Iron supplementation given to nonanemic infants: neurocognitive functioning at 16 years

Iron deficiency in infants and children - the current research challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Iron deficiency (ID) affects one in five children before they reach preschool age. Existing evidence on ID contributing to suboptimal development and neurodevelopmental disorders come mostly from mechanistic and observational studies. Recommendations for screening and treatment are diverging, emphasizing the knowledge gap. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent evidence on ID in infants and children, its possible role in developmental disorders, and effects of iron supplementation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent well powered randomized controlled trials showed no effect of early iron supplementation on psychomotor development in infants, neither in populations at high nor low risk of ID. Treatment of nonanemic ID in children 1-3 years did not improve their cognitive scores. Evidence from observational and imaging studies suggests association of brain ID and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children (ADHD).

SUMMARY

Universal prophylactic iron supplementation in infants is not supported by current evidence. Whether non anemic ID needs to be treated is uncertain and so is the legitimacy and timing of screening for ID and anemia. The role of ID and iron availability for the brain in pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental conditions such as ADHD requires further studies.

EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Turck D, Bohn T, Castenmiller J, de Henauw S, Hirsch‐Ernst K, Knutsen HK, Maciuk A, Mangelsdorf I, McArdle HJ, Pentieva K, Siani A, Thies F, Tsabouri S, Vinceti M, Aggett P, Fairweather‐Tait S, de Sesmaisons Lecarré A, Fabiani L, Karavasiloglou N, Saad RM, Sofroniou A, Titz A, Naska A. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for iron

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for iron. Systematic reviews were conducted to identify evidence regarding high iron intakes and risk of chronic diseases, adverse gastrointestinal effects and adverse effects of iron supplementation in infancy, young childhood and pregnancy. It is established that systemic iron overload leads to organ toxicity, but no UL could be established. The only indicator for which a dose-response could be established was black stools, which reflect the presence of large amounts of unabsorbed iron in the gut. This is a conservative endpoint among the chain of events that may lead to systemic iron overload but is not adverse per se. Based on interventions in which black stools did not occur at supplemental iron intakes of 20-25 mg/day (added to a background intake of 15 mg/day), a safe level of intake for iron of 40 mg/day for adults (including pregnant and lactating women) was established. Using allometric scaling (body weight0.75), this value was scaled down to children and adolescents and safe levels of intakes between 10 mg/day (1-3 years) and 35 mg/day (15-17 years) were derived. For infants 7-11 months of age who have a higher iron requirement than young children, allometric scaling was applied to the supplemental iron intakes (i.e. 25 mg/day) and resulted in a safe level of supplemental iron intake of 5 mg/day. This value was extended to 4-6 month-old infants and refers to iron intakes from fortified foods and food supplements, not from infant and follow-on formulae. The application of the safe level of intake is more limited than a UL because the intake level at which the risk of adverse effects starts to increase is not defined.

Oral iron therapy: Current concepts and future prospects for improving efficacy and outcomes

Iron deficiency (ID) and iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA) are global public health concerns, most commonly afflicting children, pregnant women and women of childbearing age. Pathological outcomes of ID include delayed cognitive development in children, adverse pregnancy outcomes and decreased work capacity in adults. IDA is usually treated by oral iron supplementation, typically using iron salts (e.g. FeSO4 ); however, dosing at several-fold above the RDA may be required due to less efficient absorption. Excess enteral iron causes adverse gastrointestinal side effects, thus reducing compliance, and negatively impacts the gut microbiome. Recent research has sought to identify new iron formulations with better absorption so that lower effective dosing can be utilized. This article outlines emerging research on oral iron supplementation and focuses on molecular mechanisms by which different supplemental forms of iron are transported across the intestinal epithelium and whether these transport pathways are subject to regulation by the iron-regulatory hormone hepcidin.

Micronutrients in infants suffering from cow's milk allergy fed with dietary formulas and breast milk

INTRODUCTION

Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in infants. As this food allergy indicates a wide range of clinical syndromes due to immunological reactions to cow's milk proteins, we aimed to evaluate the status of micronutrients in infants suffering from cow's milk allergy.

METHODS

In this historical cohort study, infants with CMA were divided into two equal groups: breastfeeding and diet formula feeding. Data were gathered by a form, including the micronutrients such as iron, selenium, calcium, phosphorus, zinc, and vitamin D. Groups were compared and data were analyzed by the IBM SPSS version 21.

RESULTS

This study involved 60 six-month-old infants, and the findings revealed no significant difference between the two groups concerning magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, and vitamin D. However, infants in the formula-feeding group exhibited significantly elevated mean serum levels of iron and selenium, whereas breastfed infants displayed higher levels of calcium.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this research revealed a significant difference in calcium, selenium, and iron levels between formula-fed and breastfed infants, even though all variables were within the normal range for both groups. In light of these results, conducting further studies with a larger sample size and extended follow-up periods becomes imperative.