perception differed between surgical and nonsurgical patients.

METHODS

The primary outcome was illness perception, measured using the total score of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ, range 0-80). Secondary outcomes were the B-IPQ subscales, pain catastrophizing (measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)), and psychological distress (measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4).

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients with various hand and wrist conditions completed the mindset questionnaires before and after hand surgeon consultation (median time interval: 15 days). The B-IPQ total score improved from 39.7 (±10.6) before to 35.8 (±11.3) after consultation (p < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.36); scores also improved for the B-IPQ subscales Coherence, Concern, Emotional Response, Timeline, Treatment Control, and Identity and the PCS. There were no changes in the other outcomes. Surgical patients improved on the B-IPQ subscales Treatment Control and Timeline, while nonsurgical patients did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Illness perception and pain catastrophizing improved following hand surgeon consultation, suggesting that clinicians may actively influence the patients' mindset during consultations, and that they may try to enhance this effect to improve outcomes. Furthermore, surgical patients improved more in illness perceptions, indicating that nonsurgical patients may benefit from a more targeted strategy for changing mindset.

Poor patient-reported mental health correlates with inferior patient-reported outcome measures following cervical disc replacement

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the correlation between the patient-reported mental health and the self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) physical function, pain, and disability at different time points following disc replacement (CDR).

METHODS

A single-surgeon registry was searched for patients who had undergone CDR, excluding those with indication for infection, cancer, or trauma. One hundred fifty-one patients were included. PROMs were collected preoperatively as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Mental health measures evaluated included 12-Item Short Form (SF-12), Mental Component Score (MCS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) which were individually assessed via Pearson's correlation tests in relation to Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI).

RESULTS

SF-12 MCS positively correlated with PROMIS-PF (range: r = 0.369-0.614) and SF-12 PCS (range: r = 0.208-0.585) with significance found at two or more time points for each (p ≤ 0.009, all). SF-12 MCS negatively correlated with VAS neck (range: r = - 0.259 to - 0.464), VAS arm (range: r = - 0.281 to - 0.567), and NDI (range: r = - 0.474 to - 831) with significance found at three or more time points (p ≤ 0.028, all). PHQ-9 significantly negatively correlated with PROMIS-PF (range: r = - 0.457 to - 0.732) and SF-12 PCS (range: r = - 0.332 to - 0.629) at all time points (p ≤ 0.013, all). PHQ-9 positively correlated with VAS neck (range: r = 0.351-0.711), VAS arm (range: r = 0.239-0.572), and NDI (range: r = 0.602-0.837) at four or more periods (p ≤ 0.032, all).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing CDR who reported lower mental health scores via either SF-12 MCS or PHQ-9 were associated with increased perception of pain and disability. Disability level correlated with mental health at all time periods. Patients with optimized mental health may report higher outcome scores following CDR.

Assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: A modified Delphi-based consensus paper of the American Society of Hand Therapists

BACKGROUND

While the literature is abundant on hand therapy assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA), clarity and uniformity are meager, making it a desirable diagnosis to establish expert consensus.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to ascertain if consensus exists for the assessment and treatment of nonsurgical management of thumb CMC OA in the hand therapy clinical setting.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a consensus paper via the modified Delphi approach.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was used to determine consensus among an expert panel, including hand therapists and hand surgeons, via two online surveys. A consensus paper steering committee (from the American Society of Hand Therapist's research division) designed the surveys and analyzed responses. Consensus was established as 75% agreement among the expert panel. Demographic information was collected from the expert panel.

RESULTS

The expert panel included 34 hand therapists and seven hand surgeons. The survey response rates were 93.6% for the first survey and 90.2% for the second survey. Consensus recommendations were classified according to the World Health Organization categorization. These included evaluating the body structures for clinical signs/clinical testing and body functions for pain, range of motion for palmar abduction, radial abduction, opposition, and thumb metacarpal phalangeal flexion/extension, and grip and tripod pinch strength. Further consensus recommendations were for the assessment of function using a region-specific, upper extremity patient-reported outcome measure (activity and participation), environmental factors, outcome expectation, and illness perception within the patient's unique environmental and social contexts. Treatment recommendations included the use of an orthosis during painful activities, a dynamic stability program (stable C posture, release of tight adductors, and strengthening of stabilizers), patient education, joint protection techniques, adaptive equipment, and functional-based intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings describe the consensus of a group of experts and provide a clinical reference tool on the hand therapy assessment and treatment of nonsurgical thumb CMC joint OA.

Biopsychosocial factors associated with pain severity and hand disability in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis and non-surgical management

BACKGROUND

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMO) is one of the most prevalent and painful forms of hand osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE

This study aimed at (1) describing the TMO pain experience, (2) identifying biopsychosocial factors associated with pain intensity and disability, and 3) documenting the use of non-surgical management modalities.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

METHODS

Participants who presented for care for TMO were recruited from 15 healthcare institutions. They completed a questionnaire addressing sociodemographic, pain, disability, psychological well-being, quality of life (QoL), productivity, and treatment modalities employed. Multivariable regression analyses identified biopsychosocial factors associated with pain intensity and magnitude of disability.

RESULTS

Among our 228 participants aged 62.6 years, 78.1% were women. More than 80% of the participants reported average pain of moderate to severe intensity in the last 7 days. Nearly 30 % of them scored clinically significant levels of anxiodepressive symptoms. The participants' norm-based physical QoL score on the SF-12v2 was 41/100. Among the 79 employed respondents, 13 reported having missed complete or part of workdays in the previous month and 18 reported being at risk of losing their job due to TMO. Factors independently associated with more intense pain included higher pain frequency and greater disability, accounting for 59.0% of the variance. The mean DASH score was 46.1 of 100, and the factors associated with greater magnitude of disability were higher pain intensity, greater levels of depression, female sex, and lower level of education, explaining 60.1% of the variance. Acetaminophen, oral non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, cortisone injections, orthoses, hand massage/exercises, and heat/cold application were the most frequently employed modalities. Most participants never used assistive devices, ergonomic techniques, and psychosocial services.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TMO can experience severe pain, disability, disturbed emotional well-being, limited QoL and reduced productivity. As disability is associated with TMO pain, and depressive symptoms with disability, reducing such modifiable factors should be one of the clinicians' priorities.

The Relationship of Patient Characteristics and Prolonged Pain after Treatment of Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis of the Thumb

Background: The carpometacarpal (CMC) joint of the thumb is the second most common site of osteoarthritis in the hand. Clinical severity stage of CMC joint arthritis has not been correlated with the pain level of the patient. Recently, the association of joint pain with patient psychological factor, such as depression or case-specific personality, has been investigated. This study was designed to determine the impact of psychological factors to residual pain after treatment of CMC joint arthritis, using pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and the Yatabe-Guilford (YG) personality test. Methods: Twenty-six patients (7 males and 19 females) with 26 hands were included. Thirteen patients classified as Eaton stage 3 underwent suspension arthroplasty and 13 patients as Eaton stage 2 underwent conservative treatment using a custom fitted orthosis. Clinical evaluation was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) at initial evaluation, at 1 month and at 3 months after treatment. We compared both groups using the PCS and YG test. Results: The PCS showed significant difference in the VAS scores only at initial evaluation in both surgical and conservative treatment. There was a significant difference in VAS at 3 months between the two groups in both surgical and conservative treatment and in QuickDASH at 3 months in conservative treatment. Conclusions: The YG test has been used mainly in psychiatry. Although this test has not yet been used worldwide, its usefulness has been recognised and applied clinically, especially in Asia. Patient characteristics are strongly associated with residual pain of the CMC joint arthritis of the thumb. The YG test is a useful tool to analyse pain-related patient characteristics and can be utilised to determine the therapeutic modalities and most effective rehabilitation programme for pain control. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Determinants of quality of life and hand function among people with hand osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to ascertain the determinants of quality of life (QoL) and hand function among persons with hand osteoarthritis (OA) and to assess the influence of hand function on QoL among persons with OA.

METHODOLOGY

Two hundred and four participants in a clinical trial completed the baseline assessment. Demographic, socioeconomic, QoL (AqoL-4D), hand function (Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis, FIHOA), pain assessment, radiographic and clinical characteristics of participants were measured using standard methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate potential associations.

RESULTS

We studied 204 participants (76% female, age 65.63 ± 8.13 years, body mass index 28.7 ± 6.5 kg/m² ) with hand OA. The mean pain score of the participants on a visual analog scale was 57.8 (SD ±13.6). There was a significant, negative moderate correlation between hand function and QoL scores except for the sense domain score. Global assessment, household income and serious illness were associated with QoL (P < .001) and explained 18% of the variance of the QoL. Pain scale, Patient Global Assessment, Mental Health Score, grip strength and cyst index were associated with hand function score and explained 26% of the variance of hand function.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate increasing impairment in hand function decreases the QoL of persons with hand OA. Some determinants were significantly associated with hand function and QoL. Determinants related to hand functions may be modifiable. In future, appropriate intervention strategies should be implemented, and further studies should be conducted to identify the effectiveness of those interventions.

Which tendon plasty has the best outcome? A comparison of four tendon plasty techniques in a large cohort of patients with symptomatic trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMC OA) is commonly treated with a trapeziectomy combined with a form of tendon plasty. The type of tendon plasty used is based on surgeons' preference. The purpose of this observational study is to compare the outcomes of four different tendon plasties combined with trapeziectomy used to treat TMC OA: the Weilby, Burton-Pellegrini, Zancolli and Anchovy plasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients treated with a trapeziectomy followed by a tendon plasty completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and twelve months postoperatively. The primary outcome is the Michigan Hand outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) pain subscale. Secondary outcomes are the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of MHQ pain, MHQ hand function, satisfaction, and complication rate.

RESULTS

793 patients received a trapeziectomy with a tendon plasty between November 2013 and December 2018. There was no difference in pain score after twelve months between the four tendon plasty techniques. Patients undergoing an Anchovy plasty had a higher chance of reaching the MCID for MHQ pain compared to the other techniques (OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2-4.6)). Overall, more than 80% of the patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome, independent of which technique was used. Complication rates of the different techniques were similar.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of TMC OA reduced pain after twelve months, independent of which tendon plasty was used. Patients receiving an Anchovy plasty were more likely to experience a clinically relevant improvement in pain, whilst having a similar hand function, satisfaction, and complication rate. This suggests that Anchovy plasty is the preferred tendon plasty.

The impact of psychosocial variables on initial presentation and surgical outcome for ulnar-sided wrist pathology: a cohort study with 1-year follow-up

AIMS

Ulnar-sided wrist pain has historically been equated to lower-back pain of wrist surgery. Little is known about the relationship between psychosocial profile and the manifestation of ulnar-sided wrist pathology and their treatment outcomes. This study aimed to determine the impact of pain catastrophising, psychological distress, illness perception, and patients' outcome expectations on patient-reported pain and hand function before and one year after surgery for ulnar-sided wrist pathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients who underwent surgical treatment for ulnar-sided wrist pathology. Before surgery, patients completed the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ), and Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). Pain and dysfunction were assessed before (n = 423) and one year after surgery (n = 253) using the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE). Hierarchical linear regression was used to assess the relationship between psychosocial factors and the preoperative PRWHE score, postoperative PRWHE score, and change in PRWHE.

RESULTS

Psychosocial variables explained an additional 35% of the variance in preoperative PRWHE scores and 18% on postoperative scores. A more negative psychosocial profile was associated with higher (worse) preoperative PRWHE scores (PCS: B = 0.19, CI = [0.02-0.36]; B-IPQ Consequences: B = 3.26, CI = 2.36-4.15; and B-IPQ Identity, B = 1.88 [1.09-2.67]) and postoperative PRWHE scores (PCS: B = 0.44, CI = [0.08-0.81]) but not with the change in PRWHE after surgery. Higher treatment expectations were associated with a lower (better) postoperative PRWHE score (CEQ expectancy: B = -1.63, CI = [-2.43;-0.83]) and a larger change in PRWHE scores (B =|1.62|, CI = [|0.77; 2.47|]).

CONCLUSION

A more negative psychosocial profile was associated with higher pain levels and dysfunction preoperatively and postoperatively. However, these patients showed similar improvement as patients with a more feasible psychosocial profile. Therefore, patients should not be withheld from surgical treatment based on their preoperative psychosocial profile alone. Boosting treatment expectations might further improve treatment outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Cohort study).

Investigating Molecular Signatures Underlying Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis Through the Evaluation of Systemic Cytokine Expression

Purpose

Non-operative management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (TMOA) demonstrates only short-term symptomatic alleviation, and no approved disease modifying drugs exist to treat this condition. A key issue in these patients is that radiographic disease severity can be discordant with patient reported pain, illustrating the need to identify molecular mediators of disease. This study characterizes the biochemical profile of TMOA patients to elucidate molecular mechanisms driving TMOA progression.

Methods

Plasma from patients with symptomatic TMOA undergoing surgical (n=39) or non-surgical management (n=44) with 1-year post-surgical follow-up were compared using a targeted panel of 27 cytokines. Radiographic (Eaton-Littler), anthropometric, longitudinal pain (VAS, TASD, quick DASH) and functional (key pinch, grip strength) data were used to evaluate relationships between structure, pain, and systemic cytokine expression. Principal Component Analysis was used to identify clusters of patients.

Results

Patients undergoing surgery had greater BMI as well as higher baseline quick DASH, TASD scores. Systemically, these patients could only be distinguished by differing levels of Interleukin-7 (IL-7), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.22 for surgery for those with increased levels of this cytokine. Interestingly, PCA analysis of all patients (regardless of surgical status) identified a subset of patients with an “inflammatory” phenotype, as defined by a unique molecular signature consisting of thirteen cytokines.

Conclusion

Overall, this study demonstrated that circulating cytokines are capable of distinguishing TMOA disease severity, and identified IL-7 as a target capable of differentiating disease severity with higher levels associated with a decreased likelihood of TMOA needing surgical intervention. It also identified a cluster of patients who segregate based on a molecular signature of select cytokines.

Neuropathic Pain in Hand Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (OA) is a severely debilitating condition. Neuropathic pain (NP) has been shown to be a factor affecting pain severity, hand function, psychological wellbeing, body schema, and the number of pain medications in people with OA of other joints. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of NP in symptomatic hand OA and assess its association with pain, hand function, measures of psychological wellbeing, sleep, body schema disturbances, and number of pain medications. Participants with symptomatic hand OA diagnosed through the American College of Rheumatology criteria, were recruited and completed a series of online questionnaires. These included the Douleur Neuropathique 4 interview (DN4-interview), Short Form Brief Pain Inventory (SF-BPI), Neglect-like Symptoms questionnaire, Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA), Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Logistic regression with age, body mass index, and sex as covariates were utilised to assess differences between participants with and without NP as identified through the DN4-interview. Correlation analysis assessed the relationship between pain intensity, body schema alterations, and number of pain medications. A total of 121 participants were included in the present study. Forty-two percent of participants presented with NP. Participants with NP reported higher levels of worst pain (OR: 10.2 95% CI: 2.2 to 48.5; p = 0.007). Worst pain intensity correlated with the number of pain medications (rho = 0.2; p = 0.04), and neglect-like symptoms (rho = 0.4; p < 0.0001). No difference between phenotypes was shown for catastrophising, function, depression, neglect-like symptoms, pain interference, or sleep. A large proportion of people with symptomatic hand OA present with NP. This phenotype is characterised by greater levels of pain intensity. Pain intensity is associated with number of pain relief medications and body schema alteration. Psychological factors, hand function, and sleep do not appear to be affected by the presence of NP.

Associations between positive treatment outcome expectations, illness understanding, and outcomes: a cohort study on non-operative treatment of first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

More positive outcome expectations and illness perceptions are associated with better outcomes for patients with several osteoarthritic orthopedic conditions. However, it is unknown whether these factors also influence outcomes of non-operative treatment for first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC-1 OA). Therefore, we assess the role of pre-treatment outcome expectations and illness perceptions in reports of pain and hand function 3 months after non-operative treatment for CMC-1 OA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cohort study with 219 patients treated non-operatively for CMC-1 OA between September 2017 and October 2018. Patients were included in the study if they completed measures of pain and hand function, illness perceptions (scale: 0-10), and expectations (scale: 3-27) as part of routine outcome measurements. Pain and hand function were measured before treatment and 3 months after starting treatment using the Dutch version of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the influence of outcome expectations and illness perceptions on pain and hand function.

RESULTS

Both positive outcome expectations (B = 0.64; 95% CI [0.1-1.2]) and a better illness understanding (an illness perception subdomain; B = 1.53; 95% CI [0.2-2.9]) at baseline were associated with less pain at 3 months. For hand function, similar estimates were found.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that positive outcome expectations and a better illness understanding, were associated with a better outcome of non-operative treatment for CMC-1 OA.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONNon-operative treatment can often be successful for patients with arthritis of the thumb.Outcome expectations and illness perceptions are associated with pain and hand function 3 months after non-operative treatment for thumb base osteoarthritis.Improving the outcome expectations and illness perceptions of patients through better education could improve the outcome of non-operative treatment.

The prevalence of radiographic thumb base osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) affects millions of people worldwide. In hand OA, the thumb base is the most affected single joint. The reported radiographic prevalence ranges from 0 to 100%, making the true radiographic prevalence unclear. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis on the age and sex-specific prevalence of radiographic thumb base OA.

METHODS

We performed a search in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Trials, and Google Scholar. We included studies of the general population that reported thumb base OA for males and females separately based on a hand radiograph and reported the age of these groups. Using meta-regression, we estimated the odds ratio (OR) of having radiographic thumb base OA for age and sex, while adjusting for within-study correlation.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 4,278 articles; we finally included 16 studies that reported the age- and sex-stratified prevalence. Taken together, there were 104 age and gender specific-prevalence rates that could be derived from the 16 studies. The prevalence of radiographic OA for the 50-year-old male and female participants was 5.8% and 7.3%, respectively, while the respective prevalence for 80-year-old male and female participants was 33.1% and 39.0%. We found an OR for having radiographic OA of 1.06 (95%CI [1.055-1.065], p < 0.001) per increasing year of age, and 1.30 (95%CI: 1.05-1.61], p = 0.014) for females.

CONCLUSION

In the general population, radiographic thumb base OA is more prevalent in females and is strongly associated with age.

Efficacy of Surgical Interventions for Trapeziometacarpal (Thumb Base) Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Purpose

This systematic review (SR) aimed to identify the surgical interventions available for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis and document their efficacy on pain, physical function, psychological well-being, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and/or adverse events.

Methods

This PROSPERO-registered SR's protocol was developed based on the Cochrane intervention review methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Among 9049 potential studies identified, 1 SR, 18 randomized controlled trials, and 40 nonrandomized controlled trials were included. We identified 11 categories of surgical techniques: first metacarpal osteotomy, first metacarpal and trapezium partial resection, arthrodesis, trapeziectomy (T), T+ligament reconstruction (LR), T+tendon interposition (TI), T+ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), hematoma distraction arthroplasty (HDA), chondrocostal graft interposition, autologous fat injection, and manufactured implant use. These findings supported by low-quality evidence revealed moderately or largely superior effects of the following interventions: (1) trapeziectomy over T+LRTI using ½ flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and metacarpal tunnel (MT) or using abductor pollicis longus (APL) and FCR for adverse events; (2) trapeziectomy over T+TI using palmaris longus (PL) for pain; (3) T+LR with ½FCR-MT over T+LRTI with ½FCR-MT for physical function; (4) trapeziectomy by anterior approach over that by posterior approach for treatment satisfaction and adverse events; (5) T+LRTI using ½FCR-MT over T+TI with PL for pain; and (6) T+HDA over T+LR using APL-MT-FCR for pain, physical function, and adverse events. GraftJacket (Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN), Swanson (Wright Medical Group, Letchworth Garden City, UK), and Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratories, Aldershot, UK) implants and hardware (plate/screw) would cause more complications than an autograft. The effect estimates of other surgical procedures were supported by evidence of very low quality.

Conclusions

This SR provided evidence of the efficacy of various surgical interventions for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Some interventions showed a moderate-to-large superior effect on the studied outcome(s) compared with others. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution because of low-quality evidence. To provide stronger evidence, more randomized controlled trials and methodological uniformization are needed.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic I.

The Relationship between Cognitive and Emotional Factors and Healthcare and Medication Use in People Experiencing Pain: A Systematic Review

Pain conditions are among the leading causes of global disability, impacting on global healthcare utilization (HCU). Health seeking behavior might be influenced by cognitive and emotional factors (CEF), which can be tackled by specific therapies. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence concerning associations between CEF and HCU in people experiencing pain. Three databases were consulted: PubMed, Web of Science and EconLit. Risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist (modified). A total of 90 publications (total sample n = 59,719) was included after double-blind screening. In people experiencing pain, positive associations between general anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms and catastrophizing and pain medication use were found. Additionally, there appears to be a relationship between general anxiety and depressive symptoms and opioid use. Symptom-related anxiety and psychological distress were found to be positively related with consulting behavior. Last, a positive association between use of complementary and alternative medicine and level of perceived symptom control was confirmed in people with pain. For other relationships no evidence or inconsistent findings were found, or they were insufficiently studied to draw firm conclusions, indicating that more research on this topic is needed.